Category: Sam Omatseye

  • Not the same numbers

    Not the same numbers

    The BOS of Lagos unveiled a N2.2 trillion  budget last week. It is a reminder that Lagos is a cut above other states in the country. No state has had even a trillion naira except one in the last dispensation which  did it more out self-aggrandisement than a measure of the state purse and ability.

    Some are even eight times lower than Lagos. Some of the other big names are close to a trillion but have not even been able to sniff it. So, Lagos can afford many things the others cannot. The BOS can afford the trains, the sprawl of housing projects and schools. Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu announced 50 per cent bonus for the civil servants and political office holders and the money will not be taxed.

    Read Also: Clark to CJN: correct grave anomalies in judiciary 

    It is the power of internally generated revenue, especially since Lagos is not yet an oil state like the Niger Delta colossi. It is a testament to the tradition of governance that has built on the predecessor’s milestone. The BOS has kept faith with this in innovation and enterprise. It brings to mind the song by the late singer Fatai Rolling Dollar, Won kere si number wa. That is, they are no match for our number. Indeed, N2.2 trillion is a big sum. Lagosians are looking forward to a new year of more development from the BOS.

      ·           

    ·              

  • Prologue: Person of the year Bola Ahmed Tinubu

    Prologue: Person of the year Bola Ahmed Tinubu

    What a year it was for him, and what a year it was for us as a nation. We were heading towards an election, but we could not move. We had legs, we had cars, and we had time, but we were at a standstill. Standstill was a crossroads.

    Our cash was not our cash because Muhammadu Buhari and Godwin Emefiele held them. Our fuel did not flow to cars. They said they were changing currency. But the caterpillar could not become a butterfly. We were caught in transition. Poverty was defined not by what you had but what you had. A millionaire begged in vain for N5,000. A millionaire queued in vain for a quarter of fuel in his car tank.

    Money failed; mobility stalled; time froze. Not only that. Banks could not dispense money. Courts, including the top court, said to release money. Court failed, too. Yams and plantains rotted in the market. Persons choked and died in bank halls. A swaggering CBN chief defied a Supreme Court.

    The government of the day had the political party of the day. If it failed, its party should fail at the polls. Its candidate hinted and yelled in Abeokuta, his emilokan city. The man said it was an internecine sabotage. Persons in government were working against their candidate. But Asiwaju Bola Tinubu roared like a man with his back to the wall. He screamed, spat, stung. He promised that the foes did not know the way. He was still headed to triumph in spite of the betrayals.

    His foes gloated in silence. The PDP candidate, Atiku Abubakar, mumbled an objection before he saw his opportunity. Ditto the Labour Party candidate, Peter Obi. The voter was suffocating, but they were hoping to be victor. They did not flinch to ride the suffering of the commoner to the diaphanous cloud of the throne. A cynical exploitation. In the end, it became a hope against hope. When the presidential election happened, the man for whom the people lacked, and because of whom fuel was unattainable, beat the odds. INEC chairman Mahmood Yakubu announced Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu winner of the votes. He would be the nation’s next president.

    But it was the victory before the victory. Tongues were first tied before they wagged. A new storm was in the offing before he could waltz into the office. Tribe, prophecy, politics. Three monsters raised issue over issue. For the tribal titans, it was an abomination. Their man was supposed to win, an ironic adoption of emilokan and unwitting tribute to the man who coined the phrase.

    As for prophecies, they failed in the words of Apostle Paul. They said his case would collapse in court. He would be arrested at Eagle Square during the swearing-in. Some predicted his death. It was hard to distinguish God and mammon. Abuja turned from a nation’s capital into the capital treasure of democracy. They sculpted the super citizen. If you did not get 25 percent in that city, you did not win. Lawyers, pundits, the streets coalesced to sanctify the city. The law took backseat. Others called for the army. It was a Samson syndrome. Win or let hell take over. At the centre was a Tinubu who rarely spoke, watching from the sideline as fury took over sanity in the land.

    The politicians, especially the Obidients, reflected a part of the country that mistook itself for the whole and appropriated the throne on the basis of its minority votes. Death wish was an open clamour, an open clamour like an open sore. If he was quiet, then he was sick. If it lasted, he was dying. They had flown him last night to Germany or Paris. He was on life support. If they saw him, they watched for signs: he was shaky at the feet, his voice was frail, he was graying at the temple, he had bloodstains, he had water stains. He went to the bathroom to change his diapers. A patch in his underarm indicated a coming apocalypse. It was desperation clothed in comedy. They were looking for R.I.P because he ripped them at the polls. In tears, a certain young woman had threatened God with apostacy if Tinubu won.

    Read Also: Tinubu receives ambassadors, mandates them to focus on new investments

    But the uproar was channeled into a new hope: in the judiciary. They said they had enough evidence that Tinubu lost. The Obidients claimed they won. The PDP claimed they won, too. They forgot that both worked together for Tinubu’s gain. At the polls, the fall of Obi, the fall of Atiku meant a windfall for Tinubu. Both vote counts amounted to over 13 million votes. Tinubu had just a little over half of their haul. Though still speculative, analysts say if both worked together, they might have had their day. But history is not about what might have been.

    Campaigns mounted against judges. Threats, insinuations, blackmails. To browbeat judges into a foreordained verdict became a mission. Intellectuals, top politicians, tribal chieftains, pastors, literary lights, professors, media luminaries conjoined to tease the wise men of the court. They even started a campaign saying, All Eyes on The Judiciary. It was a case of intimidation. But the judges did not faze.

    Both at the tribunal and Supreme Court, the justices affirmed Tinubu’s victory. He did not only win at the polls. This is in spite of internationalising the campaigns about certificate and drugs, and he triumphed on all sides. The US courts absolved him of a drug scandal. The Chicago State University proclaimed he was no impostor. The victory buried public opinion as the arbiter of justice.

    For triumphing at the polls, in court and outside the country in a year of storms, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu is The Nation’s Person of the Year.

    The runner-up has to be the Nigerian people who suffered in a year of deprivation, hunger and even manipulation. Cash crunch, fuel scarcity, the removal of oil subsidy, the devaluation of the Naira, the attendant inflationary burden combined to challenge not only the livelihood but the resilience of the Nigerian people. In spite of the gale of exodus out of the country, most remain to soldier on in times of crisis. They deserve recognition.

  • Twice betrayed

    Twice betrayed

    Not many young people know Frank Kokori. Not many old acknowledge him. He inhabits the bald region between nostalgia and optimism. So, indifference besieged him when he died last week. His blood turned cold in a country that gave him a cold shoulder. What did not leave him was his courage.

    He was betrayed in death. This essayist warned of this moment. I wrote that we should not rush to his help only after he died. That note was optimistic. His death came like a whimper. He died like a pauper. Shakespeare wrote that “when beggars die, there are no comets seen. The heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes.” He lived a prince of virtue but died a beggar of neglect.

    The news flashed his death December 7, and all over the social media and newspaper websites. Journalists did their duty. By the end of the day, only few personages had released any homages. Maybe there were closet tears, but he was no closet icon. Not even the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) mourned until the next day.

    Ajaero or Agbero was suited up in air-conditioned hallways in Dubai, sipping tea at COP28. Festus Osifo was in oblivion. Were they go doolally tap because he pleaded with both unions not to strike but give the Tinubu government “some time to rebuild the country?” Is it malice against the dead?

    They went on strike over a black eye for Ajaero’s partisan drivel. But their eyes did not moist over the death and apotheosis of a genuine hero not only of labour, but of democracy. Even politicians who are benefitting from his heroics heard of his death but they are dead from the neck up. A boo for them.

    This essayist had warned that we should not cry but care and not wait to care for his beloved as a late mea culpa. Maybe they are waiting for his obsequies since any statement now would be afterthought. The first prominent statement came from Delta State Governor Sheriff Oborevwori. In a taped statement before he died, Kokori gushed about his state governor. Kokori thanked him “for showing concern during his stay in the hospital. That he never knew Oborevwori was such a good man.” He said the governor “wasn’t close to him as some people.” The Delta State governor had picked up his bill and demonstrated empathy by paying him a visit. An applause for him.

    The presidency also appreciated him and a statement from President Bola Tinubu showed appreciation of the matador – my words – during the struggle to redeem this nation from the stranglehold of a military gangster – my words.

    But most of those who wrote tributes were not the top men of the society. It is sad indeed. Is it because he was an oil man? Or is it because he was a minority, an Urhobo man? Would he suffer like this if he was Igbo, Hausa-Fulani or Yoruba? If he were some other people, they would have whisked him early to Europe or the US. That might have saved his life even for another half a decade or even longer. Who knows? Not even the oil industry, the treasure of the economy, with its peacock wealth, rallied for him. Nor did his party come to his rescue when he was alive, not in the state or at the national level. Kudos to Femi Otedola, though, for the routine nobility of his charity for ailing. A clap for him.

    Read Also: I remember Frank Kokori

    Kokori was betrayed in death as he was in life. But this betrayal, including his neglect in his dying days, was the second perfidy. The first happened when he was the scribe of the Nigerian Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas (NUPENG). He was in hiding in the days of Sani Abacha’s demoniac terrors. A goggled brute and impostor with his jackboot on the people’s mandate. Kokori was on the run so the hope of democracy could  not ruin. Somebody Kokori trusted, who had access to his phone number, drew him out of his shadows in Lagos. The junta fumed and feared Kokori. He had made the nation ungovernable for the Abacha street gang of soldiers. He crippled the country by mobilizing oil workers to down tools. To cripple the oil sector was to cripple the country. The man who did it was Kokori. Politicians could not cripple the country as he did. Only workers could. He held the gauntlet, gaunt as he looked. His life was on the line. Abacha’s gulag masters combed the country until they took hold of a man who could lure him out. At that time, Abacha had nabbed Enahoro. So, he was told that Kokori had to be the rallying point. He had to be secure. Aremo Segun Osoba, according to Kokori, had warned him to stay out of sight. Osoba was also taking care of Kokori’s family. Kokori acknowledged that and thanked him. In his memoirs, The Struggle for June 12, Kokori said one Fred Eno, who was Abiola’s aide, aided the SSS to his lair. He called Kokori to come out to obtain certain materials. Kokori obliged and disclosed his location. The goons nabbed him and wanted to throw him in the car. Failing that, they wanted to toss him in the boot. Failing that, they immobilized him with a spray and pushed him in the car. Biceps failed to conquer a scrawny soldier of the people. He said one of the goons uttered Urhobo to him and he ignored him. They had started pounding him until he warned that if they killed him the country would be “set ablaze.” That restrained them. It was then the so-called Urhobo man wafted the sultry car with his folksy air.

    Fred Eno has denied he called Kokori. It was not the age of AI and I wonder why Kokori could have responded if he did not recognise the voice and phone number of his fellow traveler in rebellion. That Kokori survived was a saving grace for Chief Osoba, who had been accused of selling him out. Kokori cleared the veteran journalist and former governor of Ogun State in his book. May our grace not die in the grave. If Kokori did not survive Abacha’s gulag, the wrong would have haunted his name forever. The Roman poet Horace wrote: “A word once let out of the cage cannot be whistled back again.” Osoba had the good fortune of reversing the word to its resting place.

     Kokori was small, but physique did not define him. His name made headlines in the stormy hour of June 12. They sought him everywhere the way they sought some of the titans of the day like Rewane, Soyinka, now President Tinubu, Enahoro, Kaltho, Ubani and some media defiants like Onanuga, Igiebor, Alex Kabba, et al. It was a testy moment. Rewane and Kaltho were slaughtered. It was a period of gallantry and death, treachery and opportunism, manoeuvres and ingenuity, scarcity and perfidy. The streets were empty, except when they bled with protests. Workers did not know when to go to work and when to stay at home. Some grew rich from disloyalty. Democracy turned into an enterprise. It was a quicksand for values. Sometimes it was not clear who was for the country and who wanted to profit. Some who claimed to be for the country fattened and exploited the hour for personal boon. We saw open defections and stealth loyalty. The defections smelled like public defecation. The dark was shelter for imposture. Light was blinding.

    People were getting medals of praise for serving self. In the name of buoying democracy, they were buying sellouts. It is like the soldier in Hemmingway’s novel Farewell to Arms who gets a medal of honour for doing nothing. Same we see in Tolstoy’s opus War and Peace when Prince Andre feels out of sorts for being bemedalled for reporting a phony victory to the emperor. He wants to go back to war in order to deserve the honour even as Napoleon is storming towards the city. In our case, many did not deserve it but feigned applause in fables of heroics. They told their own lies to lie gloriously in their sty.

    The true hero was Kokori; no one more so than he. In the history of labour struggles, I don’t know of a better hero. Not even Imoudu, the eponym of Nigerian labour, grazed death like Kokori. No knock on the patriarch who had brushes with colonial powers, like his deportation from Lagos for years. But his life was not in peril like Imoudu. Not even Zik when he proclaimed Gerald Whitley sought after his life and said, “I go to the bush whence I came. But if it is the will of providence that I should die by the bullet of a European assassin, I go with divine confidence and spiritual satisfaction that I have served mother Africa to the extent of my physical ability.” It was all bluster. No one wanted a hair of Zik’s head. Kokori was under real threat. He ranks like anyone in making democracy what it is today. He died from devastation to his health when the despots took him. He deserves a national monument. It is true, as Senegalese writer David Diop writes in his enthralling new novel about slavery, “the historical monuments of the Senegalese people can be found in their stories…” Yet, physical monuments in form of buildings, streets names, et al, are snapshot tributes for the unwary.

    He went into the gulag a thin man. He came out a gaunt man. He did not lose his guts. He was a tiny dynamo. When Sigmund Freud died, poet W.H. Auden wrote he was “no more a person but a whole climate of opinion.” Kokori was a climate of the struggle.

    He lived a courage, and died one. He himself said he was born so and would die so. In the words of Dylan Thomas, he did not “go gentle into that good night.” He fought to die on his birthday, just as Churchill on his father’s birthday. He is like the elegy of Poet Mayakovski for the Russian legend Vladimir Lenin: “We ‘re burying the earthliest of beings that ever came /to play an earthly part / Earthly, yes; but not the earth-bound kind /who’ll never peer beyond the precincts of their sty. /He took in all the planet at a time, /saw things out of reach for the common eye.”

    Kokori has gone, and he surrendered his flesh and blood. But he left us his spirit.

    Not many young people know Frank Kokori. Not many old acknowledge him. He inhabits the bald region between nostalgia and optimism. So, indifference besieged him when he died last week. His blood turned cold in a country that gave him a cold shoulder. What did not leave him was his courage.

    He was betrayed in death. This essayist warned of this moment. I wrote that we should not rush to his help only after he died. That note was optimistic. His death came like a whimper. He died like a pauper. Shakespeare wrote that “when beggars die, there are no comets seen. The heavens themselves blaze forth the death of princes.” He lived a prince of virtue but died a beggar of neglect.

    The news flashed his death December 7, and all over the social media and newspaper websites. Journalists did their duty. By the end of the day, only few personages had released any homages. Maybe there were closet tears, but he was no closet icon. Not even the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) mourned until the next day.

    Ajaero or Agbero was suited up in air-conditioned hallways in Dubai, sipping tea at COP28. Festus Osifo was in oblivion. Were they go doolally tap because he pleaded with both unions not to strike but give the Tinubu government “some time to rebuild the country?” Is it malice against the dead?

    They went on strike over a black eye for Ajaero’s partisan drivel. But their eyes did not moist over the death and apotheosis of a genuine hero not only of labour, but of democracy. Even politicians who are benefitting from his heroics heard of his death but they are dead from the neck up. A boo for them.

    This essayist had warned that we should not cry but care and not wait to care for his beloved as a late mea culpa. Maybe they are waiting for his obsequies since any statement now would be afterthought. The first prominent statement came from Delta State Governor Sheriff Oborevwori. In a taped statement before he died, Kokori gushed about his state governor. Kokori thanked him “for showing concern during his stay in the hospital. That he never knew Oborevwori was such a good man.” He said the governor “wasn’t close to him as some people.” The Delta State governor had picked up his bill and demonstrated empathy by paying him a visit. An applause for him.

    The presidency also appreciated him and a statement from President Bola Tinubu showed appreciation of the matador – my words – during the struggle to redeem this nation from the stranglehold of a military gangster – my words.

    But most of those who wrote tributes were not the top men of the society. It is sad indeed. Is it because he was an oil man? Or is it because he was a minority, an Urhobo man? Would he suffer like this if he was Igbo, Hausa-Fulani or Yoruba? If he were some other people, they would have whisked him early to Europe or the US. That might have saved his life even for another half a decade or even longer. Who knows? Not even the oil industry, the treasure of the economy, with its peacock wealth, rallied for him. Nor did his party come to his rescue when he was alive, not in the state or at the national level. Kudos to Femi Otedola, though, for the routine nobility of his charity for ailing. A clap for him.

    Kokori was betrayed in death as he was in life. But this betrayal, including his neglect in his dying days, was the second perfidy. The first happened when he was the scribe of the Nigerian Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas (NUPENG). He was in hiding in the days of Sani Abacha’s demoniac terrors. A goggled brute and impostor with his jackboot on the people’s mandate. Kokori was on the run so the hope of democracy could  not ruin. Somebody Kokori trusted, who had access to his phone number, drew him out of his shadows in Lagos. The junta fumed and feared Kokori. He had made the nation ungovernable for the Abacha street gang of soldiers. He crippled the country by mobilizing oil workers to down tools. To cripple the oil sector was to cripple the country. The man who did it was Kokori. Politicians could not cripple the country as he did. Only workers could. He held the gauntlet, gaunt as he looked. His life was on the line. Abacha’s gulag masters combed the country until they took hold of a man who could lure him out. At that time, Abacha had nabbed Enahoro. So, he was told that Kokori had to be the rallying point. He had to be secure. Aremo Segun Osoba, according to Kokori, had warned him to stay out of sight. Osoba was also taking care of Kokori’s family. Kokori acknowledged that and thanked him. In his memoirs, The Struggle for June 12, Kokori said one Fred Eno, who was Abiola’s aide, aided the SSS to his lair. He called Kokori to come out to obtain certain materials. Kokori obliged and disclosed his location. The goons nabbed him and wanted to throw him in the car. Failing that, they wanted to toss him in the boot. Failing that, they immobilized him with a spray and pushed him in the car. Biceps failed to conquer a scrawny soldier of the people. He said one of the goons uttered Urhobo to him and he ignored him. They had started pounding him until he warned that if they killed him the country would be “set ablaze.” That restrained them. It was then the so-called Urhobo man wafted the sultry car with his folksy air.

    Fred Eno has denied he called Kokori. It was not the age of AI and I wonder why Kokori could have responded if he did not recognise the voice and phone number of his fellow traveler in rebellion. That Kokori survived was a saving grace for Chief Osoba, who had been accused of selling him out. Kokori cleared the veteran journalist and former governor of Ogun State in his book. May our grace not die in the grave. If Kokori did not survive Abacha’s gulag, the wrong would have haunted his name forever. The Roman poet Horace wrote: “A word once let out of the cage cannot be whistled back again.” Osoba had the good fortune of reversing the word to its resting place.

     Kokori was small, but physique did not define him. His name made headlines in the stormy hour of June 12. They sought him everywhere the way they sought some of the titans of the day like Rewane, Soyinka, now President Tinubu, Enahoro, Kaltho, Ubani and some media defiants like Onanuga, Igiebor, Alex Kabba, et al. It was a testy moment. Rewane and Kaltho were slaughtered. It was a period of gallantry and death, treachery and opportunism, manoeuvres and ingenuity, scarcity and perfidy. The streets were empty, except when they bled with protests. Workers did not know when to go to work and when to stay at home. Some grew rich from disloyalty. Democracy turned into an enterprise. It was a quicksand for values. Sometimes it was not clear who was for the country and who wanted to profit. Some who claimed to be for the country fattened and exploited the hour for personal boon. We saw open defections and stealth loyalty. The defections smelled like public defecation. The dark was shelter for imposture. Light was blinding.

    People were getting medals of praise for serving self. In the name of buoying democracy, they were buying sellouts. It is like the soldier in Hemmingway’s novel Farewell to Arms who gets a medal of honour for doing nothing. Same we see in Tolstoy’s opus War and Peace when Prince Andre feels out of sorts for being bemedalled for reporting a phony victory to the emperor. He wants to go back to war in order to deserve the honour even as Napoleon is storming towards the city. In our case, many did not deserve it but feigned applause in fables of heroics. They told their own lies to lie gloriously in their sty.

    The true hero was Kokori; no one more so than he. In the history of labour struggles, I don’t know of a better hero. Not even Imoudu, the eponym of Nigerian labour, grazed death like Kokori. No knock on the patriarch who had brushes with colonial powers, like his deportation from Lagos for years. But his life was not in peril like Imoudu. Not even Zik when he proclaimed Gerald Whitley sought after his life and said, “I go to the bush whence I came. But if it is the will of providence that I should die by the bullet of a European assassin, I go with divine confidence and spiritual satisfaction that I have served mother Africa to the extent of my physical ability.” It was all bluster. No one wanted a hair of Zik’s head. Kokori was under real threat. He ranks like anyone in making democracy what it is today. He died from devastation to his health when the despots took him. He deserves a national monument. It is true, as Senegalese writer David Diop writes in his enthralling new novel about slavery, “the historical monuments of the Senegalese people can be found in their stories…” Yet, physical monuments in form of buildings, streets names, et al, are snapshot tributes for the unwary.

    He went into the gulag a thin man. He came out a gaunt man. He did not lose his guts. He was a tiny dynamo. When Sigmund Freud died, poet W.H. Auden wrote he was “no more a person but a whole climate of opinion.” Kokori was a climate of the struggle.

    He lived a courage, and died one. He himself said he was born so and would die so. In the words of Dylan Thomas, he did not “go gentle into that good night.” He fought to die on his birthday, just as Churchill on his father’s birthday. He is like the elegy of Poet Mayakovski for the Russian legend Vladimir Lenin: “We ‘re burying the earthliest of beings that ever came /to play an earthly part / Earthly, yes; but not the earth-bound kind /who’ll never peer beyond the precincts of their sty. /He took in all the planet at a time, /saw things out of reach for the common eye.”

    Kokori has gone, and he surrendered his flesh and blood. But he left us his spirit.

  • First Hausa Bishop

    First Hausa Bishop

    Over the years, some have wondered at the semiotics of his name, especially in the course of ten years when he taught at the Catholic Institute of West Africa (CIWA) in Port Harcourt. Mamman Musa is not supposed to evangelise Christ, administer sacraments or applaud the virtues of the Holy Bible.

    It did not matter that his first name is Gerald. He is Hausa and close to 99 percent of them are Muslims. How come he turned out a Christian? Not only that, a priest. Not only that, a cleric with an elite profile, who thrived in the Lord’s vineyard for decades inside Hausaland, survived scorns, shunned alienation, parried persecution even. On December 12, he will make history as the first Hausa man to become a bishop of the Catholic Church not in Lagos or Abia, where he once taught, but in Katsina in  Hausaland. The investiture will not just be about renaming a place or person, but a revolution of identity. Like the novel, A New Name, by Jon Fosse who just won the Nobel Prize. Just as Fosse with his writings is Catholic, so is Bishop Musa.

    He is 52, which is young in episcopal years. So, he could be a cardinal with a chance not only to select the pontiff but to become one. Monsignor Musa – that is how is addressed now. He is not a bishop yet, but a bishop-elect until the solemnity of his elevation.

    The Katsina Diocese is excised from the Sokoto Diocese under the beloved Bishop Matthew Kukah, who broke the news to me casually during a phone dialogue.

    “Do you see yourself as a Hausa Bishop?” I asked with some mischief.

    “I see myself as a Catholic bishop who has a Hausa background,” he replies, and peps it with a sardonic line. “If I call myself an Igbo priest, or Yoruba priest or Hausa priest, they may mistake me for a traditional Hausa priest,” he adds.

    Yet he admits the historic hue of his new posting. “It comes with privilege and corresponding responsibility,” he says with sobriety.

     How did he become a priest, or, more poignantly, a Christian? No one proselitised him into the faith. That lot fell on his grandparents when missionaries known as the Society of Missionaries of Africa (SMA) landed northern Nigeria in 1934 in Gobirawa in Argungu district of today’s Kebbi State. Argungu, famous for its hefty fishes and festival, was a spiritual stream for fishers of men. His grandfather was a catch, and his parents inherited the dragnet.

    They were minorities in faith. His father, a Hausa man, was named Emmanuel Musa and fell under the arms of the white missionaries after his parents died and he dropped out of school. “The missionaries brought him back to school and he became a Catholic and a teacher.”

    Emmanuel Musa became not only literate, he turned torchbearer. He translated the Bible from English to Hausa as well as books of Christian doctrines like the Africa Our Way series by Michael McGrath and Nicole Gregoire. His father who worked in government ministry suffered alienation for his belief. It was a hostile atmosphere for a Christian, said the Bishop. Some routine privileges were out of reach. “No one would give you his daughter to marry,” he noted. Emmanuel was denied promotion in the government ministry if he did not become Muslim. He rebuffed the blackmails. His mother, Christiana Asabe, a nurse, hailed from Shendam in today’s Plateau State, and she descends from a family of converts as well.

    The family moved over to Malumfashi in today’s Katsina state. It was there Gerald Mamman Musa grew. He was surrounded with seminarians, was immersed in church activity and fell in love with it. He even was an altar server and presided at mass. In primary two, Rev. Father Lawrence Agu impressed him with the beauty of Catholic mystique in his devotion and zest.

    But he attended a public primary school – Tunau Primary School – with over 90 percent Muslims. However, he did not suffer any alienation then. He still has robust friendship with his classmates today, some of them in prominent positions in the state. They bond on a WhatsApp platform. He says that in Malumfashi, Christians enjoyed an atmosphere of religious toleration even if some Muslim clerics stoked fanatic odium for the other faith.

    Read Also: FG budget N200 billion for military operation, poverty reduction

    He attended St. Joseph Minor Seminary in Zaria, St. Thomas Aquinas Major Seminary in Makurdi and St Augustine major Seminary in Jos. He earned his master’s degree from the Pontifical Gregorian University and a doctorate from the School of Journalism and Communication of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia. He is also a professor as director of the Centre for Studies of African Culture and Communications at the CIWA, Port Harcourt.

    Has anyone called him maguzawa? It’s a slur and it means a runaway, a term of contempt for Christians in the north. “Yes,” he says. “I trace the origin to those who care to listen. I tell them Muslims were once not Muslims.” The north did not embrace Islam until the 1804 Jihad, and even then, it was a faith of the official majority only. After a while, many who did not embrace Islam had to flee places like Kano and Katsina further south like today’s Abuja and Nasarawa State where their faiths did not stir resentment. Bishop Musa says, bamaguje is the term for men and bamaguza for female. “I often say, everybody is a bamaguje.”

    But he says he has not suffered much persecution. He said he has suffered alienation but “not always persecution.”  As a person who attended Catholic institutions and rose amidst seminarians and had shunned secular work, his calling might have cocooned him in a bubble. He admits that pressure forces some Christians to change their names and others to renounce their faith. I recall as a teacher at the Aminu Kano College in Kano, I was stunned that most of the students bore northern names but were from the south and Christian.

    Was that why he followed the clerical path? He admits it could make a person make “such unconscious decision.” But he believes it is not the case with him, otherwise he would not thrive or find joy in his calling. His favorite books are The Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire, Franz Fanon’s The Wretched of the Earth for nonfiction. For fiction, he hauls Victor Hugo’s Le Miserable. They all emphasise the suffering of the masses. He said that is where his soul is. It translates to music as well. He thrills to the revolutionary pathos of Bob Marley’s Redemption Songs, War and Exodus.

    Is he keen on liberation theology? Yes indeed, quoting its founder Gustavo Guitierrez, the Peruvian priest and philosopher. Musa says the poor must be central to his work, invoking the 19th century Swiss theologian who said, “take your Bible and take your newspaper and read both. But interpret the newspaper from the Bible.” I added that today, he would interface the Bible and social media. Musa defers his views on the feudal north. That is not for now, he restrains himself.

    On the last election, he condemned the abuse of religion, although he said faith was deployed as a cloak over ethnicism. “The religious component was just a façade,” he noted, although I disagree. It was as potent. He said, though, that “some religious leaders were bought over.” He insisted that religious leaders should never take sides. On the Pentecostals, he said there was good and bad sides to any brand of faith. The Pentecostals, he lamented, have privileged prosperity over holiness, personality cult over Christ. “Some have pushed it beyond limit.”

    He describes Bishop Kukah as a role model, committed to his faith and his episcopal vocation. “We have not seen a cleric of that influence in this society,” he extols, adding he is shorn of ethnic or religious prejudices. On Mbaka, he is less charitable. He said a cleric should “stand at the intersection without taking sides. He has not done that. Sometimes the temptation is to take sides.” He quotes Aristotle that the “virtue is in the middle.” He his not the only Hausa cleric. They have a platform of about 36 priests of varying ranks.

    Will he be vocal? Yes, but he will be guided by wisdom that restrains. “You have to know when to speak and when to be silent,” tilting “the strength of silence against the dictatorship of noise.”

  • A Sheriff of restraint

    A Sheriff of restraint

    The budgetary tradition in this country is to spend more than the previous year. It is a manic ritual of the spendthrift. If I spent ten naira last year, I should spend fifteen or fifty this year. The excuses are predictable. Inflation, population growth, expanding communities and demands and, of course, ambitious projects. While inflation is one major cause, we might conclude that budgets create double jeopardy. We increase budgets to match inflation, inflation soars to match budget. The other one is ambitious projects. Ego and fraud sometimes meet there on balance sheets. It is therefore a cheer that someone has bucked the trend.

    Delta State Governor Sheriff Oborevwori has rolled out a budget less than last year’s by as much N94.9 billion, 12 percent drop from 2023. Last year’s budget was N809.4 billion while this year’s is 714.4. This is in spite of the mammoth infrastructure project for Warri whose groundbreaking took place last week as the first ever contract the state government has had with the German bulwark, Julius Berger. The budget assigns N150 billion for road infrastructure, Warri being one of such ambitious works. The Sheriff is policing the money. This column has looked at it a few weeks ago. It is cheering to see a promise and work go into action in short order. I will monitor it. Warri is the city of my birth and childhood. I still recall my walks through rain and heat from St. Andrews Primary School to our Okumagba Layout abode. But the Warri I saw recently is a city in distress, crying for a lift and the mercy of modernity. A city shouldered by oil wealth but smolders in neglect. Not Warri alone in the state. Happily, work is on as one travels from Warri to Asaba as contractors like Levante and the Chinese firms are turning potholes and craters into express.

    Read Also: Igboho to security agencies: step up efforts against killer herders

    Let Warri rise. Governor Oborewvori has a Warri State of mind. He, as a private citizen, built its Osubi Airport in the military era.  Other cities will follow suit. Asaba has enjoyed much. It should not be abandoned but Warri and environs should shout, emilokan!

  • Prodigal father

    Prodigal father

    Atiku Abubakar’s plea to foment an opposition is like an old man who just woke up to realise he had children. A macho model who should have known he was a model macho. He is also like the fisherman in Jesus’ miracle who spent all day on the wrong end of the river. Although at the end, the fellow had a mammoth harvest, Atiku is the pathetic character in Hemmingway’s novel The Old Man and Sea whose tumbles on high waves only brought home a fish skeleton.

    The Adamawa chieftain is trying to rally the brood home to roost after the doom. Atiku’s chronicle in 2023 is the big, fat prodigal in Nigeria’s electoral history. He saw a blessing but embraced a curse. To borrow from Achebe’s A Man of The People, a sweet morsel was thrust in his mouth but he spat it out.

    Why did he not do this in 2022? His PDP did not need a coalition. It was a proteus, a behemoth as big as the APC. It had only to pluck victory like a plum.

    Labour Party was not in the equation until Peter Obi, or Pitobi as some call him out of worship or scorn. This man was his deputy not long ago, and his party had a big haul of the southeast and south-south. If it was Kano, the man Kwankwanso was with him until he was against him. Ganduje was a part of a tripod, while the other two parts were within PDP’s grasp. He let it go by clutching Ibrahim Shekarau’s apron strings. Within PDP’s rump, another trio of Wike, Ortom and Makinde formed another splinter with two southeast governors in their shadow. Rather than make peace, Atiku sacrificed them on Ayu’s altar.

    Now, he wants them all back. If they come, will they be legitimate children? We know of the story of the prodigal son, but who was prodigal here? Was it not Atiku, who overturned a bible story? Is he not the prodigal who laid waste a boon?

    Read Also; PHOTOS: Gov Sanwo-Olu hosts Oba Of Benin in Lagos

    The story of illegitimate sons also has a northern part. His name is Bayajidda, the eponymous ancestor of the Hausa. His seed gave the north Hausa Bakwai and Banza Bakwai, that is legitimate and illegitimate sons. Even if Bayajidda returns today, will he recognise the cities of his seed, including Kano, Daura and Katsina? Uthman Dan Fodio transformed the cities after his own faith. They worship a different God, wed differently, profit differently and diet on new meals. When Jesus was on earth, he asked, when the son of man cometh, shall he find faith among men? If the parts return, shall they find faith in Atiku?

    Is it the case of the prodigal son or prodigal father? Indeed, Wike called him prodigal father during the campaigns. But he never anticipated father Atiku would be begging his sons for pardon after he ran riot with all his blessings. He is under the spell of half of Bayajidda’s ghost. The man had seven legitimate and seven illegitimate sons. All Atiku sons are now illegitimate. Or is it Atiku that is illegitimate for being a prodigal father?

    Atiku is too proud to beg. With his billionaire carriage, a patrician air and ramrod stare, he would make his call for a reinvigorated opposition look like a novel and inspired idea. He will not descend to the other parties. He will condescend. That’s what patricians do. But they would all know he is a mendicant at the table, a Lazarus with an ulcerous sore waiting to join the dinner with his disaffected sons. Obi thinks himself a movement. Kwankwaso feels too hurt to bow even as the Supreme Court looms with a verdict. Wike is a lost cause for him.

    Atiku may deceive himself as a magnanimous man. Aristotle uses that phrase for morally lofty personages. The Greek philosopher means it in a noble sense, although his sense of magnanimous is akin to Plato who thinks such a being must be above the crowd. But Aristotle’s definition does not fit Atiku because Atiku lacks the cultivation and depth that the philosopher extols.

    As Babatunde Fashola (SAN) noted during the hustings, Atiku and his PDP miscalculated. Their math was of subtraction, when the foe was making additions. Even those loud whispers did not coo PDP’s ears. He had Okowa as deputy and believed he would draw the Igbo vote. He was so naïve about the politics of the Igbo in Delta State. They leaned on their Anambra son. Okowa was not Igbo enough. Or he was Igbo lite.

    He is like the father in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s novel, The Brothers Karamazov, who presides over a dysfunctional family. Here is how the author describes him. “A profligate and vicious father, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, mocks everything noble and engages in unseemly buffoonery at every opportunity. When his sons were infants, he neglected them not out of malice but simply because he “forgot” them.” Sounds familiar!

    It must be his strategy to throw a bait. After certificate and drug fiascoes in Chicago and Supreme Court, his new song is one-party state. His followers are biting. They believe that we are heading there. Was he not part of the party that boasted they would govern for 60 years. They did not even make the next six. What did they mean by totalitarian? Do they know the definition of the word? It is the sort of liberty with precepts that George Orwell skewers in his Politics and the English Language. Today, we use fascism, Bonapartism, tyranny at will, just to demonise.

    How many states did APC get before the elections? How many do they have now? Is it because of Plateau? This essayist warned both on TVC and on this page of the danger awaiting the PDP because of the duels of generals. Both Jonah Jang and Jerry Useni split their party like army divisions and went to war while APC watched gloatingly. Now, the harvest comes and they are wailing dictatorship. In Kano, the claim that 165k votes were annulled is stunning on the surface. But an invalid vote is an invalid vote. If it is not signed, how can you validate it? If it is upheld as valid, an open-ended definition of valid votes will result.  It can get absurd like the Ondo State of the Agagu era when the pictures of Mike Tyson and even yours truly were counted as valid votes until they were exposed in court. Pray, where were the eyes of NNPP and PDP agents? Why did NNPP votes suffer this misadventure. I leave the issue of clerical error to the Supreme Court. Democracy is nothing without rules. That is what separates it from anarchy. Or mob rule.

  • Soyinka, Pyrates and a new play

    Soyinka, Pyrates and a new play

    I attended the event to see Wole Soyinka’s new play, Wheels of Justice, but it turned out to be part of the anniversary of the Pyrate Confraternity, also known as the Seadogs. Soyinka joined via zoom from the UAE where he performs his new tour as teacher and writer. He baffles even at 89 with his fecundity. He tackled questions before the play animated the stage. The organisers ambushed me to propound a question, but someone else asked an intriguing question afterwards about the image of the group. The questioner did not vocalise it but, at the background of the query, was an incident during the election campaigns. Some young men, decked in black, emoted a song of verbal extremism about the extremities of the then APC candidate, now president. Soyinka had condemned that delinquent theatre.

    He did not refer to it at this event but he said the Pyrates had a robust process of dealing with bad eggs among them. I wonder if those involved in that campaign act were punished? I asked him to interrogate the notion that a play is eternal and a novel frozen. Stage production improves a drama. The novel, once published, is finished. I thought it was too blanket a statement. A play can be changed by a director even a year or 10 years later. By the same token, the novel’s own changes can happen not on stage but in the imagination. The reader continues to recast and even distort a novel. I referred to his novel The Interpreters that can enjoy interpretations even a century later. Dan Brown’s Dan Vinci Code is written as fiction but read by many as non-fiction.

    Read Also: Bianca carpets Igbo leaders for abandoning Ojukwu’s legacies

    I think Soyinka’s response stuck to the playwright’s advantage in tinkering with his work. I would have wanted to even add that, though rare, novelists have had to change parts of their published novels. Femi Macaulay reminded me of Achebe’s Arrow of God. I also rewrote my Crocodile Girl. Sometimes editors revise aspects of the work. For instance, Mark Twain’s Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has undergone some changes to defrock it of racist tropes. The n-word was expunged in some editions. But Soyinka the bard, as always, did well to raise questions about the literary arts, his forte.

    The play, directed with flair by Tunde Awosanmi, traces the origins of the Pyrates as a counter-culture phenom. Striking was the dynamic between the starry-eyed Soyinka as a student and today’s Soyinka the star. It is a bit surreal but the production shies from mirroring some chasm between old and young. Both idealisms remain, the old Soyinka not changed from the young. It is a flawed bildungsroman. It’s Soyinka’s play in which Soyinka is a character, like Tennessee Williams in Glass Menagerie. But the play thrives hilariously as it tracks the birth of the Pyrates with Nigeria’s history up till today, its political trappings, turbulence, chicanery and the class, tribal and religious follies. The play is a pageant of songs, dances and costume, bringing lots of laughs and grimaces, the highlight being castrated justice where a Fayose character with a neck brace appears on a hospital bed wheeled into the courtroom to show why his case cannot be held. It becomes a metaphor for capsized justice in our history. The play is perhaps one of the subtle projects in burnishing a group feared by quite a few Nigerians as a malevolent cult. But here Soyinka makes it a critic of a decadent society.

  • The agbero way

    The agbero way

    Let us not quibble about this. Joe Ajaero had a black eye from some roughnecks. That was despicable. Why should a labour leader be dragged out like a shoplifter and tossed away to some unknown hovel and beaten black and blue? It is not the path of civilization. It is the register of the brute.

    But wait a minute, is that why Joe Ajaero and his labour group should give the nation a black eye, too? Is that not Agbero syndrome, a revenge on the street? Is this activism in pursuit of personal vendetta?

    What we are witnessing is not labour activism but the hijacking of a noble idea. It is no nod to the greats, the rebellious majesty of Imoudu or the trenchant sublimity of Sunmonu.  It is hysteria as protest and protest as radioactive force. Ajaero has seen the vehicle of protest, especially the deployment of strikes and national shutdown, as a tool and cudgel. He believes if he is angry, he calls for a strike. If he does not like the face of the president, he invokes a shutdown. Strikes have become his propeller, a motor for relevance.

    Does he know the value of a shutdown? Does he know that once a nation goes on strike, it is  like a human body in coma? The nation literally stops breathing. No light, no water, no jobs, no profit. A nation in paralysis.

    That means labour growls because the economy is not working. The strike means the economy is not working. It is fighting poverty with poverty. It is a sterility that Ajaero’s agbero style gives fuel. But the use of strikes signals an end of the imagination for labour. It shows they have no other way of thinking. It is the aggressor’s consolation and avenue.

    But this is because strikes have no consequence. If workers know that when they strike, they lose pay because no work means no profit, they will rethink. Recently, the autoworkers in the United States paralysed industry with a protracted strike. It was a coalition of the injured. But they were prepared to lose pay. They saw it as a risk, and they did not lose in the end because they got much of what they wanted. Strike is an investment, not a harvest.

    Strikes here have no regard for consequences. It is just a way to browbeat the government. We must see strikes as a mutual risk between government and workers. Or else such persons as Ajaero will happen to us. He is already happening.

    He turned labour into a grievance parlour. If you grieve Joe, you offend labour, and labour fumes and jousts. It is not about labour. It is not about fuel subsidy, or worker’s pay, or about lifestyles in decline. It is about a personality cult. He wants to turn himself into a godfather of labour. He has succeeded in corralling Festus Osifo. The TUC guy started with a nuanced and methodical approach. They have somehow convinced him that he should stop acting like a weakling. It is the way the bully convinces the nice guy to punch a friend in the jaw.

    Recently Osifo made a point we must not allow slip. He asserted that labour did not need to follow the court order over strike. Their reason? The government does not follow the rule of law. This government is too young to make that claim. It has not done so yet. So, Osifo and his associates are probably referring to the Buhari government. That man had quite a few instances of defying the rule of law and court order.

    But do we answer impunity with impunity? Is labour trying to canonize lawlessness. Is its agenda anarchy? If that were the case, is Ajaero not justifying the rough arm that gave him a black eye? What happened to Ajaero is the sort of thing that happens when there is no law, when arbitrary muscle-flexing takes charge over commonsense and law. This same group believe when it flouts the law it is right. When others do, it is wrong. Is that not the autocrat’s logic? I believe Labour wanted to dare the federal government to arrest them, and torpedo the government on charges of fascism. But the administration did not bite. Is it not the path of honour to challenge the matter in court. Agberos like Agbaero know no other way.

    Read Also: Ajaero in the eye of storm

    In the Buhari era, the most famous act of defiance of the rule of law happened earlier this year over new currency notes. The Buhari government turned its back against the Supreme Court ruling to revert to the old notes. Labour did not go on strike over it. We did not see Ajaero in his offbeat attire and look of morose distress on the streets. No fascination with a shutdown then. The reason was obvious. The labour movement that endorsed Peter Obi saw the crisis as APC shooting itself in the foot. It was a campaign suicide for its candidate. They gloated in secret while workers groaned and moaned. But labour’s voice was a low murmur in those days. The huge uproar came from the APC candidate, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, when he yelled that it was targeted at him. Even that crisis against the worker galvanized the workers against the candidate. It was the intervening voice of former Kaduna State governor El-Rufai that gave credibility to his accusation. Meanwhile, Obi and Abubakar Atiku did not hide their quiet enjoyment while the APC candidate stormed the airwaves with his frustration.

    So, why is Labour in arms now with strikes after strikes? We can find this in what I call the Imo formula. When Ajaero went to Imo, he did not present himself as a labour man, but a front man for Peter Obi’s party. That, I believe, is why someone changed the architecture of his face. I don’t support the bully’s sense of aesthetics. Joe’s face is good enough as God made it. I hope the doctors help restore it.

    But Ajaero only showed his strikes have been more politics than labour angst. He is angrier against the government than he loves the workers of this country. He is standing on the innocence of the worker to push a political party’s agenda.

    Hence Osifo exercised the effrontery to say that labour is above the law. It is a dangerous trend. This set of labour leaders have been accused of ethnicising protest. The word is out there that its leadership is ethnically skewed, and that accounts for its hypocritical belligerence. That is a matter for the entire labour spectrum to look at. They voted them into office, and if they are not satisfied with their conduct, they have to respond. So far, that demographic is mute on that matter for most part. But time shall tell. What is clear is that labour seems beholden to the party that bears its name.

  • Plateau matter again

    Plateau matter again

    When Simon Lalong was away in Europe for a Labour Conference as labour minister, the Appeal Court ruled in his favour as senator. Now, the same court has ousted Governor Mutfwang in favour of Nentawe Yilwatda as Plateau State governor. It was a matter that I foreshadowed on the TVC Breakfast show during the hustings, and the matter was simple. Did the PDP conduct a valid primary? Both sides dueled on the Breakfast show with bile and arguments.

    Read Also: Court verdict: Police warn against disruption of peace in Plateau

    This matter resembles Zamfara State where APC governorship  candidate lost his seat. The Appeal Court said this is not a pre-election matter but a post-election, especially since Governor Mutfwang did not emerge from a valid primary. The matter was in court and the party did not comply. It shows that primaries have consequences. But the matter is not over. The Supreme Court still has the final say.

  • Nwabueze and History

    Nwabueze and History

    Professor Ben Nwabueze was ready to speak even if age forced him to waddle as he walked. In his Isolo, Lagos  residence, one question boiled my innards as the TV camera lights defined his face. Why did he say his meeting with Nnamdi Kanu was the best day of his life? The man was livid. “I never said that,” he rebutted, his slow voice rippling with righteous indignation. He had never even met him. He did not even know the news strafed the internet. It turned to be a social media fiction, and I was glad to clear that.

    But as the scholar passed on, he brings to mind personages who have mixed legacies and who, in their twilight years, strive to go gentle into that good night. The interview, probably the last major one he conducted before passing, revealed an Nwabueze, who was not only federalist but a nationalist.

    Read Also: Nwabueze and his many crusades

    Yet, at the background was a man who enabled autocracy with law and rhetoric. He served them with his blood, sweat and never shed a tear. He was a rarefied salesman for tyranny. It was a black eye to a scholar’s integrity. He was front and centre though in lashing out at the impunity of this republic, especially when Obasanjo pursued his rash of impeachments. He wrote with insight and venom against them, especially the ones that defenestrated governors in Plateau, Bayelsa and Ekiti, and brought the rigour of a public intellectual to illuminate that rage.

    In my interview, he backed Amotekun, and he spoke that word with peculiar relish as a man who spoke another language. He also asked other regions to follow the West’s shining example. If the lord were to judge his politics, he might be judged a worthy man. But historians are not God. They view all and put everything on a scale, often partial, and by no means definitive. But history is always the last judge. It, however, is not like the Supreme Court. It has not one verdict. For me, he did his part and he left a better man than he started.