Author: The Nation

  • Morocco to file legal complaint over Cup of Nations final fiasco

    Morocco to file legal complaint over Cup of Nations final fiasco

    Morocco will pursue legal action over the outcome of Sunday’s Africa Cup of Nations final, where opponents Senegal walked off the field to protest a penalty awarded against them but later returned to win the match.

    Morocco were beaten 1-0 after extra time by Senegal in the decider in Rabat, but the hosts had a chance to win the trophy with a last-gasp penalty at the end of regulation time.

    Senegalese players stormed off in protest after a VAR decision to hand Morocco a spot kick for a tug on the shoulder of striker Brahim Diaz, who then squandered the kick after having to wait some 14 minutes before the Senegal side returned.

    “The Royal Moroccan Football Federation announces that it will pursue legal action with the Confederation of African Football and FIFA to rule on the walk-off of the Senegalese national team from the field during the final against the Moroccan national team, as well as on the events surrounding this decision, following the referee’s awarding of a penalty that was deemed correct by all experts,” a statement said.

    Read Also: Super Eagles rank among Africa’s top three after AFCON exploits

    “This situation had a significant impact on the normal course of the match and on the players’ performance,” it added.

    It is unclear what Morocco wants to achieve with their complaint other than being seen to formally remonstrate over the outcome of the match.

    Yesterday, FIFA President Gianni Infantino and CAF condemned the behaviour of Senegal players and members of the coaching staff after the chaotic scenes, saying violence and walk-offs had no place in football.

    “We also witnessed unacceptable scenes on the field and in the stands – we strongly condemn the behaviour of some ‘supporters’ as well as some Senegalese players and technical staff members,” Infantino said.

    “It is unacceptable to leave the field of play in this manner and, equally, violence cannot be tolerated in our sport, it is simply not right.

    “We must always respect the decisions taken by the match officials on and off the field of play. Teams must compete on the pitch and within the Laws of the Game, because anything less puts the very essence of football at risk.”

    CAF said it was reviewing footage and that disciplinary proceedings will follow, adding that it “condemns the unacceptable behaviour from some players and officials”.

  • Klopp: ‘I never felt like a world-class coach’

    Klopp: ‘I never felt like a world-class coach’

     Despite leaving Liverpool as one of the most highly regarded coaches in world football in 2024, Jurgen Klopp said he never thought of himself as among the game’s best.

     “I never considered myself a world-class coach,” Klopp told AFP and other media in an interview in Leipzig, “because I still had so many questions when I finished.”

     “I was like ‘how can I be world class with these questions still?’”

    After starting out at Mainz, where he took the club to the top flight for the first time, Klopp moved to Borussia Dortmund, where he won two Bundesliga titles and reached the 2013 Champions League final.

    After signing with Liverpool in 2015, Klopp’s Reds won every trophy on offer, including the Champions League and Premier League.

    In his new role as Red Bull’s global head of football, where he oversees a multi-club structure with teams including RB Leipzig, New York Red Bulls and Paris FC, Klopp said that he wants to help coaches answer those questions.

     “My role with the coaches is to be the guy I never had. I sat in my office very, very, very often, very, very, very alone.

     “A lot of people gave me advice and have great ideas… It’s great to have ideas, but it’s really not that easy to make the final decision.

     “I want to be in moments when I know they are alone, or feel alone. I want to be there.”

    Read Also: Chelle targets AFCON 2027 glory after Super Eagles’ Bronze finish

    Klopp oversaw the firing of then-Leipzig coach Marco Rose, a long-time friend, in 2025 and said that being on the other side felt odd.

     “Grave-digger of the coaches – that’s a title I never wanted to win!”

    From taking Mainz to the Bundesliga to breaking Liverpool’s Premier League drought, Klopp improved clubs and players wherever he went.

    Often taking over with teams at a low ebb, the coach would try and put things in perspective.

     “How did I start a game? I would say ‘the worst news is you can lose it’ – so let’s try and win it… Do not try to avoid defeat – try to win.”

    The coach said he told his players: “Giving your all doesn’t mean you will get anything, but it’s your only chance to get something. That’s pretty much how you do it.

     “We gave everything – and sometimes we got something.”

    Klopp said that media and fans were too focused on results.

     “I never watch the goals back, because I want to understand the game to the left and the right of the result.

     “I want to understand why it happened… Results are the result of the performance. So we worked on the performance and the results came later.”

    The 58-year-old said that he “didn’t take any pride” out of trophy ceremonies and parades.

    “I love being a part of it, not in the middle of it. You might see pictures where someone gave me a trophy and I’d take it, but I didn’t need to touch it.

     “For me, it was the journey that I loved. That gave me much more than the moment (of winning).”

    Klopp retains cult-like status at his former clubs, with fans remembering the German for his side-line antics and everyman appeal as much as his successes.

    RB Leipzig sporting director Marcel Schaefer told AFP that Klopp has brought the same presence into his new role, even if he is no longer on the side-line.

     “He has something that is unique. He has a God-given talent which everyone knows from his coaching jobs.

     “He can catch people in five to 10 minutes.”

    Schaefer said that Klopp plays an important role in player recruitment by “talking to families, talking to players about our vision, about our project.

     “You know if Jurgen Klopp is in the room.”

    Since stepping down at Anfield, Klopp has been linked to an array of high-profile coaching jobs, but he said that a return to the dugout is unlikely.

     “I don’t expect to change my mind, but I don’t know.

     “We’re building a house right now and my missus wanted to have a really big trophy room. There was another small room and I said ‘this is enough, because we know how many trophies we have, we will not add any.’

     “It might sound arrogant, but I know I can coach a football team. But I don’t need to do it until my last day.”

  • Qatar Football Festival 2026:  Finalissima showdown with  elite clashes featuring Argentina, Spain, four others

    Qatar Football Festival 2026:  Finalissima showdown with  elite clashes featuring Argentina, Spain, four others

    The Local Organising Committee (LOC) for Football Events has announced the Qatar Football Festival 2026, set to take place between  March 26 and 31.

    The Festival will include the men’s Finalissima 2026 alongside a series of high-profile international matches with the participation of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Serbia. The matches offer participating nations valuable preparation to measure their readiness and assess their capabilities ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026™.

    The match will be held at the iconic Lusail Stadium on 27 March, where European champions Spain will face South American champions Argentina in an anticipated meeting between continental title holders.

    H.E. Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, LOC Chairman for Football Events, said: “We look forward to welcoming players and fans from around the world as we prepare to host the world’s biggest football stars ahead of the FIFA World Cup. We are honoured to open our doors once again to the global football community.”

    Read Also: Super Eagles rank among Africa’s top three after AFCON exploits

    H.E. Sheikh Hamad added: “Hosting the Qatar Football Festival reflects our commitment to delivering world-class experiences and reaffirms Qatar’s position as a trusted partner in global football.”

    Lusail Stadium holds a special place in world football history, having witnessed unforgettable moments during major tournaments and hosted remarkable achievements for national teams and players alike. The venue has seen teams and stars crowned with world and continental titles, from iconic moments at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™ to Qatar’s triumphant Asian Cup victory. The stadium continues to cement its position as one of football’s most prestigious landmarks and a stage for creating new footballing memories.

    Meanwhile, organisers said that exclusive travel packages for international fans will be available starting from 1 February 2026, delivered in partnership with Visit Qatar, the official marketing and promotional arm of Qatar Tourism, and Qatar Airways.

    Match tickets will go on sale from 25 February 2026 at roadtoqatar.qa.

    The six matches scheduled as part of the Qatar Football Festival include:

    26 March: Egypt v Saudi Arabia – Ahmad bin Ali Stadium

    26 March: Qatar v Serbia – Jassim bin Hamad Stadium

    30 March: Egypt v Spain – Lusail Stadium

    30 March: Saudi Arabia v Serbia – Jassim bin Hamad Stadium

    31 March: Qatar v Argentina – Lusail Stadium

  • Man City capture Palace defender Guehi

    Man City capture Palace defender Guehi

    Manchester City have  signed Crystal Palace defender Marc Guehi on a five-and-a-half-year contract for a reported fee of £20 million ($27 million).

    City stepped up their pursuit of the England international after suffering an injury crisis at centre-half.

    Guehi, who came close to joining Liverpool on transfer deadline day in September, is City’s second signing of the January transfer window after their capture of Ghana winger Antoine Semenyo from Bournemouth for about £65 million.

     “I am really happy and incredibly proud to be a Manchester City player,” Guehi said.“This move feels like the culmination of all the hard work I have put into my career. I am now at the best club in England and part of an unbelievable squad of players.

     “It feels good to be able to say that. I want to grow as a player and a person, and I know at this club that’s going to happen.”

    City director of football Hugo Viana said Guehi had been “one of the best defenders in English football for quite some time now”.

     “I feel we have signed a huge talent who will help us improve,” he said.

    “He is only 25, but he has shown already he is a leader, a brilliant professional and someone desperate to improve.”

    Read Also: Chelle targets AFCON 2027 glory after Super Eagles’ Bronze finish

    The Chelsea academy graduate played 188 times for Palace after moving to Selhurst Park from the Blues in 2021.

    He captained Palace to FA Cup glory against City in May – the first major trophy in the south London club’s history – and has won 26 England caps.

    Other teams reportedly interested in the defender, including Liverpool once again and Bayern Munich, were understood to be targeting a move at the end of the season, when Guehi would have been a free agent.

    Pep Guardiola’s City, dethroned as Premier League champions by Liverpool last year, are second in the table, seven points behind leaders Arsenal.

    Central defenders John Stones, Ruben Dias and Josko Gvardiol all missed from Saturday’s 2-0 defeat by Manchester United at Old Trafford.

    The club are also still challenging for silverware in the Champions League, FA Cup and League Cup.

    Guardiola has overseen an expensive rebuild of his squad over the past year, with a clutch of long-serving players exiting the club, including Kevin De Bruyne, Ilkay Gundogan and Ederson.

  • DSS detains Malami on alleged terrorism financing

    DSS detains Malami on alleged terrorism financing

    A former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, was arrested by operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) on Monday, shortly after his release from Kuje Correctional Centre in Abuja, The Nation gathered. 

    This comes after Malami completed his bail conditions in connection with an ongoing case brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    The Nation learnt that the DSS arrest is reportedly linked to allegations of terrorism financing and the discovery of arms and ammunition at Malami’s country home in Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State.

    The EFCC had uncovered the arms during a search of his residence as part of their financial crime probe, and since the illegal possession of firearms falls outside the EFCC’s mandate, the agency handed the matter over to the DSS for comprehensive investigation.

    Read Also: WEF 2026: Shettima commissions first-ever Nigeria House in Davos

    Malami is facing a 16-count charge from the EFCC related to alleged money laundering involving over N8 billion.

    The charges implicate him, his wife Asabe Bashir, and son Abdulaziz Malami in the use of companies to allegedly acquire numerous properties across states.A security source confirmed Malami’s arrest.

    The source said: “Yes, it is true that DSS operatives arrested Abubakar Malami, SAN. There are several petitions against him bordering on alleged terrorism financing. 

    “Terrorism and terrorism financing are serious offences globally. You’ll recall that when Abubakar Malami, SAN, was the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, he vowed that the government of the day would not shield any person or persons linked to terrorism or terrorism financing.”

    “No responsible government would, in the same vein, fold it’s hands or turn a blind eye to weighty allegations of terrorism financing leveled against against any individual, no matter how highly placed. In this case, Malami, SAN. 

    “In the course of investigations, we have what is called inter-agency cooperation. It is not uncommon for one security agency to hand over a person under investigation to another sister security agency. In “Nigeria, the DSS is the sole security agency tasked which the responsibility of investigating such allegations. It’ll be best to allow them do their job.”

  • Court of Appeal lists 360 appeals in special Lagos sitting

    Court of Appeal lists 360 appeals in special Lagos sitting

    The Court of Appeal has listed a total of 360 appeals for hearing during a special court session in Lagos, in a strategic move aimed at reducing the mounting backlog of cases at the division.

    President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Dongban-Mensem, who presided over the special sitting yesterday, said the initiative underscored the court’s deliberate and sustained commitment to enhancing efficiency in the administration of justice, particularly at the Lagos Division, which bears a significant volume of appellate litigation due to its status as Nigeria’s commercial nerve centre.

    The special sitting, held in Lagos where the Court of Appeal was originally established, also forms a major highlight of activities marking the court’s 50th anniversary.

    She explained that the heavy appellate burden in Lagos made proactive intervention inevitable.

    “Today’s sitting reflects the court’s deliberate and sustained commitment to enhancing efficiency in the administration of justice by addressing the growing volume of appeals across its divisions.

    “It has become timely and necessary for the court to take proactive measures to be conscious of the docket of appeals,” Justice Dongban-Mensem said.

    To effectively manage the exercise, the Court of Appeal President disclosed that the court constituted 16 panels made up of 48 Justices drawn from various divisions across the country.

    Justice Dongban-Mensem noted that all 360 appeals listed for the special sitting were ripe for hearing and urged legal practitioners and litigants to ensure full compliance with procedural requirements to avoid delays.

    “For this exercise, the court has constituted 16 panels comprising 48 honourable Justices drawn from various divisions of the court.

    “The panels will sit throughout the week, with hearings taking place at both the Court of Appeal, Lagos Division, and the National Industrial Court (NIC) Complex, in order to maximise available judicial facilities and resources.

    Read Also: Top 10 Africa’s most powerful passports in January 2026

    “Counsel and parties are urged to take full advantage of this opportunity by ensuring readiness and strict adherence to applicable rules of procedure.”

    Recalling a previous special sitting, she expressed disappointment that several appeals could not be heard due to lack of preparedness by counsel.

    “It was very painful for me because our limited resources had been spent on air tickets, accommodation and logistics, yet we could not take most of the appeals because many counsel were not prepared,” she said.

    While acknowledging the appeal of Lagos as a city, Justice Dongban-Mensem stressed that the sitting was strictly business.

    She further disclosed that several Court of Appeal divisions were temporarily left with fewer Justices due to the deployment to Lagos.

    “It’s always exciting to be in Lagos, Justices do not have that much time for leisure travel. When we set out time to work, we want to work. This is not a vacation.

    “Many divisions have been left without Justices to take their cases. In appreciation of this sacrifice, I appeal to all lawyers to take this session seriously,” she said.

    The Court of Appeal President commended the Lagos State Government, particularly the Office of the Attorney-General, as well as the National Industrial Court, for their logistical and institutional support.

    She added that the National Industrial Court had consistently supported the Court of Appeal with both court and residential accommodation.

    “I wish to express our profound appreciation to the Office of the Attorney-General of Lagos for collaborating with the court to ensure this week happens. Otherwise, our slim resources would not be able to carry as many Justices as are here today,” she said.

    Justice Dongban-Mensem also called on lawyers, litigants and the media to help protect public confidence in the judiciary.

    She reminded the public that the administration of justice depends on evidence and active participation.

    “If we do not encourage people to have faith in the judiciary, we may not be able to contain the lawlessness that will occur when people lose confidence,” she warned.

    “Judges are not magicians. Law enforcement agencies are not magicians. They need evidence. They need people to come up and say what they saw,” she said.

    Addressing journalists, she urged accuracy and professionalism in court reporting.

    “We appreciate your work in telling the world about the judiciary, but it is important that the correct information goes out. Where there is confusion, seek clarification,” she said.

    In her closing remarks, Justice Dongban-Mensem urged all stakeholders to uphold integrity and professionalism as the Court of Appeal marks its golden jubilee.

    “Justice must not only be done, it must manifestly be seen to be done,” she said.

    Speaking on behalf of the Bar, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, described the special sitting as historic and commended the initiative of the Court of Appeal President.

    “It is an auspicious event, a rare and unprecedented opportunity for us within the Lagos Bar to be blessed with an array of wise and learned Justices from the various divisions of the Court of Appeal,” Adegboruwa said.

    He assured the court of the Bar’s cooperation in ensuring speedy hearings while also congratulating the Court of Appeal on its golden jubilee.

    “We, on behalf of the Bar, assure my Lords of our readiness to facilitate a speedy and expeditious hearing of all pending cases. It is in our own interest and in the interest of our clients.

    “We congratulate the Court of Appeal for contributing immensely to the administration of justice in our nation, in the past, now and in the future,” he said.

    However, he used the occasion to draw attention to funding and infrastructure challenges facing the judiciary.

    He further expressed optimism that ongoing efforts to improve facilities at the Lagos Division would materialise.

    “We know the challenges being faced by the judiciary in respect of lack of funding from the federal government. The Bar will continue to work with the judiciary to ensure that this important arm of government is well funded,” he said.

    “We are glad that my Lord is already working on creating facilities within the premises of the Lagos Division, and we pray that this will come to pass,” he added.

  • Court grants order for substituted service on Onikoyi

    Court grants order for substituted service on Onikoyi

    Justice O. A. Oresanya of the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja has granted an order directing that court processes in a suit against the Onikoyi of Lagos be served by pasting them on the palace wall.

    The claimants, in a motion ex-parte, asked the court for substituted service of the writ of summons, other originating processes, and any future processes on the fourth defendant – Chief Hassan Kehinde Elegushi.

    This would involve posting them on the wall of his premises at Onikoyi Palace, Block 5, Onikoyi Lane, Parkview Estate, Ikoyi, Lagos State, which is the last known address.

    The claimants appeared in court through P. O. Lasisi, SAN; former Lagos Attorney-General Adeniji Kazeem, SAN; and Ademola Ekundayo.

    The fourth defendant was represented by Wale Adesokan (SAN).

    The motion ex parte relied on Order 9 Rule 5 of the High Court of Lagos State (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019 and the court’s inherent jurisdiction.

    Members of the Onikoyi Royal Family have challenged the appointment and installation of Prince Kunle Fafunwa as the Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    The claimants are Otunba Abdul Ganiyi Kolawole Onikoyi, Prince Akinola Oyeniyi Fafunwa, Prince Abdul Waliu Omogbolahan Sulaimon, Chief Hassan Kehinde Elegushi, Alhaji Musiliu Abidemi Onikoyi, Alhaja Wosilat Quadri, Mrs. Adeola Davies, Prince Babatunde Onikoyi, Prince Babatunde Shadeko, and Alhaji Ashraf Akinyemi Esinlokun.

    Read Also: Shettima commissions first-ever Nigeria House in Davos

    They filed the action for themselves and on behalf of the Onikoyi Royal Family, also known as the Onikoyi Chieftaincy Family.

    The defendants are the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice of Lagos State, the Lagos State Commissioner for Local Government, Chieftaincy Affairs and Rural Development, Eti-Osa Local Government, and Prince Kunle Fafunwa, the 4th defendant. Claimants Challenge Legality of Oba’s Appointment

    In the suit filed by their counsel, Mr. Ademola Ekundayo of Hill City Associates, Ikeja, the claimants seek several declaratory and injunctive reliefs against the defendants.

    They argue that the selection, approval, and installation of Prince Kunle Fafunwa as Oba of Ikoyi and Moba Land were illegal, null, and void.

    They claim the process violated the Onikoyi Chieftaincy Declaration of 2006 and the Obas and Chiefs Law of Lagos State, which govern succession to the Onikoyi stool.

    The claimants want the court to set aside the selection, approval, and installation of the 4th defendant. They also seek an injunction to stop him from parading or acting as the Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    In addition, they request an order directing the Lagos State Government and relevant authorities to confirm and install the 3rd claimant, Prince Abdul Waliu Omogbolahan Sulaimon, as the legitimate Oba Onikoyi of Ikoyi and Moba Land.

    The statement of claim states that the Onikoyi Royal Family has one ruling house, the Muti Ruling House, with 10 branches: Fafunwa, Ojubiari, Kubayije, Ilumo, Idewu, Kugbamola, Aluko Ajose, Dosunmu Ajiwe, Adelo, and Dosunmu.

    The family argues that under the 2006 Chieftaincy Declaration, succession rotates among these branches and that it is now the Ojubiari branch’s turn after the death of the late Oba Patrick Ibikunle Fafunwa from the Fafunwa branch.

    The claimants allege that appointing Prince Kunle Fafunwa, son of the late Oba Patrick Fafunwa, breaks the rotation principle and violates the family’s customs and traditions.

  • Gov. Ododo, pay retired judges within 14 days or face lawsuit

    Gov. Ododo, pay retired judges within 14 days or face lawsuit

    • By Mutalubi Adebayo

    How this unnecessarily protracted issue escaped my memory still confounds me.

    I can recall that when I took up the Governor and the Government of Osun State over the long overdue unpaid allowances and rightful entitlements of the judicial officers of Osun State, in my 2024 piece in respect of the non-payment of the entitlements and allowances due to the judicial officers in Osun State, I received a call from one of the finest minds that ever adorned the bench of this country: the cerebral, erudite, articulate, very forthright and incorruptible Honourable Justice  Alaba Omolaye -Ajileye ( Rtd).

    He urged me to please assist in liberating the judicial officers of Kogi State too, who are equally suffering in silence from the tyranny and oppression of the Kogi State Governor and the Kogi State Government.

    I gave Honourable Justice Alaba Ajileye my words of assurance that I will take up the matter and ensure that all their due allowances and entitlements are paid to them in the same way and manner that I fought for the judicial officers in Osun State.

    It is pertinent that I must commend the Governor of Osun State, Senator Nurudeen Ademola Jackson Adeleke for promptly acceding to my demands then by settling all the outstanding entitlements due to the judicial officers in Osun State at that time without waiting for the ultimatum that I gave the state to elapse and thus preventing the need for a recourse to filing unnecessary litigations and its attendant costs and time.

    The Governor of Osun State further earned my greatest respect and adoration because, even though government is a continuum, he merely inherited those backlog of unpaid allowances and dues owed the judicial officers in the state from the two previous governments of APC in the State while the government under his stewardship didn’t owe any single judicial officer or public or civil servant in the state a dime or a penny. Kudos to the jolly good fellow, amiable, no dull moment, every smiling and always dancing Governor of Osun State.

    Read Also: Top 10 Africa’s most powerful passports in January 2026

    Kudos must also be given to one of the media aides of the Governor of Osun State in person of Mr. Tunde Busari who did not only call me on phone, but who also drove down to meet me in Ibadan to explain to me the challenges their government was facing over the matter and assured me that the Governor was working round the clock to ensure payment of same soonest.

    Please permit my digression and let me return to the callous, abnormal and irresponsible withholding and or non- payment of the due entitlements and allowances of the judicial officers in Kogi State and all other states where such breach and rape of the rights of judicial officers and those of any other persons, for that matter, may be occurring in the country.

    I condemn such acts of misgovernance and trampling on human rights of fellow citizens as a display of executive recklessness, tyranny, oppression and anti-people. It is even a genocide targeted at the smooth administration of justice with a view to truncating and pervert same.

    I have always formed the opinion that whenever any Government behaves irresponsibly and unconstitutionally, it behoves the people to critically examine the character of the person occupying the position of the Honourable Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in that government to fully understand the reasons for the drift of that government towards perfidy and malady, and the same would be readily known.

    A similar situation like that of Osun and Kogi States was foisted upon the government of Senator Abiola Ajimobi, the father of the modern Oyo State, upon his assumption of office on the 29th day of May, 2011.

    Some 11 retired Judicial Officers in Oyo State which included five former Chief Judges and or Acting Chief Judges – Hon. Justices N. O. Adekola, M. O. Adio, Afolabi Adeniran, R. O. Oyetunde and J. O. Ige all now of blessed memories and some other 6)Six) retired judges that included Hon. Justices T. O. Adeniran, K. A. Jimoh, L. O. Arasi, Atilade Ojo, S. O. Akinola, and A. A.Sanda all now of blessed memories made several appeals and entreaties to the government of Otunba Adebayo Alao-Akala to pay them their severance allowances and gratuities in accordance with the extant provisions of the Entitlements of Judicial Officers as prescribed by National Wages and Salaries Commission.

    When all appeals and various letters they wrote to the state government fell on deaf ears, the retired judicial officers sued the state government for their due entitlements. An Amazon on the Bench, Honourable Justice Eni Esan (now retired), before whom the matter was assigned, courageously granted all the reliefs of the Claimant Judges and ordered the State Government to pay to the retired judges all their due entitlements.

    Instead of complying with the judgment and doing the needful, the PDP government of Otunba Alao-Akala appealed against the judgment at the Court of Appeal, Ibadan.

    We inherited that appeal upon our assumption of office in May 2011. When the retired judicial officers wrote to my Governor and also endorsed a copy to me, I did not wait for the directive of the Governor before I directed the Director of Civil Litigation to withdraw the appeal from the Court of Appeal.

    It is on record that I promptly prepared a memorandum to the Governor and rendered legal advice that we should settle all the due entitlements of the retired judicial officers forthwith and also with a written apology. The Governor approved the memo, and all the due entitlements and allowances of the judges were fully paid.

    Hon. Justice Arasi copiously referenced that purposeful governance of our government in his autobiography and was full of praises and commendation for the Government, the Governor and my goodself as the Attorney-General of the State at that material time, while he also condemned the irresponsible acts and mis-governance by the government that we succeeded.

    Without wasting more time and in order not to bore my readers unnecessarily, I do hereby give 14 days ultimatum to the Governor and the Government of Kogi State to settle all the due entitlements and allowances of the retired judicial officers in Kogi State, failing which I shall proceed to a competent of jurisdiction to file an action to compel the government to pay same and also ask for damages and punitive costs in respect of the those dues entitlements and allowances.

    Injustice to one anywhere is injustice to all everywhere. Irresponsible and non-responsive government must not be tolerated anywhere within the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    Dated at Ibadan, this Monday, the 19th Day of January, 2026.

    • JCI Senator Adebayo (SAN) is the Asiwaju of Ita-Ege & Idi-Aro and Agba-Ofin of Orile-Igbon.

  • Nestoil-Neconde debt dispute: A credit problem hiding in plain sight

    Nestoil-Neconde debt dispute: A credit problem hiding in plain sight

    • By Steve Mayor

    The Supreme Court’s recent decision to reject the appeal filed by Nestoil Limited and Neconde Energy Limited, while ordering the matter back to the Court of Appeal, has once again thrust one of Nigeria’s most consequential corporate debt disputes into public view.

    Yet, beyond the legal headlines, the ruling exposes a more uncomfortable reality about Nigeria’s credit ecosystem, one that extends far beyond the immediate parties to the case.

    The apex court did not pronounce on the substance of the debt. It neither validated nor dismissed the lenders’ claims.

    Instead, it halted proceedings on a preliminary procedural issue: which lawyers were properly authorised to represent the borrowing companies.

    While technical, the pause has created space to reflect on the deeper problem the case represents.

    The dispute

    At its core, the Nestoil–Neconde dispute is not merely a legal contest between borrowers and lenders. It is a mirror reflecting Nigeria’s fragile credit culture, one that has been years in the making.

    The dispute crystallised between 2023 and 2024, when a consortium of lenders, led by FBNQuest Merchant Bank Limited and First Trustees, commenced formal debt recovery proceedings against Nestoil Limited and Neconde Energy Limited.

    The lenders allege that the companies defaulted on large-scale loan obligations, estimated at over $1 billion, arising from financing arrangements tied to oil and gas operations executed in earlier years.

    The facilities were tied to financing arrangements within the oil and gas sector. Following the alleged defaults, the lenders moved to enforce repayment through the courts.

    The borrowers, for their part, have argued that the defaults were not the result of unwillingness to pay, but of macroeconomic shocks that severely impaired repayment capacity.

    They point to the sharp depreciation of the naira, which significantly inflated the local currency value of dollar-denominated debt, alongside volatility in the oil and gas sector that constrained cash flows.

    From a commercial standpoint, this explanation is understandable. From a credit standpoint, it is troubling.

    One thing to note is that credit systems do not operate on sympathy; they operate on certainty. When borrowers treat macroeconomic stress as justification for non-payment rather than as a risk to be anticipated and managed, the cost does not disappear.

    Banks respond predictably. Loan tenors shorten. Collateral demands rise. Pricing becomes punitive. Long-term project finance retreats. Over time, credit becomes scarcer, more expensive, and more distrust-driven. The ecosystem shrinks not because capital is unavailable, but because confidence has eroded.

    This pattern is not unique to Nestoil or Neconde. It reflects a broader Nigerian tendency where large borrowers often seek judicial relief after default, rather than early restructuring before default.

    Litigation then becomes a substitute for balance-sheet discipline, stretching disputes over years while lenders warehouse non-performing exposures and the wider economy absorbs the opportunity cost of idle capital.

    What the courts have said so far

    The judicial record has, so far, favoured enforcement.

    At the Federal High Court, the lenders secured rulings that allowed them to pursue recovery measures, including receivership.

    The Court of Appeal subsequently upheld key aspects of those decisions, reinforcing the lenders’ position and narrowing the borrowers’ options.

    It was against this backdrop that Nestoil and Neconde approached the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the appellate rulings.

    But rather than engage the merits of the debt, the apex court identified a threshold issue that could not be ignored: a dispute over legal representation.

    The court ruled that proceedings conducted without properly authorised counsel could be legally defective, and therefore remitted the matter back to the Court of Appeal to resolve that issue first.

    Read Also: Shettima commissions first-ever Nigeria House in Davos

    Crucially:

    • The Supreme Court did not absolve the borrowers of liability

    • It did not strike out the lenders’ claims

    • It did not rule on the validity or enforceability of the debt

    Financial hardship and the limits of judicial sympathy.

    Publicly available rulings do not suggest that arguments around FX losses, sector volatility, or cash-flow constraints were accepted as legal defences to default.

    Courts have been increasingly clear: financial difficulty may explain default, but it does not rewrite contracts.

    Unless a borrower can show that a lender breached the agreement or failed to follow due process, enforcement rights tend to crystallise once repayment terms are breached.

    This legal posture matters. It signals to the market that courts remain reluctant to socialise private credit risk through judicial indulgence.

    Why this case matters

    Seen through this lens, the Nestoil–Neconde dispute is less about procedural technicalities and more about what happens when credit risk is mispriced, macro risk is underestimated, and repayment discipline weakens.

    It is a reminder that sustainable access to capital is built not merely on the ability to borrow, but on the credibility of repayment, especially when economic conditions turn adverse.

    What happens next

    The Court of Appeal is now expected to resolve the representation dispute and transmit its findings back to the Supreme Court.

    Only then can the apex court, if necessary, proceed to consider the substantive appeal.

    Until that point, the debt recovery process remains legally alive but procedurally paused, and the larger questions it raises for Nigeria’s credit system remain unanswered.

    Ultimately, credit markets survive on credibility, and that burden rests first with the borrower.

        Mayor writes from Abuja

  • Ex-judge lauds Fintiri for pardoning farmer sentenced to death

    Ex-judge lauds Fintiri for pardoning farmer sentenced to death

    In a resounding endorsement of executive compassion, Justice Alaba Omolaye-Ajileye (Rtd), a former High Court judge and visiting professor at the National Open University of Nigeria, has commended Adamawa State Governor Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri for granting a state pardon to Mr Sunday Jackson, a rural farmer who faced the death penalty for culpable homicide.

    He noted that the pardon, exercised as part of Christmas and New Year festivities, represents a rare invocation of the governor’s constitutional prerogative of mercy under Section 212 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    Justice Ajileye-Ajileye described it as “a luminous example of the true purpose for which the prerogative of mercy is vested in the executive arm of government”.

    He emphasised that it is “not ornamental, nor merely ceremonial, but a substantive constitutional safeguard designed to temper the rigours of the law with humanity, conscience, and equity.”

    Jackson’s protracted legal battle, documented as Sunday Jackson v. The State (2025) LPELR-80692, originated in the Adamawa State High Court.

    The rural farmer, lacking legal representation at critical early stages, was convicted of culpable homicide punishable by death following a violent confrontation linked to Nigeria’s pervasive farmer-herder crisis.

    Witnesses described a sudden altercation in a volatile area plagued by insecurity, where Jackson, a poor subsistence farmer, acted amid escalating tensions between agrarian communities and nomadic herders.

    The High Court’s death sentence was affirmed by the Court of Appeal. The case reached the Supreme Court, where a 4-1 majority upheld the conviction.

    Read Also: Top 10 Africa’s most powerful passports in January 2026

    However, Justice Helen Moronkeji Ogunwumiju, JSC, delivered a powerful dissent, explicitly urging clemency.

    “The appellant was ‘a proper candidate for the Governor of Adamawa State to exercise his prerogative of mercy,’” she wrote, highlighting doubts over whether Jackson’s actions constituted lawful self-defence rather than criminal intent.

    Justice Ajileye-Ajileye stressed the dissent’s gravity: “Surely, such language is neither casual nor customary. Justices of the Supreme Court do not lightly invite executive intervention.

    “When they do so, it is because they apprehend that the rigorous application of legal doctrine has produced an outcome that offends substantive justice.”

    The case has ignited national and international scrutiny. Human rights organisations, diplomatic missions, and advocacy groups raised alarms over its humanitarian dimensions, warning of damage to Nigeria’s global human rights profile.

    Locally, it fueled debates on death penalty application in non-premeditated cases, especially amid over 3,000 inmates on death row nationwide, per recent Amnesty International data.

    Intellectual discourse peaked at the Annual Criminal Law Review hosted by the Rule of Law Development Foundation (ROLF), coordinated by J.B. Daudu, SAN, former Nigerian Bar Association president.

    Justice Ajileye-Ajileye chaired a session where Jackson’s matter emerged as a “paradigm case for executive clemency.”

    Participants reached a “clear and unmistakable” consensus endorsing Justice Ogunwumiju’s plea, viewing the farmer’s plight, shaped by procedural lapses, evidential contingencies, and socio-economic vulnerabilities, as crying out for mercy.

    “The constitutional prerogative of mercy exists for precisely such cases, where the judicial process has reached its conclusion, yet profound questions of justice, humanity, and proportionality remain unresolved,” Justice Ajileye-Ajileye stated.

    He clarified that the pardon does not erode judicial authority: “It has demonstrated respect for the Court’s processes while acknowledging its internal division and responding to the conscience expressed in a powerful dissent.”

    Justice Ajileye-Ajileye warned that ignoring such judicial signals risks rendering mercy “merely symbolic,” underscoring the executive’s unique mandate to factor in “context, public policy, humanitarian considerations, and social justice.”

    In broader terms, the pardon addresses immediate inequities while advancing national interests.

    “The exercise of mercy by His Excellency has not only addressed the immediate injustice perceived in this case but also served the broader national interest by mitigating international concern, easing social tension, and reaffirming to the whole world, Nigeria’s commitment to balancing justice with compassion. “I commend His Excellency for this historic decision,” the retired judge said.