Author: The Nation

  • Benzema moves to Al-Hilal following Al-Ittihad departure

    Benzema moves to Al-Hilal following Al-Ittihad departure

    Karim Benzema has joined Al-Hilal, the Saudi Pro League leaders announced, following the termination of his contract with Al-Ittihad.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Top 15 Premier League most expensive signings since 2010

    Local media reported that the move to Al-Hilal came after Benzema rejected an offer to extend his contract with Al-Ittihad. The former France striker had missed the team’s previous two league matches.

    “Karim Benzema is officially Hilali,” Al-Hilal posted on X.

    The former Real Madrid striker, 38, scored 16 goals in 21 matches for Al-Ittihad in all competitions this season.

  • How judges can avoid delays, by CJN

    How judges can avoid delays, by CJN

    The Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, has urged judges to master case management techniques as a way of speeding up the administration of justice.

    She said prompt justice delivery could also be achieved if judges familiarise themselves thoroughly with relevant laws.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun spoke yesterday in Abuja at the opening session of a refresher course for judges of the superior courts on “The Management of Evidence in Trial,” organised by the National Judicial Institute (NJI).

    She said the modern judge must go beyond being a passive arbiter.

    “While impartiality remains paramount, judges are expected to exercise informed and active control over proceedings to ensure fairness, efficiency and procedural discipline,” she said.

    The CJN stressed that this responsibility requires firm mastery of the Evidence Act to enable judges deliver clear and confident rulings on admissibility from the Bench where appropriate.

    She warned that undue or routine adjournments to rule on evidentiary issues should be discouraged, noting that they contribute to delays and undermine the momentum of trial proceedings.

    “Active case management therefore, entails controlling the presentation of evidence, ruling promptly on objections, curbing dilatory tactics, and safeguarding the integrity of the trial process,” she said.

    According to her, these functions demand not only technical competence but also sound judicial judgment exercised with decisiveness and restraint.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun also emphasised the central role of evidence in the trial process, urging judges to develop effective evidence management skills.

    She noted that evidence remains the foundation upon which judicial decisions are built, as it is through evidence that facts are established, credibility assessed and the law applied.

    “While substantive and procedural rules provide the legal framework for adjudication, it is the manner in which evidence is received, managed, evaluated and applied that ultimately determines the fairness and quality of judicial outcomes,” she said.

    Read Also: FG, states, councils share ₦1.969tr December revenue at FAAC meeting

    The CJN added that for judges of the superior courts, whose decisions often shape jurisprudence and public confidence, a firm grasp of evidentiary principles is indispensable.

    She observed that the evidentiary environment in Nigerian courts has expanded significantly, with judges now confronted with electronic records, digital communications, forensic materials and expert testimony from specialised fields.

    According to her, while these developments enhance the truth-finding role of the courts, they also present new challenges relating to admissibility, authenticity, reliability and probative value.

    Justice Kekere-Ekun said judicial officers must therefore be adequately equipped to navigate these complexities with confidence and consistency.

    She noted that the Evidence Act, 2011, as amended by the Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2023, continues to provide the statutory framework for evidentiary practice in Nigeria.

    Judges, she said, must apply its provisions in line with constitutional guarantees, particularly the right to a fair hearing.

    She added that the exercise of judicial discretion in evidentiary matters must be informed, principled and firmly grounded in law and precedent, stressing that effective evidence management is closely linked to judicial case management.

    Commending the NJI for organising the course, the CJN said it came at a time when judicial work has become increasingly complex.

    She observed that judges of the superior courts are now routinely called upon to determine disputes involving extensive records, complex facts and multiple layers of evidence.

    “In this context, the effective management of evidence is no longer merely procedural; it is central to the delivery of justice itself,” she said.

    Administrator of the NJI, Justice Babatunde Adejumo (retd.), said the course was designed to allow judges revisit foundational principles of Evidence Law while engaging with contemporary developments affecting trial practice.

    He noted that the administration of justice has recently faced new evidentiary challenges requiring renewed judicial attention.

    According to him, the course aims to strengthen judges’ capacity to address these challenges with confidence and consistency.

    “It also aims to build upon the experience of your lordships to interrogate recurring challenges encountered in trial management, and to explore best practices that enhance efficiency without compromising the right to fair hearing guaranteed under the Constitution,” he said.

    Justice Adejumo assured participants of the NJI’s unwavering commitment to judicial training, noting that continuous learning remains essential to judicial excellence.

  • ‘Why Supreme Court nullified N1.4b award against Mobil’

    ‘Why Supreme Court nullified N1.4b award against Mobil’

    The Supreme Court nullified a N1.4 billion compensation suit filed against Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited over the alleged acquisition of community land in Akwa Ibom State for lack of jurisdiction.

    The appeal challenged the jurisdictional decision of the Court of Appeal, Calabar.

    In a unanimous judgment delivered on January 30, the apex court held that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain claims relating to land disputes and compensation arising from compulsory acquisition and unexhausted improvements.

    It ruled that such matters fall squarely within the exclusive jurisdiction of State High Courts under the Land Use Act.

    The appeal stemmed from a suit instituted in 1997 by His Royal Highness, Obong David Edu, and 132 others at the Federal High Court, Uyo Judicial Division.

    The claimants sued Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, now Seplat Energy Producing Nigeria Unlimited, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), and the Government of Akwa Ibom State.

    They sought compensation on behalf of themselves and the Ekid people of Eket and Esit Eket Local Government Areas for community land allegedly compulsorily acquired by the state government.

    They claimed N379,988,000, with interest from July 30, 1997, as compensation for the alleged acquisition, as well as for purported unexhausted improvements on the land.

    Read Also: Police urge NLC to shelve Tuesday’s planned protest

    In March 2014, the Federal High Court ruled in favour of the claimants, awarding the full sum of N379,988,000 with interest at 10 per cent per annum from April 8, 1998, until liquidation of the judgment debt.

    Mobil challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal, Calabar Division.

    In a unanimous judgment delivered on July 13, 2018, the appellate court allowed the appeal and set aside the Federal High Court’s judgment, holding that it lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate on land-related compensation claims.

    Dissatisfied, the claimants further appealed to the Supreme Court.

    The apex court upheld the submissions of Mobil’s counsel, Ituah Imhanze Esq of Kenna Partners, and dismissed the appeal in its entirety.

    The court reaffirmed settled jurisprudence that claims for compensation arising from compulsory acquisition of land and unexhausted improvements are matters reserved for State High Courts, not the Federal High Court.

    The Supreme Court’s ruling effectively restores the judgment of the Court of Appeal and nullifies the N379.9 million award earlier granted by the Federal High Court.

    Dr. Okiemute Akpomudge of Albert Akpomudge, SAN & Co represented the NNPC, while J. Jerome Akpan Esq appeared for the Government of Akwa Ibom State.

    The appellants were represented by Ekom Nwoko Esq of Kanu G. Agabi and Associates.

    With the decision, the Supreme Court has brought to an end a protracted dispute that spanned nearly three decades and traversed three tiers of court.

    It also reinforced the constitutional and statutory limits of court jurisdiction in land and compensation matters.

  • CDHR seeks review Cybercrimes Act, warns of threat to free speech

    CDHR seeks review Cybercrimes Act, warns of threat to free speech

    The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) has called on the National Assembly to urgently review Nigeria’s cybercrimes law.

    It warned that key provisions of the legislation undermine constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression and are being used to stifle dissent.

    The call was made at the organisation’s 2025 Annual General Conference (AGC) in Ota, Ogun State, with human rights activists, lawyers and civil society leaders faulting what they described as the increasing criminalisation of speech on social media.

    Lead speaker at the conference and former Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academics), University of Lagos, Mr. Olasupo Ojo, said the cybercrimes law, as currently applied, amounts to a “technical gag” on citizens and contradicts democratic principles.

    “How can a law prohibit people from expressing themselves on social media? That is a clear abuse of fundamental rights,” Ojo said.

    He expressed hope that the courts would eventually pronounce on controversial sections of the legislation.

    He argued that existing laws already provide remedies for defamation, which he stressed is a civil matter, not a criminal offence.

    Read Also: FG, states, councils share ₦1.969tr December revenue at FAAC meeting

    “With the cybercrimes law, defamation has been criminalised. That is unacceptable. Any provision of the law or regulation that violates freedom of expression has to go,” he said.

    Ojo also warned against the rise of what he termed “cyber-rats” – state-sponsored actors allegedly deployed to intimidate critics and suppress dissent online.

    He urged the CDHR to return to grassroots mobilisation through intensive civic education in markets, motor parks and tertiary institutions.

    “The people must not sleep and must not allow governments to rest,” he charged.

    President of the organisation, Mr. Debo Adeniran, used the occasion to call for far-reaching constitutional reforms to make social and economic rights enforceable, lamenting that Nigeria’s democratic system continues to exclude the majority of citizens from justice and effective governance.

    Adeniran criticised the inability of Nigerians to seek legal redress over the failure of the government to provide basic services such as healthcare, food security, education and infrastructure, despite paying taxes.

    He described the non-justiciability of social rights as a “fundamental injustice” embedded in the country’s legal framework, arguing that it has stripped citizens of enforceable rights to food, healthcare and education, services he described as essential to human dignity and meaningful participation in governance.

    “Human rights are not luxuries reserved for the powerful. They are everyday necessities, as vital as food and shelter,” Adeniran said.

    The conference, held under the theme “Human Rights as Our Everyday Essentials: Fundamental, Inviolable, Indiscriminate,” attracted delegates from 27 state branches of the organisation and featured deliberations on internal reforms, elections and the future direction of the human rights movement in Nigeria.

    During the National Council session, branch elections in Lagos and Delta states were ratified, while the council also dissolved the existing Board of Trustees and elected a new five-member board comprising Mr. Olasupo Ojo, Mr. Debo Adeniran, Prof. Lucky Akarueze, Mr. Gbenga Awosode and Mr. Femi Falana, SAN.

    A new National Executive Committee was also elected to steer the affairs of the organisation for the next two years.

    Those elected include Adeniran as National President; Godwin Anyebe (Vice President); Deji Adebowale (General Secretary); Imrana Yahaya (Assistant Secretary); Akinrinade Wahab (Treasurer); Naabulobari Naazigha-Lue (Legal Adviser); Onyibe Jeremiah (Publicity Secretary); and Musa Gwani Turare (Internal Auditor).

    In a communiqué issued at the end of the conference and jointly signed by Adeniran, Adebowale and Jeremiah, the CDHR reaffirmed its commitment to defending fundamental rights and strengthening internal cohesion, while calling for renewed grassroots engagement and collaboration with the legal community and security agencies.

    The conference also acknowledged the contributions of the Chairperson of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Ota Branch, Mrs. Ajose, and the Divisional Police Officer of Ota Division, CSP Idehai Godwin, both of whom emphasised the importance of upholding the rule of law and fostering cooperation between civil society and law enforcement.

    Adeniran urged the newly elected executives to remain accountable to members and communities, stressing that leadership within the CDHR must be rooted in service, discipline and unwavering commitment to social justice.

    “Let the struggle continue,” he said.

  • Protests: Falana visits injured victims of alleged police attack

    Protests: Falana visits injured victims of alleged police attack

    Activist-lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), yesterday condemned the use of teargas by the police on protesters during last week’s demonstration against alleged illegal demolitions and forced evictions in the Makoko waterfront area of Lagos.

    He described the police action as unconstitutional, dangerous and a violation of citizens’ fundamental rights.

    He spoke with journalists during a visit to the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH), where some of the injured protesters are receiving medical treatment.

    Briefing Falana on the condition of one of the victims, a burns and plastic nurse, Mr. Adedeji Hassan, said Mrs. Kafayat Muftaudeen, who sustained a severe leg injury, was being discharged but would continue treatment through regular wound dressing and weekly hospital visits ahead of surgery.

    He explained that she was fit to return home and would visit the hospital weekly for dressing until the wound healed, after which she would undergo skin grafting.

    “When the wound is fully healed, she will come back for skin grafting. We will take skin from another part of her body to cover the defect,” Hassan said.

    Hassan added that Mrs. Muftaudeen was being discharged with her medications and would be monitored by a medical colleague living near her residence.

    “Some people recover better at home, in an environment they are used to,” he said.

    He also disclosed that another protester, Mr. Ajayi, who sustained injuries during the protest, had been discharged. Ajayi was the individual whose injuries were shown in footage aired by CNN.

    Read Also: Police urge NLC to shelve Tuesday’s planned protest

    Falana argued that the Nigerian Constitution clearly guarantees freedom of expression and freedom of assembly, stressing that the police had no legal justification for attacking the protesters.

    “My position is that the Constitution of Nigeria has guaranteed freedom of expression and freedom of assembly,” he said.

    He recalled the decision of the Court of Appeal in All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) v. Inspector-General of Police, which affirmed the right of Nigerians to protest peacefully and directed the National Assembly to enact laws to protect that right.

    According to him, those protections were reinforced by the Police Establishment Act.

    Falana said: “The Police Establishment Act provides that those who want to protest are only required to notify the police.

    “Once the police command is notified, adequate security must be provided.”

    He said the organisers of the Makoko protest complied with the law by notifying the police in advance and were escorted peacefully from the Ikeja Under Bridge to the Alausa Secretariat.

    “From Ikeja Under Bridge up to Alausa, the protesters marched peacefully without disturbing anybody,” he said.

    Falana said the situation changed when no government official came out to receive a letter addressed to the Lagos State Governor.

    “The protesters sang some songs which the police considered offensive, and at that stage decided, at very close range, to teargas the protesters,” he said.

    He expressed concern over the nature of the injuries sustained by some demonstrators, describing them as unusual.

    “The injury I’ve seen is not normal. I’ve taken part in protests in this country for over 40 years.”

    I’ve never seen a situation where a teargas canister would pierce somebody’s skin to that level,” Falana said.

    He suggested that expired teargas canisters may have been used during the operation.

    Falana stressed that singing abusive or vulgar songs does not constitute a criminal offence under Nigerian law.

    “It is not the law in Nigeria that you will be brutalised for singing abusive songs,” he said.

    He cited a Court of Appeal decision which held that public officers must tolerate criticism in a democratic society.

    “If a public officer is too sensitive or irascible, the court advised that he should cover his ears with cotton wool,” Falana said.

    He rejected claims that protesters require police permission before demonstrating, describing such a requirement as a relic of colonialism.

    “You do not need a police permit to protest. All the law requires is notification, and the police are duty-bound to provide security,” he said.

    Falana said the essence of protest is to draw attention to grievances.

    “If you confine protesters to a corner, how would the government know that people are protesting?” he asked.

    He expressed hope that lessons would be learnt from the incident, warning against the erosion of constitutional rights.

    The protest was organised by activists Comrade Hassan Taiwo, popularly known as Soweto, and Mr. Dele Frank, to demand an end to demolition exercises affecting waterfront communities.

    The demonstration was intended to draw the attention of the Lagos State Government to what organisers described as illegal demolitions and forced evictions. However, the protest later turned violent after police fired teargas at demonstrators, leaving several people injured and drawing condemnation from human rights groups.

  • Lagos sensitises residents on traffic, environmental laws

    Lagos sensitises residents on traffic, environmental laws

    Lagos State Government, through the Special Offences (Mobile) Court, has  conducted a public sensitization programme across the state.

    The event which held on Friday at the Lagos Safety Arena and other key locations including Oshodi, Iyana Ipaja, Ojota, and Ikorodu was part of its ongoing efforts to educate members of the public on compliance with environmental and traffic laws.

    The sensitization exercise, themed “Justice on Wheels: Know the Law, Keep Lagos Clean, Safe and Orderly,” focused on key areas including one-way violations, misuse of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lanes, and obstruction of public spaces.

    Read Also: FG, states, councils share ₦1.969tr December revenue at FAAC meeting

    The State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Lawal Pedro, (SAN), who was represented by the Director, Citizens’ Rights, Mr. Ogunsanya Jonathan, emphasized the State Government’s commitment to justice, stating that it is accessible, corrective, and people-centered.

    “The Mobile Court is not only an instrument of enforcement but also a vital platform for public education. Through sensitization exercises like this, we seek to prevent infractions by ensuring that citizens clearly understand their rights, responsibilities, and the consequences of violating the law,” he said.

    Mr. Pedro further reiterated that the Lagos State Government remains resolute in adopting lawful and humane approaches to strengthen civic responsibility and uphold the rule of law across the State.

    Earlier, the Coordinator of the Special Offences (Mobile) Court, Mr. Olufemi Adekunle, explained that the sensitization programme was designed to bridge the information gap between the justice system and the public.

    “Our goal is to reduce avoidable offences by bringing legal knowledge directly to the people. When citizens understand the law, compliance becomes easier and enforcement less necessary,” he said.

    Also speaking at the event, the Chairman, Lagos State Environmental Sanitation and Special Offences, Mr. Adetayo Akerele, stated that environmental cleanliness and traffic discipline are central to public safety in Lagos State.

    He stressed that offences such as obstruction, misuse of BRT lanes, and driving against traffic undermine the State’s efforts to keep Lagos clean, safe, and orderly, urging residents to comply with existing laws for the collective good of all.

    The event featured interactive engagements with the public at various bus stops, distribution of fliers, and practical explanations of common offences and penalties handled by the Special Offences (Mobile) Court.

    Members of the public were encouraged to comply with traffic regulations, uphold environmental cleanliness, and carry out their daily activities in accordance with the law, as the Ministry of Justice remains committed to promoting a just, orderly, and law-abiding State.

  • Police arraign developer over alleged N1.33b fraud

    Police arraign developer over alleged N1.33b fraud

    • Beachway Homes boss Adeyinka pleads not guilty

    The police have arraigned a real estate developer, Adeyinka Lawal, at the Federal High Court in Lagos over an alleged N1.33 billion fraud.

    The Force Criminal Investigation Department (Force CID), Annex, Alagbon–Ikoyi, charged Lawal, the Chief Executive Officer of Beachway Homes Limited, alongside his company, before Justice Deinde Dipeolu. The charge is numbered FHC/L/392c/2025.

    The prosecution alleged conspiracy, obtaining money by false pretence, money laundering, fraudulent conversion and fraud.

    Prosecuting counsel, Samuel Ogala, told the court that the 60-year-old defendant, his company and others now at large allegedly committed the offences between 2020 and 2023 at Elegushi, Lekki, Lagos State.

    According to the prosecution, Lawal, with the intent to defraud, obtained the sum of N1.33 billion from one Mr. Ifeanyi Nweke under the false pretence that the money would be used to build a 52-unit estate at Ilesan–Elegushi, Lekki.

    Ogala told the court that the representation was false and that the defendant knew it to be so.

    Read Also: Police urge NLC to shelve Tuesday’s planned protest

    He further alleged that upon receiving the money, Lawal fraudulently converted the funds to his personal use.

    The prosecutor said the alleged offences contravened Sections 8 and 1(1)(3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006, and were punishable under Section 390(9) of the Criminal Code Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) 2004.

    He also told the court that the defendant’s actions contravened Section 7(2)(b) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006, as well as Section 20(b) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

    The defendant pleaded not guilty to all the charges.

    The prosecutor informed the court that the defendant had yet to fulfil the bail conditions earlier granted by the court.

    He urged the court to remand the defendant in the custody of the Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS) pending compliance with the bail terms.

    Defence counsel told the court that he had been indisposed since his client was arraigned and released to him in July 2025, explaining that this accounted for the delay in perfecting the bail.

    Justice Dipeolu ordered that the defendant be remanded at the Nigerian Correctional Service facility pending the fulfilment of the bail conditions.

    The case was adjourned to March 18 for trial.

    The charges against the defendants read in part:

    “That you, Adeyinka Lawal ‘M’, Beachway Homes Ltd. and others now at large, between the years 2020 and 2023 at the Elegushi–Lekki area of Lagos State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did conspire amongst yourselves to commit felony, to wit: obtaining money by false pretence, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 8 of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.

    “That you, ADEYINKA LAWAL ‘M’, BEACHWAY HOMES LTD. and others now at large, between the years 2020 and 2023 at the Elegushi–Lekki area of Lagos State, did with intent to defraud fraudulently obtain the sum of N1.33 billion from Mr. Ifeanyi Nweke under the pretence of using same to build a 52-unit estate at Ilesan–Elegushi, Lekki, a representation you knew to be false.

    “That you fraudulently converted the sum of N1.33 billion belonging to Mr. Ifeanyi Nweke to your own use.

    “That you laundered, transferred and retained the said sum of N1.33 billion, thereby committing offences contrary to and punishable under the relevant provisions of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006, and the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”

  • Activist seeks Electoral Act amendment before primaries

    Activist seeks Electoral Act amendment before primaries

    An activist and advocate, Princess Abiodun Islamiyat Oyefusi, has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to assent to the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill before the commencement of party primaries.

    She made the call in a legal brief, in which she also demanded strict and uniform enforcement of the amended law across Nigeria’s political system.

    The memorandum, dated February 2, and issued from the Royal Castle of Mercy, Lowa, Ikorodu, framed the proposed amendment as a constitutional and democratic imperative rather than a matter of administrative convenience or timing.

    Oyefusi warned that proceeding with party primaries under an outdated or uncertain legal framework could undermine the legitimacy of candidates, trigger extensive pre-election litigation, and erode public confidence in Nigeria’s democratic process.

    In the legal brief addressed to the President, Oyefusi raised three central questions: whether failure to enact the amendment before party primaries undermines legal certainty and the rule of law; whether legislative delay heightens the risk of pre-election disputes capable of disrupting the electoral calendar; and whether strict enforcement of the amended Act is essential to safeguarding internal party democracy and overall electoral integrity.

    Anchoring her arguments on provisions of the 1999 Constitution, including the sovereignty of the people and citizens’ right to political participation, Oyefusi also referenced the constitutional mandate of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the existing framework of the Electoral Act 2022.

    Read Also: FG, states, councils share ₦1.969tr December revenue at FAAC meeting

    She argued that electoral laws must be settled, clear, and enforceable before political parties begin their nomination processes.

    According to the brief, primaries conducted under a legal regime that is later amended are vulnerable to conflicting interpretations, disputes over retrospective application of the law, and possible judicial invalidation of nominations.

    Such uncertainty, she noted, offends the doctrine of legal certainty and destabilises the entire electoral process.

    Oyefusi further contended that delay in enacting the amendment weakens INEC institutionally, forcing the commission to operate within what she described as an “acknowledgedly deficient framework.”

    She warned that in such circumstances, INEC’s guidelines lack firm statutory backing, while its regulatory and enforcement actions become more susceptible to legal challenge.

    Timely assent to the amendment, she argued, would empower INEC to regulate party primaries with greater clarity, authority, and confidence.

    Drawing from Nigeria’s electoral history, the brief linked the majority of pre-election disputes to flawed party primaries. Oyefusi cautioned that legislative delay encourages forum shopping by aggrieved aspirants, produces conflicting court decisions, and places additional strain on the judiciary, with potential consequences for electoral timelines and outcomes.

    She maintained that enacting the amendment before primaries would establish a uniform legal standard applicable to all political parties, thereby significantly reducing litigation risks.

    On the issue of internal party democracy, Oyefusi described it as a legal obligation rather than a political ideal.

    She noted that the proposed amendments seek to clarify delegate eligibility, regulate nomination procedures, and prescribe sanctions for non-compliance by political parties. Without timely enactment and firm enforcement, she warned, party leaderships would continue to exercise excessive discretion, enabling manipulation, exclusion, and arbitrary outcomes that undermine democratic norms within parties.

    The brief also linked early and even-handed enforcement of the amended law to public trust and democratic legitimacy.

    Oyefusi argued that electoral credibility begins long before election day, at the stage where candidates emerge from party processes.

    She warned that unclear or selectively enforced rules diminish public confidence, while rigorous and uniform enforcement signals transparency and respect for voters’ choices.

    Emphasising that “legislation without enforcement is ineffectual,” Oyefusi called on INEC to apply the amended provisions uniformly and without political accommodation.

    She also urged that political parties be held strictly accountable for compliance and that the courts resist technical manoeuvres that defeat the clear intent of the legislature.

    Selective or weak enforcement, she cautioned, would only perpetuate the systemic defects the amendment seeks to address.

    Oyefusi described the signing of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill before party primaries as a legal and democratic necessity.

    She warned that any delay could undermine legal certainty, fuel avoidable litigation, weaken institutional authority, and compromise the integrity of the electoral process.

    She therefore urged President Tinubu to assent to the bill without delay, called on INEC to immediately issue binding guidelines aligned with the amended Act, and demanded that political parties be compelled to demonstrate strict compliance as a condition for candidate recognition.

    According to her, decisive and uniform enforcement of the amended law is critical to safeguarding Nigeria’s democratic credibility ahead of future elections.

  • DSVA partners monarchs to boost anti-SGBV fight

    DSVA partners monarchs to boost anti-SGBV fight

    The Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency (DSVA) has intensified its campaign against Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) with engagement visits to selected paramount traditional rulers in the Epe Division of the state.

    The visits, which took place last week, formed part of the agency’s ongoing community engagement and advocacy efforts aimed at strengthening collaboration with traditional institutions in preventing and responding to SGBV across Lagos State.

    The primary objective of the courtesy visits was to formally engage the monarchs, secure their royal support and agree on suitable dates for community sensitisation programmes on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence within their respective domains.

    The visits also sought to reinforce the vital role of traditional institutions in promoting community awareness, encouraging early reporting of abuse and fostering positive behavioural change at the grassroots level.

    Members of the DSVA delegation visited His Royal Majesty, Alayeiluwa Oba Nurani Sikiru Odedina (Alughin I), the Oni Ladaba of Ladaba Kingdom; His Royal Majesty, Alayeiluwa Oba Engr. Sulaimon Adesina Adebowale (Ilufemiloye, Akenren II), the Omola of Odomola Kingdom; and His Royal Majesty, Alayeiluwa Oba Abdurasaq Akanni Musa, the Orijeru of Igbooye Kingdom.

    Read Also: Police urge NLC to shelve Tuesday’s planned protest

    The delegation was warmly received by the royal fathers and their palace chiefs.

    During the engagements, the team outlined the mandate of the Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Agency and highlighted the prevalence and impact of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence within communities.

    Discussions focused on various forms of SGBV, including domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other harmful practices, as well as the importance of community-based prevention strategies and early reporting.

    The delegation also emphasised the availability of DSVA support services and referral pathways, stressing the need for sustained sensitisation to dispel myths, reduce stigma and promote survivor-centred responses.

    The traditional rulers expressed keen interest in the agency’s interventions and acknowledged the growing relevance of SGBV awareness within their communities.

    They reaffirmed their commitment to supporting initiatives aimed at protecting the dignity, safety and well-being of women, children and other vulnerable persons.

    The visits yielded positive outcomes, with all the monarchs pledging their support for DSVA-led sensitisation programmes in their kingdoms.

    Agreements were reached to schedule community engagement sessions at mutually convenient dates, during which chiefs, youth leaders, women groups and other community stakeholders would be mobilised.

    The monarchs also assured the agency of their readiness to use their influence to promote peaceful coexistence and encourage the reporting of SGBV cases through appropriate channels.

    The engagement strengthened collaboration between the DSVA and traditional institutions in the Epe Division and underscored the importance of royal leadership in community-based advocacy against Sexual and Gender-Based Violence.

    The Lagos State Government reaffirmed its commitment to working closely with traditional rulers and other stakeholders to ensure safer communities and more effective prevention of, and response to, SGBV across the state.

  • Shell’s bold moves

    Shell’s bold moves

    • Proposed investment of $20bn is proof of the company’s confidence in the economy

    One inevitable takeaway from the visit by Shell Plc’s team to President Bola Tinubu last Thursday is the acknowledgment of how much the climate for investment has changed for the better, and with it the noticeable surge in investor confidence in the nation’s oil and gas sector.

    Chief executive, Wael Sawan, who led the Shell Plc’s team had told President Tinubu during the parley: “We have really been in a space where we are very keen to invest in Nigeria. But I would say this has not always been the case. Your leadership and your vision have created an investment climate over the last few years that, I will be very honest with you, propelled us to invest, in particular, also as we compare to other investments around the world”.

    The high point of the parley of course was its deepened interest in Block OML 118, the Bonga Block.

    “Total Energies was selling, so we bought it because we want to deepen further. But that, we think, is not enough. We think there is more to invest here, and we understand the vision that you have for the country. And so we are indeed working on a project, Bonga Southwest, that could, if we reach a Final Investment Decision (FID) stage, see us, with our partners, invest around $20 billion in foreign direct investment, half of which will be capital. The other half will be the operating expenses and the like that will come into the country,” he said of the acquisition.

    Bayo Ojulari, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), Group Managing Director corroborated this when he noted, also at the occasion, that the company had actually completed the divestment of its onshore joint venture assets to Renaissance, a move he said reinforced Nigeria’s credibility with global investors. According to him, Shell, following that divestment, had approved a $5 billion final investment decision for the Bonga North development and a further $2 billion for shallow-water gas projects.

    Read Also: FG, states, councils share ₦1.969tr December revenue at FAAC meeting

    “Overall, since Mr President announced incentives, Shell alone has invested over $7 billion,” he said.

    He also touched on what this means for the country: “When we talk about these big numbers, we need to clarify what they mean: more jobs from construction and opportunities for Nigerians to participate,” he said.

    “Most of our fabrication yards, closed for years due to a lack of projects, will come back to life”, he also added. He reckons that the project, beyond the construction phase, would generate employment over the course of the next 20 to 25 years, spanning the field’s production life, with sustained demand for local suppliers, manpower, and maintenance services.

    Both the Federal Government and Shell deserve commendation for moving things up to this point. What it signifies is that the various initiatives of government to improve climate of operations in the oil and gas sector have not gone unnoticed, but have actually begun to bear concrete proofs. Surely, both the Tinubu administration and Shell have good reasons to be upbeat about the project’s promises in terms of what it bodes for wealth and job creation, and skills transfers.

    Yet, we consider any form of celebration at this stage premature. Indeed, there are still many phases as there are countless hurdles to cross before the final investment decision. As it is, Nigerians cannot wait to see the promises take shape in terms of the number of local contractors handed jobs that fall within their remit, the number of young Nigerians trained in the course of delivering the project, and the overall impact on the lives and the livelihoods of the communities which abut the project.

    Still, the other part which equally bears stating, now that the revamped climate of operation has been acknowledged, is the need for multinationals like Shell to do their utmost best to foster communal peace if only to make the atmosphere sustainable. Given our experiences, particularly in this area, it seems the least the company could do, going forward.