Tag: Zuma

  • Okorocha’s honour for Zuma

    Okorocha’s honour for Zuma

    •Most disgusting; most unfortunate

    Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State stunned many Nigerians when on Saturday he unveiled a statue of South African President Jacob Zuma in Owerri, the state capital. The South African president was in the state apparently on the invitation of the governor, ostensibly to “strengthen socio-economic relations and further deepen existing cooperation in the field of education.”

    Dignitaries who welcomed him at the Sam Mbakwe Airport, Owerri, included former President Olusegun Obasanjo; former Jigawa State governor, Saminu Turaki; and Maurice Iwu, former Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission. Apart from addressing some secondary school students and other young people, Governor Okorocha directed a traditional ruler in the state to confer a chieftaincy title ‘Ochiagha of Imo’ (Warlord) on him as well as unveiled his statue in the state capital. He even named a road after him and bestowed on him some other state honours.

    Governor Okorocha is reputed for some policies which are considered weird by many but he does not appear bothered about what people feel once he has made up his mind on what to do. Last year, he declared a three-week holiday from December 19, 2016 to January 10, 2017, to enable the people of the state celebrate the Yuletide and the New Year. He also instituted a four-day working week for civil servants as his own way of reducing the wage bill and allowing the workers to do some other things to augment their pay.

    And now, honour to whom it is not due.

    The governor stirred the hornet’s nest especially over the statue of the visiting South African leader that he erected. All over the world, statues are erected for icons. In this case, President Zuma does not fit the bill. He logs a lot of baggage that disqualifies him from being celebrated the way Governor Okorocha has done. It is therefore not surprising that he has been an object of criticisms since the inglorious event.

    This is a man that is unwanted at home because of his questionable lifestyle. A man that has been found guilty of corruption by the courts in South Africa and has been ordered to refund the $500,000 public money he spent  to expand his private house in order to accommodate his several wives. He  has also  had to battle allegations of rape and infidelity. Indeed, just last Friday, South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that Mr. Zuma must face prosecution over almost 800 charges of corruption relating to an arms deal in the 1990s. Perhaps no other country’s leader in recent times is this notorious.

    How a man with these unenviable record could have found favour in the eye of any right-thinking man, not in the least a governor in the federal republic, is indeed baffling. What point was Governor Okorocha trying to make by asking the South African president to address students with impressionable minds? That corruption is a virtue or what? What lessons can the youths learn from a man with President Zuma’s antecedents? This is a man whose people back home want out of office as early as yesterday because they can no longer stomach the national embarrassment that he is causing them.

    We know Governor Okorocha has under his Rochas Foundation College Africa awarded scholarship to five children each from 55 African countries and the honour to President Zuma could have been the extension of such hands of fellowship. But this is not the best way to Africanise his dream.

    Even if the gestures were diplomatic appeasement to the leader of a country where xenophobia, especially against Nigerians, and particularly Igbo indigenes, is rife, it is not likely to yield much, because President Zuma has lost it at home. Imo State could have found better use for the money spent to give President Zuma the hero’s welcome that he got in the state.

     

  • Rochas crush on Zuma

    SIR: Somewhere in Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria, a fancy statue of President Jacob Zuma poses in elegance, despite widespread condemnation of the romantic gesture by the Imo State Governor Rochas Okorocha, who appears to be quite star-struck by the South African President.

    Aside from the rumoured extravagant cost of erecting the monument—which comes at a time of extreme economic hardship, and likewise, the reported unpaid salaries of Imo State workers, the logic behind Governor Rochas’ immortalization of the embattled South African leader, eludes Nigerians.

    To many people, President Zuma, doesn’t exactly possess the ‘Perfect Role Model’ skill set, following his back and forth romance with indictments and corruption allegations. Also, with the recurring xenophobic attacks in South Africa, the safety of Nigerians hasn’t been particularly guaranteed. So, why Jacob Zuma?

    As part of the welcome package from the Imo State governor, a road was named in honour of President Zuma, as well as the President being conferred with a chieftaincy title.

    In the absence of any known logical reason why Jacob Zuma should enjoy such unusual exaltation, perhaps, it will be safe to assume that Governor Rochas Okorocha must have a deep crush on President Zuma!

     

    • Nimi Princewill,

    princewill.nimi@yahoo.com

  • Of Owelle, Zuma and Prometheus

    In the rarefied cosmology of deities, the strangest of stuff does happen. In fact, that metaphysical world may well be described as the realm of the unexpected. Even Lucifer upped one day, acted up and was felled from the celestial heights! A benign god today could morph into the most malevolent tomorrow perhaps to achieve some divine purposes while a daredevil deity could sneak up to you dressed like an angel only to ignite  a holocaust.

    Hardball is not about to present a disquisition on deities or take you on an excursion in the land of the gods, no. This piece is about two African personas – Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State, Nigeria and President Jacob Zuma of South Africa. Apart from being Black Africans and leaders in their own rights – Rochas and Zuma – may well be two of a kind growing closer to each perhaps for a divine purpose.

    First, the story: last weekend, Governor Okorocah (also popularly known as Owelle) went off the hook as they say in night clubs and did the unexpected. He unveiled a big masquerade in his Owerri, the capital city of his poor southeast state of Imo. His quarry is no mean personality in the person of the South African President, Mr. Jacob Zuma.

    By any measure, Zuma is a big cargo for any state governor to ship down to his domain. But Owelle is not himself ordinary and to prove his mettle he decked Zuma with fantabulous titles and state honours – grand costumes and all.

    Not known for half measures, Owelle named a highway after Mr. Zuma and finally, unveiled a life-sized statue. Not even the great Nelson Mandela enjoys this manner of adulation in Nigeria.

    But before you mix things up, all these are from one great foundation to another: from The Okorocha Foundation to the Jacob Zuma Foundation. Yes, lest anyone accuse Okorocha of acting ultra vires, his age-old foundation with schools across the land has finally built the school that will shame all African schools with intakes from every country of Africa.

    The African school is absolutely free and it is poised to hoist Okorocha at the pinnacle of the African totem… in the company of Zuma and perhaps to be followed by Mugabe, Bongo and King Mswati; African big men of deity stature

    Why is Hardball here being reminded of the Promethean analogy? It was Prometheus, the Greek god who in a moment of daredevilry, stole fire from Zeus, purportedly for the good of mankind. Shall we then say that the gods were at play in Owerri last weekend as Rochas coveted and bedecked Zuma, his kind?

    In South Africa, the rainbow nation is rent in two over Zuma’s presidential heists while in Rochas’ kingdom, Imo State, pensioners practically fall to their deaths out of sheer hunger.

    Who can fathom the ways of the gods

     

     

     

  • Zuma, Okorocha sign MoU on free education

    South Africa President Jacob Zuma and Imo State Governor Rocha Okorocha yesterday joined forces to offer quality education to indigent African children at no cost.

    Their foundations, Jacob Zuma Foundation and Rochas Foundation, signed a historic Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the project.

    The South African President and Founder of the Jacob Zuma Foundation, who was accompanied by his wife and top South African businessmen and government officials, described the signing of the MoU “as beginning of the journey of solving Africa’s problem once and for all”.

    Emphasising the need for education, Zuma insisted education remained the only efficient tool to prepare African children for the task of developing and emancipating the continent.

    According to him: “I am partnering with the Rochas Foundation because we share similar passion to educate poor African children.

    “Maybe my own passion is as a result of my poor background. I wanted to be a teacher or a Pastor or a Lawyer but none of this dream was fulfilled because I did not go to school.

    “So I realised at a young age that education is important to make you as a human being to be to do whatever you wanted to do.

    “So I decided that even though I could not go to school, I must be educated”.

    President Zuma, who recalled his challenges while growing up in his poor neighbourhood, argued freedom from colonialism alone cannot solve the continent’s problems or improve standard of living for Africans.

    Only education, he said, can liberate the continent, stating “Africans are condemned at birth without education”.

    He noted Africa cannot develop without education, stressing “African continent is carrying the burden imposed on it by the colonialists and the only way they can confront such challenges is through education”.

    To pioneer students of the Rochas Foundation College of Africa drawn from 55 African countries, he said: “If I can make it without seeing the walls of any school, you can make it even better because of the quality education you are getting in this Foundation; so make good of the opportunity while you are here”.

    Okorocha, President and Founder of the Rochas Foundation College of Africa, said he was glad that the vision he had 17 years ago had materialized.

    He informed the colleges have 15,000 students across the nation and over 4,000 graduates in the different fields.

    Okorocha said: “As it stands today, I have dedicated 75 percent of my wealth to charity from all my income and whatever I make in my life as a successful businessman 75 percent of it will go to charity.

    “I have equally dedicated certain assets of mine not to be inherited by my children even when I am no more those assets have been willed to Rochas Foundation for ever.”

    He added: ”Every child here is a story. Of recent we have children from Guinea and Sierra Leone whose parents and relatives all died of Ebola and they were left alone in this world, these children we are now giving hope again to live.

    “These ones will go nowhere anymore until they finish their universities and then we shall send them back to their countries where they will contribute to the economic development.”

  • Zuma: Blame not witchcraft

    SIR: People invoke witchcraft to make sense of misfortune in situations where they do not want to accept responsibility. They blame witches, demons and other evils spirits on occasions where they prefer to pass the buck or want to avoid blame. This is exactly the case with the South African President, Jacob Zuma in his latest witchcraft rhetoric. Zuma has reportedly blamed witchcraft for his party’s inability to beat the opposition, the Democratic Alliance in the Western Cape. He was quoted to have said:

    “In the last elections, I was satisfied that we were taking the Western Cape‚ I even said so. What went wrong? I too can’t tell you. I don’t know‚ [maybe] it’s because of witchcraft, witches practice their craft in different ways”.

    Just imagine that. How could a president of a country such as South Africa make such a baseless and irresponsible statement? What has an electoral defeat got to do with magic? If indeed the South African president was unable to decipher what went wrong at the election in Western Cape, why attribute the party’s dismal performance to witchcraft? How does the ‘ witches’ practice’ explain this political outcome? Did witches vote in the elections? Did these occult forces steal or magically reduce the votes of the ANC in Western Cape? What actually did witches (assuming they exist) do? What are these so-called different ways that witches (whatever that means) practice their craft in the context of South African politics?

    Using witchcraft to make sense of political situation often reinforces the belief in this superstitious idea. It gives the idea of witchcraft a creedal weight and force in the minds of ordinary people. In a country where accusations of witchcraft are rampant and these allegations often lead to attack and murder of imputed witches, it is important that politicians such as Jacob Zuma avoid making reckless and irresponsible statements that seem to give credence to the notion of witchcraft and the mistaken idea that witches exist and can cause political or electoral defeat. Witches cannot because they do not exist.

    Witchcraft is a form of superstition. Witch belief is motivated by fear and ignorance. Witches are imaginary entities and are therefore not capable of doing what President Zuma and other witch believing folks assume they do or could do.

    Zuma should identify the real causes and reasons behind his party’s electoral loss in Western Cape. Definitely, it is not witchcraft.

     

    • Leo Igwe,

    nskepticleo@yahoo.com>

  • South Africa’s allies to Zuma: time to go

    South Africa’s allies to Zuma: time to go

    SOUTH Africa’s powerful trade union federation Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) has called for President Jacob Zuma to step down.
    Its Secretary General Bheki Ntshalintshali said he is no longer the “right person” to lead the country.
    Zuma has been under growing pressure following a major cabinet reshuffle which included the sacking of trusted Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan.
    That led to South Africa’s credit rating being cut to junk status putting more pressure on a troubled economy.
    COSATU, a key part of the governing alliance, says it has 1.8 million members.
    It forms part of what is called the Tripartite Alliance along with the African National Congress (ANC) and the South African Communist Party (SACP).
    The SACP has also called on Zuma to go.
    Demonstrators came out in the capital, Pretoria, in response to the news of Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan’s sacking last week
    He termed the president’s leadership as “inattentive, negligent… and disruptive”.
    He added that the organisation was not concerned about Gordhan’s sacking because he was, as his predecessors, “not a friend of the workers”.
    “We will support the new minister where necessary and fight with him where necessary,” he added.
    Ntshalintshali also criticised ratings agency S&P’s decision to downgrade South Africa to junk status saying the union views it as political interference.
    President Jacob Zuma is certainly politically weaker today than he was over the weekend. COSATU ‘s call for him to step down is a crushing blow to the beleaguered head of state.
    The workers’ union federation had been a reliable backer of Zuma against unrelenting calls for his removal.
    Focus now shifts to the National Working Committee (NWC) of the ANC, which is currently meeting.
    However, regardless of the outcome of that meeting, deep divisions within the body will entrench positions between the pro and anti-Zuma factions.
    Zuma is due to step down in 2019 at the end of his second five-year term as president.
    Last week, Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa called the sacking of Gordhan “totally unacceptable”.
    Later, in a speech at the weekend, which has been interpreted as a public broadside against Zuma, he called for a renewal of the country and criticised “greedy and corrupt people”.
    The sacking of Pravin Gordhan has precipitated this latest crisis
    Former President Kgalema Motlanthe also said it was difficult for Zuma to command respect after the constitutional court found him in breach of the law when he failed to repay government money spent on his private home.
    But President Zuma’s obituary has been written many times before only for him to rise from the ashes.
    Despite the reported scandals that has dogged his administration, several attempts to remove Mr Zuma have floundered.
    Meanwhile, new Finance Minsiter Malusi Gigaba has been working to reassure South Africans about the state of the economy.
    Gigaba told a media briefing that Monday’s downgrade to junk status by ratings agency S&P was a setback, but said that people should not be despondent.
    “I’m not saying it’s easy to get out of a rating downgrade, yet I remain confident,” he added.
    He said he would lead a meeting with ratings agencies Fitch and Moody’s.

  • Zuma faces backlash over Finance Minister’s sack

    Zuma faces backlash over Finance Minister’s sack

    President Jacob Zuma of South Africa faced a widening public backlash from senior members of the ruling African National Congress including his deputy, Cyril Ramaphosa yesterday , after he fired finance minister Pravin Gordhan.

    Additional   cabinet changes were made .

    “I made my views known. There are quite a number of other colleagues and comrades who are unhappy about the situation, particularly the removal of the minister of finance,” Ramaphosa said in a statement from  his office.

    But he said he would not resign.

    He described Zuma’s reasons for removing Pravin Gordhan “unacceptable.”

    ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe said Zuma didn’t consult the party’s top six leaders about most of the cabinet changes, saying a list of nominees “was thrown at us.”

    The party’s chief whip in parliament, Jackson Mthembu, said he opposed the removal of Gordhan and his deputy, Mcebisi Jonas. “Their crime is incorruptibility. We stand with them,” he said in a post on Twitter.

    Zuma’s decision to fire Pravin Gordhan, with whom he feuded over control of state finances, brought to the open South Africa’s biggest political crisis in almost a decade. While a group of party veterans accused Zuma of undermining the 105-year-old ANC, opposition parties are pushing for his ouster in parliament and several public protests were held. South African bank stocks tumbled and bonds plunged as the rand headed for its biggest weekly slide since 2015.

    “Zuma’s actions are compelling some people within the ANC who have been standing on the sidelines to take action,” said Ongama Mtimka, a political science lecturer at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University in the city of Port Elizabeth.

     

  • Zuma says he’s not afraid of jail

    Zuma says he’s not afraid of jail

    President Jacob Zuma of South Africa declared yesterday that he was not afraid of going to jail, in a defiant response to critics who insists on his resignation on account of scandals involving alleged corruption.

    Zuma said   in his political stronghold of KwaZulu-Natal province that he has already spent time in prison, referring to the decade he spent behind bars as an anti-apartheid activist during South Africa’s white minority rule, which ended in 1994.

    Penultimate week, the state watchdog agency released a report indicating possible government corruption linked to Zuma and some associates, and recommended that a judicial commission investigate.

    Zuma criticised the report, saying he wasn’t given a chance to provide “meaningful input” in the investigation.

     

  • Zuma as ANC’s nemesis

    Zuma as ANC’s nemesis

    The party must move against the president if it wants to continue to be relevant in SA’s history

    Nobody needed to be told that South Africa would get to the destination it is today, with a man like Jacob Zuma in power. But it can only get worse, for as long as Zuma continues to occupy that office of president of a country that is the black man’s hope. Nigeria that used to be the beacon of hope lost that title many years before. But I do not think it lies in our mouth as Nigerians to ask the question of how Zuma could be sitting pretty on a seat that Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela left about 17 years ago because the average South African too (while appreciating the fact that this is true) would also be wondering how many of Nigeria’s successive leaders are better than their current president. So, how did they too get to the top of political positions in the country, given the talents that abound here, many of them international stars?

    With the African national Congress’ (ANC) 53.9 percent of the aggregate national poll in the August 3, 2016 municipal elections, down from 61 percent in 2011, this is the first time since 1994 when apartheid ended in that country that the ANC would score less than 60 percent of such votes. Even in Pretoria, the ANC was defeated by the opposition Democratic alliance (DA). Although the ANC still commands huge support across the country, the fact is; that support is waning. It can no longer take it for granted that the black majority will blindly follow it. Take for instance the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality; it was won by the DA, which has a rich history of anti-apartheid struggle. Indeed, its new DA mayor is Athol Trollip, who is white. It is that bad.

    One can only imagine what would have been going on in the mind of the average South African as they skipped the symbol of the ANC that they had known for years to affix their thumbprint on that of the alternative DA. I could imagine the tears that would well up in their eyes because it is indeed a painful experience. But such experience must come if they are ever to regain their lost glory before it is too late; that is if it is not too late already.

    The truth is; the ANC has been more than arrogant; its officials largely corrupt, and what has been happening, particularly in the Zuma years, was a gradual reversal of every good thing the country used to stand for. Zuma himself is corruption personified. We are yet to know what the ANC would do to Zuma who remains a local champion among his Zulu kith and kin, who form a quarter of the country’s population, despite the multiple scandals hanging on his neck. He once had about 783 corruption charges that South Africa’s High Court had ruled far back as May that the prosecutor should reinstate against him, having been dropped a few years ago. He was tried for rape in 2006, even though he was freed on the grounds that the act was consensual. Moreover, revelations that President Zuma upgraded his private home with $20m of public money caused an outcry and the Constitutional Court recently instructed Mr Zuma to reimburse the state $507,000.

    The developments in South Africa are also particularly distressing because of the political hiccups that are likely to follow. The country would now be forced to go into coalitions since hardly is there any single political party that can form a government on its own, even at the municipal level. The ideological and personal differences that exist among the political parties will make these highly fragile and will likely require repeated re-negotiation over budgets and other issues.

    But the election still reflects something of note for us, especially Nigerians. There seems a consensus by the generality of South Africans that there was the need for change in voting pattern. That the ANC has not fared well was acknowledged by majority of the people who therefore decided to vote for change because what is not good is just not good; there can be no other name for it; irrespective of the creed or colour of those behind it. Things were so bad that not even the ANC could contest the outcome of the polls because the party must have seen it coming. Within South Africa and even beyond, many people had been wondering how South Africa begot the presidency of Zuma. If the ANC could lose elections in South Africa, then any political party can be defeated in Nigeria because there is no political party that Nigerians are as sentimentally attached to as the South Africans were to the ANC. Since the death of the Second Republic, we are yet to see any such party.

    An online commentator summed the South African tragedy all up thus: It’s not even a wake- up call … its utter stupidity to continue to support this crooked self-serving scum under the guise that you are supporting the party and not the man … Even bloggers here use same excuse … The party should always be bigger than one man … Now a white monopoly party has taken votes from the ANC … It will be difficult to regain these votes … Zuma is a sell-out … sold this country to the Guptas and has sold the ANC to the DA.”

    This is the tragedy of the South African municipal elections. Perhaps the other surprise is that, since within the ANC no president is untouchable, why has the party not moved against Zuma despite the bags of woes trailing him. After all, the same party removed Thabo Mbeki from party leadership and the presidency. Yet, Mbeki was a much more urbane president as against Zuma, a parochial bigot, who was a bitter rival to Mbeki, and for whose sake the party removed Mbeki to pave the way for his (Zuma’s) presidency.

    Mandela must be moved to tears in his grave that this is what they have turned South Africa, a country over which himself and others toiled and were incarcerated for decades, to rebuild, less than three years after his death. Mandela died December 5, 2013. But that has always been the Black man’s curse: leadership. When it seems an African country is about getting it; something happens that drags the hands of the clock back several years. Only a few countries on the continent have succeeded in breaking what seems like a generational curse. Even, given that these countries are still evolving, it is too early to say categorically that any African country has crossed this Rubicon.

  • South African prosecutors challenge bid to reinstate Zuma’s graft charges

    South African prosecutors challenge bid to reinstate Zuma’s graft charges

    South Africa’s state prosecutor said on Friday it would go to the top court to challenge a ruling reinstating corruption charges against President Jacob Zuma, drawing accusation of a cover-up from the opposition.

    Zuma, whose ruling African National Congress (ANC) contests local government elections next month, has faced mounting calls to quit from the opposition and even some of his own supporters after several scandals and court rulings against him, Reuters reported.

    Legal pressure mounted in May when the High Court ordered a review of a National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) decision to set aside hundreds of corruption charges against Zuma, calling it “irrational.”

    The NPA, which has already tried and failed to appeal against the order at the High Court, said on Friday it would fight on as the case raised points of law and other principles, without going into detail.

    “The NPA has decided to apply for leave to appeal directly to the Constitutional Court against the judgment,” it said in a statement.

    The main opposition party said the state prosecutor’s decision was an attempt to shield the president and buy him time before the August elections.

    “We call on the President and the NPA to dispense with this approach and proceed with the institution of charges,” the Democratic Alliance said in a statement.

    The charges relate to a major government arms deal in the late 1990s.