The Nation Newspaper

Category: ARINZE IGBOELI

  • NCC’s tariff increase: Another misguided step in wrong direction

    NCC’s tariff increase: Another misguided step in wrong direction

    The recent decision by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) to increase phone call tariffs has sparked widespread concern and criticism across the country. Such move, which is coming at a time when Nigerians are already juggling  with severe economic challenges, poor take homes against galloping like inflation much demonstrates a troubling disconnect between regulatory decisions and market pricing realities.

    Such timing of this tariff increase by 50 percent on operating tarrifs could not be more inappropriate and insensitive. With inflation rates soaring without any form of immediate reprieve and the purchasing power of the average Nigerian readily and repeatedly diminishing, adding to such economic woes, the cost of essential communication services places an unnecessary  and unfair burden on citizens who rely heavily on mobile communications for both personal and business purposes.

    How do you go ahead with steep increases in tariffs when a number of glaring issues  affecting mobile telephony  are yet to be addressed by the NCC. These recurring problems which stem from NCC’s shambolism as a  regulator are still lingering. So the average Nigerian is none the better since neither the QoS nor the rates are favourable, mobile subscribers who have been plagued with these issues will only adjust to the continuous provision of substandard services from network providers, including frequent dropped calls, poor network coverage, and inconsistent data speeds and consumption. The regulatory body’s inability to effectively address these fundamental challenges raise a number of serious questions about its priorities and regulatory effectiveness.

    The billing methods of these mobile telephony companies have long been a source of frustration for Nigerian consumers. Subscribers are usually piqued with regular cases of unexplained deductions, questionable charges. Shouldnt this be the thrust of the NCC? Shouldnt the leadership of the NCC focus  on these critical consumer protection issues? Isnt it suprising  that it is the issue of tarriff that the leadership of the NCC has chosen to implement? One that will definitely bring about immense  hardship to the subcriber while failing to address these core issues.

    Network providers have consistently hidden under the unveriable claims them running and incurring  high operational costs as justification for various price increases, these are telecom companies that have year in year out declared jawbreaking sums as profits after taxes. Some of these telecom operators prefer to spend more on lush adverts and sponsor reality shows and yet there is little evidence of corresponding improvements in service quality. In saner  climes the NCC as a regulator would first of all seek the kingdom of evidential improvements  before deciding on any form of price increases. The message  the NCC is merely sending to the world is that poor performance will always be rewarded without seeking guarantees of offering better service quality.

    Read Also: Centre lauds NLC, NCC parley over telcom tariffs

    I have said this before and i will repeat such here, and that is that the the regulatory framework governing Nigeria’s telecommunications sector requires progressive  reform. The NCC’s approach to regulation has been largely dour rather than proactive, it has like Rome’s Nero fiddled while the sector continues to do the forward and backwards dance, it has failed to galvanise the telecoms sector with robust measures that would protect consumer interests while fostering healthy competition among service providers as well as enhance the sector’s strategic place in our economy, not only as a meana for creating jobs but also as a hib for continuous investment. In addition to this, the commission’s monitoring and enforcement mechanisms have time and time proven incompetent in ensuring compliance with service quality standards, yet it seems more focused on facilitating revenue increases for operators.

    Moreover, the lack of transparent consultation with key stakeholders before implementing this tariff increase raises concerns about the NCC’s decision-making process. Consumer advocacy groups, business associations, and other relevant stakeholders should have been given meaningful opportunities to provide input and raise concerns before such a significant change was approved.

    The economic impact of this tariff increase extends beyond individual consumers. Small and medium-sized enterprises, which form the backbone of Nigeria’s economy, rely heavily on telecommunications services for their daily operations. Increasing their operational costs through higher call tariffs could have ripple effects across various sectors of the economy, potentially leading to job losses and reduced economic activity.

    It is worth noting that many other countries are working to reduce communication costs to drive digital inclusion and economic growth. The NCC’s decision to move in the opposite direction raises questions about Nigeria’s commitment to digital transformation and economic development goals.

    The commission should reconsider this ill-timed tariff increase and instead focus on:

    The immediate reversal of this tariff increase would demonstrate the NCC’s commitment to protecting consumer interests and promoting sustainable growth in Nigeria’s telecommunications sector. The regulatory body must prioritize addressing the fundamental challenges facing the industry rather than implementing measures that further burden already struggling consumers.

    Until these critical issues are adequately addressed, any attempt to increase tariffs can only be seen as premature and detrimental to the interests of Nigerian consumers. The NCC must return to its primary mandate of ensuring quality service delivery while protecting consumer interests. The current tariff rates should be maintained, if not reduced, until there are substantial improvements in service quality and regulatory oversight.

    The way forward requires the reversal of such an ugly increase and the establishment of a more proactive regulatory regime, one  that considers the interests of all stakeholders while prioritizing the development of a robust, efficient, and consumer-friendly telecommunications sector. The NCC must demonstrate stronger leadership in this regard and work more effectively to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities, i lend my voice to the reversal of the tarrif hike, it is unjust! It is unfair!! It is the height of regulatory irresponsibility!!!

  • IBB’s memoirs and a nation’s expectations

    IBB’s memoirs and a nation’s expectations

    The announcement of Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida’s forthcoming memoirs, “A Journey In Service,” has stirred considerable interest across Nigeria’s political and intellectual landscape. The former military president’s decision to document his experiences is commendable, as it offers Nigerians insight into a significant period of the nation’s history. By this gesture, IBB joins the select ranks of Nigerian leaders like Shehu Shagari and Olusegun Obasanjo who have chosen to share their stories through autobiographical works. In a nation where leaders often depart the stage without leaving written accounts of their stewardship, such an effort is noteworthy. However, as anticipation builds around this literary venture, there is a palpable sense that Nigerians expect more than just a carefully curated narrative of his eight-year tenure as military president.

    The public expects this memoir to transcend the usual diplomatic prose and self-justifying narratives that often characterize political memoirs in Nigeria—works that frequently strive to confer a kind of sainthood upon their authors. For a leader whose tenure was marked by controversial decisions and unexplained events, this book presents an opportunity for candid revelations and honest reflections that could help heal historical wounds and provide closure to lingering questions.

    Central to these expectations is the need for IBB to address several pivotal events that defined his era as Chief of Army Staff and Military President. The coup that toppled General Muhammadu Buhari and the intrigues that led to the execution of General Mamman Vatsa remains one of his regime’s most controversial decisions. Nigerians expect a detailed account of the circumstances that led to this tragic event, including the personal turmoil he must have experienced in approving the execution of a childhood friend and colleague.

    The memoir must address critical incidents such as his relationship with Chief of General Staff, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe, and the assassination of Dele Giwa, the founding editor of Newswatch magazine, through a parcel bomb in 1986. While Babangida has claimed innocence in the murder of the veteran journalist, the lack of answers about who masterminded such a dastardly act remains a puzzle. Since this tragedy occurred during IBB’s tenure and has never received a satisfactory explanation, the memoir presents an opportunity to provide clarity on this dark episode in Nigeria’s history.

    Read Also: IGP orders enforcement of third party insurance Feb 1

    The C-130 Hercules aircraft crash of 1992, which claimed the lives of 150 middle-ranking military officers, demands explanation. The circumstances surrounding this tragedy and its impact on the nation’s military operational capacity deserve more than a passing mention.

    Perhaps most controversial is the issue of the missing $12.4 billion oil windfall from the Gulf War period. The Pius Okigbo panel’s report on this matter has never been fully made public, and Nigerians deserve to know how these resources were managed during his administration. This memoir provides an opportunity for IBB to present his side of the story with supporting documentation and evidence.

    The most significant event that Nigerians expect to see addressed comprehensively is the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. This single action, more than any other, has defined IBB’s legacy in Nigerian politics. The annulment of what is widely regarded as Nigeria’s freest and fairest election requires more than political rhetoric. Nigerians expect a detailed explanation of the forces and factors that influenced this decision, and the personal reflections of a man who must have grappled with its far-reaching consequences.

    IBB’s well-known political dexterity, which earned him the nickname “Maradona” after the legendary Argentine footballer, should not be deployed in this memoir. The Nigerian public has evolved beyond accepting diplomatic evasions and clever wordplay. What is required is a straightforward, honest account that addresses these questions directly.

    The value of this memoir will lie not in its literary flourishes but in its willingness to confront difficult truths. If IBB chooses to provide genuine insights into these controversial episodes, he could potentially reshape public perception of his legacy. The memoir should serve as a historical document that helps future generations understand the complexities and challenges of leadership in Nigeria’s political environment.

    The timing is particularly significant. Nearly 40 years since he assumed power as the nation’s leader—styling himself as “president”—and 32 years since he left office, Nigeria continues to grapple with challenges of leadership and governance, many of which originated during the IBB administration. Insights from the man who bore ultimate responsibility could provide valuable lessons for current and future leaders, but only if they emerge from a place of truth and genuine reflection rather than political calculation.

    Political memoirs serve purposes beyond personal vindication. They contribute to national memory, provide insights into high-level decision-making, and offer lessons for future generations. IBB’s memoir, given his pivotal role in Nigeria’s political history, has the potential to serve all these purposes—but only if it rises above the temptation to be mere prose or a cynical attempt to reshape public perception of his eight years in office.

    As Nigerians await the release of “A Journey In Service,” the hope is that it will break new ground in political memoir writing in Nigeria. The book should not merely add to the volume of political literature but should set a new standard for honesty and transparency in public service documentation.

    For IBB, this memoir represents perhaps his final opportunity to address the court of public opinion and historical judgment. By providing clear and honest answers to long-standing questions, he could transform his legacy from that of an enigmatic and controversial figure to one who ultimately chose to serve the cause of historical truth.

    The success of this memoir will not be measured by its sales figures or critical reviews but by its ability to provide honest answers to questions that have haunted Nigeria’s political discourse for decades. If IBB can rise to this challenge, “A Journey In Service” could become more than just another political memoir—it could become a crucial document for understanding a pivotal period in Nigerian history.

    The time for diplomatic maneuvering has passed. Will IBB confront these crucial issues with the candor and courage that history demands, or will he once again sidestep the difficult questions? Nigerians await to see what the memoir will reveal.

  • Addressing Nigeria’s ₦18tr road infrastructure deficit

    Addressing Nigeria’s ₦18tr road infrastructure deficit

    The recent disclosure by  Nigeria’s Minister of Works, Dave Umahi, that the nation needs a whooping N18 trillion to address its road infrastructure deficit brings to fore critical questions about infrastructure financing and national development. This sober revelation, coming at a time when the country is grappling with various economic challenges, presents both an opportunity and a dilemma for policymakers and citizens alike.

    The magnitude of Nigeria’s road infrastructure deficit cannot be wished away. With over 2,064 inherited projects valued at N13 trillion in 2023, and with present realities pushing the figure to N18 trillion, we are confronted with a stark reminder that our nation has for decades neglected,  squandered and misdirected  our opportunities of making Nigeria an infrastructural hub. Presently, our  annual budgetary allocations through the National Assembly have proven insufficient to address this massive backlog, necessitating the search for alternative funding approaches.

    Building qualitative infrastructure is not merely about convenience; it remains a fundamental driver of economic growth and development with a massive multiplier effect,  road construction extends far beyond the physical infrastructure itself and as Minister Umahi rightly points out, road projects create diverse economic opportunities for an economic ecosystem like ours and could help address unemployment and stimulate local economies across the country.

    Moreover, quality road networks reduce transportation costs, facilitate movement and trade, and enhances productivity across various sectors. The agricultural sector, in particular, stands to benefit significantly from improved road infrastructure, as better connectivity between rural areas and urban markets can help reduce post-harvest losses and increase farmer incomes.

    The proposal on whether we are to fund road infrastructure via borrowing will naturally spark debates. This is due to concerns about our growing debt profile, which are quite valid, the nature and purpose of borrowing must be carefully considered, though Infrastructure borrowing, when properly structured and utilized, differs fundamentally from borrowing for consumption.

    First, infrastructure investments generate long-term economic returns which in turn can facilitate debt servicing. Efficiently maintained roads enhance economic  productivity and helps boost growth- all of which contribute to increased government revenue through various channels.

    Likewise, the cost of not meeting our present infrastructural needs now, may ultimately exceed the cost of borrowing. Poor road networks lead to higher transportation costs, reduced economic activity, and lost opportunities for growth. These hidden costs accumulate over time and can be more burdensome than the interest payments on infrastructure loans.

    Despite these, it is important to note that any borrowing strategy must be accompanied by robust safeguards and clear implementation frameworks. The government must ensure:

    Transparent project selection and prioritization based on economic and social impact

    Strict monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to prevent cost overruns

    Efficient project delivery timelines to maximize economic returns

    Integration of maintenance planning into project design to ensure sustainability

    Asides borrowing, which is neccesary,  Nigeria may also have other means to addressing such  needs via a number of approaches such as Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) which can leverage private sector expertise and capital while sharing risks and rewards. Examples abound of successful toll road projects and other aspects of infrastructural development powered by PPP in countries like Rwanda, Botswana,  South Africa,  Morocco and even in Nigeria. A  demonstration of the viability of such an approach when properly structured.

    Read Also: FCTA investing in road infrastructure to open up communities – Wike

    Infrastructure bonds which could attract numerous domestic and diaspora investors readily provides  an alternative to traditional borrowing while giving Nigerians an opportunity to invest in their country’s development.

    Asset recycling, where existing infrastructure assets are privatized to fund new projects, could help generate capital while improving operational efficiency. This approach  allows for an influx of capital, where  a public sector entity can apply such  initial funding to invest in higher performing infrastructure.

    The success of any infrastructure development program depends not just on funding but on effective implementation. Nigeria must address several critical challenges:

    Procurement reforms are needed to ensure transparent and efficient project allocation. The current system often leads to delays and cost escalations that burden the public purse.

    Technical capacity within government agencies must be strengthened to improve project planning, execution, and monitoring. This includes better coordination between federal and state authorities.

    Maintenance culture needs to be institutionalized. Many existing roads have deteriorated prematurely due to poor maintenance, effectively increasing the long-term cost to the nation.

    Nigeria’s N18 trillion road infrastructure challenge requires a balanced and pragmatic approach. While borrowing may be necessary, it should be part of a comprehensive infrastructure development strategy that includes: A clear and prioritized framework for project selection based on economic and social impact

    Diverse funding sources to reduce dependence on any single financing method

    Strong governance mechanisms to ensure efficient use of resources

    Integration of local content to maximize economic benefits

    Regular maintenance programs to protect infrastructure investments

    The government must also improve its communication with citizens about infrastructure projects. Public support is crucial for any large-scale infrastructure program, especially one that involves significant borrowing. Transparency about project selection, costs, and benefits can help build this support.

    The scale of Nigeria’s road infrastructure deficit requires bold action, tempered however with fiscal responsibility. While borrowing to fund infrastructure development can be justified, it must be accompanied by strong safeguards and clear implementation frameworks. The focus should be on creating sustainable infrastructure that generates sufficient economic returns to justify the investment and support debt servicing.

    With proper planning, diverse funding sources, and effective implementation, Nigeria can begin to close its infrastructure gap while creating lasting economic benefits for its citizens. It is possible!

  • The crisis of tertiary education funding in Nigeria

    The crisis of tertiary education funding in Nigeria

    Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation and largest economy, faces a critical challenge in its tertiary education sector. The persistent underfunding of universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education has created a cascade of problems that readily threaten the nation’s academic standards, workforce development, and its  potential for economic growth.

    The roots of Nigeria’s tertiary education funding crisis can be traced to the 70’s when the military began making significant cuts in the budgets for tertiary education. By the 80’s, this had become the norm which then led to a number of disagreements between the Academic Staff Union of Universities,  ASUU , other academic pressure groups and the Federal Government. Alongside these cuts came the establishment of more tertiary institutions leaving many Nigerians puzzled as to the rationale  for the creation of more institutions while the existing ones were largely underfunded. While the number of tertiary institutions has grown substantially since Nigeria’s independence—from just one institution as at 1947 to in over 670 today— funding has not kept pace with this expansion. The federal government’s allocation to education consistently falls below the UNESCO-recommended 26% of national budget, often hovering around 7-8%.

    This funding gap has created a severe strain on the system. In 2023, Nigerian public universities received less than 60% of their budgetary requirements, forcing many institutions to operate with deteriorating infrastructure, outdated laboratory equipment, and insufficient teaching resources. The situation is even more worrisome  in  our state universities, where funding is even more precarious due to competing demands on state resources.

    The implications of this funding shortage are far-reaching and multifaceted. First, the quality of education has suffered significantly. Overcrowded lecture halls, where students sometimes stand or sit on windows to attend classes, have become commonplace. Laboratory sessions in science, engineering and medicine  programs often involve students watching demonstrations rather than gaining hands-on experience due to the dearth of  equipment.

    The funding crisis has also led to a “brain drain” among academic staff. Unable to secure competitive salaries and research grants at home, many qualified Nigerian academics have sought opportunities abroad. This moden day exodus of talent has created a shortage of experienced lecturers, particularly in specialized fields like medicine, engineering, and technology.

    Again, there is the negative impact on the quality of research output, which is a crucial indicator of academic excellence, has been severely affected. Nigerian universities struggle to fund quality research projects, maintain current journal subscriptions, or participate in international academic conferences. This limitation has affected the country’s propensity to effectively contribute to global knowledge production and innovation. According to recent data, Nigeria’s research output per capita remains significantly lower than other major African economies like South Africa, Egypt and Tunisia.

    Such lack of research funding has particularly impacted postgraduate education. Many potential graduate students either abandon their studies or seek opportunities outside the nation’s shores, creating a gap in the pipeline of future academics and researchers. This brain drain perpetuates a trend of declining academic standards.

    The underfunding of tertiary education in Nigeria also has broader socioeconomic consequences. With such limited resources, universities cannot adequately prepare graduates for the modern workforce. Employers often complaining about the wide skill gaps among Nigerian graduates has become a recurring discussion, these employers now have to add  training investments costing them more than what they ought to expend, such mismatch between education and industry needs is an indicator of the country’s high youth unemployment rate.

    Furthermore, the funding crisis has scapegoated the ordinary Nigerian who now has to pay through his nose to acquire an education as the schools transfer the costs to students and their families. As institutions struggle to cover operational expenses, they often transfer these costs to students through various fees and charges. This has made higher education increasingly unaffordable for many Nigerians, making worse the existing state of  social inequality.

    Read Also: ASUU warns against abolishing TETFund, says it’s a threat to tertiary education

    Various attempts have been made to address the funding crisis. The Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) was established to provide additional funding through a 2.5% tax on corporate profits. While TETFund has made some impact, its resources are stretched thin across the growing number of institutions. Private universities have emerged as an alternative, but then their high fees also make them inaccessible to most Nigerians.

    Addressing Nigeria’s tertiary education funding crisis requires a multi-faceted approach. Firstly, there needs to be a significant increase in government spending on education to either meet or cap the UNESCO-recommended benchmark, accompanying this should be thorough reforms in fund allocation and utilization to ensure efficiency and transparency in the tertiary  education sector.

    Again, there is also need for our institutions to diversify their funding sources through research commercialization, partnerships with industry, and alumni networks.

    The consequences of continued underfunding will remain severe towards our nation’s race towards development and self sufficiency. Without ensuring  that tertiary education is matched with quality funcing, the nation’s  desire for development will be nothing but a fleeting illusion and we risk  falling further behind our peers.

  • On Father Obimma’s ultimatum to Soludo

    On Father Obimma’s ultimatum to Soludo

    In a dramatic escalation of public discourse over Anambra State’s security challenges, the state government has entered into a heated public confrontation with prominent Catholic priest Reverend Father Emmanuel Obimma, also known as “Ebube Muonso.”

    The controversy erupted after Fr. Obimma’s New Year homily, in which he issued an ultimatum to Governor Chukwuma Charles Soludo: address the mounting security crisis or resign from office. The Soludo administration instead of  responding with facts rather gave a  disproportionate response which  has sparked a heated debate about the state’s approach to public safety and governmental accountability.

    In his homily, Father Obimma, the spiritual director of Holy Ghost Adoration Ministry Uke, characterized the security situation in Anambra as “horrible” and demanded immediate action from the state government. The priest’s intervention comes amid a troubling surge in violent crimes across the state, particularly during December 2024, with Governor Soludo’s administration appearing unable to contain the situation.

    Read Also: Six reasons some men never admit being in a relationship

    The final month of 2024 witnessed several high-profile incidents that rattled the state’s residents. Notable cases included the kidnapping of Honourable Justice Azuka, a lawmaker representing Onitsha North 1 State Constituency, on Christmas Eve. Two days later, the community was shocked by the brutal murder of Father Tobias Okonkwo, a Catholic priest from the Diocese of Nnewi, in the Ihiala area. The crime wave continued with the kidnapping of three senior staff members from Innoson Vehicle Manufacturing Company in Nnewi, whose whereabouts remain unknown.

    “As you can see, people are dying every day and he (Governor Soludo) is not doing anything,” Father Obimma declared, pointing to the governor’s statutory role as the state’s chief security officer, with the primary agenda of security of life and property. The priest particularly criticized the allocation of security votes, questioning their effective utilization in addressing the deteriorating situation.

    The spiritual leader’s criticism extended beyond immediate security concerns, challenging Soludo’s adherence to his campaign promises, notably his pledge to transform Anambra into “Dubai.” In a pointed remark, Father Obimma stated, “This is not time for using his media warriors to blow his trumpets. Whatever is worth doing is worth doing well.”

    Rather than merely criticizing, Father Obimma proposed a collaborative approach, urging the convening of a security summit to pool ideas and resources in combating the rising insecurity in Anambra.

    The response however from Governor Soludo’s camp was swift and terse but lacking in substance. These responses appeared more focused on attacking Father Obimma’s personality than addressing the substance of his message. Even if the criticism had rattled the Soludo administration, a more measured response based on facts would have been appropriate. Labeling Obimma a hypocrite and pretender has not sat well with the public, particularly Catholics, especially given that Soludo had previously sought the priest’s blessings during his campaign, even describing him as a true man of God. The administration’s quick shift from praise to condemnation because of legitimate criticism portrays it as heavy-handed and resistant to accountability. I mean when did Soludo and his coterie of media handlers discover Obimma hypocrisy? When Soludo knelt down in the course of receiving clerical blessings while he sought to be governor, was Obimma’s hypocrisy  either veiled or latent then and only now that Obimma has taken to criticising Soludo did it dawn on him that Obimma was indeed a hypocrite?

    Soludo and his media handlers, understanding the power of the pulpit, appear rattled by Father Obimma’s criticism. Given that Anambra is a deeply religious state where clerics like Obimma are highly respected and could go on to  influence Soludo’s re-election prospects, the administration’s harsh tone is understandable, since it very much needs to discredit a critic like Obimma, though it has likely diminished their standing among Ndi Anambra.

    This is not the first time the pulpit has confronted political authority. Previous instances include Father Mbaka’s criticism of former Governor Chimaroke Nnamani in Enugu, the Catholic Church’s opposition to the late Chinwoke Mbadinuju, and Ikedi Ohakim’s confrontation with the Church, which contributed to his electoral defeat in 2011. The outcome of this current confrontation will be closely watched by Ndi Anambra and Nigerians alike.

    As this public confrontation unfolds, the fundamental issue of security in Anambra State remains unresolved. The back and forth of such an exchange has highlighted growing frustration among citizens and religious leaders with the current security situation while revealing deep divisions over how these challenges should be addressed. The escalating tension between the religious leader and state government reflects broader concerns about Anambra’s security infrastructure and the administration’s approach to criticism. We are in for some interesting  political drama.

  • Beyond charity: What Nigeria’s Christmas food distribution stampedes reveal

    Beyond charity: What Nigeria’s Christmas food distribution stampedes reveal

    The joyous period of Christmas celebrations in Nigeria often bears a dark undertone that reflects deeper societal issues. The recurring tragedy of stampedes during food sharing events in Ibadan, Abuja and Ihiala, Anambra State during the yuletide season has become a haunting reminder of the complex interplay between poverty, organizational inadequacies, and cultural practices that continue to claim innocent lives.

    Typical of every Christmas season, various organizations, politicians, religious bodies, and wealthy individuals organize food distribution events as acts of charity. These events, while well-intentioned, turn tragic when massive crowds gather in hopes of receiving food items and other essential commodities. The desperation to collect these items leads to chaos, pushing and shoving that escalates into deadly stampedes.

    The fundamental driver behind these tragic incidents is the crushing poverty that affects millions of Nigerians. With over 40% of the population living below the poverty line, the prospect of free food and other condiments becomes an irresistible draw, compelling people to risk their lives in the process. The stampedes are symptomatic of a deeper malaise – the daily struggle for survival that many Nigerians face.

    As basic necessities have become luxury items, the announcement of free food distribution creates a perfect storm of desperation. People arrive hours before the scheduled time, often traveling long distances, forming large crowds that become increasingly difficult to manage. The fear of missing out on these rare opportunities for sustenance drives individuals to push forward aggressively, creating dangerous situations that quickly spiral out of control.

    These distribution events consistently exhibit a lack of proper planning and crowd control measures. Most times, organizers often underestimate the turnout or fail to implement adequate safety protocols. Proper venue selection with multiple entry and exit points, implementation of ticket systems, deployment of trained security personnel, clear communication systems, and emergency response preparations are either ignored or inadequately executed.

    Furthermore, the absence of a centralized database of vulnerable individuals makes it difficult to organize systematic distribution. This leads to a chaotic first-come-first-served approach that inevitably breeds disorder. Many organizers also fail to coordinate with local authorities and emergency services, creating a dangerous vacuum in crisis response capabilities.

    Read Also: Imo community decry alleged extortion, harassment of youths by security personnel

    The tendency to disregard orderly lines persists even among the elite, who often observe queue culture abroad but abandon such discipline within Nigeria. When educated and influential individuals repeatedly disregard decorum, it normalizes this behavior throughout society. Such a cultural phenomenon becomes particularly deadly during food distribution events where large crowds gather.

    The absence of respect for queuing systems reflects a broader societal issue where immediate individual gain often trumps collective welfare. This behavior is exacerbated during food distribution events where the fear of supplies running out drives people to abandon any semblance of order. The resulting chaos creates perfect conditions for stampedes to occur.

    Addressing these tragic incidents requires a multi-faceted approach that tackles both immediate and underlying causes. In the short term, stricter regulations must be imposed on organizations conducting food distribution events. These should include: Mandatory safety protocols that must be followed before receiving permission to organize such events. Professional crowd control personnel should be required at all distribution points. Distribution methods should be modernized through the use of voucher systems or appointment schedules to prevent overwhelming crowds from forming.

    Long-term solutions must address the root cause of poverty through sustainable economic policies and social welfare programs. The government needs to strengthen social safety nets and implement poverty alleviation programs that reduce the desperation that drives people to risk their lives for basic necessities.

    Developing a stronger queue culture requires sustained effort in public education and awareness. Schools, religious institutions, and community organizations must play active roles in promoting orderly behavior and respect for queuing systems. Public spaces should be designed to encourage orderly lines, and authorities should consistently enforce queue discipline in all public services.

    The sad loss of lives during yuletide food distribution events represents a tragic failure of society to protect its most vulnerable members. These incidents serve as stark reminders of the work that needs to be done in addressing poverty, improving organizational capacity, and transforming cultural attitudes toward public order.

    As Nigeria continues to develop, it must prioritize the safety and dignity of its citizens, especially during charitable events meant to bring joy and relief. The true spirit of the yuletide season – sharing and caring for others – should not be marred by preventable deaths. It’s time for all stakeholders to come together and implement lasting solutions that will ensure such tragic stampedes become a thing of the past.

    Only through concerted effort in addressing poverty, enforcing proper organization, and fostering a culture of order can Nigeria hope to prevent future loss of life during what should be a season of joy and celebration. The human cost of these stampedes is too high to ignore, and the time for meaningful change is now.

  • NCC: A tale of regulatory failure

    NCC: A tale of regulatory failure

    In Africa’s largest economy, sometimes making a simple phone call successfully could become a herculean exercise requiring patience and enduring frustration. Nigeria’s telecommunications sector, despite its potential and importance to the nation’s economy and amidst its increasing subscription rate, continues to deteriorate under what appears to be poor and ineffective regulatory oversight, leaving millions of subscribers at the mercy of underperforming service providers.

    The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), established to protect consumer interests and ensure quality service delivery, appears to have abdicated its regulatory responsibilities. While collecting billions in licensing fees and fines, the commission has failed to address the fundamental issues plaguing the sector, transforming from being a watchdog into a mere spectator of the industry’s decline without much of a whimper despite the glaring shenanigans displayed by these telco firms.

    For the average Nigerian, the gory and ugly experiences of using mobile services have become a daily ordeal. Network congestion, particularly during peak hours, renders smooth communication whether it be voice or voice over internet protocol communication nearly impossible in major cities. More subscribers often find themselves redialing multiple times to complete a single call, while those fortunate enough to connect must contend with poor audio quality and abrupt disconnections.

    In commercial hubs such as Lagos, Onitsha, Kano and others, subscribers have reportedly complained about such occurrences due to dropped calls and unreliable networks. This has led to subscribers purchasing multiple SIMs of different networks, still such measures yet fail to guarantee the subscriber the desire for reliable communication. This, I have witnessed firsthand.

    The situation with internet services is equally dire. On a number of occasions, the internet services provided could be described as the ‘Speed of Yesterday’. While telecommunications companies proudly advertise 4G LTE services, the reality for most users is far from the promised high-speed connectivity. Data speeds frequently crawl at 2G levels or 3G levels, making simple tasks like sending emails or accessing social media platforms a grueling exercise.

    Obviously, one cannot totally quantify the huge impact such situations have on Nigeria’s growing digital economy. To describe such as bad is an understatement. Start-ups, online businesses, and remote workers face significant challenges due to the unreliability of such internet connections, with such regression threatening not only Nigeria’s position as Africa’s leading tech hub but also largely undermining our potential to scale up to the opportunities offered by the digital economy creating the jobs and attracting the investments necessary to leapfrog our economy from where it is now to where we really want it to be.

    Read Also: NCC reduces telcos’ tariff options

    The NCC’s approach to these issues has been remarkably passive, its posture similar to regulatory negligence. Despite having the statutory power to impose sanctions and enforce quality standards, the commission’s actions have been limited to issuing occasional warnings and conducting ineffective monitoring exercises.

    The regulatory body’s quality of service (QoS) parameters, which should serve as benchmarks for acceptable service levels, have become merely passive suggestions rather than enforced standards. Telecommunications service providers routinely breach these parameters without facing meaningful consequences, effectively turning the entire regulatory framework into a paper tiger.

    As noted earlier, the economic impact of poor telecommunications services extends far beyond individual inconvenience. The Nigerian economy repeatedly loses billions of naira annually due to failed transactions, missed business opportunities, and reduced productivity. Small and medium-sized enterprises, which form the backbone of the economy, are particularly vulnerable to these telecommunications failures.

    Moreover, the poor quality of service has implications for national security. Emergency services delivery is obviously likely to be affected when networks like ours fail, and the inability to maintain stable communications affects both personal safety and law enforcement efforts.

    While the NCC maintains a Consumer Affairs Bureau, its effectiveness in addressing subscriber complaints remains questionable. The bureau’s complaint resolution mechanism is cumbersome, and many consumers report that their grievances remain unresolved for months and even years.

    The commission’s consumer protection guidelines, while comprehensive on paper, lack practical enforcement. Telecommunications companies have continued to engage in practices that place their subscribers at a disadvantage, from unsolicited services to arbitrary charges, with minimal intervention from the regulator.

    The transformation of Nigeria’s telecommunications sector requires immediate and decisive action. The NCC must transition from its current passive stance to active regulation, implementing and enforcing stricter quality of service standards. This should include:

    • Regular, transparent monitoring of network performance with published results

    • Substantial penalties for breaches of service standards

    • Mandatory infrastructure investment requirements for service providers

    • Implementation of consumer compensation schemes for service failures

    • Regular independent audits of network infrastructure and service quality.

    The time has come for a complete overhaul of Nigeria’s telecommunications regulatory framework. The NCC must either step up to its responsibilities or make way for a more effective regulatory body. The Nigerian people deserve better than to be held hostage by poor telecommunications services while regulators watch from the sidelines.

    In a world where digital connectivity increasingly determines economic success, Nigeria cannot afford to continue with its current trajectory of telecommunications decline. The cost of regulatory failure is too high, and the patience of Nigerian consumers has worn beyond too thin. The message to the NCC and service providers must be clear: Improve!

  • Identity, heritage, and complexity: Unpacking the Badenoch-Shettima discourse

    Identity, heritage, and complexity: Unpacking the Badenoch-Shettima discourse

    The recent verbal exchange between Kemi Badenoch, the Nigerian-born leader of the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, and Kashim Shettima, Nigeria’s Vice President, has seemingly thrust into the global spotlight a profound and delicate discussion about national identity, ethnic heritage, and the intricate dynamics of postcolonial belonging.

    From Badenoch’s standpoint, the context of her statement saw her refer to herself as Yoruba rather than Nigerian. Such a statement has largely reverberated far beyond mere personal preference; it represents a complex narrative of historical tensions, cultural distinctions, and a personal reckoning with a multifaceted national identity.

    Badenoch’s critique fundamentally centers on the stark cultural and ideological differences she perceives between the Yoruba people and Northern Nigeria, with similar examples found throughout the country. While many may judge her statement as provocative, those who are true to themselves would rather view it as indicative of the long-standing ethnic and religious divisions that have historically characterized Nigerian sociopolitical landscapes and our failure at nation-building.

    However, her characterization of Northern Nigeria as a “haven for Islamism and Boko Haram” is inappropriate and should not be uttered by someone who may one day govern the United Kingdom. It is akin to calling Texans “Rednecks” or describing Germany as a haven for Nazis. It is important to remind Badenoch that no region has suffered more at the hands of Boko Haram and Banditry than the North she labels as its haven. In doing so, she does great disservice to the people of that region who have died or suffered immeasurably from the terrorist organization’s activities.

    Thus, the response by Vice President Kashim Shettima epitomizes the defense of our national pride. By challenging Badenoch to “change her name” if she doesn’t want association with Nigeria, Shettima represents a perspective that prioritizes national unity over ethnic distinctions.

    His retort reflects a broader Nigerian sentiment that seeks to transcend ethnic boundaries and promote a unified national identity. However, Badenoch’s stance suggests that such unity remains more aspirational than real.

    Read Also: My husband brutalises me for denying him three rounds of intercourse, says Police Superintendent’s wife

    Badenoch’s assertion that the Yoruba were “ethnic enemies” of Northern Nigerians reveals the deep-rooted historical tensions that continue to simmer beneath Nigeria’s national facade.

    Her comments challenge simplistic notions of national identity, suggesting that belonging is more nuanced than a mere administrative categorization. This serves as a warning to our leaders and those who insist on Nigeria remaining a united entity. If we must be one nation, one people, then we must sit down and tell ourselves the basic truth and create a template that will assure all Nigerians, irrespective of where we come from, that we are better off as a united nation than as splintered entities—an argument many Nigerians will not readily buy into, given our present circumstances.

    While Badenoch declares her commitment to “protect” and her willingness to “die protecting this country” (referring to the United Kingdom), she frames her identity not as a rejection but as a principled stance rooted in her understanding of her ancestral warrior ethos.

    Such a perspective suggests that true loyalty transcends geographical boundaries and is instead anchored in cultural values, historical narratives, and personal convictions.

    This is where a majority of past Nigerian leaders missed it! Whilst they demanded unalloyed loyalty from the Nigerian citizen, they paid lip service to the issues that confronted many a Nigerian from buying into such. Take for example, my Igbo brothers will readily scream marginalisation, my brothers within the Niger Delta have long cried about the exploitation of their resources without any visible infrastructural presence, while these calls have been long drawn, government after government have all failed to properly address such clamours.  Even now, Presidenr Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whom many felt would readily address the political lopsided nature of the nation has told the nation he much prefers to face the economic challenges before tinkering with the former.

    The Badenoch-Shettima discourse illuminates several critical contemporary issues, such as the limitations of postcolonial national identities, the persistent challenge of ethnic reconciliation, the complex ways individuals navigate multiple cultural affiliations, and the ongoing dialogue about belonging in an increasingly globalized world.

    While Badenoch’s statements might seem controversial, aside from her derision of Northern Nigeria, the rest of her comments appear to represent a legitimate exploration of identity in a complex, multifaceted world. Her critique, though sharp, is not without merit and reflects genuine concerns about regional dynamics in Nigeria.

    Likewise, Vice President Shettima’s defense of national unity is equally valid, representing an alternative perspective that seeks to bridge ethnic divides. The dialogue between them is not a simple conflict but a nuanced conversation about belonging, heritage, and national identity.

    Ultimately, the Badenoch-Shettima exchange offers a profound insight into the intricate tapestry of modern identity politics, challenging us to look beyond simplistic narratives and appreciate the complexity of human experience.

  • The Youth Confab: A crucible for Nigeria’s transformative future

    The Youth Confab: A crucible for Nigeria’s transformative future

    In the complex tapestry of Nigeria’s socio-political landscape, the proposed youth conference emerges as a beacon of hope—a potential watershed moment that could fundamentally reshape the nation’s trajectory. As Nigeria grapples with multifaceted challenges ranging from economic instability to security concerns, the youth confab represents more than just a gathering; it symbolizes a critical opportunity for generational dialogue, strategic reimagining, and collective national rebirth.

    Nigeria stands at a pivotal crossroads. With a median age of approximately 18 years and over 70% of its population under 30, the youth are not just stakeholders but the primary architects of the nation’s future. The current socio-political environment—characterized by economic challenges, widespread unemployment, regional tensions, and governance inefficiencies—demands an unprecedented platform for young Nigerians to articulate their vision, concerns, and aspirations.

    The proposed youth conference is not merely a bureaucratic exercise but a profound mechanism for national healing and strategic realignment. It represents a rare opportunity to break the cycle of generational disconnect that has historically hindered Nigeria’s comprehensive development.

    Unlike previous national dialogues that often marginalized youth perspectives, this conference promises a genuinely inclusive approach. By ensuring representation across ethnic, religious, and socio-economic divides, the confab can create a microcosm of Nigeria’s diverse yet interconnected social fabric. Young Nigerians from Lagos to Sokoto, from Port Harcourt to Maiduguri, would have an unprecedented platform to engage in direct, unmediated dialogue.

    The conference’s agenda must transcend rhetorical discussions. It should provide concrete frameworks for addressing critical national challenges:

    – Youth unemployment and economic empowerment

    – Educational reform and skills development

    – Technological innovation and digital economy opportunities

    – Conflict resolution and national unity strategies

    – Governance transparency and anti-corruption mechanisms.

    One of the most significant potentials of the youth confab lies in its capacity to bridge the profound generational divide that has characterized Nigerian political discourse. By creating a structured dialogue platform, younger Nigerians can constructively engage with existing power structures, presenting innovative solutions rather than merely critiquing historical approaches.

    The urgency of convening this conference cannot be overstated. Nigeria is experiencing unprecedented demographic and technological transitions. The youth population is not only growing but becoming increasingly politically aware, technologically connected, and globally oriented.

    Delaying this conference risks further alienation and potential social fragmentation. Each passing month without a structured national youth dialogue increases the probability of spontaneous, potentially disruptive social movements emerging organically.

    Read Also: Nigerians stranded in Nigerien desert as desperate human traffickers shift attention to northern states

    The youth confab represents a strategic investment in national stability. By providing a structured platform for dialogue, Nigeria can potentially:

    – Reduce social tensions

    – Channel youthful energy towards constructive nation-building

    – Create collaborative frameworks for addressing complex national challenges

    – Generate innovative policy recommendations

    A successful youth conference should aim to produce:

    – A comprehensive youth manifesto outlining key national development priorities

    – Specific policy recommendation documents

    – Structured engagement mechanisms between youth representatives and government institutions

    – Regional and national action plans for youth empowerment.

    For the conference to achieve its transformative potential, several critical elements must be guaranteed:

    1. Transparent selection processes for participants

    2. Guaranteed implementation frameworks for recommendations

    3. Independent monitoring and evaluation mechanisms

    4. Media transparency and broad national communication.

    Beyond immediate policy discussions, the youth confab represents a profound opportunity to reimagine Nigerian nationhood. It’s a chance to move beyond historical ethnic and religious divisions, embracing a more nuanced, forward-looking national identity.

    The conference should not be viewed as a singular event but as a catalyst for ongoing national dialogue and collaborative governance. It symbolizes hope—a collective declaration that Nigeria’s future will be shaped by dialogue, mutual understanding, and shared aspirations.

    As Nigeria stands at this critical juncture, the youth conference emerges as more than an event—it is a potential turning point. It represents the convergence of youthful energy, technological connectivity, and genuine patriotic aspiration.

    The success of this conference will not be measured by the words spoken within its halls but by the transformative actions it inspires across the nation. It is an invitation to young Nigerians to become active architects of their collective destiny, transcending the limitations of past narratives and creating a genuinely inclusive, dynamic national vision.

    The time for the youth confab is now—not as a luxury but as an absolute necessity for Nigeria’s continued existence and prosperity.

  • The need to rejig Nigerian Football Leagues

    The need to rejig Nigerian Football Leagues

    Football or soccer as it is commonly called is more than just a sport in Nigeria; it is a cultural phenomenon that has united millions across diverse ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic strata. Asides this, it has raised many from poverty, made towns, generated revenue and helped create employment as well as legends, inspiring generations after generations.

     Despite producing world-class talents who have achieved remarkable success in international leagues, the Nigerian domestic football ecosystem remains critically underdeveloped. This piece therefore explores the urgent need to invest in and develop Nigerian football leagues, highlighting the profound economic, social, and sporting benefits that such development can bring.

    The Nigerian football landscape is characterized by immense potential but is then marred by systemic challenges. In the past, particularly the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s, the Nigerian league was the stuff of dreams, from it the Green Eagles and the  Super Eagles  became African power houses, winning multiple African Cup of Nations titles and making significant impacts in a number of international tournaments. This same domestic leagues which produced the likes of  Thunder Balogun, Segun Odegbemi, Yisa Sofoluwe,  Christian Chukwu, Dimeji Lawal, Felix Owolabi, Emmanuel Okala, Peter Rufai, Bright Omokaro, Henry Nwosu  Stephen Keshi,  Nduka Ugbade, Daniel Amokachi, Kanu Nwankwo, and a host of others were household names produced within our shores. Nigerians, i mean those above the Gen Z age will relish the days of Challenge cup  and league duels and the tension soaked rivalry between clubs like Flash Flamingoes, Stationery Stores, Mighty Jets, IICC, Leventis United, Abiola Babes, Ranchers Bees and Rangers International. Today, the Nigerian league is a shadow of itself,  suffering from chronic underfunding, poor infrastructure,  lack of professional management and institutional corruption.

    Most Nigerian football clubs struggle with inconsistent funding, preventing them from developing robust infrastructure, training facilities, and competitive player contracts. Even today, despite the fact that football is a money spinner, most clubs  operate on shoestring budgets, making long-term planning nearly impossible.

    Asides the issue of poor funding, many Nigerian football club stadiums are in poor condition, lacking modern amenities, proper maintenance, and essential facilities that would attract fans, sponsors, and potential investors.

     Thirdly, the administrative structures of many Nigerian football leagues and clubs are often informal, lacking the professional management practices necessary for sustainable growth.

    Such factors are thus reasons why a number of young Nigerian footballers frequently seek opportunities abroad at very early stages of their careers, depriving local leagues of their most talented players and creating a perpetual cycle of talent migration. Again, the near fixation on foreign leagues by the Nigerian audience and even using participation in such leagues as a determinant for who features in the national team has continued to do great disservice to the growth and development of our league. Today, we see our youths clinging to ‘Fandoms’ of foreign owned clubs whilst ignoring that which is in their own backyard! While such remains distasteful, these youths are not to blame as our local parlance  naturally suggests, ” Who no like better thing?” The Premierships, La Ligas and Bundesligas have readily invested in their leagues and their brands and so the audience will always go  there.

    Investing in Nigerian football leagues is not merely a sporting endeavor but a significant economic opportunity. A well-structured, professionally managed football ecosystem can generate substantial economic benefita such as job creation which will create robust football leagues can create thousands of direct and indirect jobs, including:

    – Professional players

    – Coaching and training staff

    – Stadium and facility management personnel

    – Sports marketing and administration professionals

    – Merchandise production and sales teams

    – Media and broadcasting professionals. Also,  well organized football leagues can transform local economies by attracting domestic and international sports tourists which could help boost our foreign exchange earnings not only via revenues from ticket sales but also through patnerships that would  create opportunities for local businesses around football infrastructure as well as help develop sports-related hospitality and entertainment sectors. Asides as an investment opportunity, a well structured football league system creates alternative pathways for youth development, opportunities for social mobility, and serves as positive engagement that can reduce youth unemployment and social tensions.

    Read Also: Football aficionado Akpenpuun excited on birthday milestone

    To realize these potential benefits, a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach is required, such as

    infrastructure Investment, by modernizing existing stadiums

    developing world-class training facilities, creating regional/state and local football academies.

    These efforts must go in hand with  governance and management reforms which include entrenching of transparent, professional management practices, the establishment of  clear regulatory frameworks, the implementing of  robust financial monitoring systems and the encouragement of quality corporate governance standards.

    Developing Nigerian football leagues is not a luxury but a necessity. It represents a strategic investment in the nation’s sporting potential, economic diversification, and social development. By adopting a holistic, long-term approach that combines infrastructure development, professional management, and a commitment to youth empowerment, Nigeria can transform its football landscape reaping the potential rewards – economic prosperity, international recognition, and a united, inspired nation – make this endeavor not just worthwhile, but essential.

    The time to act is now. Nigeria’s football future awaits transformation.