Tag: Wanted

  • Wanted: Drivers day

    According to Global Reports, yearly, nearly 1.3million people die as a result of road traffic crashes-more than 3,000 deaths daily. About 50 million more people sustain non-fatal injuries from crashes and these injuries are clear cause of disability worldwide.

    More research reports have also affirmed that over 70 per cent of the road accidents were caused by human error (drivers). The United Nations General Assembly has described the Global Road Traffic Crashes, Death and Injuries as a major public health problem with a broad range of social and economic consequences which if unaddressed, may affect the sustainable development in countries and hinder progress.

    Considering that most of the human and material movements or travelling are done on the roads, it, then, becomes very expedient to pay more attention to the human factors (drivers). Drivers are  important because an error on their part can result to loss of irreparable lives and valuable properties. It is in view of the aforementioned and allied factors that I decided to advocate the observance of “National Drivers’ Day” (DD) in Nigeria.

    The objective is to motivate and give recognition to the relevance of Drivers in the reduction of traffic crashes and injuries as contained in section 3.6 of the Sustainable Development Goals (2016-2030) and to further teach and encourage Drivers to be safety-conscious and law abiding on the roads.

    Suggestions for the drivers’ day.

    1.Gather drivers in offices, motor parks and other locations for relevant lectures and other activities on driving and road safety.

    • Presentation of awards and gifts to drivers by their employers and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) at various levels.

    Suggested awards:

    • Overall best driver award.
    • Best accident-free award.
    • Best vehicle management award.
    • Best well-behaved driver award.
    • Refreshment and interactive sessions with drivers.

     

    1. Christian and Muslim prayer sessions for the Drivers.

     

     

    1. Other memorable or motivational activities.

    BENEFITS:

    Ø         Boost Driver Education.

    Ø         Boost experience-sharing among Drivers and other Officers.

    Ø         Boost the Morale of Drivers among other Staff (gives the Drivers a sense of belonging in the Organization).

    Ø         Motivates the Drivers for improved productivity.

    Ø         Promotes the commitment of the Drivers.

    Ø         Promotes safe driving and security.

    Ø         Promotes positive competition for efficiency and effectiveness.

    Ø         Promotes Driver Retention.

    Although this is an initiative in Nigeria, we would like to draw a quick reference: The World Day of Remembrance for Road Traffic Victims was started by Road Peace in 1993. Since then it has been observed and promoted worldwide by several NGOs. However, on 26th October, 2005, the United Nations endorsed it as a global day to be observed every third Sunday in November each year making it a major advocacy Day for Road Traffic Injury prevention.

    The whole World is concerned about the high rate of Road Traffic Crashes and how to drastically reduce it but no programme has been specifically established to directly address the Drivers (Human Factors) who constitute over 70 per cent of the causes of accidents.

    I strongly believe that if Nigeria starts the observance of the Drivers Day, other Countries and the United Nations will quickly see the relevance and the need to make it a global event to be observed annually. Nigeria will eternally be on global record as the initiator of the event.

    I hereby use this forum to encourage all the Employers of Drivers, Transport Companies, Driver Unions and other Stakeholders in the Transport and Safety Sectors to key into the proposed Drivers’ Day to be observed on the 3rd THURSDAY IN NOVEMBER of every year. The 3rd Sunday in November of Every year is already the United Nations Day of Remembrance of Road Accident Victims.

    These 2 Events when appropriately marked every year, will greatly boos safety – consciousness and reduce Road Traffic Crashes on the roads. No cost is too high to prevent the loss of lives.

     

  • Wanted: An ‘independent’ INEC

    Electoral bodies have the responsibility of conducting elections to enable citizens exercise their franchise to elect their leaders.

    Whoever secures the votes of the majority is entrusted with the mantle of leadership and it is to him that the electorate surrendersits political and financial rights.

    The choice of the majority may not always be the right one, and, although the minority will have its say, politics is a numbers game, so, the majority will have its way.

    But if privileged minorities force their will on the majority (which, in my view, has continued for too long in our country) it is an invitation to bad governance. There is a direct correlation between free and fair elections and good governance. In fact, the most certain way to ensure accountable leadership is a free and fair ballot system.

    It is often said that elections in Nigeria since the inception of the Fourth Republic in 1999, have been anything but acceptable. There is thus a need for concerted efforts to right the wrongs.

    The first step, in my opinion, is to identify the wrongs that have corrupted the system and cheated the majority of their choices for too long.

     

    The Constitution and the Independent National Electoral Commission (Establishment) Act

    Sometimes, the problem is caused by the inadequacies in the enabling legislation: the Independent National Electoral Commission (Establishment) Act 2004.  It might also be the absence of the will power to implement the safeguards for independence and good polls as provided and stipulated in the Act.

    The prevailing attitude of indifference by Nigerians as if they are resigned to the impossibility of achieving the desired objective must be discouraged. Nigerians must begin to see themselves as the beginning of the change – an ‘it begins with me’ attitude.

    The 1999 Constitution (as amended) and INEC Act have copious provisions for INEC’s independence.

    But, do these provisions merely express an intention of independence for the electoral body or do they cloth the electoral body with actual independence?

    Section 158 of the Constitution provides for the independence of certain federal executive bodies, to wit: “In exercising its powers to make appointments or to exercise disciplinary control over persons, … the Independent National Electoral Commission, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other person or authority.”

    Similarly, the INEC Act in Section 6 provides that “In the discharge of its functions under this Act, the commission shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other person or authority.”

     

    How legislation undermines INEC’s independence

    Do these provisions really guarantee the independence of the electoral body? Is it enough to state that the commission should be independent when the independence is given by the right hand and essentially taken away by the left?  How is the leadership of the electoral body appointed and what is the source of its funding?

    The Constitution and the Act are silent on the funding of the electoral body despite providing for the appointment of the leadership of the electoral body.

    On appointment, Section 154(1) of the Constitution provides that the INEC chairman shall be appointed by the president subject to confirmation by the senate. The President also reserves the right to remove him from office albeit on an address supported by two-third majority of the senate – Section 157 (1) of the Constitution.

    In a polity like ours, I dare to say that the mode of appointment of the head of the electoral body makes it susceptible to manipulation by the Presidency and to maintain an unholy loyalty to the president as experience has shown thus far.

    There must be something fundamentally wrong with the system as we operate it here that has made nearly all the leadership of the electoral body under whatever nomenclature since independence to have failed or performed really poorly.

    From Eyo Esua, Michael Ani, Victor Ovie-Whiskey, Ema Ewa, Humphrey Nwosu, Ephraim Akpata, Prof Okon Uya, Abel Guobadia, Maurice Iwu to Prof Atahiru Jega and now Mohammed Yakubu, our elections have always lacked the acceptability element of results of elections which electoral bodies in other climes enjoy.

    For instance, EyoEsua, who led the first indigenous electoral body in the country, organised the first post-independence federal and regional elections of 1964 and 1965. The December 1964 election was marred by controversy and confusion which led to a military coup in 1966.

    The result of the Michael Ani-led commission, which conducted the election that ushered in the Second Republic government of Alhaji Shehu Shagari on October 1, 1979, was rejected by the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), led by late Chief Obafemi Awolowo who challenged Shagari’s election in court but lost.

    The elections conducted by Justice Ephraim Akpata that ushered in the Obasanjo’s government in 1999 did not carry any wide acceptability or approval.

    Maurice Iwu conducted the elections that were perhaps the most controversial in the nation’s history. Even the late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua admitted that the election that made him president in 2007 was flawed. By the time his tenure expired he had perhaps no goodwill left, that his appointment was not renewed.

    After those era came Prof. Atahiru Jega and now Mohammed Yakubu. The outcries against controversial elections have still not changed. However, the situation does not seem to be as absurd as it was in the recent past. At least, there are hardly many incidences of number of votes outnumbering number of registered voters. Whether that is as a result ‘of the bird learning to fly without perching because of the improvement of the shooter’s prowess, is another issue.

    All over the world an aligned electoral body no matter how slight the alignment is, has done a polity no good and it cannot be different for our country.

    With the experience in Nigeria since the return of democracy in 1999, one can say with almost no fear of contradiction that the ‘INEC’ has been anything but independent. From Abel Guobadia to Maurice Iwu, to Jega and now, Mohammed Yakubu they have always maintained a leaning, most commonly to the ruling and appointing authority.

    The then ruling party, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) enjoyed the revered privilege of being in control of the ‘INEC’ for so long (sixteen years) and during the period the other political parties were at their mercy and most likely envious of PDP’s position of influence over the electoral body.

    What we see presently with the state electoral commissions is clear proof. Just as it has always been with the other states, Edo State recently conducted its Local Government elections and the results released by the Edo State Independent Electoral Commission (ESIEC) shows that the ruling party won in all the 18 local governments in the state. It is almost the same in all the states.

    To be continued next week

  • Couple declared wanted for ‘fraud’

    Enugu State Police Command has declared a couple wanted for alleged N63 million forgery and fraud in a mortgage  institution.

    Spokesman Ebere Amaraizu said in a statement in Enugu yesterday that the Criminal Intelligence and  Investigations Department had begun investigation  into the matter.

    He said the wife, Mrs. Chinyere Amalunweze, 36, an indigene of Umuegbu Ego village, Nnobi community in Idemili South Local Government of Anambra State is fair in complexion and a former worker of a mortgage  institution.

    Amaraizu said the husband, Mr. Tony Amalunweze, 38, from Umulumgbe community in Udi Local Government of Enugu State, who lives at 2a, Akpugo Street, Independence Layout, Enugu, is dark in complexion.

    “They were alleged to have been involved in a case of conspiracy, forgery and fraud in which they defrauded a mortgage institution of N63 million and escaped.

    “The command is asking the public with information about how they can be traced, to report to the nearest police station,” he said.

     

  • High Court quashes EFCC’s declaration of Benedict Peters as ‘wanted’

    •Orders removal of declaration from website

    A High Court sitting in Abuja has quashed the declaration of Executive Vice Chairman of Aiteo, Benedict Peters, as ‘wanted’ by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    In a March 22, 2017 judgement, the court said the anti-graft agency had no power to declare Peters or anyone ‘wanted’ without a court order.

    This was in response to a suit by Peters, accusing the EFCC of declaring him wanted on its website without following due process.

    As affirmed by the court, “Peters has never been charged with, nor tried for any criminal offence in any Court, nor has he ever jumped bail for any offence howsoever in Nigeria and so cannot be declared wanted by administrative fiat, without any prior order or leave of Court.”

    The judgment by Justice Othman Musa said: “The very act of declaring the Applicant (Benedict Peters) wanted on the official website of the first Respondent (EFCC) without any prior order or leave of a Court of competent jurisdiction to that effect is unlawful, illegal, wrongful, ultra vires, unconstitutional and constitutes a flagrant violation of the Fundamental rights of the applicant to personal liberty, private and family life, freedom of movement and right to not be subjected to inhuman treatment and degrading treatment as guaranteed under Section 34, 37, 41 and 46 of the 1999 Constitution (As amended) and Articles 2, 3(1) and (2), 4, 5, 6, 7, and 12(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act 2004.”

    On August 15 2016, Peters was declared wanted by EFCC without an order of Court and in the absence of a valid charge in a Court of law. The said declaration was published in some newspapers, online medium, and EFCC’s official website.

    EFFC said Peters was summoned on severally before he was declared wanted. However, evidence presented in court showed that Peters was out of the country on health grounds and this was communicated to EFCC by his legal representatives and so he requested for a rescheduling.

    But a day before his court appearance, armed men and policemen, at the behest of EFCC, invaded his company premises and arrested some people.

    EFCC’s claimed it acted based on an arrest warrant issued by a Magistrate Court.

    After scrutinising the contents of the document constituting the warrant, the Judge discovered that the document was dated August 5 2016, suggesting that it was made or signed by the issuing Magistrate on that date. But, curiously, EFCC endorsed it as having been received on August 4, 2016, at 10.32am.

    This inconsistency flawed EFCC’s defence and Justice Othman Musa said:

    “I am left with no option but to conclude that the first respondent (EFCC) has presented to this Court an absurd and unimaginable case of receiving a signed document a day before it was actually signed. I am afraid such a thing is not possible in our physical world. Perhaps, it is possible in the spirit world. This renders the circumstances surrounding the procurement of this document doubtful.

    “Since EFCC’s declaration was not within the ambit of the laws, and did not comply with the conditions precedent to the said declaration, the court dismissed the case thus:

    -An order is hereby made directing the first respondent (EFCC) to remove from its website the purported declaration made against the applicant forthwith.”

     

  • High Court quashes EFCC’s declaration of Benedict Peters as ‘wanted’

    •Orders removal of declaration from website

    A High Court sitting in Abuja has quashed the declaration of Executive Vice Chairman of Aiteo, Benedict Peters, as ‘wanted’ by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    In a March 22, 2017 judgement, the court said the anti-graft agency had no power to declare Peters or anyone ‘wanted’ without a court order.

    This was in response to a suit by Peters, accusing the EFCC of declaring him wanted on its website without following due process.

    As affirmed by the court, “Peters has never been charged with, nor tried for any criminal offence in any Court, nor has he ever jumped bail for any offence howsoever in Nigeria and so cannot be declared wanted by administrative fiat, without any prior order or leave of Court.”

    The judgment by Justice Othman Musa said: “The very act of declaring the Applicant (Benedict Peters) wanted on the official website of the first Respondent (EFCC) without any prior order or leave of a Court of competent jurisdiction to that effect is unlawful, illegal, wrongful, ultra vires, unconstitutional and constitutes a flagrant violation of the Fundamental rights of the applicant to personal liberty, private and family life, freedom of movement and right to not be subjected to inhuman treatment and degrading treatment as guaranteed under Section 34, 37, 41 and 46 of the 1999 Constitution (As amended) and Articles 2, 3(1) and (2), 4, 5, 6, 7, and 12(1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act 2004.”

    On August 15 2016, Peters was declared wanted by EFCC without an order of Court and in the absence of a valid charge in a Court of law. The said declaration was published in some newspapers, online medium, and EFCC’s official website.

    EFFC said Peters was summoned on severally before he was declared wanted. However, evidence presented in court showed that Peters was out of the country on health grounds and this was communicated to EFCC by his legal representatives and so he requested for a rescheduling.

    But a day before his court appearance, armed men and policemen, at the behest of EFCC, invaded his company premises and arrested some people.

    EFCC’s claimed it acted based on an arrest warrant issued by a Magistrate Court.

    After scrutinising the contents of the document constituting the warrant, the Judge discovered that the document was dated August 5 2016, suggesting that it was made or signed by the issuing Magistrate on that date. But, curiously, EFCC endorsed it as having been received on August 4, 2016, at 10.32am.

    This inconsistency flawed EFCC’s defence and Justice Othman Musa said:

    “I am left with no option but to conclude that the first respondent (EFCC) has presented to this Court an absurd and unimaginable case of receiving a signed document a day before it was actually signed. I am afraid such a thing is not possible in our physical world. Perhaps, it is possible in the spirit world. This renders the circumstances surrounding the procurement of this document doubtful.

    “Since EFCC’s declaration was not within the ambit of the laws, and did not comply with the conditions precedent to the said declaration, the court dismissed the case thus:

    -An order is hereby made directing the first respondent (EFCC) to remove from its website the purported declaration made against the applicant forthwith.”

     

  • Police nab suspect on wanted list

    The police in Bayelsa State have arrested Mr. Temona Alison, said to be on their wanted list for cultism and pipeline vandalism.

    Alison, in his 20s, was reportedly nabbed by the command’s Strike Force on Sunday in his home on Tombia-Ammassoma road, by Boxi Water.

    A source said four grenades (miniature bombs), one live cartridge, a pair of military uniform, one cutlass, among others were found in his possession.

    The source, who spoke in confidence, said Alison was on the police wanted list for criminal activities.

    He said the police believed that the suspect was using the grenades to destroy oil pipelines to carry out vandalism.

    Police spokesman Asinim Butswat confirmed the arrest.

    He said the suspect was being interrogated.

    Butswat said: “On February 4, about 0100 hours, the Bayelsa State Command Strike Force, a team that specialises in tracking down wanted criminals, arrested Temona Boleigha Alison, male, based on a tip-off.

    “The suspect was arrested in possession of four hand grenades, one live cartridge, a pair of military uniform, one machete, one SIM card and 12 wraps of substance suspected to be cocaine.

    “He is undergoing interrogation. Investigation is on.”

  • Police declare doctor wanted for alleged robbery

    Police declare doctor wanted for alleged robbery

    The FCT P, who is at large, is said to be the proprietor of Vital Care Hospital in Kubwa, Abuja.

    He is alleged to be the leader of a robbery and car- snatching gang, which operates in Abuja.

    The police yesterday paraded five members of his gang at the FCT Police Command headquarters.

    They are Sunday Okhomode, Meshak James, Amusu Koku (a painter who specialises in changing the colours of stolen vehicles); Kunle Obajemi,(a printer who is an expert in changing chassis numbers on the dashboards) and Suleiman Isa, a goldsmith who buys stolen jewellery from the gang.

    The police said four pistols with eight rounds of live ammunition and a face mask, hidden in a bag in the office of the doctor, were recovered during execution of a search warrant in the suspect’s hospital.

    On how the gang operates, FCT Police Commissioner Sadiq Bello said: “I alerted the public last year to the activities of a robbery gang, whose modus operandi is to gain access to homes by blaring horns at the gates.

    “These criminals, who operate in the evening, come in heavily-tinted vehicles. When they get to the entrance of their victims, they will blare the horns, the gatemen will assume they are family members, or relations, or friends. They will open the gates. Then the hoodlums will rob the occupants of their cars and other valuables, especially jewellery.”

    He went on: “I am happy to tell you today that the FCT Command has bust one of the gangs responsible for such evil acts.

    “The gang is led by Dr. Ola Solomon Jimade, the proprietor of Vital Care Hospital in Kubwa, who is on the run. Five members of the gang have been arrested. They are cooperating with the police.

    “The arrest followed a reported case of robbery at a house in Maitama, Abuja last November when a BMW X6 vehicle, quantities of gold and other valuables worth millions of naira were stolen by the robbers.

    “Upon receipt of complaint, the command through the Specia1 Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) began discreet investigation, which led to the arrest of the suspects and recovery of the vehicle.

    “During investigation, five vehicles, whose colours have been changed, were recovered. Four of them have been identified by their owners, who were robbed at gunpoint.

    “If anybody knows the whereabouts of Dr. Jimade, said to be an indigene of Ife Olukotun community in Yagba East, Kogi State, he should report at the nearest police station.”

    The command also nabbed Destiny Abang, who hails from Boki East in Cross River State.

    He was arrested while trying to steal a car from where it was parked in Area 8, Garki, Abuja.

    The CP said: “During interrogation, the suspect confessed to have stolen cars in Garki and its environs. Most of the vehicles were taken to Boki in Cross River State where they were sold. Discreet investigation led to the recovery of the 13 stolen cars.”

    He said investigation was on to recover more vehicles and arrest other members of the gang.

    The police boss urged car owners to install anti-theft gadgets in their vehicles, to reduce thefts.

  • Wanted: stricter enforcement of insurance laws, regulation

    The role of law and regulation in insurance was the theme of the first annual seminar of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Section on Business Law (SBL) Insurance and Pensions Committee. JOSEPH JIBUEZE reports.

    Lawyers and insurance experts have called for stricter enforcement of insurance laws and regulations.

    It will lead to confidence in the insurance sector and prevent abuses, they said.

    They spoke at the First Annual Seminar of the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) Insurance and Pensions Committee.

    An insurance expert, Dr. Omogbai Omo-Eboh, said there were challenges in enforcement, such as the compulsory insurance of public buildings.

    According to him, the law contains several provisions outlawing “rampant” practices such as unregistered underwriters, brokers, agents, and insurance consultants, among others.

    He said such unqualified persons engage in nefarious activities unchecked and defraud unsuspecting public in the guise of selling insurance products, resulting in loss of confidence in the industry.

    Omo-Eboh, a partner at Consolex, said: “The law itself contains extensive provisions making these practices criminal offences subject to the payment of a fine or a term in prison or both upon conviction.

    “However, the enforcement machinery of these provisions by the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM) appears inadequate, making it possible for those with unwholesome motives to infiltrate the industry and get away with their activities.

    “The Commission, which is vested with the responsibility of enforcing the provisions of the law, ought to be more proactive.

    “To this end, the Commission should set up an enforcement department whose primary responsibility will be to liaise with the law enforcement agencies at all levels of government.”

    Nigeria Insurance Association (NIA) chairman Eddie Efekoha said the body has set up a Customer Complaints Bureau chaired by a retired Supreme Court Justice George Oguntade, who he said has resolved several issues bordering on unpaid claims.

    “We felt that we don’t need to go to the law courts to resolve our issues because of the attendant negative publicity that follows,” he said.

    Efekoha urged customers who have complaints on disputes claims or unmet expectations to approach the Bureau. He expressed his association’s willingness to partner with the SBL committee.

    NBA Second Vice President Onyekachi Ubani called for the increment in insurance companies’ capital base as was done in the banking sector, saying it would lead to more confidence in the industry and prevent big businesses going abroad for insurance.

    Executive Director, Leadway Assurance Company Ltd Ms Adetola Adegbayi, who spoke on Insurance Law Practice: beyond the Status Quo, said it was crucial for the public to have confidence in insurance. “It’s important that the trust aspect is strong,” she said.

    According to her, an insurance company should have few court cases. “When an insurance company begins to litigate too much, then something is wrong,” she said.

    Adegbayi listed areas in which insurance companies need lawyers, such as in litigation, contract reviews, assets/ shares acquisition, international investment, in-house advisory, company regulatory administration, compliance monitoring, among others.

    Managing Director (Technology), Accenture Nigeria, Mr Olaniyi Tayo, said though Nigeria has shown positive signs of development in insurance, it is still confronted with numerous challenges constraining its growth.

    Such constraints, he said, include cultural and religious beliefs which hinder individuals from taking out life insurance, poor distribution channels, lack of innovation in product development, and limited access to local specialised insurance skills, such as actuarial scientists, data architects, among others.

    Tayo believes that low penetration rate demonstrates low level of acceptance, adding that there is a lack of trust regarding claims settlement.

    He said more should be done by the industry stakeholders to reverse the situation, including use of relevant technology, such as robotics/drones, mobility and analytics in underwriting, claims management, among others.

    An independent non-executive director at FBN Holdings Plc Director Ms Cecilia Akintomide said there was a lack of awareness of the importance of insurance.

    She said the issue of lack of trust was being addressed through regulation, adding that more enforcement of insurance laws was needed.

    NBA-SBL chairman Olumide Akpata said the number of insured Nigerians was too low, adding that more penetration was needed.

    “The number of Nigerians who actually take insurance is abysmal. There’s a lot more that regulation can do to ensure that it is second nature for us to take insurance, and that it’s not something we’re compelled to do.

    “A lot of this has to do with culture. People are not so inclined. When you talk of risk, people say: ‘It’s not my portion.’ But you must protect yourself against risk, and that’s insurance,” he said.

    NBA-SBL Insurance and Pensions Committee chairman Dominic Ichaba said lawyers were not doing as much as they could in the insurance industry because they do not know what opportunities exit.

    “There are many areas of legal work in the insurance industry for lawyers in other climes not yet open to Nigerian lawyers. Besides, the Nigerian insurance industry is far from achieving its potential.

    “For instance, while insurance penetration (the rate of insurance penetration to GDP) is 12 per cent in South Africa, it is less than one per cent in Nigeria.

    “This means that there is plenty of room for growth, which brings more work for insurance law practitioners,” he said.

     

  • Wanted: a Third Force

    “The civil war was a disaster, the failure of reason and the triumph of egoism and narrow-mindedness” — Sam Amadi, in a 4 September 2002 piece published in This Day, headlined “Nigeria: enter the Third Force”

     

    The first casualty of the Nigerian Civil War (1967-1970) was reason.  But mutual hurt sharpened the knife for that grand slaughter.

    The Igbo pogroms all over the North followed the 15 January 1966 coup.  That coup overthrew the North-led civil order. But it enthroned Major-Gen. Thomas Aguiyi-Ironsi, after the so-called “Igbo coup”.  The pogroms badly hurt the Igbo — as it would any other people.

    But the pogroms too were a result of reported taunting, by some Igbo in the North, of the northern locals.  The taunts were over the northern leaders, felled during the first coup.  That hurt the North — as it would any other people.

    The counter-coup of 29 July 1966 gorily settled scores — a Northern coup cancelled out an Eastern one, with all the grisly killings.  But it only roasted the collective Nigerian psyche.

    No surprise, the counter-coup only signalled the final descent into political Hades — the Civil War, which followed Eastern Region Governor, Lt-Col. Emeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu’s 30 May 1967 declaration of the ill-fated Republic of Biafra.

    Before that tragic denouement, however, the drums of war beat with deafening intensity. Ojukwu was canonizing his Biafra Army as so formidable “no force in Africa” could vanquish it — a tragic bluff.

    Yakubu Gowon, also then a lieutenant-colonel though also head of state and supreme commander of the Nigerian Armed Forces (before the Aburi Accords in Ghana pared that title down to commander-in-chief), was also positioning the coming slaughter as a “police action”, to rein in the break-away rebels of the East — a sinister threat.

    Less than three years later, tragic bluff had sized up sinister threat — and no less than two million, victims on both sides, lay dead!

    Even as that tragedy was brewing, only Wole Soyinka, then 33, of all the intelligentsia then, was unimpressed by the war-mongering.  He would try to prevent war at all cost.  Hence, he called for a Third Force, neither for Nigeria nor Biafra but against avoidable carnage.

    His reward?  Detention without trial, almost all through the war, by the Gowon Federal Military Government.

    But his contemporary writers?  Ken Saro-Wiwa, of the Ogoni South-South minority, opted for Nigeria.  Indeed, after the liberation of Port Harcourt from the Biafra forces, he was administrator of that city.  But the country he opted for later consumed him under Sani Abacha, a young military commander when Saro-Wiwa was PH administrator.

    Chris Okigbo sided with his Igbo folks, though using his poetry to lament the blood and gore.  He was consumed by the war.

    Chinua Achebe, Soyinka’s most famous contemporary, also sided with his Igbo folks; and was soon drafted as Biafra’s war-time envoy.  He survived the war and even joined Aminu Kano’s People’s Redemption Party (PRP), during the 2nd Republic (1979-1983).

    But his unrelieved Civil War bitterness would come in There Was A Country, his 2012 “Personal History of Biafra,” a classic example of the swan song as ogre.  That book is believed, by not a few, to power the philosophical push for the present neo-Biafra campaign.

    That ogre may yet consume the naive.  But the old man is safe in his grave.

    The Achebe angle neatly ties the present to the past, with its avoidable tragedies. History is threatening to repeat itself.  But it may well be a costly farce.

    Already, there are eerie parallels: check out Ojukwu of 1967 with Nnamdi Kanu of 2015.  The one bluffed and blustered out of plain hurt.  The other does, out of free-wheeling bigotry and hatred — as the  callow youth, in that Yoruba proverb, that mistakes potent herbs for a delicious vegetable soup.   But both are  hardly the epitome of sober introspection.

    Check out too the Igbo-Hausa/Fulani ethnic baiting and counter-baiting, culminating in the sensational diktat, by the so-called “Northern youths”, for the Igbo to quit the North before October 1 — or else!  That, in response to IPOB’s gospel of hate and threat — lunacy and counter-lunacy!

    As in a theory in basic creative prose, you know the true character of a person when under crisis.  In the crisis of the moment, about every ethnic group is betraying its own maladies.

    Some elements in the Niger Delta have given their own counter-order: not only should northerners quit their enclave, those that have oil well interests should also scram.

    Even in Yorubaland, some atavistic elements are celebrating the sweet prospects of their great utopia: the immaculate Oodua Republic where, open sesame, Ibadan domination would vanish in Oyo State; the Ijebu-Remo rivalry, in Ogun, would disappear; and the “Lagos-for-Lagosians” lobby in Lagos would, Saul to Paul-like, morph into happy-go-merry pan-Yoruba nationalists, with zero condescension towards the ”ara-oke”, the Yoruba upcountry denizens!

    It’s an emotive season of anomie, which shows how little the Nigerian mule, warts and all, is appreciated by these ultra-nationalists!  Indeed, as crooned Don Williams, the American country music ace, some folks don’t know what they’ve got until it’s gone!

    Kudos to Acting President Yemi Osinbajo for his systematic way of diffusing the tension by his ongoing meeting with leaders of the different ethnic groups.

    But one point must be made, if you must come to equity with clean hands: you can’t blame the northern reaction to torrential threats and insults without first condemning, in the most vigorous of terms, the South East source of that torrential hate.

    Still, to forestall tragic history from repeating itself, a third force against reckless ethnic ultra-nationalism is imperative.

    Despite all the ethnic bellowing and muscle-flexing, it is reassuring that a parallel counter-voice, from all ethnic divides, is challenging this emotional foray into Golgotha.  Those voices — Igbo, Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, Ijaw, Idoma, Tiv, Kanuri, et al — should coalesce and face down these divisive voices.  More of such sane voices should speak up.

    In 1967,  Wole Soyinka went solo, when the rest of Nigerians were going mad on ethnic hate.  Their eyes did not clear until two million people lay dead.

    In 2017 — 50 years later — surely we have learnt enough from our tragic past to avert yet another?

    That is why the Soyinka spirit of 1967 must inspire a determined pan-Nigeria Third Force to defeat this ethnic madness.

    If Nigeria is sick – and indeed, it is — fix it!  Restructure, if you must.  Ensure justice, equity and fair play reign.

    But sure, balkanization cannot be the solution?  That would create new problems for the illusory el-dorados to follow.

     

    Poetic Extra

    June 12

    June 12!

    And a culprit is long dead.
    But his memory 
    is a septic tank of sleaze,
    memory worse than no memory!

    Another lives,
    perfumed by the high
    and the mighty.
    But what oozes from his chamber
    is the rot
    of the living dead!

    But MKO, their victim
    lives, though long dead!
    Each year, this day,
    he comes alive:
    pleasure to the righteous,
    pain to the hideous,
    but a deep gash,
    on the soul 
    of a nation
    that kills its best!

    June 12!

    Lagos, 13 June 2017

     

  • Wanted: Our help!

    Wanted: Our help!

    She came to The Nation’s office the other day, but she looked quite upbeat. But behind that exterior, Stella Monye was not the happiest mother on earth. Her son has been held down by an illness of damaged kidney, bladder and urethra that has crippled him since boyhood. Ibrahim who has earned a degree at home needs the mother to care for him everyday. She needs N20 million to take the son to the United States for treatment.

    Monye is no ordinary Nigerian. She has used her talent to sing and entertain and inspire. The least we can do is help her. Governors, senators, the president and his ministers: N20 million is small money to help the son. She sang “Oko mi ye duro timi o.” Translation: “My husband stand by me.” It is a plea for solidarity. She needs it now. It is a disgrace to us all that a woman like that who has been ambassador all over the world on our behalf is reduced to nursing a “vegetable” child when healing is on our wings.