Category: Columnists

  • Time exactness

    THE GUARDIAN Front Page and inside pages of July 23 nurtured morphological crises: “Yesterday’s meeting which began at about 12.20 p.m. at the Presidential Lodge opposite the Government House, Minna, lasted for two hours.” In timing, there must be exactness (at 12.20 p.m.) or an element of uncertainty (about 12.20 p.m.). The usage of both in the same environment indicates befuddled thinking. Another way round it—a middle road for some people—is to use ‘at’ or ‘about’ 12.20 p.m.!

    “Police deploy officers at (in) Sokoto mosques” Deployment: always ‘in’

    Now The Guardian Editorial: “The question that immediately arises is, who the Amnesty Committee reached (sic) an agreement with.” Cloud over ceasefire agreement: who did the Amnesty Committee reach an agreement with?

    THISDAY, THE SATURDAY NEWSPAPER, of July 20 disseminated a few solecisms: “Clearing disused aircrafts from airports” THISDAY Plus: ‘aircraft’ is non-count

    “I went through my training at Awgu in Enugu State and was deployed to (in) Nsukka.”

    “After that, God saved me because the man (men) on my right and left were killed and I was in the middle of dead bodies.” Memoirs: corpses instead of ‘dead bodies’!

    “Governors’ wives make case for protection of widows (widows’) rights”

    “Nestle IAAF kids’ athletics flags-off (begins) July 25″ I don’t understand this stubborn incorrigibility about the illiterate and wrong application of ‘flag off’ and ‘commission’ (in faulty contexts) as verbs!

    THE NATION ON SUNDAY of July 21 could not defend its freedom: “Probe Kogi flood relief (flood-relief) fund”

    “Generator powered (Generator-powered) economy is not good for Nigeria”

    “…who visited Cotonou, capital of Benin Republic, en route Seme (en route to Seme) recently.”

    “One of the things they are also doing is that we have a lot of them who work as auditor-generals (auditors-general) in the office, governor-generals (governors-general) and they do it very well.”

    Saturday PUNCH of July 20 circulated this headline blunder: “Places where Nigerians’ fate are (is) decided”

    “FG embarks on quela birds control in Northeast against the birds which wreck (wreak) havoc on rice farms” (THE NATION, July 7)

    “She was the only woman among the 12 distinguished legal practitioners that were sworn in to (as) SAN at (on) the premises of the Supreme Court in Abuja last week Monday.” An inspirational phrase: last Monday or Monday, last week. ‘Last week Monday’ smacks of sub-literacy.

    “Shortage of materials stall (stalls) teachers’ training”

    “All sorts of sounds rented (rent) the whole building as the women started speaking in tongues, as the rain continued to run on the roofs.”

    “NYSC fast loosing attraction” I hope this medium will not lose (not loose) readers’ attention.

    “Group moves to restore peace in (to) Rivers State House of Assembly.”

    “A grassroot mobilization group known as.…” Structural crisis: grassroots always.

    “Perhaps it is a coincidence that these kinds of terrorist organization (organizations).…”

    “By extension, aircrafts which are patterned after birds also have that significance.” War without borders: ‘aircraft’ is uncountable.

    “…the commission then requested the counsels of petitioners and the….” ‘Counsel’ is uncountable.

    “…considering the enormous wealth on (in) which the state is swimming.”

    “…the challenge of providing jobs for our youths without regards (regard) to….”

    “In recent time (times), there have (has) been plethora (a plethora) of essays….”

    “The boss of Rhythm 96.3FM addressed issues as it (they) affects (affect) the broadcasting industry….”

    “One of my favourite opening paragraphs in literature are (is) to be found in….”

    “I wept for the pains of nine months that was (were) dashed by one bullet in her little head.”

    “…no matter how the offsprings of Afghanistan settle their family problem….” ‘Offspring’ is non-count.

    “They go into production because probably they were opportuned (they had an opportunity) to have a camera.…” Get it right: ‘opportune’ does not admit any inflection and is usually classically applied.

    “Under such a setting, the shoot at sight orders, the curfews.…” No lexical terrorism: shoot-on-sight orders….

    “Nigeria is notorious as a dumping ground for all manners of substandard, fake and expired products imported into the country by dare-devil money maniacs.” The war against bad English: all manner…of products. And this: what does ‘imported into the country’ mean?

    “…his mother and the president’s wife was (were) present at (on) that occasion.”

    “…build up to November convention” Noun: build-up; phrasal verb; build up.

    “Plateau police arrest 5 persons with arms, ammunitions” ‘Ammunition’ is uncountable.

    “Their invasion has led to the lost (loss) of about 300 lives and destruction of a whole community carelessly.”

    “Gov. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State appears to be towing (toeing) a different line from the rest of the PDP.”

    “Compared to the other parties, the PDP deserves a part (pat) on the back for….”

    “It is not as if the party does not have areas which one strongly object (objects) to….”

    “…will like to draw attention to what one of the honourables (name withheld)….” ‘Honourables’ is Nigerian English! Get it right: one of the honourable lawmakers.

    “But the level of pain, agony and anguish inflicted on Nigerians by ethno-religious carnages require (requires) more than a mere setting-up (setting up) of a National Security Panel.”

    “The menace deserves urgent governmental response in terms of hackening (harkening/hearkening) to the needs of the nationalities constituting Nigeria.”

    “We (a comma) the rising stars in the midst of oldies (another comma) must put in everything in ensuring that voters (sic) registration in our various areas are (is) monitored diligently.”

  • People versus power

    People versus power

    That which hatred does, compassion can undo

    The past two weeks I have written on the Trayvon Martin case. I did so for two reasons. One, the matter exposed the racist underbelly of American society. By extension, this episode warns that racism permeates all aspects of social and political-economic interaction Black people have, even among themselves. Global history has been unduly colored by racism; that morose legacy remains alive. The international political economy is more a product of racial competition than one of racial harmony. Much like Trayvon suffered on the isolated sidewalk in a small Florida town, to be Black is to be a potential victim in danger of being deemed the perpetrator of his own demise. Our color makes us an eyesore to others and thus harmful to ourselves because of the reaction of others to us. As it is with individuals so it is with us as a people and with our nations.

    The second reason was that Martin’s tragedy lifted the veil covering a human dilemma even more fundamental than racism. In almost every population, from the smallest, humblest village to large, prosperous nations, there are people who would rather lord over others than allow each to live as they should. As there are those of us who desire the dignity of freedom and independence of thought and action, there is a countervailing element. This element would rather enchain your mind, body or both. People of this ilk seek to bend your will to fit their designs. If your will refuses to bend, they resort to breaking your body. These people will neither stop nor ever question their need for dominion. They only will question why you resist them. This struggle is age-old and endless. It shall exist as long as mankind exists. It exists between races as well as within the races. Oppression is unfortunately versatile to a fault. It often takes the form of racism. But it can be colorblind. It can found itself on religion, ethnicity or on the amount of money in one’s pocket.

    Sadly, those who seek dominion over others spend inordinate time acquiring power then maintaining it so that they may perfect their schemes over others. We pray that we are governed by angels but history warns us to be prepared for the opposite. The man who lusts to have a gun, control an army, rule a land, or own the economy is more apt to use these instruments against your best wishes than to help you realize those wishes. Oppression of others is as much a human characteristic as breathing and eating. As long as this world exists, we are one bad turn from a loss of freedom if not of life. To be a person in this world is to be ever vigilant or a victim.

    This sounds gloomy. Here I confess a recent comment from a reader struck me. The commenter remarked my columns made him feel sad, as if hope had fled. The comment touched me to the extent that it became the impetus to what you now read. My writing tends to focus on tough issues and do so starkly. I do this not because I am forlorn or to deprive anyone of hope. My goal lies to the contrary. If I were devoid of hope and of the belief that people could have a better life, I would not expend my time in the futile exercise of writing. I would direct my energy toward other things that bring a more selfish profit. But I direct my efforts as I do because I hold the dearest hope for our people and for all of humanity. I believe the common person can face the swelling tide of power, arrogance and hatred yet withstand the awful might of these worldly, awful things. The odds say the poor and average should fold and break at encountering the great onslaught of wealth and power. Yet, I believe there is something that allows us to survive the odds and the powers arrayed against us. There is some thing that stops evil and wrong from claiming total victory. We survive the dark assault that we may join together in common, humane cause to claim a brighter day and just future.

    The great thing in which I invest my belief, I know as God. My Muslim and Arabic brothers call him Allah. He is known by other names in other languages and religions. I believe he wants as many of us to escape from perdition and destruction as is possible. Thus, we battle against those things that would drag us in the wrong direction or crush us between the pestle and mortal of hard experience.

    To believe in something higher and truer than our mortal selves is to believe we can reclaim our frail mortal beings from the grasp of the powers that would trammel us from reaching better ground.

    I write not to break your spirit or resign you to the graveyard. That is as far from my intention as east is from west. I write to warn and awaken you. In times of war and battle, a slumbering man is a corpse in prospect. Ignorance is bliss only for the dead or already defeated. If you have hope and fight left in you, ignorance is as grave an adversary as the armed enemy itself. I write to warn and bestir your mind and passions so that you are sufficiently roused to fight and claim that which by virtue of being human is inherently yours. If perchance anything I have ever written has led you to take a step toward the pit of despair, forgive me for it means my pen has failed in its mission.

    To any one whom any of my writings have lead to despondency, I ask that you discard the shrunken-feelings and revive your spirit. Our race, our people have great tasks ahead. There is no room for sadness or space for despair in the curative, collective endeavor we must undertake. We must go forward in the spirit that we live to live more fully despite the powers aligned against us.

    In all that I have written, I have tried to sound this warning not to douse your spirit but to arouse it. Sometimes, a topic may anger you. This is good because rightful anger in correct proportion can be a tonic for a people caught so long in stupor’s web. Sometimes a piece may bring some sadness, but that is not to induce a defeated spirit but to make you aware how far things have fallen from their proper place.

    A great storm has passed but it is not for you to relax. A greater storm approaches. Those who are not ready shall be swept aside. Each generation and each epoch has its own special characteristics and struggles. Some are times of peace. Some are times of learning and enlightenment. Some are times where little takes place as if history has reached a standstill. Yet, some are times where so much occurs that it seems fate and history never sleep. Some are times not of peace but of war and strife. We live in such a time.

    The harshest wars are not always sword against sword, army against idea. At times, the most trenchant wars are those of idea against idea, vision against contrary vision. These are not battles pitting corporeal army against army but are struggles pitting the mind and spirit of enlightenment against those invested in inequity and wrong. Today, we exist in an age where affluent privilege seeks to drive all others toward penury and the socio-political subjugation penury ascribes.

    We live in an age where technology and science allows man to do his best for his fellow man. Poverty, disease, hunger and many scourges that have plagued us can be decimated due to the advances in human knowledge. Unfortunately, our moral advance has not kept apace. Worst, not only has it lagged behind, the morality of the political economy has strayed far. Morally, we have entered an age as selfish and uncaring as any prior to it.

    Poverty is rife though there is enough food to feed the planet. Water is being hoarded to profit some while the livelihoods and lands of many are being desiccated. People in whose families land has existed before recorded time are being dispossessed. The urban poor and working class are being pushed to the limits of their endurance.

    Almost everywhere on the planet the powers of elite conservatism are on the loose, swallowing everything they can then blaming the victims for allowing themselves to be consumed by the merciless processes of a global political economy resentful of most of its inhabitants.

    We write not to bring to tearful resignation but to incite the maiden stirrings of renewed struggle.

    As Black people and Africans you must realize war is being made upon you. Thus, you will do well to wage your own war back against it. It is not necessary that you call the war upon yourself. War does not just come to the eager and willing. It more often falls on the weak, tired and unsuspected. To claim foul and unfairness will do little good; those that wage war against you will continue with greater relish the longer you ignore the reality of our situation. In America, Black people face resurgent racism. Trayvon’s case shows you can be killed in the middle of the street and your assailant be deemed the victim. Meanwhile, voting rights protection is being swept away. Black poverty and unemployment have escalated to Depression–era levels. That all this takes places under the first Black president only makes the caper sweeter for those effectuating it. American Blacks are being scammed of their hard won yet meager victories yet are mostly ignorant of the massive confiscation being enacted against them.

    Meanwhile, Africa undergoes similar assault. The historic forces that detest Black America hold similar content for Black Africa. Thus, rural land is being gulped by international agro-business while food prices climb as do poverty rates. The global economy demands Africa open its markets to international trade but the markets of established nations remain closed to the new types of trade that will assist Africa’s necessary industrial development. If we continue in this way, we will forever remain the lowest rung of the world economy yet they will tell us to be glad with the progress we are making. It will be true that we mark progress. However, that progress will be owned by others and not ourselves. The more we work and do as they say, the richer they become and the poorer you grow. During the coming decades, our commodity prices, especially oil, will stagnate or even lower in real terms. Our population and misery shall be the two things that are sure of rapid growth.

    Despite the talk of a world waiting for Africa to development, the world invests more heavily in Africa’s underdevelopment. As in the colonial era, the global economy will establish several outposts on the continent. These places will experience growth and dynamism. But it will not be growth based upon the growth intrinsic to Africa. These outposts will grow to the extent that they mimic how the global economy extracts Africa’s wealth from Africa. You will be told to look at these places as examples of what can be done for Africa when the reality is more akin to look at the harm being done to Africa.

    Again, this is why I write. I write to warn you of the war that comes dressed as a friend and that speaks the language of development. I write that you will know the powers with which we must contend and that you understand their strategies, tactics and wiles. This generation must do its best to lighten the burden of five centuries of pain endured by Africa and her children who have been scattered to the four winds. I write that the old sun might set on our broken state and that a new sun may rise on our dreams for equality and justice. As long as I sense malign forces seeking to harm us, I shall write as I do. I hope that you continue to read as you have.

     

    08060340825 (sms only)

     

  • Of friends, girls and fat, old men

    Of friends, girls and fat, old men

    The idea of marrying some old man fills most girls with horror right enough that they close their eyes, throw back their heads, stand with arms akimbo, and pronounce with every little strength their puny chests will allow: NO WAY; HE-E-E-E-EAVEN FORBID!

    I still have a vivid picture in my mind of my growing up years in my village when we girls of roughly the same age (yes, age-mates, thank you very much for that word of dubious origin), would gather together to do things: fetch water from the stream, run errands, giggle at our elders or just share girlish giggles that no sane adult could put any logic to. We were young, foolish and free. We were girls. We were friends.

    I have stolen these two posters from the internet because they both illustrate today’s topic; that’s right, every bit of it. Now, I understand that the international day of the girl is supposed to be celebrated sometime in October (I assure you, we will mark the day here) but I could not resist the link between the poster on the girl-child and the poster on friendship, the international day of which is to be celebrated on Tuesday, July 30. If you’re reading my mind as surely as I am reading it just now, I think our little cartoon girl is demonstrating to her friends not only a picture of what she is but also what she wants to be in the future: a queen pronouncing OFF WITH HER HEAD! Trust me, when we girls get together, we fill our mutual heads with all kinds of dreams, hopes and aspirations.

    Funny thing is, some of our childish dreams come true. I know someone who declared when she was young that she was going to visit Europe and would even be paid to live there by that country. Ladies and gentlemen, I assure you that the said lady did visit Europe on the invitation of the host country exactly as our little queen pronounced. I know another lady who said she was going to marry a real prince when she grew up. Hold your breath, reader, while I tell you that the little mouth did grow up to marry one. She still reigns as a venerable queen of her little kingdom somewhere in the… Oh, wouldn’t you just like to know! I tell you, there is no end to the dreams that ooze out of the heads of our young ones. But you will agree they are beautiful dreams, no? Te Hee! Hee!

    Anyway, one thing that is common to all the girls I have ever had the honour of speaking to, however is what is certainly an anti-dream for all girls: the idea of marrying any fat, old man is hideous. The idea fills most girls with horror right enough that they close their eyes, throw back their heads, stand with arms akimbo, and pronounce with every little strength their puny chests will allow: NO WAY; HE-E-E-E-EAVEN FORBID! Oh, yes, it’s just like the girl in our poster is doing right above.

    So, in this what is probably Planet Earth’s Last Millennium, when men of science and philosophy are busy scraping the bottom of their brains’ barrels for solutions to world aches and pains such as ozone layer depletion, AIDS, how to air-condition the roads, or make my computer go as fast as my brain (or is it the other way round now?), our esteemed but not inestimable senators here in Nigeria are busy elsewhere. They are very, very busy scraping the bottom of their brain barrels for only one thing: how to make it possible for fat, old, tottering men to legally get young girls into their fat, old, wrinkled arms in unholy wedlock! Now, who would ever think that such an important topic can be turned down? Certainly not me.

    Come now, sayeth the Holy Book, let us reason together on this thing. Does it seem right to continue to sacrifice the purity of our nation’s youths for the satiation of spent forces (terminology for old men) who have never been of any use to this country, their community or even their families except to attract infamy? Does it seem right for us as a nation to continue to watch while these bright young girls are condemned to lives of pain, diseases, discomfort, mutilation and sadness over some men’s senseless base needs in the loins?

    Many years ago, I watched in horror as a documentary detailed the very traumatic physical, psychological and emotional experiences that young girls given out in early marriage go through. I was surprised to find that the documentary had been shot in northern Nigeria. It was so bad, the documentary showed, that there is an entire hospital dedicated to the cases of VVF, the common problem that such girls have to endure as a result of early childbirth, often through their entire lives. Naturally, the indignation increases when one remembers that the problems are not only man-made, literally, but are completely avoidable. What kind of beasts lived in our men to cause such problems, I mused then?

    Obviously, the kind of beasts that lived in men then still lives in them now, going by last week’s announced gloss-over by the senate of the offensive section of the constitution which allows girl-marriage. Our Nigerian senators would no doubt like to be seen as wizened old foxes. That announcement, however, did nothing but show them up, particularly in those from the north where this culture of girl-marriage is prevalent, as devious, old epicureans that history can’t wait to quickly spew into Freud’s ‘Ich vergessen’ (I forget) zone.

    I think it is time to call in the exorcist. He is MR. FRIENDSHIP which we are celebrating this next Tuesday. Friendship is the kind of relationship which the heavens themselves rejoice over. It not only lets little girls dream, it lets them bare their dreams so that passing angels can work on them to bring them to pass. It is the kind of relationship that enables us all to view others as potential means of making our dreams come true. Friendship is the kind of relationship that allows everyone in the human race to meld into others in glorious connections with nothing in their minds but purity of purpose. Friendships allow the world to go on because they allow us a fodder to use, lean on, cry on, lift up, be lifted by, kick dust with, dream with, share with, give to, be given things by, laugh with, laugh at, and just generally share the sunset with. It brings out the best in us.

    It is not enough in this world to simply have friends. It is more important to be the friend that your friend has. The world needs good friends. Everyone needs good friends. Little girls, who are given out in marriage to old men who are in diapers for incontinence before the poor little things can finish counting the beads on a counting board, need friends. Our little princesses need friends right now among our senators, house of representative members, elders, elites, all over Nigeria, be they old, young, fat, thin, black, yellow, or red, in you and me. Let us be the voices for their dreams right now.

  • Clinging to the serpent for help

    Clinging to the serpent for help

    That govs had to rush to IBB and OBJ to save democracy shows the depth we have  sunk 

    In one breath, it is good to commend the five northern governors who, seeing the way the country is drifting like a rudderless ship, took the matter to three of the country’s former heads of state. Yet, in another breath, one could also query the wisdom behind the decision. In a country where birds are no longer singing like birds and rats are not crying like rats, that is exactly what to do: look for people with the experience to intervene and get the country back on track. It is only when there are no elders that a country goes into ruins; it is also when the family head is no more that the house becomes desolate. Nigeria, as it is today is like the proverbial child strapped into its mother’s back but with its head bent. When that happens, then the elders around have become the exact opposite of what true elders should be.

    The governors in question are Babangida Aliyu (Niger), Sule Lamido (Jigawa), Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa) and Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano). Nyako was not at the meeting held last Monday, which lasted two hours at the Presidential Lodge in Minna, the Niger State capital as he was reported to have been held back in Yola by a meeting with a Camerounian envoy. He was however represented by his deputy. They met with Generals Ibrahim Babangida and Abdulsalami Abubakar. The good thing about the development is that the five governors are all of the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The governors had earlier paid a similar visit to former President Olusegun Obasanjo on July 20.

    The visits afforded these former leaders the opportunity to play the roles they hardly could play well. General Babangida in particular must have relished the visit because it afforded him an opportunity to come into national limelight once again. Hear him: “I want to commend the governors and some of their colleagues. I was very impressed because they have seen the problem of the country as our problem and they have taken the right steps to consult widely in trying to find solution to some of these problems.

    “These governors are real patriots and I am very happy and I told them so,” Gen. Babangida said after the meeting.

    Now, what are Babangida’s antecedents? This is a man on whom we can write volumes without making reference to any library. This is a man who had all the opportunity in the world to write his name in gold but chose, rather, for selfish reason, to write it on the marble of infamy. If we look at his economic programme, the so-called Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP); it was a monumental failure. It was during his reign that the country’s currency lost its essence and it has never recovered from the slide of that era. In Babangida’s time, his go the slumber to talk about corruption despite the fact that the issue had become a cankerworm then.

    Babangida, perhaps, might have been forgiven for all of his maladministration if only he had honoured his promise to hand over to a democratically elected government. But, rather than do that, he chose to scuttle the process in spite of the billions that his government sank into a transition programme that failed, in line with the design of the evil genius. Babangida kept shifting the goal post, banning and unbanning politicians depending on his whims and caprices. As is usual with all evil geniuses, Babangida eventually shot himself in the foot when the June 12, 1993 election finally held in a peaceful atmosphere, contrary to the chaos that the Babangida government had expected. After failing to stop the election via a kangaroo court ruling on the eve of the election, and seeing that Chief Moshood Kashimawo Abiola was coasting to victory, Babangida summoned the courage to finally annul the result of the election, adjudged the fairest and freest in the country’s history. Now how can a man with this kind of antecedent save democracy?

    In the same vein, if it takes the deep to communicate with the deep, I do not know what lesson someone like Chief Obasanjo wants to teach when the issue is democracy. His eight-year tenure, from 1999 to 2007 was replete with various acts that were detrimental to democratic ethos. Is it his seizure of Lagos funds for months that we want to commend? Or the illegal manner by which some governors were removed by people backed by the Obasanjo presidency.

    As a matter of fact, this is the script that his estranged political son, President Goodluck Jonathan, has been playing and which is now heating the polity unduly. He did it in his home state of Bayelsa and got away with it. Now, he is experimenting with it in Rivers State, where he wants to remove the democratically elected governor, Rotimi Amaechi, by hook or crook. Although Jonathan’s presidency has continued to deny its involvement in the Rivers fracas, the more it does that, the more opprobrium it gets from Nigerians who are seeing through the presidency’s hands in all the shenanigans going on in that state.

    When the president of the federal republic descends so low as to be involved in the politics of a mere governors’ club and he gets rubbished in the process, whose fault is that? And, if the presidency still has not learnt its lesson and be able to truly gauge its true worth in the eye of the average Nigerian correctly, then it should have no one but itself to blame for whatever disgrace it attracts to itself. It is this Dance Macabre by the presidency that has made the five governors rush to where there can never be salvation in search of solution to some self-inflicted crises.

    That is the kind of thing that happens when one is caught up in the circle of confusion. The tendency is for such a drowning person not to mind clinging even to a serpent for help. Going to Babangida and Obasanjo to help solve problems of democratic nature is akin to asking someone to give what he does not have. Clearly, these two generals do not have any answer to the problems we have at this point in time. The only good thing working for General Abubakar is the fact that he promised to hand over the reins of power to a democratic government and he did within what we considered a reasonable time. But the choice of the then powers-that-be (Obasanjo) has turned out to be a disaster. But, if we can give General Abubakar the benefit of the doubt; we cannot for Generals Obasanjo and Babangida. Indeed, but for our common resolve, Babangida would have returned after he was forced to ‘step aside’ in August 1993. Nigerians seem unanimous in telling Babangida that ‘you step aside today, ‘you step aside forever’. In like manner, Obasanjo would have got a third term through the back door if we were not resolute in saying ‘no’.

    Politicians in the country have to ponder this sad development. By going to Babangida and Obasanjo in search of solution to democratic challenges is indication of how things have degenerated in the country. It shows the depth to which we have sunk as a people because, apart from General Abubakar, the other two generals are in the red in terms of goodwill and can therefore not draw anything from its bank. We gave them enough rope to tie themselves and they did not disappoint us. How then can they be the ones to rescue democracy, the very thing on whose grave they danced naked in their eras in government and in power?

  • When leaders juggle impunity, growth and decay

    When global leaders overreach themselves  and abuse their legitimate powers and expect the society or political system to do  nothing, then they are indulging in what I call impunity . It  is a state of mind or attitude in which the leader is confident that even though he has violated the rules of the game he is invincible enough to avert any challenge  to his authority or any sanctions for his apparent  abuse of office. Which is like saying that such leaders know that they can get away with murder quite easily. Such cheeky impudence is plain, old, leadership impunity.

     To  me, on the other hand, growth is not just cold statistics on increasing quarterly returns or GDPs as is usually the case. The growth I have in mind on the above topic,  is meaningful growth that enhances and  promotes prosperity and social welfare  as well  as  the quality of life of the citizenry of any nation,  at any point in time. Decay, therefore, is the antithesis of growth and the absence of prosperity and indeed a dismal situation when mass and crass poverty predominate in the midst of plenty and filthy opulence.

    The role of some nations and their leaders in managing their political economies and their raison d’être is our concern here today. The nations and leaders are China, Egypt and Nigeria   and the concomitant situations  in nations like  the US  and Tunisia,  with particular emphasis on events that happened  in  these places this last week. We are therefore looking  today at how leaders have handled the issues  of leadership impunity, growth  and decay in these nations in recent times.

    To tackle corruption China has   reportedly, finally decided to put on trial the former powerful  Party Chief of its wealthy Chongqing  Province  Bo Xilai. Bo is being charged with corruption and abuse of power, as Party Chief of Chongqing. His equally powerful wife had been charged with the murder of a Briton who served as consultant to British firms looking for business in China. This is in consonance with the new Chinese government’s policy of reducing corruption in China to zero level as far as possible.  Chinese President Xi Ping has made this fight against corruption a priority and Bo is the first example to show that nobody is above the law  and gets away with impunity in today’s China. Bo himself before his fall was amongst those leaders being considered for high office in China’s   recent once in ten years leadership change  and overhaul,  before he and his wife shot themselves in the leg with criminal acts of impunity that have led to their fall from grace to grass.

    To battle what it identified as slow growth in its economy China has announced new economic measures to create jobs and help small businesses. It has suspended value added tax and turn over tax for small businesses with earnings below $4000 and this is expected to create about 6m jobs and help millions of small businesses. The Chinese government has simplified custom procedures for small businesses and cut operational costs while making it easier  for small businesses to export their products  and create  and earn foreign currency in international business. The objective of the Chinese leadership is to ensure that the small businesses in China do not suffer unduly from the slowdown of the Chinese economy but are even given a soft landing to experience growth of their businesses and I think this is role model approach for any caring government in the world to adopt in looking after the people in its care.

    Egypt presents a different and almost opposite scenario to China. This is because in Egypt earlier this week at a military  graduation ceremony   the Egyptian Chief  of the Army  General al  Sissi called on Egyptians to demonstrate yesterday to give the ‘mandate’ to the military to counter Egypt’s  drift to what he called   ‘violence and potential terrorism’. The General also told his audience that he had earlier warned the Muslim Brotherhood not to contest the last elections that brought deposed President Morsi to power but he was ignored. Which showed clearly that Morsi‘s removal was premeditated and malicious and has nothing to do with his alleged dictatorial tendencies, mismanagement of the economy or the military bowing to public opinion in removing Morsi . Effectively then, the Military in Egypt has shed its toga of neutrality in Egyptian politics and has entered the arena as an interested political participant. Yet, the US which spurred on the demonstrators at Tahrir Square in Cairo two years ago to topple Housni Mubarak, is holding a Congressional hearing to determine if a coup had happened in Egypt when Morsi was removed. I tell the Americans candidly that  not only had a coup happened in bright day light , it has moved a step further from diarchy which the existing political arrangement represented, to open military involvement in the democratic process  given the call by the military chief for Egyptians to give the military power through street demonstrations yesterday.

     It is a situation similar to that in Nigeria during the Interim   government of  Ernest Shonekan   after the cancellation of the June 12 elections when Abacha was the Minister of Defence. Abacha eventually booted Shonekan out of office and assumed full powers as Head of State. Abacha later consolidated his rule and was on the way to becoming a civilian head of state as the NTA was already running the commercial on ‘Who the Cap Fits ‘before tragedy struck and Abacha died most unexpectedly. General  al Sissi is also the Minister of Defence in Egypt’s brand new Interim government but with his call for demonstrations you can bet that like Shonekan’s ill fated Interim contraption,  the days of the Interim government in Egypt are numbered and a return to the Mubarak   days  and ways are imminent in Egypt. Obviously the military in Egypt  has  acted with impunity that it seems no one can stop in that nation and economic growth and prosperity will take a back seat in the face of looming repression that will be used to justify  political stability. Again,  I wonder how the Americans will handle that,  given the fact that they had always used stability to justify support for past despotic leaders in the Middle East including Egypt.

    Lastly,  the report in the Economist of London that Nigerian legislators are the highest paid in the world  has outraged many Nigerians who have not seen any reason for the legislators to earn so much ahead  of their counterparts in the US  and Western nations . But the budget is the goose that lays the golden egg for Nigerian legislators. The Legislature approves the budget usually presented by Nigeria’s presidency according to our presidential constitution. But in Nigeria , the Legislature which prunes expenditure elsewhere as a matter of cost control ,  budget and fiscal discipline,  simply asks the presidency to add legislators personal emoluments   and fringe benefits to budget proposals before it or else it will not play ball and approve. Such additional benefits have been added by successive governments such that they have ballooned into the monster that has made our legislators the highest paid in the world .It  is   a sordid case of impunity in law making and crass abuse of office .Of  course,  funds for economic development and growth cannot be forthcoming when the legislators’ emoluments are the priority of budget presentation and approval by the executive .

    At  a different level of economic existence  in Nigeria, the picture of a Nigerian electrician and musician electrocuted on an electric pole in Jos is symptomatic of the comatose state of decay in the Nigerian polity  and economy. The Nigeria named  Chukwuebuka Eze   was trying to get power into his shop in Jos by climbing the pole  – obviously as usual –  before PHCN brought power as he was fiddling with the pole wires. Reportedly his shirt was burnt off him and he was electrocuted instantly. Which really is a pathetic situation. But then how many such Citizens Eze do we have in this nation today?  I daresay millions who are frustrated by incessant power failure but dare not like Eze take the suicidal plunge to fix the wires and have light . As an electrician Eze felt he had the skill to have his own back at PHCN inefficiency but paid with his life in that folly. Iwonder how Eze will be buried and how his family will cope and wish them succor over his loss.

    Yet, Eze’s case in Jos is not much different from that of Mohammed, the vegetable seller in Tunis , Tunisia whose burial sparked the Arab Spring revolt that has chased despotic leaders out of office in Tunisia , Egypt and Libya. Local government officials had been taking bribes from Muhammed at the site where he was selling his vegetables. At a stage he refused to any pay more bribes to sell his vegetables. When however the Local government officials seized his vegetable weighing machine Mohammed decided he has had enough. He bought a bottle of fuel and burnt himself in front of the local government office. It was his procession funeral that ballooned into the street demonstration that drove the   then President Ben Ali   of Tunisia out of office in 2011 .

    In effect then both Mohammed in Tunis and Eze  in Jos were driven  to desperation by greed corruption and institutional inefficiency and decay which in both instances claimed lives and created great pity as well as befuddlement in their respective societies . Impunity was also eminently present in both instances and one can only pray that global leaders will have compunction and not drive those in their care to suicide or premature deaths by their actions or a lack of it. Amen

  • Dodgy lawmakers versus sleepy electorate

    Current distractions at the national and state Assemblies point to one ultimate question: are our lawmakers the problem of the country or is it the electorate who reportedly voted them into power?

    Now, it has become quite clear that among decent folks making laws at the state or national levels, there is a frightening number well-disposed to everything shameful, uncivil and retrogressive. Rather than make laws, they break them. Rather than talk things over, they fight over things. Instead of canvassing superior arguments, they resort to clenched fists and weapons. They place brazen selfish-ambition over enlightened self-interest. They have blood on their hands but it is all the same to them. And they are all in the revered legislative assembly, all honourable men and women.

    But there is another side. Who took them to the otherwise hallowed Assembly?

    For much of the week, senators and many Nigerians have been distracted by the developments at the Senate. In the course of the processes of tweaking the Constitution, 85 out of 101 senators voted to remove Section 29 (b4) from the laws. By the way, that section gives a married lady, even if she is below 18, the right to renounce her citizenship of a country. Their reason for pursuing this line of action is that a lady below 18, at least in the eye of the law, may be mentally immature to understand or handle such matters as citizen renunciation. Their perception chimed with anti-early marriage activists who point out that there are health, social and other risks attending early marriages, and so should be discourages.

    There were a few who held back their votes but in the words of Senate President David Mark, “there was hardly any dissenting votes but once it got mixed up with so many other issues, (the senators could not) get the required 73 votes” to expunge that section of the Constitution.

    Senator Ahmed Sani Yarima of Zamfara State played a key role in mixing up the proceedings with those “other issues.” He and a band of protesters he apparently inspired, managed to halt the larger body in their tracks. Yarima’s thesis was that removing that section of the Constitution was anti-Islamic. He was trying to stir a religious storm by inferring that marrying underage girls was fine by every Muslim and that the intended excision of Section 29 (4b) from the Constitution was an attack on Islam. That is not true.

    That “blackmail”, as Mark called it, cost the Senate a lot. Many, including organisations overseas, said the Nigerian lawmakers had made a law legalising child-marriage. On these shores, criticism poured in, too, forcing the Senate president to make a statement. Addressing a team of activists, some of them renowned national leaders who denounced the outcome at the national Assembly, Mark said: “There was and there is still a big misunderstanding of what the Senate is trying to do. We are on the side of the people. That was why we put it that we should delete it; that is what the people want. We, in fact, were the first to take the step in the direction of deleting it. It didn’t go through because of other tangential issues that were brought to the floor of the Senate that are totally inconsequential and unconnected…A religious connotation was brought into it, it became a very sensitive issue. You must agree with me that in this country, we try as much as possible not to bring in issues that involve faith to this chamber.

    “I think the bottom-line is when people get sufficiently educated, we can do a rethink and if the Senate agrees, we can then go back and see whether we can get the required number once more, because that is the solution.”

    As governor, Yarima was the first to introduce Sharia in the North. In 2010 he reportedly brought home a 13-year-old Egyptian bride and was roundly criticised for it, though he denied the young woman in question was that young.

    Others including fellow Muslims have pointed out to the senator that his latest exertions are selfish and not in any way in the interest of Islam. Yarima does not need any reminder that many societies, even in non-Muslim countries, have seen the risks and dark sides of early-marriages and are changing their habits. The well-travelled former governor should know that several Muslim countries have put the health and well-being of their citizens and nations first and pegged the age minimum age of marriage at 18, even as they will not trade their faith for any other.

    Cases of VVF or vesico-vaginal fistula are consequently and needlessly widespread in the North, and otherwise enlightened leaders like Yarima should have been leading the campaign against such preventable diseases. The Senate would have been an ideal platform to campaign for a better deal for the North’s children and help them be the best they can be. But, clearly, Yarima has no such visions or persuasions.

    Sadly, there are many like him who are driven by wild passions. Some time ago, we found that some of our lawmakers were seeking to legalise gay relationships, even marriages. Thankfully, reason prevailed and their intentions were shot down. Still, it points to the fact that some people were sent to the legislature to do nothing but drag the country and its people back several centuries.

    That leads to an even bigger question. How do these sort of dodgy people get into the legislature? Do we vote them in, knowing they have very little to offer? Or are they still being imposed on us as their predecessors used to be?Or do they play the good boys and good girls long enough for us to take them where they want to be, only for them to shed their innocent garb and put on their true wear?

  • Dodgy lawmakers versus sleepy electorate

    Current distractions at the national and state Assemblies point to one ultimate question: are our lawmakers the problem of the country or is it the electorate who reportedly voted them into power?

    Now, it has become quite clear that among decent folks making laws at the state or national levels, there is a frightening number well-disposed to everything shameful, uncivil and retrogressive. Rather than make laws, they break them. Rather than talk things over, they fight over things. Instead of canvassing superior arguments, they resort to clenched fists and weapons. They place brazen selfish-ambition over enlightened self-interest. They have blood on their hands but it is all the same to them. And they are all in the revered legislative assembly, all honourable men and women.

    But there is another side. Who took them to the otherwise hallowed Assembly?

    For much of the week, senators and many Nigerians have been distracted by the developments at the Senate. In the course of the processes of tweaking the Constitution, 85 out of 101 senators voted to remove Section 29 (b4) from the laws. By the way, that section gives a married lady, even if she is below 18, the right to renounce her citizenship of a country. Their reason for pursuing this line of action is that a lady below 18, at least in the eye of the law, may be mentally immature to understand or handle such matters as citizen renunciation. Their perception chimed with anti-early marriage activists who point out that there are health, social and other risks attending early marriages, and so should be discourages.

    There were a few who held back their votes but in the words of Senate President David Mark, “there was hardly any dissenting votes but once it got mixed up with so many other issues, (the senators could not) get the required 73 votes” to expunge that section of the Constitution.

    Senator Ahmed Sani Yarima of Zamfara State played a key role in mixing up the proceedings with those “other issues.” He and a band of protesters he apparently inspired, managed to halt the larger body in their tracks. Yarima’s thesis was that removing that section of the Constitution was anti-Islamic. He was trying to stir a religious storm by inferring that marrying underage girls was fine by every Muslim and that the intended excision of Section 29 (4b) from the Constitution was an attack on Islam. That is not true.

    That “blackmail”, as Mark called it, cost the Senate a lot. Many, including organisations overseas, said the Nigerian lawmakers had made a law legalising child-marriage. On these shores, criticism poured in, too, forcing the Senate president to make a statement. Addressing a team of activists, some of them renowned national leaders who denounced the outcome at the national Assembly, Mark said: “There was and there is still a big misunderstanding of what the Senate is trying to do. We are on the side of the people. That was why we put it that we should delete it; that is what the people want. We, in fact, were the first to take the step in the direction of deleting it. It didn’t go through because of other tangential issues that were brought to the floor of the Senate that are totally inconsequential and unconnected…A religious connotation was brought into it, it became a very sensitive issue. You must agree with me that in this country, we try as much as possible not to bring in issues that involve faith to this chamber.

    “I think the bottom-line is when people get sufficiently educated, we can do a rethink and if the Senate agrees, we can then go back and see whether we can get the required number once more, because that is the solution.”

    As governor, Yarima was the first to introduce Sharia in the North. In 2010 he reportedly brought home a 13-year-old Egyptian bride and was roundly criticised for it, though he denied the young woman in question was that young.

    Others including fellow Muslims have pointed out to the senator that his latest exertions are selfish and not in any way in the interest of Islam. Yarima does not need any reminder that many societies, even in non-Muslim countries, have seen the risks and dark sides of early-marriages and are changing their habits. The well-travelled former governor should know that several Muslim countries have put the health and well-being of their citizens and nations first and pegged the age minimum age of marriage at 18, even as they will not trade their faith for any other.

    Cases of VVF or vesico-vaginal fistula are consequently and needlessly widespread in the North, and otherwise enlightened leaders like Yarima should have been leading the campaign against such preventable diseases. The Senate would have been an ideal platform to campaign for a better deal for the North’s children and help them be the best they can be. But, clearly, Yarima has no such visions or persuasions.

    Sadly, there are many like him who are driven by wild passions. Some time ago, we found that some of our lawmakers were seeking to legalise gay relationships, even marriages. Thankfully, reason prevailed and their intentions were shot down. Still, it points to the fact that some people were sent to the legislature to do nothing but drag the country and its people back several centuries.

    That leads to an even bigger question. How do these sort of dodgy people get into the legislature? Do we vote them in, knowing they have very little to offer? Or are they still being imposed on us as their predecessors used to be?Or do they play the good boys and good girls long enough for us to take them where they want to be, only for them to shed their innocent garb and put on their true wear?

  • A word on Okagbare

    A word on Okagbare

    Let’s move away from the sport whose actors are treated like gods, yet they cause us more pains when we bank on them to shine. Let’s consider athletes who bring us glory through their exploits in sports that we often derisively tag lesser sport. Let’s acknowledge these athletes who toil to make others perceive Nigeria from the prism of endless stream of producing world champions and not a polity of jesters.

    For us as a nation, soccer is it. Other sports can hit the roof with their exploits, we cannot be perturbed. But when soccer runs into a stormy patch, heads roll. There is panic in the land. Top government officials push and shove to get picked for trips. The Presidency is anxious. Task forces are inaugurated to avert disasters. Not so for the lesser sports.

    In the last ten days, one woman has put Nigeria’s imprint in the world of athletics. She has left the pack of world-beaters in the sprints panting behind her. They have watched in awe as she strides towards the finish-line with grace and aplomb. Their coaches have started studying the way she outpaces the pack, with one objective- stop this Nigerian from winning the top prize in big competitions, such as the Olympic Games and, possibly, World Athletics Championships.

    Blessing Okagbare is a potential world beater, the foreign media are screaming. Their thoughts are real, especially now when drug cheats are being fished out like lice in the dirty hair.

    Athletics pundits are convinced that it would be a travesty if Okagbare doesn’t win one of the big competitions, given her potentials. But can she achieve her best with the kind of people who run our sports? I don’t think so, not with the way she discredited them when she participated in the country’s trials last month.

    Okagbare didn’t shock anyone when she revealed that she had been abandoned. Many argued that she was an ingrate, based on what she had been given. But you ask: did she not work for those gifts? Is this not a new year? Shouldn’t we fund her the way her peers are funded? Is she not our best prospect for glory in athletics? Are the Super Eagles rated the best in the world like she is in athletics? Is it not about time that Okagbare became a project that is bigger than the Eagles?

    Okagbare, we are told, won the Long Jump event in the Monaco leg of the Diamond League penultimate weekend. She called Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan to say: “I’m approaching our target and, God willing, we’ll get there. I dedicate this to you, sir.” Surprised? Don’t be, because the governor bankrolls all her activities. What does Nigeria do for her? You may say that the governor represents Nigeria. Hmmmm. Can we say this of the Super Eagles?

    At the opening of the Diamond League event in Monaco penultimate Saturday evening, the women’s Long Jump turned out to be a competition of the highest quality as Russia’s European indoors champion, Darya Klishina, produced a second-round leap of 6.98m, just seven centimetres off her personal best, only to see Nigeria’s Blessing Okagbare outdo her with successive seven-metre jumps.

    Okagbare warmed up with 6.86m for a first-round lead, produced a wind-assisted 7.04m (2.1m/s) in round two and followed up with a third-round PB of 7.00m (0.0m/s).

    Okagbare is very hot and the world knows so because they are at her feet. What are we doing to help her beyond giving her our tracksuits and kits? Shouldn’t we sit down with Okagbare to chart her programme from now till after the 2016 Olympic Games? Is this not how others do theirs? Or are our sports administrators waiting for Minister Bolaji Abdullahi to think for them again?

    The enthralling part of Okagbare’s current form is that she looks poised to win the gold medal in women long jump at the 2016 Olympic Games, 20 years after another Nigerian Chioma Ajunwa, did it in Atlanta ’96. But will she? Again, I doubt it. Why? Okagbare is being left to burn the tracks unguided. She is beating everyone but losing steam for the big dance. Who will stop her from participating in these events when she needs the cash from such competitions to make ends meet?

    This has been Okagbare’s dilemma. This is where Okagbare’s manager and coaches must show that they are true professionals. But does she have such people around her? Read my lips.

    Okagabre’s post-race conference in Monaco tells the story of a talent running her affairs and it is dangerous at a time that other countries are plotting her fall in bigger competitions. She said: “I would say nine times out of 10. It’s a PB for me. My fourth and fifth jumps were better, but I fouled them. My seven metres jump was far from perfect and we’re working on a lot of different things.”

    Shouldn’t we help her now? Twice she has hit the running board in the long jump event for the 7.00 metres mark. Yet she appears to be more comfortable with the 100 metres.

    One only hopes that Okagbare’s feats in Monaco won’t be likened to that of the proverbial deer who danced itself lame before the real dance. Are our coaches studying the tapes of the Jamaicans, Americans, Britons, Germans and others to see if they are saving their best for the last? Have our coaches worked out a plan that would ensure that she doesn’t give everything away for other coaches to exploit? Have the coaches worked on her movement out of the starting bloc?

    These questions may look pedestrian but when the race is over, we may be told that if we had addressed some of these posers, Okagbare would have been the fastest woman in the world. Want to take a bet?

    It hurts to think that Nigeria, which made her Olympics debut in 1936, can only thumb her chest on Okagbare’s medal potentials. It explains our penchant for Fire Brigade approach to important issues. Okagbare needs a regime of experts to handle every detail of her training programmes, like big stars, such as Usain Bolt, have. She is our best and must be guided to excel while wearing the country’s colours in big competitions and not running her races for cash. This writer isn’t averse to her running for cash. No. She could compete in such races, provided they add value to her.

    It will be of more benefit to Okagbare more if she enters big competitions as Olympic Champion or/and Commonwealth Games champion than the also-ran status she presently enjoys.

    Asked by a BBC reporter which between long jump and the 100 metres is her favourite event in a post-race conference last year, she paused but quickly said that she was comfortable running the 100 metres. Yet it was in the long jump event at the Beijing Olympic Games in 2008 that Okagbare won the bronze medal. It was in her debut appearance.

    Many would want to ask who Okagbare is? She told her story to the BBC last year before the London 2012 Olympic Games. There were plenty of interesting twists, including the fact that she spent over nine months in her mother’s womb.

    Many had given up on her birth and expected the worst but the family trusted God for a miracle. When, eventually her mother gave birth on October 9, 1988 in Sapele, Delta State, her father aptly named her Blessing.

    Blessing, daughter of Margaret and Francis Okagbare, has lived up to the meaning of her name so much so that she has grown to become one of Nigeria’s gold medal prospects at the London 2012 Olympic Games.

    She told the BBC: “I asked my daddy why I was called Blessing and he said that I spent over nine months in my mother’s womb. When I was delivered, he named me Blessing. Since that time, I have brought joy, hope and aspiration to the Okagbare family. I have seven step brothers and seven step sisters. My family is behind me and keeps track of what I am doing. I would have loved to have them in London during the Olympics. But in Nigeria, such luxuries don’t form part of government’s obligation to athletes. I agree with the sense that they could distract me, but I will remain focused.”

    With seven step brothers, Okagbare’s first contact with sports was football. She played with boys and later soccer clubs. But it is in soccer that she is writing the name of Nigeria in gold and making her parents proud.

    Athletics is an individual sport and it cost less to run than football. While footballers earn so much as match bonuses, an athlete merely needs less than half of the aggregate bonuses paid to soccer players.

    So, isn’t it time we reconsidered our passive interest in athletics? Food for thought for those in charge of our sports! And for Okagbare, let’s not forget that an early bird, they say, catches the worm.

  • Dangerous delusions

    Dangerous delusions

    The year was 1965. Western Nigeria was paralysed by riots, protests and bloodshed.

    The people were up in arms against electoral robbery and political oppression. Trouble started when, just as it is happening in Rivers State today, the Federal Government of Alhaji Tafawa Balewa interfered illegally in the affairs of the region to destabilize the Action Group (AG), incapacitate Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the leader of opposition, and impose an unpopular Chief Ladoke Akintola on the people as Premier.

    Capitalising on a contrived crisis in the Western Region House of Assembly, the Federal Government declared a State of Emergency in the west, appointed an administrator for the region while detaining Chief Obafemi Awolowo and several AG chieftains. The October 1965 regional election in the west was then horrendously rigged to return Chief Akintola to power against the will of the people while Awolowo was put on trial and subsequently sent to prison for alleged treasonable felony.

    Everything was going very well for Akintola and his friends at the centre or so they thought. Balewa was told that the west was burning and he should do something urgently to pacify the people and arrest the situation. The velvet voiced Prime Minister and darling of the western world calmly responded that he could see no smoke in the west.

    On January 15, 1966, the flames got to him. Democracy came crashing down in the country and Nigeria descended into anarchy and ultimately civil war. Balewa, Ahmadu Bello and Akintola had been dangerously deluded. They did not survive the fiasco.

    Fast forward to the Second Republic. Just as is happening today, the President Shehu Shagari administration was pretending that the country was making speedy progress under his lacklustre and utterly visionless, inept leadership. In his 1982 budget presentation to the National Assembly, President Shagari told the lawmakers that “The enumerated setbacks in our economy in 1981 notwithstanding, our GDP has shown a slight improvement…available indicators show an encouraging growth of 15% in the manufacturing sector. There is a 3% rate of growth in the agricultural sector. Furthermore, there are increases in investments. These are, without doubt, expressions of confidence which investors have in the resilience of Nigeria’s economy. This confidence has remained unshaken, despite prophesies of the local forecasters of gloom and doom, who do not know the difference between resilience and buoyancy.”

    The reader can surely see the similarities here between this speech and President Goodluck Jonathan’s mid-term report that suffocated us with statistics indicating that we are all faring very well even as hunger, poverty, disease, joblessness, violence and ignorance stalk the land and public infrastructure lie prostrate across the country.

    The ‘forecasters of gloom and doom’ referred to by President Shagari in the budget speech cited above was none other than Chief Obafemi Awolowo who, in mid-1981 had warned in an open letter to Shagari that the economy was fast approaching a precipice and that urgent steps be taken to salvage the situation. Suggesting several measures that could be taken to safeguard the economy, Awolowo also criticised certain actions taken by Shagari and asked: “Shehu, do you ever ask yourself the question ‘Cui bono’”?

    In a scathing reply, most likely authored by his political adviser, the late Senator Chuba Okadigbo, Shagari told Awo: “My dear Chief, I never ask myself questions in Latin. I only ask myself questions in Hausa or English”. Ah! Those were the days! Shagari’s Economic Adviser, Professor SM Essang addressed an international press conference in London lampooning Awolowo and declaring that the economy was in sound health.

    To cut a long story short, in a matter of months Awo’s prediction came true. The economy was in deep crisis. Eating humble pie, Shagari addressed the National Assembly seeking special permission to introduce austerity measures. I promptly and very urgently threw my high school economics text book authored by Professor Essang, ‘Intermediate Economics’ into the waste bin telling myself, ‘teacher stop teaching me nonsense’!

    That economic crisis signalled the beginning of the end of the second republic. Both Shagari and his economic advisers were dangerously deluded. The second republic did not survive the debacle.

    Fast forward to 2013 Nigeria. The more presidential aides deny such a glaring fact, the more the vast majority of Nigerians are convinced that the Jonathan presidency is bent on destabilizing the Rivers State government and getting the governor, Rotimi Amaechi, out of office at all costs and by all means no matter how foul.

    Having successfully hounded Governor Timpre Sylva of Bayelsa State out of office and imposed Seriake Dickson on the state as governor in a highly militarized election, Jonathan and his inner clique obviously believe they can do the same in Rivers. Amaechi’s sin? He is believed to harbour ambition for higher office in 2015 – an aspiration which Jonathan strategists think can hurt the President’s second term ambition.

    Thus, the police in Rivers State provided security for five members of the 32-member state House of Assembly to sit and attempt impeaching the Speaker illegally but for Amaechi’s timely intervention. The same police looked the other way as a mob attacked four northern governors who paid a solidarity visit to Amaechi in Port Harcourt. Mr Mbu John Mbu, the Rivers State Police commissioner, obviously reading the presidency’s body language, has been openly rude to and disdainful of the governor without rebuke.

    President Jonathan, received the arrow head of the anti-Amaechi forces, the Minister of State for Education, Mr Nyeson Wike, and the five minority members of the House whose violation of the 1999 constitution sparked the recent violence in the legislative chamber, at the presidential Villa in Abuja. This was a tacit recognition by the presidency of Evan BapakayeBipi, who has been absurdly, preposterously and ignominiously parading himself as the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    Dame Patience Jonathan openly told 16 Bishops from the South-South, who visited her in Abuja that Amaechi defied her request that some structures should not be demolished in her hometown, Okrika, and that he removed the Chairman of a local government who held a reception in her honour. Does this not suggest that these are part of the causes of Amaechi’s travails and that the presidency is deeply involved in the Rivers crisis?

    Despite the clear danger that the Rivers crisis portends for democracy in Nigeria, presidential aide, Dr.Doyin Okupe, avers blissfully that all is well. In his words, “The crisis in Rivers State in no way poses any threat to the nation’s democracy. Nigeria remains peaceful and cannot in any way be threatened by political developments in the state…The situation in Rivers State is purely a localized political matter and has no dangerous or far reaching consequences for the peace and security of the nation”.

    This is a very dangerous delusion. Has Dr. Okupe pondered what would happen if Governor Amaechi drops dead today even if of natural causes? Has he considered what would have happened if northerners had retaliated against South-South indigenes in their states for the treatment meted out to their governors in Port Harcourt? Is he not disturbed that an ordinarily taciturn General Abdusalam Abubakar has uncharacteristically come out to warn publicly that the Rivers crisis may torpedo the country’s democracy if not quickly checked? Does he not think that there may be something the General knows that he does not?

    Is Dr Okupe aware that there are currently military task forces operating in at least 28 states in the country – an indication of pervasive instability? This column sincerely hopes that President Jonathan does not share this dangerous delusion. It is heart- warming that the President on Thursday vowed to curb political excesses in the country while receiving the leadership of the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) at the Presidential Villa. The earlier he does that the better. For, the degeneration of the Rivers crisis may signal the ‘Nunc Dimittis’ of this democracy. God forbid.

  • Useful idiots (4)

    Shame. It’s an embarrassment that no one can see it or ably do something about it: I speak of that keen, thin scent of decay that scorches our psyche and everything; that afflicts with a terrible streak, the inertia, abiding laziness and fraudulence that pervades our hearts.

    We have been corrupted by money and sentiment; and sentiment even more dangerous because we still can’t name its price. A man open to bribe is to be relied upon below a certain figure, gratification or artifact, but sentiment may uncoil in the heart at a name, a platitude…even a smell remembered.

    Bet you can feel it now, even as you read; that flagrant, scented stench of putrefaction that announces our innate nature. Feel it now; that you may remember this stench when everybody and everything are shed of trait, in that dreaded epoch when Nigeria gives to rancidness and collapse.

    Until then, we shall continue to have “today” everyday. And every day, “today” will continue to be unfortunate – because we choose to live like we are programmed to self-destruct. Nigeria’s unfortunate situation besides it’s benefaction of a class of desperate, uncultured, emasculated and hopeless breadline, has also foisted upon the nation, an inferior youth population that, in spite of daunting socio-economic realities, are accumulating property and obviously indefensible academic honours.

    This human demographic is not nearly as powerful as a fairer socioeconomic system might make it, hence those who survive in spite of the daunting economic realities are handicapped in intellect and character and thus accomplish much less than they deserve to. The fraction of successful youth is usually left to chance and accident, and hardly to any intelligent culling or rational method of selection.

    We can only hope then, that in this generation, and not subsequent generations, that the mass of Nigerian youth can be excited to assume that humane and altruistic leadership and citizenship which our current reality so desperately demands. Such culture must be fostered by the youth themselves.

    For a long while, the Nigerian ruling class have doubted, albeit justifiably, as to whether the country’s youth can develop and produce that humane citizenship and leadership that we profess to want; unfortunately, no one can seriously dispute the incapability of the Nigerian youth to nurture, incorporate and ably exploit a progressive culture and uncommon aptitude of modern civilization for the benefit of present and future generations.

    In pursuit of remedy for this evident deterioration in citizenship and thought, we must accept the inferiority and degeneracy of the Nigerian youth as a reality, unpardonable in its intensity, regrettable in consequence, and perilous for the future.

    Thus the imperativeness of crucial and practicable steps by the youth to forge our way out of the thickets and tangles of our current situation. This imposes the essential demand for trained, dependable Nigerian leaders sired from the nation’s youth.

    Nigeria ruins for lack of men of aptitude and character, men of ability, sophistication, and industry. Nigeria needs men that thoroughly understand and treasure modern civilization without being enslaved by it; men capable of assuming leadership of Nigerian communities and improving them by force of precept and example, unfathomable compassion, and the inspiration of common blood and ideals.

    But if such men are to be effectual, they must have access to power – they must be bolstered by the best public opinion and be able to wield for their objects and aims, such weaponry as the experience of the world has taught and that are indispensable to human cum national progress.

    Of such weapons the greatest, perhaps, in the modern world used to be the power of the ballot; but ever since the Nigerian populace forsook their right and power to choose the best among our kind to lead us to the future of our dreams; the need for a pervasive and ultimately progressive culture of citizenship and patriotism became more pronounced.

    The attitude of the Nigerian mind towards democracy and other political measures of self-determination can be traced with unusual accuracy to our prevalent conceptions of government. In pursuit of freedom from our British colonialists, we argued that no social class or race was so good, so true and disinterested to be trusted wholly with the political destiny of its neighbors; that in every state the best arbiters of their own welfare are the persons directly affected; and that it is only by arming every hand with a ballot, with the right to have a voice in the policy and politics of the state, that the greatest good to the greatest number could be attained.

    Expectedly, there were objections to these arguments, but we thought we had answered them quite convincingly; if someone complained of the ignorance of voters, we recommended that we educate them. If another complained of their venality, we suggested that we disenfranchise them or cast them in jail. And in response to fears of demagogues and the natural perversity of certain Nigerians, we insisted that time and bitter experience would teach even the most hideous of them.

    It’s been five decades since we won our right to self-rule and Nigeria disappointedly remains a perfect study in the human propensity to self-destruct. Having won back our freedom, we have become wholly incapable to protect Nigeria from those of us that do not believe in our freedom and have not yet charted a blueprint for believing in our right to have it.

    This explains why we are yet to use the ballot intelligently and quite effectively. We do not understand how to channel that proverbial power we are believed to possess nor have we been able to discern the possession of a power so great that it could compel the more privileged and politically conscious elements amongst us to educate, enlighten and thus emancipate the less privileged and ignorant to its clever use.

    It is no minor impediment that trammels the economic and intellectual development of the Nigerian citizenry. Can we establish a mass of students, laborers, artisans and technocrats who, by law and collective opinion, constitute a great and reckonable voice in shaping the political and economic clime in which they live and toil? Can we evolve and nurture to fruition a system capable of empowering the breadline and the working class to compel respect for their judgment and welfare? Can this system be evolved in a Nigeria that the youth is voiceless in all three tiers of government and powerless in their own defense?

    Today, the Nigerian masses have no say about how much they are taxed, or how those taxes shall be expended. They have no say about the quality of our laws and policies even when they manifest devastatingly to wreck our dear old survival routine and the possibility of achieving our dreams.

    Resignedly, we have learnt to look upon law and justice, not as protecting safeguards, but as sources of humiliation and oppression of our class. These laws are perverted by men and women who have little interest in you and me; they are executed by men and women who have absolutely no motive to be civil to you and me; and despite the monstrosity we are forced to endure, we could only endure more; deservedly though.

     • To be continued…