Tag: unsettles

  • Governors’ position on minimum wage unsettles workers

    The N22, 500 proposed by the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) at its extra-ordinary meeting as a new minimum wage has stalled moves by the Federal Government to abort the indefinite nationwide strike planned by Labour for November 6. TONY AKOWE, JOSEPH JIBUEZE and TOBA AGBOOLA report that the workers are threatening to resume their push for N66, 500 as the new minimum wage.

    SHOULD workers stick to their guns, the row over a new minimum wage may rage for a very long time.

    Labour, on Tuesday, staged a sensitisation rally to mobilise its members and warn of a nationwide strike on      November 6, should the employers of labour fail to grant the workers’ request for N30, 000 minimum wage.

    The Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) yesterday threatened to revert to earlier demand for N66, 500 as the minimum wage for the least paid worker.

    The new twist followed what the NLC called Federal Government intimidation of the Organised Private Sector (OPS) to disown the N30, 000 agreed to by the tripartite wage negotiating committee.

    Already, there is a stalemate on minimum wage as the federal and state governments could not reach a consensus with Labour on the same figure as the minimum wage.

    Before the latest twist, Labour was insisting on N30, 000; the Federal Government offered to pay N24, 000 and the states, under the auspices of the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF), have proposed N22, 500.

    But, the NLC, through its President Ayuba Wabba, berated the governors, accusing them of speaking from the two sides of their mouth.

    Wabba described as double speak for the governors as NGF to propose N22, 500 after they had individually promised to implement whatever the tripartite committee recommended as the new minimum wage.  He challenged them to return to their respective domains and feel the pulse of their workers on their reluctance to pay N30, 000 as minimum wage.

    The NLC boss accused the Federal Government of threatening OPS members to back out of the agreement on the N30,000 figure to at the concluding meeting of the tripartite committee on New National minimum Wage.

    Speaking at a news conference in Abuja, Wabba denounced NGF position. He challenged them to go back to their various states, gather the workers and tell them that they cannot pay the new minimum wage and how much they can pay and see the reactions.

    According to him, the current grandstanding by the governors was to seek more money from the Federal Government and a subtle blackmail against the Federal Government by returning to their states to tell the workers “that it is the federal government that is not willing to pay the new figure”.

    He recalled that the governors had individually showed willingness to pay whatever is agreed upon by the tripartite committee, stressing that throughout the process of negotiation, the governors were fully represented by six governors.

    He reminded the governors that the NGF remained unknown to law and the process of collective bargaining, adding that what is known to law is the individual states, pointing out that the offer of N22, 500 by the NGF “is not accepted to Organised Labour”.

    He said that since the federal and state governments are presenting fresh figures, Labour may also be forced to revert to the old figures it presented before N30, 000 was agreed upon through a process of collective bargaining.

    Wabba said: “We wish to state that the Nigerian Governors’ Forum is not a negotiating body but merely a political organisation for the convenience of state governors.

    “The tripartite committee from inception sent letters to each state government to send in their memoranda as their contributions to the new national minimum wage negotiating process. Twenty-one states sent in their memorandum quoting figures.

    “Second, the demand of Labour is not N30, 000. Our demand is N66, 500. The N30, 000 is the compromised figure arrived at the end of negotiations by the tripartite partners – government, employers and Labour. The new minimum wage was a product of intense negotiations that lasted for almost one year.

    “It was mutually agreed at the concluding meeting of the negotiating committee on the 5th of October, this year.  So, this is the stand of Organised Labour.  Minimum wage is not an allocation or an award. It is negotiated. So, the long process of arriving at a figure is a tripartite process.

    “The figure that has come out of the NGF is a mere pronouncement and has no place in collective bargaining machinery provided by the various ILO (International Labour Organisation) Conventions and our national laws. What the law recognises is a tripartite negotiation. Six governors represented the governors and so, they have been part of the process where decision was made.

    “At this point, Labour wants to reiterate that the figure that has been allocated by the governors is hereby rejected because it has no place in collective bargaining process.

    “One more thing we need put in proper perspective is the claim by the governors that workers in Nigeria are merely five per cent. But, the question is: what is the population of the political class compared to the population of Nigeria? These five per cent workers constitute the workforce and therefore you cannot overlook their contribution to national development.

    “The health workers take care of the entire population. Therefore, it is about human beings and not only about building infrastructure. You build infrastructure so that human beings can use it.  You cannot undermine the contribution of Nigerian workers who create the wealth.

    “It is very petty to say that the working class is merely five per cent. Let them tell us the number that they (political class) constitute in the context of the workforce. Globally, it is the workers that service the economy.

    “For example, you cannot advance issues of education without looking at the centrality of the teacher. It is crude to now denigrate and undermine workers and call the, merely five per cent of the population. This is unfortunate and therefore, we stand by our earlier position that on what was agreed we stand. Outside that, we will revert to our earlier demand of N66500.

    “We are also aware that intense pressure is being mounted on some OPS members, especially NACCIMA, who were forced to issue a statement under duress. I spoke to the lady, Dr. Maheeba Dankaba, who disputed what was published today (yesterday) in many newspapers as her position.

    “I am aware that NECA, the OPS umbrella body will issue an official statement.  Nobody can go out of a collective bargaining process and begin to advance falsehood or bend the truth.

    “We stand by that and all of us must be careful the way we report information. She told me that somebody (highly-placed in government) called her to do a statement.

    “I am sure NECA will make a formal statement to confirm whether there was a conclusion of the meeting and an agreement reached. I want to say that just as the NLC has pronounced that without making sure the issue of N30, 000 which was mutually agreed through a well-known process is accepted and signed into law, the action that has been proposed from November 6 will take effect.

    “We are in a society where people use every opportunity to extort money and I think that is what the governors have tried to do. They want to explore the demand for a new minimum wage to see if they can get more money from the federal government.

    “The current minimum wage of N18000 has expired since 2016 and workers have been patient and unions have played their role. So, workers should not be taken for granted for being patient.

    “Therefore, we want to say clearly now that every governor should go back to their state which is he entity recognised by law,  gather their workers and say they cannot pay N30, 000 and not come to Abuja hide under a forum that is not recognised by law and say they cannot pay N30, 000.

    “Interestingly, individual governors have gone back to answer their names by saying whatever is agreed, they are ready to pay. I want to call on Mr. President to be aware of this mischief. They want to go back to their states and tell their workers that it is the Presidency that is not willing to pay, but that they will be willing to pay whatever is accepted.

    “Let there be this understanding that this forum has no legitimacy whatsoever in the context of collective bargaining process. What is recognised by law is individual state. So, let them go back and tell their workers what they will be willing to pay and see the reaction. This will put the whole argument into contest and everybody will know where things are.

    “We will continue to respect collective bargaining process and whatever has been agreed through that process will be respected. Aside that, if they are not willing to respect that, labour is willing to revert back to our initial demand of N66, 500. We want to tell Nigerians that workers have been very patient despite the difficult challenges.

    “In the entire West Africa today, despite being the best economy, our minimum wage is the least, yet, our political elite, including the governors, receive the highest salary in Africa. Where is the justice and fairness?

    “Where is also the issue of ability to pay if state governors and other political office holders across the county earn the same salary? Who is more important?  We are resolute that there must be fairness and justice and there must be respect for the rule of law.

    “Let me say that if this minimum wage is not reviewed within the context of collective bargaining, the law has been violated because we are already two years in arrears.  Even if we are to pay interest on the new figure, what will that be?  We should put the facts before the public.

    “What is going on is an attack on workers’ rights and trade unions’ rights and this is unprecedented because such has never happened before. Collective bargaining agreements are usually respected in other to have industrial peace and development.

    “Like I say, we stand by the figures that has been agreed upon, but if everyone is reverting to a figure prior to when we agreed on 30, 000, then Labour will have no choice than to revert to our earlier demand.

    If governors will now start advancing new figures and then federal government doing same, nothing stops organised labour from doing same.”

     TUC faults Fed Govt  

    The Trade Union Congress (TUC) said the Federal Government was economical with the truth. It said the government lied to Nigerians about the minimum wage agreement reached at the tripartite meeting.

    Refuting the statement that tripartite committee on minimum wage did not agree on N30, 000, TUC stated that the NGF has power under the law to negotiate minimum wage on behalf of the union.

    Speaking yesterday at a press conference at the Airport Hotel, Ikeja, TUC President Bobboi Kaigama said: “The committee has concluded its job and has come up with N30, 000 and ‘TUC stands by this decision’.

    “We condemned in totality the statement credited to some quarters that the tripartite committee on minimum wage did not agree on N30, 000. This is a travesty of history.”

    According to Kaigama, Labour will not be intimidated by the ‘No-work, No-pay’ slogan by the government, instead Labour will emphasise on ‘No-N30, 000 minimum wage, No-vote’.

    He said the union aligned itself with the position of the organised labour to commence a nationwide strike on the November 6, should the government fail to implement the National Minimum Wage of N30, 000.

     

    ULC: no going back on strike

     

    The NLC position was echoed by the United Labour Congress (ULC), which rejected the N22, 500 NGF’s proposal, describing it as “contemptuous”.

    ULC said the proposal negated the principles and spirit of social dialogue as envisioned by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Conventions.

    Threatening to embark on the strike slated for November 6, the labour group said it was withdrawing from the agreed N30, 000 compromise figure and reverting to its initial N65, 000 demand.

    ULC President Joe Ajaero said the governors’ offer was unacceptable and disdainful of the vast majority that make up the nation’s workforce and the masses that create the nation’s wealth.

    He said the “paltry” offer makes the N30, 000 compromise figure “an orphan”.

    Ajaero said: “Since the government which is a major stakeholder in the Tripartite Committee has reneged on the agreement repudiating its earlier documented offer, ULC in conjunction with other labour centres, rejects the N30,000 compromise figure of the Tripartite Committee and now insists on our original collective demand of N65,000 as an irreducible minimum.

    “The only figure that we now recognise is N65,000 or nothing else. This shall be the focus of our demand as we move into the nation-wide strike come Tuesday, the 6th day of November, 2018.”

    Accusing the Federal Government of frustrating and sabotaging workers’ desire for a decent wage via a new minimum wage, Ajaero said: “The deployment of the subterfuge called the NGF to disrupt and hijack the due processes known to the nation’s industrial relations space in reaching a new minimum wage for workers”.

    The ULC chief said this was despite the fact that the NGF was represented by six governors in the tripartite committee.

    He said: “Going outside the known framework to seek the resolution of the contrived Minimum Wage impasse is devious.

    “It undermines tripartism and the various traditions that govern responsible and equitable engagement of the social partners – workers, employers and government.

    “A sensitive government is not expected to reject tested and proven frameworks and processes for civil engagement but this is what this government has chosen to do.

    “It is unfortunate that this government would rather seek ways of keeping workers at the periphery of the nation’s economy.

    “Drafting in that inglorious political forum at this time is a clear sign that government is prepared to continue politicising the right of workers to an acceptable wage floor thus exacerbate the marginalisation and exploitation of Nigerian workers and masses. This is deplorable.

    “Once again, we reassure all Nigerian workers of our commitment to our collective resolve to get this government to show more responsibility and sensitivity to our plight as workers and those who lay the golden egg.

    “All workers should be on the alert! Gird your loins and be ready as we go into the Joint CWC and the final days of preparation to grapple with the looming oppression.”

  • NDDC tenure extension row unsettles Niger Delta

    NDDC tenure extension row unsettles Niger Delta

    The proposed extension of tenure for the current board of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) has created tension in the Niger Delta.

    Activists and lawyers, at the weekend, protested this move.

    In an open letter, the activists called on President Muhammadu Buhari to stop “setting a bad precedent” by intervening in the matter to ensure the right thing is done in the interest of peace.

    They urged the President to investigate the tenure elongation controversy, alleging that the ongoing plot was motivated by bribery.

    The aggrieved stakeholders, under the aegis of Constitutional Rights and Peoples Development Advocacy Initiative (CRAI), described the attempt as criminal, illegal, offensive and satanic.

    According to them, the development was anathema to peace and development in the Niger Delta, as well as the harmonious co-existence of all ethnic nationalities in the nine oil-producing states.

    The letter reads: “The so-called extension is morally wrong and does not stand on any legal high ground. It is said that the elongation coup originated through a legal memo by Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr. Abubakar Malami.

    “This exercise is offensive and contrary to the extant and explicit provisions of the relevant sections of the NDDC Act. Section 4 of the act provides for the rotation of chairmanship of the board as between ‘member states.

    “In the 16 years of the NDDC, Section 4 and 5 (2) had always applied. When the commission was established in 2000, Godwin Omene, from Delta State, was the Managing Director; Omene had hitches and left, and Emmanuel Agwariavwodo completed his tenure. He did not start a new term as the current Managing Director, Nsima Ekere, is seeking to procure from the black market. What a misnomer?”

    The activists faulted a letter by the Permanent Secretary in Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Dayo Apata, that the current board was a new one and was not inaugurated to compete the term of the dissolved board.

    They said: “We disagree with the position of the SGF; the argument is lame and a complete aberration. Please, we ask that you kindly refer to history of the board, which shows the pattern of succession for the completion of four-year tenure between two substantive boards.

    “This fraud should not be allowed to stay a day longer because of the consequences it would bequeath on the region. The peaceful co-existence among tribes and ethnic nationalities would be shaken to its foundation and replaced by mistrust and mutual suspicion – an invitation to chaos.”

  • Warning of possible Boko Haram attack unsettles Abuja

    A memo by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) about possible Boko Haram attacks has unsettled residents.

    Copies of the letter with reference number FCTA/SSD/S.781/VOL 1 and entitled “Forwarding of Intelligence” circulated in Abuja last night.

    The letter was addressed to the National Presidents of Jaamatu Nasril Islam (JNI), Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the General Manager of the Abuja Markets Management Limited (AMML).

    It was also copied to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Permanent Secretary of Federal Capital Territory Authority and the Acting Secretary, Area Councils’ Services Secretariat.

    The letter reads: “Intelligence reaching this office revealed that insurgents are planning to attack the Federal Capital Territory.

    “Their main targets are worship centres and markets with the use of young girls as members of groups to carry out their planned attacks.

    “It is in view of the foregoing, I am directed to inform you to communicate the content of this letter to all mosques, churches and markets across the FCT for extra-vigilance, particularly unknown persons dressing as aid workers loitering around the worship areas and markets.

    “The Nigerian Police has made available, contact numbers to report any suspicious persons or movement. These are: 09063872207, 09053872208 and 09053872209.

    “Please give the content of this letter the widest and fastest circulation to enable our worshippers to be vigilant and curb the menace of insurgency in the territory and beyond,” the letter stated.

    Explaining the memo’s source to The Nation on Saturday, Alhaji Adamu Gwari, the Deputy Director of Federal Capital Territory Authority’s Security Services Department said the letter was “based on intelligence that those insurgents have new methods of operation whereby they use young girls posing as members of aid groups.”

    He said: “We are informing members of the public that the method of the operation is based on intelligence received that they would be targeting worship places and markets.

    “So, we decided to inform the most important bodies, that is, the two religious bodies and the General Manager of Abuja Market Management Limited so that they can give the content of the letter the widest circulation.

    “In the letter, you can see that we specified the possible use of young girls as members of aid groups; we had to intimate the religious bodies so that they can know or monitor those whom they deploy to their worship places. It is based on the intelligence we received that we decided that members of the public should be told to be vigilant about that particular group of people.

  • North’s gov’s N2bn mansion unsettles Aso Rock

    North’s gov’s N2bn mansion unsettles Aso Rock

    •House overlooks seat of power            

    •Anti-graft agencies may intervene

    There are security concerns over a N2 billion mansion overlooking the Presidential Villa, just completed by an outgoing governor from the North.

    The mansion is said to be built at an elevated point within the precincts of the Villa, making the seat of government vulnerable to “espionage” from the governor’s comfort zone.

    It was not clear if the governor would be asked to remodel the new residence, be subjected to an undertaking or be placed on surveillance.

    Investigation by our correspondent revealed that the governor had acquired the choice plot, said to be worth over N1 billion, in anticipation that he might play a key role if President Goodluck Jonathan was re-elected.

    It was gathered that the governor had planned post-office life in such a manner that his residence would be a stone’s throw from the seat of power, but his dream crashed following the loss of the March 28th poll by the President.

    Findings however revealed that the new mansion of the governor had been a security issue even before the general election.

    According to a top source who spoke in confidence, the mansion was erected on an elevated level that “gives a view of movement in and out of the Presidential Villa.”

    The source added: “The over N2 billion posh residence poses a security worry because with sophisticated equipment, the governor, as from May 29, can conduct some surveillance on the Villa depending on his political leaning or mischief.

    “No one is comfortable with this development. Based on security audit, the elevation of the mansion is not good for the Presidential Villa.

    “If the governor compromises after leaving office, the residence can be used for espionage or any other challenge.”

    Another source however said: “I think the governor wanted to be a nominee for the Vice Presidential ticket but lost out to Vice President Namadi Sambo during the intrigues. It was in line with his target that he opted for a house near the Villa.

    “I think there are three options available to the governor. These are : to remodel or reconfigure the house, be subjected to a security undertaking or be placed on permanent surveillance.”

    It was however learnt that the governor had explained that the land was rocky and that was why it appeared the “elevation” is a bit higher.

    “The house was built with the best of intention and not for any political or pecuniary gains. The Villa itself presents a scenery of an undulating landscape.

    “Take a look at the Presidential Villa’s neighbourhood, many ex-governors, permanent secretaries, senators and others have houses there, “ a top source added.

    At press time, it was gathered that the governor might be probed by anti-graft agencies on the billion-naira mansion at a time it was difficult for his state to pay some entitlements of workers who have retired from public service.

    An anti-graft source said: “The house is worth over N2 billion. The governor might be investigated after May 29 when he will no longer enjoy immunity from trial.”

  • New transport policy unsettles bus owners

    Imagine a park filled with commuters on a rainy June evening, the torrents of rain pelting the waiting crowd, the icy winds making them shiver to the bone marrows in the approaching night while waiting for vehicles that never came.

    Would this be the impending fate of thousands of workers and commuters in the coming days?

    From this week what will be the lot of the masses in the Federal Capital Territory in terms of transportation? How much is going to be the amount to be spent by an average worker for daily transportation in Abuja in the coming days? How long would it take people to get to work in the mornings and home in the evenings?

    Would people be able to afford taxis or have the energy to trek long distances everyday to and from their offices and various destinations?

    These are the questions currently being asked by concerned citizens in the Federal Capital City of Abuja.

    The FCT Administration decided that from that date mini-buses shall no longer operate within the main city. The administration has said that any mini- bus found in the city after that date would be impounded.

    The determination of the FCT administration to enforce the policy has elicited concerns and criticisms from the populace about the fate of the thousands of workers that commute daily from the satellite towns of the FCT to the city centre on a daily basis.

    There is also the fear that the stoppage could escalate the current unemployment situation and increase the crime rate in the capital city.

    Scores of mini-bus owners and drivers last Tuesday staged a protest at the National Assembly over the imminent ban of the buses in the Federal Capital Territory metropolis.

    An earlier test of the policy for a few days in February by the FCT Administration left thousands of commuters stranded across the city.

    The Transport Secretariat of the FCT has expressed the intention to confine the operations of the mini-buses to the satellite towns in the FCT and stop them from coming into the city and to replace their services with long buses.

    The new policy initially thought to have been postponed indefinitely is now the source of apprehension in the city as those who are not car owners believe that the policy would compound an already complex transportation situation.

    There are also fears that the cost of transportation will skyrocket and commercial activities in the city would be affected.

    The protesters at the National Assembly last Tuesday under the aegis of the Owners and Drivers of Mini-Buses Association in the FCT, described the new policy as “obnoxious policy on transport,” and that it is “not mass-friendly.”

    “About 62,000 drivers and conductors will be denied of their daily bread as a result of this inhuman government arrangement,” the association said.

    Members of the association carried various banners that had inscriptions like: “We are Nigerians, give us our right to work please,” “We are not in military regime, we are in democracy, hear our cry,” “We’re part of the organised labour, we are not touts, live and let live,” “SOS, SOS, save our jobs, don’t throw us into starvation and death. Save our jobs,” “NASS save our families.”

    Other banners read: “We are legitimate drivers and conductors, NASS stop this impending slavery,” “Is government afraid of competition? Live and let live,” “Create jobs not joblessness.”

    A member of the association, Prince Paul Omeire, stated that the objective of the protest was to get the National Assembly influence the FCT Transport Secretariat change the policy

    “We are members of Owners and Drivers Association, and we operate the town service. We own the bus and drive it. Our problem is with the Transport Secretariat of the FCT.

    “The new transport policy is that we should stop operation in the city on June 3 and this means that thousands of drivers and conductors with their families and other extension will suffer. We create jobs and we don’t know why they want to create joblessness,” he said.

    On why they were at the National Assembly, he said “We are here to see our representatives at the National Assembly and see if we can get the FCT Transport Secretariat to change the policy.

    “In many cities across the world, small, big buses as well as taxis operate without hindrance, why should it be different in Abuja, all we want is peaceful co-existence.

    Omeire said that in the alternative, the FCT could build alternate motor parks and garages in the city where the mini-buses can utilise within the city, “so that the complaints of disturbance will stop.”

    The association enjoined all FCT residents to “Lend your voice and save the situation,” adding that “we are persuaded that the timely disapproval and condemnation by the masses of the FCT of the Machiavellian policy can make the FCT policy makers think twice.”

    Clement Acholonu, an FCT resident who stays in Maraba told The Nation that the problem stems from a disconnect of the policy makers from the problems of the people.

    “These people do not understand. They have many cars. Do they stand in the sun like we do? Do they stand in the rain like we do? Do they feel our pains? Do they trek kilometres after a hard day’s job? Of course, the answer is no. Its not enough to sit in air-conditioned offices and craft policies that affect the people negatively. That is not governance,” he said.

     

  • INEC shake-up unsettles workers

    INEC shake-up unsettles workers

    A Major reorganisation of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has unsettled its workers.

    The shake-up, it was learnt, followed the recommendations of PriceWaterCooper, the consultancy firm hired by INEC.

    In its report, the firm observed among other things that the Commission has bloated workforce.

    The restructuring, which might not be unconnected with the 2015 general elections, has so far seen the redeployment, transfer and retirement of some of the 67 directors.

    It was learnt that the shake-up has reduced INEC’s departments to nine from 26 and its directorates trimmed to 10.

    Besides, directors who have less than two years left in service were asked to consider the voluntary retirement option.

    Confirming the development, the Chief Press Secretary to INEC chairman, Mr Kayode Idowu, said that by reducing the departments, the commission now has fewer departments to be headed by efficient hands.

    According to Mr Idowu, the merged departments include: the civil society; gender; voter education; and public affairs. He said they were rolled into the department of voter education, public relations and civil society.

    He also spoke of a plan to reconfigure the departments’ leadership because the commission has many directors in the system, pointing out that a lot of options are on the table for them.

    Mr. Idowu also said the new departments would be headed by directors with directorates under them.

    He said the commission can no longer retain all the directors presently on its payroll, even as he assured that no officer would be shortchanged in the ongoing reorganisation.

    The reduction in workforce notwithstanding, Idowu argued the commission required strong workforce due to its scope of work across the country.

    Justifying the need for more hands, he informed that the continuous voters’ registration in the country’s 8,809 wards will soon begin.

    Argu that the commission’s workforce was inadequate, Idowu said: “If you are looking at the number of wards, everybody at INEC will be fully utilised.”

    He said when the commission did the recruitment exercise in 2012, only 1,500 people were recruited, explaining that nd to do the exercise there was need to deploy more workforces across the country.