Tag: TUC

  • State workers as pawns in hands of NLC, TUC

    State workers as pawns in hands of NLC, TUC

    Sir: The national leadership of the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and its Trade Union Congress (TUC) counterpart appear to be taking workers on the payroll of state governments for a ride whenever they threaten the federal government with a nationwide strike. The state chapters of these labour unions do not bother to find out the reason behind such strikes.

    For them, the fact that the directive is coming from the national leadership of their unions, led by Joe Ajaero (NLC) and Festus Osifo (TUC) is enough. For that reason, the roof must be pulled down on the head of the presidency unless it does their bidding. As for the state chapters of the NLC, they must dance to their drum beats of war like puppets without considering the relics and rhymes of the drumbeats. That the drumbeats are targeted at the presidency is all but satisfactory to them; whether it is justified or not; whether it is expedient and of any benefits to them does not count. 

    And when the drumbeats of war settle down, the drummers, Ajaero and Osifo can afford to run away from the drums with a bargain of N35,000 additional wage award for federal workers alone!

    They usually leave their pawns in the state chapters wondering what is going on in the end. Workers in the payroll of state governments are always the losers; having joined the bandwagon in futility.

    So far, Ajaero, the belligerent NLC president known for kickboxing has not seen the need to traverse each of the 36 states to call out the workers to shut down their states if the state governors fail to implement the wage award as approved by the federal government. He suddenly went quiet after getting what he requested from the federal government. The various state chapters of the NLC are the pawns on the chess board that he can use anytime to achieve his selfish end whenever the need arises.

    Ajaero and the national leadership of the NLC will always succeed. Not because they are fighting for the masses; but because the leadership of the state chapters of NLC always act emotionally, like the Jews who shouted “Hosanna in the highest” and minutes later “crucify Him”.

    Read Also: Imo: NLC now a political arm of Labour Party – CSOs

    Virtually all the state chapters have not seen the need to come forward to explain to their members the benefits that have accrued to them in allowing themselves to be dragged into the threats of strike against the federal government.

    They have all gone to sleep, except for states like Enugu, Edo and Bayelsa that have keyed into the N35,000 wage award. Others, especially the oil-producing states have turned deaf ears to the wage award.

    For the labour leaders in those states, theirs is to mobilize the state workers to jump onto the bandwagon of the NLC national leadership, so long as the strike is targeted at the administration of President Bola Tinubu. In contrast, in their various states, the governors are emperors whom they must not dare.

    Today, the state chapters are waiting for the next directive from Ajaero to pull down the roof on the head of the presidency for the benefit of federal workers. Surely, the state chapters will always remain the losers after dancing to Ajaero’s drumbeats of war as the case may arise.

    • Ifeonu Okolo, Asaba, Delta State
  • Ajaero: NLC, TUC list conditions to avoid nationwide strike Nov 8

    Ajaero: NLC, TUC list conditions to avoid nationwide strike Nov 8

    The organised labour has listed some conditions that must be met to avoid a nationwide strike following the attack on the president of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Joe Ajaero, by suspected political thugs in Owerri, the Imo state capital.

    Labour said it could not guarantee industrial harmony in the country from November 8, 2023.

    Ajaero, who mobilised labour leaders to Owerri on Wednesday, November 1, was attacked and “severely injured,” by thugs allegedly sponsored by the state government, according to the NLC.

    At a joint briefing in Abuja on Friday, November 3, by Deputy Presidents of the NLC and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC), Adewale Adeyanju and Etim Oko, the labour unions expressed their disappointment on the “deafening silence of the federal government, and the extent to which men of the Nigeria Police in Owerri could go in meting out harm to peaceful protesters and newsmen in a bid to ensure evidence of their acts were confiscated.”

    Labour noted it was “irritated” by the defence put forward by the Imo State Police Command that they had only taken Ajaero into protective custody from where he had emerged, “battered, concussed, puffed-eyed, debilitated and condemned” with threats of death before the timely intervention of the National Security Adviser; Nuhu Ribadu who ordered for his immediate release.

    According to Labour, “Ajaero who was blindfolded, beaten to a pulp, brutalised, humiliated, and violated by police personnel before he was taken to an unknown destination where he was subjected to more battering and torture, could not recognise the people around him neither could he walk without being aided or supported when he was released.”

    They said: “At first contact with him at the Police Hospital at 3:30 pm, Ajaero was described to have a puffed right eye that was black and shut, one of his ears had a tiny trace of dried blood, his speech was slurred and incoherent even as he had welts all over him before he was taken to the Federal Medical Centre, Owerri where he was referred for ophthalmic investigation, a head and brain scan, a full body scan, Chest X-Ray, a full body scan and cervical spine therapy among other investigations and promptly fitted with a neck collar.”

    Read Also: Why APC will win Kogi, by Bello

    The labour’s demands read: “The Commissioner of Police, Imo State Command; CP Ahmed Barde should not only be investigated and deployed out of Imo state for his serial complicitous and unprofessional behaviour and conduct immediately;

    “The Area Commander of the Nigeria Police Force and all other Officers and Men in Owerri through whom the Police Commissioner supervised the brutalisation and humiliation of Comrade Ajaero and other workers be relieved of his office and stripped of his commission;

    “Mr Nwaneri Chinasa, Adviser on Special Duties who supervised the terror on workers and bestial brutality meted out to Congress President; Comrade Joe Ajaero be arrested immediately and prosecuted for his crimes against workers and the President.

    “We demand an immediate, independent and unbiased thorough professional medical examination of Comrade Ajaero in light of the physical and psychological injuries inflicted on him.

    “Other workers and journalists subjected to this inhuman treatment by the Police and the Hope Uzodimma’s goons be treated by the State and all the properties lost be restored immediately.

    “All the outstanding Industrial Relations issues as previously agreed with the Imo state Government be implemented immediately.

    “We further resolved that in the event the Government fails to comply with any or all of the conditions above-stated, NLC, TUC and their affiliates will no longer guarantee industrial peace in Nigeria beginning Wednesday the 8th of November, 2023 while a joint National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of the two Labour Centres will meet to decide on the next course of action.”

  • Now, a reprieve

    Now, a reprieve

    • It’s time for Labour movement and government to review their role relation

    Since the advent of the Fourth Republic, the Labour movement has been playing the role of an adversary to governments at the federal and sub-national levels. Perhaps it is a spillover mentality from the military years when the men in khaki used coercion to get everyone in the country into line. Civil society groups were at odds with that culture and forged alliance with Labour, the media, the academia and students movements.

    More than two decades on, Labour has allowed that mentality to define its relationship with the various governments since then. At every point when Labour felt that the public was feeling uneasy at implementation of policies, it “rolled out the tanks,” threatening to apply maximum pressure to control and direct public policy in whatever direction it preferred. The October 3 “indefinite and total strike” that failed to take off was one example. A united Labour movement said it had mobilised all its members, including those in essential services including aviation, power, petroleum upstream, among others to “shut down” the economy. Why the workers thought that to be the solution to the hardship in the country is not clear. It is good, however, that good sense eventually prevailed.

    Read Also: NLC/TUC strike; in whose interest?

    The Federal Government that is constitutionally saddled with industrial relations, too, must realise that workers are important to the production process and running the affairs of the nation. It should not wait until strike actions are declared before securing the understanding of workers’ representatives.

    Governments in Nigeria since the Cost of Living Allowance strike of 1945 have failed to regard the Labour movement as a partner in progress. Labour, understandably at the time, as well saw itself as a partner of the burgeoning radical arm of the nationalist movement and was still learning to understand the transition from the colonial to the independent era when the military swept away the elected post-colonial government. The longer the military held the reins of government, the more it grew disdainful of democratic forces. At some point, it even legislated against discussing national affairs in the public space. It was in that context that Labour kicked and fought. As was the case for other sectors and institutions, the military government had no time for “tantrums” by Labour leaders who were seen and treated like irritants.

    Read Also: Nigeria@63: Oyo NLC, TUC shun parade

    But the circumstance has changed, it is no longer the same setting. If at the inception of this Republic, Labour could not easily forge new strategies and tactics for its primary role of seeking better living standards for its members, it has the blame for still living in them beyond nearly a quarter of a century into the new dispensation.

    In under four months of the Bola Tinubu presidency, Labour has moved from the threat of a strike that was averted by court injunction on the eve of breaching industrial peace, to a warning strike that recorded partial success, and then to the October 3 aborted strike. When that tool is overused, it loses its cutting edge. So, Labour should device means of engaging with government in its bid to protect workers’ interests and project the national interest, as it understands, above all else.

    Labour, civil society, the academic community as well as the organised private sector should push for inclusive governance that would protect their interests from within the system. Nigerian political parties are diverse and broad enough to represent all segments of the society, and many of those in the current ruling party had themselves been activists in the past. They should be used by both camps as links. The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC) should realise that the government does not exist for workers in the public service alone. Most times that they mobilise all workers, and sometimes a wing of the civil society to bare their fangs, they only come up with demands for more wages that only push up the inflationary trend. Nigeria is currently faced with multifaceted challenges that require all hands on deck of a ship sailing at sea and being tossed by storm.

    All must be ready to make sacrifices, but national leaders have to work hard at earning citizens’ confidence. The Tinubu administration inherited much of the baggage it is carrying and should be given time to sort things out. But, the government should start showing its difference from its predecessors by faithfully implementing every agreement with Labour and others. It starts with fidelity to the famous social contract.

  • Labour’s Independence bouquet

    Labour’s Independence bouquet

    For Nigeria at 63, organized Labour had a bouquet of spikes — an “indefinite” strike that nevertheless resonates with its long-suffering members.

    Poor folks!  They are riled up to mauling an instant Judas (the sitting government), for a long-standing economic angst! The question though is after the strike, what? 

    Now, compare the Labour spikes with the nest of feathers, thrust onto the citizens, in President Bola Tinubu’s balmy Independence speech.  Different strokes? 

    The way Joe Ajaero, president of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), marshalled his troops to at least get the one crippling strike he had craved since May 29, reminds you of Karl Marx — that bit about history repeating itself as farce.

    To boot, he finally got to his side the Trade Union Congress (TUC) — TUC nobles with the NLC rabble! — more perhaps for the TUC tiff with the Lagos government over the state’s Road Transport Employers Association of Nigeria (RTEAN) ban, than any ardour to go on a strike.  Indeed, my enemy’s enemy is my friend!

    Now, put Ajaero side by side with Adams Oshiomhole, now a senator of the Federal Republic, but then NLC boss.  Throw in their common anatomy — little guys that boss giants around!

    Then add, as spice, fuel subsidy — clearly the prime issue of Nigeria’s 4th Republic — with its co-irritant: importation of petroleum products, when Nigeria could more rationally — and cheaply — refine its crude oil, and all you have is the perfect storm.

    Oshiomhole fought President Olusegun Obasanjo to a standstill on petrol pricing yo-yo, with the government reversing price hikes after strikes, but not to pre-strike levels.

    In this Labour-government show down, Ajaero would hope to go one farther: force President Tinubu to junk oil subsidy removal, shove down pump prices to pre-May 29 levels — or otherwise face an indefinite strike that would cripple the economy!

    Still, how many days does NLC think it could get its members off work before fatigue — euphemism for search for daily bread — sets in?  Even in Oshiomhole’s triumphant days, strikes hardly lasted for three days before troubling signs of sudden abortion.

    Besides, NLC has asked its members — and the general public — to stock up.  But really how many have the capacity to do that with the present economic throes?  

    Even those that could, how much could they possibly “stock up” to sustain an “indefinite” strike?

    And after “stock up” and triumphant crippling, how can a stark economy, further drained, support workers’ demands for better deals?

    Ajaero craving an Oshiomhole-era triumph is no more than a craven dream — bold cowardice in rushing at new challenges with old methods.  In such circumstances, history can only repeat itself as farce!

    That’s the thing, though: times have changed but Labour is fixated with set past practices, instead of thinking anew, to get more for its members.  

    Still, none of all these suggests organized Labour is the sole sinner, while the government it contends with is a saint — far from it.

    Read Also: Nigeria@63: Oyo NLC, TUC shun parade

    If you remove subsidy without local refining; and float the Naira such that every kobo buys far less than hitherto, then brace yourself for a stiff social cost!

    The first manifestation of that is anger from the hoi polloi — the first (and worst) to be hit by spiralling prices, no matter how much that jolt could push a strategy that may eventually improve their lives.

    Then, you risk Labour leaders, stuck in old ways but deathly scared to think anew, milking the raw emotions, and basking in popular roar, as they tear at the government for “anti-people” policies.

    Between earnest unionism and artful dissembling, there is but a thin line!

    But pray: how can a government that just earned its legitimacy, from a tough election, from the same people, suddenly turn rogue and unfeeling on them?  

    That’s hardly logical.  Still, emotion is mushy rush to hurting answers, especially when the pocket burns!

    Aside from eager “critics” and sundry anarchists, feasting on yet another “pro-people” crusading, add baleful foes diving into the fray for cheap and nasty politics.

    Ram in too the hybrid agitators, in this season of virulent partisanship.  

    Pray, who does Ajaero represent — NLC, as he postures?  Peter Obi’s Labour Party, which Joe and co blindly backed but who lost at the polls, but continues to deny the obvious?  Or both in different degrees, as cynically convenient!

    But after all the high drama, after all the thunder, after all the tempest, the economy is no magic the government must quickly conjure, or be roasted at the stakes.  

    That is the fundamental folly of rushing into strikes, as Ajaero’s NLC has been bristling to do.  That again reinforces that earlier question: after the strike, then what?

    The poor economy, integral and systemic, demands a productive Labour-government partnership, anchored on mutual trust.  It’s a critical juncture at which old thinking must yield to new: patient collaboration, against hasty confrontation.

    Still, it’s hard times.  So, the government should — indeed, must — concede to the people as much quick reliefs as possible.  

    Incidentally, from the president’s Independence broadcast, the government already offered some reliefs: workers to get additional N25, 000 for six months; the expanded National Social Register (NSR) to now accommodate 15 million Nigerian households, and compressed natural gas (CNG)-powered buses deployed to down transport costs.  

    Salary awards and CNG buses are two prominent demands on the Labour strike menu. Later, Femi Gbajabiamila, the presidential chief of staff, announced the raise of the wage award, from N25, 000 to lowest earners to N35, 000 to every worker, low or high.

    Still, the people too must accept that initial pains come with tough measures to crack hard times. 

    Why the six months duration for the wage awards, though?  Could it be that in six months, some local refining would have been in place, leading to lower pump prices of petrol, thus tamping down the present high inflation?

    Inasmuch as the the government may not fully expose its strategy, a clear timeline, detailing when the many refineries in the works will come on stream, should help to shore up public confidence, sympathy and eventual support.

    Besides, that alone will help defang Labour’s eternal refinery agitations, public or private — no crime, though — and force fresher thinking on union leaders, so as to  extract the best deals, in challenging times, for their members.

    So, while this government has the bounden duty to fix the economy — President Tinubu is the first to tell folks not to pity him, since he campaigned hard for the job — changed attitudes, on both sides, are imperative.

    Enter then, a new cold pragmatism that thinks through the harsh reality.  

    Exit, fond dreams that purport strikes could prise open resources simply not there.

    Both the government and Labour should tread this new collaborative path all of the way.

  • BREAKING: FG, Labour in last minute attempt at averting strike

    BREAKING: FG, Labour in last minute attempt at averting strike

    The federal government and the organised Labour have just commenced another negotiation meeting at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    The meeting, which was called by the federal government, is a last minute effort at preventing the nationwide indefinite strike called by the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC).

    Attending the ongoing meeting on the side of the organised Labour are the NLC President, Joe Ajaero; Secretary of the TUC, Nuhu Toro and his counterpart from NLC, Emma Ugbaja.

    Read Also: BREAKING: FG invites organised Labour to another meeting today

    The government team is led by the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila.

    Other members of the government team include the Head of Service of the Federation, Dr. Folasade Yemi-Esan, the National Security Adviser, NSA, Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, the Minister of Labour and Employment, Simon Lalong, the Minister of State, Nkeiruka Onyejecha, the Minister of Finance, Wale Edun, the Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Atiku Bagudu and the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, Beta Edu 

    Also present are some directors from the Ministry of Labour and Employment. 

    There was no opening ceremony as the meeting went straight into closed-doors.

  • Conspiracy against Feb 25 poll continues

    Conspiracy against Feb 25 poll continues

    By Friday, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) were still adamant about their ‘indefinite and total’ strike beginning on Tuesday. They declined to meet with the ad hoc federal delegation raised to address their grievances. The negotiations and the strike threat began inauspiciously and conjunctively in June. Admittedly, the negotiations have been largely desultory, punctuated by the order of the National Industrial Court (NIC) temporarily barring the unions from calling a strike. Since June, the strike threat has been hurled around many times, positioned almost like the sword of Damocles on the head of the Bola Tinubu administration. The temper of the president’s October 1 Independence anniversary address is unknown: whether it will be a damp squib or it will take the wind out of the unions’ sails. Subject to that anniversary address and the interpretation of the NIC order, it is expected that more strike threats will be issued in the months ahead. The reason is that the economy is so damaged by debts and systemic inefficiency, and the country’s foundational structure so weakened and compromised by years of exploitation and corruption, that it is unlikely there will be an easy meeting of minds between the government and the unions in the near future. Indeed, the whole strike threat has become a political witch-hunt.

    While it is true that the Tinubu administration has approached the union grievances with less assiduousness than expected, and has been unconvincing and sometimes provocative about cost-cutting, it is even truer that the NLC in particular has been fanatical and conspiratorial about embarking on strike, regardless of its combustible consequences. The NLC is inseparable from the Labour Party (LP) which lost the February 25 presidential poll, and both have since remained bitter and inconsolable. Workers have legitimate right to respond angrily to spiraling cost of food and fuel and other services such as healthcare and education, but it is not clear from the demands of the unions that they have an understanding of the enormity of the damage done to the economy in the past two decades or so. Nor is it certain that they know that the problems cannot be rectified in a few months or even years, let alone a little more than hundred days.

    Read Also: Tinubu, Sultan urge NLC, TUC to shelve proposed strike

    Two things are painfully clear. One is that whether the unions acknowledge it or not, or whether they deny involvement or not, a conspiracy is afoot to conjure a different outcome to the February 25 poll. Many names have been mentioned, and the security services are obviously aware of the roles being played by various actors. Things will, therefore, probably get to a head sooner rather than later, while the consequences, one way or the other, are unlikely to be pleasant. Alarmingly, too, the conspiracies and incitement have taken a definite, ethnic twist. Students of history are generally less romantic about civil disorder and revolutions, for no one is able to predict their outcomes. But these drawbacks will not dissuade those advocating street protests or the total collapse of the system. The second issue is that in responding to these and many more budding crises besetting the country, the Tinubu administration itself has been inscrutably less surefooted. The president’s kitchen cabinet has so far not demonstrated the overarching expertise sufficient to inspire confidence. The administration has focused almost exclusively on designing policies potent enough to tackle the country’s economic crisis almost to the detriment of assembling ad hoc teams to shape and explicate its responses to the crises.

    Moreover, the cabinet is curiously large, though redeemed by the presence of many bright minds who are evidently an asset to the country. Blending them into one powerful defensive and attack team has, however, proved herculean. More importantly, no one, including the president himself, has really and exhaustively spoken to the magnitude and depth of the country’s economic crisis in order to put the unions’ noses out of joint. The unions have a superficial and insular understanding of issues, and are even more naïve about the solutions. Until the administration saturates the media space with the enormity of the crisis the country faces, even to the point of exposing the culpability of the previous administration, few will appreciate the enormity of the crises, while the unions continue to exploit the pains of the gullible. Printing trillions of naira and distorting the economy in the midst of massive infrastructural collapse, in addition to allowing insecurity to become cancerous, will not be resolved quietly and painlessly. Conspiring to delegitimise the presidential poll and inciting public revolt will also not help resolve the crises as ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo and others romanticise. Sadly, in these parts, and in particular in the past few months, protests do not seem designed to coax the administration into rethinking its panaceas but to serve as witch-hunt; they are tailored towards system collapse whose end and scope no one can foretell, not to talk of manage.

  • Govt to TUC, NLC: respect court order barring strike

    Govt to TUC, NLC: respect court order barring strike

    • AGF writes unions, Falana, DSS, IG, NSA
    • It’s judicial terrorism, breach of rights, says Labour

    Labour yesterday got an advisory from government: Its planned strike, on October 3, will amount to “a violation of the subsisting order and a disregard to the dignity and integrity of the court”.

    Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF)/Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) stated this in a letter to the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Trade Union Congress (TUC) and their lawyer Mr. Femi Falana (SAN).

    The letter, dated September 26,  urged the unions to respect a subsisting ruling barring workers from going on strike over petrol subsidy removal and its aftermath.

    It also urged Falana to advise his clients accordingly.

    Copies of the letter were sent to the Labour and Employment Minister; Chief of Staff to the President (CoS);  National Security Adviser (NSA); Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Director-General, Department of State Services (DSS).

    But in a swift response, the NLC described the AGF advisory as “judicial terrorism.”

    Fagbemi noted that from the communique issued by the NLC after its National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of August 31 and the September 26 joint communique by the NLC and TUC presidents, it was obvious that “the proposed strike  is premised principally in furtherance of issues connected with fuel subsidy removal, hike in fuel price and consequential matters of making provisions for palliatives and workers welfare.

    Fagbemi said: “These are undoubtedly issues that have been submitted to the National Industrial Court for adjudication.

    “Therefore, the proposed strike  is in clear violation of the pending interim injunctive order granted on June 5, 2023, restraining both Nigeria Labour Congress and Trade Union Congress from embarking on any industrial action/or strike of any nature, pending the hearing and determination of the pending motion on notice.

    “We wish to reiterate that a court order, regardless of the opinion of any party on it, remains binding and enforceable until set aside.

    “It is the expectation of the public that the labour unions would lead in obedience and observance of court orders and not in its breach.

    “It is therefore the earnest expectation of this office that your distinguished law firm will advise the Labour unions on the need to protect the integrity of courts and observe the sanctity of court orders.

    “Consequently, you are kindly requested to impress it upon the organised labour unions to note the fact that their proposed strike  is in gross breach of the subsisting court order, as well as the appropriateness of addressing their grievances/demands within the ambit of the law.

    “Hence, the need for them to be more accommodating and show greater appreciation of the effect of the order of the court, by shelving the strike .

    “The foregoing will afford parties more room for further mutual engagements, for a holistic and sustainable resolution of all outstanding issues on this matter in the overall national interest.”

    In the June 5 verdict, Justice Olufunke Anuwe of the National Industrial Court (NIC) restrained the NLC and TUC from proceeding with their plan to embark on strike from June 7 over the removal of fuel subsidy.

    Read Also: NUPENG directs members to mobilise for proposed strike

    Justice Anuwe gave the order while ruling on an ex-parte motion filed by the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (OAGF) which was moved by Mrs. Maimuna Lami Shiru, Director, Civil Litigation, Federal Ministry of Justice.

    Justice Anuwe said the order shall remain in force pending the hearing and determination of a motion on notice dated June 5 which was filed by the Federal Government through the office of the AGF.

    ‘Judicial terrorism’

    Criticising the AGF, Head of Information and Public Affairs, NLC, Benson Upah noted that a restraining order couldn’t be equated to a permanent or perpetual injunction.

    Upah’s response followed the calls by the AGF asking the organised labour to respect the June 5 order issued by the National Industrial Court, restraining both the NLC and TUC from embarking on any industrial action over fuel subsidy removal and related issues.

    Upah said: “The first reason why that order cannot subsist is:

    * Restraining order cannot be equated to a permanent or perpetual injunction.

    *The parties are different.

    *The issues are different.

    “Finally, it will be operating against our fundamental rights, our rights to freely associate, freely speak and freely organise as provided by the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    “What the Attorney General of the Federation is trying to do or say amounts to an infringement of our constitutional rights and we call it judicial terrorism or litigious terrorism. The AGF doesn’t have the wherewithal to hold the people of this country hostage. His powers do not extend to that.”

    No pact with govt to drop planned action

    Also yesterday, the NLC said it has is no agreement with the Federal Government to suspend its planned strike.

    In a statement the Head of Information and Public Affairs, Benson Upah, the NLC said there was no planned meeting with the government to discuss the possibility of rolling back its decision.

    According to the NLC spokesman, the issues at hand were beyond what the Ministry of Labour and Employment ca n handle.  

  • BREAKING: NLC, TUC direct workers to withdraw services Oct 3

    BREAKING: NLC, TUC direct workers to withdraw services Oct 3

    The Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC) have agreed to withdraw their services nationwide from Tuesday, October 3.

    The two labour centres directed their affiliates to mobilise for protests from October 3

    Labour took the decision after a joint National Executive Council between TUC and NLC meeting on Tuesday, September 26, in Abuja.

    Ajaero said the government has “substantially failed to meet its demands after the removal of fuel subsidy.”

    Recall that on September 5th and 6th, the NLC embarked on a two-day warning strike which led to the partial crippling of economic activities in some states.

    It gave the government a 21-day ultimatum to meet its demands.

    Ajaero said the grace period given by the two labour centres had expired.

    Read Also: Indefinite strike: MAN, NECA, others kick as NLC decides Tuesday

    He asked Nigerians to stock their homes ahead of the planned nationwide strike.

    The organised labour is demanding wage awards for public workers and a new minimum wage.

    The other demands made by the NLC to cushion the effects of the May 29 subsidy removal are tax exemptions and allowances to public sector workers, provision of Compressed Natural Gas buses, the release of modalities for the N70 billion for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and immediate reversal of all anti-poor policies of the Federal Government.

    It also wants a stop to the increase in public school fees, the release of the eight months withheld salaries of university teachers and workers as well as the increase in Value Added Tax (VAT).

  • TUC protests takeover of Lagos parks, proscription of RTEAN

    TUC protests takeover of Lagos parks, proscription of RTEAN

    Members of the Trade Union Congress (TUC) yesterday marched on the streets of Lagos to protest the takeover of motor parks by the Lagos State Government.

    The peaceful protest was also staged over the proscription of the Road Transport Employees Association of Nigeria (RTEAN) and the seizure of their vehicles by the Lagos State Government.

    The protest started early in the morning from Ikeja roundabout to Lagos State House of Assembly, where the protesters were received by some lawmakers, led by the Deputy Majority Leader representing Ikeja Constituency 2, Adedamola Kasunmu.

    President of TUC, Comrade Festus Osifo, said the protest became necessary as the government had failed to yield to court judgment.

    According to Osifo, RTEAN was prescribed sometime last year and afterwards, the Lagos State Government went ahead to seize all their equipment and took over their offices, including their vehicles “and we believe this is not acceptable.”

    Read Also: Govt entices workers with wage award to stop strike

    “We know that trade unionism is not in the concurrent list and so a state government does not have the power to proscribe a trade union. This is absolutely the responsibility of the federal government.

    “We approached the industrial court for judgement and it was clearly stated that the Lagos State Government has no right to proscribe trade unions.

    “We wrote a letter to the State Governor to open the office of RTEAN, which they forcefully took over and release their vehicles, which were seized by government officials, but I can tell you that the government is already using the vehicles”

    Earlier, in a statement made available by the Commissioner of Information, Gbenga Omotosho said the State Government has filed an appeal against this judgment and has a pending application for stay of execution of the said judgement.

    He maintained that the protest would be in breach of the Rule of Law, which expects both parties to maintain status quo, pending determination of the application for stay of execution and appeal.

  • TUC vows to disrupt economic activities in Lagos over ban of RTEAN

    TUC vows to disrupt economic activities in Lagos over ban of RTEAN

    The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) has threatened to ground economic activities in Lagos to protest the ban on the operations of its affiliate union, the Road Transport Employers Association of Nigeria (RTEAN) by the state government.

    The congress has directed its members to mobilise for a one-day protest on Monday, September 25, in preparation for the total withdrawal of service by its members.

    President of TUC, Comrade Festus Osifo, made this known to journalists in Abuja on Friday, September 22.

    He said all affiliate unions of TUC including the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), Association of Senior Civil Servants of Nigeria (ASCSN), Association of Senior Staff of Banks, Insurance and Financial Institutions (ASSBIFI), and others are expected to join the action.

    Osifo said TUC has employed all the necessary tools of engagement for amicable resolution, including writing letters and holding meetings with the Lagos State government on the issue.

    Read Also: TUC, NLC differ on modalities for planned strike

    He added that the RTEAN also went to court and got a judgement from the National Industrial Court which said the state government had no powers to proscribe a trade union legally registered by the federal government.

    Osifo added that the state government refused to allow the union to operate, saying that TUC would utilise trade unionism powers to protest the ban on its affiliate union.

    The labour leader also called on the Ministry of Labour and Employment which has the power to register and deregister trade unions to call the Lagos State government to order.

    He said: “The National Industrial Court, Lagos State division in its judgment told the State government to unlock the offices of RTEAN. The Court expressly said also that the Lagos State government has no powers to proscribe a registered trade union but the Lagos State government refused to comply with the judgment.

    “On the 4th of September this year, we wrote another letter to the Lagos State government drawing their attention to the government judgment and the meeting we had earlier with them where they promised that the issue would be resolved, but there was no response. All other attempts to reach the state governor were to no avail.

    “In fact, we have even reported to the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment and to people in the federal government that are from Lagos State to call the governor to order. What they are doing to RTEAN is the same thing they are doing to NURTW today. So this is fundamentally wrong.

    “It is against this backdrop that we said on the 4th of September: within two weeks, if the Lagos State government remains adamant in resolving the issue, we are going to carry out a protest and after the protest and there is no resolution in sight, there is going to be a total shutdown in Lagos State. Because what the State government is doing against a legally registered trade union is not acceptable to us.

    “So in order for us to carry out a successful protest in Lagos on Monday, we informed the DG of DSS, IGP, and the National Security Adviser. The reason is that we want them to provide us with adequate security. And we have informed all our affiliates to proceed to Lagos next week.”

    ReplyForward