Tag: Words

  • Stella Damasus, Toyin Aimakhu trade words

    Stella Damasus, Toyin Aimakhu trade words

    In what suddenly became a Twitter row, actresses Stella Damasus and Toyin Aimakhu, over the weekend, kept their fans busy when they took volleys at each other.

    Though the thespians are known to have been engaging each other in a quiet war over the former’s affair with filmmaker, Daniel Ademinokan, things came to a head recently when Toyin, again, took to Twitter to attack Stella.

    Among other things, Toyin accused Stella of ‘stealing’ Daniel when she said; ‘Madam, Nigeria is my country. Nobody is killing anyone cos no be only you do video. #VisaDonExpire #BringOurSonBack #AttentionSeeker #LoveYouStill.’

    However, in Stella’s new vlog, she chose to reply what she describes as Toyin’s mean tweet when she stated; ‘I love you like crazy. But let’s look at your hashtags again. You said #VisaDonExpire#, I have been in this country for about two years, and nobody has asked me to leave. Apart from that, I’m doing a lot of work with the United Nations. If I had a problem with my visa, I don’t think they would be working with me. When it comes to the visa issue, let’s be sure of what we are saying.’

    On the #BringOurSonBack hashtag, Stella replied; ‘Is her son missing? Does she have a son? If your son is missing, let us look for him.You know I know how to do videos as you said. Tell me and I will scream till my lungs burst or something.’

    Toyin Aimakhu and some of her colleagues in the Yoruba movie industry are said to be unhappy with Stella over allegations that the latter was responsible for the separation of Doris Simeon and her estranged husband, Daniel Ademinokan.

  • Parties trade words over planned protest against Osun poll’s result

    Parties trade words over planned protest against Osun poll’s result

    The ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) in Osun State and the opposition, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), traded words yesterday over a plot by the latter to sponsor a mass protest to the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja to denounce the result of August 9, governorship poll won by Governor Rauf Aregbesola.

    APC also alleged that the PDP had concluded arrangements to carry out a sustained mayhem in Osun to make the state ungovernable.

    Its Director of Publicity, Research and Strategy, Kunle Oyatomi, who revealed the plan in a statement yesterday, said the state’s “PDP leadership is already arranging for hundreds of youths to be transported to Abuja to protest the victory of Aregbesola in the August 9 governorship election.”

    The party insisted that the PDP had “fashioned an elaborate plan to create mayhem in the state and give the impression of popular displeasure at the outcome of the election.

    “The first phase of this plan is to hire 10 buses that will convey young men and women to Abuja to protest Aregbesola’s victory. The youths are allegedly being motivated with N10 million to participate.

    “This protest will be based on the yet-to-be- substantiated allegation by the PDP that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) colluded with the governor and the APC to rig the August 9 election. The underlying theme of the Abuja protest by the PDP will be that INEC gave the election to the APC to prevent President Goodluck Jonathan from winning the 2015 presidential election. So, the protest will be effectively against the INEC and the APC.”

    But the PDP described the allegation as ridiculous.

    The party Publicity Secretary, Prince Bola Ajao, in a statement yesterday, said the allegation should not be taken seriously.

    “It is unfortunate that they are coming up with this cock and bull story. As a matter of fact, we are civilised people who are always in tandem with due process and rule of law. We are at the election petition tribunal and we are sure that with all the unassailable and incontrovertible evidences on ground, we would retrieve the mandate given to our candidate, Senator Iyiola Omisore, by the people.”

  • War of words over ATM charge

    War of words over ATM charge

    The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and others in financial circles have been defending the return of Automated Teller Machine (ATM) charge, which was N100 before it was abolished in 2012. It was restored few weeks ago at N65 and it will take effect from September 1. Depositors are not impressed with arguments for its return. They perceive the policy as a ploy to shortchange them, reports COLLINS NWEZE.

    The reintroduction of N65 Automated Teller Machine (ATM) charge took many bank depositors by surprise. The N100 ATM charge was abolished in 2012. But, a few weeks ago, the charge was reintroduced but with a different amount of N65.

    Depositors believe its return is  another policy targeted at further enriching the banks and impoverishing them.

    But the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), in a statement last week, said the policy was intended to enhance the process of ATM transactions and ginger lenders to invest more in the machines. The CBN also wants customers to understand that banks need the charge to improve ATM services and achieve the seamless cash-less banking they have been asking for.

    The CBN said it noted some public comments on its recent circular in respect of fees/charges on the extended use of other banks’ ATMs. These reactions, it said, had been mixed with most commentators showing great understanding and others expressing clear lack of understanding of the rationale for the decision of the Bankers’ Committee.

    To experts, N65 per transaction on remote-on-us ATM cash withdrawals is a step in the right direction. Remote-on-us are transactions done by a card holder on another bank’s ATM.

    The policy, which will take effect from September 1, is generating mixed reactions.

    Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Financial Derivatives Company (FDC), Mr. Bismark Rewane, described the reinstatement of the charge as appropriate.

    He said it was wrong for the CBN to have removed the charge in the first place. Rewane insisted that the charge was necessary given that the dynamics of banking are such that banks would  continue to invest and re-invest in infrastructure to ensure that they continue to provide quality service to customers.

    He noted that banks are carrying the burden of paying the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) levies; the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) premium, adding that the commission on turnover (COT), which is also a cash spinner for lenders is also almost being removed by the apex bank.

    An Executive Director at Sterling Bank, Abubaker  Suleiman, said that the re-instatement of cost recovery for the use of other banks’ ATM was intended to limit the cost incurred by banks and does not constitute profit.

    He said: “Banks are still left with the burden of three free withdrawals a month, which translates to N195 monthly charge.   While this cost is less than the income on medium and high value accounts, it is sufficient to render most low value accounts unprofitable, which will force banks to discontinue marketing such accounts.”

    Suleiman argued that the last thing the country needs at this time is a rollback of the financial inclusion campaign, which has resulted in a noticeable uptick in customer enrollment by banks and has created access to financial services for more than one million Nigerians in just over a year.

    He stressed that the previous policy on limitless withdrawals might have benefitted those who were already financially included in the short-term but would have harmed mostly poor people with banks scaling back investments for mass market and refocusing on the middle class.

    Furthermore, emphasised that the burden on banks arising from the combined weight of NDIC premiums and AMCON levy as well as the increasing cost of Cash Reserves gave little room for pushing additional cost to banks.

    He added that these costs has become a source of concern for investors and could have negative impact on capital flows. “When it comes to the cost of using ATMs, Nigerian banking customers still have one of the best deals you can find in any jurisdiction” Suleiman averred.

    But chairman of the National Humans Rights Commission (NHRC) Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, kicked against the policy, saying does not benefit the poor and should be discouraged. “So the CBN Governor has decreed that each ATM transaction shall henceforth attract a charge of N65. Clearly, providers of banking services exist to make profits for their shareholders. But regulatory powers are a public good. There is a legitimate question to be raised here: (how) does this serve the public good?,” he queried.

    Odinkalu continued: “Nigeria is a country that is heavily under-banked; banking penetration is low; retail banking is poor in many places. For these deficiencies, customers are to be levied what is in effect a financial services tax of N65 per withdrawal. And this in a country in which no bank recorded a loss in the last year. I do understand ATMs need a back-end. But if the banks are already profitable, while introducing the fee”.

    Does anyone know the figures for average trip to a cash-point per customer per annum? That would give a sense of ? how much this tax is worth. “With the level of hardship we have here, how many Nigerians can afford this tax? I would like to get a legal team to review this because there may be room to get the CBN to justify itself under the applicable rules of judicial review,” he said.

    Central Banking Report, international online researchers, said the CBN is defending the ATM policy because it feels the reintroduction of fee will hinder abuse of expensive ATMs and promote its cash-less policy. It also said fee was abolished in 2012 to encourage use of ATMs and promote the cash-less banking initiative.

    According to Chairman Rockview Consulting Limited, Kingsley Obinna, pressure on some banks’ ATMs is likely to rise with the new policy. This, he said would lead to poor service quality and loss of fund by customers.

    However, he said since ATM has become lucrative, it more banks which found no reason to expand their ATM figures will be forced to invest more in new machines.

    Also, he said customers of banks with limited number of ATMs will be disadvantaged if they have to rely on their banks which may be far away from their homes.

    For him, lenders are finding ways to defray the burden of the cost from themselves despite the huge billions declared as profit every year from credit interest and bank charges.

    Also an electrical parts merchant in Balogun, Lagos, Emeka Onyewuchi lamented that apart from the fact that the reintroduction would impoverish ATM users, it would also discourage people from using the ATMs.

    Likewise, a textile dealer based in Oshodi, area of Lagos State, Michael Obi, said it was surprising that the CBN could take such a decision when people are been encouraged to go cashless.

    He called on the apex bank to reverse the decision as it capable of send­ing wrong signal the banking populace.

    Speaking in an interview in Lagos, Director, Banking and Payment System Department, CBN, ‘Dipo Fatokun, said the policy will not affect the apex bank’s financial inclusion campaign. He also insisted that the policy was not a re-introduction of charges.

    Fatokun said prior to the amendments in December 2012 it used to be N100 on any remote-on-us withdrawal. But he said the N100 was removed then so that people would be encouraged to go to other banks’ ATMs.

    “But the truth is that, as we said in the circular, that of the N100, N35 goes to the payment bank, which has now been completely waived. But in going to other ATMs to make withdrawals, your bank, which is the acquirer bank, incurs a cost of N65 which they pay to the switches and the owner of the ATM that you are using.

    “Between 2012 and recently, when the review was done, it was discovered that people have actually turned ATMs into their personal purses because nothing is charged. Somebody needs N500, N1,000, he will go to an ATM to withdraw, such that in a day, some people can patronise ATMs up to five times,” he said.

    According to him, this has created a huge cost burden for the banks that issued the cards. It was the major reason the central bank decided that even though remote-on-us would still be encouraged, a customer can go to other banks’ ATMs and withdraw up to three times and there would not be any charges. But the customer would be charged N65 when he makes the fourth withdrawal.

    “Of course, if you go to the ATM of your bank, you are free to withdraw as much as you like. So, it does not discourage financial inclusion,” Fatokun argued further. The central bank had explained that it took the latest decision as a result of the unintended consequences on banks.

    It had said the earlier arrangement had resulted in substantial cost burden incurred by banks in defraying the cost for the service. According to the CBN, the re-introduction of the fee was also to cover the remuneration of the switches, ATM monitoring and fit-notes processing by acquiring banks.

     

    What the policy says

    The CBN had reintroduced Automated Teller Machine (ATM) fee it scrapped in December, last year. The apex bank said from September 1, customers will commence payment of N65 as against the N100 fee charged previously.

    Fatokun, who made this known in a circular, the re-introduction of Remote-on-us ATM cash withdrawal fee of N65 per transaction, is to cover the remuneration of the switches, ATM monitors and fit-notes processing by acquiring banks.

    He said the new charge shall apply as from the fourth transaction in another bank’s ATM. “The fee shall apply in “Remote-on-us” withdrawal (in a month) by a card holder, thereby making the first three (3) ‘remote-on-us transactions free for the card holder, but to be paid for by the issuing bank. September 1, 2014 shall be the effective date for the implementation of the new fee,” he said.

    However, all ATM cash withdrawals on the machine of issuing banks shall be at no cost to the card holder. He advised banks to conduct adequate sensitisation to their customers, on the introduction of the new fee.

    The Nation’s findings showed that the top five banks – FirstBank, GTBank, Zenith Bank, United Bank for Africa and Access Bank – are worst hit by the removal of the ATM fee. However, it is expected that the reintroduction of the fees is a plus for these lenders and would boost their revenue base.

    For instance, FirstBank of Nigeria operates an extensive distribution network with over 750 business locations (623 branches, 61 quick service points and 69 cash centres/agencies), over 2,397 ATM’s and over nine million customer accounts. The bank has five subsidiary companies, providing a comprehensive range of financial services. Equally, banks will fewer ATMs are likely to lose some of their customers as they drift to the bigger banks over the policy.

     

  • Daniel: I won’t engage in war of words

    Former Ogun State Governor Gbenga Daniel has said he is a statesman and would not descend low to engage ordinary citizens in a “war of words” because of 2015 politics.

    Daniel, in a statement yesterday by his media aide, Mr Ayo Giwa, said he has observed the frustrated attempt by some politicians to drag his name into a desperate political chess game for reasons best known to them.

    The former governor, who was reacting to a report describing him as a political prostitute, said he would rather busy himself with policies and political administration to make life more meaningful for the citizens and improve the state than engage ordinary people in an unproductive war of words.

    The statement reads: “We note the frustrated attempt to drag Daniel’s name into a desperate political chess game by some politicians for whatever reasons known to them, but definitely not far from seeking to perpetuate relevance.

    “We need to sound it that Daniel, after serving eight years of two terms as governor, has become a statesman and so cannot descend low to the level of engaging ordinary citizens in the war of words the originator of the story seeks to achieve.

    “Let it be noted also that Otunba Gbenga Daniel is a businessman and engaging some of those who had been his subjects in the past would not compliment his busy schedule.

    “Rather, as a statesman, Daniel is more concerned about statements and issues of policies and political administration that will make life more meaningful for the citizens and move the state forward. From this, he will not be distracted.”

     

  • Kwara APC, PDP trade words over ‘billboards’

    THE All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kwara State yesterday said thugs allegedly sponsored by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) had demolished its billboards in parts of Ilorin, the state capital.

    APC urged the state police command to fish out and bring alleged perpetrators to book.

    The State APC Chairman, Alhaji Ishola Balogun-Fulani, who addressed reporters in Ilorin, said his party had lodged a formal complaint about the development with the Department of State Service (DSS).

    He added that the party would without delay officially write the state police command on the issue.

    He listed the areas where the APC’s bill boards were destroyed to include General Hospital area, the Queens School area, Garin-Alimi Roundabout and Offa Garage and other parts of Ilorin metropolis.

    Balogun-Fulani alleged that after the failed attempt to instigate the impeachment of the state governor, Alhaji Abdulfatah Ahmed, “as the PDP did in Adamawa State, events in Kwara State in the past few days point to a desperate attempt by the PDP and its sponsored political thugs to make Kwara State ungovernable through PDP-instigated political unrest and crises.”

    But the state PDP Spokesperson, Chief Rex Olawoye, dismissed the APC’s allegation, adding: “That is what they have always been saying. They are not yet aware that they are becoming unpopular even among their members.”

  • Words and Deeds From the Pope

    Words and Deeds From the Pope

    Each time Pope Francis speaks out, he seems to be evolving in his view of how well the Roman Catholic Church has been dealing with the grave historical legacy created by priests who raped and abused children. Last month he was decidedly defensive about a United Nations report that criticized the church. Francis insisted “no one else has done more” than the church to address the scandal, “yet the church is the only one to have been attacked.”

    This month, on the other hand, the pope took a different tone in stepping forward to stress his own responsibility as a leader “compelled to personally take on all the evil” that some priests — “quite a few in number” — committed against children.

    Without being specific, Francis promised the imposition of sanctions, presumably against those who committed or covered up the abuses. He offered no concrete measures, though he did venture a step beyond his Vatican predecessors in personally taking responsibility for confronting the problem.

    “It is personal moral damage carried out by men of the church, and we will not take one step backward regarding how we will deal with this problem,” the pope promised in impromptu remarks at the Vatican to a French children’s welfare organization. “On the contrary, we have to be even stronger, because you cannot interfere with children.”

    As welcome as the pope’s words were, advocates for abused victims properly asked whether and when they will see deeds to go with the talk. “Until he takes some actions, it’s hard to believe that his request for forgiveness is serious,” said Barbara Dorris of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests.

    Pope Francis has created a special commission to advise him on the protection of minors and the reform of church procedures. One glaring area that must be addressed has been the Vatican’s failure to punish members of the church hierarchy who took part in the widespread, systematic cover-up of the pedophilia scandal and shielded priests from being charged in the criminal courts.

    For all the pope’s heartfelt comments, his and the church’s record on this shameful issue will depend considerably on whether Francis calls diocesan leaders to account for their crucial role in perpetuating the scandal.

    – New York Times