The Nation Newspaper

Tag: Uwais

  • Uwais: An advocate of electoral reform goes home

    Uwais: An advocate of electoral reform goes home

    With the passing of former Chief Justice Muhammad Lawal Uwais, Nigeria mourns a jurist whose quiet strength shaped law, democracy, and national integrity. Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI examines the life and times of the departed elder statesman

    With the passing of Justice Muhammad Lawal Uwais (GCON), former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), the nation has lost not only a jurist but also a statesman—one who viewed the law not as a tool of power but as a compass for justice.

    Justice Uwais passed away six days before his 89th  birthday last Friday, marking the end of an era in Nigeria’s legal history. A towering figure in the judiciary and one of the finest minds to grace the Supreme Court bench, his legacy is defined by integrity, judicial courage, and an enduring contribution to Nigeria’s democratic framework.

    Transformative role

    He played a transformative role in Nigeria’s legal and political evolution, not only through landmark rulings but through visionary leadership in electoral reform. As chair of the Electoral Reform Committee, established in 2007 by the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, he led a team that set a new benchmark for conducting elections with transparency and credibility. Members of that committee included the Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Sokoto, Mathew Hassan Kukah; former chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Attahiru Jega; and lawyer and human rights activist, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN).

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu described Uwais as “a compass of constitutional order who defended the law without fear or favour”. The Nigerian Bar Association also hailed him as “a titan of justice whose voice strengthened democracy”. Even critics of the judiciary agree that Uwais left the institution stronger than he found it.

    Early life and education

    Born on June 12, 1936, in Zaria, Kaduna State, Uwais came of age during Nigeria’s transition from colonial rule to independence. His early education in Zaria, followed by legal training in London, forged a disciplined and rigorous intellect. He was called to the English Bar at the Middle Temple in 1963 and to the Nigerian Bar the same year, thereby beginning a four-decade journey of service to law and nation.

    His judicial career commenced in 1966 at the Northern Nigeria Ministry of Justice. By 1973, he had become a Judge of the High Court of the former North Central State. In 1979, he was appointed to the Court of Appeal and, later that same year, to the Supreme Court. His rise to Chief Justice in 1995 marked the beginning of one of the most consequential tenures in Nigeria’s judicial history. He retired in 2006, making him the second-longest-serving CJN.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders security chiefs to restore peace in Benue

    Guardian of judicial independence

    One of Justice Uwais’s most defining qualities was his steadfast commitment to judicial independence. In an era when military regimes exerted suffocating control over state institutions, he maintained a stance of principled neutrality and quiet defiance. He shielded the judiciary from overt political interference, insisting on the sanctity of due process and the clear separation of powers.

    Under his leadership, the Supreme Court asserted its constitutional authority in pivotal cases. His jurisprudence reflected an unwavering commitment to the rule of law and the protection of citizens’ rights, even in politically turbulent times.

    While many decisions bore his influence, notable cases such as INEC v. Musa (2003) reinforced the autonomy of Nigeria’s electoral commission. Even the post-retirement decision in Attorney-General of the Federation v. Abubakar (2007)—a case concerning executive authority—reflected a constitutional clarity and boldness shaped by the judicial tone Uwais had helped establish.

    Architect of electoral reform

    Justice Uwais’s legacy extends beyond the courtroom. Following the contentious 2007 elections, President Yar’Adua appointed him to lead the Electoral Reform Committee. The outcome of the exercise, the “Uwais Electoral Reform Committee Report”, remains a cornerstone in the quest for credible elections in Nigeria.

    Its recommendations were bold and pragmatic. They include the establishment of an Electoral Offences Commission, technological integration such as electronic voting and result transmission, unbundling INEC into specialised commissions, and reforms to voter education and political financing.

    Though successive governments have only selectively implemented its proposals, the report remains a reference point for any genuine conversation about electoral integrity.

    Dr. Kayode Ajulo (SAN), Attorney General of Ondo State, who first announced Uwais’s passing in a viral online tribute, noted:

    “His call for an independent electoral commission was a vital measure designed to enhance transparency. He championed voter education, technological innovation, and fair financing—all aimed at making democracy more inclusive.”

    Legacy of modesty

    Despite his elevated status, Justice Uwais was known for humility and composure. Colleagues remember him as soft-spoken but firm, meticulous in his logic, and generous in mentorship. He never courted publicity but commanded respect—from court clerks to presidents.

    In a country often weakened by personality cults and theatrics, Uwais demonstrated that true authority rests on principle, not performance.

    Even after retirement, he remained engaged in public policy, serving on the National Judicial Council (NJC) and lecturing at legal institutions. His judgments are still cited regularly in courts across Nigeria. His insistence on legal clarity, procedural fairness, and judicial restraint continues to shape the ethical spine of the legal profession.

     Last of a golden generation

    Justice Uwais stood for order in chaos, for law amid lawlessness. He belonged to a generation that valued service over spectacle, substance over show. His death is a monumental loss, but his ideals remain a guidepost for those who believe in the rule of law.

    As Nigeria continues its journey toward democratic maturity and institutional reform, his legacy endures—not merely in the pages of law reports or reform documents, but in the hearts of all who yearn for a just society.

    May his life remind Nigerians that the law, at its best, is not an instrument of power, but of conscience.

  • Exit of legal giant Uwais

    Exit of legal giant Uwais

    • How he will be remembered, by NBA, SANs

    Mohammed Lawal Uwais GCON (June 12, 1936 – June 6, 2025) was a revered jurist who served as the Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 to 2006. Aside from his landmark judgments, his legacy includes chairing the Electoral Reform Committee. The Uwais Report is regarded as one of the most comprehensive blueprints for electoral reform in Nigeria. President Tinubu, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and senior lawyers have paid tributes to him, writes Deputy News Editor JOSEPH JIBUEZE.

    “He superintended the Judiciary at a challenging time in our history with tact, patience, and a sense of duty,” said President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in a tribute to former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Mohammed Uwais, who died last Friday at 88.

    Uwais was a towering figure in the Nigerian judiciary and would have been 89 on June 12.

    He is remembered for his commitment to impartial justice, legal integrity, and reform.

    His passing marks the end of a distinguished chapter in Nigeria’s legal history.

    His career exemplified what it means to serve the law with conscience, balance, and unwavering ethics.

    Born in Zaria in 1936, Uwais was called to the Bar in 1963 after studying law in London.

    He quickly rose through the judicial system, becoming a Supreme Court Justice at 43 and eventually serving as Chief Justice from 1995 to 2006—one of the longest-serving in Nigeria’s history.

    His tenure coincided with Nigeria’s transition from military rule to democracy.

    It was a critical period during which he worked to insulate the judiciary from political interference and uphold its independence.

    Uwais was known for promoting merit-based appointments and pushing for judicial integrity.

    As chair of the National Judicial Council (NJC), he introduced processes to ensure transparency and professionalism in judicial promotions and discipline.

    His approach to justice was not only rooted in law but guided by ethical clarity and constitutional fidelity.

    One of his most enduring contributions came after retirement when he led the 2007 Electoral Reform Committee.

    The “Uwais Report” recommended sweeping reforms, including the creation of an Electoral Offences Commission, a more independent appointment process for INEC leadership, and improved judicial capacity to address electoral disputes.

    Although largely ignored by successive administrations, the report remains a foundational text for electoral reform.

    His passing has led to a renewed advocacy for its implementation as a tribute.

    Globally, Uwais gained recognition through his role with the World Jurist Association and other international legal bodies.

    Domestically, he was appointed to lead multiple commissions and inquiries, such as investigations into civil unrest and government contracts, reflecting his reputation for fairness and trustworthiness.

    Senior Advocates described him as a consistent and principled jurist.

    They highlighted his fearless judgments on legislative accountability, prosecutorial discretion, and procedural compliance.

    They noted how his decisions continue to set standards rarely matched today.

    For many, Uwais symbolises what a judicial leader should be: fair, principled, and reform-minded.

    His life’s work offers both inspiration and a roadmap for judicial and democratic progress.

    Born on June 12, 1936, in Zaria, Kaduna State, Uwais was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple, London, in 1963.

    Highlights of his judgments

    Justice Uwais delivered several landmark judgments and played a pivotal role in the development of Nigeria’s constitutional and electoral law.

    Throughout his judicial career, he participated in numerous rulings on federalism, judicial independence, election law, and constitutional interpretation.

    In INEC v. Musa (2003) – a party registration case, the issue was whether INEC could limit the number of political parties to only those that meet certain administrative conditions.

    Justice Uwais ruled that INEC’s restrictions were unconstitutional.

    Read Also: Troops arrest 43 oil thieves, destroy 27 illegal refineries

    The court held that the Constitution permits any association that meets the criteria in Section 222 of the 1999 Constitution to be registered as a political party.

    This judgment led to the liberalisation of Nigeria’s political space, allowing the registration of many more political parties.

    In Buhari v. Obasanjo (2005) – a presidential election petition, the issue was the challenge by Muhammadu Buhari (then ANPP candidate) against the re-election of Olusegun Obasanjo in 2003.

    Justice Uwais, as part of the Supreme Court panel, was involved in the controversial majority decision that upheld Obasanjo’s election.

    However, the case is known for the dissenting opinion by the late Justice Niki Tobi.

    The case became a reference point for presidential election petition jurisprudence in Nigeria, with implications on the burden of proof and admissibility of evidence.

    In Lawal Osula v Lawal Osula (SC 66/1993) [1995] 3 NWLR (Pt. 382) 128; Supreme Court, March 9, 1995, Justice Uwais laid down important principles relating to the substitution of deceased parties in appeals.

    In Momah v VAB Petroleum Inc (SC 183/1995) [2000] NGSC 4, [2000] 4 NWLR 701; Supreme Court, February 25 , 2000, Uwais, as CJN, clarified the Court of Appeal’s jurisdiction in stay-of-execution applications and foreign currency payment orders

    In Mohammed v Olawunmi & Ors (SC 147/1991) (1993) JELR 45349; Supreme Court, May 14, 1993, Uwais authored the leading opinion in this pivotal land/injunction dispute.

    In Attorney General of the Federation & Ors v Atiku Abubakar (Vice President) (SC 31/2007) [2007] 2 All NLR 58; [2007] NGSC 177; Supreme Court, April 20, 2007, Uwais held that the Vice President could not be removed by presidential fiat without following the constitutional process.

    The issue was whether the President (Olusegun Obasanjo at the time) had the power to remove the Vice-President (Atiku Abubakar) from office.

    Uwais (in his post-retirement role leading a panel) emphasised constitutionalism.

    The court held that the President could not remove the Vice-President without following due constitutional process (which involves impeachment by the National Assembly).

    This decision upheld the principle of separation of powers and reinforced the independence of the office of the Vice-President.

    Tinubu, Atiku pay tribute

    President Tinubu described Uwais as “a phenomenal jurist and statesman who served Nigeria with honour, courage and exceptional integrity”.

    He said: “I join family members, friends, proteges and well-meaning Nigerians in mourning this respected patriot and statesman, who passed away as we mark Eid-Al-Adha.

    “Many remarkable high points hallmarked Justice Uwais’ illustrious career on the bench.

    “He superintended the Judiciary at a challenging time in our history with tact, patience, and a sense of duty.

    “This stabilising role helped usher in the current democratic dispensation, which he had the distinct honour of ushering in as the CJN, who swore in the elected president on May 29, 1999.

    “In retirement, the Federal Government called upon Justice Uwais to head a panel to investigate the conduct of our elections.

    “Given his pedigree and personal integrity, he was the right person for that onerous assignment.

    “Not surprisingly, Justice Uwais led the panel to produce a critical report that contained a detailed prognosis of our electoral system.

    “In active service and retirement, the late Justice Uwais maintained a dignified persona, earning him respect beyond his immediate constituency.

    “May God Almighty accept the soul of Justice Uwais and admit him to Jannatul Firdaus.

    “I extend my heartfelt condolences to the Uwais family, the government and the people of Kaduna State, as well as the members of the Nigerian Judiciary, over the death of this colossus.”

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar said Uwais was a towering figure in Nigeria’s judiciary.

    “His legacy of integrity, fairness, and commitment to democratic reforms, especially through the Electoral Reform Committee, which he chaired, will continue to endure,” he said.

    NBA: he was conscience of the bench

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) said Uwais was the conscience of the bench and an architect of electoral reform.

    In a statement by its President, Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN), the association said: “Justice Uwais was not only a pillar of the Nigerian Judiciary, but a symbol of integrity, learning, and institutional reform.

    “His tenure as CJN from 1995 to 2006 remains one of the most consequential eras for the Nigerian Judiciary.

    “He was the second-longest-serving Chief Justice in the country’s history, and during those years.

    “He championed judicial independence, ethical discipline within the Bench, and the protection of democratic values.

    “A man of scholarly depth, Justice Uwais was instrumental in landmark rulings that expanded the frontiers of constitutional interpretation and civil liberties.

    “His jurisprudence was marked by clarity, depth, and fidelity to justice, hallmarks that earned him the admiration of his peers and the respect of the public.

    “Following his retirement from the Supreme Court, Justice Uwais continued to serve Nigeria with distinction.

    “He chaired the Electoral Reform Committee established in 2007, whose recommendations for the unbundling of INEC, the establishment of an electoral offences commission, and depoliticisation of appointments remain reference points in conversations about electoral reform in Nigeria.

    “His legacy is not only one of legal excellence but of public service, discipline, and visionary thought leadership.

    “He leaves behind an indelible mark on our national consciousness, the legal profession, and the administration of justice in Nigeria.

    “The NBA extends its heartfelt condolences to the Uwais family, the Nigerian Judiciary, and the entire legal community. May Allah (SWT) grant him Aljannah Firdaus and comfort all those who mourn his loss.

    The Bar has lost one of its finest! Nigeria has lost a patriot!”

    SANs pay tribute

    Dr Wahab Shittu noted the significance of the timing of Uwais’ passing coinciding with the Eid Mubarak, remarkable for Juma’h prayers.

    He added: “In my view, however, what is significant about his passing is not just the timing of his exit, but what he stood for while alive. The question is: how will the departed be remembered?

    “Three events in our nation’s history offer insights about the quality of his contributions to our collective consciousness.

    “First, he was a huge lesson in judicial integrity. This attribute offers a model of distinction and an example for our judex.

    “On this index, he shone like a thousand stars and offers a lasting example of how to be a judex.

    “The second example was his role in the elevation of the late Chief Gani Fawehimmi as a senior Advocate of Nigeria.

    “It will be recalled that late Fawehinmi applied many times for the exalted rank unsuccessfully, and at a time resolved never to apply again.

    “It was the departed CJN Uwais who persuaded Gani not to give up and even encouraged him to pick the form again in the year the erudite lawyer adorned the silk.

    “This showed CJN Uwais as an encourager of excellence.

    “History will always remember this gesture to the Great Gani, considering the contributions of the duo to our jurisprudence.

    “The third notable contribution of late CJN Uwais was his additions to our electoral jurisprudence.

    “The Uwais committee on electoral reforms made profound recommendations that undoubtedly redefined and improved significantly our electoral jurisprudence and the conduct of elections in our country.

    “History will never forget his unique role in this regard. These three major contributions are very significant.

    “In addition, the jurist delivered many landmark decisions through the cases. The law reports are replete with his profound and incisive judgments.

    “These cases litter the pages of our law reports and shall remain forever reference points for erudition and sound jurisprudential justifications.

    “He also remains our longest-serving CJN to date. And so, with his exit, the nation has not only lost one of its finest jurists but also a real human being.”

    Dr Muiz Banire (SAN) said Uwais was a CJN like no other.

    “He had a very calm personality and was unassuming. He was very receptive to all without discrimination while firm in his resolve.

    “In practice, he shaped the law to a large extent in a very pragmatic manner.

    “The most admirable aspect of his life that I cherish was the political reform report engendered by him as Chairman of the Electoral Reform Committee.

    “The only justice the country can do to his memory is to implement the report.”

    Dr Anthony Idigbe (SAN), son of the late Supreme Court Justice Chike Idigbe, said he had a great relationship with Uwais.

    “We had a good relationship. He was really nice to me. He had a great relationship with my late dad. He chaired the launch of the biography of my dad, ‘The Path of Justice Chike Idigbe’ in 1999.

    “In 2004, he commissioned our former head office at Plot 45 Oyibo Adjarho St Lekki. He was always there for me when he had the energy.

    “I miss him so much and pray that Allah receives his soul with mercy. I also pray that God gives his family the fortitude to bear the loss.”

    Mike Igbokwe (SAN) said Uwais was an erudite Justice who left an indelible mark in the annals of the Nigerian judiciary through his judgments and dispensation of justice, which could be seen through his decisions.

    “He had the interest and development of not only the judiciary but also the legal profession at heart.

    “He would advise on the need for lawyers to uphold the ethics of the profession.

    “He was the chairman of the panel set up for electoral reforms, although his recommendations had not been implemented fully or at all.

    “However, one of the things I remember him most for was that in order to avoid delays that hamper the speedy determination of substantive suits, his advice in one of his judgments was that preliminary objections to the court’s jurisdiction which usually caused delays, should be taken along with the final written address at the end of trial and be determined along with the substantive matter.

    “I advise that as a mark of respect and honour to him and his memory, his recommendations on electoral reforms should be dusted and read by the National Assembly, which should implement those that are still relevant today.

    “Finally, he was a good family man. Before his Lordship became CJN and whilst sitting as a Justice of the Supreme Court in Lagos, I once ran into his Lordship driving his wife to Alaba International market to do some shopping for electronics on a Saturday.

    “May the Lord rest his soul and comfort his family,” Igbokwe said.

  • Buhari mourns late CJN Uwais

    Buhari mourns late CJN Uwais

    Former President Muhammadu Buhari has condoled with Nigerians following the passing away of former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Mohammed Uwais.

    The former president said he was pained by the passing of the late CJN, “who had a distinguished career as a lawyer and a judge.”

    A statement issued on Friday in Abuja by his spokesman, Garba Shehu, quoted Buhari as saying that Uwais made notable contributions in bringing justice closer to the people.

    “He was admired for his compassion and justice.

    “He made important contributions toward making Nigeria‘s democratic fabric stronger.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Ex-CJN Uwais dies at 89

    “He will always be remembered by countless people for his emphasis on a meticulous approach to law as a judge and a member of the Council of States.

    “I extend by heartfelt condolences to his family members, relatives, and friends who are grieving his loss as we all are,” he said.

    Uwais served as chief justice of Nigeria and as chairman of the Electoral Reforms Committee.

    His involvement in the Nigerian judicial system began in the 1960s.

    He held various positions within the judicial system before becoming chief justice, such as state counsel and senior state counsel.

    He worked in the Court of Appeal for 16 years.

    He studied at the Institute of Administration, Ahmadu Bello University, and the University of London and Inn of Court, School of Law.

    (NAN)

  • UPDATED: Ex-CJN Uwais dies at 89

    UPDATED: Ex-CJN Uwais dies at 89

    An ex-Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Mohammed Uwais has died at the age of 89 years.

    The Nation learnt that he died earlier today in Abuja. Sources at the Supreme Court confirmed the development. 

    The Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice in Ondo State, Kayode Ajulo (SAN) and Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN) equally confirmed the death of the eminent jurist in thier moving tributes.

    Preparations are said to be underway for a funeral prayer and his interment. 

    Born on June 12, 1936, Justice Uwais served as the CJN between 1995 and 2006. 

    Shortly after his retirement, he was appointed by the late President Umaru Musa Yar Adua to lead the Electoral Reform Committee.

    The late jurist was to the Bar by the Middle Temple, London, in 1963 after graduating from the University of London. 

    He served as a State Counsel and Senior State Counsel (1966-1970), before his appointment as a Judge of the High Court, and later Chief Judge, of Kaduna State (1973-1976). 

    In 1977, he was appointed a Justice of the Court of Appeal, and in 1979 as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria. 

    In 1995, he was appointed Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman of the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    Justice Uwais served as Chairman, Body of Benchers (BOB) between 1993 and 1994; Chairman, Board of Governors of the National Judicial Institute (NJI) from 1995 to 2006 and Chairman, Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the Awards of Contracts by the Military Government of North Central State (1976).

    He was also Chairman of the Jimeta Disturbances Tribunal, Gongola State of Nigeria (1984); and a Commonwealth Member of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into the deaths of senior army personnel, Sri Lanka (1993).

    He was the Honorary President of the World Jurist Association, Washington D.C; Honorary Fellow of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies, London; and a Member of the Board of Trustees, Global Legal Information Network Foundation (GLIN), Washington D.C. 

    He was Chairman of the Nigerian Electoral Reform Committee (2007-2008); and was appointed Chancellor of Umaru Musa Yar’adua University, Katsina, Katsina State in 2011.

    Ajulo and Adegboruwa described the deceased as a quintessential jurist who will be missed by all.

    Ajulo said: “It is with profound sorrow that I mourn the passing of Chief Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais, GCON, who has departed this world today. 

    “As I contemplate his significant impact on my life as a lawyer and the lives of countless Nigerians, I am filled with deep appreciation for his enduring legacy. 

    Read Also: CJN Kekere-Ekun, Supreme Court mourn Uwais

    “My first appearance in any court was at the Supreme Court, under the esteemed leadership of Justice Uwais. 

    “His dignified presence commanded respect, and his steadfast commitment to justice inspired not only the legal community but all citizens who sought fairness.

    “Justice Uwais was instrumental in our journey of democratic development and nation-building, serving not only as a jurist but as a visionary reformist of our electoral process. 

    “His leadership as Chairman of the Electoral Reform Committee, alongside esteemed members such as Bishop Mathew Kukah and Dr. Olisa Agbakoba, OON, SAN, exemplified his remarkable wisdom. 

    “The recommendations he presented not only established new standards but also instilled in our system a profound understanding of law and the responsibilities it entails.

    “Among his most significant contributions was the call for the establishment of an independent electoral commission, a vital measure designed to enhance the integrity and transparency of Nigeria’s electoral process.

    “Furthermore, his committee championed the integration of technology in elections, advocating for electronic voting and the transmission of results—initiatives aimed at reducing fraud and fostering public confidence in our electoral system. 

    “The reforms also underscored the critical need for voter education and equitable political party financing, ensuring that elections became more accessible and just for all.

    “The lasting impact of these recommendations continues to shape our electoral policies and informs the ongoing discourse on improving democratic practices in Nigeria.

    “Justice Uwais was a true beacon of integrity, guiding the judiciary with grace and wisdom. His tenure as Chief Justice from 1995 to 2006 fundamentally transformed the landscape of our legal system, laying a foundation that continues to resonate today. 

    “Beyond the courtroom, he dedicated himself to the advancement of Nigeria’s electoral process, revealing a profound passion for democracy and good governance.

    “Though he has left this earthly realm, his legacy will forever endure in the hearts of those he inspired. 

    “We honour his memory by striving for the justice and fairness he championed with unwavering resolve. Rest in peace, Chief Justice Uwais. Baba will be deeply missed,” Ajulo said.

    Adegboruwa said the deceased “served Nigeria as a jurist with distinction, leveraging on his exalted office to preach unity, to deliver justice to those deserving and to promote integrity on the Bench. 

    “My Lord rose from his humble background in Zaria to join the highest court of the land with an unblemished record of diligence in service. 

    “As the longest serving jurist in the Supreme Court, My Lord deployed his wealth of experience to unite the Bench and Bar, rising ultimately to the peak of his career as the one of the longest serving Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 to 2006. 

    “His sojourn in the court was characterized by excellence, delivering landmark judgments and making worthy contributions to the judgments of others.

    “However, the defining moment of My Lord’s positive impact upon our nation was when he turned in the report for electoral reforms which contained fundamental ideas for sanitizing our political space. 

    “The best way to honour this great jurist is for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to revisit the Uwais Panel Report for the reform of INEC and to implement the reforms contained in the said report,” Adegboruwa said.

  • CJN Kekere-Ekun, Supreme Court mourn Uwais

    CJN Kekere-Ekun, Supreme Court mourn Uwais

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun and the management of the Supreme Court have joined the nation’s legal community in the mourning of the former CJN, Justice Muhammadu Lawal Uwais who died on Friday at 89 years.

     In separate statements, Justice Kekere-Ekun and the Supreme Court spoke glowingly about Justice Uwais many contributions to the development of the nation’s judicial system.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun said: “I have received, with sadness but also with gratitude to Almighty God for a life of impact, the news of the passing of Hon. Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais, GCON, former Chief Justice of Nigeria (1995–2006), which occurred earlier today.

    “Hon. Justice Uwais was a towering figure in Nigeria’s legal and judicial history—an erudite jurist, visionary reformer, and statesman whose contributions to the development of constitutional law, judicial independence, and democratic governance will forever remain etched in the annals of our national life.

    “Appointed to the Supreme Court in 1979 and later rising to serve as the Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 to 2006, Hon. Justice Uwais distinguished himself by his unwavering commitment to justice, courage in the defence of the rule of law, and the clarity and scholarship of his judgments. 

    “His post-retirement service, including chairing the Electoral Reform Committee, further affirmed his deep love for country and passion for institutional integrity.

    “I extend my heartfelt condolences to the family of the late jurist, the Nigerian judiciary, and the nation at large. I pray for the peaceful repose of his noble soul.

    “The life and legacy of Hon. Justice Mohammed Lawal Uwais will continue to inspire generations of judges, lawyers, and public servants. 

    Read Also: CJN okays panel for judiciary sports association

    “He was, indeed, a beacon of principle and a guardian of judicial honour. May his soul rest in perfect peace,” the CJN said.

    The second statement was issued on behalf of the Supreme Court by the court’s Director of Information and Public Relations, Dr. Festus Akande.

    It reads: “The Supreme Court of Nigeria mourns the loss of a distinguished legal luminary and former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Hon. Justice Muhammadu Lawal Uwais, GCON, who passed away in the early hours of Friday, June 6, 2025. 

    “He served as the 9th Chief Justice of Nigeria from 1995 until his retirement in 2006, leaving behind a formidable legacy of judicial excellence and integrity.

    “Born on June 12, 1936, in Zaria, Kaduna State, Justice Uwais embarked on a remarkable journey through the legal profession. 

    “He was called to the Bar at the Middle Temple, London in 1963 and quickly made a name for himself through his commitment to justice and fairness. Over the decades, he held various influential positions within and outside the judiciary.

    “During his tenure as Chief Justice, he championed judicial reforms aimed at improving the administration of justice in Nigeria. 

    “He was instrumental in the establishment of the National Judicial Council, which plays a critical role in maintaining the independence and integrity of the judiciary. 

    “Justice Uwais was also dedicated to advancing legal education and was a mentor to many young lawyers and judges.

    “The Supreme Court of Nigeria expresses its deepest condolences to the family of Justice Muhammadu Uwais, GCON, during this moment of grief. 

    “We honour his tireless dedication to the rule of law and the improvement of the Nigerian judiciary; values for which he will always be remembered.

    “Hon. Justice Uwais’s professional achievements and unwavering commitment to justice have had a lasting impact on Nigeria’s legal landscape. 

    “He will be sorely missed by colleagues, friends, and the many lives he touched throughout his career.”

  • JUST IN: Ex-CJN Uwais dies at 89

    JUST IN: Ex-CJN Uwais dies at 89

    An ex-Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Mohammed Uwais has died at 89.

    The Nation learnt that he died earlier today in Abuja. Sources at the Supreme Court confirmed the development. 

    The Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice in Ondo State, Kayode Ajulo (SAN) also confirmed the death of the eminent jurist in a moving tribute.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Former education minister Jubril Aminu dies at 85

    Preparations are said to be underway for a funeral prayer and his interment. 

    Born on June 12, 1936, Justice Uwais served as the CJN between 1995 and 2006. 

    Shortly after his retirement, he was appointed by the late President Umaru Musa Yar Adua to lead the Electoral Reform Committee.

    Details shortly…

  • Electoral reform: Stakeholders seek holistic implementation of Uwais reports 

    Electoral reform: Stakeholders seek holistic implementation of Uwais reports 

    Two decades after the submission of the Justice Muhammadu Uwais Electoral Reform Committee reports, stakeholders in Civil Society Organizations and Nigeria’s election process have called for their full implementation ahead of the 2027 general election.

    The call was made on Tuesday in Abuja during a high-level conference on Civic Space, Poverty, and Elections in Nigeria, organized by the African Centre for Leadership, Strategy, and Development (Centre LSD) in partnership with Women’s Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA).

    Following the 2007 general elections, late President Umaru Yar’Adua established a 22-member Electoral Review Committee, led by Justice Uwais, to evaluate the electoral process and recommend necessary reforms.

    In his keynote address, Professor Adele Jinadu, former National Commissioner at the defunct National Election Commission (NEC) and a professor of Political Science at the University of Lagos, emphasized the urgency of implementing the Uwais Committee report to safeguard electoral integrity in future elections.

    Among the key recommendations cited were the unbundling of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the establishment of the National Electoral Offences Commission.

    Professor Jibrin Ibrahim, Director of the Centre for Democracy and Development, also urged civil society movements to intensify efforts in pushing for the full implementation of the Uwais reforms.

    He lamented that most of the approved recommendations of the committee that were accepted in government’s White paper have not been implemented.

    Ibrahim decried the inability of the National to pass the Electoral Violence Commission bill which has been on since 2017.

    In the same vein Austin Aigbe argued that the Uwais reports remain the pivotal reference in the ongoing discourse around electoral reforms. 

    Read Also: Kaduna stakeholders laud Sani’s projects, endorse gov for re-election in 2027

    He maintained that the committee’s recommendations higlighted the deep-rooted challenges in the country’s political landscape and provided the framework for improving electoral integrity

    Executive Director of the African Centre for Leadership, Strategy & Development (Centre LSD), Monday Osasah, said the goal of the conference is to enhance democratic governance, social protection, and electoral integrity in Nigeria. 

    “We believe that by working together, we can build a more inclusive, transparent, and accountable democracy that truly serves the needs of all Nigerians.

    “This project is timely, given the current state of our democracy. We have seen the constriction of civic space, widespread poverty, and electoral malpractices that hinder our nation’s development. However, we also see opportunities for reform and positive change.”

    Also speaking, the Secretary General of WRAPA, Hajiya Saudatu Mahdi, said when poverty persists, it entrenches gender inequalities and stifles community agency. And when elections lack integrity, it is the hopes of the marginalized, especially women, youth, Persons with Disability and other vulnerable groups that pay the highest price. 

    “Against this backdrop, WRAPA is proud to join forces with the African Centre for Leadership, Strategy & Development (Centre LSD), with the invaluable support of the MacArthur Foundation, to host this critical conference.”

  • Electoral reforms: Falana seeks implementation of Uwais, Lemu, Nnamani reports

    LAGOS lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) has urged the civil societies to join forces and mount pressure on the Federal Government to implement the recommendations of the electoral reforms panels headed by Retired Justice Mohammed Uwais, Sheik Ahmed Lemu and Dr. Ken Nnamani for the country to have flawless elections in future.

    He stated that the postponement of last Saturday’s elections by the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) on account of logistical or operational reasons cannot be justified under the Electoral Act or the Constitution and would have been prevented if the reports, “with far-reaching electoral reforms”, have been implemented.

    Falana stated this in a statement issued in Lagos yesterday titled: “Time to revisit reports of Uwais, Lemu and Nnamabi panels”.

    “By virtue of Section 26 of the Electoral Act, an election may be postponed if a serious breach of peace or violence is likely to occur or on account of natural disaster or other emergencies. To prevent any abuse of power, the reasons for postponement of any election must be cogent and verifiable,” he maintained.

    He said the panels, set up by the Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu Buhari regimes had recommended the unbundling of INEC for effective performance.

    He contended that the postponement of the 2019 general election would not have occurred, if the Federal Government had unbundled the Independent Electoral Commission (INEC) and ensured the practice of internal democracy in the political parties.

    He accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) of failing to commit themselves to electoral reforms and for forgetting that the late Yar’Adua had admitted that the 2007 general election,  which produced his regime, was highly flawed.

    Since general elections had been postponed on two previous occasions due to lack of adequate preparations, he argued that INEC ought to have prevented the shifting of the 2019 general election.

    Falana said INEC and the political parties contributed to the postponement of the elections, which he described as “a national shame and embarrassment”.

    “Owing to the decision of political leaders to select and impose candidates on their parties in utter violation of Section 87 of the Electoral Act, many aggrieved candidates rushed to court for legal redress.

    “Consequently, not less than 600 pre-election cases were filed and are pending in the various courts while not less 40 orders have directed to INEC to accept the names of candidates, who won the primaries but were shortchanged.  The resort to litigation due to the impunity of majority of political parties contributed to the unwarranted delay in the preparations of INEC for the general elections,” he argued.

    He said both the APC and PDP, apart from INEC, should apologise to Nigerians for their deliberate refusal to implement the electoral reforms recommended by the two panels.

    He stated for instance “as INEC lacks the capacity to prosecute electoral offenders, an electoral offences commission/ tribunal was recommended for the enforcement of laws to address all forms of electoral offences and consequently stem the incidence of electoral violence.

    “Even the panels had recommended that the posts of the chairman and other members of the INEC be advertised to make them independent of the executive. But in a bid to sustain the status quo of electoral fraud, these recommendations and others have been rejected by the PDP and APC-led Federal Government,” he said.

  • Between Uwais and Nnamani on electoral reform

    Between Uwais and Nnamani on electoral reform

    A new 24-man committee headed by former Senate President Ken Nnamani has been saddled with the task of reforming Nigeria’s electoral laws. A statement by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, says that  “The committee is expected to review the electoral environment, laws, and experiences from recent elections conducted in Nigeria and make recommendations to strengthen and achieve the conduct of free and fair elections…” Dr Nnamani himself gave an indication of what he thought his assignment would be. “I think my basic assignment will be to ensure that we improve on the electoral institutions in this country just as the name implies,” he says. “However, the outcome of that panel will still end up at the National Assembly.”  Other members of the committee include Dr. Mamman Lawal of Bayero University, Kano, (secretary), Dr. Muiz Banire, SAN, Dr. Clement Nwankwo, and a representative of the  Federal Ministry of Justice, among many others.

    In August 2007, ex-president Umaru Yar’Adua also set up a similar 22-man committee headed by Justice Muhammadu Uwais  (CJN, 1995-2006) to undertake a review of the electoral system and suggest ways of reforming it. It concluded its job in December 2008, having asked for an extension of the initial one-year deadline on account of the massive number of memoranda it received. The report was thorough, exhaustive and frequently cited by stakeholders as an appropriate and adequate response to the electoral malaise that undermines the stability and development of Nigeria’s political system. In fact in 2010, ex-president Goodluck Jonathan, whose electoral altruism is increasingly coming into sharper relief, forwarded the report to the National Assembly for action. The legislature chose to dither.

    Dr Nnamani undoubtedly has the intellect, firmness and integrity to undertake the assignment given him and his committee, especially considering his rich and illustrious legislative background and experience; but Justice Uwais also had a rich and enviable resume to carry out the task assigned him and his equally high-profile committee. So far, however, neither President Muhammadu Buhari, who approved the setting up of the new committee, nor the Justice minister, who implemented the decision, has explained why a new committee is needed when the government has not as much as glanced at the 2008 Uwais report.

    The Buhari presidency exists and thrives on the strange paradigm that its predecessors did little or nothing worth anyone continuing with or even regarding, and that if any milestones were nevertheless reached, then they were not worth sustaining or building upon. To President Buhari, Dr Jonathan’s national conference report is a waste of time he would not dignify with the most perfunctory of glances. He astonishingly admitted he had not looked at it, and did not plan to, and much more, was minded to consign it to the dustbin. Why he chooses to approach the weighty responsibility of presiding over the affairs of 180 million Nigerians with that kind of bewildering cursoriness and prejudice is hard to understand. Regardless of the criticisms he has attracted on the national conference matter, the president continues to stand his ground. Having appeared to get away with ignoring the huge work done by Dr Jonathan’s national conference, he has now extended the same attitude to the 2008 Uwais electoral reform committee whose report he has obviously not perused at all. From all indications, he will not look at it.

    It is even doubtful whether the Justice minister has looked at the Uwais report. Perhaps no one in the Buhari presidency has checked the files to see what had been done before they assumed office last year. Or perhaps they are not interested. This may account for why on so many matters the government has been slow and hesitant. Rather than build on many of the foundations they met, not all of which were disused or shaky, they have preferred to build new ones, often grudgingly and bad-temperedly. The terms of reference to guide Dr Nnamani’s committee, not to say the objectives of the electoral reform, are virtually the same with that of Justice Uwais’ panel. Perhaps the only concrete difference is the size of the two committees, with Justice Uwais’ being 22 and Dr Nnamani’s being 24. Given the exhaustiveness of the Uwais report, it is hard to see what new grounds Dr Nanamni’s committee would break. There will of course be chronological and political updates, and to some extent differences in priorities and language and concepts; but beyond that, there will be little else.

    Many commentators have taken exception to the new task of saddling another committee with reforming the electoral system when the previous one undertaken by the Justice Uwais committee still remains very relevant and comprehensive. Ex-president Yar’Adua would almost certainly have implemented the report had he lived through his first and possibly second terms. Despite the bad publicity curried by the cabal that hijacked power when he became incapacitated by illness, the late president was an altruistic, forward-looking and enlightened politician. Dr Jonathan followed in his predecessor’s footsteps by forwarding the report unedited to the National Assembly. But by setting up a new electoral reform committee rather than examining the unimplemented Uwais report, President Buhari seems bent on wasting time and money. There is really nothing else, or at least little else, to say on electoral reform that the Justice Uwais committee left unsaid.

    A brief review of the Uwais report, which many analysts campaigned stridently and vigorously during the Jonathan presidency to be implemented, shows that little or nothing is omitted. Some of the areas covered in the 254-page main report (Volume 1 of a six-volume report) include an executive summary; review of Nigeria’s history with general elections; legal framework for electoral reform, role of institutions, agencies and stakeholders in shaping the quality and credibility of elections; review of electoral systems relevant to Nigeria’s experience; sanitising Nigeria’s electoral system; and general recommendations. The executive summary is a succinct excursion through the Uwais committee’s eight terms of reference. For those too lazy to commit themselves to exhaustive reading, Chapter Two’s executive summary would satisfy their superficial curiosity. It identifies most of the electoral problems and challenges confronting the country, and proffers comprehensive, sensible and implementable solutions to stabilise  the system.

    In particular, Chapter Two, among other things, looks at the role of institutions and stakeholders in shaping the electoral process; the role of the judiciary; and the Independent National Electoral Commission, subdivided into the reorganisation of INEC, composition of INEC board, etc. A more detailed treatment of the subject is, however, offered in Chapter Five. The question, indeed, is what else the Nnamani committee will be looking at when the subject is the same and the Uwais panellists are also of high quality. Former INEC chairman, Attahiru Jega, was in fact a member of the Uwais committee. So, too, were a host of intellectuals, judges, security chiefs etc. What the Nnamani committee seems designed to accomplish is a needless and wasteful repetition.

    If President Buhari truly wants to reform the electoral system, and if he is really the frugal leader he is cracked up to be, and if indeed he has no ulterior motive to execute, then he should first call for the Uwais report and examine it to see whether it does not adequately represent his worldview on the subject and much more. He has no reason whatsoever to authorise a new electoral reform committee in an era of financial squeeze when a completed one is already in government hands. He has a duty to the country to look at the Uwais report. More importantly, he also has a duty to go beyond electoral reform to look at the report of the national conference completed under Dr Jonathan. He has no excuse not to, for the country under him cries even much more for restructuring than electoral reform.

  • Uwais, Gambari: Buhari’s corruption war on course

    Uwais, Gambari: Buhari’s corruption war on course

    •Saraki, Dogara ‘should make
    lawmakers’ budget open’

    President Muhammadu Buhari’s war on corruption got yesterday a major backing, with former Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Mohammed Uwais and  former Ambassador to the United Nations (UN) Prof. Ibrahim Gambari urging him to keep pushing.

    Buhari should remain resolute and vigorously pursue corruption suspects, the eminent Nigerians said, describing as callous “the allocation of Nigeria’s scarce resources to individuals for political interests at the expense of huge losses of lives and property, especially in the Northeast where the fight against Boko Haram continues to rage”.

    Acting under the umbrella of the Council of the Wise, they said: “Ten months after Nigeria’s historic elections that pushed out of power the 16-year PDP government, President Buhari’s APC-led government remains trapped by massive state corruption that has almost ground the country to a halt.”

    They also applauded former President Olusegun Obasanjo for his letter to the National Assembly, calling on Senate President Bukola Saraki and House Speaker Yakubu Dogara to release the expenditure profile of the National Assembly for public scrutiny.

    The Executive Director of Savannah Centre for Diplomacy, Democracy and Development (SCDDD) and Nigeria’s former Ambassador to Chad, Amb. Abdullahi A. Omaki, spoke on behalf of Justice Uwais and Prof. Gambari.

    The Council of the Wise operates under the auspices of the SCDDD.  Justice Uwais is the Chairman of the Centre. Gambari is the founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO).

    In a statement signed by Omaki, the elder statesmen urged Buhari “to remain resolute in his administration’s fight to free Nigeria from the claws of corporate and individual corruption that have held the country hostage”.

    They described the President as the only Nigerian politician and leader who has the pedigree to engage this systematic corruption because of his own personal record of high integrity, which was personalised during the campaigns .

    The call “is hinged on the mind-boggling revelations on institutional rot that permitted for such callous and heartless looting to take place under the PDP Federal Administration until May 2015.”

    “The Executive Director notes that President Buhari and APC campaigned on five critical issues; security, corruption, economy, youth employment and the redemption of Nigeria’s image world-wide. Savannah Centre notes that although the President was inaugurated on 29th May, 2015, the mass of those that voted for him and his party of Change, began measuring his performance since March 28th, because whatever he uttered after being proclaimed winner of the election determined the course of events in Nigeria and indeed how the rest of the world related with Nigeria.

    “Following the huge expectations that followed the APC’s presidential victory, the slow phase of governance since President Buhari’s inauguration has been a matter of disappointment from his huge supporters who expected him to hit the ground running by positively addressing the concerns of the populace.

    “The Savannah Centre notes that while President Buhari’s performance in the areas of security has brought sanity to the fight against terror in the North-East of Nigeria and redemption of Nigeria’s image in the world, the populace remains apprehensive on the repositioning of the economy as well as the approach in fighting corruption.

    “Irrespective of the different perspectives of analysis of the challenges facing Nigeria, Savannah Centre believes that the fight against corruption should remain unrelenting until the institutions of state are repositioned to perform according to the laws establishing them.

    “The Centre’s position is hinged on the callous nature of allocating national resources for political interest at the expense of huge losses of lives and properties, especially, in the North-East, where the fight against Boko Haram continues to rage.

    The continuing revelations regarding the re-looting of Abacha’s funds in the name of arms procurement, the savagery of the NNPC, heartless desecration of the Customs, amongst others, necessitate Savannah Centre’s call for this fight to be comprehensively fought to save Nigeria and its citizens.

    Omaki said the National Assembly should take the side of the people and stressed that Obasanjo deserves the appreciation of all for his letter to the National Assembly’s leadership. He noted the tentative response by the Senate President, adding that the nation awaits Senator Saraki’s promised detailed reply.

    Omaki dismissed the other comments by Senator Dino Melaye and Hon. Abdulrazak Namdas, describing them as self-serving and stressed that the issue is not who initiated corruption but how corruption has been elevated into an art deserving of state honours. He urged all to work together and salvage the country rather than passing the buck.

    “The Executive Director of Savannah Centre also advised that the fight against corruption should not be limited to the Federal Government. He stressed that apart from the Federal MDA’s, the judiciary require touch-lighting. Eventually, the state governments, state assemblies and local governments should not be immune from critical evaluation, in the interest of justice in our nation.

    “He advised that State Governments should desist from embarking on white elephant projects across the country and concentrate on those that have the capacity to bring immediate reliefs to the people to ensure the impact of dividends of democracy to spread to all. He stressed that rural electricity, provision of bore-holes for potable water, health care centres, fixing schools and feeder roads were much more impactful than the construction of airports embarked by several state governments when they cannot even pay salaries.”