Category: Saturday

  • Terrorism, identity and democracy

    I start  and stand  today  with  the view  that  with regard  to Democracy  one man’s  food  is another  man’s  poison.  I  also lace that with  the dictum  that a  hero  in  an environment  can  be a villain to others,  in the same environment. Given  the title  of today’s  piece  it is not difficult  to guess the events  that engaged  my thoughts  and agitated  my mind  on the world  scene in the last  week.  These  are happenings  in the world at large  that have tasked  peaceful communal  living under  democracy  as we practice  it in various  parts of the world including Nigeria.

    These events have raised serious doubts about how democracy  is getting on with the rule of law and  are challenging the virtues of tolerance, and respect for dissent which have hitherto been the main selling point of democracy as the best ideology in the world as we know it today.  It  is  not  an issue  or development  that can  be explained  away  by apologetic concepts  like the Clash  of  Civilisations  or  the End  of  History,  because  these are  issues  that  have arisen  unexpectedly  in various  parts  of  the world  seemingly  unexpectedly  but in reality  were    bound  to  happen  sooner  than  later,  given the unusual  scenarios  that  preceded  them.

    For  today’s  analysis  I will  like to give  my own  definitions  of the concepts  I  have  chosen  for discussion,  namely  Terrorism , Identity  and Democracy,  mainly  for  today’s  discussion.  Which means I cannot  be held accountable  for  any  different  meaning thereafter.  Just  like the Nigerian Chief  Justice  Fatai  Williams ruled  that his  judgement  in the infamous  two  thirds  of  13 case  cannot  be taken  as a precedent  in  one of  Nigeria’s  many post  election  cases  that  make  you  wonder if  post  election verdicts  were  about  events that happened elsewhere and  not  in Nigeria  right before  our  eyes. This is  important  to  note especially  as we  enter  the season  of  post election litigations in  Nigeria.  This  undoubtedly    is  a very  lucrative  festive season  for  the  Nigerian  legal  system  and  the  judiciary.

    Not  to  mention the  ebullient array    of  Men  In  Silk called Queen’s  Counsels  elsewhere,  but  more  famously  prodigiously known as  SANs –  Senior  Advocates  of  Nigeria  –  in  our  great nation. This  then  is the background  of  my  conceptual definitions  today.

    I  define  terrorism not  only as killing of innocent  people  for whatever  causes  or motive  but  all  violations of set  rules  and values  of  democracy by  force  within  the state or  polity. I define Identity  as the nationality or  tribe  which  sets  one set of  people apart from another within the nation  state.  I  also define  democracy  as  government  of the people,  by the people and  for  the people  flowing from  free  and  fair  elections.

    Given  these  definitions  then  let  me highlight  the incidents to illustrate  them.  The first  is the prevalent  charge of militarization  of the last 2019  elections in  Nigeria  and the introduction  of the dubious  terminology  of’  inconclusive elections ‘ in many states  of  the Federation.  The  second  was the slaughter  of innocent  people in Europe  namely  New  Zealand and Netherlands  and the use  of such  tragic  events  for propaganda  and  electoral  campaign  by  Turkey’s  President Tayyip Erdogan. The  third  is the state of  leadership of  Nigeria’s  temple of  justice, the Judiciary as  we  enter  the era  of  post  election  litigation, after  surviving  or sailing    through  the much feared  era  of  post election  violence ,  literally  effortlessly.

    Let  me state  clearly  that    I  put  militarization  of politics, especially  elections  on the same pedestal  as terrorism by  Boko Haram  or  ISIS.  I  hold  the same view  on inconclusive elections when  it is  apparent  one side or  the other  is on the verge of  winning.  This  is because all involve the dehumanization  of  human  beings. One  – that    is terrorism – does  this  bloodily  and with blood  letting . The other  does it by killing the  voters    right  of  choice  of  those to give power to rule them. Both  castrate  human  values    and  make  nonsense of  the rule  of  law  and a mockery  of  democracy.  In  the last election  it  was apparent  that the state  was being  used  against the state in the deployment  of soldiers  to  guarantee  the security of  the elections  so  that people  can  go  out  to  vote. They went  out in the presidential  elections and stayed indoors in the state assembly  and  governorship  elections. That  is  not how democracies  work  and Nigeria  is  Africa’s  biggest  democracy.

    In  Rivers  state the Army  issued  a statement  to  accuse INEC  of bias.  It  must  have  been  hard  pressed to  do  that  and  the statement  was  bitter  and  had  a tinge  of betrayal  by INEC. That  incident  should  be probed  further  to know who  betrayed democracy and if  the referee, which  is  INEC  took  sides  in the election.  Such  actions  are  subversive  of  democracy and  are treasonable  as elections,  free  and fair,  are  the source of legitimacy, which is the end product  of  democracy  and which becomes  questionable when  elections are not free  and  fair  or are  abandoned to favor one group  of  contestants  or  another.

    Voters  in any  democracy should  not  be intimidated  or deterred from  coming to  polling  booths.  Such  actions are  as bad  as plain  rigging  and stand  shoulder  to  shoulder  with terrorism in devaluing  and  dehumanizing  voters and  humanity in the march towards  inequality  and  justice  which  are  the essence of any democracy.

    The  killing  of  worshippers in two  mosques  in  New  Zealand and three people  in a tram  in Utrecht in the  Netherlands  are  both tragic  and  condemnable  and the  leaders in both nations have shown that such  acts  are  not  part  of their  culture  or  way  of  life.  But  the truth  is that  the issue  of  identity  and  nationalism are  behind  both  events.  The  killers  are  really  mad  but they  are basically  mad  at  the influx  of  migrants  into their environment.  Such  killings are totally  uncalled  for  as  voters have a right  and duty  to vote  out pro or  anti migration  political parties  at  elections when  they  become due  and  that explains why new  parties  are  coming  to  parliaments  based  on these  anti immigration  concern  of  those  who think  that the EU  is for Europeans and  no one  else.  Yet  it is equally  objectionable the way  the Turkish  president  is  politicizing  the  issue  and making it look like  a religious  warfare. That  is blatant escalation of  religious  hatred  and is  dangerous  for  world peace  and  Turkey’s  Erdogan  should  be called  to order in the comity  of  nations.

    Thirdly  one  cannot  but  wonder  how  the judiciary  would handle our post  election  petitions  and litigations  when  it  is virtually  headless.  The  Acting  CJ  reportedly  defended his appointment  by saying  he was right  to make himself  available  for swearing  in because  he  is acting  and the Substantive CJ is just on  suspension.  But  the suspended CJ is  also  on trial  for  false declaration  of  assets. Yet  justice  on political  petitions  need a transparently  free  and fair  environment  to  thrive  and justice  must  not only be done  but  be seen  to  have been  done.

    For  now  given  the configuration of  leadership  of  our judiciary in this    election    petition  era,  one  can  only  repeat that  ancient  saying  that ‘the hood  does  not  make the monk. ‘ Which    really    is  a great  pity.  Once  again, Long live the Federal Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • Mane: The rise of a star

    Senegalese Sadio Mane was ten years ago pushing a wheelbarrow on the dusty streets, hawking sugar cane to eke a living. There was no sign that in a decade’s time, the world will watch in awe as he plays for Liverpool FC of England in easily one of the biggest soccer competitions in the world.

    As at Sunday when he led Liverpool’s army to beat Fulham, Mane had scored nine goals from nine consecutive matches – not an easy feat for an African, who defied his parents’ craving for education, so that their fate (illiteracy) wouldn’t be their children’s. Yet, 12 months ago, Mane donated £200,000 to the Senegalese village of Bambale to help build a school. He asked for this not to be made public.

    Mane is in red-hot form for the Reds right now, with 11 goals in his last 11 games in all competitions. Indeed, he is attracting juicy contracts, such as over $180m package from Real Madrid, in addition to giving one of their best defenders, Varane, to Liverpool as part of the deal. Clubs pray that Real Madrid doesn’t show interest in their players. If they do, they are prepared to break the bank for them.

    Mane has scored 17 goals in the Barclays English Premier League, not forgetting the few he scored in the prestigious UEFA Champions League competition, where Liverpool have a quarter-finals date against FC Porto at Anfield in April. In Germany, Bayern Munich supporters are sulking, having watched in awe as Mane bestrode the Allianz Arena, scoring two goals that etched Liverpool atop the two-legged tie, winning the second leg tie 3-1, after a goalless first tie at Anfield.

    Not tall, but swift and sharp, Mane has left his markers stranded. But it is his telescopic vision within the goal area and his ability to leap higher than taller markers that have created the goal scoring niche for him this season. If he continues this way, he could be crowned the 2019 Africa Footballer of the Year, especially if Liverpool win the Barclays English Premier League title, after 29 years. This won’t come easy for Liverpool, with Manchester City aiming to retain the title they won last season.

    Many may argue that it is too early to talk about the next Africa Footballer of the Year. But there is the need to highlight those who are garnering the points that will qualify them for the shortlist. Mane is light years ahead of the pack that has the current holder Mohammed Salah, also of Liverpool, who has scored 17 goals in the EPL, but has not scored a goal for the Reds in the last seven games. Interestingly, Liverpool’s manager Jurgen Klopp is solidly behind Salah; this is what he needs to restore his goal-scoring confidence.

    Top African performers abound besides playing for Liverpool, including Nigeria international Alex Iwobi, Wilfred Ndidi, Isaac Success, Kelechi Iheanacho et al.  But Gabonese striker Pierre-Emerick Emiliano François Aubameyang ranks close to Mane and Salah, having also scored 17 EPL goals, aside others who scored in the Europa Cup competition. Arsenal has been drawn against Napoli in the two-legged quarter-final fixture just as Liverpool have a two-legged date against FC Porto of Portugal.

    With the European league season drawing to a close, pundits have their focal lenses on Mane, Salah and Aubameyang. Sad tales for Nigerians craving for another Super Eagles player to be crowned African Footballer of the Year.

     

    Iheanacho the striker

    Kelechi Iheanacho can heave a sigh of relief now that we have found a reputable manager who knows his rightful position. Iheanacho’s emergence from one of FIFA’s grassroots competitions suggested that he could be a prolific striker. But at 17, the little boy’s target was to score goals. It didn’t matter the position from which he scored them. Iheanacho’s concern was to help his team win matches. The Nigerian coaches who handled the Golden Eaglets’ games leading to Nigeria winning the FIFA U-17 World Cup trophy in 2013 didn’t make Iheanacho the team’s arrowhead in the attack.

    Not even Iheanacho’s emergence as the top scorer and best player at the 2013 FIFA U-17 World Cup competition could convince Iheanacho or his coaches about his rightful position. With such a nebulous setting, signing for Manchester City brought fame and cash, but couldn’t allow him to hit the top of his career as quickly as many anticipated.

    Iheanacho joined Manchester City’s Academy on 10 January 2014. Before the 2014–15 season, City visited the United States on a pre-season tour. Although still not formally a City player, he joined up with the squad. He played and scored in the first match of the tour, a 4–1 win against Sporting Kansas City, and scored again against Milan in a 5–1 win. After the conclusion of the tour, Manchester City arranged for Iheanacho to train with the Columbus Crew until mid-October.

    Delays in obtaining a work permit meant Iheanacho was unable to play in England until February 2015. He made his debut at under-19 level in a UEFA Youth League match against Schalke 04, but sustained an injury after only 11 minutes. After his recovery, he began to represent Manchester City at both youth and under-21 levels in the latter part of the season. Iheanacho played in the FA Youth Cup final, where he scored, but ended on the losing side after Chelsea claimed a 5–2 aggregate victory. The following week, he scored the only goal as Manchester City beat Porto in the final of the 2014–15 Premier League International Cup.

    Manuel Pellegrini signed Iheanacho into the Manchester City main team where he scored goals which raised hopes in Nigeria that, perhaps, a new replacement for the late Rashidi Yekini had come.

    Pep Guardiola, the manager who replaced Pellegrini, didn’t want Iheanacho and recruited Jesus, who he gave playing time. Jesus started scoring goals, which eliminated Iheanacho from the squad. He threw Iheanacho into the transfer market, where Leicester City offered him a deal, which now looks threatened, with the Nigerian’s continuous bench role and cameo appearances. Claude didn’t help matters with Iheanacho, rightly preferring Jamie Vardy to the Nigerian as the Foxes’ top striker.

    As a Liverpool fan, I was excited when Leicester replaced Claude Puel with Brendan Rodgers, whose tactical savvy is top notch. Rodgers has guided Leicester through three matches, losing one and winning two. A good citation. But it is his findings on Iheanacho and where he should be playing and what he should do that bowled me over.  Eureka, I screamed unconsciously while reading Rodgers’ assessment of Iheanacho.

    “It’s been hard for Kelechi because he’s come in and he’s been a secondary striker at Manchester City. All of a sudden he makes a move for big money and I think everyone can see the potential. But he’s come in to one of the top strikers in the league (Jamie Vardy) and I think it’s very hard to displace that. But it’s just a case of adapting to these new players.

    “Actually, my job is not to put them in a trap of pressure, and take that away from them. Enjoy your football, but ultimately your first job is to press and work hard. From that what can you add into your game?”

    “I think he’s a great talent but he’s a number nine. He’s not one who can play on the sides or come in. Some strikers I’ve worked with can maybe shuffle them about and slide them around to make it work – but he’s a number nine and that’s it. And we already have a good number nine. So he’s got a fight to get ahead. But there’s maybe another system to make it work, like a diamond,” Rodgers said.

    Someone who knows Iheanacho closely and a colleague, Morakinyo Abodunrin, told me that the Leicester star likes being challenged, raising hope that the last of the strikers in  Eagles shirt is not nigh. Abodunrin was the Media Officer of the Golden Eaglets in 2013, 2015 and 2017, so his word is authority on matters of our youth players in the last decade.

    Super Eagles’ real test

    March 26 is a big test date for the Super Eagles, irrespective of the team’s result against the Seychelles Pirates. On that day, Eagles will be playing against a slightly weakened Pharaohs of Egypt inside the late Stephen Keshi Stadium in Asaba.

    The Pharaohs are here without their talisman Mohammed Salah, which should change the way they will play on March 26. If the Eagles mean real business, this is one game in which they must aim to trounce the Pharoahs to send the signal to others that the games at the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations in Egypt will be filled with upsets.

    The Eagles are outsiders in the permutations of likely winners of the trophy when the games begin on June 21. But, this is the kind of setting any underrated Eagles side choose to tear the form books and lift the trophy like they did in 2013 in South Africa, the last time Nigeria won the Africa Cup of Nations’ title.

    I expect the legion of Europe stars to boost the team’s chance of improving on Nigeria’s monthly FIFA ranking. A top 20 ranking will improve our chances of playing against formidable soccer nations. Nigeria’s ranking won’t move up if we continue to play against countries which we should beat.

  • The German ‘’machine’’ lessons

    The process of revving the German ‘’machine’’ has begun. Rustic components of the machine are being replaced, with the resultant effect of shocking the world in the next three years in Qatar. That is how to plan for the future, making short term, but enduring decisions. Indeed, the recent changes in the German team have thrown up lessons which developing football nations, such as Nigeria, should learn, if we hope to compete favourably with world beaters when the chips are down at the 2022 World Cup slated for Qatar.

    The Germans have thriving youth academies, which produce new talents, using the country’s football federation’s templates. The changes in the squad are meant to expose those nurtured in the nurseries. Going to the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, the Germans were a seeming emerging force in the game, having fallen on their fours after a heartbreaking World Cup outing in 1998. Croatia cranked the German machine with a humiliating 3-0 victory, courtesy of goals scored by Robert Jami (45th minute), Goran Vlaovic (80th) and Davor Sucker (85th).

    Berti Vogts (remember him? He was once Nigeria’s senior team’s manager) guided the German national team to a Euro 1992 runners-up place and a Euro 1996 win, two World Cup quarter-final defeats in 1994 and 1998. He stepped down as manager in September 1998. The Germans were provoked to do a holistic rebuilding of their team, which yielded dividends in 2002, four years after Vogts stepped aside. Germany and Brazil met in the final game on June 30, 2002, the first World Cup meeting between the two sides. The Brazilians won, with Ronaldo de Lima scoring goals which fetched him the highest goal scorer’s award. The Germans have also been runners-up three times in the European Championships, four times in the World Cup and four third-place finishes at World Cups. East Germany won Olympic Gold in 1976. Germany is the only nation to have won both the FIFA World Cup and the FIFA Women’s World Cup.

    With such a rich resume, playing in the final of the 2002 World Cup wasn’t their target. They wanted the ultimate prize and strove for it, using flaws noticed in this final game to upgrade their national team. Things went awry for the Germans in the 2006 edition, even as hosts, because the final game was between the Italians and the French. Italy beat France 5–3 on penalties. The match ened 1–1 after an extra time on  July 9, 2006 at the Olympiastadion, Berlin, Germany.

    The Germans sprang into action to redeem their image, knowing that they had not won the World Cup at the senior level since 1990. They beat Argentina 1-0 on July 8, 1990 at the Stadio Olimpico in Italy’s capital. That was unacceptable to one of the world’s football powers and one of the eight that have won the World Cup. The eight countries are: Brazil, England, Argentina, Italy, Germany, Spain, Uruguay and France. The Germans have  won four World Cups (1954, 1974, 1990, 2014), three European Championships (1972, 1980, 1996), and one Confederations Cup (2017), making them one of the most successful national teams in international competitions.

    The major lesson that Nigeria’s football chieftains can learn from the Germans in rebuilding our national teams is the promotion of Joachim Low to senior level, jettisoning early penchant for elevating former star players to coaches. The other advantage was that Low bridged the transition of players from the younger teams to the senior side. Low did it so well at the 2017 Confederations Cup, where he dropped his 2014 World Cup-winning stars for younger boys who won the trophy in Brazil.

    Immediately, Germany won the Confederations Cup in Brazil, they had 44 title-winning players, which was good but troubled the manager when it came to picking his best 22. It showed at the Russia 2018 World Cup with the way the Germans crumbled easily as defending champions. Rather than sack Low, the Germans kept him in the saddle.  A lesson in continuity for Nigeria. After all, the game is about winning, drawing and losing games, even though all fans want their teams to win all titles and games.

    Planning isn’t rocket science. It comes from taking stock. It becomes more difficult in teamwork where all facets of the relay need to be oiled to achieve set objectives. Germany are reaping the benefits of keeping Low on the job because he is walking a familiar path.

    Low ruffled feathers among the hierarchy of the German machine, when he visited key players, such as those in the Bundesliga side Bayern Munich. He told them that he wasn’t going to invite them for the team’s matches. Low doesn’t reckon with their experience, which is what has ruined most attempts to reinvent the operations of the Super Eagles. The German boss ended the career of World Cup winners Jerome Boateng, Mats Hummels and Thomas Muller.

    ‘’I thank Mats, Jerome and Thomas for the many successful, extraordinary and unique years we shared,’’ Low said in a statement issued by the German FA. Now it is time to set the course for the future. We want to give the team a new look. I am convinced that this is the right step. The youngsters coming through will have the room they need to grow. Now it’s up to them to take on responsibility.’’

    What Low has done is to throw experience into the lagoon, having used the 2017 Confederations Cup held in Brazil to assemble younger players, who have imbibed the German winning mentality. Experience cannot be achieved, if those who should replace the ageing stars don’t play matches.

    What most Nigerian coaches forget, unlike Low is that the experienced players started as rookies. They used the matches they played to improve on their games. Such experiences don’t come by not fielding new players or keeping them on the bench. It was difficult for Low, but he looked at the future. He didn’t respond to the jibes thrown at him by those dropped. He expected such responses, but has moved on.

    The striking aspect of Low’s expedition was that it never leaked. No football chief accompanied the manager to see them. It wasn’t discussed at board meetings nor did Low banter with any so- called technical committee. It was the manager’s show, knowing that he will carry the can, if the German Machine doesn’t rev on all its cylinders at the next tournament.

    Will Gernot Rohr, who interestingly is a German, adopt a similar template in ringing changes in the Super Eagles? Will the federation’s chiefs trust Rohr to make the right decisions? Will Nigerians back Rohr, if he decides to stick to his guns that Victor Moses should call him to say he wants to play again for Nigeria, before he could be invited? Is it right for Rohr to leave the door open for a seeming reluctant John Mikel Obi on grounds of his experience and leadership qualities? Does Rohr have the powers to re-jig the Eagles without recourse to the NFF board or its technical committee?

    Where will Rohr find the replacements for our ageing stars from the rudderless domestic league? It is sickening to note that we have turned our searchlight to Europe for Nigeria-born kids to replace players across our national teams, including age-grade teams. We have lost hope in our domestic coaches in picking players with the right ages, which can’t be faulted by any disgruntled person.

    Grassroots competitions, which in the past produced the new kids of our soccer are dead. The synergy between the schools and the states’ sports councils to develop sports in the 774 local government areas is extinct, largely because some of the playgrounds have been built up to accommodate more students. Physical and Health Colleges that groomed the games masters and mistresses who were redeployed to the schools are derelict, in some cases built up to become hotels, shops etc. The facilities inside colleges, such as the late Pa Michael Imoudu College of Physical and Health education in Afuze, Edo State, are outdated.

    States’ ministries of education which had the relevant personnel to oil the operations to groom talents, have looked elsewhere for greener pastures, knowing that their calling has no future. Some governors have not helped matters by paying lip-service to sports. These governors are driven by their pre-election promises to the electorate, which most times doesn’t include sports. Sports can only thrive if the nurseries are oiled through competitions. The nurseries are the grassroots in the states.

    We will be helping Rohr to fix our soccer if  we return to the old templates, but this time with effective record keeping to prevent cheats from circumventing the system. Germany can re-jig their soccer teams because of her rich nurseries. We should emulate her.

  • Elections, power and democracy

    The much  awaited  2019  elections  have come and gone and the APC is still  the ruling party  and President  Muhammadu  Buhari  is still  in power  even  though  his defeated opponent has gone to the courts  to  contest  his electoral  victory. That  in  a nutshell puts Nigeria in the league of nations  where  the rule of  law prevails  and  constitutionalism,  transparency  and accountability  are  the indices  of  the  march  into  democracy, the prevailing norm  and ideology  of  our  time.  Really  in  spite of  all  the problems which  beleaguered  our 2019  elections  I  feel proud  of the fact that it has come  and gone  peacefully  and the transition and Inauguration  are  up  and  coming.  I  say  this sincerely without  any  sarcasm  and insincerity  and you will  soon see  why.

    To  appreciate  what we have achieved  as a nation  on these elections  you  just  have  to  look at events in many  nations of the world  today  which  just went through elections or  are contemplating new  ones,  to know that  we  have achieved our  own indoor  miracle in landing in one piece  as a nation. Even  as the winners  and victors  celebrate  and the losers  count their losses and moan  in silence, wondering why their  luck  deserted  them  so much, this time  around. We  are  lucky  that  Nigerians  feel a sense  of relief  that the elections  have come  and gone  and  we are still  at  peace with each other despite the gloomy  predictions of  some so  called civilized nations and observers  who  have  come to  view  our elections as tourists in a foreign  zoo  in Africa.

    When  indeed  their own  brand of politics  and  values especially  on gay  rights  and sexual  equality  have turned their  environment into an arena of  cultural  Marxism versus  the rest, in a way  and manner  that shows  the decay  and decadence of  the democracy  they sold  so  gladly  to  us at  colonialism  and  globalization.

    I  therefore  want  to  highlight political  events in the US, Britain,  and    Venezuela  to show  that  comparatively  we have managed our politics  and elections  better  than  these  places. And like the lizard  that    landed flat  on its stomach  from  a great height  proverbially  said,  we  can  congratulate  ourselves  even if  no  one is going to applaud  our  electoral  feat.  Which again  I  say  with  all  seriousness is  no  mean  feat.

    Let  us  look  at  America  or  the United  States  of  America  [USA] which  some  have dubbed the Divided States of  America  [DSA] because  of  the deep  division  in the American  society  since the election of President Donald  Trump  in the 2016  presidential elections two  years  ago.  I  read  an  article recently in which the writer  was appealing  to liberal  and conservative democrats alike    in the US  to try and see  the other  side’s  point of  view instead of  seeing  those  with a different  point of view as devils incarnate.  The  writer  in particular  frowned  at  the slander, insult  and ridicule  with which  a section of the American  press covers the presidency  of  Donald  Trump  who  too believes  that  the press  is Public Enemy  No  1  and  has  tarnished  their professional  integrity  by calling them  fake news. The  point  I am  making is that two years  after their  presidential  elections Americans  are still at each others’  throat  over Russian meddling in the election  even  as they prepare  for  the  approaching  2020 presidential  elections. Yet  the US embassy  in  Nigeria  behaved as the international  albeit    unofficial  referee  of  our  2015 elections in which  power changed hands  and the 2019  election in which  power  was  consolidated,  with  Nigeria  maintaining  its head  as a nation  and  living up  to its motto of unity in diversity.

    In  Britain  where  Brexit  holds  sway in terms of  political discourse  and confusion, one  can  only feel  sorry  for Parliamentary  democracy  because the Brexit debate  and debacle has  shown  the Achilles  heel  of this  type  of  democracy. Indeed the  British  Parliament  has overreached itself  and has shown that  too many debates    lead  to  verbosity  and that  in the end breeds  confusion  and  leadership  misdirection. The  British  PM’s Brexit  Plan,  amended and not, has  been  defeated  several  times and yet  she is  planning another one even  though the Opposition leader  has suggested  a  general  election to choose  a government that    knows  what  it should  do  on Brexit.  Quite  interesting was the veiled  threat  by the Speaker  that  he would  veto a discussion on the PM’s  next  Brexit  Plan  if he sees  that the plan was just  the earlier debated  one  with  just  a change  of words.

    Worse  still  was  the observation by  an  MP  that  the PM said  it would be undemocratic to have  another referendum on leaving the EU or  not. Yet the PM did  not  see  it  undemocratic  to bring a defeated Brexit  Plan  for  debate  twice  or thrice. Again  the lesson  is that Britain  bungled a democratic  process  that was uncalled  for  because some of its  party  leaders  have  a false sense  of  Britain’s  importance  and relevance  in  the world. Yet despite  the  appalling  failing  voice  of its PM  in  Parliament no one  especially  no  gentlemen dared  query  her physical  capability for  leadership  because  that would be sexist  challenge.  That is  how  far  British  civilization  has  led itself  even  as they too sent observers  to  watch  our elections when  they  do  not know what they  want to do with the result  they  voted  for  with  Brexit.  Really,  charity  could  begin at home in Britain.

    In  Venezuela  there  is  confusion after  the last  presidential elections  of 2018  which the Speaker of the National  Assembly claimed  was rigged  and  which  the incumbent  President Nicolas Maduro  claimed  he won.  The Speaker Juain Guuado    proclaimed himself president  and the EU  and  US  have  recognized  him  as Interim  President  while  the incumbent  president  has thanked the military  for  standing by him and keeping him in  power.  Venezuela is  a socialist    country  and  China, Russia and  Turkey  are backing  the incumbent  and newly  elected  president.    Since  the election over 3m  Venezuelans  have fled    the  country.  So there is no peace in Venezuela  since their  last  election  in 2018 as they have two  internationally  recognized  presidents.

    In  effect  then  while  we  may  moan  about  our  many  electoral shortcomings  and  inadequacies  over these 2019  elections, we as a nation can  thank  God    for the peaceful elections we  just  went through.  This  does  not mean  we have swept  our  problems with our peculiar brand of democracy where  might is right  under the table. It  is a way  of thanking  God  that it could have been  worse. Once again, long live  the Federal  Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • A mystifying and demystifying election

    During his presidential campaign, President Muhammadu Buhari suggested to the All Progressives Congress (APC) crowd that thronged his rallies in two or three states to vote their conscience. His admonition, it seems, did not fall on deaf ears in Imo and Ogun States, in particular. Analysts suggested that the president was in fact tactful in giving that admonition because the APC was divided in both states. Unwilling to take sides lest it jeopardise his own election, the president was believed to have solicited the party faithful and other journeymen who gaped in his rallies to vote him as president, and any other party’s candidates during the state elections. He got his wish.

    In Imo State, where the outgoing governor, Rochas Okorocha, demonstrated unalloyed loyalty to the president’s ambition but displayed unrestrained haughtiness towards the party faithful in the state, no one was certain the APC would go to the state elections united. Indeed, the mutually destructive and antagonistic sides were eager to pursue each other to the grave. They literally did that on March 9, 2019 when they split their votes and handed victory to a third force. Governor Okorocha planned to impose his son-in-law, Uche Nwosu, as the APC governorship candidate. The party rank and file, who were loath to serve the governor and his son-in-law, revolted and took matters into their own hands and pitched tent with Hope Uzodinma, a senator. Indeed, they were willing to pitch tent with Lucifer himself if that would liberate them from what they termed the bondage of the loquacious and imperious Mr Okorocha.

    Unable to foist Mr Nwosu on the APC, and despite spending a fortune to do so, Mr Okorocha eventually secured the governorship ticket for his favoured candidate from another party, the Action Alliance (AA). That ticket failed miserably on March 9, 2019, with the Peoples Democratic Party’s Emeka Ihedioha taking the diadem. Not only was Mr Nwosu’s ambition thwarted, even Mr Okorocha’s election as a senator for Imo West on the platform of the APC now seems also threatened. The returning officer for the Imo West senatorial election, Innocent Ibeawuchi, a professor,  told the world, as he announced Mr Okorocha’s victory, that he did so under duress. Consequently, the governor is yet to get his certificate of return. In all likelihood, the whole senatorial election in that constituency, or a part of it totalling about eight local governments, might be repeated. Whenever the Imo West poll is redone, Mr Okorocha is unlikely to win, thus completing the total humiliation and demystification of an orator who started very well until power got the better of his judgement and he veered towards the mundane and the frivolous.

    But the demystification of Mr Okorocha seems to pale into nothingness compared with the humiliation suffered by the Ogun State governor, Ibikunle Amosun. Though the Ogun governor won his senatorial election on the platform of the APC, having at one time been a senator also, his desperate attempt to install a successor, not to say the resources and emotions he heavily invested in the effort, have all come to nought in a spectacular, highly public and dispiriting manner. Like Mr Okorocha, Sen. Amosun stayed put in the APC, which he described as hated, while he pushed his favoured candidate and other supporters to another party to contest the governorship and other offices. That candidate, Adekunle Akinlade, defected to the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) to vie for the governorship. But he fell, not just to any candidate, but to the hated APC standard-bearer, Dapo Abiodun. Mr Amosun is still livid. Indeed, his fury is still incandescent. Having tried many times to profit from his closeness to the president, the Ogun governor is still shocked that that closeness has counted for nothing, despite the president admonishing the Ogun crowd at his February 11, 2019 campaign rally to vote their conscience.

    Mr Amosun may have secured the consolation goal of a senatorial seat, unlike Mr Okorocha’s path to the upper legislative chamber which is still paved with thorns, it appears the Ogun governor would have loved to lose his senatorial seat and gain the governorship for Mr Akinlade, his protégé. He had framed the governorship election as a contest of wills between him and the APC leadership. During the contentious and violent president campaign in Abeokuta less than two weeks before the February 23, 2019 presidential election, the beleaguered Mr Amosun had boasted that his APM candidate would win and thereafter, together with him, return to take over the APC. Indeed, for the governor, he and his APM crowd and other supporters were poised to put the APC hierarchy to shame after the elections. That goal may now be unrealistic. He is alleging shady electoral dealings on the part of his opponents, but the battle may really be over.

    But it is not only Messrs Amosun and Okorocha who have had their wings clipped; Governors Abiola Ajimobi and Abdullahi Ganduje may also have sung their Nunc Dimittis. Though Dr Ganduje is still bracing up for a rerun poll, the Kano electorate, if feelers are right, may have sealed the fate of the dissembling governor. In any case, whether he wins or loses, he has been thoroughly demystified. He had promised President Buhari some five million votes. He could only deliver a little over a million. Even that one million plus is suspected by some analyst to be controversial, given that figure’s deviation from the national mean. But for the governorship, he has been unable to deliver as much to himself as he coralled for the president. The reason, as Kano voters allege, is that the governor is dishonest, having been caught on camera soliciting for and receiving bribes. According to them, had there not been a definite sexing up of figures in some polling units loyal to the governor, the margin of his defeat would have been horrendous.

    The demystification of the Oyo State governor, Abiola Ajimobi, is even more dreadful and distressing. He won’t get over the defeat easily, though he has tried to put on a brave face. As recorded on this column two weeks ago, Mr Ajimobi of course lost the senatorial election. Recognising his failings and foibles, his party waded into the fray, helped him to cobble some alliances together, and attempted to placate the Oyo electorate. All the efforts were, however, a little too late. Not only were Oyo voters dead set against him, they let anyone who cared to listen know that the defeat they inflicted on him during the senatorial poll was just a foretaste of the horrifying rejection they planned for him during the governorship poll. Despite the emergency alliances, especially the one with former governor Adebayo Alao-Akala, Sen Ajimobi’s candidate, the brilliant and technocratic Bayo Adelabu of the APC, lost his local government and 27 other local governments to the PDP’s Seyi Makinde, gaining only five in the process. The APC defeat was emphatic. The ruling party lost essentially on account of Sen. Ajimobi’s politics, attitude and insensitivity. No demystification was ever so complete, and no defeat was so humiliating as one in which the senatorial and governorship polls are lost weeks apart and with uncontroversial margins.

    But what would anyone say of the crushing defeat inflicted upon Senate President Bukola Saraki who not only lost his seat by a wide margin, but also lost the governorship candidate he was backing by an equally astounding margin, and then lose a dynasty, if not an empire, through what can pass for a horrendous beating? His defeat was long in coming. When it came, however, it was a total repudiation. Messrs Okorocha, Amosun, Ajimobi and Ganduje were brutally crushed. If they are capable of recovery, the country will have to wait and see. Perhaps in one form or the other, one or two of them can attempt to stir themselves in the near future, though it will be a hard prospect indeed. But if Sen. Saraki is to bestir himself for a return to the throne, if he is to attempt any form of political recovery and reincarnation, he will need his successors to not learn anything from his fall, and for them to mistreat the electorate and inflict pain and mediocrity upon a disillusioned state. No one knows whether Sen. Saraki’s successors are capable of that precipitous decline.

    Overall, the electorate may be finding their voice and discovering the immense power in their hands. If they can secure the help of the system to continue to conduct elections that are credible, they will move to deploy that power in ways that will dispossess the political class of the false sense of security and omnipotence they have long tried to claim. Perhaps, in the short run, the electorate will misuse and mishandle that enormous power, enthroning and dethroning at will, with kakistocratic fecundity and unabated panache. But in the long run, after imbibing a lot of moderation and restraint, and being coaxed by circumstances and happenstances, they may use their voting power to deliver a civic culture. That’ll be the day.

  • Atiku, Fela Durotoye win in their own ways

    THOSE who think that President Muhammadu Buhari, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), was the only winner in the just concluded presidential election missed the point. One or two other candidates can boast of victory in the election in their own ways.

    For instance, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, may have lost the ballot, but he recorded two great victories in the sense that he and his erstwhile sworn enemy and former boss, Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, are now the best of friends on account of the election and he was able to visit the United States of America after more than a decade of trying in vain to do so.

    In Lagos, the candidate of Alliance for New Nigeria (ANN), Fela Durotoye, was wildly celebrated by the congregation at the House on the Rock Church where he had gone to worship the Sunday before the election in which he polled a paltry 16,799 votes. Buhari polled more than 15 million votes and Atiku, the runner-up, polled more than 11 million.

    The church had barely settled down for service when the presiding pastor, Paul Adefarasin, who is never an admirer of Buhari, and like many pentecostal preachers wanted him to lose, noticed the presence of Durotoye. He drew the congregation’s attention to the candidate and commended him for his courage and for running a brilliant campaign. You are a candidate of the future, Adefarasin, SENTRY learnt, declared. Durotoye got a thunderous applause

    The accolade Durotoye could not get from Nigerians, he certainly got from the pastor and the church members. But whether they voted for him six days after is a different kettle of fish because many members of the church were believed to be ‘Atikulated.’

  • Party chief on AWOL with millions of naira

    THE 2019 presidential and National Assembly elections have come and gone. But while many politicians are counting their losses, others are counting their gains.

    Among the politicians whose accounts are on the positive side of the balance sheet is a party chief whose party was said to have given hundreds of millions of naira for the presidential election initially scheduled for February 16.

    Upon learning on the eve of the election that it had been postponed by one week, party leaders instructed him to stay action on the disbursement of the funds. He complied.

    Then came the rescheduled election and time to spread the largesse, the party chief was incommunicado. All the efforts made by party chieftains to reach him physically or even on the phone, as they say, ‘proved abortive.’ The election held nonetheless, “any how, any how,” apology to our Niger Deltans. Suddenly the next day, the party chief showed up.

    Asked what happened, he said he had been busy working for the party and reaching out to people that mattered. But as it turned out, the result of the election showed that there was no work done by the party chief.

  • Disquiet in Abuja church over pastor’s extramarital affair

    THE survival of a popular Abuja church is under threat after a confession made by the presiding pastor that he had a child outside wedlock and had divorced his wife because she was determined to make the incident public.

    The popular pastor had tried to justify his action by saying that his wife was the first to engage in an extramarital affair from which she bore a child. He argued that while he protected his wife from public embarrassment by keeping the matter secret, his wife was not willing to reciprocate the gesture when his turn came.

    He told the congregation that he had to tell them about it as a sign of remorse expected of a man of God who had erred, adding that he should not be condemned but commended for his forthrightness in bringing the matter to their knowledge.

    But many of the church members are said not to be impressed with both the pastor’s confession and the erotic mess in which his family is enmeshed. Many of them are said to be threatening to quit the church, having lost confidence in the man of God.

  • 2019 governorship poll and state leadership

    If there is no postponement again, the governorship and Houses of Assembly polls should be taking place by now in at least 29 states. The outcome of the presidential and National Assembly polls alarmingly indicate that Nigeria, already a unitary state by every possible definition, may be heading for a one-party state. But whether at the federal or state level, particularly now at the state level, Nigeria has through decades of elections solidly entrenched poor leadership. A few states may be guiltier than the others, but overall, nearly all the states in recent years have demonstrated a lack of capacity to produce competent and secular leaders. Where a few of those leaders are competent, many others are unable to exclude religion from public life; and vice versa. In addition, many of the states have produced leaders who should properly be described as rulers, with many of them acutely lacking the talent to procure a legacy for themselves.

    The question on many lips today as the electorate troop out to cast their votes is whether Kaduna and Kano will re-elect their governors or dare to embrace change. The Northeast is almost solely responsible for the beginnings of the Boko Haram insurgency when they enacted and supervised abhorrent social and economic policies between 1999 and 2003 that pauperised their people and fed or pacified them with the fake elixirs of religion. Ignorant of the factors that predisposed Hausaland to Jihadist conquest, the Northeast, particularly Borno and Yobe, attempted to spread a veneer of sham religion on a socio-economic milieu that already left the people hungry, and rendered them uneducated and hopeless. Whirlwind follows the sowing of wind. But strangely, the rulers of the Northeast felt they could get away with their reckless and complicit handling of public policies. One or two of the outgoing governors of the region have attempted a few remedies, but their efforts have been uncoordinated and inadequate to smother the ongoing rebellion or stanch the flow of blood.

    The Northwest is virtually in full-fledged rebellion, with Zamfara quietly but bloodily becoming the epicentre. Full deployment of military and police assets in the zone has barely made a dent on a crisis that is threatening to escalate beyond its present immediate confinement. The rebellion, like in the Northeast, was triggered by poverty, alienation and misrule. And like the Northeast also, religion was boldly deployed as a tool to distract and engage the populace, with only token efforts made to find an answer to the socio-economic crisis confronting the populace. So far too, the Northwest has been unable to produce a first-rate leader of men and resources, a visionary leader capable of offering the kind of leadership that could bring a significant number of people out of poverty and misery.

    In the First and Second Republics, the Southwest used to have a reputation for producing excellent leaders. Now, such leaders are few and far between. The last two election cycles were even worse; they managed to produce third-rate leaders who couldn’t hold a candle to the worst of the worse, leaders more grandiloquent and megalomaniacal than the most comical the Second Republic ever produce. From the swampy southernmost tip of Nigeria to the humid savannah of the Middle Belt, and the erosion-plagued communities of the Southeast, Nigeria is locked in a vicious circle of producing incompetent administrators and mediocre politicians quite unfit to govern even a local government.

    It is in the midst of this crisis that the country is once again heading to the polls to elect governors and state lawmakers. No state in Nigeria has managed to emplace a vigorous and independent legislature. If voters do not resist the temptations put before them, they will once again elect misfits into their legislative houses. No one can tell whether they will do what is right today. But far worse is the likelihood of the voters electing mediocre governors. Flowing from the convincing win the president secured in some states in the North, some governorship candidates are hopeful that the electorate would overlook their failings and foibles and re-elect them. Governor Abdullahi Ganduje of Kano State is one of a few examples that constitute a moral and political dilemma for the electorate. Accused of demanding and receiving bribes to the tune of millions of dollars from contractors, with electronic evidence deployed as proof, the governor has stonewalled. Aided by what some critics described as a conniving legislature and a downright colluding judiciary, the governor has been able to stall both a potential trial and impeachment proceedings. Even the president has waffled over the accusation, wondering what type of technology was deployed to, as it were, entrap Dr Ganduje, one of his most ardent supporters.

    Should Kano vote for him this Saturday, the electorate would have made nonsense of the anti-corruption campaign garishly embarked upon by the president at the early stages of his presidency. With the courts inexplicably putting an obstacle before the governor’s leading Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) opponent a few days to the election, Dr Ganduje seems poised to retake the State House except voters can enact a full-scale rebellion against the state’s ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). After having voted massively, perhaps in defiance of statistical logic, for President Muhammadu Buhari, it remains to be seen whether the electorate can truly dissociate the controversial governor from the cult-like personality of the president. If they do, they would be displaying their remarkable sophistication. If they do not, they would be reiterating their commonalty, as fellow voters in the Northwest exhibited some two weeks ago when they broke the numbers bank.

    Kaduna State is contending with a far worse dilemma than even Kano. Yet, no one can tell how they will resolve the existential crisis facing them. Together with Kano, Kaduna State has faced some of the most violent religious crisis Nigeria has ever witnessed. That religious question has been further compounded by deep and unresolved ethnic fissures. The governor, Nasir el-Rufai, is of course not the cause of a crisis that predates him. But so far, both by his lack of restraint and poor understanding of issues, not to say his absolute lack of wisdom and irritating cocksureness, the governor has managed in his first term to aggravate the multiple crises the state has been contending with for some decades.

    First, he announced that he paid off those attacking the state, implying that he was able to identify them; but rather than bring them to justice, he preferred to use taxpayers’ money to mollify the fury of the criminals. Then at every turn, he has been unable to manage the state’s religious and ethnic differences and struggles, barely managing to disguise his biases. Now, he has finally set out to prove that he could break the political convention and received wisdom of presenting a mixed candidacy of Muslims and Christians for the State House.

    Today, the state will either reinforce Mallam El-Rufai’s iconoclasm or punish him. He believes that flowing from the president’s election, his repudiation of conventional wisdom will carry the day as voters turn out to make nonsense of the state’s religious calculations. He is daring, very daring. But there is nothing to suggest that he could not in fact get away with his cold and ruthless calculation. If the electorate support his redrawing of the state’s political and behavioural map, they will have voted for the present and hope that they would not reap any whirlwind sometime in the future. Mallam El-Rufai took on the more sensible and ethical Shehu Sani, a state senator, and vanquished him. Consequently, the governor, who is never a moderate and modest man to begin with, is already feeling invincible, nay immortal. Should he carry the day, his enemies will groan in anguish for years to come.

    But whether the electorate endorse him or not, it does not detract from the fact that Mallam El-Rufai’s legacy will be controversial at best, and poor beyond description at worst. It is inconceivable that a politician who has inspired so much division, while not matching it with grand and gargantuan futuristic projects and programmes, can hope to last in the minds of the people.

    Many other states will be grappling with their own peculiar issues and troubles. How they resolve these issues, starting from the votes today, will determine how far their states can go in the coming years. Using Kano and Kaduna as examples, there is not much optimism that the 36 states as a whole can go very far. They are crawling now when they should be walking briskly, and have embraced the wrong arguments and personalities in their prolonged quest for development. They must hope that the choices they make today would not completely paralyse them or, worse, predispose them to the full-scale rebellion ravaging some states in the country.

  • Setting Lagos free?

    After one of their meetings to deliberate on the contentious new minimum wage in Abuja, the 36 state governors insisted that there was no way they could afford to pay the proposed N30000 demanded by labour without going bankrupt. But they made one exception. In the words of the Chairman of the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF), Zamfara State governor, Alhaji Abdulaziz Yari, “We are not able to pay N18000 today. When the President assumed office, 27 states were not able to pay; not that they chose not to pay; now you say N30000 how many of them can pay? We will be bankrupt…Like Lagos that is paying about N7 billion as salaries, if you say it should pay N30000 now it will be N13 billion. From our calculation, it will be only Lagos State that will be able to pay N30000”. But then, the question is why will Lagos be able to pay? Her strategic location and population size are not enough to explain the geometric growth in the fiscal capacity of the Lagos State government since 1999.

    When people refer off handedly to the relative fiscal autonomy of Lagos today, they forget that it was not always so. Let us cast our minds back to Y2000 shortly after Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu assumed office. He had a running battle with the comrade Ayodele Akele-led Lagos State chapter of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) because of the state’s inability to pay the then proposed N7,500 minimum wage. There was a stalemate for close to 3 months. The governor was at least twice pelted with pure water and other assorted items at Alausa. Akele was adamant. Tinubu was unyielding. What was the stark reality? The state’s Internally Generated Revenue was N600 million monthly. The public service wage bill was N800 million monthly.

    Tinubu insisted the federal allocation would have to be expended on infrastructure and critical social services for the populace. He said he could not just pay salaries and shut down the state. At that time, Lagos was so much like a war zone. There were mountains of refuse on the streets. The roads were in terrible state. Residents were carrying assorted basins all over Lagos in search of water. Bank robberies and other crimes were occurring almost on a daily basis. School children were carrying benches and chairs on their heads to and from school every day. Traffic was chaotic. School walls were collapsing routinely injuring and killing children.

    So bad was the situation    that President Olusegun Obasanjo described the city with characteristic lack of charity and perhaps some relish as no better than a jungle. At the end of the day there was a compromise with labour but the state had to downsize the workforce.

    The story of the financial buoyancy of Lagos today is a function of immense hard work as well as bold, innovative and creative thinking. Under the guiding hands of three  successive governors, Tinubu, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), and the incumbent, Mr. Akinwunmi Ambode, the IGR of Lagos State had attained a quantum leap from N14.64 billion per year in 1999 to over N34 billion per month today. It is a feat that did not just happen per chance. What were some of the measures responsible for this achievement? Let us cite some. For instance, the state undertook comprehensive tax reforms culminating in the introduction of the electronic tax Clearance Cards (etCC) as early as 1999, which is a vital, fraud free and convenient vessel of tax payers’ records that significantly plugged revenue leakages.

    Another innovation in Lagos State was the early introduction of the Electronic Banking System/Revenue Collection Monitoring Project (EBS/RCM), which enabled the state in partnership with the private sector to create an enhanced tax payers base leading to substantial increase in IGR. The state’s Board of Internal Revenue (BIR), now Lagos State Internal Revenue Service (LIRS), was radically professionalized, modernized and granted operational autonomy again with positive impact on revenue generation.

    After protracted negotiations with stakeholders, Lagos State introduced the Land Use Charge Law No. 11 of 2001, which had yielded a total of N3.5 billion between 2001 and March 2007. The numbers must be more impressive now. Ibile Holdings Limited (IHL) was strengthened and recapitalized as the Special Purpose Vehicle for the state’s investment policy. For example, it was through IHL that Lagos State invested N69million in Celtel (former Airtel) in 2001, grew the investment to N3.48 billion in 2003 and by the time she divested in 2006, Lagos State reaped N19 billion, which was ploughed into the provision of infrastructure.

    Even as the state systematically grew her internally generated revenue, she devised ingenious financial engineering strategies for the radical modernization of infrastructure in diverse sectors to boost economic prosperity. For instance, Lagos State was the first government to go to the capital market in 2002 to source long term funds to finance its long term projects. In September 2002, Lagos State floated its 1st 2005/2006 Floating Rate Redeemable Bond through which it raised the sum of N15 billion at the capital market for scores of critical infrastructure projects across the state.  The bond was finally redeemed in September 2009.  The federal and some other state governments were later to exploit this option for project finance.

    Suffice to say that it is impossible to tell the tale of the still evolving but all the same remarkable radical transformation of Lagos State without mentioning the invaluable contributions of the APC governorship candidate, Mr. Jide Sanwo-Olu and his Deputy, Dr. Obafemi Hamzat. As Special Adviser, Corporate Affairs, Secretary of the State Tenders Board, Commissioner for Economic Planning & Budget, Commissioner for Establishment, Training and Pensions and Managing Director of the Lagos State Development & Property Corporation (LSDPC) at various times, Sanwo-Olu, a graduate in surveying and former banker has been a critical part of economic management and governance in Lagos State over the last two decades.

    Under Dr. Obafemi Hamzat as Commissioner for Science and Technology, the Ministry, representing the city of Lagos, in December 2005 and December 2006, respectively, clinched the first position in the Science and Technology category of the prestigious World Leadership Awards, which both held in London. He was no less exemplary as Commissioner for Works in Lagos State and later Special Adviser on Works at the federal level. Both cerebral men had considerable private sector experience before coming into the public sector.

    Running for the office for the third time, the PDP candidate, Mr. Jimi Agbaje, remains as likeable.  A pharmacist, he comes across as a decent gentleman, entrepreneur as well as civil society and pro-democracy activist. His deputy, Mrs Haleemat Busari is a lawyer with invaluable corporate governance experience in the private sector. Apart from being a Muslim activist, she brings the gender factor to the ticket. Neither in private sector nor in public sector governance can Agbaje and his deputy the duo of Sanwo-Olu and Obafemi Hamzat.

    Agbaje’s catchy campaign slogan is ‘Let’s set Lagos free’. The interesting thing is that he seeks to set Lagos free on the platform of the PDP, which for over 16 years led Nigeria deeper into the bondage of corruption, poverty and underdevelopment. Agbaje’s case cannot be helped by the fact that for 16 years the PDP controlled federal government unconscionably abandoned critical infrastructure all over Lagos state, leaving them in a state of utter dilapidation to the socio-economic and environmental detriment of Lagos.  Is it not the Buhari APC administration that has begun to work frenetically on these long abandoned projects in the last three years Agbaje will surely be asked?

    According to Agbaje, “When a formula does not give you the result you want, you change it! Lagosians must change this unprofitable team committed to govern for their own selfish interest”. But Agbaje’s critics will contend that he canvassed support for Jonathan in 2015 despite being intelligent enough to know what most Nigerians knew – he ran a hopelessly corrupt, selfish and inept government. Of course, most Nigerians voted to change the PDP unprofitable team.

    Change at the centre in 2015 had become imperative because of the sheer scale of the venality of the PDP and the Jonathan administration in particular leading to the squandering of 16 years in a nation’s life. But can anybody really go about Lagos except he or she is blind and claim no appreciable progress has been made over the last two decades? Agbaje is a gentleman. I believe that truth is his credo.

    Has Lagos arrived at the Promised Land? No one will say that. But she has certainly crossed the red sea. As the Buhari administration, its flaws notwithstanding, strives to bring the rest of Nigeria out of Egypt, where the PDP had left her marooned for 16 years, will Lagosians heed Agbaje’s call to journey back with the PDP across the red sea? It is unlikely.