Tag: Whodunit

  • Whodunit

    Whodunit

    • Whoever killed the lawyer and his client on their way from court in Anambra must be fished out and punished

    The gruesome murder of Mr Rolex Iloakasia and his client around Agulu and Nanka communities in Anaocha Local Government Area of Anambra State, has triggered fear among the local communities. The stories surrounding the killing and the identity of the victims have raised national outrage and we hope the police will identify the killers and bring them to justice.

    According to the Anambra State Police Command spokesman, Tochukwu Ikenga, the killers operated on a motorcycle. One of the victims was a lawyer who just secured a bail for a person accused of murder. The other victim was a client to the lawyer, while the third person survived the attack. According to the spokesman “preliminary investigations suggest that the victims were attacked while returning from the court session, having been trailed and double-crossed by the assailants.” If the insinuation that the lawyer was attacked because of his work is true, then every professional has cause to be concerned. For, no matter how unacceptable the outcome of a professional service may be, murder should never be contemplated as the answer for any disagreeable conduct.

    In every legal contest, there will be a winner and a loser, and if after every such context, the winner is exposed to danger, then the society is in grave danger.

    In other professions like medicine, doctors are sometimes exposed to danger when a patient dies in their care. While expression of emotion is human, predetermined killing can never be condoned, regardless of the level of provocation.

    Sadly, judges and magistrates who preside over cases are sometimes victims of attack when a judgment does not go a certain way.

    The sad incident in Nanka and Agulu community must be used to forestall recourse to murder as a way to settle scores, for professional services rendered in an unsatisfactory way, as insinuated in this case.

    Read Also: Govt gives panel four weeks to design disposal plan for 753-unit Abuja estate

    The quick intervention of the state’s commissioner of police, who has reportedly ordered an intensive investigation into the murder and has deployed tactical intelligence teams to ensure the perpetrators are tracked to face criminal justice, is heartwarming. Anything short of that may open a floodgate of self-help, when a client disagrees with a service rendered. If, as the preliminary investigation suggested, the culprits are those who lost a loved one to a defendant who has been granted bail, following the effort of the slain lawyer, then they should be ready to suffer a double jeopardy when they are caught and punished for their crime. If, as alleged, a bail was granted against their wish, they have the option to urge the prosecution to appeal the bail. Moreover, a bail is not an acquittal, so if the accused person is guilty, as they believe, they can still get a conviction if the facts support their belief.

    The ease with which ordinary Nigerians have access to firearms is a cause to worry. Over a decade ago, the chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, Onitsha Branch, Anambra State, Barnabas Igwe, and his wife were gunned down over their activities as lawyers. Their murder was linked to agents of government, who were allegedly uncomfortable with the work of the NBA chairman in defence of human rights and abuses of power by the then state government.

    We urge the legal community, the state government and the police to work together to ensure justice for the lawyer and his client, whose lives were cut short in broad daylight. No effort should be spared to ensure that the killers are identified and made to answer for their evil act.

    We emphasise that anyone aggrieved with the outcome of a professional service should approach the law enforcement agencies, the court or relevant professional body, for redress.

  • Whodunit?

    Whodunit?

    • We need to know who killed Dele Giwa, others

    Assassinated Nigerian journalist Dele Giwa has grabbed the headlines yet again, 38 years after his death, following the order of the Federal High Court, Abuja, on February 16, directing the Federal Government to “investigate, prosecute and punish perpetrators of all attacks against journalists and other media practitioners, and ensure that all victims of attacks against journalists have access to effective remedies.”

    Justice Inyang Ekwo also made an order directing the Federal Government to “take measures to prevent attacks on journalists and other media practitioners.”

    This judgment was the outcome of the suit instituted by Media Rights Agenda (MRA), a non-governmental organisation, in 2021, seeking to enforce the fundamental rights of journalists to safety as stipulated in the Nigerian Constitution, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

    The NGO had listed journalists in the country who were killed extrajudicially, including Giwa. Others were Bolade Fasisi of the National Association of Women Journalists, killed in March 1998; Edward Olalekan of Daily Times, killed in June 1999; Omololu Falobi of The Punch, murdered in October 2006; Godwin Agbroko of Thisday, December 1999; Abayomi Ogundeji of Thisday, August 2008; and Edo Sule-Ugbagwu of The Nation, April 2010.

    The judge noted that the Federal Government “neither denied that these killings have taken place nor that these persons were not journalists or media practitioners.”

    Predictably, reports of the court judgment highlighted Giwa’s murder because it was a unique case and perhaps the most devastating of the unresolved cases of journalists murdered in the country. The colourful, high-profile journalist and founding Editor-in-Chief of Newswatch died from injuries inflicted by a parcel bomb he received while having breakfast in his residence in Ikeja, Lagos, on October 19, 1986. He was 39.

    In 2015, 29 years after Giwa was killed, a former Deputy Inspector-General of Police who investigated the murder, Chris Omeben, was reported saying his efforts to interrogate a “principal suspect” failed due to interference from “high places.” He was in charge of the Research Department of the Police CID when Giwa was murdered.

    The gruesome murder happened under the Gen. Ibrahim Babangida military regime, which was accused of the killing in some quarters. In 2001, Babangida rigidly refused to appear before the Human Rights Violations Commission, popularly known as the Oputa Panel, concerning the Giwa murder. He demonstrated desperation for silence by going to court. Babangida,  Col. Haliru Akilu (retd) of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) in his regime, and Lt. Col. A.K Togun (retd), who was the Deputy Director of the State Security Service (SSS), obtained an order barring the commission from summoning them to appear before it.

    An astounding travesty of justice followed as the commission’s chairman was reported saying while it had powers to issue arrest warrants for the trio, it decided against such a move “in the overall interest of national reconciliation.”

    Read Also: Tinubu commends outgoing Immigration CG

    The campaign for justice for Giwa has been relentless. The other listed media victims of extra-judicial killings deserve justice as well. According to a 2021 report by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), 278 journalists were killed in Nigeria in the 10 years prior to the report. It is unclear whether any of these cases was resolved.

    The court order directing the authorities to reopen the unresolved murder cases involving journalists is a strong legal and moral statement.

    It is said that there is no perfect murder. The failure of the authorities to bring the perpetrators of the stated extra-judicial killings to justice amounts to a failure of law enforcement and a contradiction of that assertion. 

    The Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, and the Inspector- General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, must carry out the court order by reopening the unresolved cases of extrajudicial killing involving journalists, particularly the ones listed by MRA, and pursue justice for the victims. The momentous judgment demands nothing less.