Author: The Nation

  • Keyamo: petitions hearing can’t end before May 29

    Keyamo: petitions hearing can’t end before May 29

    Those calling for the determination of presidential election petitions before May 29 are “plainly ignorant or crassly mischievous,”  Minister of State for Labour and Employment  Festus Keyamo has said.

    Keyamo, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), argued that for such to happen, an amendment to some sections of the Constitution and court rules must be undertaken.

    “In the future, it is possible to amend our laws and rules of court to accommodate such an idea, but it is clearly impossible under our present circumstances,” he explained in a statement yesterday.

    In Keyamo’s view, it is not in the opposition parties’ interest for their petitions against the victory of President-elect Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) to be rushed.

    If that happens, he argued, the cases of Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)   and  Peter Obi  of the Labour Party(LP) before the Presidential Elections Petitions Tribunal  could be destroyed because “justice rushed is justice crushed.”

    Atiku and  Obi are seeking to overturn the victory of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in the February 25 presidential poll at the tribunal.

    The tribunal will today begin a pre-trial conference today.  It has 180 days to complete the task. The appeal will last 60 days.

    Keyamo argued in the statement that those who call for the conclusion of the cases before the May 29  inauguration date “do not realise that they are, in fact doing great harm to the cases of the petitioners.

    “It is the petitioners that need more  time to prove their cases and not necessarily the defendants,” he said in the statement titled: “ Those calling for a quick determination of election petitions before May 29 under our present laws actually want to destroy the cases of petitioners.”

    The statement reads partly: “Those calling for the determination of the election petitions before the swearing-in ceremonies on May 29t  under our present electoral laws and Rules of Court and/or procedure are either plainly ignorant or crassly mischievous.

    “They do not realise that they are, in fact doing great harm to the cases of the petitioners. It is the petitioners that need more time to prove their cases and not necessarily the defendants.

    “That is why the petitioners are given 21 days to file and the defendants have 14 days to respond. And the petitioners have a further seven days to reply, making a total of 30 days as against the 14 days of the respondents.

    Read Also: Keyamo, Melaye fault Obasanjo’s endorsement of Obi

    “It follows that in leading evidence in court/tribunal in support of the petitions, the Petitioners would also take more time. It is more arduous to prove an election petition than to defend it.

    “If these characters say a single point (let’s say the FCT 25 per cent storm-in-a-teacup issue) should be set down for determination immediately, would the Petitioners’ lawyers agree to withdraw and abandon all other issues raised in their petition and proceed only with that issue? Will they take that risk?

    “Ask them privately. They know better. This is because the rules of election petitions do not allow petitioners to prove their cases piecemeal.”

    The senior lawyer added that a petitioner cannot pursue a single point up to the Supreme Court and after losing, return to the tribunal or court and say he wants to now prove other aspects of the case.

    He said: “Even that single point alone cannot be determined by the Supreme Court before May 29  because of the time given by the rules for parties to file their notices of appeal and exchange their briefs.

    “It is indeed only the respondent that can raise a preliminary objection that can determine the petition in limine (that is, at the threshold). Even at that, the rules allow the court/tribunal to take the objection together with the Petition itself and give one judgment at the end in order to save time.

    “So, this is free advice to the advocates of pre-May 29th determination of the election petitions: they are doing the cases of their principals (the petitioners) great harm. They should realise that just as we say ‘justice delayed is justice denied’, we also say ‘justice rushed is justice crushed.”

  • Max Air plane makes emergency landing in Abuja

    Max Air plane makes emergency landing in Abuja

    There was panic yesterday evening, following the emergency landing of a Boeing 737 aircraft belonging to Max Air at the runway of Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja. The aircraft blocked the runway for many hours.

    The emergency landing, around 2.50pm, according to officials of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), was due to a burst tyre suffered by the aircraft.

    The officials said other aircraft could not land at the runway because airplane, forcing FAAN to close it for some hours.

    The officials said since the aircraft made the emergency landing, the airport authority and other agencies, despite the heavy downpour, doubled efforts to evacuate the passengers and their luggage.

    However, the airport, which was closed, was reopened for flights at 8.50pm after the incident aircraft was removed around 8.30pm, the facility cleared and certified for flight by NCAA inspectors.

    An official said the aircraft was towed out of the runway before it was reopened for normal flight activities.

    He said FAAN and other agencies deployed heavy duty equipment to clear the runway to enable other airplanes utilise the facility.

    Confirming the incident, Acting General Manager, Corporate Affairs, FAAN, Mrs Faithful Hope Ivbaze said the authority scaled up efforts to ensure the runway was put to use as soon as the Max Air aircraft was removed.

    She said: “There was no crash landing of any aircraft in Abuja Airport. What happened was an emergency landing involving a Max Air aircraft. There was no harm to the passengers on board. They have all been evacuated. We are speeding up efforts to remove the aircraft from the runway, so that the airport could reopen to normal flights.”

    Sources at the airport said that the Max Air aircraft had arrived from Yola, Adamawa State, when the incident happened.

    The source said immediately the tyre burst after landing, officials of Aerodrome Rescue and Fire-fighting Service (ARFFS)  at the airport were swiftly mobilised to handle the situation.

    A passenger who was onboard the aircraft said: “We thank God. We are still on the runway and the pilot briefed us on the development.

     ”The pilot called for the stairs and we are now disembarking from the runway to be evacuated to the airport building at the arrival hall.

    “We bless God because we had witnessed the pull out of the tyre right from the airport in Yola and we went into a prayer session.”

    Read Also: Air Peace makes history, orders 10 brand new 737 MAX planes

    He expressed gratitude to God for the safety of the 144 passengers and six crew members.

    The passenger said the airline would officially inform the appropriate authorities to carry out an investigation into the incident.

    The management of Mar Air confirmed that its flight experienced tyre burst during landing.

    The airline on its official Twitter page @MaxAirLtd posted: “On May 7th, 2023, a Max Air flight with 143 passengers and one infant on board, departing from Yola at around 14:05, was scheduled to arrive in Abuja at 15:00.

    “However, the aircraft experienced two tire bursts on landing in Abuja, and the emergency response team quickly responded at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport.

    “We are pleased to report that all passengers and crew on board the aircraft are safe and sound.

    “The airline has taken all necessary steps to ensure that the passengers are comfortable and are being taken care of during this time.

    “They have been conveyed to the arrival terminal with their luggage and belongings. The aircraft tires are being replaced and the aircraft will taxi to the ramp for further investigations before being released for future flights.

    “Max Air is committed to providing safe and reliable air travel to all its passengers. We thank all the passengers for their patience and understanding of what transpired.

    “The airline would like to extend its appreciation to the airport authorities, emergency services, and all relevant agencies who responded promptly and professionally to ensure the safety of all passengers and crew on board.

    “Max Air will continue to provide updates on the situation as more information becomes available.”

    Following the incident, Air Peace Airline announced the cancellation of eight of its flight due to the closure of the runway.

    The notice which was signed by the management of the airline was posted on its official Twitter page @flyairpeace.

    It reads: “Dear Esteemed Customers, the following flights have been, regrettably, canceled due to Abuja runway closure caused by another airline’s aircraft that got stuck on the runway.

    “Owerri-Abuja 14:20hrs, Abuja-Owerri 16:00hrs, Abuja-Benin 15:45hrs, Calabar-Abuja 14:40hrs, Abuja-Calabar 16:10hrs.”

    Benin-Abuja 16:20hrs, Abuja-Owerri 14:40hrs, and Warri-Lagos 16:20.

    “The runway closure has also led to the delay of other flights into and out of Abuja. We empathise with passengers affected and seek their understanding and cooperation.”

    For more information on flight schedules and other customer-related concerns, the airline asked customers to contact it via callcenter@flyairpeace.com.

  • Dangote Refinery for inauguration May 22

    Dangote Refinery for inauguration May 22

    President Muhammadu Buhari will inaugurate the Dangote Refinery on May 22.

    Special Assistant to the President on Digital Communications, Bashir Ahmad, stated this yesterday.

    He tweeted: “Efforts by the Federal Government to make Nigeria self-sufficient in local refining of crude oil and save the scarce foreign exchange used in the importation of petroleum products have received a boost.

    “The 650,000 barrels per day Dangote Refinery, the world’s largest single-train refinery, is set for inauguration on May 22nd, 2023, by President Muhammadu Buhari.”

    General Manager, Corporate Communications at the Dangote Group, Sunday Esan, told The Nation that invitations have been sent out for the event.

    Dangote Oil Refinery is a 650,000 barrels per day (BPD) integrated refinery project in the Lekki Free Zone near Lagos. 

    Read Also: Fed Govt expects Dangote Refinery to start Q1, 2023

    It is expected to be Africa’s biggest oil refinery and the world’s biggest single-train facility.

    The Pipeline Infrastructure at the Dangote Petroleum Refinery is the largest anywhere in the world, with 1,100 kilometres to handle three billion standard cubic feet of gas per day.

    The Refinery alone has a 435MW Power Plant that can meet the total power requirement of Ibadan DisCo.

    The Refinery will meet 100 per cent of the Nigerian requirement of all refined products and also have a surplus of each of these products for export.

    It is a multi-billion dollar project that will create a market for $21 Billion per annum of Nigerian crude.

    The refinery is designed to process Nigeria’s and other crude.

  • ‘Govts are major debtors to DisCos’

    ‘Govts are major debtors to DisCos’

    The Senate Committee on Power has named state governments, military formations and educational institutions among those owing electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos) huge debts for power consumed.

    Chairman of the Committee, Senator Gabriel Suswam stated this during an interactive session with the Minister of State for Power, Abubakar Aliyu, an engineer, and heads of power agencies in Abuja.

    The Federal Government claimed that electricity tariffs  are the cheapest compared to other countries in the West African sub-region.

    It also claimed that Nigeria has the highest rate of defaulting electricity consumers in terms of paying for power consumed.

    The Minister of State for Power, Engineer Aliyu, made these assertions in his submission during the session.

    He further added that electricity is highly subsidized in Nigeria by the Federal Government which made its cost, to be cheapest across the globe.

    He backed up his claim by making comparative analysis of cost of electricity in Nigeria with those of neighbouring countries.

    “Cost of electricity in Nigeria is the cheapest across the globe, particularly gas to power, which is highly subsidized.

    “For example, while cost of electricity in Nigeria is 15 cent per kilowatt, it is 42 cent in Niger Republic, 23 cent in Republic of Benin, 25 cent in Mali, 28 cent in Senegal, 27 cent in Burkina Faso etc,” he said.

    He however lamented that while government is doing everything possible to make electricity affordable and available to Nigerians, many of the ordinary consumers and even critical agencies of government, often neglect to pay their bills.

    On his part, the Managing Director of Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN), Engineer Sulyman Abdulaziz, said high rate of defaults on electricity bills by critical government agencies led to disconnection of Electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos) in Kaduna and Kano from the National grid  recently.

    He added that though they have been temporarily reconnected but they must make  payment through the affected DisCos to TCN within the 60 days period of grace given.

    As a way out of the problem, Chairman of the Committee, Senator Suswam and other members like Senators Adamu Aliero and Yusuf Abubakar Yusuf, suggested that electricity bills of such agencies be deducted at source by the  Ministry of Finance.

    According to Senator Suswam, one of the complaints made by the DisCos, particularly in Kaduna and Kano, is the huge debt incurred by them from electricity bills payment defaulters.

    “The DisCos in their written complaint specifically mentioned military formations across the country,  educational institutions, State Governments, among others,” he said.

  • IMF urges Nigeria, others to take over Russia’s oil market in Europe

    IMF urges Nigeria, others to take over Russia’s oil market in Europe

      

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has advised Nigeria and other commodities-producing countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to seize Russia’s energy market in Europe.

    Geo-political tension persists as the Russia/Ukraine war continues after one year of military attacks.

    Europe and the West have isolated Russia, which they considered as the aggressor in the war.

    Russia is under economic sanctions, including non-purchase of oil and other commodities from the country.

    The most significant potential of the market takeover lies with established exporters, and countries with available facilities like Nigeria, Angola, and Ghana, among others.

    Nigeria’s oil production is about 1.3 million barrels per day; Angola’s oil production is 1.1 million barrels per day; Ghana’s oil production is about 420,000 barrels per day.

    In a report titled: Geopolitical Divisions Threaten Growth, IMF economists Qianqian Zhang and Ivanova Reyes said commodity exporters in the region could potentially displace much of Russia’s energy market share in Europe.

    The IMF said the countries could rely on trade promotion agencies to help identify potential opportunities, build the necessary skills and capacity for exports, and eventually re-orient production to take advantage of new trade flows. “Improving the business environment, such as by lowering entry, regulatory, and tax barriers could also help,” the Fund said.

    “What the exact outcomes will be from fragmentation and polarization, and whether these trends will continue are uncertain. What is clear, however, is multilateral institutions will need to continue to facilitate dialogue among nations to promote economic integration and cooperation,” it added.

    The IMF said economic growth in Sub-Saharan African economies could permanently decline including a $10 billion loss of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) if geopolitical tensions escalate.

    It said economic and trade alliances with new economic partners, predominantly China, have benefited the region but have also made countries reliant on imports of food and energy more susceptible to global shocks, including disruptions from the surge in trade restrictions following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

    The IMF said sub-Saharan Africa stands to lose the most if the world splits into two isolated trading blocs centred around China or the United States and the European Union.

    These losses could be compounded if geopolitical tensions cut off capital flows between trade blocs, with the region losing about $10 billion in foreign direct investment and official development assistance.

    “Economic and trade alliances with new economic partners, predominantly China, have benefited the region but have also made countries reliant on imports of food and energy more susceptible to global shocks.

    “If geopolitical tensions were to escalate, countries could be hit by higher import prices or even lose access to key export markets—about half of the region’s value of international trade could be impacted.

    IMF said the reduction in FDI, in the long run, could also hinder much-needed technology transfer. It added that for countries looking to restructure their debt, deepening geo-economic fragmen­tation could also worsen coordination problems among creditors.

    Read Also: Russia’s cut may boost Nigeria, others’ oil revenue

    IMF said if geopolitical tensions were to escalate, countries could be hit by higher import prices or even lose access to key export markets—about half of the region’s value of international trade could be impacted.

    “The losses could be compounded if capital flows between trade blocs were cut off due to geopolitical tensions. The region could lose an estimated $10 billion of foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development assistance inflows, which is about half a per cent of GDP a year (based on an average 2017–19 estimate),” the report stated.

    The Fund said countries will need to build resilience to manage the inevitable shifts in trade and foreign direct investment.

    It said that in this severe scenario, sub-Saharan African economies could experience a permanent decline of up to four per cent of real gross domestic product after 10 years—losses larger than what many countries experienced during the Global Financial Crisis.

    The IMF advised that to better manage shocks, countries need to build resilience. 

    This, it said, can be done by strengthening the ongoing regional trade integration under the African Continental Free Trade Area, which will require reducing tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, strengthening efficiency in customs, leveraging digitalization, and closing the infrastructure gaps.

    Also, deepening domestic financial markets can also broaden sources of financing and lower the volatility associated with relying too much on foreign inflows.

    The IMF advised that to take advantage of the potential shifts in trade and FDI flows, countries in the region can try to identify and nurture sectors that may benefit from trade diversion, for example, in energy.

  • Sudan crisis: Fed Govt warns against self-evacuation

    Sudan crisis: Fed Govt warns against self-evacuation

    • ‘No more Nigerians left at Egyptian border’
    • Fourth batch of 834 citizens back

    Nigerians in Sudan should not self-evacuate to the Egyptian border, the Federal Government warned yesterday.

    It said the border crossing between both countries was dangerous because of the war.

    The Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development, Dr. Nasir Sani-Gwarzo, stated this while receiving 834 evacuees from Egypt and Port Sudan.

    He said there were no more Nigerians left at the Egyptian border as they had all been airlifted, adding that the focus had now shifted to the Nigerians at Port Sudan.

    Sani-Gwarzo said the government was prepared to evacuate anyone that indicates interest rather than going to the Egyptian border all alone.

    He said: “They will not meet anybody because it is not the normal border situation. You don’t go there on your own. It’s a border that has three crossings.

    “You exit from Sudan and this costs eight dollars. Then enter Egypt and pay an entry fee of $25 per person. Then you ride on the Nile River, which is a one-and-a-half-hour journey. The entire bus enters a ferry and it takes the entire bus across.

    “So, it’s not a normal border crossing that you just walk to that place and find yourself stranded. You have to be taken there in the first place. We do not have any fears about that. The information we have sent out to everybody who still needs to be evacuated is to proceed to Port Sudan.”

    He also explained that the luggage of some of the evacuees was impounded by bus drivers, who were demanding additional charges for the extra days they spent on the road to Egypt.

    He, however, assured that the money had been paid and the impounded luggage had been released.

    Sani-Gwarzo said: “The rumour you had that they kept your luggage because money was not paid is not true. It is because even after paying the money, they charged us what they call ‘garama’.

    “We made an agreement and hired vehicles to bring them to the border and we paid for that but they (bus drivers) said they spent an additional 10 to 11 days waiting. So they charged additional penalties per day, per bus, and we had to pay for them. For each day that the bus stayed with the evacuees, they kept increasing the charges and that is what caused the delay. We concluded everything a few days ago, we paid them and they released the impounded luggage.

    “Those buses have returned the luggage and they have now been brought back in the two aircraft. So you will wait and receive all your luggage and by the grace of God none of them is going to be affected.”

    On the numbers that came, he said: “I am happy to announce that 834 persons have arrived from the Egyptian border and Port Sudan. Azman Air brought in 322 persons, Max Air brought in 410 and 102 from Port Sudan.”

    The Nation reports that this brings to 1,471 Nigerians that have been evacuated from Sudan since the last Wednesday.

    Giving an update on those still waiting to be airlifted, he said: “No single Nigerian currently is at the Egyptian border. We have completely concluded all the airlift from the Egyptian side. What remains now is the Port Sudan side and that will be completed in the next few days probably”.

    On the number of people still waiting at Port Sudan, he said: “Initially they are about 1700 but the number has continued to reduce with the three flights. In the next one hour or two or less, we are expecting another flight from Port Sudan that will reduce the number of people to just above 1000 and by the time we do additional shuttles of 125 per trip, we will get them out in two to three days but we are also making arrangements with large-bodied aircraft to increase the number of people that will come per flight.”

    Meanwhile, one of the evacuees expressed disappointment with the Egyptian authorities.

    Abdulnasiru Suleiman, a final year medical student at Sudan International University, said: “It was a very stressful journey and we faced a lot of difficulties because I have never experienced such things before in my life. No food, no water on the way but with the help of embassy officials when we got to the border, they provided much water for us.

    “Before we got to the Waldi Halfa border from Khartoum, the journey was two days. We had a lot of terrible experiences such as sleeping on the bus, no food because I was out of money. However, our driver was nice. He bought some of us food which sustained us.

    “Getting to the border, the Egyptians were very strict. They treated us anyhow. I was not comfortable with the way we were treated. I pray that peace is restored in Sudan because I want to go back.”

    Jemila Azara, whose immediate younger brother Jemilu is stranded in Sudan, lamented that she had been visiting the airport daily since the announcement of the arrival of evacuees with the hope that he would be amongst those airlifted.

    Azara said: “I came from Nasarawa State. We were here on Thursday from morning till the early hours of Friday because he told us that they were boarding but he was not on the flight and that was disappointing for us. We had to go and stay at our aunt’s house here in Abuja. He called again in the evening to explain why he was not onboard the aircraft.

    “He said they told him that they wanted the females and children because the team believes the boys are stronger than the females. We have been coming to the airport since Thursday to wait with the hope that he will be amongst those returning.

    “Today being Sunday (yesterday), he called us again that they were boarding, so we are hoping that he will be amongst those returning today. We are hoping that he will be on the next flight.”

    Another family member of a returnee, Rashida Shittu, who was also at the airport for two of her brothers who were studying in Sudan, said the news of the war had been traumatizing.

    She said: “When we learnt about the war, it was not easy, especially for my 54-year-old mother. She was really traumatised, we just had to keep encouraging her that all would be well and giving her hope because we all cannot be down at the same time. We know it is not easy to hear that war has broken out where one member of your family is but we prayed to God and thank God they have arrived”.

    Meanwhile, senior UN aid envoy Martin Griffiths arrived in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia yesterday to discuss the worsening crisis which experts fear could leave 2.5 million people without enough food and spark a wave of mass migration, of nearly one million.

    Griffiths, the Under Secretary General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Co-ordinator, was in Jeddah “to engage in humanitarian issues related to Sudan,” UN spokeswoman Eri Kaneko said.

    Saudi Arabia has been working with the US and allies to secure a ceasefire since fighting began in Sudan on April 15, but rival generals Mohammed Dagalo and Abdel Fattah Al Burhan have shown little desire for compromise as the war enters its fourth week.

    Riyadh and Washington have supported the “pre-negotiation talks” and urged the rivals to “get actively involved”.

    A ceasefire is vital for safely moving aid into the country where health, water and electricity services have collapsed.

    Griffith’s visit came as the kingdom announced more than $100 million in additional aid for Sudan.

    The Sudanese Doctors Union said the fighting had killed at least 700 people, many of whom are civilians, wounded thousands and led to millions of Sudanese and foreigners fleeing the country.

    Many have fled to Chad, Egypt and South Sudan for safety, while others fled to Port Sudan and were then taken across the Red Sea to Saudi Arabia.

    In Khartoum, residents remain trapped in their homes and makeshift shelters with little food, medicine and water as fighter jets pummel the city.

  • Sudan: Thank you, Buhari

    Sudan: Thank you, Buhari

    Sir: So much has come to the fore over the plight of Nigerians trapped in war-torn Sudan, and the very valiant efforts of Nigerian government officials and agencies, working their tails off and putting their wits to work, to safely bring back students especially, back home to Nigeria.

    Customarily, Nigerians condemned the government over the efforts it was putting into the rescue of the students from the war zone. One accusation over the other were churned out on a daily basis, belittling the Foreign Affairs Ministry, Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), NEMA and the Presidency.

    A proverb in Hausa says, ‘The finest boxer is always at the ring side.’ Experts and journalists who were ‘proficient’ in rescuing refugees from war zones, were from the comfort of their homes here in Nigeria, picking loopholes and dishing out streams of invectives on the efforts the Nigerian government was putting together, to get the students back home as safely as possible.

    Reality checks started filtering in from different countries as to the efforts they were making and the conditions they were facing in their own rescue efforts. Canada made it clear to its citizens in Sudan that they were under no legal obligation to rescue them from Sudan. Other western countries signalled that they were billing the evacuees for the cost of their rescue. Unconfirmed sources say an Argentinian rescue airplane was hit by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the major rebel group in Sudan. In its entirety, the rescue efforts by different nations to get their citizens out of Sudan has been very precarious, sketchy and scanty.

    Bus business is big business in Sudan and the war situation had turned the business into an extortionist venture, with bus drivers charging astronomical prices just to transport passengers to the border. A private organisation ferrying just 50 of its staff was charged thousands of dollars just to take them to the border. Invariably, the criticisms coming from ‘arm-chair’ experts in Nigeria just reeked of the fact that they failed to comprehend that Sudan is at war!

    Notwithstanding, the Federal Government did not say it was under no legal obligation to rescue its citizens, and neither did it say it was going to bill the evacuees for the costs of the rescue mission. It has been on its toes since the outbreak of the war, to see that its citizens, especially stranded students, who had suddenly become refugees in Sudan, were safely flown back home. In the buildup of the rescue efforts, it was discovered that there were so many South Easterners in Sudan as well, as against the notion that only Northern Nigerians were trapped in Sudan. This rubbishes claims by some that the students were neglected because they were largely of Northern extraction.

    This is not the first time the President Muhammadu Buhari administration has made successful rescue efforts concerning its citizens in war-torn countries or countries that Nigerians had become endangered in. Citizens have been rescued from South Africa, Libya more than once, and Ukraine to mention a few. The Sudan war has seen the deployment of AirPeace, Azman Air, and the Nigerian Airforce’s C-130 Hercules by the Nigerian government. Already, hundreds of the evacuees have landed at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja. The Foreign Affairs Ministry, through the able services and responsiveness of NIDCOM, has made this possible. The Federal Government has not relented in efforts to rescue its citizens from across the world, not only Sudan.

    On behalf of the students, their parents and other well-meaning Nigerians, I say a big thank you to President Baba Buhari. Thank you for caring. Thank you for having NIDCOM, which has marvelously shown great enthusiasm, patriotism and commitment to the plight of Nigerians in Diaspora. The way the agency operates, I am sure if they were constitutionally empowered to cater for the plight of Nigerians in Nigeria, they would spiritedly do so. They have been diligent and they have worked hard without religious or ethnic discolorations to their operations. Mrs Abike Dabiri is truly a rare patriot. There are so many other things that have stood out from this administration but the most immediate one that has made us feel proudly Nigerian, is our motherland’s efforts in rescuing our younger ones from Sudan. Videos of the students in the C-130 Hercules on their way home were quite comforting. Thank you, Baba Buhari. ‘Mungode’. Don’t mind our sense of entitlement and our penchant for ingratitude.

    •Tahir Ibrahim,

     Talban Bauchi

  • Senate presidency: Yari complicates matters

    Senate presidency: Yari complicates matters

    Sir: Despite the reported endorsement of Senator Godswill Akpabio, former Akwa-Ibom State governor, for Senate President by President-elect Bola Tinubu and the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator-elect Abdul’Aziz Yari, ex-Zamfara State governor, is reported to be forging ahead with his aspiration to be the next Senate President.

     Stakeholders and observers say this could lead to another political upset and a repeat of the events of June 9, 2015 which produced former Kwara State governor, Senator Bukola Saraki as Senate President, and Hon Yakubu Dogara as Speaker of the House of Representatives for the 9th National Assembly, against the choice of the then Senate Leader, Ahmad Lawan from Yobe State, and Lagos lawmaker, Rep. Femi Gbajabiamila as Senate President and Reps’ Speaker respectively.

    Reports said that President Buhari had called for a meeting with all APC members in the Senate on that fateful morning to smooth out the contours ahead of inauguration, but Saraki and his “gang” who boycotted the meeting, had other plans.

    Precisely, Saraki and his loyalists were at the national assembly complex. But Lawan and his “gang” were absent. They had gone for the meeting at the International Conference Centre (ICC). The inauguration commenced even after news that it would not take place. Saraki was nominated, there was no challenger. He afterwards assumed the position of Senate President unopposed. It was at the closing of the event that some of Lawan’s supporters thronged in, in bewilderment and confusion. But the “deed” had been done.

    Fast-forward to 2023 with a President-elect (Bola Tinubu) from the South and a Vice President-elect (Kashim Shettima) from the North — both of same faith — Tinubu and top party leaders have reportedly endorsed the Senator representing Akwa-Ibom North-West, Godswill Akpabio, for Senate President.

    But what should have been a “done deal” or “consensus” with the withdrawal of the hitherto frontrunners in the race including Senators Ali Ndume (Borno), Dave Umahi (Ebonyi) and Barau Jibrin (Kano) backing Akpabio, is becoming a tough nut to crack with Abdul’Aziz Yari refusing to step down.

    Yari, a ranking Senator and former Zamfara governor, was reported saying “What is going to happen that day, it is going to happen based on the instructions of the Constitution and not for anyone. The election of the President of the National Assembly is the Senate’s business and not based on anyone’s instruction.”

    The APC currently controls the incoming 10th Senate with 59 seats, PDP, 36; Labour Party, 8; New Nigeria Peoples Party, 2; All Progressives Grand Alliance, 1; Social Democratic Party, 2; and Young Peoples Party, 1.

    Does Yari have the “political will” and “force” to stage a ‘Saraki 2.0’?

    •Ogochukwu Isioma,

     ogochukwuisioma@gmail.com

  • Lightning forecast

    Lightning forecast

    • Nigerians should take NEMA’ s alert seriously

    While Nigerians are used to annual forecasts of heavy rainfall and other weather emergencies by the requisite authorities over the years, there has been this year the unusual forecast of serious lightning in the country accompanying the heavy rains predicted for May, 2023. In a statement issued mid-April, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) advised Nigerians to be prepared to experience about 2.9 million lightning strikes in May, and the attendant consequences. According to the agency’s warning, “If you hear thunder, go indoors for your safety. Thunder and lightning are expected to spread across Nigeria in the month of May”. NEMA thus warned people to be prepared for possible fatalities and fire outbreaks this month.

    This new sense of responsibility manifesting in the lightning advisory by NEMA may be a function of growing turbulent weather conditions involving floods, earthquakes, heat waves and fire occurrences around the globe and an indication that weather monitoring and emergency management agencies in the country are increasingly more alive to their institutional obligations.

    This is commendable.

    It is noteworthy that NEMA’s position has been corroborated by a lightning safety education and awareness non-governmental organisation, the Nigeria Lightning Safety and Research Centre (NLSRC), based in the United States. The NLSRC identifies states likely to be most affected by the intense lightning strikes to include Delta, Rivers, Cross River, Enugu, Taraba, Nasarawa, Kogi, Anambra, Ebonyi, Edo, Osun, Bayelsa and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.

    Surprisingly, however, the Nigeria Meteorological Agency (NiMET) in a statement disowned the NLSRC on the lightning forecast while being curiously silent on the same advisory to Nigerians by NEMA. “NiMET wishes to inform the public that at no time did it authorise NLRSC to issue any such weather forecast to the public, as this is the statutory function of the Nigeria Meteorological Agency” the agency insisted.

    Read Also: NEMA receives 107 Libya returnees

    It is difficult to comprehend NiMET’s grouse here. We are already in May and being presumably aware of its statutory responsibilities, the agency ought to have issued the requisite lightning advisory to Nigerians long before now. Reacting to the obviously needless controversy, an expert based in the United States observed that “Safety and awareness of lightning needs just more than one organisation to lead the effort”. Public agencies and private organisations involved in diverse areas in this sector ought to cooperate and complement, rather than antagonise and controvert each other.

    In any case, there is still a lot that the Nigerian public ought to know about lightning so as to be effectively protected from the dangers of the phenomenon and NiMET has a critical role to play in these public enlightenment efforts.

    An acquaintance with the various manifestations of lightning will empower members of the public with the knowledge of how lightning strikes can affect them. For instance, there is the direct lightning strike when large quantities of energy pass through the individual’s body very swiftly resulting in internal burns, organ damage, nervous system damage or explosions of flesh and bone. In the case of contact injury, a person can be electrified as energy surges through an object he or she is holding. There are also situations in which victims of lightning strikes are hurled some distance and suffering blunt-force trauma or hearing damage from the sound of the accompanying thunders.

    In countries with experiences in handling lightning strikes, the requisite authorities give the public practical steps to take when the phenomenon occurs. For instance, people who are in open spaces and unable to flee to safer, fully enclosed locations “are advised to assume the “lightning position”, which involves sitting or crouching with knees and feet close together to create only one point of contact with the ground”. If sitting, the feet must be off the ground while the feet must be touching when standing. Furthermore, people are enlightened to take shelter in a building or a vehicle as well as to avoid being near high objects like a tree or metal objects like poles and fences during lightning strikes. Those inside vehicles are warned to avoid touching anything metal or using electronic equipment while those inside a building should avoid electrical equipment and plumbing, including taking a shower.

    These are the kinds of safety and protection strategies against lightning strikes that ought to preoccupy NiMET rather than quibbling with fellow agencies on unproductive turf wars. The agency should also be collaborating with other agencies in ensuring that critical public facilities are equipped with lightning-protection devices such as lightning rods, lightning arresters, lightning conductors and discharges as well as lightning monitoring and warning systems to alert people on the probability of a strike, deploying scientific risk assessment methods suitable to specific conditions and circumstances. Given the propensity for increase in fire incidents during intense lightning strikes, it is important to have efficient fire services at the corporate level, as well as training and equipping of individuals to respond to fire outbreaks.

  • MOFI rebirth

    MOFI rebirth

    • It’s exciting that the ministry is morphing into an active public sector player.  But let that not toll the knell for TSA

    To the extent of the public sector evolving into active economic enablers, from their passive traditional receptacles, the news is good: that the (Federal) Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) is moving from a mere policy incubator, into some future money-spinner.

    But to effectively play that new role, MOFI is asking — indeed, it just secured presidential nod for a ‘partial exclusion’ — from the Treasury Single Account (TSA).  TSA is a single account or a set of linked accounts ensuring all Federal Government transactions are through a Consolidated Revenue Account (CRA), domiciled at the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN).

    That news is not so good — but not because MOFI wants to start spinning cash.  It’s near-bad news because TSA was established to foil the hitherto near-routine multiple bank accounts by government ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs), through which many smart Alecs, with itchy palms, corralled a good chunk of the common wealth, leaving the millions of commons in pervasive but avoidable poverty.

    Indeed, under President Goodluck Jonathan, multiple accounts, as conduit for sundry sleaze, became such an epidemic that the Jonathan Presidency pondered the TSA to arrest the pestilence.  But it lacked the political will to fully consummate it, though the first rather limited experiments started in 2012.  TSA was, however, the first major policy President Muhammadu Buhari put in place, as doughty base for his anti-sleaze war.

    Might this ‘partial exclusion’ that the president just granted MOFI then be the beginning of the end for TSA, since other ministries, cooking up sundry sweeteners, could begin to call for ‘partial exclusion’ too, until TSA becomes a policy joke?

    This is fair and legitimate musing, given the sundry abuse of the common purse, by the old proliferation of accounts by ministries, departments and parastatals (MDAs).  After eight years, no one should forget, in a hurry, the sheer wastes of the previous 16 years.

    Read Also: President approves partial exclusion of MOFI from TSA

    Still, this is not a morbid fixation with TSA.  Every policy requires fine-tuning, given the dynamism of the environment.  Nothing is static.  Indeed, such dynamism called for a re-christening to Federal Ministry of Communications and Digital Economy, from its pristine name of Federal Ministry of Communications.  That re-brand appears self-explanatory.

    However, might the communications ministry begin to demand ‘partial exclusion’ from TSA because it gets more active on its latest self-assigned portfolio of digital economy?  If it did — and got that leeway — could that motivate other ministries to jump on the bandwagon of economic sweeteners?  Isn’t the way to hell often paved with good intentions?

    Again, these are legitimate posers to ponder as useful guides to fair and legitimate caution, not as cynical stone-walling to stall any credible and worthwhile innovations on the TSA.

    Such caveat emptor should start with a full disclosure of ‘partial exclusion’.  What does that mean, in real terms?  In what and what transactions would MOFI be granted leeway to side-track TSA?  What are the checks and balances to fend off abuse?  What rigours must other ministries surmount to earn ‘partial exclusion’?

    All of these must be put in black-and-white; and served the relevant and general publics.  In the best principle of openness, these publics have a democratic right to know.

    Still, despite this fair dose of skepticism, it’s a thing of cheer that MOFI is embracing the changing times, and breaking out of the passive mode of traditional ministries and sundry government agencies.

    By a statement put out by Femi Adesina, the “new” MOFI, launched on February 1 (that launch must have been drowned by the cacophony of the looming presidential election of February 25), would transform from “a registry of investment record to world-class asset and investment management company.”  That goal is impressive, even if the language is a tad flowery, suggestive of a marketer pitching for sales.

    President Buhari was also upbeat in his assessment of the ministry’s new mandate: “MOFI’s mission is to generate strong risk-adjusted returns, contribute to the well-being of Nigerians, and be a trusted steward of our nation’s asset and investments.  With a vast portfolio and strategic investments that span across multiple sectors,” the president added, “MOFI has the potential to shape industries, spur innovation, and support economic growth.”

    Good talk — particularly from a hitherto placid public sector, rippling with new-found private sector-like activism and putative dynamism.  But to walk that talk is a different ball game entirely.  So, doughty checks and balances must be put in place to ensure the new dream doesn’t tragically derail.

    But whatever happens, everything must be done not to subvert the TSA.  Many MDAs, not leaving behind the university system, have complained against TSA and how it reportedly slows down their operations.  While those points are noted, TSA has ensured increasing stability in public sector accounting than hitherto, in the past eight years.  

    It’s no time to junk that stability. That’s why whatever waivers granted MOFI must be rigorously and vigorously monitored.