Tag: UPN

  • Court adjourns suit on SDP, UPN

    Court adjourns suit on SDP, UPN

    AN ABUJA Federal High Court yesterday adjourned to December 9, the suit filed by a human rights activist, Mr. Richard Akinnola, against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Social Democratic Party ( SDP ) and Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN).

    In his originating summons filed in August,  Akinnola is challenging the registration of the two political parties by INEC.

    Akinnola is praying the court to nullify the purported registration of the two parties by the INEC on account that the two parties, having been dissolved by existing laws, as well as urging the court to determine whether INEC has the power to resuscitate prohibited and dissolved parties.

    Filed on his behalf by Mr. James Ode Abah of Bamidele Aturu Chambers,  Akinnola argued that both SDP and UPN were outlawed out of existence by the Political Parties Dissolution Decrees of 1984 and 1993.

    Justice Gabriel Kolawole adjourned the case to December  9, to enable all the defendants to be properly served with the court processes.

  • UPN suspends Fasehun as chair

    UPN suspends Fasehun as chair

    The Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) has defended the indefinite suspension of its Chairman and founder of the Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC), Dr. Frederick Fasehun.

    It accused Fasehun of running the party as his property.

    UPN, which suspended Fasehun at the end of its fourth National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting in Abuja, also distanced itself from the suit filed by Fasehun against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and its Chairman, Prof. Attahiru Jega, on the controversial additional 30,000 polling units allocated to the North ahead of the 2015 general elections.

    In a communique read to reporters yesterday in Abuja by its National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Adedeji Salau, the party elevated its former Deputy National Chairman, Dr. Manzo Abubakar, to Acting Chairman.

    Salau said: “In his address, Fasehun posited that contrary to the speculation making the round, he did not sue INEC on behalf of UPN but on his right as a Nigerian citizen.

    “The chairman tried to defend his unsuccessful attempt to postpone the September 19 meeting, which he described as illegal, but which most members of the NEC agreed that had become part of our record as the third NEC meeting of the party.”

    He added: “He is running the party as his private property. That is what he is doing, and we have catalogued his offenses in that regard. He is on suspension and his coming back to the party depends on the NEC. What we are against is his dictatorship.

    “The NEC members viewed the September 19 meeting as the mother of this fourth meeting, which was presided over by the National Chairman since the holding of the fourth meeting was as a result of the resolution passed at the thirrd NEC meeting…”

     

     

    But we view his defence as very unsatisfactory.”

    The UPN also accused Fasehun of placing an advertorial of his unilaterally appointed Chairmen of the State Caretaker Committees as against the legitimately endorsed NEC list advertised in the newspapers and “viewed the Chairman’s action as on affront and deliberate attempt to denigrate the NEC of the party.”

     

  • Why UPN will not participate in Ekiti poll – Fasheun

    The Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) on Wednesday said it would not participate in the Ekiti governorship polls slated for June 21.

    The party, however, said it would take part in the Osun governorship polls in August.

    The UPN National Chairman, Dr. Frederick Fasheun, told journalists in Lagos that his party was excluded from the Ekiti governorship election by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) rules and regulations.

    “The UPN ran short of time according to INEC’s guidelines and so cannot participate.

    “However, we will participate and intend to win the Osun polls,’’ he said.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that INEC had on May 22 presented a certificate of registration to UPN with effect from April 17.

    Fasheun, however, said the party supported calls by some Ekiti and Osun people that local government elections must be concluded ahead of the governorship polls in the states.

     

  • INEC schedules nationwide voter registration for May

    INEC schedules nationwide voter registration for May

    … Approves UPN registration

    The Independent National Electoral Commission has fixed May for the commencement of nationwide distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs).

    This would be followed by the commencement of the Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise in the same month.

    According to the commission, the exercise would be in three phases. The first phase consists of ten states- Taraba, Gombe, Zamfara, Kebbi, Benue, Kogi, Abia, Enugu, Akwa-Ibom and Bayelsa.

    The distribution of voter cards will begin with the aforementioned states May 23-25 2014, while fresh voters registration exercise has been slated for May 28 to June 1.

    The decision to stagger the voters’ registration exercise and the distribution of PVCs was reached at the commission’s meeting on April 17.

    The electoral body noted that the decision was informed by its recent experience of similar exercise in Ekiti and Osun States.

    The electoral body is however yet to release dates for the outstanding phases.

    Meanwhile, the commission has approved the registration of Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN).

    According to a statement signed by INEC Director, Voter Education and Publicity, Mr. Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, the approval was granted on April 17.

    UPN’s registration brings to 26 the number of political parties in Nigeria.

    The statement reads in part: “the commission at its meeting held on Thursday 17th April 2014 approved the registration of the UPN, the applicant having met the legal requirements for registration.

    “The registration of UPN brings to 26 the total number of political parties in Nigeria.”

     

  • INEC registers UPN

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has registered the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) as one of the political party in the country.

    The registration of UPN the number of parties  to 26.

    INEC’s Director of Education, Oluwale Uzzi announced UPN’s registration on Friday.

     

  • Retrace your steps, Fasanmi urges Bamidele

    Retrace your steps, Fasanmi urges Bamidele

    Second Republic Senator Ayo Fasanmi yesterday lamented the crack in the Ekiti State All Progressives Congress (APC), warning the House of Representatives member, Hon. Opeyemi Bamidele, to retrace his steps to the party.

    Bamidele, who represents Irepodun/Ifelodun Constituency in the House, recently defected to the Labour Party (LP), where he hopes to contest for the governorship next year. He was one of the leaders of the party in the state before his defection.

    Fasanmi, who reflected on history, advised the federal legislator to ponder on the fate of prominent politicians, who left their political families for other camps, based on temporary political challenges.

    He also advised him to learn from the political career of the famous Ekiti son, the late Chief Akinwole Omoboriowo, who deserted his leader, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, in a bid to dislodge former Ondo State Governor Adekunle Ajasin from power. Fasanmi recalled that Omoboriowo, despite his popularity, never bounced back into reckoning after he left the proscribed Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN).

    The elder statesman said that past experience should instruct ambitious young men and women to think deeply and peep into the future before taking far-reaching decisions that have implications for their political future, their political groups, and the welfare of the state they hope to govern.

    Fasanmi, who spoke with our correspondent on phone, said: “The defection of Bamidele from the APC is most unfortunate. It is an unfortunate incident. He is a boy I know very well. Well, he is a man now. I first saw him in 1994, when I was a member of the Constitutional Conference Commission set up by the late military Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha. I have followed his career since then.

    “I am disappointed. This is an unfortunate situation. As an elder statesman, I will advice Fayemi (Governor Kayode) not to be diverted. The APC is on a sound footing. Fayemi is doing well as the governor of Ekiti State. The APC is on course in Ekiti”.

    Fasanmi recalled that the parting of ways between Awolowo and Omoboriowo was painful to many Ekiti patriots, who equally loved the former deputy governor. He said that history is merely repeating itself as Bamidele will be seen to be parting ways with his leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.

    He added: “There were Awolowo and Akintola. There were Ajasin and Omoboriowo. Now, there are Fayemi and Bamidele. But this should not be so in Yorubaland. We should learn from the past”.

    The veteran politician noted that Bamidele’s career in the progressive fold under the Tinubu’s tutelage has been impressive, adding that he had climbed the ladders of leadership and fame as a key functionary of government in Lagos State.

    He said that it is risky for a promising politician like Bamidele to desert the party he had jointly nurtured with compatriots and seek refuge in another, where some people may perceive him as a stranger. Recalling Awo’s advice to his disciples, he said: “It is better to discuss and disagree in your party and fight for your interest there, but if it appears that you can’t have your way, you should jettison your personal interest and subscribe to the collective interest, where accommodation would be found for your interest. In the progressive camp, where service to the people is the watchword, you cannot be a loser”.

    Fasanmi, who described the LP chieftain as a competent and vibrant person, warned that a progressive politician may lose relevance outside his original political family.

    He added: “The question people are asking is: what does Bamidele want? I understand that he has served as a party officer, special adviser, commissioner for two terms. Now, he is in the House of Representatives. He who the god will destroy will first make mad. This should not happen to Bamidele. That is why I want him to retrace his steps. His grievances can still be addressed within the progressives family. I like him so much. So, I want him to learn from history”.

  • Retrace your steps, Fasanmi urges Bamidele

    Retrace your steps, Fasanmi urges Bamidele

    Second Republic Senator Ayo Fasanmi yesterday lamented the crack in the Ekiti State All Progressives Congress (APC), warning the House of Representatives member, Hon. Opeyemi Bamidele, to retrace his steps to the party.

    Bamidele, who represents Irepodun/Ifelodun Constituency in the House, recently defected to the Labour Party (LP), where he hopes to contest for the governorship next year. He was one of the leaders of the party in the state before his defection.

    Fasanmi, who reflected on history, advised the federal legislator to ponder on the fate of prominent politicians, who left their political families for other camps, based on temporary political challenges.

    He also advised him to learn from the political career of the famous Ekiti son, the late Chief Akinwole Omoboriowo, who deserted his leader, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, in a bid to dislodge former Ondo State Governor Adekunle Ajasin from power. Fasanmi recalled that Omoboriowo, despite his popularity, never bounced back into reckoning after he left the proscribed Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN).

    The elder statesman said that past experience should instruct ambitious young men and women to think deeply and peep into the future before taking far-reaching decisions that have implications for their political future, their political groups, and the welfare of the state they hope to govern.

    Fasanmi, who spoke with our correspondent on phone, said: “The defection of Bamidele from the APC is most unfortunate. It is an unfortunate incident. He is a boy I know very well. Well, he is a man now. I first saw him in 1994, when I was a member of the Constitutional Conference Commission set up by the late military Head of State, Gen. Sani Abacha. I have followed his career since then.

    “I am disappointed. This is an unfortunate situation. As an elder statesman, I will advice Fayemi (Governor Kayode) not to be diverted. The APC is on a sound footing. Fayemi is doing well as the governor of Ekiti State. The APC is on course in Ekiti”.

    Fasanmi recalled that the parting of ways between Awolowo and Omoboriowo was painful to many Ekiti patriots, who equally loved the former deputy governor. He said that history is merely repeating itself as Bamidele will be seen to be parting ways with his leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.

    He added: “There were Awolowo and Akintola. There were Ajasin and Omoboriowo. Now, there are Fayemi and Bamidele. But this should not be so in Yorubaland. We should learn from the past”.

    The veteran politician noted that Bamidele’s career in the progressive fold under the Tinubu’s tutelage has been impressive, adding that he had climbed the ladders of leadership and fame as a key functionary of government in Lagos State.

    He said that it is risky for a promising politician like Bamidele to desert the party he had jointly nurtured with compatriots and seek refuge in another, where some people may perceive him as a stranger. Recalling Awo’s advice to his disciples, he said: “It is better to discuss and disagree in your party and fight for your interest there, but if it appears that you can’t have your way, you should jettison your personal interest and subscribe to the collective interest, where accommodation would be found for your interest. In the progressive camp, where service to the people is the watchword, you cannot be a loser”.

    Fasanmi, who described the LP chieftain as a competent and vibrant person, warned that a progressive politician may lose relevance outside his original political family.

    He added: “The question people are asking is: what does Bamidele want? I understand that he has served as a party officer, special adviser, commissioner for two terms. Now, he is in the House of Representatives. He who the god will destroy will first make mad. This should not happen to Bamidele. That is why I want him to retrace his steps. His grievances can still be addressed within the progressives family. I like him so much. So, I want him to learn from history”.

  • Ekiti ronu

    Ekiti ronu

    If Ekiti ronu [Ekiti think] echoes Yoruba ronu, iconic caution as mass protest music by late dramatist, Hubert Ogunde, during the 1st Republic’s political storm, it is simply because a storm of similar magnitude is hovering over Ekiti.

    Should this storm dawn and thunder break, as the pan-Yoruba one did in the 1st Republic Western Region, Ekiti people would be the grand victims in the present South West.

    Indeed, in Ekiti, the third generation of Obafemi Awolowo’s developmental politics are about to fall upon themselves, ironically as the paterfamilias and his policy greats did; making hideous political killing fields of the same Western vista in which they had showcased startling policy wonders; and birthing the first generation of Yoruba political sinners and saints!

    Now what is this: history inevitably repeating itself or plain hubris, pushing towards avoidable ruin?

    Enter Samuel Ladoke Akintola and his fallen angels, among the brightest and best in the old Action Group (AG), the first generation of Yoruba political sinners versus Awo and faithful disciples, the first generation of Yoruba saints; then Akin Omoboriowo and pals, among the brightest and best in the 2nd Republic Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), second generation of Yoruba sinners versus Michael Adekunle Ajasin and brood, second generation of Yoruba saints.

    Now, is the black-or-white, famously unforgiving and notoriously ancestral-feuding Yoruba political clime ripe for a third generation of sinners and saints, in the looming Ekiti toss-up between Michael Opeyemi Bamidele (MOB) and John Kayode Fayemi (JKF)?

    Both lead feuding blocs of the All Progressives Congress (APC), present South West political lords of the manor, and closest articulators of Awo’s development politics, among the varied groups laying claim to the Awo legacy.

    Indeed, Awo political descendants are no united phalanx. From the very genesis, even with Awo in charge, the ranks had always fissured. So, it is with the present generation.

    For starters, a bloc insists it is Awo natural franchisers, to be disputed by no one. This class comprises the living Awolowos, the Afenifere grandees, Awo-era battle-hardened but ageing veterans and other Awo ideology coterie and family friends, in the clergy and other fields.

    This group considers itself the Areopagus, apex chamber of wise elders in ancient Athens, from which the Awo franchise must be cleared. But aside from holding this virtual “spiritual brief”, to use legal-speak, they have done pretty little to concretise the Awo developmental essence.

    Indeed, it is not illegitimate to charge this bloc with illicit doctrinaire trade-offs, for immediate but eventually ruinous political gains (as the Afenifere grandees did with Ogun’s former governor, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, OGD, and his Ogun Peoples Democratic Party, PDP; and currently with Olusegun Mimiko and his Labour Party in Ondo), when faced with political pressures from rival claimants to the Awo legacy.

    Then there is the Bola Tinubu group, from the Alliance for Democracy (AD) at the start of this 4th Republic, to Action Congress (AC), Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) and now All Progressives Congress (APC). Though the Afenifere bloc regards Asiwaju Tinubu and his younger Turks as a breed of upstarts (and on both sides, the contempt is mutual), the Tinubu bloc has done more than any other to actualise Awo’s developmental vision.

    Indeed, what the AD class of 1999-2003 miserably flunked, the Tinubu current brood in the South West is doing with panache: in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Osun and Ekiti states, with the South West boasting robust development makeovers, reminiscent of the golden Awo days, in stark contrast to the abject developmental puddle of the Olusegun Obasanjo mainstream era.

    But aside from the Afenifere and Tinubu blocs, there are the Awo ideological fair weather friends, exemplified by the Mimikos and OGDs, who nibble the Awo rhetoric for political sustenance, but are political Machiavellis, sworn to the end justifying the means – or “meanness” to parody Prof. Wole Soyinka.

    Since every Tinubu gain necessarily translates into an Afenifere loss (and probably vice-versa), the Mimikos and OGDs are in booming business, entering sweetheart partnerships with Afenifere, as the unending battle flares, to control of the soul of the South West.

    It is to this vicious vista, therefore, that the looming MOB-JKF battle royale for the capture of Ekiti is opening. But that is not the only danger. Lurking in the wings, and waiting for carrion, are the federal political vultures of Goodluck Jonathan, a presidential camp desperately craving a second term (after making a hash of the first), and for whom a fissured Ekiti APC would be virtual gift from the gods!

    If all these would not jolt into sense the Ekiti gladiators, behaving as children without a sense of history, then it is plain hubris, the good old Yoruba eedi, at play!

    MOB, rumoured to be lining up joining forces with Labour Party (LP) would probably destroy himself. That is trite, but if only conventional wisdom holds right.

    So, after Akintola and Omoboriowo, is MOB bracing up to lead the latest generation of progressives-turned-demons in Yoruba politics? But what if conventional wisdom turns grand folly and MOB turns the table? Or worse: the federal reactionaries cook up the vote and bolt with the prize, while MOB and JKF, in progressive feuding, mutually self-destroy?

    But why would a man take such a perilous path? Why would MOB eye possible glory but probable doom, and yet develop a Samson’s complex to stake it all? That is what is not trite!

    That would suggest an intolerable political situation in his APC, that makes coexistence mutually unbeneficial. So, if a man cannot legitimately actualise his dreams in a union, why should he invest his time and loyalty in it? Vaulting ambition? Maybe. But ambition is no crime, and “vaulting” is only an adjective!

    That takes the discourse to the Fayemi side, now posing as saints in the divide. They are not. MOB and his coalition of the aggrieved accuse the governor of bad faith and of use-and-dump tactics.

    These allegations could be right or wrong. But the reality is that one side is incensed enough to torpedo the whole house. That cannot be good for a sitting governor that even the aggrieved admit – even if in private – has done enough to earn re-election.

    MOB must, therefore, beware of the Coriolanus syndrome. Shakespeare’s Coriolanus, in a fit of fatal anger, joined the Volscians against his native Corioli. He lost his life in the gambit.

    But JKF too must be wary of the hubris of gubernatorial conceit to crush a comrade turned foe. And those bent on media demonization of MOB are tragically mistaken. He who is down need fear no fall!

    Whatever it takes, the APC leadership must tweak the ears of both combatant camps, and bring both to reason – whatever it takes! On the basis of equal opportunity membership, they must hand each side mutual, cast-iron guarantees to build confidence and fend off the looming disaster.

    Each time the South West advances, reactionary forces gather to scuttle the efforts, using feuding progressives themselves as fuel.

    Should such happen again in Ekiti, MOB and JKF would take the flak. So, they had better both jerk awake before earning themselves a harsh verdict of history.

    Ekiti ronu!

  • UPN can’t bounce back, says Fasanmi

    UPN can’t bounce back, says Fasanmi

    In the First Republic, Chief Ayo Fasanmi was the President of the Action Group (AG) Youth Association and member of the House of Representatives. In the Second Republic, he served as a Senator. The octogenarian Afenifere and All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain spoke with SOJI ADENIYI on the political situation in the Southwest and the country.

     

    What is your reaction to the move by the leader of the Oodua Peoples Congress(OPC), Dr. Fredrick Faseun, to resusitate the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) led by late Chief Obafemi Awolowo?

    Faseun is someone I have a lot of admiration for. In the interview I granted about a month ago, I let the people know that we are related, not only in friendship, but in marriage. The question is: what is his intention, particulary at this point in time. Is the intention genuine? A young man in the camp, not Faseun, recently called me on the phone and informed me that they wanted to resusitate the UPN and would like to know if I wanted to be party to the arrangement. I said “No.” I cannot be party to a sabotage.

    I have always advocated the re-alignment of the progressive elements in the political parties in this country because that is the only legitmate process by which the Peoples Democratic Party can be thrown out of governance. As a matter of truth, when I gave evidence at the Awolowo’s trial many years ago, I said that I believed that the coming together of the progressive elements was necessary for salvaging the country from disintegration. What I said about fifty years ago is still truthful and relevant till today.

    The balance sheet of the PDP today shows that there is so much to worry about in the country. Look at the decay in the infrastructure, insecurity and mass unemployment that have reached an alarming level. And as you know, devil finds job for an idle hand. If you dont give the youths the jobs they deserve to get what do you expect, nothing but crisis and insecurity wll result. And look at the PDP as at today. It has reached an irreversible stage of complete disintegration. So, when four political parties; the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), the Congress of Political Congress (CPC), the All Nigerian Peoples Party (ANPP) and the All People Grand Alliance (APGA); decided to form the All People Congress (APC), I saw the development as a political panacea to the headache of this nation.

    Now that Faseun has come up with the idea of rescusitating the UPN, what do you think is up to?

    I read some of the statement he made in the newpaper. I that any alliance that will confront the people must be based on principles and ideology and I know that the leaders of these four political parties are serious-minded politicians whose antecedents are well known in the country. And I am very confident that, by the grace of God, the APC will succeed. But I also keep asking myself what Faseun is really up to? Is it an attempt to cause disaaffection among the rank and file of the politicians in the Southwest? Is it an attempt to break the unity among the politicians in the ACN, which is dominating in the Southwest? Who are the people that will join the crusade to rescusitate the UPN? If Faseun had a good intention, why did he not advocate or convene a conference of all progressive parties? So, I see a proposed attempt to rescusitate the UPN as a clever device to divide the rank and file of progressive politicians and people should be very careful. And when I read a statement by Faseun that the tree and branches will be uprooted and I was asking myself that does he want to replicate the kind of crises in another form in the Southwest, as it has happened in other geo-political zones? There is the Boko Haram insurgency in the North, kidnapping in the Southeast and militancy in the Southsouth. Is he trying to introduce a political ingenuity of chaos into the peaceful Southwest? I dont know what he is really up to by saying the tree and its branches will be uprooted. As I said, I have a lot of admiration for Faseum, but I can not understand his intention for planning the rescusitation of the UPN, particularly at this point in time. I am sure his intetion is not to promote peace and progress of the Southwest as a region.

    Is Fasehun not inventing another platform to fight for Yoruba interest?

    It is not going to be a viable platform to represent the Yoruba interest. It is going to be a political exercise in chaos and futility. What does he want to acheive and who are the members, the people to use for this end? I fault his timing, more so, at the time the APC wants to get registered and I still can not really understand his intention. So, I am baffled.

    Can the APC dislodge the PDP, which has indicated its intention to win in 32 states in 2015?

    I can only describe Jonathan’s target of thirty two states in the 2015 general election as a big joke. Look at the Southwest, for instance. We are going to have two elections next year – one in Ekiti State and another in Osun. Do you think, with the massive development going on under the indefaigable leadership of Fayemi and Aregbesola, the PDP will ever have an headway? I dont see this happening. I was recently discussing with a friend and we both agreed that there is no way the PDP can make any headway anywhere in the Southwest. So, I dont know where Jonathan will get his thirty two states. I dont see things being the same in the 2014 and 2015 elections, if the APC is not guided by personal ambition, but people first. I will advise the APC leaders to shun personal interest. Their ultimate should be the masses. The masses are suffering, particularly under the Jonathan Administration and they are looking for a redeemer. So, if the APC is not guided by personal interest, it is the only alternative. Nigeria will next year celebrate its centenary. What have we to show for it? So, I think APC, guided by sound principles, will deliver. Though people may be refering to the past alliances, but today, I can confidently say Nigerians now have known better.

    Can the crops of leaders in the Southwest re-enact the feats of your leader, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo?

    Awolowo was a fantastic person. He had very rare qualities that you cannot find nowadays. But judging by the transformation that is now going on in the Southwest, from Lagos State to Ogun State, Oyo State, Osun State and Ekiti State, the region is blessed. At a time, they picked Aregbesola as the best governor in the country. In far away South Africa, Fayemi was recorgnised as best governor in Africa. Also, many that have come to Osun State have acknowleged Aregbesola’s brilliant performance. Even Senator Chukwumerije, a PDP person and chairman, Senate Committee on Education, commended the Aregbesola Administration. He said what he saw here was the best in the entire country. The antagonists and protagonists of the ACN said the region had never had it so good and the Southwest has become a shining example in the country. To be a shining example, there must be sterlin qualities the leadership in the region must demonstrate. And these leaders are following the foothsteps of Chief Awolowo, in terms of performance, transparency, accountability and integrity. I have not seen any of them beig dragged before the anti-graft agencies; the Economic Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and Independent Corrupt Practices and other Crimes Commission (ICPC). These are young men who are emulating the visionary like Chief Awolowo. And I think they should be given time becuase Chief Awolowo was in the leadership saddle for many years, starting from the time of Egbe Omo Oduduwa to the time he founded the Action Group (AG), and later, the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN). These young men are just starting and, at the rate of development we are witnessing, the revolutionary transformation has shown that they have taken after the visionary leadership of our great leader, Chief Awolowo. And I believe that what is going on in the South west can be expanded by 2015, if the APc can take over the central power there would be an effective leadership change.

    Can the regional integration achieve the desired result?

    I don’t see anything wrong in the regional integration. In a federal system of government, that kind of arrangement is very good. It means working together to achieve progress for the people of the region. Awolowo started this many years ago. It will help all parts of the region to benefit from one another’s strenght. Regional integration can promote understanding by pooling your resources together in the interest of the people in all the parts of the region and that does not mean that the region will be enstraged from the central government. Aferall, unity begins at home. So, I believe in the regional integration agenda. It is just starting. Let us wait a year more.We will see the good result it will produce, in terms of economy, social infrastructure and many more. When you pool your resources, it could be very helpful and beneficial to the people of the region.

     

  • ACN, UPN, pipeline  contracts and OPC

    ACN, UPN, pipeline contracts and OPC

    Shortly before the inauguration of Nigeria’s Fourth Republic, I travelled by public transport to Ilorin. Somewhere in Ibadan, we came upon a band of Odua Peoples Congress (OPC) toughs wielding various weapons including automatic guns, short machetes and axes. Their leaders/commanders wore various specially embroidered clothes that harked back to the era of the Yoruba wars. Apart from small gourds strapped to their jumpers, they also wore red wrist or head bands with cowries stitched to them. They stopped traffic majestically and defiantly, and strolled across the road with not a care in the world. A few kilometres down the main road to Ilorin, we again encountered another band, this time in a convoy of beat-up cars and perhaps a pick-up van, if my memory serves me well. They drove fiercely and menacingly, some sitting on top of their cars, and others popping their heads out of the windows as their vehicles bobbed and weaved through the choked traffic.

    This was in the late 1990s, barely a few years after the 1994 Rwandan genocide raged in all its atavistic and sanguinary fury. Using the autocratic regime of Gen Sani Abacha as pretext, Yorubaland began to regress into anomie and idolatry. While still in traffic, and as OPC militants were strutting their stuff, I became both troubled and humiliated. Was this what the Southwest had become? Was the region’s civilisation so tenuous that it took just one destabilising incidence to demolish its accomplishments and send the region lumbering abjectly into the embrace of undemocratic and impulsive bands of area toughies? The OPC may no longer be brazen and daring as it was, but it has kept its structure fairly intact, and continues to attract mainly those who, like cultists, want a sense of adventure and meaning to life.

    The Southwest was somewhat lucky to have understood very early the pitfalls of putting its hopes and trust in an ethnic militia. Given the cold shoulder in polite circles, the OPC quietly morphed into a militia of local enforcers and security consultants. These jobs were needed to keep them busy in place of the revolution they, and many people, believed loomed in the 1990s and early 2000s. After reading about the Rwandan genocide and watching a documentary on it, not to talk of the post-Tito Yugoslavia that dissolved into civil war, it was easy to make up my mind about the dangers of indulging ethnic militias, whether among the Yoruba or in Boko Haram territory. The Yoruba were lucky the OPC experienced considerable attenuation over the years; the North is not so lucky in the hands of Boko Haram, which they at first indulged, then lamely opposed, and finally watched with quiet dismay and resignation from afar.

    For those who naively put their trust in the OPC as the saviour, backbone and standby militia of the Yoruba, the ongoing struggle for pipeline security contracts and leadership supremacy between Frederick Fasehun and Gani Adams can be very disillusioning. Sometime in April, Dr Fasehun had delivered a broadside on Mr Adams for attempting to match him wit for wit and brawn for brawn. But he also acknowledged that he had bidden for a pipeline security contract because the six million youths in his militia deserved the federal government’s economic patronage, just as Niger Delta youths are beneficiaries of very lucrative federal government contracts. No one knows where he got the outlandish figures of OPC membership. But responding to the ACN spokesman’s criticisms that he bade for the contract in order to fund a political party and turn it into a destabilising counterpoise to the region’s dominant party, Fasehun offered a most peremptory and non-ideological argument indicating that in his political world everything boiled down to money. That this materialism subverts the lofty principles of the Southwest, especially the lodestar of the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) he is presumptuously trying to revive, is immaterial to him.

    I have read many opinions on the contract bid by the OPC leaders, and find them humbling. In defending Fasehun, most of the views quite illogically ignore the contradictions between propping up oneself as a saviour or defender of the Yoruba and being a federal government contractor. The Tompolos, Boyloaf and Dokubos of the Niger Delta have never tried to sound principled or ideological. From their antecedents and their current standing, they give the firm impression they need financial empowerment more for its own sake than for any esoteric reasons. They are not driven by any principle of democracy, federalism, human rights, or any other lofty values that ennoble humanity. If the right contracts are dispensed to them, it becomes an incentive to work with and give support to the government of the day. In this they are at least honest, for they do not attempt the disingenuousness their OPC counterparts have now become famous for. How Mr Adams and Fasehun, for instance, hope to get pipeline protection contracts from the Jonathan presidency and in the same breath defend the values that have characterised the Yoruba for centuries is a puzzle. More puzzling is the fact that they do not see the tragedy of outsourcing security to ethnic militants and repentant bigots.

    But the dishonesty of the OPC leaders and their self-serving philosophy do not end there. They are not squabbling over ideology, or over political orientation, or even over societal reengineering. These self-appointed defenders of the Yoruba race are squabbling over two things only: contract from the government, and leadership position in the OPC. It is a surprise that it has taken so long for many Yoruba elites to see through the gimmickry of the militia. While the contracts have not yet been awarded, Fasehun has spoken condescendingly of subletting less than one-third of the contract’s value to Mr Adams’ faction of the OPC. The latter, inured to the paradox of Yoruba defenders fighting for crumbs from a potential enemy, is asking for nothing less than half of the total value of the contract. This, he says, is because he leads about 90 percent of the membership of the OPC.

    The dissembling duo already has projects in the pipeline. While Dr Fasehun is attempting to revive the defunct UPN, Mr Adams, less pretentious, less ambitious, but perhaps more practical and self-important, simply wants to keep his boys engaged and happy. Both suggest that the Southwest deserves it, for the ACN, according to them has proved incapable of taking care of the welfare of the region. On April 18, Fasehun published a rambling and innuendo-ridden advertorial in which he attempted to rationalise the revival of the UPN. The best in the advert is his exaggerated affectations on democracy. But it would have been better if he had not published anything, for it is clear that in spite of his activist years, he lacks both the depth and character to preach democracy to anyone or offer leadership to any group.

    Fasehun assumes that merely invoking the name of UPN is enough to bring back the glory of the Chief Obafemi Awolowo era. He forgets that it was not the party that ennobled Awo; on the contrary it was Awo through his brilliance, depth, passion and discipline, not to say contempt for federal handouts, that ennobled the party. What virtue will Fasehun bring to the party he seeks so cavalierly and comically to resuscitate? I can see none. And what on earth has come over opinion writers and analysts that they give Fasehun a hearing, he that recently asked for Major Hamza Al-Mustapha to be pardoned, he of doubtful ideology and of hidden motives? Had the ferment in the country graduated into a revolution and any of the two OPC leaders assumed prominence, imagine what terrors, poor judgement and mediocrity would have been unleashed on the region.

    As Mr Adams said in his provocative response to Fasehun’s angry and disrespecting characterisation of his rival, the two OPCs are perfectly irreconcilable. But much more than the struggle for leadership of the ethnic militia, the pipeline contract controversy has exposed the superciliousness of the older man and the superficiality of the younger claimant. The elites and opinion moulders in the Southwest must surely have taken the measure of the two pretenders to the Yoruba throne. They are first and foremost contractors, a duo of self-serving and ambitious leaders without the farsightedness, discipline, sacrifice and competence to interpret the past and decipher the tangled skein of Nigeria’s future, let alone embody the values and virtues that have stood the Southwest out for centuries.