Category: Columnists

  • Here’s what I think about our educational system

    The social space is experiencing such frenetic energy now everyone is gone mad in it: spending, acquiring, competing, calling, surfing, partying, killing … oh shucks, who cares anymore!

    Today, dear reader, let’s get a little serious and talk about something that concerns nearly, if not all, homes in this country: the education of our children. I’m sure you and I agree we do need to talk about it; what we may disagree on is what you and I would have to say about it. The problem is that we have different points of view: I am, for instance, short-sighted, and you are, for a fact, always wrong. There, I’m glad we’ve had that talk.

    Seriously, if there was any justice in this world at all, all our milito-politicians should be swinging on trees by now because many of them did not go through the old school system which emphasised the rigours of sweat, merit and quality. Since many of them are pampered children of the ol’ time milito-political class (as in, their mothers used pampers to collect their poops), they did not get the old school education. This is why they neither know the value of nor necessity for building a strong, virile society. They were born in financially contentious circumstances (their parents embezzled), reared in disorderly comfort (they were hidden abroad), and now they spew jeopardy all over us all (they now misrule us). That’s why I say that if there was any justice in this world, I should be sitting over the national treasury because I went through the old school education (as one of my readers observed), while milito-politicians and their children should be swinging on trees.

    The problem confronting the educational sector in this country, from the primary to the tertiary levels, is precisely that confronting our national life: it is the paradox of More Wealth = Less Gain. Now, that is a mathematical formula you cannot beat. Certainly, there is more wealth in the country now than say the nineteen-seventies, eighties or nineties, even with inflation factored in. I don’t know anything about net or per capita income and all that, but I know that state, national and personal budgets now have potential and promissory capabilities to do a lot more than before if there is political will. So, when people ask me what is wrong with our educational system now, I say there is nothing that fixing the government, teachers, students and society won’t cure. All of them are rolled into three core problem areas: devaluation of merit, the frenetic increase in the amount of social space and the gradual loss of community.

    Pardon me, but I think the moment this country began to go down was when it yielded to the strange argument that merit was not worth a thing. That thinking worked like a wave, beginning slowly but assuredly permeating the national system until it overtook the entire country. Every child now knows that old time cliché: it’s not what you really know that matters; it’s who you know. When I went to school, things were fairly normal. The sun rose in the east and set in the west (not like now when people can command it anyhow) and people had just one head. And when that head sinned, it generally died, or almost did on account of the punishment meted out to it. Now, children of the big and unjust get into scrapes, and their daddies and mummies pull all kinds of plugs to get their heads out of the net – a matter of knowing the right person. Children now know that to razzle-dazzle the family with intelligence in the hearth may not necessarily get them more provisions to take to school, but knowing the most powerful person in the house can help. Throughout the country, teachers, students and policy makers are not chosen on merit. Children know this. They also know that access to very good jobs sort of depends on a lot more than just good degrees.

    For instance, good positions in many firms, banks, T-com industries have often been filled by weak degrees accompanied by svelte figures or sharp tongues; national public life is peopled with last class brains who expectedly bring out last class behaviour, or first class brains who compromise and bring out last class behaviour. They also see their parents staking out government houses to become minister, commissioner or special assistant rather than staying at home to give their children some quality attention, since it is generally agreed that society should only reward crooks. No? Oh dear, I really thought so. Anyway, Nigeria seems to have brought up its children to believe that there is no equitable access to privileges. If the country generates twenty units of electricity for instance, a good chunk should first go to the leaders, and others can share what is left. Some animals are indeed more equal than others. Naturally, it pays children to study less and become leaders than to study more and become nothing, which is the current formula: More Work = Less Pay; take it or leave it. Meekly, most of us take it.

    Nigerians make up for this deficit in other spheres: the social space. There is now so much energy in the national social space, it is astounding. Listen, every event concerning the child is now a social event. A child is leaving nursery school? Cook and invite everybody. A child is leaving primary school? Dress and invite everybody. There is no end to the litany of ‘cook, dress and invites’ that distract the child at different stages of his/her education. This is why children are more taken with dressing than anything else. Worse, nearly every school-going child can be reached on their mobile phones (students and teachers alike take calls in class); and the more expensive, the more they attempt to put the parents in the peerage class. Does it work? Naaaaah! Then, look, nearly every child is more concerned about his/her Facebook status than about his/her average score in class. And this Facebook thing has a way of making king and peasant equal, unlike the old school times when the teacher exerted so much power his boot reverberated throughout the community. I have a sneaky feeling those good old times are yet to come really. Altogether, the social space is experiencing such frenetic energy now everyone is gone mad in it: spending, acquiring, competing, calling, surfing, partying … oh shucks, who cares anymore!

    Oh yes, the community should care, but sadly, it too has lost its wisdom – both teeth and soul. As someone would say, where is the community now anyway? It used to be that the community made sure all children went to school, all teachers did their work and all men and women went to farms. It made sure no one became a thief, murderer or cheat because it hung beads of shame and repentance on such erring necks. And they were usually heavy. Now, the only necks the community wants to hang anything on are the rich and powerful ones; you know, those thick-set necks oozing oils that scream to anyone looking at them from behind: look at me, I am from the government. Those necks now receive chieftaincy beads. The community is tired and does not want much to do with anyone who cannot command wealth anymore.

    That leaves us the government in this sad story of our educational system. Actually, the government carries a good chunk of the problems: bad funding, weak political will and inconsistent actions. Just look at what it is doing with ASUU and ASUP. Governments come and go, but their tactics never seem to change: ignore, ignore, ignore. All told, what is wrong with our educational system can be fixed. However, it requires our collective wills: Government’s Action + Parental Attention + Community Wisdom = Affirmative Education. Lots of maths today, no? Phew!

  • Bitter pill, not bitter truth

    NATIONAL MIRROR Front Page of July 11 verbalized ignorance: “Police tear gas Amaechi” Fracas: ‘tear gas’ is an uncountable noun—not a verb. So, Police use tear gas on Amaechi

    “…Nigerians will have no reasons to be desperate about migrating to other lands.” My view: end the sentence at ‘migration’! There is no need for ‘other lands’.

    Now the Editorial which circulated three solecisms: “…in it’s (its) latest 10-year forecast….”

    “…in the last quarter of 2011 to between N1,700 to (and) N2,000 in 2013.”

    “The truth is that the insight provided by industry watchers, non-state actors and watch-dog (watchdog) groups in the construction industry appear (appears) to confute….”

    “FG flags off (begins, signals…) fertilizer distribution in Gombe State” There is no such verbal expression as ‘flag off’ except in car-racing competitions.

    “Rotaract Club to commission (inaugurate) health centres in Ifo”

    Lastly from NATIONAL MIRROR Back Page: “…he has literarily (literally) set his new agenda on 2015…pitching (pitting) himself against the NGF….”

    DAILY SUN of July 10 goofed: “The current confrontation between ASUU and the Federal Government can best be described as a game of hide-and-seek.” An insight: …be described as hide-and-seek.

    Let us welcome National Daily to this column. Its July 8-12 edition showed the character of the newspaper with many headline blunders: “Controversy trails passage of bill on N20bn bond: None involvement of public condemned” Building a new culture: non-involvement

    “Abia losses (loses) internal revenue source”

    “Oil theft: PENGASSAN, NUPENG, (what is this comma for?) give FG 60 days (60-day or 60 days’) ultimatum”

    “Chinese is (are) taking over our businesses—Manufacturers”

    “Miss Ezinne Akudo emerges winner of 2013 Miss Nigeria Beauty contest (sic)” Would it have been Mrs. Ezinne Akudo?

    “Jonathan raises curiousity to deliver on infrastructure” What is the meaning of this? Spell-check: curiosity

    “Tension mounts over Ijaw/itsekiri tribal (ethnic) clash”

    “CP Aduba assures adequate security” Who did he assure?

    Finally from National Daily: “….bemoans the poor performance of students” Educational standard: students’ poor performance

    “Gun men kill soldier in Edo” (NIGERIAN PILOT Front Page Headline, July 9) Before the paper crashes: Gunmen

    The Guardian Editorial of July 9 leads the newspaper’s catalogue of wrongdoings: “People who for one reason or the other (or another) are unable to observe it either in full or part are required….” The extract is restrictive (limiting to two) while the correction gives a broad latitude.

    “Nigerians in Diaspora seeks (why?) tax waiver for home investments”

    From the Back Page of The Guardian: “Come (In) 2005, many occupants of elective offices will constitutionally relinquish their positions.” Except for Apocalypse or other rapturous manifestations, 2015 will come!

    THISDAY of July 8 disseminated advertorial and editorial faults: “Silverbird in conjuction (conjunction) with the Bayelsa State Tourism Development Agency presents….”

    Next is the EDITORIAL which contained four indiscretions: “…Dr. Okonjo-Iweala said the country is (was) losing around (about) 300,000 barrels of crude daily to oil thieves, amounting to a loss of $1 billion per month ($1 billion monthly).”

    “Yet so massive is the crime that the JTF last week discovered another sets (another set or other sets, depending on the fact of the matter) of crude oil loading points in three communities in Bayelsa State.”

    “Cost of funds drop (drops) on cash inflow”

    “…the Lagos State Government has initiated a process that will deliver at least 900 million litres of portable (potable) water to homes in different part (parts) of the state.”

    “Your election as the new (would it have been old?) President of ARSO is a testimony of (to) your giant strides in….” (Full-page advertisement signed by the managements of Promadaz Industries Ltd. & Macpee Agencies Ltd.)

    The July 7 edition of THE NATION ON SUNDAY failed to show why it is Nigeria’s widest circulating newspaper with a few blunders starting from its front page: “NSA orders probe, more troops deployed to (in) Yobe”

    Now its Editorial: “Despite the fact that 54 out of the reported 175 prisoners that escaped from the Olokuta prison have been re-arrested, the bitter truth (pill) is that prisons in the nation are not well secured.”

    “In a desperate last minute (last-minute) bid to beat the NCC June 30th deadline….”

    “School holds inter house (inter-house) cultural competition”

    THISDAY, THE SATURDAY NEWSPAPER, of July 6 goofed on a few occasions: “Community gives Mobil 21 day (21-day) ultimatum to pay N4bn oil spill (oil-spill) compensation”

    “…an incident that have (has) been mired in controversy”

    “…a centre that will offer retirees across the state antidotes for (to) boredom and solitude after three decades of active public service.”

    Lastly from THISDAY: “But like (as) I said, you don’t know what God plans.”

    The next six Offences are from THE GUARDIAN of June 18: “That’s why renowned scholars from top-rated citadels of learning around the world would be converging in (on) Ekiti State….” (Full-page advertisement by the Government of Ekiti State)

    “Nigeria (Nigeria’s) food import reduce (reduces) by N857b, says Adesina”

    “This way you stay connected to our world class (world-class) audio and video channels.” (Full-page advertisement by DStv)

    “MTN Project Fame 6.0 All-Stars Concerts” (Full-page advertisement by MTN) Everywhere you go: All-star concerts

    Still on advertorials in THE GUARDIAN of June 18 with Standard Chartered offering the next two identical howlers: “Its (It’s) good when a relationship can help you achieve what truly matters”

    “Connect to the worlds (world’s) most dynamic markets”

    REACTIONS NEXT WEEK, PLEASE.

  • Freedom of information Act and dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity

    Freedom of information Act and dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity

    It gives me great pleasure to at last be able to give this lecture. I say this because, first, I was to have given the lecture last year but could not do so for all sorts of reasons and, second, because this year once again, other pressing engagements and commitments almost made it impossible for me to give the lecture.

    There is another reason why I am very delighted to be giving the lecture and this is simply the fact that the sponsors of the lecture, the Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism, is an organisation whose work and vision I both greatly admire and endorse. Journalism, specifically activist journalism, was crucial in the struggle for our country’s freedom from colonial rule, just as we are finding out more and more that in the long and unfolding struggles to consolidate that independence from continued foreign domination and internal misrule, anarchy and suffering for the vast majority of our peoples, that tradition of journalism will prove indispensable. The Wole Soyinka Centre for Investigative Journalism is a leading, perhaps pioneering organisation for the consummation and perpetuation of this vital tradition of the press at this particular conjunctural moment in our history. May its work live up to the great expectations that its mission bestows on its founding in the years and decades ahead!

    All modern democratic nations and societies need a free press at the centre of which stands the kind of activist, professionally mature investigative journalism that the WSCIJ seeks to nurture and expand in our country. Beyond this, the developing nations of Africa and other parts of the global South have an even much greater need for a free press, for an activist, independent-minded journalism than the affluent liberal democracies of the global North. The theme of my lecture this morning – the Freedom of Information Act of 2011 (FoI) as it confronts the immense challenge of what I call the dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity – is a small part of this larger global issue of the centrality of a free press and an independent-minded activist journalism for all modern democratic societies. But this should not blind us to the immensity of its ramifications for the survival of our country and the future prospects of the majority of our peoples. Since the term “dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity” in the title of my talk goes to the heart of this assertion, let me now dispel any puzzlement concerning the term by directly addressing the range of issues and significations I have in mind in my use of it.

    Before going directly to this theme, a word of clarification is perhaps necessary. As I move into discussion of the theme, I ask you, my audience, to bear in mind that the question that drives all my observations, analyses and projections is this: What need do we have for a Freedom of Information Act when what I am calling the dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity in our country is so open about all the corrupt misdeeds, all the inept illegalities and all the official inanities that attach to “democratic” governance in our country?

    Well, my answer to this question is that we still need that landmark legislation that is known as the Freedom of Information Act that was passed in the year 2011, even if corruption and the mediocrity which it creates on a gargantuan scale in our country are normatively not hidden, not shrouded in secrecy in Nigeria. As a matter of fact, I shall in the course of my lecture be arguing that there is a crisis of under-utilisation of the FoI by our press, by our media houses in spite of the fact that they were at the forefront of the struggle for the passing of the Act. Indeed, my central argument in the lecture will be that though the nature and scale of corruption in Nigeria poses a challenge to the FoI, this is a challenge that is not insurmountable. However, before I come to this argument, it is perhaps helpful to highlight three particular cases that are exemplary in their graphic illustration of the climate of corruption that the FoI must contend with in our country that is almost without comparison with the moral and political climates that the FoI in other countries of the world have to deal with. [Parenthetically, let me note here that the FoI exists in many countries of the world; it has indeed become an almost indispensable part of human and civil rights legislation in many parts of the world]

    The first case concerns perhaps the biggest and most brazen act of state or official corruption ever perpetrated in Nigeria. This sublime brigandage is known as the oil subsidy scam of 2011. It involved vast sums of monies paid out of our national coffers to a cabal of oil marketers that hold the lifeline to the distribution of petroleum products in our country. I am sure that every woman and man in this hall has heard or read of this case before but all the same, a critical look at the details is necessary in the context of this lecture.

    For the avoidance of doubt or confusion, let us remember that in the Nigerian context oil subsidy implies an annual budgetary allocation to defray the costs of refined oil imported into the country to augment the shortfall between what our oil refineries produce and the volume of petroleum products that the nation consumes annually. There is a longstanding controversy concerning the reality and the scale of this subsidy, but in the present context, we need not concern ourselves with that controversy. The important thing to note here is that in the year 2011, and depending on which set of posted and announced figures you use for your computation, what was actually paid out to marketers as oil subsidy was six to nine times bigger than what was budgeted, even though there was no rise at all in the volume of petroleum products sold and consumed in the country. Indeed, for 2011, the posted, budgeted sum was N245 billion for the whole year. But within the first eight months of the year, an alleged sum of N1.3 trillion had been paid out to the marketers. I say “alleged” here because N1.3 trillion was only one of the figures thrown around. On this particular crucial issue, let me quote from the Report of an Ad-Hoc Committee of the House of Representatives on that oil subsidy scam:

    Contrary to the earlier official figure of subsidy payment of N1.3 trillion, the Accountant General of the Federation put forward a figure of N1.6 trillion; the Central Bank N1.7 trillion, while our Committee established subsidy payment of N2.58 trillion as at December 2011, amounting to more than 900% over the appropriated sum of N245 billion.

    Please note that the sum of N2.58 trillion actually paid out was 900% greater than the N245 billion budgeted. Indeed, for the year 2011, the budget approved for the whole country was N4.97 trillion, which means that what was paid out to the cabal of oil marketers was more than half of the national budget itself for that year. And to place this within the framework of some of the convertible currencies of the world, N2.58 trillion is approximately $16 billion US dollars; 12.46 billion Euros; and 10.73 billion British pound sterling, all paid out to marketers most of whom were phantom dealers in petroleum products who supplied nothing.

    One more quotation from that same House of Rep Ad-Hoc Committee Report and we will move on to my second example of what I am calling the dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity. This is the quotation:

    Contrary to statutory requirements and other guidelines under the Petroleum Support Fund (PSF) scheme mandating agencies in the industry to keep reliable information data bases, there seemed to be a deliberate understanding among agencies not to do so. This lack of record keeping contributed in no small measure to the decadence and rot that the Committee found in the administration of the PSF… We found out that the subsidy regime, as operated in the period under review (2009 and 2011), was fraught with endemic corruption and entrenched inefficiency. Much of the amount claimed to have been paid as subsidy was actually not for consumed PMS (i.e. petroleum products). Government officials made nonsense of PSF Guidelines due mainly to sleaze and in some cases, incompetence. [The emphases are mine]

    “Decadence”; “rot”; “entrenched inefficiency”; “incompetence”: these are the Committee’s own terms, not mine. Mine is only to draw conclusions from these terms and from the combined effect of their concatenation in the Report’s searing indictment of the sublime kind of corruption that reigns in our country. This is my conclusion, my extrapolation: Corruption is not only dishonesty, fraud, or sleaze; it is also aided by, and in turn generates mediocrity, rottenness, putrefaction. We shall come back to this issue later in the lecture.

    For now, let us turn our attention to the second of the three exemplary cases that I wish to highlight in these observations and reflections on the challenges that the dictatorship of corruption and mediocrity poses to the FoI Act. This happened in the year 2006 and entailed a very public feud between no less august and authoritative political personages than the President and Vice President of the Republic at the time, Olusegun Obasanjo and Atiku Abubakar. The feuding in essence entailed accusations and counter-accusations by Obasanjo and Atiku of massive looting of the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) of hundreds of millions of dollars. It was precipitated when the President sent a report to the National Assembly alleging that Atiku had conspired with some Americans to divert vast sums from the PTDF to the benefit of himself and his foreign co-conspirators. Please note that the word “loot” was in the report that Obasanjo sent to the National Assembly with a demand that impeachment proceedings be launched against the Vice President.

    Of course, as could be expected, Atiku promptly responded to Obasanjo’s charges. But what no one expected, what in fact nearly took everyone’s breath away in Atiku’s response was that he did not deny the charges at all; rather than a denial, he alleged that Obasanjo and some of his cronies and girlfriends had benefitted from the funds he had diverted from the PTDF. And to back up this claim, Atiku made photocopies of the cheques he had written in favour of these cronies and paramours of Obasanjo. He took out full-page advertorial spreads in major newspapers in which documents in support of this extraordinary counter-accusation were published.

    Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, it is tempting to say that this account, this story speaks for itself. But that is not exactly true. To the story itself and for our purposes in this lecture, we must ad that no action based on the FoI could ever have brought out the surfeit of information on the looting, the corruption that Obasanjo and Atiku, together with their supporters, voluntarily revealed about themselves. And let us also note that nothing happened to Obasanjo, Atiku and their cronies, girlfriends and sycophants that benefitted from that vast looting of the funds of the PTDF by way of well deserved punitive action. Ironically, the only person who did go to jail was the American congressman, William J. Jefferson who, at one time, was Atiku’s point man in the United States theatre of operations in financial wheeling and dealing before he and the Vice President quarreled and went their separate ways. But Jefferson served prison time in the United States, not in Nigeria.

    To be continued

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Race on trial in america

    Race on trial in america

    To be a black man is to eat the daily bread of injustice

    To some, the epigram above would seem from a bygone era. After all, the White House is occupied by a Black man twice voted into office. His election surely was no accident. Racial progress has been made on some levels. However, the mean past dies hard because the ills of the future always try to rescue it.

    What we thought was a monumental breakthrough has cheapened into a poor lithograph of what could have been; President Obama’s ascendance has been reduced to an image of an image, a compound mirage. At best, it serves as a weak foretaste of something more substantial to come. At worst and more likely, it herald the advent of a cold, calculating and compromised black leadership class: A leadership that devotes itself more to its own position and maintenance than the welfare of those upon whose backs it climbed to get into the leadership position. We are witnessing the birth of a new Black American leadership – one from the people but not of or for them.

    After President Obama there shall come a long procession of black-skinned Wall Street proxies and hirelings like photogenic, articulate Newark Mayor Cory Booker who is preparing to contest for Governor of the New Jersey in the near term and has trained his farther sights on national office. Unlike the progressive Black politicians of yesterday, this man has been and will be bankrolled by the biggest financial houses and the deepest pockets America has to offer. He will receive this tainted largesse because the policies he advocates are a smooth elixir to the well-heeled but a mean tonic to the poor and broken. Yet, he will tell the people that he is doing all that can be done. Any other alternative would be too radical and unreasonable to consider. It will be a lie but Black people will believe him because he looks like them and because they figure he must be great because he has managed to get big money on his side. In their analysis, they will be partial correct and only in a superficial manner. He looks like them. However, it is not that he is great enough to have convinced Wall Street to be at his side. The truth is that he has been cunning enough to go the side of Wall Street.

    With the future looming as dank as the past, Black people are trapped between the tide and backwash of a national history that refuses them respite. Forget the relatively small corps of entertainment and sports figures who have attained affluence. In the antebellum period, a few blacks were slaveholders, some of them viciously so. They were the nadir of social derangement, the perverse quiddity of a racism that ultimately makes a man make a slave of himself. There are few evils greater than this.

    A subtler yet dangerous evil tracks modern Black America. Four decades of minute accumulation of average Black household wealth has totally dissipated since 2008. The drainage has yet to cease. Black children in parts of the rural South are so ravaged and impoverished that European humanitarian nongovernmental organizations have been plying these straitened communities with the same type of assistance normally reserved for Africa or Haiti.

    Joblessness and underemployment touch close to one in three Black men. More likely a Black man will see the inside of a jail or prison than that of a university classroom, unless he is fortunate enough to be employed to provide janitorial or other menial services to the learned institution. Black America suffers higher rates of almost every disease with its causality primarily linked to a person’s living environment or diet. Violence has become one of the ghettoes leading forms of recreation. Our people kill each other at a higher rate because we place little value on our own lives, as only a degraded people do. The rich and powerful despise the sight of the poor and the wretched, but they rarely hate themselves. It is only the poor and degraded who compound their misery by despising themselves in the same way that others despise them.

    To add injury to prior insult and injury, instances of racial violence and discrimination seem to be waxing.

    A bright light in the Black community has been the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU’s). These schools have been outlets for higher education for a Black community starved of learning and immersed in the ignorance that accompanies political and economic powerlessness. Without these schools, the malaise in Black education would have flared into utter catastrophe. If these largely government-funded institutions are shuttered, the number of Black youth attaining tertiary education will dwindle significantly.

    As a candidate, then Senator Barack Obama spoke to audiences at HBCUs extolling their work and vital service to a struggling community. He positioned himself as a staunch champion of their cause, promising their endangered status would change under his presidency. For years, there has been a slow erosion of government funding for these institutions. Some smaller, financially weaker schools have already receded into the pages of history. Many others are on the chopping block, and with them the hopes and aspirations of thousand of Black students for higher education and a better life. Given the disheveled condition of the Black community, if there were a time to give the HBCUs a vitamin boost, it is now. Instead, the leeches have been liberally applied and bloodletting has proceeded apace.

    Under President Bush and Republican-controlled state governments, HBCUs had been a favorite target for budget cuts. It was hoped President Obama would change this. He did: he made things worse. A slow draining under the Bush Administration has become a geyser under President Obama. While talking sweetly to HBCU officials in their private meetings, the Obama Administration has presided over HBCU budget cuts and other measures clipping 300 million dollars in funding in the past two years.

    This stands as perhaps the most severe diminution HBCUs have experienced within any comparable timeframe. While trying to maintain their composure because they still believe it is out of school to publicly criticize the first Black President, the leaders of HBCUs privately scream betrayal. Like the community at large, they have found out the good fellow in the White House is a man who is Black but is not really a Black man. Thus, he sides with the Republican conservatives in choking this important asset to the Black community. For conservative racists, this is a symbolic but relatively small victory that will not ingratiate the President to them. For the Black community, it is strangling defeat that will render cinereous the educational aspirations of many Black youths.

    The teenage Trayvon Martin might have been fortunate enough to have been included in that shrinking number of Black male university students. Unfortunately, he was killed by George Zimmerman in February 2012. Charged with second-degree murder, Zimmerman recently stood trial in Florida. Zimmerman pled he shot the lanky teenager in self-defense, allegedly fearing the boy would beat him to death with his bare hands.

    The trial has ended; a jury now deliberates the matter. Zimmerman will likely receive a lesser sentence of manslaughter in the end. In some ways, this might be considered justice. A few decades ago, Zimmerman would not have been tried and, if tried, would have likely have been acquitted. As with most things American, race factors into this case. At first, the police did not arrest or charge Zimmerman with a crime although he had killed an unarmed teenager. They let him go quietly home and would have left him there. Only after the public outcry of the Black community, did the justice system move to provide a semblance of justice by charging the man with a crime. Had a Black man shot an unarmed White teenager in similar circumstances, that man would have instantly been arrested and charged with heinous murder.

    We shall never know all that transpired on that evening sidewalk in Sanford, Florida. Only two people know what occurred. One of them is died and the other has a vested interest in a rendition of events that depict him as the victim. Zimmerman’s version is what the mainstream wants people to believe. In America, an unarmed Black male can be fatally shot yet the common perception is that he was at fault. In killing a Black male, a White shooter is presumed the victim and presumed to have been under threat by reason of decedent’s color.

    What we know about the case is Martin was walking home after going to a local store to purchase snacks. Carrying a bag of candy in one hand and soft drink in the other, he strolled home. An unofficial neighborhood crime watch volunteer, Zimmerman somehow considered Martin suspicious but never could articulate why he assumed the teenager was a threat. Against the instructions of a police department operator with whom he had communicated, the armed Zimmerman left his car to follow Martin on foot.

    A confrontation ensued. When it ended, Martin was on the ground, dead from a fatal gunshot at close quarters. The stocky Zimmerman had a few superficial lacerations on the back of his head and a swollen perhaps broken nose. Zimmerman’s excuse was that he shot Martin because he feared the boy might beat him to death.

    Under the Florida law of self defense, a person does not have to attempt to flee before using lethal force it that person was under a reasonable apprehension of fear of death or grievous bodily harm from an assailant. Thus, Zimmerman claimed he had killed in justifiable self defense.

    The claim is ludicrous in two parts. First, Martin was traipsing homeward with snacks in both hands and talking on the phone to a friend. This hardly fits the aspect of a criminal on the make, let alone someone intent on attacking a burly man like Zimmerman for no reason. Moreover, Zimmerman had pursued Martin. Without Zimmerman stalking the boy, the fatal exchange would have happened. If anything Zimmerman was the aggressor, not Martin. If Zimmerman aggressed then self defense should be unavailing and Zimmerman should face prison.

    Second, Martin had no special martial arts skills that would have turned his hands into lethal weapons. He was a lanky teenager that is all. Rarely do we hear of a teenager bare-handedly beating someone to death because such a thing rarely happens. For Zimmerman to claim he was in fear of his life because he received a few punches from a teenager does not jibe with normal human experience. If Zimmerman’s position becomes the standard, then every schoolyard skirmish is now a life and death situation where a teenager is legally within his write to shoot dead his rival classmate. Of course, this would be tragic and silly. However, it would be the inevitable fallout of a verdict confirming Zimmerman’s theory of defense.

    Additionally, Zimmerman claimed Martin severely bashed his head multiple times against the sidewalk. However, the medical testimony showed the head wounds to be superficial at worst. The wounds were inconsistent with Zimmerman’s testimony of severe bashing. None of the wounds rose to the level where one should fear for his life or be in apprehension of severe injury.

    In a pretrial statement, Zimmerman disclaimed knowledge of Florida’s self-defense law. However, it was uncovered that the man pined to be a police officer to the extent of taking criminal justice courses at a local community college. The course instructor testified self defense was a major component of the course and that Zimmerman was one of his best students. Zimmerman lied when he feigned ignorance of the law, perhaps for good reason: to save his hide. Knowing he had killed the only other witness, Zimmerman could well have fashioned a tale he knew would accord with the provisions of the state’s self defense law.

    There were other lapses in Zimmerman’s account. In pre-trial statements, he said Martin grabbed Zimmerman’s gun. However, there were no fingerprints or DNA attributed to Martin on the weapon. Also it seems unlikely that Martin was straddling Zimmerman and pounding Zimmerman as claimed yet still allowed the man to reach to his waist, extract then gun and then get off a clean, deadly shot at such a close range that the heated muzzle of the fired weapon singed Martin’s clothes. If Martin had established such physical dominance over Zimmerman when matters were at the level of fisticuffs why would Martin suddenly become lax and give Zimmerman wide quarter when the man had a gun in hand?

    The trial will send a powerfully wrong signal should Zimmerman walk free. The trial will become a standard for the crafty and the criminal genius. The plea of self defense will be a strong, available cloak whenever a person is sufficiently cunning to lure their victim to an isolated placed occupied solely by the two of them. Once the victim is done in, the killer may contrive any tale that suits him so long as it fits within the contours of the self-defense law. This controversial law will become a legal invitation for premeditated murder. Be assured, a disproportionately large percentage of Black males will be the victims.

    Fearing possible race riots in some Florida cities once the verdict is reached, local authorities have their police forces on high alert. The more time changes the more it goes backward. In 1980, parts of Miami Florida went aflame as the Black community combusted after several policemen were acquitted in the homicide of a Black motorcyclist. The motorcyclist had led the police on a chase through the city before surrendering. The man died of multiple skull fractures after the apprehending white police officers pummeled him multiple times with nightsticks and flashlights through he offered no resistance.

    2013 is still 1980 in some ways. A racially-charged court case is in hand. Again, the dead Black male appears to have been dealt a punishment much more terrible than anything he might have done. Unlike the fearful local authorities, I doubt the Black community will erupt if Zimmerman is exonerated. The Black community has lost its spirit and drive in many ways. There is little fight left in the community except for its people to fight among themselves.

    In the end, this case is a human and social tragedy. Zimmerman thought the boy suspicious for one reason only. Martin was Black. Thus, Martin died because of his skin color. For many Whites in America, this is enough of a defense to set Zimmerman free, no real questions asked. Thus, they feel Zimmerman is being persecuted. The case serves to remind Blacks that in America, the self proclaimed land of the free and home of the brave, they are not as free as their white counterparts but that they must act braver because the legal system and society deems them culpable even when the wrongdoing is perpetrated against them. The current paucity in Black leadership means injustice will grow. In America, to be Black is still to be blamed.

     

    08060340825 sms only

     

     

     

     

     

  • Stop the mob

    Imagine a 12-year-old boy held by a mob over allegations that he wanted to kidnap a child.

    Much as he tries to deny the accusation, recounting how he found himself begging on the streets, the mob couldn’t be persuaded.

    The moment the woman he claimed was his mother denied him before the fierce mob that seemed set to dish out instant justice to mother and child, the lad had a tyre put on him, sprayed with petrol and was burnt alive.

    The above instance is unfortunately a real situation that played out in Lagos some years ago.  A professional film maker, Abimbola Ogunsanya, who stumbled on the incident managed to record the harrowing  video of Samuel’s lynching which is the basis of a new online campaign tagged “Don’t Walk Away”, launched in Lagos recently.

    Samuel’s story as the campaigners rightly noted is a vivid example of the gross injustice and horrific cruelty of mob killing which is becoming prevalent at the slightest excuse in some parts of the country.

    It is not certain how many innocent persons have been killed in situations similar to Samuel’s case where allegations could not be substantiated.

    The killing of the ‘Aluu 4’ in Rivers State last October is a good instance of why mob justice should be discouraged. From all indications, there was no conclusive evidence that the late students committed any offence to warrant the dastardly way they were killed.

    I found it hard to understand how members of the community watched the whole drama unfold as the students were marched naked through the streets, beaten and eventually burnt alive.

    Considering the high rate of crime in the country, it is understandable why many would not hesitate to support instant justice for especially criminals caught ‘in the act’. When people recall their harrowing experiences with robbers and other criminals, they cannot be easily persuaded to spare anyone caught to be handed over to the police for prosecution.

    Instead of being prosecuted to prevent them from indulging in crimes or serve as a deterrent to others, many criminals have gotten away for various reasons including lack of diligent prosecution by the police. Some simply bribe their way out and it is not unusual to find some criminals back on the streets days after they were arrested in full glare of the public.

    Notwithstanding the situation, I still find it difficult to support mob justice.  There have been cases of miscarriage of justice when the mobs take the law into their hands. There have been false alarms that have led to the killing of innocent persons for offences they did not commit.

    It is hoped that “Don’t Walk Away” campaign will convince Nigerians about the need to shun mob violence or jungle justice and motivate them to intervene to prevent future lynching.

    I wish to lend my voice to the campaign that “mob justice needs to be stopped before it starts”.

    It could be risky though, sometimes, to try to stop the mob but we must try.

    “When the finger is raised, and before the thugs move in and take over, we need to raise a hand and say no to ‘justice’ on the streets. The solution to mob justice starts with all of us.”

    www.dontwalkaway.co.ng is a platform where people can post their views and experiences of mob justice.

    Twitter: @lotufodunrin

  • Re: The second coming of Western Nigeria

    Re: The second coming of Western Nigeria

    Good day, brother Alamu. It has been a long time from sight. Your comfort with the concept of post-colonial Nigeria where Western Region political leaders/ elites can now dig her out of Nigeria’s hellhole through the instrument of electoral revolution is, indeed, a bewildering puzzle. If the official end of external colonialism could not deliver us from internal neo-colonialism, and if successive electoral heists hosted by the fraudulent constitution have not been able to effect needed redemption, why then focus our hopes on electoral revolution when no one is yet offering that platform? Cheers ooO. This, AKINGBA, again.

     

    Am sorry, Snooper to bother you with my reactions to your column. Just can’t help it. Yes, wasn’t it Jakande’s trail-blazing metroline project that was spitefully cancelled by military fiat, just to retard Lagos’ development and, by extension, that of the old west? To hell with federal presence and deluded ‘mainstreamers’ who only care for their pockets! I agree with you that “ a solid holistic vision of regional development” is what we need, which would stand the test of time, like Awo’s legacy. Whatever happened to the Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) launched with fanfare sometime ago. Happy Sunday. God be with you.

    Rev. Feyisola Famutimi

     

    The second coming of western region is a master piece. It is highly recommended to our elites especially ministers, economic team members, advisers etc. it is useful primer on the theories of development current practice and approaches. There are many routes to development and the task is for each nation to chart the best fruitful path. This the Nigeria elites had failed to do for so long now. The situation of economic growth without meaningful development and positive impact on citizens is not new. It is the trade mark of classical economics which we have painfully embraced especially since the 1980s. the challenge is for our elites to change our current course of development to a people focused one. Well done.

    Dr John Abhuere Former Director NYSC, CCYD Uromi.

     

    Richywright

    June 30, 2013 at 7:20 am

    Baba Tatalo, i thought u understand Nigeria government more than this article. And as a special person, and as a special columnist in this country, the influence of ownership should not be visible in ur write-up. Bcos, if u are talkin about architect of modernization in the west, governor MIMIKO sud b first or second on list.

     

    Peniela

    June 30, 2013 at 9:01 am

    Waoh, this is a fantastic analysis with accurate and excellent use of word. Excellent display of the mastery of English and political language. I salute the writer. I agree with you. Good roads and flyovers, street beutifications and ‘opon imo’ is useless if it is not building people. Though these are laudable programs, it is only what is built inside people that lasts for many years. The road constructed will soon worn-out; a useless government may take-over and neglect the urban revolution. The major reason why Awo is still celebrated till today is because he invested more resources into building the young people through his revolutionary educational policies and his aggressive ideological indoctrinations. The emerging western leaders should therefore take a clue from their acclaimed mentor and role-model.

     

    Olu Ayekooto

    June 30, 2013 at 9:02 am

    I drove from Molete to Iwo road through Idi Arere and Gate; I did not use the route in over 10 years due to congestion but was so surprised how free the road was. Took us less than 15 minutes to reach Gate from Molete.

    God bless the governor and the people of Oyo State.

     

    Jide

    June 30, 2013 at 10:51 am

    Human development is key to any national development. Our leaders should develope the youth positively so that we can compete with the rest of the world. The educational system is in shambles and as it is leaves Nigeria hopeless for at least the next ten years. What we need are serious and commited leadership. And every other thing will follow naturally. God bless nigeria.

     

    John Yemi

    June 30, 2013 at 11:30 am

    I always says, it is not all the times resident of natural resources that brings economy growth and infrastructural development but the present of capable human resources. Japan is a typical example. Iam not praying for Nigeria to break up but if it happens, South West will be on top in term of economy and infrastructural development at a fast rate. This is because the zone has good thinkers and capable human resources.

     

    Iska Countryman

    June 30, 2013 at 1:07 pm

    Why the national conference option when you can sell this idea of restructuring on the platform of the apc?…or is that also a joke…i mean the apc…?

     

    rich

    June 30, 2013 at 1:21 pm

    the west is cheating the rest of the country bcos of the war with the east. all the major companies in nigeria have their head office in the west. major seaport and airport in the west. we thought that the west and the north were coming to liberate the niger/delter during the war with the east, not knowing that they where coming for the oil. open up the seaport and airport in niger delter and see what the west will become even the north is not happy with the west bcos the west also cheated the north.

     

    Nnana

    June 30, 2013 at 10:19 pm

    But they would never have the courage to open up the ports in the Nigerdelta. PH wharf before the civil war bubbled as Lagos ports. Real International airports in the old southeast remain a mirage. Most Nigerians have to travel through the West. But to what degree has President Jonathan set out to remedy the lost glory of the Nigerdelta and the surrounding areas?

     

    rich

    June 30, 2013 at 11:24 pm

    I have personally written to the president and soon very soon the seaport in calaber,warri and port harcourt will be opened.

     

    kenjo

    June 30, 2013 at 3:54 pm

    If they move capital of Nigeria to Niger Delta the zone will still remain backward bcos of their self center leader who does not care about their future, in what way the west cheated you people of the North/ East? please find something to say

     

    Femi Ajetunmobi USA

    June 30, 2013 at 4:36 pm

    i totally agree with the write up but i must also add that the present developments are on going of the pa awo doctrine. he emphasided the human development (capital). if you can read this, thank your teacher. in another phrase that do not feed me fish but teach me how to fish. this is best investment in any nation or personal lives. we should continue to leave hamoniously (tolerance) with our brothers and sisters from different part of the nation. the present leaders are product of pa awo and many are two dimensional people who have seen how things are been done in other places. as they say in business circle that location!location!! sells. the south west axis is blessed with many infrastructures from colonial eras and independent. the area is self sufficient to be on its own as an entity or nation. it will continue to be driving machine for the nation in terms of developments. people from this neck of the woods do not request services from their leaders but they demand it and most of the times, the best are not good enough. it will countinue to dictate tempo for the rest of the country. currently, opposition to the ruling party helps in creating competitiviness between the two. a market or brand differention to the voters. it is imperative to keep peace and safe guard properties in the area.

     

    Osundina, O

    June 30, 2013 at 5:17 pm

    Thank you my dear Tatalo. You have brilliantly knocked the nail down well without doing any damage to the hammer, the wood and the nail. I was home recently and had reasons to travel to Oyo, Osun, Ekiti and Ogun states. the physical transformation is phenomenal to put it mildly. I commend the governors. What is happening in edo is amazing. Two questions bother me a great deal. What have the previous governments in the southwest done with the resources of the past when they governed? when will human development take its proper place so that REAL DEVELOPMENT. You have raised this point at the end of your analysis but in a quite manner. I hope that the governors of the southwest are hearing this. I commend adams, Isiaka, Rauf, Kayode, ibikunle, babatunde and olusegun for their exemplary dreams. Because man is the only agent of development man must be properly developed. to focus man in the development process is to breed a living development for all ages. and that development must be home grown to endure.

     

    Adrian

    June 30, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    I am glad with what is happening in the SW. It is encouraging and exciting. But try visiting other states especially in the east like Enugu and Anambra before running to comparative conclusions that the west is leaving the rest of Nigeria behind. You may also want to visit Akwa Ibom and Rivers. Otherwise, you may start believing your own side of your analysis.

     

    Obinnna75

    June 30, 2013 at 7:16 pm

    Snooper takes a stand. Hurrah. Now do question Awo’s successor as to the basis of his flirtation with General Buhari.

     

    Mike

    June 30, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    ALL THIS IS ENGLISH

     

    Nna why?

    June 30, 2013 at 11:25 pm

    Where is your logic?

     

    Olorinla

    July 1, 2013 at 8:22 pm

    Snooper, you wittingly left Mimiko out of the showers of encomia. An egg head like you should see not only the political SW, but also the extent of its geography.

     

    Ebelegi Kponam Newton

    July 5, 2013 at 6:03 pm

    Good to read about encouraging stories in the country after all. But typical to academics from this region,Tatalo cannot see, it is happening elsewhere too. In the South South,Cross Rivers set the pace for the country. In Rivers State,human capacity development effort is unequaled anywhere in the country too.The wonder of Akwa Ibom is one of the success stories of this republic. Even in Bayelsa state, there is an impatient awakening under governor Dickson. It is happening elsewhere too in Owerri and Enugu. As the president once put it,there is a quiet competition among these states for development. And don’t Tatalo think the current president deserves even an unusual credit for guarantying the rare electoral and political peace needed in the South West to witness this development? Since 1960, all civilian federal governments have tormented the region. Even under Obasanjo,it was a political pillage. This is important because there could have been enough temptation (even provocations) that could have invited the usual federal tampering in the region.

     

    Adetule

    july 8, 2013 at 4:14 am

    give yoruba people industrial estates across the breth and length of yoruba nation the way chief awolowo established ikeja, ilupeju, apapa, oluyole industrial estates. they are the bedrock of western nigeria industrial evolution and factories, the base of industrial advancement that will ultimately absorb our unemploy youths.

  • Leaders, ideologies  and development

    Leaders, ideologies  and development

    Last Wednesday the Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan signed a $ 1.1 bn low interest  loan deal with

    the Chinese President Xi  Jinping  during a state visit to China. The loan is for  infrastructure development and particularly for roads , airport terminals in four Nigerian cities  and a light rail  line in Abuja. In  Egypt which  is in  political  and socio economic  turmoil, with both the opposition and the formerly ruling Muslim Brotherhood disagreeing bitterly with the electoral plans and strategy of the leader of the interim government, put in place by the army which killed 51 pro – Morsy demonstrators in front of the army barracks where he was being detained recently,  the US  went on to honor a contract to deliver 4 F-16  planes to the Egyptian army now running Egypt by proxy. These two  events  namely a state visit to consummate an infrastructure contract and an arms sale to an army truncating democracy in a foreign land by a nation that calls itself the champion of global democracy and the market economy, open a pandora box on the quality of leadership in these nations  as well  as the manner of ideas  or ideologies  these leaders pursue in driving the economic development of their nations.

    Let me first of all mention some clichés that are relevant to these two events  and the nations involved. With regard to China the Chinese leader noted that   the development of their two nations had  brought about the visit and their growing economic relations and ties and ended with a Nigerian proverb that –  a man cannot sit down alone to plan prosperity. On  Egypt which is in the throes of two revolutions now,  with no end in sight,  the Egyptian masses  are learning the hard way that a revolution   like  Chinese  leader Mao Tse Tung   said  sometime  is not a  tea  party. On  the arms sale to the Egyptian  army the Egyptians again are learning that bread and butter politics take precedence over democratic  rights and norms, at least where US intervention in foreign lands  are concerned and  this is not the first time the US will show its hands this way  in Middle East  politics.

    Given  the state of Nigerian infrastructure the new China loan deal is much needed and the visit may well be quite worth the while.  But  of what use is infrastructure if it is not well maintained, which really is the sad story of Nigeria’s economic development. The  Chinese definitely provide a welcome alternative to the endless questions and conditionalities  of the IMF  but at least they should have asked how and what happened to our infrastructure facilities especially our Tin Can Island Port and its access road, the Apapa – Oshodi Express Way which is as unpliable as it is a death trap to all  traffic going to the port or passing by it on  a  daily basis.

    Secondly President Xi and President Jonathan could have been brought together by the mutual quest for the development of their two nations but  their background and culture on the use and maintenance of infrastructure are at  variance. China has a history of building infrastructure like roads and airports  to open up China starting from the time of Mao and this has continued after Mao died in 1976. Since  then China has opened up its economy from a planned  to a mixed one with the acknowledgement by the Communist Party , which runs China proudly affirming that its  economic ideology is –  Socialism  with Chinese Characteristics. Unless  the Chinese have some ulterior  motive   therefore, they should  put in place an after – sales service condition for the delivery of the infrastructure involved in the loan deal. Unless  of course too they are confident that we do not have the quality assurance capacity to  vet whatever infrastructure type they  give us with the loan which is a low interest  one anyway. Anyway still, the Chinese  need our oil  because of their huge population the largest in the world, and they  need our infrastructure to open up our nation too to have access to our minerals but then the low interest rates may be a Greek gift as  the Chinese are a very commerce and profit oriented nation just like the Americans they are competing with to dominate the world economy. Already ,  it is estimated that China’s demand for our oil  will rise  to ten times the present level at 200,000 barrels per day by 2015 which will be 10 times the present Chinese demand for our oil .

    Which  brings us again to  the Nigerian proverb quoted by the Chinese president that a man does not sit down alone to plan prosperity. This  may  be a Nigerian proverb and I wonder about its origin but  it  really does not reflect  the Nigerian situation in any context. This is because in Nigeria leaders don’t really plan for prosperity. They  stumble on it and call that good fortune which they are not ready to share with any one. Which  again reflects the nature of our political competition and economic management of our resources. Our  presidential  system vests power in the presidency at Aso Rock from where the largesse trickles down to the states and local government while the ruling party indulges in the enjoyment of power in the best syndrome of the winner – takes –  all embroidered by  the determination never to lose any election  by all,  or any means while still in government. Which really  is a pragmatic way of perpetuating power and since there is really a lacuna in terms of theory or knowledge to formulate a working ideology to govern, you are  welcome to call that, the average  Nigerian leader’s    working ideology.

    Notwithstanding its obvious flaws, the Nigerian leader or politician still feels superior in terms of ideology to his Chinese counterpart. That will explain why the Nigerian contingent to China  must have been surprised at the use of a Nigerian proverb  by the Chinese president . This is because Nigerians don’t regard Marxists as democrats but as dictators and this is really true in a way. The  Chinese Comminist Party which runs China has a membership of one million people and it is lording it over 1.4 bn Chinese people. China is a one party state and Nigeria runs a plural democracy although one  party has been in power since 1999 . The  Communist party in China has five – yearly party national conferences and a decadal change of leaders which just brought in Xi  Jinping as president and Li Keqiang  as Premier. Right now in Nigeria there is a debate on whether the Nigerian president will contest again in 2015  or continue for 6 years if a constitutional amendment goes through .In China there is orderliness in succession albeit dictatorial and not as democratic as in Nigeria. But the Chinese  Communist Party plans  a lot for the prosperity of its people and  it does it severely  alone and without competition. Yet it has made China a world power in terms of  high quality  infrastructure such as it is giving Nigeria  a loan for . My concern is that China should not stop at giving loans  for infrastructure  but make a condition for maintaining the infrastructure  imperative for giving such a  loan to Nigeria.

    While  one may be forgiven for calling China’s  mixed economy  and  Marxist government a dictatorship and Nigeria’s presidential system a unitary democracy,  as distinct from the federation it purports  to be,  one is in a real quandary on what to call  the effervescent street democracy  emerging  in  Egypt, where the army has become a referee  of sorts in the political imbroglio.  Egypt was a dictatorship under Housni Mubarak who guaranteed stability funded by the US yearly donation to the Egyptian coffers for the peace Egypt Anwar Sadat made with Israel’s Menachem Begin  on his historic visit to Israel. That peace made enemies for Sadat till he was assassinated at a military parade by a member of the Muslim Brotherhood   whose member   Mohammed Morsi  was elected recently  as  President of Egypt only to be deposed again by the military and replaced by an Interim president. In  two years therefore Egypt has moved from a Mubarak  dictatorship   to a full blown democracy   with Morsi and now with the incarceration of Morsi Egypt has become an explosive diarchy. But  then there is still no end in sight as both the opposition and elected government have rejected the future  election plans of Interim leader Adly Mansour   and the Muslim Brotherhood has vowed to fight to finish till the deposed Morsi is reinstated while  the army keeps watching . Predictably as usual in the past the army will mow down protesters as it has done in the past in the name of national security  and will return to power . Undoubtedly, Egyptians have learnt bitterly that the US does not hate the Egyptian army when it comes to contracts especially expensive military jets like F16 . That is why the US still supports the tyranny of the  House of Saud’s  monarchy in Saudi Arabia. That is why it still sold F16s to the Egyptian army mowing down Egyptian politicians and demonstrators goaded to the streets by Obama’s Cairo speech a couple of years ago. For Egypt and its demonstrators, democracy activists  and  actors  therefore, the horizon is bleak and bloody. Democracy has become an expensive ideology in Egypt and sooner than later the army will make it an expedient and disposable commodity. Which really will be a great  pity as it seems so so inevitable.

  • Automated teller machines or automated trouble machines?

    I returned home from work the other day and met my semi-literate neighbour fuming. In his hand was the exercise book of his 10-year-old son and pupil of a popular primary school in the area. “Nonsense! Arrant nonsense!” he yelled repeatedly. The son’s answer to a social studies question was marked wrong by his teacher and the poor man was livid with rage.

    The pupil had been asked the full meaning of ATM and he put it as Automated Trouble Machine. The teacher insisted that the correct answer is Automated Teller Machine, but my neighbour believed he was being mischievous. “What are those empty contraptions if they are not automated troubles? They are either permanently out of service or they tell you they cannot dispense money after you have spent hours on the queue,” he fumed. Not even my intervention persuaded him that his ugly experience could not give his son the liberty to change the meaning of ATM from what everyone else knows it to be.

    Of course, I knew where the poor man’s anger derived from, as I have also fallen victim to the machines on numerous occasions. While the ineffectiveness of ATMs has been a general problem, my experience with the ones on the premises of a branch of a first generation bank with which I operate an account in Ota, Ogun State has been particularly traumatising. Ironically, there are no fewer than six ATMs on the bank’s premises. A notice at the entrance advises any customer withdrawing an amount less than N100,000 to use the machines, but it is almost as sure as daybreak that they will disappoint.

    It must have been a policy at the bank that only one of the half a dozen machines must function at any particular time. Hence you will always find a queue of customers as long as the unaided eye can see. And some of those who wait for endless hours are there to withdraw sums that can barely take them home. Customers’ plight has been compounded by the decision of the Central Bank of Nigeria to outlaw the N100 service charge imposed on those who use the ATMs of other banks than the ones they operate accounts with. Apparently in protest against the CBN directive, most of the ATMs of banks that proved to be more efficient in the past now tactically decline payment non-domiciled customers by telling them that the issuers of their ATM cards are inoperative.

    In the circumstance, the customers of most of the first generation banks are more or less restricted to the largely inefficient ATMs of their banks. I experienced one of my most frustrating moments on a Saturday last month. My wife needed to make a pot of soup and approached me for money. Realising that I did not have a dime on me, and knowing that the ATMs at my bank are designed to frustrate and disappoint, I approached a branch of one of the second generation banks to use their ATM, but it told me that the issuer of my card was inoperative. I went round the branches of some other banks, but the situation was the same. Left with no choice, I went to the branch of the bank I operate an account with and met a queue of desperate customers numbering more than 50.

    Left with no choice, I joined the long queue and waited for my turn. But I soon realised that the only machine that functioned could only dispense N1,000 per transaction. The customers had agreed among themselves that no individual should perform more than three transactions, which meant that the maximum amount any of us could withdraw was N3,000. I remained patient on the queue only for the machine to indicate that it could no longer dispense cash, with just two people left in my front. Of course, I returned home crestfallen. But my real frustration occurred two days later when I checked my account’s balance and realised that one of the ATMs I tried earlier had debited my account without dispensing cash.

    Last week, one of the ATMs of the bank in question added embarrassment to the streak of pains it has inflicted on me. I had gone there to withdraw the sum of N20,000. Unknown to me, one of the N1,000 notes dispensed by the machine was fake. I did not realise it until I got to a filling station and paid the attendant after buying N3,000 fuel. But as I made to enter the car and drive off, the young lady approached me and said, “Excuse me sir.” She handed out one of the N1,000 notes I had just given to her. I thought that I had overpaid her by N1,000 and she was being honest to return the money. But with disarming calmness, she said, “No sir, you did not overpay. I’m returning the money because it is fake!”

    The embarrassment can only be imagined. Fake N1,000 note from ATM? Exasperated, I threatened to return to the bank the following morning to challenge them for loading fake naira notes in their ATM. But my wife reminded me that I could be setting myself up for further embarrassment because I had no way of proving that the controversial note was dispensed by their machine. Before I knew it, she said, I would be the one to prove to the police that I am not a member of a fake naira syndicate. I saw the sense in her counsel and backed out. As I write, the money lies at my bedside, untouchable and “unspendable”.

    Happily, there have been reports of plans by the House of Representatives to probe the ugly trend. The lawmakers will also do well to take a holistic look at the ineffectiveness of the machines, which informed sources say are always grounded because they are bought in the refurbished form after they had been used and discarded by foreign banks. Without any shade of doubt, the ATM is one of the greatest human inventions designed to ease the pains associated with withdrawing money over the counter. But in Nigeria, it seems to be adding more to customers’ troubles than solving them.

  • Our gods are not to blame

    Think continuously of those who are truly great, men and women who by their deeds fight for fairness and the good of all; think of those who wear on their hearts’ sleeve and domicile in the inner recesses of their souls, irrepressible zeal to make our lives better and worthy of our dreams …there are no such men and women alive, are there? For if there are, Nigeria would be 21st century version of Eden or Al Jannah; and men and women on whose watch our country so evolves and appreciate would be everything and even gods.

    Our people are quite insane, they wouldn’t know how to create a heaven or sustain the like of it but they create gods by the dozen. I do not speak of divinity that manifests only in far-fetched miracles and dreams; I speak of individuals that we quite desperately and misguidedly deify as our vanities dictate.

    Being rich is the closest you get to being god in Nigeria. Add an impressive root and very intimidating academic record to the mix and you have yourself a 21st century hero or god. Of what calibre are our idols? Who really, is the Nigerian god? Who is an example of a quintessential idol? Allison-Maduekwe? President Goodluck Jonathan? Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, Reuben Abati, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala or the rampaging law makers of Rivers State? Do their deeds make them worthy of hero-worship or blind deification?

    To what would these individuals owe our reverence of them? Some would say it is their brilliance and extraordinary achievements in their chosen callings. Anyone could be brilliant from time to time but intelligence is what we have to affect all of the time. How intelligent are our ruling class? How intelligent is President Goodluck Jonathan, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi? How intelligent are other members of the Nigerian ruling class?

    By their citizenship, do they provide the pathways to empowering the Nigerian youth…the disillusioned school drop outs of Umukegwu, Akokwa, Urualla, Apongbon, Idumota, Agege, Agbor, Sankwala, to mention a few? Do they teach the youth particularly, to evolve beyond the greed, selfishness and idiosyncrasies of their generation? Do they teach us to accept truths we cannot change, like the fact that we collectively make our world as gory and burdensome as it is by turning a blind eye to their tedious politics? Do they teach us to make peace with our guilt and conquer our riotous demons? Do they teach us that at the end, we get to choose what to make of our own lives and our own world?

    The answer lies as much in their utterances as their deeds. Alas! Transcendent moments and heroic acts are rather deeds of an exalted intelligence, something which Nigeria’s incumbent ruling class pitifully lacks. But despite its protests and dissatisfaction with the status quo, the Nigerian citizenry equally lacks that towering immensity of intellect and strength of character that remains prime requirements in the constitution of a progressive race.

    Our lust for heroes and gods illustrates a fable; it is not of latent strength but disintegration rather it reveals the weakness and shallowness of the Nigerian adult’s awfully preadolescent mind. Such mind is inherently incapable of creating leaders worthy of being called gods of unconditional love and compassion. All we are capable of are gods of impoverishment and gods of war.

    The Nigerian hero is a human sound bite. He is essentially a half-formed mammal, animal to be precise. Take for instance gods and goddesses we have created as our ruling class; they are no longer exclusively Nigerian or humane. Rather they have been turned upside-down and inside-out; they have been scrambled, corrupted and fertilized by ghastly manifestations of self love, tribalism, wantonness, perverted education and sense of worth.

    “All gods are homemade, and it is we who pull their strings, and so, give them the power to pull ours,” says Aldous Huxley, English writer. However, the manner in which the Nigerian electorate worships its ruling class and celebrates its bestiality makes it impossible for the latter to affect the necessary humaneness, tact and humility that are prime requirements of occupants of exalted public office. Having made super humans of them, they begin to delude that they are untouchable and unquestionable. They begin to parade themselves as gods and see the electorate on whose strength they ascended to their exalted positions as lesser creatures.

    They seek the exaggerated safety and coziness of fortresses they build around themselves to protect their ill-gotten wealth and ostentatious lifestyles. Suddenly it becomes taboo for them to hobnob with the working class. It becomes abominable for their wives, daughters and cooks to visit the same grocer or shop in the same market as the masses.

    Shamelessly, they clear our public coffers of our collective fund without any inhibition and in response; we celebrate them and grovel at their feet for crumbs of what is rightfully ours. Whenever they intrude our world, they leave behind pungent memories and pains. Whenever they come to town, we must be kept in traffic for them to move freely; whenever they are ‘guests of honour’ at our functions, we are treated with little or no honour. Apology to Kayode Oteniya.

    The chief quality of a true leader is the apparent sincerity in his manners. The speeches he makes are never mere platitudinous enterprise and his developmental programmes are never extraordinary elephant projects; his politics and humanity are not only heard but concretely seen and felt.

    Really there is prime merit in everything about him, and his life generally, radiates truth. His life is what we may call a great sober sincerity. A sort of temperate authenticity that is not only blunt but uncompromising. His fervor is undomesticated, bordering on the wild and forever wrestling naked with the elements that be for the love of the good and the truth of things. In that sense, there is something of the savage yet humane in him like all great men.

    He is one in whom one still finds human substance. He relishes no opportunity to tell any colourful story of himself anywhere; usually, he stands bare and grapples like a giant, face to face, heart to heart, with the naked truth of things. ‘That, after all,” according to Thomas Carlyle “is the sort of man for one.”

    And such is the type of man we should value above all others. He is the man who as Norman Mailer, an American writer, puts it, would argue with Gods and awaken devils to contest his vision. When he dies, his death would be felt nationwide as something more than a historic calamity; women would weep and men would fight back tears as if they had heard of the death of a very dear friend or Saint.

    The creation of such honorable man and god would be our noblest work. But we seem incapable yet of such honorable task. We could start by stripping ourselves of the greater vanities and portentous contradictions. Unhappy the land that has no heroes, says Andrea; No, unhappy the land that needs heroes, responds Galileo in Bertolt Brecht, late German playwright and poet’s “The Life of Galileo.” Regrettably, the meaning is lost on all.

  • Gen. Alabi-Isama’s Biafara

    Gen. Alabi-Isama’s Biafara

    Biafra is dead, long live Biafra! This is the feeling on gets upon reading General Godwin Alabi-Isama’s recent interviews and upcoming book, The Tragedy of Victory. I have the rare privilege of interviewing the ebullient retired general and skimming through a review copy of his civil war memoir, to be presented to the public in Lagos on July 18 at the NIIA, Victoria Island. The Tragedy, according to Alabi-Isama, is the on-the-spot account of the Nigeria-Biafra war as prosecuted in the Atlantic theatre that is, the seas and rivers front of the war. He was involved with the 3Marine Commando (3MCDO) as Chief of Staff of the command and serving under such illustrious commanders as Brigadier Benjamin Adekunle, Generals Alani Akinrinade and Olusegun Obasanjo.

    Alabi-Isama’s is a 670-page tome with the unique feature of containing hundreds of photographs taken during the war. It must represent one of the most captivating accounts of the Nigerian conflict coming from someone who was only a 27-year-old who played a major role in such a historic moment of a nation’s life. Here are some points to note:

    DEBUNKING OBASANJO: Before Alabi-Isama’s book, the only other book telling the war story from the federal government point of view is My command, written by General Olusegun Obasanjo. According to Alabi-Isama, his numerous war photographs and the need to put the lie to My Command prompted him to pen his account. He thinks Obasanjo’s book is an exercise in self-glorification, vain, misleading and full of lies. He never minced words in saying it. Page by page, he punched holes into Obasanjo’s book pointing out the inaccuracies, over-claims and outright lies. In his opinion, Obasanjo was cowardly, of low IQ and obdurate to boot especially in comparison with the other commanders he had served.

    A particular narrative in the book (page 409) is of how Obasanjo took over the command of the 3MCDO from Adekunle on May 16, 1969 just a few months to the end of the war tends to sum it all up. It is sub-titled: “Obasanjo’s first battle experience – a fiasco: Briefing over, Col. Obasanjo was ready to go as commander of 3MCDO, but his very first move was a disaster. In complete disregard to our advice, he planned an attack from the same problematic Sector 1 under Lt. Col.Godwin Ally. The target was again Ohoba, a town about 40 kilometres south of Owerri where Adekunle’s conventional war tactics had resulted in heavy casualties earlier on. Obasanjo did exactly what Adekunle had done by reinforcing failure. The pity of this failure, however, was that Obasanjo himself was not there at the war front to experience the tragedy. He ordered Lt. Col. Godwin Ally to counter-attack. He saw them advance, but turned back and travelled to his HQ in Port Harcourt, a distance of about 240 kilometres away. Obasanjo had no operational HQ in the field which we call command post in the army. He had no map of the operation, there was no intelligence report as to the strength of the enemy and their reinforcement capability, or how far behind their reserves were. He just thought that the troops would simply get up and capture the place. The atmosphere everywhere was abysmal…”

    A FEDERAL STORY: Beyond demystifying Obasanjo’s image as the great general and war hero who ended the conflict, the book is also largely a story about the federal side of the war. It offers us a rich detail of command structures, positions, operational strategies, tactics and a fresh insight on how the then head of state, General Yakubu Gowon prosecuted the 30-month war. More than any other book on the Biafran war, The Tragedy regales us with interesting details of battles, encounters, skirmishes, environments and even the atmospherics of war. The book is dotted with numerous juicy tidbits that will be of interest to Nigerians, young and old. It is indeed the account of an officer who was truly in the thick of it from the beginning to the end particularly in the marine sector. And with the benefit of hindsight, he is able to point out some of the blunders made in prosecuting the war from both sides.

    COMMANDO WOMEN, CANNIBALISM AND PARTIES GALORE: The beauty of Alabi-Isama’s book is that the author has numerous photographs to corroborate his story. When he talks about commando Women, there are pictures showing the likes of Mrs Florence Ita-Giwa, Ndi Okereke-Onyiuke, Margeret Ekpo and Cecelia Ekpenyong, to name a few in the thick of war ‘actions’. They were called 3MCDO ladies and were engaged in various odd duties including ‘intelligence’, cooking, party girls and whatever other uses soldiers put beautiful women in war zones to. And talking about parties, the book records so many scenes of dancing and frolicking one would wonder whether the Nigerian men in the war zones missed anything. Indeed, the impression is that war is ‘sweet’.

    There are other stories of cannibalism, ‘drinking’ garri with urine, a snake (perhaps an anaconda) swallowing a soldier and the troop thinking it to be witchcraft, etc.

    NDIGBO, THE POGROM, THEN AND NOW: Alabi-Isama admitted that yes, Igbo were slaughtered and that their may have been a pogrom but he rationalizes it to be the result of the killing of other tribe’s leaders in the first coup. He thinks that in a feudal system that the north was, when the leaders who won the bread are killed there is no telling the consequences. He admitted that in pre-war Nigeria, Igbo dominated everything – the civil service, trade and commerce as well as the armed forces and to have killed the leaders of the other tribes in a coup was unbearable for the feudal populace of the north. Though he did not state it so directly, his narrative shows that there was clearly Igbo envy at that period and the coup was only a needed excuse to seek to decimate and even terminate Ndigbo.

    The Tragedy is indeed a rich and refreshing angle in the Biafran story which every Nigerian must read but there will be a lot of questions he may be called upon to answer on the ‘Igbo question’.