Tag: Washington

  • U.S lied about anti- ISIS campaign in Syria – Russia

    U.S lied about anti- ISIS campaign in Syria – Russia

    Russia accused the United States on Tuesday of pretending to fight Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.

    Russia also accused U.S. of deliberately reducing its air strikes in Iraq to allow the group’s militants to stream into Syria to slow the Russian-backed advance of the Syrian army.

    In the latest sign of rising tensions between Moscow and Washington, the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement that the U.S.-led coalition had sharply reduced its air strikes in Iraq in September when Syrian forces, backed by Russian air power, had started to retake Deir al-Zor Province.

    “Everyone sees that the U.S.-led coalition is pretending to fight Islamic State, above all in Iraq, but continuing to allegedly fight Islamic State in Syria actively for some reason,” said Major-General Igor Konashenkov, a spokesperson for Russia’s defense ministry said.

    The result, he said, had been that militants had moved in large numbers from Iraqi border areas to Deir al-Zor, where they were trying to dig in on the left bank of the River Euphrates.

    “The actions of the Pentagon and the coalition demand an explanation. Is their change of task a desire to complicate as much as they can the Syrian army’s operation, backed by the Russian air force, to take back Syrian territory to the east of the Euphrates?,’’ asked Konashenkov.

    “Or is it an artful move to drive Islamic State terrorists out of Iraq by forcing them into Syria and into the path of the Russian air force’s pinpoint bombing?’’

    He said Syrian troops were in the midst of trying to push Islamic State out of the city of al-Mayadin, southeast of Deir al-Zor, but that IS tried daily to reinforce its ranks there with “foreign mercenaries’’ pouring in from Iraq.

    NAN

  • NSWG partners U.S. for united, peaceful Nigeria

    NSWG partners U.S. for united, peaceful Nigeria

    The Nigeria Senior Working Group ( NSWG ), a group of Nigerian senior civic leaders, have converged on the United States Institute of Peace, Washington, D.C., to rekindle hope for peace and stability in Nigeria.

    The group of eminent Nigerians was in the U.S. for a symposium on Nigeria tagged ‘Peace in Nigeria: How to build it, and America’s role’, organised by the U.S. Institute of Peace, Washington, D.C.

    The group has as members the Archbishop of Catholic Archdiocese Abuja Cardinal John Onaiyekan, Sultan of Sokoto Sa’ad Abubakar, Gen. Martin Agwai (rtd) and Prof. Ibrahim Gambari.

    Others are Dr Obiageli Ezekwesili, Prof. Attahiru Jega, Amb. Fatima Abubakar, Dr Nguyan Feese, Dr Chris Kwaja, Dr Usman Bugaje, Dr Jibrin Ibrahim and Aisha Murtala Muhammed-Oyebode.

    The group was brought together by the United States Institute of Peace in 2016 to represent public issues about Nigeria.

    They also lend their expertise in support of the efforts of the State Governors and national policymakers to address the social, religious and political forces that fuel extremist violence and instability in Nigeria.

    Amb. Hassan Hassan, Ambassador/Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Nigeria in Washington, at the symposium, emphasised that Nigeria needed peace now more than any other time in its history.

    The Nigerian envoy also said  that “once there is peace in Nigeria, “it will vibrate across Africa because peace in Nigeria means peace in Africa”.

    Hassan identified the prominent cause of instability and breakdown of peace in Nigeria as religious animosity and rivalry among the adherents of the Christian and Muslim faiths.

    The Nigerian envoy tasked the group to carefully, effectively and incisively consider the issues at stake in Nigeria, extend it to Africa and the world at large.

    Speaking on behalf of the group, Agwai stressed that one of the group’s task was to help the Nigerian government to resolve insecurity, especially the Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast.

    He said that their mandate was to liaise with the U.S. Government through its Think Thank and policy makers to proffer solutions.

    According to him, the group is also mandated to suggest steps Nigeria should take to build and sustain peace as Africa’s most important country.

    Agwai said  the Nigerian government was determined to achieve sustainable peace and development in the country.

    He stressed that there could not be peace without development and there could be no development without peace.

    The outcome of the discussion was to reduce instability and re-weave the social fabrics of the country.

    Amb. Johnnie Carson, the Senior Adviser of United States Institute of Peace, remarked that Nigeria under President Muhammadu Buhari had made military gains against the Boko Haram extremist group.

    Carson emphasised that conflict resolution, peace and security would not be achievable purely through military solutions alone.

    To achieve sustainable peace in Nigeria, he advised that all levels of government, non-governmental organisations, and other stakeholders must get involved.

    He said every Nigerian  should join to fight to defeat the Boko Haram insurgency, corruption and other security challenges through dialogue, community policing and promotion of good citizen.

    Thomas Shannon, the U.S. Under-Secretary for Political Affairs, praised the various initiatives by the government towards establishing and preserving  peace.

    Shannon said peace was required to foster a prosperous Nigeria and Africa, stressing the U.S. Government will continue to encourage the Nigerian government to take up a call as peace-loving government.

    The U.S. envoy noted that President Buhari had demonstrated that his administration was positioned to strengthen Nigeria’s dignity in the world.

    NAN

  • Workers at Washington nuclear waste plant take cover after tunnel collapse

    Workers at Washington nuclear waste plant take cover after tunnel collapse

    One tunnel partly collapsed on Tuesday at a plutonium handling facility at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state, leading authorities to evacuate some workers and instruct others to take cover, federal officials said.

    Workers took cover and turned off ventilation systems after minor damage was discovered in the wall of a transport tunnel, a spokeswoman for the Department of Energy said by telephone from the Hanford Joint Information Center.

    The damage was more serious than initially reported, and the take-cover order was expanded to cover the entire facility after response crews found a 400-square-foot section of the decommissioned rail tunnel had collapsed, she said.

    “The tunnel itself was breached. There was a 20-foot wide hole,” the spokeswoman said.

    No spent nuclear fuel is stored in the tunnel, and no further evacuations have been ordered for workers, nor have any warnings for civilians around the site been issued, she said.

    She declined to identify herself, citing agency policy.

    The site is in southeastern Washington on the Columbia River, about 170 miles (270 km) east of Seattle.

    Operated by the federal government, it was established in the 1940s and manufactured plutonium that was used in the first nuclear bomb as well as other nuclear weapons.

    It is now being dismantled and cleaned up by the Energy Department.

  • Why Northern Governors are in Washington 

    When I arrived at the entrance of the United States Institute of Peace a short while ago, I recalled the last time I was here in March 2014, when the Institute organized a security symposium for members of our forum. Since my last visit here, I can point to many benefits that my primary constituents –the people of Borno State –have derived, since they sponsored my trip here. The 2014 symposium was dominated by issues of security and the Boko Haram insurgency, of which Borno State was the epicentre.

    The discussions we had then must have contributed in many different ways to the commitment and responses of the United States government and the international community in helping Nigeria to fight the insurgency. Our visit here in 2014 proved to be highly beneficial in the fight against Boko Haram, which affected Borno State the most but also had a destabilizing effect on nearly every other state in Northern Nigeria and the country at large.

    Soon after that symposium, the United States government increased humanitarian and development support for Borno State through the United States Agency for International Development, USAID.  But then, my visit today for the 2016 symposium is not just about Borno State. My colleagues and I are here to seek benefits that should accrue to all the 19 Northern States of Nigeria.  We look forward to many more benefits that will accrue to our region after this important symposium.

    Ongoing economic recession in Nigeria has made life very challenging for our citizens but the federal and state governments are tackling it in many different ways. As you would shortly see in a 14-minute documentary, the North of Nigeria is grappling with all kinds of problems.

    Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, by the time we wake up tomorrow, print, online and broadcast media houses in Nigeria would have screaming headlines, that “Ten Northern Governors storm Washington” in the midst of economic recession, when our national currency, the Naira, has sharply depreciated against the U.S Dollar. Majority of our citizens will quickly conclude that we are here on a jamboree. Well, leadership isn’t only about popular decisions; leadership is about doing what is right at a time that is right.

    Our visit to Washington is an opportunity to re-engage with our American partners on the most vital issues that can help us to quickly make transition from volatility to a phase of peace and development in the Northern States of Nigeria. Over the past few years, we have realized that the indices of development in our region have not only been some of the most damning in our country, they have also been the background against which the problems in our region have manifested. These range from the deepening problems of Boko Haram, rural banditry, spontaneous religious and inter-tribal violence, deadly clashes between pastoralists and farmers, cattle rustling as well as the Mother of them all, which is pervasive poverty that gives birth to the many forms of crime.   The emergence or the re-surfacing of insurgencies are not episodic events. They manifest through lingering processes which eventually symptomatize into aprons like Boko Haram and ISIS.

    We have the greatest respect and admiration for the American government and we hold the United States Institute of Peace in very high esteem due to its track record. It is for these reasons that even though we anticipate criticism at home for this visit, we came here with high expectations. We believe that our hosts, USIP and officials of the U.S government will work with us with the utmost sincerity of purpose to guarantee quick benefits that will improve the living conditions of our people. As governors of the 19 northern states, we hope to secure tangible benefits that we can point to our people as proof, that our visit here is not a jamboree as they would assume.

    We in the Northern States Governors Forum recognize that our partnership with USIP is strategic. Some of the benefits we derive from this partnership include deepening cooperation towards eliminating conflicts. We may not be able to point this benefit tangibly to our people but we know for instance, that the United States is the world’s pre-eminent agricultural power and the number one food exporter. On the other hand, No land in the world is better suited for agricultural cooperation than Northern Nigeria.

    Your highly adored and respected first lady Mrs. Michelle Obama has a programme for intervention on girl-child education in Africa. We eagerly look forward to benefit from this programme as well as many other areas in which we can partner with our American friends to tackle our under-development and weak infrastructure. What is needed is the will and I can assure you that all the governors of the northern states here and those at home, are irrevocably committed to these partnerships in the service of our people. The Northern Nigeria provides a good eco-system for all developments and development partners. What we need is sincere will from our development partners and I am sure that our development partners have the will.

    Finally, on behalf of my colleagues, let me express our profound gratitude to the American government, to the Board and officials of the United States Institute of Peace, to the United States Agency for International Development, to the European Union and to all partners who have stood in solidarity with us through development support in different parts of Northern Nigeria. We are also grateful to USIP for organizing this symposium that once again, brings the underdevelopment in Northern Nigeria to the front burner of discussion. But even as we discuss, we cannot ignore the fact that the outcome of the U.S election in 21 days to come, may affect the full implementation of our goals after this symposium. Favourably, our country is not as close as Mexico for us to worry about a ‘wall’ that could come between our forum and the United States after January 20.

    Ladies and gentlemen, what works in today’s world is coming together with sincerity because like the American Henry Ford said, COMING TOGETHER IS A BEGINNING, KEEPING TOGETHER IS PROGRESS AND WORKING TOGETHER IS SUCCESS.

    We look forward to successful partnerships.

     

    • Shettima, Governor of Borno State and chairman of Northern States Governors’ Forum, delivered these remarks on Tuesday, October 18, at the opening of a three-day symposium hosted by the United States Institute of Peace in Washington.

     

  • IMF pledges to stop competitive devaluation

    Nigeria might get some respite from international pressure to devalue her currency. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its Communiqué after the Thirty-Fourth Meeting of the IMFC released in Washington DC on Saturday, promised to refrain from competitive devaluations and not “to target exchange rates for competitive purposes.”

    The IMF lamented that “the economic outlook is increasingly threatened by inward-looking policies, including protectionism, and stalled reforms.”

    ” We commit to design and implement policies to address the concerns of those who have been left behind and to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to benefit from globalization and technological change.”

    Going forward, the IMF demanded that “all countries should use fiscal policy flexibly and make tax policy and public expenditure more growth-friendly, including by prioritising high-quality investment, while enhancing resilience and ensuring public debt as a share of GDP is on a sustainable path.”

    The Fund noted that “appropriate and credible fiscal policies along these lines will support growth, job creation, and confidence. Well-designed tax structures, as well as income policies where appropriate, can promote stronger growth, protect the vulnerable, and reduce inequality.”

    With regards to monetary policy, the Fund urged monetary authorities to “remain accommodative, consistent with central banks’ mandates, mindful of financial stability risks, and underpinned by credible policy frameworks. Monetary policy by itself cannot achieve sustainable and balanced growth, and hence must be accompanied by other supportive policies.”

    To help ensure that the financial sector is robust enough to support growth and development, IMF pledged to “intensify efforts to address remaining crisis legacy issues in some advanced economies and vulnerabilities in some emerging market economies, while monitoring potential financial stability risks associated with prolonged low or negative interest rates, systemic market liquidity risks, and nonbank intermediation.”

    It cautioned that “timely, full, and consistent implementation of the agreed financial sector reform agenda remains an important priority, as well as finalizing remaining elements of the regulatory framework as soon as possible.”

    The Fund agreed to redouble its “commitment to maintain economic openness and reinvigorate global trade as a critical means to boost global growth.”

    To help maintain the current lending capacity of the Fund, it was agreed that they will welcome the pledges of US$360 billion received from 26 members to ensure the IMF’s continued access to bilateral borrowing under the strengthened governance framework approved by the Executive Board; support the need for continued access to multilateral borrowing agreements; and call for broad participation of the IMF membership including through new agreements.”

    Looking ahead, the Fund reaffirmed its “commitment to a strong, quota-based, and adequately resourced IMF to preserve its role at the center of the global financial safety net.”

  • U.S. lifts ban on transgender military service

    U.S. lifts ban on transgender military service

    The Pentagon on Friday announced that transgender individuals can now serve openly in U.S. armed forces.

    U.S. defence chief Ash Carter said this at a press conference in Washington.

    “Effective immediately, transgender Americans may serve openly, and they can no longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military just for being transgender.

    “Americans who want to serve and can meet our standards should be afforded the opportunity to compete to do so,’’ Carter said, adding that the policy will be phased in during a one-year period.

    According to 2014 study by RAND Corporation, about 2,500 people out of roughly 1.3 million U.S. active-duty service members and about 1,500 out of 825,000 reserve service members are transgender.

    He said that the end of the ban on transgender service was the latest step by the Pentagon to be more inclusive.

    However, the U.S. military has also ended the ban on gays serving openly and opened all combat jobs to women.

  • Buhari: From Washington with dignity

    Buhari: From Washington with dignity

    It was an official visit that attracted not only national, but also international attention. President Muhammadu Buhari was going to visit the United States of America for four days, on the invitation of President Barack Obama. Was this going to be just another jamboree, or truly an event that would reset the buttons in the relationship between the two countries?

    Sure, there had been some cooling of passion between the two erstwhile allies during the dying days of the Goodluck Jonathan administration, and American experts sent here to train our military had even been asked to leave. She had also refused to sell us Cobra helicopters and other armaments, which could have made a lot of difference in our fight against insurgents in the North-east of the country. America had cited some reasons, including alleged human rights violations. The then President  Jonathan was thus forced to look towards South Africa for arms. He loaded millions of dollars in a private jet as if going to Oyingbo market, and got his fingers burnt in the process. South Africa seized the cash, and also impounded the aircraft for some time. The Nigerian government could only huff and puff for a while, and then licked its wounds quietly.

    No doubt, the kiln of passion needed to be kindled anew between Nigeria and America, and the invitation extended to President Buhari during the G7 Summit in Germany in June, was a much needed elixir. The Nigerian leader accepted the offer, and so was in Washington between Sunday, July 19 and Wednesday, July 22.

    But another whiff of controversy had presaged the meeting. America, through its Supreme Court, had recently legitimized same sex relationship. A man could marry a man if he wanted, while a woman could also marry a woman. It was against the laws of God, but heck, what did America care? God was either dead due to old age, or now belongs to the old school.  What matters now are rights, and people with homosexual or lesbian cravings must have their rights protected under the law.

    It was into the eye of this storm that some Nigerians felt President Buhari would be flying, on his trip. True, he had been asked to bring a ‘wish list’ by his host, but is there ever free lunch in America? Yes, your wish would be granted. America would help you decapitate Boko Haram, would help you trace and repatriate billions of dollars salted away in foreign banks by past rulers, would help boost your economy and generate employment, but at what price? At a price of endorsing same sex marriage, which would be contrary to our laws as a country, and to the laws of the God that majority of Nigerians believe in, and serve? Would President Buhari capitulate simply because America would help him fulfill promises he made during election campaigns?

    To America we flew last Sunday, arriving after a voyage of 12 hours. Our President was accommodated along with some members of the entourage at the historic Blair House, just a peeping distance from the White House. A good number of meetings were to hold at that Blair House in the next four days.

    You would be permitted if you had jet lag after 12 hours in the air, punctuated only by a one hour technical stopover at a Portuguese island called Santa Maria, to refuel your plane. But President Buhari was still spry enough to settle down to business immediately. We have heard of the work rate of former Army General and later civilian president, Olusegun Obasanjo. Now we see another retired Army General now civilian president, exhibiting the same horsepower work ethics. Could it be true that they give them some injections in the military, which makes them go on and on? Well, I did not say so. I only heard of it.

    After a briefing of what was to come in the next four days by Professor Ade Adefuye, Nigerian Ambassador to the United States of America, the President played host to former American Ambassador in Nigeria, Thomas Pickering and Professor Jean Herskovits. The man who has been quite outspoken about Nigeria, and who had doubted if the country would survive the 2015 general elections, Ambassador John Campbell, also came, among other people.

    The day was not done until Madeline Albright (remember her? A large number of people across the world were mad about Madeline years back when she was American Secretary of State. She did the work admirably).  Well, Madeline came to dinner with our President. She has aged, but rather gracefully.

    Day 2 was the day the world had been waiting for. Day of meeting with the world’s most influential president, Barak Obama. But not so fast! First, breakfast with the Vice President, Joe Biden. Venue was the Naval Observatory, which is the official residence of the American number 2 man. What did he tell our President?

    Biden gave an overview of the objectives of the entire visit,assuring Nigeria of the goodwill  and support of America. He shared perspectives on the terror war, drawing from America’s experiences after the September 2001 assault, in which thousands were killed by Al-Qaeda inspired terrorists. He said Boko Haram, which has now pledged loyalty to ISIS, should not be battled with just military option. There was also the need to combine the war with strong socio-economic programs. He said the U.S would be ready to work with Nigeria in that direction.

    On the Nigerian economy, Biden bade the leadership to tackle the issue of corruption, strengthen the institutions, and appoint tested hands to man critical sectors. If all these were done, he assured that investors would flood Nigeria in droves.

    President Buhari thanked his host, and added that the role played by America prior to general elections, sending Secretary of State John Kerry to convey that America would not tolerate the subversion of the people’s will, went a long way to guarantee fairness and justice.

    Having served as Minister for Petroleum Resources for over three years in the 1970s, President Buhari did not forget to mention the oil sector. He said between 10 to 20 billion dollars may have been lost to oil theft in the past one year, and pledged to sanitize the sector. He welcomed American assistance.

    The much awaited meeting with President Obama came up a while later at the White House. American leaders have been known to be fairly parsimonious with praises, particularly when talking about leaders of other countries. But Obama was effusive. He described President Buhari as a man of integrity, needed for such a time as this in Nigeria. He congratulated him for winning the March 2015 presidential election, adding that Nigeria was very important to Africa. The destiny of the continent was tied to Nigeria’s, he said, pledging that America would continue to support, as long as Nigeria does the right things.

    Every patriotic Nigerian must have stood several feet taller, as Obama eulogized our President. It served to rekindle confidence in our country. With the right leadership, Nigeria can, and will get there. Sure.

    The American president charted the same course as his deputy on the issue of Boko Haram. According to him, economic and social programs must run concurrently with military option, to conclusively defeat insurgency.

    Obama said the diversity of Nigeria, rather than be a centrifugal force, must be a centripetal one. The disparate parts of the country should be harnessed to become source of strength, adding that no part of the country should be left behind, or alienated.

    Buhari, the American president observed, was hugely popular, judging by the enormous goodwill that surrounded his election. He urged him to use the goodwill to serve Nigeria, alongside the governors that accompanied him. The governors are Rochas Okorocha, Imo, Adams Oshiomhole, Edo, Tanko Al-Makura, Nasarawa, Kashim Shettima, Borno, and Abiola Ajimobi, Oyo.

    Speaking on behalf of the governors, Okorocha assured Obama that the states’ helmsmen would back up Buhari to bring enduring change to Nigeria.

    President Obama made pledges. America would help Nigeria in diverse ways: checkmate insurgency, train and equip her military, recover monies siphoned out of federal coffers, and many others. And with no strings attached.

    The bilateral meetings/ audiences with the Nigerian president at Blair House, and other venues, were worth their weight in gold. The American Secretary of Commerce met with the Nigerian team, so did Loretta Lynch, U.S Attorney General, Jack Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, the Barker Group, potential investors in the Agriculture and Power sectors. There was an interactive dinner hosted by U.S Chamber of Commerce and Corporate Council for Africa, and captains of industry from Nigeria and America were there, among others.

    What of the meeting with Dr Pate of the World Health Organization (WHO), representatives of the World Bank, and  of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Refreshing. WHO unfolded plans to spend 300 million dollars to fight malaria in Nigeria, while the World Bank, subject to ratification by its board of directors, will make available the princely sum of  2.1 billion dollars for the rebuilding of infrastructure in the North-east, a region beleaguered by insurgency in the past six years. The fund, under the auspices of International Development Agency (IDA) will be made available as loans for Nigeria, at very low interest rates. The first 10 years would be interest free, while an additional 30 years would be granted at rates lower than that of the capital market.

    A delighted President Buhari said priority would be given to the resettlement of more than one million internally displaced persons (IDPs), and directed that a team be set up on the side of the Federal Government, which would meet and harmonize plans with the World Bank team as soon as possible.

    The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also disclosed plans to work with the Dangote Foundation to ensure that Nigeria gets a clean bill of health on polio. Already, no case of polio has been recorded in the country for a full year, and if the position subsists for another full year, Nigeria would be declared polio free.

    Cheery news also from the session between the Nigerian team and the American Attorney General. The host country would track illicit money from Nigeria in all their jurisdictions, including the U.S, while training would also be provided for our judicial officers, prosecutors, police, and other security agencies, to track and recover stolen funds.

    There were other bilateral meetings with John O. Brennan, Director of the CIA and Deputy Secretary of Defence, Robert Work, and Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen Martin Dempsey.

    Oh, the courtesy call by the Class of 1980 of the United States War College, in which the then Col Muhammadu Buhari participated, and got glowing recommendations. It was a time to go down memory lane.

    Same sex issue enters the scene. On Tuesday afternoon, President Buhari was in his right elements, as he attended a joint session by the Senate and House Committees on Foreign Affairs at the Capitol Hill. Many issues came up for discussion, ranging from foreign relations, to growing democracy, human rights, and many others. Then a senator brought in the clincher. What does Nigeria think of the rights of homosexuals and lesbians.

    Sodomy or anything of such kind is against the laws of Nigeria, and, indeed, the Nigerian society abhors such practices, the President declared. Pastor Tunde Bakare of The Latter Rain Assembly was in the audience, and from the delight on his face, he could have carried the President shoulder high, if protocol had permitted such.

    To cap that delightful day, the president headed to the Chancery, Nigeria Embassy. He had two assignments there. A Meet and Greet session had been packaged by Mo Abudu of Ebony Life TV, in which Nigerian youths, who are professionals, had been invited from across America to greet President Buhari, and share their dreams of a greater country with him. The young people were really happy to have their president and father figure in their midst.

    Next was the meeting with Nigerians in Diaspora, who also came from across America. Biodun Ogunjobi had driven 12 hours to attend the event. He alo had waited for four hours outside the Embassy gates, till the program commenced. Such is the fervor Nigerians in America have for their country, and for a president they see as symbol of change. For about two hours, the President interacted with them, answering all the questions.

    The night did not end without the president meeting with the All Progressives Congress (APC) members in USA and Canada. The previous day, the party members had massed at the gate of Blair House, bearing different placards hailing President Buhari. When he saw them, he got down from his vehicle to greet them. The gesture drew sustained applause.

    On the final day of the visit, it was an interactive event at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP).  It was jointly organized by the National Democratic Institute, International Republican Institute, Centre for Strategic Studies and Atlantic Council. Ambassador Johnny Carson, who coordinated the session, described the guest as a man of honour and integrity. The event included a question and answer session, a round table discussion, and a presentation by the Nigerian president. And did the man sparkle? In fact, so remarkable was that outing that Pastor Bakare told this writer: “He obviously left the best for the last. That was simply brilliant.”

    President Buhari went to America, he saw, and he conquered. As I watched him signing the Visitors’ Register as he attempted to leave that historic monument called Blair House, I wondered how many people in the world would ever have such privilege. Not many. An American official had given him a pen, and the president wrote for about three minutes. He also must have been effusive in his appreciation. When he finished, he read over what he had written, put the pen back in its casing, rose, and handed it to the American official. That one collected it, and solemnly handed it back to the Nigerian president as a gift. Very solemn. And moving.

    As President Buhari strode out of Blair House for the last time, with his entourage in tow, one could see that an invisible Nigerian flag had been hoisted in the Amrican sky, and it was fluttering proudly. The Nigerian president had come with dignity, attended all the sessions lined up for him, not missing a single one,  and was returning home with an enhanced reputation, not just for himself but also for about 170 million of his country men and women. Who says change will not come to Nigeria?

     

    • Adesina is Special Adviser, Media and Publicity, to President Buhari
  • I prefer to go slow and steady – Buhari

    I prefer to go slow and steady – Buhari

    President Muhammadu Buhari has again defended the delay in the appointment of his ministers.
    Speaking in Washington, United States, on Tuesday Buhari said contrary to critics who have nicknamed him ” Baba Go Slow,” he prefers to be ” go slow and steady.”
    He noted that the question of when he would name his cabinet has been chasing him around the world.
    According to him, not even the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) during all the years it ruled the country formed a cabinet within the first four months.
    “I am going to go slow and steady,” he assured and called for patience to allow the new administration “put some sense into governance and deal with corruption.”
    The President had earlier in the week indicated that he will name his cabinet in September.

  • Buhari’s Bucket List to Washington

    Less than a week from President Muhammadu Buhari’s visit to Washington on July 20, attentive Nigerians should be considering the visit’s import and possible outcomes. For the trip, the President should have a bucket list; not a shopping list. A shopping list includes wishful takeaways. A bucket list is diplomatically collaborative and aimed at quid pro quos. The Washington trip is propitious in view of the premise enunciated by Ambassador Bulus Lolo, Permanent Secretary in the Foreign Ministry, that the visit “is not an expression of romance… but a crystallisation of a relationship that is strong and mutually beneficial to the people of Nigeria and America.” Yet, in welcoming this early engagement, it is hoped that the preparations for Washington will be better than that for the G-7 Summit outing, which revealed some snags and faux pas.

    It is gratifying that the Washington trip had been preceded by visits to and return visits from our immediate neighbours and a visit to South Africa for the African Union Summit. That trajectory reaffirmed clear policy continuity of Nigeria’s ‘Africa is the centre-piece of our foreign policy’ doctrine and Prof. Ibrahim Gambari’s concentric circle framework. However, some vitally important issues will be broached with Washington, even as Abuja-Washington relations have cooled discernibly and the engagement halting. Both sides may contest this point. But the true measure is that neither President Barack Obama nor Vice-President Joe Biden has visited Nigeria, which speaks volumes.  One salutary point as President Buhari goes to Washington is that Nigeria’s sweet-crude-oil-relationship with the U.S. has turned lukewarm, thanks to global oil dynamics and realpolitik.  The unintended consequence is a level-playing field for the two nations to engage real-time and on strategic basis; with strict focus on their commonality of interests and shared responsibilities. As such, the President’s maiden visit to Washington will neither be a shopping spree nor a mutual attraction exercise. The President should not expect or demand too much.  And since Nigeria’s role as a strategic partner to the U.S. subsists, the visit ought not to be about Nigeria’s needs alone; but about envisaged Nigeria’s role in keeping the sub-Saharan Africa region safe and stable, given the disconcerting developments in the Middle East and the Magreb.

    The guiding principles of the talks will rest on the observations by Nigerian foreign policy experts that Buhari’s visit to Washington will occur against an ambiguous, but reality-check-laden backdrop. First, should Nigeria’s domestic uncertainties persist, that reality would continue to impact negatively on her proactive role in foreign affairs. After all, proactive foreign policy leadership draws its impetus from national will, domestic self-confidence and wherewithal. Nigeria proved that in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Second, in assessing Nigeria’s present capacity in global politics, there’s stark cognizance that failure to seize the moment, make a turnaround linked to her new leadership, will translate to further diminution of her influence. Third, for a nation once accepted as Africa’s foreign policy bellwether, Nigeria can ill-afford to be risk averse and still expect to be taken seriously in international affairs.

    Without prejudice to the briefs my erstwhile colleagues in the foreign ministry will proffer, the plausible approach to the visit would be for President Buhari to arrive Washington in a listening mode. Whereas the U.S. may no longer need Nigeria’s oil, hard lessons drawn from Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia and Libya, compels Washington to articulate and seek Nigeria’s role as an ally in Africa’s geo-politics. Secondly, despite her wherewithal, the U.S. is visibly stretched in its role as the global policeman. Washington will thus continue to favour a strategic partnership with Nigeria aimed at enhancing global security in the adversely altered post-9-11 environment. Moreover, the U.S. needs a stable Nigeria capable of playing a buffer role against existing or emergent non-state actors. Given its international peacekeeping track record, Nigeria remains a “capable partner who can take on more responsibility for low-end operations.” Besides, democracies favour each other; as such, even a nascent democratic Nigeria is to be preferred to non-democracies and rogue states. Thus, U.S. will affirm its support for Nigeria’s democracy. Aware of the Nigeria’s challenges with Boko Haram, Washington has definitely gone beyond conjectures in evaluating the ruinous impact of a destabilized or dismembered Nigeria. Every evaluation of the havoc wrought on Somalia and its neighbouring states by Al Shabaab and the destructive disposition of the Levant ISIS in Iraq and Syria remain instructive.  Then also, the realization persists that the spill-over effect of the break-up of Iraq and Libya will pale against such an occurrence in Nigeria. As the Economist observed recently, “If Nigeria fails it could bring down half a dozen neighbouring states with it.” U.S.  knows that a fractured Nigeria will pose vast risks and challenges to its economic and strategic interests.

    Discussions in Washington will straddle bilateral and multilateral concerns. The top bullet talking point on President Buhari’s bucket list should neither be an offer nor a demand.  First, President Buhari should ask President Obama:  “How can Nigeria partner with the U.S. to make sub-Saharan Africa secure for Africa, the United States and the rest of the world?” Prosaic as the question is, a secure sub-Saharan Africa will include Nigeria as well as U.S. strategic and economic interests, including core issues now before the U.N. Security Council, where Nigeria will hold the Presidency in August.  President Buhari should focus on few issues that are tangible and can be flagged as catalytic to advancing President Buhari’s national agenda for good governance. President Buhari should be prepared, therefore, to discuss such germane issues like corruption, impunity, insecurity, oil theft, money laundering, financial instability, elections and human-trafficking. While thanking the U.S. for its guidance and support in containing the Ebola outbreak in Nigeria, the President should underline the need for U.S. support in three key areas. (1) Combating corruption: U.S. should help repatriate or recover all the stolen funds that Nigerian anti-corruption will trace to U.S. Financial institutions. U.S. should not throw legal or administrative obstacles on the recovery of the funds.  (2) Overcoming Insecurity: There is need for vigorous support to fight Boko Haram by sale of military hardware, as well as resumption of training of Nigerian soldiers in counter-terrorism.  President Buhari should observe that in fighting the scourge of terrorism including Boko Haram, there can be no conscientious objectors, citing how Nigeria tackled the Maitasine Sect in the 1980s.(3) The economy: Focus should be on U.S. support for developing and boosting electric power generation. President Obama has an Africa Power Initiative, which will need to be expanded in scale in order to accommodate Nigeria’s power needs.

    It’s well known that U.S. spearheaded the countries that denied Nigeria arms for fighting Boko Haram on grounds of human rights violations, despite our missing Chibok Girls challenges. The U.S. will thus revisit human rights issues and even if obliquely, issues of personal choices – gay rights and same-sex-marriage- in the context of freedom of association. President Buhari should stress that while lines might have blurred sometimes in the fight against Boko Haram terrorists, the sanctity of Nigeria’s Constitution and its human rights provisions remain intact, despite the recent Amnesty International report. On gay rights, the President should push back very hard, as traditional norms here frown on such lifestyles and, in any case, this matter remains controversial in the US itself, in spite of recent Supreme Court ruling. Finally, the President should inquire when President Obama intends to visit Nigeria. A non-committal or non-definitive reply should be taken for what it is:  a continued unwillingness to engage Nigeria fully.

    • Obaze is a strategic public policy adviser and immediate-past Secretary to the Anambra State Government.

     

  • Transferring Abuja’s governance narrative to Washington

    Transferring Abuja’s governance narrative to Washington

    What is innovative about this contract is that all the activities of changing the narrative about governance in Nigeria are to be done from K Street in Washington

    With several years of aggressive cultivation of the Nigerian diaspora by the executive and legislative branches of the federal government, it is reasonable for value-added Nigerians in the United States to feel unsettled by the recent announcement in Abuja of a multimillion-dollar contract to a Washington public relations or lobby agency.

    The federal government’s decision to hire a Washington-based lobby group to burnish its image from Washington to the rest of the globe must have meant a major loss to local professional public relations firms, lobby agencies, and savvy advocacy groups, the type that have been beating the drum of President Jonathan’s re-election bid, even when the president remains reluctant to announce his entry into the race. For a meagre sum of 275 million naira per annum, Levick Strategic Communications has been hired to lead other subcontractors to assist in promoting “transparency, democracy, and the rule of law throughout Nigeria.” More specifically, Levick is to assist Nigerian government’s efforts to mobilise international support in fighting Boko Haram as part of the greater global war on terror.

    What is innovative about this contract is that all the activities of changing the narrative about governance in Nigeria are to be done from K Street in Washington. The public relations game changer for Nigeria is not working just to spread good messages about Nigeria’s governance in the Western hemisphere but also to spread new narratives about governance in the country to citizens at home. From now on, strategising about consolidating and enhancing the culture of democracy in Nigeria will be determined and directed by sophisticated lobbyists in Washington. And this company will also be responsible for conveying messages of Nigeria’s commitment to democracy and the rule of law to all the corners of the world.

    Nigerians in diaspora in the United States must wonder what led a government with which the Nigerian Diaspora Association has a robust relationship of cordiality to jump over them to give such a juicy contract to foreigners. Public communication professionals among them (and they are legion) must marvel why the loss of homeland PR firms in Lagos and Abuja has not been allowed to become the gain of Nigerian public professionals in diaspora. Those Nigerians abroad who are not savvy about the workings of power are likely to feel betrayed or cheated by a federal government that had organised conferences and seminars in Atlanta, New York, Washington, and other U.S. cities on how to create synergy between the country and its diaspora.

    On their own part, Nigerians at home must be astonished by this contract, especially the objective of assisting the government to promote transparency, democracy, and the rule of law throughout Nigeria. Is the local media narrative not already doing that and very aggressively too? Without doubt, some segments of the media created and operated solely to do panegyric journalism has done so much of that and very well too. But there are other media houses across the country that are mordantly critical of threats to transparency, democracy, and the rule of law in the country. Similarly, top public relations firms within the country must be puzzled about new pro-democracy narratives that Washington spin doctors have been hired to create and propagate all over the wide world.

    With respect to the charge to Levick to assist the federal government’s efforts to find and safely return the abducted Chibok girls, those who observed the activities and pronouncements of Malala during her recent visit to Abuja must wonder why the country would need a special contract to do what Malala had chosen to do pro bono for the country. Malala may not be an image manipulator, she is without doubt the world’s most admired symbol of anti-terrorism. She is more likely to assist the government in this respect at no cost to a government that is already too stretched financially to the point of seeking one billion dollar loan from the international community, even if on Shylockean terms. With her pronouncements during a recent visit to Aso Rock, Malala appears to be in the best of positions to talk to the international community about the readiness of the government in Abuja to find and bring the Chibok girls to safety, more so after the government’s announcement that it knows where the girls are and is only working on the best time to emancipate them from their captors.

    It is not clear in media reports when the project to hire K Street’s image makers was conceived. Was it before or after the government discovered where the girls are kept by the terrorists? Given the assurance by the federal government that all its security agencies know the location of the Chibok girls, one part of the project seems to have been accomplished, even before signing the contract with Levick. The second part, bringing the girls home safely, looks less of political advocacy Washington style, than military strategic thinking and attention to tactical details that are needed for the job of liberation of innocent school girls from the den of terrorists. If there is need for special assistance, is it not more reasonable to approach the many countries that have already sent representatives to the country to show their commitment to assist Nigeria in the liberation of the girls and termination of Boko Haram’s terror, especially after the U.S. government has undertaken to train our security forces in strategies and tactics of fighting terrorism?

    The federal government may have found one new friend on account of the contract given to Levick. It certainly has lost many friends at home and abroad. It has made it known to the entire world that it does not believe in the professional know-how of thousands of public relations specialists within Nigeria and among its diasporic communities in the western world. It is an irony that at a time the federal government is committed to transformation of the job market to create jobs at home, it is also creating jobs for public relations workers in the United States, a major aid giver to Nigeria on many fronts.

    It should not surprise anyone if the federal government chooses to hire another lobby group to work on the message of dis-alienating competent Nigerian public relations men and women at home and abroad that its offer of contract to Levick’s Strategic Communications for millions of dollars per annum had insulted and alienated. This should be the time for the government to go into its archives to remind itself of the methods used by late Dora Akunyuli to re-brand Nigeria during the presidency of UmaruYar’Adua.