Tag: verdict

  • Lagos appeals verdict on resettlement of Otodo Gbame community

    The Lagos State Government has faulted a Lagos High Court verdict which declared illegal, the demolition of Otodo Gbame Community and some other riverine settlements around Lekki.

    In a Notice of Appeal filed at the Appeal Court, in Lagos, the government said Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo’s June 21 judgement was capable of encouraging illegality.

    The judgement, it noted, visited the constitution.

    The government claimed that the high court erred in law and misdirected itself when it made far-reaching decisions that conflicted with the facts of the matter placed before it.

    Under the first ground of appeal, the government said Justice Onigbanjo erred when he held that the demolition was illegal when there was no demolition in Otodo Gbame before the case was filed.

    According to the government, there was a fire in Otodo Gbame caused by violent clash between two rival cult groups. The fire destroyed the community with no residents and property remaining because the burnt shanties were built with corrugated iron sheets, woods and bamboos.

    It said Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, who visited the community after the incident stopped the reconstruction of the shanties and directed all those living on the riverine areas to leave for security reasons.

    The riverine areas, the government said, were known to harbour illegal bunkers, kidnappers and robbers.

    The governor’s directive, the appellant said, according to government, was pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 14 (2) (b) of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    The appellant accused the residents of visiting the governor’s directive which led to the demolition of Otodo Gbame and other communities when the case was referred to mediation by Justice Onigbanjo.

    The appellant claimed: “The declaration of the lower court that the demolition of March 17, 2017 is illegal and unconstitutional is misplaced and one-sided without considering the violation of the same order of court by the respondents. The demolition was to return both parties to status quo.”

    Under in ground two, the appellant said the high court erred when it held that the government should have consulted with the communities before any further evictions, and also compensate them for the demolition of their properties. The appellant claimed that in as much as Chapter 4 of the Constitution provides for fundamental rights, some rights contained provisos that made such rights not sacrosanct and absolute.

    It said: “There are abundance of uncontroverted evidence before the lower court that the structures built along riverine/swampy areas of the state are without building permit as required under the Urban and Regional Development Planning Law.

    “The respondents have constructed shanties and illegal structures without the requisite building permit/approval and the rights under the Constitution do not permit breach of a law or exempt anybody whosoever from building without first obtaining requisite approval. The respondents are squatters and deliberately failed to put the issue of title in contention.”

  • Why FG’s appeal of CCT verdict is a must

    SIR: The no case verdict of Code of Conduct Tribunal on the asset declaration infractions alleged against Senate President Bukola Saraki remains a watershed in the annals of jurisprudence in Nigeria.

    The case remains novel, first for the discharge and acquittal awarded by the tribunal chairman whereas the tribunal is constitutionally empowered to discharge and not to acquit; and secondly, for its sweeping discountenance of what the prosecution counsel regarded as overwhelming evidence of infractions proven by prosecution witnesses.

    It is gratifying that the Federal government has expressly appealed this judgement thereby living no room for speculation as to intervening political nuances. Allowing the judgment to fly without appeal would have degraded the anti-corruption outlook of Buhari’s government.

    The case which is a matter expected to terminate at the Supreme Court would provide an enduring jurisprudential precedence in the administration of code of conduct going forward.

    Furthermore, it smacks of moral insensitivity for the Senate to have celebrated the rather cold comfort when the case is still open to adjudication by courts of superior jurisdiction. It is also inchoate to advance the theory of political witch-hunt as if to suggest that we are in a banana republic where laws are skewed in favour of a suspect for his perceived political predilections.

    The rule of law is preserved when both the victim and the villain are given opportunity for redress based on equity and justice.

    Nigerians ought to wish both the prosecution and defence teams the best of luck and insulate the conversation from any extraneous spin pending the apex court’s ruling.

     

    • Bukola Ajisola,

    bukymany@yahoo.com

  • Group faults Apo Six verdict

    •’No faith on army panel on Biafra agitators’

    A group has rejected an Abuja High Court verdict, which sentenced to deaths two of the five police officers charged with the 2005 murder of the Apo Six.

    The Nzuko Umunna, an Igbo socio-cultural group, said it was strange that officers who obeyed a command were sentenced to death, while their superiors were freed.

    The group also said it had no faith in the panel set up by Chief of Army Staff Lt Gen Tukur Buratai to investigate the alleged extra judicial killing of some pro-Biafra agitators. It asked the   Federal Government to constitute an independent panel to investigate the matter.

    In a statement  by its coordinator, Ngozi Odumuko and public relations officer, Prof  Emeka Ezeonu, the group said Buratai’s previous comments  that Indigenous People of Biafra(IPOB) members  ” cannot achieve their aims in his lifetime ” portrayed him as bias. ‘’This indicates that the army chief  is committed to stopping the agitation by all means’’, it said.

    The statement reads : ‘’It is noteworthy that Gen Buratai had denied the extra judicial killings of the members of IPOB… given these dispositions, there is no doubt that Gen Butatai’s panel is an ambush and its findings cannot be taken seriously. This is further buttressed by the lopsidedness of the committee ”

    The group dissociated itself from violence  and called for calm by IPOB and other Biafra agitators.

    Nzuko Umunna said it considered the Apo Six verdict a travesty of justice, urging  ‘’the Attorney-General of the Federation  and National Judicial Council to review this case and assign same to another Judge for trial for proper justice to be seen to be done on the souls of the murdered Apo Six…we seriously demand for justice to be done and to be seen to be done on Apo Six killings. Only in doing so will the perennial bad tales of extra judicial killings of innocent and promising young elements for no reasons be stopped.”

  • Peace‘ll return to PDP after court verdict, says Ojougboh

    Peace‘ll return to PDP after court verdict, says Ojougboh

    The factional Deputy Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) (South), Dr. Cairo Ojougboh, has reflected on the leadership crisis in the opposition party, saying that peace will return to the fold after the judicial intervention.

    He said the leadership of Senator Modu Sheriff was not in dispute, stressing that Senator Ahmed Makarfi, who heads the National Caretaker Committee, was an impostor.

    Ojougboh told reporters in Lagos that the protracted crisis was a blessing in disguise, assuring that the party will come out of it stronger.

    He lamented the role of the governors who persuaded Sheriff to serve as chairman, only to attempt to pull the rug off his feet at the disputed Port-Harcourt convention.

    The factional deputy chairman maintained that Sheriff has not stepped down as the chairman, urging the aggrieved chieftains to embrace the reality.

    Ojougbo acknowledged that a legal solution may not bring peace to the party, but the court verdict will definitely herald a political solution.

    He stressed: “We are optimistic that the Court of Appeal will give its judgment very soon. The Court of Appeal adjourned for judgment and they have a period of 90 days to come up with their judgmentThere will be no legal solution to the problem of the PDP, but the legal solution is a prelude to a political solution.

    “So as soon as the Court of Appeal gives its judgment, a general meeting will be called where everybody will sit down in a room and we will take it from there. I am very optimistic that the national convention of the party will hold in the first quarter of the year.

    Ojougboh also spoke on the composition of the National Working Committee, saying that its tenure will expire later in the year.

    He said Sheriff’s priority is to bequeath a party where members will take ownership of party processes and halt the culture of imposition by big wigs.

    The deputy chairman said plans were underway by the Sheriff leadership to initiate and implement other reforms that will further democratize the party at the national, regional, state, local government and ward levels.

    Ojougboh said the failed attempt to remove Sheriff illegally had rubbed off on the ruling party, adding that, if he had been removed, the All Progressives Congress (APC) may have also been removed.

    He said it is an insult to described Sheriff as a mole in the PDP by the chieftains who persuaded him to take up the leadership role.

    Ojougboh added: “Sheriff was sitting in his house when Governor Fayose and Governor Wike went to invite him to become the chairman of the party. Governor Fayose and Governor Wike gave him three months to stay in the office. At the end of three months, they went to Sheriff. They said, Chairman, you have repositioned the party; lok at the number of ‘Agbada’ in the PDP Wadata Plaza. You should continue in office.”

    The politician also reflected on the concern of the founding fathers, noting their willingness to return to the party, following the exit of men of impunity.

    Ojougboh, who said the party will reclaim its lost glory, following the resolution of the crisis, urged members to make sacrifices and return to the vision of the founding fathers.

  • Lagos sues for calm over hijab verdict

    The Lagos State Government yesterday appealed for calm over last Thursday’s Court of Appeal’s verdict endorsing the use of hijab by Muslim schoolgirls.

    It urged the people to be law-abiding and exercise restraint in pursuing their rights.

    “We must not breach public peace. People should remember that to every right there is corresponding responsibility,” said a statement by Commissioner for Home Affairs Dr Abdulhakeem Abdullateef.

    The verdict, the commissioner said, is victory for the rule of law and not for a particular religion or its followers.

    The government, he said, recognises the rights to freedom of religion as enshrined in the Constitution and it has not at any time been at war with any religion or its followers.

    He said: “As a government, we have continued to provide an enabling environment for all citizens irrespective of their religious affiliations. The Appeal Court pronouncement on the use of hijab in public schools is victory for the rule of law, victory for everyone.”

    “No one should see this as war,there is no victor no vanquished in this situation. It is simply a constitutional issue on rights of citizens.”

    AbdulLateef said the Akinwumi Ambode administration has since inception condemned harassment and victimisation of any individual on religious basis, including those who wear of hijab.

    Also yesterday, two Islamic groups, Al-Mu’minaat Social Advocacy Project (SAP) and The Companion, said the verdict would increase girl-child enrolment in public primary and secondary schools.

    SAP Coordinator Mrs Sherifah Yusuf-Ajibade said the verdict came when privately run Muslim schools were beyond the reach of the common man, because of the prevailing economic challenges.

    “The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Number Five seeks to attain equality for men and women. This starts with giving both genders equal opportunities; particularly equal educational opportunities. Recent surveysshow that even here in metropolitan Lagos, there is a significant percentage of parents who would rather get theirgirl-children married after acquiring primary schoolthan enrol them in secondary schools,where their faiths are not guaranteed.This judgement will give hope to such parents, thus enhancing girl-child enrolment in Lagos primary and secondary schools, and ensuring Muslim parents and their children are not forced to choose between their religion and education; both of which are essential ingredients of a good life,” she said.

    The Companion President Alhaji Musibau Oyefeso said there would have been no need for the judicial process “if the Lagos State government had taken the right steps which states like Ekiti had taken long before now by allowing female Muslim pupils in public schools that chose to wear hijab to do so. It is unfortunate that the state government (which prides itself as centre of excellence) succumbed to the whims and caprices of mischievous and overzealous school heads and teachers to ban the use of hijab in public schools. It is a well known fact all over the world that hijab is the divine right of female Muslims which is allowed in public schools in virtually all countries of the world including the United Kingdom and United States as well as global organisations like the United Nations and its agencies.

    “For anybody to attempt to deny this right is an effort in futility and we are happy that the Court of Appeal was courageous enough to uphold this right. We call on the government not to attempt to appeal the judgment as it would amount to deliberate squandering of state scarce resources.”

    “Instead, the government should just take steps to invite Muslims and other stakeholders to design appropriate hijab for the use of the female Muslim pupils that opt to use hijab. This in our opinion is the most appropriate and sensible thing to do without further delay.”

  • That curious verdict

    •Justice Falola’s judgment distorts the principle behind introduction of uniforms in schools

    The proactive measures taken by the Department of State Services (DSS) in Osun State to stem the looming crisis over the accepted uniform in the secondary schools is commendable. Justice Jide Falola of the state high court had ruled that wearing of hijab to school is a fundamental right of Muslim students.

    The judgment has expectedly provoked a fresh row between the Muslim and Christian communities in the state. While the Christians see it as an affront, especially when schools established by them are involved, the Muslims have lauded the verdict. They challenged whoever found it unacceptable to approach higher courts.

    The invitation to the groups by the DSS indicates that the matter should not be handled with levity.  Already, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has directed  Christian students to defy the school uniform code by wearing robes to school as soon as  effect is given to Justice Falola’s judgment.  We find it unfortunate that young minds are being polluted at a time when we should be emphasising things that unite us, rather than those that divide us. It is even the more difficult to appreciate what has stoked this fire in a state in the South west, an area noted for religious understanding.

    The Falola judgment is puzzling. What has human right got to do with the dress code adopted by organisations? Do police women wear hijabs? Do judges? They do not because there are codes to which they are expected to subscribe. Those who subscribe to Justice Falola’s perspective have argued that the students would only wear half hijab. To this we respond that a distortion is unacceptable. Once it is allowed on the ground that it is a fundamental right, there is no limit to the absurdity that could be introduced.

    We cannot pretend, as a nation, to be oblivious to developments on the global stage. Terror attacks have forced an outright ban on the wearing of such covers in France. And, in Nigeria, most suicide bombers in the North East are young ladies and girls covered up in full hijab. Security concerns should teach us that this is not the way to go. Besides, it is a notorious fact that examination cheating is rife in our schools. The trend is likely to increase if hijabs are allowed and the person behind the veil is unknown.

    There are enough complications in Nigeria already; it will be unwise to introduce more.

    Justice Falola should have realised that the practice of law cannot be taken outside the social context. Where there is chaos, one of the first victims is the justice system. This judgment is not only likely to ignite fire in the state; it could spread to neighbouring states.

    The Falola verdict cannot stand and should immediately be appealed. Where the Christians decide to adopt passive resistance, it should be seen as their right. This is a time to build a stable Nigeria, not one for self-serving judgments. Governor Rauf Aregbesola should be dispassionate in handling this delicate development. He should immediately activate dialogue with all groups and get them to sheathe their swords and submit to the Rule of Law. But we see nothing wrong with peaceful protest, even as the Christians have promised to test the judgment at the Appeal Court.

  • Lagos hails verdict

    Moments after the Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence given to the General Overseer of the Christian Praying Assembly, Chukwuemeka Ezeugo (Rev. King) by a Lagos High Court for murder,the Lagos State Government hailed the ruling as  further evidence  that criminals in the state will not go scot free no matter how long it takes to prosecute them.

    The apex court dismissed King’s appeal for lacking in merit.

    Reacting to the verdict, the Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Adeniji Kazeem, vowed that Governor Akinwunmi Ambode’s administration “ is going to be very strong on fighting crime.”

    “Wherever a crime is committed, no matter how long it takes, the government of Lagos State will ensure that the perpetrators of those crimes face justice eventually.”

    Kazeem  assured the public that “we will continue and we will not relent in our fight to make Lagos a safer, secure and more prosperous state.”

    ýKazeem, who led the prosecution team, comprising Idowu Alakija, the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), and other senior counsel from the Lagos State Ministry of Justice, had urged the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal and uphold the judgment of the lower courts.

    Rev. King was arraigned on September 26, 2006 before a Lagos High Court on a six-count charge of attempted murder and murder.

    He pleaded not guilty to the allegation, but was sentenced to death by the then Justice Joseph Oyewole of the Lagos High Court, Ikeja, on January 11, 2007 for the murder of one of his church members, Ann Uzoh.

    Justice Oyewole is now a judge of the Appeal Court sitting in the Calabar Division.

    The Lagos State Government had said that the convict poured petrol on the deceased and five other persons and that Uzoh died on August 2, 2006 – 11 days after the act was perpetrated on her.

    Specifically, Rev. King was convicted and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for the attempted murder and death by hanging for the offence of murder.

    Dissatisfied, he challenged the verdict before the Court of Appeal in Lagos, but the appeal was thrown out.

    “I hereby rule that the prosecution effectively discharged the burden of proof on it. This appeal is devoid of any basis and accordingly fails,” Justice Fatimo Akinbami had said while reading the judgment.

    ”The judgment of the High Court is hereby affirmed, and the conviction imposed on the appellant (which is death by hanging) is also affirmed,” Amina Augie and Ibrahim Saulawa, the two other members of the Appeal Court panel of Justices, concurred with the lead judgment.

    King, not being satisfied with the Appeal Court verdict, approached the Supreme Court for invalidation of the judgment, but has now failed with the final decision of the apex court.

  • ’How appeal court erred on Abia governorship verdict’

    Civil society organisations under the aegis of Civil Society Alliance for Good Governance has criticised the judgment of the Appeal Court which upturned the election of Abia State Governor Okezie Ikpeazu.

    The group said the decision, which resulted from the cancellation of results in three local government areas of Obingwa, Isialangwa North and Osisioma Ngwa amounts to disenfranchisement of the masses.

    In its statement endorsed by the Coordinator and Secretary, Emmanuel Usoro and Okechukwu Victor Ogbonna, the group expressed optimism that the Supreme Court would restore ‘the inalienable right’ denied the people by the judgment.

    They argued that the voting strength of the three cancelled local government areas would substantially affect the result of the entire election.

    “If the number of votes awarded to the two candidates by the Appeal Court, which is 279,776, and the number of registered voters in the three local government’s is 259,222, then there is no way the result of the election in the three local government areas will not affect the result of the entire election substantially.

    “Going by the above facts, it stands to reason that the Appeal Court judgment disenfranchising this large number of voters is very unfair, grossly perverse and ought not to be allowed to stand”, they stated.

    The group submitted that the judgment even denied the declared winner right to vote for himself, arguing that there is no law that says an entire local government election should be cancelled on account of over-voting, insisting that over-voting did not and cannot occur in 458 polling units in the three local government areas.

    “For us in the civil society, this judgment flies in the face of our collective march towards a people-oriented democracy and good governance”, they declared.

    Meanwhile, some lawyers have also reacted to the judgment, saying it amounts to disenfranchisement of voters. Former chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch, Monday Onyekachi Ubani said he doesn’t think the Court of Appeal was right in canceling the results of three local governments without ordering for a rerun.

    According to him, it is bizzare to cancel an entire local government because of over-voting which in any case occurs in polling units. He expressed optimism that the Supreme Court would strengthen the position of the law with regards to that.

    Also, a Lagos-based lawyer, Martins Nnebedum said he was shocked when he read the decision of the Court of Appeal. He stated that the number of votes cancelled was high, adding that it amounts to disenfranchisement.

    According to him, what the court could have done was to order for a rerun as a result of the number of votes involved. He added that the cancellation is strange because it did so in the local governments where the sitting governor has his strength. He stressed that elections should be by the people and not by judicial fiat.

    “The worst case scenario is that the court should order a rerun,” he said, urging the Supreme Court to do justice.

     

     

     

  • Peterside: Supreme Court’ll reaffirm Appeal Court’s verdict

    Peterside: Supreme Court’ll reaffirm Appeal Court’s verdict

    The governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State in the April 11 election, Dr. Dakuku Adol Peterside, has said members of the party and other lovers of democracy are confident that the Supreme Court will reaffirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal which sacked Governor Nyesom Wike.

    Peterside, a former member of the House of Representatives, spoke at the weekend at APC’s Rivers Southeast Senatorial District’s meeting at Senator Magnus Abe’s office at Bori, the traditional headquarters of the Ogoni and the seat of Khana Local Government Area.

    Besides Abe, who represented the district at the Seventh National Assembly, other party chieftains at the meeting included State APC Chairman Chief Davies Ikanya; the Director-General of Peterside’s Greater Together Campaign Organisation, Chief Victor Giadom and the party’s Deputy National Secretary, Orji Ngofa.

    Peterside assured that the APC was prepared for the governorship rerun, as ordered by the Appeal Court.

    The election is expected to hold between February and March.

    Wike, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, was sacked by the Election Petitions Tribunal in Abuja on October 24, last year.

    The Court of Appeal, Abuja, on December 16, last year, affirmed the tribunal’s judgment.

    But the governor immediately directed his lawyers to go to the apex court.

    Peterside said: “We are confident that the Supreme Court will reaffirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which also affirmed the verdict of the Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal in the first instance. I am convinced, like any Rivers person, that the Supreme Court will nullify the 2015 governorship election in Rivers State.

    “The APC is looking forward to participating in free and fair rerun, where the winner of each ballot will be determined by the actual votes cast by the electorate…’’

  • The poet’s verdict: Danjuma, Tinubu

    The poet’s verdict: Danjuma, Tinubu

    In “Piano and Drums”, Gabrial Okara, the poet — or in any case, the protagonist — suffers a serious dissonance: to stick with the vitality of the drums of his nativity (African culture) or be lured by the seductive though destructive lure of the European piano — but end with putative cultural death!

    Cultural death is, of course, the most lethal for the living dead: for without your culture, what are you?

    Performance poet, Akeem Lasisi and his performing songbirds suffer no such dissonance.  Their earlier works, Wonderland: Eleleture, the sweet Udeme and the epochal Ori-Agbe, in celebration of Wole Soyinka, our own WS, at 80, were a splendid mix of the piano and drums for poetic euphony and vitality.

    Way back, in the late 1960s to late 1980s, during the musical hegemony of the duo of Ebenezer Obey and Sunny Ade, and the Abami Eda, Fela Anikulapo-Kuti’s Africa 70 and Egypt 80 ruled the roost of Afrobeat (Fela’s own piano and drums musical brew), the debate between always ensued between “praise” and ideological music.

    Juju, where both Obey and Sunny excelled, was often dismissed as happy-go-merry, praise music without any ideological core.  Afrobeat, on the other hand, was trumpeted (and not unfairly) as ideological music that spoke truth — nasty truth — to power, no matter the huge cost.

    Indeed, costly it was: for Fela really did bear a lot of brunt in military-era savagery; by a ruling military order, scared stiff by Fela’s fearless and formidable moral authority, even if the soldiers-in-government controlled all the hideous instruments of state coercion.

    So, from Eleleture and Udeme, solid socio-political poetic commentaries, is Akeem Lasisi the poet veering into “praise” poetry, as his poetic telescope zooms on two eminent citizens, Gen. Theophilus Yakubu Danjuma (rtd) and Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu?

    Not quite, though the listener would make his or her own judgment.

    One quick observation, however, on From General to Manager, Lasisi’s tribute to Danjuma.  In this work, Lasisi’s trademark African drums (to borrow again from the Okara image) are mute.  Only the European piano raises its plaintive voice.

    The poet should perhaps have, as he is wont, given the Danjuma work some Jukun musical background.  That would have steeped it in African nativity; and added more vitality to its performance and rendition.  Sure, that would have needed some arduous research.  But the final product would have been much more pleasing — and entertaining.

    Still, that hardly distracts from this work: a fair, if poetic assessment, of the public persona of Gen. Danjuma, from when he first burst on Nigerians’ public consciousness as a young military officer, to his exploits as chief of Army staff and virtual guarantor of return to civil rule in 1979, under Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo as commander-in-chief, his foray into business thereafter, brief return to politics during Obasanjo’s second coming as elected president from 1999-2003, and his philanthropic activities happily ever after!

    If I deny you a place in the Muse’s house,” the poem opens, “The Zuma rock will break its stony silence/The Niger and Benue will find their liquid tongues/From Mokola to Trinidad battalions will rise/Millions of IDP children will join a flood of SAPETRO staff/The Congo will rise and sing your praise …”

    Mokola and Trinidad battalions, the Congo, SAPETRO workers and millions of IDP [internally displaced children] are all allusions to Gen. Danjuma’s rich vein of past and present life: the early regimented times, peace keeping at the Congo, another era as oil investor and community charity in troubling times, tending Nigerian children displaced by the murderous Boko Haram fanatics, by virtue of chairing a presidential fund-raiser to care for the displaced.

    One life?  Ay, but with a texture of many rolled into one!  That would appear why this allusion echoes another in the scriptures — that bit about nature, animate and inanimate, rising to applaud the virtues of the Christ Jesus, even if spiteful humans demurred.

    Indeed, Gen. Danjuma burst on the public consciousness, as somewhat an enforcer of northern political hegemony, given his reported roles in the July 1966 counter-coup.  But over the years, he would appear to have morphed into a revered Nigerian patriot.

    Hear the poet’s parting shot: “Danjuma, teach me a cardinal lesson/to dodge invisible bullets in the market square/Give me the magic wand/To coast to victory in our Civil Peace [Note the clever pun on Civil War?]/From Barracks to the board room your breed is rare/From General to Manager your gut is high.”

    In the Lion Speaks to the Poet, the Lasisi tribute to Tinubu, the parting shot is reminiscent of the concluding lines in J.P. Clark’s poem, “Streamside exchange”, a deadpan response that further confounded the child-protagonist, over its mother’s return prospect: “You cannot know” replied the river bird, “And you should not bother;/Tide and market come and go/And so shall your mother.”

    But while the Clark river bird deadpanned, the Lasisi Lion revealed the “secret” of Tinubu’s stunning political triumphs — which has reaped him bitter and implacable enemies; and his rare talent at nurturing future leaders — which has earned him due praise, even from grudging quarters.

    When others were saving for the rainy day,” the Lion roared in full glory, “I picked my cutlass and sharpened my hoe/I tilled and planted for the rainy day.  The dreaded season has finally come/They are chasing my crops with their anxious cash.”!

    That is as clinical a poetic response as any to the thick peer envy against Tinubu, from political opportunists who hate to sweat, yet love to be the first to swoop on the groovy.

    Why, it even echoes another Obafemi Awolowo quip: When others are busy chasing after women of easy virtue, I was always at my desk, forging out solutions to Nigeria’s problems!  Awolowo was, after all, the most meticulous politician of his generation, if not, so far, in all of Nigerian history.

    As to the old issue of piano and drums, the Lion has both aplenty.  The poem itself runs on cutting wit: “But is it really true,/That everything golden belongs to you?”  And a couple of hyperboles, perhaps to underscore ridiculousness of it all: “They say Aso Rock now belongs to you/That you are the new owner of Disney Land …?”

    But this piquant piano soars on the wings of African drums: a traditional Yoruba genre that thrives on ote (intrigue) and efe (biting humour), twin-concepts the Yoruba devastatingly deploy to wrong-foot adversaries.  That sure would be music to Tinubu’s friends; but pure poison to his fiends!

    In General and Lion, Lasisi has entered uncharted waters in his glorious poetic career: that of a poet making definitive judgment on active, if not outright controversial, citizens in the public space.

    Will he retain his poetic rigour?  Time will tell.  Meanwhile, like Ori-Agbe that toasted Prof. Soyinka at 80, General and Lion epitomise praise clinically — and poetically — earned.