Category: Columnists

  • Tunde Ponnle: From classroom to boardroom (1939-2025)

    Tunde Ponnle: From classroom to boardroom (1939-2025)

    Although I had read about him online in Nigerian newspapers, Prince Michael Ayantunde Ponnle was already far along in his journey into stardom before I ever met him. That was fifteen years ago or so, when we met at his pioneering MicCom Golf Course in Ada, Osun state. I was introduced to him by Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola, then Governor of Osun state, who had invited me from the United States, to participate in a conference on Yoruba culture, which he had organised. I was among the guests lodged in the MicCom Golf Hotels and Conference Resort on that occasion. It was only more recently that we truly became friends. That friendship was solidified by a common friend, Bode Adediji of Bode Adediji Partnership, also from Ada, and by Prince Ponle’s marriage to the former Deputy Governor of Osun state, Mrs. Titi Laoye-Ponnle, whom I had known for quite some time.  

    His was a star-studded life, but it did not start that way. His parents were so poor they could not afford to send him to a secondary school. Instead, he went to a Teacher Training College to become a classroom teacher. However, when be could no longer tolerate his secondary school friends’ taunts about science, he enrolled in a correspondence programme to learn science. That was his steppingstone to admission to the Polytechnic of North London to study electrical engineering.

    Upon return to Nigeria, he was hired by the Ministry of Education from where he resigned to establish his own company. That was the beginning of the famous MicCom Wires and Cables Company. Like his humble educational beginnings, the take-off of the company was rough. It started out as a contracting company but graduated into a full-fledged manufacturing company since 1978. The foundational capital was £25,000 with which Prince Ponnle went to India to buy three cable-making machines. These would be complemented with other machines to produce various types of completed wires and cables, from household electrical wires to armoured and non-armoured cables.

    About 20 years after establishing the cable manufacturing company, Prince Ponnle was introduced to golf, and he fell in love with the game (some see it as a sport) as he did with science. In no time, the MicCom Golf Hotels and Resorts was established in Ada, his home state of Osun as both a tourist and leisure destination to serve private individuals, groups, corporate and military executives, and government institutions.

    Read Also: New tax laws take off January 1, 2026, Tinubu insists

    He also diversified into real estate. I once intervened in a property he wanted to sell to a Chinese company. My intervention was motivated by the proximity of the property to government establishment. I negotiated with the government to purchase the property. Prince Ponnle agreed, although at a reduced price and staggered payment terms. Yet, my friend was still grateful for sensitizing him to the security implication of selling the property to the Chinese. He would later send an intermediary to me to find out how much cut I would take. My response was prompt and clear: “Nothing. I did it as a friend of both government and seller. Any cut would damage the friendship with both parties.” It was later revealed that a government official had earlier intervened, asking the government to purchase the property at a higher price than I negotiated. The fellow had asked the seller for a N10 million cut!

     All along, Prince Ponnle had always set funds aside for philanthropy, leading to the establishment of the MicCom Foundation for Educational Development. The Foundation has provided scholarships for secondary and higher education and research grants for university teachers. He was appalled by the deplorable state of university education in Nigeria, when he served as a member of the Governing Council of Osun State University, Osogbo. He also sponsored an annual lecture series, The Prince Tunde Ponnle Lecture, given around convocation period at the Osun State University.

    Prince Ponle also invested in healthcare by establishing the MicCom Cancer Foundation through which Nigerians were alerted to the need for regular health checks for early detection of killer diseases, such as cancer. He was a pillar in the fight against the coronavirus epidemic in Osun state through the donation of money and time. He served on a state committee to develop a strategy for fighting the pandemic in the state.

    In the course of his business activities for about 50 years, Prince Ponnle created jobs for thousands and wealth for millions. He provided educational support, assisted the sick, and nurtured industries. His services to individuals, groups, communities, state, and nation did not go unnoticed. His business acumen, strategic foresight, and leadership skills attracted him to corporate boards. One of them was Lafarge, formerly West African Portland Cement, of which he was once Chairman.

    Three qualities stand out about Prince Ponnle. First, he had the qualities of a pioneer, which include vision, resilience, resourcefulness, and courage. In pursuing new ventures, pioneers are willing to take risks, even in the face of difficulties and initial failure, because they are visionary enough to see far into the future. The traits of a pioneer trailed Prince Ponnle throughout his life—from valuing science early and picking it up through correspondence tuition; from starting out as a teacher to becoming an engineer; from working as a contractor to turning around as a manufacturer; and from being taught how to play golf to establishing a multimillion-dollar golf course.

    Second, he was as meek and gentle as they come. The milk of human kindness was in his makeup. His philanthropic ventures sprang from this quality.

    Finally, lest he be accused of sudden death, Prince Ponnle was careful about taking care of himself. He had been overseas at least twice this year, each time looking after his health as many people in his age bracket do. He had just returned from England, when he was called to eternal rest. He will forever be remembered for his enduring legacies.

    My heart goes to his wife, Mrs. Titi Laoye-Ponnle, the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. May his soul rest in peace.

  • Makinde and PDP warriors of democracy

    Makinde and PDP warriors of democracy

    A latent war of attrition among PDP factional leader started with the pulling out of the late Bola Ige/Olu Falae group on the eve of the party’s registration in 1988. It did not become covert until the party’s takeover by retired Generals and their contractor fronts. Victory in the 1999 election and greed over sharing of spoils of victory only brought in more acrimony. Resentment among factional leaders at this point was tagged “family quarrel” because there was more than enough to go round. But by 2015, PDP had fought itself out of power. For a group driven by greed, that there might be nothing to share until probably after 2031 is the source of today’s bitterness and factional leaders’ resolve to fight to the bitter end.

    Much as PDP anti-democratic fortune-seekers might wish to change the narrative, I am not sure Nigerians are deceived by the claim that the current renewed war of attrition is a patriotic attempt to protect democracy, or prevent President Tinubu from turning the country to a one-party state.

    Is it not an irony that those who in 1993 buried democracy, promoted an unconstitutional Interim National Government, became beneficiary of sacrifices of NADECO, Civil Society Groups, journalists and other unsung Nigerians killed by Abacha soldiers, and then danced on the grave of MKO Abiola for 16 years without acknowledging his supreme sacrifice, now say they are soldiers of democracy? 

    It cannot get any more sardonic than the claim that President Tinubu, the arrow head of opposition to  dictatorship and the only man left standing during Obasanjo  2003 “mainstreaming” crusade that led to PDP’s ‘land slide and sea slide victory in opposition strongholds’ (apology to Walter Ofonagoro) is today considered a threat to democracy?

    There is no doubt Nigerians are worried about survival of democracy. How about the ongoing deliberate attempt by anti-democratic elements like Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi, Rotimi Amaechi and others now in ADC, (Obasnajo’s special vehicle for disgruntled politicians) with history of moving from party to party at every election season in search of platform to mislead our youths below 30 years of age? This concern is perhaps what informed Nigerians who know that democracy thrives better under a multi-party system, to counsel PDP factional leaders on the virtue of negotiation which is an invaluable democratic ethos, instead of acquiring new war arsenals.

    Concerned Nigerians had also expected the warring factions to have been sobered by INEC’s declaration of the controversial Ibadan Convention null and void, and the forced dislodgement of warring factional leaders and their thugs by the police from their Abuja Wadata Plaza headquarters which for a period became a battle field. However, with last Wednesday’s Wike-backed NWC announced dissolution of the party’s state executives in some states and the inauguration  of a 19-member state caretaker committee, it is not difficult to conclude that neither survival of PDP nor democracy matter to Wike’s group or his opponents who are also digging in.

    For instance, instead of Seyi Makinde, the newly appointed war leader seeking way to put his house in order after the Ibadan fiasco, he is trying to find a scape goat in President Tinubu. And without the courage to confront PDP demon, Kabiru Turaki, the Ibadan elected faction leader is seeking outside help to truncate two and half years old Tinubu’s administration. Nigerians can still hear the roaring ring of his desperate plea “I want to call on President Trump, what is at stake is not just genocide against Nigerian Christians, he should come and save democracy in Nigeria”. Turaki can be excused because a drowning man will hold to any straw.

    But he has probably not heard about a Yoruba axiom that admonishes us to first study the apparel a man that promises us a new dress adorns. In his desperation, Turaki forgets that Trump was the first American President in 200 years to be impeached twice for sponsoring an attack on the Congress, the symbol of American democracy in a failed attempt to overturn an election he lost and a leader that has assaulted all democratic institutions since his re-election.

    But much as we all want PDP to survive because democracy thrives better under multi-party system, the challenge is whether a party that has always been haunted by crisis of internal democracy can offer what it has not got. It is on record that Obasanjo was imposed by retired generals and northern ruling class as Yoruba candidate and eventually president in 1999. And as a leader who was roundly rejected by his Yoruba people even in his own polling booth, by becoming a president without a base, it can be said he literarily climbed the palm tree from the top.

    And in power, Obasanjo who has always been a victim of messianic complex, publicly declared he was not obliged to listen  to appointed advisers insisting he would rather listen “to the voice of God’. But deeply religious Nigerians agreed that it was the voice of someone else other than God that drove Obasanjo and Maurice Iwu to conduct the most scandalous elections in Nigeria in 2003 and 2007. In the 2003, the judiciary had to retrieve stolen mandates of governors of Edo, Ondo, Ekiti and Osun from Obasanjo. In  2007, Umaru Yar’Adua the declared winner, was so scandalised by the extent of rigging that he set up the Justice Uwai’s commission to prevent a repeat of what happened under Obasanjo.

    Besides Obasanjo, all PDP political actors are tarred with the same brush of anti-democrats. There were the 16 PDP governors who resorted to self-help after losing the Governors’ Forum election to Rotimi Amaechi; there was PDP gang of seven including Atiku Abubakar, Alhaji Baraje, Bukola Saraki and some governors that traded PDP for APC in 2015. In 2023,  Atiku Abubarkar, Kwankwaso,and  Peter Obi, out of greed, splintered PDP into three on the eve of an election, while Wike like his fellow sore losers, led his ‘integrity group ‘of five governors to Tinubu’s camp to spite Atiku.

    But beyond actors, PDP itself is never a political party. The distinguishing characteristic of any political party is a consensus of members on identified values and principles.  PDP and its factional leaders hardly agree on anything. PDP’s illegal sharing of our nation’s resources is often accompanied with acrimony. It was through their endless war of attrition that we knew about the mismanagement of the privatization programme under Atiku and El Rufai. Bukola Saraki was the whistle-blower in the fuel subsidy scam. Yar Adua and other PDP members told us Obasanjo spent between $10 and $13b on the energy sector that only brought darkness. It was from Chukwuma Soludo and Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala the nation got to know the level of debauchery by PDP leaders under Jonathan presidency. The above facts confirmed the claim by many including former US envoy to Nigeria, that PDP is not a political party but an elite group that came together for the sharing of power and proceeds of oil.

    Read Also: Hakeem Shitta: Why Nigeria must cherish, preserve arts, cultural history — Curator

    But if Nigerians want to know the true colour of PDP and its ignoble leaders, all they need to do is sieve what Seyi Makinde, the new war commander of “PDP warriors of democracy” claimed to have discussed with the president from other aspects he did not disclose.

    But first two quick anecdotes: Wike once told us long before the mass defection of PDP members to APC started that some governors who criticise President Tinubu openly often pay nocturnal visits to seek private favours. Makinde said he went to see the president in respect of expansion of Ibadan Airport. As a member of Council of State, he did not need Wike to see the president if expansion of Ibadan airport was the only agenda.

     Makinde, like his fellow politicians is probably a man of many words because we can draw more conclusions from what he did not say than what he said. For instance, he started his narrative not from airport expansion but from where he told the president that Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, the man the president picked in place of his recommended ministerial nominee, did not have the capacity to mobilise APC party in Ibadan with the president challenging him by saying “ I want you to do the mobilization for me”.

    For Makinde who supported the president in 2023 but currently not facing the challenges of re-election like his fellow PDP defectors, the president’s response was proof he coerced his colleagues to join APC and his rejection of the president’s request establishes his democratic credential and consolidates his position as commander of PDP warriors of democracy’!

    I have been wondering if Makinde is confessing he and his defected colleagues can be so cheaply bought; how he expects Tinubu whose resourcefulness, political, brinkmanship and capacity for skilful exploitation of human infirmities has been acknowledged even by political foes,  not to take advantage of politicians who behave like prostitutes  with five husbands (apology to TOS Benson).

  • Designating bandits, kidnappers as terrorists

    Designating bandits, kidnappers as terrorists

    Federal government’s last week’s designation of bandits, kidnappers or any group that engages in similar criminalities as terrorists is very welcome. But it has long been overdue. But Minister of Information, Mohammed Idris betrayed official prevarication on the issue while announcing the decision when he said the era of ambiguous nomenclature is over.

    “Henceforth, any armed group or individual that kidnaps our children, attacks farmers, and terrorises our communities is officially classified and will be dealt with as a terrorist”, he said.

    The minister captured the seeming duplicity in the previous handling of killings when he stated emphatically that – “Now the era of ambiguous nomenclature is over, if you terrorise our people, whether you are a group or you are an individual, you are a terrorist and will be classified as such. There is no name hiding this again”.

    Though the government did not explicitly name the groups under reference, armed killer groups such as bandits, killer herdsmen and sundry kidnappers fit into this categorisation. They have been involved in attacks and killings in our communities, kidnapping for ransom and abduction of school children.

    The new stance by the government marks a significant departure from the previous order of treating mass kidnapping, abductions and rural attacks as ordinary crimes. By this, the full weight of counterterrorism will be deployed to confront the criminals behind these attacks.

    It is heart-refreshing that the government is coming to terms with the mortal challenges posed by the activities of the so-called bandits, militant herdsmen, sundry kidnappers and an assortment of non-state actors challenging its authority and legitimacy. Before now, government’s handling of the criminal challenges by these groups had left discerning Nigerians doubting its seriousness in decisively taming the monster.

    Read Also: Tinubu must complete eight years as president – Wike

    The body language of the last administration on the twin issues of banditry and insurgency of the herdsmen did not help matters either.  What we saw were rather strident efforts to rationalise the killings especially by herdsmen as communal or herder-farmer clashes spurred by climate change, pressure on land and migration challenges. These were the common terms deployed to obfuscate and conceal well planned and well targeted attacks to kill, displace and occupy targeted communities.

    What of the alibi that the killer herdsmen were foreigners who got their arms and ammunitions when Libya under Ghaddafi was collapsing? That was how late President Muhammadu Buhari explained away the attacks and killings in the Middle Belt when he interfaced with the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby.

    He told the Archbishop that the problem has always been there, but now made worse by the influx of gunmen from the Sahel region into different parts of West Africa: “They were trained and armed by Muammar Ghaddafi of Libya.  When he was killed, the gunmen escaped with their guns. We encountered some of them fighting Boko Haram”, Buhari had said.

    That has been the level of official narrative that obfuscated clear understanding of the characters behind the apparent invincibility of the killer herdsmen, the source of their sophisticated arms and ammunitions, their purpose and overall objective. But the communities at the receiving end have not been under any illusion as to their attackers and their motivation. Not with the displacement of the natives and renaming of apparently conquered and displaced communities.

    Curiously, as this official prevarication and denial of the potent danger the insurgency of the herdsmen portends, Global Terrorism Watch had as far back as 2015 listed Fulani militants as the fourth most deadly terrorist group in the world coming after ISIS, Al-Qaida and Al Shabab.

    Perhaps, the other group that has not been clearly decoded and understood is the so-called bandits. They made their debut into Nigeria’s insecurity matrix not long ago. At some point, they were taken for renegade Boko Haram insurgents or killer herdsmen.

    But the characters behind the mask were seemingly unveiled when fiery Islamic scholar, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi interfaced with them in Zamfara forests. In the discussions he had with them, they listed their grievances as cattle rustling, attacks by natives of Zamfara on the roads and attacks by the security agencies.

    Gumi has been canvassing a lot of options from the federal government to rein them in. These range from the mundane to the very absurd. Of late, he went beyond amnesty advocacy to ask that they should be included in the budget by the federal government. He went very strange when a fortnight ago, he sought to rationalise mass abductions by bandits on the premise of being better than the killing of soldiers.

    Ironically, this official duplicity has allowed the terrorism of the herdsmen and bandits to take root such that today Gumi is not only asking that bandits who share no visible dividing line with killer herdsmen, should not be attacked but included in the budget to share resources with other levels of the government. Yet nobody sees anything wrong with it even with the recent conviction of IPOB leader, Nnamdi Kanu for terrorism.

    Nigerians must have heaved a sigh of relief when the federal government announced the designation as a terrorist organisation, any armed group that kidnaps children, attacks farmers, or host communities. It has also come to terms with the deployment of ambiguous nomenclatures to camouflage acts of terrorism by sundry criminals operating in the country.

    For long, questions have been raised about the real identity of the bandits. Curiously, these questions are usually brushed aside because those who control the affairs of the country either share sympathy with, collaborate, or, are the real enablers of the cascading insecurity for one objective or the other.

    It is good a thing President Tinubu has taken up the challenge to call the spade by its real name. Realistic stance on the chequered issues of our national being holds the future for the peace and progress of the country.

    But the government must go beyond words and initiate immediate and measurable interventions to confront the scourge. The bandits’ enclaves and some of their leaders in the forests are known to the security agencies. They have of recent, engaged them in negotiations. And unless they have extracted commitments from them to dismantle their cells within an agreed timeframe, the government should take the war to their hide-outs and smoke them out. That is the message served by the Christmas day strike on terrorists in Sokoto by the United States of America (US)

    Matching words with concrete action will convince the international community of our commitment to stem the spate of insecurity that has diminished the worth of life in our country. 

  • Who is on talakawa’s side?

    Who is on talakawa’s side?

    The state of the talakawa. That is the story we hardly tell in the whole theatre of banditry. Yet we know that it is the poor in the north who do everything. They are poor so the elite can preen. They wash their clothes, clean their cars, secure their homes, flatter their vanity in songs and dances, cook for them, fight for them. When it is over, they die for them. They are the lambs on the slab.

    For those who know them, they are called the almajiris. They are innocent on the streets, pan in hand with beggary looks. When I was a youth Corps member in Wudil in Kano State, I had one as friend. He ran errands for me. Mosquitoes upended my joy and he was by me day and night like a son as I tried to shake off the pangs and shivers of malaria. I don’t remember his name now. But I know he needed some mentor or official policy to redeem him from the life of a happy mendicant.

    I remember boys like him today, and I wonder what and who he is today. Is he in the throes of banditry?   Oliver Twist or a redemptive tale like Pip in A Great expectation? Is he still in the precinct trying to live out his days under the mercies of a kitchen, or a dinner leftover, or working like another friend I had in Kano city known as Sunusi, who was a security person but who could read every word of the newspaper?

    That was what we should contemplate as we await details of the sweet morsels of 16 tomahawks that rattled southern Sokoto. Some are trying to spin it in different ways. To some, it is America invading northern Nigeria. Some said it is the government of Tinubu, who allowed an imperialist to undercut our sovereign pride. Gumi, the irritant foul mouth, would rather have Turkey do it.

    Read Also: Tinubu must complete eight years as president – Wike

    What is left out is the little boy and little girl, their fathers and mothers in the underbelly of the north. The man who had been paying fines or taxes just to retrieve masara or shinkafa from his farm. The mother who cannot travel without fear to her daughter’s wedding or son in the hospital. The fellow who has lost all hope because the bandits have destroyed all lifelines and he has caved in to their logic of brigandage. He now survives supplying them food and medicine. Of the mother who now carts her daughters to their beastly arms as aquiline comforts.

    They are the ones who live in the underbelly of Sokoto and Kebbi and Zamfara. They are the little fellows whose children lay in bunks and are ferried away by the goons of plunder. They are the ones who get slaughtered on the highways, on the farms, on the way to mosques. They are the defenceless citizens who seek mercy but get death.

    They have no one to cry to and nowhere to scream, except to their boy wonders of Ak47 and in their lairs in the forest glades of hate. They are the folks we must think about this season. We must not look at the bullets that torch the goons, because they have no mercy in the fibres of their beings. We must not look at it with the eyes of partisan fights because the first people we must fight for are those who have no Ak47 or armoured cars or who do not have bank accounts in Abuja.

    Hence, it was a pity when a section of the northern elite has kept quiet and tried to weaponize the misery of the folks for partisan benefits. But it is this section of the northern elite who have shown no pity for the commonfolk. They are not only politicians but a few clerics and even intellectuals and media. They think the fight to stop the hoodlums is about fighting against a region.  We have heard about the tormented soul of Gumi and his cohorts and a few politicians including men like Nasir el Rufai and Prof  Usman Yusuf, although the small fellow had said nothing at the time of writing. He had tried to turn ploughshares into swords, seeing a north and south duel when it should all be about lifting the real small fellows in the north. His successor is showing him how to do it.

    Thank God not all of the northern big men think like Gumi and some top media fellows who see fire when there is light. The fellows who do live in the secluded luxury of feudal rampart. They are not affected by all the hoopla of bandit carnivores. Their children are not in those schools. none of the reports has indicated that even the Kebbi incident involved a big man’s daughter. No. Their children are either in a top school in an impenetrable enclosure in Abuja or in the London at Eaton, or in Switzerland or in Canada or in Dubai or the United States.

    They do not need the hospitals. They go for checkups in the U.K. or Germany, when they are not splashing huge sums in choice clinics in Abuja or Lagos. They do not have to go to a bank in town. They have dollars at the ready, and they will spend at will. They have their homes in secure precincts, and their security guards are armed to the teeth. If you get past the security, the homes are fortes.

    They do not need to go to the markets where bandits storm and loot and kill. Their kitchens sizzle with aromas inside a fortress of their homes, and all the choice dinners and lunches and breakfasts are chummy between their tongues and lips.

    The poor pray in public mosques. The rich talk to God from beneath their roofs. They pray in peace, except when they fortify their ride to and from the place of worship.

    They are immune from all the news of the slaughters and tears in the villages and towns in the north. Hence some, like Bashir Dalhatu, who was an Abacha crony and now the leader of Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), can compare them to the Niger Delta militants. And they are saying we should coddle the goons.

    It is sentiment like this that gave birth to Aminu Kano with his Northern Elements Progressive Union (NEPU) and later the People’s Redemption Party (PRP) and he held sway in Kano and Kaduna, and some of the northern progressives today still see him as their ancestor. Alhaji Kano still personifies the tendency of talakawa empathy today as we can see in Kano and Kaduna where strong strands of people empathy still assert themselves.

    It is a time like this that we know who is on the people’s side and those who are in the cocky circle, looking down on the majority with disdain and make merchandise of the talakawa and politics of their aches and pains. This is not the time to turn the people against their helpers as Shakespeare narrated in his play Coriolanus.

  • Last man sinking

    Last man sinking

    Seyi Makinde is one of the politicians that has the look of the meek but acts with the stealth of a reptile, especially the green variety. The reptile can do nothing until its back is against the wall in the home, and then it tries to deliver its strike. The thing is, the reptile is not supposed to be in the house and so its anger should belong to the landlord.

    That is the problem with the Oyo State governor. He is now in a corner and all he can do now is try to strike. But Makinde first showed a lack of creative flair. He wanted to fight Nyesom Wike and yet he borrowed his style. He gathered journalists in Ibadan, and the sitting arrangement is also like Wike. His is like what in literary tradition is described as the anxiety of influence in which you imitate the person as though they are imitating you. You have to perfect it or else they will call you a copycat and it will mean you are trying to flatter your model. In this case, Wike may not be impressed.

    Read Also: FG did not give Makinde N50bn, only N30bn was released – Aide

    Then he turned it into an ego booster for himself. He told us how good a business man he is and how he can be president. He lies to himself in public about the tranquility in PDP. Everyone has fled, even his fellow governors. There was a pity of a picture online where he was sitting at a one-man southern PDP summit. He probably did not get the memo. Or he got it, but lost his memory. He is suffering because of his insistent illusion. As Roman sage Seneca wrote, People “suffer more in the imagination than in reality.”

    He wants to imitate President Bola Tinubu, who is known as the last man standing. Makinde is like a passenger in a ship that caught fire in Joseph Conrad’s novella, Youth. A fire was already gutting the ship. The first to know were the rats that were leaping out of the vessel. By the time many on board like Makinde  knew, the ship in its magnificence had been lapped up by flames. That is Makinde. He is the last man sinking. He just does not know. First, he needs to answer Fayose’s poser about another fire under his watch and a certain saga of N50 billion.

  • COLOUR OF BURNING BOOK (1)

    COLOUR OF BURNING BOOK (1)

    From Book-banners to Book-burners for Jack Mapanje

    II

    Tell me:

    What is the colour of burning books

    Is it the chalky anthem of the egret’s December glide

    Is it the indelible indigo of agbe’s plumes

    Is it the eloquent fire on ayekooto’s tail

    Is it the rainbow’s arc on the sky’s bewildered face?

    Who struck the match

    Who fanned the flame

    Into ill-literate adolescence?

    Tell me:

    What colour, the flame of a burning book?

              III

    There is a stubborn echo

    In the legend of the letter

    Whose butterfly turns eagle

    In the palms of crushing kings

    Whose earthworm is cobra

    Read Also: Extend U.S–Nigeria military strikes against terrorists to northeast, Ndume tells FG

    Beneath the tramping heel

    Beyond edicts, beyond statutes,

    Beyond the fiery imprimatur of uniformed nescience

    The letter lives

    Beyond the Emperor’s metallic behest

    On the cobblestone

    Of slippery nights,

    On both sides

    Of the Bridge of Fearless Wisdom

    Notes

    Published here with a slight amendment of the original version

    Reference to Ifa divination among the Yoruba: the diviner seeks the grains of truth by tracing hidden visions on a tray of sands

    Agbe is a bird with deep-blue plumage

     Ayekooto: the world-abhors-the-truth (a Yoruba name for the parrot).

    (Concluded)

  • In defence of Guerrilla Journalism

    In defence of Guerrilla Journalism

    The Bile of Ray Ekpu

    Ray Ekpu, Nigeria’s master journalist, accomplished craftsman and one of the exemplary columnists that the nation has produced, has drawn the ire of many of his younger colleagues with his caustic dismissal of the notable tradition of anti-state writing known as guerrilla journalism. In an otherwise finely wrought tribute and homage to his fallen colleague, comrade in arms and bosom friend, Dan Agbese, Ekpu threw caution to the winds  when he reached the subject matter, launching into a tempestuous tirade against  guerrilla journalism . As for its practitioners, he dismissed them all as frauds and psychologically impaired entities who are not worthy of the sacred mantle of journalism.

    Many who knew the master columnist in his prime are horrified by this wild confetti of lies, illogicalities, inaccuracies and outright falsities. It may well be that Ray Ekpu has been badly tripped by a series of recent personal bereavements which have affected his normally sunny and cheery disposition; his capacity for stoic equanimity in the face of pressing tribulations. Or it may well be that Ray is   smarting from the psychological trauma inflicted on him in some very public encounters by some juvenile disruptors of the journalistic status quo in the not too remote past.

       Dismissing a social phenomenon for its juvenile antics and its occasional resort to delinquent fabrications does not, and cannot, equate to denying its existence. Ray Ekpu does not even offer an argument. He offers a rant. Like guerrilla warfare, its more famous genetic cousin, guerrilla journalism is a response to particular developments in the society which demand urgent countervailing action. It is not born of moral precepts or ethical exhortations. It is a logical outflow and direct consequence of certain developments in the society and the contradictions spawned.

       You do not need to like the troika of Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin to appreciate the extravagant saga of human heroism that the Russian Revolution is. Without ever stepping into any military school Leon Trotsky became a general of the Red Army repeatedly routing the rump of the Russian Imperial Army and its western imperialist cohorts in a stunning demonstration of superhuman bravery and audacity. How about the epic march of Mao’s ragtag largely peasant army which allowed them to overwhelm the Kuomintang forces, sending the leadership scampering across the Taiwanese Straits? This is not to discount the storied confrontation of the apartheid regime by the African National Congress which was founded in 1912 but did not come to power until 1994. In all these nations, we witness the dramatic collision of human agency and will with one side boldly staking its claim to hegemonic domination while another set of actors push forward to oppose it. This confrontation of altars is the motor and driving impetus of human history.

    In every department of human endeavor be it religion, royalty, politics, economics, law, academics, music, culture, industry and of course the important substratum of communication, we witness this unceasing struggle for hegemonic domination among opposing forces which often results in the overthrow and dethronement of extant reality or the tense accommodation of contrasting and countervailing visions of society until the material basis of one tendency is subverted from within by emergent realities. This is what is currently unfolding in the north of the nation as the Boko Haram insurrection, religious insurgency and various bandit groups stake a bold claim while the ruins of the old feudal order insist on supervising its own funeral with the help of foreign mercenaries.

    READ ALSO; 10 things to know about late actress Allwell Ademola

    The anticolonial struggle in Nigeria and the brutal pacification of the tribes of the lower and upper Niger by Lord Lugard and his honchos gave birth to an anticolonial press centred around the emergent Yoruba coastal aristocracy in Lagos.  They fought the colonial masters with their pen setting the stage for an intellectual demystification of the entire colonial project in Nigeria. They gave as much as they got from Lord Lugard and his brother. So outraged was Lugard by their presumed arrogance matched only by their supercilious airs and merciless condescension that he dismissed them as “uppity niggers”.

     MJC Echeruo, the notable Nigerian scholar, captured the sizzling and scintillating drama very memorably in his book, Victorian Lagos. Their relentless criticism and sharp rebuff of the colonial agenda in Nigeria forced Lugard and his imperialist cohorts from one unforced error to another until the military overreach of the Adubi war which suborned the burgeoning Egba city-state but which also led to the terminal recall of Lugard after suffering another nervous breakdown. It was the last time anybody ever heard of him.

      This anti- colonial animus of a section of the Nigerian press set the tone and stage for the emergence of a radical segment of the press after independence in 1960. But with the conservative Daily Times and a slew of regional newspapers ruling the roost, the influence waned dramatically. The political inheritors of the new nation also realized that they have a lot at stake and that there is a lot to gain in preserving the system. Radicalism became a smear word and a progressive party like the Action Group had a tough time explaining the beneficence of some its key programmes to the wider masses. Corruption and mismanagement didn’t need to be explained. They assume a trans-national efficacy. The radical press went into hibernation.

    The Rapture of Gani Fawehinmi  

    But as it so ever happens in nature and history, the moment of distress and destruction is also the moment regeneration kicks in. On the first day of November, 1983, that is about forty two years ago at the terrace of the ground floor of the middle block of the Humanities Complex of the then University of Ife, I met a group of  students clustered around the tall, gangling figure of Femi Ojudu himself a final year student of mine. They were poring over an article in the edition of the Guardian newspaper of that day. Femi looked up and saw me, probably alerted about my approach. “We are discussing your article which came out this morning”, the future guerrilla journalist and future senator of the federal republic informed yours sincerely in a polite and admiring manner.

    Talking about politics and ideology, students of the much storied university remain among the most politicized and radicalized in the country. It is wired into their DNA. As a student, yours sincerely remember being at the vanguard of a student uprising in which the Vice-Chancellor, H A Oluwasanmi himself,  was abducted and taken hostage. In his very last interview, the man in whose honour the university was named after and who remains the nation’s ultimate symbol of political integrity, administrative wizardry and economic genius had informed his interviewer that if he were to come back in thirty years and Nigeria were still to be a bastion of injustice, inequity and massive inequality, he would be found at the head of the stone-throwing mob.

    But back to the article in question. 1983 was the last year of grace for the old Nigerian political class. The scandalously rigged elections of that year were the icing on the cake of infamy. Despite the glitz and glamour, the intellectual sophistication and stylistic razzmatazz, the newly established Guardian newspaper proved to be part of the establishment and its cerebral foremen nothing but organic intellectuals of a decadent postcolonial state. Avant- Garde technique was in the service of Derriere- Garde retrogressive and reactionary politics. Titled, The Guardian and the state of the nation, the article accused The Guardian of cold complicity and collusion with the mess taking hold of the country.

    Submitted at the end of September of that year, The Guardian Nomenklatura sat on it for about five weeks wondering what to do with the parcel bomb until it decided to publish a well-reasoned and weighty rejoinder written by its helmsman, Stanley Macebuh, vigorously defending the values and virtues of liberal ideology and politics. It was titled, The Liberal Society and its Enemies. It provoked a rash of rejoinders from angry nationals particularly from the university communities. Yours sincerely kept his cool until an excellent opportunity presented itself which was the passing of Raymond Aron, the great French conservative intellectual. In the tribute, simply titled For Raymond Aron, yours sincerely heaped praises on the French titan as a true defender of liberty and equality. What was left strategically unsaid was more devastating of the liberal poseurs at the Guardian in a society of deep inequality and illiberal politics. Sixteen days after the article was published on December 14th, 1983, the military swept the Second Republic into the trashcan of history.

     Now fast forward to ten years after the encounter with Femi Ojudu and his fellow students. On a cold evening in early November 1993, yours sincerely, chaperoned by Seye Kehinde, slipped into the Ikeja GRA neighborhood of Gani Fawehinmi to commiserate with him on his recent ordeal in the hands of the government. It was another period of uncertainty for the nation, this time emanating from military misrule. The military, having exhausted their military and political possibility, had testily withdrawn to the barracks. But with the goggled general still on the prowl, everybody knew that this was a ruse to allow things to cool down. But civil society, now better organized and better educated than it was ten years before, had mounted ferocious and bloody challenges to military dictatorship.

    The newspaper industry suffered a severe setback as a result of summary proscriptions, seizures and illegal court summons. Many suffered ruination. A few that could not bear the military affront chose to go underground. Most notable were Tempo, a fiery, irrepressible tabloid which gave the military authorities sleepless nights, and The News magazine which heroically refused to be proscribed by the junta. They were now edited by politically conscious radicalized students of the eighties: Messrs Bayo Onanuga from the University of Lagos, Babafemi Ojudu, Dapo Olorunyomi, Idowu Obasa, Kunle Ajibade, Seye Kehinde and their foot-soldiers such as Ebenezer Obadare  all from the old University of Ife and later on Obafemi Awolowo University. This was the origin of the underground press Nigeria and what became known as Guerrilla Journalism.

       This is the tradition of heroic resistance to tyranny that our good friend, Ray Ekpu, pooh-poohed and assailed with merciless assiduity. It is worth recalling that on that night, Ganiyu Oyesola Fawehinmi, patriot extraordinary, legal colossus and Ondo nobleman, received us with extravagant cordiality and conviviality. Turning to yours sincerely he gushed with child-like excitement: Ah, you see, all those things you are writing, we were reading them in Guje. There was even a time an inmate snatched my copy of Tempo only for him to drop it in the pit latrine. We cleaned it up to continue our reading”.

      But like a scene out of the Theatre of Chaos, we had hardly settled down to merriment when one of the political apparitions haunting the nation at that point in time suddenly materialized out of the shadows resplendent in overflowing lace agbada and lugging a hefty sack brimming with files of the membership of the infamous ABN. “This is Alhaji Abimbola Davies and he has brought a comprehensive list of the membership of his organization. The list will shock Nigerians. When I put all of them in the dock, they will collapse with terminal exhaustion”, Gani vowed. Reeling out otherwise sacred names, the files revealed the extent of the elite conspiracy against Abiola’s mandate.

    Luckily for the conspirators, it did not come to that. Abacha’s creeping coup swept away the hideous contrivance known as the Interim National Government about a fortnight after. Thereafter, the goggled despot bared his fangs against the press and went after the underground papers in particular. Kunle Ajibade was summarily impounded as he made his way out of a safe house. He spent the better part of two years cooling his heels in horrific incarceration. Femi Ojudu was also nabbed and was sent to Abacha’s Gulag where he survived by drinking his own urine. The duo of Bayo Onanuga and Dapo Olorunyomi outpaced and outwitted the security services until it became a bridge too far. They fled abroad. Bagaudo Kaltho was not so lucky. He was grilled to death by Abacha’s goons.

      The severity and enormity of Abacha’s repressive rule particularly his anti-press animus are better imagined. In March 1996, yours sincerely wrote an op-ed piece for Africa Today on the state of the nation . The edition was summarily confiscated on getting to Nigeria by security agents. In a chance encounter at Abuja Airport with Kayode Soyinka, the publisher of the London-based magazine, a minister of Yoruba origins serving in Abacha’s government gleefully told Soyinka that although he was a gentleman, he should blame himself for turning over the page of his magazine to rebels, rabid subversives and past masters of agitprop. Such was the dread with which the guerrilla journalists were held that at a meeting before the falcon fled the falconer, General Oladipo Diya asked Bayo Onanuga, his fellow Ijebuman, whether it was true that his papers were published inside the American Embassy. The truth was more mundane and pedestrian.

    When Gani Fawehinmi was cynically accused of always playing to the gallery in his crusade for justice in Nigeria, he retorted that his interlocutors should also submit themselves to arrest and brutal detention over a hundred times by succeeding military despots so that they can confirm how easy it was to play to the gallery. Let it also be with guerrilla the journalists. They were antithetical forces responding to a particular historical thesis of military brutality and misrule. They faced guns without being fazed and challenged the notion that brute force should supersede rational consensus in the affairs of humanity. With their brazen bravery, they wrote their names into the political folklore of their people.

    Post-Guerrila and the American Unibomber

    It is possible that a strict and straight laced professional like Ekpu might have been riled and irritated by the swiftness and ease of transition of some guerrilla journalists from underdogs to top dogs. This is the normal case when a society faces some transitional turbulence. Dismissing the Babangida transition as a charade, the late Professor Oyeleye Oyediran noted that the class project of cooptation opened up tremendously with many new recruits clambering on the bandwagon. But this is what has happened with every transition in Nigeria from colonial to postcolonial .Nobody remembers that SL Akintola, Antony Enahoro, H.O Davies, Ernest Ikoli and many others were fierce anti-colonial journalists who found their way  to the power podium.

     Brave identification with a power project makes them sterling recruits. What is important and provident is to hold the feet of the new entrants to power to fire.  As history has shown us, the Nigerian political public is so mercurial and inquisitorial that it does not allow heroic antecedents to get in the way of current infractions. Check our history. Those who are calling for a return of guerrilla journalism are completely misdirected. That development has served its cause. No two historical conjunctures can be alike. Since the departure of the military, the Nigerian society has opened up. God must forbid the return of a draconian military dictator who will have to be fought on new terms and not on the old paradigm of cockroach journalism. We live in totally uncharted times particularly in the epoch of the grim American global unibomber. What now faces the nation is far more dangerous with the American intervention. Unless the Nigerian political elites get far more serious and stitch something together and on time too, we may be facing a post-Yugoslavian apocalyptic meltdown. God bless the nation.

  • Shameless bandits and abduction of infants

    Shameless bandits and abduction of infants

    If anyone still sympathises with bandits after they carried out the Papiri (Niger State) St Mary’s School abduction of 230 pupils and students, then they must be cut from the same cloth. Aged between 10 and 17 years old, the victims were taken on November 21. One hundred of them were released on December 8, while the remaining regained their freedom last Sunday. Watching the video of the abductees paints not only a picture of state helplessness and impotence in securing what is clearly a very vulnerable country, it also paints a gory picture of the abductors’ abominable cruelty and callousness. They may still be more accurately described as bandits, but they are now also legally terrorists. They can, therefore, no longer plead socio-economic underpinnings for their crimes or take refuge in their so-called struggles; and they can no longer feel entitled to any sympathy from anyone who is not a terrorist or a terrorist sympathiser.

    The bandits also clearly specialise in artisanal mining and protection rackets, turning vast regions of the Northwest and North Central parts of Nigeria into a replica of the North and South Kivu provinces of the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In addition, they have discovered the equally lucrative secondary attraction of kidnapping hapless citizens for ransom. Their exploits in mining and running protection rings do not, however, receive as much attention as their kidnapping prowess, but the two crimes are undoubtedly intertwined. No matter what anyone says or feels, they are unenthusiastic about abandoning the crimes. Just as they abduct one set of victims and release them, a fresh abduction is concomitantly planned. Series of dialogues between the blighted states and bandits have done little to smother the crime as law enforcement agents idealistically hope. To enter into lasting peace deal with the terrorists would be, in the estimation of the bandits, a call to disarm and renounce their crimes. They are unsure any state is capable of satisfying their criminal urges.

    READ ALSO: No place for terrorists, kidnappers in Kwara, says Abdulrazaq as forest guards end training

    The world was outraged by the 2014 abduction of Chibok schoolgirls in Borno State, the 2018 Dapchi abductions in Yobe, and since then many more abductions of lesser severity; but in recent years no kidnapping spree has arrested popular imagination as the November 21 Catholic school attack that saw 230 pupils, students and staff of the Papiri St Mary’s School seized by bandits. To tear away so many young learners from the embrace of their parents and comfort of their homes, some of them as young and impressionable as just 10 years old, is unforgivable. But the bandits enacted that crime, showed no sense of remorse, and swapped some of them for the release of their own fighters and possibly money. The federal government has refused to disclose the details of the negotiations, but there are indications that a swap might have been involved.

    Most of the bandits are family men. They have wives and children, and have been known to be so embittered by the state killing of their family members as to also respond with vicious attacks on the society. For men so touched by the killing or arrest of their relations to respond in kind by picking on infants, is an obvious and irreconcilable contradiction. Will they do it again? Yes, they will, if they can. With so much ungoverned space in Nigeria, can the state prevent future reoccurrence? It is not clear. But it is the state’s responsibility to tighten security around schools and monitor, through the installation of novel security architecture, forests and other ungoverned spaces around the country. It is not a small task, given the fact that for decades, the authorities had failed to invest in national security that includes border patrols and drone surveillance. That decades-long failure has brought Nigeria to this sorry and tragic point.

    It is pointless reposing hope in the kindheartedness of bandits. They do not see the children and the infirm they abduct as mere victims or collateral damage when they practice their crimes. They deliberately go after soft targets, hoping to elicit the highest form of cooperation from the government and security agents caught flatfooted. This means they will do it again if they get half the chance. Branding them terrorists may sound tough, practicable and even sensible, but what the authorities need to do more is to ensure that any future re-enactment of mass abduction of schoolchildren is forestalled. The state may not be able to recalibrate and monitor the entire country, but once abduction takes place, they must be able to lock down the affected areas with a view to ultimately thwarting the crime. And if abduction occurs, they must not rest until a fitting closure in favour of the state and the victims is achieved. More, the authorities should urgently acquire the capacity and expertise to monitor and foil the banking and spending of ransom money, no matter in what currency it is laundered.

    Bandits do not care whatever it costs to settle scores, nor do they have any scruples, as they showed in the Papiri abductions. Completely desensitised, they will plunge the country into war if they had the chance. Equally, Northeast terrorists do not care what harm they bring upon others or attract to themselves. The United States has controversially waded into the picture by conducting some airstrikes; it remains to be seen whether the bandits and terrorists will bow to the massive display of force of outsiders, having long disdained or compromised the efforts of Nigeria’s security agencies, or whether they will absorb the punishment and transmogrify into something more sinister. They don’t have shame going after infants; but they may, however, prove to be even more cowardly and vulnerable than the society they had preyed on for more than a decade.

  • Lamido on PDP alliances

    Lamido on PDP alliances

    Speaking to a gathering of his Jigawa State Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) supporters at his Kano office on the factionalisation of his party, former governor Sule Lamido, a foundation member of the troubled Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), suggested that “If reconciliation fails, alliances, not coalitions, will become inevitable.” He added: “You know there is a difference between alliance and coalition; we are going to form alliances with any of the opposition parties.” A few commentators immediately began looking in the direction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), the fringe party already hijacked by former vice president Atiku Abubakar for his 2027 presidential campaign, and assumed that the former governor might be heading in that direction. He, however, seemed to spurn that idea. He loathes mergers, he clarified, preferring instead an alliance.

    READ ALSO; 10 things to know about late actress Allwell Ademola

    Whatever he does, especially after the PDP schemed him out of the chairmanship race before the Ibadan November party convention, Mr Lamido has admitted the sundering of his party, his readiness to contemplate other options together with his supporters, and the repudiation of any kind of merger with any other party. All he wants is the defeat of the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC), however that goal is achieved. But who can say whether in the end the ruling party would not throw a crunchy bone at him to tease his delicate palate and test his resolve in the face of complete political erasure in the run-up to 2027?

  • Language activism V

    Language activism V

    Now that this series on language is coming to an end, it is only appropriate for me to give some background information about the subject that I have been discussing.

    This series is an extended typecast of the keynote address I delivered at a colloquium in honour of Niyi Osundare (he needs no introduction) at the Ekiti State University in Ado Ekiti on the occasion of the poet’s seventy-eighth birthday. It was a grand occasion made even grander by the presence of the celebrant, his natural  exuberance not  diminished an iota by advancing age. As usual in the crowd that turned up on the day, there were a large number of those who had encountered Osundare in classrooms and on the pages of books and newspapers over a long period of time. They had all come to celebrate a life of achievement. This  was a celebration of a life in drama and literature and a great time was had by all. In the background however, the seriousness of the occasion was appreciated by all as it was also an interrogation of language; that score that is shared by all humankind even if there is a multiplicity of languages which in any case, is an indication of human diversity. And really, that is a cause for celebration as it is a sign of human adaptability to the various environments which have been colonised by human beings most of whom spread out of Africa about 50,000 years ago.

    There is no gain saying the fact that Osundare is an accomplished writer in the English language, a language which has, over the years, become wired to his very bones. And yet, I can confidently wager that he did not speak a word of English until he was eight, if not ten years old. He belongs to a generation which was made literate through the medium of local languages. I know because I belong to that generation myself. Looking back, I think we all derived great benefit from that system, a system which acknowledged our cultural and linguistic roots and hardly exposed us to the language of the oppressor in our infancy. Interestingly, this policy was designed by the oppressor, perhaps because we were considered not worthy of introduction to the master’s language until we had proved our mettle. But really, that is unlikely. Yoruba in our case was used as an introduction to learning and it worked admirably, not least in the case of Niyi Osundare whose command of the English language is in the class of legend. It comes to him without effort in the manner of Athena who sprang into the world fully grown from the head of Zeus, her divine father. He has been a writer in English for close to sixty years, so long and so well that his works have outgrown that language and have been translated into more than a dozen languages all around the world. This means that his genius has not been restricted to the more than one billion speakers of English but extended to other billions going through life without the benefit of the English language in their baggage.

    READ ALSO; 10 things to know about late actress Allwell Ademola

    There has been a great deal of debate about the desirability of African writers writing in English or French. Ngugi wa Thiongo stands out as a prominent African writer who turned his back on the use of English and took to writing in his mother tongue, the language spoken by the Kikuyu people of Kenya. They were one of the few African people who rose up in rebellion against British rule and paid for their independence with impressive amounts of blood, sweat and tears. It can be said that under their circumstances their language deserves to be admitted to the table of global languages. Ngugi was only making that claim on behalf of his people. Most of us are content to write in English in an attempt to reach the rest of the world but ironically, Ngugi was not denied that privilege because the world had been introduced to him through translation in the same way that Osundare has been able to speak to the world through through the medium of translation into many other languages.

    Osundare speaks to the world through the use of the English language. Under the dense foliage of that language, his message is rooted to the soil of his native Ekiti dialect from which it has extracted a peculiar richness which has complimented the richness of his English. Without those nutrients, the flavour of Osundare’s tremendous contribution to the English language could have been in some dispute. And, this cannot be restricted to Osundare because we see the same adaptation of other Nigerian languages in the writing of practically all Nigerian writers including Achebe and Soyinka. Gabriel Okara, perhaps the oldest of that lot, has left a body of work dripping with his native Ijaw. It should not be forgotten that the English language lends itself to such interpretation or, if you like, misinterpretation because of her natural flexibility. The English language must not be allowed to set any boundaries of our own use as this would only be a restriction of our freedom to contribute our own quota to that language, to its detriment. Amos Tutuola is an example of this. An extreme example but an example all the same. There is no limit to the number of people who, like Shakespeare can bend the English language to their will.

     It must be pointed out however that there are not many people with the facility to do this. Osundare and a few other Nigerians have amply demonstrated their ability to manipulate the English language as the fancy directs them and that is just a fact. With the availability of excellent translation facilities, does it really matter in which language literature is produced? I have been able to enjoy a large number of authors in translation without any feeling of being deprived and so have many other people. This is why I am intrigued that there is hardly any translated literature available in Yoruba or any other Nigerian language for that matter. Osundare writes in English but his work has been translated into practically all the major languages of the world. Very little of it has so far been rendered in Yoruba. I am certain that Osundare’s poems would be as resonant in Yoruba as they are in English and they could even be better mined for context, after all, most of them are set locally. We just don’t know and can’t know. This problem is put in proper perspective for me when the only major book in world literature that has been translated into Yoruba is the Bible. Food for the soul, not so much for the intellect. None of the many science books that our students read or pretend to read, has been found worthy of translation into Yoruba. None of them have of course been written in Yoruba. This can only be as a result of our collective lack of confidence in our post-colonial status as second class global citizens. It has nothing to do with the sophistication or the lack of it of the language.

    We are no longer colonial subjects but we are still waiting for our liberation. This can only be the reason the Federal Minister of Education can, at a forum organised by the British Council of all such bodies, announce the ban of all local languages from the Nigerian educational system. Henceforth, the only language worthy of being heard in any Nigerian school is English. Never mind the lame excuse he gave for this language policy. It is simply shameful that a system that produced the likes of Niyi Osundare is now receiving official and public condemnation for the almost systematic destruction of the entire Nigerian educational system. The Minister is advised to take an educated look at the system over which he is expected to preside.