Author: The Nation

  • Football Money League: Madrid top as Man United drop to lowest  position

    Football Money League: Madrid top as Man United drop to lowest  position

    Manchester United have fallen to their lowest position in the annual Deloitte Football Money League rankings, which have been topped by Real Madrid.

    Madrid generated a record €1.2 billion ($1.4 billion) in revenue, with the top 20 teams represented clearing €12.4 billion ($14.5 billion) when combined, also a record.

    The €12.4 billion figure represents an 11 percent increase in total revenue over the previous Money League season.

    United fell to eighth place Money League, with Liverpool the highest-earning English club for the first time in fifth place. Barcelona were second, up from fifth, Bayern Munich third and Paris Saint-Germain fourth to round out the top five.

    Two new teams entered the top 20, with Bundesliga side Stuttgart coming in at 18th with €296.3 million ($345 million) in revenue, and Portuguese club Benfica generating €283.4 million ($330 million) to finish 19th. Among the three sources of revenue, the Deloitte report assigned commercial revenue as the main source of income (43 percent of the total). However, matchday revenue was the fastest-growing source (16 percent year-over-year, accounting for 19 percent of the total).

    The remaining 38 percent comes from broadcasting rights revenue, which also grew by 10 percent. The 10 teams involved in the Club World Cup last summer saw their broadcast revenues rise 17 percent.

    United were once regarded as the blueprint for commercial success in football and have topped the Money League in 10 of its 29 editions, most recently in 2017.

    However, United are down in eighth in the 2026 table, in part due to broadcast revenue dropping from €258 million ($301 million) to €206 million ($240 million) because of their absence from the Champions League in 2024-25.

    The club is set to generate even less matchday revenue in the current season due to their total absence from European competition, and their failure to go past the first hurdle in either domestic cup means they will play only 20 competitive fixtures at Old Trafford in 2025-26.

    Tim Bridge, the Sports Business Group Leader at Deloitte, told the Press Association: “The clubs with the biggest football club brands and position in the market have an opportunity to broaden their reach and offer more to fans on a matchday, offer more to fans on a non-matchday, and become a more 365-days-a-year touch point. United are probably only just starting that journey now, because of the reported stadium development.

    “If you went back 10 or 15 years, and you looked at Manchester United’s matchday revenue it was the industry leader. If you looked at their ability to generate commercial revenue, it was the benchmark by which everybody then went to market and set their strategy. I don’t think that remains the case.

    “The opportunity remains for Manchester United. They are arguably still the biggest global football club brand, and therefore they have the opportunity to maximise that in a way that is only possible for a select few.

    “But to do that requires fit-for-purpose facilities. As the industry evolves, clubs should ask themselves whether there is a need to rethink how they engage with fans and how that relationship works. With reports of the new stadium, it is clear they have started to do some of that, so it’s very clear they’re thinking in that way. Their timing of making that change is behind Real Madrid and Barcelona, but the opportunity remains.”

    Read Also: Super Eagles: NFF  demands compensation from Airtel over ambush marketing

    United are the fourth-placed English club in the 2026 Money League behind Liverpool, Manchester City and Arsenal, who are fifth, sixth and seventh overall, respectively.

    Liverpool’s return to the Champions League in 2024-25 helped them to a seven percent increase in commercial revenue from non-matchday events at Anfield.

    It is the first time there has not been an English team in the Money League top four, with Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern and PSG all benefiting from going deep in the newly-expanded Champions League and the expanded FIFA Club World Cup in the summer.

    Premier League teams may expect to fare better generally in the 2027 Money League, which will be the first to reflect the new broadcast deal which runs to 2029, but Bridge said the best-performing clubs would continue to be those who match on-field success with diversification off it.

    “The trick to staying [in the top five] is maintaining both of those. It used to be you only had to maintain one of them. Now, in 2026, we’re at a point where the highest revenue generating clubs are probably broader than football,” he said.

    Manchester City’s sixth place was their lowest since the Covid-19-impacted season of 2019-20.

    In all, nine Premier League clubs made it into the top 20 of the Money League, with Tottenham (ninth), Chelsea (10th ), Aston Villa (14th ), Newcastle (17th ) and West Ham (20th ) all represented.

  • Tension as suspected miscreants attack Lekki Palm Estate

    Tension as suspected miscreants attack Lekki Palm Estate

    Tension gripped Lekki Palm Estate on Thursday evening after a group of suspected miscreants reportedly invaded the area, claiming they were acting on the directive of influential figures in Lagos.

    Eyewitnesses said the individuals stormed the estate, triggering panic and unease among residents.

    Attempts to confirm the reason for the attack were still ongoing as of the time of filing this report.

    Security operatives responded swiftly to the incident, with officers of the Lagos State Police Command arresting some of the suspects. 

    Read Also: 24 Nigerian varsities in 2026 global subject rankings

    Authorities have commenced investigations to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the attack and verify the authenticity of the claims made by those involved.

    Meanwhile, residents have urged relevant authorities to take decisive action to restore calm and guarantee the safety of lives and property within the estate as investigations continue.

  • AFCON 2025: Morocco proud to have contributed to Africa’s prominence, football —– King Mohammed VI

    AFCON 2025: Morocco proud to have contributed to Africa’s prominence, football —– King Mohammed VI

    Following the successful hosting of the 35th   African Cup of Nations (AFCON) by Morocco, His Majesty  King Mohammed VI  said his country  is proud  to have contributed to the prominence of Africa and its football.

     The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, African Cooperation and Moroccan Expatriates conveyed the king’s message in a statement on Thursday, adding that “Morocco remains proud to have offered, on its soil, a month of popular joy and sporting emotion.”

    “Following the 35th African Cup of Nations, hosted with great enthusiasm by the Kingdom of Morocco from December 21st, 2025 to January 18th, 2026, His Majesty the King Mohammed VI, may God assist Him, wishes to convey His gratitude to all members of the Nation, who have contributed admirably to the full success of this wonderful event.

    “His Majesty the King particularly wishes to congratulate all citizens, across various cities of the Kingdom, for the efforts deployed, and to thank each and every one for their valuable contribution to this historic success, which has been acknowledged and acclaimed worldwide.

    “The Sovereign also addresses His congratulations to millions of Moroccan women, men and children who, in an exemplary manner and each in their own way, tirelessly supported their national team, currently ranked 8th best national team in the world.

    “Such remarkable result, fruit of a high-level proactive sports and infrastructure policy, as well as the patriotic choice made by talented youth of Moroccan Expatriates to opt for the national team’s jersey and to defend its colors with pride and gusto,” the ministry said.

    The statement added that this  edition of the continental competition will stand as a milestone, as, beyond its sporting outcomes, it made for a gauge for the Kingdom’s major leap on the path to development and progress, fruit of a long-term vision and a unique and efficient Moroccan model which puts the citizen at the heart of all ambition.

    Read Also: Shell plans fresh $20bn investment in Nigeria, NNPCL — Ojulari 

    While acknowledging the unfortunate events of the final minutes of the match between the national teams of Morocco and Senegal, the statement noted that although the incidence was regrettable, “it remains nonetheless that, once passions have subsided, inter-African fraternity will naturally prevail, for this Moroccan success is also an African success.”

    “Furthermore, in view of the denigration and attempts at discrediting sustained, His Majesty the King, may God assist Him, remains convinced that hostile schemes will never reach their aims, and that Moroccan people know to balance matters and not to be drawn into resentment and discord.

    “Nothing will alter the closeness that was fostered over centuries between our African people, nor the fruitful cooperation built hand in hand with different countries of the Continent, bolstered by ever ambitious partnerships.

    “The Kingdom of Morocco is and shall remain a great African country, faithful to the spirit of brotherhood, solidarity and an always nurtured mutual respect towards its continent.”

    It added: “In accordance with the enlightened vision of the Sovereign, Morocco will further its resolute and steadfast commitment in favor of a united and prosperous Africa, notably through mutual exchange of experiences, expertise and knowledge.”

  • NAHCON, Saudi Hajj Ministry hold strategic talks on hajj preparations

    NAHCON, Saudi Hajj Ministry hold strategic talks on hajj preparations

    The National Hajj Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) yesterday hosted a high-level delegation from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Hajj and Umrah, led by Professor Dr. Ghassan Al-Nuaimi, at the Hajj House in Abuja.

    The NAHCON Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Prof Abdullahi Saleh Usman, called for enhanced collaboration and cooperation between NAHCON and the Saudi Ministry of Hajj and Umrah, while formally requesting additional Hajj slots, noting that Nigeria has already exhausted its allocated quota.

    During the meeting, the NAHCON Commissioner for Operations, Prince Anofiu Elegushi, briefed the delegation on Nigeria’s level of preparedness for the Hajj, covering early planning initiatives, airline engagements, accommodation arrangements in Makkah and Madinah, and pre-arrival data submission processes.

    He emphasised that no pilgrim will be allowed to depart Nigeria without complete documentation submitted at least 72 hours before departure, in strict compliance with Saudi regulations.

    Read Also: Shell plans fresh $20bn investment in Nigeria, NNPCL — Ojulari 

    He requested additional Hajj slots and Saudi intervention on accommodation allocation and airline approvals, while also raising concerns over recurring visa-related challenges, which the Saudi delegation agreed to review through appropriate technical channels.

    The commission outlined measures aimed at addressing overstay concerns, including plans for biometric data capture and the deployment of a centralised pilgrim tracking system.

    The Saudi delegation stressed the importance of strict adherence to international Hajj timelines, noting that early preparation is mandatory and that extensions may not be granted.

    Both parties reaffirmed their commitment to sustained cooperation, with the Saudi delegation pledging continued technical support and engagement through diplomatic channels to address operational challenges and ensure a safe, efficient, and successful Hajj for Nigerian pilgrims.

  • MssN: The almond tree

    MssN: The almond tree

    “Do you not see how Allah sets forth a parable? Pleasant word is like a splendid tree which roots are firmly entrenched in the earth while its branches sprout protectively into the sky yielding fruits every season by the grace of Allah. Allah talks to men in parables that they may be mindfully alert”. Q.14:24

    Almond tree, for those who know it, is splendid to behold. It is magnificent in appearance. It is grandiose environmentally. But much more than all these, it is highly curative in substance and in essence. No soil whether in the forest or in the savanna or even in the desert is objectionable to this great tree for a dwelling. Wherever it is found, Almond tree creates a serene environment and serves as a protective umbrella for other living organisms around. It is one unique tree that wears the crown of a king and bears the scepter of a generalissimo. What other tree can compare favourably with this wonder tree?

    Believed to be an original native of Morocco in North Africa, Almond is not just about roots, stem and leaves. It is also a medicinal tree with invaluable medicinal properties. Its medicinal virtues are evident in its pharmaco-dynamic action of copper, iron, phosphorus and vitamins B1, B2, B3, B4 and B6 which exert synergic action in man and boost the formation of new blood cells and haemoglobin even as they maintain smooth physiological function of the brain, the nerves, the bones, the heart and the liver.

    The summarized analytical description here is not much about Almond tree per se as it is about the parable which its existence seeks to interpret. The similitude of the MUSLIM STUDENT SOCIETY OF NIGERIA (MSSN) is like that of the Almond tree. It was planted like a Mustard seed. It germinated into an enlivening plant with no irrelevant part.

    Most Nigerian Muslims of the current generation, including this columnist, do not know or cannot remember how MSS came into existence. They can now afford to take it for granted either because they were not part of the struggle that brought their spiritual harmony to bear or because the struggle has taken a different form which they are yet to be conscious of.    

    MSS is a revolution which quietly crept into the Nigerian society at the very right time that a revolution was required. If Islam enjoys a hitherto denied official recognition in Nigeria today, it is mostly due to that miraculous revolution.

    How and when did this gargantuan SOCIETY come into existence? Who were the irrigators that watered its seed into a tree? What suckers have since sprung from this tree and where are the farmers planting and nursing those suckers? Should MSS be called an Institution? Who actually are its alumni today and where are they? What further height is this tree aspiring to attain? These and many other questions had spurred ‘THE MESSAGE’ to fetch water from its very source for the sake of originality and genuineness.

    In a one on one interview with a man who joined hands with others to plant its seed, who was its chief irrigator from the very beginning, who grew and towered with the tree and who is more authoritative than others in telling its story, these questions were answered. Dr. Abdul-Lateef Adegbite, the first and longest serving National President of MSS (and former Secretary General of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs by the grace of God) went the memory lane and relayed it all for posterity sake. It must be recalled that Dr. Adegbite as pioneer President served five terms of one year each from 1954 to 1959. That length of service turned out to be a saving grace for the infant SOCIETY.

    ‘THE MESSAGE’ decided to put the interview in a prose form for lucidity and proper perspective rather than a question and answer rhetoric. Here we go:

                   “It all started like a dream in April 1954. A student of Methodist Boys High School (BBHS) Lagos, Tajudeen Aromasodu, clairvoyantly muted a unique idea. He proposed an association of all Muslim students in Nigeria starting with Lagos secondary schools. The intention was to create a forum of unity and identification with Islam. Such a forum was also to enable them pursue and defend their common interest.

    Aromasodu’s idea had emanated from the constitution of the Muslim Students Society of Burma which he accidentally came across. He read the constitution and became fascinated by it. That was at a time when Muslim children could hardly pass through secondary schools in Southern Nigeria without getting converted. Muslim children seeking Western education in those days were seen as trespassers or intruders except they were ready to cross to the other side of the   bridge against their faith and the wish of their parents.

    Aromasodu’s focus at that time was probably not beyond Lagos which was the federal capital of Nigeria and the seat of the colonial rulers. He quickly contacted a few other Muslim students of like minds and, together, they decided to invite two delegates from each of seven most prominent schools in Lagos at that time. Thus, fourteen of such students (boys and girls) formed the pioneer nucleus of what was destined to become a formidable SOCIETY. The schools were Kings College, Lagos; Queens College; Yaba, Methodist Boys High School, Lagos; CMS Grammar School, Bariga; Ahmadiyya College (now Anwarul Islam Model College), Agege; Methodist Girls High School, Yaba and Baptist Academy, Obanikoro.

    The nucleus body held its inaugural meeting at Ansar-ud-Deen Primary School, Alakoro, Lagos, on May 30, 1954. It was at that meeting that a proposal which had earlier been sent out to the mentioned schools was formally adopted. And, a resolution was taken to draft the constitution of the SOCIETY which was ratified thereafter.

    With the constitution in place, some members of the first executive body were elected into office. Dr. Adegbite was unanimously elected President while Shuaib Oloritu of Kings College and Saidat Anibaba (now Professor (Mrs.) Mabadaje) of Queens College became first and second Vice Presidents respectively. Dr. Adegbite’s election was quite timely and coincidental because he was not just the Chairman of the Library and Debating Society of Lagos secondary schools, at that time, which made him a first among, he too was planning a common forum for Muslim students.

    Other officers were elected and given responsibilities. Duties were delegated with trust and virtually everybody lived up to the trust.

    What would have been a major hindrance to the realization of that dream was money with which to run the new SOCIETY. But nothing fails at the dream level which has the hands of Allah in it. With strong determination and commitment, the young boys and girls levied themselves one shilling each monthly. Besides, each of them bore the cost of transportation when assigned to a duty outside the immediate environment.

    If the first national conference of the SOCIETY, held in Lagos in 1954, drew the attention of many people to it and attracted many new members, that of 1956 held in Ijebu-Ode was a watershed. It was at that conference that the SOCIETY can be said to have become a real national body. Some members especially of northern origin who later became prominent in that body joined in 1956. These included Shehu Musa, Adamu Ciroma, Yerima Abdullah and a host of others.  It was about the same year that some other Lagos students like Lateefat Oyekan (now Alhaja Lateefat Okunnu) joined the SOCITY and boosted its growth with indefatigable activities. At this time, Islam was not yet known to have significantly reached what is now called South East or South South of Nigeria.

    The third conference was held in Ilesha in 1957. It was hosted by M.A Smith. The fourth and fifth conferences were held in Ibadan and Abeokuta in 1958 and 1959 respectively.

    The conference had to be held consistently in the South-West because most of the initial members were students in that region. There were only two Higher Institutions in the country at that time. The two (Yaba College of Technology and University College, Ibadan) were situated in Lagos and Ibadan respectively. And all northern students seeking higher education in Nigeria had to attend these two Institutions.

    The MSS annual conference had by now become a meeting point for almost all Muslim students in Nigeria because of the awareness it created in those students and the spiritual succour it engendered in their parents.

    Despite their young age and little experience, the founders of the SOCIETY were foresighted enough to know that they would need the guidance and support of some elderly prominent men and women in the society to survive. They therefore appointed some of such people as patrons and matrons.

    Among them were Alhaji (Sir) Abubakar Tafawa Balewa; the then Prime Minister of Nigeria, Alhaji (Sir) Ahmadu Bello (the Sardauna of Sokoto and Premier of Northern Nigeria); Alhaji Adegoke Adelabu, (a Federal Minister); Alhaji Dauda Adegbenro (a Minister in the Western Region); Professor Saburi Biobaku; Alhaji Ekemode; Mr. H.A.P Adebola (a labour leader); Alhaji M.A Smith; Alhaja Humani Alaga (from Ibadan) and Alhaja A. Shodeinde (from Lagos).

    The contribution of these Patrons and Matrons to the phenomenal growth of MSSN was invaluable. And its spread across the country within a very short time was due to providence. Abdul-Lateef Adegbite, the President of the SOCIETY had completed his secondary education at Kings College in 1957. He had wanted to vacate the office of the President for someone else but others would not hear of that. They persuaded him to continue having appreciated his cool-headedness and the leadership ability in him.

    Providence set in to play a role in the life of Abdul-Lateef and that of MSSN simultaneously. He got a job as a researcher at the Historical Research Scheme in Ibadan in which he was engaged while awaiting admission to read English at UI. At this time, Abdul-Lateef experienced a repeat of providence working for him against his wish. He did not succeed in getting admission into the Premier University but that was a blessing for MSSN. If he had been admitted as he wished, he would have had less time for the SOCIETY in its infancy and he would not have become a lawyer that he happily became later. He also would have studied English at UI without any scholarship. His patience and faith paid off as he later got admission into the University of Southampton where he obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in Law before proceeding to the University of London for his Masters’ and Ph.D. on scholarship.

    Read Also: Shell plans fresh $20bn investment in Nigeria, NNPCL — Ojulari 

    Earlier in his life, he had experienced a similar fate. While seeking admission into secondary school, his desire was to be a student of Government College, Ibadan which his brother Saburi Biobaku had attended. But as providence would have it, his Primary school   Headmaster mistakenly filled Kings College, Lagos, in his form. And that was how he became a student of Kings College.

    If he had attended Government College, Ibadan, he would have probably not been part of the formation of MSSN and his leadership quality that nursed that SOCIETY from inception would not have been of such great benefit. And if he had got admission into UI at the time he desired, perhaps the history of MSSN would have been different today.

    As a researcher always on the road, Adegbite used his time, his energy and the car attached to his office to spread the good tidings of MSSN to many other Muslim students, especially in the Western Region, who later became members.

    By the time he eventually travelled to United Kingdom for his University education in 1959, a solid foundation had been on ground for the SOCIETY. He therefore had no fear on what would become of it in his absence especially when he had confidence in those who succeeded his tenure.

    One major fear that had been averted before he travelled was that of the interaction of male and female students. That was the fear of the parents who didn’t want immorality to debase the good intention with which the SOCIETY was established. This sensitive aspect was carefully handled through the enforcement of discipline. Marriage among members was not forbidden but modalities were laid down for such based on the guidelines of the Qur’an and Sunnah.

    Realizing the implications of talking any of the sisters into marriage, the President himself avoided any act that could set a bad precedent for others. When it was time for him to choose a marital partner, he made sure that his wife to be (Miss Taibat Yetunde Carew, of blessed memory) was not a member of the SOIETY. Although he met her at an MSS forum, the latter just escorted her friend to that forum.

    When he returned into the country in 1965 with Ph. D degree, he was surprised at the growth rate of MSS across the country. All the secondary schools have fully become members and most of the foundation members had either graduated from Higher Institutions or about to graduate.

    He therefore thought of a higher pedestal for the SOCIETY’s alumni to operate Islamically. Fortunately, he was appointed Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice in the Western State.  

    Today, most of those members are great men and women in various public and private sectors. The current Sultan, some Emirs,   Ministers, Governors, Vice Chancellors, Professors and, even President Umar Musa Yar’Adua were members of that great SOCIETY.

    It is however disturbing that despite the greatness of this SOCIETY and its alumni, there was no permanent office that could be called its national headquarters even by the time its 50th anniversary was celebrated in 2004. An attempt was once made to site such office in Ilorin being the midway between the north and the south. But that attempt was unsuccessful. It was only when the elders decided to pay   attention to the issue of headquarters, recently, that work began on a befitting office in Abuja which may soon be completed.

    Dr. Abdul-Lateef Adegbite’s appointment as Commissioner also helped tremendously in bridging the religious gap between the north and the south especially in respect of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs in which he was to play a major role to bring to life.

    His actions that led to the formation of ‘WEST JOMO’; how he contributed to the formation of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs; How he became the Secretary General of that Islamic apex body and other Islamic activities he has engaged in will become a subject in this column in a foreseeable future. In sha’a Llah.

  • Civic responsibility and the building of greater Lagos

    Civic responsibility and the building of greater Lagos

    By Idowu Adewara

    Lagos is often described as chaotic, but chaos is rarely accidental. It is shaped by human choices, by what citizens tolerate, excuse, or quietly normalise over time. While government bears enormous responsibility for planning, infrastructure, and service delivery, the quality of life in the city is also shaped daily by the behaviour of its residents. This is where civic responsibility becomes unavoidable.

    Civic responsibility is not merely about compliance; it is about commitment. It is the recognition that society is not an abstract entity run solely by government officials, but a shared project sustained by the everyday actions of ordinary people. At its core, civic responsibility asks citizens to hold themselves accountable beyond personal convenience or immediate gain.

    We often speak of wanting a “good society,” one with reliable electricity, clean streets, efficient transportation, responsive institutions, and justice for all. Yet this vision remains elusive, not always because resources are absent, but because the culture that sustains such a society is weak. A good society reveals itself in how people treat public spaces, how they respond to rules, how they engage authority, and how they extend care to one another even when no one is watching.

    Too often, civic responsibility is misunderstood as something abstract or bureaucratic. It is not limited to voting during elections or paying taxes, though these are important. It is about recognising that one’s actions, however private they seem, have public consequences. It is the understanding that society is not an external entity imposed on us, but a shared project sustained by our choices.

    Civic responsibility is reflected in how residents dispose of waste instead of blocking drainage systems that later cause flooding. It appears in how drivers obey traffic laws, not only when enforcement officers are present, but because order protects everyone. It shows in how citizens treat public property —not as nobody’s business, but as everybody’s concern. It asks citizens to choose long-term collective benefit over short-term individual gain.

    These actions may appear insignificant, but they accumulate. Societies are not weakened only by corrupt leaders or failed policies; they are eroded daily by ordinary acts of neglect, indifference, and rule-breaking. When people normalise cutting corners, bribing their way out of accountability, or damaging shared spaces, they unknowingly reproduce the very dysfunction they criticise.

    In a city as interconnected as Lagos, no action is entirely private. Blocking a drainage channel, spreading misinformation, evading civic duties, or disregarding public order may feel inconsequential in isolation. Collectively, however, these actions determine whether the city functions or frays.

    Consider the butterfly effect of everyday civic behaviour. A single act, like queuing patiently at a BRT station, quietly challenges the “big man” syndrome that clogs public systems. Volunteering at polling units helps ensure credible elections and curbs the godfatherism that often silences youth voices. In education-starved communities, parents who deliberately teach children respect for rules and public spaces are planting seeds for future leadership. These are not heroic gestures, they are habits that compound over time.

    A good society is not built only in moments of crisis or celebration. It is constructed quietly, through repetitive actions that rarely make headlines. Paying taxes promptly funds roads, schools, and public services. Reporting crimes or environmental hazards early prevents small problems from escalating into crises. Imagine if illegal dumping along roadsides simply stopped. Drainage channels would flow better, floods would be less destructive, and public health risks would reduce significantly. None of this requires extraordinary sacrifice, only consistency. These acts form the invisible architecture of any functioning society.

    In Lagos today, the question of civic responsibility is more urgent than ever. It shows up in traffic management, waste disposal, public discourse, elections, and emergency response. Whether Lagos becomes merely a city that survives or a society that thrives depends largely on how seriously citizens understand and practise their civic duties.

    Take waste management as an example. The sight of refuse dumped on roadsides or into drainage channels has become common enough to feel normal. Yet each act of improper disposal contributes directly to flooding, environmental degradation, and public health risks. When floods occur, we often blame government agencies for poor drainage systems, and rightly so. But the truth is that no drainage system, however well designed, can function if citizens consistently undermine it. The work of building a good society begins with the uncelebrated discipline of proper waste disposal, practised daily by individuals who may never be praised for it.

    The same logic applies to transportation. Lagos roads are a daily theatre of impatience and negotiation. Drivers cut corners, ignore traffic lights, and flout lane rules to save a few minutes. Each individual decision feels rational, even necessary, in a congested city. Collectively, however, these actions produce chaos, accidents, and longer travel times for everyone. Civic responsibility, in this context, is the quiet decision to wait one’s turn and follow rules even when breaking them seems easier. It is restraint in service of collective order.

    Read Also: Shell plans fresh $20bn investment in Nigeria, NNPCL — Ojulari 

    Civic responsibility also operates within institutions. Many Lagosians encounter government not through policy documents or press briefings, but through frontline workers: teachers, nurses, clerks, police officers, and local government officials. The quality of these everyday interactions shapes public trust more than official speeches. When a civil servant chooses diligence over negligence, fairness over favouritism, and service over exploitation, they perform the invisible work of rebuilding confidence in public institutions. This labour rarely attracts applause, yet it determines whether citizens feel alienated from or invested in the state.

    Equally important is the idea of shared ownership. Many citizens relate to government as something distant and adversarial, an entity to be endured rather than engaged. Given Nigeria’s history, this mind-set is understandable. However, it weakens civic life. A good society requires a shift from “government versus people” to “institutions as extensions of our collective will.” This does not mean blind loyalty or silence in the face of failure. It means recognising that neglecting public spaces, abusing public resources, or disengaging entirely does not punish the government alone; it impoverishes the community.

    Modern conversations about citizenship tend to emphasise rights, and rightly so. Citizens must demand accountability, transparency, and justice from those in power. However, rights without responsibility create a fragile civic culture. A society where everyone demands fairness but few practise fairness quickly collapses into cynicism. Responsibility must accompany rights if civic life is to endure.

    This responsibility is reciprocal. Citizens must demand better governance while delivering their own part faithfully. As John F. Kennedy once urged, citizens should not only ask what their country can do for them, but what they can do for their country. This idea remains uncomfortable but necessary.

    Building a greater Lagos demands that civic responsibility be reclaimed as a collective strength. It is not about waiting for utopia, but constructing it gradually, street by street, neighbour by neighbour. In Lagos State, the future will be shaped not only by mega projects, economic reforms, or political leadership, but by millions of small decisions made daily by ordinary people —the decision to queue instead of push, to report wrongdoing rather than participate in it, to show up consistently rather than occasionally. These actions may never trend, but they matter. The greater Lagos we deserve awaits those willing to take on the mantle of civic responsibility. Will you?

    •Adewara is a fellow of the Lateef Jakande Leadership Academy.

  • What Baba Segi reminds me of

    What Baba Segi reminds me of

    It was supposed to be a Netflix original series. That was the plan. Mo Abudu’s Ebony Life Studios had acquired the right from Lola Shoneyin, and the literary community was looking forward to seeing the cinematic version of their favourite novel, ‘The Secret Lives of Baba Segi’s Wives’. Shortly after the plan was announced, Netflix pulled the plug on its funding of original productions from Nigeria. Till date, it has not given details about why it took the decision. All we bank on are rumours and conjecture.

    But, the good news is that the dream hasn’t died. Netflix pulled its carpet, but Abudu has been able to get other partners to replace it with a fluffy rug, a movie instead of a series. And come December, we will see actors such as Iyabo Ojo, Odunlade Adekola, Omowunmi Dada and Shaffy Bello breathe life into Shoneyin’s lively book in which a polygamous man, Baba Segi, one day finds out that nearly his whole life has been a joke, a lie, with his wives as the major players in the drama of his life. Were it not for his youngest wife, the beautiful and university-educated Bolanle, he might have gone to his grave without knowing the truth.

    While those who have read the book are speculating about who and who will play what characters, I am more concerned about Baba Segi’s real-life replicas. The news of the movie adaptation reminds me of a woman. Throughout the first year of her marriage, her menstrual flow was constant. This cycle would be repeated for the next seven years. And, in those years when her period maintained its constancy, tears and sorrow were her uninvited guests. They never alerted her before they start cascading down her cheeks, leaving her helpless hubby to play the consoler when it happened in his presence. Many times she cried when he was away at work or visiting friends and family members.

    Months after months, her monthly flow never ceased for once. The prayers and the fasting did not work the miracle she expected. Science seemed to be where she should have put her hope and trust. After going for series of tests, moving from one hospital to the other, a gynaecologist told her it was time she tried the In-vitro fertilisation (IVF). It is estimated that approximately 3.5 to 5 million children have been born worldwide following ART treatment. It is estimated that over 40,000 babies have been born through IVF in Nigeria since 1989.

    The IVF route did not come cheap. She and her husband had to cough out about $3,300. It could have been more if luck had not smiled on them and the first IVF was successful. Age was still on my friend’s side so good eggs were harvested, fertilised and implanted in her uterus. And it did not take time for a successful pregnancy to occur in her uterus. And like the parents of Louise Brown, the first child successfully born through IVF treatment in July 1978, luck smiled on my friend and her hubby, she carried the pregnancy to term and they had a son— thus joining the expanding list of beneficiaries of the work of Robert G. Edwards, Patrick Steptoe and Jean Purdy.

    Many women go through as much as ten IVFs and still have to adopt babies or take babies from family members. A popular pastor’s wife’s quest for those tiny tots who love to scatter homes with no knowledge of how to fix them saw her waiting for a decade. She sought help, including IVF. The money went down the medical drain and her tummy remained in perfect shape. Eleven IVFs refused to yield results and she opted for adoption, and life continued.

    Before my friend took the IVF route, a pastor, who came for a programme in her church to pray for women, told them that in trying to have babies, they should emulate Sarah and Anna who never had IVF. He also mentioned other women in the Bible who conceived without scientific help. My friend, at that point, felt she had backslid into sin and was not trusting God enough. She was torn between going with science or with faith. Her gynaecologist resolved the dilemma for her: IVF is not satanic, the gynaecologist explained. In fact, the gynaecologist added a clincher: IVF is a miracle from God.

    There was another issue for my friend and her husband to resolve: who should know about the IVF. They decided it should be for their ears only. And of course, the medical hands involved.

    The day my friend narrated her story, another woman shared hers as well. She also had IVF. Not one, not two, not three, not four…She had ten and still there was no pregnancy. She eventually went the adoption route. She blamed the fact that she did not act on time on the belief in Africa that such matter was spiritual and should be left to God to handle.

    Read Also: 24 Nigerian varsities in 2026 global subject rankings

    My friend buttresses this point by saying it is wrongly generally believed that a Nigerian man can never be sterile. Thirty per cent of infertility, my friend says, according to statistics, is traceable to men who have either low sperm count or zero sperm count. Baba Segi falls in this category.

    Infertility is not just primary. A couple who have had a kid before may find it difficult to have another, a situation experts describe as “secondary infertility”. It is said to account for more than half of all infertility cases.

    My friend believes it is time Nigeria and the rest of Africa went the way of nations such as Canada and Belgium where universal coverage of IVF improved the use of safe fertility treatments. She also believes the time had come to drum it in the hearing of ignorant men: men too can be infertile with either zero sperm count or low sperm count, thus being a major contributor to what researchers have found out: five to eight per cent of couples battle infertility worldwide and the prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa is higher, with 10 to 30 per cent of couples in Nigeria slugging it out.

    An expert says a man will have low sperm count and it is the woman that will be taking drugs; lifestyle factor such as smoking of cigarettes, marijuana and cocaine plays a major role in male infertility. Obesity reduces sperm count, and what men eat and the vitamins they takes are key to improving their sperm and reproductive organs.

    My final take: Lola Shoneyin’s ‘The Secret Lives of Baba Segi’s Wives’ portrays men’s role in infertility, and the need for this reality to be adequately acknowledged. A woman’s value needs not depend on whether or not she has a biological child; government need to put in place health coverage that can reduce the financial burden of IVF; in-laws, friends, family members and the society at large need to stop depressing women in the waiting room.

  • General Musa: From the trenches to the table

    General Musa: From the trenches to the table

    By Kennedy Elaigwu Awodi

    The security of a nation is not a laboratory for experimentation. It is the bedrock upon which every other pillar of development, economic growth, social cohesion, and infrastructure, either stands firm or collapses. When President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, took the oath of office, his “Renewed Hope” agenda promised a departure from the tentative steps of the past. Nowhere is this promise more evident to me today than in his strategic decision to appoint General Christopher Gwabin Musa (Rtd) as the Minister of Defence.

    This is not merely a political appointment; it is a masterstroke of continuity and competence. In my view, General Musa is the quintessence of this administration’s vision. By elevating the immediate past Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) to the helm of Ship House, the president has bypassed the traditional “learning curve” that often hampers new administrations. He has chosen a man who doesn’t need a map to find the battlefield because he has spent his entire life drawing it.

    When I watched the transition ceremonies, I was struck by the recurring sentiment shared by the Permanent Secretary and the current Chief of Defence Staff: they called it a “homecoming.” To me, this is the most significant advantage of General Musa’s leadership. He is not an outsider trying to understand the Byzantine corridors of the Ministry of Defense; he is a seasoned practitioner who knows exactly where the bureaucratic bottlenecks are hidden and how to dismantle them.

    In a time of national urgency, we cannot afford a minister who is “getting to know” his generals. We need a leader who already has their respect, understands their operational constraints, and speaks their language. Musa’s transition from CDS to minister ensures that the strategic reforms he initiated in uniform can now be sustained and funded through his seat at the Federal Executive Council. This is the institutional strengthening that “Renewed Hope” looks like in practice.

    My belief in General Musa’s capacity is not based on blind optimism but on the cold, hard data of his recent tenure as Chief of Defense Staff (2023–2025). During those critical years, I saw a shift in our military’s posture that was both refreshing and effective.

     The power of synergy: For years, the Nigerian military struggled with inter-service rivalry. General Musa made “jointness” his mantra. He didn’t just talk about collaboration; he enforced it. Under his watch, the Army, Navy, and Air Force began to operate as a singular, lethal fist. This unity of command is, in my opinion, the only way to win an asymmetrical war against insurgents who do not respect borders or jurisdictions.

     Intelligence-led warfare: I have always advocated for a move away from reactive “boots-on-the-ground” approaches toward a more sophisticated, technology-driven strategy. General Musa championed the modernization of our military capabilities, prioritizing surveillance, reconnaissance, and data-driven strikes. He understood early on that in modern terror warfare, the side with the better information, not just the bigger guns, wins.

    He was credited for revitalizing the armed forces by restructuring the operational theatres which led to the creation of Operation FASAN YANMA in the North-West, Operation ENDURING PEACE in Plateau and parts of Kaduna States. This tactical reorganization effectively shrank the operational space for insurgent groups, putting them on the defensive for the first time in years.

     Perhaps the most resonant aspect of General Musa’s agenda for me is his unwavering focus on personnel welfare. He has often described welfare not just as a “nice-to-have,” but as a “strategic” priority. I couldn’t agree more.

    Read Also: Shell plans fresh $20bn investment in Nigeria, NNPCL — Ojulari 

    A soldier who is worried about his family’s health, his children’s school fees, or the quality of his kit cannot give 100% to the mission. By prioritizing the human element of the Armed Forces, General Musa is investing in the very soul of our national defense. When he pledges to ensure that those making the ultimate sacrifice are cared for, he is sending a message to every man and woman in uniform: Your country has your back. This is how you build morale, and this is how you win wars.

    Then you look at how he handles accountability and the path to peace. What I find most refreshing about the General’s approach is his commitment to evidence over conjecture. In an era of misinformation, his pledge to be guided by hard data is a signal of modern, accountable governance. Furthermore, his willingness to probe past lapses, such as the troop withdrawals in Kebbi shows a man of integrity who is not afraid to look at the cracks in the system to fix them.

    The mandate from President Tinubu is clear: go after the kidnappers, the bandits, and the criminals. In General Musa, I see a leader who has the tactical depth and the political will to translate that mandate into a lived reality for every Nigerian.

    Final Thoughts: The challenge ahead is undoubtedly immense. The shadows of insecurity have loomed over our nation for too long. However, as I reflect on this appointment, I feel a renewed sense of confidence. General Musa is not just a minister; he is the president’s strategic anchor.

    My hope, and the hope of millions of Nigerians, is that this leadership will finally allow our farmers to return to their fields without fear, our children to sit in their classrooms without shadows, and our citizens to sleep with both eyes closed. The president has provided the vision; General Musa has the hands to build it. It is now time for us to support this unified front as we reclaim the peace and prosperity that is our birth right.

    • Awodi writes from North Carolina, USA.

  • Comparing Fela with Wizkid

    Comparing Fela with Wizkid

    By Ogungbile Emmanuel Oludotun

    I never met Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. I was born the same month he died. There was no moment where I watched him command a stage, no memory of Kalakuta Republic in real time, no lived experience of his daily defiance against military power.

    In fact, my generation arguing on X(Twitter) did not meet Fela in flesh and blood; we encountered him in fragments, through stories, documentaries, old interviews, cracked vinyl, protest chants, and the stubborn way his name refuses to fade.

    Yet somehow, despite not being there, his greatness still reached me. That, perhaps, is the first lesson in what true greatness means. It does not require presence to convince; it survives absence. Long after the man was gone, his work continued to speak so loudly that even those of us born after his death could not ignore it.

    This is important to clarify; I am not a fan of Fela in the shallow, romantic sense. I do not admire his excesses. I do not like the way he smoked, the recklessness of his lifestyle, or the parts of his personal choices that are often conveniently brushed aside in the name of genius. I am not even a “fan fan” of his music in the everyday sense of enjoyment. However, I am deeply drawn to his stubbornness. I am a student of his message. I respect his refusal to bend. I admire his relentless insistence on African dignity, on freedom, on calling power by its real name. What fascinates me about Fela is not how he lived comfortably, but how he lived uncomfortably by choice.

    I did not inherit Fela’s reputation through nostalgia or inherited worship. I arrived at it through evidence. By listening closely and realising that his music was not designed to soothe or entertain first. By reading history and discovering that his art was inseparable from bruises, arrests, exile, raids, and loss. By understanding that his legacy was not sustained by awards, streaming milestones, or global applause, but by consequence. Fela paid for his voice in ways charts cannot calculate. That is why, even without witnessing him live, I was convinced of his greatness. Not because he was popular, but because he was costly, to himself and to power.

    This context matters, especially now, because the current argument around Wizkid and Fela did not grow out of a serious interrogation of history or cultural meaning. It erupted the way many Nigerian pop culture controversies do, on social media, powered by fandom bravado and careless exaggeration. What began as praise for Wizkid’s global achievements slowly slid into provocative claims by some of his supporters, boldly positioning the Afrobeats star as a modern replacement for Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. In the rush to celebrate charts, awards, stadiums, and international validation, Fela’s name was dragged into arguments designed more to win online battles than to honour legacy. Screenshots, tweets, and viral hot takes quickly pushed the comparison into Nigeria’s trending conversations.

    Seun Kuti, Fela’s youngest son and one of the fiercest custodians of his father’s ideological memory, refused to stay silent. Through emotionally charged videos and blunt online rants, he described the comparison as ignorant and deeply disrespectful. To him, placing Wizkid beside Fela revealed a generation fluent in streams and stardom but unfamiliar with sacrifice, resistance, and consequence. His response, raw, confrontational, and unapologetic dragged the debate out of fan spaces and into mainstream national discourse.

    The tension escalated further when Wizkid himself appeared to respond, not with a carefully argued position but with dismissive social media posts and reposted videos mocking Seun’s outbursts. At that point, what had been a fan-driven argument turned into a symbolic clash between two eras of Nigerian cultural expression. The debate stopped being just about music and became a mirror reflecting how Nigeria remembers its heroes, celebrates its stars, and repeatedly confuses popularity with historical significance.

    This confusion is not accidental. In today’s Nigeria, fame has become shorthand for greatness. Streams are mistaken for substance. Sold-out shows are treated as moral authority. Social media dominance is confused with cultural weight. We now measure impact almost entirely by numbers, followers, awards, reach, without asking harder questions. What was said? Who was challenged? What system was confronted? What did it cost?

    The word “legend” is now used so loosely that it risks becoming meaningless. Anyone with longevity, visibility, or viral relevance can be crowned one, even if their work never disrupted anything beyond playlists.

    Meanwhile, there is no denying Wizkid’s greatness within his own context. From Ojuelegba to global stages, he has achieved what once seemed impossible for Nigerian pop artists. He helped carry Afrobeats into the global mainstream, shaping sound, ambition, and confidence for an entire generation. His influence on youth culture, fashion, and modern African identity is undeniable. Measured by commercial success and cultural relevance, Wizkid is one of Africa’s most successful musicians.

    Read Also: Nigeria’s economic reforms working, says IMF

    However, Fela was never defined by commercial success, and that is where the comparison collapses. Fela Anikulapo-Kuti was not merely an entertainer; he was a political force, a cultural disruptor, and a constant threat to authoritarian power. His Afrobeat was not crafted for approval or validation; it was a weapon. He named names, mocked dictators, endured arrests, beatings, exile, the burning of his home, and the death of his mother. His music cannot be separated from resistance, ideology, and consequence. To measure Fela by today’s metrics of success is to misunderstand his mission entirely.

    This is why the question of “who is greater” often feels intellectually dishonest. Wizkid operates within a global entertainment industry that rewards diplomacy, branding, and strategic silence. Fela existed in a time when silence was submission and speaking out invited violence. Wizkid navigates power; Fela confronted it. Both approaches exist. Both have their place. But they are not interchangeable.

    Perhaps the real issue is not Wizkid versus Fela, but Nigeria’s discomfort with complexity. We struggle to hold two truths at once: that Wizkid is a global icon of modern African music, and that Fela remains an unmatched symbol of cultural resistance and political courage. One is a superstar of his era; the other is a historical force whose relevance outlived his life.

    In the end, asking whether Wizkid is greater than Fela says more about our obsession with rankings than about either man’s legacy. Wizkid does not need borrowed mythology to validate his success. Fela does not need modern approval to remain great. Greatness is not always loud, popular, or profitable. Sometimes, it is simply the ability to still convince generations that never met you. Anything else is not cultural debate, it is just another rubbish talk: viral, noisy, and empty.

    •Oludotun writes via thedreamchaser65@gmail.com

  • Fela vs.Wizkid FC: Generational greatness and ethics of comparison

    Fela vs.Wizkid FC: Generational greatness and ethics of comparison

    Every generation possesses an inalienable right to define its own heroes. While history records figures whose greatness transcends time and epochs, it is neither natural nor just to deny succeeding generations the freedom to recognise excellence within their own cultural moment. Greatness is not a finite resource, and it is not inherited by negation. Each individual must be allowed to pursue significance independent of the shadows cast by predecessors. People sometimes fail to realise how transitions between generations can be rough. Social transitions can sometimes be filled with tension and misunderstanding. Paradoxically, many figures now revered as icons were, in their own time, misunderstood, resisted or outright disdained.

    If this paradox were not true, one must ask why figures such as Gani Fawehinmi appear greater in death than they ever were in life. In memory, he is celebrated as the Senior Advocate of the Masses, a tireless defender of the oppressed and an uncompromising voice against military dictatorship. Despite these, when he sought political power through the same masses whose cause he championed, their support was conspicuously scarce. He contested elections. He presented himself for leadership. And the inevitable question arises: how many people truly voted for him?

    This contradiction exposes an uncomfortable truth about society’s relationship with heroism. We often admire courage at a safe distance but hesitate to shoulder the cost of standing with it in real time. We canonise what we once resisted. We sanctify in retrospect what we could not accommodate in the present. It is only after their departure that society fully grasps the magnitude of the vacuum they leave behind.

    Read Also: Critical success factors for Nigeria’s economy this year

    A further complication arises from our obsession with comparison. We habitually ask: Who is greater? Messi or Ronaldo? Wole Soyinka or Chinua Achebe? Alabi Pasuma or Saheed Osupa? Jay-Jay Okocha or Kanu Nwankwo? Dangote or Otedola? King Sunny Ade or Ebenezer Obey? Obafemi Awolowo or Nnamdi Azikiwe?

    These questions, while popular, are shallow. They collapse distinct contexts and purposes of excellence into a false hierarchy. One is compelled to ask: toward what end are these comparisons made? What truth do they ultimately reveal, beyond inflaming sentiment and rivalry?

    Fela Anikulapo Kuti was undeniably great. That fact is not open to dispute. His artistic genius and political courage remain potent nearly three decades after he died. His continued relevance is itself evidence of the depth of his legacy. But greatness is not diminished because another generation finds resonance in a different figure. Also, celebrating contemporary excellence does not amount to erasing historical significance.

    Can anyone today claim to surpass Fela? Such a claim is premature, or perhaps incoherent. Legacy is not adjudicated in real time. It matures through decades of cultural endurance and critical reassessment. If we are to speak honestly, the only fair arbiter of such questions is time itself. Let us allow the present generation to live, create and define meaning on its own terms, and reserve final judgments for history.

    To ask who is greater is often to misunderstand what greatness truly is. In the end, reverence for the past and recognition of the present need not be mutually exclusive. A society secure in its values can honour its legends without weaponising them against the aspirations of those who come after. 

    •Matthew Alugbin, PhD,  Edo State University,  Iyamho.