Category: Monday

  • Suffering and smiling

    Suffering and smiling

    Sam Omatseye

    IT is a novel as cornucopia.

    For those who have read Professor Wole Soyinka’s new novel, they may not be sure what to call it. That is its enigma. Some may say it is journalism, and for good reason. They meet the benign ghost of the former Oyo State Governor, Abiola Ajimobi. They cannot miss the grinning mien of Rochas Okorocha and his happiness ministry of in-law, siblings and cronies. Also from Kano, Governor Ganduje skewers emirs into sundry emirates.

    Of course, we also see Okija, the shrine as cause celebre. The ecclesiastical takes centre court, with a cleric, neither Muslim nor Christian, both though and more ensconced in his charismatic, ecumenical soul of grand deception. He is the sort you saw thumping a fist on teevee, or the imam of reclusive and taciturn awe in the neighbourhood. For good measure, you meet, pop-eyed, the mystic island of Sat Guru Maharaji on the express.

    This sort of novel is what French critics call romans a clef, a novel of recognition, a novel with a key. In Primary Colours, novelist Joe Klein tosses President Clinton about.

    The novel, Chronicles Of the Happiest People On Earth, Soyinka’s third, is a recycling of the author’s work, parents giving birth  to a child, but the child taking on all their traits while individualising them. The child is theirs, but the child is his own person. It is 506-page tome of a society of oddballs and bloodthirsty villains and abbreviated heroes.

    If you want satire, you can keel over your chair. For instance, we see a prayer session when the pastor as patriarch, Pa Davina’s “rising obastacle” around his loins confronts a woman on her knees. She genuflects, face before Terigbogo’s mid-section. Terigbogo in Yoruba means “bow your head for glory.” Pa Davina is also named Terigbogo. Or when a governor arrives for an award with an exaggerated caravan and he flicks out a grateful dagger from layers of babanriga. The host faints and finds himself in Dubai overnight. Or Badetona’s encounter with a lizard that ignites a wife’s fear and sees it as an omen of wizardry. The husband, a skeptic, has to ascend a breathtaking mountain for absolution with, of course, the mystic masseur of the soul, Pa Davina.

    The novel takes a swipe at religious hypocrisy and sexual peccadillos of men of power and mystery, oaths upend oaths. We see this in the triumphs of the Jero plays and the Lion and the Jewel.  We also see the exploits of Madmen and Specialists in one of the main characters, Duyole Pitan-Payne, although it is his son who is the maleficent type of Dr. Bero. That also gives a hint of Death and the King’s Horseman in the strain where son charts a different path from father, in an oedipal betrayal.

    The novel is about four main persons, friends, ostensibly since they leave school. In his first novel, The Interpreters, we have five graduates confronting a teething nation. Their idealism falters. In this Chronicles, the four are supposed to belong to a Gong of Four, a fraternity of good intention with a dose of the idealistic.  Badetona is a bureaucrat, Pitan-Payne an engineer, Kighare Menka a surgeon, and Farodion. Who is Farodion? He is the mystery man of the tale, a man of many names, many faiths, many countries, many sojourns, a man with a pact with life and death. We do not know him until the story ends, and the sophistication of his treachery enlarges the skewed nature of the happiness project that Nigeria is.

    The tragedy re-echoes Soyinka’s lament of a wasted generation, brilliant idealists who make bonfires of a nation’s dream. You cannot also miss the motif of the tyrant in power, the hustlers around him, the vanity of bringing up those who know nothing into reckoning of the wrong kind. Opera Wonyosi is his play of political indulgence, megalomania and glamorous putrescence, where a character says, “he who begs, bags.” A fellow, Ubenzy Oromotayo, is the dispenser of awards that flatter the egos of vain and parasitic elite. Oddballs and lofty maniacs replace the good. A street gang dressed up as models. Opera Wonyosi adapts The Beggar’s Opera, Playwright John Gay’s play that flays the first British Prime Minister Robert Walpole. It also adapts Brecht’s Three Penny opera.

    The motif of ritual and body parts undergirds the tale. He calls it the “meat mall.” It weaves the story of kilishi and Boko Haram, and the ritual murder in the south as well as nurses and hospital staff across the country who make a killing out of blood and offal of patients purloined from hospital theatres. The high and mighty use albinos and other human parts for wealth and power. It is all tied together in the Okija tale, where we see him soar into the roman a clef territory again.  The novel tells, with a sardonic eye, the familiar tales of a governor abducted, a toilet farce, a police officer’s list of marque members and a national audience in bewilderment.

    The cadaverous mess is the undertow of a society that claps over a crowd of mourners, a carapace above dead men’s bones, where pious ecstasy props the lies of priests and political leaders. It creeps into family. The Pitan-Payne clan is a connected, well-known name. But the fellow is not loved. They crave his wealth. His son colludes with his enemies to destroy him because, somehow, the son envies his father’s prowess.

    The novel gets personal with Pitan-Payne in a recast of Femi Johnson, the bosom friend of the bard. In his memoirs, You Must set Forth At Dawn, he recounts his effort to exhume his friend’s remains and rebury him here at home.

    In the novel, he makes the yarn a series of genres. A comedy, when the deceased’s sister pours accolades on Austria’s scenic beauty and lashes at Nigeria’s slovenly environment, whereas she fattened on defacing the Marina in Lagos. A thriller in the tale of outsmarting the family obstruction in bringing the body home. A whodunit in the inquiry into the fiction that Menka hid something inside his friend’s body. And, of course, his son’s role in his father’s death. A farce in the dance march to the funeral. He also gives us a slave trade tapestry as Pitan-Payne, who hails from Badagry, a slave port, has to be returned home to reverse the servile relationship with the west in that symbolic act.

    In his interview with The News editor Kunle Ajibade, Soyinka says he is wary of claiming to know the life of any person. And this is wise. No one can appropriate anybody’s interiority. French Philosopher Rousseau asserted that autobiographies are inevitably self-serving. We only cut slices and spices of other’s lives. It is a matter of perspective as Pa Davina himself says in the novel on the issue of happiness.

    The happiness of Nigerians is the illusion of wellbeing, a people diagrammed to accept anomie as peace, a sense of life as glee. We are like Sisyphus, who takes the rock up the hill on end. Albert Camus says Sisyphus is happy in his book of essays, The Myth of Sisyphus. Nigerians embrace their joy in rigged elections, in fuel prices that rise, in kidnaps and slit throats, in baby factories. It is what Fela calls Suffering and Smiling.

    It is an offering that has it all. Sometimes Soyinka writes with the rigour of an essayist. Sometimes we see the stage as the dramatist unfurls his yarn. Or even as a poet and he gets cryptic. Sometimes he flows as master story teller.

    The humour lifts the heavy passages at times, like an engine that revs a B-2 bomber to fly light in the sky. The humour sometimes forgives the prose. But it is no easy read like Things fall Apart or Half of a Yellow Sun. It offers pleasure to those ready to plumb its depths.

     

    Fifty claps for Kabiyesi

     

    HE ascended the throne at 32. Fifty years on, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi III, the Alafin of Oyo, still acquits himself with poise, charisma and a royal presence unsurpassed in the land.

    He is the sort of royal who brings compassion and modernity to an institution some have passed off as history. As they say, the king makes the crown.

    He has been a crown to the king as well by the majesty of engagement in society these five decades.

    He exudes erudition and has positioned himself on the side of the progressive principle of the age.

     

  • Tale of three bishops

    Tale of three bishops

    By Emeka Omeihe

    The last week of December 2020 appears one the Catholic Church in Nigeria will not easily forget for a long time to come. A number of disparate events ranging from the good, the bad and the ugly involving three of its Bishops in parts of the country seemed to have combined to carve out a special place for that year in the annals of the Catholic Church in this country.

    First was the Christmas message of the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto, Most Rev. Matthew Hassam Kukah in which he dealt extensively with the challenges bedevilling the country. The very elaborate and all-embracing message touched on virtually all issues of concern currently vitiating attempts by the current leadership to find the right mix of solutions to the debilitating challenges that have cast a pall of insecurity across the country and left our citizens hewers of wood and fetchers of water in spite of vast natural endowments.

    Kukah in that message said among others that the “prospects of a failed state stare us in the face: endless bloodletting, a collapsing economy, social anomie, domestic and community violence, kidnapping and armed robbery etc. Beyond the pall of politics, very prominent northerners with a conscience have raised the red flag pointing out the consequences of President Buhari’s nepotism on national cohesion and trust”.

    Of all the issues Bishop Kukah raised, none appeared to have stirred much controversy as his position on the nepotic disposition of the Buhari administration. Hear him: “Every honest Nigerian knows that there is no way any non-Northern Muslim President could have done a fraction of what President Buhari has done by his nepotism and gotten away with it. There would been a military coup a long time ago or we would have been at war”.

    Expectedly, the statement was given varying colourations depending on the side it was coming from. While government apologists are quick to assign a dubious motive of regime change, albeit unconstitutionally to the statement, others view it beyond such narrow confines. Some of the views saw the statement as outright partisan politics querying the propriety of mixing religion with politics. Others went to the very extreme of suggesting that the Bishop should drop his robe and venture into politics for failing to adhere to the distinction St Augustine made on his allegory of the two cities- the city of God and the city of man.

    But then, even with attempts by early philosophers to make a distinction between the corporeal and the ecclesiastical realms, the reality in contemporary world is that there is a thin line between the two. They complement each other. Both the government and the Church exist to promote the good of the society and there is a point where these interests converge. At any rate, what is left of the church if it fails to speak truth to power when it matters most?

    The language may seem controversial especially with such terms as ‘Non-northern Muslim President’ and ‘coup’. But there is no better way of capturing the futuristic message it is meant to serve. The problem those who called out attack dogs against Kukah have with that aspect of the message lies in their inability to decipher its metaphoric content. Theirs is just an ordinary interpretation of the statement apparently from the mind-set of regime protection. But that is not all there is to it.

    The value of the comparison lies more on its heuristics for the future than the present. Therefore those who are quick to impute a motive to overthrow the government to that statement lost the message. Kukah is projecting into the future that someday, a non- northern Muslim would emerge as the president of this country. He is pricking our collective consciences to the possibility of a southern Christian president emerging in the Nigerian political scene. It has happened before and there is no reason why it will not happen again.

    Kukah was just on a voyage on scenario building. He is worried whether the country will accept to live with the crass and unbridled nepotic acts for which the Buhari regime has become notorious if they manifest when a non-Muslim southern president is on the saddle?  There are two future challenges arising from this. The first is that an incoming president would definitely move to dilute these skewed appointments and other vestiges of nepotism to make for fairness and balance. The other scenario is that since Buhari has set the precedent and it went well with the section of the country he comes from, a southern Christian president will have no qualms repeating the same. He will be at liberty to select most of his service chiefs, the leadership of paramilitary organizations and his personal staff from one part of the country and all will be well with it. Kukah foresees a danger in that scenario playing out. He was therefore doing a great deal of favour by pointing out the foreboding danger.

    And unless we are prepared to tolerate such crass mismanagement of our diversities in the future, unless we are prepared to sacrifice nation building, all right thinking people should appreciate the good the Bishop has done to the corporate fate of this country by pointing out the perilous path to our nationhood that awaits us. All he said in that message are already within the public domain. Those calling for his head do not love this country that is buffeted in all angles by all manner of debilitating challenges.

    But as agents of the government were busy attacking Kukah for drawing attention to the degenerate security situation, the Catholic Church was assailed from another quarter when the Auxiliary Bishop of Owerri Diocese, Most Rev. Moses Chikwe was abducted in the most callous manner by kidnappers. Though Catholic priests have severally been victims of serial kidnapping in parts of the country with some of them paying the supreme sacrifice, that was the first time a Catholic clergy of that rank was being kidnapped since the ‘kidnapping crime’ crept into the list our national misdeeds

    The news shook the Catholic faithful to the marrows especially given that the Bishop was fully dressed in his religious regalia thus ruling out the issue of mistaken identity. That singular kidnap ruffled public sensibilities a great deal especially given the sentiments that go with anything that is bound to inflict mortal harm on such revered church leaders.

    Soon, conspiracy theories began to have a field day. But a lethal poison was injected into such speculations when an online social media platform claimed that the Bishop’s body had been found with his head decapitated. This generated serious fury and another round of speculations given what we know in this country of that manner of killings.

    The Catholic ArchBishop of Owerri, Most Rev. A.J.V. Obinna was swift in saving the day with a press statement denying the report and asking for fervent prayers for the release of Chikwe and his drivers by their abductors. As luck would have it, the duo regained their freedom barely two days after the dangerous fake news. This put paid to all the theories that hitherto competed for acceptance as to the motive behind the abduction of the Bishop.

    Even as the Bishop has been released, it is important that the said online medium be made to account for the source of that fake story. The story was definitely crafted to cause public disorder given the sentiments that are bound to be ruffled by that manner of killing in a predominantly Christian setting. We thank God nothing of such happened.

    But it takes demented people to kidnap a Catholic Bishop or even any clergy man given their special call of duty. It is even worse that such a senseless and dehumanizing treatment could be given to a Bishop in a milieu that is predominantly of Christians.

    As the kidnapped Bishop was still in the dungeon of the criminals, the sad news filtered of the demise on December 29, 2020 of Bishop Emeritus and pioneer Catholic Bishop of Orlu Diocese, Most Rev. Gregory Obinna Ochiagha at the age of 88 years. He was ordained a priest in 1960 and served as the Catholic Bishop of Orlu from 1981 till 2008. As the pioneer bishop of the Orlu Diocese, his name is almost synonymous with the Diocese. May his soul rest in peace! Such was the tale of the three Catholic Bishops in the last week of last year.

  • Bandits and banditry

    Bandits and banditry

    By Femi Macaulay

    It is alarming that bandits have compounded Nigeria’s security crisis by joining kidnappers and terrorists in fuelling insecurity, particularly in the northern part of the country.

    Niger State Governor Abubakar Sani-Bello, whose state in the country’s North-Central geopolitical zone is faced with banditry and kidnapping problems, last week characterised the bandits troubling the state after a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari on security issues.

    “We are having an influx of bandits from neighbouring states, especially Zamfara and Kaduna states,” the governor said. Then he introduced a more disturbing dimension, saying some of the bandits were sponsored foreigners recruited for subversive purposes.

    Sani-Bello said:  “In one particular case, we arrested bandits that are foreigners from as far as Sudan and Mali and they came on motorcycles. They are being recruited through social media, through Facebook in some cases. They confessed to this.”

    Who is recruiting bandits? Why? The governor observed a new trend suggesting that banditry may well be a tool to achieve political aims.  “They started burning farms and animals,” he noted. “So, this has given me some concerns and at the same time, it has kept me thinking. What is the motive?

    “I can understand if you kidnap, you are looking for money. But, when you burn farms, then, there is something else happening. Or when you kill animals. They go to villages and kill animals. They don’t steal.

    “So, if you stop people from going to farms, it means you are trying to deprive that nation of food security. Why will someone want to deprive people of food security?”

    The governor’s observations are thought-provoking.  It is a complicated matter. It is puzzling that he also accused community leaders of collaborating with bandits. According to him, “The bandits are being invited by some locals. In fact, we have arrested some village heads. Now, if a whole village head invites bandits or harbours bandits, then, where are we headed to? The village head is supposed to secure the village.”

    Worsening insecurity has generated various narratives of blame. The mass abduction of students from Government Science Secondary School, Kankara, Katsina State, by suspected bandits last month, generated another story about who is responsible for heightened banditry in the Northwest region.  Thankfully, the abductees have been released.

    All Progressives Congress (APC) acting Deputy National Publicity Secretary Yekini Nabena said in a statement: “Our security agencies have intelligence reports linking one of the Northwest governors to collusion and sponsorship of violent and criminal activities of bandits. I won’t give details because of the sensitive and security nature of the issue.”

    Five of the seven states in the Northwest are controlled by APC, the federal ruling party.  The governors are: Nasir El-Rufai (Kaduna); Abdullahi Ganduje (Kano); Aminu Masari (Katsina); Badaru Abubakar (Jigawa) and Atiku Bagudu (Kebbi).

    The two other states in the geopolitical zone are controlled by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the main opposition party. The governors are Aminu Tambuwal (Sokoto) and Bello Matawalle (Zamfara).

    Though the APC spokesman did not name the governor allegedly sponsoring bandits in the region, he said enough to suggest the governor’s identity.  He listed the PDP among “enemies of the country who seek political gains from issues of insecurity.”

    By mentioning the PDP, he suggested that the alleged evil sponsor is a member of that party. It is understandable that he pointed in the direction of his party’s main rival. It is also understandable that he seemed to have ruled out the possibility that the alleged evil sponsor could be from his own party.

    Is the allegation true? It should not be ignored.  However, the claim that a Northwest governor is to blame for the increasing cases of banditry in the region cannot excuse the failure of the authorities to find a solution to insecurity.

    Understandably, the Nigerian Army wants to be seen as not only fighting banditry but also winning the war against insecurity. But the army’s claims of success have been contradicted by locals in the affected areas who claim that the army has failed.

    The acting Director, Defence Media Operations, Brigadier General Benard Onyeuku,  represented by the Nigerian Army Operations Media Coordinator, Colonel Aminu Ilyasu,  told journalists in Katsina State on January 6 that the army had killed 220 bandits and destroyed 197 bandits’ camps from June to December last year. He also said the army had rescued 642 kidnap victims, foiled 167 cases of attempted banditry and 81 kidnap attempts.

    This picture was meant to reassure the public that the army had not failed in its effort to counter insecurity in the Northwest. The spokesman also stated that 73 AK-47 rifles, 194 Dane guns and 53,200 ammunition were recovered. Also recovered were 7,761 stolen cows and 1,876 sheep, he said.

    He added that the army had arrested 335 suspected bandits, 326 illegal miners, 147 bandits’ informants and collaborators, 14 bandits’ arms suppliers, 24 rustled cattle sellers and 46 bandits’ logistics suppliers.

    However, instead of applause and commendation, this narrative was greeted by complaints from some community leaders in Dansandau Emirate of Maru LGA, Zamfara State.

    A community leader, Alhaji Nuhu Dansadau, for instance, was reported saying bandits were still terrorising the locals, flaunting AK-47 rifles even during the daytime. “The military operation did not make any meaningful impact, particularly in Kuyanbana forest,” he was quoted as saying.

    People had deserted their villages because of persistent attacks from bandits, he claimed, naming some of the abandoned villages, including Jesa, Kalhu, Tasa, Gazamba, Yartsaba, Magamar-Danbata, Anguwar Doka, Kwangerawa and Maidoraiyi. He told a reporter: “As I am talking to you now, there are over 700 people who are waiting for vehicles to convey them to other places.”

    Another community leader, Alhaji Ibrahim Tofa, lamented that “despite the deployment of the military, the bandits are still attacking us.”

    Perhaps the army had exaggerated the result of its intervention in order to attract public praise. Maybe the mentioned community leaders had exaggerated the presence and activities of bandits in their areas in order to create a picture of increasing insecurity.

    But there is no doubt that when insecurity is effectively tackled, there would be no such collision of narratives as the reality would be beyond dispute.

    Obviously, banditry won’t end until the bandits are overpowered. It is now a major problem, and demands maximum attention from the authorities.

  • Where is nanny?

    Where is nanny?

    Sam Omatseye

     

    A GOOD nanny is a parent’s dream. A good nanny, though, can overthrow the parent. That provides a dilemma for a home. But, more so, in the running of a country.

    A government as nanny captures the imagination. When we encounter novels like the Perfect Nanny by a French Moroccan writer Leila Slimani or The Help by Kathryn Stockett, we wonder what a mother-surrogate who thrashes about the cot and kitchen has in common with politics.

    The nanny state, first advanced by a lawmaker Lain Macleod in Britain in 1965, is another way of saying we should choose between a state of affection or the one that leaves citizens to their devices. But no state can be free from the nanny’s apron.

    The nanny state is a welfare state. It spreads its benevolent bosoms over the suckling citizen. In a country like Nigeria where the needs are many, the state should play nanny. And for good reason. But not an absolute nanny. We expect the nanny in special places. We expect such a nanny to be a good one, or else the nanny will unleash a maleficent soul like in the novel Perfect Nanny about a so-called happy family. Things go awry and the children choke. Murder suffocates affection.

    The Buhari administration was born not sure whether it wanted to play the nanny or the aloof parent. It has managed to do both, but unmanaged it. It has left the child at once panting for the nanny and the parent. A Hobson’s choice. A riot of a vision.

    In a country, the state provides infrastructure, security and resources. The parent does that, too. But in a nanny home, the parent does not exude empathy and intimacy. They cannot give the routine joy and play for the child. They are aloof, swum away to workplace avarice. The parent cedes their seed to the maid.

    It reinvigorates the debate as to how much of government we need in our lives. Abraham Lincoln asserted that governments should do for the people what they cannot do or cannot do so well for themselves. Lee Kuan Yew boasted that if he did not run a nanny state, his country would not have leapt ahead. It draws the charge of a despot. Hence we have a democracy after many years of gun-handed mulls on the throne.

    A state plays nanny when it builds roads, bridges, secure army and railways and schools. Dinner table steams with food, the sick get drugs, the jobless work. The nanny state is the capitalist antidote to the smothering blanket of a socialist state. it is a Fabian ideal free of Lenin’s shackles.

    Under Buhari, we see two things working quite well. Work is going on for the Second Niger bridge, the Lagos-Ibadan expressway and many restored bridges across the country. We also have witnessed the Lagos-Abeokuta-Ibadan railway project on the verge of formal commissioning. These are the doings of two work horses. One is the Trojan of works, Babatunde Raji Fashola, SAN, and for transportation is Rotimi Amaechi.

    Nobel laureate Wole Soyinka made a subtle point recently in his commute on the train to Abeokuta. He said he loved the train but he was not ready to speak about Buhari. It looks like a disconnect, but it is not. The bard was like the child who loved the nanny but is alienated from the parent. Of course, Buhari will take the credit for the train, a first and even revolutionary approach to transport on that heady corridor and busiest in the sub-continent.

    See the Third Mainland Bridge. But for what Fashola has instituted, that iconic bridge was a prefabricated preface to a major world disaster. Just one rush hour, one crack, then a lagoon roaring with metal frames and blood. Under him, we have the first institutionalised check. It is a story of the nanny checking the cot for fragile hinges. Or else the parent, like in the Perfect Nanny, comes home to a tragedy of broken bones.

    Other elements make the home right. For this essay, I would mention security. Even in keeping the home for the nanny, parents must prioritise safety. The nanny will not do well when the doors are open for robbers and kidnappers. That is one cardinal area of worry.

    That was Bishop Matthew Kukah’s Xmas homily. When people die and the army frails, the parent fails. With a parent aloof, the child drools in a pool of blood. The administration has appointed the right people for works and transportation. Why has he not done the same for areas that would have helped him succeed? In his security outfits, his picks grovel. The service chiefs are chafing, and defence architecture is aching. They don’t bubble with ideas or action. He won’t fire those who fumble. Buhari is scoring with Fashola and Amaechi because he hired the right nannies.

    But the nannies of safety are wrecking the home. Why has he retained them in the kitchen while tuwo burns the palate? The ministers of works and transportation hold his keys to posterity, so why has he not done the same in the areas of welfare, security and finance? He does not need to look at tribe, just the square pegs. If he puts the right people in place, maybe they would have saved his name. But he has stuck to incompetent men. They are his “kinsmen,” not keen men. They have held him in their mesh – as hostage both as a president but also to failure. He should pick those who can make him shine, not those who shine for themselves and at his expense.

    If you must be a nepotist or ethnicist, emulate President John F. Kennedy, who picked his brother Robert as attorney general. Not the sort we have today who pines more for power than justice. We cannot run a diverse country for justice when some groups are barred from the temple. There are competent nannies everywhere, north south, east and west.

    We cannot sugarcoat a disaster like the Borno slaughters or emirs eliminated, or broken schools or power outages.

    In terms of welfare, there were some good ideas. Feeding students across the country has been applauded in this column. But we also saw the scandal that befell it recently when COVID shut down schools. The food was going to ghosts of students. Disembodied hands and mouths shoveling non-existent plates of rice and beans. No student, no food, big budget. The humanitarian lady of the cabinet stuttered afterward to explain why shuttered schools had supplies. After all, we have seen snakes and reptiles digest tens of millions of Naira in the past. The welfare programmes for small-time investors seemed to have a good beginning. But the numbers affected are too small to turn around the poor man’s economy. What happened to its initial momentum?

    If daddy and mummy cannot do it, then find a good nanny.

     

     

    Tambuwal’s counterforce

     

    AS the north cringes under militant hoodlums, the times call for imagination. Sokoto State Governor, Aminu Tambuwal is not waiting for the service chiefs or Buhari’s architecture. He is taking the fate of his citizens in his hands. He has come with the idea of merging schools, especially those in the perilous areas. The affected schools include GSS Kebbe students who will now couple with GSS Sanyinna, Sultan Muhammadu Tambari Illela to GSS Gwaddabawa, and a quite a few more. The state has seen lords of violence send farmers out of their farms, extort taxes, maim and maul, and send some citizens leaping across the border out of the country just to keep safe.

    Governor Tambuwal’s step only demonstrates how desperate things have become in the country, especially in the northern part of the country. The school merger goes to the safer areas, especially away from the borders. This makes it easier to police and monitor them and keep students safe. Leaving them in clusters in vast stretches of land problematises the ability to track the militants.

    This is a model that other states can follow, especially because the north is a vast geography and moving from one place to another is unwieldy. The felons know that. Governor Tambuwal’s decision is a counterforce of an idea.

     

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080

     

     

     

  • Shenanigan in INEC and courts

    Shenanigan in INEC and courts

    By Sam Omatseye

    No one who reads Shakespeare’s play, The Merchant of Venice, can forget the immortal poser, “Is that the law?” Shakespeare puts those words on Shylock’s lips. The playwright and bard for the ages propounds that question again, today, from his tomb in Stratford-upon-Avon. It is both a query and plea for justice and even sanity, and it is directed at INEC, judges in Abuja and a certain politician with both a triple and double name, Jarigbe Agom Jarigbe.           `

    The yarn has escaped the rigour of political reporting because of its twisted and underhand current. Yet it is a story like this that undermines the integrity of our courts and the sanctity of politics. It underwrites a quiet conspiracy of law and man. It unveils the loss of conscience and the atrophy of decency. By yielding facts to farce, it underlines why a UK newspaper continues to echo the doomsday scenario for Nigeria as a failed state.

    For those who are serious, it has a gritty component. For those who want to laugh, their ribs may rip apart. Your sense of smell may force you to hold your noses for its stench of the sewer.  It is not about a presidential poll, and not gubernatorial sweepstakes. It is a bye-election, but it is for senatorial election in Cross River. All politics, they say, is local. But it is from a unit that we know the unity of a country.

    As I write, two fellows, Dr. Steve Odey and Jarigbe, have each a certificate of return from INEC. It should be the parody of two senators and one seat, but it is a fact. One false, one authentic certificate from electoral umpire. Hence fact has yielded to farce. Interestingly, both are members of the same political party, the PDP. So, these two ran for the primary of their parties. Everything was set. A five-man panel was present, so were INEC men from its five local governments in the senatorial district. Midway through the primary, Jarigbe announced he was quitting, and cried foul that INEC officials were not present. There and then, the INEC fellows there said they were around. But he left anyway with two of the members of the PDP panel and an INEC official, even though he claimed they were not present.

    INEC role was not to monitor, but to observe as it did in Lagos, Plateau and other districts where primaries took place. But Jarigbe moved to a hotel in Ogoja to declare himself the PDP candidate. But the returning officer of the party, the chairman and secretary of panel carried on with the votes and normal process. Odey won with the tally of 450 to 90 votes.

    Jarigbe had challenged the delegates list for the primary, and the courts affirmed the authenticity of the list used for the primary. Again, Odey’s name was submitted to the PDP headquarters, and it sailed through the eyes of the National Working Committee in Abuja. That normally should put paid to the matter for the PDP because Odey was ratified as the party’s point man for the polls. Jarigbe did not fill any nomination form. Only Odey did, and substitution was out of the question in the party rules.

    In spite of this, INEC would not publish Odey’s name as the PDP candidate. Odey went to the Federal High Court in Calabar to compel INEC to do a right thing. But just like Giringori of the comedy of manners, Jarigbe put on a new masquerade. He went to court, or shall we say somebody went to sue him in an FCT court in Apo. Not over the list, not over whether he won the primary, or whether INEC was present at the primary. He did not even tell the court under Justice Binta Mohammed that he had declared himself winner at a primary. A fellow named John Alaga sued Jarigbe over forged certificate, and that Jarigbe could not be a candidate with a wrong certificate. He did not even sue Odey. He did not join Odey, or even the PDP in the suit.  Jarigbe’s name was not submitted to INEC as candidate, yet INEC presented a lawyer at the court. They did not address the substantive issue. Out of their creative foundry, they forged a new case: false certificate.

    The justice did not question Alaga’s locus standi, as lawyers say. The judge did not ask for Odey, nor did she ask for the representative of the PDP. It was a red-herring of judgment. Many have alleged that Alaga was, at least, an associate of Jarigbe.

    They enacted, through Mohammed’s court, an alternate reality. It was a theatre of alternative facts. Jarigbe’s facts. The alternative facts were that there was a proper primary, he won, INEC published his name, the PDP headquarters ratified and he was on course for the December 5 poll. No evidence of these. Then a certain upstart called Alaga challenged the PDP pick on grounds of false certificate. The point, though, is that there is no forged certificate, but just a ploy to subvert the law by using a court to hand Jarigbe a certificate of return. INEC succumbed. INEC did not say, My Lord, we already gave another person a certificate of return. This theatre of alternative facts is what Shakespeare in plays like Twelfth Night and All Labour’s Lost mocked as theatres of the absurd, theatres of alternative facts.

    So, the court came with alternative judgment, and INEC issued an alternative certificate of return. Lie has become truth. It was a case of deceptive integrity. He used a good certificate to obtain a false one.

    The irony is that we cannot concoct an alternative seat in the senate, and we cannot invent an alternative senate. That was where the plot got stuck for Jarigbe. Senate president had received the proper certificate of return from INEC for Odey, and he was duly sworn in.

    The snag here is how does INEC force Jarigbe to return the certificate of return? This is the scenario that Frederick Engels calls the “negation of negation.” Dostoyevsky in his Notes from the Underground said, one plus one is not two, or three. It is not life but the beginning of death. It is mathematics that INEC has to figure out. How does one certificate for Odey and One for Jarigbe amount to one senate seat? Senate has resolved its own. INEC as an institution has to wake up Professor Chike Obi from the grave to help them.

    I wonder if judges do not read the news and do not follow the currents in their society. Judgments are not about law, but society. If they read, they would have known about the background. Maybe the farce would have come to an end. INEC’s hands here are not clean. They had SANs in the cases in Port Harcourt and Calabar. They were never deployed to FCT. Why FCT? Why didn’t the matter go to Calabar? Abuja courts have become refuge for judgment hunters. Politicians now commit felony before the courts.

    Both men have each INEC’s certificate of return. If anyone were to challenge an educational certificate, it should be Odey, who had a locus standi, or PDP. Just as we have seen in Bayelsa and Edo states. Not a shadowy fellow in his district.

    We hope what happened in Cross River does not foreshadow a year of political delirium. This is a consequential year in Nigeria for political ambition. We should not subordinate the rights of man to the law. Politicians have become men of rights rather than men for rights. That is the democratic spirit that inspired Essayist Henry David Thoreau to write, “It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for law, so much as a respect for right.”

    Politicians should leave the courts for justice, not for politics. This story shows that our courts need cleansing.

     

     

  • Peacocks of zoning

    Peacocks of zoning

    Sam Omatseye

    AS the year ends, eyes focus on 2021, a year a politician and Buhari insider told me will be “turbulent.” But that dialogue preceded the spark from Bishop Matthew Kukah’s sacred fire. It is none other than the quicksand path to 2023. The dreamers and their footmen are jockeying for the public’s imagination. Never before in this country’s history has an election been sought and the prospects so cloudy. We are bracing for eruptions of surprises, blindside, and even personal misfortunes and losses. Hence even a conservative poet like Samuel Coleridge crooned, “anticipation is more potent than surprise.”

    We are now back to the hobgoblin called zoning. Rather than joust over ideas, we are there again at the familiar altar of comfort: the shrine of the tribe. But the lesson from 1999 has told us what lie zoning has been. It has neither benefited the tribe, nor their gods. It has satisfied the priests of sacrifice: the elites. It is just like Chinua Achebe’s Arrow of God where the priest diverts the cock meant for the palate of the gods. It ends up on the plate of the home.

    We saw that under Obj, the Owu chief. The short realm of Yar’Adua precludes him from judgment. Jonathan had the sin aplenty, and today we are watching the iniquity at play under Buhari. When the republic began, the idea was to expiate the wrongs of June 12, and give it to a Yoruba. The poll was a bow at the shrine also of MKO. To pay with a Yoruba president would exorcise the stammering rage of an Abiola ghost. But when it happened, the Yoruba kinsmen did not like the choice that resulted. OBJ was not Yoruba enough for the race. It was good enough for the other ethnic groups. Obj satisfied a zoning that was not at that time seen as zoning. It was a payback for the northern sneeze at Abiola. The southwest saw it as casting a swine before the Yoruba pearl. OBJ did not romance Abiola in life or death. Like in the civil war, he benefited where he did not toil. MKO built a presidential dream-house, but he inhabited it.

    In this narrative, Obj may have become a Yoruba man in Aso Rock, but the southwest spirit was not with him. It was the opposite. The southwest haunted him. If the polls sought to appease the MKO gods, MKO ‘s ghost growled at night over Aso Rock. It was a victory to paper over a crime. Obj read it that way. Even within his ethnic group, Obj played a divide-and-rule hand, and revved a train wreck against its progressive mainstays. This led to rigged elections, and surrogate phonies as governors until a backlash came through the courts. The west had its revenge after presidential zoning failed.

    For the people of the southwest, they were invited to dinner. The invite read dinner at 8pm. To the others, it read 6pm. Food had finished before they arrived. They arrived to the crumbs and the dance session.

    When Jonathan came, a shoeless era had begun. He was known also as Azikiwe, a name that shushed the Igbo into line. Money was awash. Oil rose to over 110 dollars per barrel, and Jonathan was the wonder boy of indulgences. In Abuja, we saw rows of Niger Delta hats just as a witch saw an apparition of gods at the Witch of Endors’ place. They expected great deeds for his people. So did the Igbo. For sure, we saw the appointments. Many came for his folks. When Anyim was secretary to the federal government, he could not escape the charge that he was partial to his folks. So much was the money, that even on the tony streets of London, shoppers could not escape the hats and the buys, the profligacy of preening elite. Even the minister of minister, Okonjo-Iweala once said Igbo were beating everyone in tests for jobs without showing how candidates were recruited and perimeters for testing.

    In all though, Jonathan left office, and what legacy? Of course, the appointments and peacocks with their big troughs of personal cash. But the real people? Not much for the average Ijaw. The Igbo who complained of bad federal roads forever did not even put Jonathan’s feet to the fire. They loved him, and that sentiment enshrined him in their hearts. Now, some people want him back, even when the constitution says that anyone who has finished a term of another person cannot be eligible to contest again. The constitution also says anyone who has been sworn in twice cannot be sworn in a third time. His lovers are so tied to him that they can subvert the evidence before them.

    It is an irony that an unlikely person in Buhari, with the force of Babatunde Raji Fashola, his Trojan of works, has done more roads for the east  than any minister in a long time, including the second Niger Bridge that is on course to be a breath-taking achievement.

    Bishop Kukah said if any other ethnic leader did what Buhari has done in his nepotism, he would have inspired a coup. He was right. But he forgot that Jonathan committed the same crime, and that is what led to Buhari’s second coming. It was not a coup of the gun, but of the vote. But just like all coups in Nigerian history, they were heralded as messiahs and have disappointed in the end.

    Today, the reason that Buhari came was also partly because talakawa rallied behind their hero. They would not do that today. The talakawa vote rid their hero of his mystique. Buhari the aspirant was a soldier who did not bend to folly. He did not accept injustice. He did not work with the filthy or the compromised. He was the myth and legend of the aspiring poor. He was idealized in stratosphere. But Buhari the mythmaker will not pardon the ambitious Buhari for snuffing out the epic tale. Office closed the orifice.

    But giving prime jobs to his kinsmen have not stopped the butchery in Borno. It has not stopped the bloody maelstrom in southern Kaduna, the ferreting away of the Boys of Kankara, the blood-spattered highway between Abuja and Kaduna, the tax-collectors who have set Sokoto poor out of their farms and out of their country. His home state emir wondered what sort of a country Nigeria was. The Sultan of Sokoto has lamented the north as the perilous part of Nigeria. The talakawa are poorer today than ever. So, there. The soldier’s gun is dud at his own homestead.

    It is the region that Soyinka in his new novel, Chronicles of the Happiest People on Earth, locates part of his morbid tale. In the bard’s Chronicles, the society is like a living mortuary, so we the analysts are “social morticians.”

    Why do we think we should vote according to tribe, when tongues still can’t taste the good life?  We should stop thinking ethnic when we vote. Zoning is a ploy, not policy. The issue is, when does the tribal end and the Nigerian begin? It is only when such a leader demonstrates it that the Nigerian can save the tribe, and ultimately save Nigeria.

     

      Isama and Sagay at 80

     

    TWO distinguished Nigerians turned 80 this month, and In Touch pays tribute. They are Itse Sagay, man of law. The other is Alabi Isama, a man of war. Both have served this country with their treasures. Sagay, a warrior, has fought battles for democracy and justice on the street and campus as an early day Action Group youth. On campus, he threw salvos at intellectual colonialism. Sagay wanted to be a doctor until, after he left Government College Ughelli, was in Lagos and spent evenings watching parliament with Awo in action. Awo the pundit, researcher, methodical presenter and polemicist took the doctor from Sagay and seduced him with the wig and gown. He decided to be a lawyer. I

    in his Ife days, he formed the AG youth wing and has since been in the vanguard for democracy. On campus, he fought a military that dislodged him from his home in Benin, where he set up the law faculty. He won the battle in court with his colleagues like Festus Iyayi. Today, he is still at it, the latest being his joust with the attorney general on war against corruption.

    Isama is a veteran of three wars. He fought in the Congo, became chief of staff to Black Scorpion Adekunle during our Civil War, and led the force that ousted the Matatsine revolt.  He fought to save the continent, to unite his country and quell a sectarian impulse. Ensconced in his Ilorin home, Isama should be an invaluable consultant in these heady days. His book, A Tragedy of Victory is perhaps the best book as yet on the civil war, written with great anecdotal support and pictures.

    These are the true Nigerians, and I doff my hat to them.

     

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080

  • 2020 as a contradiction

    2020 as a contradiction

    By Emeka Omeihe

    As the year 2020 winds down, it will be highly uncharitable to allow it pass by just like some other years before it. Not with its projected significance in our clime and the stunning but unanticipated events within the same timeframe that have combined to carve out a place for it in the conscience of all Nigerians.

    Coincidentally, the year 2020 had long been programmed by our policy makers as the target date to launch the country on the path to sustainable growth and development. By the projections in its Vision 2020 document, Nigeria was speculated as “one of the 20 largest economies in the world, able to consolidate its leadership role in Africa, and establish itself as a significant player in the global economic and political arena”

    Before then, the country had been listed by Goldman Sachs among the 11 countries with the potential for attaining global competitiveness based on their economic and demographic setting and foundation for reforms. As the curtain draws to a close, issues are bound to be raised as to what has become of all these lofty projections? This is especially so given some of the events of the envisioned magic year that are at polar opposites with the Eldorado we had been promised.

    What really happened? Is it a case of wrong visioning, lack of foresight or sheer inability to anticipate the weight of exogenous variables with potentials and capacities to negate and undermine those lofty ideals? Or is it a case of inability to read between the lines, inverted projections or a combination of both?

    Around the same time also, there was this projection from an American study group speculating that Nigeria would come up as a failed state by the year 2015. That year has also come and gone. But with the current situation in the country especially as the year 2020 ends in a few days time, comparisons are bound to arise as to which of these two seemingly contradictory projections are approximating reality as events on the ground bear out?

    In effect, what signals are there that Nigeria is now on the path to becoming one of the top 20 largest economies in the world and a significant player in global economic and political arena? Or are we confronted with the verity of a failing state as projected by the American study group?

    Within the course of the year, there arose significant events that Nigerians will for a long time continue to remember. The first was the global COVID-19 pandemic. Though the deadly viral infection is not limited to the country especially given that it was imported into our shores, it was the first time most of those living today got exposed to national cataclysm of that nature.

    We cannot forget in a hurry, the nationwide lockdown that kept us indoors for many months; the fear of imminent death from a disease that spreads from the air for which no cure had been found and the protocols to check its spread that redefined the way we usually lived our lives. Not with the new wave of the viral disease that has compelled the various levels of government to roll out once again, some of those restrictions this festive reason.

    It is hard to forget the hardship which COVID-19, first recorded in the country in 2020 imposed on the Nigerian citizens culminating in the fear of possible deaths, trepidation, shut down of the economy and massive loss of jobs. It was a year that recorded the highest global deaths raising fears as to whether the world was coming to an end. The Nigerian economy did not fare any better as it plunged into unavoidable recession twice within the year under focus.

    Not unexpectedly, religious leaders took advantage of the unexpected and the fact that the disease had no cure to draw attention to the awesome powers of the almighty God and the limits of science. For them, the significance of the pandemic lay in the reality that all powers lie in the hands of the almighty God to whom we must turn to for solutions to our afflictions.

    We are still contending with the reality of that virus notwithstanding announcements on the production of its vaccines. The way things are, we are bound to live with the disease for a long time to come. But one thing that stands out very distinctly is that the emergence of the deadly virus has really redefined our social relations; the way people hitherto saw life. How long these changes will endure is another kettle of fish.

    The second event in the expiring year that had very profound impact on the country was the ENDSARS nationwide protests. Though the protests against the dreaded police anti-robbery squad commenced sometime around 2017, it later fizzled out as it could not gather enough steam. But it resonated with great intensity in 2020 not minding the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Initially peaceful and well organized as it drew support from a broad spectrum of the Nigerian youths, things got awry when the military launched an offensive against the protesting youths at the Lekki Tollgate in Lagos resulting to deaths that have been a subject of speculation as the government and its agencies evade responsibility.

    But that was the last straw that broke the camel’s back as hoodlums hijacked the protests unleashing in its wake, a reign of terror, looting and destructions. They attacked police stations across the country burnt down many of them with police officers and their men scampering for safety. It was the first time in recent memory such coordinated attacks was launched against the police institution.

    Police operatives were so frightened that such scale of anger could be visited on them by the very public they are paid to protect and they got seriously demoralized. It took serious preachments, persuasion and threat from their leadership for them to return back to work. Even now, they are yet to fully recover from that experience.

    Worthy of note here is not just the attack, but the reality that security agencies could be made to account for their deeds albeit violently. It also came with the serious message that security agencies owe responsibility to the public to discharge their duties in a way that satisfies public good. They owe their job to the public and must discharge them to public satisfaction.

    The heuristics of the incident is that governments and their agencies hold power at the discretion of the public and must use them to promote public good or incur their wrath. That is the message and it is hoped lessons have been learnt about the supremacy and sovereignty of the peoples’ will.

    The emerging issue is whether Nigeria has inched closer to the vision of attaining the status of one of the 20 largest economies in the world or become a verity of a failed state as projected. A few facts will bear issues out. But even without adducing these facts, it would appear the answer should be clear to observers of Nigeria’s economic and political trajectories over the last few years.

    What are the issues? With the rating of the country by the World Poverty Clock as the poverty capital of the world overtaking India in hosting the poorest of the poor and its unenviable position as the third most terrorized country of the world on account of rising but debilitating insecurity, it is obvious that the projections of Nigeria joining the league of 20 most developed economies has become a huge illusion.

    For, no reasonable development can take place in a milieu hounded by insecurity from all fronts and of diverse dimensions with the government showing manifest inability to stem the tide. Life has become a verity of the state of nature characterized by unbridled atavism and survival of the fittest. Life has become short, nasty and brutish- conditions that compelled man in the state of nature to surrender some of his powers to a sovereign in return for protection.

    It is the failure of this social contract; the failure of the government to rise to the challenge of the raison d’être for its existence that is fuelling fears that Nigeria has shown all the signs of a failing state. That is where we find ourselves at the twilight of 2020.  For us, 2020 has become a huge contradiction- a case of upturned projections.

  • Kankara puzzles

    Kankara puzzles

    By Emeka Omeihe

    Even with the release of 344 abducted students of Government Science Secondary School, Kankara in Katsina State, those familiar with surrounding villages and communities still wonder how bandits were able to kidnap the boys and vanish into the thin air. They find it increasingly difficult to come to terms with the reality that such a huge number of boys could be ferried out of the area without the authorities noticing. The story that they were taken away from their school on motorcycles made the entire episode more perplexing. How many motor cycles were involved and how many of the students the armed cyclists were able to carry at a time, are puzzles that perhaps, only time will entangle.

    If 344 students were taken away in motor cycles, there is everything to suspect that close to that number of cycle-riding armed bandits would have been deployed into active duty that ill-fated night. That should have been more than enough disturbance to alert the security agencies if actually they maintain some presence around the areas they passed through. But it appeared the bandits operated without being noticed or resisted.

    The initial story by the presidency was that the military supported by airpower had located the “bandit’s enclave at the Zango/Paula forest in Kankara and there have been exchange of fire in an-ongoing operation”. But five days after the kidnap, Governor Bello Masari of Katsina State told the BBC Hausa Service that the kidnapped students “are in Zamfara. We have got the information. We are negotiating with the kidnappers to ensure the release of the abducted students”.

    The disclosure by Masari further injected some confusion and puzzle into the entire episode. Which of the two accounts do we now believe: the tale by the presidency or the account of the state governor? And since Masari’s was the latest, we were led to the assumption that his account was the real position at the moment he spoke. So the narrative that the bandits were holed up in an exchange of fire power with the military in the Zango/Paula forest in Kankara was after all a hoax. Not also with the disclosure by Masari that the abducted students were in Zamfara with negotiations going on to free them. Their eventual release in Tsafe, Zamfara State proved very conclusively that there was no iota of truth in the claim by the presidency that the bandits were holding the boys in a Kankara forest.

    Apparently rattled by the contradiction in the two accounts, the Nigerian military was quick in dissociating itself from any negotiation reaffirming its committed to militarily dislodge the bandits. How they intended doing that with the negotiations entered into by Masari is left to be conjectured. But it leaves the unmistakable impression that at least one of the parties is not telling us the truth about the efforts to rescue the poor students.

    Incidentally, Masari while claiming that no ransom was paid for the release of the students, named the military, police operatives and Miyetti Allah as those involved in the negotiations. So, we are left to form opinions on some of the issues that have been traded. But in all, it appears the facts of the matter are not as clear as they were presented. This may be the first negotiation entered into with organized criminals without some conditions. So, what was the negotiation all about if the bandits did not get anything in return? The issues are still hazy.

    There is also the additional matter arising – that the bandits were able to ferry their victims from Katsina across to Zamfara State. In which case, they did not only beat the security in Katsina State, they totally outsmarted whatever security presence there exists in Zamfara State. That says a lot on the security situation in that part of the country.

    Not unexpectedly, conspiracy theories have for good reasons, resonated. There are speculations that the kidnap could not have been possible without the connivance or active participation of security personnel, traditional rulers and community leaders. How come hundreds of motor cycle-riding bandits carrying many passengers were able to pass through the villages and communities without village heads, traditional rulers, security agencies or even ordinary residents raising an eyelid?

    This puzzle further gives credence to the growing feeling that some powerful interests are behind the debilitating insecurity in parts of the north possible for financial or political gains or both. The stunning manner in which a security summit organized by civil society groups in Kaduna was sacked by sponsored armed thugs who stormed the venue and attacked the distinguished audience with dangerous weapons seem to corroborate this theory. Somebody somewhere must be benefitting from the spate of heightened insecurity that has reduced the worth of life in that part of the country in particular.

    This requires very thorough investigation by the federal authorities to fish out those behind the recurring mass kidnapping of students. First was the Chibok girls’ incident of 2014 that is yet to account for the lives of many of the students. That was followed by the Dapchi abduction of 2018. The latest incident at Kankara would seem one abduction too many.

    Like the two previous abductions, the Boko Haram insurgents have claimed responsibility for the incident. They showed a video footage of some of the presumed abducted students with their spokesmen pleading with the government to negotiate with their abductors and avoid force to secure their release. Though the Nigerian military and Masari have sought to diminish the weight of this claim, the fact that the abduction bears the imprimatur of Boko Haram’s weird ideological prompting, weakens any attempt to dissociate them from the attack.

    At any rate, who are the so-called bandits and which territories do they occupy? If the so-called bandits could muster such a huge force to diminish and beat our security architecture hands down, they must have a strong operational base. So, who harbors the bandits and why has it been impossible for the security agencies to flush them out if they are an ad hoc and rag tag criminal as they are being painted?

    On the contrary, the bandits from what we have seen, maintain a large and strong army comparable to what we know of the Boko Haram insurgents. The Kankara abduction bears the footprints of the Boko Haram insurgents both in planning, surprise and manner of execution. Not only does Boko Haram have grouse with western education, its agenda is to discourage school attendance by selectively marking out students for frequent abduction.  When this ignoble mission is weighed against the campaigns by northern governors to substantially get more pupils enroll in their schools, the correlation between students’ abduction and the campaign to discourage education by the insurgents becomes very glaring. It is little surprising that many state governments in the north had in the wake of the Katsina showdown, shut down boarding schools within their domain

    So, there is everything to link the abduction to Boko Haram. Or are we really talking about the same people by using the terms bandits and Boko Haram interchangeably? The sooner we untangle the puzzle surrounding the seeming invincible bandits, the better we are in resolving the debilitating insecurity that has reduced life in the north to a verity of the Hobbesian state of nature.

    If bandits have now ventured into the mass kidnap of students for either pecuniary or other gains, then there is no difference between them and the Boko Haram insurgents. They are clearly terrorists and must be confronted the same way the terrorists are being fought.

    But the relative ease with which the negotiations progressed leading to the release of the 344 students unharmed meant the leaders of the so-called bandits are known. They are known to Miyetti Allah otherwise they would not have been part of the negotiations. They are also known to the Katsina State government that had in the past entered into an amnesty program with their leaders.

    So, what happened to the peace agreement Masari signed with the leaders of the bandits even to the extent that he posed in a photograph with some of them clutching sophisticated riffles. What happened? And what is the link between Katsina bandits and the ones in Zamfara? Many puzzles!

  • Lost Boys of Kankara

    Lost Boys of Kankara

    Sam Omatseye

     

    FEW can imagine the trauma beneath the façade of the hundreds of Kankara boys as they walked out of bondage last week. We saw the freedom of the body in pictures and video footages, but how much damage is afoot in those souls?

    I recall a personal experience over a decade ago in Ibadan at a conference, and how robbers visited us in the hotel at night. I was sharing a suite with Dapo Olorunyomi, then chief of staff at EFCC and now publisher of Premium Times. But many persons inhabited rooms in the large hotel. We had completed the course and had an evening together outside after the heady hours of intellectual exchange.

    I was in my room when I heard what was like brawls and capers of the unhinged. I chalked it up to the wall banging and throaty uproars of the drunken, a wild afterglow of what was however a tame evening. It went on for almost an hour before a silence. And someone knocked on my door to ask for my whereabouts, and it was then I learned that robbers had struck. There were no after-parties on the corridors, but armed goons flexing guns and daredevil eyes. I walked out of the room to see the air-conditioners dislodged to the floor. Televison set crested the refrigerator before I went inside. In that position, we had seen African Cup of Nations the previous night. But now both Televison set and refrigerator lay prostrate beside each other.

    Where was Dapo? I asked. He had been rushed to the hospital. He returned with neck braces. Former Rivers State commissioner Ibim Semenitari, then a publisher, had cleverly outmanoeuvred them. Most conferees saw the men, trembled and lost valuables. I did not lose a kobo. I wondered why they did not even knock. My door was not locked.

    But I did not escape their foray. The sound of hectoring and banging followed me out of Ibadan, and it did for at least a year. I never slept well. Whenever crockery quaked, silverware dropped, a foot fell, an involuntary cough leapt into the air, I started. If at night, I woke up. They did not rob me of Naira or phone or shirt, but they murdered Shakespearean sleep. They banged my soul. I was bruised and bled inside. It was a trauma I thought would flog me forever until I decided to fight it with willpower and prayers. That was for me as an adult.

    I recalled my struggles when I saw the boys. They had seen threat, walked miles on barefoot, hectored by what one of them described as “tiny boys with big guns,” survived on grass and leaves of questionable edibility, starved, displaced, tortured, pined for home, despaired of rescue.

    We are not sure how they were released. Few believe that they did not get ransom. Negotiations imply concessions. We are not sure what they conceded. But the boys are back. We thank God for their body, but is their soul in hell? Are they battling nightmares? Are they going back to school? Can they ever see school as education rather than a door to danger? Did that weekend just seed a monster or breed a mouse? “The diseases of the mind are more numerous and more dangerous than the diseases of the body,” noted Cicero.

    That is why the government’s self-congratulation is premature. Somehow, some are seeing it as a feat of the military triumph, even trying to force us to fantasise about Entebbe Raid. President Muhammadu Buhari called it a military operation. Army spokesman General Enenche said the army had no hand in the release. The word ‘rescue’ exaggerates what happened. Until we know the details we should suspend judgment. Were the boys just too many for them to handle. From reports, the goons did not know what to do with their miracle. They had to make phone calls on what to do, and decided to walk many of them. Unlike the Chibok girls, there were not many trucks to ferry the find. We still need an accounting. How many did they take? How many are left behind? A reckoning in form of a roll call should clarify. Then we have to ask, why did they leave the others if we cannot account for them? Was it a sort of selection, a Spencerian survival of the fittest? I hope they released all. We do not want the repeat of the Dapchi example of Leah Sharibu and a few others held behind?

    Maybe we are seeing the boys back because they form a logistical nightmare. It takes too much resource to feed such an army of boys, even if you want to make an army. Again, one of the boys said they asked for the location of the girl schools around. Are we “lucky” because they are boys? Would they return them if they had three hundred girls, innocent, nubile, waking up the primitive impulses of their loins?

    One reason we cannot celebrate is that we know it should not have happened. It shows our army, unlike Buhari’s claims are not motivated and ready for the task ahead. We know that even as the boys returned, an emir was laid to rest after a bandit attack, some innocent were killed and ferreted away in Borno, several died in southern Kaduna. Death still skulks the north while Abuja gurgles its Kankara wine.

    What we had in Kankara is the story of lost boys. They are lost even though we found them. There are many who are not captured but who are lost because they are thrashing about for hope and meaning for their lives. Yet, it is not about the north alone that we should grieve. We are seeing in the south another incarnation of mass murder, slow, surreptitious, apoplectic, its numbers swelling. They butcher better than surgeons. Or call them surgeons of the gods. In his new novel, Chronicles of the Happiest People On Earth, Wole Soyinka draws parallels between a surgeon treating many butchered after a terror onslaught in Jos, and the ritual murderers down south. Both cut human parts, the southern ritualist being more cold-eyed and clinical. Like in the north, they pick the child, the albino, the big and small man, and the women.

    The federal government has decided to subject the boys to medical tests. But it is not just about a test or a psychiatric treatment of a few days. This is a lifetime experience.

    The Katsina State where it happened has been in the spotlight for years. Many have drawn the president’s attention to his home state of terror. They did not strike for the boys when Buhari was ensconced in Abuja. They waited moments after he came to town in all his pomp and presidential grandeur in Daura. For emphasis, they farted when the emperor walked in for dinner. If he was absent when the House called him, and the soldiers were a no-show when they arrived in Kankara, why should anyone think we have any answer to the free fall of insecurity? It is a season of absences, both soldiers and president. Were the soldiers there when the bandits made a butchery of slit throats in Zabarmari?

    We have all kinds of lost boys today. Not only the herders on the prowl, not only the gold hunter in Zamfara, not only the jobless in the Niger Delta. Nigeria is a lost boy with his father preening about his luxury and great power. Rather than the son, it is the leader who is prodigal.

    Nigeria is not the first country to have lost boys trekking for miles. When Southern Sudan fell to slaughter over a decade ago, thousands of boys were displayed and walked for miles in lines, through bushes and plains, and villages, some of them bitten to death by snake, others devoured by lions. They were scattered all over the world, including in the United States and Europe. American novelist Dave Eggers captured it in his novel, What is the What, a thriller that reads like a movie. But it was a real life experience.

    But our boys came home. But is the body together with the soul?

     

    • For comments, send SMS to 08111813080

     

  • PERSON OF THE YEAR: Prologue

    PERSON OF THE YEAR: Prologue

    By Sam Omatseye

    It was a war without arms. Eyes did not see nor did ears hear it. It came like a thief in the night but it struck without the vanity of self-announcement. You saw a body bag, or an asthmatic quiver before you knew it. When it killed, it was without guns or machetes or fist pumps. It had a touch-and-go effect. Not all fell by its sword, but most who felt it saw the abyss. When they survived, they thrilled to a new era of free air. It was a second chance, a sort of surreal new paradise to live again.

    It began in China, and then invaded Europe. America, their America fell in spite of the best health care system and armory history ever knew. Then it came here.

    We had fear and trembling, all cloaked in denial. Most Nigerians, Muslims, Christians, atheists waxed Biblical: “It is not our portion.” Until an Italian ported it home.

    The borders were still open. Planes flew in from China, Europe and America, bearing virus with them. No one, not in the states, or in the centre felt the pulse. No Governor, or president, or minister or cleric anticipated or knew how to respond.

    Cometh the disease, cometh the hero. The Governor of Lagos, thin, boyish, with the charisma for the moment, had addressed citizens of Lagos ahead, undertaking tours of facilities, including special centres and nurses, and also making a humble flourish of the coming greeting mode sans handshakes and hugs.

    He knew his city, and the sprawl of interlocking densities and population. Many traders, many breathing into each other, touching each other, backslapping, backstabbing, chugging and hugging. It is a city of a million droplets.

    Where Lagos goes, so goes Nigeria.

    He became the lone voice in the country, energizing all to hope and caution simultaneously. Wear face mask, don’t party, no hugs, wash your hands, social distance, sanitise. Shut down. A paralysis of caution gripped the state.

    The centre followed his lead, so did other states. We know it might have been worse, but the man saw the moment of salvation and acted. Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu became the top martial, a healing minister in a field of fear and unease.

    For his show of initiative, daring and facility for action in a pandemic, Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu is The Nation’s Person of the Year.

    He did not save all but he turned on the tonic that led to the airport closures and national shutdown and averted many opened coffins and shed tears and homes with empty beds.

    Tragedies followed in the country though. Nigerians began to fall, one big man after the other from a former governor to a chief of staff. Celebrity after celebrity dropped for Covid-19 to take all the glory. The common folk grew into cynics and thought it was the well-deserved rest for the preening elite.

    Deities in heaven, they contended, cleared the deck for the lowly. Then rumour of death spread. So relieved were Nigerians that even the taskforce for Covid-19 retreated as Nigerians started to applaud their God, weather and some mystical content in our diet for proving the western doomsayers wrong. Some Nigerians were speaking of “during the pandemic,” as though it had been banished forever. As the year ends, we are witnessing what many see as the second wave. For irony, the man who led us with grace and aplomb through it announced the invisible visitor came calling. Even at that, he is at work urging all to not retreat to complacency.

    Yet he did not work alone. A general may not wield a rifle, but the soldiers on the frontlines face crossfires. The health workers, doctors, nurses, their assistants, all in their moon wears. They saw the living, the weak, the febrile, the respiratory quakes and quirks, the big man gasping, the expiring wife looking limp at the husband, the husband who would not return home, the parent who had said the final goodbye. Also the happy moments, the climb out of the abyss, the smile, the relief, a supernova day, a resurrection of sorts. The workers were the many unsung, unseen soldiers of the year. They are the first runner-up.

    The second runner-ups are the EndSars Protesters. In spite of the Pandemic, they trooped to the streets. They were the young who spoke flawless English, who studied their society and knew the future they wanted. The trigger was police brutality, a brutish aspect of the Nigerian society that seemed to happen without address. Police men who rape, who rob, who maim and kill, and who got away with it. The streets rebounded with words and defiance. It became a platform for grievances against social injustice in the land.  They nudged the conscience of power, even made them fear and think. They thought about their demands. Here again, Governor Sanwo-Olu was a central figure, interacting with the youths, disdaining fear, parrying ‘pure water’ sachets, and even becoming their courier to the president. But it was the same protests that broke down when they failed to rally behind a leader, and allowed the flair and nobility of their movement fall to gate-crashing hoodlums. They were distinguished from the original protesters because the hoodlums could not utter a proper sentence, and they lacked the finesse or the refinement of the early days. It must be said, though, that the original protesters were guilty of overreach in blocking streets and stopping honest workers from going to work.

    But the matter came to a head in riots, police killings, bonfires and arson, and looting of a scale not seen in this country. It also led to the Lekki Shooting incident. Some called it massacre without matching that claim with figures. Did any die? Two persons have been identified so far, but beyond that it is still speculations. Claims have come up, but evidence of persons must be priority over sentiment. So to obviate claims and counter-claims, Gov. Sanwo-Olu set up a panel for transparent inquiry. It is all about evidence, not claims. Lawyers, journalists, elders even protesters are part of the panel. The Governor has kept mum while awaiting the panel, to prove where the army erred and who killed who and whether those who assert can prove.

    This package also contains other categories like Business persons of the year about two cutting-edge young entrepreneurs. We also present the public servant of the year, Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State, the intrepid governor who engaged his people and emerged with nine lives, a matador in a democracy. We also have such other categories as sports person of the year, entertainer of the year, controversy of the year, issue of the year. But we have novel awards like pugilist of the year between Minister Godswill Akpabio and Joy Nunieh as well as slogan of the year, Soro Soke.

    All the categories reflect the dynamic of human foibles and triumph, a nation in the ferment of its compulsions, it hopes and despairs and curmudgeonly holding on to the future.