Tag: Yakubu

  • Yakubu gets  N300m bail

    Yakubu gets N300m bail

    THE Federal High Court, Abuja has admitted a former Group Managing Director, Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Andrew Yakubu, to N300 million bail with two sureties.
    Yakubu was arraigned by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on six counts of non-disclosure of assets and fraud – charges to which he pleaded not guilty.
    Yakubu was alleged to have as “Group Managing Director of NNPC, between 2012 and 2014, within the jurisdiction of the court, with intent to avoid lawful transaction, transported to Kaduna $9.7 million and €74,000’’.
    He was accused of not disclosing $9.7 million and €74,000 to the EFCC in his asset declaration form, a crime which contravened Section 27 (3) of the EFCC Act.
    At the resumed hearing to determine bail application, Justice Ahmed Mohammed said from the arguments canvassed and placed before him by the defence team, Yakubu was not likely to jump bail.
    According to him, the fact that Yakubu received an invitation from EFCC while abroad and decided to honour it, he did not strike him as someone who would jump bail.
    The judge further said the only grounds upon which a defendant could be denied bail as stipulated by law was where there was reasonable ground to believe that the person would commit another crime, if released.
    He also said bail could be denied only where there were grounds to believe the defendant would jump bail or interfere with investigation, adding that none of these was applicable in this case.
    Mohammed said bail was also granted particularly since the prosecution confirmed that it had concluded its investigation.
    He, therefore, admitted Yakubu to bail, but refused the application seeking the release of his international passports to enable him travel abroad for medical treatment.
    According to him, when a defendant is arraigned, the primary concern is whether he should be granted bail or not and not whether he should travel or not.
    The other conditions of the bail were that one of the sureties must be employed and be resident in Abuja with a traceable address.
    The judge directed that the two sureties must deposit their passport photographs to the court’s registrar.
    He adjourned the matter until May 9 for commencement of trial.

    Earlier, the Prosecutor, Mr. Ben Ikani, had urged the court to deny Yakubu bail on the grounds that in view of the huge sum involved, he was likely to influence the witnesses named in the proof of evidence.
    However, Ahmed Raji (SAN), counsel to Yakubu, urged the court to grant his client bail since he surrendered himself to the EFCC upon their invitation even when he was abroad for medical treatment.
    Raji had also argued that the offences Yakubu was accused of, which bordered on false asset declaration, money laundering and fraud, were bailable and that he had never been convicted before.
    He said moreover the 1999 Constitution provides that Yakubu was presumed innocent until proven otherwise.

  • Ex-NNPC GMD Yakubu seeks to recover seized $9.7m

    Ex-NNPC GMD Yakubu seeks to recover seized $9.7m

    Former Group Managing Director (GMD) of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Mr. Andrew Yakubu has asked the Federal High Court to discharge the order temporarily forfeiting  his $9,772,800 to the Federal Government.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) recovered the money from Yakubu’s house in Sabon Tasha, Kaduna on February 10.

    In a motion on notice file before the Federal High Court sitting in Kano, Yakubu is praying for an order setting aside, discharging or vacating the ex-parte order made on February 13, which ordered the interim forfeiture to the Federal Government of $9,772,800 and £74,000,000 belonging to him.

    Yakubu said the court lacked the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the matter, being one related to a crime alleged to have been committed in Abuja, which is outside the court’s territorial jurisdiction.

    According to him, by Section 45 of the Federal High Court Act, an offence shall be tried only by a court exercising jurisdiction in the area or place where the offence was committed.

    He said no aspect of the perceived offence in respect of which the order was made, was committed within the court’s Kano judicial division.

    “The applicant/respondent (i.e. the Federal Government of Nigeria) lacks the competence (locus standi) to seek the interim reliefs whereof the order of this honourable court dated 13th February, 2017, was made.

    “By Section 28 of the EFCC Act, only the commission has the vires (authority) to seek an order for the interim forfeiture of property under the Act. Although the EFCC was not the applicant, the order was granted in its favour in the body of the order.

    “The power of this honourable court to make interim forfeiture order(s) pursuant to Sections 28 and 29 of the EFCC Act, 2004, is applicable only to alleged offences charged under the EFCC Act and not to offences cognisable under any other law,” Yakubu said.

  • INEC to replace over 3000 card readers, says Yakubu

    INEC to replace over 3000 card readers, says Yakubu

    THE Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)need to replace over 3,000 Smart Card Readers lost during elections, its Chairman Prof. Mahmood Yakubu said yesterday.

    A statement  by the Chief Press Secretary to the INEC Chairman, Mr. Rotimi Oyekanmi, also said the commission needs to get more Card Readers.

    According to Yakubu, only one of the 164 elections conducted by the commission under its present management has so far been upturned by the court.

    He spoke when he visited members of Senate Committee on INEC at the National Assembly.

    Yakubu was accompanied by nine National Commissioners and other top officials.

    He said the commission had so far conducted 164 elections with another one slated for the weekend in Langtang Local Government in Plateau State.

    The INEC boss said that other elections would soon be held in Anambra (senatorial), Delta and Rivers (Etche Local government).

    According to him, of the 80 elections nullified by the courts after the 2015 general elections, 76 had already been conducted.

    He stated that uninformed critics castigated the commission over inconclusive elections.

    He identified inducement by politicians before and during elections as a major challenge facing the commission, noting that the recent revelation by the police panel on the Rivers re-run elections underscored the enormity of the problem.

    But he assured the committee that the commission would continue to uphold good practices and deal expeditiously with proven cases of corruption against its workers.

    He hailed the Senate for embarking on electoral reform, adding that the commission successfully prosecuted 40 electoral offenders in Kano while  “62 cases are currently in court”.

    Yakubu added that the commission was addressing the challenges associated with the Smart Card Readers (SCRs) and striving to improve its mechanisms for collating and transmitting election results.

    However, he claimed that due to rising costs, the commission would require more resources to carry out its activities.

    “Our monthly salary is N1.3 billion, we have 16,000 staff and 820 offices across the country. We have offices in all the state capitals and local government areas.”

    The committee chairman, Senator Mohammed Ndume, hailed the commission.

    He said of all the general elections conducted since the advent of democracy in 1999, only the 2015 version truly reflected the people’s will. To that extent, he said INEC must strive to improve on it and organise a more credible election in 2019 that all Nigerians will be proud of.

    Ndume gave assurances that his committee would cooperate with the commission as it prepares for the 2019 polls.

  • INEC planning for 2019 polls, says Yakubu

    INEC planning for 2019 polls, says Yakubu

    •’We ‘ll not relent in prosecuting electoral offenders’

    The Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu has spoken on the commission’s preparation for 2019 poll, saying the mistakes of the past elections will not be repeated.

    Acknowledging that election is a collective enterprise involving the cooperation of stakeholders, he said the strict electoral duties that fall within with purview of the agency will be discharged with utmost responsibility.

    Yakubu warned against electoral malpractices, reminding unscrupulous agency officials and other Nigerians that culprits will be brought to book.

    He said 120 electoral offences have been prosecuted while 61offenders have been convicted.

    Reflecting on the controversial legislative rerun in Rivers State, Yakubu said the commission had ordered an “administrative review” of the exercise in a bid to prevent its reoccurrence.

    He said plans were underway to conduct a credible governorship election in Anambra State later in the year, stressing that past pitfalls will be avoided.

    The INEC boss spoke at the opening ceremony of the commission’s ‘Strategic Retreat’ in Lagos. It was attended by electoral officers from the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The retreat was organisaed in collaboration with the United States International Development (USIA) and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES).

    Yakubu was accompanied by INEC National Commissioners, including Prince Deji Soyebi, Dr. Adekunle Ogunmola, Air Vice Marshall Ahmed Tijani Muazu, Mallam Mohammed Haruna, and Hajia Amina Zakari.

    Experts who shared their experience with the electoral officers included Prof. Bolade Eyinla, Technical Adviser to Yakubu, Prof. M.J. Kuna, Prof. Sam Egwu, Prof. Adele Jinadu, Dr. Lawal Ismaila and Prof. Abubakar Momoh.

    Yakubu reflected on past elections, saying that Nigerians expect a better performance in 2019. He said future elections conducted by the agency must past the test of transparency, integrity, credibility and impartiality.

    He added: ‘Our task is to conduct elections that will be acceptable to Nigerians. Before the election, people expect the commission to plan ahead for a hitch free exercise, in terms of voter’s card availability, proximity of polling units to voters, and building of confidence that the votes will count.

    “On the election day, people expect the polling officers and materials to arrive early. People want peaceful poll, functional equipment. Polling units must open at 8 am. Materials and personnel must be available. There are other areas beyond the INEC; security and peaceful environment. A successful election dies not come by fluke. It is a product of planning.”

    Eyinla, who explained the retreat objectives and expectations, described elections as “the indispensable root of democracy.”

    He added: “For elections to have integrity, it must be conducted by the Election Management Board (EMB) with full independence of action in a professional, non-partisan and transparent manner. This requires professional EMB composed of persons whose credibility, neutrality and fairness are generally accepted.”

    IFES Country Director Shalva Kipshidze lauded the INEC for planning ahead of 2019 polls, stressing that planning will provide a sense of direction and highlight measurable goals.

    Noting that Nigeria has taken a great leap it its democratic process with the 2015 elections and successful governorship polls in Edo and Ondo states, he said there is a greater expectation about the 2019 elections by the citizens and the international community.

    Kipshidze added: “The review of the 2012-2016 strategic plan is pivotal as it will provide the right platform for INEC to consolidate the gains made and further continue to improve on the democratic process through critical, concise, constructive analysis and assessment to assist in strengthening subsequent strategic plan.”

  • INEC already planning for 2019 polls, says Yakubu

    INEC already planning for 2019 polls, says Yakubu

    •’We ‘ll not relent in prosecuting electoral offenders’

    Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Chairman Prof. Mahmud Yakubu yesterday assured the nation that the commission was already preparing for 2019 polls, saying the mistakes of the past elections would not be repeated.
    Yakubu, who acknowledged election as a collective enterprise involving the cooperation of stakeholders, said the electoral duties that fall within the agency’s purview would be discharged with “utmost responsibility”.
    He warned against electoral malpractices, reminding unscrupulous agency officials and other citizens that culprits would be brought to book.
    He said 120 electoral offences have been prosecuted and 61 offenders have been convicted.
    Reflecting on the controversial legislative rerun in Rivers State, Yakubu said the commission had ordered an “administrative review” of the exercise in a bid to prevent its reoccurrence.
    He said plans were underway to conduct a credible governorship election in Anambra State later in the year, stressing that past pitfalls would be avoided.
    The INEC boss spoke at the opening ceremony of the commission’s ‘Strategic Retreat’ in Lagos. It was attended by electoral officers from the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
    The retreat was organisaed in collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES).
    Yakubu was accompanied by INEC National Commissioners, including Prince Deji Soyebi, Dr. Adekunle Ogunmola, Air Vice Marshall Ahmed Tijani Muazu, Mallam Mohammed Haruna and Hajia Amina Zakari.
    Experts, who shared their experience with the electoral officers, included Prof. Bolade Eyinla, Technical Adviser to Yakubu, Prof. M.J. Kuna, Prof. Sam Egwu, Prof. Adele Jinadu, Dr. Lawal Ismaila and Prof. Abubakar Momoh.
    Yakubu reflected on past elections, saying that Nigerians expected a better performance in 2019.
    He said future elections conducted by the agency must past the test of transparency, integrity, credibility and impartiality.
    He added: “Our task is to conduct elections that will be acceptable to Nigerians. Before the election, people expect the commission to plan ahead for a hitch-free exercise, in terms of voter’s card availability, proximity of polling units to voters and building of confidence that the votes will count.
    “On the election day, people expect the polling officers and materials to arrive early. People want peaceful poll and functional equipment. Polling units must open at 8a.m. Materials and personnel must be available. There are other areas beyond the INEC; security and peaceful environment. A successful election does not come by fluke. It is a product of planning.”
    Eyinla, who explained the retreat objectives and expectations, described elections as “the indispensable root of democracy”.
    He added: “For elections to have integrity, it must be conducted by the Election Management Board (EMB) with full independence of action in a professional, non-partisan and transparent manner. This requires professional EMB composed of persons whose credibility, neutrality and fairness are generally accepted.”
    IFES Country Director Shalva Kipshidze hailed the INEC for planning ahead of 2019 polls, stressing that planning would provide a sense of direction and highlight measurable goals.
    Noting that Nigeria has taken a great leap in its democratic process with the 2015 elections and successful governorship polls in Edo and Ondo states, he said there was a greater expectation on the 2019 elections from the citizens and the international community.
    Kipshidze added: “The review of the 2012-2016 strategic plan is pivotal as it will provide the right platform for INEC to consolidate the gains made and further continue to improve on the democratic process through critical, concise, constructive analysis and assessment to assist in strengthening subsequent strategic plan.”

  • INEC ‘ll support Diaspora voting, says Yakubu

    INEC ‘ll support Diaspora voting, says Yakubu

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is in favour of Diaspora voting, and will continue to work with the National Assembly towards its actualisation, the  Commission’s Chairman, Prof Mahmood Yakubu, has said.

    Speaking at a meeting, with members of the Senate Committee on Diaspora and Non – Governmental Organisations, in Abuja, Yakubu said that Nigerians living abroad “have the right, like their compatriots living in the country, to exercise their franchise in all elections organised in the country”.

    However, for this to happen, he explained, the relevant sections of the constitution would have to be amended. Besides, some challenges that could emerge from allowing Diaspora voting, such as funding and the modalities to be adopted, would have to be tackled.

    The Chairperson of the Committee, Senator Rose Okoji Oko said the agitation by Nigerians in the Diaspora to be given the opportunity to exercise their franchise, and the favourable disposition of President Muhammadu Buhari and his predecessor, former President Goodluck Jonathan, informed the Committee’s visit to INEC.

    According to her, the former President had endorsed the idea in 2010 during his visit to Gabon, while the current President also gave his support during his recent visit to Malabo.

    The senator, who once served as National Commissioner at INEC, affirmed that a total of 115 countries, 28 of which are on the African continent, currently have provisions for Diaspora voting.  She admitted that some Nigerians were against the idea “because of what they perceived as funding challenges, the current position of the law on the matter and some fears about the electoral system.”

    But that notwithstanding, she was of the view that despite the various challenges facing INEC in the conduct of various elections in Nigeria, the Commission “has not continued to conduct elections.” And for those who complain about what Diaspora voting would cost, she asked: “Is the amount so huge that we cannot afford it?”

    She said that while Nigeria did not need to copy what other countries had done, “the country needs to evolve its own unique policy.”  According to her, 79 countries currently allow voting to take place at their respective foreign embassies, while 16 others allow voting by proxy. “Nigeria can look at all these different procedures and then evolve its own unique method,” she observed.

    One of such methods, she said, is to determine if Diaspora voting could apply only to presidential or governorship election as a starting point. She insisted that it would be unfair to continue to deny Nigerians in Diaspora their right to vote, despite their enormous contributions to the country’s economy. She revealed that two – thirds of the $34 billion being projected to flow into sub-Sahara Africa this year “will come into Nigeria.”

    Responding, the INEC Chairman assured the senators that the Commission would continue to work with the National Assembly to make Diaspora voting a reality. He said: “INEC believes that Nigerians living outside the country should be able to vote. This is because they are citizens of Nigeria, they make considerable contributions to the economy, there is a sizeable number of them living all over the world – some have estimated that they are around 15 million – and Diaspora voting is consistent with global practice.”

    However, Prof Yakubu said under the exiting law, Nigerians living abroad who have the desire to vote must return home to register when voters’ registration exercise is being conducted and also to vote during actual elections.

    To change this position, he said, some amendments to the constitution would have to be effected. “The first step towards making Diaspora voting possible,” he told the senators, “rests with the National Assembly.” He, however, assured: “INEC is committed to Diaspora voting and will continue to work with the National Assembly on its actualisation.”

  • Anambra poll: Court okays contempt proceedings against INEC chair, Yakubu

    •Form 48, other court papers to be served on commission’s chief

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has given Ejike Oguebego and Chuks Okoye, the Chairman and Legal Adviser of Anambra State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the green light to begin contempt proceedings against the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Mahmood Yakubu.

    Oguebego and Okoye, who are suing for themselves and on behalf of other members of the Executive Committee of the PDP in Anambra State, are accusing Prof Yakubu of refusing to obey the December 5, 2015 judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, delivered by Justice Evoh Chukwu.

    Justice Chukwu, in the fifth order contained in the judgement, restrained INEC, its agents, among others, “from accepting or receiving any delegates’ list or nominated candidates that may emerge from the congresses or primaries conducted by the caretaker committee set up by the first defendant (PDP) for the Anambra PDP, except those that emanate from the plaintiffs”.

    Bothered by INEC’s alleged refusal to comply with the judgment, particularly the Fifth order, Oguebego and Okoye initiated contempt proceedings against the INEC chairman before the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Last Friday (May 20), Justice John Tsoho (also of the Federal High Court, Abuja) granted an order ex-parte for substituted service of processes in relation to the contempt proceedings, including Form 48, on Prof Yakubu.

    For service on the INEC chairman, Justice Tsoho directed the plaintiffs to serve the court processes, including Form 48 on “an adult person, staff or official at the Legal Department of INEC at 436 Zambezi Crescent, Maitama, Abuja, being the usual place of business of the second respondent (Yakubu)”.

    On INEC, the judge ordered the services of all processes, including Form 46, “by delivering or leaving same at the Legal Department of INEC, the commission, having refused to accept service of same from the bailiffs of this honourable court”.

    The Form 48 issued by the court’s Registrar on March 31 is a notice of consequences of disobedience to order of court.

    It states: “Take notice that unless you obey the directions contained in the order of the honourable court, attached to this Form (in particular, the Fifth order, restraining you from acting on any list of nominated candidates for the PDP in Anambra State in respect of Legislative seats for the 2015 general election, except those that emanated from the plaintiffs), you will be guilty of contempt of court, and you will be liable to be committed to prison.

    “Take further notice that if the INEC continues to disobey this order, you, Prof Yakubu, the Chairman of INEC, will be held liable for contempt of court and liable to imprisonment.”

    Justice Tsoho adjourned further proceedings till May 27.

  • INEC to adopt electronic voting in 2019, says chair

    INEC to adopt electronic voting in 2019, says chair

    Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has decided to drop manual conduct of voting in 2019 general elections, it was learnt yesterday.

    Its chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, said this during a meeting with executives of the Forum of State Independent Electoral Commission (SIECs), who visited  him at the commission’s headquarters in Abuja.

    Prof. Yakubu noted that the commission was working to replacing the manual process with modern technology in the conduct of local elections.

    He said: “We can no longer continue to conduct elections manually in Nigeria. We must introduce modern technology as being done in other countries. Very soon, the use of technology for the conduct of local elections in the country will be mandatory

    “It will make the process transparent and very open as it should be. The use of smart card, otherwise known as Card Reader machine,  has come to stay, though it requires a lot of resources. We see we can do it because it adds value and more credibility to the electoral process in the country. Some states have been using it in the conduct of their elections. We are seeing how we can make it to go round,” he added.

    He assured the SIECs of the commission’s collaboration during his tenure as part of efforts to deepen democracy.

    “We will continue to collaborate and cooperate with SEICs and other organisations in improving election management in the country,” he added.

    The forum’s chairperson, Mrs. Gloria Ukpong, who is also the chairperson of the Akwa  Ibom State SIEC, said the forum could learn from INEC chairman.

    “We had great and beautiful memory under the former commission and we want the relationship to continue. We can learn many things from the commission under you and take them to our states.

    “The introduction of Card Readers at the national level is a welcome development. Only Sokoto State had implemented it. It allows for more transparency.

    “If we use the same voters’ register to conduct elections at the state levels, why can’t we come together for discussion on how we can also be using the Card Readers. It requires a lot of resources, which the states may not be able to bear the cost,” she said.

     

     

  • Yakubu’s INEC

    Yakubu’s INEC

    The role of the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC in stabilizing democracy in this country came under focus last week when President Muhammadu Buhari swore in its new chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu and his national commissioners. Apparently drawing from our unsavory electoral experiences, the president had charged the commission to abhor external influences in their duties as they will be held accountable for their actions.

    Buhari who promised not to interfere in the affairs of the commission said the change mantra of the APC will be all embracing in electoral matters such that it will give boost to the conduct of free and fair elections.

    The president’s promises are as heart-warming as they are equally refreshing. No doubt, one of the greatest challenges to the sustenance of enduring democracy within these shores has been the glaring inability of electoral umpires and politicians to abide by the rules of free and fair competition. This has over time resulted in the subversion of the pristine values on which the wheel of democratic governance revolves.

    Before now and especially during the regime of Obasanjo, the management of elections had left so much to be desired. Rigging, falsification, outright writing of election results and all manner of malpractices were the order of the day. The bastardization and corruption of the electoral process came to an all-time high that the electorate began to lose confidence in its capacity to reflect the true will of the people as expressed at the ballot box. The conduct of the two elections that were supervised by that regime shook peoples’ confidence in their capacity to approximate the collective will of the people and cast serious doubt on the underlying philosophy behind representative democracy.

    So much damage was wrought to the electoral process that the future of democracy was put in serious jeopardy. The Yar’Adua administration had to contend with public disenchantment and cynicism on the continued relevance of voting during elections when such votes will count for nothing in determining those to emerge from the exercise. This in turn, threw up a crisis of legitimacy. Yar’Adua fought to contend with the situation as it posed obvious threats to the future conduct of elections. His successor, Goodluck Jonathan was left with no option than to make the conduct of free and fair elections a cardinal goal of his regime apparently to gain legitimacy and restore peoples’ confidence in the electoral process.

    He made considerable progress in that direction as the 2011 elections came out a substantial improvement on the ones before it. Jonathan showed serious commitment to the conduct of free and fair elections as evidenced in the technology-driven innovations of the electoral body to enhance the overall credibility of elections. For the first time in the management of elections in this country, card readers were deployed to stave off the stuffing of ballot boxes by ensuring that only those duly accredited to vote actually voted at those elections.

    The 2015 elections, despite shortcomings arising from the refusal of politicians to play according to rules, was devoid of any grand plan by the government in power to manipulate the process as was previously the case. Perhaps, that in part, accounted for why the Jonathan government lost power to the opposition.

    Even Buhari had admitted Jonathan had an option to manipulate the process but opted out in the overall interest of the country. It was for the same reason he received accolades from the international community as his action brightened the prospects for the deepening of democracy in the country. The outcome of that election was very symbolic given that it represented the first time in our political annals an incumbent will concede power to the opposition at that level.

    As a beneficiary of this goodwill, Buhari does not seem to have an alternative than to improve on the records set by Jonathan in restoring some modicum of credibility to the management of elections. That is why his promises not to interfere in INEC’s affairs and also to reflect the change philosophy of his party in all electoral matters are very timely. We say so because, in a couple of week from now, that commitment will be facing its true test. Elections are at the corner in Kogi and Bayelsa states.

    Their handling will serve as a litmus test to the commitment of the Buhari regime to institutionalizing orderly succession through the reflection of the collective will of the people in the final choice of their representatives. That is the challenge before Buhari and the new INEC. The way it is handled will point the direction to the future of democracy.

    It is true that the management of elections is the sole responsibility of the INEC. But it is no less correct also that the overall success of that electoral body will depend on the support and cooperation it gets from the government. There is therefore a whole world of difference between promises and giving effect to them when the need arises. Buhari should therefore move beyond promises to initiate actions that will imbue confidence in the electorate that INEC will remain an impartial umpire in electoral matters.

    One issue that will continue to create concerns for political observers is the tendency for people to gravitate to the winning party. This has raised genuine fears of a possible slide to a one-party state. These fears cannot be wished away especially given the awesome powers at the disposal of the central government.

    Not surprisingly, governments at the centre had through sundry contrivances encouraged this tendency. That is the danger created when undue emphasis is placed on compensation to those who voted the governments in power especially in a clime the same government controls virtually everything.

    Unfortunately, Buhari was the first to be publicly identified with this centripetal viewpoint which Nasir El-Rufai has also referenced upon in respect of the sharing of the perquisites of office in Kaduna State. Such a disposition has all it takes to increase the slide towards a one-party state that may sound the death knell to democracy. There is no reason for every voter to vote for the same political party. It is not intended to be so and the electorate must not be coerced into it. All parties should be able to win elections in their areas of strength with the right ambience provided by the electoral body. That is the objective our leaders should seek to approximate.

    But the buck for whatever finally transpires during elections will eventually stop at the table of Yakubu and his lieutenants. Buhari has told whoever cares to hear that he will not interfere in the affairs of the commission. He has promised change in its activities. He will be judged by these commitments. The new INEC management must take copious notice of these promises and conduct itself as an impartial referee despite the challenges it will encounter in the hands of government officials.

    But the government still shares vicarious responsibility in the overall management of elections. The role, manner of deployment of security personnel and the ferrying of logistic support during elections are areas government still has much work to do. Before now, allegations have been traded on the use of sundry security personnel to intimidate voters and manipulate the outcome of results. It will be interesting to see what the situation will be under Buhari and the new INEC chief.

  • Yakubu’s new song at INEC

    Few remembered him by his real name, Moshood Folorunso Abiola. He was simply known as Prof. Peller. However, this enigma born in 1941 at Iseyin, Oyo State, was so adept at his trade that he would easily get a stadium-capacity crowd into a frenzy by his simply mesmerising acts.

    He was a friend to renowned princes, kings, presidents and the influential in the society across the world and was a known face at banquets in palaces and at official and private government functions, just in the same manner he conjured ecstatic vibrations among the ordinary folks. Prof. Peller, the magician was simply magical.

    However, fate, that unseen, but powerful force known to control everything else, was to play the fastest trick on the man known for his tricks. He died on August 2, 1997, the same day death chose to take another legend, the Abamieda himself, the iconic Fela Anikulapo Kuti.

    That was how he left the stage, completely unsung. For very few people seemed to notice his exit despite the tragedy surrounding his end, having been shot in his Lagos residence by some gunmen. Newspapers, struggling to find a space to give all the perspectives of the late Afrobeat king, could only manage to tuck his story in one corner, while radio and television stations, simply mentioned the incident in passing, as they were all consumed by the Fela fever. Such a sad story.

    One couldn’t help but recall this event in the developments that played out a few days ago in Nigeria’s upper legislative chambers, the Senate and how they seem an apt replication of that episode, almost 14 years ago. On Thursday, October 29, the Senate cleared Prof. Mahmood Yakubu as chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), alongside five other national commissioners of the electoral body. However, it was the same day that it also ended the Rotimi Amaechi saga, by confirming the nomination of the former Governor of Rivers State.

    Perhaps, the jury is still out on which is more important – the issue of alleged corruption, which is the crux of the drama in the Senate over Amaechi and that of the decades-old unsavoury electoral system, which has remained a sore point in the making of a great nation out of Nigeria.

    Anybody would have thought that the two would not only have conjured equal importance, but be seen as parallel and complimentary. But it was clear from the media attention given to both incidents that the nation has failed to connect the deafening echo about corruption in the country, especially where politicians are involved, with the absence of a sound and robust electoral system, with special focus on those who ought to make it possible, which was what the screening of the INEC wise men was all about.

    How? One peep in the media the next morning after the exercise, gives all the answers. The very media that chose to give scant regard to the screening of the INEC commissioners, enthusiastically dedicated all the time and space in celebrating the Amaechi saga. While virtually all the newspapers splashed headlines on the walkout staged by members of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and how their All Progressives Party (APC), went ahead with the confirmation of the former governor, not a single radio or television station appeared convinced enough to invite guests to discuss the issues raised during the screening and, or even the quality of the INEC personnel.

    Even the social media, equally caught in the frenzy of the Amaechi affair, turned their eyes away from what, in many ways, could and indeed have become a matter of life and death to the country and its people.

    By so doing, they simply missed or glossed over the very critical content disclosures raised on the floor of the Senate chambers by the INEC men on how they intended to transform the agency into an institution of hope not only for the electoral emancipation of the country, but that which would create a pathway for the fast and steady movement to a dream Nigeria.

    Else, the declaration by Mahmood Yakubu, would not only have been reverberating across the country today like the echo of a church bell, but creating deep impressions in the hearts of all lovers of democracy with its eternal import.

    Hear the new INEC helmsman when asked about what he was bringing on the table: “I want to assure distinguished senators and Nigerians that no elections ever, under my watch, will be won and lost at INEC headquarters. If you want to win elections, go and canvass for the votes of the Nigerian people. We will protect the interest, integrity and sanctity of the decisions taken by the Nigerian people. Never again will elections be won and lost at INEC headquarters, at the headquarters of the state electoral commissions, and the EOs (Electoral Offices) at the local governments. This will be a thing of the past.”

    To any critical mind, these are not only words on the marble by the deep meanings they conjure, but words that ought to be engraved in the minds of all Nigerians with which to confront the INEC boss, should he deviate from them, because they speak directly to the heart of one of the cardinal issues in the Nigerian troublesome system. For no matter what anybody might say, INEC, still remains a very big barrier to elections in Nigeria.

    Yes, there are many people who would easily roll out the drums today to celebrate Mahmood’s predecessor, Prof. Attahiru Jega, for the handling of the 2015 general elections. But that can only serve the purpose of those professing the glass is half-full philosophy. A quick look at the judgements of the electoral tribunals today, certainly appears not to make Jega’s INEC smell roses.

    Incidentally, there is nothing in the stars that says that what the new INEC boss is saying is impossible within our shores. In the Ghanaian presidential election in 2008, what the ruling party needed to form a government, after winning the first ballot, was less than five per cent of the votes. It would have been a piece of cake to have just awarded it and ask the opposition to go to court. But the Electoral Commission of Ghana, under the watch of the inimitable Kwado Afari-Gyan, refused to grant it.

    Interestingly, the ruling party lost at the second round of balloting, leaving the opposition to go ahead to form government. What followed that act of one man, who refused to budge under pressure, was that the image of Ghana towered in democratic circles, such that it did not only leave many other African countries behind, it practically rubbed shoulders with even the giants of democracy across the world.

    What Mahmood is promising is that he would act in a similar manner, when so confronted. Of course, it could be argued that Jega achieved the same thing with the last election. But such a claim would fall flat in the face of critical examination. Even then, it was clear that Nigerians in their hysteria for change, simply glossed over a lot of things, as is becoming quite apparent now.

    The fact therefore, that Mahmood, instead of living in denial, has decided to do some introspection, by focusing his attention on INEC first, means a major departure from the past.

    This indeed is where the hope comes. Besides, it is not difficult to place the new INEC helmsman at the commanding heights of the nation’s intelligentsia, as a first class brain, who comes with a rich pedigree of performance in other positions.

    But, what becomes more enthralling is that he is also a professor of history. Therefore, he is not only supposed to be at home with historical antecedents, but is expected to be equally eager to create his own history. Here, perhaps, President Muhammadu Buhari might have hit the bull’s eyes with his change mantra. Obviously, the coming elections in Kogi and Bayelsa states, would be the first litmus test.

    Surely, as the various political gladiators plan their own strategies, towards becoming the chief executives of their states, Mahmood, must also be planning his own victory – how to win the hearts of Nigeria. And with all at his disposal, it is a victory only he could lose. The world waits.

    • Igboanugo, a journalist writes from Abuja