Author: The Nation

  •  NCFRMI: Journey to ‘Smart Commission’ 

     NCFRMI: Journey to ‘Smart Commission’ 

    Sir: The embrace of technology worldwide in institutions and organisations in this modern age, no doubt, has transformed the way things are done; and tasks are accomplished effortlessly for increased productivity, efficiency and effectiveness of operations. It has made institutions in the private and public sectors able to deliver on their mandate.

    However, most of the government agencies in Nigeria are yet to embrace and deploy technology in their operations for effective administration, management and service delivery.

    It was therefore surprising to learn that a government agency, the National Commission for Refugees Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons (NCFRMI), has taken a leap forward to embrace technology, with the launch of an online learning platform for its staff, code-named “DIGITAL ACADEMY.”

    I was curious, as a tech freak, to find out what the Commission is up to that informed such a laudable initiative. I logged in to the website of the agency where I was able to have a peep into their pages that contained a lot of information I never had before about the agency. I realised that the mandate is broad-based, covering the overseeing of issues relating to Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and the coordination of Migration Development as well as to coordinate the national action plan for the protection and assistance of Refugees, Asylum Seekers, Returnees, Stateless Persons, Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and Migrants.

    Also, their mandate is to Provide Durable Solutions, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Care and Maintenance for Persons of Concern (POC’s) in Nigeria. Given the above, the reality dawned on me that the agency is such that it requires a lot of capacity building for its staff to be able to cope with the challenges of administration and management of humanitarian affairs. Honestly, there is no other way the agency could be able to perform better in the near future if it does not quickly embrace technology now, which it has found in “Smart Commission” with Digital Academy platform.

    In my opinion, the effort of the head of the agency, Imman Sulaiman- Ibrahim, the federal commissioner, and her laudable initiative in this direction, deserves commendation. With the Digital Academy Online Learning platform meant for staff, management and partners, employees can have access to learning materials, policy documents, process manuals and take courses on any devices, from any location at any time.

    The platform will surely improve staff skills and knowledge in areas such as planning for the Return, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Re-Integration of all Persons of Concern (POCs), technical area personal development and, more importantly, leading to better service delivery and internal efficiency.

    As much as this development is applauded as a laudable initiative, the Commission and the federal commissioner should not rest on their oars by looking forward to work and plan towards the sustainability of its various initiatives, programmes and projects. The provision of internet connectivity in the offices during office hours and, most importantly, computers, cannot be over flogged for the Digital Commission and the Learning platform to function properly. This will help in keeping the dream alive, and ensure that a good legacy is bequeathed to those coming behind.

    Meanwhile, the type of vision that produced this initiative serves as a challenge to all other chief executives of government establishments.  There is a need to automate the institutional machinery of the government, and embrace technology in the management, administration and delivery of service to the citizenry.

    This singular effort is worthy of emulation as a quick pathway to the dream and vision of becoming an e-Governance compliant country.  

    •Tunde Oyasanya, tundeoyas@gmail.com

  • Rise in malnutrition in Northeast

    Rise in malnutrition in Northeast

    Sir: The alarm by the World Food Programme (WFP) that about two million children in the North-Eastern part of Nigeria are estimated to suffer from acute malnutrition, and cases have quadrupled to 700,000, gives cause for concern and must be heeded by the relevant authorities.
    Northern Nigeria has the highest number of poor people in the country. It is the reason Nigeria is seen as the poverty capital of the world. Out of 133 million Nigerians living in multi-dimensional poverty, 90 million poor Nigerians are in the north. Sadly, there is a lot of hypocrisy among the political, traditional, and religious leaders in the region in seeking redress to this growing menace.
    The problem of malnutrition in the North-East is so bad that we now read of cases of women who abandoned their infants to die, rather than watch them die of hunger. A case in point is the story of a woman in an Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camp in Borno State. The IDP, Aishatu Muhammad, a heartbroken woman, had dumped her twin daughters because she had five children, and due to the dire symptoms of malnutrition, she had assumed they were dead and her motherly instinct could not hold on to the ‘corpses’ of her twins. Luckily, an 86-year-old kola nut seller had picked the babies to hospital where they were fed and cleaned up and seen to be alive.
    Cases of malnutrition aren’t limited to the North-East alone. It encompasses the entire Northern Nigeria.  While it is true that this ugly phenomenon has been exacerbated by an insurgency that has raged for 14 years, it is equally true that there has been a lack of concerted effort by the leaders of the region at all levels to nip this monster in the bud.
    Child marriages are a causative factor of this plague of malnutrition. No child-mother can be in a position economically to feed her child nutritious food. How can a child take care of another child successfully? Another causative factor is the failure of the various state governments in the region to educate the masses on the importance of family planning.
    Malnutrition is a challenge requiring short, medium, and long-term solutions. Governments in the North-East should collaborate with NGOs and other global agencies to find solutions to malnutrition in their domains. They should stop behaving like the proverbial ostrich that buries its head in the sand hoping that the problem of malnutrition would suddenly vanish without any effort on their part.
    •Peter Ovie Akus,  
    akuspeter@gmail.com

  • Moral turpitude

    Moral turpitude

    • This is the only explanation for a man raping his woman friend’s eight-year-old daughter

    It is an increasingly prevalent and familiar tale that illustrates the alarming rate of moral turpitude and ethical degeneration across the length and breadth of the Nigerian society. Hardly a day goes by now without an account on the news of the most repulsive acts of moral depravity that assault human decency, including rape of both elderly women and underaged girls, ritual murder for occult and pecuniary reasons and gruesome, utterly mindless and barbaric killings that defy reason.

    In a recent occurrence of one of these acts that demonstrates the moral void in which Nigeria daily descends ever more steeply, a woman and her eight-year-old daughter have tested positive to HIV after the mother’s boyfriend, one Jude Ajeigbe, also known as Ijiegbe, reportedly raped the minor in their house in Delta State.

    As a member of the Alegber community in Uvwie Local Government Area of Delta State told the police and the media, the suspect, who is a married man, is a boyfriend to the mother and had been squatting with both mother and daughter in their house. Unknown to the woman, Ajeigbe, who reportedly hails from Anambra State, had been having carnal knowledge of the little girl. Each time the mother went out for her daily rounds of hawking pap, the boyfriend would bath the little girl, have sex with her and threaten to kill her if anyone got to know of his nefarious act.

    After some time, however, the woman began to notice unfamiliar changes in the girl’s behaviour in addition to odious discharges from her body. After intense questioning, the girl confessed that her mother’s boyfriend had raped her severally at various times. When confronted, the suspect fled the house and has since been declared wanted by the Delta State Police Command.

    In the first place, it is difficult to fathom the depth of carelessness and irresponsibility of the woman. As a mother, how could she have left her vulnerable child to the predation of a man who is married but had left his family to hibernate in another woman’s house? If she had given the boyfriend shelter for the financial support he was giving her, it is unlikely that she would be engaged in the menial job of hawking pap daily while the man idled away in the house and took undue sexual advantage of her daughter.

    In any case, it is hardly surprising that a woman who readily harboured a married man in her house without presumably caring about his abandonment of his family would be so careless as regards the security and safety of her daughter. What kind of moral example was she setting for the girl? Indeed, as a mother, she ought to have noticed psychological and physiological changes in the little girl immediately the boyfriend began sleeping with her without giving him the opportunity to repeatedly defile the minor before being discovered.

    As it is now, most unfortunately, both the mother and daughter have tested positive for HIV while the boyfriend is on the run. Even when and if he is eventually apprehended as will hopefully be the case, he will be liable before the law for having carnal knowledge of a minor, but can it be proven conclusively that he was responsible for infecting mother and daughter with the virus? Suppose it is a situation for which both the mother and her boyfriend are responsible, with the little girl as an innocent victim?

    The kind of sexual promiscuity embodied in this scenario is no doubt responsible for the high rate of sexually transmitted diseases in our society, not least the dreaded HIV/AIDS. One lesson from this incident is that, contrary to widespread perception, HIV/AIDS still poses a serious threat to public health in the country. From all indications, both the relevant health authorities at all levels and the general public have become complacent about the disease and abandoned all precautions such as use of condoms during sex and avoiding serial sexual partners once the initially high death rates from the infection began to decline as research on vaccines and treatments progressed. This is a wake-up call. HIV/AIDS is still alive and thriving and we must rediscover the discipline and restraint that the onset of the disease imposed on society.

    We commend the human rights activist, Kelvin Ejumale, who made an entry of the incident with the police and has been following up on the search for the culprit after the matter was reported to him. We plead with the police to ensure that the suspect is apprehended wherever he is and prosecuted. We urge that priority be accorded to making HIV treatment regime available to both mother and child. The little girl in particular must not be deprived of her bright future as a result of this tragic experience.

  • Unpaid allowances

    Unpaid allowances

    • INEC’s ad hoc staff and others engaged for elections should be paid promptl

    If truly a labourer deserves his wages, then there cannot be any justification for not paying the 3,138 Customs personnel who took part in the last general elections, about seven weeks after. The elections ended on March 18. The officers included customs assistants, assistant inspectors of customs, inspectors of customs, assistant superintendents of customs, deputy superintendents of customs, superintendents of customs and chief superintendents of customs, that were deployed nationwide to assist the Nigeria Police in the maintenance of peace and security during the elections. The list of the officers was contained in a document signed by M. Abba-Kura, acting Deputy Comptroller-General (E, I&I), for the Comptroller-General of Customs, dated February 8, 2023 and titled: ‘Re: Forwarding List of Officers Deployed for 2023 General Election Duties.’
    A deputy superintendent of customs deployed to Kano State expressed dissatisfaction with the delay in payment of the allowances. “We still do not know what happened to our election allowances. It is almost two months now but we have not received any amount, and I can confidently tell you I have not heard of any customs officer that has received the allowance,” he said.
    Spokesman of the Nigeria Customs Service, Abdullahi Aliyu Maiwada, confirmed the non-payment of election allowances to the officers across the country. He said efforts were being made to get the officers paid as soon as it is practically possible.
    We are unhappy with this development.
    All employees or labourers deserve to be paid their wages even before their sweat dries up. That is immediately after finishing their work. It is about two months since the elections were concluded, yet, some of the people who participated in making the process hitch-free are yet to be paid.
    Ordinarily, the business of safeguarding the internal peace and security in the country is that of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF). But then, there is an acute shortage of policemen generally in the country. With about 370,000 officers and men, the country is grossly under-policed. The number falls far short of the recommendation of  the United Nations one police officer for every 450 citizens.
    It was this manpower shortage in the police force that informed the deployment of other security agents to assist the force during the elections. For rendering such selfless service, they deserve to be paid their wages promptly. To delay the allowance as in this case is to discourage such personnel and this is bad for the future. When called upon next time for what ordinarily is a patriotic duty at election times, they would not be able to serve as diligently as they should.
    We wonder why this is becoming a regular pattern when security agents serve on national assignments. Soldiers have had to protest non-payment of their allowances after engagements, policemen too complain regularly over such matters.
    With specific regard to elections, this is not the first time that those who served the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) would have payment of their allowances delayed. National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members who served as the commission’s ad hoc staff during elections had also experienced similar fate in the past. Reports also had it that some personnel of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) who made similar complaints of non-payment of their allowance in March got paid only last month.
    This should not be so.
    After all, INEC already knew the number of such personnel it would require long before the elections. The commission ought to have made provision for them such that they would be paid immediately after concluding their assignments. So, what exactly is the problem? Is it that the cash is not available, or what? At least Godwin Emefiele, governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) assured INEC even during the Naira redesign and cash swap that witnessed serious cash flow problems in the country, that INEC should rest assured that it would have enough cash for the elections.
    The customs officers’ case is further compounded by the fact that they claim not to know how much exactly they would be paid for the service. If this is true, it is also bad. Granted that the personnel involved should see the job as a patriotic duty to the country that they should cheerfully participate in even if with only a token of appreciation, their duties and expectations from the commission for the assignment ought to have been clearly spelt out at the point of engagement. To have done otherwise is not only unfair to the personnel concerned, it is also bad for accountability.
    We appeal to the electoral commission to sort out this problem immediately. And it should not be for the customs personnel alone. If there are others who have not been paid for similar service to the commission, it should ensure that they are all paid forthwith. The beauty of such exercise is to get paid promptly to incentivise the participants and others who might be called upon to help in the process sometime in the future..

  • Africa’s never-ending crises

    Africa’s never-ending crises

    By Mike Kebonkwu

    Sudan is in turmoil and on the verge of collapse as anarchy reigns supreme. From the Horn of Africa, to the Congo, to Central Africa down to the West African sub-region, there is one crisis or the other threatening the stability of our countries. We are so rich but Africa has remained the poorest continent as Europeans, Americans and Asians harvest our rich minerals, flora and fauna, with their advanced technologies while we are bogged down by crises of underdevelopment and poverty.

    Just about the time combatants in one crisis have worn themselves out and exhausted, another is brewing. It is either terrorism by ideological zealots, insurgency and banditry, war for control of mineral resources or political brigandage. It has gotten to a point where one begins to wonder if Africa is not indeed bound to violence.

     At the root of it all is corruption, disruption or collapse of the rule of law and institutions of State. Why are they fighting in Sudan? It is a struggle amongst the elites for power and control of the wealth and resources of the country; not for the general good to improve the living standard of the people. This is the political malaise plaguing Africa without exception.

    Members of the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Force (RSF) are running amok in Khartoum. They have turned their guns on the people and national infrastructure. Foreign embassies have since evacuated their staff and nationals except for some African countries still struggling to extricate their stranded nationals; Nigeria is one of them. There is a huge displacement of the population with many running into neighbouring countries as refugees. For those caught in the crossfire who cannot escape, they are in a dire situation lacking basic essentials to survive, food, water and electricity.

    The hospitals and medical facilities have been overwhelmed and at breaking point without necessary replenishment. This is a country that relies on food aids from donor agencies and countries in the normal course of events now thrown into crisis of full-scale armed struggle between two generals.

     Africa has proved incapable of governing itself and has continued to live under the epidemics of inept political leadership and corruption. Our political leaders have an insatiable rapacious appetite, stealing our common patrimony and what they do not need. We want the Europeans to pay reparation for what they stole from our continent as a result of slavery and colonialism. Since independence, our political leaders have stolen far more from the people than the period of slavery and colonialism put together. Yet we are not asking our political elites for reparation. We fight their battles for them to continue to oppress the poor and manipulate every electoral cycle to subvert the will of the people.

    The footage of the streets of Sudan show the primitive and barbaric savagery of Africans to themselves, butchering his type without empathy, women, children and the elderly. If the crisis ends today, Sudan certainly will not remain the same again, rebuilding the damaged infrastructure and reconciliation of the tribal groups.

    The crisis is made worse due to the availability of light weapons which are as easy to get as vegetables in the local markets. We receive weapons from European merchants and turn them on our brothers and sisters and keep the continent permanently on the ground. In spite of all the miracle workers in the churches and mosques, Africa has remained in endless crises as if we are under a spell. For weeks running, the parties in the conflict in Sudan have turned Khartoum, the capital, to Golgotha. Civilians are the vulnerable population, receiving bullets for the greed of the military elite and their political leaders.

    Serious countries and embassies have evacuated their nationals hurriedly, but Nigerian nationals, especially students, are still trapped and stranded and held in border countries of Egypt and Chad who make conditions for their passage difficult. They cannot but treat our citizens the way the world sees our government treat us at home. Nigerian citizens and students are economic refugees fleeing from insecurity and harsh economic conditions; education is just a facade.

    Nigerian youths are trooping to study in higher institutions abroad while our graduates, doctors and other professionals look for greener pastures abroad. Our leaders have destroyed our public school system; so those parents that can afford it send their children and wards abroad. With our endowment, Nigerians have no business going to Sudan to study. Today, Nigerian youths form a huge percentage of foreign student population in Cotonou, Ghana, Gambia; indeed, every other country within the sub-region and beyond.

    It is a shame that our country has never been able to respond timeously to distressed Nigerians outside our shores during emergencies and crises. Our embassies and high commissions exist only as text book theory, and we have envoys that do not even have records of Nigerians in their countries of assignment.

    Events in Sudan are a big lesson to us.  Like Sudan, we also have proliferation of firearms in all the geo-political zones of the country in the hands of non-state actors acting with reckless impunity. The government is unable to mop up the arms. To make matters worse, we are arming paramilitary organisations that are supposed to perform simple civil functions amongst the populace without considering the security implications. We have the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF) in the Northeast. Hisbah Police operate in some states like private armies. The war against insurgency will end someday, and what happens to these elements that have had some form of military training and are battle-tested fighting alongside with soldiers?

    The National Assembly is busy making laws arming paramilitary organisations like the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps who are not supposed to perform military functions.  The next would be the Road Safety Corps and Boys Scout. We do not want to think about the implications of throwing light weapons and small arms all over the country. These are people without proper training and good mental attitude to bear arms. This is in addition to the fact that they do not have secured armouries like the Armed Forces, and, to some extent, the Nigeria Police Force. It is also easy for criminal elements to capture these weapons from these agencies, or their operatives, using it for illegal purposes as reports are showing. The military high command that is in a position to advise on such things shy away from doing so in order to be politically correct and not be seen to be opposing civil authority.

    The civilisation of Sudan has been laid waste due to bad leadership. There is even speculation that some faction in the conflict is contemplating engaging mercenaries from Russia. For those who care to know, mercenaries do not win wars, they are merchants of death; we can see that in the Russia-Ukraine war.

    If we want to live in peace, we must stop the war drums and inflammatory rhetoric setting one ethnic group against the other just because elections have been lost and won. Let us allow the judiciary to prove that justice and the rule of law are still possible in our country, until they prove the contrary. When the scourge of war comes, everyone will taste from the bitterness of its poisonous vial. Sudan is so far but so near!

    •Kebonkwu, mikekebonkwu@yahoo.com

  • Airports everywhere

    Airports everywhere

    Sir: Virtually all the 36 states of the federation, and the Federal Capital Territory (Abuja), now have an airport. The exceptions are very few indeed. All but one of the last set of states (six of them) created in 1996 by the late head of state, General Sani Abacha, now have an airport. They are Bayelsa International Airport, Yenagoa; Nasarawa Cargo Airport, Lafia; Agro-Cargo Airport in Ekiti State; Ebonyi International Airport, Abakaliki, and Gombe International Airport.  Zamfara State is the odd state. And it is also the only one of the total seven states in the Northwest zone without an airport. It has an airstrip, of course, located in its capital, Gusau. Expectedly, the state government has plans for its own airport.

     Thus, we have Sokoto, Kano, Kaduna, Kebbi, Dutse and Katsina international airports. Also in this zone is Zaria airport (Kaduna) military airport (Kaduna) and Tunga airstrip (Kebbi). For the Northeast zone, Yobe State is the only one without an airport in this zone. But it has two airstrips which are in Potiskum and Nguru, that is, outside Damaturu, the state capital.   

    In the North-Central zone, Kogi is the only state without an airport. It, however, has an airstrip in Ajaokuta while the Ilorin International Airport (Kwara) is the only designated ‘international’ airport there, apart from the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

     All six states in the South-South zone have airports, Bayelsa being the latest entrant to the league of state-owned airports. The other state-constructed airports in this zone are Akwa Ibom International Airport and Asaba airport while the ones in Port Harcourt and Calabar are owned by the federal government. Apart from having an airport, the Akwa Ibom State government also owns an airline (Ibom Air), which is fairly popular in the south.

     For the Southeast, there were hitherto, two functional airports here, namely, the Akanu Ibiam International Airport, Enugu, and Sam Mbakwe International Airport Cargo Airport, Owerri. The state-funded Anambra and Ebonyi international airports came on board with inaugural flights in 2022 and 2023 respectively. So, Abia is the only state without an airport now in this zone.

    In the Southwest zone are Lagos, Ibadan and Akure Airports. Ogun, Ekiti and Osun states are building their own airports. While Osun’s Moshood Abiola International Airport is stalled, the Agro-Cargo Airport in Ekiti and Ogun state’s Cargo Airport are very much on course. In fact, the latter recently had an inaugural flight.

     The question is how justified, viable are these airports that dot the length and breadth of our country?  The Cargo Airport in Ogun State can be justified on the grounds that that state is now an industrial hub with nearby Lagos state congested.  The Uyo airport is also being complemented by the Ibom Air that offers commercial flight services. But the federal government –owned Ibadan airport is perplexing from the point of view of economic returns, with Lagos, Ilorin, Akure airports around it.  Ditto other airports that are surrounded by airports in neighbouring states. I sense that a driving force for the establishment of airports is the prestige that goes with it, being ranked as a state with an airport.

     Another question is, how ‘international’ are these airports, given the trend of adding ‘international’ to their name. Again, such a designation seems to be borne out of prestige-hunting. Apart from Lagos, Abuja and perhaps Port Harcourt airports, it is doubtful if the plethora of ‘international’ airports in the country play host to international passengers. Many of the airports hardly have regular flights to such places, and so rarely have regular Nigerian passengers. Most of those that patronise them are governors and the super-rich on chartered flights. 

    However, some of these ‘international’ airports in the north serve the useful purpose of airlifting their indigenes for hajj, thereby saving them the stress associated with travelling to another state for the yearly hajj. This is an occasional operation, though.

      I suspect that the state governments that have built airports would be lobbying the federal government to take them over in order to save them the associated huge maintenance costs.

    Air travel has the advantage of speed. And with security concerns in parts of the country, coupled with bad roads, it should be the preferred mode of travel. But its prohibitive cost puts it out of reach of the ordinary man/woman. For state governments in particular, constructing an airport, a capital-intensive project, remains an elitist project.  

    •Victoria Ngozi Ikeano, Victoriangozii@gmail.com 

  • King Charles III coronation: My view

    King Charles III coronation: My view

    watched the coronation of King Charles III of England with avid interest, perhaps because I am an historian and also an old person who grew up in colonial Nigeria. I remember going to the community centre in Ado Ekiti in the 1950s as a primary school child to “March past” parades during Empire Day celebrations. We were asked at some point to watch out for the British flag hoisted on a long pole when we reached where it was hoisted. We did not know what we were supposed to watch out for but like all children fearing being flogged if we got out of line or missed our steps, we did what we were asked to do.
    We sang in Yoruba “Kolorun d’ oba si, K’Oba ko pe loye,” which is the British national anthem “God save the Queen.” We were not told why we were doing this, and if we were told we would not have understood. But I remember we were feted in school and we all looked forward to celebrating the Queen’s birthday, if possible, every day!
    When I entered secondary school, all that stopped, except perhaps in the regional headquarters at Ibadan. By the time I finished secondary school in 1960, I was then quite clear about Nigeria’s place in the British empire. I remember in 1959 writing about the coming of independence as an assignment in my English class, and saying that by 1960 “Nigeria would be free from under the jackboots of British colonialism. “
     Our English teacher, a young man called Allan Reed, whose wife was the first principal of Ekiti Anglican Girls Secondary School, crossed out the whole sentence apparently in annoyance. I later realised that I should have chosen a less offensive expression. I was also trying to show off my command of the English language – thanks to my English teachers who came all the way from England to teach us.
     I was not an ideologue ranting against British imperialism, although my brother, Chief Oduola Osuntokun, who was then a minister in Obafemi Awolowo’s cabinet, was an anti-colonial politician eager to get rid of the British so that we could govern ourselves. I may have grown into a nationalist later, but it was always as a friend of my British benefactors.
    This preamble is necessary so that my readers can appreciate my impression of the coronation. I watched the events with interest, recalling the previous coronations in British history I had read about.  I was an exchange student with the School of Oriental and African Studies and Queen Mary’s College, two affiliated colleges of the University of London, during my second year at the University of Ibadan in the 1964-5 session.  I had the privilege of learning English History from the celebrated Professor S.T. Bindoff, the author of “Tudor England,” who taught us as if he had lived the historical experience. I was carried away by British scholarship and university traditions which the University of Ibadan tried very much to copy. I did not see the British as enemies, rather I appreciated their efforts to leave a permanent impression on us on how to run things like our universities, the parliament, political parties, the Anglican Church, yes, the Anglican Church, and the government.
    Anyone who grew up in my generation will say we have managed to run all these things down! I was impressed by the clockwork orderliness of the coronation without obtrusive police and military presence. Of course, the intelligence services were there, but they did not make their presence felt. None of the eminent heads of state and crowned heads from all over the world were announced as they took their places, except by the news media.
    There is much to admire in the way the British run their affairs, far better and superior to any other country, except perhaps the Japanese. This is not to say that the British have no fault; of course, they do. They benefited tremendously from the triangular slave trade in which our ancestors supplied the market by capturing one another and selling them on a journey of no return.  They abolished the slave trade when it was no longer beneficial to them, and when sugar could be got from India, then under their control, thus rendering the West Indian sugar expendable. The aftermath of the trade in such a sweet commodity, but bringing with it the unkind brutality of plantation slavery, is the enduring racism of white racism against the blacks and browns of which the British are the guiltiest. 
    Of course, they are not the only racists.  I can postulate that we are all racists, preferring our own kind to others; but what is odious about the racism of non-blacks is that they all now associate it with black inferiority in relation to all other races.  
    The British were the biggest imperialists in human history. They exploited every part of the world for their country’s development. For a long time after flag independence was granted to their colonies, they replaced it with neo-colonial economic relations. They also managed to put in power, on their departure from their colonies, puppet leaders who for long protected British interests.
     In all these the monarchy was a central institution. But we should not blame King Charles III personally, even though he shares part of the historical guilt of association. While I am aware of all these, I still see things to admire in Britain, and in other countries apart from mine.
    When I asked if my children enjoyed watching the coronation, my four children were unanimous in saying they had other more important things to do. This is of course in tune with the reaction of young people in Britain itself. My kids said any status based on privilege of birth was unacceptable to them. Even when I said the monarchy provides a seamless headship of state irrespective of politics or when one sovereign passes on and another successor comes to the throne, they were not persuaded. My historical explanation of how the monarchy had provided a rallying point in two World Wars and other times of crisis were unconvincing. 
    The economic role of the British crown in bringing tourists to Britain was also downplayed. In short, I couldn’t convince my children, but I held my position that the monarchy has been good to Britain. I am not oblivious of the fact that the accident of birth should not confer undue privileges.
    But I will argue that what is ideal is not necessarily real. In our country of perhaps more than two thousand kings, can one really argue against monarchies if it makes the people happy?
     Of course, India removed the powers of the Maharajahs, but left them with their tremendous wealth and palaces. Our own kings are harmless. In fact, politicians find them useful in social and political mobilisation, and they can be helpful in times of crisis. Some of them may be a bit reckless in their amorous escapades, but they provide us with the entertainment and excitement necessary in times of serious local and national problems.
    I may not be a royalist, but I see nothing wrong in being one. I am myself descended from royalty, but that is not why I see them as part of our culture. Of course, they exist everywhere under the law, except in some Middle Eastern countries. The British monarchy is a constitutional monarchy, and I would, if I were British, prefer it to a million Donald Trumps, which those in favour of elected presidency may yet get.

  • A tale of two elders

    A tale of two elders

    Go-On-With-One-Nigeria. This slogan was popular during the civil war. It became a thematic and not a battle cry, of sorts, as the man from whose name the slogan was coined did all he could to ensure that the country remained united, war or not. Unity in war? What an incongruity! It is hard to believe that Gowon, he needs no introduction, was still talking of unity when soldiers were shooting and killing themselves in the war front.

    GOWON is not an acronym. It is a name that we all know so well. Yakubu Gowon was head of state between 1966 and 1975 and it was his lot to see Nigeria through a war after the collapse of the Aburi talks in Ghana. Gowon did not want war, but he was left with no option after all his efforts to prevent one failed. Little wonder that at the end of the bitter enterprise, he declared that there was “no victor, no vanguished” and the process of reconstruction, reconciliation and rehabilitation (the 3Rs) began.

    The process is painfully, still on, 53 years after the war and long after the nation should have put the episode behind it and moved on to greater things. Rather than move forward, we keep pulling ourselves backwards with our religious, tribal and political differences. Nothing shows these differences more than the outcome of the February 25 presidential election. With 18 days left to the inauguration of the President-elect, Bola Tinubu, of the All Progressives Congress (APC), many of our leaders who should be seen calming frayed nerves are the ones stoking the fire. 

    Agreed that in politics we cannot share the same beliefs and philisophy, but a line is expected ro be drawn where elections are concerned. In elections, whether we like it or not, there must be a winner and there will be many losers, depending on the number of contestants. The bigger the field, the larger the number of losers. There can never be two winners at any time, there will only be one. Although, losing is difficult to swallow, it is still part of the game. So, if a contestant can celebrate victory, if he wins, he should be ready to accept defeat too, if he loses.

    The bile spewed over the February 25 poll is too much. Even, if the political class, particularly the contestants are ready to let go, the way many in the society, who should be peacemakers are taking things is not helping matters at all. These people abound in every segment of the society. Sadly, those in the clergy whose main job is to preach the gospel and the love of Christ in a situation like this have become the cheerleaders for one of the candidates and are openly rooting for him.

    I have nothing against that as the clerics have the right to support any candidate of their choice. But what is irksome is when they delve into areas they know little or nothing about. With the election dispute now before the Presidential Election Petitions Court (PEPC), it goes without saying that we should all be mindful of what we say. But, hey! This is not the case. It is now that many are oiling their guns to shoot. They have suddenly become an authority in law, wondering why the president-elect should be sworn in when his victory is being challenged at the tribunal.

    These ‘experts’ are talking as if this is the first time in the nation’s history that we are confronted with this kind of situation. It is not. We had similar cases in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011 and 2019 and in none of these situations did those commenting now ever come out to say “do not swear in the president-elect until the cases at the tribunal are done with”. What then can be made of their positions today? Are they genuinely motivated by love for their country or are just being partisan?

    If there was nothing wrong in swearing in the presidents-elect in 1999 (Obasanjo), 2003 (Obasanjo), 2007 (Yar’Adua), 2011 (Jonathan) and 2019 (Buhari), while cases were pending against them at the tribunal, what then is the rationale for demanding that the president-elect in 2023 (Tinubu) should not also be so treated? There is no precedent for the position that people like Catholic Archbishop Emeritus John Cardinal Onaiyekan are pushing that there is no sense in swearing in the president-elect while petitions are pending against him at the tribunal.

    If it made sense for those elected into the same position before him to be sworn in, in their own time, why should President-elect Tinubu not enjoy the same privilege now? After all, as the saying goes, what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. The justice and logic of the matter are not in not swearing in the president-elect on May 29, they are in allowing him to take the oath of office like others before him did, pending the outcome of the cases at the tribunal. Anything short of this is a breach of the Constitution which allows the president-elect  to enjoy the fruits of his victory until the final determination of any case against him.

    The election may not have been perfect. There is no perfect election anywhere in the world, anyway. But you do not cure the so-called imperfection of the February 25 poll by denying the president-elect, by hook or by crook, the right to take the oath of office on the due date. That historic date is May 29, which is just 18 days away. Onaiyekan and others may feel otherwise, their feelings will change nothing. Only the tribunal now has the last say on the February 25 election and until it gives its decision one way or the other, it will do well for us all to allow the Justices to do their work without distractions.

    As General Gowon advised in Abuja recently: “we need to allow the Justices to engage in their deliberations and come up with their decisions, and as the public, to be humble enough to accept their decisions as final… I think this is very important at this stage in view of the post-election litigation now going on. Let us give the judiciary the opportunity to do their work and let us accept their decision as it is”. This is the way to go and the soldier-statesman could not have put it better.

    I doff my hat to the uncommon General for his statesmanship. His intervention is coming at the right time. Having seen our country evolve over the years, Gowon has spoken as someone who played and is still playing a leading role in its evolution. It will do well to listen to him. All those shooting from the hip and calling for the suspension of the May 29 inauguration should, therefore, sheathe their swords to watch and wait for what happens at the tribunal.

  • Re: Reuben Abati’s ‘Stranded in Sudan’

    Re: Reuben Abati’s ‘Stranded in Sudan’

    By Musa Ilallah

    Reading Reuben Abati’s May 2 article (originally published in his ThisDay column, and widely syndicated) about Nigerians in Sudan, drove home again for me the fact that many Nigerian journalists need a masterclass in how not to denigrate their country falsely and needlessly; how not to downplay its positive attributes and commendable actions.

    So much of that article feels like a desperate attempt to denigrate Nigeria by unfairly and inaccurately comparing her with other countries, who all happen to be stuck in the same situation as Nigeria, and have been struggling in the same way to figure out what to do about evacuations in a war situation filled with so much uncertainty and tension.

    A senior journalist of his calibre, especially someone with high-level government experience, needs to do much better in terms of research and realism. It is not enough to be led by emotions, especially when those emotions are coloured by partisanship. 

    Abati has very uncomplimentary words for his country, words that are not rooted in fact, or in any reasonable assessment of the situation. He claimed, and I quote: “While the Sudanese are fighting, Nigerians are staging a backward drama of their own… the Nigerian government always disappoints, and that is precisely what they are doing in Sudan.”

    None of the thousands of Nigerians who were safely evacuated from Ukraine, or the already close to 1,500 who have been safely evacuated from Sudan, will share this grossly exaggerated sentiment from Abati, especially not now that they are safely back home. 

    The random incidents he is holding on to can be explained easily in the context of a war. Drivers stopping in the middle of the desert and asking for more money is exactly the kind of opportunistic and exploitative behaviour that happens in war zones and other times of crisis. 

    The fault here is human capacity to take advantage of the vulnerability of others, nothing else. We saw it during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, when basic masks and hand sanitisers were being unscrupulously sold at multiples of their normal price.

    A bus catching fire in Sudan is also not out of place, considering it’s one of the hottest countries in the world, with temperatures regularly in the 40s (degrees centigrade). A simple online search would have revealed this, and prevented Abati from exposing his ignorance in this way.

    Abati also went on and on complaining about the Nigerian Air Force Hercules C-130, claiming they were “stranded.” This was clearly a hatchet piece by a man who has decided that he will not and is not capable of seeing anything good about anything Nigeria is doing to bring her citizens back home.

    He then goes ahead to downplay President Buhari’s direct personal intervention with the Egyptian government, which finally helped resolve the obstacles being posed by the Egyptians. 

    He also said: “Nigeria is being snubbed by Egypt… Or are we so hated diplomatically in Africa that nobody would offer our people easy passage […] Every African country treats us shabbily, especially the North African countries.”

    On this point, it is very necessary to remind Abati that the last time Nigeria was deeply disrespected as a nation was back when he (Abati) served in government. That was the era when Chad complained about Nigeria being absent in the fight against Boko Haram, and Morocco embarrassed the Nigerian government by proving that an official claim that President Jonathan spoke by phone with the Moroccan King was false. 

    That was also the era when the US could not be convinced to approve critical arms sales for the country, because nobody in the international community trusted that government Abati served. 

    Under President Buhari, all of that has since changed for the better: one of Nigeria’s biggest agricultural deals has been with Morocco, the US has approved for Nigeria the largest US arms deal ever done in sub-Saharan Africa, and Nigeria has been the major funder and enabler of the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF). 

    As for the question Abati asked, “Do we have a functioning Naval vessel that can provide transportation from Port Sudan to Nigeria, or do we need to hire Navy transportation?” 

    The answer is a very proud YES. A year ago, Nigeria took delivery of the NNS KADA, a brand-new Landing Ship Tank (LST) that has the capacity to do the needed evacuation work in Sudan. Abati should be reminded that it is under President Buhari that the Navy is acquiring these important new vessels that were last purchased in the 1970s and 1980s. 

    It should also be noted that NNS KADA has been on standby just in case it is required. But so far, this has not been necessary – the Air Force supported by local airlines are up to the task, and flying is in these circumstances more efficient than sailing.

    For Nigeria to deploy a ship, it is a journey that will go around the northern or southern coast of Africa, covering thousands of nautical miles, and that will take over three weeks to complete. This is why the air option was settled on as the most ideal for Nigeria. In the time that the Navy’s NNS KADA will take to sail to Sudan, the Air Force C-130 would be able to do several trips. 

    When Abati praises Somalia for being able to “rescue its nationals from Sudan,” and goes on to attack Nigeria, Abati is exposing his shocking ignorance of basic African geography. By geography, countries like Kenya and Somalia will definitely find it much easier and quicker to evacuate their people, ahead of Nigeria, which is in a different region entirely. 

    I wonder if Abati knows that the US, UK, Germany, Spain, Italy, France, China, and Saudi Arabia maintain permanent Military Bases in Djibouti, right there at the mouth of the Red Sea, and a much shorter sailing distance to Sudan than from West Africa. Which means their deployment time is much less than for countries that do not have bases in the region. 

    Abati said “my own country is busy telling Moonlight tales.” If anybody is telling moonlight tales here, it is this senior journalist who should know better, but is instead allowing partisan bias and a tendency to believe the worst of his country, to overpower and mislead him. 

    Just to remind Abati, as of Monday May 8, 2023, there have been five daily batches of evacuations of Nigerians in Sudan, as follows: 129 on May 8, 834 on May 7, 131 on May 6, 130 on May 5, and 380 on May 3. Making a total of 1,604 so far, with the flights scheduled to continue into the week. Nigeria is doing right for its citizens, despite obstacles, and it should not be a crime to be honest in acknowledging this.

    With all of these in mind, the least one expects from Abati, as a responsible and respected journalist, is a more honest and more responsibly-framed update to that hatchet job article.

    •Ilallah writes from Abuja

  • Ekweremadu as mirror

    Ekweremadu as mirror

    Back in March, Ike Ekweremadu, Beatrice, his wife, and Obeta, their daughter’s doctor, were convicted under Britain’s Modern Slavery Act for organ trafficking by a jury that ruled they criminally conspired to bring a 21-year-old Lagos street trader to London. They were last week sentenced to various jail terms with Ekweremadu receiving nine and a half years, his wife six, and Obeta, ten years.

    While sentencing them at London’s Old Bailey criminal court, Justice Jeremy Johnson did not forget to let them know that “The act of extracting human organs is a type of servitude which reduces human beings and their physical forms to commodities that can be traded.” Although from his charity work and attestations of Nigerians, including law makers, a former Nigerian president and some clergy men, Justice Johnson was in no doubt Ekweremadu was a good man. But being celebrated as a good man could however not vitiate the argument of the investigating and prosecuting officers that Ekweremadu was criminally minded. For the judge, therefore, the law is the law.

    Indeed, the investigation and prosecution proved Ekweremadu and his other two accomplices convicted for what the judge described as “a reprehensible business” are all criminally minded. Justice Johnson was therefore persuaded that Ekweremadu, who lied freely through his teeth and was also accused of involvement in bribing a medical secretary (an Igbo interpreter) at the Royal Free, during the trial, masterminded the act. His wife also lied. Obeta, who helped organise the organ harvesting plot after he himself had received a kidney transplant at the Royal Free through human trafficking, was similarly criminally minded. This was a doctor who took N4.5m from Ekweremadu on behalf of a victim he only paid N270, 000.

    Of course, the victim was not any less criminally minded. Determined to benefit from his own victimhood, he escaped when he was about to be returned to Nigeria following the failure of their plan. He sought police protection by lying he was a 15-year-old gullible poor boy picked up from the street of Lagos without being told he was coming to London for organ harvesting. But he was 21, and this was after the victim had signed all the papers and claiming he was a cousin to Ekweremadu’s daughter. In fact, it was not until this development that Ekweremadu, who had thought he was on top of the game, realised the victim had his own plan to “japa” to seek greener pastures in Britain. It is a case of “a cunning man died; a cunning man buried him.”

    Except that being criminally minded is a common affliction among Nigerians, Ekweremadu, who according to the judge had over 400,000 pounds deposited in his account in six months while in detention doing nothing in addition to a record of over 40 houses across the globe, had enough resources to take care of his daughter. After all, struggling middle-class Nigerians routinely travel abroad for organ transplants. The problem is that some criminally minded Nigerians just believe they must cut corners.

    In this regard, it was very clear Ekweremadu and his chosen victim are two of a kind. What counted against Ekweremadu was that he was trying to exploit the poor and weak in spite of his stupendous wealth, which but for his greed, was enough to build a kidney transplant clinic in his Enugu State.

    And similarly, from all indications, his victim was not as innocent as the British prosecution and investigation officers would want us to believe. This was a young man squaring up in a game of roulette hoping to outwit Senator Ekweremadu. What worked in his favour despite being equally criminally minded were the testimonies of British medical/psychological experts that indicated he did not fully understand the consequences of his action, which could have led to his untimely death.

    And the British experts attributed this to desperation and poverty. And who else carries the can for the ravaging poverty in a country described by a former British prime minister as very corrupt but politicians like Ekweremadu, who has been in the senate since 2003 and has thrice served as deputy senate president?

    Of course, Ekweremadu was also haunted by his past. In today’s globalised world, the British authorities know he has always cut corners. They remember how in 2015, he and Saraki literally stole the senate presidency and senate vice presidency. They know how the Nigerian lawmakers, described as “pen robbers” by Olusegun Obasanjo, cornered 25% of the nation’s budget to reposition themselves as the highest paid lawmakers in the world. They know it was the senate that in 2000 created fuel scarcity that allowed them to increase the number of fuel importers from the initial four multinationals to over a hundred. They remember that it was that instrument the lawmakers, PDP stalwarts and their children, deployed to forge documents to swindle the Jonathan government to the tune of N1.7tn in the name of fuel subsidy ‘without importing,’ in the words of Audu Ogbe, one time PDP chairman, ‘a pint of fuel.’

    But weep not for Ekweremadu. The truth of the matter is that there are just too many criminally minded Nigerians. In politics, they want to reap where we did not sow, or pull down the edifice on their heads. In the name of business, some criminally minded Nigerians import fake and substandard goods, including drugs, killing not only our budding industries but snuffing life out of innocent Nigerians.

    Ekweremadu’s tragedy has only shown that cutting corners irrespective of one’s wealth or poverty status has become an affliction among many Nigerians. Your mechanic, plumber, electrician, POS operator, all share the same mindset with the country’s political and economic fraudsters.

    Criminally minded Nigerians abound in the church where they sell grace and promise the poor wealth without work, even when God has decreed every man must live by his sweat. They flourish in the media where, in the quest to protect the rich and powerful from whose table they get some crumbs, they suppress the truth. While fighting the battle of their masters as slaves, they give the impression the state, saddled with the responsibility of protecting the rest of us from the antics of some criminally minded powerful Nigerians, is the enemy. Show me one newspaper or TV platform that published the possible source of Justice Thomson angst- the fact that Ekweremadiu had over four hundred thousand pounds deposited in his account in six months while in detention doing nothing.

    The judiciary has its own share of many criminally minded individuals. Magu, the immediate past EFCC chairman, told us that some SANS were given a brief to prosecute criminals on behalf of EFCC but ended up shielding such criminals. It is on record that many of them have become experts in defending government illegalities, thieving governors and bank owners that defrauded their depositors.  One of them described Saraki’s trading off the victory of his party for a pot of porridge and Ekweremadu’s opportunism as ‘real politick.’

    But in every adversity, there is opportunity. The fall of Ekweremadu from grace to grass, after spending twenty years in the senate and serving as number four citizen for twelve years, provides an opportunity for us to look at ourselves in the mirror. Ekweremadu is not the only criminally minded Nigerian public servant smiling to the bank with four hundred pounds every six months for doing absolutely nothing. For far too long, we have played the ostrich.