Category: Energy

  • Shell’s controversial oil blocks

    Shell’s controversial oil blocks

    Who  should operate the oil blocks divested by Shell? The Nigerian Petroleum  Development Company (NPDC) says it has the financial and tehnical capacity to run them. But, its Joint Venture (JV) partners in the private sector say it cannot. They argue that the oil assets are “grossly” underutilised under NPDC, adding  that “this is impacting negatively on our investment in the oil acreages.”  They want the blocks transferred   to them. EMEKA UGWUANYI reports.

    In the last two months, the battle over the operatorship of some of the Shell’s divested oil blocks in oil mining leases (OMLs) 30, 34, 40, 42 has been a major issue in the oil industry in the country.

    Trouble started when the Federal Government handed over its 55 per cent equity stakes in the oil assets to the Nigerian Petroleum Development Company (NPDC), which is the exploration and production arm of state-run oil firm, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC). The remaining stakes of 45 per cent in the Joint Venture (JV) oil blocks held by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC), Total and Agip were sold to some indigenous companies that came together as a consortia.

    Aside  Seplat Petroleum Development Company that bought the very first set of divestment in oil mining leases (OMLs) 4, 38 and 41, and was granted the operatorship of the assets, the government transferred the operatorship of subsequent divested assets to the NPDC.

    However, very recently, the government withdrew the operatorship of OML 42 from the NPDC to the private sector JV partner, a situation that irked the NPDC workers and compelled them to embark on strike. The strike stalled the transfer of the operatorship of the remaining three oil blocks to the private sector JV partners, which lingered until the President Goodluck Jonathan’s led administration ended last month.

    The indigenous private sector JV partners of NPDC are Neconde Energy Limited (OML 42), Elcrest Exploration and Production Nigeria Limited (OML 40), Shoreline Natural Resources Limited (OML 30), ND Western Limited (OML 34) and First Hydrocarbon Nigeria FHN/Afren (OML 26).

    These companies are of the view that due to bureaucratic bottlenecks associated with public owned companies,  NPDC is constrained technically and financially to optimise output from the oil blocks adding that NPDC as a firm, cannot borrow money from banks to conduct its business and also cannot take decision on crucial issue of production without getting clearance from its parent company, the  NNPC.

    As private sector companies that have made huge investments, non-optimisation of the assets is affecting their bottom-line and the economy, the investors lamented.

    The buyers of SPDC’s divested stakes in OMLs 30,34, 40 and 42 cite the achievements Seplat as operator of its acquired oil blocks. They said if the operatorship had remained with NPDC, Seplat couldn’t have recorded meaningful progress. When Seplat acquired Shell’s stakes in the three blocks in 2010, the combined production was less than 30,000 barrels per day (bpd) but as at last year, the production has been ramped up to 70,000 bpd while also increasing the natural gas output significantly.

    A source in the NNPC, however, said the truth is that NPDC doesn’t have the capacity. ‘Imagine a company that was operating just one block and got eight oil blocks in one fell swoop. They have been advised several times to go into partnership with other companies to improve capacity and efficiency but they held on to status quo.

    “Frankly speaking, we don’t have the financial and requisite personnel to manage these blocks and this is the reason for the transfer of the operatorship to the indigenous firms in joint venture partnership with them NPDC. NPDC was unable to absorb the multinational oil firms’ workers in the divested assets resulting in acute personnel deficit and fortunately, the indigenous JV partners absorbed them. Besides, NPDC doesn’t have the capacity to take loans from banks for their operations unlike their JV partners, which puts a serious financial constraint on the firm,” the source said.

    The indigenous JV partners of NPDC that are expecting that operatorship of their blocks may be granted include Elcrest (OML 40), Shoreline (OML 30), ND Western (OML 34) and FHN/Afren (OML 26). The source said the firms have the technical capacities, personnel and financial strength to operate the assets and also have the ability to invest billions of naira into drilling of new wells and multi-field developments, which will increase oil and gas production and revenue to the nation.

    Despite the strike embarked upon by NPDC workers, the private sector JV partners are not relenting in the transfer of the operatorship from NPDC. The Nation, however, spoke to some NPDC workers in confidence on the veracity of the claims by their independent JV partners.

    The NPDC workers said the company is being unjustly undermined adding that it has the capacity and personnel to manage the oil blocks. They listed the achievements the company has recorded in the past including some of the Shell’s divested assets especially OMLs 30 and 34.

    They said OML 34 is among the assets the NPDC acquired from SPDC in 2012 during its divestment programme.  The asset is predominantly a gas producing field with Utorogu non-associated gas (NAG) 1 and Ughelli East (UGHE) gas plants as the two running plants prior to the acquisition. Utorogu NAG 1 and UGHE gas plants have an installed capacity of 360 million standard cubic feet of gas per day (mmscf/d) and 90 mmscf/d) respectively.

    Prior to the takeover by NPDC, the former operator SPDC, was producing an average of 270 mmscf/d and 60mmscf/d) from NAG 1 and UGHE plants respectively. However with the recent improvement drive and overall service commitment by the management and staff of NPDC, production has steadily ramped up to 360mmscf/d and 70mmscf/d for NAG 1 and UGHE plants respectively. Currently NPDC produces 420mmscf/d from the two plants, they added.

    “It should be noted that this is a record that has never been achieved since the field came into existence in the 1970s. Production is still ramping up, having attained 430mmscf/d. In addition, plans are currently underway to further increase production from the two fields with the completion of Utorogu NAG 2 plant with an installed capacity of 150mmscf/d. NPDC’s focus is to ramp up, grow and sustain production from the three plants at 450mmscf/d by the third quarter of 2015 and this would make NPDC the second largest gas producer in Nigeria.

    “NPDC wishes to achieve this feat through the aggressive gas development campaign currently going-on in OML 34. This involves drilling of gas wells and completing/commissioning of the 150mmscf/d capacity NAG II plant in the short term. The NAG II plant is 96 per cent completed as at 4th June, 2015. The company’s medium term plan is to deliver about 600mmscf/d of gas to the national grid to support the Federal Government’s gas to power aspiration by the end of 2015. NPDC took over the operatorship of OML 34 from SPDC on Monday, 31st December, 2012.

    “Also at takeover from SPDC, daily oil production was 10,032 bpd and has since increased to 22,000 bpd. We have increased gas production in the asset from an average of 295mmscf/d in 2012 to 360mmscf/d for NAG 1 and 70mmscf/d for UGHE Plant, altogether producing 430mmscf/d making the asset the largest single supplier of gas to the country’s domestic market. We also successfully shut down and carried out improvement job for NAG 1and UGHE Plant to revamp work and boost production, successfully drilled and completed three wells to ramp up gas production.

    “NPDC took over operatorship of OML 30 from SPDC on 1st February, 2013. NPDC holds 55 per cent equity shares while its Joint Venture partner, Shoreline Natural Resources has the remaining 45 per cent participatory shares. The average daily net production as at takeover from SPDC was about 20,982 bpd. Today, production in OML 30 has increased to 60,000bpd under the operatorship of NPDC. The oil block’s flow-stations are all operational now.”

    The NPDC workers also stated the company achieved successful re-entry into Uzere community to open-up Uzere-West field with a locked-in potential of 14,000 bpd, rehabilitation of eight units of 5.2mmscf/d gas lift compressors and commissioning of new compressors to ensure adequate production uptime and increase in gas lift capacity. Other achievements include successful installations for proper hydrocarbon accounting; successful negotiation on Global Memorandum of Understanding (GMOU) with 112 communities of OML 30 together with Delta State Government to ensure uninterrupted production   took over Oleh Field Logistic Base (FLB) and deployed personnel to fully man all the flowstations and Ughelli production station.

    We also developed and secured approval for the AFELOROW (Afiesere, Olomoro-Oleh, Oroni and Oweh) fields development plan, and ensure proper management of the Trans Forcados Pipeline, the workers said. They recalled that the former NPDC Managing Director, Mr. Iyowuna Briggs, in an interview with energy correspondents during a facility tour, said taking over the operatorship of the oil fields came with enormous challenges, but the state-owned company was keeping the promise to ensure that the fields remained productive.

    Briggs said: “It is clear right from the beginning that the challenges faced by the NPDC are enormous, following the divestment of OMLs 34 and 40 on January 1, 2013, and OML 30 on February 1, 2013. For example, five days after the takeover of the operatorship of OML 30, the Oroni and Olomoro flow stations were forcefully shut down by the members of the Igbide and Olomoro communities respectively. “Oroni flow station was eventually shut down for over 50 days. This resulted in the deferment of production amounting to over 115,000 barrels. Other shutdowns of production in various fields had impeded the attainment of the company’s production target of 135,000 barrels of oil per day for the fiscal year 2013. Consequently, over the past one year, NPDC had witnessed a drastic drop in its daily oil production from about 135,000bpd to 115,000bpd leading to a substantial loss of revenues.”

    In spite of this, Briggs said the NPDC was producing between 65,000 and 70,000 barrels of oil per day before it took over the assets, and this had since gone up to 140,000bpd with a target to hit 160,000bpd by the end of 2014. He stated that NPDC would spend a minimum of $1.8billion per annum on capital expenditure over a two-year period. He explained that the company would drill 18 oil wells across its oil assets in 2014, stressing that it currently maintains an interest in 28 OMLs in the country.

    He said: “NPDC drilled less than 10 wells over a five-year period ended October 2012. However, we drilled about six to seven wells between then and 2013 and we are going to be drilling up to 18 wells in 2014.” Briggs said NPDC then had the capacity to produce 140,000 bpd adding that it had been delivering 410 million metric standard cubic feet of gas per day into the domestic gas.

     

     

     

     

  • Why we want to increase tariff, by Eko DISCO

    Why we want to increase tariff, by Eko DISCO

    Electricity  consumers will pay more despite the epileptic supply, if the distribution companies have their way.

    Eko Electricity Distribution Plc, which is championing  a tariff hike, said it would enable the firm service its customers better and sustain service delivery.

    Its Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer, Dr Oladele Amoda, said the tariff hike had become imperative if the gap between power demand and supply must be bridged on sustainable basis. He said because of poor supply from the grid, the company wants to explore off-grid (embedded) generation, which is private sector driven and more expensive, to meet customers’  demand.

    Amoda said: “As stakeholders in the power sector, many of us are familiar with the state of the industry before privatisation. The industry was bedeviled by myriad of problems including mismatch between level of demand for electricity and level of supply; lack of investment in supply infrastructure for decades; dilapidated distribution infrastructure; huge technical and collection losses; huge indebtedness by customers; tariff that was not cost-reflective; vandalism of equipment and cables, low energy allocation from the national grid; and obsolete metering system.”

    When the private sector investors took over on November 1, 2013, the challenge was how to quickly overcome these problems, guarantee sustainable and quality power supply with customer-friendly attitude, he said, adding that the company currently is exploring alternative source of power supply.

    He noted that the only source of bulk power supply is from the national grid, which is grossly inadequate but stated the company has begun  a process to augment power allocation from the grid with about 700 megawatts (MW) through embedded independent power plants (IPPs), and more from bilateral agreements with existing merchant generators.  Also we are making effort to reduce aggregate technical, commercial and collection (ATC&C) losses, he added.

    He said: “At the advent of privatisation, our loss stood at 35 per cent but today it is below 30 per cent. The modest reduction was achieved through network rehabilitation, reinforcement, improvement and assets upgrade. More than N10 billion have so far been expended on these projects. Poor metering is one of the legacies inherited from the defunct Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN). We have initiated a robust metering plan, if approved by the regulatory body – the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), will enable us roll out and step up meter installation activities and this will run through the next few years until all our customers have functional meters. The meters will come with modern technology to delight customers. This will cost a whooping sum of N52 billion.

    “We are also investing in technology to automate most of our operations by introducing SCADA/DMS, GIS, CRM, among others, for the efficient management of our distribution network and customer care activities. These processes will facilitate quicker faults detection/rectification and thus improve services. It will also reduce downtime and improve safety of human and equipment.

    “To ease payment of electricity bills, we have upgraded our multiple channels of payment such as ATM, internet, scratch cards, POS, telephone, and extended bank vending, among others. We have established a 24/7 customer help lines to attend to customer complaints on supply and commercial related issues’’.

     

  • Efficient procurement beneficial to economy, says NLNG chief

    Efficient procurement beneficial to economy, says NLNG chief

    NIGERIA Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG) Managing Director, Mr. Babs Omotowa, has backed the implementation of an efficient procurement system, listing its benefits to the economy’s growth.

    Omotowa, who is also the Global President of Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply (CIPS), spoke in  Lagos at the Contract and Procurement Conference organised by NLNG to highlight how efficient procurement can help bring public confidence for a government and enable private sector to grow considering rise in costs, especially capital costs, which have  increased by over 500 per cent in the past two decades. Therefore, driving cost efficiency and value-for-money out of government and organisation spend and lowering costs through efficiency, discipline, creativity and innovation, is critical, he added.

    He stated that good procurement strategies and practices can bring about significant benefits as seen in developed countries, and it also provides a significant tool for addressing corruption and capacity building in developing countries.

    He said through efficient procurement system, his company recently utilised a $1.6 billion ship-building contract with Samsung and Hyundai to deepen local capacity through training  of 600 Nigerians in Korea and Nigeria in shipbuilding and  facilitation of export of $20 million ‘made in Nigeria’ goods to Korea for use on the vessel  such as cables, paints, furniture, anodes, among others. He also noted that $10 million simulators were also obtained from Samsung and Hyundai and are being installed in Bonny to enable many more operators and regulators be trained in-country than sending a few overseas.

    According to him, the United Kingdom Government’s efficiency programme, saved it GBP14 billion in a year through centralisation, eliminating inefficiency, digitisation and moving online as embedded in its public procurement policy.

    Omotowa said: “Nigeria has moved forward positively in this direction too with the set up and good work being done by the bureau of public procurement. Due processes, transparency, benchmarking database, e-procurement, among others are indeed in the right direction. These should be built upon, and also many more states should join the likes of Lagos and Rivers States, in setting up similar bureau at state levels.

    “We should also start to transparently see the comparative cost of Federal and states and across different states. Such open benchmarking will also help to drive for lower costs.”

    He said the recent indication by the new government to implement the provisions of the Public Procurement Act of 2007, and set up the National Council of Procurement is a welcome development. Apart from enabling Federal Executive Council to focus more on the strategic and huge task ahead for the country, the Procurement Council will be an enabler to deepen procurement standards and deploy best practices in the country. It is of utmost importance that membership of the council should also include seasoned and experienced Procurement professionals so as to enhance its effectiveness.

     

  • Subsidy: Govt owes marketers, depot owners N291b

    Subsidy: Govt owes marketers, depot owners N291b

    The Federal Government owes members of the Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association (DAPPMA) and the Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria (MOMAN) over N291 billion in unpaid subsidy reimbursement for fuel imported under the petroleum subsidy scheme, interest on delayed payment and foreign exchange differentials, DAPPMA Executive Secreatary,  Olufemi A. Adewole has said.

    Adewole said the aftermath of the Senate Committee’s meeting with major petroleum industry stakeholders that persuaded the petroleum tanker drivers, and NARTO to call off their strike and resume loading of fuel, it has become necessary to state that the two bodies are still being owed over N291 billion under the fuel subsidy scheme.

    He said: “This much was expressed to DAPPMA and MOMAN by the former Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala in her letter to both associations, a copy of which she also released to the Senate Committee for reference. However, the letter did not state the timeline for the re-verification exercise, which the minister instituted on the amount she disputed and also did not state the expected date of payment which petroleum subsidy scheme participants had been clamouring for in all the meetings held with her since February 2015.

    “It  should be noted that this is the first time since the establishment of the petroleum subsidy fund (PSF) scheme that marketers will not have ready and easy access to fuel import loans as it is also the first time that commercial banks will notify importers that based on CBN regulations, importers have attained their credit ceilings with their various banks and would have to make some refunds on the existing loans prior to being funded for petrol imports. Unfortunately, the expected refund to the banks is yet to be reimbursed by the Federal Government.

    “Due to debts owed transporters by marketers, who have been experiencing serious financial stress due to outstanding debts owed them by the Federal Government as a result of petrol imports under the petroleum subsidy scheme, the PTD-NUPENG and NARTO had at various times protested non-payment of their freight charges by withdrawing their services.”

     

  • Firm launches anti-spill technology

    To strengthen its health, safety and environment (HSE) service delivery in the oil and gas industry, Eunisell Solutions has introduced a secondary tank containment system on its production facilities to further minimise oil spill.

    Eunisell’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickson Okotie, said the innovation was in line with the company’s commitment to the health and safety of its staff and the growing need to find more innovative ways to protect the environment especially where containment of environmentally hazardous fluids are stored within its production facilities.

    He stated the secondary containment system is designed to withstand fluid pressures resulting from rapid fluid fill from a non-catastrophic failure of up to 15,000 barrel of oil. “The design is such that the surface mounted containment system can safely contain the internal fluid pressure, should a spill occur and also withstand high wind speed without loss of contained fluids. The tanks are perfect in today’s world for crude oil because they are designed with a proprietary blend of polyurea impregnated geotextiles and a state-of-the-art, high-performance elastomeric materials that provide tough, flexible, resilient products.

    “At Eunisell, we continue to introduce innovative ways of getting things done more efficiently while meeting the standards laid down by the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency,” he added.

    The company has maintained an 18-year record of a high level health, safety and environment protection policy. It has also recorded no loss time incident in its operations on the central processing facilities built and managed for marginal field operators in the country.

    The company provides services and products that measure, improve, control and process flow from oil and gas wells, well testing services, and drill stem testing, among others.

     

  • NIPCO imports 37m litres of petrol

    NIPCO imports 37m litres of petrol

    The Nigerian Independent Petroleum Company (NIPCO) Plc has imported about 28 million metric tons (about 37 million litres of petrol) to ease fuel scarcity.

    The product was brought into the country by ‘MT Admiral L.’  This demonstrates the company’s resolve to make fuel available across the country, especially in this period of fuel scarcity that  almost crippled the economy. The import would augment supply by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) the company added.

    NIPCO depot has been working round the clock to dispense fuel to marketers to distribute to filling stations across the country.

    NIPCO’s Manager, Corporate Affairs, Lawal Taofeek confirmed that the importation product would augment supplies from Products and Pipeline Marketing Company (PPMC), an arm of NNPC. He stated that the import was one of the steps taken by NIPCO to meet the needs of its esteemed customers who had remained steadfast with the organisation in the last 11 years. He noted that the dream of the investors in the company has been the organisation’s driving force to go extra mile in getting products to keep the retail outlets wet.

    In 2015 and beyond, we intend to enhance our product importation both for regulated and deregulated products to meet fuel marketers’ need and prepare adequately for the upcoming reforms in the oil and gas industry, he added.

  • Marketers get 6,000 tonnes of cooking gas to ease scarcity

    Marketers get 6,000 tonnes of cooking gas to ease scarcity

    To  ease cooking gas scarcity, the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas(NLNG) has supplied 6,000 metric tonnes of Liquefied Petroleum Gas(LPG) to oil marketers.

    The product arrived in Lagos at the weekend, by MT Gas Provident, which  left Bonny, Rivers State, a few days ago.

    Few hours after the vessel  berthed in Lagos, the product  was  distributed to oil marketing firms  such as Conoil, Mobil, MRS, Nipco and others, by the Federal Government.

    The aim was to ease     scarcity caused by  the strike embarked upon by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) and the Nigerian Association of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG).

    The strike, which was called off last week, has seen prices of cooking gas normalising because tanker’ drivers who are members of PENGASSAN and NUPENG have resumed  supply  of the product to marketers.

    The Nation  findings  revealed     that   prices of cooking gas have reduced  because  marketers are no longer rationalising the product.

    It was found that prices which went up by  between 70 to 100 per cent has reduced to 30 per cent, depending on the areas  consumers buy from.

    In some places, consumers  now refill a 2.5kilogramme gas cylinder with between 3, 000 and N3,200,  as against N4,000 they paid during the scarcity.

    At Iyana- Ipaja, Egbeda, Ikeja, Oshodi,  Yaba, Maryland, among other  has visited by The Nation, the price of the cooking gas has reduced slightly.

    Marketers said the scarcity of the product and the attendant increase in prices caused by the strike has reduced.

    A marketer, who identified himself as Joshua Roland, said the scarcity of cooking gas  has disappeared, adding that marketers are  getting  the product to sell.

    He said: “Anytime there is shortfall in the supply of gas in the country, either due to strike or technical problems from the Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas Limited (NLNG), what I do for my loyal customers, is reserve and sell to them. “A good businessman must know the needs and mindset of his customers to stay in business,” he said.

    A  gas dealer in Ikeja,  Moses Adeoye, said the scarcity has had untold effect on their operation. He said the problem was compounded by power supply and fuel scarcity.

    He said the campaign for increased use of cooking gas by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and operators such as Oando and Forte Oil, have not been effective because of the problems in the sector. “How can people use cooking gas for domestic and industrial purposes when they cannot get the product to buy when needed? How can the government achieve the goal of making people use cooking gas when it cannot remove the bottlenecks hindering supply of the product?

    The President, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Association of Nigeria (LPGAN), Dapo Adesina, said the scarcity of cooking gas and rise in price was expected, given the strike. He said the strike affected the distribution of the product across the country, stressing the situation is normalising  now that the strike has been called off.

     

  • Why govt can’t    improve power generation

    Why govt can’t improve power generation

    Lack of  appropriate gas pricing regime is stalling efforts by the Federal Government to improve electricity generation and supply, the Chief Executive Officer, Sahara Group, owners of Ikeja Electric and Egbin Power Plant, Mr Kola Adesina, has said.

    He  said natural gas, which is a feedstock in the sector, is yet to command the right price, despite the decision of the Federal Government to review the price of the product upwardly, and make it more accessible to thermal plants that rely on it to generate 70 per cent of the electricity required in the country.

    He said Nigerians, especially power firms’operators, do not price gas well because they do not see it as an economic product, adding that the issue is affecting electricity generation and supply.

    He said: “One of the major problems in the sector is ineffective gas pricing regime. People do not see gas as an economic product, and as such, unable to price it well. People only see gas as a socio-political product, hence their inability to price the product well and further use it to provide additional economic activities. The moment gas users such as power firms, petrochemical industries and others see gas as an economic product; they would price it well knowing they use will use it to provide more activities for the economy.

    “The government should come out with an economic model where critical assumptions and frameworks relating to production, sales and pricing of gas are mentioned and made to function. I’m talking about a model in which the component part of any pricing regime is factored. The model should be able to answer these questions: “How much is the price of gas today?  What is the quantity of gas made available to users?  Based on this, gas users would know where, when and the amount they would buy the product for production activities. “

    He said once the right price regime exists in the industry, it would be easier for government to facilitate the growth of the sector.

    Adesina said people that are desirous of change in the sector must be ready to pay the price, adding that through this, the sector would record growth.

    “In the telecommunication sector, some people were desirous of change; they paid the price and the economy is better for it. For instance, anybody that is going to set up a telecom company would find out whether the cost of providing services to people is good or bad, right or wrong. Having done this, he would be able to know what would happen, let’s say, in the next one, two, three or four  years.  Besides, he would be able to know much profit he would make.  What is happening in the telecom should be replicated in the electricity sector,” he added.

    The Federal Government has over the years upwardly reviewed the price of gas from less than a dollar for 1,000 standard cubic feet to $2.50, which the same quantity sells now, all in an effort to ensure that producers make uninterrupted supply to consumers.

  • We can handle  complex oil facilities, says firm

    We can handle complex oil facilities, says firm

    Kaztec Engineering Limited can deliver world-class complex facilities such as offshore platforms and subsea infrastructure to the oil and gas industry, its Managing Director,Mr John Niezner, has said.

    Niezner told The Nation in the United States that many people working for Kaztec have handled and delivered very complex facilities at their former workplaces and can easily do that for the operators.

    He said: “Kaztec is a wholly indigenous company. It is not owned by any foreign company. It is not partly-owned by any foreign company. There is a great deal of interest from the operators. What the operators are looking for is past experience. We said we can deliver, and we have delivered. There are many people in the industry that are working for Kaztec that in their previous roles have delivered very complex facilities, which we want to prove now to the operators over the next six to nine months. Yes, there is incredible interest in Kaztec fabrication yard in Lagos and we are handling very complex projects.”

    Niezner also noted that in the next three to five years, he expects to see substantial growth in the company where projects will be delivered at lower costs.

    “We are looking at incredible amount of growth in Nigeria. Once we break the problems associated with high cost, we will see a lot more opportunities for companies like Kaztec. We are looking at strategic relationships with indigenous companies because basically for one company to do all these is too much,” he added.

    He stated that the focus of Kaztec in the last few years has been in offshore installation, barges, laying pipelines and installing platforms offshore.

    ‘’What we are diversifying into is full delivery chain of works for the operators. From concept to commission, we insist in developing solutions for offshore, utilising indigenous equipment, right throug”, he added.

    According to him, the oil and gas industry service business is not just about dependence on technology. It is reliant on effective and efficient managerial processes within the organisation. What we need to do is to address that first and the technology will underpin that in good time. We need to really address the efficiency and process in the industry, which is cumbersome and very costly, he stated.

    On what he expects from the new government, he said: “Our focus is to provide services to the operators regardless of government, we will continue to provide that service and realise our vision. We hope and really trust that the incoming government will support us because we are doing the right thing that will benefit not only the operators but benefit the nation and of course, Kaztec. Niezner said his company wants  the government to ensure that the Nigerian content Act is maintained fully (100 per cent) and that work is done in Nigeria by Nigerians, not by foreign companies, to encourage the establishment of Nigerian companies.

    ‘’The government should  not only establish those companies,  but also see to the  establishment of capabilities within those companies to execute works to international standards. That is one of the downsides. What we are seeing is a lot of new companies coming to the surface in Nigeria that do not have the capabilities, which will have detrimental effect resulting in projects needing higher costs and longer schedules.

  • We can handle complex oil facilities, says firm

    Kaztec Engineering Limited can deliver world-class complex facilities such as offshore platforms and subsea infrastructure to the oil and gas industry, its Managing Director,Mr John Niezner, has said.

    Niezner told The Nation in the United States that many people working for Kaztec have handled and delivered very complex facilities at their former workplaces and can easily do that for the operators.

    He said: “Kaztec is a wholly indigenous company. It is not owned by any foreign company. It is not partly-owned by any foreign company. There is a great deal of interest from the operators. What the operators are looking for is past experience. We said we can deliver, and we have delivered. There are many people in the industry that are working for Kaztec that in their previous roles have delivered very complex facilities, which we want to prove now to the operators over the next six to nine months. Yes, there is incredible interest in Kaztec fabrication yard in Lagos and we are handling very complex projects.”

    Niezner also noted that in the next three to five years, he expects to see substantial growth in the company where projects will be delivered at lower costs.

    “We are looking at incredible amount of growth in Nigeria. Once we break the problems associated with high cost, we will see a lot more opportunities for companies like Kaztec. We are looking at strategic relationships with indigenous companies because basically for one company to do all these is too much,” he added.

    He stated that the focus of Kaztec in the last few years has been in offshore installation, barges, laying pipelines and installing platforms offshore.

    ‘’What we are diversifying into is full delivery chain of works for the operators. From concept to commission, we insist in developing solutions for offshore, utilising indigenous equipment, right throug”, he added.

    According to him, the oil and gas industry service business is not just about dependence on technology. It is reliant on effective and efficient managerial processes within the organisation. What we need to do is to address that first and the technology will underpin that in good time. We need to really address the efficiency and process in the industry, which is cumbersome and very costly, he stated.

    On what he expects from the new government, he said: “Our focus is to provide services to the operators regardless of government, we will continue to provide that service and realise our vision. We hope and really trust that the incoming government will support us because we are doing the right thing that will benefit not only the operators but benefit the nation and of course, Kaztec. Niezner said his company wants  the government to ensure that the Nigerian content Act is maintained fully (100 per cent) and that work is done in Nigeria by Nigerians, not by foreign companies, to encourage the establishment of Nigerian companies.

    ‘’The government should  not only establish those companies,  but also see to the  establishment of capabilities within those companies to execute works to international standards. That is one of the downsides. What we are seeing is a lot of new companies coming to the surface in Nigeria that do not have the capabilities, which will have detrimental effect resulting in projects needing higher costs and longer schedules.