Tag: Yinka Odumakin

  • Fani-Kayode, Odumakin sue EFCC for N20m over planned arrest

    A former Minister of Aviation Chief Femi Fani-Kayode and Afenifere Renewal Group Publicity Secretary Yinka Odumakin have sued the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over an alleged plan to arrest them.

    They joined the State Security Services and the Police in the suit filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    The applicants, through their lawyer Chukwuma-Machukwu Ume (SAN), are praying the court to stop the respondents from arresting them over alleged false information they spread.

    They are demanding N20million “as damages for the unlawful threat to arrest the applicants”.

    Fani-Kayode had claimed that EFCC operatives surrounded Chief Justice Onnoghen’s home, while Odumakin shared a video to that effect. Fani-Kayode later retracted the publication, saying his sources misinformed him.

    The applicants are praying for a declaration that the respondents’ public declaration to arrest them on the basis of spreading false rumours is an infringement of their fundamental rights as enshrined in Section 34 (a), 35 (1) (4) and (5) of the 1999 Constitution.

    They said the threat to falsely imprison their liberty, safety, peace and security is a breach of their rights.

    Fani-Kayode and Odumakin prayed for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the respondents and their agents from harassing, arresting or detaining them.

    They are praying for the enforcement of their fundamental rights and an order stopping the respondents from threatening them with unlawful arrest.

    The applicants prayed for an order compelling the respondents to tender an unreserved apology to them for the infringement of their fundamental rights and for “describing them in demeaning manners”.

    In a verifying affidavit in support of the application, the deponent Rev Emmanuel Olorunmagbe, said he was at the Online Publishers Association of Nigeria (OPAN) conference on Wednesday when EFCC’s spokesman Tony Oriade threatened to arrest the applicants.

    “He stated openly that while the first applicant tweeted that the EFCC wanted to arrest the CJN, the second applicant released a video on it, and that two of them will be invited and if they fail to turn up within 48 hours, they will be arrested,” the deponent said.

    The applicants said they and their families are living in fear  “as to what might happen if these respondents are not restrained by the honourable court, coupled with their state of health.”

    According to them, EFCC is biased and its invitation, which they said they have not received, “is a disguised plan to incarcerate them and thwart the cause of justice”.

  • The pathetic delusions of Yinka Odumakin

    Any regular reader of Yinka Odumakin’s ‘Candid Notes’ column in the Vanguard newspaper every Tuesday cannot but marvel at the dexterity with which he ,in a dishonest manner casts himself as the lead actor in every drama, largely of his fecund imagination’s concoction. You must, however, give the magical point man of latter day Afenifere  ( at least we saw Odumakin function in that direction with President Jonathan’s campaign group   in the 2015 elections)   some credit. He is a riveting, even spell binding story teller. Were he , to have in place of political merchandising, tried his hands at fiction, Odumakin would surely have earned for himself honour as a best-selling author, instead of notoriety as unstable political entrepreneur, moving from one camp to the other, to earn a survival,which though  has fetched him big cash, but without honour among his peers.

    Odumakin’s talents as all-weather cash and carry agitator, which I saw him exhibit when we both campaigned for Mr Jimi Agbaje in 2007 were on display once again, in his three- part column titled ‘Portrait of the tiger Ambode rode’ published on page 17 of the Vanguard of Tuesday, October 9, 16 and 23rd respectively. For avoidiance of doubt, I am not Asiwaju’s man but I hate young or old men ,who in their time  of need  crawl to a man desperately for help but repay such magnanimity through malicious criticism and denigration of their benefactor. Every human being has his or  her fault. There is nothing wrong in criticizing anyone we think will be better off by our criticism and for that matter leaders like Asiwaju Tinubu  can only stand focused by our constructive criticism. However when it becomes the character of some individuals to denigrate anyone strong enough to resist their political merchandising like the point man of Afenifere has chosen to do agaist Asiwaju Bola Tinubu ,it is nothing but deceit. How many times has Yinka Odumakin critizised the acute prolifigacy committed with funds budgeted for security but expended on 2015 elections? The only reason why Odumakin is embarking on his present deceit is the 2019 Presidential elections,which has pitched the interest of Asiwaju Tinubu for Buhari against that of “Afenifere” for Atiku

    How lucky  is Odumakin  for God to have used Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to sponsor him on a medical trip abroad a decade and a half ago, which saved his left hand from   amputation. Thus, he is very fortunate to be able to use the same hand today   to inflict his largely fictive and unsubstantiated tales on readers week after week, when scores of infinitely more disciplined and serious writers are seeking to contribute their quota to quality public discourse through concise articles that demonstrate respect for facts, logic and basic decency.

    A veritable magician with a pretentious capacious and encyclopedic memory, Odumakin cites word for word, quotes dating back to almost two decades ago, which he attributes to diverse persons (mostly dead) without stating the contexts in which such utterances were made or even where and when. With such ‘sharp’ memory,he could not remember to put down in few words how his left hand was rescued from amputation in addition to other goodies benfitted by his ‘activist’ family from Tinubu. Like the famous James Bond, Yinka Odumakin plays a key role in every drama of his own making. More than a dozen books have been published, for instance, by various participants in the struggle against the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election won fair and square by the late Chief MKO Abiola. Not in a single one of these publications by some of the most credible and prominent actors in the events of that momentous period in our history does Yinka Odumakin’s name feature even as an obscure footnote on the pages of history.

    Yet, every week, Odumakin massages his own ego in his column posing falsely as a frontline member of the opposition against continued military rule in the aftermath of the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. Of course, no one can deny him of his entitlement to an exaggerated sense of self importance. In his characteristic deceitful manner,Odumakin used  the issue of the Lagos State governorship primaries of the All Progressives Congress (APC)  with the clear aim of shooting down perceived opposition to the Afenifere’s alliance for  Political trading with Atiku Campaign Organisation,as it was in 2015 when they endorsed then President Jonathan. It is unfortunate that Yinka Odumakin has continued to thrive and profit financially in deceit. One would ordinarily have been tempted to simply ignore Odumakin’s mischievous antics. However, it is important to let him know sometimes that he cannot always get away with the perpetration of deliberate falsehood. It is amusing that Odumakin, in his foolery thought that he can use the APC Lagos State Primary election to whip up sentiment against those they perceive may spoil the market for Afenifere in the 2019 political  ‘stock exchange’ with Atiku Campaign Organisation..

    In Odumakin’s fictive universe, statements can be loosely made and quotes attributed without reference to substantiating facts or verifiable evidence. His prime rule of engagement seems to be simply: Once Odumakin has asserted it, it is the gospel truth. Thus, he merely asserts that he once heard Tinubu declare that “Eko fe lo sun” (Lagos wants to sleep) when the latter got up from his seat to go to bed. He does not tell us when or where this statement was made and who were his witnesses. It is because of this kind of slovenly and lazy journalistic writing that many serious minds, particularly scholars, treat newspaper analyses with disdain and condescension believing they mostly lack analytic rigor, logical vigor or philosophical depth as Odumakin’s columns so vividly demonstrate.

    As far as Odumakin is concerned, Tinubu rode to power as governor of Lagos State in 1999 “largely on account of his association with NADECO abroad”. He forgets conveniently that Tinubu not only associated with NADECO abroad from the margins but was at the very centre of the struggle to actualize the June 12 mandate being one of the closest associates of the late Chief MKO Abiola. It was a struggle to which he committed his time, energy and resources and one which endeared him to the teeming masses of the south west.

    Odumakin with audacious recklessness bordering on megalomania boasts that he “put together the first jingle Tinubu had on TV which I composed from one of the popular songs the struggle field (sic) which I had to work with Tinubu doing some voice over”. As far as we know.prior to the harvest of Naira during Jonathan’s  2015 campaign, he has no stake in the media as scores of media practitioners  who I know are notable  associates of Asiwaju Tinubu. Odumakin is certainly not fit to untie the sandals of any single one of these disciplined professionals. They include Dele Alake, Tunji Bello, Segun Babatope, Bayo Onanauga, Dapo Olorunyomi, Femi Ojudu, Kunle Ajibade, Segun Ayobolu, Sunday Dare, Kayode Komolafe, Sam Omatseye and Louis Odion among many others. So was it Odumakin’s pedestrian and juvenile sole jingle that won Tinubu the governorship of Lagos Satte in 1999? He must be either totally demented or living in a fool’s paradise.

    It is unfortunate that in his desperation to demean Tinubu , Odumakin creates the impression that respected Afenifere chieftains such as Chief Abraham Adesanya and Chief Ayo Adebanjo among others were deceitful and dishonest in taking certain decisions, which is a very serious assault on the hard earned reputations of these revered statesmen. For instance, Odumakin insinuates that Engineer Funsho Williams actually won the AD governorship primaries but the Afenifere chieftains fraudulently did Tinubu a favour by declaring Tinubu the winner of the intra party polls. This is most regrettable and leaves one with no other conclusion that Afenifere wants Tinubu down for refusing to continue paying for the favour of ‘rigging out’ illustrious Engr Funso Williams,who incidental my hero, for Tinubu. Great Yoruba leaders indeed.

     

    • Awonuga Olajide is a former PDP Chairmanship Contender in Somolu Local Government of Lagos State

     

    • Continued online

    www.staging.thenationonlineng.net

  • Atiku meets with regional leaders in Abuja

    …says Nigeria’s problems need urgent solutions

    Presidential Aspirant and ex-Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, on Sunday met with leaders of the Southern and Middle-Belt Leaders Forum in Abuja.

    He is the first presidential aspirant to meet with the leaders of the regional group.

    The meeting is holding in  the house of Ijaw leader, Chief Edwin Clark, at his Asokoro residence.

    The former Vice President said he decided to meet with the group because he believed that the problems plaguing the country needed to be tackled urgently.

    He said it was the responsibility of the leaders to meet and discuss the challenges confronting Nigeria and find solutions to them.

    “Nigeria is beset with a lot of problems. In fact problems that are so grave that they are likely, if we don’t move fast enough to curtail them, will bring about another national crisis.

    “It is our responsibilities as leaders to engage ourselves in meaningful discourse so that together, we can resolve the problems confronting this country.

    “Particularly, I will like to mention a few key areas where we need to pay attention. One is the structure of our country. Is it working? Is it what we want? At least it has been there for a number of decades. Maybe since the military incursion into our politics since 1966.

    “Is our economy working well? What of other sectors of our public life? Security. Are we secured? Is law and order protecting majority of people in this country? And of course we have the social sector to contend with. Those are problems as far as our educational, health systems are concerned. Even our infrastructural deficits. Count them.

    “And I think without interacting, exchanging views, and agreeing on how best we can resolve these problems whether as socio-cultural leaders or political leaders or leaders of the business community, I don’t think we will be able to resolve these problems,” Atiku stated.

    The President, Ohanaeze Ndi-Igbo, John Nwodo, who spoke on behalf of the forum, said the group has decided to invite presidential aspirants on their plans to move the country forward.

    He said: “We have decided to talk with him since he has expressed desire to rule this country, to contest the presidency. We wanted to rub minds with him, to know his views so that by the time we finish this interactions we will be able to assure ourselves which one of them we think have the capacity to reflect our aspiration and rejig our country and bring it to where many will like it to be.

    “We want to see the people who want to represent us. We want to hear from them, we want to be convinced of their capacity to represent us.”

    Those present at the meeting include: Chief Ayo Adebanjo, John Nwodo, Yinka Odumakin, Amb. Godknows Igali,

  • Buhari has no respect for rule of law – Afenifere

    The pan Yoruba socio cultural organization, Afenifere on Tuesday said President Muhammadu Buhari’s call for the placement of national interest above the rule of law was illogical.

    It noted that the claim was a proof of the President’s lack of respect for the rule of law since assumption of office.

    The group in a communique issued at the end of its monthly meeting held yesterday at the residence of its leader, Chief Reuben Fasoranti in Akure, the Ondo State capital said Buhari’s statement undermined his belief in democracy.

    The National Publicity Secretary of the group, Yinka Odumakin who read the communique said the All Progressives Congress (APC) and president Buhari have failed Nigerians, even as he declared that the president lacks the ability to deliver his campaign promises.

    Besides, he noted that the APC and President Buhari do not believe in restructuring which he said remains the only solution to the problems confronting the country.

    According to the communique “We maintain that restructuring remains the major issue in Nigeria and the meeting reviewed the comments made by the Vice President of Nigeria, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo at town hall meeting in USA.

    The Vice president was quoted as saying “the problem of our country is not the matter of restructuring and we must not allow ourselves to be drawn into the argument that our problems is drawn from geographical destructuring , it is about managing resources properly and providing for people properly. ”

    “The statement of the Vice president should be viewed against the background that in 2016 the APC as a party inserted restructuring into its manifestos and in 2017 when the argument about restructuring became so loud, they set up the El-rufai committee to go and provide their own idea of restructuring and up till now they have not told us their new definition only for them to be telling us that restructuring is not our problem.

    “That shows clearly that restructuring for the APC is an issue to play gallery with,  they don’t believe in it, they are not committed to it,  and for the Acting President to say the problem of Nigeria is managing resources, we want to ask them how much of it they have done in the last three years ?

    “How much of providing for the people have they done? How much of managing resources have they done with the monumental corruption? The Transparency International has said Corruption has worsen under this administration.

    Read Also: Fasanmi to Afenifere: ignore Obasanjo

    “Apart from the question of lack of coordination and incompetence in this government, it is clear that there is structural issues that is making it difficult to deliver to the people. And in any case, the issue confronting us today is not all about good governance, we have bad governance and bad structures and this is why we are experiencing bad governance within a bad structures, but even if we have good governance,  there are issues in our polity that good governance alone cannot resolve.

    “There is no any amount of good governance that can alter the derivation formula, good governance cannot address resource control, there are issues of restructuring that are outside the scope of good governance which is an essential ingredient of restructuring.

    “This remains the only condition for any political party to earn the support of Nigerians and Nigerians should not allow  anybody to deceive them again by playing on their emotions and after the election they will give another definition to restructuring, we have had enough of political fraudsters.

    “The meeting observe the recent statement by the President at the NBA conference  to defend the concept on the rule of law in all established democracy should be subject to some nebulous national interest or security.

    “Afenifere says and must be clear to everybody that this present government has done everything possible in the last three years to show clearly that it observes the rule of law in a breach and we have had disobedience of court orders,  detention of citizens without trials, arbitrary arrests,  extra judicial killings, invasion of National Assembly, invasion of National Assembly by thugs and till date no action has been done in it.

    “And many other clear subversion of constitutional role which is a great knock to our constitutional  democracy has been witnessing in the last three years” The communique stressed.

  • Restructuring: Southern leaders barred from flying to Makurdi

    Group says government descending into military dictatorship

    They were prevented from flying for security reasons – airport Commandant

     

    Some members of the Southern and Middle Belt Forum (southern flank) led by Chief Edwin Clark, were on Monday stopped from traveling to Makurdi to attend the Middle Belt conference on restructuring.

    Addressing a press conference in Abuja after they were disallowed from flying, the group said they were told they could not fly to Makurdi because of security reasons even after securing a charter aircraft.

    Speaking on behalf of the group, the Secretary General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, John Nwodo, said the elders spent about five hours at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja trying to obtain clearance to make the journey but were refused by the Commandant of the Makurdi Airport whose name was given as Lt. Commander A. Audu.

    He said: “We arrived in time for our flight today at 12 noon; the airport commandant disallowed us from flying and said we needed to go and get permission to land in Makurdi.

    “We consider this fundamental infringement on our democratic rights of freedom of movement and freedom of association. There is nothing in our law precluding us from moving to wherever we like, from holding an opinion in so far as we do not breach any law in Nigeria.

    “What has happened to us today expresses a lot of doom for fundamental human rights in our country, for the free exchange of ideas as unavoidable instruments of achieving growth and development of our polity.

    “We deprecate the treatment that we were given today, which treatment prevented us from physical joining our brethren in the Middle Belt in a common view which we all hold, a very patriotic view, which we think will be the only way to guarantee the future of our country.” he said.

    Read Also: Restructuring will address IPOB agitation – Atiku

    Nwodo, who joined other southern leaders to watch the live transmission of the conference in Chief Clark’s residence, said that they wanted to show solidarity with the Middle Belt people who he said had been supportive to the forum.

    He added: “Please publicize this for many reasons. One, the teeming crowd that you saw on television in the Middle Belt is our brethren who showed us solidarity in other zonal summits. The fact that we were barred from showing them this solidarity is bound to hurt them.

    “Through this press conference, we want to express our solidarity with them. We want them to know that we are one and the same in our views of the restructuring of the Federation” he said

    The group also faulted the recently signed Executive Order 006.

    He said “Secondly, to deprecate this new tendency. Not too long ago, the President signed into law an Executive order, which gives him the right to seize people’s assets. This is almost like a military government. And we think that this is an intrusion into the principles of separation of powers in our country.

    “It is the responsibility of the legislature to make law, of the executive to implement the law and the judiciary to interpret the law. I do not think that Section 5 of the Constitution gives the President such Executive authority to make laws.

    “The right to property is a fundamental right in a democracy. It cannot be expropriated here without decision of the court. What has happened to us today shows a continuing tendency to slide into a dictatorship in a democratic government. That is condemnable.” he stated

    Asked if the forum suspected any deliberate attempt to sabotage their participation at the Makurdi summit or for other technical reasons, Mr. Yinka Odumakin said “The first jet that was to take us started this funny game of saying that there was a bad weather to Makurdi and that they could not fly. Until we got to other airlines and I asked what’s bad about the weather. They said they were ready to take us.

    “As we were about to make payments, they now said there was landing permit issues. They called the commandant in Makurdi, who said they should send application.

    “The Chief of Staff to the Benue State Governor said we should fax the application to him and to the commandant. We waited at the airport for hours. Eventually, the Chief of Staff had to contact the commandant in Makurdi and was told that the landing permit requested by the first airline was still on their table. At that stage, General C. Ariyo Niege, a veteran ex-soldier, who was head of Nigerian military forces in Sudan, went to the commandant in Abuja.

    Speaking on his encounter with the commandant in Abuja, Niege said he was told they would not be able to fly to Makurdi due to security reasons.

    He said “I pleaded with him that we were having issues in flying to Makurdi for the summit and he told me that for security reasons civilian aircraft were no longer allowed to fly into Makurdi airport.”

  • Forum urges Buhari to address agitations on restructuring

    Forum urges Buhari to address agitations on restructuring

    Some leaders of Southern and Middle Belt states on Monday urged President Muhammadu Buhari to address agitations for restructuring rather than embark on wild goose chase.

    The forum, which comprises of leaders from the South West, South -south, South East and Middle Belt, was reacting to the President’s New Year address to Nigerians.

    The group, in a statement jointly signed by the Publicity Secretary of Afenifere, Yinka Odumakin, for the South West, Senator Bassey Henshaw, South- south, Prof. Chigozie Ogbu, South East and Mr. Isuwa Dogo, Middle Belt, accused Buhari of playing down the clamour for restructuring while embarking on a wild goose chase about “process.”

    According to the leaders, Nigeria’s crisis had peaked that there were no guaranteed opportunities for Nigerians by its leaders despite promises packaged to offer falsehood.

    They noted that instead of Buhari to address the cause of the nation’s affliction, he was busy trying to rationalize the country’s failure by passing the buck.

    The forum said: “It is a time when we should be having national introspection to know where the rain began to beat us, how to dry our clothes and ensure that we are no longer exposed to rainfall. Unfortunately, we are not addressing the cause of our affliction and only trying to rationalize our needless failure, passing the buck and running from the solutions to our problem.

    “We are in a period where empty platitudes are being offered our people instead of concrete assurances on reasoned prescriptions. The truth of the matter is that our nationhood crisis has peaked and there are no further opportunities to guarantee opportunities for our citizens no matter the good intentions of leaders or even unrealistic promises packaged to offer them false hope.

    “Social scientists have argued correctly that a problem is not resolved either by running away from it or ascribing it to the wrong source. Unfortunately, that is what we are doing as a country by playing down our crisis of “structure” while on a wild goose chase about “process.” That is akin to a man going to Benin City while driving towards Benin Republic. The faster he runs the farther he is away from his destination.

    “In 1983, when the Shehu Shagari administration was overthrown, its budget for a country of 80m people was $25b.35 years after, the Buhari government has just proposed a $23b budget for about 180m people!

    “The above clearly shows that there is no way out of our systemic crisis except we resume productivity which was our hallmark in the years that we practiced federalism as an entity.

    “We have exhausted all possibilities of a rentier and sharing economy and all that is left is unemployment, hunger, gnashing of teeth and conflicts among nationalities over shrinking opportunities.”

     

     

  • Odumakin: When Activism Is Enslaved By Sinister Motives

    To say the least, I am amused, with the apparent self-contradiction by Comrade Yinka Odumakin, a veiled politician, masquerading as a social activist of the Afenifere stuff. He has just pierced himself with a sharp knife.

    In a published piece captioned “What is wrong with Buratai’s Army,” Odumakin , was on a voyage of perfidy, but truth held him back to unconsciously declare that “Less I am accused of crying wolf where there is none…, ” thus watering the substance of his arsenals as an attack dog.

    Obviously a hatchet job, Odumakin had taken scathing jabs at the Nigerian Army under the leadership of the Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Lieutenant General Tukur Yusufu Buratai for executing its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) through the free medical outreach programmes in host communities in Nigeria.

    I immediately sensed in him shadows of a desperate politician and ethnic chauvinist groping for cogent reasons to deliver what he presumed to be an irrecoverable punch on the institution of the Nigerian Army. In so doing, he simultaneously minced no words in expressing his veiled hatred, ethnic bigotry and aversion to the leadership of Nigeria by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Therefore, the short piece was replete with confounding blunders and contradictions to a level of even confessing to the truthfulness of some of the issues he held sacrosanct as weapons to disparage the Nigerian Army. Nigerians are known for their flair for flaunting an identity far from their innermost convictions.

    When I perused Odumakin’s piece, his image as the last don of this clan of reprehensible characters assailed my senses as the sole motivation for his baseless umbrage. The writer knows beyond doubt that the speculated news about soldiers of the “Operation Python Dance II” inoculating school children in parts of Nigeria with vaccines infused with the deadly Monkey Pox virus is a mere rumour, patently false and unfounded.

    Also, Odumakin knows the peddlers are miscreants, which antagonizing politicians have deployed against the Federal Government under the Buhari Presidency to discredit the Army. He knows, the Nigerian Army has not stepped into any school or community to administer free medication without the consent of relevant authorities, as attested by the presence of government officials and traditional rulers at the flag-off of the programme by “Operation Python Dance II,” or “Operation Crocodile Smile II.”

    I can bet to high heavens that Odumakin has no evidence or proof of any reported incident of death arising from any medication by the Army in any of the places it has been administered. Yet, he elected upon himself to add strength to the tantalizing wind, flesh up the wild and destructive rumour tales by enthusing a confirmation and rehearse of the speculations as;

    “The rumour mongers of course succeeded because the Nigerian state already lost credibility with the people. The idea of medical mission by the military is not totally alien.”

    The exposition by Odumakin confirms the current deliberate attempts to put Nigeria in disarray. More than anything else, his plot to destroy the reputation of the Nigerian Army by lending credence to a rumour is visible, hence Odumakin admits that the Army’s free medical programmes is not strange to the people. And so, by any stretch of imagination, Buratai’s Army, as he puts it, could not have launched it because it was handed an agenda of depopulating some regions as he claimed.

    And he was right in the sense that the Nigerian Army under General Buratai had undertaken these CSR projects as far back as 2015 when he assumed office as the COAS. No one raised eyebrows and the CSR projects have extended beyond Medicare to cover water, roads and electricity projects across Nigeria.

    These are facts on the fingertips of every Nigerian, Odumakin inclusive. But bolstered by the desperation to deliver on the assignment of executing a selfish and ethnic political agenda, handed down to him by his pay masters, he dramatized the artificial panic scenarios created by the rumours, shamelessly in these comic words; “I saw a woman scaling a fence that even men will have difficulty climbing in order to get hold of her child.” But the writer failed to notify Nigerians further whether the panicked woman who scaled a fence sustained a broken rib or leg and which hospital admitted her.

    Somewhat petulant and resisting the aura of truth, as reflected in subsisting realities, Odumakin confessed he was motivated to drop his lines after watching General Buratai’s advertisement of his proposed “empowerment programme for internally displaced persons,” “on Channels TV on Saturday.” And his pedestrian reasoning for condemning the advert hinged on the inaccessibility of IDPs to television sets and so, “This advert is therefore not for them.”

    Yes, the advert is not for them! But he missed the point that the advert is meant for demonic souls like him and the other agents, experts and specialists in rumour peddling. It is meant to forestall concocted tales on the Nigerian Army to the effect that it has again sneaked into IDPs camps to dish out “poisoned items or cash,” to hapless victims of armed internal conflicts.

    I am the least surprised that Odumakin would remember the selfless and humanitarian services rendered to IDPs from time immemorial by the Nigerian Army. They treated the wounded in camps, offered them a share of their loaf of bread, and operated makeshift schools, where soldiers spared time out of their tight schedules to teach children of IDPs in camps.

    Then, Odumakin never questioned whether soldiers have become teachers or the loaves of bread were poisoned. But himself and the group/ organization he represents never perceived these humanitarian crisis as worthy of intervention by rendering assistance. When soldiers camped repentant insurgents; de-radicalized and de-militarized terrorists with a new orientation and absorbed them into the sane society, Odumakin and buddies never questioned whether soldiers have become psychologists.

    When soldiers pushed by the passion of humanity, stretched themselves to rescue trapped victims of kidnappers in the Niger Delta, free of charge, they were not queried for usurping the responsibilities of civil security. That’s the extent of hypocrisy in us, which is actively and relentlessly promoted by the likes of Odumakin.

    So, he was indiscernibly piqued with General Buratai’s appearance on BBC “Hard Talk” programme; forgetting in his peevish idiosyncrasies that aside being the COAS, General Buratai doubles as the leader of the Counter-Insurgency Operations in Nigeria. Consequently, he owes eager Nigerians a sacred obligation to once in a while explain the progress, challenges and developments concerning the counter-insurgency operations in the country.

    If America’s Secretary of States, Mr. Rex Tillerson admits that fighting insurgency across the globe is beyond the sound of weapons on the battlefield alone, as propaganda is also key, I cannot understand Odumakin’s failure to decode the dynamics.

    But to embellish clannish and selfish sentiments to appear as a patriotic national cause, the writer cleverly encased it in political ambitions of the military/Army, with stale historical allusions. I cannot buy the idea that yesterday’s coup history, would dictate today’s signals for a coup just because the Army has decided to be selfless and humane to the people they serve or use the media as a counter-terrorism strategy. Coups generally are unfashionable in any part of the world, as democracy has triumphed defiantly even in Nigeria.

    The Nigerian Army, particularly under the watch of General Buratai has not only consistently pledged subordination to civil authority and defended Nigeria’s democracy, but soldiers have been re-oriented, re-professionalized and disciplined. It explains why the Nigerian Army especially has excelled in all its assignments, observing the best practices of professionalism, upholding human rights and sticking religiously to rules of engagements in all assignments.

    The Nigerian Army’s current leadership’s aversion to coups is not in doubt. Some elements in the country, which Odumakin strikes as one believes everything in Nigeria, must be tied to politics and the feeling becomes more overt when they fail to clinch appointments in patronage. These were the same forces which wanted a military coup in Nigeria and sprouted a rumour to this effect.

    They allegedly had their names penned down for juicy appointments, as PR Managers and so on, before the Army leadership by Gen. Buratai thwarted this obnoxious plan by issuing a rebuttal statement and placed soldiers on secret surveillance. And still pained by this frustration, they think, extracting their pound of flesh against the Army Chief is to haul any balderdash at him or the Army, whether real or imagined. It cannot work!

    The Nigerian Army is adamantly professionalized, as attested by the global encomiums poured on them. It is not a fluke, but a product of careful assessments by independent international bodies and governments.

    I agree that accusations can surface from time to time. It’s normal and no one has the capacity to restrain anybody from cooking allegations against the Army. But several probe panels and independent civil society organizations have proven such accusations as a farce and vindicated the Nigerian Army. The ongoing Presidential Probe Panel is almost left with no job to do, as the accusers of the Nigerian Army of crimes against humanity are refusing to step out to substantiate their claims. Amnesty International (AI), a leading crusader in this direction has declined appearance too.

    I believe, Odumakin is less informed or deliberately malicious for personal reasons. We have seen situations where the Army bent backwards to accept unprovoked armed attacks on them, without reprisal reactions, as recently recorded in Abia state in the build-up to the commencement of the “Operation Python Dance II.”

    My candid advice to Odumakin and coy is that they are free to hate the Buhari Presidency to any length. But he has no liberty to extend to the limits of attempting to discredit the Nigerian Army, with infantile speculations. He lives on politicians and thinks everyone in government should invite him for lunch. But today, there is a new order in Nigeria and he must discard the old mentality to be at peace with his soul.

    In recent times, the likes of Yinka Odumakin have demonstrated a penchant for selective interpretations of our laws and its applications as it suit their debased thoughts to push illegitimate gains. We shall therefore not allow him to dance naked on the graves of our founding fathers by allowing these tissues of falsehood to settle down anywhere near sane minds.

    No amount of blackmail can intimidate the Nigerian Army and its leadership under General Buratai from protecting and defending the sovereignty of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Odumakins can again mask to try a new style another day; but the one of today under activism is sinister. It has become stale and useless.
    Odeh is a public affairs analyst and contributed this piece from No19 Anthony Enahoro Street, Utako, Abuja.

  • Buhari not opposed to restructuring, but disintegration, says Adesina 

    Buhari not opposed to restructuring, but disintegration, says Adesina 

    The Special Adviser on Media and publicity, Femi Adesina, on Friday maintained that President Muhammadu Buhari is not opposed to restructuring.

    He made the clarification in Abuja while speaking at the 8th Annual Lecture Series of the Change We Need Nigeria Initiative.

    It was theme ‘Disintegration or Restructuring: Which Way Nigeria?’

    He said “The topic of today Disintegration or Restructuring: Which way Nigeria, is topical, german, is current. But then I have my own opinion about the topic.

    “When we talk of restructuring we don’t necessarily need  to accompany it with disintegration. Because we can talk restructuring without falling apart.

    “In the history of Nigeria there was a time when the various people and communities lived in this space that is today called Nigeria. And then the colonial masters came, formed what is called the northern protectorate, southern protectorate, that was restructuring of what has subsisted.

    “And then in 1914 precisely, the northern and southern protectorate, were amalgamated into one country, that was another restructuring. Did it come with any saber-rattling or did it send the country into tailspin, no.

    “And then we we got to a point that we had regionalism in the country, the regions were formed and we begin to grow, that was another restructuring, it happened almost altrusively and each region begin to work on its own pace.

    “Eventually Independence came. Independence came we had parliamentary system at the beginning and we continue to grow.

    “Today, we have a presidential system of government that is another form of restructuring from parliamentary to presidential.

    And then there was a time we had a unitary system when the then Gen. Ironsi tried to formalize through the unification decree.

    “We have a unitary system which to a large extent still subsist in the country, its a form of restructuring. Don’t forget there was a point in this country we had diayache   – president Babangida was at the center and the civilian governors were in the state, another form of restructuring. Did we disintegrate? No, we didn’t.

    “Nigeria has always restructured. There was a time we had 12 states, and then at a point it became 19 and then to 36 states, that is restructuring.

    “Then why must restructuring then be accompanied with saber-rattling? It is restructuring or disintegration that is what I disagree with.

    “Restructuring will come, this country will be renegotiated, restructured but then we will not disintegrate.

    “I begin to get suspicious times that is this call for restructuring another form of opposition? When you found people who have been in power for 16 years now being champions of restructuring, so I begin to suspect that restructuring is becoming another form of opposition in Nigeria.

    “Nigeria l will eventually be restructured. This Government is not opposed to restructuring but the government is opposed to anything that will splinter the country.

    “We will get to where we are going on restructuring and Nigeria remain one united indivisible entity. That is my thought. And from the first paper I have heard I know this issue will be dissected properly today and at the end we will come up with something that is pragmatic, something that is not emotive, something that is not knee jack, something that can take this issue and clamour for restructuring forward.” he stated

    The Spokesperson of Afenifere Group, Yinka Odumakin, stressed that Nigeria has it is today is in terminal crises.

    He said “Nigeria is currently careering dangerously to the edge of the precipice because we have erected our super structure on a wrong sub-structure. This is at the core of the call for the restructuring of the country so that we can return to the spirit of federalism in the 1960 and 1963 constitutions that our founding fathers negotiated.”

    According to him, the expression ‘Nigeria’s unity non-negotiate’ which is always used to reply calls for restructuring, have missed the whole concept of nationhood.

    “There is nothing that is settled in the life of any nation. A nation is like any living thing that grows and therefore a daily dialogue.

    “It is therefore my considered view that the whole idea of non-negotiability of Nigerian unity only developed on the strength of keeping the rents from oil from Niger Delta and proceeds from Lagos and VAT. It has nothing to do with the love of the union beyond reaping without sowing.

    Stressing on the need to restructure in order to avoid disintegration, he said that Nigeria will blossom and prosper when the rights of the nationalities within it are recognized.

    The government, he said, should desire to build a centre that coordinates rather than being overlords.

    He said “Our exclusive list must become leaner. We need a central government and federating units that are coordinates and not a colonizing centre and vassal states.

    “The resources that are under the soul of each section of the country must belong to it and agreed percentage should go to the government of the federation. We must move away from a rental and indolent economy to a productive economy where every section of the country becomes a productive centre.

    “We have the capacity to generate a N50 trillion economy annually as against the current N6 trillion we are killing ourselves over.

    “We would have no choice than turning our huge population to human capital as against beggars and destitute who are just numbers.

    “This is the spirit of the over 600 resolutions reached at the 2014 National Conference which had the best of Nigerians.

    “But if we remain obstinate and refuse to address the structures of Nigeria, we risk the fate that befell the USSR, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia, they have all disappeared from the World map. Let that not be the fate of Nigeria.” he said

    The Lead Discussant at the event and General Overseer of the Charismatic Renewal Ministry (CRM), Dr. Cosmas Ilechukwu, blamed the incursion of the military into Nigeria’s politics.

    He said “The aftermath of the military incursion into political leadership is value somersault, cultural disorientation, economic bastardization, and political rascality.

    “Nigerian military laid the foundation of most of what has become our governance culture today. They introduced executive impunity that shows no regard for the pronouncement of legitimate courts of law or to the court of public opinion.” he added

    Stressing that Nigeria has been held captive under an obnoxious unitary system of government for 51 years,  he called for immediate convocation of a Constituent Assembly as a way forward.

    Abia State Governor, Okezie Ikpeazu, who was represented by Hon. Godwin Adindu, disagreed with the position that the opposition parties are behind calls for restructuring.

    “Nigeria needs it and that is the position of my governor,” he said.

    Besides supporting creation of state police, he urged the Federal Government to convene a meaningful and open dialogue.

    On her part, Hon. Nkoyo Toyo, said that the calls for restructuring are not peculiar to Nigeria.

    According to her, the country as it is now is only working for few people.

    Noting restructuring is a complex process, she said that it would be too much for National Assembly to handle.

    She said that a body should be established to handle it.

  • Suspected Fulani Herdsmen invade Falae’s Farm again

    Suspected Fulani Herdsmen invade Falae’s Farm again

    The Ilado farm of the Former Secretary to the Federal Government (SGF) Chief Olu Falae near Akure, the Ondo state capital was again Wednesday reportedly attacked by suspected hoodlums suspected to be Fulani herdsmen.

    Sources said crops worth millions of Naira were destroyed in the process of grazing their cattle.

    The Publicity Secretary of the pan-Yoruba socio-cultural group, Afenifere, Yinka Odumakin told reporters in Akure after the monthly meeting of the association, held at the residence of its leader, Chief Reuben Fasoranti.

    The Personal Assistant (PA) to Chief Falae, Captain Moshood Raji (rtd.) confirmed the incident, saying many crops were destroyed by the hoodlums.

    According to him, it was the police escorts of the elder statesman who shot sporadically into the air that sent the herdsmen out of the farm.

    He said they attacked Falae’s farm and destroyed the crops,adding that they had immediately reported the incident to the police.

    Odumakin,in a communique he read after the meeting accused the Federal Government of showing no concern at the incessant attacks of the Fulani herdsmen on the people of the South-West and Middle-Belt.

    He expressed worry over the renewed onslaught of Fulani herdsmen in Yoruba land.

    His words “ Recently, a Permanent Secretary of Osun origin, Mrs. Funke Kolawole was killed on Okene-Lokoja road on her way to Abuja.

    “Also, another 72-year-old woman was recently gang-raped in Odigbo area of Ondo State and the hoodlums are yet  to be brought to book and of course Chief Olu Falaye whose farm has become a source of attacks by the Fulani herdsmen.

    It urged the governors in the South-West to emulate the Ekiti State Government, stressing that they should put in place appropriate laws  to deal with the activities of the herdsmen in the region.

  • Again, the return of Chinweizu and all that

    Again, the return of Chinweizu and all that

    A supposed email exchange between Chinweizu, veteran columnist and author (The West and the Rest of Us, Anatomy of Female Power) and Professor G.G. Darah, communications teacher and prominent Delta State delegate to the just concluded national conference, has been making the rounds on the internet. If the exchange is true – and the style and substance of the exchange suggests it is – then we are in an even deeper trouble in this country than we imagine because of the Boko Haram insurgency.

    The exchange, dated August 6, was copied to Mr Yinka Odumakin, an outspoken Afenifere spokesman, Col. Tony Nyiam, Rtd, who, like Darah, is also a Delta State delegate to the national conference and the arrowhead of the 1990 attempted coup against General Ibrahim Babangida, which purported to have excised much of the North from Nigeria, and to one Professor Chinedu Nwajimba.

    The chilling concluding paragraphs of the exchange is worth reproducing in full, if only because of the possibility, even probability, it raises that it may have been the motive in convening the conference, if not of the authorities themselves, at least of elements at the conference who are known to be very close to the powers that be.

    “The main point,” Chinweizu said in his email, “is that we can’t afford to prolong our agony under Caliphate Colonialism. Our Liberation requires that they leave Nigeria entirely, and the sooner the better. If they are allowed to remain on any terms, even by return to 1960 Federalism or even Aburi, we’ll still have them polluting our polity. (Please see the attachment). So the sooner we get them out completely the better for us.

    “And if we can defeat and expel them without recourse to shooting war, i.e. without bloodshed, that’s the best. So you guys should do it within the Confab walls. Excise them by talking and voting; don’t wait till you have to shoot and bleed. Political war is better than military war.”

    Earlier in the roughly 800-word email, Chinweizu had expressed his happiness at what he said was a new division in the country the so-called progressives at the conference have engineered, something he described as the new “Greater/New South vs. Shariyaland geopolitical divide.” He then said although they were to be congratulated for their achievement in creating this new fault line, they should know that the battle had just begun.

    “When the Confab returns to wind up,” he said,  “if you can’t get them to walk out or can’t pass a resolution excising Shariyaland, Orkar style, then engineer a breakdown, with a Greater South separate majority/minority report that creates the cleavage that would oblige the Prez to reconvene the Confab as Confab 2, ostensibly for reconciliation across the cleavage. But you’d seize the opportunity at Confab 2 to create a Peoples’ Constitution, without any compromises to accommodate Arewa/Shariyaland. And you can there excise them if they resist the new constitution, as they will surely do. Am sure you and Yinka (Odumakin) can get that going and accomplish it. If all fails, at least get a resolution passed by the Greater South majority, postponing the 2015 election till after a new Constitution is approved by referendum.”

    The reader will recall that in my column of January 15 on these pages, entitled: “The return of Chinweizu and all that,” I had cause to join issues with the gentleman when he wrote in The Guardian of December 12 and 19, 2013 to take on the radical politician and Kano State delegate to the national conference, Dr Junaid Muhammad, and President Olusegun Obasanjo, one over his criticisms of President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration in press interviews, and the other over his since famous open letter to our No 1 Citizen, which was even more critical of the president than Dr Muhammad’s interviews.

    Chinweizu entitled the first piece “To Junaid Mohammed and the Shariyalanders.” What he said in it was pretty much the same as what he repeated in his email to Darah. It was also pretty much the same as his December 19 criticism of Obasanjo’s letter, except he did not forget to dismiss the 1999 Constitution under which Obasanjo returned to power as “illegitimate” and “a self-interested creation of Northern generals for the parochial interest of Shariyaland”. This was in spite of the fact, as we all now know, that the 1979 Constitution promulgated by Obasanjo as military head of state, which is essentially the same with the 1999, was authored principally by people like Professor Ben Nwabueze, Chinweizu’s fellow Biafran traveller and critic of the 1999 Constitution – thanks, in part, to the professor’s self-confession in a recent interview in Sunday Vanguard (March 20).

    Chinweizu’s email began with thanks to Darah for his situation report on the national conference and a plea that Darah and perhaps those he copied would “get it widely published in the media for the enlightenment of the Greater/New South (i.e. South + Middle Belt) Public.” Specifically, he wanted Odumakin to get it published in the Nigerian Tribune.

    I am not aware than Odumakin has been able to do so but Darah’s report has been published in The Pointer (August 25), the newspaper of Delta State, at least in its online edition from where I was able to download the report. Darah’s triumphalism over his version of the outcome of the national conference betrayed a malicious intent towards a section of this country – a malicious intent probably shared among those in power – which nearly turned the conference’s final sitting into a fiasco.

    “There will be two layers of power. One federal, two states,” Darah said in his report rather cockily. “Local governments will exist as they are in section 7 of the section, but they will not be a tier of government. Get me correctly, they will not form a tier. There is no federation where councils are tiers. It’s only in Nigeria, and they did it to spoon feed those 419 local governments in the North.”

    States, he also said, will design their own constitutions to cater for local interests. “It is so in India, Germany, Canada, it is so in America,” he said.

    Darah is absolutely correct that in a true federation there can be only two tiers of government; the federal and the state. It would then be up to the latter to create any number of local and municipal governments it wants depending on its wherewithal and the wisdom of its politicians.

    Problem is, Nigeria ceased to be a true federation like all of Darah’s examples, from the day the military first seized power in January 1966. True federations come about by aggregation. The Nigerian federation since 1966 has been by disaggregation. In other words, instead of power being ceded to the centre from the component parts, it has flowed in the opposite direction, with all this implies for the autonomy of the component parts.

    Even then, I believe the conference took the right decision in abrogating local governments as a tier, if only because they have no legislative powers except for bye-laws, and even though the decision smacks of vendetta against a section of the country. The ill motive behind the decision was apparent from the conference’s confusion in its decision to still allocate 22.5 per cent of the federal revenue pool to the tier as against 42.5 per cent for the centre and 30 per cent for the states in its recommendation for revenue allocation.

    This brings me to Darah’s explanation for what he described in his situation report as the “climb down” by delegates from the Delta region on the controversy over the size of derivation as a principle of revenue allocation, a climb down he chose to blame essentially on the Yoruba, in particular one Yoruba delegate from Lagos.

    The merit of his position on this issue and on the major decisions of the conference will be the subject of this column next week, God willing. It will also examine Darah’s report as a wanton denigration of the North and as propaganda for President Jonathan.