Any decision to reinstate the gratuity scheme into the Contributory Pension Scheme (CPS) must be backed by law, an actuarial scientist and chartered insurer, Dr Pius Apere, has said.However, this will require an amendment to the PRA 2014, particularly Section 7(1) (a) of the Act to avoid duplication of payment of lump sum benefits,
Apere, who is the Chairman/CEO, Achor Actuarial Services Limited, made this known in a report titled: “Rationale behind Review of Retirement Benefits for CPS under PRA 2014”.
This is coming after the proposed introduction of gratuity for Federal Government’s public servants under the CPS by the Director-General (DG) of PenCom, Ms Omolola Oloworaran, in partnership with the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation (HCSF).
Apere pointed out that state governments were likely to introduce similar schemes for their workers.
The only constraint, according to him, will be the Federal and state governments’ ability to fund their liabilities, which would include the cost of actuarial valuation whether as a scheme or embedded in CPS.
He stated that the latter would result in a Hybrid “Middle-way” scheme – a scheme, which offers defined benefit (GS) and defined contribution (CPS) sections.
He defined gratuity as a defined benefit, a one-time lump sum payment, paid to an employee upon retirement or when he leaves the organisation after completing a specific number of years of service.
He also said Gratuity Scheme (GS) is usually non-contributory as only the employer contributes to the scheme, which varies depending on the yearly actuarial valuation of the gratuity liabilities in accordance with International Accounting Standard (IAS) 19 Employee Benefits.
He, however, noted that Section 7(1) (a) of PRA 2014 allows a lump sum benefit (determined by PENCOM) to be withdrawn from a RSA holder’s total RSA upon his retirement or attaining age of 50, whichever is later.
Read Also:Workers’, retirees’ complaints trail CPS
He further stated that Section 4(4) (a) of the Act explicitly allows employers to offer “additional benefits to the employee upon retirement”, which can include gratuity, severance benefit among others that existed prior to 2004 and yet the federal and state governments, alongside a number of private sector employers, ceased the payment of gratuities to their employees with the commencement of the CPS in 2004.
He said many private sector employers in recent times have established standalone gratuity schemes to improve their employees’ standard of living in retirement but in compliance with PenCom’s Guidelines for the Administration of Gratuity Benefits in April 2017 to ensure that full funding of gratuity liabilities is guaranteed.
In the same vein, Apere said the framers of the PRA 2004 (as amended) did not consider the importance of pension increases when designing the two pension products in the CPS, namely Programmed Withdrawal (PW) and Retiree Life Annuity (RLA), to provide retirement benefits for the Retirement Savings Account (RSA) holders at retirement.
He said: “Alternatively, the framers made provision for Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) in section 84(1) of PRA 2014 to protect the RSA holders against some of the risks of low investment returns and the erosion of pensioners’ incomes by inflation.
“However, the economic hardships facing the retirees have called for review of some aspects of retirement benefits design in CPS as explained below.
On PW product design, he noted that the delay in the implementation of GMP could be considered to be the main reason for PenCom’s approval for redesigning the product with Enhanced Pension (EP) feature for only PW retirees effective from December 2017 which is akin to allowing for pension increases.
“EP is aimed at providing sustainable standard of living for the PW pensioners which in turn cushioning the effect of the non-implementation of GMP for only PW retirees at the detriment of RLA retirees as they were not considered in the review.
“In an event held at Eko Hotel in Lagos on 26th June 2025, PenCom had expressed worries about “the impacts of inflation on [CPS] savings [and proposed] to ensure that pension fund operators generate inflation plus returns for retirees and RSA holders”.
“The inflation-proof investment returns will be achieved by encouraging pension fund operators to invest in alternative assets thereby diversifying their portfolios. The resultant effect of targeting inflation-proof investment returns is to enhance a significant growth in the pension pot (RSA) at retirement and to cushion the effect of inflation on retirees’ regular incomes. The inflation-proof investment returns will be quite appropriate for PW retirees since their RSA balances after retirement are invested solely for their benefits.
Also on RLA product design, he posited that the current RLA product design provides a regular fixed income for life as long as the RLA retiree is alive. In practice, the fixed regular income has been eroded by inflation over time leading to RLA retirees living in abject poverty relative to PW retirees who are receiving EP.
“The CPS-Pack-2020 (A Guide for Retirees under CPS), jointly signed by both regulators (PENCOM and NAICOM) on 1st September 2020 stated that the periodic pension enhancement [for RLA retirees] may be applicable depending on the type of [RLA product] purchased”. Section 4.3 of Revised Regulation on Retiree Life Annuity Pursuant to the Pension Reform Act 2014 dated 1st September 2020 stated that “a retiree shall be at liberty to have increasing annuity features as an option subject to the RLA product being approved by NAICOM”.
“Thus, NAICOM has the regulatory backing to approve a separate RLA product design with increasing annuity feature (or periodic pension increase) for retirees to cushion the effect of inflation, thereby making RLA product competitive”.
Apere submitted that the review of retirement benefits by PenCom was a welcome and commendable initiative to improve the retirees’ welfare.
