Tag: Yahaya Bello

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Witness in Yahaya Bello’s trial claims fund withdrawals by Kogi State government lawful 

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Witness in Yahaya Bello’s trial claims fund withdrawals by Kogi State government lawful 

    A prosecution witness in the ongoing money laundering trial of former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello before a Federal High Court in Abuja has claimed that the various withdrawals made by the state government in its accounts did not breach any known law.

    The witness, Mshelia Arhyel Bata, a Compliance Officer with Zenith Bank also claimed that the defendant’s name did not feature as beneficiary in the account statement tendered before the court.

    Bello is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on a 19-count charge relating to money laundering, breach of trust, and misappropriation of public funds estimated at ₦80.2 billion.

    Bata, who featured as the fourth prosecution witness, made the claims while being cross examined by Bello’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu (SAN).

    Daudu drew Bata’s attention to some transactions (mainly withdrawals) by one Umar Comfort Olufunkebin the account statement tendered by the prosecution

    The witness said the withdrawals, which were in multiples of N10million, were made between December 2017 and April 2018, with beneficiaries being some hotels in Kogi State.

    Bata added there were withdrawals by one Alhassan Omakoji between November 2021 and December 2022, which did not exceed N10million per transaction. 

    He said the withdrawals conformed with the withdrawal limits set by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). 

    The witness said he was not aware of any law that regulates how Kogi State Government spends its money or allocation.

    Bata added that beside from the beneficiaries of the funds like the hotels, it was impossible for him to know what the state’s withdrawals were meant for.

    READ ALSO; Progressive governors laud Tinubu’s security overhaul

    The fifth prosecution witness, Jesutoni Akoni, a Compliance Officer with Ecobank Plc, was led in evidence by Chukwudi Enebeli, (SAN), for the prosecution.

    The prosecution tendered, through the witness, some documents including a statement of account.

    From the statement of account, Akoni confirmed cash deposits which were between N3 million and N20 million, and totalling N57 million. 

    Under cross examination, Akoni claimed that the defendant was was not the beneficiary of the said deposits.

    Akoni said it was impossible to ascertain the source of funds from the face of the documents.

    The prosecution also called a sixth witness, Mohammed Bello Hassan, who is a Relationship Officer with Keystone Bank. 

    The prosecution tendered through him the statements of account of Dantata and Sawoe.

    Its seventh witness was Olomotame Egoro, a Compliance Officer from Access Bank, who was also subpoenaed like the others.

    The prosecution also tendered through the witness some documents, including bank records.

    The trial continues on Tuesday before Justice Emeka Nwite.

  • Yahaya Bello will emerge stronger from EFCC case – Agbese

    Yahaya Bello will emerge stronger from EFCC case – Agbese

    Deputy spokesman of the House of Representatives, Philip Agnese, has defended former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello, asserting that he will emerge stronger from the ongoing money laundering allegations levelled against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Speaking outside the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in Maitama, Abuja, Agbese stood in solidarity with Bello, describing the trial as a test of a patriot’s resilience rather than evidence of wrongdoing.

    In an address to journalists and supporters gathered after Thursday’s court proceedings, the lawmaker representing Ado/Okpokwu/Ogbadibo Federal Constituency described Bello as a leader of unblemished integrity.

    “Yahaya Bello is one Nigerian who cannot and will never steal a dime from the public purse,” he declared emphatically.

    “I have known Yahaya for over two decades, and I can vouch for his character as a patriot, a nationalist, and a man wholly dedicated to the progress of his people.

    “This is not a trial of a corrupt politician; it is the trial of a patriot who left Lugard House [Kogi State Government House] poorer than he entered it, having poured his heart and resources into transforming Kogi State.”

    Agbese emphasised the former Covernor’s selflessness and commitment to public service.

    “In my over 20 years of knowing Yahaya Bello, I have seen a man who consistently placed the welfare of his people above personal gain,” he said.

    “When he assumed office in 2016, Kogi was grappling with infrastructural decay, insecurity, and economic stagnation.

    “Bello changed that narrative through bold reforms, youth empowerment programs, and massive investments in roads, healthcare, and education. He didn’t amass wealth for himself; instead, he left office with a leaner pocket but a richer legacy of service. Nigerians must recognize that what we are witnessing is a politically orchestrated attempt to tarnish the image of a man who dared to prioritize governance over personal enrichment.”

    The lawmaker urged Nigerians to look beyond the EFCC’s allegations, which he described as “a smokescreen designed to distract from Bello’s transformative achievements.”

    He highlighted Bello’s tenure as one marked by fiscal discipline and transparency. “Under Bello’s watch, Kogi State saw unprecedented development,” Agbese noted.

    Read Also: Transactions in Kogi govt’s accounts violated no regulations – Witness in Yahaya Bello’s trial

    “From the construction of the Muhammadu Buhari Civic Centre to the establishment of the Kogi State University Teaching Hospital in Anyigba, Bello’s projects were tangible and people-centered. He introduced free education policies, empowered women and youths, and tackled insecurity head-on, making Kogi safer.

    “These are not the actions of a man who loots public funds. I am confident that when the dust settles, Yahaya Bello will walk out of this trial not just vindicated but stronger, with his reputation as a patriot intact.”

    Agbese also called on Nigerians to critically evaluate the motives behind the EFCC’s pursuit. “This case is less about accountability and more about settling political scores,” he asserted.

    “Bello’s rising profile as a young, dynamic leader who delivered results made him a target for those who feel threatened by his influence.

    “Nigerians should ask: why is a man who left office without a single personal mansion or offshore account being hounded? The answer lies in the politics of envy and vendetta. But truth is resilient, and Yahaya Bello’s truth will prevail.”

    “Yahaya Bello represents the hope of a new generation of leaders who prioritize service over self,” Agbese concluded.

    “This trial will only strengthen his resolve and amplify his voice as a champion of the people. Nigerians should stand with him, for in defending Bello, we defend the very idea of patriotic governance.”

  • Transactions in Kogi govt’s accounts violated no regulations – Witness in Yahaya Bello’s trial

    Transactions in Kogi govt’s accounts violated no regulations – Witness in Yahaya Bello’s trial

    A prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of ex-governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, and two others has claimed that the transactions carried out in accounts belonging to the state government violated no known banking regulations.

    The witness, Mrs. Abimbola Williams, who is a Compliance Officer with the United Bank for Africa (UBA), featured as the third prosecution witness.

    Bello is being prosecuted before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    He is being prosecuted with Umar Oricha (Director General, Kogi State Government House) and Abdulsalami Hudu (an Accountant with the state government).

    The EFCC is, in the 16-count charge, alleging criminal breach of trust to the tune of N110.4 billion.

    Under cross-examination by the lawyer to Bello, Joseph Daudu, Williams said she was not the relationship or account manager of the Kogi Government House account.

    She added that the account is domiciled in Lokoja (the capital of Kogi State), while she works in Abuja.

    The witness said the banks do not enquire from customers the purpose for which they were making cash withdrawals, but that such a question could be asked when making transfers, and the relationship with the beneficiary in cases of high-volume transactions.

    Mrs. Williams said that as a compliance officer, her duties involve protecting the integrity of her employer from legal penalties, reputational damage, and financial losses.

    Read Also: Appeal Court restores EFCC’s interim forfeiture order on Yahaya Bello’s alleged properties

    She said no withdrawal went beyond N10 million in all the transactions presented before the court, adding that she has worked with UBA for 19 years.

    The witness, who said she was familiar with the duties of a cashier, which she said included paying cash and receiving cash, added that a customer could withdraw his/her money as much as he/she prefer as long as the mandate is correct.

    The witness told the court that she had not met Bello in person before and that she had equally not met or had business dealings with Oricha.

    Under cross-examination by lawyer to Hudu, A. M. Aliyu (SAN), the witness was handed a bank statement which reflected the various withdrawals made.

    She stated that the narration on the credit entry in the statement was the governor’s security fund, adding that it was a credit entry of N100 million, in two tranches of N50 million each.

    On whether she could state that the funds were not used for security purposes, the witness said: “My Lord, I am not privy to the details of the transaction and cannot categorically answer that question.”

    Earlier, while being led in evidence by the lawyer for the prosecution, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), Mrs. Williams was handed documents relating to the account of the Kogi State Government House.

    The lawyer took the witness through the documents from which she narrated how withdrawals were allegedly made by Hudu.

    She said cheque transactions totalling 64 at N10million per transaction, amounting to N640 million, were allegedly made within six days (between 31st July and 6th August, 2019) by Hudu.

    She added that she was not in a position to know why the withdrawals were made.

    She also confirmed transfers, in tranches, by one Bello Abdullateef, on July 5, 2019, but noted, on cross-examination, that her bank did not breach any regulations in allowing the withdrawals or transfers.

    The prosecution also called in its fourth witness, Jesutomi Akanni, a Compliance Officer with Ecobank.

    The prosecution tendered a 13-page statement of accounts from 2016 to 2024 and some other documents through the witness.

    The witness gave details of some transactions in the account, following which the defence lawyers cross-examined the witness.

    The prosecution called its fifth witness, Victoria Oluwafemi, who, like Akanni, was a subpoenaed witness from Polaris Bank.

    Earlier, Daudu informed the court about his client’s pending application, challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

    He urged the court to hear the application, a request Pinheiro objected to, arguing that it was not ripe for hearing.

    Hearing in the case, before Justice Maryanne Anenih resumes on Thursday.

  • Court restores EFCC’s interim forfeiture order on Yahaya Bello’s ‘properties’

    Court restores EFCC’s interim forfeiture order on Yahaya Bello’s ‘properties’

    The Lagos Division of the Court of Appeal yesterday reinstated the interim forfeiture order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over 14 properties allegedly linked to former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello.

    In a unanimous decision delivered virtually, the appellate court set aside an earlier ruling by the Federal High Court, which struck out the EFCC’s case, based on the constitutional immunity granted to a sitting governor.

    Justice Yargata Nimpar, who delivered the lead judgment, with Justices Danlami Senchi and Paul Bassi concurring, ruled that the trial court erred by invoking Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution to halt the proceedings.

    The judge held that immunity does not shield property suspected of being proceeds of a crime from investigation or preservation.

    “The trial court erred in striking out the case rather than determining whether or not the properties should be finally forfeited,” she said.

    The EFCC had obtained the interim forfeiture order in a judgment delivered by Justice Nicholas Oweibo of the Federal High Court in Lagos. The judge had allowed the anti-graft commission to temporarily seize the 14 properties located in Lagos, Abuja, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    The agency alleged that the assets were purchased with proceeds of unlawful activity and filed an ex parte motion seeking their forfeiture.

    The court had also ordered the EFCC to publish the forfeiture notice in two national newspapers, inviting any interested party to show cause why the properties should not be permanently forfeited to the Federal Government.

    Read Also: Invest in Nigeria’s eco-tourism destinations, says Balogun

    The former governor, through his legal team, opposed the order, arguing that the properties were acquired before he assumed office and could not have been purchased with the state’s resources.

    He also invoked Section 308 of the Constitution, claiming immunity from civil and criminal proceedings, and further argued that the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act, 2022, could not apply retrospectively.

    His lawyers also cited a subsisting order of a Kogi State High Court restraining the EFCC from investigating the state’s accounts, and questioned the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court in Lagos.

    The lawyers averred that the properties were located outside Lagos, while Bello resides in Lokoja.

    But counsel to the EFCC, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), leading Bilkisu Buhari-Bala and Hanatu Kofanaisa, urged the appellate court to uphold the agency’s statutory mandate.

    The lawyer argued that no Nigerian court had barred the commission from investigating suspected economic crimes.

    He maintained that the luxury properties — including an apartment in the iconic Burj Khalifa in Dubai — were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with illicit funds.

    The EFCC also sought the interim forfeiture of an additional N400 million linked to the same investigation.

    Justice Oweibo had ruled that the court lacked jurisdiction and struck out the case based on Bello’s immunity. But the EFCC appealed the decision.

    In its judgment, the Court of Appeal dismissed Bello’s preliminary objection, held that the immunity clause did not apply to property preservation proceedings.

    It ordered the EFCC to proceed with the final forfeiture hearing.

  • Appeal Court restores EFCC’s interim forfeiture order on Yahaya Bello’s alleged properties

    Appeal Court restores EFCC’s interim forfeiture order on Yahaya Bello’s alleged properties

    The Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, on Wednesday reinstated the interim forfeiture order obtained by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over 14 properties allegedly linked to Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello.

    In a unanimous decision delivered virtually, the appellate court set aside an earlier ruling by the Federal High Court, which had struck out the EFCC’s case based on the constitutional immunity granted to a sitting governor.

    Justice Yargata Nimpar, delivering the lead judgment, with Justices Danlami Senchi and Paul Bassi concurring, ruled that the trial court erred by invoking Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution to halt the proceedings.

    She held that immunity does not shield property suspected to be proceeds of crime from investigation or preservation.

    “The trial court erred in striking out the case rather than determining whether the properties should be finally forfeited,” Justice Nimpar stated.

    The EFCC had obtained the interim forfeiture order from Justice Nicholas Oweibo of the Federal High Court in Lagos, allowing it to temporarily seize the 14 properties located in Lagos, Abuja, and Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

    The agency alleged that the assets were purchased with proceeds of unlawful activity and filed an ex parte motion seeking their forfeiture.

    Read Also: EFCC warns against suspicious foreign airlines ticket promos

    The court had also ordered the EFCC to publish the forfeiture notice in two national newspapers, inviting any interested party to show why the properties should not be permanently forfeited to the federal government.

    Governor Bello, through his legal team, opposed the order, arguing that the properties were acquired before he assumed office and could not have been funded by state resources.

    He also invoked Section 308 of the Constitution, claiming immunity from civil and criminal proceedings, and further argued that the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery and Management) Act, 2022, could not apply retrospectively.

    His lawyers also cited a subsisting order of a Kogi State High Court restraining the EFCC from investigating the state’s accounts, and questioned the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court in Lagos, noting that the properties were located outside Lagos, and that Bello resides in Lokoja.

    However, EFCC counsel Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), leading Bilkisu Buhari-Bala and Hanatu Kofanaisa, urged the appellate court to uphold the agency’s statutory mandate.

    He argued that no Nigerian court had barred the commission from investigating suspected economic crimes and maintained that the luxury properties—including an apartment in the iconic Burj Khalifa in Dubai—were reasonably suspected to have been acquired with illicit funds.

    The EFCC also sought the interim forfeiture of an additional N400 million linked to the same investigation.

    Justice Oweibo had originally sided with Bello, ruling that the court lacked jurisdiction and striking out the case based on the governor’s immunity. But the EFCC appealed the decision.

    In its judgment, the Court of Appeal dismissed Bello’s preliminary objection, held that the immunity clause did not apply to property preservation proceedings, and ordered the EFCC to proceed with the final forfeiture hearing.

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Why court rejected Yahaya Bello’s request for UK medical trip

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Why court rejected Yahaya Bello’s request for UK medical trip

    • ‘Ex-Kogi governor presented unsigned medical report’

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has declined the request by the immediate past Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, for the release of his international passport to enable him to travel to the United Kingdom (UK) on health grounds.

    In a ruling yesterday, Justice Emeka Nwite found that the medical report attached to Bello’s application was unsigned, as required by law.

    Justice Nwite averred that the report, marked “Exhibit B”, which was the medical report provided by a doctor, was not signed by its maker, and as such, could not be accorded any probative value.

    The judge stressed that an unsigned document carries no weight in law and is, therefore, considered worthless.

    He said: “In other words, ‘Exhibit B’ is devoid of probative value and cannot be relied upon by the court.

    “The defendant has failed to place sufficient materials before this court for his passport to be released for him to travel. Consequently, this application is hereby refused.”

    Justice Nwite faulted the argument by the prosecution that the application constituted an abuse of court process.

    He noted that Bello’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu (SAN), had argued, among others, that his client was a known hypertensive patient for about 15 years.

    Commenting on the prosecution’s argument that Bello’s sureties were not involved in the defendant’s application, he judge noted that the case was only between the prosecution and the defence.

    Read Also: Yahaya Bello weds fourth wife in private Abuja ceremony

    He added: “The counsel to the complainant did not cite any section of the law that says sureties should be given notice or made a party in the motion on notice.

    “The counsel did not cite any law, whether locally or internationally, to back his argument.

    “On the abuse of process of court, it is the argument of the complainant that the instant application is incompetent and amounts to abuse of the court process.

    “It is not in dispute that the applicant is standing trial before this court and the FCT court and it is not in dispute that the applicant was granted bail in this court on December 13, 2024 and at FCT High Court on December 19, 2024…”

    “The FCT High Court, in its ruling, said that the applicant must seek the leave of the court. Hence, this instant application does not amount to an abuse of court process.

    “It is also the fact that this court and the FCT High Court are courts of coordinate jurisdiction,” Justice Nwite said.

    He adjourned till October 7 for the continuation of the trial.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is prosecuting Bello on a charge.

    e in which he is among others, allegedly laundering N80,246,470,088.88 purportedly belonging to Kogi State.

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Court rejects Yahaya Bello’s request for UK trip on health grounds 

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Court rejects Yahaya Bello’s request for UK trip on health grounds 

    …says he presented unsigned medical report

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has declined the request by a former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, for the release of his international passport to enable him travel to the United Kingdom (UK) on health grounds.

    In a ruling on Monday, Justice Emeka Nwite found that the medical report, attached to Bello’s application was not signed by its maker as required.

    Justice Nwite noted that the report, marked as Exhibit B, which was the medical report provided by a doctor, was not signed by its maker, and as such, could not be accorded any probative value.

    The judge stressed that an unsigned document carries no weight in law and therefore, considered worthless. 

    He said: “In other words, Exhibit B is devoid of probative value and cannot be relied upon by the court.

    “The defendant has failed to place sufficient materials before this court for his passport to be released for him to travel. Consequently, this application is hereby refused.”

    The judge faulted the argument by the prosecution that the application constituted an abuse of court process.

    READ ALSO: Katsina Gov Radda stable after minor road crash

    He noted that Bello’s lawyer, Joseph Daudu (SAN) had argued among others, that his client was a known hypertensive patient for about 15 years.

    On the prosecution’s argument that Bello’s sureties were not involved in the defendant’s application, noting that the case was only between the prosecution and the defence.

    He said, “The counsel to the complainant did not cite any section of the law that says sureties should be given notice or made a party in the motion on notice.

    “The counsel did not cite any law, whether locally or internationally, to back his argument. 

    “On the abuse of process of court, it is the argument of the complainant that the instant application is incompetent and amount to abuse of court process.

    “It is not in dispute that the applicant is standing trial before this court and FCT court and it is not in dispute that the applicant was granted bail in this court on December 13, 2024 and at FCT High acourt on December 19, 2024.

    “The FCT High Court, in its ruling, said that the applicant must seek the leave of the court. Hence, this instant application does not amount to abuse of court process. 

    “It is also the fact that this court and the FCT High Court are courts of coordinate jurudiction,” Justice Nwite stated.

    He then adjourned till October 7 for continuation of trial.

    The ex-governor is being prosecuted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on a charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024,in which he is among others, allegedly laundering N80, 246,470, 088.88 purportedly belonging to Kogi State.

  • Yahaya Bello weds fourth wife in private Abuja ceremony

    Yahaya Bello weds fourth wife in private Abuja ceremony

    Former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello has married a fourth wife, Hiqma, in a ceremony held over the weekend in Abuja.

    The private event was attended by close friends and family members.

    Confirmation of the marriage came through an Instagram post by Bello’s third wife, Hafiza Yahaya Bello, who publicly welcomed Hiqma to the family.

    “Our family just got a little bigger and more loving,” she wrote, expressing gratitude and praying for peace and blessings in their home.

    Read Also: Court denies holding Yahaya Bello’s passport

    Bello, who governed Kogi State from 2016 to 2023 on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC), was previously married to Amina Oyiza Bello, Rashida Yahaya Bello and Hafiza.

    Known for his low-profile personal life, Bello has largely kept his family affairs out of the spotlight.

    His latest marriage adds a new chapter to his private life following the conclusion of his gubernatorial tenure.

    He holds both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in Business Administration from Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

  • Yahaya Bello weds fourth wife in private ceremony

    Yahaya Bello weds fourth wife in private ceremony

    Former Kogi Governor Yahaya Bello has married a fourth wife, Hiqma, in a ceremony held over the weekend in Abuja.

    The private event was attended by close friends and family members. 

    Confirmation of the marriage came through an Instagram post by Bello’s third wife, Hafiza Yahaya Bello, who publicly welcomed Hiqma to the family.

    “Our family just got a little bigger and more loving,” she wrote, expressing gratitude and praying for peace and blessings in their home.

    READ ALSO: Lagos unveils Nigeria’s first LG-owned radio station

    Bello, who governed Kogi State from 2016 to 2023 under the All Progressives Congress (APC), was previously married to Amina Oyiza Bello, Rashida Yahaya Bello and Hafiza Bello.

    Known for his low-profile personal life, Bello has largely kept his family affairs out of the spotlight. His latest marriage adds a new chapter to his private life following the conclusion of his gubernatorial tenure.

    He holds both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in Business Administration from Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

  • Court denies holding Yahaya Bello’s passport

    Court denies holding Yahaya Bello’s passport

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) has said the international passport of the former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, is not in its custody.

    Justice Maryanne Anenih said this while ruling yesterday on an application the ex-governor filed in which he sought the release of his passport to enable him to travel abroad on medical grounds.

    Justice Anenih held that the court would have considered the application for the release of Bello’s passport if it were to be in its custody.

    The judge added that even if the request to retrieve the passport was granted, it would be of no effect since the travel document was not in the custody of the High Court of the FCT but with the Federal High Court.

    Bello is being prosecuted by the High Court of the FCT by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) with Umar Oricha (Director General, Kogi State Government House) and Abdulsalami Hudu on a 16-count charge.

    The EFCC is, in the charge, alleging criminal breach of trust to the tune of N110.4 billion.

    Read Also: Mai Gaskiya: The unmaking of a myth

    Bello is also being prosecuted by the EFCC before a Federal High Court in Abuja on a separate charge of alleged money laundering.

    The former Kogi State governor had submitted his passport as part of the conditions attached to the bail granted him by both courts.

    Justice Anenih said a review of the court’s record revealed that the applicant had previously been ordered to deposit his international passport and other travel documents with the Registry of the court.

    But upon further enquiry and a search conducted by the court, it was discovered that Bello’s international passport was not in the custody of the court’s Registry but with the Federal High Court.

    Justice Anenih adjourned further hearing in the case till October 8.