Category: Monday

  • A bandits’ republic

    A bandits’ republic

    By Emeka Omeihe

    It is getting clearer that this country is home to a verity of the sovereignty of bandits.  Call them by whatever name; the reign of bandits or herdsmen especially in the north, is fast conveying the miserable impression that there exists a bandits’ republic within the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    Sadly, the body language of the leadership to this manifest challenge to their authority seems to be exacerbating the matter. Since many of these forests are largely ungoverned, bandits took control and established strong authority from where they now dictate the rules of engagement with the government of the day.

    But the bandits’ territory is not a normal republic where rule of law and due process form the basis for political action. What you find is a republic that shares common features with the Hobbesian state of nature where life has at once become nasty, short and brutish. This republic is governed by the law of the jungle, war of man against man reinforced by bestial and survivalist predilections.

    No serious economic enterprise goes on in that jungle. Neither are the inmates under the dominion of a singular authority. But adjoining this jungle republic is a modern republic which the warlords are rebelling against. And from that jungle, they invade the territories of the more established and legitimate government with the latter seemingly and inexplicably helpless.

    Curiously, this lethargy is rationalized on some tenuous grounds. The most canvassed is that hostage taking is a complex matrix requiring extreme care so as not to harm victims and innocent settlements in the forests. This has been the rationalization even as we are also regaled with the touted capacity of the government to decisively tame the monster.

    Of recent, there emerged the laughable excuse from the Minister of Information Lai Mohammed that the government is being cautious in attacking the bandits’ enclaves for fear of destroying the ecosystem even as he pointed out that kidnapping also takes place in the United States of America and elsewhere. The purport of the latter part of this statement is that there is nothing special with the serial invasion of schools and abduction of pupils in their numbers since kidnappings also takes place in advanced countries. That is the kind of tepid, puerile and insensitive rationalizations that have exposed our citizens to the mercy of the marauding bandits.

    This attitude is a measure of the dilemma we face in the festering insurgency of the bandits and herdsmen that has put the legitimacy of the government to serious test. Not unexpectedly, events have taken place in several fronts to depict unambiguously how helpless and hopeless we have become as the reign of the bandits looms larger than life.

    Bandits seem to have perfected a devious technology for the serial abduction of school pupils’ and other innocent citizens in their hundreds with the nation’s security architecture offering no resistance. There was the Kankara abduction of about 400 school children in Katsina State on the very day President Buhari arrived that state for some rest.

    As the dust of the Kankara abduction was about to settle, the government college in Kagara, Niger State became a victim when 42 students, staff and their relations were abducted in similar circumstance. Before the Kagara incident, travelers in Niger State mass transit bus had suffered the same predictable fate. Negotiations for the release of the travelers and the students went on contemporaneously.

    That is not all. Zamfara State which had been at the epicenter of the bandits’ scourge had students’ abduction visited on it when over 300 students of Government College, Jangebe were abducted and ferried into the forest in similar circumstances with one student shot dead. Elsewhere in Kaduna, Plateau and Sokoto states, it has been a sorry tale of serial killings and kidnapping for ransom. As I write, reports of kidnappings and killings have continued to make the headlines in our national dailies despite the pledge by the president that the Jangebe abduction will be the last one.  About seven states in the north have shut down schools as a result of the kidnapping spree.

    Why kidnappers target school children is not very clear. Speculation has it that it is to discourage school enrolment in those areas. This is also obvious from the closure of schools and confessions of some of the abductees who said they will not return to their former schools.

    That takes us to the question as to whether there exists a link between the so-called bandits and Boko Haram insurgents that see education as evil. There is also the theory that bandits are lured into school children abduction because of the huge money they make from it especially given the sentiments associated with long incarceration of children in dangerous forests.

    Curiously, the raging state of anarchy is being compounded by the inexplicable posturing of state and non-state actors. Even as the scourge of banditry has been with us for some years now, there is lack of unanimity on who these bandits are, what they really want or what their grouses are. Even then, there does not seem much difference between those termed bandits in the northern parts of the country and the herdsmen that are at the center of the mounting criminality in the south. The only difference is in their degree of criminality and territorial control. This difference can also be explained by environmental variables. We shall return to it.

    The interface of Islamic scholar, Sheik Ahmad Gumi with Zamfara bandits, opened new dimensions to the bandits’ question. The two camps he met and had discussions with in the forests were those of the bandits and the Fulani. But in the presentations of their nebulous grievances, leaders of the bandits spoke for the Fulani. They fingered cattle rustling and attacks on Fulani by the military and Zamfara indigenes as part of their grievances. There was nothing in the report presented by Gumi that showed a difference between the bandits and the Fulani herdsmen. They struck as just two sides of the same coin.

    This fact is relevant to understand the character of those termed bandits in the north and herdsmen in the south. It was largely on the same score that Gumi’s recommendation of amnesty for the bandits and the similarities he sought to draw between them and the Niger Delta militants failed to fly. Not with his disclosure that the bandits were on the verge of acquiring anti-aircraft ammunitions. If anything, revelations from Gumi reinforce the feeling that bandits have become law unto themselves; and we run the same risk in the south unless quick action is taken to tame the monster.

    But there were some unintended payoffs from Gumi’s visit. It is evident that the interests and grouses of the bandits are similar with those of the herdsmen in northern forests Gumi visited. These interests are not dissimilar with events in southern forests and bushes occupied by the herdsmen. But their grouses and lethality of criminal attacks against host communities in the south vary because of environmental factors. And this is quite understandable.

    In the north, both the bandits and herdsmen share the same cultural traits with the local population. They are entrenched within those environments on account of cultural affinity and religion. That gives them wider latitude to operate undetected. Their occupation of the forests had long been accepted as a way of life.

    The situation is a different ball game in the south.  Herdsmen in the south do not share these features with their host communities. The forests belong to the host communities and they are regularly aware of the presence of the visitors. For the same reasons, it is not possible for herdsmen to embark on serial abduction of school children in high numbers without being detected. That may have been the constraint.

    There is everything to suspect those causing trouble from the southern forests are a cell of the bandits. The risk of a bandits’ republic in the south in the same manner it is in the north must be avoided like a plague. Forests are our greatest challenge in the festering insecurity. President Buhari’s order to shoot bandits with AK-47 riffle though belated is nonetheless the way to go.

  • A king and his money

    A king and his money

    By Femi Macaulay

    What’s the use of the information recently provided by Oba of Lagos Rilwan Akiolu about how much money people described as hoodlums stole from his palace during the #EndSARS campaign last year? Did he expect public sympathy?

    Oba Akiolu’s remarks during the opening of the remodeled Glover Memorial Hall, Lagos Island, on March 3, showed that he didn’t learn any lesson from the invasion of his palace. Has the eminent traditional ruler forgotten that he had to be evacuated from his palace by military protectors who saved him from becoming a casualty as well?

    The king’s palace was among “private facilities, as well as other investments that were partly torched and vandalised/looted,” the police had announced at the time. The palace at Isale Eko, Lagos Island, known as Iga Idunganran, is the official residence of Oba Akiolu, the most important traditional ruler in the country’s economic and commercial capital.

    “The incident that happened here from October 20th to 23rd is so saddening,” Oba Akiolu said at the event.  “The destruction we suffered in Lagos is so enormous than in any other part of the country.

    “Many buildings were burnt, including vehicles used to generate income. I can now say publicly that they stole away from my palace $2 million and N17 million.

    “Those who committed the offence would not have done that if they knew the implication. But as a father, I won’t place any curse on them.”

    His palace is a place of traditional power and may be likened to a government house, the official residence of a governor.  In a sense, the attack on the palace was like an attack on a government house. It is ironic that the palace was attacked by locals expected to be loyal to the king. The attack suggested that the king was unpopular. A popular king should have more friends than enemies in his kingdom.

    The king ought to reflect on the humiliating attack by his subjects, and be sober. Instead, he exhibited indiscretion and insensitivity by publicising the money they allegedly stole, two factors that had provoked the attack in the first place.

    Oba Akiolu, 77, didn’t need to publicise his monetary loss. He was indiscreet because the disclosure highlighted his riches and suggested that he was flaunting his affluence.  He was insensitive because he seemed not to consider that his announcement could provoke the many poor people in his domain.

    In particular, two million dollars is a lot of money to keep at home. It is unclear why he had kept so much money in his palace? How much did he keep outside his palace at the time?  Many people in his domain, and beyond it, must be wondering about the king’s riches.

    People described as hoodlums had taken advantage of the widespread #EndSARS non-violent protests against police brutality and abuse of power to make a statement against widespread poverty and hardship.

    It is noteworthy that the palace is located in a poor locality. Isale Eko is an urban eyesore. The picture of a beautiful palace amid visible poverty is unappealing.  It is always a possibility that the poor will protest against poverty and aloof prosperity.

    “It was inevitable,” a prominent Lagos royal, Princess Abiola Dosunmu, the Erelu Kuti of Lagos, had observed at the time.  “They didn’t touch any other building in Lagos Island, only the Oba’s palace. That’s a direct message,” she said.

    Poverty is no excuse for criminality. But the traditional authorities need self-examination. How has the traditional leadership helped to develop the locality and the locals? Have the traditional leaders done enough to alleviate the obvious poverty in the area?  How many of the people in Isale Eko are among the more than 83 million Nigerians living below the national poverty line, according to figures released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) last year? Nigeria’s population is about 206 million.

    The NBS 2019 report on Poverty and Inequality in Nigeria deserves the attention of not only the federal, state and local governments but also the traditional authorities across the country.  Every level of leadership has a development role and should be development-conscious.

    Before he became king, Oba Akiolu had served in the police force. He spent 32 years in the police force and became assistant inspector-general of police in 1999. He retired in 2002. He is a lawyer. It is unclear if he was rich before he became king, or how rich he was before his coronation.

    He was crowned in 2003, but his kingship was challenged by royal rivals, resulting in a long-drawn-out legal battle that ended in his favour in 2019, 16 years after he ascended the throne. “My appointment as the king is the first time in history that kingmakers will be unanimous in selecting an Oba of Lagos,” he had said in court during the battle. The attack on his palace did not reflect his assertion.

    The palace of the Oba of Lagos, built in 1670, is a tourist attraction.  The ancient palace has been modernised over the years, including in Oba Akiolu’s era. There are ancient shrines within the palace grounds, and some of the previous kings are buried at Iga Idunganran. These features were insignificant to the mob that desecrated the palace.

    Oba Akiolu was forced to live outside his palace for more than two months, and returned to the repaired palace on January 1. In a tweet, the Senior Special Assistant to the Lagos State Governor on Health, Oreoluwa Finnih, described his return as a “triumphant entry to Iga Idunganran Palace.”

    The description was an attempt to downplay and trivialise the king’s humiliation in his domain, by his subjects. Dramatically, those who invaded and looted the palace stole Oba Akiolu’s staff of office and displayed it as they marched through the streets. It suggested that the mob had dethroned the king, if only temporarily.  It is significant that his staff of office was said to have been recovered.

    Oba Akiolu should be thinking of leaving a legacy of development, and pursuing the development of his domain. May he not be remembered as a king who was forced to flee from his palace, and lost unexplained money in his palace to an angry mob.

  • Expiry date

    Expiry date

    By Sam Omatseye

    The herdsman is a centenarian. He has ploughed lands flat and steep, from farm to farm, crossed rivers small and large, lapped up running water, and clamped the earth dry and moist. His  cattle with unfeigned fortitude have conquered terrain after terrain like T.S. Eliot’s The Journey of the Magi. The cows have munched husks and crunched grass. They have survived the fury of whips and ferocities of weathers. They have exercised what John Pepper Clark in his poem described as their “courage so mute and fierce and wan.”

    The centenarian wants another century. In fact, they have been more than centenarians. They want eternity. They don’t want to abandon tradition because the past is comfort. So, when many say we should stop herdsmen, it is not ever going to be an easy fight. The strongholds of the radical Miyetti Allah and their cohorts will pit battle against the modern ones. The past will yield to the future. But the forces of the future must wage the battle. They must fight the good fight of faith and seize the eternity of change from the dead-enders who are in the forests and exercising the orgies of rape, kidnapping and killings. We have to abide by the credo of Rousseau, who admonished the French society to “force them to be free.”

    Coercion comes in two ways, violence and systemic change. When the president urged his men to kill anyone with AK-47, it was no strategy. It was bluster. Hence hours later, bandits stormed Kaduna airport community and barreled away with innocents. Humans are still bounty. The military fails when it lacks knowledge. Like ours. We need to develop a strategy, not rage. Or rage powered with strategy. In our forests of a thousand demons, we need brains to defeat the brawns of wild men thrashing about with antediluvian appetites and promising anarchy.

    While we are at that, we need to make the herdsman obsolete. Ganduje made a point in public about the need to stop open grazing. But Sokoto has put that in motion quietly for years on the watch of Governor Aminu Tambuwal. The idea began with his predecessor, but it was abandoned when they sought cattle from Argentina and they could not adapt them to our climate and circumstances.

    Governor Tambuwal sought South African breeds of the Jersey, Red Swiss, white Holstein, and created clusters or experimental ranches across eight local governments of the state. He started with nine animals, reported Dr. Adamu Abdullahi Abdukadir, director of veterinary services, Sokoto State. Pointing to the bulky beings, he said “That is American jersey.” A few minutes later, he announced the Holstein and the Swiss red.” The calves were grazing about. Their parents were mouth deep in wheat and corn offal. He reminded me not all of the animals were from outside.

    “We have indigenous cattle here. We call them Gudali. When you cross them with the foreign species, we get what you see here.” It is a tour of pointing fingers. Each of the clusters across the eight local government areas received nine foreign ones. At the time this writer visited, there were about 300. Some of them have been sold. The government is preparing a 5k hectares for a more elaborate project in Rabah Local Government Area.

    The process is hard slog. It is not a cluster for meat alone. Some of the animals are good only for milk and others for meat. It is biological division of labour. They have milk sheds, with milk tanks, milking machines. They also have feeding troughs and water troughs. I was fascinated with what Dr. Abdulkadir called Early Control, which a section that traps the animals between metal bars and poles.

    “When you want insemination and embryo transfer, you restrain them,” he said. The result is that they become hybrids. He took me through the process of semen analysis and implanting the seeds in the uterus, but before that the female ones must be fertility ready. They will become ready to mate and follow the males. This process takes at least 10 months before the calves scream out of their mother’s wombs.

    He also took me through the process of milking and how to turn this biological reality into a commercial fact. That is the quiet war against the herdsman crisis of the day.

    I observed the cows, plump, ruddy, rested and weighty with meat and milk. These were like the animals I saw in my American sojourn. These animals will not travel from border to border, confront the snarl of beasts or the snake’s forked tongue, or collide with the innocent farmer on the outskirts of Aba or the omen of an Amotekun uniform. So, they will be lush with nutrients for the Nigerian buyer, rather than the lean, weary, whipped wraiths that excite the owambe parties.

    As Gov. Tambuwal said, the clusters are a part of an overhaul of the Sokoto young for the future. By implication, it is the right pivot for northern education. We have not heard of a bandit foray into a school in the state. But with Zamfara flailing on his border, he first amalgamated boarding schools, especially those verging on the borders of Kebbi and Zamfara states as well as the Niger border. Now, he has disbanded boarding schools, and allowed the students to attend day schools close to their residences. Gov Tambuwal said, on my television show, The Platform, the idea is not to fulfill the Boko Haram vision of abolishing education. The children have to go to school, he noted.

    So, that is the journey to the future, and if there should be emergency in dealing with herdsmen situation, such projects as in Sokoto should take accelerated momentum. Tambuwal said he has also visited Indonesia for the same purpose.

    Yet, ranching will not stop  bandits overnight. Some of the criminals don’t even have cattle anymore. Hence we have to prioritise security, and mobilise the intelligence agency against them. It is not about weapons, it is a war of knowledge. The greatest victories in history were won less by superior weaponry than superior intelligence. Goliath had more brawn than David. America lost to puny Vietnam for lack of knowledge. It defeated ISIL through intelligence first. Tambuwal signed a Hisbah law, not to pursue Sharia principles, but to gather intelligence. He said “the forests are vast but humans are limited.” So we need men to alert the security forces.

    Gov Tambuwal also emphaised that we have to re-examine our ECOWAS protocol and change it to suit our security need. The marauders are taking advantage of the law for rapine and slaughter in our country. It is a very important issue that President Buhari has to take up. We cannot open our borders to crooks.

    The centenarian herdsman is no easy hurdle. Removing him is a battle against tradition, and an effete one at that. Traditions have expiry dates, so do herdsmen.  We have to use force and system to fulfill it.

    Just a thought

    In an interview with Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, SAN, the Ondo State helmsman made a comment that intrigued me. He said when the Amotekun arrests erring cows in the state, the herdsmen has to beg to retrieve the cattle. He implied the cows would not follow their masters until the Amotekun gave the animals the permission to go. It is a story not arms, I suppose, but of charms. But the governor did not want to go into details. Maybe the Amotekun folks should let us know how they have humbled the herdsmen without guns or bullets. We would do with more battles without arms.

    Was it the same situation when we saw last year of lightning striking cows down on mountains? Just a thought.

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080
  • Unexplained and inexplicable wealth

    Unexplained and inexplicable wealth

    By Femi Macaulay

     

    Interestingly, the Senate confirmed the appointment of the new Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chairman, Abdulrasheed Bawa, in the middle of a clash between Imo State Governor Hope Uzodinma and ex-governor Rochas Okorocha, who is now a senator, over properties alleged to have been illegally acquired by Okorocha and his wife.

    The violent drama at Royal Spring Palm Hotel and Apartments in Owerri, the state capital, on February 21, says a lot about the intensity of the fight between Uzodinma and Okorocha.

    The state government had sealed off the hotel, said to belong to Okorocha’s wife, Nkechi, claiming it was illegally acquired.  The action was based on the findings of a panel on recovery of lands and related matters under the previous administration.

    Okorocha was arrested for allegedly unsealing the hotel. The police said it was discovered that he “allegedly led some people to the place sealed by the state government. This generated unrest and some youths from Owerri stormed the place.”

    According to Okorocha, “There was a complete breakdown of law and order.”  He named two government officials involved in the drama, saying they had led thugs that injured his orderly and staff with machetes. “They also shot Uzor, my in-law, shattering his feet with bullets.” He added:  ”The police were there watching because they came from Government House.”

    The drama happened because he went to the sealed hotel. Why did he go there? He could have challenged the government’s action without going there. But agents of the government shouldn’t have responded with such alleged violence. It is true that Okorocha is no longer governor, but the current governor can make the point without seeming to encourage violence.

    Both of them are members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). This should be a restraining factor in their fight.  Okorocha never supported Uzodinma’s governorship ambition and had wanted his son-in-law to succeed him. This may be part of the problem. Their fight must be an embarrassment to the party.

    They are high-profile politicians, but they are allowing their conflict to reduce their stature. As governor and senator, they are supposed to represent law and order. But in the eyes of the public, they are behaving like agents of disorder and lawlessness.

    Predictably, their conduct attracted criticism from the opposition. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Imo State chapter, said their fight “has nothing to do with the welfare and wellbeing of Imo citizens,” adding that “the battle is about who retains or takes over looted assets of the state.” This damning portrayal is food for thought.

    The two fighters need to review their fight plan if they intend to continue fighting.  They should ensure that their fight does not cause a breakdown of law and order.

    After the drama at the hotel, the state government approached the matter in a more civilised manner and got a court order on interim forfeiture of properties allegedly acquired illegally by Okorocha and his wife.

    The affected properties include: “Eastern Palm University, Ogboko; Royal Spring Palm Hotel and Apartments; IBC staff quarters said to have been illegally acquired for the purpose of Rochas Foundation College, Owerri; magistrate quarters, Orlu road/cooperative office/Girls Guide allegedly converted to private use housing market square, Kilimanjaro eatery; public building plot B/2 Otamiri South Extension Layout given to the ministry of women affairs for establishing a skills acquisition centre for women, allegedly acquired for the benefit of Nneoma Nkechi Okorocha’s all-in stall, Aba road.”

    Others are: “Plot P5, Naze residential layout, initially part of primary school management board but now annexed to All-In Stall, Aba Road, belonging to Nkechi Okorocha, and all the properties contained from pages 226 to 272 of the government white paper on the recommendation of the judicial commission of inquiry into land administration in Imo State from June 2006 to May 2019.”

    Okorocha’s reaction showed another dimension of the fight.  He claimed that the Uzodinma administration “deceived the court to give them an order of interim forfeiture because they never let the judge know that there has been an existing and valid High Court judgement on the properties.”

    He stated: “In Suit No: HOW/947/2019, Hon. Justice T.N. Nzeukwu gave judgement on these properties on Monday, September 7, 2020. We are not talking about the Interim Order, but Judgement; and after looking at the facts on the ground, restrained the state government agents over these properties.”

    A viral video of the impressive hotel that triggered the violence continues to generate questions about how its construction was funded. Okorocha and his wife need to provide an explanation.  ”I requested my wife to come home and invest for the purpose of creating jobs. I was never a poor man before I became a governor,” the former governor said, but this does not explain how the hotel was built.

    Notably, EFCC boss Bawa referred to the UK’s “Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO)” when he appeared before the Senate for confirmation of his appointment, saying, “There are certain provisions in the EFCC establishment Act that more or less gave us these powers.”

    He said: “Section 7, subsection 1b of the Act says the ‘commission has the power to cause investigation to be conducted into the properties of any person that appears to the commission that the person’s lifestyle and the extent of the properties are not justified by his source of incomes.’

    “This means without any complaint, if it comes to our knowledge that you have amassed so many properties that are not justified by your source of income, the EFCC can ask questions. That is what the simple definition of explanation regarding the Unexplained Wealth Order means.”

    Bawa explained how UWO works in the UK: “If you have this property, the UK will ask you – what is this property for? If you explain that this is how you earned it; so be it. If you do not explain, then they can further their investigation to determine how you acquired it.”

    It is unclear how the EFCC uses its power to demand explanation concerning unexplained wealth.  It is useful to have such power. It should be used effectively.

    Unexplained wealth can be inexplicable. Okorocha and his wife, for instance, face the challenge of explaining their wealth, and proving that it isn’t inexplicable.

  • Gumi: not our peace

    Gumi: not our peace

    By Sam Omatseye

     

    His head swathed in hoary beard, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi might be ensconced today as a recluse, the holy man in his mosque in Kaduna, projecting a less dramatic persona than his father. His voice might have emitted lower decibels in the country if bandits did not go into and come out of the forest. If they did not ransack our bushes and made them home. Suddenly he became a prophet as a sort of rock star, his hood, beard and demeanour making him sometimes cooler than Davido!

    If he had patience with his life in uniform, we might know him today as a general, a retired soldier with exploits we shall never know. And he seemed he made his path for moments like this. Especially when he volunteered to walk into the bush. The bandits are sick people in the flesh. As a doctor, he can conjure his scalpels and tablets and heal them. The bandits are sick in spirit. As a sheikh, he can redeem them. He has no reason to fear their hoods and guns and bravado. He left the army a captain. He knows how to make a gunner gone.  A healer. A fighter. A Preacher.

    He was trained a medic but he picked a cleric’s life over a clinic. Hence he is a shepherd over souls. That’s all he ever wanted to be. He could preside in a consulting room, a scalpel replacing his sideburns. But his eyes beam in between ruddy and sometimes scraggy white beard. To be sure, he is sheikh rather than chic.

    He seemed to be the deliverer just over a week ago when Lai Mohammed enunciated the federal government’s official surrender. The information minister said his government had no influence with the brutes. Only a non-state actor like Gumi could meet them and mitigate the turmoil in the land. Gumi also seemed to forget his ascetic aspect and swiveled into the grandiose role of a rock star peacemaker. It was the vanity of the priest, but some had hope. The bandits did not see him as a traitor. They did not fulminate at his shadow. They did not rustle in the woods, growl or shoot him, or even threaten. They welcomed him as a father of sorts, as a man they could engage.

    He did not alight from the forest as a man of light. He came out as an advocate for sinners. He said the bloodthirsty youths needed to be listened to. A professor of bones and blood, Yusuf Usman, who reportedly accompanied him, said on Arise News that the boys were between 13 and 17 years of age. The sheikh and professor say the bandits have grievances. They have legitimate points. We should not sit in our moral high horses in Lagos and Abuja and condemn those who have made the bush their habitation and our homes, schools and roads their hangman’s noose.

    They changed the narrative before our eyes. The boys are arboreal heroes, new-minted revolutionaries in the woods. They deserve the pardon we gave the Niger Delta militants. The priest made a sacerdotal heresy. He was asking the sinner to forgive the sinned against. We who are afraid should now show faith. They who made us fear are on God’s side. Who are the sinners now? Those now in trauma that they abducted and released? Mothers who died, fathers who bled to silence in front of children? Mothers looking in impotent horror as goons raped their daughters? Schools vandalised, those whose bank accounts now atrophied of millions? We should pardon them for stealing, killing, raping and stirring anarchy? Whose justice will it be? Is that the Sheikh’s own definition of good and bad? In fact, it means we should be begging them for pardon so they do not barrel into our lives again.

    First, we have what is called false equivalences. Savage as they were, the Niger Delta militants did not abduct students, or crash into homes. They did not stop vehicles for kidnap of whole families. They blasted the jugular of our oil wealth: the pipelines. They targeted the governments, and enriched themselves with illegal bunkering. They were daredevils and lawless. But the communities even shielded them because they sometimes played robinhood, stealing from the state and plying them with some of their resources. They had a cause, if they did not fight the good fight. With such comparison, Gumi is making the Niger Delta militants glorious though they were not.

    But Sheikh Gumi says the boys have a cause. They hate being ostracised. They hate being left jobless because of their rustled cows. They want free access to the farms of others, to trample and graze with impunity.

    He seemed to have scored when some of the bandits dropped their weapons. But we had not heaved a sigh when, Gbam!, over three hundred girls were whisked into the lorries and driven into the shadows of Nigerian forests. When asked what happened, he said the bandits under question were not the ones he met. Chibok, Leah, and the long trek of boys from Buhari’s backyard, the slaughter of innocents, the dread of parents, the closure of schools, all took new dimension with the 317 students snatched among the gold mines of Zamfara.

    But Gumi’s narrative had hit a snag. He was not a Nigerian negotiator. He was not making peace for all, but for a section. He distinguished the Christian and Muslim soldier. According to a now viral speech to the gangs, Gumi said only Christian soldiers were after them. “What I want you people to understand is, soldiers that are involved in most of the criminality are not Muslims. You know, soldiers have Muslims and non-Muslims. The non-Muslims are the ones causing confusion just to ignite crisis.” What a peacemaker! This is the peace of the bandits, not peace for Nigeria. He wants them to become converts to the priesthood of division, of a bigoted clergy. Gumi has not walked back that tirade.

    This episode only recalls his father’s Islamic orthodoxy, an oedipal legacy. His father did not hide his contempt for Christianity. He was a cleric of division. He espoused the purity of faith, the firestorm of bigotry. He took on the Sufi, who saw Islam as dynamic. His father Abubakar saw it as dynamite. He was a slash-and-burn puritan who set the stage for religious hate in the country. He did not believe Christians should lead, only Muslims. His son only followed his father’s path in spite of the cosmetics of education as doctor. His father once made headlines when he said, “Christianity is nothing.” As editor of The Guardian Express, Nduka Irabor called him “fire mouth.” He was a Grand Qadi, the last to hold that title. That was before Boko haram.

    His son is aping the father. As he walked into the forests, he saw himself as alternate government. Not only that, he took on the toga of religious alternative to secular government, a theocratic presence. This is what happens when a government has no strategy, when the police scratch for solutions, the air force lumbers in the clouds, when the army thrashes about in the bushes, when intelligence has given up the ghost, when the centre cannot hold, when a sizeable population believes the president is enabling the bandits with his silence, and when the president would not break that silence with a reassuring speech in which we can measure his voice, facial expression and then say, yes the man means it.

    As this essayist has noted, the bandits are not invisible. They are juveniles with hot blood and death in their cargoes. If we cannot strafe them, and dissolve them, we stand the present danger of being eliminated as a nation. It is not civil war I fear. I dread anarchy, the mere anarchy that the Poet Coleridge moaned about, the sort we saw in Rwanda not so long ago.

     

     

  • Uzodinma and  Orlu invasion

    Uzodinma and Orlu invasion

    By Emeka OMEIHE

     

    In this column three weeks ago, I had under the title “What’s on in Orlu” raised issues on the precise nature of the military operations then going on in that local government area of Imo State and its environs.  That interrogation was informed by the dearth of information on the character and texture of the alleged security infractions in that usually quiet and peaceful town, that brought about the deployment of soldiers and other security operatives in the manner they were sighted.

    Things were not made any better with trending video clips showing soldiers and police lying on the ground aiming at their targets in a manner reminiscent of serious military confrontation. Even then, the background of the attacks depicting market environment and residential areas raised further puzzles as to what could have been amiss.

    No information was handy except perhaps, the confirmation by the state’s police spokesman Orlando Ikokwu that a military operation was going on there. The nature of the operation and issues that led to it remained a matter of intense speculation. So it was until the state governor, Hope Uzodinma, announced the imposition of dusk to dawn curfew in 10 local government areas citing “the activities of a group of militants who unleashed a shooting spree in the Orlu area of the state, killing and maiming innocent citizens in the process”

    The governor said he was appalled by what appeared as a break-down of law and order in Orlu. Nothing was heard of who invited the military, the issues to the conflict, the targets and victims as well as the identity of the so-called bandits whose existence in Orlu was being heard for the first time from the governor.

    A new dimension was to emerge days after when military helicopters entered the scene firing sporadic shots to the consternation of harmless villagers. Unconfirmed reports had it the invasion claimed the lives of a good number of people and inflicted psychological trauma on many of the villagers who were seeing such airstrikes for the first time in their lives. Serious concerns were also raised as to who actually invited the military and the propriety of the invitation on an issue that should ordinarily, be handled by the police and other sister security outfits.

    But this air of confusion and uncertainty was somewhat diffused when the state’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Cyprian Akaolisa addressed the press owning up that the government invited the military. He said the state government invited soldiers to restore calm in Orlu after members of the proscribed IPOB killed several policemen and innocent citizens in the area, alleging there were deliberate attempts by IPOB to attack Orlu people and the government in the guise that they were looking for Fulani herdsmen.

    Hear him: “they killed 10 policemen, a prominent Orlu son, Ignatius Obieze and one Emmanuel Okeke (Soludo) collected their vehicles. The IPOB also shot and killed four Muslims doing business in Orlu”. The state government also claimed that the attacks on police stations and killing of policemen during the #ENDSARS protests were carried out by the IPOB and not protesting youths.

    It is not clear whether all the alleged killings took place during the nationwide youths’ protests or in the course of the renewed skirmishes for which the state government invited the military. Whatever it is, all acts of lawlessness and killing of innocent citizens must be condemned in very strong terms. Those who are implicated in such heinous crimes must be made to face the law.

    But there is something very odious and reprehensible about Akaolisa’s account of those killed by suspected IPOB members. What point did he intend to score by the claim that the IPOB killed ‘four Muslims doing business in Orlu’. If profiling of the dead in terms of their religion was the issue, he should have gone ahead to disclose the religious faith of the 10 policemen, Ignatius Obieze and Emmanuel Okeke alleged to have suffered the same fate.

    If he was not deliberately acting out a script to endanger the lives of people of his zone living in other parts of the country, that statement smacks of rabid naivety unexpected of the occupant of his office. Or, how do we explain the statement given its prospects to heighten religious tension and precipitate reprisal attacks? That innocent people were killed is bad enough. The introduction of the religious angle to the killings amounts to crass insensitivity that could expose his kinsmen in other parts of the country to unmitigated harm. So, whose interest was the state government actually serving by that tendentious and combustible statement?

    There is also something untidy in the claim that all the atrocities committed during the #ENDSARS youth protests in the area were the handiwork of the IPOB rather than hoodlums that hijacked the event in all parts of the country. How they came to that sweeping conclusion is rather curious. That was the same mistake Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State made that saw to the random rounding up of Igbo youths in Obigbo into detention. Many of those innocent youths are just being released from detention camps in Abuja and environs months after nothing was found linking them to the IPOB.

    There is everything to suggest such arrests will be taken to ridiculous levels in Orlu offensive since it falls within the areas the IPOB lays claim to in its self-determination agenda. Then, any and every youth with the misfortune of encountering security men on siege should count themselves lucky if they escape arrest. That is the risk in the blanket ascription of all and every criminal activity to the IPOB members either during or after the #ENDSARS protests.

    The same crass insensitivity to what a people holds very dear re-occurred in the reasons the state government adduced for the military invasion of some places of worship in Orlu and the arrest of their pastors. Akaolisa claimed hoodlums establish and use such churches as front for their nefarious activities. “We have records that armed robbers have been hanging out as pastors, in the night they will go for their operation but in the day they wear garments and use such white garment churches”, he claimed.

    It is perhaps, only in Imo State that we can hear such thrash. Worship places admit of all manner of people- the good the bad and the ugly. But any time the law enforcement agencies suspect a particular person or groups of persons of criminality; the right engagement is to trail and arrest them instead of invading the sanctity of worship places in session on the flimsy allegation that armed robbers hang out as pastors. It is a sweeping generalization and dangerous profiling that can inflict incalculable damage on the image of our churches.

    It is a failure of intelligence gathering that security agencies would have to attack and destroy a church on the suspicion that there are criminals there. It is only in Imo State such a thing can possibly happen. Even then, some of the white garment churches in question are local affiliates of their national bodies. And I ask, what interest does it serve to speak of the churches in such disparaging manner as the government did? And can they possibly brand religious leaders of some other faiths as armed robbers and destroy their places of worship on such claims and go home to sleep? These are the issues to ponder.

    Unguarded statements as these, speak volumes on the mindset and leaning of the current government in Imo State. That is why the explanations by Governor Hope Uzodinma last week on why he invited the military to Orlu cannot go down well with the people. And they are unlikely to have any appeal on the people. Not many agree that the alleged security infractions were beyond what the local arrangement could handle to warrant the invitation of the military. The impression conveyed by that invitation is that Orlu is home to some form of insurgency. That is far from the truth.

    Parallels have been drawn on the incongruity of his approach with the handling of the insurgency of the bandits and herdsmen elsewhere. The handling of those grave security situations by his colleagues, should have instructed greater caution in dragging the military into the fray, if an agenda was not behind it all.

  • Who saves the talakawa?

    Who saves the talakawa?

    By Sam Omatseye

    I remember the great Aminu Kano and I look at Muhammadu Buhari, and I say, let us not forget the talakawa. They are the northern jewel, but they are more like gold dust in the mud. Their shine will never match their value because, somehow, no one allows them to be.

    Today, the growl of the bandit is the voice of the talakawa, a distorted echo of their elegancies. It is more their frustration, its loss of leverage, its fall out of grace. Most of them are helpless while a few among them are wrecking the house.

    The poor in the north has never purred with joy. Each time salvation peers, it veers into trouble. Whether in the mining storms of Zamfara, in Kaduna where home is no longer refuge as they become refugees, the anarchy in Niger, ghost farms in Sokoto, or the villages on their knees in Borno, the talakawa are a people adrift for a long time. What we are seeing today is a culmination of failure, not of the poor man but of the northern elite, especially that segment that has always seen them as at once battle axe and breastplate.

    The past half century has been the story of two men the talakawa gave a worshipful bow. They were their fount and redemption. With the duo, they peered at a promised land but their feet ran cold. When Aminu Kano rose, he came with faith and butter. He was a great Islamic icon as well as Marx’s marksman. His vision was an alchemy of  God and the world, materialism with mysticism.

    He was conscious of the north as feudal forte. He wanted to free the poor. He formed the Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU). The choice of the word ‘elements’ has often fascinated me. He craved to conjure Marx out of the people: their skill, their sense of justice, their rage, and above all, a quest for equality. He wanted to overthrow the feudal system. He was a sort of Abdel Nasser of Egypt, who sought to dismantle feudalism. But Kano opted for suasion over revolution, or the ballot over blood, a revolution of the willing and not Nasser’s staccato of gunfire. He was Nasser’s dove.

    Gradually, the poor knew Kano, and followed him. He became, next to Awo, the most genuine political leader of his generation. But more than Awo, he was the great mobiliser. He fought against an ideological mountain. He was a loner for equality. He exposed elite hypocrisy while praying at the same altar. He enshrined a war against privilege and entitlement, against the confidences of class divide sanctioned by faith. He asked his people to see the Quran and also inhale the disruptive scents of Das Kapita, and make wedlock of butter and the book. He was squaring up to over a century of sanctimonious contempt.

    They loved him enough to give him a berth in the Second Republic. The two big prizes of the North, Kano and Kaduna States, bowed to the noble impulses of new party, The People’s Redemption Party. He had Governors Abubakar Rimi and Balarabe Musa. It turned out that the two stewards of his vision, Rimi and Balarabe, fell short and cut him short. Rimi embraced ideological flamboyance. Musa lacked tact. Both of them lost their way with their leader. Kano’s vision was lost to the bargain, and the man who had fired a great crowd and brought men like Soyinka, Bala Usman and Achebe to the fold was left a spectator of his own impotence.

    That was the first big disillusion of the masses. They looked for another, and had to wait for one tall, gangling man of reticent ways and winsome face. He first materialised with a beret in his first misadventure, which included a coup that ended Kano’s life adventure. And because of that misadventure, he nurtured the talakawa. If Kano captured the talakawa with ideas and charisma, Buhari did with soul, a mystical air and spartan exterior. He was the messiah they were waiting for. They were with him always, in temptation and narrow triumphs. They were with him until, after four tries, he won the crown.

    Before him they had been astray. Now they wanted to climb out of poverty. They wanted what Aminu Kano promised. They wanted to have good education, good jobs, good homes. They wanted an end to the al majiri system. They wanted the girl child out of the persecutions of genital tyranny and husband’s patriarchal furies. They wanted to traipse into the bright light of the classrooms. Kano was a short, sprightly fellow. His (Buhari’s) head sometimes dodges a lintel. He was Kano’s reincarnate.

    Rather, in his backyard, students are carried away in long treks, their villages come down in ruins from gunfire and machetes. The poor are getting poorer and the rich are purring. No safety at home. No school to nurture the mind. because the bandit has spoken. They are still betting on a suspect future while the rich are belching from pots above their waists. His north is the prostrate part of the country, where the talakawa lives but mostly looks to God and not to the man they saw as messiah.

    The people always stray when they don’t find their leaders. But once they see a person who flatters their secret hopes, they exalt and follow. When Moses left to the mountain, the Israelites strayed to other gods. They crave what Weber called the charismatic fellow. If anyone dresses up in that toga, they make him an altar, whether he is genuine or not. Napoleon emerged on the ruins of French rabble. Moses stuttered his away to his people’s redemption. They are either good or bad. Hence Brecht was wary of heroes. “Unhappy is the land that needs a hero,” he wrote. He knew heroes often are made of clay feet. “No man’s virtue is complete, the great Galileo loved to eat.” Even in the southwest, Igboho is whipping up nativist ire and reifying himself as the new Yoruba leader. He does not know that a blast can wipe everyone. His Yoruba kin are all over the country. As my father Moses once said, don’t throw a stone in the market because you cannot guarantee the safety of your mother.

    The streets and villages are alive with death and dying. The talakawa is broken and today is not the day if they are looking for that man who can flatter them into salvation. What we should fear is not the civil war that Abdulsalami Abubakar invoked, but anarchy. Anarchy is worse than civil war. It foments many centres and trajectories of trouble. The centre cannot hold. We are seeing a void when we need the president’s voice.

    The rise of violence from the herdsmen is a consequence of a void. The excuse that the marauders came from outside the country does not explain why they can still thrive within the Fulani in the country and blend. If there is no weakness within, the outsider has no entryway. As French philosopher Montesquieu said, a republic cannot be broken from outside. The infiltration of  infection is here. Before he took his bow, President Washington warned that American democracy would only fail if the system developed its own internal fault lines.

    The talakawa are now left to their own devices. That is what we are seeing all over the place. How can we stop a killer who makes a big ransom of millions of Naira in a day’s work when as almajairi he will not make same in a lifetime. When the government relies on a religious minister rather than its own minister to make peace with bandits, it means it has lost the argument. They say we should forgive the bandit who killed and raped but leave the crayfish thief in Kirikiri. It means we have it all upside down. It is the same lack of care that produced the bandit that is forcing us to broker peace on its own term. The innocent are brought to the justice of the murderer.

    It is a failure of political stewardship. The talakawa had two heroes. They both failed them. Having no God and no man to follow, they are shooting their way to their own promised land.

     

  • Nigeria, Quo Vadis

    Nigeria, Quo Vadis

    By Emeka OMEIHE

     

    All is not well with this country and nobody seems to know where it is heading to. It is not that the foreboding signals have not been there all along. Neither are the nagging issues and their potentials to wreak incalculable harm on our corporate existence entirely novel.

    What has been in criminal short supply is the absence of the political will, sincerity of purpose and courage to confront the challenges headlong to the satisfaction of all the constituents. Instead, we have had to contend with a growing culture of silence and official denials of the unmitigated damage such challenges are capable of inflicting on our collective being. Curiously, underneath this inexplicable official attitude lurk self-serving and clannish interests.

    Notable Nigerians had drawn unceasing attention to the increasing slide to lawlessness with wanton wastages in human lives in the face of inability of the nation’s security architecture to rise to the challenges. Former president, Olusegun Obasanjo, had warned severally that Nigeria was fast drifting towards a failed state on account of the increasing slide to anarchy, a leadership enmeshed in nepotism and increasing lure of self-determination consequent upon the mismanagement of our diversities.

    Obasanjo is with many in this. That was also the central theme of the homily by the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto, Most Rev. Matthew Kukah last Christmas. Instead of the Buhari regime to work on those observations, they resorted to name-calling and denials of the dangers lurking at the corner. A Muslim group in Sokoto state even served quit notice to the Bishop for speaking truth to power. But the killings by the herdsmen and bandits across the country neither abated nor were new effective therapeutic responses evolved to checkmate them.

    It is little surprising that the chicken appears to have come home to roost with some state governments and individuals taking up the challenge for self-preservation in ways they considered expedient. Nature abhors vacuum. There is a limit beyond which a people will face threats of extermination by invaders without rising to the challenge of defending their territories.

    That was the challenge that threw up one Sunday Igboho. The quit order by the Ondo State government for herdsmen to leave their forest reserves and the flushing out of criminal herdsmen from Oyo forests by operation Amotekun were all desperate responses to save their peoples from annihilation. The skirmishes in Orlu, Imo State, Abia, Ebonyi, Delta and parts of the south-south bear the same imprimatur.

    But even as these states are increasingly getting restless on account of the insurgency of the herdsmen, kidnapping and hostage taking in the northern parts of the country have taken alarming dimensions. As I write, more than 42 students and staff of Government College Kagara, Niger State were taken captive by the marauding bandits who now seem larger than the government. Less than three months back, more than 300 students of Government College Kankara, Katsina State suffered the same fate.  Abduction of students from their hostels without any form of security resistance in the northern parts of the country has become a new normal.

    When a former military head of state, Abdulsalami Abubakar warned last week that the country could disintegrate if Nigerians do not remain calm and united in the face of the current challenges, one could observe the same equivocation that put us in the current pass. Abubakar had told journalists in Minna Niger state that “in the last two weeks or so tension has been growing in the country and embers of disunity, anarchy and disintegration are spreading fast and if care is not taken, this might lead us to a point of no return”.

    He fears with continuing insurgence, kidnapping and armed banditry in the country, emerging ethnic attacks in some other parts was bound to complicate the situation. He is right. But the issues are not new.

    Yes, there is need for calmness and unity in the current challenges. But these precepts cannot suffice as solutions to the deliberate mismanagement of our diversities and escalating insecurity across the country. That a people are panicky and divided are signs of festering systemic ailments. The solution is to realistically address the issues that put them into those conditions. Mere exhortations as Abubakar would goad us into will serve little purpose.

    Even then, the government is not lacking in recommendations on what to do to reverse the dangerous trend. The senate has called for the declaration of a state of emergency on security while urging the president to implement its subsisting recommendations to resolve the security situation. State governors have also met in Abuja to evolve ways out. These underscore concerns on the increasing prospects of heightened insecurity sliding the country to the edge.

    But suggestions emanating from some quarters indicate that vested interests want to make political capital of the festering insecurity. In this category, fits the recommendation of Islamic cleric, Ahmad Gumi. He had after his tour of bandits’ and Fulani camps in Zamfara State called for amnesty for the bandits and killer herdsmen in the same fashion Niger Delta militants were handled.

    If Gumi’s suggestion which amounts to rewarding bandits for their murderous activities is not provocative enough, the call by the minister of justice, Abubakar Malami for the setting up of a federal agency for herdsmen further exposes the hypocrisy in the festering insurgency of the herdsmen rated by global terrorism index as the forth deadliest terrorist group in the world. In all, positions as these, account for why we are unable to find a good handle to the danger which the insurgency of the herdsmen and the bandits had constituted.

    But those who bear the brunt of these mindless killings, kidnapping for ransom, rape and maiming of their loved ones by strange elements hiding in their forests seem to have a new friend in the Minister of Defence Bashir Magashi when he urged them to defend themselves in the face of the security challenges. Magashi’s position could pass as admission of government’s failure to protect lives and properties-the raison d’être for its existence. But it is a statement out of frustration as former Chief of Army Staff Tukur Buratai has just told us that insurgency may be with us for the next 20 years.

    Incidentally, that is where the country has found itself. That is why some state governments, groups and individual are now rising to the duty of defending themselves in the face of the orgy of violence that has reduced the country to a verity of the atavism of the state of nature.  Curiously, even in the face of the degenerate security situation, we are still engrossed in clannish rationalizations and trite excuses.

    Of note is the energy dissipated on the alleged profiling of all Fulani herdsmen as criminals. Even when nobody has said so and it is not possible to tag all herdsmen as criminals, the media space is replete with efforts to debunk that touted insinuation. But in the attempt to do that, little compassion is given to the substantives issues in dispute-the mortal harm posed by criminals posing as herdsmen at the backyards of their hosts.

    That is the key issue. The attempts to displace the real issues with such irrelevances as rationalizing why herdsmen carry AK-47 sophisticated riffles as was done by Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi State is part of the deception that has brought us to this pass. If the security of the herdsmen is the basis for carrying prohibited weapons unchallenged, then the host communities they terrorize courtesy of the same weapons have better reasons to be more armed.

    The way out is to admit that the leadership of this country has been less than honest in handling the festering insecurity and other challenges of our federal order. The perception is that there is an agenda in the reign of terror by bandits and herdsmen across the country in the face of the ambivalence of the Buhari regime to stem the tide.  That is why those at the receiving end are now taking up the challenge to defend themselves. That is the new momentum nobody can predict unless quick and realistic measures are taken to reassure the people of the capacity of the government to protect all citizens and do justice to them all.

  • Bandits or herdsmen

    Bandits or herdsmen

    By Emeka Omeihe

    Is there a link between herdsmen and bandits in the raging insecurity in the southern part of the country that has put us all on edge? Could it be that criminals hiding as herdsmen to levy terror on hapless citizens are an arm of the bandits that kidnap, kill and main in the northern parts of the country?

    These posers have become urgent following developments from the recent visit of Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi to Zamfara forests on a peace mission with bandits notorious for kidnappings, killings and other unlawful activities in that part of the country. They are also given further fillip by some similarities in the mode of operation of bandits and the activities of herdsmen that are often attributed to criminal elements infiltrating their ranks.

    It is not that these questions have not been raised before now or that the nomenclature ‘bandits’ had not come under serious interrogation. They have. But each time they are raised, nobody, not even some of the northern governors that entered into questionable negotiations with the so-called bandits was forthcoming in providing answers. Thus, we have come to accept the danger posed by bandits even when we do not know the difference between the security risks they pose in that part of the country and that caused by herdsmen especially in the south,

    Are they the same with herdsmen especially as they also live in the bushes and forests and cattle rustling is said to be one of their grievances? Nobody has cared to provide answers to this. But we are regularly assailed by bandits’ devious escapades-the sacking and burning down of villages, abductions, kidnappings and sundry criminalities. Nobody seems to know what their motivations really are or what should be done to get them out of the forests. It is not surprising that in those cases some governors granted them amnesty or offered them money to lay down their arms, the bandits were soon to return to their old ways.

    In the face of the inability to decode who the bandits really are, there have been suggestions that they are not different from criminal herdsmen. Other interpretations of their mode of operation liken them to no more than an extension of the Boko Haram terrorists or Boko Haram in another garb. And there are signposts of their activities that seem to corroborate all these speculations.

    But the recent visit of Gumi to Zamfara forests, notorious for harbouring the worst band of the bandits, appear to have thrown up new insights into the matter. These came obvious from the statements credited to Gumi, what he saw on ground and comments from commanders of the bandits. The fact that they have commanders says a lot on their organizational structure and even corroborates speculations that they share much in common with Boko Haram insurgents.

    That is not all. There are comments from Gumi after the tour and reactions from Governor Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State that appear to have removed the veil between bandits and herdsmen. Additionally, there are statements credited to some of the bandits and their commander that suggest that those in the banditry business are mainly herders.

    Gumi led the way in this regard when while briefing Governor Bello Matawalle of Zamfara State on his findings he said “In most of the bandits and Fulani camps we have visited in Zamfara, I came to understand that what is happening in the state is nothing but an insurgency”. Buoyed by this, he asked the federal government to enter into negotiations with the bandits and the Fulani to reintegrate them the same way Niger Delta militants were handled.

    By extrapolation, what Gumi said in essence was that those responsible for the insecurity arising from the forests they occupy are bandits and herdsmen. This is noteworthy. But he did not tell us who the bandits are and how to differentiate them from the herdsmen. At any rate, there was no need for that differentiation since they are all involved in insurgency.

    The link between herdsmen and bandits is further evident from statements of some bandits and their commanders in the course of Gumi’s visit. One of them was reported to have said there would be no peace until the authorities stopped hunting the Fulani and that the Fulani were tired of living in the forest. The leader of the bandits, Kachalla Turji was also reported to have said that only reconciliation can stop the killings while accusing the people of Zamfara of selectively impoverishing and beating the Fulani on the road. Yet, another commander was quoted to have called for the halting of the “killing of our loved ones by security agents…as well as cattle rustling that denied most of us of legitimate means of livelihood’.

    Central to all the discussions were the grievances of Fulani herdsmen such as cattle rustling, their fate in the forests and bushes and the treatment they receive from some unnamed people in Zamfara State. There were no grouses and demands that gave a clue of any difference between the bandits and the herdsmen. None at all!

    Rather, we saw leaders of the bandits speaking for the Fulani and vowing there would be no peace until the authorities stopped hunting the Fulani. Why the conditions of the Fulani in the forests were the key issues and the fact that the authorities were hunting them further blurs any dividing line between the so-called bandits and the criminal herdsmen. And from what we have seen, there is no difference between the grouses and demands of the bandits and that of Fulani herdsmen. Rather, the bandits spoke for the Fulani herdsmen in the forests.

    This point was given added credence by Governor Nasir El-Rufai when he disagreed with Gumi for asking the federal government to use security budget to address the bandits’ demands as most of them had lost all their possessions to cattle rustling and extortion. Hear El-Rufai “any man that thinks that a Fulani man that ventured into kidnapping for ransom and he is earning millions of Naira would go back to his former life of getting N100,000 after selling a cow in a year must be deceiving himself”.

    The key issue here is the regularity with which the Fulani, cattle rustling and the fate of the herdsmen re-occur in all discussions on how to tame banditry in the north. One would therefore be stating the obvious to conclude that there is really no difference between the bandits and the herdsmen in the orgy of violence that has rendered life worthless in that part of the country.

    But does that leave us with a clue on the complex security situation in the south that has of recent seen the local populations resorting to self-help to tame the scourge? Does that lead us anywhere in the accusations of profiling and stigmatization of Fulani herdsmen for complicity in kidnapping for ransom and sundry criminalities? Or are we now to believe that the criminal elements that terrorize us hiding under the cover of the forests are the bandits’ arm of Fulani herdsmen?

    What seems obvious is the difficulty in drawing a line between the bandits and the criminal herdsmen. Gumi was unable to show us that difference. If one wants to be patronizing, he may admit bandits as the criminal arm of the herdsmen. For, the interests and grouses of the bandits are verily the same with those of the herdsmen. They are two sides of the same coin. And that is a mark of how complex and complicated the matter stands.

    The same complexity has been responsible for stunting all efforts to confront the insurgency of the herdsmen in the south. Each time attempts are made to flush out the criminals hiding as herders from the forests the matter is deliberately misinterpreted and skewed as an attempt to sack genuine herdsmen making a living through their trade.  Yet, the indigenous populations have had to bear the brunt of these inhuman elements taking cover as herdsmen.

    Reason is beginning to prevail with northern governors and leaders coming to terms with the anachronism of open grazing. El-Rufai succinctly captured the dilemma in fighting the terrorism of the herdsmen when he said if northern governors do not “come together for the federal government to provide us with soldiers and police to enter the bush and kill all the bandits, it will be difficult to succeed in fighting against banditry”. That has been the moot issue in the south that precipitated the quit orders on criminal elements in the forests.

  • LKJ now and then

    LKJ now and then

    By Sam Omatseye

    The story is told of an act of benevolence that went awry. It was Lateef Jakande’s example of looking a gift horse in the mouth. He was no longer governor, and somebody thought the man, with his mammoth legacy, ought not to ride in a crawling contraption.

    The man sent him the choicest of cars: a Mercedes. But the former governor was not impressed with the German invention. He did not want to appear ungrateful, and so he called his benefactor to say thank you. As an aside, he enquired in what dealership the car lay quiet before money sent it out to his home. He just wanted to know.

    The unsuspecting benefactor told him the truth. Jakande quickly returned the car to the shop and asked for the refund. The dealership obliged. After all, it was Jakande, and he probably bargained a profit for the sellers.

    That was Lateef Jakande, known as LKJ, the first civilian governor of Lagos State. That anecdote was an emblem of the austere politician. But it showed that he was simple but cunning. Yet he would rather be cunning than showy or false.

    The man had always been an enigma for me. Anytime I saw him in public I tried to unmask the sage, to rip open his soul. He was now hoary. Age had subdued his flesh. He walked into a venue without fanfare and often outlasted the event with wordless presence. He looked slow but not geriatric.

    I always wondered why he did not remain at home. But he insisted on being around, often he arrived early. You thought a certain brio bubbled inside, his ears alert, his eyes without a glitter of surprise, curiosity or even joy. His pose, with a little stoop, gave him an unflappable appearance of unbroken age. A fighter against time, a warrior in silence, his soul a battlefield. He engaged without oratory. Often, the only reference to him was an emcee’s acknowledgement. Even then, he did not seem to crave it or even want it. He sat still. But everyone knew this was the man of Lagos, the man who was the first to inspire the word “action” as a prefix to governor.

    In spite of all I saw of the man in public places, I always wondered why I thought that the man finished his life story many decades ago, when he completed his tenure as the chief helmsman of Lagos. His song grew dark after that. He seemed to have spent the rest of his life trying to recreate that grandeur, that moment in the people’s graces when some called him Baba kekere, when he became a synonym for political stewardship, when many saw him as heir to the greatest Nigerian ever, Chief Obafemi Awolowo.

    So, I thought LKJ did not die a few days ago. I thought the man had gone decades ago, and that was his days as ripe apple. The days of his visionary audacity, when he challenged governance and proved at once to be the litmus test and success, to be the visionary and implementer, the talker and doer. He embodied the dream fulfillment. It was the time when he collapsed day and morning schools, when he turned his mockers into a hallelujah chorus. When they said he built poultry sheds as schools and the same products are more brilliant than their children.

    When the people choked under landlords or under the sun, he built them sprawling shelter. When they thirsted for knowledge, he gave schools. For more knowledge, he erected a university. He opened roads and sub-divisions. He started the inlets into what is Lekki today. He saw tomorrow but he wanted to be there. Not like the children of Israel who did not see the Promised Land. Or like Martin Luther King, who knew he would not get there with his fellow blacks. Or the dream prose of Obama’s memoirs called The Promised Land, but it must have, at times, tortured him to write it. Jakande planted and reaped.

    He was called Baba kekere because, somehow he wanted to be Baba. Buhari and his military men saw to it that he didn’t become baba. His Metroline project has become a metaphor of his abbreviated dream. Just as Buhari stopped the train, he ensured Jakande’s personal train could not puff ahead. Jakande never stepped up, again. He wanted to be baba when he ran for president. But even his party and kinsmen could not mobilise for his local triumph. He could work for Lagos, but he could not craft a successful political platform in Lagos. When his group settled for a compromise, they gave us a governor, the late Otedola, who was an antithesis of Jakande. Yar’adua became a grand puppet master of southwest politics, especially Lagos, with his formidable party. His acolytes like Dapo Sarunmi, Yomi Edu, et al, made mincemeat of the great LKJ.

    If he rose to be Lagos governor on  Awo’s back, he could not be baba after baba soared into the sunset. So, 1983, when the coup swept him out of office, was the beginning of the offence against him, and his work horse of a life.

    But what aches this essayist was an episode in the aftermath of LKJ’s turn as minister under the Abacha junta. It was an Afenifere event, and the door was locked against him. He, the man who was the governor of his generation, and arguably one of the best ever to bear that title in the country. He, who made the sick well and blind see. He who was an ambassador for the race. He the model in integrity, a contempt for extravagance. He who did not steal. He was let out of the inner sanctum. He was not welcome in a meeting of his own folks.

    It was because he did not leave the junta when everyone said he should. The story had it that he had warned Abiola and the June 12 caucus that no one should trust the soldiers when Abacha teased them with offices and promised to leave the office in six months. Jakande joined as works minister. He worked well, but his performance did not invest him with the spectral dignity of his time as governor. But that was beside the point. When the time came, he remained with the junta when the rest of his homeland burned with rage against the goggled brute. Others in the cocoon that Yorubas labeled as traitors were Ebenezer Babatope and Olu Onagoruwa. The late Chief Gani Fawehinmi rang loud his objection to his bosom friend Onagoruwa’s cohabitation with the despot.

    That chapter casts a shadow on our Jakande, and history will have to script whether all he did in material terms could overshadow his act of looking the other way when his people groaned under oppression. They would ask why he did not become Moses and leave the palace when his people’s back bent under the tyrant’s whip.

    Hence I said, our Jakande died long ago. The person I saw in events was probably the Jakande, the disembodied hero trying to resurrect that old fire, that man of action we loved and applauded. But time and flesh have overtaken him.

    Gbaja’s poser

    Water Bill
    Speaker of House of Representatives, Hon. Femi Gbajabiamila

    Recently when Speaker Femi Gbajabiamila addressed the media after a session with the president, he made it clear that the nation was in a security crisis, and we all should work together as a people to solve it. At another time, he noted that the Nigerian leadership had failed in that area. That was a moment in elite humility. He did not utter his words in syrupy lines.

    He belongs to the legislature. He has cried as well as his House colleagues over the herder problem. Such an act of eating the humble pie should send a lesson to the president. It is the president who should have said what the speaker said. After that, he would act. The house does not have guns, cannot command the army or order the police, or even appoint them. It is the executive’s assignment.

    The point is, we have not seen even that level of contrition up there in the presidency. As Wordsworth said: “Wisdom is oftentimes nearer when we stoop  than when we soar.”  Shasha Market in Ibadan is the latest of such a breakdown of law and order.

    But we are not even seeing any hint of humility upstairs. When a man cannot unite his family, or even his party, how can he unite our country?