Category: Saturday

  • Imo’s unending war of words

    Imo’s unending war of words

    The good people of Imo state are not hiding their displeasure over the ongoing war of words between Governor Hope Uzodimma and his predecessor, Rochas Okorocha. The political rivals have not spared each other since the verbal punches started flying.

    Worried by the development, eminent citizens of the state and other leaders of the Southeast zone have been calling on them to sheath their swords in the interest of the state. Ohaneze Ndigbo, umbrella body of leaders of thought in the zone, as well as several other groups and individuals, already intervened to no avail.

    It is clear the two politicians aren’t ready to let go their bile going by developments during the week. While Okorocha continued to taunt Uzodinma and his government for failing to name sponsors of terrorism in the state as earlier promised, the government urged the former governor to seek forgiveness for innocent blood allegedly spilled during his reign.

    While Okorocha said the Uzodinma’s administration has made Imo State a laughing stock and become a nightmare to itself, Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Declan Emelumba, said the blood of Somtochukwu, the 11-year old killed when security agents stormed Ekeukwu Market, Owerri allegedly on the orders of Okorocha, and several unresolved assassinations that took place during his eight-year reign, were seeking vengeance.

    As the verbal assaults continue amidst fear that it may degenerate into violence, the people of the state are urging both sides to ceasefire in the interest of peace.

    Read Also: Okorocha’s blackmail will no longer work in Imo, says Uzodimma

    Sanwo-Olu’s trains wining hearts

    Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu’s, move to acquired two sets of Talgo 330 kilometre per-hour trains for the Lagos Red Line rail project is winning the hearts of numerous citizens and politicians.

    The governor completed the acquisition deal on the trains at a public event inside the Milwaukee facilities of Spanish train manufacturer Talgo Incorporated in the United States last Tuesday.

    The trains will soon arrive Lagos for the 37 km track rail project in line with his administration’s commitment to traffic management and transportation agenda.

    Sentry found many Lagosians expressing satisfaction with the governor’s commitment to the project and hailing him for striving hard to deliver on his election promise.

    “All over social media Sanwo-Olu is enjoying rave review for his trains,” a commentator said.

    Sentry also sighted a post by Comrade Abbass Hassan, an opposition politician in Alimosho area of the state and avowed critic of the ruling party, where he said: “For this, Sanwoolu won my heart. And when he completes the project, I will worry his party less because of him. He appears like a committed person. I give him kudos.”

    Since the commencement of his administration on May 29, 2019, Sanwo-Olu has maintained his administration’s commitment to bringing the Red Line project to fruition during the lifetime of his government. Lagosians, with their expressions of satisfaction, have told Mr. Governor in clear terms that they want the project completed as soon

  • Festus Adedayo, Tinubu and  the character question

    Festus Adedayo, Tinubu and the character question

    Regardless of his proclivities for misdirected mischief you must give it to him. Dr. Festus Adedayo, political scientist, lawyer, journalist and Tribune columnist has impressive academic and professional credentials. He is also a good prose stylist. For years, I have considered Festus to be not just a friend and professional colleague but also a brother. As the Chief Press Secretary to Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu when he was governor of Lagos State between 1999 and 2005, Festus who was then the Features Editor of the Nigerian Tribune was one of the most frequent visitors to my office at the Lagos State government Secretariat, Alausa. On a number of the several occasions that Festus visited my office from his base in Ibadan, I would ensure he met either the Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Mr Dele Alake, or the governor directly. It was our practice to bring leading journalists and columnists face to face with the governor so that they could debate him on issues and he could also have access to views from outside those of us serving in government.

    Against this background, I find Dr. Adedayo’s column of last Sunday titled ‘Why Tinubu Must Never be President of Nigeria’ curious and inaccurate in a number of respects. Naturally, as Features Editor, the controversies raging around discrepancies in the information supplied in the governor’s INEC form was of professional interest to him. But it was not an overriding or consuming passion for him contrary to the impression he sought to create. I cannot recall any occasion when he visited my office with the intention of investigating issues surrounding Tinubu’s certificates or the institutions he attended. And there was no time he had any difficulties seeing me, the commissioner and, if necessary, the governor on issues of interest to him. As Features Editor of the Tribune, he wrote regularly on the policies and programmes of the state government. However, those who worked daily and consistently on issues affecting Lagos State were the Tribune’s full time Lagos State government correspondent based in Alausa and the Lagos City Editor based on Lagos Island.

    I must admit that because of our friendship, I was partial towards Festus in channeling most of the governor’s office adverts meant for the Tribune titles through him rather than the newspaper’s accredited correspondent at Alausa. And as was my practice then, I never deducted any commissions from these adverts. If Festus will be honest, he will admit that he has profusely expressed his gratitude to me each time we have met. I have uncharacteristically gone into these personal details to show that the relationship between Festus and the Tinubu administration was quite close and not as adversarial as he tried to portray it in his column.

    The exaggerated, arrogant and hypocritical sense of moral integrity and self righteousness exhibited throughout Dr. Adedayo’s column in question is so unlike the ever humble and unassuming Festus I used to know and there is just no basis for this. Of course, the questions about Tinubu’s certificates, institutions and age raised by Dr. Adedayo are critical and cannot be ignored especially by someone who wants to be President of Nigeria. But Festus’s column is even more baffling because he is in a position to know and I am convinced that he does know that these questions have been thoroughly investigated and conclusively addressed by the appropriate institutional authority legally competent to do so. What then could be his motive? I cannot pretend to know.

    Shortly after he was sworn in as governor of Lagos State in May 1999, there were allegations widely published in the media that Tinubu had perjured and forged the credentials that qualified him to run for the gubernatorial election in the state. The allegations were contained in a petition dated August 12, 1999, written by one Alhaji Jameed Seriki of No. 62 Balogun Street, West, Lagos, and one Dr. Waliu Balogun-Smith of No. 5, Unity Road, Ikeja. The kernel of their allegations were: (1) that there was a discrepancy in the age of the governor since the profile published during his inauguration stated that he was born in 1952 and the age on his transcript at the Chicago State University claimed that he was born in 1954; (2) that the governor did not attend Government College, Ibadan, as was stated in his profile and INEC FORM CF.001; and (3) the governor did not attend University of Chicago as claimed in INEC FORM CF and an affidavit sworn to at the Ikeja High Court of Justice on 29th December 1998.

    It was unanimously agreed by all legal authorities that the governor enjoyed legal immunity courtesy Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution and that the Lagos State House of Assembly was the only competent institution that could investigate the governor and take punitive action against him if he was deemed to have committed acts constituting gross misconduct.

    Consequently, following a motion moved by Honourable Tajudeen Jaiyeola Agoro representing Lagos Mainland Constituency, the Speaker, Dr. Adeleke Olorunimbe Mamora, on Tuesday, September 21, 1999, set up a five-man ad hoc committee to investigate the allegations and report back to the House. The committee comprised Hon. Babajide Omoworare (Chairman), Hon. Thomas Ayodele Fadeyi, Hon. Adeniyi Akinmade, Hon. Ibrahim Gbola Gbabijo and Hon Saliu Olaitan Mustapha.

    In its report to the House, the Committee stated that “The Committee deemed it fit to invite the petitioners and therefore wrote the petitioners. The letters were sent by courier. The petitioners did not attend the hearing and we have not heard from them up till now. We visited their address at 62 Balogun Street, West, Lagos and 5, Unity Road, Ikeja, Lagos, on Wednesday, September 22, 1999 and found out that the petitioners neither reside nor carry on any business at the addresses. Hence, we concluded that the petition was written in fictitious names. Attached herewith and marked “Annexures 1 and 2” are pictures of the buildings bearing the above addresses taken when the Committee visited the addresses. Also attached and marked “Annexxures 3 and 4″ are copies of the evidence of courier of the letters forwarded to the fictitious Petitioners”. Despite this, the Committee continued with its investigation.

    Continuing, the committee stated in its report that “The Committee invited Editors of ThisDay Newspaper because of the prominence, which they have given to the publication of the allegations. The Editors of ThisDay visited us informally, refusing to oblige our invitation and informing us that they would rely on their publications”. The governor appeared before the Committee on Thursday, September 23, 1999, alongside his counsel Mr. Femi Falana who was then not yet a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). According to the report, “The Governor of Lagos State started his evidence by admitting “full responsibility” for some of the “needless errors” being pointed at in recent publications and which formed the basis of allegations against him. The Governor told the Committee that as a result of the acrimonious primaries of the Alliance for Democracy in Lagos State and its attendant crisis, the information contained in both the INEC form and affidavit of loss of certificates was supplied by Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi. The Governor then submitted to the Committee a copy of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) senatorial candidate form dated June 1, 1992, which he used to contest the 1992 Senatorial election as candidate of the party for Lagos West. In the form, which he personally filled, the Governor attached the certificates of Richard Daley College and Chicago State University. For his educational qualifications he filled B.Sc Accounting only”.

    According to the committee report, “This according to him demonstrated that “needless errors” spotted in the 1999 INEC form were not consistent and that they were “genuine errors”. He further directed the attention of the committee to the INEC form CFO1 that bore a wrong date of twenty-eight December 1999 instead of twenty-eight December 1998. The error he said was made by INEC which printed the form. And not even the Commissioner of Oath detected the error. This in his view further confirmed that the hurried and confused manner under which the preparations for the governorship primaries of 1998 were gave room to error on all sides”.

    Giving further insight into their interaction with the governor, the committee report stated: “The Governor spoke about his difficult and traumatic youth and how he scaled the hurdles of life as a self made man. After his primary education, the Governor said he was admitted into secondary school but he could not further his education because of his poverty. The Governor thus had to engage in menial jobs before he proceeded to the United States of America in search of the Golden Fleece. The Governor informed us that in America, he undertook various odd jobs and tried to improve himself academically. After five years of the most harrowing work experience, the Governor said he enrolled at Richard Daley College in Chicago, which among others offers basic, remedial and academic classes, preparatory to entering Chicago State University. He presented a photocopy of a certificate issued by Richard Daley College (City Colleges of Chicago), a copy of which is attached as herewith and marked as “Annexure 5″. Throughout the time he studied in Chicago, the Governor said he also had to fend for himself and that he actually paid his way through school by working extra hours as a tutor in the same university. He said he studied for extra hours especially during summer. The Governor said 27 (twenty seven) credit hours were transferred from Richard Daley College to Chicago State University, where he obtained Bachelor of Science in Business and Administration. His major was in Accounting”.

    Read Also: Replicate your achievements in Abuja, Niger governor tells Tinubu

    To back up his claims, Tinubu provided the committee with at least 11 documents, which were attached to its report as annexures. These included a copy of a letter dated September 6, 1978, written by Andrew F. Sikula, Dean, College of Business Administration informing

    Mr. Bola Tinubu that he had made the Dean’s honours list by making a 3.50 or better grade point average; an inter-office memorandum of Chicago State University dated May 28, 1979 written by one Clyde Smith to the Honours Award Committee recommending Bola A. Tinubu as recipient of the outstanding senior award; copies of May/June 1979 edition of the TEMPO, Chicago State University Campus journal covering Chicago State University Annual Awards Ceremony. Bola Tinubu was described as the President of the Accounting Society and was also running for Student Government Association presidency; a Chicago State University statement issued by the Accounts Receivable Department on June 15, 1979 with his social security number; the Chicago State University Certificate dated 22nd June 1979 conferring on Bola A. Tinubu the degree of Bachelor of Science in Business and Administration (Accounting with honours); a copy of Chicago State University year book with the picture of Bola A. Tinubu on page 75; Chicago State University academic record transcript dated 11th July 1979; a Chicago State University letter dated August 20th 1999 addressed To Whom It May Concern advising that Bola A.Tinubu did indeed attend Chicago State University from August 1977 through June 1979; his pay slips when he worked as an accountant with Deloitte Haskins & Sells and at GTE Services Corporation before returning to Nigeria; a copy of Mobil Oil Nigeria Plc Certificate of Service dated 14th May 1992 issued in favor of Mr. B. A. Tinubu and a letter written by Mobil Oil Nigeria Plc dated December 29th, 1998, addressed to whom it may concern confirming that Mr. Tinubu was an employee of the Company between December 1, 1983 and May 17th, 1992.

    When he appeared before the Committee on Friday, September 24, 1999, Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi, according to the committee’s report, “informed the committee that he was heading the unit of the Governor’s campaign responsible for processing the form and he accepted responsibilities for the mistakes in the INEC forms. He said the forms were filled for the Governor in a rush and under tense circumstances at a point when there were problems and crises in the party, Alliance for Democracy (AD) in Lagos State during the gubernatorial primary electioneering campaigns. He said as a result of the crises they had very little time to fill and process the INEC form. He said the Governor also hurriedly signed the forms so as to beat the deadline given by INEC for the submission of all forms”.

    It was the legal opinion of Professor Itse Sagay (SAN) who accompanied Senator Afikuyomi to the proceedings, as cited in the committee’s report, that “even if the allegations against the Executive Governor of Lagos State are true, they are not impeachable offenses as the Lagos State House of Assembly only possesses power to impeach for gross misconduct in relation to his conduct while in office; that it is more of a moral matter than a legal issue. He suggested that the Governor should apologize to the people of Lagos State concerning the mistakes he made in his forms, which were not intentional”.

    Chief Gani Fawehimmi whose testimony is also contained in the committee’s report “was of the view that the primary duty of the Lagos State House of Assembly is to determine if any law has been breached by the Lagos State Governor at this stage and not to determine the impeachment of the governor now. He said the House of Assembly must find out if the Governor has committed any crime against the laws of Lagos State. The issue, according to him, is that there are 2 (two) affidavits deposed to by the Governor of Lagos State and false declaration has been established. Finally, Chief Fawehinmi summed up his evidence by stating that Governor Bola Tinubu volunteered false information on oath to enable him contest for the post of Governor of Lagos State”.

    In his written defence on behalf of Tinubu before the panel, his counsel, Mr. Femi Falana, addressed the various allegations against the governor. On the issue of perjury, Mr. Falana submitted that “Since no iota of evidence has been led to show that the facts contained in the affidavits in dispute were given in the course of judicial proceedings or in anticipation of judicial proceedings, the offence of perjury cannot be sustained in the circumstances of this case”.

    On alleged forgery, he submitted that “From the facts of this case, no evidence has been led to show that Governor Tinubu presented a forged certificate to INEC. And in fact, Governor Tinubu never presented any forged certificate to INEC”.

    On the allegation of inaccurate information, Mr. Falana argued that “We urge the committee to believe the oral evidence of Governor Tinubu that it was Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi that filled Form CF001 on his behalf and supplied the information contained in the affidavit dated 29th of December, 1998 to Barrister Oriola. This aspect of the Governor’s evidence has been corroborated by Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi who took responsibility for the errors contained in both documents”. He also stated that”Perhaps to convince the committee that the governor did not set out to give false information to INEC, the committee may wish to examine the contents of a similar form dated June 1, 1992 filled by the Governor himself when he was contesting election to the Senate. The Governor did not, on his own, supply the information, which has formed the basis of the allegation of false information. In any case, since Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi has admitted that the errors were made by him and not by the governor, we submit that the Governor should not be penalized in the circumstances of this case”.

    Mr. Falana also addressed at length, issues raised regarding Tinubu’s age declaration. He wrote in his statement to the committee and contained in its report that “From all the documents tendered before the committee, it is abundantly clear that the alleged false declaration of age as per the documents submitted to INEC before the election is an isolated inconsistency. In other words, whereas all the other documents contain one and identical age i.e. 1952, the academic transcript of Chicago State University (which was not made under oath and which could not be elevated to the pedestal of a sworn-declaration) in which 1954 was given as the date of birth of the Governor stands alone. It is predominantly clear, therefore, that taken together the age-claim of the Governor, which he has continued to maintain, and the age contained in the other documents tendered, 1952 is the correct and accurate birth year of the Governor”.

    Beyond this, Mr. Falana submitted to the committee that “Assuming without accepting that the 1954 birth year contained in the transcript is the actual birth year of the Governor, does it affect his eligibility as the Executive Governor of Lagos State as regards age-qualification? Under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to be eligible to contest as a Governor of a state, a contestant, among other requirements, must be 35 years of age. Even if the Governor was born in 1954, he was qualified on age ground, to contest the gubernatorial elections when he did. In conclusion, it is an incontrovertible fact that the inconsistency of the Governor’s age contained in the said transcript with that contained in the Governor’s other documents did not secure for him any advantage in the elections that brought him to office. Furthermore, the said age did not render him ineligible as Governor. From a legal standpoint, no offence could be said to have been committed. The Governor did not prepare the transcript. It cannot be argued at all that the governor set out to mislead the electorate or deceive INEC to secure a clearance therefrom”.

    To further aid its work, the Committee sought the legal opinion and advice of some renowned legal practitioners. These were Chief Fred Agbaje a prominent constitutional lawyer; Deacon Dele Adesina, then the Chairman of the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja branch; Mr. Olisa Abgakoba, constitutional lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and Mr. Nurudeen Ogbara, then the Executive Secretary of the National Association of Democratic Lawyers (NADL). I can only present here brief extracts from the detailed presentations of these legal luminaries to the Committee as contained in the latter’s report. Chief Fred Agbaje, according to the report, “was of the opinion that if it has not been contested that the Governor attended Richard Daley College and the Chicago State University and obtained a degree, he is qualified for the post of governor of Lagos State. He said the minimum requirement is school certificate in both the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the INEC requirement form. He concluded that since the Governor did not fill the form himself, but was helped by his aide who later admitted he made some mistakes, the crime of the litigant should not be visited on the client”.

    On the legal opinion of Mr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), the Committee report states among others that “He said there are two limbs to subsection 11 of Section 188. The first limb is an objective test i.e. a grave violation or breach of the provisions of the constitution. It is for the House to determine if the allegations against the Governor, if established amount to a grave violation or breach of the constitution. Whether or not the allegations amount to a violation of his oath of office falls within discretion of this House under the second limb which is a subjective test i.e misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion of the House of Assembly to gross misconduct”. Among other submissions, Deacon Dele Adesina’s opinion to the Committee was that “Indeed, the Governor is still competent and qualified to be eligible to contest for the post of the Governor since the law says the minimum requirement is a school certificate. So, by having a certificate from Richard Daley College and a degree from Chicago State University, the Governor is qualified to contest for the post of a Governor”.

    And in his legal advice to the Committee, the report cites Mr. Nurudeen Ogbara as stating among others that “On the issues of whether the Governor gained an advantage or not, Mr Ogbara said that the Governor could not have deliberately lied on oath since he is qualified whether he was born in 1952 or 1954. He could not see the advantage the Governor sought to have since he also had the minimum educational requirement. Furthermore, Mr Ogbara said assuming Senator Tokunbo Afikuyomi was responsible for the errors on the affidavit, to show there was no intention to cheat or gain an advantage, he could have advised the Governor to do a further affidavit superseding the one earlier sworn to”.

    Based on all these considerations, the Committee found on the allegation of perjury that “It is clear that since the alleged incorrect statements were not made for the purpose of judicial proceedings, there could be no perjury by Law. However, on the question of providing false information on oath (sections 191 & 192) we are satisfied that the statements of the Governor’s educational qualifications which he has admitted were incorrect, were not intended to confer any special advantage and in fact did not confer any advantage on the Governor in his bid for the governorship of Lagos State. The minimum requirement of age and educational qualifications were met by him. The electoral forms, which were filled by him in 1992 for the senatorial race did not contain any of these incorrect statements. Only his basic qualification was stated. This in our view confirms that there was no intention to deceive or defraud by the statements contained in the INEC forms filled for the gubernatorial race”.

    The Committee’s finding on the allegation of forgery was that “We have NO evidence that any forged document was presented to INEC. The only certificate presented to INEC was a transcript of Chicago State University Degree, which was subsequently found to be genuine”. And on the comparison between Alhaji Salisu Buhari, former Speaker of the House of Representatives and Governor Bola Tinubu, the report stated that “It is the view of Chief Gani Fawehinmi that the certificate forgery and falsification of age committed by Alhaji Salisu Buhari, former Speaker of the House of Representatives is similar to the allegation against Governor Tinubu. But as the legal experts unanimously submitted, whereas Alhaji Buhari was twenty-nine years old and lied on oath that he was thirty-six years old in order to qualify to contest as a member of the House of Representatives, Governor Tinubu was over the qualifying age of thirty-five years at the time he contested the election. Alhaji Buhari forged and presented certificates while Governor Tinubu did not forge or submit any forged certificate. Alhaji Buhari did not have a qualifying certificate with which to contest the election. Governor Tinubu has the certificates of Richard Daley College and Chicago State University”.

    In conclusion, the Committee wrote that “However, we wish to state that the Governor’s inability to clear these issues promptly left the field to numerous aides and well wishers who circulated statements and documents, some of which the Governor claimed were neither from him nor authorized by him. Since the Governor himself accepted responsibilities for the “needless errors” made, and in any event he is responsible for documents signed by him, we strongly advise him to be more careful in ensuring the accuracy of documents that carry his signature in future”.

    Following from the aforementioned, it is clear that Dr. Festus Adedayo swims and fishes in the gutter of rumour, gossip, baseless insinuations, misleading innuendoes and unsubstantiated allegations to question the parentage and ancestry of Tinubu in his quest to impugn his character and malign his integrity. This is unbecoming of a supposed scholar and intellectual of his stature. He cites no iota of proven and credible evidence for his allegations of corruption against Tinubu. What he seeks to do is to cast doubt on Tinubu’s character and moral integrity to lead Nigeria as President. The ultimate test of character is the conduct of life. It was certainly a measure of character for Tinubu to have played a key role in the struggle against military rule at grave risk to his life and livelihood at a time when many were selling their consciences for a mess of pottage. It was a mark of character that he led a government in Lagos State that was for eight years at the forefront of fighting for true federalism and the rights of states at a time when most governors were intimidated and shackled by Obasanjo’s imperial presidency. It was a mark of strong moral integrity for Tinubu to have maintained a constant and consistent stand as a leader of opposition in Nigeria when the prevailing tendency is for politicians to do everything to be in and identify with the government in power at the centre all cost.

    Has Dr. Festus Adedayo exhibited similar character and principled conduct over the years? Was he displaying character and moral integrity when he served as media aide for eight years in an administration accused of some of the worst forms of corruption and violence against opponents in this dispensation? Was he displaying consistency of character when he worked for over three years as Chairman, Editorial Board, in a newspaper founded by this same Tinubu he holds in such revulsion? Was it a mark of moral integrity for him to have angled badly to be Chief Press Secretary to a Senate President elected on the platform of a party he had spent years attacking and denigrating in his column? Only Festus can honestly answer these questions for they have become matters for his conscience.

  • A new dawn for Super Eagles

    A new dawn for Super Eagles

    The power of sports in uniting people, especially countrymen and women with divergent opinions can’t be overemphasised. For Nigerians, watching sports can be very addictive. You will be shocked at the level of awareness from the elderly, who you would ordinarily think should be disinterested because of the generational gap. What stands out is that the elderly are excited and feel a strong sense of belonging when the younger ones hug them in celebrations. The scene which thrills me the most is when grandpa and his grandchildren discuss the beautiful game and its trends. Perhaps such kids’ parents didn’t have the luxury of sitting down with their fathers the way their kids are doing. All parents were very strict. I digress!

    I was in Abuja during the week and I took time to watch the matches of the Africa Cup of Nations in viewing centres and gauge it with what operates here in Lagos. No difference. Nigerians are following the AFCON games and they have been excited over the exit of Ghana’s Black Stars. I joined them in their celebrations because of the rivalry between the Black Stars of Ghana and Nigeria’s Super Eagles. Could it be that AFCON matches rate better than the Premier League and other European leagues?

    Foul. The paradigm shift rests with the fact that Chelsea FC has been fumbling recently with the Blues’ spate of drawn matches. Asides,  fans of the rival teams in the Premier League are not too keen on watching those rescheduled games because Manchester City looks like runaway winners of the trophy this season. Again, teasing fans have found respite in the fabulous displays of the Super Eagles in their two games against Egypt and Sudan, with the latter trounced 3-1in Garoua.

    Eagles’ outings have been impressive beginning with the uncanny way in which Austin Eguavoen evolved a method to silence Pharaohs’ legend Mohammed Salah in the opening game the Eagles’ approach to the opener against Pharaohs was tentative. They played with caution with their set objective of stopping Salah in his tracks. It worked but they were wasteful in front of the goalpost largely because of the way the players assembled in Abuja before hitting Garoua on January 6.  Indeed, Eguavoen has restored confidence in the players with many pursuing the target of playing ugly if that is what they need to do to win games.

    Of course, the second game against Sudan was one in which the players were more assertive in their performance resulting in the goals which they scored with aplomb. Eguavoen needs to educate our players to learn how not to impede the opposition’s striker inside the penalty box and from set-piece since the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) would spot the offence the way it did in the second game by fishing out Ola Aina stepping on the opponent’s toes during the melee arising from a corner kick.

    Eguavoen showed he understood his trade by parading players who sat on the bench in the first two matches against Guinea Bissau. That decision gave Eguavoen the opportunity to assess the depth in the strength of his team and options are available to him en route to getting to the finals, where anything is possible. With six goals scored and one conceded, bookmakers have tipped the swift-playing Super Eagles to play against the Indomitable Lions, all things being equal. But football, like the Sierra Leoneans, would say is like biscuits, you would never know where it would crack if you try to divide it into bits.

    Otherwise, the Black Stars of Ghana and the Desert Warriors of Algeria would still be participating in the matches of the 2021 Africa Cup of Nations held in Cameroon. They aren’t in one of the several shocking results which have characterised the 2021  AFCON in Cameroon.  Cote d’Ivoire eliminated the title holders Algeria from the Africa Cup of Nations, Cameroon 2021with a 3-1 to finish top of Group E and setting up a mouth-watering Round of 16 in Douala on Wednesday in easily the star match of the round with the world to see Liverpool’s Egyptian star Mohammed Salah rise to the occasion to lift the Pharaohs with goals to The Promised Land.

    Nigeria is drawn against the Tunisians in easily the star fixture of the Round of 16 matches if we are to follow the history of the competition. Not so any longer as both countries are a shadow of their past. They appear to be rebuilding their squads, so the spark expected from them would end at the level of pre-match discussion leading to the game on Sunday.

    Read Also: People beginning to respect Super Eagles, says Coach Eguavoen

    For the Tunisians, their situation is precarious given the spate of Covid-19 cases which has hit her squads in spite of the fact that CAF increased the number of players that a participating country can field in the biannual competition from the conventional 23 to 28 players. Before the Thursday last group game against the Gambia 12 players in the 28-man squad contracted COVID-19, the country’s football federation said Wednesday. Key player Wahbi Khazri is among the players to test positive.

    The report stated further that: “This evening (Wednesday) the players took part in a training session with 16 players present and the rest absent due to Covid-19 contamination,” the federation said on its Facebook page.

    The federation also said: “Tuesday, the tests revealed the contamination of Ali Maaloul, Aymen Dahmen, Ghailene Chaalali, Mohamed Ali Ben Romdhane, Wahbi Khazri, Ali Jemal and Mohamed Amine Ben Hmida who have been isolated from the group.”

    The Tunisians were beaten 1-0 by Gambians by a sweet left-footer from Gambia’s striker, Musa Barrow in the dying minutes of the game. The Carthage Eagles bounced back from their controversial opening 1-0 loss to Mali, when the referee blew the final whistle early, by thrashing Mauritania 4-0 in their second game. Right-back Mohamed Drager has though recovered from the virus. The Tunisians are hoping that five other players, positive since the start of the tournament, will test negative.

    The Tunisians are not what they are renowned for in this competition, having struggled to handle the hard-tackling Malians who their morphological advantage to muscle the Tunisians off the ball. The Desert Warriors have lost the flair and speed in their game, leaving them vulnerable at the rear on the counter.

    On paper and current form at the competition, Nigeria’s Super Eagles look like the odds on favourite to qualify for the quarter-finals in the country’s quest for the fourth Africa Cup of Nations win, having won it in 1980 in Lagos, 1994 in Tunisia and in 2013 in South Africa. In fact, Eagles coach Austin ‘Cerezo’ Eguavoen played in the final game for the Super Eagles. If Eguavoen succeeds to guide Nigeria to lift the trophy on February 6 in Yaoundé, he would become the second person after the late Stephen Okechukwu Keshi to lift the trophy as a former player and as coach of the team. Several other nationals have achieved this feat too.

    But fellow Super Eagles striker Victor Osimhen who isn’t in Cameroon, having withdrawn over health matters arising from a facial injury and being a victim of the dreaded Covid-19 pandemic watched how his teammates beat Guinea Bissau. Osimhen who watched Wednesday’s game in Naples was very impressed with what he saw describing his colleagues’ overall outing as ”brilliant.”

    “Brilliant performance from the whole squad! Special mentions Moses Simon, Wilfred Ndidi and Kelechi Iheanacho,” Osimhen tweeted.

    No doubt the trio Ndidi, Simon and Iheanacho who Osimhen listed have been exceptional for Nigeria at the championship and they would need to motivate their mates on the pitch to give their best against the Tunisians who have what it takes to upset Nigeria if they are handled with kids gloves.  The Super Eagles should strive to convert their goal-scoring chances. They should fight back to retrieve the ball if a colleague loses the ball to the opponents since this game is hinged on teamwork and a high level of concentration and tactical discipline throughout the duration of the game. These are the ingredients needed to win a football game. Up Super Eagles! Up Nigeria!

  • Tinubu: A bid for higher service

    Tinubu: A bid for higher service

    Without dispute, the main issue in Nigeria’s politics today is Asiwaju Bola Tinubu. The question, as it was asked in the days of the indomitable Awo, is whether you are with him or not.

    Shortly after informing President Muhammadu Buhari about his intention to run for President, a great movement started springing up. Across the six geo-political zones, the race is gathering momentum. Ebonyi State Governor Dave Umahi and Moses Ayom have also thrown their hats into the ring. If the presidential ticket of the ruling party is zoned to the South through a categorical statement, Senate Whip Orji Kalu said he will vie.

    Among the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) aspirants are: former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and ex-Senate Presidents Anyim Pius Ayim and Bukola Saraki, while Sokoto State Governor Aminu Tambuwal and his Bauchi State counterpart, Senator Bala Mohammed, are warming up.

    To many observers, Tinubu, who appears to be the aspirant with a difference, is on a crucial scale. Also, in the view of some others, a popularity test is in the offing.

    The Jagaban Borgu stands before the mirror of history. What is discernable? A national and continental asset; a financial surgeon, a consummate politician, an astute administrator, a tested, trusted and tolerant leader, experienced tutor and competent mentor, a political megastar, philanthropist, risk taker, a man of foresight, detribilised actor, an apostle of unity in diversity, a realist and strategist, welfarist ideologue, statesman, and a citizen of the world. The charm, the magnetism, the credentials are intimidating.

    A loyal party man, Tinubu has a track record of a party builder, a bridge builder and a moulder of men.

    But the primary will not be a walkover for the eminent politician. The stakes are high for Nigeria. Indisputably, Tinubu is a workaholic and a go-getter. Yet, the obstacles are formidable. But courage is an arsenal. Incisive wit is a weapon. Tactics are not in short supply. All calculations will, in the final analysis, be moderated by the God-factor.

    For any aspirant to get the ticket or lift the crown, the support base should be solid. Alliances should be steady, and the structure should cut across, giving an impetus to the evolution of a pan-Nigerian movement.

    There are many hurdles to cross. There will be screenings in the court of public opinion. Hired character assassins will be on the prowl. Predictably, the social media will be grossly abused. Attention may shift from governance to politicking. There will be a clash of analyses. Understandably, the polity may be polarised.

    The position of the President on succession is crucial; so is the support of other influential party stalwarts, blocs and other forces within and outside the party.

    Also, the mobilisation of zonal support and cross-regional endorsements are vital.

    At the first stage, which is the primary, decision makers will be few. Party leaders, or delegates, will decide the fate of contenders at the shadow poll. Later, Nigerians will decide at the general election.

    The ultimate decision will have implications for the future of Nigeria. It is, therefore, a period of sober reflection on leadership recruitment in Nigeria. The eye of the world is on the most populous Black nation on earth as it prepares for 2023.

    Those against Tinubu may not likely relent. But they are not likely to wax stronger as time passes by. They have their reasons for objecting to his entry into the race. It is within the framework of human rights to take a position. But they may be greatly troubled by their lack of rational, persuasive and convincing explanations. Not all the stories and hearsay they fabricate, or will concoct, can stand the test of time. They may fizzle out as tissues of lies, which may boomerang to hunt them.

    Those behind the fabrication may be motivated by envy or jealousy. It is in the character of Nigerian politics, which is devoid of affection and sustained by blind antagonism. The reasons being projected by foes may stem from bile, owing to their inability to match the credentials, strategy, structure, mass following, and rising profile of a political warhorse who has a reputation for consistently thriving in adversity.

    This category of subjective critics has sworn to stop the frontline contender at the presidential primary of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) later in the year. They are resenting his life-long ambition to serve Nigeria the same way he served Lagosians between 1999 and 2003.

    Their tactics include blackmail, character assassination, campaign of calumny and propaganda designed to whip up sentiments, shape public opinion and influence perception.

    Columnists and other media writers are even going to the extreme now. They manufacture unfounded allegations and encourage the social media to spread their falsehoods.

    But the long distance runner is never distracted. Determined and focused, the APC stalwart is on the firing line, intensifying his consultations and mobilisation, conscious of the reality that while he had groomed some of the former lieutenants-turned detractors the requisite rudimentary administrative skills, they never mastered deft and superior skills which they can now deploy to run him out of the race.

    As powerful or influential this category may be, they are actually the minority in numerical strength, despite their affluence, their exposure to federal politics and resources, and the emergency structures they are packaging in a hurry. Only a few of them can even come out as surrogates to stare from afar at the proverbial Ogedegede bird, who has stormed the market, and, as it is said in Yoruba land, no other bird dares make noise again.

    Tinubu never groomed them to destroy him. Analysts have berated them for a shortfall in historical perception, vision and loyalty when it is required most. But such is the nature of politics in contemporary Nigeria.

    Since the leader has never approached the struggle for power in a do-or-die manner, he has stayed focused, forging ahead with hope, optimism, and superlative confidence, strengthening the bridge of understanding he has constructed over the years and leaving the jesters behind. He is not swayed by the antics of backbiters.

    Within the Tinubu camp, the place of some old associates is becoming desolate and in this electioneering, their seats will be taken over by other faithful.

    But would men of Tinubu’s stature in the future not be discouraged? Would they still emulate him by nurturing and opening doors of opportunities for their disciples, if they are instructed by the realities of the moment as underscored by attempted or real sabotage by some allies?

    However, the consolation is that more fanatical supporters are also joining the train. Those with Tinubu are bold, brave and courageous, like himself. They share the same conviction. While foes are inventing theories and generating controversies about birth, age, certificate and public record of ser vice, matters that have been over-flogged and resolved years ago, as well as ethnicity and religion, the groundswell of support is fast crystalising into a national platform pushing for a new socio-political order under a new government of continuity in post-Buhari period. Though the vehicle is moving, the mockers have not yet arrived at the park.

    According to keen observers, governance is not a tea party. Part of the challenges of 2015 and 2019 will still be carried over to 2023. Nigerians yearn for relief from the worsening insecurity, soaring unemployment, pervasive corruption and a rickety economy.

    They seek answers to the refineries that are not working, diversification that is moving at a snail speed, foreign investment that is not arousing much interest, industrialisation that is barely rolling, ethnic and religious tensions that is rending the nation and exacerbated by nepotism, as well as lack of national unity that is polarising the people.

    Read Also: Tinubu clarifies position on PVC

    They want solutions to infrastructural decay, conditions that make industrial action compelling, the contentious national question, problems of intergovernmental relations between federal authorities and states, and mounting debt.

    What is Tinubu bringing into the race? What is he offering Nigerians? Answers to these will be provided when he unfolds his manifestos. But definitely, as pointed out by numerous individuals and groups rooting for his candidature, the former Lagos State governor has an antecedent and pedigree. He will be bringing his wealth of experience, his exposure, creativity, passion for development, capacity for talent hunt, vision of a better society, maturity, sagacity, and proven competence to bear on governance, if elected.

    The consensus is that Tinubu will replicate his achievements as Lagos State governor on a grand scale at the centre. Therefore, his ambition is in national interest.

    During his erstwhile administration, the colourful politician was not found wanting. He had taken the politics of Lagos West by storm in the short-lived Third Republic, when, as a green horn, or new breed, as they were called, he polled the highest votes as a Social Democratic Party (SDP) senator. In the National Assembly, he was not a bench warmer. In those days of diarchy, he never compromised principles. He had, along with fellow compatriots, refused to dance to the tune of the military as he joined forces with progressive elements to resist the elongation of military rule. The political class, nevertheless, lost the battle for the de-annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election results and the unifying mandate of its symbol, the late Bashorun Moshood Kashimaawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola. His tenure as a federal legislator ended through the barrel of General Sani Abacha’s gun in a coup d’etat on November 17, 1993.

    Tinubu never wavered in spirit. After his release from detention, he escaped abroad, becoming one of the arrowheads of the now defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). If there was no NADECO, the military would have continued to toy with the destiny of Nigeria beyond 1999.

    That was the year he was elected as governor of Lagos, following the conclusion of the General Abdulsalami Abubakar transition programme. With the State Executive Council (Exco) of talents he set up, governance was never approached with levity. Many of his commissioners later rose to national political prominence: vice-president, governors, ministers, National Assembly members, all on the progressive platform. Tinubu’s marks are visible across the sectors. He defended education, fought the infrastructure battle, protected the health sector, and fostered effective political inclusion.

    Under his leadership, Lagos lived to its billing as a mini-country shouldering enormous national, sub-regional and continental responsibilities. From far and near, many Nigerians migrated to Lagos in search of real and imagined greener pastures.

    The former governor took certain decisive steps, with the interest of Lagos as the bedrock. He embarked on an aggressive revenue generation. From N600 million monthly internally generated revenue (IGR), the state now generates around N30 billion. Tinubu initiated the Independent Power Project (IPP), which was frustrated by the Federal Government. Following agitations by Lagosians, he created additional 37 local council development areas (CDAs). When the Federal Government seized the state’s allocation, it did not only survive under Tinubu, it also thrived. The security trust fund, LASTMA, BRT were in the pipeline before he left office in 2007.

    In 2003, he became the last man standing after the curious political earthquake swept across the Southwest. As the opposition leader, he and his compatriot embarked on rescue mission, reclaiming Oyo, Ondo, Osun, Ogun, Ekiti and Edo.

    In 2007, he handed over to a competent successor, Babatunde Fashola, who built on his achievements.

    Also, his leadership role manifested in the successful fusion of legacy parties, the formation of the APC, the participation of the Southwest in mainstream politics for the first time, and the consummation of the progressive alliance that culminated in the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari in 2015 and 2019.

    Although he has not directly been part of the current administration, Tinubu has always supported the Buhari administration. On some occasions, his interventions, which aptly underscored his capacity for problem-solving, have doused tension in the ruling party and the polity.

    His bid for higher service is informed by his desire to add value, to make a difference and build on the gains of democracy. It is up to the party and the people to decide.

  • Female politicians, the media and victim mentality

    Female politicians, the media and victim mentality

    The Nigerian general election is a few months away and the permutations are on a high pitch. The advocacy for gender equity is everywhere you turn. Nigeria presently has a very low male-female ratio in the political space. The reasons are not farfetched. Modern democracy in Africa is an offshoot of colonial governance that was mainly a male affair.

    Africa originally practiced dual governance in ways that there was no need to agitate for political equity even though socio-culturally and religiously the issues were there. African system of leadership to a large extent had roles cut out for the genders and there was no usurping each other’s roles. However, with colonial governance and the introduction of mainly male leadership by the west, Africa was set for a downward spiral of cultural values that had political leadership implications.

    The post-independent military and civilian leaderships in most African countries have seen less gender representation  even though progress is steadily being made to include more women in leadership in Africa. Rwanda seems to have circumstantially set the pace for the world with the highest percentage of women in parliament, a global record at about 61%. The progress that the nation has made in post 1994 genocide has amazed the world as the country is now a business and tourism hub in Africa.

    Other African countries like Liberia, Malawi, Tanzania etc., have records of  female Presidents, Heads of government  or Prime Ministers. However, Nigeria seems to be in dire straits when it comes to gender equity.  The Nigerian democracy since independence has largely been a largely male affair. However a few women have been in the field at elective positions few as they are.

    The political party electoral processes seem to structurally exclude a lot of women from successfully participating in politics. This is in addition to other socio-cultural, economic and religious huddles the women face in the Nigerian society.

    However,  a few women have been involved in politics at least since the return of democracy in 1999. The number of women has been abysmally low but there have been women in the political parties at Board of Trustees, National/State Executive and ward levels. There have also been women elected as deputy governors, legislators and other official positions.

    The Roundtable Conversation has been observing and noticed that women like Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, late Dora Akunyili, Oby Ezekwesili (madam due process), Amina Mohammed, Ruqayyah Ahmed Rufa’I, Chief Nike Akande etc. all performed creditably in their different  appointive positions and are today reference points.

    The question the Roundtable Conversation is asking remains, what have most of the elected women especially in the legislative arm at both state and federal levels done to impact on fellow women and the country in general, are the excuses about male domination in politics enough reason to not have some level of impactful achievements in national development? Do the women have to outnumber men first to have their impact felt?

    The Roundtable Conversation has been tracking some of the women politicians. Some of them are too comfortable in their comfort zones, some are too triumphant to care, some have made some little impact but a lot of them tend to blame the media for not giving them enough coverage. True or false?  We spoke to some top journalists in the country’s electronic and print media.

    Juliet Bumah is a veteran journalist and the Editor of New Telegraph. She finds that excuse of lack of media coverage as very puerile and laughable because the media looks for content and news. If your actions are newsworthy, it is to the benefit of the media. The media does not report itself, in fact their existence is subsumed in their duties to the public in a democracy. “we can’s report ourselves, newsworthy actions attract the media” she said. When they have any event and invite the media, the media would be there. It is actually the female politicians that take the media for granted and do not reach out the way they should. Media houses either have pages or airtime to fill. As a woman in the media, it is a thing of joy to report the activities of fellow women in all fields not only in politics because my belief is that the voices of women must be heard more. No one can hear you when you are in your room. You must engage and you do not need to personally know anyone in the media for your story to be heard but you must speak before you are heard. Your actions make news.

    As a female journalist, my experience is that most of the female politicians seem to have an erroneous view about the media. There is that sense of entitlement that their existence is enough, no, it is not. You must be valuably engaging. You must be knowledgeable about what roles you are playing in a democracy. It is not about you, it is about your activities that impact positively on the people and it is not about payments. Even the citizens would report your actions if they are positively impactful.

    Read Also: 2023: INEC determined to secure elections, says Yakubu

    Juliet again advises that women in or going into politics must be versatile enough to engage in debates and arguments. If you are a legislator, you must know your onions and be ready to use your voice in one of the pillars of democracy, the legislature. You must be smart and engage aides that can assist you to research, articulate and present your points on the floor. Sadly most women just sit there expecting miracles to happen and later blame the media.

    She believes most women in politics adopt acute victim mentality. They are rather victims of their own shortcomings and values, of not doing enough to  learn and engage as politicians but feeling that just being there is enough news, no its not. Most of them do not engage the media because they are scared of exposing their intellectual shortcomings which could be solved by them learning the ropes more as elected people. Flaunting femininity for whatever reason can never confer excellence and the female politicians should know that. Improve your knowledge and realize you have to be super active and knowledgeable to compete favourable with the men. The men are not exceptional but they have the numbers. Women should be more connected with the people.

    The Editor of The Guardian newspapers, Alaba Williams believes the female politicians should not pass the buck. Their underperformance in most cases is a result of personal choices and not necessarily lack of media coverage. To start with, like most male politicians, the females are from the same society and most politicians actually do not start off as advocates of social change in the civil space. So,  more of than not, that inner passion to push for effective changes do not come naturally to them.

    According to Williams, a few women who were or are in the civil rights movements often carry their activism into politics. They come off more passionate and pushy. Women like late Margaret Ekpo, Funmilayo Ransom-Kuti, Gambo Sawaba (even with her little education was able to push through and write her name in gold). Women like Nkoyo Toyo and Ladi Lar were able to reach out because they understood the value of being very active and powerfully articulate in making their points for good governance as activists before venturing into politics.

    Again, many female politicians are very fixated with either their communities and regions. They rarely get involved in national issues especially outside politics. Most of the women are too conscious of their political parties and tend to alienate themselves from other people unlike the men that play politics without borders most of the time. Some of the women again concentrate on buying gifts for their fellow women in a bid to buy loyalty without really empowering them in any way. We would want them to mentor and educate more women about their civil  and gender rights and by doing so get more women to participate. Democracy is a game of numbers and the men seem to understand this better.

    The women rather than expend energy blaming the media must try to be more inclusive of other women. They should train them and get them to understand their voting rights. They must be accommodating of other views. The women are the voters and the female politicians must begin to organize better and restrategize.

    Sometimes the female politicians misplace their priorities. They can spend money on politically expedient actions like giving some production  items to a few widows and other women as elections approach but they would be the first to scream they do not have money to organize trainings or empower other younger women to boost the number of women in politics or even other male youths around the country. Women must work better together to empower each other so that more capable women can enter the political space and effect the changes we would all benefit from.

    The Roundtable Conversation understands the handicaps of female politicians in a patriarchal society like Nigeria. However, the excuses for non-optimal and functional performances by the few women already there must give way to more progress. They must stop playing the victim card because the mandate givers are not men alone but the people. Their strategies must change. Populist strategies like weaponizing widows by always claiming to take care of them or flaunting femininity must stop. Democracy is about the whole people and their welfare.

    The media is not the problem of female politicians or anyone for that matter, it is about the sole of democracy and even women must be held accountable. We spoke to more than a dozen journalists and the responses point to a demographic of a voting population that have largely been let down by the few women in politics through inaction and victim-playing to get by and not be held accountable.

     

    The dialogue continues…

  • Democracy, culture and succession

    Democracy, culture and succession

    When  I started this column in January  2021  to replace my earlier one of Global Economy and politics ,  I had an apprehension that the defeat  of the 45th US President Donald Trump   in the   2020   US  presidential   elections  and the emergence of his successor Joe Biden,  will  impact the world far more culturally,  and  quite  negatively for African values   than ever  before and  I have not  been disappointed. I  titled  this column then, New  Cultures and Politics and  I  am  excited at the rate at which  my apprehensions have been proven right and   almost  clairvoyant. Take a look at the issues that have arisen in the one year of the Biden presidency and you will see what I am talking about. Of course the pandemic has not helped and has indeed aggravated matters but Biden is a pandemic president and political beneficiary while his predecessor was a pandemic   and    political victim. But again look at the emergence of race as the main cultural decider of what is acceptable behavior, Black Lives Matter emergence, Cancel Culture, Critical   Race theory, the rewriting and questioning of history, LGBT issues and the emphasis of that especially on EU values and you can come along with me and my proven fears in choosing the title of this column a year ago. Early in December 2021, I took an   unannounced leave from this page and I am happy to be back at what I love dearly in spite of the vicissitudes of life and its attendant risks. I say happy new year belatedly but with hope for a thrilling new year on this column, New Cultures and Politics.

    You may wonder why American politics or European ones should arrest my attention so much. This is a hangover indeed from colonialism, globalization, and the simple reason that information technology has made the world a global village. That  too explains why the English Premiership and all  its clubs are on the fingertips of Nigerian school  children both boys  and girls because  of the dream of becoming professionals  so they can lift the quality of life for their families   like the African heroes playing  at the 2022 African Cup of nations  in Cameroun  have  done  for  their families because   they   play  in Europe  and  abroad and earn enormous   amount  and hard currency consequently. More pungently, American and European values which  are changing rapidly  in this Biden era and post Angela Merkel EU, are exportable materials  diplomatically,  politically, globally;  and most nations including Nigeria and Africans swallow them  hook  line and sinker   with  the major line  of resistance  being China and Russia  which    look with disdain on Western values and democracy. Especially now with the dominance of gender politics, protests,   de policing and the relegation of family values to the back ground in both the US and the EU.

    It is necessary to look at the pattern of political and democratic succession in   some nations,   in the light of the political culture that threw up a Biden in the US and threw a Trump in to the dustbin of history. We shall also look at a democratic U turn in Germany where after a decade and a half the party of long time German Chancellor Angela Merkel is now in the opposition. Naturally we shall compare these, with the much expected news that the Jagaban has thrown his cap into   the ring to engage all comers in his quest to become Nigeria’s president in 2023. And   he announced this in the presence of the leader he hopes to  succeed if he wins the 2023  Nigerian presidential  elections .Quite predictably I take  on the Jagaban succession bid  first because I am  excited about it.

    Read Also: Democracy has come to stay in Nigeria —CDS Irabor

    Let me start by saying that the Jagaban is not a stranger to succession politics. Indeed he is adept at it and has managed governorship succession very successfully in Lagos state. In fact the only governor that strayed got his finger burnt to a one term governorship. He also has experience in presidential succession as it is an open secret that he ceded that ambition to be in the presidency albeit as a Vice President to the present incumbent. Obviously the Jagaban knows his onions politically and has immense network nationally and in that wise he resembles the late MKO who won the militarily rejected June 12 elections. More importantly the Jagaban paved the way for the present incumbent who had lost the presidential election twice till the Jagaban put his neck out for him and he won. I do not see why he cannot reap where he has sown so amply and diligently .The only stout opposition I see for now is the man in the state house in Port Harcourt. He is about the only one who can boast a similar control and achievement in his state although for not as long as the Jagaban has done for a long time in Lagos state .Whether the Jagaban will contest on his own leadership formula or adopt the legacy of the present incumbent president is for him to decide and let Nigerians know.

    Let me now borrow a leaf from the succession politics in the US from the Obama presidency. Joe Biden, Obama’s Vice President wanted to succeed him but the party wanted Hillary Clinton, who was picked eventually as the Presidential candidate but lost the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump.  Obama did not want a quarrel with his VP and coaxed him to a press conference in the White House to announce he would not compete with Hillary. But Biden is an old fox and he insisted that whoever would contest on the platform of the party should contest on the Obama legacy which he knew will not jell with the American electorate then. Hillary of course contested on that legacy and lost .Ironically a volatile Donald Trump and a devilish pandemic helped Biden to the presidency in 2020. But it is apparent that the present President Joe Biden is a worn out version   of   the   one that snared Hillary into the trap of campaigning on the Obama legacy and predictably losing the 2016 US presidential elections to Donald Trump.

    Similarly in Germany the electorate have not forgiven Angela Merkel  for  allowing  in  2015 about a million refugees from the Middle East into the EU nations and giving them quota on how many to take . In addition Merkel – dominated EU threatened to stop financial aid to those   member nations like Greece and Hungary which   refused the refugees quota and built fences at their borders instead. The new coalition government in Germany now is more radical than Merkel’s government and is quite pro climate, pro LGBT rights and is very ready to dispose of the use of fossil fuel and replace it with clean energy. Germany’s elections are usually transparent and clean but the change political outlook, culture   and environmental values and disposition are so vast and in a very new direction such that one can talk of a   revolution in political perceptions. It is such changes that nations with strong leaders but supposedly scant regard   for human rights in China, N Korea and Russia fear so much that they only allow controlled elections. It is such fear that is making Russia very ready to invade Ukraine which it will do sooner than later because the west has not read the handwriting on the wall to see the failure of diplomacy and the absence of deterrence in a world in which the balance of terror has shifted in favour of Russia and China given the way the US fled Afghanistan recently like a   frightened dog with its tail between its legs ‘.

    Nature it is said abhors a vacuum and the same applies to global political culture and power mongering . The  west  is about to learn a hard lesson on war from new Czar in Russia’s  new  empire – building Kremlin when   he consummates  his visible  strategy  of  geopolitical control  with the invasion of Ukraine .

     

  • AFCON 2021: Nothing to cheer, but…

    AFCON 2021: Nothing to cheer, but…

    I sat through the opening ceremony of the 2021 Africa Cup of Nations waiting for robust soccer displays with a bit of upsets characteristic of the beautiful game. I thought Burkina Faso had hit the right chord when they shot into the lead in the first half, dominating the midfield against the Indomitable Lions of Cameroon in Yaoundé on Sunday. It didn’t happen as the Lions roared to victory courtesy of two penalty kicks which were scored by the vastly experienced, but aging Vincent Aboubakar, who was making a sixth consecutive appearance in Africa’s biggest soccer carnival.

    For the period when the Burkinabes led in last Sunday’s game, my silent prayer, though I craved for such a result, was for the Indomitable Lions to roar back to victory to save the fans’ attendance which would have hit an unprecedented all-time low. So, when Cameroon won, it served the purpose of having the fans at the venues. Aboubakar scored another brace on Thursday against Ethiopia, yet the Indomitable Lions’ s enforcing approach after conceding a goal raised doubts about their defence with many pundits warning that they meet their waterloo against star-studded African teams. Cameroon beat Ethiopia 4-1.

    Aboubakar is the highest goal scorer in the competition with four goals. Two of them from the penalty spot against Burkina Faso and good goals against Ethiopia on Thursday. Aboubakar has so far scored 29 goals for Cameroon from 78 matches –  Abobuakar is one of the strikers to watch for the competition’s highest goal scorer award in a field that has Sadio Mane and Mohammed Salah playing for Senegal and Egypt.

    I told those around me who were expecting a rout for the Indomitable Lions that the Burkinabe’s’ youth system was worthy of being emulated by African nations. The Lions didn’t look enterprising and could be beaten at home going by the way they played on Sunday. Other group games have taken the format of the first game with narrow 1-0 or 2-1 results as of Wednesday night.

    Those who thought Mohammed Salah would run the rule over the Nigerians on Tuesday received the shock associated with the highly unpredictable but beautiful game – soccer or football whichever one you are used to. Nigeria beat Egypt 1-0.

    The fans appear to be the only indices that make the game exciting which has lived up to expectations. The sounds and sights at match venues have witnessed a beautiful display of Africa’s rich culture and ways of life. The fan’s dresses and the manner in which they stormed the venues created the right ambience when shown on television. So far, there haven’t been sad tales to tell about the unscrupulous conduct of hooligans which goes to show that the Cameroonian government has a commendable security architecture that has kept the criminals out of the cities where games have been played. This is not to say that there haven’t been some ugly sides in the competition.

    Visitors to the cities have been thrilled by the unique hospitality of the Cameroonians and their government, except that the prices of foodstuffs, hotels, eateries, high cost of transportation, and other immediate needs of people have shot up to unimaginable heights. Such things are normal during competitions. It is one of the ways in which the host government makes the people to reap some of the gains of hosting such global events.

    Questionable penalty goals have been given but the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) has chalked off quite a few dubious tendencies from players and the laws of the game.

    Indeed, referee Janny Sikazwe from Zambia has been one of the talking points of the tournament on the lips of observers, fans, chroniclers of history, and commentators since Wednesday after he stopped the game between Tunisia and Mali which ended in favour of the better playing West Africans 1-0. Sikazwe’s mistake drew a furious reaction from Tunisia’s bench, with boss Mondher Kebaier furiously grabbing the arm of the Zambian referee and pointing to his watch in the immediate aftermath of the full-time whistle.  Kebaier and his staff stormed onto the pitch holding their hands where they had wristwatches to show the linesman nearest to them the wrong timing of the referee. Hasn’t it been said that the referees are the sole custodians of time? Just the flip side to the shameful action of referee Sikazwe. The security operatives handled the ugly situation professionally by shielding referee Sikazwe, who officiated at the Russia 2018 World Cup, and his assistants out of the pitch to keep angry Tunisians from unleashing havoc.

    Sikazwe blew off the game after 85 minutes but realised his error before restarting play, but then blew again with just 89 minutes and 43 seconds of the Group F clash instead of the stipulated regulation time of 90 minutes and a few added minutes where delays have been witnessed. It was as if Sikazwe was condemned to fail in anything that he did, as he rejected a VAR review of the red card for Mali substitute El Bilal Toure. Mention must be made about the decision taken by officials of CAF that the game between Mali and Tunisia be completed having noticed that the game ended the 89 minutes 44 seconds. Both countries returned to pitch to complete the game. Meaning that the game was ended for the third time. Is Sikazwe still in Cameroon as a referee?  I doubt it. He has been a terrible citation of how to handle games as a referee.

    Sikzwe was suffering from heatstroke and severe dehydration and was taken to hospital after the match, according to the man in charge of officiating at AFCON Essam Abdel-Fatah.

    ”The referee suffered from heatstroke and very severe dehydration, which led to him losing focus and was taken to the hospital,’ Abdel-Fatah told MBC Egypt’s Al-Laib.

    ”It caused him to lose time in the 80th minute, and he ended the match in the 85th minute. He returned after directions from the assistant staff and then returned to finish the match in the 89th minute.

    ”When the crisis occurred and the objections and control were lost in the match, the fourth referee was the one who was going to complete the match [instead of Sikazwe], but one of the two teams refused.”

    The world expects to read the doctor’s report which corroborates all that has been stated by CAF otherwise history would use it against the Africa soccer body as one which tolerates incompetence which brought the game to disrepute. As an adult, Sikzwe ought to have signalled to the reserve referee that he was feeling unwell. If indeed the referee had bouts of severe heat stroke leading to dehydration, followers of the game ought to have noticed it from the referee’s action before he blew off the game, in the first instance.

    At what point did CAF notice that Sikzwe was sick? Was it after the Tunisians refused to come onto the field for the third start of the game that CAF knew of this ‘ailment’? Did Sikzwe show any sign of incoherent discussion when led back onto the field? CAF should stop defending the indefensible. What Sikzwe did was a disgrace to the whistling game and he deserved severe punishment, not given a soft landing as is being done by CAF.

  • Issues in Tinubu’s ambition

    Issues in Tinubu’s ambition

    LAST week Monday, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu visited President Muhammadu Buhari to discuss important national and party matters and on his way out he addressed the State House Press Corp where he answered questions on his presidential ambition. Asiwaju Tinubu was most daring, courageous and audacious when he made a categorical declaration that he would run for the nation’s highest office and he had already informed the President about his intention. The 2023 polls are less than 14 months away. These are not times for tentativeness, anonymous ambiguity or timidity on the part of any serious presidential contender who seeks to make an impact in an election only months away. Speaking with the Presidential Villa reporters Corp after his private meeting with the President, Tinubu described his aspiration as a lifelong ambition.

    All too often we have been saddled with accidental leaders who never deliberately desired and sought the country’s apex position of leadership and were thus largely unprepared for the tremendous responsibility. A candidate who has a passionate desire to lead the country is also more likely to have prepared himself for the demands of the office than one who is thrust on the throne by sheer luck. This does not mean of course that it is not impossible to seek public office for the pomp, glamour and material benefits rather than an ardent desire to offer transformational public service.

    Tinubu naturally referred to his accomplishments and legacies as governor of Lagos State as an indication of his capacity to offer the country transformational leadership. It is difficult to credibly dispute this claim. On assumption of office in 1999, Tinubu inherited a practically collapsed and insolvent state. Coming up with an inspirational vision, a systematic programme of action, and appointing an impressive array of talents to actualize this plan, he offered the effective leadership that laid the foundation for the sustained progress Lagos State has been enjoying since then.

    Some critics have faulted Tinubu’s assertion that he intends to build on the foundation and accomplishments of the Buhari administration. They referred to what they consider the “faults and failings” of the APC government even when these so called “failings” are matters of perspectives. But should an aspirant running on the APC platform like Tinubu focus on the negatives of the administration rather than its positives and attainments? I don’t get the logic. One indisputable fact is no government in the world and in history is so perfect to the extent that it could satisfy all the yearnings of every citizen. While the Buhari administration certainly has its low points, the government has also scored many big points that will remain landmarks for generations to come.

    Others contend that as a kingmaker, Tinubu should not seek to become king. This may be true of a traditional, absolutist monarchy as in the Obaship institution of the Yoruba or the Emirate system in the north. However the concept of kingmaker is irrelevant and misplaced in a constitutional democracy like we run today. Anyone who has been supported by Tinubu in their quest to hold elective public office in the states or at the centre had to go through democratic elections in which the electorates are the Kings. In this context, the concept of kingmaker is meaningless. Thus, Tinubu’s concluding answer to the question is apt. His words: “Whatever is your attribute is your own opinion. Me, I want to pursue my ambition without the title of a kingmaker. You can write your literature or your story based upon your own perception”.

    Responding to a question from the Presidential press Corp, on the purported presidential ambitions of Vice President Yemi Osinbajo and Dr Kayode Fayemi, Ekiti State governor and Chairman of the Nigerian Governors Forum, Tinubu appropriately stated that he would not discuss other individuals but would rather focus on his own ambition. Another name routinely mentioned in connection with the 2023 presidential race is Mr Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), Federal Minister for Works and Housing who seems entirely focused for now on his current public assignment. If these three accomplished individuals are perceived as being worthy of Nigeria’s presidency, then a lot of credit should be given to Tinubu’s judgement who spotted their talents and either appointed them into public office or strongly supported their electoral bid as in

    However, it is difficult to find any contender across the parties who possesses Tinubu’s array of accomplishments and range of experience. As a Senator in the aborted Third Republic, he worked closely with then President of the Senate, Professor Iyorchia Ayu, and other like-minded Senators to thwart the effort of the military regime to use the National Assembly to legitimize the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. Tinubu was a frontline player in the protracted struggle to dislodge military rule and enthrone democracy that has prevailed since 1999. His sterling record of performance as governor of Lagos State is already too well known and need not detain us here.

    During his tenure as governor, Tinubu was an ardent fighter for the deepening of federal practice in Nigeria supporting his then Attorney General, Professor Yemi Osinbajo (SAN), to sue the Federal government over diverse issues on the rights of states and Lagos recorded no less than 13 victories in the Supreme Court at the time that helped expand the horizon of state autonomy in the Nigerian Federation.

    After the routing of the Alliance for Democracy (AD) in the South-West with the exception of Lagos in the 2003 elections, Tinubu became the last man standing as governor in the region and he stood steadfastly in his party helping to rebuild and nurture the opposition contrary to the belief in some quarters that he would have no choice but to dump the AD for the then ruling PDP at the centre. That courageous stance is one reason why opposition did not wither and die in Nigeria and we have the competitive, vibrant democracy we enjoy today despite its failings and shortcomings. He has been widely applauded as a key and most critical factor in the formation of the APC and the latter’s success in dislodging a government in power at the centre through the ballot box for the first time in the country’s history.

    He has built over the last three decades a network of friendships and political associates across the length and breadth of Nigeria. Before going into politics, Tinubu had achieved success in the private sector where, as an accountant, he rose to become Treasurer of the multinational oil corporation, ExxonMobil. He is thus at home both with the grammar of politics and also the algebra of economic and financial management.

    When the Director-General of Tinubu Support Groups, Honourable Abdulkumin Jibrin featured on the Arise TV ‘The Morning Show’, one of the anchors persistently wanted to know the source of what he described as Tinubu’s immense wealth. He claimed that Tinubu owns a bullion van. I am not aware that the laws of Nigeria permit individuals to own bullion vans.

    Again, any astute journalist ought to do his or her homework and come up with concrete and specific allegations of corruption against him that the Tinubu campaign can respond to. Beyond this, Tinubu has been out of office since 2007. That is clear 15 years ago. I remember PDP chieftains like Chief Bode George boasting that Tinubu would head for prison once he left office and no longer enjoyed immunity. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had been under the control of PDP governments at the centre between 2007 and 2015 when the APC government came to power. Could it be that the PDP governments chose to ignore allegations against Tinubu even when he was a persistent thorn in the flesh of the PDP?

    All the talk about Tinubu and corruption reminds me of the travails of Chief Obafemi Awolowo throughout his political career. His adversaries accused him of amassing immense wealth as Premier of the Western Region. The vindictive Coker Commission of Enquiry into the finances of the Western Region under Awolowo accused Awo of building an empire around himself through the disbursement of public funds. Of course, these allegations remained un-litigated and unproven.

    I recall that during the Second Republic, the Concord newspaper published a sensational front page story alleging that Awo owned 360 plots of land at Maroko in Lagos. This issue immediately generated widespread national controversy. How could a man who claimed to be a fighter for the poor and a democratic socialist own so much land many asked? And to tell the truth, I was quite disenchanted and apprehensive myself. Awolowo was on vacation abroad as this controversy raged.

    On his return from his trip, a tumultuous crowd welcomed Awo at the Lagos airport. Interacting with journalists at the airport, Awolowo stated that he had handled and won a protracted land case for the Oniru family and he received the plots of land in lieu of his legal fees. Interestingly, he submitted and I paraphrase him here, “In Nigeria if a poor man is fighting for the poor, they will claim he is only being jealous of the rich and if a rich man is fighting for the poor, they will ask him to first of all go and commit economic suicide and join the poor before he can pursue their cause”. Awo went on to wonder how he could have established a powerful newspaper as well as help fund the establishment of viable progressive political parties if he did not have the necessary financial means.

    Other issues raised against Tinubu’s ambition relate to his age and health. Of course, age is not a factor in the determination of a candidate’s competence and suitability for public office. This has again and again been demonstrated across time and space. One of the Arise TV anchors persistently sought to know what Tinubu’s real age is. The celebration of Tinubu’s birthdays over the last one and a half decades has been a major feature on the country’s political calendar. Anyone who doubts his declared age should come up with credible and incontrovertible evidence of what they consider his real age to be.

    On the issue of health, we have seen all too many outwardly robust men and women, seemingly radiating health and energy, who succumbed unexpectedly to chronic ailments or even just slumped and died suddenly. On the other hand, there are several others who have been written off for their perceived fragile physical frame only to live for many productive years. On the matter of health, let no human being magisterially proclaim on the health of others as God Almighty is the sole determinant of the life or death of his ephemeral creatures.

  • Ekiti: Fayemi in search of a truce?

    Ekiti: Fayemi in search of a truce?

    Feelers from Ekiti State, where governorship election will be taking place later this year suggest that Governor Kayode Fayemi may be tired of the lingering ‘civil war’ within his ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    Sentry gathered that governor is now reaching out to stakeholders on how peace can return to the troubled party in time for it to win the all-important gubernatorial election.

    “Fayemi wants to ensure that the man who takes over from him is not from the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). He understands how dangerous that is for him,” a source said on Thursday, adding that “the governor, as the leader of the party is finally doing the right thing.”

    As part of his quest for a united APC in Ekiti, he met APC National Leader, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, during the week.

    Sentry also gathered that the governor has held meetings with several APC stakeholders within and outside the state in the last couple of weeks.

    A party leader, who accused Fayemi of victimising Tinubu’s supporters in Ekiti under the aegis of the South West Agenda 2023 (SWAGA) led by Senator Dayo Adeyeye, confirmed that the governor appears to be more desirous of peace in the party in recent times.

    “We have noticed his overtures, but can he be trusted to be a gentleman all the way? Ekiti APC will benefit more from being united,’ he said.

    Fayemi is believed to be backing the aspiration of the immediate past Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Biodun Oyebanji, while the Adegeye group is supporting Senator Opeyemi Bamidele’s gubernatorial aspiration, all within the APC.

    It is left to be seen whether Fayemi’s latest moves bring succor to the troubled party.

  • Ayu’s inherited headache

    Ayu’s inherited headache

    National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Iyorchia Ayu, has vowed to pursue completion of the party’s national secretariat in Abuja.

    But many are worried he may be getting himself involved in something he should stay away from in his own interest.

    “That’s an unnecessary headache he is about to inherit,” a chieftain of the party told Sentry.

    Made up of 11 floors, the edifice located at the Central Business District, has dragged on for years and eventually stalled when the party lost power in 2015.

    “We believe that apart from the critical holders in the party, we’ll look for other ways advised by experts to look into commercial considerations. I think it is possible to look for ways in the commercial sector to complete this building,” Ayu said.

    Sentry gathered that many close associates of the former Senate President have advised him to concentrate on repositioning the party ahead of the 2023 general elections instead of wasting precious time, energy and resources on what many now refer to as a “white elephant project.’

    “I fear for him. He doesn’t need the trouble that the project has become. Every national chairman that had anything to do with that building got their fingers burnt. There is a lot on Ayu’s plate at a time like this for him to be bothering about completing the national secretariat. He should leave that to another administration,” a leader of the party warned.

    But Ayu has described the secretariat as “a building that must be completed;” stressing that “it must never be allowed to remain wasted as is it.

    How will he fare where others have failed? Sentry is watching.