Category: THE CEO

  • ‘Govt shouldn’t meddle in capital market’

    Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS) outgoing president and Magnartis Finance & Investments Limited Managing Director Mr Oluwaseyi Abe is an accomplished investment banker with over 20 years’ experience. In this interview with Capital Market Editor Taofik Salako, Abe speaks on the investment environment, the economy and his stewardship, among other issues.

    IN the light of recent high-profile infractions in the market, what regulatory and enforcement frameworks have been put in place by the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS) as a Self-Regulatory Organisation (SRO) to checkmate abuses and ensure professional integrity?

    We have our disciplinary processes that ensure proper handling of complaints and enforcement actions against any erring member. Our processes are robust enough and provide opportunities for all parties to seek redress through transparent disclosures and fair hearing. You must have heard of cases decided in the past by the disciplinary committee of the institute. Our disciplinary framework complements other frameworks that are obtainable on the different platforms across the capital market space. We all have one thing in common; all of us have zero tolerance for infractions because we are obligated to promote and sustain investor confidence.

    What will facilitate greater flow of foreign investments into Nigeria?

    Foreign investments depend on a lot of things, and all these are what you look at when you are determining the macroeconomic outlook.You know that investors generally – both foreign and domestic – usually look at risks and returns and the risks are basically in the areas of political, legal, monetary management and policy formulation and stability. When you look at our current scenario, we need improved currency regulations, fashioned towards encouraging ease of movement of capital by foreign investors. Our laws on sanctity of contracts must be enforced. We need improved security of lives and properties. We also need workable fiscal and monetary policies to provide the much-needed enabling environment for local and foreign investors at individual and corporate level. So, you will talk about a basket of policies that cumulatively reduce macroeconomic risks.

    What’s your assessment of the outlook for the economy?

    The outlook is very bright. All the indices are there, and you would have noted that most assessments favour Nigeria. But there are downside risks, things that must be done to unlock the potential of the economy and, which invariably, if left undone, will continue to stifle growth. First, there is the need to depoliticise policy making and implementation, we must downplay the act of reading political meanings to everything. Let’s put professionalism above personal interest, national interest above regional or ethnic interest and do the right thing because it is good for the economy, rather than for politics. Skill and competencies of every professional must be accorded priority without prejudice to the issue of integrity. These are necessary basic variables that can drive economic growth and development. When you get the basics right, it permeates all the other major decisions.

    How do you see the regulatory structure at the capital market, especially with the recent happenings at Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)?

    In my personal opinion, the government should reduce involvement in the affairs of our capital market regulators for enhanced independence of these institutions. Capital market regulators, such as SEC, need to be independent of undue influence to play larger roles expected of them in the entire capital market space.

    What can be done to encourage companies to list on the stock market?

    We must accord priority to investor education with emphasis on the benefits of listing companies on the stock market. Investors must be educated on liquidity generation and risk – return trade-off. Also, there is a need to review listing fees across all platforms to make our stock market attractive and competitive. We must continually create healthy competition among our listed companies through innovative criteria such as corporate governance and shareholder value among others. These will encourage listed companies in the valley of indecision to brace up for outstanding performance. When the listed companies are doing better and the stock market becomes viable linchpin for growth and sustainability, more companies will naturally seek listing. The government can also weigh in with incentives, given that the development of the capital market will rub off positively on the economy.

    If you are to offer President Muhammadu Buhari three pieces of advice, what will they be?

    I am not a politician. As a technocrat, we have our medium for advising government officials at all levels. President Muhammadu Buhari should weigh the cost-benefit analysis of re-contesting rather than be persuaded by all sorts of people that are clamouring for his re-election for their selfish interest. He should endeavour to live his footprint on the sand of history. There are a lot to still address in the areas of economy and security.

    Few Nigerians invest in the capital market  and our savings ratio is one of the lowest in the world. What can we do to improve savings and investments?

    There should be more enlightenment on savings and investments. On our part as professionals, we should be encouraged to create more financial products. The government should improve on its financial inclusion activities across all strata of the economy to boost savings. This will have multiplier effects on our activities in the financial market. Savings and investments are bedrocks of national economy growth, and the government should galvanise all stakeholders to tackle this problem of low savings and investments.

    With many rules and code, is there any fear of overregulation at the capital market?

    Rules and regulations are meant to guide human conduct. We need those rules as the market continues to evolve. We cannot operate optimally in the global space without strengthening our regulations. These rules are designed to protect investor and uphold market integrity in the final analysis.

    What’s your opinion on the government debt issue and management, especially the background of the recent uproar on debt level and financing?

    It is the sure way to go. We must appreciate that the Federal Government has been able to bring down considerably the cost of local borrowings. This is good for the economy. We expect the government to take advantage of the capital market to finance infrastructure projects. It had been done in the past and such opportunities always abound in the capital market. The market has potential to provide funds for long-term projects.

    The primary market segment, especially for public offerings and initial public offerings (IPOs), has been largely inactive, despite the rally at the secondary market. What’s responsible for this?

    We cannot shy away from the fact that we are just recovering from recession. Economic growth and development are often moderated by recession. Although recession also has its positive impact as it challenges everyone to wear thinking caps on how to get out of it in a better form. Recession encourages creativity. I am sure we will start to see a lot of tractions in this segment, given the fact that we are out of recession. Our economy is improving generally and this should encourage companies to seek opportunities for growth.

    How much influence do you think political risk will have on the performance on the  capital market as we head for the 2019 national elections?

    We have not totally overcome the recent challenges that were brought about by recession. We, therefore, need to thread logically and cautiously. Usually, transition years have their effects on the economy. We must focus on recent gains and achievements and protect same and gun for more, despite the inevitable challenges of globalisation. The stability of the political system and national interest should be paramount in the minds of all the political actors. But I think we should weather it pretty good.

    You have just concluded your tenure as the President of the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS), what are the highpoints of your achievements? What are the challenges and what would have done differently? What are your pieces of advice for your successor?

    We have been able to refocus and reposition the institute greatly. We have returned the institute into profitability, though there is room for improvement. We got our council’s approval to confirm Honorary Fellowship on four eminent Nigerians for the first time in the history of the institute. This allowed us to invite prequalified prominent Nigerians to be part of us as stockbrokers under the Honorary Fellowship provision.  At 25, the institute acquired a befitting secretariat at highbrow Ikoyi area of Lagos, this is in spite of our challenging operating environment. We have also commenced the Specialised Professional Certification (SPC), which provides for specialisation and allows professionals to acquire practice licence in a particular area.This is in line with global best practices to encourage specialisation.

    We have increased awareness through ”Operation Catch them Young’ by partnering tertiary institutions. We have recorded significant improvements in members’ participation in the institute’s functions, an indication of renewed confidence. We have re-launched the Nigerian Stockbroker Magazine. We have held successful national workshops that received Federal Government’s nod. With all humility, I can say we have done well. Our successes are also predicated on the support from stakeholders. It is a collective effort and I have no doubt that my successor will keep the flag flying.

    Where do you see  stockbroking in Nigeria in the medium- to long-term? Relatedly, how will the enlarged scope of CISI bill impact the capital market?

    CIS has built an enviable profile as a force to be reckoned with. Quite a lot of people are showing interest in our affairs. Going forward, we are on a better pedestal to play our advocacy roles in the economy. The CISI Bill will unite all players and professionals in the entire financial market by putting everyone under the same monitoring radar. This will enhance cooperation and sanity in the market. With this, there will be a more cohesive regulatory system for all professionals, which should impact positively on the operations of the capital market.

    What strategy is being put in place by the market operators to woo back investors into the market?

    It is a multi-faceted approach: first, the investors must be educated that our market has recovered, and that current price swings are normal. The Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) must fashion out a policy that encourages the licencing of more stockbroking firms to operate in the remote states and towns. Corporate governance at all levels must be significantly enhanced.The government also has a role to play in providing liquidity to stabilise the market. Finally, efforts should be stepped up to revitalise the primary market and promote new listings of local and foreign firms.

    CIS at 25. What is the institute’s major request from the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari?

    In formulating economic policies, the potential impact on the capital market should be a key consideration. Some of the issues we will also want the administration to give utmost attention to include financing of major infrastructure projects through the capital market, thereby moving from a largely bank-based to a capital market-based financing model. The government must support capacity building initiatives by funding appropriate professional groups such as CIS to carry out the task. The government should provide a buffer stabilisation funding arrangement for the capital market.This can be done through the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), for instance. The government should also put in place policies aimed at channelling more savings and investments into the capital market. For instance, the government should encourage pension funds, through the National Pension Commission (PENCOM) to invest more in the stock market. It should also provide appropriate incentives and legislation for companies to list, especially those in the major sectors of the economy.

    What is your advice to the investing public?

    The public should be assured that the  capital market has fully recovered and it is on the path of surpassing our previous high points. Domestic investors should, therefore, take advantage of emerging opportunities. However, investors need quality advice from qualified professionals. The investing public should work with reputable stockbrokers. For the teeming young Nigerians who wish to become finance and investment professionals, the time to take action is now. CIS certifications will open doors of opportunity to you, as they are some of the most attractive in the country, especially now that activities in the capital market are booming once more.

    You recently announced scholarship for capital market correspondents to undertake professional studies and possible certifications under the CIS, what informed this?

    We believe the press is our partner in progress. It is in pursuance of our institute’s capacity building that the Governing Council endorsed the scholarship. The capital market has evolved over the years and the role of the financial press cannot be underestimated. The market is dynamic and there is a need to empower the press by ensuring that they understand the dynamics of the market to report the market professionally. We believe this will be to the advantage of the market.

     

  • ‘80 per cent of our resolutions are negotiated’

    The Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) is at the forefront of recovering bad debts. Its Managing Director/CEO, Ahmed Kuru, in this interview with Assistant Editor Nduka Chiejina, speaks on the corporation’s activities and other issues.

    How have you been dealing with obligors who are willing to pay back their loans but lack the capacity to pay?

    When the loans and facilities were purchased from the commercial banks, the underlining assumption was that there were collaterals covering those facilities; that is, security covering responsibilities. So, the underlined assumption is either you pay cash or we take over the assets and sell the business; it is as simple as that. We are not a bank; we are a recovery, intervention agency; so, the original assumption is that if you do not have the ability to pay, then you relinquish the assets, because when you took the money from the commercial banks, you gave them collateral as security. If you are willing to pay and you do not have cash, the honourable thing for you to do is to relinquish the assets, it is as simple as that.

    AMCON has been facing the challenge of reconciling procured collaterals. How do you reconcile with poorly-procured collaterals?

    Quite a lot of collaterals had issues because at the point when the facilities were transferred from the commercial banks, there was this understanding that if you go through the collateral documents and you find gaps, we are allowed to do what we call “Clawback,” that is, you can, send back the loan. If you remember, AMCON was asa result of the crisis of 2005 and by 2011, within a very short period, there was a need to make the exchange. Now what we do is, some of those cases where a lawyer can fine-tune and correct the deficiencies, we engage one to go to some of the registries to get to the root of some of those documents. But when you are challenged with the issue of non-availability of critical documents, to give you title, ownership and right over that property, and neither the bank nor the obligor is able to provide, we send back the documents. We work with our lawyers to find a way to correct some of those deficiencies that legally speaking, cannot be corrected.

    How do you manage politically-influential and well-connected individuals owing their banks?

    This administration has proven that there is no big man. I can tell you with every sense of responsibility. Despite the fact that 350 of our obligors come from 80 percent of our outstanding N5 trillion to N8 trillion from the big men, but it has not stopped us from doing what we should do. The only thing they (big men) do is sometimes personalise the issues, try to threaten you, make a lot of noise, go to court, get all manners of injunctions. But with this administration, anywhere they go to, the question they always ask them is:  “Do you have an obligation to pay?” “Have you borrowed ? Go and talk to AMCON.’’ This has given us a lot of courage to do what we are doing, and this “big man” theory has not worked as far as we are concerned. Any big man in debt, mention his name, I will show you the records to prove he is talking with us, if they can’t pay, we take their assets, and that is it. There is no big man that anybody has stopped us from doing what we should do.

    In reference to the politically-exposed people, could you be a specific about their percentage from the 80 percent you gave initially?

    In Nigeria, every big man is politically-inclined. Once you have a lot of money, that means you have the political goodwill. That also means, if you are not in office, you must have sponsored somebody to office. So, if you can’t use your position as a political office holder, you will have someone who is a political office holder you can talk to, isn’t it? However, with this setup, when it comes to what we do, what is important for us is to prove to you that you actually took the money from these banks and then you need to pay. It is not that people have not tried to influence AMCON, the thing is, with this government, you can’t risk anybody to intervene because everybody has seen the body language of the President. Institutions are getting stronger, because people are being allowed to do their job, thus you can go anywhere and you will still be referred to us. I have not heard nor has anybody called me to say be soft on this person or do not ask for your money, for the past three years.

    In conflict resolution, there is always a provision for resolution without going to court. How many out-of-court settlements has AMCON engaged in?

    I can tell you that any case going to court is always the last resort,  most of those cases that were in court have been there for a long time. We have been here for the past seven years. AMCON will try all manner of processes to find a resolution; the court is always the last process, because the court process takes you a minimum of five to 10 years. You would not want to go to court as a first default; it is always the last because we know that the court process is very long and painful. However, if all our efforts to resolve an obligation remain futile, since we cannot carry guns, then the only option is to go to court. Now we are looking for alternate deep resolution and mechanisms, even while we are in court, because sometimes, we could be in court of appeal, but we will still leave that window open. In quite a lot of cases we have consent judgment and I can tell you that the majority of our resolutions are based on interactions, discussions and not the court. The court-resolved process are not up to 20 percent of our resolutions; eighty percent of our resolutions are through discussions with the obligor, because that is the first and best thing to do. We go to court when all manners of resolution have failed.

    Given the sensitive nature of what AMCON does, people have suggested that there should be a special court for AMCON to handle their cases. What progress have you made in terms of this idea?

    I strongly believe that for AMCON-related cases, this initiative will help our resolution and make our winding down process very swift. My intention is to recover that money; and while I am not afraid to go through the court process, which is the last resort, but the process should be fair and prompt. The advantage of some of these special courts is that the turnaround time is very short and it doesn’t change the facts. If you have a situation where all the objective and main issue will be put together based on a process of practice, then it will shorten the process. The time you go to the Supreme Court and it says, go back to court of appeal and discuss, may make a case last up to 12 years and this organisation has just 10 years as its sunset period. So, the concept of special court is good because it doesn’t change the fact, it doesn’t change the law, it only accelerates the process and makes sure that there is a resolution. This is an intervention agency. It has a period, like General Sani Abacha of blessed memory did with the failed banks tribunal within a very short period, things are settled and closed.

    You once described AMCON as a child of circumstance. When is the sunset date for AMCON?

    The law says we should exist for 10 years, thus by 2024, we are supposed to have finished our assignment, but the law also leaves an open window which says that, if by that due date we have not been able to execute our assignment, the National Assembly reserves the right to give an extension. My view is, if by 2024 and I haven’t resolved this issues, I don’t see how they will be resolved after 2024, thus the target should be, whatever needs to be done within this time frame should be done, because the debt that has been with AMCON  for the past seven years has been with the commercial banks for five years or more before they were transferred. So, if the seven years are added, the average age of debt that is with AMCON is 12-13 years old. Now if you tell me in 15 years I cannot resolve a debt, how can an extension make a difference? So, as we are approaching that date, we should change our strategies to see how to use the instrumentality of the National Assembly to find a way to work on the process and close it. It is a child of time and necessity, it is not supposed to die habitually.

    Would there be any suggestions towards this end?

    Yes, the National Assembly, in fairness to them, is concerned about AMCON, the debt profile and every other thing associated with AMCON. Everyday, we discuss with the National Assembly on how to help us in this process, because we all understand that after 2024, it becomes a hopeless situation. We have to make sure we achieve a very heavy traction and  that by the end and time we are closing in 2024, we would have resolved all issues that need to be resolved.

    What is the total value of recoveries that AMCON has made so far?

    The recovery we have made so far is in the estimate of N300 billion; but you should understand that there is recovery and there is also resolution. These are recoveries, but some of them, we are still recovering, because, there is a resolution. For example you come to me saying, “I have a debt of N6 million; I will pay you in five years.” Now you have paid N6 million and the balance of N4 million is supposed to be paid in the next four years. In this instance, in my book, your name is still there but I have made a substantial recovery from you, so, a lot of them are on-going, they are also performing based on the agreement and the re-structured figure.

    What becomes of AMCON after 2024?

    Part of the things we are looking at is to find a way of ensuring that at the end of the sunset period for AMCON, the staff of AMCON are incorporated to get into the system, because AMCON staff are very young. They are less than 40 years old, they are well-trained and are sourced from all over the world, including financial institutions. So, they are assets which cannot be thrown away. Part of our strategy is to ensure that at the end of our sunset period, we should have a collation that will ensure they are moved to other agencies to make their contributions because they are well trained and they are national assets.

    As it is done in some other countries, debts recoveries are parcelled out and sold to private contractors in a well-modulated and organised way. Are you considering this?

    Yes, it is part of the strategy and we have been talking to a number of fund providers that specialise in buying distress assets. If this is achieved, we will go very far. It is part of the resolution. That is why I said, before 2024, you have to look at so many programmes.

    Have you ever recovered the entire debts owed by an individual or a company? If not, what happens to the difference?

    It is very obvious you cannot recover 100 per cent

    You have already made up your mind on that?

    Not that I have made up my mind, it has nothing to do with the mind; it is not a mind issue. If it is a mind issue, I want to recover 200 per cent, but it is not a mind issue, it is a reality. Some of the assets have been bad, some of the factories are closed, some of the machines are obsolete, some of the machines have been vandalised, so the evaluation is the point that they were given a collateral, but it is not the same thing today. The rate of interest that is on the liability is not proportionate to the depreciation if the assets, the rates of interest go up, depreciation goes down, so, there is the gap why this happens. You can wake up one day and say the book value is N20 billion, the security collateral is N10 billion, so I must be able to recover N20 billion, it is not possible, although what you could do sometimes, is after packaging to sell it, you can now look at an obligor if he has another line he is making money from, you discuss the gap and liability, you make him understand by having a sensible talk which can often lead to resolution. If anybody tells you it is possible to recover 100 per cent, it is not possible, because it is a distressed situation.

    The penalty for insider abuse is about N150, 000. Are there plans to change this law because it is said to be grossly inadequate to serve as deterrent?

    About six to seven weeks ago, there was a public hearing by the committee on banking and CBN made a presentation as to how they intend to amend the profit and improve the consequence of management law binding on the credit officers, not even on the debtors. This is because to borrow is not a criminal offence, not being able to pay the money borrowed is not a criminal offence, to borrow money from the bank is not a criminal offense, you can’t punish somebody for that. Not being able to pay the debt is also not a criminal offence, it is a commercial transaction. However, the process may be a criminal act, because if you study most loans that have gone bad. In getting the approval, you will find out that they did not comply with the policy of the financial institution. A lot of instances abound. There are some banks that are very good with credits, you can see all documents intact, but there are some banks you go to and you wonder how somebody can take a loan of N5-N10 billion with certain documents. So, to borrow money or not been able to pay money borrowed from the bank is not a criminal offence. Even if taken to the court, the court can’t take you to jail because you could not pay your debts. The court can only send you to jail when there are some abuses to certain things that will amount to criminality. With this, CBN is looking at the buffet to see how to make amends. If you remember the first tribunal, the focus then was on the banks, not on the debtors. If you focus on your debtors, they will make sure they do all they can. It will not eliminate it because we have bank credits all over the world, it minimises it to a reasonable rate. When banks say your ratio of non-performing loans should not be more than five percent, they are using the standard law because they know it is that five or 10 per cent that must go back, but when you have non-performing loans of 60 or 80 percent, then there is a problem somewhere.

    Who manages assets taken over by AMCON? Do you engage professionals to manage them?

    What AMCON does is that we look for professionals. AMCON is not wired to manage any business. What we do depends on the objective of taking over the business. If the objective is opportunity, we go for the professionals to manage that business just like we did for Arik and Delta State. We look for people that are professionals, you can never find an AMCON staff members going there to be CEO of those organisation because we are not wired to lead any business. We are financial people, but we insist that there must be proper corporate governance in place, and there are very few businesses that we have taken through these processes and they are doing very well. We do our work, people abuse us. They sayAMCON has taken over; AMCON will take over. But if you have a loan, and you are not paying, you do not have the ability to pay cash, and there is an underlining collateral, I will take it and sell it. This is the law, it is nothing personal. The law assumes that if you cannot pay, there is an underlining asset for me to take over, sell and recover my money. It is nothing personal. But you have an option to come with a programme to pay and if you fail, then I will sell it, it is the law, it is as simple as that, not that I will go take over a life business, but if there is a need to take over a life business, we will take it over if the obligor is not responding.

    Go to Ajaokuta and Delta, you will cry. If you go to Ajaokuta and see the investments at the time that Ajaokuta was set up, it was the best technology in the world because it was the first technology, that was set up and it is almost 80-90 percent completed.The sister to Ajaokuta is Delta Steel Company, Aladja now sold to a company called Premium Steel. It was commissioned last week by the Delta State governor. For me, it is a major achievement for this government.

     

  • ‘Nigeria ranks low on agric mechanisation scale’

    National Centre for Agricultural Mechanisation (NCAM) Acting Chief Executive Dr Yomi Kasali says for Nigeria to attain food security, it must improve on agricultural mechanisation. Kasali spoke with DANIEL ESSIET on this and other issues. Excerpts:

    What can be done to increase agricultural sector’s contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and its employment generation?

    The agricultural sector has improved tremendously since the advent of this administration. The government has focused on agriculture as one of its cardinal programmes and has treated agriculture as a business.

    There has been tremendous increment in productivity due to the various incentives given by the government to farmers. Some years ago, the contribution of agriculture was about 22 per cent, but it has increased significantly now; however, much is still needed to be done to further improve its contribution to the GDP and improve the economy. In the early 1980s, agriculture’s contribution to GDP was about 50 per cent – second to the contribution of the oil sector. To improve agriculture’s contribution to GDP, there is need to improve on the quality of input to the farmers, such as seed, fertiliser and agro chemicals. Secondly, the rural infrastructure needs to be developed and improved to aid in agricultural production. Thirdly, there is need to make credit facilities available and accessible to farmers and at one digit interest rate. Eighty per cent of agricultural productions in the country are from the small holder farmers with holdings less than 2ha; it is, therefore, any credit facility granted above a digit interest rate will have adverse effect on the farmers.

    What other steps should be taken to drive agriculture?

    There is the need to introduce low- cost machinery to replace the traditional method of farming.This will help to increase production and accelerate the pace of agricultural mechanisation, which will improve timeliness of operation and increase productivity. All these factors are geared towards increasing agricultural produce. When production is increased, there is need for post-harvest infrastructure, which will enhance processing of these products. To earn export value on these products, efforts should be geared towards the training of commercial farmers who are looking towards the exportation of their produce. These farmers need to be trained on export requirements for various crops and how to process these produce to meet the international market. It is also imperative to gear some of our efforts to produce secondary produce by adding value to it in order to earn more foreign exchange. To this end, more agro-processing clusters should be established so that entrepreneurs would be encouraged to process these produce instead of exporting raw produce.

    What is the future of agriculture in the country?

    The future of agriculture is very bright. Nigeria’s economy had been an agrarian economy before the advent of petrol. The country is tending towards mechanised farming and as such, many youths are now venturing into agriculture. Hitherto, agriculture has been an orphan, but recently, many people from diverse professions have been investing in the agricultural sector. Agriculture is a gold mine waiting to be tapped and many people have now realised this because of the dwindling pricing of petrol. In the developed countries, farmers are the richest set of people, but in Nigeria, a farmer is looked down upon; this scenario is, however, fast changing. In the nearest future, agriculture will be contributing at least 60 per cent to the country’s GDP.

    How can the development of large-scale agricultural projects be encouraged?

    The government will need to provide an enabling environment that can allow the private sector to operate. To do this, the government needs to enact policies that can encourage inventors in the sector. For large commercial agriculture, the lending rate should be moderated through the Central Bank. The Land Use Act needs to be reviewed; or the various state governments will give preferences to these investors in large scale agriculture to make more land available for them. The government has already enacted policies on importation of agricultural machinery, which is in favour of this group of investors. Most agricultural machinery is duty free. Other issues to be considered are: favourable credit facilities, rural infrastructure development, and rural infrastructure.

    How can increased agricultural productivity be encouraged in every state?

    Farmers reside in the states; therefore, the state governments need to have profile of their farmers to know the population of their farmers and their locations. The states need to encourage these farmers to form cooperative groups so that they have better capability to access credit facilities. This formation will also allow them to share risk and have a better reach in terms of marketing. States need to also assist in organising a hiring scheme through public-private partnership (PPP). This is what the Federal Government is doing through the Agricultural Equipment Hiring Enterprise (AEHE) programme, which is a PPP where the Federal Ministry of Agriculture sold to private entrepreneurs (service providers) tractors and equipment for hiring to farmers.These entrepreneurs purchased these tractors and machinery on subsidy by depositing 20 per cent while 80 per cent cost is shared by the Federal Government, vendors, and Bank of Agriculture. The service providers were given a moratorium of two years and the loan is to be paid in four years by instalment by the entreprenuer. They are monitored to be sure they are providing the services that they are required to do.

    Good quality seeds are out of reach of the majority of farmers, especially small and marginal farmers, mainly because of their high cost. What should be done to enable the industry record impressive yield?

    Seeds are classified as breeder, foundation and certified under the seed certification scheme.The breeder seed are produced by relevant research institutes, according to their mandates. The overall seed production is supervised by the National Seed Council. The quality of agricultural production lies on the quality of seed produced. The Federal and state governments are advised to establish multiplication Centres to produce certified seeds of various crops for farmers’ use. Research stations that produce breeders’seeds and plant materials should make them available to the Ministries of Agriculture or National Seed Council for multiplication to produce certified seeds, and these can be sold to farmers at a fairly subsidised rate. Another option is to organise the farmers into cooperative groups, where they are in large numbers and will cultivate large area of land; pool resources and they will be able to afford high cost of Foundation/Certified Seeds. The use of pure (certified) seeds will ensure a uniform stand, uniform ripening and healthy plants with higher yields. This will reduce cost of producing the crops and eventually increase farmer’s profit margin

    To what extent does post-harvest infrastructure impact agricultural productivity?

    Post-harvest infrastructure is critical to the agricultural productivity. Proper storage will reduce post-harvest losses and improve the shelf life of the produce. Threshers, driers and processing equipment are as important as storage and transport. Threshing of grains at appropriate moisture content will reduce yield losses, when moisture is low, the grains are lost due to inability of the machine to thresh the grains and also separate the grains from the chaff. Likewise, transportation of these produce from the point of harvest may lead to losses due to improper storage most especially fruits and tomatoes. Therefore, availability and the qualities of post-harvest infrastructure impact positively on agricultural productivity.

    Outside of improving supply chain infrastructure, what other measures are needed?

    The major measures outside improving chain infrastructure is to have a coordinated supply chain that can lead to good management of the relationship between the actors in the supply chain from the farm level to the consumers; others are: provision of credit facilities to allow supply chain actors participate effectively; the system should be strengthened by putting in place proper marketing system that places more emphasis on information dissemination on what to produce and when to sell.

    Which staple foods offer investment potential in the country’s agricultural sector?

    Most of the staple foods in Nigeria offer investment potential. Let’s look into cassava. Cassava has been underutilised in terms of investment potential. It can be used in the food industry as cassava flour for confectionary, garri for local consumption; in textile as starch; in animal feed as pellets for livestock feeds; in paper industry as adhesive and particle board; in pharmaceuticals as syrups and tablets; and in alcohol industry as ethanol. All these category of usage leads to different forms of investment. They are all money spinning ventures. Nigeria has not utilised this crop efficiently enough because most of the cassava produced in the country are consumed as garri and starch in some cases.

    Also, let’s leave tuber crops and look at grains, such as rice and maize. Apart from the investment potential of rice in milling and selling of the product, the by-products of rice can be used in industries as rice husk and bran, which are used as animal feeds.The mixture of broken rice from mills, rice bran and rice germ is used in the brewery industries in the production of beer. Oil extracted from rice bran is medicinal and lowers cholesterol level in human. For maize, it is used in feed industries as animal feed, the cobs can be used for the manufacture of pulps, paper and hard brands. It is also processed as starch, which is used in paper industries, textile and pharmaceutical industries. At this juncture, I want to say that most of our staple foods have diverse investment potential, which have not been exploited.

    Where are the greatest opportunities in agriculture?

    Opportunities are found in all aspect of agriculture. The opportunity that is being exploited is in the production sector but more is still needed to produce enough for food security and export. The greatest opportunities are found in the agro-processing industries, which are not yet fully exploited. The processing of primary products into secondary products in terms of value addition will not only create wealth to investors, but also double the foreign exchange earnings of the country. It will generate employment to the rural areas and improve the economy of the specific locations of the agro processing industries. The employment generation of the value added industries is more than double that of the production sector.

    Are there specific policies that might help to encourage value-added agricultural activities?

    Value added agriculture is an important strategy to both entrepreneurs and the rural development. The policies to be adopted should include policies that will create enabling environment for the establishment of the value added agro industries; policies that concern the macro-economy of the industries in terms of creating enabling environment for access to credit facility; regulatory environment for entrepreneurship where all the supply chain actors are regulated; tax policy that will encourage investment, and infrastructure and rural development policy which will help in boosting the rural economy.

    The National Centre for Agricultural Mechanisation (NCAM) was estabished for designing and development of technologies &equipment. How is this centre functioning across Nigeria?

    NCAM was established to research and innovate into the development of indigenous machines for farming and processing techniques; by designing and developing simple low-cost equipment which can be manufactured with local materials, skills and facilities. The centre was also established to standardise and certify, in collaboration with Standards Organisation of Nigeria (SON), agricultural machines, equipment and engineering practices in use in Nigeria; and also develop manpower by training stakeholders in the field of agricultural mechanisation. In line with these mandates, the centre has achieved modicum of success in machinery development. Though NCAM is a research institute, the centre design and develop machinery based on farmers’ need. Many machinery and equipment for production and processing have been developed across various crop value chains. For cassava, the centre has developed the processing line such as cassava peeling machine, grater, hydraulic press, sifter, mechanical fryer, as well as chipping and dicing machines.  We have also developed for rice the following machines; rice parboiler, distoner, rice milling machine and polisher. We have also developed complete processing equipment for oil palm processing. Aside these processing lines, the centre has produced multi-purpose threshers to thresh major grains and legumes; fish kiln, hammer mill, feed mixer, groundnut decorticator, maize shellers, dryers, etc.

    On production equipment, the centre has developed a 30hp and 40hp mini tractors, two-row tractor drawn cassava planter and harvester, motorised hand guided rice reaper, mini rice combine harvester, four-row multi-seed planter, hand push multi-seed planter for small holder farmers and hosts of other production equipment. Recently, the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh mandated the centre to develop a yam heap moulding implement. This has been developed. It can produce 1050 heaps per day.

    Most of the processing machines we developed have been installed in many states. Apart from machinery development, NCAM has developed her technology on rice production called SAWAH Eco-Technology. We have successfully promoted this technology in 12 states cutting across the six-geopolitical zones. The technology has increased the average yield of paddy from as low as 4t/ha to 7.2t/ha in states like Ebonyi and Kebbi. Kebbi was one of the first states the technology was introduced and I will say that NCAM had contributed to the success of the rice revolution in Kebbi, though this was largely due to the state government’s efforts to support the farmers, to boost the growth of rice production in the state. At present, a two-ton capacity rice mills are being installed at Nasarawa, Ebonyi, and Borno states. In Kwara State, 11 rice and cassava processing sheds equipped with appropriate machines for rice and cassava processing were constructed last year. These sheds were also established in Kogi, Rivers and Cross River states. The level of mechanisation in the country is still low due to the fact that the majority of  farmers have small farm holdings and they have fragmented farm lands, which make mechanisation difficult. Farmers can access tractors better due to the public-private partnership on hiring enterprise introduced by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. The small holder farmers are still not having the privileges of acquiring mechanisation equipment due to their financial limitations and so the traditional methods of farming still prevail; though some small holder farmers have embraced new mechanisation technologies. The tractorisation index still remain low and for some time the index has remained 0.027, which means that we have 27 tractors to a thousand hectares; this is too low.

    Although Nigeria is an agricultural country, its farm holding is mostly small. How can a small farmer afford the costly farm machinery?

    The small holding of farmers is between 0.1 and 2ha. This is just sufficient for subsistence with little available for sale. They are incapacitated financially and, therefore, they are not able to grow their hectarage. For this set of farmers  to acquire farm equipment, there is the need for them to come together and form cooperative groups, so that they can pull resources together and share capital investment and also share risk in investment. Let me give you an example, in 2015, a group of farmers approached NCAM to buy a thresher, but they couldn’t pay more than one third of the total cost of the machine. We accepted the money and asked them to pay the rest in three instalments. After about three months, they came back to pay the balance in a single tranche instead of three installments and told us that after using the machine, they hired it to their co-farmers and was able to raise the balance. So, the centre always advise farmers to come together and buy equipment as a group and then render services to other groups to recoup their investment. The cost of equipment depended mainly on imported components, such as mild steel, stainless steel as well as prime movers, which are usually the most expensive parts of a motorised machine.

    Are there any results or impact of NCAM’s work so far?

    Yes, as I have said before the NCAM rice Eco-Technology (SAWAH) was introduced in many states, among which is Kebbi State, which has effectively applied the technology to develop the rice production. Most of NCAM-developed machines and equipment are in use in many farms in the country. Efforts are also in place to work with the states to bring our technology to the local farmers. In 2016, about 100 of our rice threshers were procured by the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and distributed to farmers in various states. Eleven processing sheds were also constructed in Kwara State for cassava and rice processing. In 2016, the processing lines have impacted on the local processors. The centre also trained artisans on its technologies every year to disseminate the knowledge to welders who have been producing these equipment. At present, women are also trained on the use of cassava flour to produce confectionaries such as cake, biscuits, chinchin, doughnut and meat pie.

     

  • ‘Our refineries better off in private hands’

    What can be done to stop the perennial fuel scarcity? It’s by privatising the refineries, says Integrated Oil and Gas Limited Executive Director Captain Emmanuel Iheanacho (rtd). In this interview with AKINOLA AJIBADE, he says repairing moribund refineries will end the drama over subsidy and importation.

    WHY has the government been unable to fix its refineries?

    The reasons are many. First, is the fact the refineries are old and they defy resuscitation. The refineries are in dire strait, a development, which has made it difficult for the government to bring them back on stream. Built in the 1980s, the refineries were replete with old spare parts, and replacing them have been pretty difficult. This has impacted negatively on the output of the refineries. Little wonder the capacity of each of the refineries has fallen below 50 per cent.

    Secondly, the refineries have suffered from lack of proper maintenance from successive administrations in the country. It is not surprising that the Turn Around Maintenance (TAM), aimed at putting the refineries in tip-top condition, has always failed. Thirdly, Nigerians showed non-challant attitude to the refineries. To them, the refineries are public institutions and as a result, no one showed interest in their maintenace. These, among other issues, have hindered the government from providing solution to its decaying facilities, of which refineries are some of them.

    Will the refineries fare better under private entrepreneurs?

    Yes, the refineries would perform better whenever they are managed by private individuals. The reason is because private operators have enough capital, expertise and the motivations required to make refineries and other projects work. They are committed to the growth of the refineries and other projects that were designed to serve the needs of the masses. They know full well that they would be sacked, in the event that they are not performing and would not like to lose their jobs.

    In achieving cost efficiency, private operators are better than their counterparts in the government. They make good use of the resources available to them (human and capital), by minimising cost of operation, reduce wastages and do overhauling, where necessary. All these have helped in promoting efficiency in many of the privately-owned institutions. I believe that the Federal Government has done the right thing, by allowing private investors to set up refineries for the growth of the country.

    How can Nigeria end perennial fuel scarcity?

    For Nigeria to end the recurrent fuel scarcity, the stakeholders in the value chain must work together. That is, the Federal Government, the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), the oil production and exploration companies, refinery operators, marketers and other stakeholders must come together to proffer solution to the problems affecting their organisations.The stakeholders must not shy away from their responsibilities if they want to achieve necessary growth in this regard. They must work to fulfill the mandates given to the agencies of the government by the constitutions, of which refineries are one of them.

    In a situation whereby marketers play their role as expected, so also the refinery operators and other relevant stakeholders, there would be enough fuel in the country. Not only that, there would be seamless distribution of fuel, coupled with the fact the country would not find it difficult to achieve self sufficiency. Once there is enough fuel to consume domestically,  demand for the product would not outstrip supply and this means there would not be fuel scarcity in the country. On the other hand, when there is a deficit in the supply side and the demand exceeds supply of fuel, there would be scarcity of the product.

    Can the country meet its needs, with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) as the sole fuel importer?

    Yes, the country has the capacity to meet its needs once its able to improve on the level of fuel imported and distributed in the country. The NNPC, which is the only institutions approved by the government to import fuel, is trying its best in this regard. It needs to put more efforts.  The government can meet the fuel need of its over 170 million population by directing the NNPC to work harder in the area of importation of petroleum products. To achieve this goal, the NNPC must allow other stakeholders, especially marketing oil firms, to import fuel into the country. When this happens, the NNPC‘s efforts at improving fuel supply would be complimented, as well as appreciated by the vast majority of Nigerians.

    What should be marketers’ role in this regard?

    Private marketers play important role in ensuring efficiency in the distribution of fuel in Nigeria. They are regarded as middlemen, serving as link between the refiners and the consumers of the product. It is on record that private marketers have played similar role in the past and I believe that they can still do the same, if they are given the opportunity to do so.There was a time in Nigeria when marketers were saddled with importing 63 per cent of the fuel consumed in the country. The marketers were taking the unenviable risk of locating the refineries abroad in order to help them process the crude oil into petroleum products; taking the risk of buying dollars to import fuel despite the fluctuations in the foreign exchange market; taking the risk of importing fuel from abroad; taking the risk of putting the fuel in the ships; taking the risk of bringing the fuel to Nigeria; taking the risk of storing the fuel in their farm tanks and distributing it nationwide.

    Private marketers have done this job before and can still do it. They have the infrastructure required to improve fuel supply in the country, coupled with the fact that they have a good knowledge of the operation of the oil and gas industry, especially the downstream sub-sector.

    How can marketers overcome liquidity challenge?

    It is not true that marketers are having liquidity problem. Marketers can raise enough money for importation of fuel by borrowing money from both local and international banks. The banks are ready to provide loans to the marketers, provided they (banks) see opportunities to make profits in the business. Once the banks realise that they can make enough profits from the business, they will not hesitate to make funds available to the marketers.

    The only way, by which profit motive cannot be constrained, is for the government to allow a free market economy or liberalised economy to be in place in the industry. That is, there should be a free market economy where every player comes in, plays and exit the market when there is the need to do so. There should be a free entry and free exit market system. Under this system, a marketer may decide to make N500 profit, another may make N700 profit on the fuel sold. Another may decide to make a profit that is a little bit lower, until the time the price gets to a level refered to in economics as equilibrium price.

    In economics, equilibrium price is the best price, which consumers can buy his/her product. It is a situation where a marketer may decide to sell a litre of fuel at N140, knowing full well that a litre of fuel costs him N181 a litre to bring to Nigeria. When a marketer is able to sell his fuel in large quantities, he will in the process make huge turnover.

    What are the benefits of a liberalised market?

    In a liberalised market or economy, there would not be restrictions regarding what a seller of a product must do, how he would do it, when he would do it and where he would do it. In a liberalised market, the issue of allowing somebody to dictate to others what they should import, the volume of goods they must import and the price they must sell the product would not arise. Marketers will be free to buy and sell at a price, which he or she thinks will provide values.

    At this point, we need to look at how we can engineer a change in the price regime of fuel. That has to come from the issue of deregulating the market. Though the market has been deregulated partially, the market should be fully deregulated. When the market is fully deregulated, the control of the market will not be in the hands of a few, but privileged people. That is, people, who by their closeness to the corridor of power, enjoy a high level of patronage from the government. You can see how deregulation of the fuel market has helped the country. For instance, if you go to the Eastern part of the country, you see people buying fuel at N190 per litre. The same thing happens in the West and the far North.

    If people are willing to buy fuel at different prices, not minding its cost, that shows that the country needs to deregulate its market fully by removing obstructions that will hinder the flow of the business. When marketers are able to male their profits, the issue of smuggling fuel to other countries in order to make more money will not happen.

    What is delaying the take-off of modular refineries?

    Basically, the problem facing people trying to set up a modular refinery is underestimation of the tasks or the challenges in the area. People are underestimating the amount of time and work required to set up a modular refinery. They are under-estimating the time it takes to conceive the idea of owing a refinery, the time it takes to do visibility studies, do the market survey, write an articulate content engineering paper and look for the financiers among other things that will help in the take–off of the refinery. It is painful to hear people say that the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR) issued forty licences or more and that none of the companies  given licences was able to set up a refinery.  They failed to look at the volume of works required to own a refinery. These are the steps which anybody, who wishes to own a refinery in order to improve fuel capacity in the country, must follow.

    How can modular refineries help in addressing fuel crisis?  

    Modular refineries would help in solving fuel scarcity when they are well established. When modular refineries are built in states such as Lagos, Imo and others, they will help in reducing scarcity of fuel in those areas. For instance, when you have modular refineries in the riverine areas, they will help in improving availability of fuel in the country. Secondly, the refineries will assist in creating jobs and thirdly, people in the communities where such refineries are located, will feel a sense of belonging. They will be proud to identify with the lofty and developmental programmes that are taking place in their environment.

    Can Nigeria achieve self-sufficiency, with the coming on stream of Dangote Petro-chemical Refineries soon?

    It is a good thing that Dangote Petrochemical Refineries is coming to process 650,000 barrels of crude oil per day. The project, which is billed for completion in 2019, will help in improving fuel supply in the country, boost employment opportunities, improve individual and government earnings by way of taxes and other fees charged by the state and Federal Government. Even at that, the supply of fuel in the country is not going to be enough. The reason is because Dangote Refineries is not going to refine crude oil for Nigerian market alone. There is room for fuel exports, which Dangote as a business oriented firm, will be ready to leverage for growth. The company will be exporting its products to countries in the West African sub region in order to earn foreign exchange.

    So, if one considers the size of the fuel market in Nigeria, one will realise that the market goes beyond Nigeria. It goes as far as all the countries in the West African sub-region and beyond. So, if the government and its people demand that Dangote should be refining crude for the Nigerian market, there will be still be deficit, which will create opportunities for modular refineries to grow their business.

    How many barrels of crude does Nigeria consume daily?

    The country consumes between 700 and 800 barrels per day, which runs into millions of litres, after it has been processed into petroleum products. To me, the 700 or 800 barrels of crude are still not enough to meet the demands of over 170 million Nigerians. This is aside the fact that Nigeria’s neighbours, such as Benin Republic, Togo, which rely on the fuel to carry out their social and economic activities.

    When was Integrated Oil and Gas Company established?

    The firm was incorporated in 1998 as a spin-off from its parent company, Genesis Worldwide Shipping (GWS), the ship owning/vessel chartering arm of the corporate group. The firm specialises in offering one-stop services to consumers in the downstream sector. The company has retail outlets through which it dispenses fuel to customers nationwide.

    What is the capacity of the refinery? 

    The firm is building a modular refinery with a capacity to refine 20,000 barrels of crude oil per day to help bridge the demand and supply gap, and further ease fuel scarcity in the country. The refinery can increase its capacity to between 50,000 and 100,000 barrels per day in the nearest future by adding more modules to it. The refinery, farm tank and other plants will be located in Tomaro Island, Apapa, Lagos.

    Besides the refinery, which other companies will be on the island?

    The island is going to serve as an industrial hub for oil and gas and maritime in West Africa. The reason is because indigenous ship owners will be able to participate in the lifting of crude oil from the island aside the refinery, farm tanks and other plants.

     

     

     

     

     

  • ‘Why Telcos, DisCcos must embrace credit bureaux services’

    Getting more people into the financial services net requires strategies, one of which is making credit accessible to people of all classes. Just as banks need information on borrowers, telecommunications companies also need subscribers’ credit data, especially for post-paid customers. That is where credit bureaux services come to play. CRC Credit Bureau Limited Managing Director/CEO ‘Tunde Popoola speaks with COLLINS NWEZE on the gains of embracing credit bureaux services and steps taken to ensure that other non-financial services providers key into the scheme.

    Nine years after credit bureaux operations started in Nigeria, what has been your experience with customers, borrowers and regulators?

    Credit bureaux were licensed in 2009. So, the industry will be 10 next year. My experience with customers has, on the whole, been very positive. We have been able to grow our customer base from being largely financial institutions to other sectors. We now have some insurance companies, telecommunication firms, real estate companies, leasing companies that have come onboard.

    At the very beginning we used to have many issues with the quality of data submitted by these institutions; but there has been an improvement, although there is still room for improvement. The adoption of standardised common data submission template has helped. Most Nigerian banks’ customers still do not know much about credit bureaux and how they are impacted by their existence. Some also do not know how to seek corrections to wrongs and disputed information submitted to the credit bureaux by creditors.

    Many do not know the rights conferred on them by the law on the limited permissible purposes for which their information could be used, and the protection of their data and robust provisions on how to address disputed information. A lot needs to be done in this area. Our experience with the regulators has been positive. The credit bureau industry is a highly regulated one. The CBN granted licences to three private credit bureaux to operate and without a licence no one can operate a credit bureau. From time to time, the CBN issues circulars that guide credit bureaux operations. Last year, the Credit Reporting Act, which lays down the legal framework for the operations of credit bureaux, was signed into law. The CBN continues to grant tremendous support to our industry so that the credit reporting culture would be fully adopted as a way of life.

    What are your priority areas as  chairman of the Credit Bureau Association of Nigeria (CBAN)?

    The industry has come a long way since three credit bureaux were licensed in 2009. The operators have always worked closely, especially since CBAN was incorporated as an umbrella advocacy association in 2012. My tenure will try to deepen some of the achievements we have recorded. We have received significant support from the World Bank Group and the CBN.

    The support includes promoting the on-boarding of all categories of financial institutions under the supervision of the CBN as credit information suppliers and users; building the capacity of credit information suppliers and users; creating awareness about the services and products of credit bureaux to the public and providing the strategic input towards the enactment of the National Credit Reporting Act. We realised that there is still a lot to do in this regard. Awareness creation to other stakeholders is also key and we will do a lot more in this area. There will be media engagement and roadshows for business management organisations. We think a lot more needs to be done to sensitise the judiciary and the general public about the National Credit Reporting Act 2017.

    What of the financial sector and others?

    The financial sector has embraced credit reporting and they are benefitting from it. Other credit grantors in the economy such as the telecommunication companies, distribution companies (Discos), utility companies, insurance companies, cooperative societies, and retailers have not fully embraced credit reporting. We will do a lot of engagements in this area. We appeal to telcos and discos regulators and operators to see embrace credit reporting fully. These sectors and Nigerians will benefit immensely from a credit reporting system that is inclusive of these sectors and other utilities. I hold the view that the adoption by these strategic and critical sectors will deepen financial inclusion and further enhance access to credit even for the unbanked. Nigeria needs to play significant role in credit reporting in Africa.

    We started a head of many countries. We will make CBAN play a major role towards an association of credit bureaus in Africa, as some other continents such as Europe. This will enhance peer review, capacity building and promotion of credit reporting in African countries.

    The level of non-performing loans in the banking sector is extremely high, far above 15 per cent as against the five per cent regulatory threshold. How does this affect credit bureaux, given that the sector is expected to check bad borrowers?

    The credit bureaux do act as a check against bad borrowers. They are a repository of the credit history of individuals and firms and in this way banks can know the individuals and firms with a history of bad debts and refrain from lending to them. It is a testament to the efficacy of credit bureaux that the level of non-performing loans in Nigeria has reduced from 37.25 per cent in 2009 to 12.82 per cent in 2016. However, more can still be done. The current level of non-performing loans in the banking sector is very worrisome. The high level of NPL that we are currently seeing can be traced back to the challenges in the oil and gas sector. The oil companies are some of the biggest borrowers of banks and when the global oil crash occurred it affected their ability to repay back their loans. There isn’t a lot that the credit bureau can do in this case because it is not as if the oil companies had a history of bad debts that the credit bureau failed to report on, but going forward the lesson here for banks is not to concentrate their facility in one sector.

    What is your view on the CBN’s plan to institute new private asset management companies to buy up bad loans and how would you assess the impact of AMCON on the level of bad loans in its six years of existence?

    The CBN’s plan to institute new private asset management companies is a sound one. It is a move dictated by the current realities in the financial system with respect to the high incidence of non-performing loans. Besides, I believe that a private-sector owned bank will run much more efficiently just like any other private sector initiative.

    With regards to the impact of AMCON on the level of bad loans, I would say they have done well though there are certain challenges, which limit the level of achievements recorded so far by the corporation. Such challenges include the slow nature of our judicial system and the poor documentation surrounding the loans consigned to the corporation and backed-up assets. My submission is that if these bottlenecks are not dealt with, the private asset management companies may also experience difficulties in selling assets to third parties.

    What are the benefits in the credit bureau industry that would attract more Nigerians to obtain their credit scores?

    One major benefit of credit bureaux that should excite Nigerians and make them want to obtain their credit scores is that they help individuals to amass reputational collateral. Reputational collateral is built over time as an individual borrows and pays back on time without defaults. Reputational collateral can stand in place of physical collateral and help individuals get access to finance.

    Why are Nigerians reluctant to embrace your services, especially getting and keeping their credit scores?

    Nigerians are reluctant to use the services of credit bureaux because they are not aware of them and not necessarily because they don’t see the benefits that come with it.

    To this end, we have been organising various programmes to reach out to the populace through our umbrella body: Credit Bureau Association of Nigeria (CBAN). I believe that concerted efforts to create awareness for the services of credit bureaux will see a rise in adoption. Nigerians and Nigerian companies should cultivate the habit of self-check. Good enough, the law enables individuals to obtain one free credit report in a year from the credit bureaux. The law also gives you the opportunity to guestion the credit report used to decline your loan request, if your loan request was turned down on account of negative information in your credit report. Besides, the credit bureaux have developed a number of products that individuals and firms can use to know their credit status at any time.

    Consumer lending, which is a critical sector expected to benefit from your operations, is still untapped several years after you came into business.

    There are many factors that affect consumer lending in Nigeria. One  is that banks have been traditionally wary of lending to consumers compared with lending to corporates because of the perceived risks involved. While the credit bureaux have been able to mitigate these risks by reducing the information asymmetry between banks and borrowers, this mindset still persists. But it is rapidly disappearing.

    Can we say operators have not measured up to expectations, and if that is the case, what are the factors stopping you from achieving set objectives?

    For instance, in January the total amount of loans to consumers stood at under N1 trillion, while that of corporates stood at about N15 trillion. But things are changing very fast. The amount of loans and the number of consumer loans and loans to SMEs have increased and keep on increasing in recent time. Most banks  have now developed consumer products and dedicated desks for SMEs. Many banks are changing their lending model to enable them upscale and lend in few minutes to consumers. Some are even now lending to individuals without bank accounts with them.

    In some banks today, you can access loans under 10 minutes if you latch on to their loan application. Things are rapidly changing, but it will take some time before we see the impact. The credit bureaux and the fintechs are the enablers of these new lending models to consumers and SMEs. It must be understood that the credit bureau merely exists as an enabler. We are an infrastructure that helps banks manage credit risks and promote access to finance for individuals. However, we do not directly influence a bank’s decision on whether or not to grant credit. That is still up to the bank and there is nothing that we can do if their model of lending favours corporates compared with consumers.

    On the other hand, we have the consumers themselves and their aversion to borrowing because of high interest rates and poor credit culture. So, no, I would not say that credit bureaux have not measured up to expectations when it comes to consumer lending, rather the prevailing credit culture has impeded consumer lending in Nigeria.

    Have you been able to explore opportunities in other financial institutions, small businesses and civil servants to bring borrowers into your coverage area?

    We have to an extent. Take CRC Credit Bureau, for instance, our operations have been able to cover all states in Nigeria and our data providers include other financial institutions. Civil servants can use our services to check their credit status and government and other employers can run credit checks on prospective employees using our services.

    What can you tell us about product development at CRC? Are there unique products that set you apart from what your competitors offer?

    CRC is constantly innovating and we have been recognised for this. We won the 2017 Nigeria Brand award for the most innovative and impactful credit information service provider in West Africa. We are very big on product development at CRC. Last year we launched CRC FICO score in partnership with Fair Isaac and Company. CRC FICO score is the only international credit score in Nigeria. CRC FICO score is a three-digit number that summarises the information in a credit information report and enables lenders and/or credit grantors make swift decisions on the credit worthiness of loan applicants and buyers of post-paid products.

    We have several other products that set us apart. They are mostly credit monitoring products such as CRC I-CON plus and CRC CONplus. These are credit overview notification products that enable individuals and firms to receive information about their credit status on a monthly basis through an annual subscription mechanism. CRC I-CON plus delivers an easy, convenient and cost effective solution that enables customers monitor their overall credit exposure through monthly e-mail notifications, which can be viewed on the go. CRC CON plus is the same as I-CON plus except that it is targeted at firms. We also have developed  credit monitor alert products that once you subscribe, you receive notification once there is a transaction that affects you from any of our data providers. These products can be purchased on our website: www.crccreditbureau.com. Some other initiatives are on the line and we will unveil our credit mobile application very soon.

    Also, our strength lies in our partnerships with international firms such as Dun and Bradstreet and FICO. What this means is that our products are of world-class standard.

    What is the biggest challenge facing the credit bureau industry at present?

    There are three major challenges facing the credit bureau industry at present. One is data submission by institutions. Apart from financial institutions that submit data on individuals and commercial entities on a regular basis, most other institutions in the non-financial sectors are yet to fully come on board. There is a need for telecommunication companies, utility companies, insurance companies and all other companies that transact on a pay-later basis to regularly submit data to the credit bureaux in order to enhance credit reporting in Nigeria. There is also a low level of awareness of our activities, especially by individuals and business entities.

     

     

  • ‘Govt’s growth agenda should target exports’

    Diageo Plc, the United Kingdom-based majority core investor in Guinness Nigeria, has led a N40 billion recapitalisation of its Nigerian business, a strategic move that underpins the importance of Nigeria to the global business group. Guinness Nigeria Plc Managing Director Mr. Peter Ndegwa, in this interview with TAOFIK SALAKO, speaks on the multinational’s outlook on economy, corporate growth strategies and social responsibilities, among others. Excerpts:

    WHAT are the barriers that must be removed to enhance trade and cooperation among African countries?

    I think we have a lot of lessons to learn from the various sub-regional economic integrations in Africa. For example, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Trade Liberalisation Scheme (ETLS), which I am very familiar with having worked in some West African countries, has tremendously boosted trade among member-countries of the sub-region by encouraging the free flow of goods and services as well as transfer of skills. The scheme promotes the West Africa region as a Free Trade Area.

    In strengthening Nigeria as the regional economic hub, what  do you think will facilitate greater flow of foreign investments into Nigeria?  

    Further diversification of the economy from dependence on crude oil will enhance national development and create more opportunities for Nigerians. A major leg in the diversification drive is to target sectors with export potential. A boost in non-oil exports will definitely generate capital inflow and investments. Another factor to consider is to add more value locally rather than being an import country. So, it is not just dependence on oil, but adding more value to local production. Let’s localise production, source locally, and then let us drive export. ECOWAS is a big market for Nigeria. The regional blocks are within Africa, we can source more trades regionally within Africa. Part of the reason why our exports, as a company, are increasing is because we have increased exports to Ghana and Cameroun, to some of our sister companies. Certainly, I think Nigeria should drive the diversification of its economy and also add more local value in the areas of raw materials substitution and manufacturing.

    What’s your perception of the  economy? What changes or improvements have you seen in recent times?

    Although still somewhat fragile, it appears the recovery is bringing the economy back in the right direction. Looking back, there is no doubt that a number of areas have improved in the country’s economy. Specifically for us, first we have seen better availability of liquidity for foreign currency especially for manufacturers who import raw materials and also spare parts for their plants. We have seen some level of stability both in terms of the expected range of price versus the volatility we have seen in the currency before. That is good because it improves predictability, ability to plan and even when costs are higher, it helps that we know what the price is, which is key.

    The second is the availability of gas. About 12 months ago we had fluctuations on the availability of natural gas which we use to power our plants. When we had shortages we had to go into the use of diesel, which is more expensive, less environmentally-friendly and more erratic. Previously, we experienced incredible delays in getting work permits or travel permits, however, in these areas, we have seen some level of improvements.

    Areas I feel we could improve further are the congestion at the seaports. Our exports have doubled in the last 18 months and one of the reasons we are doubling exports is to get foreign currency, which is very helpful for us. But we have seen some level of delays as a result of the congestions at the ports, both in terms of outbound and inbound of raw materials. As a result, two things happen to the business eventually, we incur demurrage and more transport costs and also when we don’t get the materials on time, it is challenging to ensure continuity of production.

    Additionally having regular power supply is something everyone yearns for. The benefits arising from this are obviously very enormous.

    Regardless of the outlined challenges, the economy holds much promise. I believe that we will continue to unlock growth as we continue to take the right steps. However, it is good to see that government wants to spend more money on infrastructure.

    After the recent rights issue, was there any significant change in the shareholding structure of Guinness Nigeria?

    The rights issue was undertaken to optimise and de-leverage the statement of financial position and reduce finance costs. The rights issue was an optimal recapitalisation opportunity for us, whilst providing all shareholders with an equal opportunity to maintain their shareholding. Also, the company is able to strengthen its capital base to support business growth whilst giving it greater financial flexibility. There has been no significant shift in the shareholding structure as a result of the rights issue.

    What new business opportunities and expansion of your existing businesses do you see in Nigeria?

    We still believe very much in the potential of the market. That is why, despite the challenges in the operating environment, we continue to invest behind our business.  We have invested in our production capacity to produce spirits locally and today we are producing Smirnoff X1, Gordon’s Moringa, and McDowells locally instead of importing. This allows us to keep costs down and in turn we are able to offer these brands at the right price so that consumers can enjoy international quality standard products at accessible prices. Our investment in spirit shows that we are committed to the future.

    The second is we have also increased our local sourcing. We used to source only about 40 per cent locally; now we are sourcing about 75 per cent of local materials like sorghum, glass, packaging materials like labels and crown corks. This reduces our cost of doing business.

    Innovation continues to be a core part of our business and we have come to be known as the business that innovates. In addition to the spirits segment mentioned above, we have also expanded our participation in some of the other categories, including beer and soft drinks. We are the only total beverage business which has spirits, beer and soft drinks, giving us a bit more opportunity to service consumers, compared to if we were specialists in a particular area. For us, growth has a lot to do with expanding our portfolio through innovation and also through building existing brands. It is about lowering our costs both through local sourcing and locally produced brands instead of importing. We also continue to drive our productivity agenda, which is all about reducing waste and being more effective.

    What are you doing to address the harmful effects of alcohol?

    Alcohol has been part of the society for a long time and had been used in celebration for many centuries but if misused, it can cause harm, which is the primary basis of all the messaging on the responsible drinking campaigns that we do. As you know, Guinness is a household name, it is a brand that is known for quality and it has been in Nigeria for 67 years. So, for us, it goes beyond just alcohol. The whole issue of alcohol in the society, and in particular, our response to the drinking agenda, is very important to us. While our commercial interest, investment and paying dividends and returns to shareholders are very important, success for us is more than the commercial aspect. Reputation, trust and respect are also very important. What consumers, customers and society think about us is a big part of what makes us successful.

    As leaders in the alcohol industry, we want to make sure that we also lead the agenda in raising awareness about responsible drinking with stakeholders, not just consumers but communities, suppliers and the public. The other context is at a global level. Diageo, our parent company, is a part of the global producers and marketers of alcohol. The CEOs of global companies that produce alcohol came together and made a commitment that across the countries they operate, they will ensure that they focus on efforts that reduce the harmful use of alcohol. So, as part of Diageo, the activities that we take part in locally are a part of that bigger commitment and global collective. Also in Nigeria, we are part of Beer Sectoral Group (BSG) for beer and for spirits, we are also part of the Spirits and Wine Association of Nigeria (SWAN) and we work with these groups to tackle the misuse of alcohol.

    Many reports have linked alcohol abuse to road accident. Specifically, what are you doing to address this problem?

    The first one I’d like to mention our partnership with the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) across the country. We have partnered with the FRSC for the past 13 years on our “Ember Months Campaign”, a responsible drinking campaign targeted at commercial drivers and motorists, especially those using public transport. It aims to help them to understand the importance of not drinking when driving or about to drive. In 2015, we gave them breathalyzers to enable them test drivers and this also provides a way to check that our education and awareness initiatives are working.

    Secondly, this year, we are starting a radio programme where we will be giving a lot of information about responsible drinking, making people aware of the various elements about responsible drinking, for example how they shouldn’t drink if driving and how much alcohol is permitted in your body according to regulation. Our overall message to drivers is ‘Don’t Drink and Drive’ and we have mostly focused on this campaign around the ember months. However, from 2018 we have decided to extend it through the year, from January to December. This is because accidents don’t just happen towards the end of the year, and drinking doesn’t stop at the end of the festive season, it goes throughout the year. So far this year, we have launched one of the ember months campaign in Agege Motor Park here in Lagos and we will also be launching in other parts of the country, including Abuja, Kano, Benin and Onitsha, just to sensitise the commercial drivers on the risks of harmful misuse of alcohol especially when driving.

    Thirdly, for the first time ever, we will be organising structured trainings for new driver’s license applicants and fleet drivers across the country and this plays well into our education piece for responsible drinking.

    What other initiatives are you taking?

    Soon, we will be launching an initiative called Join the Pact. This is a global initiative that Diageo introduced over nine years ago. It is a global initiative for people to make a pledge not to drink and drive. Working with our trade partners and at every touch point where our brands are consumed and enjoyed, this will cut right across all our external stakeholder groups.

    We aim to collect 100,000 pledges from Nigerians not to drink and drive. When you drink, don’t drive. When you go out in a group to have fun, designate one of you to drive and that person should not drink. If you are going out alone, arrange for taxi to take you home after you have had something to drink.

    Diageo has also launched a new campaign called ‘Drink Positive’, which is also aimed at creating awareness about alcohol. The advantage of looking at alcohol in a positive way is to recognise that alcohol, if used in moderation is a part of a balanced lifestyle. Therefore, Drink Positive is asking employees to engage consumers in their jobs and personal lives about the positive role that alcohol can play in our lives. For example, I am talking to you as a journalist; this is part of my role to create awareness about responsible drinking to the public through the media. As we go to the motor park for our rallies, that is another way of creating awareness on responsible drinking through various forums. We are saying that consumers should not abuse alcohol, they should drink positively. On one of our internal websites where employees collaborate and communicate, an employee said that every time he sees a behavior that is not positive he will use the knowledge he has to tell the individual to stop misusing alcohol and convince the person to drink positive.

    We are also part of the Beer Sector Group (BSG) of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN). As a group, the BSG of MAN, which comprises alcohol beverage manufacturers, has come together to drive the responsible drinking campaign in the society, and drive awareness around responsible drinking. We have a programme that we normally run during the ember months, which is Drive Alcohol Free. It is a way of encouraging drivers, whether commercial or private, not to drink and drive. Individual companies do various things on their own but we also come together to create awareness and communicate the dangers of drink driving. We support FRSC in their initiatives, and we will continue to do so. We also do research on areas we should be focusing on as far as alcohol in the society is concerned. One of the issues we research on is underage drinking. We are interested in knowing which parts of the country are more prone to issues around drink driving; which parts of the country would be prone to underage drinking; which types of drinks should we be watching out for in terms of underage drinking; We do these researches because there are lots of perceptions about what alcohol does and doesn’t do. There are lots of misconceptions about alcohol and we try to educate consumers around that. Some people may believe that alcohol gives you more power to drive. So, we make sure we remove that kind of misconception in our communication.

    Talking about the dangers of underage drinking, do you have any programmes targeted this societal problem?

    As part of the global CEOs commitment, one of the areas we focus on is underage drinking. We need to make sure that young people understand the dangers of alcohol misuse from when they are younger rather than when they have already started to engage in drinking. We have a programme called “Smashed”, which has been running in Diageo for about nine years. We are going to launch the programme in Nigeria in the year.We will work with an agency to run this in schools, using drama to educate young people about the dangers of excessive drinking so that they understand what alcohol abuse means from the time they are young and understand the harmful impact this may have. We believe by doing this and doing it in an interesting way, in an environment where they are comfortable, they will respond to the message on the dangers of alcohol misuse.

    The second thing we are doing is to look for advocates within youth communities. We recently signed a partnership with the National Youth Service Corp (NYSC) and we use that platform to recruit responsible drinking ambassadors amongst the Corp members who are then tasked with spreading the message of responsible drinking in their communities and places of primary assignment. These ambassadors will be chosen and trained to influence their colleagues not to engage in alcohol in harmful ways.

    We are also increasing awareness and knowledge on alcohol and its uses. One of these is our “Drink IQ” programme. The Drink IQ website, www.DRINKiQ.com was first introduced in 2008 when Diageo led the industry in launching a responsible drinking website. Information on questions, such as what should I know about alcohol, how is alcohol harmful to my body and how much alcohol should I drink, among others, are made available on this website. The website has been refreshed, it is much more engaging and more user-friendly and consumers can actually teach themselves.

    Like they say, ‘charity begins at home’, so our members of staff also have access to it. Very soon, it will be extended to professional bodies and at the end of the day it is about increasing awareness on alcohol.

    But with all these initiatives, don’t you at any point think these campaigns may have a direct negative impact on your sales?

    Our objective is not only to be the best performing business, but also to be the most trusted and respected.  We would not have been in this country for 67 years if we had taken a short cut in the way we drive our sales. The reason we preach responsibility in the way people consume alcohol is so they can have a balanced lifestyle that incorporates alcohol while celebrating or enjoying themselves. Abusing alcohol is harmful and we do not want harm in our society. Part of our responsibility is to ensure that there is increased awareness of the dangers of alcohol misuse and how to reduce related harm. And where we have carried out a number of these initiatives we have recorded a reduction in the incidences of abuse. This means that a lot of the work we have done around the “don’t drink and drive” initiative has had impact. So, the level of awareness is much higher. It is like safety, when people are more aware of the need to stay safe, they wear seatbelts. They know that when you are in the car and if we do not wear seat belt, you are likely to be injured if an accident occurs.

    We believe that we will create a better society if we have a better understanding about alcohol use and its role in a balanced lifestyle. That is why it is not in conflict with our commercial interest. In fact, it supports our ability to be in business because we will be a more respected organisation if we are seen to be responsible.

     

     

     

  • ‘Only 943 individuals pay over N10m tax yearly’

    Globally, government revenue is derived from taxes. However, it is a herculean task collecting taxes, making penalty for default punitive in most countries. The Federal Government’s introduction of the Voluntary Asset and Income Declaration Scheme (VAIDS), therefore, is a welcome development by tax collectors, not only because it will save them the rigours of pursuing defaulters, but to increase revenue. The Federal Inland Revenue Service Executive Chairman, Mr. Tunde Fowler, says out of N305 billion VAIDS’ target, only N20 billion has been generated. Fowler, in an interview with Group Business Editor, SIMEON EBULU, speaks on the issue and other tax matters.

    The grace period for tax defaulters is end of this month. What follows the deadline?

    What follows the deadline is that we shall follow the laws that deal with tax administration and for those that are not complaint. We shall investigate them and if need be we prosecute them. We shall take all actions in line with the law, which includes the stoppage of their business activities and if need be, the sale of assets.

    Will you be prosecuting high net worth individuals and big corporate tax defaulters? Also, is there a possibility of extending the deadline?

    The issue of extension does not depend on me. It was a decision and approval by all the tiers of government, meaning that the presidency was aware of it and approved it. The governors approved it. It was taken to the Federal Executive Council (FEC), the Senate approved it, the House of Representatives approved it. So, I don’t have the capacity to change that approval. I think the only person who can, for whatever reason, decide to give an extension would be the President or the Vice President, who oversees the economy, through the Minister of Finance. Every tax defaulters would be prosecuted. People say we should use the 80-20 principle- meaning that we focus on people that give you 80 per cent of your tax revenue. You can say you are a big tax payer and that you have paid N1 billion and because you have paid N1 billion, we should forget the N500 million you are owing.

    Meanwhile, somebody who paid N100, 000, paid 100 per cent of his tax liabilities, meaning he was 100 per cent compliant. The organisation that paid N1 billion and still had N500 million left, was only 50 per cent compliant. So, you can’t compare both. Tax is based on profit and income. So, what we look at as tax administrators is the level of compliance. That is, we should use same law for those who are paying N100,000 and those who are paying N1 billion.

    What was the target amount for VAIDS and how much have you realised so far?

    The target amount we are looking at is $1 billion, which is equivalent of N305 billion; this include both corporate and individuals. Now, what has come in so far from the corporate angle is about N20 billion; you might think it is small, but from our own experience and the experience of those who have had similar programmes, like Turkey, India or South Africa, is that everybody waits till the last moment. So, we have received a lot of enquiries. We have received a lot of proposals, but in terms of payment, they have not paid yet. So, we believe by mid-March, there would be a better appreciation of the value we are looking at. But for us, N305 billion is doable.

    It is believed that some people, who have political connections, cannot be punished by the FIRS. What is your take on this assumption?

    I am a nominee of the President and I was approved by the Senate, under the supervision of the Vice President and the Minister of Finance. All of them have assured the FIRS of 100 per cent support and none of them have said we should take political considerations into account. None of them has said we should take the status of persons or corporate organisations into account. So, that tells me that we would do our job the way it was supposed to be done. So, there are no sacred cows.

    Can you shed more light on the information that the FIRS has compiled a list of Nigerians with property abroad?

    We did that even before VAIDS started. We looked at the number of tax payers that were paying under direct assessment, those who pay N10 million as tax per year and those figures were made public. We found out that in the whole of Nigeria, only 943 individuals paid over N10 million tax. And out of those 943, 941 were from Lagos and two from Ogun State. That tells me that in all the other states of the federation, including the Federal Capital Territory, there is no billionaire or multi-millionaire.

    But, when you look at the assets and the vehicles that are on our roads, then you will know that something is wrong. If you look at the average house at Ikoyi or the average house in the high net worth neighbourhoods in Kaduna, Rivers, Onitsha, and other cities, you find houses that are worth over N500 million. So, if an individual has a house worth over N500 million and he did not pay N10 million in tax, where did he get his money from? Now, we are carrying out an exercise on corporate Nigeria and we are doing it nationwide. We started in Abuja, looking at all corporate organisations that own property. We got a valuation of those assets. We found out that over 2,000 properties are owned by corporate organisations that do not pay tax. Now, what the law says is that if you don’t file your returns, we can use an estimated turnover and based on that turnover, we assume you make a profit of 30 per cent and we charge you at 30 per cent.

    For example, if your turnover is N100 million, we assume that you make N20 million profit and we charge that N20 million at 30 per cent, then you pay about N6.6 million in tax. We found out that we had properties more than N2 trillion in Abuja alone, under corporate names that did not pay tax. We have sent out assessment and we are in court to get a judgment that would let us seize those houses and sell them. We have concluded Lagos and we are nearly completing Kaduna. I believe without doubt that by the time we complete other states,  you will find out that corporate Nigerians with property of such would be in multiple of trillion. The same goes for individuals. The whole idea is that all of us must come together and put our little contribution to make Nigeria work. I was in the United Nations recently and the experts came up with a formula and said if any country’s tax to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio is below 15 per cent, it is highly unlikely that they can expect economic or social development in that country.

    In 2016, we were about six per cent. In 2017, through the support of the media, the FIRS was able to cross N4 trillion. Nigeria Customs Service, for the first time in their history crossed N1 trillion. We are looking at the collection of all the states revenue agencies. From the information we have got so far, they equally have crossed N1 trillion. That tells us that in 2017, the Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) from tax would be in excess of N6 trillion. But we believe that for government at all tiers to be able to provide services, we must hit at least, 20 per cent, so that we can start feeling the impact of government.

    What kind of support and corporation do you have from the 36 states?

    We have a very good support. Under the Joint Tax Board (JTB), in 2016, we signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with all the states’ Internal Revenue Services, to exchange tax information. This meant that all tax companies that were registered by the state were given to us. We equally gave to them the names of all our own tax payers. Some states were able to add close to 100,000 new corporate accounts that were paying tax to the FIRS, but were not paying to them. Likewise, we got over 200,000 companies that were paying to various states but were not paying to us.

    So, we were able to expand our tax net just by that single move. We also agreed that we would do what is called joint audit. For example, for a big corporate organisation that has representative in almost all the states of the federation, we said instead of every state chairman coming to audit these companies for tax, why don’t we do a national audit and then we tell every state how much they are owed by the company. A lot of them have not taken up that offer and to our mind, not taking that offer means they want to deal with it individually with each revenue agency. It shows me that a lot of them are not willing to declare freely. To us, that will save them money and it will be more efficient.

    Beyond the shores of Nigeria, how do you share data? Are there organisations you collaborate with?

    There are quite many countries and we have also signed certain agreements with the OECD to exchange information. That means that they can ask us for information about individuals or corporate entities that transact with us, likewise we can also ask for information. A number of countries have offered to give us information of corporate organisations and individuals who own properties also.

    How do you plan to trace those who don’t keep their monies in the bank and use fictitious names in buying assets?

    There was a law passed in Britain called the Unexplained Wealth Order. For now, they are dealing with property. It means that if you are a British or a foreigner, you have a house and you can’t show evidence of tax payment based on the income you used in buying that house or you cannot substantiate the source of your income that property would be taken away.

    So, some countries have taken this a step further than Nigeria. But a lot of Nigerians have now seen that even if they have property or investments in other countries, those countries are not going to allow them to continue to invest without doing the right thing. I will give you an example, I was speaking at an anti-corruption forum that took place after Evans, the alleged kidnapper was captured. He (Evans) had bought property in one of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in Ghana. He took money there and the Ghanaian authorities did not investigate who he was. They didn’t ask for evidence of his tax. But he was living among the high and mighty. He might have even gone there to open a new branch of his business and they wouldn’t have known. So, countries can say they welcome foreign investors, but they need to probe where the funds are coming from, the line of business such persons do and that they pay their tax.

    When will the Common Reporting Standards take off?

    It has taken off. But what we should talk about is what it means. It means that you should disclose all your transactions, so that if anyone is looking at your financial statements and reads the note, he or she will understand fully where your money came from, how you made the money and where the money is going.

    Now, let me take a step further to the area we call Transfer Pricing. A lot of companies used to just lump large expenditure together and that would reduce profit in one country and they would charge the income to another country where there is a lower tax rate. So, the issue is that countries found out that it was not in their interest. I will give a typical example. In Ireland, Apple had over a billion dollars in tax that ought to be paid to the country and maybe based on investment, the government wanted to give them some benefits, but the EU said no, that they can’t attract further investments at the expense of others by the company not paying the required tax. I think that is what the US President is now saying, that for countries that are taking businesses from America by giving them certain breaks when it comes to tax, that he would bring them back by reducing the tax rate in America. So, every government is promoting its own business and its own business men. That is why this issue of information sharing is very critical.

    A category of Nigerians believe VAIDS is not about them and that VAIDS is exclusively for the high net worth individuals and firms. What is your take on that?

    Before I go to the direct answer, if your state governor gets additional N10 billion, whether he is good governor, a bad governor or an average governor, he must spend that N10 billion. Assuming he spends half of it on unproductive ventures, the other half is spent on productive ventures. Whether it is by buying medicine, constructing a road, making a park, will it not affect the young people? So, VAIDS may not call for the young people to pay money because the young people don’t have investments, but the result of VAIDS will affect them. So, VAIDS affects all of us – old and young.

    There are some individuals based in Nigeria, but work for multinationals and are paid from abroad, how are they expected to pay their tax?

    You pay tax where you reside regardless of your nationality. Foreigners, who are posted here for example, are paid. If they earn an allowance for even coming into Nigeria, they are supposed to declare that income and they are expected to pay their taxes here.

    How will you deal with issues of corporate organisations that are underpaying their taxes even after deducting same from their workers?

    We are addressing it. That is why part of the MoU we signed with the states internal revenue agencies. After they pay the corporate tax and they pay their workers salary, every individual worker must have a tax clearance. And what we are doing on the JTB is that we are consolidating the tax data base. That means that if I am in Lagos, I can hit a button and it will give me your name if you are in Sokoto and your tax profile. So, we are insisting that every worker should request for a tax clearance certificate from their employer. If the employer does not give them, we come in and take up that employer. Some organisations would deduct your tax from your salary, but they will not remit it, some organisations would charge VAT, but they will not remit it. So, in working with some consultants, we are designing VAT forms and certificates that we would display in every business premises, so that when a customer goes in, the VAT certificate would be displayed to show they are a registered tax payer. So, once they collect the VAT, they must remit it to government.

     What are those things FIRS is looking at beyond VAIDS?

    If you look at what are looking at getting from VAIDS, it is N305 billion. If you look at the increase in collections between 2016 and 2017, it was over N700 billion. So, if you look at a tax type that we are pursuing vigorously, it is VAT. VAT increased by over N200 billion in one year and it is continuous. What VAIDS will do is that it will bring individuals into the tax net and once they are in, they will continue to pay yearly thereafter. So, it is just one aspect that we are focusing on and we are giving it publicity and letting everybody know that it is an opportunity where we will not ask too many questions, we will not prosecute you. Just come in and do the right thing.

    After the deadline, for those you may wish to prosecute, are you foreseeing an avalanche of court cases?

    If that is what it takes? We increase the budget for legal fees in our 2018 budget.

    Why do you think Nigerians should pay tax when government is not adhering to the social contract because Nigerians provide their own water, security and in some cases, repair the roads that lead to their houses?

    If you look at it in terms of the social contract, I read in the newspaper that Governor Ambode just signed a contract for the construction of 284 roads in Lagos State. If people had been paying tax, you will not have to fix 284 roads at once. The roads would have been there before. Now, the roads that were not there before that he is trying to fix from taxpayers’ money, may not be the road in front of your house today, but tomorrow, when he does another 284, maybe it will get to your turn.

    But in a situation where for so many years, people were not paying taxes, how do you expect the government to fix the roads? I was in Lagos for 10 years. When we started, the average IGR was N3.6 billion a month. By the time we left, it was N23 billion a month. So, you can imagine all those period of time when government didn’t have money, they couldn’t provide services. In 1999, we had 200,000 individual tax payers in Lagos State. When we left, they were 4.5 million and they still have not captured everybody. So, for those 200,000 that used to pay, they can feel bad, but what can you do with 200,000 people paying tax? How many roads can you build?

    Post -VAIDS, how do you see taxation in Nigeria?

    You see, once everybody comes in and we build a credible tax database and the economy starts to boom, every individual and every corporate organisation will be paying their taxes. So, next time you want to go on holiday, you will not say you want to go to Dubai or South Africa; you will go to Ibadan where there will be good roads, trains, and other good things.

     

     

  • ‘Banks can do better in tackling financial crimes’

    ‘Banks can do better in tackling financial crimes’

    The Inter-Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA) is committed to fighting corruption, terrorism financing and money laundering across the ECOWAS sub region. The agency has established functional financial intelligence units in all ECOWAS member-states and strengthened financial institutions to report suspicious transactions to regulators. GIABA’s Head in Nigeria, Timothy Melaye, speaks with COLLINS NWEZE on the enormous threats posed by money laundering and terrorism financing to the economy, security and social life in the ECOWAS region and globally.

    Can you tell us some of the steps the Inter-Governmental Action Group against Money Laundering in West Africa (GIABA) has taken to tackle money laundering across the West African sub-region?

    The GIABA as an organisation has been working assiduously to cover all aspects relating to fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. Basically, we are working with all stakeholders and in doing that, we have initiated a lot of programmes that are very different from the level of stakeholders. We are working, as you are aware, with journalists and we think these poeple are veritable tools to pass information in terms of awareness reasons and agenda settings.

    We are also working with the civil society organisations. We have established network of civil society organisations that are working in this area to raise awareness as well, and to confront and advocate in the areas of money laundering and terrorist financing. We have specific trainings for law enforcement agencies, the Customs, the Police, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commissions (EFCC) and border agencies across the region. We are training them to  address the gap within their area.

    Are there further steps you are taking in that direction?

    We did not stop there. We also have specific training for financial institutions, all the banks compliance officers. We have specific annual trainings for them in terms of what they need to do, for instance, in raising what we call the Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for them to know when to submit those reports. We also have what we call Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs). These reports are raised by banks on suspicious activities of individuals and are submitted to Financial Intelligence Unit. Asides the bank, we have looked at the judiciary, just in August last year, we took Court of Appeal Judges and Justices of Supreme Court of member state to United States in Washington, for them to have first-hand experience of what other jurisdictions are doing. Well, this is the second round of that.

     Money laundering and terrorist financing, do they really pose a threat to ECOWAS countries?

    Yes, money laundering and terrorist financing pose not only a threat, but are enormous threats, enormous challenges to the economy, to security, to social life in this region and globally. You will notice, for instance, no one needs explanation to know that terrorism is a major threat. You saw the number of lives that were lost in the northeast of Nigeria, in Mali, in Niger, even down to Burkina Faso and in Cote d’Ivoire. All these activities are of terrorist. Without funding it is impossible for them to execute their prospect. They use cars to operate, those cars were purchased with money.

    So, if we do not deal with terrorist financing, we cannot deal with fight against terrorism itself. You will see the dearth of facilities and infrastructure in the region, some of them can be directly attributed to the activities of economic crime and financial crimes. We must fight money laundering, we must fight terrorist financing to have a sane society in this region and globally.

    Financial institutions have been blamed for aiding these malpractices. Now, don’t you see them as a setback to this fight?

    Yes, financial institutions will continue to be partners, that does not mean they are adequately doing what they should do, but they have improved overtime. The level of knowledge within the financial institutions across the region has greatly increased from what it used to be. Now, there is functional financial intelligence unit in all member states of ECOWAS. Therefore, they have also received capacity to collect, analyse and disseminate intelligence from financial information or suspicious transaction that come to them and banks have been strengthened to do that.

    So, we have moved away from where we were, we are not yet where we want to be, but we are progressing. I will say financial institutions have made tremendous efforts and contributions in terms of the activities that are going on. That does not mean there are no bad eggs, that does not mean there are no institutions that are still covering up for criminals. But it is just that the system is having a self-check. If any criminal activity is conducted and researched or investigated  and you find a financial institution… for instance, if you get a man who is corrupt arrested and you find out that he has some money and by the time the money got to the bank, the financial institution did not file suspicious transaction report, which they supposed to file, that bank can be sanctioned.

    If you look at our recent histories you will find that in the United States (US) that HSBC was fined $1.9 billion. In our region, hardly will any bank survive that kind of fine; fines will escalate in this region, sanctions will be proportionate, will be dissuasive and will be appropriate for the crime and if that increases and continues that way, there will be no incentive for any financial institution to hide or not to comply again.

    There are countries that are not implementing the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations. What are the implications for such countries? And secondly, can a country implement all the 40 recommendations?

    The FATF 40 recommendations are expected to be implemented by all member states and many countries have signed on to it and almost about 180 countries. So, any country that is not implementing should be sanctioned. Those sanctions are dissuasive enough for you not to comply. For instance, if a country is put on the list, public statement is issued on that country; so investors will not want to go there and corresponding banks of that particular country will not even be taken  serious.

    No international transaction that anybody wants to do in that country will be effective, this is because the country is under one form of sanction or the other. So, no country will want to be sanctioned and countries are forced to comply because they want to avoid sanction. So, hardly will you find out any country that is a threat; that is not implementing. It is possible for countries to implement, but nobody is saying that you have the capacity and resources to implement all the 40 recommendations and the full standard that is expected, that is why we will have what we call the immediate outcomes.

    There are 11 immediate outcomes and those ones are kind of essential areas and we have some that we consider. It is important for global security, so these are what we expect that each country will comply with. We will measure performance of evaluation based on the categories as we implement them and then each country is rewarded in terms of our own rating. Countries are rated based on that they are sanctioned.

    What is Nigerian status in that category?

    Nigeria’s mutual evaluation is on our website, the next one has not taken place yet.

    But what is the last evaluation?

    The reports are there and there are lots of recommendations that are involved, but the performance, I will tell you is not encouraging. The last one was long ago, it is a bit overtime because it was done in 2007 and the report came out in 2008. So, we are talking of about 10 years and things have changed drastically over that period of 10 years. It will be unjust for me to give you the result of Nigeria based on what happened 10 years ago. Over 10 years now, a lot of things and a lot of activities have taken place. A lot of identified gaps have been filled. The next one was supposed to commence last year or this year, but unfortunately it is not going to commence because Nigeria has applied for membership of FATF and that process has halted the evaluation pending when the FATF approves.

    When is this application likely to take effect?

    No fixed time. The application has been submitted to FATF. FATF has some process and procedures. Those processes are still undertaken, they were supposed to be in Nigeria last November, unfortunately that meeting has been shifted again because Nigeria has an issue with Edmond Group of FIUs and they wanted to see if this can be resolved before they can proceed with that process.

    What advise do financial institutions give priority to at present?

    According to the recommendations of the FATF, financial institutions are supposed to deal with two major issues, which concerns Customer Due Diligence and Know Your Customer. So, if they do that and they submit their own suspicious transactions report of foreign exchange, they maintain the fact that they need to identify their customers and do customer due diligence. If the banks can know their customers, they have addressed major challenges. And they submit their STRs as and when due, and they do not collude with criminals to hide resources, those are the expectations of the recommendations as they concern financial institutions.

    GIABA has been in operation since 2000. Are there some major achievements that can be credited to it?

    GIABA was established in 2000 by the authority of heads of states and governments of Economic Community of West Africa States (ECOWAS). But major operations started in 2005 and 2006. There were no major operations in the early years of operations,. But subsequently, GIABA has done quite well. For instance, when GIABA started operations, there were only two financial intelligence units in the region. Today, GIABA has helped all member states to have functional intelligence units. So, that is a major step taken.

    GIABA grew from nowhere to become an associate member of FATF. GIABA competencies have brought it to do mutual evaluation of member states, which is usually done by FATF, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF). GIABA has trained accessory, built capacities to conduct evaluation of countries. GAIBA’s performance in the region has made non-ECOWAS members to start joining such Comoros Island, and Sao Tome and Principe. They left their own region and said, this is where they want to belong. GIABA has assisted in legislation drafting, review of legislative documents to support enactment of laws that are needed in the regions. We have identified sources, patterns and so on concerning terrorist financing in the region.

    And it’s a specialised institution, and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) regional body. The FATF is the global body responsible for building standards and recommendations to fight money laundering, terrorists financing and proliferation of small, light and weapons of mass destruction. Within the confine of this work, GIABA has a mandate to protect the economy and financial institutions of West African states from laundering of proceeds of crime and  to work with the FATF recommendations to ensure that terrorists financing is not happening within the region and by extension, across the world. That is the core mandate and responsibility of GIABA. Today in this region, we have raised consciousness about money laundering like no other organisation has done. This is why GIABA is considered as one of the champions of the ECOWAS region.

    What is the biggest challenge GIABA is facing within the ECOWAS sub-region?

    There is no political will in the region. We need more political commitment from the leaders. That does not mean they are not committed, but they need more of it. More political commitment in terms of driving process from leadership position.  Secondly, resources can never be enough; the challenges are daunting. The training required is huge, and our region is seen as low capacity region. The more knowledge we are able to pass to others depends on how much resources are available to us. Also, this region does not have good and structured database. If you require some data or information, they are hardly available.

    Are there other specific challenges you are facing in Nigeria now?

    Of course everywhere you see issues of criminality, there are challenges. Not only in Nigeria, but eventually in most African countries; corruption is high, trafficking is high, drug related offences are also high. We are trying to work with all relevant agencies. For instance, GIABA provided technical assistance to EFCC in Nigeria, and this is part of things to strengthen their capabilities to carry out their duties and encourage the leadership to provide the political will.

    How sincere are the various governments across the region about fighting corruption and terrorist financing?

    Low political will is not synonymous with sincerity or in sincerity. Low political will is about commitment in terms of allocation of resources, manpower and other issues that are related to that. For instance, we want to see a situation whereby government allocates adequate manpower, resources and attention to key issues about fighting corruption, money laundering and terrorist financing as well as other offences of money laundering. Sometimes, physical presence of top government official in a relevant meeting may be a political will. If you have a meeting and you see the President of a country or minister that has power to take major decisions that are politically willed. Not necessarily talking about sincerity or insincerity, there are those who are not sincere. It is not my position to identify them now. But the truth is that we expect more commitment and allocation of resources and attention from those taking decisions.

    Are there steps you are taking to help government achieve better tax compliance?

    It is fine for any country in the region, which decides to pursue adequate payment of taxes. Citizens do not only have rights, they also have obligations. Some of such obligations are for them to pay their taxes, adequately and as at when due. And any process or policy of government that drive that process is a welcome development. FATF 40 recommendations have added tax evasion as one of predicate offences of money laundering. It is right for government to pursue proper tax payment for everyone to be able to pay adequate tax and have the voice as a taxpayer to make demand on public service.

    And GIABA, as an institution, has always advocated that every predicate offence on money laundering should be pursued vigorously. And if government decides to pursue payment of taxes, I think it is a commendable effort and every hand should be on deck to support it and ensure that it succeeds. Those, who evade taxes should know they are committing crimes, and the crime that is committed should be paid for.

    There seem not to be many convictions on money laundering and corruption. What is the problem?

    I think that should be left for each of the country’s criminal justice system to address because conviction is not a product of whether they were arrested, it is a matter of criminal justice system. And criminal justice system starts with issues of identifying them, prosecuting and convictions. It is a chain of actions. And the fact that there are no convictions bothers GIABA. Therefore, in 2013, we supported some institutions in the region with financial capacity to strengthen capacity of investigators and persecutors by providing trainings for them.

    We also trained judges to enable them understand the processes and procedures for them to be able to secure convictions. It is not just to secure convictions when people have not committed a crime. That will be unfair on the people. It is to secure convictions where crimes are committed. We are training law enforcement agencies. We are training investigators, prosecutors and judges, so that we can end up letting no criminal escape and those, who have not committed crimes, should of course, be set free.

    What advice do you have for governments and businesses across the West African sub-region?

    My sincere message to businesses is that they should do business with conscience. Let business you are doing add to the society and not to destroy the fabric of the society. If terrorists engage in activities and they kill people, they do not identify your race or age. Bomb does not know who is who. Anybody can be hit, anybody can die in the process. Therefore, whatever you are doing, do it with conscience. If you are a businessman, contractor, and you have contract to execute for a school, for education, hospitals and you are part of those, who corrupt and destroy the system, one way or the other, it will affect you or member of your family.

    So, let us do business with conscience. And if you are a public office holder, or government official, do the right thing. I must insist that government in the region must be people-serving. The purpose of government is to serve the people. Government  must be people-serving and not self-serving. We want to encourage them to do that. We are seeing changes, we are seeing improvements, that must be enhanced, increased and we will see the best out of it. That is how we can better and best our society.

     

     

  • ‘To end hunger in 2020 not realistic’

    ‘To end hunger in 2020 not realistic’

    Hopes of eradicating hunger in the country may be delayed much longer. This is because the structures and parameters for expanding food production are not adequate yet, says the Registrar and Chief Executive, Nigeria Institute of Animal Science (NIAS), Prof. Eustace Iyayi. The Institute was established by the National Assembly Act No. 26 of 2007, under the Federal Ministry of Agriculture. In this interview with DANIEL ESSIET, Iyayi speaks on issues affecting the agricultural sector in Nigeria.

    Are we prepared to feed 250 million people in 2020?

    We certainly will have to feed them. But now is the time to prepare for that huge task because 2020 is just three years from now.

    Inadequate funding, poor rural infrastructure, neglected agricultural research and adverse effects of climate change have led to the nation experiencing some challenges in exploiting its potential to increase food and agricultural production. Can we end hunger and half poverty by 2020?

    Looking at what is on ground, ending hunger and halving poverty by 2020 (only three years from now) does not seem realistic. The structures that we need to expand food production to a level of eliminating hunger are either not there or that the few available are not effectively utilised.

    What role does agriculture play in the overall economic development of the country?

    Agriculture contributes about 30-40 per cent to the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP). It generates employment; it is a foreign exchange earner. It is a means of diversifying the nation’s economy. It is a veritable tool for food and nutrition security. Agriculture provides raw materials for the industries.

    How is the current economic situation affecting food production?

    The current situation is affecting food production through the difficulty in accessing inputs, majority of which are imported. Access to loans from the bank has also become more difficult and the twin problem of interest and limited accessibility to loans have also heightened. Farmers have also had it very rough finding internal markets for some commodities due to the fact that the disposable income of many people has significantly reduced. Poultry farmers for example have been seriously hit. Many of them have not been able to sell their eggs due to artificial glut and inability to find markets across the borders.

    At an African Union summit in Malabo in 2014, heads of governments agreed to allocate 10 per cent of their budgets to agriculture. Why has this not been effected? And what do you think can be done about it?

    The reason is mainly due to the lack of priority being placed on agriculture. Recall that agriculture before now, was the mainstay of our economy until oil was discovered. As long as oil was there, developing our agriculture was relegated to the background and we took to importation of nearly everything. We are only now just returning to agriculture because of the fall in price of oil in the last couple of years. As long as we think that we have an alternative source of national income, we will not embrace the Maputo and Malabo declarations. We may eventually do so when we have nowhere else to turn to. What to do about it is simply to give agriculture the first place priority. Until we attain food and nutrition security and have enough to export and to feed our industries, economic development will be far-fetched.

    The state of our slaughter slabs and abattoirs are appalling. What is your institute doing about it?

    Our abattoirs and slaughter slabs are not in good shape. Operations there are not in accordance with best practices for  meat processing. The Institute has been doing a lot of advocacy to educate our abattoir operators on the need to adhere to minimum operating procedure. The facilities in them are far from adequate. Some don’t have good water supply. The Institute is currently working on a model to collaborate with our veterinary colleagues and the state governments where the abattoirs and slaughter slabs are located on the provision of facilities, training, capacity building and enforcement of regulations.

    How do we address the challenges small holders face in scaling up and commercialising their operations?

    The rural infrastructure has to be given much attention. Rural roads have to be created and existing ones maintained for easy evacuation of farm produce. For some commodities, on-farm processing and farm gate off-take have to be expanded. This model was suggested for cassava some years ago for the production of ethanol from cassava, after the Brazilian practice. But it was never pursued to take off. We also need rural electrification. This will help small businesses to grow. Our non-functional dams have to be rehabilitated for all-year food production. Agricultural lending institutions should ensure that increased efficiencies are realised at every step. There should be provision of a system through which small farmers can improve efficiencies in all areas, including accessing inputs, improving yields, marking linkages, infrastructure development and skills transfer. Information needs of farmers is very important as farmers can improve agricultural productivity and ensure food security when up-to-date information is provided, using appropriate languages and formats and delivered through proper communication channels. Extension agents need to intensify their efforts in educating farmers to increase their level of awareness. Of all the existing channels of agricultural communication, farmers rank extension highest in terms of providing credible information and advice, especially on agricultural technology.

    Agricultural financing is risk-ladden. There are poor agricultural value chain development, lack of credit worthiness by the smallholder farmers and many more. What model do you suggest to improve agricultural financing in Nigeria?

    This claim is no longer so. The value chains for the different agricultural commodities have been developed during the Agricultural Transformation Agenda. This is currently being built upon in the Agricultural Promotion Policy of the present government. Every business comes with risks. And risk is part of entrepreneurship. Agricultural investments come with risks, but they also come with their benefits that transform into income.

    What sort of credit products do you think can solve farmers’ access to finance challenges?

    Any credit product that will reduce the interest rate

    Aside from micro-enterprise and revolving credit facility, what kind of financing framework will enable key players such as agri-input suppliers, post-harvest facility providers and processors, integrators and consolidators, valuable access to financing?

    The Bank of Agriculture should be adequately recapitalised and reorganised to function properly. The Bank of Industry should be strengthened to build on its present achievements.

    Antibiotics are under increasing criticism and feed additives can play a role in their replacement. What is your take on that?

    I agree with this view. Long and uncontrolled use of antibiotics can lead to residual amounts of them in meat, milk and other animal products. When passed to humans through consumption, this can lead to resistance of pathogens to antibiotics administration. There are probiotics, prebiotics and symbiotics, which are not antibiotics, but have the ability to modify the internal environment in animals such that the harmful bacteria, which will eliminate antibiotics with are competitively excluded. That way, the animal is spared the effect of the harmful bacteria without the use of antibiotics. Another way is to use feed-grade organic acid, which are able to attack the bacteria directly and leave no harmful residual compounds in the animal products.

    Your institute actively engages in variety of public policy issues that directly affect the sector. What recommendations has the institute made towards strengthening the nation’s agriculture?

    We are mainly a regulatory Agency. Our mandate is to regulate activities in the Livestock Industry, higher institutions of learning where Animal Science is offered and our members to ensure that they discharge their duties in a professional manner.

    We also engage in social advocacy to let our people know that it is their right to have access to good quality animal protein products. Regulation to ensure standards when adhered to leads to safe and quality products. This leads to sustainability of the business and eventually, expansion. Ensuring that production is done according to international best practices can also lead to access of international markets. This is because products from such systems become internationally compliant and competitive. All these help to sustain production locally, while having a foothold on the global market for foreign exchange earnings.

    What brought about your institute and what was the reason for its establishment?

    My Institute came into existence by an Act of the National Assembly, Act No 26 of 2007 as Amended in 2015. The Institute is a regulatory agency under the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development with powers to regulate all issues pertaining to animal husbandry in Nigeria. The Animal Science Association of Nigeria saw the need for the professionalisation of animal science and the greater need to regulate the animal husbandry industry in the country. The Association approached the National Assembly with the Bill and it was passed and enacted into law.

    Who are those to benefit from the Institute?

    Every Nigerian and eventually the global community. Though we have a national mandate, our activity is gradually spreading to the global sphere.

    What lessons have you learnt so far from this effort? What has worked for the institute and what has not?

    The lesson I have learnt so far is the necessity of vision for creation. Anything borne out of genuine vision is sustained and benefits mankind. As to what works or does not work, it depends on the boundary you set for yourself and how much you want to be limited. All things good should work.

    How has the role of agric businesses changed over the years and where has the greatest adjustments occurred?

    Agribusiness has always been there. It thrived in the years before oil was discovered, but almost died because of the discovery of oil. But it is gradually coming back as the government is taking diversification of the economy serious. The consciousness of agriculture as business has woken up in most people. There is the awareness of income generation potential from agricultural commodities along the value chain of any of them.

    What role do agric cooperatives play in the modern value chains?

    They serve as clusters of entrepreneurs of like passion and same business goal either for input receivables, production and market. They play a major role, especially in accessing finance and extension services. They are stabilising factors in the drive for organised small scale production and in the scale-up of the small scale producers to big time commercial enterprises.

    What do you consider as the most significant challenges agricultural cooperatives will face in the future?

    Access to finance, sustainable input supply and markets for their products.

    Young people are seen as  agents of change in the industry what  can be done to invest in the youth, who are so uniquely equipped, to turn the  industry  vision into reality?

    All that can be done to encourage the young ones to embrace agribusiness must be done. The future of the country actually is in their hands. They are about one-third of our estimated 180 million, which is about 60 million critical mass of workforce. The country must harness not only the energy, but the intellect in these young ones. By the year 2050 Nigerian population is estimated to hit 450 million. We will be the third most populous country in the world after  China and India. Our food need will be more than double. Who will feed this huge population? The system that will feed us in future must be laid down today and the youths of today have a great part to play because they are the ones, who will be around at that future date.

    How do we inspire a new generation in agriculture?

    We can inspire by making people see the income generating capability from agriculture along the value chain for any of the commodities. When people know that they can derive their livelihood from agriculture and see that what they do contributes to national development, they will be inspired to join and sustain what they do. We can also inspire them by assisting them to build their capacity in their chosen field of agriculture.

    How will the development transport infrastructure help Nigeria to become an agricultural exporter?

    Among agricultural infrastructure, road plays a very significant role in accelerating agricultural production. Rural roads connectivity is one of the key components for agricultural development, as it promotes access to economic and social services, generating increased agricultural income and productive employment as well as export. Access roads and rail transportation provide the means to bring the rural population to the main stream. A good road and rail network reduce transport cost, accelerates efficient delivery of farm inputs and enhance special agricultural production, distribution and export.

    A good network of roads and rail will expand the distribution of agricultural goods as well as open up additional opportunities for agricultural trade. Good road and rail infrastructure lead to expansion of markets, economies of scale and improvement in factor market operations. It also opens up the rural economy to greater competition. This may take the form of cheaper products from lower-cost sources of supply, new or improved products that may displace some locally produced items. Infrastructure investment has a strong impact on rural incomes and especially, on small holders. This helps to drive export on the long run. Improved rail, road and air transportation can enhance entrepreneurship activity.

    How do you think Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) can help Nigeria move up the livestock value chain?

    Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is generally believed to propel economic growth in developing countries as it makes significant contributions to the host country’s development process, especially through easing of the constraints of low levels of domestic savings and investment as well as foreign exchange shortages. Furthermore, FDI can increase the GDP and generate a stream of real incomes in the country. The increased productivity in the livestock value chain due to FDI can benefit local income groups through higher wages and expanded employment, lower product prices paid by consumers, rent to local resource owners, and high tax revenue or royalties to the government.

    Determined to move in tandem with the urgent dictates of the deplorable state of the nations infrastructural needs, Nigeria plans to attract $600 billion in Foreign Direct Investment by the threshold year of 2020 to deal with the mammoth infrastructure deficit, including those in the livestock sector of the economy. Research shows that Nigeria is not even in the top 10 of FDI destination.

    According to Goldman Sachs, the bulk of FDI inflows has gone to the oil and gas sector. The livestock sector with a huge potential to contribute significantly to the nation’s economy can benefit from FDI in the areas of input supply, development of infrastructure, new technologies for production, processing and packaging of livestock products and creation of markets.

    Are there any policy challenges?

    There are policy challenges not in the lack of it, but in implementation. If successive governments can follow an existing blue print that has been adjudged as workable, the livestock sector will record significant development. Often time, policy changes lead to reduced impact in several ways among the different value chains.

     

     

     

     

    What is the Institute doing in relation to building the capacity of the various value chain actors?

    The Institute is building capacity through direct training and re-training of the operators. For example, the Institute is the Secretariat for the International Feed Industry Federation (IFIF) of the FAO. The Institute also represents the country at the annual International Feed Regulators’ meeting where issues relating to the Feed Industry are discussed on a global scale. We are the only body mandated by the IFIF to train operators in the Feed Industry on Good Manufacturing Practice and we have done this across the 6 geo-political regions of the country. Through the efforts of the Institute the country has moved from the 51st position to the 40th position in the Altec Global rating of feed producing countries. We plan to improve on this. We are also building the capacity of farm operators. In collaboration with the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, we have developed Minimum Operating Procedure in the poultry and other livestock value chains. We are in collaboration with the National Board for Technical Education for training as Quality Assurance Assessors for building the capacity of middle level manpower in the livestock production sector. We have working MoU with other bodies, e.g. the OFFER Center in Iwo, Osun State for the training of Youths and Women in livestock production. We carry out advocacy programs to educate abattoir operators. We also regulate the practice of Animal Science in higher Institutions. The goal of our intervention measures and regulatory activities is to ensure that best international practices are adhered to in all operations in livestock production.

    What opportunities are there in the livestock sector?

    There are several opportunities along all the value chains. For a population of over 180 million gaps still exist in the production of food animals to meet the protein needs of the populace and for export. So there are opportunities in production, in processing, in creating markets (national, regional and international), in logistics, in communication, in supply of inputs, in financing, in training and capacity building.

    The formal daily milk sector constitutes only about 5 to 10%, the rest is informal. Have you found this to be attractive to foreign investors? There are a number of European investors coming into the nation’s a

    The dairy sector is attractive to foreign investors. Our current milk production stands at 700,000MT while the consumption demand is 1.3 million MT. The huge deficit is bridged by importation, which costs the government about $1.3 billion. The duty on dairy products is only about 10 per cent, which allows for massive importation of dairy products into the country, thereby killing local production. To help local production rise, duty on imported dairy products should be increased to between 55-60 per cent. The Honourable Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh announced that 42 foreign investors from European countries were expected in the country last year as a result of a previous visit of President Buhari to Germany and Rome. According to the Honourable Minister, a good number of the investments will be in agriculture and food processing. Friesland Campina WAMCO has been investing in the dairy industry in Nigeria. They have also developed a local content with the help of its DDP scheme across different parts of Oyo State. Promasidor has also made some investments in the sector. But this is not enough. Following bilateral talks with the government of Denmark in 2016, Arla Foods of Denmark was also to invest in the development of the dairy industry in Nigeria. It was announced last year that Alhaji Aliko Dangote plans to invest $800 million in the dairy sector to breed 500,000 cows in 2018, which will produce 500 million litres of milk a year starting from 2019. There is enough room for investment by both foreign and local investors.

     

     

     

  • ‘Nigeria deserves seat in IMO council’

    ‘Nigeria deserves seat in IMO council’

    The talk in the Maritime sector now is blue economy, which experts say covers aquatic and marine life, such as oceans, seas, coasts, lakes, rivers and underground water. In this interview with OLUWAKEMI DAUDA, Nigerian Maritime Administration and Safety Agency (NIMASA) Director-General,  Dr Dakuku Peterside says the agency is working hard to promote such economy. He also blames Nigeria’s loss in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) council election  on late preparation and wrong perception.

    There’s been so much talk about blue economy. How can Nigeria tap into this?

    The blue economy in African context covers both aquatic and marine spaces including oceans, seas, coasts, lakes, rivers and underground waters. It encompasses a range of productive sector. Fisheries, aquaculture, tourism, transport, ship building, energy bioprospecting, under water mining and related activity that we can tap into to boost the economy and create employment.

    It may interest you to know  that 38 of Africa’s 54 nations are coastal states. Ninety per cent of Africa’s import and exports are conducted by sea. Maritime zones under Africa’s jurisdiction total 13 sq km to 6.5sqkm of continental shelf. Africa’s 63 trans boundary river basins cover 64 per cent of the continent’s land area providing home to 77 per cent of the region’s population.

    What is the implication of this?

    The implication is that we have another Africa under the sea.

    Why did Nigeria lose the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) election?

    We lost the election based on late preparation. The fact is that we did not go round other countries like others did. It would have cost plenty of money, but we are not willing to spend such money. We had considered economic factors in the context of our political aspirations.

    Nigeria contested for IMO category ‘C’ and for you to use the name Nigeria; you must get the approval of the man who is managing all the country. The president just got elected, so it would have gone through a process, we have lost some time but the approval eventually came. After we got the approval, there are also budgetary processes to go through, even if the approval was given two years ago, we also need to do the background work to get budgetary provision for it before we begin the campaign; all of these things affected our early preparations.

    What is the  lesson to take from this?

    We cannot wake up as a country and say we are going to contest IMO elections. The rules of engagement require that we get the approval of the Federal Executive Council and that takes a process.  Now that we know better, we are starting the next preparations immediately, because we deserve a place in the council of the IMO, these are what we meant by late preparations.

    What was the cost implication?

    Nigeria did not spend as much as other countries. Before, whenever Nigeria bids for elections in IMO, we will go from country to country. But this time, we are just coming out of recession and we did not think it is wise to send delegation from country to country. If we had got the commitment of other nations early before other got their commitment, the outcome will have been different. We are going to start preparation for the biannual election now. Countries such as Singapore, China, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) attended the IMO with a large retinue of delegates

    What was the process? 

    The choice of who get elected into the council is actually a democratic process. We presented ourselves but a few things were not tidied up which has to do with administrative processes and our campaign was not as potent as it should have been.

    What is your take on the high rate of piracy on our territorial waters? 

    I cannot deny the fact that the issue of piracy may have had some impact on the elections. Our colleagues did not have much information about what we were doing to tackle piracy and there was a general impression that Nigeria was not doing enough to tackle the issue of piracy. But Nigeria is always being misrepresented by the International Maritime Bureau (IMB), because not all criminal activities on the waters can be classified as piracy. There is difference between piracy and other forms of maritime crimes. We have noticed that everything that happened within the Gulf of Guinea is referred to as piracy. Even when there is kidnapping within our inland waterways, it is referred to as piracy. We have taken this up with the IMB that we have been misrepresented.

    What should IMB do?

    There is difference between piracy and other forms of maritime crimes. They classify everything as cases of piracy instead of trying to do a distinction between it and other forms of crimes.

    The G7 Friends of Gulf of Guinea Group is in Lagos. Can you comment on their mission in Nigeria?

    The ‘G7 Friends of the Gulf of the Guinea Group’ is one of the international initiatives Nigeria is leveraging to strengthen the fight against piracy and other criminal activities on the sea. What you are seeing now is an international dimension to the fight against piracy and maritime crimes which is a new strategy. G7 is an initiative of the group towards finding lasting solution to the issues of security in the Gulf of Guinea. For the first time, they decided to take the programme outside the continent of Europe and the lot fell on Nigeria because they think the Gulf of Guinea suffers the peculiar problem and criminal activities on sea.

    What is NIMASA doing to end waterways crime?

    NIMASA has  gone a step further to tackle piracy from four broad approaches. One legal framework. Through this, an anti-piracy bill is before the National Assembly which will soon be passed into law, thereby making Nigeria the first country in the whole of Africa to formulate such policy. Others are acquisition of military hardware, through partnership with an Israeli firm, which will enhance our response capabilities to criminal activities, enhancing our intelligence gathering system and regional integration and collaboration through working with other African countries. No piracy begins and ends in one jurisdiction; when there is a hot pursuit, they shift to another region, and on our part, we are determined to give them a hot chase through our partnership and other collaboration with other countries in the region. Nigeria is the first country in Africa that subjected itself to IMO audit, which rated Nigeria high in terms of security on its waterways in line with the International Ships and Ports Security (ISPS) facility code with Nigeria having complied by over 80 per cent. Also, in the area of ratification of IMO conventions, Nigeria has done very well, which is evident in the day-to-day running of the maritime sector in the country.  We did not win the election due to the fact that we started fairly late in our campaign for the election, as the country was still coming back into the international reckoning with a new government. So NIMASA could not reach out early enough to its counterparts in other countries for support, some of whom have made up their minds.

    What is the role of G7++Friends?

    The G7++ Friends of Gulf of Guinea Group is headed by the Italian government and it is poised to ensure sustainable interest in the promotion of peace, security and development in the Gulf of Guinea.

    What is the relationship between NIMASA and maritime union?

    We have a robust relationship with Maritime Workers Union (MWUN). NIMASA is a home to every maritime worker. From the advent of this administration, we have noted that the union believes in dialogue and not confrontation in dealing with issues as it pertains to our operational relationship. We believe that the human element is the greatest asset in our quest to ensure the growth and development of our maritime sector. Without the human element, our equipment and other resources are useless. That is why we always acknowledged the complementary and symbiotic roles maritime workers, seafarers and dockworkers play in the sector. It is heartwarming to note that the MWUN leadership have clearly stated that maritime workers prefer engagement to confrontation, and we all know that confrontation is not usually the best approach. That is why our new capacity development initiatives are now tailored towards growing human capacity in the sector for immediate employment.

    What is your take on the campaign against the Federal Special Anti-Robbery Squad (FSARS) mostly in Rivers State?

    The campaign against the FSARS is being championed by Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State and probably the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). They have been shouting that SARS be scrapped. We all know that without the police in a society, we cannot maintain law and order. In order to enforce its mandate, which is the enforcement of law and order, the police created units and SARS was created as a response to violent crimes such as armed robbery and kidnapping. Unfortunately, these vices are worst in Rivers State. Consistently for the past 18 months, Rivers State has occupied number one position in high profile crimes. There have been recent cases of assassination and armed robbery.

    What do you think is responsible for the campaign?

    The SARS in Rivers State has been very potent in tackling such crimes. But because the state government seeks to control the unit and it has refused and insisted that it was an institution of the Federal Government, working for the general good of the people (it is under attack).

    What is your concern?

    My concern is that if we keep quiet as a people, this issue would assume a life of its own and we would have a society that is brutish and one where there’s a wind of crime. Another fact is that I am from that state and I think we should put things in proper perspective-that Nigerians support the police. We support the FSARS. We also support that the police be reformed to perform optimally like other institutions of government.

    What should be done?

    Rather than condemn them, we should advocate that both the federal and state governments should give them the tools to do their work. The government of Rivers State has singled out FSARS for attack because they are used to working in unholy alliance with some of these institutions. This particular unit has refused to compromise and so, they have initiated a campaign of calumny against them. But the ordinary people of Rivers State appreciate the sacrifices of FSARS.

    Which  sacrifices are you referring to?

    They have helped to control high violent crimes in Rivers State. For the state to spend all her resources to campaign against a unit of an agency, shows that something must be wrong with some of those campaigning against the unit. Nobody could deny the fact that SARS has been very potent in tackling violent crimes and helped to reduce incidents of crimes and build confidence in the people.

    What is the relationship between NIMASA and other security agencies?

    The Director-General of the Defence Research and Development Bureau, Air Vice Marshall Jomo Osahor led his team to NIMASA to initiate new processes based on detailed research, which will in turn guarantee sustainable growth with a positive multiplier effect on the nation. I made it clear to them that we need to develop indigenous capabilities to build armoured and ballistic vessels amongst others, which will be specifically designed to suit our geographical terrain. It is only when the research capabilities of the armed forces are fully developed that we can maximise our military powers. We are now more knowledgeable that not everything in the country is imported. Yes, we cannot accomplish all over night, but with sustained efforts we will be there and even surpass them. We are also partnering with the Army, Navy and the Airforce. I commend them for their doggedness in ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Nigeria is not compromised. We are also partnering the Customs, police and other security agencies to promote peace in our land. On our part as NIMASA, we are open to all forms of developmental initiatives that can help better our maritime sector, especially in the area of maritime security.

    How secure is Nigeria’s waterways?

    As the Chairman of the Association of African Maritime Administration, (AAMA), I know that piracy attack on our water and the Gulf of Guinea has reduced tremendously as statistics shows that attacks on oil and gas installations, both onshore and offshore, reduced from 36 in the first half of year 2016 to nil in the corresponding period this year. The truth is that maritime security architecture in the Gulf of Guinea has political, strategic, regional, multinational and national components which are aimed at enhancing security in the region. The strategic operational headquarters to coordinate the implementation of the maritime security architecture in the region are located in Abuja Nigeria, Libreville in Gabon, Luanda in Angola, Pointe Noire in Congo and Yaoundé in Cameroun.

    What is NIMASA doing to curb piracy?

    Some of the efforts being put in place by NIMASA to curb piracy include; sponsoring anti-piracy bill in the National Assembly to enhance the legal framework to fight piracy, establishment of NIMASA-Navy Maritime Guard Command Unit to enhance the implementation of some of the provisions of UNCLOS Law; capacity building programme to enhance human and infrastructural capacity amongst others. The Federal Government has also approved heavy investment in maritime security which include command and control centre, acquisition of special mission aircraft, special mission patrol vessels, special mission helicopters, specially trained Naval personnel among others.

    There has also been the issue of regional integration. What is NIMASA doing on this and blue economy?

    NIMASA has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Ghanaian Maritime Authority (GMA). The intra-African collaboration is a vital requirement for Africans to effectively harness the natural potential that the blue economy represent for the continent. African countries must cooperate to solve challenges peculiar to the continent.  All maritime nations on the African continent have comparative advantage in different areas, and only collaboration will ensure that we complement each other, thus ensuring that the maritime sector contributes effectively to the growth of the continent. The African maritime sector is richly endowed to the extent that coastal and aquatic ecosystems within the continent are treasures that provide diverse and vibrant natural resources. The importance of bilateral cooperation to solve maritime environmental challenges that transcend international boundaries in our coastal and aquatic ecosystem cannot be overemphasised. We are ready, and will give our support to tackle all associated maritime challenges that have over time impeded and slowed the region’s maritime sector progress. We are ready to work with Ghana and other African countries in all fronts within our defined and enabling capacities. NIMASA will not relent or derelict its duties and responsibilities within the contemplation of the MoU. The highlight of the MoU, include knowledge transfer and sharing Initiative between both agencies; joint capacity building initiative; cabotage enforcement joint study initiative; joint comparative research initiative and joint efforts to combat piracy and terrorism initiative.