Tag: Yemi Osinbajo

  • Selfie with Osinbajo

    Selfie with Osinbajo

    Selfie with Vice-President-elect Professor Yemi Osinbajo in Abuja
    Selfie with Vice-President-elect Professor Yemi Osinbajo in Abuja
  • President Jonathan, Osinbajo at Redeemed Camp

    President Jonathan, Osinbajo at Redeemed Camp

    President Goodluck Jonathan with APC Vice Presidential candidate, Professor Yemi Osibajo at the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) camp at the monthly Holy Ghost Service on Saturday night
    President Goodluck Jonathan with APC Vice Presidential candidate, Professor Yemi Osibajo at the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG) camp at the monthly Holy Ghost Service on Saturday night
  • Osinbajo campaigns in public bus, says APC would fix economy

    Osinbajo campaigns in public bus, says APC would fix economy

    The Vice Presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, on Thursday, introduced a new dimension to electioneering campaign when he joined passengers in the Lagos State public bus service, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)  to canvass for votes for  Gen. Mohammadu Buhari and his party.
    Speaking to the passengers, the former Lagos State Commissioner for Justice and Attorney General urged them to vote massively for Buhari, whom he said has the moral capacity to tackle corruption in the country.
    Describing the former Head of State as a no nonsense person, Osinbajo added, “Gen. Buhari is determined to make changes that would turn Nigeria around for the better. Remember that the APC is the party of change and please ensure that you vote for the APC.
    “The only way to make an omelet is to break an egg. I think that all of us, whatever it is that we are involved in must be interested in making a difference in this country. This country needs help desperately. Considering the economy and the security challenges, everyone must be involved in trying to get a change.”
    In response to a question by one of the passengers, Ayotunde Babatope on how an APC government would address the poor state of the nation’s economy, Osinbajo said contrary to insinuations in many quarters, the party has formulated a comprehensive manifesto, which has proffered solutions to issues such as job creation, social security, agriculture, economy amongst others.
    Responding to another question on measures in place to tackle corruption, Osinbajo recalled his stewardship as Attorney General, during which he ensured that the state enforced zero tolerance policy for corruption.
    He told the passengers that during his tenure, 22 magistrates and three judges were relieved of their jobs due to corruption-related cases. He said, “In 1999, there was a survey and a great percentage of people said there was massive corruption in the judiciary in Lagos State.
    “We decided on a plan; first, we increased the remuneration of members of staff, we also decided that if a report was made against any judge, we will follow up on the report and respond to any complaint of injustice swiftly.”
    Osinbajo dismissed allegations leveled against Buhari as sponsoring the Boko Haram sect as “pure propangada”, adding that if Buhari was behind the Islamist sect, the group was would not have made attempts on his life some months ago.
    The arrival of Osinbajo at the Barracks area attracted scores of APC faithful and caused a mild gridlock on the route.
  • Magical realism in Yoruba politics

    Magical realism in Yoruba politics

    A wind with magical portents is blowing across the Nigerian landscape. With the announcement of  Yemi Osinbajo, a notable professor of Constitutional Law,  as the running mate of General Mohammadu Buhari in the forthcoming presidential election, the battle to redeem or redefine Nigeria seems to be joined  at the electoral level in a way it has not been in a long time. There is a great rousing of the Nigerian multitude.

    For close comparison, we may have to go all the way back to the federal elections of 1964. In that electoral slugfest, what was known as APGA, an unstable and fraught coalition between the old Action Group and the NCNC, battled it out with NNA, an alliance of convenience between Chief S.L Akintola’s NNDP and the ruling NPC.

    The elections ended in a constitutional stalemate with the President, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe, initially refusing to call on the federal coalition to form a new government. It was the opinion of the revered Zik that the elections had been so badly compromised through rigging and other forms of electoral malpractices that it didn’t make sense to declare anybody a winner. After some tense negotiations and parleying, Azikiwe relented and Balewa was persuaded to form a broad-based government of national unity. But the background crisis lingered on and eventually led to a truncation of democracy with grave consequences for Nigeria.

    But why go back to fifty years ago when there have been other federal elections, in 1979, 1983, 1993, 1999, 2003, 2007 and 2011? The point is that there is something very predictable about military-organized elections.  In terms of high drama and sheer unpredictability, military-ordained elections cannot begin to compare with pre-military era elections.  In 1979 and 1983, Chief Awolowo’s party stood no chance against the pan-military cartel known as NPN.

    The 1993 presidential election did not elicit much passion among the populace until it was annulled. The two parties, famously dismissed as government parastatals by Chief Anthony Enahoro, were seen as products of “army arrangement” totally lacking in emotional and organic connection to the people.  In 1999, AD, the restricted and narrowly based party of Awolowo’s  ideological heirs, even in alliance with APP stood no chance against the military inspired political monopoly known as PDP.  The elections of 2003 and 2007, under General Obasanjo’s watch, were in reality military exercises conducted under electoral camouflage.

    But nothing lasts forever, and change is the only thing constant in human evolution. Not even the most tightly controlled and artificially regulated military contraptions can withstand the vicissitudes of time.  It was only after the election of 2011, as a result of a series of strategic errors and lapse of concentration, that the pan-Nigerian glue that binds the dominant party has come unstuck with its military knuckle unraveling. Events are prising apart the vice-grip of the ruling coalition on Nigeria. But even then the PDP would have shambled ahead but for the emergence of the APC.

    This is why whether we like them or not, or whether we are grateful to them or not, we must give kudos to the brains behind the formation of the APC.  The APC is a triumph of will and political engineering over national adversities.  Like all ersatz coalitions, it may be lacking in ideological solidity, but what it lacks in political gravitas is more than made up for in the sheer grit and determination, the ferocious focus on the ball, of its principal partners.

    This is the first time in the post-military history of Nigeria that such a broad-based opposition coalition has been successfully cobbled together to challenge the status quo. Only those who have in themselves the spirit of pan-Nigerian possibilities and the ability to be at home in any corner of Nigeria’s expansive but fractious space could have come up with such a coalition. It is in the nature of human societies to set up their most politically talented children for execution.  Being at the frontiers of political consciousness, visionaries see what others cannot see. Like genius in other fields, it can be profoundly disruptive of the normal order.

    This is why the next two months will be very interesting indeed.  Already, panic and hysteria have invaded the hallowed and complacent sanctuary of power and debased status quo. We are beginning to hear some strange noise. A rogue presidential mastiff has even compared the reigning king to Jesus with the ancient Bethlehemite worsted in comparison. Stranger rituals are been enacted on a daily basis in the name of democracy.  In Ekiti, the majority lawmakers have been banished by the minority lawmakers and the federal authorities do not appear unduly perturbed. There is a biblical denouement about all this which portends the end of these times.

    Just as they were fifty years ago in 1964, the Yoruba people are also central to the current crisis in a way no historical pundit could have foretold. The current platform for change is powered by a core alliance between the current dominant political tendency among the Yoruba and nascent forces of change in the old north. Sixty years ago such an alliance was not only unthinkable but would have been tantamount to political heresy. This is not to talk of 1983, 1993 and 1999. It is sheer magical realism in the political theatre. History moves in very strange ways and those who are fixated on old battle formations often remind one of Don Quixote charging at some imaginary windmill while the world has moved on.

    But just as it was the case fifty years ago in 1964, the Yoruba political elite are hopelessly split down the middle this time around too while the overwhelming majority of the Yoruba populace are clamouring for change.  When this disjuncture between elite and popular aspirations prevails, the Yoruba political mob tries to wrest control precipitating a situation of revolutionary anarchy which quickly infects even the most backward and compliant sectors of the nation.

    Like every other multitude and even more so in a federated hell of collapsing federal will, the predominantly urbanized Yoruba people feel the hurt more acutely. Food is in short supply. The roads are impassable. The native herbalists have fled and modern drugs are in dire shortage. The home has  become an abode of hopelessness and a heightened awareness of insecurity  drives everyone to fear , panic and mutual loathing.

    Since the political mob or the masses lack the clarity of thought needed for an emancipatory political project or the knowledge regimen critical to transformative politics violence and industrial bloodletting become the order of the day.  For the entire society, political and social hallucination sets in. There are reported and repeated sightings of a putative messiah who will come and redeem the people. This vision of apocalyptic redemption is the outlandish fantasy of a famished people.

    Sometimes, the avenging messiah is sighted rumbling through the skies flashing the inevitable victory sign.  Magical realism without which a distraught and disorientated people can perish takes the place of political reality. Voodoo healers and other assorted miracle workers take over the polity, bypassing regular and traditional structures of politics.

    Like all conquered people trapped between the alienating necessities of western political modernity and the hobbled templates of traditional governance, the Yoruba people as we have seen often  resolve the contradictions in favour of political magic. It is the creative resolution of pressing contradictions at the level of ancient symbolism. Curiously enough, it was in Ile-Ife, the iconic founding metropolis of the unified Yoruba race, that this drama of political shamanism was enacted recently. It is to this that we must now turn.

  • Judicial appointments not based on merit, says Osinbajo

    Judicial appointments not based on merit, says Osinbajo

    •Lagos CJ faults appointment process

    Most judicial appointments in Nigeria are not based on merit, a former Lagos Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo (SAN), said yesterday.

    The law expert said merit was the least considered factor when lawyers were being appointed to the Bench.

    According to him, indigenousness and political connections, rather than intellectual capacity and character, have been the bases of such appointments.

    Osinbajo spoke in Abuja at the Judicial Reforms Conference, with the theme: Putting Our Best Foot Forward: The Judiciary and the Challenges of Satisfying Justice Needs of the 21st Century. It was jointly organised by the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Judiciary Committee, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and Access to Justice (with the support of Open Society Initiative for West Africa and the National Judicial Commission’s (NJC’s) Performance Evaluation Committee).

    He said: “Generally, our systems of appointment locally and nationally focus more on other considerations. Merit comes very low in order of considerations. When judges are appointed on the basis of ethnicity/religion or other parochial considerations, they will almost invariably see themselves as champions of the platform which gave them the position rather than ‘justice’ or a national platform.”

    Osinbajo stressed that to ensure merit in judicial appointments, there should be clarity on criteria and selection process; information for intending applicants; openness in the shortlist from a wide range of eligible candidates; rigorous standard testing of competences and quality assurance at every stage of the process.

    The expert recommended the United Kingdom (UK) model for judges’ appointment, which involves vacancy request, advertising and applications, shortlist, references, open candidate selection, panel decision, statutory consultation, checks, selection decisions and quality assurance.

    Lagos State Chief Judge (CJ), Justice Ayotunde Phillips, who was represented by a member of the Lagos Judicial Service Commission, Chief Kunle Uthman, criticised the process where the CJ only calls for nominations from serving judges.

    She said: “The question is: Why is the nomination limited to judges only? This, in my view, is a major flaw in the system, which permeates the entire process and results in a limited pool of applicants.

    “In my view, it is better to advertise for the vacancy and involve the bar associations, ministries of Justice, the magistracy and other agencies whose members are eminently qualified to be appointed judges.”

    Justice Phillips urged the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and the NJC to review the present process of selection of judges and make it merit-driven, open and transparent.

    “This process of nomination by serving judges is awkward, restrictive, limiting in nature and forecloses other constituencies like the magistracy, the ministry of justice and private practitioners as relevant in the exercises,” she said.

    A Professor of law, Dakas CJ Dakas (SAN) said the secrecy involved in judges appointment make it appear like a cult.

    “An open, transparent and credible process inspires confidence in the men and women who are charged with the responsibility of dispensing justice,” he said.

    Executive Director of Access, Mr Joseph Otteh said appointment of judges should not be left to the states alone to prevent abuses.

    “We need a layer of safeguard and that’s why I think the role of the NJC is very critical,” he said.

    The session, chaired by Anambra State Chief Judge, Justice Peter Umeadi, has the theme: “Reform of judicial appointment systems.”

  • Finalists emerge in Law firm’s competition

    Finalists emerge in Law firm’s competition

    Overall winners in the ongoing Simons Cooper Advocacy Development Competition (SCAD Compete) will be announced tonight at a special award dinner at the Oriental Hotel, Lagos.

    The competition, which began on Monday, had over 100 entries from Law students across the country. Ten of them were selected as the best.

    The 10 students, from various universities, have received instructions on component parts of Law in a pre-contest legal clinic moderated by legal icons.

    Law students across the country competed yesterday against one another in various aspects of the subject, including moot trials.

    The final rounds of the competition will hold today and the overall winner will be announced at the dinner.

    The SCAD Compete was initiated by Simons Cooper Partners (SCP), a legal firm headed by Prof Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) and former Lagos State Attorney-General.

    A spokesperson for the firm said the competition is SCP’s contribution to improving advocacy in the Nigerian legal practice.

    The firm also maintains a mentorship and councillorship relationship with the finalists after the competition.

  • Nigerian leaders lack commitment, courage, says Osinbajo

    Nigerian leaders lack commitment, courage, says Osinbajo

    •’Citizens have a role to play in national growth ‘

    Nigeria is faced with multiple challenges because its leaders are not committed to the people, former Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice Prof. Yemi Osinbajo (SAN) has said.

    He said Nigeria needed courageous and passionate leaders like the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Mr. Nelson Mandela and Mr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    Osinbajo said good leaders must have self-discipline, integrity, humility and must be honest and selfless.

    He spoke in Lagos at the Surulere Leadership Conference organised by a firm, Unboxed 2.0, and sponsored by The Nation, Lagos State Internal Revenue Service and Fidelity Bank Plc.

    Speaking on “Leadership and legacy: The power of one”, the professor of law said it takes one man to conceive ideas that could transform the lives of millions.

    He said some leaders, such as Mobutu Sese Seku, Adolf Hitler and Muarmmar Ghadafi, had opportunities but left no inspiring legacy.

    Osinbajo said: “I do not think that good attributes are country-specific or region-specific. They are general attributes that we can see in anyone. We have our own great leaders as well, who we see those attributes in, but there are so many things that are missing.

    “As far as I am concerned, the first is the commitment to the people; commitment to any kind of ideals. We do not find that a lot in leadership, especially national leadership. You may find in some states some measure of decent leadership, people who are committed, such as Lagos, Osun, Rivers, where there is some commitment to something, but in terms of national leadership, it is sadly missing. You do not find a commitment to serve the people, rather they, deceive and blame everyone. You cannot find courage if you do not find commitment.”

    He said good leadership is manifested in “even how an official ceremony is organised”.

    Osinbajo showed the audience two short video clips showing United States (U.S.) President Barrack Obama and his wife, Mitchell, at a ceremony to remember victims of the 9/11 terrorist attack. The other video showed President Goodluck Jonathan swearing-in the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Mariam Aloma-Mukhtar.

    In the first video, Obama and his wife marched in unison to the praying field, placed their hands on their chests and closed their eyes. Everyone else followed their lead. Two military officers of the same height opened the door as Obama and his wife stepped out, with other officers artistically forming a guard of honour in a beautiful scene.

    In the other video, a man was seen searching through a book for the page containing the CJN’s oath of office. Another man was seen adjusting the microphone while President Jonathan and Justice Aloma-Muktar watched. After a page was opened, President Jonathan looked in and realised it was the wrong page. He opened the right page himself.

    Osinbajo said Obama and his wife, despite their busy schedule, must have practiced their movement and what was expected of them before the ceremony, highlighting the attention to detail that is required for state functions.

    He said: “It is that kind of attention to detail that makes people respect a government. Why are you bringing a whole book? Why can’t you bring a page? And the whole world was watching.”

    Founder of LeapAfrica Mrs. Ndidi Nwuneli, who spoke on “The power of five loaves and two fishes: Collectively using little to achieve much”, said everyone is guilty of how beautiful or ugly their environment is.

    To make a positive impact in the society, she said people must determine their visions, take stock of their assets and utilise them well; prepare; be willing to work as part of a team; galvanise others to buy into the vision and re-invest the returns.

    Grooming tomorrow’s leaders is also crucial, she said, adding: “We tend to cling to power and the limelight and are rarely willing to share the risks and rewards with others. This remains a huge stumbling block. Leaders who are willing to galvanise others to do the work achieve greater results.”

    Unboxed 2.0’s Chief Responsibility Officer Mr. Wale Adenuga said the meeting was an opportunity to bring leaders and youths together to explore how to better the community.

    Adenuga said: “People do speak a lot against leadership, but the purpose of this conference is to make people realise that we also have a role to play. We need to take responsibility for some things. The government ought to take responsibility for a whole lot of things, but we ourselves need to take responsibility. We need to be our brother’s keeper; we need to realise that life is not just about ourselves and that we can make a difference even within the spheres of our influences.”