Author: The Nation

  • Erelu Fayemi at 60: It’s the humanitarian factor for me

    Erelu Fayemi at 60: It’s the humanitarian factor for me

    • By Olayinka Oyebode

    Purple is the colour today, no doubt, sixty is the milestone and joyful is the mood as friends, family members, associates and mentees as well as an army of beneficiaries of her generosity rise in unison to celebrate one of God’s gifts to humanity- Erelu Bisi Fayemi, the immediate past First Lady of Ekiti State and  Co-founder of the African Women’s Development Fund (AWDF), regarded as one the most impactful non for profit organisations, supporting women in the continent.

    I have many good reasons to join millions other well-wishers home and abroad to celebrate Erelu Bisi Fayemi on her day.  On a personal level, I am a testifier to her magnanimity, generosity of spirit and keen interest in uplifting other individuals and working hard to rally support, empower and raise the bar for women and the girl child.

    ‘Erelu Bam Bam’ or “Ochiorah” as she is fondly called by her numerous admirers, is many things to many people. But the main attribute of hers that stands out of the pack is her generosity of spirit. Apparently, she has milk of human kindness flowing through her veins. And for this, some call her ‘Mother General’. She also goes by the name ‘Yeye Atayese’. ‘Yeye Oba’. All these sobriquets speak to her royalty, the grace she wears like a garmenr, loyalty to good causes and penchant for supporting and lifting others.

    To these attributes of brilliance, kindness, thoroughness, thoughtfulness, decency and civility should be added a number of others, too numerous to be outlined in a short tribute such as this. There are for instance, such attributes as her frankness, firmness, wittiness, creativity, eye for details, her insatiable penchant for excellence, ability to bring out the best in people, and her love for art works.  Erelu Fayemi’s unmatched ability to mix freely with the lowly placed, the struggling and the mighty is a classical lesson in inter- personal relationship management. And quite remarkable is her simple way of turning up bold, brave, brainy and beautiful, decked in her favourite well styled ankara or lace materials, designer bags and top range jewellery. A prolific writer, historian, gender development advocate of repute, Erelu is at home with words. Words – creative words are the vital flavour that spice up her weekly newspaper column- ‘Loud Whispers’ and her Above Whispers.com blog. Her words, like Mother Teresa wrote, “leaves an endless echoes”. Her spoken words are inspiring, reassuring and possess therapeutic effect.

    In giving back to the society, Erelu has mastered the art of doing it effortlessly with focus on change and transformation that would be the portion of the benefitting individuals, groups or communities. This is because her motivation is anchored on the biblical injunction: “Love your neighbour as yourself”.   She is not just a woman of substance with a heart of gold, she is a humanitarian who has dedicated her life to the service of humanity. No one comes in contact with Erelu without a good story to tell. Even her most rabid critic readily admits this as well as her ability to use power and influence quite positively.

    My first encounter with Erelu Bisi Fayemi was on January 3, 2011 when I resumed in her office as her Special Assistant on Media, following my appointment by her husband, Dr Kayode Fayemi, then the Governor of Ekiti State. I had resumed with much enthusiasm at the Governor’s office that fateful morning only to be told that I had been re-assigned to the office of the Wife of Governor as her SA Media. The development dampened my spirit, having not had a prior working experience under a female boss. I quickly put calls across to a few friends and relations on the fate that had befallen me. Some pitied me, while some urged me to give it my best. I walked the 300 metres distance between the Governor’s office and the office of the Wife of Governor, with dejection. All that melted immediate I entered Her Excellency’s office.

    The one hour meeting with Erelu was all I needed to convince myself that I was in the right place at the right time with the right principal. The meeting turned out an interview cum motivational session. I left her office feeling some inches taller than I came in, armed with some tips on better work ethics, interpersonal skills, and a better estimation of myself as a media and public relations professional.

    “Your CV is quite impressive, and I have read some of your published works. I have no doubt you will go far if you remain steadfast”, she told me as she opened her diary and took me through her itinerary and work plan for the next three months. “Ise ti bere niyen (the work has started), she said with a smile as she handed me two books- my first gift from her. “You will find these books quite interesting”. What struck me most during our conversation was the fact she asked questions and showed genuine interest in my immediate and future plans, my family and my parents.

    Even though my stay in her office was just for six months, as I was promoted and redeployed back to the Governor’s office as the Chief Press Secretary; we however, forged a mother and son relationship that has seen her mentoring and nurturing me till date. Erelu remains one person I can call at anytime to seek her opinion or professional advice on any issue and would readily oblige me. And that goes for many people as she is ever willing and ready to go the extra mile just to make sure everybody around her feel good.  She is ever positive and receptive to ideas and even advice from younger people and subordinates, and gives credit to whom it is due, and does not fail to acknowledge, even seemingly inconsequential, gestures.

    Erelu’s love for fellow human beings, regardless of their social strata, is legendary. I remember the case of her personal photographer who just went on ‘AWOL’ a few days to a major event. The development caused some anxieties and we had to quickly arrange for a replacement. But when the guy resurfaced in the office some few months later and tendered an apology, Erelu welcomed him after listening to his “story”. Having given directive that the photographer should not be fired, she called me aside and explained to me how ‘crazy’ some highly talented people can be. Citing some of the great works the photographer had churned out, she said it was rather unfortunate he did not have the right grooming, just like many other talented fellows. She then threw a challenge at me that I should endeavour to provide the needed guidance to the photographer so he could make the best of his enormous talent. At another instance, I witnessed Erelu insisting that a committee I served on should pay what she considered a “just and fair” professional fee to a chap we hired to do a job. She was of the opinion that it would be unfair to pay a poor wage and expect excellent service delivery. Based on her insistence the chap got an upward review that positively impacted his life.

    There are legion other instances of Erelu championing and defending the rights of women and the girl child. She does this with her personal resources and institutionalises it through partnership with relevant organisations and development agencies. As First Lady in Ekiti State, she facilitated the multiple births Fund, which provides support for families that give birth to multiple births ( i.e twins, triplets etc). A few years back, she set up ‘The Wrapper Network’ an online mentoring and support program for over 4,000 young women.

    Born in Liverpool, England on June 11, 1963, Erelu Bisi Fayemi has a BA (1984) and MA (1988) in History from the University of Ife, Nigeria (now Obafemi Awolowo University). She also received an MA in Gender and Society (1992) from Middlesex University, UK.  She served as a United Nations Women Nigeria Senior Advisor (2017-2018) and is currently a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Africa Leadership Centre, King’s College, London. In 2000, she co-founded the African Women’s Development Fund, (AWDF) – the first Africa-wide grant-making foundation, which supports the work of organizations promoting women’s rights in Africa. Since it began grant-making in 2001, AWDF, based in Accra, Ghana, has supported over 3,000 women’s organisations in 42 African countries and the Middle East with millions of dollars in grants.

    Today, I join million others in singing a birthday song to this quintessential leader, celebrated teacher, writer, women rights advocate and global citizen, Erelu Bisi Fayemi. Sixty hearty cheers “Mother-General”!

    • Oyebode, is Special Adviser (Media) to Ekiti State Governor.
  • Subjugating subsidy scam? (Part 2)

    Subjugating subsidy scam? (Part 2)

    It is likely that virtually any discourse, debate or dialogue going on within Nigeria’s socio-economic and political contexts presently centres on the big elephant in the room – oil subsidy. This is a matter that affects the life of all Nigerians due to the multi-dimensional effects of gasoline (petrol) on the populace. The removal of oil subsidy touches on transportation, food, clothing, housing, logistics that will dictate and determine prices of goods and services within the economy, cost of governance, etc. It is both intriguing and interesting to consider certain facts, of recent, oozing out of the oil industry that are mind boggling. For instance, how do you juxtapose the present impasse on the sudden removal of oil subsidy with the recent discovery of the real rate of consumption? It has been unearthed that the supposed daily consumption of gasoline before the Tinubu’s administration’s recent withdrawal of subsidy was guesstimated at 69 million litres per day. However, in just one week, the daily consumption has ‘dwindled or dipped’ to 13 million litres per day! Poser: pray, where ‘went’ the 56 million litres? This depicts and displays the pervading cantankerous corruption inherent in the country’s oil industry spanning years? If our oil industry is likened to a human being suffering from this level of horrendous hemorrhage, she would have long been dead, buried and forgotten!

    It is high time followers (citizens) adjusted to new normal even as fuel queues have disappeared and gasoline consumption has drastically gone down, in towns and cities, nationwide. In essence, a household possessing five cars may need to reduce to two. This columnist is aware that much needs to be done to enhance our transportation system in our cities and towns to make it efficient and effective. In essence, the federal and state governments should prioritize proactive development of infrastructure, particularly investing more in roads, rails and water transportation; the latter specifically in our riverine areas. For instance, why should some citizens not travel or ferry their goods from Lagos to Ayetoro (Ondo), Warri or Calabar or Port Harcourt by water rather than by road? Someone once told this columnist that it takes less than one hour to traverse by water from Lagos to Warri, Delta State exploiting modern boats. Is that not worth exploiting since it is time saving and might be simultaneously economical? 

    Refineries: Read, Reflect and Respond

    Imagine these headlines from 2017 till 2023, and no litre of refined products from our government owned refineries:  “NNPC is intensifying efforts toward rehabilitation of refineries” – Ibe Kachikwu (December 2017)

    “FG begins rehabilitation of Port Harcourt Refineries” – Maikanti Baru (March 2019)

    “NNPC will begin full rehabilitation of Nigeria’s refineries by 2020″ – Mele Kyari

    “The sum of $5.8 billion was spent on rehabilitation of refineries between 2015 and 2020” – NNPC

    “Mele Kyari, Maikanti Baru spent $19 billion on Refineries Maintenance in 8 years” (8th June 2023)

    Dear esteemed readers: If you are a business man or woman reading and reflecting on the above lines, what will be your response? It is not just the immediate administration of Muhammad Buhari that was culpable but governments before it. Should we be investing impudently humongous amount of fund in seeming drain pipes referred to as refineries which are producing no refined oil? Will it not be sagacious to think in line with the tinkering of American business mogul and investor, Abigail Johnson, who once opined: “returns matter a lot. It’s our capital.” It is weird and worrisome that workers are being paid for services bereft of output or outcome: no return or value for money! Yours sincerely was a guest on TVC News Breakfast on Wednesday 31st May 2023. Fielding questions from one of the anchors regarding our irritating refineries, without minding whose ox is gored, I retorted rationally:

    “Our refineries should work, but I don’t know the magic wand the new government will put into our refineries to work … for the past 8 years of the Buhari’s administration, it is like you are putting in something and you are not getting anything out which any business man will not do; and with President Tinubu there as a financial engineer, I don’t think he will invest in such kind of moribund enterprise … Really while should we be producing crude, for crying out loud … year in year out, and carrying our crude out to a nation like Singapore that is not producing oil to refine … and bring back to us, and milking our economy? The present government should set a time frame to stop this oddity… it is a shame (sic)!” – John Ekundayo, TVC News Breakfast @ Wednesday 31st May 2023 (available on YouTube).

    In addition, the House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee on the state of refineries in Nigeria, to the chagrin of its members, discovered that after expending a humongous amount of N11.349 trillion to rehabilitate the nation’s refineries, apart from the fact that none is functioning, there were duplication of projects and double payments! Is that not tantamount to double tragedy for a country with a bleeding economy seemingly reeling on the verge of collapse? In surmising the matters relating to the ailing refineries, President Tinubu should within the wink of an eye set up a high-powered committee to be headed by the Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, to initiate and negotiate the selling off of the moribund refineries. This is the sagacious strategic step in arresting further hemorrhage of the economy whilst at the same time giving incentives to investors to invest in more refineries. Reforms promised should commence with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), etc. Moreover, the government should, acting within her acclaimed actionable plans of intervention (quoting presidential spokesman, Mr. Dele Alake), set a specific timeframe for prohibition of ferrying our crude oil outside Nigeria for refining. This timeframe should be made known for all Nigerians so that the followers can track the transparency and good intention of the government in this matter. Going this route will ensue, enlist and enhance the trust of the followers (citizens) in governance.

    Tangible and Timely Interventions

    It is a good development that there is an on-going parley of labour with the federal government. The President and his men had also interfaced with the marketers soliciting for their cooperation in the matter of subsidy removal and in a win-win situation; the NNPC is no longer the sole importer of refined oil as marketers can join the fray as well! This is cheering!! It is remarkable that President Bola Tinubu met with all the Governors, first his party’s and then all of them together in pushing for their support; there was a consensus or unanimity in siding with oil subsidy removal. The next parley between the labour unions (the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC)) comes up on 19th June 2023. Expectedly, the government team would be coming to the table with its offerings on what was tagged as interventions rather than palliatives, according to Mr. Dele Alake, spokesman on behalf of the team. Will the government earn the trust of the followers in justifiably dispensing the accrued savings from the oil subsidy removal into tangible and distinguishable deliverables in healthcare, infrastructure, education and power? This columnist will desire that a certain portion be applied proactively to agribusiness development countrywide as a means of diversifying the economy and enhancing our country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which will ultimately shore up the value of the local currency – Naira. Will more of the followers be engaged in economic ventures thus lowering the exacerbating unemployment rate through these interventions? Will the attendant expending of the resources garner from removal of oil subsidy impact positively in moving up the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) overtime, thus shoring up the value of the Naira? Over all, will the proposed interventions, when unveiled, meet with the expectations of the citizens in cushioning the current hardship encountered by them? It is interesting to note that two states – Kwara and Edo – have made a move in reducing working days from five to three within the week. Is this a productive move even though less money will be expended by workers in coming to the office while freeing up plenty of time for the workers? However, will the public service encumbrances allow for productivity of these public servants as it should? It is high time civil service rules were relaxed to allow government workers to be involved in productive ventures other than agro-allied. The extant rule is atavistic and archaic in this regard!

    Concluding Comments

    “The biggest risk of all is not taking one.” — Mellody Hobson, American business woman.

    President Bola Tinubu, sounding surefooted in his demeanour in his inauguration speech at Eagle Square coupled with events that followed days after, has exhibited and exemplified with candour that his administration will not just be kicking the can down the road but actually picking the can into the dustbin once and for all unlike previous administrations taking cognizance of knotty issues relating to oil subsidy removal. It is imperative on the part of the federal government to both ensure transparency and build citizens’ trust. One way to achieve this is to separate the gains from the subsidy removal into a separate or dedicated account with appropriate name tag, such as Subsidy Reinvestment Fund. The details of money going into the fund and how it is expended should be given monthly and widely published as well. Moreover, there should be proper application of monitoring, evaluation, accountability and learning (MEAL) systems to track the progress in order to ensure and enhance value is delivered for money expended. Experts in this area of development should be involved in the strategy execution in order to ensure that tangible outcomes dovetail to real and discernible impacts, over time. There should be a consensus between the federal and state governments the specific programmes and projects to channel this fund into that will impact followers within the polity. These social intervention programmes and projects should be published periodically state by state with detailed locations for MEAL and peer review purposes. Will the government be able to take the bull by the horns in disposing off the rotting refineries that are akin to horrendous hemorrhage knowing that in the words of Mellody Hobson, American business woman, and Chairman, of Starbucks: “the biggest risk of all is not taking one”. The coming weeks will depict the distinguishing stuff, if any, of Tinubuism – strategic leadership style of Tinubu to issues relating to governance of Nigeria. We are flowing and following along as courageous exemplary followers. Feedback to issues raised here is welcome and will be highly appreciated.

    • John Ekundayo, Ph.D. – can be reached via +2348030598267 (WhatsApp only) and drjmoekundayo@hotmail.com
  • IPMAN hails Tinubu for subsidy removal, tasks him on palliatives

    IPMAN hails Tinubu for subsidy removal, tasks him on palliatives

    The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), has commended President Bola Tinubu for subsidy removal and tasked him on palliatives for Nigerians.

    According to a report by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), Mr. Debo Ahmed, National President of IPMAN, said this while addressing newsmen in Abuja.

    Ahmed said that for a long time, IPMAN had been very supportive of the removal of fuel subsidy because of its implication on the economy and the market space.

    He added that a lot of money that should be channeled into the development of the country was used on subsidy.

    “I commend the president for removing subsidy on his first day in office. He has tried.

    “He did a very good job. The previous government found it difficult to remove subsidy.”

    According to Ahmed, not that they do not want to remove it because the political exigency is more than economic exigency to them.

    “If you remember, during President Olusegun Obasanjo’s time, they came with appropriate pricing, deregulation.

    “They gave it all sorts of names but they could not do it; Obasanjo was only increasing the price, you increase the price the thing is still there because we are importing.

    “So President Tinubu has done a good job and it is going to help this country a lot,” he said.

    Ahmed, however, said that the government needed to put palliatives package together for Nigerians because that was the area it was lacking.

    He said putting some palliatives in place that would ameliorate the sufferings of Nigerians and even the marketers would be helpful.

    “The government should have started planning about palliatives like the provision of buses, and salary increase because it is not the government that will increase salaries but the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC).

    ” All these things should have been done but the government did not do all these things. I am sure that the new government is doing something about palliatives.”

    Ahmed said there were other lingering issues that needed to be addressed.

    He said that before now, it was only Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) that was importing while all the marketers depended on NNPCL to get their products.

    “When the subsidy removal was announced, we had a lot of tickets that were pending.

    “We have up to N5 billion worth of tickets that are pending with NNPCL retail that we have not been able to access.

    “Most of these monies were borrowed from the banks and our members are not enthusiastic to go and load because they don’t know what happened to their tickets.

    ” We are trying to meet with the management of NNPC to discuss these issues amicably,” he said.

    According to Ahmed, IPMAN controls 70 percent of the market and the purpose of establishing IPMAN has been achieved.

    He said that with IPMAN units, it would be better for the country because it would be able to import more products and crash the price in the long run for the benefit of Nigerians.

    He said that IPMAN could do a lot to bring the prices of petroleum products down.

    He said that IPMAN was in a position to bring in a lot of products to make sure that the price dropped a little.

    “Since the market has been deregulated, a lot of people will bring in products and when the products come, the law of economics that is supply and demand will set it and certainly prices will go down.”

  • A big faith

    A big faith

    • The nation should emulate the open heart of Kaduna Muslims who paid ransom for abducted Christians

    Rare indeed that Christians could employ the word ransom in reference to anyone other than their saviour in heaven. But recently the word is uttered by Christian lips paying homage to a different meaning and applauding an unlikely group of people: Muslims.

    That is the cheering story from Kaduna State, precisely from Madala near Buruku in Chikun Local Government Area.  A group of Muslims in the community embraced harmony and advertised peace when they decided to pay ransom for Christians in their midst who were in the hands of kidnappers.

    They sacrificed their money and treasure to pay the hoodlums. They also bought motorcycles. The kidnappers often love money to buy weapons and motorcycles. Increasingly, the goons also make demands for motorcycles that they recalibrate to thrive on the rocky terrain of the north, including the forests.

    The number of ransomed Christians was 16, but about 40 of them were whisked away by the kidnappers during a Sunday church service at the Bege Baptist Church at Madala on May 7 this year. The number released were those who were left in the nest of the abductors. The others had escaped and probably had relatives and friends who had paid for their ransoms. The 16 represented the helpless and hopeless among the victims whose relatives or friends did not have the wherewithal to save them. This emphasized the power of the community to come to the rescue of the weakest among them. The abduction raised a lot of nervous fear in the land and reinforced suspicions that the Buhari administration’s vaunted fight against bandits was nowhere near a cheery place.

    The act of the Muslims bucks the trend of some of the triumphal rhetoric of quite a few Muslim bigots up north and the view of some Christians who make a blanket profiling of all Muslims as fanatics and bloodthirsty.

    The media did not play up this act of humanity and their disdain for sectarian impulse when their neighbours sulked in terror. But the Christians in that part of the country and Kaduna State are gushing with gratitude.

    The chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria, CAN, in Kaduna State, Rev John Hayab, said: “The Muslim community where the worshippers were abducted contributed money and bought a motorcycle as part of the ransom required for the release of their Christian brothers and sisters in captivity.

    “This goes to show good, caring and sincere neighbours that practically showed concern to the plight of their brothers and sisters that were abducted and their sincere wish that they return home to live together with them in peace and harmony.”

    It is not just a score for good neighborliness. It is not just a triumph for interfaith handshake. It is a moment of positive reckoning in a country that emerged from a fractious election in which many voted to reify their faith over and above the call of human togetherness.

    These men and women of kindness saw citizens, not tribe, humans not Christians, tolerance and not hate. When they saw Christians, they saw human first and appreciated the quality of human interaction without religious barriers. They have by their gestures shown to our divisive elite how a country of such multiple tribes and different faiths can live together.

    They gave their treasure, but they do not belong to a wealthy precinct. They have demonstrated that it takes sacrifice to work out peace in a community.

    Nor is this the first time we have witnessed a case of this sort. In 2018, we praised Imam Abdullahi Abubakar for his single-minded heroics of saving hundreds of fellow citizens in the rustic backwoods of Yelwa Gindi Akwati in Barkin Ladi Local Government Area in Plateau State. The village was under a bloody terror attack by unknown goons who were after Christians.

    Imam Abubakar hid the Christians in a mosque, but the worship place and its overflow could not contain the fleeing Christians, some of whom ran there from neighbouring villages.  The rest were hidden in rooms inside his compound. The gun-wielding criminals confronted the cleric who even stumbled in the rain as the goons stared menacingly at him before they brushed off. The Iman was justly rewarded with a national award during the Buhari administration.

    Before that, in 2014, a group of Muslims showed their love in December when they guarded a church in the same Kaduna State, this time in the main city itself, of Christian adherents during a Christmas carol service. They were at least 200 Muslims who had seen with horror the devastation and murderous onslaughts some of the bigots had made of their faith and of fellow humans. Pastor Yohanna Buru of the Christ Evangelical Church described it as an act of interfaith harmony.

    What the citizens of Buruku Chikin Local Government Area did with their treasure was a faith in humanity. We expect no less from the rest of us.

  • The emasculation of the Nigerian middle class

    The emasculation of the Nigerian middle class

    Emasculation is a brutal word or to put it more appropriately, it describes a brutal process, one which does not have a feminine equivalent because in practical terms it describes the removal of external genitalia. However, there does not have to be any violence in emasculation as it can be used figuratively to describe a process of depriving someone of a group of people of power; power with which to make or unmake. It is on this basis that it can be said that the Nigerian middle class has lost its relevance and has become effete. In plain physical terms the Nigerian middle class is in the intensive care unit and is well on its way to the mortuary.

    Humans by their biological character are social animals but they are no less so than a lot of other animals who depend on each other for individual survival. For social groups we need to look no further than the insects we see around us. A bee colony is a lesson in social engineering with the different classes of bees carrying out their naturally assigned duties all their lives and not only that, prepared to sacrifice themselves for the good of the colony should the need arise. The queen is at the centre of all activities in the hive and is given everything needed for her to produce every other member of the colony whilst only a few drones, perfect example of an emasculated group, are needed to provide the queen with the wherewithal to ensure the continued existence of the colony. Insects have been social animals for many million years and they have perfected this process. They are likely to be doing the same thing long after man would have vacated the premises that they have shared with other species.

    Man may be a social animal but the scope of their social interaction has for the most part been severely limited in that until about ten thousand years ago, the extent of their cohabitation was limited only to a few individuals who were constantly on the move trying to survive on what they could squeeze from the intolerance of niggardly nature. Their collective means of survival was very limited and some bands must have been wiped out by any of the numerous accidents of nature which was their misfortune to encounter along the way as they foraged for food and shelter on a more or less continuous basis. Life was hard, short and thoroughly miserable and the only thing in the favour of the early modern man was the spirit of togetherness which ensured that everyone in the group contributed in more or less equal terms to the continued survival of the group within which there simply was no room for any form of elitism not approved by age and experience.

    This picture of unremitting struggle changed dramatically when quite by accident, mankind discovered the science of agriculture and rather than roam around in a barely fruitful but continuous search for their means of livelihood, settled down in ever expanding groups to till the land and bring forth harvests in season; allowing them to have time for other occupations besides pitching themselves against the pitiless might of nature. Their farming activities allowed them to build up impressive stores of food to last them through from one planting season to the next. Man rose from the chaos of hunting and gathering to the paradise of surplus, marred only by the fact that they became vulnerable to those of their kind who insisted on hunting and gathering, many times gathering what they had not sown. These footloose nomads were in reality robbers who expropriated the result of the labours of farming communities which were forced to raise among them, those who were of a warlike nature to defend themselves from the robbers. In time, these defenders constituted themselves into a class which because of their might elevated themselves above the common people who had no choice but to comply with the wishes of their overlord who in due course elevated themselves to such heights that they claimed to have divine rights, to determine the workings of society. In that way, kings and royal dynasties were born to rule over other members of the communities. The king required courtiers and priests to shore up their authority and the nobility, who were a step down from royalty came into existence and helped to control the life and ambitions of those who lived in the shade of the kings and nobles. Other classes including common soldiers and traders were formed in order to ensure that society functioned firstly to the benefit of royalty, then the nobility and finally, the common toiling herd which carried the weight of society on their frail shoulders. Society almost everywhere adopted this system of governance and made it possible for human civilisation to puncture the darkness of primitive living and build complex physical structures such as the pyramids, sophisticated cities, ocean going vessels and other such items which promoted the ascent of man as a builder of human comfort.

    Like the bees and other insects, the various classes assumed their allotted places within society and for several millennia did not question the fairness or otherwise of the arrangement. Along the line however, some people challenged the system and in many cases forced a rethink such that kings lost their self proclaimed divine rights. As expected, the kings did not go quietly and in the famous case of King Charles I of England disputed his divine right against the Commons so strongly that he lost his royal head over the matter. It is ironic that Charles I had to lose his head in order for Charles III to be crowned king, albeit a much diminished king nearly four hundred years later. His brother king across the English Channel in France managed the situation so badly he not only lost his head , together with that of his wife and countless number of the nobility that what exists in France today is a republic, members of the royal houses and nobility having been guillotined out of existence.

    Every modern society is made up of different classes, each of them fulfilling a role which enhances the continued survival of any group of people. We have now more or less settled for three broad social strata; the ruling class, the middle class and the working class. The ruling class are those who for a variety of reasons do not have to do any work, principally because they use their enormous wealth to do all the work for them. Some of them are first  generation wealthy but a very significant percentage of them inherit both their money and their understanding of society from their parents and tend to marry other members of their class in order to keep everything within the group. People in this group are so rich that they are not bound by any moral scruples. In other words, they are amoral and practically above the law. Their education is incidental to their lifestyle and they are quite capable of committing murder and not have to worry about the consequences as long as the victim is not a member of their exalted class. They exist in virtually all societies and remind me of the story of a particularly debauched Aremo (Crown prince of the Oyo Empire) who is reported to have employed a porter to carry a particularly heavy load. As the poor man went along with the load on his head, his neck appeared to grow shorter. Noticing this, the prince wondered if his thick neck could be cut through with a sword. He decided to test his hypothesis, drew his sword from its sheath and with one hefty stroke deprived the man of his head. Satisfied with the result of his bloody experiment, the prince casually employed another porter who must have carried out his task with great trepidation fearing the descent of a sharp sword blade on his tortured neck with every step of the way.

    On the other end of the scale from the members of the ruling class are those who are described as belonging to the working class. These are people who depend on the work of their hands for their bare sustenance. They work for low wages and when they die, they leave very little to their children who in turn depend on the strength of their hands to make a living so that their poverty, like the riches of the members of the ruling class, is hereditary. The more talented members of this class struggle to get into the middle class and a significant number of them make the break through to give some encouragement to others in their group harbouring this ambition. Members of this class however labour against their origins and although they have a sense of what is good or bad, such is their struggle that they have no truck with morality and are described as being immoral. Because of this, prisons are brimming over with members of this class, especially since when they get in trouble with the law, they are not able to cough up the money with which they can hire clever lawyers who can extricate them from their predicament.

    Sandwiched between the ruling and working classes is the middle class, many of whose members  have climbed out of the working class on the basis of some talent, usually associated with education. A great many of them are the children of parents who are themselves native to this class and in common terms are said to have been born with some privileges of which the working class people can only dream about. Virtually all the members of the so called liberal professions; doctors, lawyers, engineers, university lecturers, senior civil servants, accountants and other such people are solidly middle class. They are the engine room of any successful community and are usually guided by the principles of moral behaviour. They are brought up with the message of decency, hard work and integrity ringing in their ears. They are not likely to be found in jail and are brought up to appreciate impressive family values. In others words they are the veritable salt of the earth.

    The above characteristics are associated with the middle class everywhere except Nigeria where too many members of the group behave like members of the corrupt working class or the amoral ruling class. They have acquired their middle class status through education but in Nigeria they have supervised the dismantling of the excellent primary school educational system bequeathed to them by the departed British colonialists. First, they set up primary schools for their pampered offspring. Not satisfied, they eviscerated the public secondary school system and paved the way for overly expensive secondary schools to which they send their children from the proceeds of corruption and from which some members of their class derive enormous profit. The universities which over the last fifty years produced most of the current members of the middle class are now in ruins following thirty years of criminal neglect and those that teach in them are now in danger of being expelled from the middle class unless of course they resort to self help bordering on criminality. It appears that there is a damaging civil war raging within this group as too many of them attempt to climb into the socially useless but dizzyingly wealthy ruling class, the members of which over the years have contrived to warehouse a great deal of the money that should be used for societal development. All that the Nigerian middle class has managed to do however is to subject itself to a process of self emasculation from which nobody in society can profit. And yet without a viable middle class, there is no way that Nigeria can make any meaningful progress.  

  • No to ‘novice’ ministers

    No to ‘novice’ ministers

    I remembered two of the many profound thoughts my former editor at The Punch, Mr Gbemiga Ogunleye shared in some past discussions when I read the report of the former Minister of Education, Mallam Adamu Adamu admitting that he only had a superficial knowledge of the Education sector when he was appointed in 2015.

    When we discussed some long-serving staff complaining of not being considered for some key appointments, Ogunleye noted that there is a difference between being qualified for a position and being competent to perform the role.

    The aggrieved staff, he said should not expect to get appointed just because they have been long in the service of the company. If they don’t have the required competence, they should be grateful they are still retained.

    The second point which is more relevant for the focus of this column is about how to compensate family members or people close to you when you are in a position to either hire or appoint people for vacant positions.

    While there may be nothing wrong in hiring one’s relatives the organisation one head, he said it’s wrong to give them positions they may not be competent for.

    For example, if you are the Managing Director of a bank and your brother is a good cleaner, don’t make him an Assistant Manager, make him or her the head of the cleaners at most.

    He will definitely not be able to perform the managerial role of a banker, but he or she will do better heading the cleaners.

    Considering the various requirements for appointing ministers, including the constitutional requirements and political considerations the President has to balance, it’s definitely not easy ensuring that all the ministries are manned by persons who are very knowledgeable about each sector.

    The federal cabinet is supposed to be composed of at least one minister each from the 36 states of the federation and the federal capital city, Abuja. Beyond competence, there are various interests to be considered and persons to be compensated for their roles in the election, while some ministries are regarded as more ‘juicy’ and prominent.

    It’s indeed tough for the President to decide who should be the right fit for any of the ministries, but as much as possible, the ministries should be manned by experienced and knowledgeable persons.

    Adamu is not the only minister who got appointed into ministries they didn’t know much about the issues they are supposed to superintend over. He should be commended for owning up. According to him, he was busy recommending suitable persons for appointment as ministers when he was appointed to a ministry he knew little or nothing about.

    Even when he suggested his replacement and that of others for the second term, President Muhammadu Buhari preferred to retain them. The Education Ministry is too strategic to have been experimented with as President Buhari opted to do considering that he would have been spoiled for choice if he wanted to have a minister with sufficient or relevant experience in the education sector.

    Based on the profiles of ministerial nominees, the public usually assumes who should be named for which ministries, but as usual, the assigned portfolios usually come as a surprise, except in a few cases like the Ministry of Health and Justice.

    While some appointees, as we have seen in the present and past cabinets have performed well in ministries they had no experience in the sector before, it’s better to appoint ministers based on their relevant academic and professional experience.

    There is no point in appointing ministers who have to start seeking experts to advise them on how to run the ministries they are assigned as Adamu had to do. How does the novice minister know if the advice he or she is given is the right one or not? It’s so easy for some civil servants to take advantage of the ignorance of ministers who only have a superficial knowledge of what they are supposed to do as has been the case.

    As we get ready for the new administration, President Bola Tinubu should do his best to ensure that we have the right persons manning the ministries and other positions.

  • 30 years gone!

    30 years gone!

    • June 12: the good, the bad and the ugly

    It is incredible that it is already 30 years since the June 12, 1993 presidential election that the then self-styled President, General Ibrahim Babangida, annulled. It is incredible. Whenever I remember the June 12 struggle, it is as if I am watching a movie. It is incredible that what transpired in Nigeria that culminated in the crisis could ever have happened in a country that was supposed to be the ‘Giant of Africa’. And only 30 years before. While the script was playing out, I kept asking myself if this was for real because it is the kind of thing that happens when a country has leaders who, like the proverbial greedy fly, would always follow dead bodies to the grave. Africa has a surfeit of such flies that eventually get interred with the bones.

    Thirty years since June 12, 1993, we need to tell and retell the story of that unforgettable experience, especially as most of our children did not have the benefit of the study of History between 2007 and 2019. We must keep stressing the importance of History because even the developed nations don’t joke with the subject. You must know where you are coming from so as to be able to chart the appropriate way to where you are going. Although the immediate past President Muhammadu Buhari reversed the ban in 2019 and restored History as a stand-alone subject in our schools, enough harm had been done. I felt sufficiently embarrassed when some years ago, a student in Ikenne, Ogun State, the home town of the Late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, was asked whether he knew Chief Awolowo. He said no; that the only Obafemi he knew was Obafemi Martins! This is how potentially damaging the deleting of History from our curriculum could be.

    Babangida began the June 12 shenanigans. When he came to power on August 27, 1985, he came with infectious smiles that swept Nigerians off their feet. The Buhari/Idiagbon regime that he overthrew had started to show traces of intolerance and dictatorship. It introduced some draconian measures, including the infamous Decree 4 of 1984 which punished journalists for non-patronising reports, and another decree which took effect retroactively, leading to the execution for drug trafficking, of three Nigerians, Bernard Ogedengbe (29), Bartholomew Azubike Owoh (26) and Lawal Ojuolape (30).

    So, when Babangida and Co. came, they were well received by Nigerians who heaved a sigh of relief that an end had finally come to the Buhari/Idiagbon dictatorship which itself sacked the Second Republic administration of Alhaji Shehu Shagari on December 31, 1983.

    Babangida legalised the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and National Republican Convention (NRC) in 1989 and asked Nigerians to queue behind either. Parliamentary election went ahead as planned in 1992 with Option A4 voting process. SDP won majorities in both houses of the National Assembly. It was the presidential election that later became problematic, thus fuelling speculation that what IBB, as Babangida is popularly called, wanted if he must leave power was at worst dyarchical system of government that he would head. It was in the process of arriving at ‘wuruwuru’ to this answer that Babangida kept on banning and unbanning politicians until the June 12, 1993 election was held.

    The election, won by the Late Bashorun Moshood Kashimawo Abiola of the SDP went peacefully contrary to the expectation of Babangida and some of his fellow sit-tight officers. Like the 2023 presidential election, the election was won on a Muslim-Muslim ticket. Abiola and his vice presidential candidate, Babagana Kingibe, defeated Alhaji Bashir Tofa and his vice, Sylvester Ugoh of the NRC with about 2.3million votes even though the results had not been formally declared when Babangida came on national television bouncing like someone possessed and high on something, to confirm that he had annulled the election.

    This was an election which both local and foreign observers had declared the freest and fairest in Nigeria’s history. It was peaceful too because the politicians and Nigerians generally had started seeing the handwriting on the wall that Babangida was not prepared to go. So they comported themselves so as not to give the dictator an opportunity to stay beyond his self-appointed August 26, 1993 exit date.

    That was the beginning of the June 12 crisis that shook the country to its very foundation.

    What gladdens my heart however was the fact that Nigerians gave it to the military adventurists. Even when they gave themselves exit dates that they thought would never come, they were not honourable enough to honour their own words when the self-imposed dates came. They wanted to sit tight like their counterparts in other parts of Africa and the rest of the Third World. But, trust Nigerians, they gave them a good fight for their bullets.

    When the heat became too much for the gap-toothed General, he hurriedly ‘stepped aside’, as he called it, despite his initial grandstanding that he would not be stampeded out of power. Anyone who saw his confused state on August 26, 1993 would know that he left in a hurry, unprepared. We all saw on television how he was prevented from returning to his seat as president immediately after he had told the world that he was ‘stepping aside’.

    And, as if to bring his ‘prophecy’ of ‘stepping aside’ to come to pass, IBB attempted to return to power twice, in 2006 and 2010 when he collected the presidential nomination forms of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) but saw his chances were low on both occasions and withdrew.

    But Babangida did not leave without putting in place a contraption that he called Interim National Government (ING) headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan, an Egba man from Abeokuta, Abiola’s home town, to pacify the Yoruba that at least one of their own had been given power. But the Yoruba did not see Shonekan as Abiola; so, it was like; if it was not Abiola, it cannot be the same as Abiola. Shonekan did not enjoy the office one bit as protests resumed, especially in the southwest, with people insisting that the June 12, 1993 election results be validated.

    By November 17, 1993, barely three months after the ING was inaugurated, General Sani Abacha who had been waiting in the wings shoved it aside and assumed power  as head of state.  Still, this did not stop the June 12 protests. People, including policemen were killed, major markets, shops, banks and other businesses were shut while looters broke into several shops. June 12 it was that made Nigerians know how powerful the National Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG) was, with its then leader, Frank Kokori, calling the shots and shutting down the country several times in its show of solidarity with the June 12 cause.

    This was the situation in the country, particularly in the southwest, for months. Nigeria was literally grounded.

    Abacha was eventually taken out of the equation by death, the ultimate leveller, on June 8, 1998, and buried same day according to Muslim tradition. The fact that no autopsy was performed on him as well as the fact that Abiola himself died about a month later, precisely on July 7, 1998, fuelled speculation that they may both have been assassinated as a way out of the June 12 logjam. Other prominent Nigerians, including Kudirat Abiola, Abiola’s wife; Pa Alfred Rewane, a major financier of the struggle, were killed by agents of the Abacha government.

    Students in tertiary institutions, workers, despite the betrayal by the then leadership of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), and virtually every segment of the society participated in the struggle. Prominent individuals, including military generals who believed in the cause of the June 12 struggle joined forces with civilians to push the military out of power. Some of these, including Nobel laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka, the incumbent President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the late Rear Admiral Ndubuisi Kanu, Gen. Alani Akinrinade, Kokori, the Late Pa Rewane, Chief Ayo Adebanjo, Chief Ayo Opadokun, Prof Bolaji Akinyemi, Dr Kayode Fayemi, among others, came together to form the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), which became a thorn in the flesh of the military. Some members of the coalition were arrested; others fled into exile. A guerilla radio station, Radio Kudirat, came handy for the project.

    The media also stood behind the people but paid a huge price for their stance. Babangida banned The Punch, National Concord and The Guardian for over one year, over the struggle. Other vocal media outfits suffered a similar fate. When Abacha came, he, in his desperate move to legitimise his government de-proscribed them only to ban them again when he saw they were not ready to renounce their position on June 12.

    The military taught the Nigerian press underground journalism as they banned and unbanned the critical private newspapers and chased the vibrant magazines out of town. I remember how we suddenly metamorphosed from being publisher of The Punch to publisher of an emergency magazine, and later producer of ‘Write-On’ exercise books in order to stay afloat.  I had told the story of my little contribution to the struggle last Sunday on this page and I feel privileged to have been part of that struggle. It was indeed an experience.

    Sadly, no government listened to Nigerians’ cries for recognition of June 12 as a watershed in the country’s history, at least not until the immediate past President Muhammadu Buhari did in 2018. Buhari it was, who in that year said from 2019, Democracy Day should be marked on June 12 every year in honour of Abiola, instead of May 29 that the military finally handed over. He awarded the business mogul the highest national honour, the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) and Kingibe, as well as the late human rights activist, Chief Gani Fawehinmi, the second highest national honour, the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON). He also declared the day work-free.

    Unfortunately, the way things are in the country today, we can only mark, not celebrate the 30th anniversary of June 12 tomorrow. It is an occasion for sober reflections, especially on the part of those of us who witnessed or participated in the watershed one way or the other. Those who read me last Sunday must have understood the reason I expressed regret that majorly, it is those with little or no value to our democratic struggle that hijacked the democratic space as soon as we drove away the soldiers.

    They would also understand why I referred to President Tinubu as ‘omo oninkan’ (the child of the owner). He was a dogged NADECO fighter. He knew we had to send the military away from government houses so we can have a better Nigeria. Having paid such a huge price that he and other patriotic Nigerians paid for this democracy, he cannot afford to fail. Ceteris paribus.

  • SMEs  in Nigeria get boost

    SMEs in Nigeria get boost

    As part of its Africa-wide commemoration of Deloitte’s Volunteer Day, Deloitte Nigeria organized a Business Clinic to support small and medium-sized businesses across Nigeria.

    The event, which was held at the Deloitte Head Office in Lagos, was an opportunity for Deloitte experts to provide guidance on key areas such as tax advisory, financial management, growth, and market strategy.

    The event had in attendance FATE Foundation, who delivered a Masterclass on “The Nigerian Enterprise Ecosystem: Challenges and Opportunities for MSMEs”.

    In his opening remarks, Fatai Folarin, the Chief Executive Officer of Deloitte West Africa, emphasized the importance of supporting SMEs, which contribute significantly to Nigeria’s GDP and are critical to growth. He highlighted the importance of creating an enabling environment in which SMEs can thrive and build world-class businesses both within the country and around the world.

    Deloitte West Africa Chief Sustainability Officer, Abena Biney, said: “Our goal for the Business Clinic is simple: to provide mentorship and training sessions tailored specifically for small business owners.”

    We want to provide all the SMEs in attendance with the skills they need to effectively manage their businesses and propel them to new heights.

  • Collaboration on Nigerian food export will boost global recognition – Obasanjo

    Collaboration on Nigerian food export will boost global recognition – Obasanjo

    The Executive Director, Marketing and Development, Obasanjo Farms Nigeria Ltd, Mr Oludayo Obasanjo, has advocated the promotion of Nigerian foods globally, through planned efforts by all stakeholders.

    Obasanjo said this at the annual programme of the Nigerian Institute of Food Science and Technology, Lagos Chapter, 9th Regional Food Science and Technology Submit, NIFST Day celebration.

    Obasanjo said this could be achieved by highlighting the unique qualities and health benefits of Nigerian foods.

    He said repositioning Nigerian foods for global accessibility requires patriotism from the government, individuals and stakeholders.

    He cited the population of Nigeria with more than 200 million people, as an advantage and a desirable destination for many manufacturers in the world.

    He also said Nigeria must leverage this strength to improve local production to meet demands for food as well as exports to other countries.

    “Nigerian foods are diverse and rich with a variety of traditional dishes that are both healthy and delicious.

    “However, Nigerian foods are not well known globally like Chinese or Indian foods.

    “Nigeria has a large population in the diaspora, our exports to the United States and Europe can begin with Nigerians and other Africans as target consumers,” he said.

    He said that it was also saddening that the little exports the country managed to send out were being rejected.

    He stated that the recent National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control‘s (NAFDAC) revelation that more than 70 percent of food exported from Nigeria was rejected abroad, amounts to a great loss to the country, and urged the food sector to wake up and be more efficient, noting that even the minimally processed foods such as chicken were still being smuggled into the country.

  • Advocacy group calls on FG to reduce trade production of plastics

    Advocacy group calls on FG to reduce trade production of plastics

    The Centre for Earth Work in partnership with other advocacy groups has called on the federal government to reduce trade production use of plastics as they affect health and food systems.

    The team leader of the advocacy group, Benson Dotun Fasanya made this call at the plastic treaty briefing which includes other advocacy groups like the Global Alliance for Incarcerator Alternative, Center for Earth Work, Community Development Advocacy Foundation, Green Knowledge Foundation, Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria/ Era/FOeN in Abuja, lamenting that plastic fragments release toxic chemicals into the body and posing as a threat to the planet and biodiversity.

    He warned that Nigerian women suffer the most from this plastic waste considering the fact that their biological bodies react in different ways. The use of these plastic products in their tampons and pads equally puts them at risk of breast cancer and affects their unborn children in the case of pregnant women.

    Ubrei-Joe, Director Environmental Rights Action, Friends of the Earth Nigeria said transport, energy, and agriculture are the sectors most often blamed for climate change, stating that the rapid increase in plastic usage has an extensive effect on climate change as plastic production is one of the largest and fastest-growing contributors to these emissions.

    Ubrei noted that advocating for a plastic treaty and ending the Nigerian plastic tsunami is an instrument that presents the country with the opportunity to reduce plastic production, eradicate toxic substances in plastic, exclude false solutions like incineration, scale up zero waste solutions such as reuse, and centre a just transition for waste pickers and other groups as the Frontline of the crisis.