Tag: Yahaya Bello

  • BREAKING: Court grants Yahaya Bello N500m bail over N110.4bn alleged fraud

    BREAKING: Court grants Yahaya Bello N500m bail over N110.4bn alleged fraud

    The Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja has granted the immediate past Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, bail in the sum of N500 million and three sureties.

    The trial judge, Justice MaryAnne Anenih on Thursday made the pronouncement after listening to the fresh bail application brought before the court following the court’s refusal to grant Bello bail at the last sitting.

    Read Also: Alleged N80.2b fraud: Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello gets N500m bail

    Bello, alongside two others, Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu, are facing trial on 16 counts preferred against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering to the tune of N110.4 billion.

    The court, however, granted the second and third defendants bail in the sum of N300m with two sureties alongside other conditions.

    Details shortly…

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello gets N500m bail

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Ex-Gov Yahaya Bello gets N500m bail

    •Urges court to overlook his past conduct

    Reprieve has come the way of the former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello as a Federal High Court in Abuja granted him bail to the tune of N500 million yesterday.

    Bello was arraigned earlier on Friday on a 19-count charge of criminal breach of trust brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), to which he pleaded not guilty.

    Bello is, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/98/ 2024, accused of diverting funds, estimated at over N80.2billion, belonging to Kogi State to acquire, through proxies, property both in Nigeria and abroad.

    After Bello’s plea, his lawyer, Joseph Daudu (SAN) prayed the court to overlook the defendant’s past conduct in relation to the case.

    Daudu told the court that his client’s failure to attend court before now, was not out of disrespect, but a desire to fully defend himself.

    Read Also: Tinubu administration most Igbo-friendly, says Obielom

    He said Bello had asked his lawyers to challenge the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case.

    Daudu stated that his client’s decision to challenge the court’s jurisdiction up to the Supreme Court was not intended to disrespect the court, but his desire to defend himself.

    He added: “It was an episode that could have been avoided, but it has come and gone. Things are clearer now.”

    Daudu proceeded to apply for bail for Bello, an application that the prosecuting lawyer, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) did not object to.

    Pinheiro blamed the previous unpleasant incidents in the case on Abdulwahab Mohammed (SAN), who earlier led Bello’s legal team.

    He elected not to oppose the bail application made by Daudu, noting that he is a prosecutor and not a persecutor.

    Ruling, Justice Emeka Nwite said but for the decorum and candour exhibited by Daudu, he would have had a different disposition to the bail application.

    Justice Nwite said ordinarily, going by the antecedent of the case, especially the conduct exhibited by the defendant and his counsel, he would have acted otherwise.

    He added that after taking a second look at the application made by Daudu “and, based on the decorum and candour exhibited by the learned senior counsel for the defendant, J. B. Daudu, which was reciprocated by the learned senior counsel for the prosecution, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN), I am minded to bend on my earlier stance over this matter.”

    The judge proceeded to grant bail to Bello at N500million, adding that he must produce two sureties in like sum.

    The sureties, the judge said, must have property within the court’s jurisdiction, which should be verified by a Deputy Registrar of the Court.

    He ordered Bello to deposit his international passport with the court and to be remanded in Kuje Prison, Abuja until he is able to meet the bail conditions.

    The case, which was instituted earlier this year by the EFCC, had suffered delay owing to Bello’s reluctance to attend court.

    At a point and upon an application by the EFCC, the court issued a bench warrant for Bello’s arrest, an order the anti-graft agency could not execute.

    Bello eventually gave in following the dismissal of his case challenging the legitimacy of the law setting up the EFCC, a suit he had relied on to stay away from court.

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Yahaya Bello gets N500m bail

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Yahaya Bello gets N500m bail

    The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Friday, December 13, granted bail to former Kogi state governor, Yahaya Bello, at ₦500 million.

    Bello had earlier been arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on a 19-count charge of criminal breach of trust. 

    He, however, pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    The charges, filed under case number FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024, allege that Bello diverted over ₦80.2 billion belonging to Kogi State. 

    The funds were reportedly used to acquire properties in Nigeria and abroad through proxies.

    Read Also: Alleged N80.2b fraud: Yahaya Bello pleads not guilty to 19-count charge

    Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling a moment ago, admitted Bello to bail at N500m with two sureties in like sum.

    The sureties, the judge said, must have property within the court’s jurisdiction, which should be verified by a Deputy Registrar of the Court.

    He ordered Bello to deposit his international passport with the court and to be remanded in Kuje prison, Abuja until he is able to meet the bail conditions.

    Details shortly… 

  • Alleged N80.2b fraud: Yahaya Bello pleads not guilty to 19-count charge

    Alleged N80.2b fraud: Yahaya Bello pleads not guilty to 19-count charge

    The former governor of Kogi state, Yahaya Bello has pleaded not guilty to a 19-count charge of criminal breach of trust brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Bello is, in the charge, accused of diverting funds belonging to Kogi State to acquire, through proxies, property both in Nigeria and abroad.

    When the charge was read to Bello by an official of the court, he said he understood all the counts and pleaded not guilty to all of them.

    Read Also: BREAKING: Court sends Yahaya Bello to Kuje prison over alleged N110b fraud

    His lawyer, Joseph Daudu, (SAN) told the court that his client’s failure to attend court before now, was not out of disrespect, but a desire to fully defended himself.

    Daudu said the decision of his client to challenge, up to the Supreme Court, the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case was not out of disrespect.

    “It was an episode that could have been avoided but it has come and gone. Things are clearer now,” Daudu said.

    Daudu and lawyer to the prosecution, Dr. Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) are currently addressing the court on the issue of bail.

  • Judge sends Bello to Kuje Prison, adjourns till Jan 29

    Judge sends Bello to Kuje Prison, adjourns till Jan 29

    There is no reprieve yet for former Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello.

    A HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama  yesterday ordered that Bello be remanded in the Kuje correctional centre, Abuja pending his bail application.

    By the court’s ruling, Bello may remain in prison till January 29 when the court adjourned proceedings in the criminal case involving him.

    Bello is standing trial, along with two others, in a 16-count charge brought against them by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The three are accused of criminal breach of trust to the tune of N110,446,470,089.

    In an earlier ruling  yesterday, Justice Maryanne Anenih faulted the competence of Bello’s bail application and held that it was filed prematurely.

    Justice Anenih held that the application, having been filed when Bello was neither in custody nor before the court, his  application was incompetent.

    She said: “Consequently, the instant application, having been filed prematurely is hereby refused.”

    Bello’s bail application was filed  on November 22 before he was arrested on November 26 and arraigned on  November 27.

    Read Also: Tuggar to chair 53rd ECOWAS mediation, security council meeting

    Justice Anenih held that by the provision of Section 158 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), the condition for applying for bail did not exist when the application was filed.

    She  held by the provision of the ACJA, bail application could  only be filed when a person has been arrested, detained, arraigned or brought before the court.

    The judge said: “The instant application for bail showed that it was filed on 22nd November, 2024.

    “This shows that it was filed days before the first defendant was taken into custody,” she sad.

    The judge then held that the application is premature having been filed when Bello was not yet arrested, detained or brought before the court.

    In two other rulings,  Justice Anenih granted bail to each of the two  co-defendants – Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu –

    at N300m with two sureties in like sum.

    The judge said the sureties must have property worth the said amount within the court’s jurisdiction.

    She said the original title documents of the property must be deposited with the court after verification by court’s officials.

    The sureties are also to submit two passport photographs each to the court.

    The judge ordered Oricha and Hudu to deposit their passports with the court’s Registrar and must not travel out of the country without the court’s permission.

  • BREAKING: Court sends Yahaya Bello to Kuje prison over alleged N110b fraud

    BREAKING: Court sends Yahaya Bello to Kuje prison over alleged N110b fraud

    …ex-Gov may spend Christmas in Kuje

    …court adjourns till January 29 for trial

    A HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama has ordered the remand of the immediate past governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello in Kuje Correctional Centre, Abuja  pending his bail application. 

    By the court’s ruling, Bello may remain in prison till January 29 when the court adjourned further proceedings in the criminal case involving him.

    Bello is standing trial, along with two others, in an alleged N110bn money laundering charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Read Also: BREAKING: Alleged N110b fraud: Court declines Yahaya Bello’s bail request 

    In an earlier ruling on Tuesday, Justice Maryanne Anenih faulted the competence of Bello’s bail application and held that it was filed prematurely. 

    Justice Anenih held that the application, having been filed when Bello was neither in custody nor before the court, his  application was incompetent.

    She said: “Consequently, the instant application, having been filed prematurely is hereby refused.”

    Bello’s bail application was filed  on November 22 before he was arrested on November 26 and arraigned on  November 27.

    In two other rulings, Justice Anenih granted bail to each of the two Bello’s co-defendants – Umar Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu –

    at N300m with two sureties in like sum.

    The judge said the sureties must have property worth the said amount within the court’s jurisdiction.

    She then adjourned further proceedings till January 29 next year.

    It was learnt that Bello’s lawyers could file a fresh bail application and apply to the court for an early hearing date. 

    If the request for an early date is granted by the court and the fresh bail application granted, Bello could escape spending the yuletide period in Kuje correctional centre.

    Details shortly… 

  • BREAKING: Alleged N110b fraud: Court declines Yahaya Bello’s bail request 

    BREAKING: Alleged N110b fraud: Court declines Yahaya Bello’s bail request 

    A HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama has rejected the bail request by a former governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

    Bello is standing trial, along with two others, in an alleged N110bn money laundering charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Read Also: EFCC fails in bid to arraign ex-Gov Yahaya Bello in his lawyers’ absence

    Justice Maryanne Anenih, in a ruling on Tuesday, faulted the competence of Bello’s bail application and held that it was filed prematurely. 

    Justice Anenih held that the application, having been filed when Bello was neither in custody nor before the court, his  application was incompetent.

    She said: “Consequently, the instant application, having been filed prematurely is hereby refused.”

    Details shortly… 

  • Bello: Now the real drama begins

    Bello: Now the real drama begins

    The immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, is truly a man of drama. He never went to drama school but he seems to act with exquisite skill between when the curtain opens and when it falls.

    During the days of Covid-19 when Nigeria and the world were catching cold and doing everything directed by the medical authorities to stop the spread of the epidemic and the tragedy it carried in its wings, Bello stood against the world and reason. People were dying in their thousands in and around Nigeria but Bello became an unbeliever, a naysayer, a dissenter, a prophet of doom who didn’t think that Covid-19 existed. And if it existed, he thought it did not have the power to kill. And if it had the power to kill he thought, it would not kill people in his Kogi State.

    No one knows how many people from Kogi State formed part of the statistics of the dead, and the diary of disaster but they must be many.

    Then Bello’s political drama. As a northerner, President Muhammadu Buhari was working on rounding off his eight-year term in office which was grandly facilitated by a southerner called Bola Tinubu, Bello thought that he, another northerner, should be the one to take over from a northerner in a country with multiple demographics. It did not occur to him that it was not a step that would unite and build a volatile country like Nigeria. He organised a huge parade at Eagles Square, Abuja to announce his candidacy. What did he think the south that produces the oil that feeds the country would think if a northerner was to talk over from a northerner who had just served for eight years? Would that bring unity and peaceful co-existence?

    It didn’t matter to Bello. Such an audacious and impudent gesture must have encouraged Buhari to dream about handing over to another northerner. Luckily some fair-minded northerners saw the danger ahead and worked against that patently unfair plot. Today, we have a southerner as president who for fairness must do two terms despite the desperation of some partisan northerners. This country can only survive as a united unit based on fairness and equity only not on domination by one section over the other. No. That will not work.

     More drama from the Bello School of Drama. When his term as governor of Kogi State ended last year, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) thought he had a case to answer and invited him for a meeting. Bello refused to honour the invitation citing a subsisting court order. But why would a man who held a public office by the grace of Nigerians go to court to seek to be protected from being asked to answer for his deeds or misdeeds in office when his term ends? Everyone knows that when the term of a president or governor, ends the immunity he enjoyed expires and he can be asked to give an account of his stewardship.

    Read Also: We will tackle migration challenges, Shettima assures

    A few years ago when the then governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, was rounding off his term the EFCC indicated that they would like to have a meeting with him when his term ended. Fayose printed a T-shirt with the inscription “EFCC, here I am” or something like that and showed up at the EFCC office in Abuja. That kind of drama was desirable in the public interest. Fayose did not run away. He did not play hide and seek. He did not seek to hide in the toilet of his successor. He stood firm to deal with what he did while in office.

    But Bello did it differently. He went missing and the EFCC declared him wanted. The Nigerian Immigration Service placed him on its watch list while the Nigeria Police ordered the withdrawal of his orderlies. Why would a man who occupied the high office of a governor and also sought to occupy the higher office of president put himself in such a disgraceful position, court order or no court order? In the normal order of things if a man who has a good name is accused of a crime of which he is not guilty, he should seek to defend his good name by showing up and having his day in court. If you are not guilty of a crime, why should you go into hiding or why should you ask the court to protect you from being questioned or tried even if that is your right. You also have a right to clear your good name, don’t you?

    When Donald Trump, former American president who has just been re-elected was invited to New York to respond to charges of felony, what did he do? He did not run away. He did not go to court to halt the invitation. Even if he did, I am almost certain that no American court would grant such an order. What did he do? He went to New York and sat before the judge humbly, a former president. The judge made his pronouncement. That is how civilised systems work. If we want our system to work and work seamlessly we must do what is right, fair and proper. No tricks. No corner cutting. No hide and seek. No mago mago. No wuru wuru.

    Ray Ekpu

    More Bello drama. Six months or so after he was declared wanted, Bello appeared at the EFCC office with a large battalion of supporters or hirelings whichever applies. He was escorted by his successor, Usman Ododo. But curiously, the EFCC did not arrest him. Instead, they allowed him to go and turned up later at his residence with guns. That is evidence that there is no shortage of drama in this matter.

    Now Bello has been given a 19-count charge along with his nephew, Ali Bello, who is now Chief of Staff to the incumbent Governor Ododo. Others charged are Dauda Suleiman and Abdulsalam Hudu. All of them are alleged to have laundered N80.2 billion belonging to Kogi State.

    More drama. On November 27, Justice Maryam Anenih had come into the court to take Bello’s plea and that of his co-defendants. She saw a huge crowd of supporters or hirelings whichever applies, behaving in a very unruly fashion in the court premises. She had to leave the court premises abruptly.

     As this case gathers momentum, there will probably be more drama either from Bello and his team and cheerleaders or from the EFCC. We don’t need drama. What we need is a quick and fair attention to this case that has gathered more attention than necessary. Bello and his co-defendants are by our legal system innocent until they are convicted. That is a statement of fact which must be accepted and respected by all concerned.

    The other statement of fact is that Nigeria has become notorious for corruption. It has occupied a place of inverted eminence among the corrupt countries of the world. If it does not clean up its reputation by tackling corruption firmly, it will not make much headway in its attempt to attract investors into our economy. If that happens, then all the international travels by our leaders to court the friendship of potential investors will become an act in futility. Besides, our green passport will remain, globally, a document that is despised and disregarded.

  • JUST IN: EFCC’s attempt to arraign Yahaya Bello fails

    JUST IN: EFCC’s attempt to arraign Yahaya Bello fails

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Friday failed in its bid to arraign former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello due to the absence of his legal team.

    Bello, currently in EFCC custody, was brought before Justice Emeka Nwite on charges of laundering N80.25 billion allegedly belonging to Kogi State. 

    The case, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/98/2024, accuses Bello and others of financial misconduct.

    At th mention of the case, lawyer to the prosecution, Kemi Pinheiro (SAN) announced appearance, but with no lawyer announcing appearance for the defendant.

    The development prompted Justice Emeka Nwite to inquiry when the defendant had no legal representation.

    In response, Pinheiro said the defendant would be in better position  to answer the question, following which the judge turned to Bello for an answer.

    The ex-governor, in response, said he was only informed on late Thursday, around 11pm, about his planned arrangements by the EFCC before the Federal High Court.

    Bello has been in EFCC’s custody since November 27 upon an order by Justice Maryanne Anenih of the HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) before who Bello along with Umar Oricha (Director General, Kogi State Government House) and Abdulsalami Hudu were arraigned on a separate alleged money laundering 16-count charge.

    Following Bello’s response, Pinheiro proceeded to apply orally for Bello’s arraignment, arguing that by the provision of the law, such proceedings could be aborted where the defendant was absent, not the defence lawyer.

    Pinheiro relied on the authority of Joseph Vs. State, 2014 to argue that what the court requires for arraignment is the physical presence of the defendant and not the presence of his counsel.

    He cited sections 271 and 396 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015, noted: “I respectfully apply that the charge be ready to this defendant and his plea be taken. Then this matter can be adjourned.”

    Justice Nwite then noted that Bello’ case was peculiar, in that the court had, at the last proceedings, adjourned till January for further hearing.

    The judge added that: “It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel,” in view of the fact that he was previously represented by lawyers.

    Justice Nwite held that, in the interest of fair hearing, proceedings could not be conducted in the absence of Bello’s lawyers, as sought by the prosecution lawyer,

    In rejecting Pinheiro’s application that the arraignment be conducted in the absence of the defence lawyers, held that it was in the interest of justice to await the presence of Bello’s lawyers.

    The judge said: “I have listened to the submission of counsel to the prosecution and also heard from the defendant.

    “It is not in dispute that on 30th of October, this matter came. It is also lol pl not in dispute that the defendant was not in court.

    “It is also not in dispute  that the court ordered parties to address the court on whether the defendant can be tried in absentia.

    Read Also: Court rejects EFCC’s request to arraign Yahaya Bello without his counsel

    “And it is also not in dispute that the matter has been adjourned till 21st day of January, 2024 for ruling.

    “It will be unfair if the matter is taken without the defendant’s  counsel. It would have been a different thing if the defendant had no counsel.

    “Therefore, I am of the view that the defendant’s counsel be put on notice,” Justice Nwite said.

    He proceeded to adjourn till December 13 for the hearing of the match tion by the EFCC for the abridgement of time for the arraignment of the defendant.

    Justice Nwite ordered that  hearing notice be issued and  served on the defendant’s lawyers.

    He ordered that Bello be remanded in the custody of the EFCC until December 13.

  • Court rejects EFCC’s request to arraign Yahaya Bello without his counsel

    Court rejects EFCC’s request to arraign Yahaya Bello without his counsel

    A Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday turned down the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission’s (EFCC)’s application to arraign ex-Gov. Yahaya Bello of Kogi in the absence of his lawyers.

    Justuce Emeka Nwite while delivering a ruling on the oral application by the EFCC’s counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN, held that such request could not be granted in the interest of fair hearing.

    Justice Nwite agreed with Pinheiro that though a bench warrant was issued against the former governor, “fair hearing cannot be sacrificed on the altar of bench warrant.”

    The judge held that it was not in doubt that the matter was originally adjourned until Jan. 21, 2025, before the anti-graft agency brought a motion for the abridgement of time to arraign Bello.

    When the matter was called on Friday, although the former governor was in court, he was not represented by any lawyer.

    The judge then asked the EFCC’s counsel why the defendant was not represented in court.

    Pinheiro said the defendant would be in better position  to answer the question.

    However, when the ex-governor was asked why his lawyers were not in court, he said he was only informed of the sitting late Thursday night at about 11pm and so could not contact his lawyers.

    Pinheiro then made an application for the arraignment of Mr Bello.

    “What the law requires is the presence of the defendant, not the presence of his lawyers,” he argued, citing sections 271 and 396 of Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.

    “I respectfully apply that the charge be ready to this defendant and his plea be taken.Then this matter can be adjourned,” he said.

    But the judge said the instant case was peculiar.

    “It is peculiar in the sense that we have already agreed on a date, which is in January.

    “It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel,” the Judge said.

    Pinheiro insisted that the defendant’s plea be taken, citing a previous case.

    According to him, I rely on the authority of Joseph Vs. State, 2014, to the effect that what the court requires for arraignment is the physical presence of the defendant and not the presence of his counsel.

    Delivering the ruling, Justice Nwite turned down Pinheiro’s application.

    “I have listened to the submission of counsel to the prosecution and also heard from the defendant.

    “It is not in dispute that on 30th of October, this matter came up. And it is not in dispute that the defendant was not in court.

    “It is also not in dispute that the court ordered the parties to address the court on whether the defendant can be tried in absentia.

    “And it is also not in dispute that the matter has been adjourned till 21st day of January, 2024 for ruling.

    Read Also: BREAKING: EFCC to arraign Yahaya Bello again over alleged N80.2bn fraud

    “It will be unfair if the matter is taken without the defendant’s counsel.

    “It would be a different thing if the defendant had no counsel.

    “Therefore, I am of the view that the defendant’s counsel be put on notice,” he ruled.

    Justice Nwite consequently adjourned the matter until Dec. 13 for the hearing of the EFCC’s motion for the abridgement of time for the arraignment of the former governor.

    The judge, who ordered that the hearing notice be issued and be served on the defendant’s lawyers, directed that the ex-governor should remain in the anti-graft agency’s custody pending the adjourned date.

    (NAN)