Tag: Var

  • FULL LIST:13 VAR errors recorded in EPL so far in 2025/26 season

    FULL LIST:13 VAR errors recorded in EPL so far in 2025/26 season

    Video Assistant Referee (VAR) mistakes increased during the first half of the Premier League campaign, according to figures from the league’s independent Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel analysed by BBC Sport.

    The panel logged 13 VAR errors across the opening half of the season, marking a 30 per cent rise from the 10 recorded at the same stage last term. Despite the increase, the number remains lower than previous seasons, with 20 errors at this point in 2023–24 and 23 in 2022–23.

    Of the 13 mistakes this season, 11 were classified as missed interventions, where VAR failed to recommend an on-field review despite an incorrect decision by the referee. This represents a notable jump from seven missed interventions last season. Incorrect interventions, where VAR wrongly became involved, dropped slightly from three to two.

    The overall number of VAR overturns has also fallen, declining from 57 last season to 47, a 17.5 per cent reduction, reflecting the Premier League’s continued insistence on the “clear and obvious” standard for intervention.

    In addition, the KMI Panel highlighted 15 refereeing errors on the pitch that did not reach the threshold for VAR involvement, up from 12 at the same stage last season.

    The KMI Panel, established by Premier League clubs in 2022, meets weekly to review key match incidents such as goals, penalties and red cards. It is made up of five members, including three former players or coaches, alongside representatives from the Premier League and the Professional Game Match Officials. The panel assesses the referee’s original decision first before evaluating VAR’s role, acknowledging cases where VAR may be correct not to intervene due to the high threshold.

    Read Also: EPL: Arsenal go six points clear after goalless draw with Liverpool

    The 13 VAR errors this season occurred in several high-profile fixtures and involved missed red cards, penalties and disciplinary decisions.

    Full list of VAR errors this season:

    Liverpool vs Bournemouth – Marcos Senesi avoided a red card for handball that denied a clear goalscoring opportunity.

    Chelsea vs Fulham – Fulham’s Josh King had a legitimate goal incorrectly disallowed following VAR intervention.

    Wolves vs Everton – Wolves were denied a penalty after a careless challenge on Hugo Bueno.

    Brentford vs Manchester United – Nathan Collins escaped a red card for denying a clear goalscoring opportunity.

    Chelsea vs Brighton – Malo Gusto went unpunished for a high boot to Yankuba Minteh’s head.

    Crystal Palace vs Bournemouth – Marcos Senesi again avoided a red card for a DOGSO offence.

    Brentford vs Newcastle – Dango Ouattara was wrongly booked for simulation instead of being awarded a penalty.

    Bournemouth vs West Ham – Max Kilman should have been sent off for deliberate handball.

    Newcastle vs Manchester City – No penalty was awarded after Phil Foden was fouled inside the box.

    Wolves vs Manchester United – Emmanuel Agbadou’s handball, which blocked a shot, was not sanctioned.

    Everton vs Arsenal – Everton were denied a late penalty following a foul by William Saliba.

    Chelsea vs Bournemouth – Malo Gusto escaped punishment for another handball offence.

    Brentford vs Tottenham – Cristian Romero avoided a red card after bringing down Igor Thiago when through on goal.

  • EPL: VAR misread West Ham penalty against Man Utd – Webb

    EPL: VAR misread West Ham penalty against Man Utd – Webb

    Referees’ chief Howard Webb says West Ham should not have been awarded a penalty during Erik ten Hag’s final game in charge of Manchester United on 27 October.

    The Hammers were given the decision on the recommendation of video assistant referee Michael Oliver following Matthijs de Ligt’s challenge on Danny Ings.

    David Coote, the on-field referee, had waved play on following the incident but awarded a penalty after reviewing the incident on the pitch-side monitor.

    Jarrod Bowen scored the penalty, sealing a 2-1 win for West Ham. Ten Hag was sacked less than 24 hours later.

    “I thought it was a misread by the VAR,” Webb told Sky Sports’ Mic’d Up programme.

    “A VAR that’s normally really talented and reliable, but gets uber-focused in this situation on De Ligt’s leg. His leg coming through on to Danny Ings, not making any contact with the ball. The ball’s already past De Ligt as he as he makes contact with Danny Ings.

    “And the VAR sees that as a clear foul. I think he was too focused on that aspect. I don’t think he should have got involved.

    “I think this is a situation where we’d leave the on-field decision as it is, probably whichever way it’s called. On balance, I don’t think it’s a penalty kick.”

    On-field referees are not required to follow the recommendations of the VAR official.

    “They are told that they are absolutely within their rights to keep their decision when they go to the screen,” said Webb.

    Read Also: Webb Fontaine restates support for govt revenue drive

    Webb, who is chief of refereeing body PGMOL, was speaking publicly for the first time since Coote was suspended with immediate effect after he appeared to make derogatory comments about Liverpool and their former manager Jurgen Klopp in a video that circulated online.

    “We became aware of a video that was being circulated on social media that we are taking very seriously,” said Webb.

    “We’ve instigated a full investigation. One of our referees, David Coote, has been suspended with immediate effect pending the outcome of that investigation.

    “There’s not much more I can say at this stage until we’ve worked through that investigation.”

    BBC

  • VAR: Nigeria still snoring

    VAR: Nigeria still snoring

    When Ademola Lookman’s goal against Libya inside the Stadium of Champions in Uyo was chalked off, not a few fans looked towards the stadium’s big screen for the replay of the scenario leading to when and how the disallowed goal. Their primary objective was to watch the replays to find out what the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) would say. To their dismay, play resumed as soon as the referee identified with his assistant referee’s offside decision. Really! Just like that? were some the words from the fans signifying their disgust that one of the biggest stadia in Nigeria had no VAR machine,

    It didn’t matter if the goal was disallowed by the custodians of the game for FIFA here -the chieftains of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF). After all, Nigeria won the game with a last-ditch effort. For the fans inside the stadium and those at home around the globe, the disallowed goal was the subject of discussion with many wondering why no stadium in Nigeria has a VAR machine. How much would it cost the owners of such stadia to install the VAR machine, reminiscent of what is obtained in big stadia in serious-minded football nations?

    Had Nigeria needed more than one goal to qualify for the next round, for instance, such a wrongly disallowed goal would have stolen Nigeria’s thunder. Perhaps, that would be a call to quickly install a VAR machine in Uyo Stadium. The fans could also take the laws into their own hands, and wreak havoc after the game, especially if the game is against any of rival African nations. Shouldn’t we task our soccer administrators to do everything within their power to make the installation of VAR machines on all grounds where domestic games are being played weekly?

    I posed this question to a top technocrat, Chuks Sokari and he revealed that: ”The installation cost of a Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system can vary depending on specific needs and the scale of implementation. A basic (entry-level) VAR system which includes cameras, monitors, and necessary equipment, is estimated at around $50,000 to $100,000. On the other hand, a Full VAR System which comes with more advanced features and additional cameras costs significantly more, potentially ranging from $200,000 to $500,000. For competitions with smaller broadcast setups, a VAR Light system can be a more cost-effective option, with costs ranging from $100,000 to $150,000. There may be additional costs for installation, typically ongoing maintenance, software updates, and technical support, as well as training of personnel.

    ”Based on the above, the cost of installation of VAR nationwide would involve determining the number of stadia to be covered,” Sokari stated.

    Would the Nigerian sports ecosystem embrace the need to have all the stadiums, where the domestic league matches are played, fitted with VAR machines? Not likely going by the NFF President’s utterances which seem to suggest otherwise. Our sports administrators always give the excuse of high purchase of the VAR machines rather than thinking of how to engage the private sector to invest in it stating what they would gain from such a business arrangement.

    Read Also: One third of Nigerians, Ghanaians likely to develop kidney diseases – Study

    Going by the statement attributed to the President of the NFF as stated above, a minimum of six stadia might be involved in the pilot phase of implementation, and the cost of acquisition could be extrapolated from the above estimates based on the option(s) considered. While this would help to improve officiating, a better option would be to go full blast and implement VAR use in all football matches. Selective implementation does have some drawbacks, including a lack of confidence in and controversies over the results of matches played in non-VAR stadia.

    Again, Sokari, prefers a pragmatic approach towards the enforcement of VAR pointing out that: ”Nigeria has approximately 2,000 registered referees and this forms the pool of personnel to be recruited to handle the VAR. Though the referees are trained, operating VAR requires specialised skills. Fortunately, recent efforts by the NFF and the Confederation of African Football (CAF) have seen Nigerian referees undergo training in VAR operations. Only last month, some referees from the country recently returned from a CAF-organised course in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, equipped with enhanced knowledge of VAR operations. Having promised earlier to introduce VAR in Nigeria, the President of the NFF, Alhaji Ibrahim Gusau would appear to be keeping to his promise.

    According to Sokari: ”Notwithstanding the above, not all the referees may meet the skills necessary for operating VAR; however, it is expected that approximately 10-15% of these referees might be trainable for VAR functions based on technical aptitude. Consequently, given that VAR operations require technical expertise in video technology and decision-making, Nigeria may need to recruit additional personnel with backgrounds in sports technology, video analysis, or related fields.”

    As interesting as the submissions of Sokari are,  a trade that has been perceived as a hobby, shouldn’t we toy with the idea of professionalising refereeing in a bid to raise the standard which would rub off on the quality of the referees and the approaches to the trade?

    ”Training VAR operators involves both theoretical and practical components. This includes classroom-based training on the VAR protocol, on-pitch simulated practice sessions, and live match testing. The cost of training can vary based on the duration, location, and depth of the programme. On average, the cost of training a single VAR operator ranges from $1,000 to $3,000,” Sokari insisted when asked to estimate how much it would cost intending stadium owners to train and expose personnel to operate the VAR machines in their premises.

    ”The introduction of VAR technology in Nigerian football refereeing would be a significant investment that holds the promise of improving the quality of officiating and the overall integrity of the game. Amongst other benefits, VAR significantly reduces mistakes in crucial match moments, such as goals, penalties, direct red cards, and mistaken identity in bookings. It also provides referees with immediate access to video replays; VAR supports better outcomes and thus promotes fairness in the game.”

    What stands out clearly is that it would be easier for the proverbial Carmel to pass through the eye of the needle than for any meaningful attempt made to have the VAR machine installed in key venues where games are played. It would take a stadium riot arising from the absence of VAR to decide an obvious goal in Nigeria’s favour that those who run our sport would start the process of acquiring one or two.  Those who administer sports in this country aren’t proactive on this kind of tricky issue until a calamity occurs.

    Pray, that the football world has left us behind with the introduction of the VAR. In Nigeria, we are pretending that it doesn’t matter now until it becomes a prerequisite for hosting international matches. It would be too late because of the cost of installation, and training of the personnel to operate the VAR machine. Pity!

  • EPL to explain VAR decisions on social media during matches

    EPL to explain VAR decisions on social media during matches

    The Premier League hopes to reduce frustration with the VAR system with the launch of a social media account that will provide near real-time updates and explanations regarding officiating and operational decisions for every match.

    Teams voted in favour of keeping VAR in June despite huge amounts of criticism about the technology-aided officiating system last season, with Wolverhampton Wanderers initiating a petition to scrap it.

    Read Also: Gallagher back at Chelsea as Atletico move stalls

    “In the absence of live VAR audio being broadcast, as it is not permitted in football, the Premier League Match Centre will be able to relay on social media near-live information from the VAR Hub during a game,” the league said in a statement on Tuesday.

    In addition to posting refereeing decisions, the X account, @PLMatchCentre, will also provide insights directly from the VAR hub and refereeing experts with the aim of bringing transparency, the league said.

    Experts from PGMOL, the league’s officiating body, will also clarify the laws of the game and provide additional information and updates on the VAR decision-making processes when necessary.

  • Premier League clubs vote in favour of keeping VAR

    Premier League clubs vote in favour of keeping VAR

    Premier League clubs have voted by 19-1 in favour of keeping video assistant referees (VAR) next season.

    Wolves triggered a vote on the use of VAR in the 2024-25 season after formally submitting a resolution to the Premier League in May.

    In order for VAR to be scrapped, 14 of the 20 Premier League clubs needed to vote in favour of doing so.

    But only Wolves voted in favour of the proposal as they failed to gain any support from other Premier League clubs.

    The Premier League has come under increasing pressure to modify VAR, which was introduced at the start of the 2019-20 season.

    Read Also: 100 more wrong decisions if VAR scrapped – Premier League

    It was reaffirmed at the meeting that semi-automated offsides will be introduced at some point in the autumn, while the Premier League confirmed in-game VAR announcements will be put in place.

    The in-game announcements, which were used during the 2023 women’s World Cup, will see referees explain post-VAR decisions to supporters in stadiums.

    In addition, the Premier League said the “high threshold” bar for VAR officials to intervene over subjective on-field decisions would be maintained.

    Wolves triggered a motion after a string of decisions went against Gary O’Neil’s side last season.

    The Midlands club listed nine reasons to support its proposal to ban VAR, including the impact on goal celebrations, hostility towards match officials and the length of time needed to reach decisions.

    BBC

  • 100 more wrong decisions if VAR scrapped – Premier League

    100 more wrong decisions if VAR scrapped – Premier League

    There would be 100 more incorrect refereeing decisions made per season if clubs vote to scrap video assistant referees (VAR), the Premier League has claimed.

    The league sent a briefing document to all 20 clubs before the annual general meeting on Thursday, 6 June, explaining the reasons why it feels VAR should remain.

    Wolves formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League in May, which triggered a vote on the continued use of VAR.

    Premier League clubs are unlikely to vote through this proposal, though in-game VAR announcements are set to be introduced.

    The Premier League sent a ‘VAR Improvement Plan’ to clubs on Wednesday, written by chief football officer Tony Scholes.

    The document, seen by BBC Sport, includes a section on the foreseen impact of removing VAR.

    Among the consequences listed is that some “match-defining” decisions from on-field referees which were incorrect would not be overturned should VAR be absent.

    It acknowledges that while scrapping VAR would result in fewer interruptions and delays to the game, “significantly more officiating errors would be made (around 100 per season), including highly contentious match-deciding incidents, potentially in critically important matches.”

    Read Also: Veritas varsity students win Commonwealth Universities debating championship

    The Premier League also states there were only five incorrect VAR interventions last season, compared to 105 correct calls. This is an improvement on 2022-23, when the league says there were 11 wrong VAR decisions to 105 which were right.

    Among the other reasons cited to keep VAR is that the Premier League is “contractually committed to significant operating cost elements of VAR for the next three years”.

    As the Premier League would be the only major European league to remove VAR if the vote passes, the league warns that it would be “potentially damaging” to its reputation, while English referees would not get major assignments for Uefa or Fifa tournaments “as regular experience operating both on-field with VAR and acting as VAR domestically are critical”.

    BBC

  • EPL: ‘Get rid of it or get better’ – Anthony Gordon on VAR

    EPL: ‘Get rid of it or get better’ – Anthony Gordon on VAR

    Newcastle forward Anthony Gordon said he “doesn’t understand the point” of having video assistant referees (VAR) in football.

    Gordon was denied a first-half penalty despite appearing to be caught by Manchester United’s Sofyan Amrabat in Newcastle’s 3-2 loss at Old Trafford.

    With Newcastle 1-0 behind at the time, on-field referee Rob Jones did not give a spot-kick and was then not told to review the incident by VAR official Jarred Gillett.

    “I have watched it back and it is a clear penalty,” said Gordon. “He [Amrabat] goes down my Achilles and pushes me in the back. I knew straight away, that’s why I didn’t appeal. I waited for the VAR to check, I told my team-mates ‘it was a clear penalty’.

    “I don’t mind the referee getting it wrong on the pitch, but I don’t understand the point of VAR. Either get rid of it or get better. It’s that simple, there’s too many mistakes.”

    Newcastle boss Eddie Howe added: “I thought it was a penalty. I thought that’s what VAR was good at.

    “I have always been in an era where the referee makes a decision and I back it. I would possibly keep it [VAR] with offsides, but I want more power with referees.”

    Gordon’s comments came hours after it was announced that Premier League clubs will vote on whether to remove VAR from next season at their annual general meeting next month.

    Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League which will trigger a vote when the 20 member clubs meet in Harrogate on 6 June.

    Read Also: Premier League clubs to vote on scrapping VAR

    Earlier on Wednesday, ex-England captain Wayne Rooney, speaking on Sky Sports, said he preferred the game without VAR.

    “I don’t like VAR and if it’s there and they get all the decisions right then fair enough but it’s taken all the enjoyment out of the game,” he added.

    “You’re better off letting referees ref it and understand they will make mistakes. I’d much rather see the game without it.”

    BBC

  • JUST IN: Premier League clubs to vote on eradicating VAR

    JUST IN: Premier League clubs to vote on eradicating VAR

    Premier League clubs will vote on whether to scrap video assistant referees (VAR) from next season at their annual general meeting next month.

    Wolves have formally submitted a resolution to the Premier League which will trigger a vote when the 20 member clubs meet in Harrogate on 6 June.

    The club said VAR was introduced “in good faith” but has led to “numerous unintended negative consequences that are damaging the relationship between fans and football”.

    VAR was introduced in 2019 to help support on-field officials with key match decisions, but there have been a number of controversial incidents involving the technology this season.

    “The price we are paying for a small increase in accuracy is at odds with the spirit of our game,” read a Wolves statement.

    The Premier League said it “acknowledged the concerns” about VAR but “fully supports” technology and will continue to work with referees’ body PGMOL to make improvements.

    Any rule changes need a two-thirds majority – 14 of of the 20 clubs – to vote in favour.

    Premier League clubs have already voted for semi-automated offside technology to be introduced for the 2024-25 season.

    A number of Premier League managers have been critical of VAR and of refereeing standards this season, including Wolves boss Gary O’Neil.

    Read Also: Sexual harassment: Kogi varsity lecturer stripped naked

    O’Neil was given a one-match touchline ban in April for his conduct near the referee’s room after a game against West Ham, which saw Wolves have a late equaliser disallowed following a VAR check.

    Wolves chairman Jeff Shi also questioned the role of VAR after the West Ham game and said the club would be higher in the table “if it wasn’t for a number of incorrect or contentious decisions”.

    One of the most high-profile VAR mistakes to date is Luis Diaz’s goal that was incorrectly disallowed for offside for Liverpool at Tottenham in October.

    The Premier League said the incident highlighted “systemic weaknesses in the VAR process” and that “key learnings and immediate actions” were taken.

    BBC

  • Var error officials not selected for weekend games

    Var error officials not selected for weekend games

    The video assistant referee officials involved in wrongly disallowing a goal for Liverpool at Tottenham have not been selected for this weekend’s Premier League games.

    Darren England and assistant Dan Cook did not overrule on Saturday when Luis Diaz was wrongly flagged offside.

    The on-field referee from that game, Simon Hooper, will be the VAR official for Bournemouth’s trip to Everton.

    Read Also: 40 American varsities participate at education fair

    Michael Oliver, who was the fourth official, will feature in two games.

    Oliver will be VAR official for Luton’s game against Tottenham on Saturday, before taking charge on the field for Arsenal’s game against Manchester City on Sunday.