Tag: Zaria

  • Civil servant docked for certificate forgery

    Civil servant docked for certificate forgery

    A 30-year-old civil servant, Usman Nasir, was on Monday arraigned before a Lokoja Chief Magistrate court for allegedly forging a Bachelor of Engineering certificate of the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

    Reading from the Police First Information Report (FIR) on the arraignment of the accused before the Lokoja Chief Magistrate Court I, the prosecuting police officer, Sgt. Tuesday Ganagana said the matter was reported on August 19, this year.

    The prosecution stated that the case was incidental at the Ajaokuta Police station

    He said that Nasir, a staff of the company fraudulently forged a Bachelor of Engineering degree certificate of the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria to secure employment at the Ajaokuta Steel Company.

    He said that luck, however, ran against the accused when the company embarked on verification of his certificate and authorities of the supposed alma mater, ABU, confirmed that the certificate was forged.

    He said that upon interrogation, Nasir admitted that he personally used three different software to forge the institution’s result, with which he secured the employment.

    The prosecutor said that the accused confirmed that he was computer literate and a drop out of ABU, saying that after gaining admission into the institution in 2008, he dropped out as he could not continue due to financial constraint.

    The accused was charged with, “using as true, a certificate known to be false and forgery,” contrary to sections163 and 264 of the Penal Code.

    Ganagana said the offence of forgery preferred against the accused carried a punishment of 14 years in prison.

    He said that the first leg of the offence carries seven years imprisonment, adding that the court had jurisdiction to try the offences, just as he left the issue of whether or not to admit him on bail for the court to exercise its discretionary powers.

    The Chief Magistrate, Levi Animoku in his ruling said, “I am of the view that the accused will stand his bail and consequently, the accused is admitted to bail in the sum of N100,000 with a reliable surety in like sum”.

    He said that the surety must be a civil servant resident in Lokoja, with traceable address, before adjourning the matter to November 10, for the mention.

  • Kaduna declares Shi’ite movement unlawful society

    Kaduna declares Shi’ite movement unlawful society

    The Kaduna State Government has issued an order declaring the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN) an unlawful society.
    A statement signed by the Special Assistant to Governor Nasir El-Rufai on Media and Publicity, Samuel Aruwan, said the action is taken in the exercise of the government’s duty to preserve peace and security in the state, and to ensure that all persons and organisations are guided by lawful conduct and with due allegiance to the Nigerian state and its Constitution.
    The Kaduna state executive council approved the making of this order following deliberations at its meeting on Thursday, 06 October 2016.
    According to the statement, “the Order, which has been signed by the Governor, draws on powers vested by the Constitution and the laws of Kaduna State. Section 45 (1) of the Constitution categorically vests in the Governor the powers to take such measures and actions as are necessary for the promotion and protection of public safety, public order, public morality or public health; or the rights and freedom of all persons in Kaduna State.
    “Section 97A of the Penal Code (Cap 110, Laws of Kaduna State, 1991) empowers the Governor to declare as an unlawful society any organisation whose activities are dangerous to the security and good governance of the state.
    “The Judicial Commission of Inquiry into the Zaria Clashes of 12-14 December 2015 found that the IMN is not a registered organisation, that it has a paramilitary wing and that its members do not recognise or respect the laws of the country and the duly constituted authorities that have the responsibility to secure and administer the country.
    “The Declaration Order noted that since the regrettable events in Zaria which resulted in the loss of 347 lives, the IMN “has overtly continued with unlawful processions, obstruction of public highways, unauthorized occupation of public facilities including schools without regard to the rights of other citizens and the public peace and order of the State.
    “The Order noted that ‘these acts if allowed to go unchecked, will constitute dangers to the peace, tranquility, harmonious coexistence and good governance of Kaduna State’.
    “The Declaration Order, which comes into effect on Friday, 7 October 2016, provides for the prosecution of persons that may be in breach of its provisions under the laws of Kaduna State:
    Whoever manages, or is a member of the said Society under any appellation or mutation with the propensity of causing the breakdown of law and order, or operates in a manner dangerous to the good governance of the State shall, from commencement of this order, be prosecuted in accordance with the Laws of Kaduna State.
    “Sections 97A and 97B of the Penal Code prescribe a penalty of imprisonment for seven years or a fine or both for any person convicted for belonging to an unlawful society.
    “The Kaduna State Government reaffirms its vigorous commitment to upholding the right of citizens to practice the religion of their choice. These are rights fully protected by Sections 38 and 40 of the Constitution.
    “Such rights to freedom of thought and worship must, however, be exercised in ways that do not infringe on the rights of others, and should not subject other people to distress and inconvenience,” the statement read.
  • ‘Teaching Hospital can’t provide cotton wool, spirit’

    ‘Teaching Hospital can’t provide cotton wool, spirit’

    .X-Ray machine down

    .Resident Doctors to go on strike Monday

    The management of the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital (ABUTH), Zaria cannot not provide common cotton wool and methylated spirit needed for the dressing of patients’ injuries.

    Also, the Haematology Department of the teaching hospital cannot provide blood component for patients. The hospital is also having problems with its X-Ray machines.

    These were part of the revelations made by the President of the National Association of Resident Doctors (NARD), Dr. Waziri Aliyu in Abuja on Friday.

    Aliyu, who led a delegation of his colleagues to the Senate Committee on Health, also complained about dilapidated infrastructure and insecurity within the hospital’s work environment.

    He similarly complained about poor sanitation and broken down facilities and equipment that have continued to reduce human and material capacities.

    Dr. Aliyu narrated an incident where a member of the association suffered a snake bite but could not get prompt medical attention.

    Said he, “The sewages in the hospital’s labour ward are presently leaking. The Haematology Department of the teaching hospital cannot provide blood component for a patient. As simple as X-ray is, we have been having problems with it.”

    The doctor also said the premises of the teaching hospital were not completely fenced, giving room for frequent intrusion and trespass.

    According to him, two medical officers were recently attacked by hoodlums on two different occasions.

    He continued, “Lack of adequate accommodation and opportunity of Residency Training as various units of the health institution lack adequate personnel, a situation that has led to the over stretching of the remaining workforce even without motivation.

    “Part of their (doctors) grievances with the hospital management include alleged illegal sack of 19 personnel and non-intake of Resident Doctors since 2012 as many people have left the hospital services over time without replacements.

    “ABUTH personnel earn less than their contemporaries in other Teaching Hospitals across the country.

    “As simple as cotton wool and spirit are, we ask the patients to provide them. It is as bad as that”.

    The doctors were summoned by the Senate committee over their warning strike notice to the management. The ultimatum will expire next Monday.

    Addressing the doctors, the Senate committee chairman, Dr. Olanrewaju Tejuoso, requested them to come forward with a comprehensive report on their demands and grievances.

    Senator Tejuoso pleaded with the doctors not to embark on the planned strike, assuring them that the Senate would sort out the issues raised.

    “We will make sure that when your next budget comes, we will ensure that we take care of your demands”, the senator said.

    Also commenting on the issues raised by the doctors, Senator Shehu Sani warned that denying the country’s teaching hospitals the needed attention could jeopardise the nation’s projections in the health sector.

  • Zaria and  the Shi’ites  without  El-Zakzaky

    Zaria and the Shi’ites without El-Zakzaky

    Though the group is continuing with its numerous programmes and activities, there is no doubt that last December clash between a detachment of the Nigerian Army and members of Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN), otherwise known as Shi’ites movement and the subsequent arrest and detention of its national leader, Sheikh Ibrahim Yakubu El-Zakzaky, has thrown the group off balance. Abdulgafar Alabelewe reports.

    SHEIKH Ibrahim Zakzaky has, for about three decades, remained the leader of the Shi’ites group in Nigeria. Not only has he called the shot in the movement, he is also the link between the financiers of the the Islamic sect in Iran and its Nigerian followers. Stories, as gathered from sources within and outside the movement, have it that that Zakzaky, the acclaimed founder of the Shi’ites movement in Nigeria, came in contact with the the Iranians who lured him into the movement in the late 70s. To his credit, he succeeded in gathering a large followership within a short period.
    Born on May 5, 1953, the outspoken Zakzaky was said to have started propagating the Shi’ite sect of Islam when he was still a student at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. This was during the time of the Iranian revolution, which saw Iran’s monarchy overthrown and replaced with an Islamic republic under the leadership of Ayatollah Khomeini.
    An elder brother to Zakzaky, Malam Sani Yakubu once said that, “when Ibrahim graduated from the School of Arabic and Islamic Studies (SAS) in Kano, he started writing letters to different countries especially China and Iran. He developed interest in relating with China largely because China had revolutionalised her economy through agriculture and moved her people out of hunger.
    “Iran was responding to his letters by sending their books to him; trying to lure him into their creed of Shiite. Because of that, he turned his attention to Iran, especially after the Ayatollah’s revolution in 1979. They started having meetings in England every year, before they moved their meetings to Iran. When Iran attained certain level of development, he sometimes travelled there twice in a year.
    “When we saw that, we decided to start counselling him, particularly with our teachers, Malam Sani Abdulqadir and Malam Usman Maccido. This is because even at that time we know that Shia is not Islam. Based on that, we sat him down to tell him the implication of what he was doing. He kept saying that he was not into Shi’a that he was only into struggle for revival of Islam. This started in early 1980s. When we realised that he would not listen, largely because it involves a lot of money, we left him alone.
    “But our elder brother, Malam Abdulqadir Yakubu, did not stop counselling him. In fact, about a week or so before their clash with the Army, our elder brother wrote him. In the letter, he told him that what they were doing is not part of Islam.”
    The Shia according to El-Zazakky
    Zakzaky believed that the establishment of a republic along similar religious lines in Nigeria would be feasible. Though, he was detained several times due to accusations of civil disobedience and recalcitrance under military regimes in Nigeria during the 1980s and 1990s, the 2015 clash of the Shi’ites and Army seems the most devastating to the group so far.
    The Shi’ites group before the December 12-14, 2015 incident was unknown to many, especially Nigerians of Southern extraction. To Northerners however, they were a group of extremists who often disturb non-members’ peace.
    An average northerner and other Nigerian resident in the North has had one unpleasant encounter or the other with the Zakzaky group. It is either one’s movement was at one time or another disrupted by protesting Shi’ite members, or they grounded activities in areas where their events took place.
    During their numerous processions, the group which allegedly has its own security forces, subjected other road users to security checks, in some cases force motorists to one lane of a dual carriage way a or even block the road in many cases.
    Reports have it that, members of the movement had at different times forced convoy of the Emir of Zazzau, who is the Chairman of the Kaduna State Traditional Rulers Council, Alhaji Shehu Idris and that of former Governor Mukhtar Ramalan Yero to change their routes. The same treatment was what the Army resisted in 2015, when similar procession insisted that the Chief of Army Staff’s convoy must change route.
    And the residents rejoice
    Residents of Gyellesu, a Zaria community where Sheikh Zakzaky resides have bitter tales to tell about their living with the Shi’ites. Though, they could not complain before December 2015, due to fear of intimidations, the area went into jubilation when Zakzaky was whisked away.
    A Chieftain of Gyellesu community, Malam Mu’izzu Daruddeen recently said, Zazzau Emirate is now safe and conducive without Sheik Ibrahim El-zakzaky. He said, the ancient city and its environs had recorded “sudden positive change” in its day-to-day activities.
    According him, “as peace loving organisation and patriotic citizens of this nation, we are in support of anything that will promote peace, unity and harmonious relationship among people. Every resident of Zaria is affected directly or indirectly by the self-acclaimed powers and disregard for traffic rules by the Shi’ite members in Zaria, especially when it comes to the use of public roads.
    “These Shi’ite members consider any other person as a second class citizen who has no rights and privileges. Whenever the leader of the Shi’ite was going for preaching, he would be escorted by youths bearing dangerous weapons. These boys traumatised and brutally dealt with anybody while El-zakzaky was on transit. Complaints to police at different times did not yield any result,” he said.
    When El-zakzaky was in Gyallesu, the area became a home to all kinds of criminals because his boys did not allow uniform personnel into the area, no matter the level of crime committed. These boys used to search anybody that is coming into the area irrespective of his or her status.
    “Again, once they lock up the gates at night you have no right to go out for whatever reason. The kind of loyalty these boys accorded El-zakzaky was second to none. They see him as a messiah. They neither have respect for constitution nor any constituted authority. His instruction is the final.” Daruddeen said.
    Cracks in the wall
    However, since the detention of the IMN leader, things have not been the same with the Shi’ite group. One, the December incident has no doubt crippled the group’s excesses and robbed it of its excessive powers. Secondly, the Zakzaky who has the direct link with those funding the group in Iran is out of reach of his followers.
    His absence has equally led to what can be termed as the fictionalization of the Shi’ite group. Though, its leader yet unknown, a faction of the movement has, since the arrest of Zakzaky dissociated itself from the Zakzaky led IMN. It has equally continued to preach against Zakzaky the principles for which the detained leader stood.
    The IMN which felt threatened by the the development recently issued a warning circular to its members. The circular issued by a chieftain of the IMN Media Forum, Abdulmumini Giwa, alleged that the faction was a parallel Shi’ite group created by the Israeli and Saudi Arabian authorities.
    According to Giwa in the circular published on the official website of the movement, “I will like to use this medium to remind my fellow brothers in Islam that a parallel Shi’ite group has been founded by Israel and Saudi Arabia to fight against the Islamic Movement in Nigeria which they consider as the only threat to them.
    “They are working hand-in-hand with the compromised Nigerian security apparatus to ensure they stop the Islamic Movement under the leadership of Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky. The Israeli’s are after fighting the increasing Iranian influence while the Saudi’s are against the fast spreading of Shi’ism in Africa which is a threat to their terror laden Wahabism.
    “Some of the steps they have taken includes founding a fake Shi’ite organization to counter the growth and strength of IMN. You will notice that the only thing they do is attack the personality and person of the IMN leader Sheikh Ibraheem Zakzaky.Their aim is not to preach love for Ahli Bayt but to drive people away from Sheikh Zakzaky who they see as a threat.
    “The Saudis have invested millions of dollars on this contract and are not only funding the Arabic speaking idiots to spread Wahabism and institute lies against Shi’ites and Shi’ism, they are also bribing northern state governors to always clampdown on the IMN members to scare them away from the revered Sheikh.
    “The attack, killing and subsequent arrest of members of thhe IMN in Zaria last December was part of the plan which they are still pursuing. Currently they are sponsoring campaigns on social media to discredit the personality of Sheikh Zakzaky and spread lies and calumny against him, and by all means show people that he is not Shi’ite so that they can pull away his followers, supporters and sympathizers who they see as following him because of Shi;ism. Most of those presently engaged in this smear campaign are people of questionable character who pose as religious persons.
    “You will always see them pretending to be Shi’ites and attacking Sheikh Zakzaky. I advice that you remain steadfast and resolute as always, for they have already failed as usual,” the circular read.
    In the area funding however, the Shi’ite group have practically resulted to taxing members to run their programmes. Though, they have state leaders, none of them is yet to assume Zakzaky’s position as the custodian of the movement’s resources and power.
    Similarly, one would observe from their recent events that the once powerful Shi’ite group has now become a friendly, and ‘law abiding’ Islamic sect. Law abiding in the sense that, they are now conscious of the existence of security agencies. Agreed, they still don’t get police permission to stage protests or processions, but they now quickly disperse when security agents appear to stop their gatherings.
    The group held its annual Qud’s Day procession in several Northern cities last week, without any reported attack or harassment of other citizens. All these are indications that, Shi’ite without Zakzaky is no longer at ease.

  • El-Zakzaky: House Committee visits Zaria, promises fairness

    El-Zakzaky: House Committee visits Zaria, promises fairness

    The House of Representatives Committee on National Security and Intelligence on Wednesday promised to be fair to all parties involved in the military/shiite clash which occurred in Zaria, Kaduna State last month.

    The Chairman of the Committee, Rep. Aminu Jaji, made the disclosure in an interview with journalists shortly after he led the Committee members to various scenes of the clash in Zaria.

    He said “we are here to ascertain what actually happened on Dec. 12, 2015 between the military and members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria also known as Shiite.

    “We have visited the scenes; we have spoken to the public and we are satisfied with what the people told us; we will make sure we do everything within the ambit of the law to avoid a recurrence.’’

    Jaji appealed to the public to be law abiding and endeavour to sustain the prevailing peace in the country.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the committee had earlier paid homage to the Emir of Zazzau, Dr Shehu Idris, at his palace.

    The Emir appreciated the Committee for the visit, saying it demonstrated the members’ efforts and concern toward lasting peace in the country.

    During the visit to the various demolished scenes, the Committee members sought for public opinion as they moved.

  • Zaria killings and  el-Rufai’s impetuousness

    Zaria killings and el-Rufai’s impetuousness

    In their response to the bloody Shi’ites/Army clash in Zaria on December 12, the Northern Governors’ Forum led by Borno State governor Kashim Settima expressed confidence in the way Governor Nasir el-Rufai of Kaduna State handled the crisis. They were hasty in their pronouncement. The 19-member forum, all of whom were anxious to prevent a reenactment of the kind of religious cum socio-economic revolt that morphed into the intractable Boko Haram insurgency, praised all the steps taken by el-Rufai in responding to the clash. But rising from the meeting, and perhaps emboldened by the vote of confidence passed in him by his colleagues, the Kaduna State governor indicated that the Shi’ite leader, Ibraheem Yaqub el-Zakzaky would be prosecuted.

    Then, in a statewide broadcast in which he announced his decision to set up a judicial panel to investigate the clash, Mallam el-Rufai addressed some of the issues that triggered the horrific Zaria killings. Incredibly and insensitively, he attributed all the triggers to the serial malfeasances of the Shi’ites. He accused them of forcibly appropriating the lands of their neighbours, attempting to take over mosques they had not built, and building without permits at their Hussainiya headquarters. He appeared unwilling or impatient to let the judicial panel probe the remote and immediate causes of the clash, and to come to independent assessments and conclusions. Indeed, as a spokesman of the Shi’ites said, the governor had appeared to take sides, and had indicated which of the two parties was guilty.

    There is hardly any commentary on the clash that has not accused the Shi’ites of strong-arm tactics, of disrespecting, flouting and circumscribing the law and the constitution, and of provoking and inconveniencing their neighbours, far and near, within or outside their city base. These infractions cannot be glossed over, and must of course be comprehensively addressed by the judicial panel. But it was not only unwise of Mallam el-Rufai to have made the kind of insensitive broadcast attributed to him, he was even more shockingly insensitive to the scale of the tragedy that had befallen Zaria in particular, and the state as a whole. If he knew he had all the facts of the clash and possessed the courage to declaim on the crisis as peremptorily as he did, and did not need a panel to probe it, he should have gone the whole hog to talk of the casualties sustained essentially by one party to the clash.

    The Northern Governors’ Forum should have avoided passing a vote of confidence in the Kaduna State governor. They had responded well to the crisis by summoning a meeting to address the matter in Kaduna. And they did well to fear the worst. But they should have limited their involvement to empathisisng with the state and the victims, and warning of the need to avoid a replay of the Boko Haram crisis. Unfortunately, both the governor and his sympathising colleagues failed to address the two most crucial parts of the crisis — the need for justice; and the need to divorce the provocation by Shi’ites from the content and character of the army’s response. On these two aspects hang the future of Nigeria and the integrity of its constitution.

    Mallam el-Rufai’s broadcast should have been more nuanced. He needed rightly to be worried about the Shi’ite provocation, but to begin railing against the sect’s lack of building permits and their constant disagreements and frictions with neighbours seems to make the governor anxious to justify the mass killings. In the broadcast, the governor did not give indication he knew much about the concept of justice, its beauty, its many sides, and its contribution to stability and peace, let alone understand how to achieve that peace. The northern governors may have connived at his style, and underscored their anxiety not to worsen the crises in the North by their adulatory statements; but neither they nor the governor seemed to appreciate that the brutality that hallmarked Boko Haram and the conflagration it triggered were given fillip by injustice.

    Importantly, too, while the Shi’ites could not by any stretch of the imagination be absolved of blame, it was however more crucial to worry about the nature and temper of the army’s response. There will always be provocations and infractions; but the security agencies and other law enforcement bodies must respond according to the dictates of, and within the confines of, the provisions of the law and constitution. It is that kind of sane response that sets the civilised community apart from violent and anarchic groups. In the Boko Haram case, extra-judicial killings were initially the order of the day, with the army citing the extenuating reasons of the insurgents’ own cruel and barbarous standards. Against the Shi’ites, surely the country has learnt enough lessons not to countenance, in any circumstance, and no matter the intensity of provocations, a resort to self-help. No one is sure of the casualty figures. But estimates range from 60 or 70 to a couple of hundreds, some say as many as about 300. Neither Mallam el-Rufai nor the northern governors showed appropriate concern over such an alarming figure, nor what it portends for the region.

    Worse, even the presidency has been bewilderingly reduced to prevarications and whispers. It was of course not expected that they would condemn outright Malam el-Rufai’s faux pas or his intemperate reaction, but given the involvement of the army, which controversially went beyond the rules of engagement to reinforce its troops and launch fresh attacks against the Shi’ites, the presidency should have paid more than a passing interest.

    And so while it is incontestable that the Shi’ites habitually infringed on the rights and privacies of others and disrespected lawful authorities, it is even more damnably true that Mallam el-Rufai was insensitive and unwise in his broadcast, the northern governors curiously detached and ingratiating, and the presidency slow, unresponsive and unable to properly deconstruct the issues involved. Nigerians must have no doubt about what should be done. The Shi’ites must be made to answer for any law they break on a general basis. But in the case of the Zaria killings, in which unlawful and disproportionate force was applied, the judicial panel must separate the provocation from the response, and everyone, including the top brass of the army, found culpable must be made to face the law.

    Nigerian laws expect infractions, including very severe and horrendous breaches; but they also recommend that punishment must be aligned with legal and constitutional provisions in order not to promote anarchy. The Zaria killings must be made a test case, notwithstanding the aloofness of the presidency, the connivance of the northern governors, and the churlishness of Mallam el-Rufai. Public focus on the judicial panel must be intense and unrelenting. If the panelists do not have the character, wisdom and temperament to ensure justice, the public, both local and international, must force the reconstitution of a new panel until justice has been done and seen to be done. The scale and one-sidedness of the killings demand nothing less, for it may be any other group’s turn tomorrow in the hands of nervous and excited security agents flouting and dishonouring the constitution under the guise of punishing crime and promoting peace and order.

  • 10 killed as soldiers, El-Zakzaky supporters clash in Zaria

    10 killed as soldiers, El-Zakzaky supporters clash in Zaria

    •Army: It was assasination attempt on Chief of Army Staff
    •Military attack was unprovoked says sect

     A pall of tension descended on Zaria, Kaduna State yesterday after soldiers killed at least 10 supporters of outspoken Shi’tte leader, Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakzaky, during a clash between the entourage of the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant-General Tukur  Buratai, and the Shi’tte members.

    The development sparked a war of words between the army and the sect following claim that   members of the Muslim Brotherhood had attempted to assassinate General Buratai.

    “Shiites attempt to assassinate the Chief of Army Staff in Zaria”, was the  way Army spokesman, Colonel Sani Kukasheka Usman broke the news  in a tweet under his official tweet handle, @HQNigerianArmy which was also posted on the Nigerian Army website last night.

    He later issued a formal statement, saying: “The Shiite Sect on the orders of their leader, Ibrahim El-Zakzaky today (yesterday) in Zaria attacked the convoy of the Chief of Army Staff while on his way to pay homage on the Emir of Zazzau and attend the Passing Out Parade of 73 Regular Recruits Intake of Depot Nigerian Army, Zaria.

    “The sect numbering hundreds carrying dangerous weapons, barricaded the roads with bonfires, heavy stones and tyres. They refused all entreaties to disperse and then started firing and pelting the convoy with dangerous objects. The barricade was obviously a deliberate attempt to assassinate the Chief of Army Staff and members of his entourage while on a legitimate official assignment as Special Guest of Honour at the passing out parade which had earlier been widely publicised.

    “The troops responsible for the safety and security of the Chief of Army Staff on hearing explosion and firing were left with no choice than to defend him and the convoy at all cost as well as open up the barricaded road for law abiding citizens. This is in line with the Nigerian Army Rules of Engagement and Code of Conduct. This kind of behaviour will not be tolerated from any individual or groups and should not be allowed to repeat itself.

    “We wish to implore all Nigerians to continue to be law abiding and remain conscious of other people’s right to life, freedom of movement and passage. The Chief of Army escaped unhurt and continued with his duties.”

    The sect dismissed the allegation as a lie, wondering how unarmed people would want to assassinate a service chief.

    Its spokesman, Ibrahim Usman, in a counter statement, said:

    “At noon today (yesterday) armed soldiers were seen in the precincts of Hussainiyyah Baqiyyatullah, Zaria, where members of the Islamic Movement were to carry out the hoisting of flag to usher in the new month of Maulud, the birth of the Holy Prophet of Islam.

    “Similar occasion was previously carried out on the same spot with free traffic flow under the supervision of the Movement’s traffic warders.

    “When some brothers met the soldiers to understand the mission of the soldiers, they took position and opened fire indiscriminately, killed many and took away seven of the casualties to an unknown location.

    “Based on the foregoing, we believe that the military had pre-planned this and had acted according to their mischievous script. They came with their cameramen, videotaping the whole incidence while it lasted.

    “We are however surprised that, spokesman of the military Colonel Kuka Sheka shamelessly came out in the media and issued a press statement to say, that it was an assassination attempt on the Chief of Army Staff on the order of the movement’s leader.

    “Why was it that there were no casualties on the side of the military, if it were to be an assassination attempt? What happened was never a clash, but a continuation of act of terrorism by the Nigerian military on the Movement, as was the case in the past.

    “We are not surprised by this action, as there were reports spread by the same military the night before that the Shi’ites were to avenge their dead by hired thugs on Friday in Gabari, a village in Zaria.

    “The same military also spread rumour that the Shi’ites had killed soldiers, all in attempt to justify today’s (yesterday’s) dastardly act.

    “Kuka Sheka should know that once bitten twice shy. The 2014 massacre of 34 members of the Islamic Movement, including three of Sheikh Zakzaky’s children by the military; the attempt on Sheikh Zakzaky’s convoy by the same military are still on our minds.

    “No government can flourish successfully with disoriented military, full of trigger-itchy personnel and security operatives trained by CIA and Mossad.

    “Until the present government fishes out this cabal in the military and brings the culprits to book, we will believe the government is condoning, violence and terrorism on innocent citizens.”

    An eye witness Yusuf Abubakar said, “I saw two soldiers asking the Shi’ite members to remove the barricade but they refused only for the soldiers to open fire on them.

    “Suddenly, there was confusion everywhere. I saw more than 30 corpses on the ground before soldiers took them away.”

    Another eye witness who pleaded anonymity told The Nation that, “the soldiers were armed to the teeth as they came in about three Hilux vans and armoured personnel carriers.

    “They were pleading with the Shi’tte members to clear the way for the Army Chief who was being expected.

    “Rather than comply, members of the Islamic Movement said that they had blocked the road for security reasons. They began brandishing clubs and swords, chanting ‘’Allahu Akbar’’(God is great).

    “A few shots followed   and we all dispersed. Some Shi’ttes lost their lives in the process.”

    El-Zakzaky himself could not be immediately reached but his followers branded the army’s version of the story as an unfair and unjust portrayal of the incident.

    Yesterday’s incident is the latest in the series of clashes between security agents and members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

    In one of such encounters in July last year, three sons of El-Zakzaky were killed allegedly by soldiers.

    The army dismissed the allegation at the time.

    But the United Kingdom-based Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) issued a report blaming soldiers for what it called shooting and killing of defenceless members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeria between July 25 and 26.

    It said that shortly after the Jumat prayers on July 25,the Shi’tte members  embarked on the traditional Al-Quds procession done in support of the Palestinian Cause following the same route it has followed in the last 33 years.

    The report said 34 defenceless members of the group were murdered in cold blood as they marched through the streets of Zaria, in Kaduna State.

    About 100 others were injured, it said citing interviews with victims, their families, witnesses.

    The IHRC also obtained a video footage of soldiers firing at unarmed civilians at the end of the procession.

    Besides, it said that it had proof that many of those arrested died in military custody, unable to withstand the brutality they were subjected to by the soldiers.

    The procession ended at about 4:30 p.m. and participants, said to be thousands began to disperse stretching over about three kilometres from the meeting point, before soldiers attacked them.

    Soldiers allegedly confronted volunteers managing traffic at the PZ Junction on the criteria they were using to give priority pass to cars.

    The truck in which the soldiers were driving was allowed to pass only for them to start shooting at protesters indiscriminately.

    The IHRC said: “This appears to have been a smokescreen for the attacks, because even as they were being given priority passage, the soldiers started shooting at demonstrators from a very close distance. Ishaq Abdullah was shot and bundled into the army vehicle. The soldiers then sped off, went around the block of shops and cut off a large group who were at the tail end of the procession from the main body. They took positions near these shops and started to shoot at the crowd. The volunteers and other non-partisan eye-witnesses stated that the volunteers did not have weapons and did not instigate the violence.”

    Last month, about 20 members of the sect were blown up in an bomb attack during a procession from Kano to Zaria.

    A suspected suicide bomber who pretended to be part of the procession set off a bomb at Dakasonye village in Garun Mallam Local Government of Kano State.

    Boko Haram claimed responsibility for the attack and called the Shi’ttes heretics,but El-Zakzaky said his group knew those behind the attack.

    “We know the names of the contractors and those contracted to commit the massacre, their identity is not hidden from us. Therefore we cannot be cowed by an imaginary Boko Haram tale, let them tell it to the fools and the ignorant. They should know that they are dealing with those with foresight, wisdom and intelligence, and above all with the real religion,” he said.

    “There is nothing like a suicide bomber. They torture and drug unsuspecting captives and made them carriers of the explosives which they detonated amidst people.

  • Govt demolishes 32 buildings in Zaria

    •El-Rufai begins land recovery

    Thirty-two illegal buildings were yesterday demolished on the premises of Alhudahuda College, Zaria.

    This is part of Kaduna State government’s efforts to recover government land in state-owned institutions.

    Governor Nasir El-Rufai had given an ultimatum to owners of such property and last weekend reminded them that the deadline would end on Wednesday (yesterday).

    Supervising the exercise, the General Manager, Kaduna State Urban Development Authority (KASUPDA), Mrs. Saratu Hassan, said 32 houses were affected.

    She said the government did not promise to compensate owners.

    Mrs. Hassan said the government would not rescind its decision.

    She said the demolition team would soon move to other areas where there were illegal structures.

    Her words: “The Kaduna State government has saddled our department with the responsibility of demolishing illegal buildings on government land.

    “This is why we are here at Alhudahuda College, Zaria to begin the demolition of illegal structures. When we finish, we will move to other areas.”

    Armed security personnel were on ground to guard officials of the agency.

    Owners of most of the affected buildings, before the arrival of the demolition squad, removed their valuables.

    There was no trouble in Zaria, but in Kaduna there was tension as houses on school and hospital land had been marked for demolition by KASUPDA.

  • 25 killed in Zaria blast

    … NEMA seeks blood donation for victims

    At least 25 persons including a two-year old child were killed in a bomb blast that rocked the ancient city of Zaria on Tuesday.

    32 others were seriously wounded in the blast.

    Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, confirmed the incident in a statement signed by his Special Assistant, Media and Publicity, Samuel Aruwa and made available to journalists in the state.

    The governor said the explosion occurred just as the residents welcomed the new chairman of the interim management committee of Sabon Gari local government to his office.

    He said, “The city of Zaria today suffered a terrible act of infamy. Terrorists detonated explosives that killed and injured several persons at the secretariat of the Sabon-Gari local government council. The casualty count as at 12noon is 25 fatalities, including a two-year old child. 32 injured persons are being treated at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria and other hospitals in the city.

    “The Kaduna State Government has expressed its sadness at this mindless attack on our citizens. It has condoled with the victims and is coordinating the treatment of the survivors.”

    Speaking at the scene of the blast, the governor sympathized with the direct victims and the residents of Zaria.

    He prayed Allah to grant the souls of the deceased persons peaceful repose.

    Meanwhile, the National Emergency Management Agency has called on members of the public to donate blood to victims of the explosion.

    Many of the injured victims have been evacuated to the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital in the city.

    In a statement issued by the Director General of NEMA, Alhaji Muhammad Sani Sidi, the agency said the request was urgent in order to ensure survival of the victims who had lost much blood in the attack.

    He said, “The government appreciates the quick response in the evacuation of the victims and assured immediate supports of NEMA in the deployment of medical consumables and drugs for their treatment in the hospital.”

     

     

  • Fertiliser: Farmers resort to animal dung in Zaria

    Farmers in Zaria and Kaduna states have expressed concern over the delay in the distribution of fertiliser for this year’s farming season, a sittuation that has forced them to resort to using animal dung.

    The farmers made their position known in separate interviews with the News Agency of Nigeria in Zaria.

    Alhaji Musa Dogara, a Zaria-based farmer, said the call became necessary following the commencement of rain across the state.

    He said: “We thank God Almighty rain had already commenced, therefore, I want to appeal to governments at all levels to speed-up effort at supplying fertiliser to enable us put in more efforts towards realising a bumper harvest.

    “This delay has forced us to resort to using animal dung in order to bridge the gap,” he said.

    Dogara observed that the delay in the supply of the commodity would not only affect the input of individuals and farmers generally, but it would negatively affect the overall output.

    On his part, a peasant farmer at Rafinyashi village, Malam Mutawakkilu Rafinyashi, described early supply of fertilisers as a path to national food security.

    He called on farmers not to rely 100 per cent on inorganic fertilisers, advising that they should endeavour to be prompt users of organic fertilisers such as animal dung and refuse.

    “Relying 100 per cent on conventional fertiliser is not the best for our farmers but they must resolve to use organic fertilisers with a view to reviving the soil acidity,”he said.

    Rafinyashi also appealed to government to consider the possibility of replacing the conventional fertilisers with organic.