Category: Saturday

  • Change: Hopes and impediments

    There is an intricate and intertwined relationship between hope and change. Human beings across time and space have always desired change in extant conditions because they believe their situations can be better. Those who advocate and promise the capacity to be midwives of positive change thus evoke great hope for the future in the hearts of their fellow citizens. The longer the time- lag however, between the promised change and the consequent great expectations aroused and its realization, the more intense the rising frustrations on the part of the citizenry resulting in a not inconsiderable degree of disenchantment.

    That appears to be the fate of President Muhammadu Buhari and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) as the administration clocks one year in office tomorrow. There are loud groans about the continued and even intensified socio-economic hardships particularly with the recent, admittedly unavoidable, fuel price hike. Epileptic power supply has worsened even though electricity tariffs have been raised. Unemployment and inflation have spiked. Millions of Nigerians are wondering when exactly the fruits of the change they voted for will begin to manifest. But then, President Buhari has a four-year mandate. His administration cannot be fairly and justly judged on the basis of the first of four years tenure. In any case, only crassly partisan and incorrigibly anti-Buhari elements will not acknowledge the huge socio-economic, moral, political and security liabilities inherited from its incomparably venal, spendthrift and incompetent predecessor.

    Perhaps the greatest hope for the ultimate realization of the APC’s promised change agenda is President Buhari’s personal incorruptibility and unrivalled moral integrity. He has thus pursued his anti-corruption campaign with a single-minded and uncompromising doggedness even though critics contend that the anti-graft war is one sided as it seems directed mainly at opposition political figures. The truth is that it is practically and logistically impossible for any administration to pursue and prosecute all corrupt elements at once. But the good thing is that where one administration stops, another will continue as no party can monopolize power for ever in our emergent democratic system. That is the beauty of a functional democratic process that facilitates the continuous moral cleansing of the political space by successive administrations until corruption, with time, becomes the exception rather than the accepted societal norm.

    What cannot be denied is that in fulfillment of his electoral promise, Buhari is admirably focused both domestically and internationally on taming the corruption menace, bringing culprits to book and recovering as much of the looted funds as possible. However, as the administration enters its second year in office, it needs to demonstrate greater strategic acumen in its fight against corruption. For instance, with proper planning, it ought to have anticipated that an efficient and incorruptible judiciary is indispensable to any successful war against corruption. It should thus have taken far reaching proactive measures to reform and cleanse the judiciary to ensure that its fight against corruption is not a futile exercise. So far, the administration seems to have been content with screaming media headlines on alleged perpetrators of corrupt acts. Not a single high profile conviction has been secured in one year. The trial of Former Director General of the Nigeria Maritime Abdministration and Safety Agency (NIMASA), Chief Raymond Omatseye, who has received a five-year sentence for a N1.5 billion  contract scam, actually started under the previous administration. This is a signal failing particularly of an appallingly inept and ineffective Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice.

    Again, the administration should have known that a cooperative National Assembly with which it is on the same page is critical to any successful anti-corruption effort. Yet, as leader of his party, President Buhari was inexplicably indifferent to the process through which the leadership of the National Assembly emerged. We thus have on our hands a National Assembly that remains as profligate and its finances as opaque as ever even in these austere times. Furthermore, the anti-corruption war is still largely seen as that of a Messianic President Buhari. The people must be made to own the war. Now that a Director General has been appointed for the National Oriental Agency (NOA), this very important agency must come up with a mass mobilization programme to transform the anti-corruption war from that of President Buhari to that of the Nigerian people.

    In its first year, the administration has performed creditably in substantially downgrading the offensive capabilities of Boko Haram. The military is better equipped and motivated to combat the insurgents and there is better coordination with our neighbours in this regard. However, the administration has shown no inclination towards the imperative of overhauling and fundamentally re-designing the country’s security architecture to make it more appropriate for a complex, federal polity like ours. Buhari has rightly affirmed his determination to protect and preserve the country’s territorial integrity in response to resurgent militancy in the Niger Delta and separatist agitations in the South East.

    Yet, the military is distracted by having to undertake policing duties across the country as a result of a unitary and archaic policing structure that has become wholly incapable of maintaining internal security. Hence the astronomical increase in the atrocities of pipeline vandals, herdsmen, kidnappers, armed robbers and sundry other criminals across the country. We can only continue to postpone the urgent need to radically decentralize policing functions in the country to our collective peril.

    It is perhaps in the area of reviving the economy that Nigerians will score the administration lowest. The inexcusable delay in the composition of the Federal Cabinet had negative implications for the preparation of the 2016 budget. Matters were worsened by the serial bungling and manifestations of gross incompetence at various levels that considerably delayed the ultimate signing of the budget into law. Meanwhile, the socio-economic conditions of the people continue to deteriorate abysmally.

    There is also the tension between the instinctive patriotic and nationalistic inclinations of Buhari and the heightened fragility, vulnerability and dependency of Nigeria in the global economy. Thus, the administration has been forced by economic circumstances not of its making to substantially hike the price of fuel. Again, there are indications that it is gradually caving in to serious external pressure to formally devalue the Naira. There is the need for the President to considerably strengthen his Economic Team to come up with the bold, original, out-of-the box thinking times like these demand.

    Most Nigerians still believe in the sincerity, honesty and integrity of President Buhari. However, not the same can be said of some influential members of his administration and trusted advisers who are widely seen as impediments to change. For instance, most of the President’s appointments continue to be perceived as unduly skewed in favour of the North. The electoral impunity and lawlessness currently on display in Kogi State remains an indelible stain on the APC’s banner of supposed integrity. The cavalier and casual manner with which his recent official visit to Lagos was cancelled at the last minute due to ‘scheduling difficulties’ leaves much to be desired especially when the entire state had been mobilized to honour and give Buhari a rousing welcome. This is more so as the President was widely shown in the media the following day heartily receiving visitors at the Villa.

    One of the President’s advisers recently said that Nigerians should be thankful for having Buhari as President. This is not the kind of thing they should be telling the President. Yes, his integrity is unquestionable but he is not doing Nigerians a favour. Indeed, at every point he should show appreciation and gratitude to a people who sacrificed so much for him to ascend to power. Buhari has done reasonably well in his first year. He can do better.

    Rachael Oyetesu unveils ‘Immortal’ on Democracy Day

    It is certainly not fortuitous that singer, song writer, and a Christian worship leader from Lagos, Rachael Oyetesu, has chosen tomorrow, May 29, Nigeria’s Democracy Day, to unveil her new spiritual musical offering titled “IMMORTAL” to the public. May 29 represents Nigeria’s formal deliverance in 1999 from the cruel jackboots of military autocracy. Rachael Oyetesu’s impassioned divine lyrics are aimed at liberating her listeners from what Eugene Peterson would call the ‘brutal tyranny’ of sin and other forms of satanic bondage. Spiritual emancipation is as critical as political freedom seems to be her message.

    A graduate of English language from the University of Lagos, Rachael is also a fashion designer and mentor of young people. A member of various performing groups and Choirs she is currently the Music Director of the Joseph Company Choir, an outreach Ministry of the He Cares Gospel Church in Lagos. She is married to Mr Owolabi Oyetesu of the Lagos State waste Management Authority (LAWMA) who doubles as her manager.

    The event, which holds at the New Revelation Baptist Church, 8, Ashabi Cole Street, Daily Times Bus Stop, Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos, from 3 pm will take the form of a live video and audio recording with full audience participation. Yours truly will surely be there to soar in the spirit on the wings of soul stirring music.

  • The Spanish example

    Tonight in Milan, Italy marks another watershed for the beautiful game when either Real Madrid or Atletico lifts the UEFA Champions League diadem inside the San Siro Stadium. This is the second time San Siro Stadium will be hosting the UEFA Champions League final. The first time was in 2001 when FC Bayern beat Valencia 5-4 on penalties after a pulsating 1-1 draw in a game that went into an extra time.

    This all-Spanish final underlines where the best of soccer artistry resides today, because Sevilla FC of Spain annexed the Europa Cup silverware, for the third consecutive time, penultimate Wednesday and for the fifth time in the competition. In fact, pundits have cynically tagged the competition as Europa ‘Sevilla’ Cup and you won’t blame them, given the uncanny manner in which the Spanish side drops from the prestigious UEFA Champions League competition every season only to lift the trophy with aplomb. The pundits can stew in their childishness while the Spaniards celebrate another historical feat, despite their country’s troubled economy.

    The two European trophies for clubs have been in Spain since the 2013/2014 soccer season. This has been the trend in the last three years. This is the ripple effect of Spain winning the 2010 World Cup held in South Africa. The Spaniards came to Africa in 2010 as the European Nations Cup winners and annexed both world titles for national teams. Spain retained their European Cup title in 2012 but lost the World Cup in Brazil in 2014 – no thanks to the scandalous 5-1 loss to Netherlands in the opening game. With these national team feats, it should not come as a surprise the dominance of the European game at club level.

    Not a few remember Spain as a buoyant country than from the prism of soccer, arising from the incredible exploits that Real Madrid and Barcelona have recorded in global soccer tournaments. The impact of these two teams in European football has given rise to two new entities ready to upset the applecart every season. The new boys in the chain for glory from Spain are Sunday’s UEFA Champions League opponents Atletico Madrid and the 2016 Europa Cup champions, Sevilla. No doubt football is the best commodity in Spain; forget about the media blitz associated with the Barclays English Premier League thanks to the robust packaging by the English press.

    The rivalry between Real Madrid and Barcelona is so fierce that the Galaticos’ fans protested against the Spain FA’s initial decision to play the finals of the Copa De Rey at the Bernabeu Stadium. The fans couldn’t stand watching Barcelona players winning a trophy inside their stadium.

    The Spanish example underscores the fact that Nigeria could record, if not surpass the feats of the Spaniards, who have ruled Europe. We have the talents. But our problem has been the insistence of the government at all levels not to hands of supporting football and encourage knowledgeable people to run the game. If the government stops funding football, for instance, the game won’t die. What will happen is that big players across the globe will key into a bilateral relationships with our domestic clubs. These clubs’ personnel would come with their templates and identify, train and retrain those that they want to man the chain in the clubs’ organograms. It is the absence of an organogram in our clubs that has made the administration of the game incapable of generating cash like we see in other climes. European clubs’ organograms are such that eliminate overlaps. These overlaps are what corrupt officials exploit to enrich themselves, pauperise players and discourage businessmen from investing in soccer.

    No entrepreneur would read about Arsenal FC of England’s £100, 952,257 earning from only television rights and won’t talk with their management, if it knocks on his doors. The corporate world would be encouraged to do football business in England, given the television outlay prize of £1.636 billion shared by the 20 clubs which participated in the 2015/2016 Barclays English Premier League. The outlay made public by the organisers of the competition showed that Arsenal earned more from television rights than the eventual winners Leicester. Leicester’s management won’t bat any eyelid because the details are self explanatory.

    Leicester topped Arsenal on that table in the section on merit money as winners, with £1,242,405 difference. This level of transparency is what the big business players need to lure them to commit their goods and services to the English game. Winners of the European leagues don’t visit governors or heads of their country’s governments for winning international honours. There are existing templates for such rewards in those leagues which predates this time. The figures are only increased to be in sync with what operates globally. Real Madrid, Atletico Madrid, Barcelona and Sevilla are not owned by the Spanish government but private people. For Barca, they are the Catalans.  Besides, those who run these clubs emerge from elections. During their campaigns, they make promises which they keep. It is the reason these clubs have big stars who generate cash for themselves and the clubs. This novelty has been extended to the coaches. Mourinho is today locked in an image rights wahala with Chelsea. Manchester United has accepted to buy the Special One’s image rights with Chelsea, knowing that they would recoup what they spent on merchandising, using the Special One’s image. I digress!

    Followers of the game in England are wondering why Manchester United have signed Jose Mourinho, given the fact that Louis Van Gaal won for the Red Devils its 12th  English FA Cup, the most prestigious trophy in England, in terms of tradition. But for the managers of Manchester United, the fans are sacrosanct. They are the ones who oil the club’s business with their patronage. It follows therefore that when they are dissatisfied, the managers of the business must respond otherwise; it would amount to a failure of leadership if their rivals beat them to the biggest European title – the UEFA Champions League – next season.

    Van Gaal lost his job because Manchester United’s management knows that Pep Guardiola is a performer, if given the materials to excel. And with the owners of Manchester City feeling strongly that the Citizens could conquer Europe next season. Guardiola just fits the bill to actualise that corporate dream, having lost out in the semi-finals this season to Real Madrid. I cannot wait to witness the two matches of the Manchester derby next season because the crowd turnout would be captivating. No matter what Manchester United’s management would spend on Mourinho and his armada of stars, the figures from the turnstiles during United’s games and volume of sales from merchandising of the products associated with the Special One and his stars would be awesome.

    Recall that Chelsea’s owner Roman Abramovich was impressed with the fact that Claudio Raineri guided the Blues to a second position in 2004. But he wanted Chelsea to join the big league teams that have lifted the UEFA Champions League diadem, hence he laid off Raineri for Jose Mourinho. This Chelsea analogy is necessary for us to know that Van Gaal’s sack was informed by the need to get Manchester United to be on the same page with their “noisy neighbours” in terms of the clout of their managers and their pedigree in European competitions. Mourinho’s feats and Guardiola’s in European competitions are the same, I dare say. So, beginning from the bench, Manchester United’s owners want to match their rivals in personnel.

    Indeed, when Abramovich grabbed Mourinho, the tilt of power among London clubs went in Chelsea’s favour, with Mourinho winning more of the games against Arsenal than Arsene Wenger. Wenger, in my view, is the most successful manager. He hasn’t guided Arsenal to win the UEFA Champions League diadem, but the Gunners are easily the most exciting team to watch when in their element. Perhaps, if Wenger can shop big for the 2016/2017 season, Arsenal will fit the next UEFA Champions League title. Arsenal’s defence is horrible. Wenger hasn’t been able to replace Patrick Vieira in the midfield. The closest to replacing Vieria has been Caziola. Unfortunately, Caziola was injured at the time when he was needed most this last season. Caziola’s injury is the reason why Gunners are not the Barclays English Premier League champions this season. I don’t intend to undermine what Raineri has done with Leicester City – the Foxes too are another fairytale story in the English game. Leicester won the title with 10 points difference, not a small feat, given the competitive nature of the league in England.

    I was glad that Raineri was given the honour denied him by Chelsea in 2004, when the Blues mounted a guard of honour for the Italian as champions of the Barclays English Premier League. Take a bow Abramovich for being present to give a plaque to a manager he seemingly humiliated in 2004. It takes men of honour to perform such an act. All hail Abramovich!

  • When leaders rattle and supporters fret

    American  President  Barak  Obama  set  the ball  rolling on today’s  topic when  he   told an  audience this week  that the utterances  and antics of the new nominee  of the Republican  Party  for the 2016  presidential  elections in the US, Donald  Trump  have   got world leaders rattled.  Obama lamented that  Trump  has  been ignorant and cavalier in  his  views  on government, the economy  and  world  affairs  generally. This  was a cute,  direct and  bold condemnation  of  the  man  that  many  feel  could  well  be his successor.

     Which  in  cold terms then  means a tragedy  or  calamity  is about to befall  the US  and  our world as  we  know  it today,   given  the fact  that the US  more  than  any other  nation in the  world  including China  and even  Russia  under an aggressive  President Vladmir Putin,  calls  the shots on world  affairs  and  the direction of  global  diplomacy and  security. Mercifully  though,  the political  equation  for world  affairs is  not just  a matter of simple  arithmetic as  the human element in both leaders and their  followers   as well  as the decisions they make on choosing  their  leaders and dumping them at elections, are a social  phenomenon    far   beyond  human  understanding and  the US no  matter  how much it is trumpeted as God’s  own country, is  not  an  exception.  So  for all  the dire forecast  about the    pitiful   and   sorry  consequences  of  a Donald  Trump presidency  for the US and  our world, the issue is  not  for President  Barak  Obama to  resolve, confirm  or  condemn  for the simple  reason  that it is very  much  beyond  him. Obama  whether  he  likes  it or not is quitting when  the ovation is loudest  as he can  not  have a third term  as that is a taboo in current  US  politics.  A  lame  duck  president  goes  his way not  necessarily  into  oblivion  after  his tenure and it  is in his own  interest to  leave those to succeed  him  to be  clearly  seen as elected in a free and  fair  election  which  is the  core value  of America  libertarianism  embedded  in the slogan, Freedom, Liberty  and Equality.

    It  therefore  does  not matter if world  leaders are rattled by Donald  Trump’s    stupidity or  buffoonery as  they  are not  part  of the US  electorate and  therefore  have  no say in who  the  Americans elect  as their  president.  Just   as  they could  do nothing   but  applaud ,  at  least  at  last,  when  Americans eight  years ago,  elected a  black  man whose  father  came from Kenya  in East  Africa as their leader and president. Indeed  it also  does  not matter  that Donald  Trump the new enfant  terrible  of US  politics has retorted to  Obama’s categorization  of him  by saying that he  does  not  care  if world leaders are  rattled   by  his   emergence  and   his   typical  verbal   gymnastics  . Trump  did  not need  to say it in so  many words  but  the  world  has changed dramatically  since  his emergence  as a nominee presidential  candidate  for  his party and  the world is waiting with  baited breath  to see if  he can scale the hurdle  and win the US  Presidency.  If  he does  it will be the most  wonderful  Cinderella rags  to  riches  story  in US politics in  spite  of  Trump’s  billionaire  status,   comparable  only  to  how  Obama dazed  us all  with  his election  eight years  ago. It will certainly be  a heady  story  of a unique man  and leader diagnosed  with verbal  diarrhea by  his predecessor making  his way  to  the  White in spite  of his awful oral  disposition   and   verbiage   and the  attendant  stigma  of  in electability nailed  on  his   head  on that account.

    The  other  side of  this story  or  topic  has to do  with followers  fretting  and it is to  Nigeria that I turn  to illustrate  what  I have  in mind. Just  as Obama  fretted that world  leaders  are rattled by Trump I  fret  today  that Nigerians  are  rattled  about  their leaders  in  government  today and  the  reason  is  not far  fetched. It  is in  the astronomical  increase  in the  price  of fuel  from 86  naira  to 145  naira.  Nigerians  are  rattled  because  this is a government  they  believe  in and  trust. This is  really  true  and  that is why I say Nigerians  are really  rattled  and shocked  by the huge  rise.  No  other  government  could  have  done it and  gotten  away  with it and really I do  not believe  this government  has seen  the last  of the  matter. It  is not a case of protests or  strikes. It  is the inhumanity inherent  in the huge  rise which  is bound to have terrible consequences  on the economic life of the  masses  of this  nation   that  is  the issue  to confront  and resolve and  the  sooner  this is done the better for  the  government  and  all  of  us.

    A series  of posters that adorn  the Okota- Apple  Junction  Rd declared  open  by the  Vice  President  recently in Lagos has  the picture of the hard  working Governor of the State and the President with the inscription – Our  Trusted  President. That  really is how Nigerians  see  and   hold this president. That  is why they  are stunned  by  the fuel  price  increase  to  far away 145 naira. They  are more  than  rattled   and  it is as if  they have scored an  own  goal. Their  state  is like that described in Peter Enahoro’s book   How  To  Be  A Nigerian . They  are  ‘ flabberwhelmed’ and   ‘overgasted.’  Yet  this is still a  popular  government they put in place a year  ago and  with  this 145 naira wonder it is as if a father has given a scorpion  to a   trusting  child  who asked   just   for bread.

    Yet  this  fretting in the land is not beyond  redemption.  An  opposition  politician recently  told  some APC  diehards  to  my hearing that  with  the 145  naira  price  it  seems   that  the  party has  just started  to  inflict  its  own   brand   of  suffering  on  Nigeria and  Nigerians.  I  do  not  believe  that  one bit and  I believe  that by the time the  party would  have spent the next  year in office such  an  observation would be a thing of the past    or    at  least   have  feet  of clay.  Really, Nigerians are hopeful because this government is their  political investment  and they must  reap  the dividend of a better life  from it well  before the next election as a year is gone by already  and it  has ended on a sour note of fuel  at 145naira.  Which  is a tragedy and not a dividend of democracy or any political investment.

    To  the opposition leader who  taunted my  APC  friend  on suffering under the  government I will illustrate  my support  for the government with a  political  story. This  was the story  during the coup  in   the   military  era    during which  some Yoruba  generals  were shown in a video  detailing  their  complicity  against  the Abacha  regime  in Aso  Rock, Abuja. The  video  was shown  reportedly to some Yoruba  Obas  most  of whom  were carried away  and believed  the charge  of complicity. It  was  only one Oba who  refused  to disown the generals for any complicity in spite  of the odds inherent in the video. That  Oba was  Sikiru  Adetona, Ogbagba 11, the inimitable  Awujale  of  Ijebu  land whose ‘son’ Oluwole Diya was  among the arrested generals. Awujale  famously  and historically  told  the  Nigerian  tyrant then –  he  is our son  –  and  the Yoruba general  lived till   another day and is still alive and  kicking today.

    That  to  me is the attitude  of  Nigerians to this government  in spite of the 145naira fuel  menace. Like  the  Awujale  stood  by his  man  in spite  of  the odds and  kept  faith with  him, Nigerians still  have  faith in this government. What  they need is that  the yoke  of governance should  reciprocate the love and trust  they  put in place  a year ago  when they  elected  change and put  their  future and  hope  in the  hands of the government of the day.  That  certainly  is  not  too much to ask for or  look  forward  to.

    Once  again,  long  live the  Federal  Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • Like football, like Nigeria

    If all you see in football is the players’ mere task of putting an inflated round object into the opponents’ net, or even lifting a trophy at the end of the season, you miss out on some stunning similarities between the game and our dear country. Beyond the hard job on the pitch lasting all of 90 minutes or 120 or even more, in some cases, football proves why it is called the most popular game on earth.

    But so does Nigeria, a fantastically blessed nation, yet incredibly blighted by its leaders, some of whom should better be called misleaders. It has time and again proved it is not just another nation. It offers the world not merely its best, but also such puzzling paradoxes as must qualify it for the most interesting country earth’s inhabitants can find.

    Football draws a large following, but in saying this I have carefully avoided factoring in those who kick it in bedrooms, living rooms, or the backstreets or community square or just about any space they can find such as a Lagos road or motor park on a strike day. I refer only to those who live off the game as players, and also those who spend their money to watch it, listen to it or follow it in one form or another. This set of people is in millions, even hundreds of millions, sometimes.

    As I laboured at this piece just hours before the kickoff of the Uefa Champions League match in Milan, Italy between Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid, those millions were getting ready for the encounter, perhaps as much as were the players themselves, the second time in three years both sides would try one another for size in Europe’s most important football matchups. Their first clash in 2014 in Lisbon, Portugal was aired in over 200 countries and viewed by a projected 380 million global audience, the largest TV audience in years in Spain. On Friday night those numbers were bound to jump appreciably.

    The game brings joy to souls. That cannot be denied. It also brings grief. From Bolton to Liverpool in the United Kingdom, football has left families in eternal horror from stadium tragedies, just as it has wrecked homes from Brussels, Belgium to South Africa and beyond through hooliganism or facility breakdown.

    My country, in its own way, shares a lot of these joys and horrors. It pulsates with a staggering number of citizens, closer to 200 million than away from it. Its politics boasts a dizzying following, just like football, pulling away many from their first professional, but sometimes unrewarding, loves onto a train whose every coach runs over with gravy. Along with gravy also comes blood, the blood of the people. Yes, the god of football has quite an appetite for blood but the deity of Nigerian politics seems to live on nothing else. Our politics is ruined by violence, bile and blood.

    Football is supposed to be a sport and should offer some entertainment to watchers. But this is perhaps one of the most intriguing things about the game. What is essentially a sport has since become war not just between rival teams but, more seriously, among opposing supporters, leading to bloodshed, even outright death.

    Yet, that’s not the only worry. It has become increasingly difficult trying to understand what really drives the passions of club football supporters. Is it club success proved by trophies won? Is it how much money a club makes at the end of a season? Or is it good old good football?

    And what is good football?

    Football Club Barcelona on the Catalan side of Spain play arguably the best football on the planet, and have just won their sixth La Liga title in eight years. Along with enviable trophies have also come sworn enemies. The other day someone called the Barca style that “useless passing game”. Conversely, if a side can dam up their goal area, as it were, and manage to sneak the ball into the opponents’ goal and run away with victory, that side also probably plays great football. And if a set of players lacks no artistry whatsoever but can kick and follow the ball, perhaps leading to some victory, that team are no less deserving of praise.

    In other words, it is difficult determining why people support their clubs. Put differently, people will stick with their team even if everyone else finds them obnoxious.

    The Nigerian situation is hardly any different. Take those who lead or mislead this potentially great nation. It does not seem to matter what they do, those who govern Nigeria will always have their supporters. And those who will write off those leaders will do so no matter what. The economy has dipped in part because global oil prices have crumbled, and in part because the immediate past administration wrecked it. This has earned President Muhammadu Buhari blame and cynicism, if not outright condemnation. The other day in a public space, a young woman raved and ranted against the President, calling him all manner of unprintable names. For Dr Goodluck Jonathan, the word was silence. Those who robbed the country blind in broad daylight are being questioned but that does not seem to make any difference to the aforementioned girl or to those who think like she does. Two of the abducted Chibok girls have returned, but the word in some quarters is Na Buhari bring dem back?

    In recent memory, Boko Haram was taking territory, not losing prized captives.

    Like or hate. It is a free world.

  • Leadership, credibility and authority

    IN diplomacy and politics the saying is quite true that there are no permanent enemies but permanent interests. What this means is that people and leaders can change their alliances and the company they keep based on new realities and facts. It is the same thing as saying that politicians and leaders should be flexible and pragmatic in reacting to new events and situations and need not be unnecessarily rigid on political situations and circumstances as they arise. Nevertheless if leaders switch positions too often and cannot hold any opinion for any length of time they are deemed as chameleonic and unreliable. Such leaders invariably generate and create credibility problems for themselves which negatively affect their authority, especially amongst their followers. Today we look at global leadership in terms of credibility, authority and legitimacy in the light of global events and news in the last one week and pass judgment on the decisions and actions of world leaders in their various spheres of operations, and decision making. In this context we use the NLC strike in Nigeria on fuel price increase from 86 naira to 145 naira as a case study. We also look at the US presidential campaign and the utterances and credibility of the political actors on the scene. We then sift through the Brexit arguments in Britain and scrutinize the credibility of the two sides as they argue to convince the British people on whether Britain will benefit or lose by staying or leaving the EU in a referendum slated for June this year. Let us go back to the strike on the fuel price increase called by the Nigerian Labor Congress which from all indications has failed because workers have ignored the call not to go to work as the NLC ordered. Worse still the TUC did not go along with the strike which indeed was called by a faction of the NLC. This simply means that the NLC lacked credibility with Nigerian workers or else they would not disobey its orders so brazenly and so massively. In simple terms the NLC’s authority on the matter can be said to be in shambles perhaps because of the factionalisation of its leadership or because of other leadership voices that the workers listened to, to defy their union leadership and I can point out two such voices. The first is Asiwaju Bola Tinubu who asked Nigerians to bear the pain and yoke of the price increase as it was something that has to be done anyway if Nigeria was to move forward economically. The second leadership voice was Mr Kwokori the former NUPENG leader against fuel price increase who in an interview last Sunday asked Nigerians to bear the pain and not take to the streets as he led them in the past. There is no doubt that the NLC strike has failed so far because workers believed these two leaders who had led such protests in the past. In effect they had credibility with the workers even though their authority is not formal as that of the NLC over the workers who disobeyed its directive. Kwokori’s informal authority was his reputation as a worthy leader who fought for the masses on such fuel hike in the past at great risk to his life. Asiwaju Tinubu’s authority was the mandate he secured for his party that made success possible for the APC in the 2015 elections and the fact that he has always been on the side of the Nigerian people even though he has no position in today’s formal APC government. Tinubu has deftly and politically manipulated empathy and understanding for an unpopular government decision and he could only have done it because the people have given him credibility arising from the successful role he played in securing the presidency for his party in the 2015 presidential elections. Tinubu has used his political stature in industrial relations to thwart the authority of the NLC and the NLC has an uphill task in regaining that authority for the foreseeable future unless it finds a way to reclaim its jaded leadership credibility. Our second case is that of the US presidential campaign in which it is becoming apparent that Donald Trump of the Republican Party will have to face Hillary Clinton of the Democratic Party for the Presidential elections this year. Yet it is clear that Donald Trump has a credibility problem having changed his positions and opinions on several issues including banning Muslims from entering the US and building a wall to bar Mexicans from entering the us. In spite of this Trump has garnered over 11m votes in his presidential quest. Far more than any Republican presidential candidate in US history as acknowledged by House of Representatives Speaker Ryan, also a Republican who refused to endorse Trump still, in spite of that fact. Which means that Trump’s popularity has not made him a credible candidate with the Speaker who is the highest ranking elected Republican in the US. Yet again in spite of Trump’s lack of credibility with the US public or his party leadership the masses of Republican voters love him and a poll has shown that these voters want the party leadership to endorse him as the party’s presidential candidate even before the convention in July. What the Trump leadership phenomenon has shown is that in politics it is the people who decide who their leaders will be in any democracy. They also decide who to elect, who to obey, ignore or disobey as the NLC strike has so vividly demonstrated. With regard to the Brexit issue in Britain there is no doubt that credibility is very much at stake. The Prime Minister David Cameron wants Britain to stay and has been speaking eloquently on that and has even said he has no apologies if he is accused of using government money in that regard. But those who want Britain to leave are equally credible leaders like the former Mayor of London Boris Johnson who likened the EU to an attempt by its creators and champions to recreate the Ancient Roman Empire which it said collapsed from the weight of its expansion and size. Those who want Britain to go it alone also point to the exploits of Hitler and Napoleon and wonder why such ambitions which ended in tragedy for Europe can be allowed to continue in the form of the present EU. Undoubtedly the EU debate will be decided by the arguments and credibility of the exponents on both the quit or stay divide. To me it is a robust lesson on leadership, articulation, and credibility although as in any democracy it is the people who will decide who to believe at the end of the day when they cast their vote in the referendum next month. That really is the essence of democracy in spite of its many ups and downs and apparent inconsistencies in leadership, credibility and authority.

  • Needless summons

    Members of the House of Representatives have suddenly woken up to see that there is trouble in the house of football. Now that they have intervened in the crises orchestrated by those who want the organisation of the game to be under government lackeys, has anything changed? I laughed my heart out over the summons handed to Sports Minister Solomon Dalung and the President of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF), Amaju Melvin Pinnick, to appear before the House’s sports committee in the House of Representatives over the leadership tussle at the Glasshouse when those recognised by the world soccer body’s last Annual Congress in Mexico.

    Ironically, the likely political resolution of the impasse will be a nullity for the simple reason that it amounts to interference by third parties, which is one of the things that FIFA frowns at. Besides, decisions from the meeting won’t be binding on those who may lose, if are they are the ones who emerged from a democratic process.

    I found the decision to put Chris Giwa on the list quite preposterous since Pinnick and his deputies were rubbing minds with FIFA and CAF chieftains, who run the game for the world body in their 210 affiliates. Giwa opted to seek redress in the courts and it is only proper to allow him get to the end of the matter than to cajole anyone to accept a political resolution to an exercise that had been decided through the ballot box.

    I’m miffed at the sudden realisation by the House that the fuss in the Glasshouse was remotely responsible for our ouster from the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations. Was this failed expedition happening for the first time? Wasn’t this intrigue responsible for Nigeria’s was elimination from the 2015 edition?

    Where were these emergency peacemakers when Giwa was stopped from seeing the Super Eagles on the pitch before a game inside the UJ Esuene Stadium in Calabar? Don’t the committee members know those they have been relating with since their inauguration? Don’t these members, some of whom have travelled with the country’s soccer teams, know that Giwa has no role to perform at the NFF?

    It appears that some people are benefitting from the meddlesomeness of busy bodies, such as the House, in an issue that has been decided. The legislators have a right to intervene in matters of national interest. But, shouldn’t they allow sleeping dogs lie after seeing Pinnick et al interface with their counterparts in the 210 countries under FIFA’s umbrella? If they were not the legitimate body, according to FIFA’s rules, they would have been excused out of the Congress and sanctions meted out to Nigeria, like it has been done to Republic of Benin, for a matter similar to ours. Benin is a soccer pariah today, because their football matter was taken to the court. Is this not what Giwa has done? Do we need a summons to know what is right? Must we always fail to learn from others’ mistakes, considering the Benin situation? The House must be told that the Giwa group wants Vice President and four other “juicy” posts as part of the political arrangement for peace. Foul – it won’t happen because FIFA rules are sacrosanct. Nobody forced Nigeria to belong to the body. We may as well renounce our membership of FIFA and see if anyone would invite us for a game. Nigeria is bigger than anyone. We have a right to use soccer to engage our youths, create employment for people and use the game to enable the citizens recreate to stay healthy. Soccer is played across a wider range of people than any other sport, hence its leadership status in terms of followership.

    Rather than repeat this fruitless exercise of having the minister and Pinnick face them like we have seen in the past, the House members ought to have waited for the opportunity of FIFA President’s proposed visit to Nigeria to ask the critical questions about the workings of the international body, in a bid to truly stop this laughable rituals which happen every four years, after elections.

    I’m excited that the FIFA president will meet President Muhammadu Buhari. I know that he will tell the President the dos and don’ts of the federation in unambiguous terms. The FIFA president will tell Buhari, who between Pinnick and Giwa, his body recognises. So, the House of Representatives’ men shouldn’t have beaten the gun with this needless summons.

    The truth must be told – the electoral rules allow dissatisfied people to seek justice. But, here we have a man occupying a seat through legitimate means and another struggling to unseat him through means forbidden by the custodians of the game’s rules. At the risk of repeating myself, if Nigeria doesn’t want to belong to FIFA, we should say so and join the league of banned countries, such as Benin (God forbid).

    Asking the minister and Pinnick to appear before them with Giwa attending was an insult to both institutions that they represent. Would it be fair for those who emerged through an election to lose their positions thorough political resolutions? Would you accept that, honourable members, if you are in these members’ position? What happens to those whose offices would be given to those who didn’t partake in the elections? Will they keep quiet?

    Nigerians would be excited to see Giwa’s members in a flawed election organised by FIFA, which is the body recognised to supervise its elections. Indeed, all Congresses, including the ones for elections, are recorded. Can Giwa show us the video of the election he wants us to believe he won? The Warri election was recorded and observed by FIFA chieftains, unlike the Abuja one which went ahead despite FIFA’s warning against it.

    If the House members want to be busy, they can organise a forum where stakeholders can rub minds to make the sports sector solvent through working relationships with the private sector. Nigeria’s preparation for the 2016 Rio Olympic Games is in quandary. We don’t have good structures where our athletes can train for major competitions. This problem predates what is happening now.

    I won’t be surprised if this committee initiates another summons to the minister after the Olympics, seeking to know why Nigeria returned from another Olympics without a medal. Just watch out.

     

    Why not Guus Hindink?

     

    Surprise, surprise, surprise! I heard that John Mikel Obi accepted to play in the central defence position for Chelsea without qualms. Mikel has played in that position thrice and did very well. Could that be Mikel’s best position in the twilight of his meteoric career? Have we forgotten the jabs thrown at former Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho by most pundits that he destroyed Mikel’s attacking instincts by restricting the Nigerian’s playing area with the Blues?

    What has Guus Hindink seen in Mikel to necessitate this novel change in position for the Nigerian? Is Hindink’s decision not a justification of what Mourinho started? Should we not go for Hindink as the Eagles’ next manager, especially as the glory days of our football at that level has been with Dutch coaches? Our football needs this drastic change in personnel and positions in the Eagles’ formation, if we hope to excel at the 2018 World Cup slated to hold in Russia? We shouldn’t be scared of Hindink’s wages. We can employ him for one year and see how well the Eagles transform to become giant killers, not their present Super Chicken sobriquet. If Nigeria qualifies for the semi-finals at the Russia 2018 World Cup with Hindink, a lot will happen to the game to make the NFF self-financing, with the new dispensation at the Glasshouse.

    Hindink isn’t new to handling national teams. He knows how to breathe life into sinking teams by injecting younger players to rev up the team’s attacking forays. He will gladly accept the Nigerian job at the right price, knowing that success with the Eagles will reopen a new vista for Dutch coaches in the developing countries. We truly need a foreign coach in Hindink’s class to rejuvenate the Super Eagles.

    No Nigerian coach dares play Mikel in the central defence position. He will lose his job that day. Drafting Mikel to the defence, clears the way for younger boys like Oghenekaro Etebo, Alex Iwobi, Kelechi Ihenacho et al to blossom in the midfield. Mikel slows the pace of the game in counter attacking situations, largely because he is ageing. His experience will help block the Eagles’ leaky defence, as the other defenders would easily listen to his instructions in the course of the game. As a central defender, Mikel can be the coach on the field since he sees everything happening from the vintage position. No player dares misbehave, if he beckons on them to mark the opponents in the course of the game. These younger boys can cope with the rigours of the game over 120 minutes.

    I’m a big fan of technically competent foreign coaches for the Super Eagles – Nigeria’s biggest brand waiting to blossom. I also feel strongly that with a coach who knows his onions handling the Eagles, the pool of talents that we will throw into the international market will be awesome. Only foreign coaches can make the fight for spaces fierce, such that established stars will sit on the bench for the new kids. This idea of fielding the same players and expecting different results still beats my imagination.

    We need new kids in the Eagles who will be hungry for glory, not what we have where nothing challenges our experienced stars, because they have seen it all. This is why the Eagles wobble and fumble (apologies to Coach Fanny Amun).

  • The bigger picture

    Sitting before my computer on Thursday afternoon, a lot of headlines ran through my head, with every topic looking like a weekly column idea. In fact, I started writing many in my mind’s eye but shelved them, especially those that I wrote on sheets of paper while in Benin City.

    Indeed, in one’s quiet moments, the head is free of life’s baggage. Rather than sleep away the time, one tries to scribble down interesting trends of the beautiful game. I plead guilty of being a football writer, even though I played cricket in my younger days.

    Truth is, if the business of soccer thrives, those firms which cannot find the space to identify their goods and/or services with the beautiful game would shift their attention to other sports with the right followership and men who can convince the corporate world not to sulk over its inability to identify with soccer.

    Sports, such as cricket, boxing, basketball, golf and table tennis, have robust marketing initiatives which have been used to activate some of the programmes executed today. It is true that they need more, except that soccer, which ought to be the elixir for other sports, is burdened by the intrigues of failed NFF people.

    Let me not bore you with these intrigues but look at the bigger future for soccer as it is being showcased by other nations. I hope this bigger picture can be appreciated by the coaches of our national teams, if they truly want the game to move up.

    I cringe when I hear ex-internationals distort facts in pushing their case for them to run the game, as if that is the norm in other climes. The last time I checked, the three FAs in which ex-footballers are in charge as Federation presidents are Chile (Arturo Salah), Portugal (Fernando Gomes) and Spain (Ángel María). Their countries are listed among the top 10 in FIFA rankings.

    In descending order in FIFA’s rankings, England FA has Gregory “Greg” Dyke (born 20 May 1947), a British media executive, journalist and broadcaster, as chairman of The Football Association (FA). He was Director-General of the BBC from January 2000 to 29 January 2004.

    In Uruguay, the FA President is Wilmar Valdez (born 10 July 1965), a Uruguayan football executive. At 21, Valdez started working for his hometown’s club Rentistas. Valdez also worked as a sports journalist for a while. At Rentistas, he served in various positions, including Secretary General and President, for four years.

    Portugal’s FA president is Fernando Mendes Soares Gomes (born 22 November 1956), a retired Portuguese professional footballer, who played as a striker for FC Porto, Sporting Lisbon and Sporting Gijon. Brazilian FA President is Marco Polo Del Nero (born 22 February 1941); he is a lawyer and sports administrator.

    One of the three FA presidents, who is a former footballer, is Spain’s Ángel María (born 21 February 1950). He played as a midfielder. He is the acting President of UEFA. He wasn’t an ex-international.

    Germany’s FA president isn’t a footballer, yet his country is the defending World Cup champions. Reinhard Dieter Grindel (born 19 September 1961 in Hamburg) is a German journalist, politician (CDU) and football administrator. From 2002 to 2016, Grindel was a member of the Bundestag (Lower Chamber of the German Parliament). On 15 April 2016, he was elected president of the German Football Association (DFB) and resigned as a member of parliament.

    Colombia’s FA president is Ramon Franco, a businessman. Chile’s president Arturo Salah is a former Chilean footballer and manager. Belgium’s federation president is Francois De Keersmaecker and he is a lawyer. Argentina’s Luis Segura is a business entrepreneur.

    England, Brazil, Germany, Argentina, France, Spain, Belgium and Uruguay are not being run by their ex-internationals. Note that these countries are in the top 10 in FIFA’s current rankings, with not a few being former World Cup champions like the reigning kings- Germany.

    The trend shows that lawyers, business men, journalists and politicians make good soccer federation chairmen. It is very revealing that a journalist presides over Germany’s FA. Need I restate that the Germans are the World Cup kings?

    What most ex-internationals in Nigeria, who disturb the media with the infantile wish, fail to understand is that the essence of any enterprise is profits and losses. And it isn’t a venture for half-baked and unprepared people not versed in the rudiments of business. Our players still see soccer administration like an inheritance, forgetting that there are many people who are eminently qualified.

    Besides, our ex-internationals must know that they won’t be interfacing with Lilliputians from other climes, hence they must equip themselves properly before seeking positions of importance, such as NFF’s headship.

    Most times when I hear or read about these advocates for ex-internationals running our football, my mind goes to reconciling all that they achieved as players – tears run down my cheeks. Perhaps, if they equipped themselves, they would be talking about owning clubs in their states that would serve as models on how the game should be run.

    Again, I laugh at these ex-internationals because only a few of them have contributed to the local clubs which made them. These gestures come when they are in the twilight of their careers – more or less like forward purchase stuffs or as public relations stunts initiated by their friends and lackeys.

    Clubs, such as Rangers, 3SC, Bendel Insurance, Heartland, Kano Pillars, Enyimba etc shouldn’t be run by any state government, given the exodus of players from these clubs to Europe. Our players must learn to put their money where their mouth is. Is it out of place if five top former players of 3SC in Europe decide to pay the players’ annual salaries as their contributions to the club’s existence?

    Is 3SC’s yearly budget up to N700 million? I doubt it. That is the equivalent of $2 million which is what the club’s ex-internationals and those still playing can cough pay. Not so here. They would tell you that the money would be misappropriated. But if they pay it into a bank and get the bank to do their biddings in terms of payment, the players would get their dues. If our players are serious about their cry to run our football, they must go back to their local governments and states to contribute to the grassroots development of the game.

    If those players who left Enugu Rangers FC for Europe contribute 10 per cent of what they earn playing European football to the club’s management, they won’t need government funding. What have those players who left Shooting Stars Sports Club (3SC) of Ibadan to play in Europe done for the club’s management now that the Oyo State government is indebted to the players and coaching staff for five months? Ten per cent from their one month salaries would make 3SC the richest in Nigeria. Only a few of our ex-internationals and those still playing have bought jerseys, boots etc for their former clubs.

    What they do when they visit the country is to drive around the cities in posh cars, with musical sets at the loudest volume to increase the nuisance value that we already have on the streets. Back in their European bases, they dare not do so. They know the penalties involved if caught by the authorities. Not so here, where those who should reprimand them join in the boogie sessions – awaiting when the big star leaves the place like a rocket, leaving in his wake wads of naira flung into the air with multitudes falling over themselves to pick up the crumbs.

    Those who excel in those places would definitely get the votes to qualify them to run for their state FA elections. Once in that setting, it would be easier for them to contest the NFF elections and run the office, if the Congress deems them worthy of such an exercise. Nothing qualifies an ex-international without requisite educational qualifications to run the NFF than the educated mind, who chose the academics. A literarily empty head cannot lead people. Indeed, most of the educated footballers have moved on to other ventures and won’t want to touch the NFF with this kind of rancorous setting.  State FAs run by ex-internationals have been riddled with tales of impeachments and accusations of their leaders running a one-man show.

    One will stand at the roof top to campaign for Adokie Amiesimaka, if he decides to run for the NFF president. I will have advertorials in many media houses explaining why we need Felix Owolabi (Phd) as NFF president, if he takes the plunge.

    I will proceed on vacation to support Edema Fuludu, if he shows interest in NFF president’s job. These (Amiesimaka, Owolabi and Fuludu) are ex-internationals and Africa Cup of Nations winners. The list of educated players is endless. They combined sports at the highest level with quality education, which is the distinguishing line between them and the rest of the pack.

    We want people who are cerebral to articulate the federation’s road map to the corporate world. We need men with pedigree, such as Amaju Melvin Pinnick, who distinguished himself at the state level. The current NFF board has the right mix of technocrats to lift the game, if given an opportunity to deliver on their campaign promises.

    Football management at the NFF isn’t a job for charlatans or political jobbers. It is a job for those who have given life to moribund institutions, not those who want to use the platform to improve their CVs, enrich their international passports, lobby for positions at FIFA and CAF and travel with every team in a bid to collect estacodes in foreign currencies.

     

  • Democracy, Global Corruption and the Trojan Horse

    In  the  quest  to clean up any  society it is agreed that  in terms  of taking bribes  both the giver  and the taker  of bribes are equally guilty   before  the law. Generally  however,  in  most societies  and nations,  the taker bears  the brunt of the opprobrium most  probably  because  the  taker is invariably  a public official working in a public  institution taking the bribe for  a normally  free  service or to bend the rules  or look the other way  on a legal  infringement by the giver . As  IMF  MD Christine  Lagarde said rightly this week   on   CNN ,  corruption destroys  any economy ,  and  that is the  truth.

    However  it is a mockery of the global  concern  on stolen  assets involved  in corruption and money laundry for  Mr  David  Cameron,   a Prime  Minister of a nation like  Britain which aims  to organize   next    year  a  global    anti-corruption  conference  on stolen  assets   in the UK ,  to have  told  the British  monarch as widely  reported,  that  some  ‘fantastically corrupt’  nations   like  Nigeria   and  Afghanistan are  coming  to the  global  anti corruption conference in London next  year. Such   a  shrilly  and   excited use  of words on a serious  issue  like   corruption  is  simply  misguided, insensitive  and uncouth in diplomatic  terms. Perhaps  if  Mr  Cameron  had  paused to weigh his words before speaking,  he would  have known  that Britain  in terms of receipt of stolen  assets  has  been  a major  beneficiary and  recipient  of stolen  goods   or  assets   more  than  any EU  nation except  perhaps France .  This   is  because  of the legacy  and connection  of Colonialism through which  both the British and the French  brought up those  African  leaders  they  handed power to after  milking such African and developing nations dry of their  assets  especially  minerals  and  agricultural  produce before  granting  them , what  with  the  benefit    of hindsight, we  can  now  safely   call   phony  independence

    Even  now the British  PM  should ask  for a list  of the owners  of the richest  Premiership    soccer clubs in  Britain  like  Manchester  City, Chelsea  or  even  new  Champions   Leicester   and open a register for them to find out how  they  made  the  money  that the  English  Premiership  has used  to  make its  citizens  so    happy  and psychologically  fulfilled  week  in, week  out.   Just    as    the same Premiership  has become the most  potent  instrument  for the re Colonisation  of the  minds, time and outlook of the citizens of the former  colonies  of  Great  Britain  and  France  globally   in  Africa, Asia,  and   especially   the  Middle  East, where  Britons, French  and  indeed  the agents of Western  Civilisation  are  most  hated.  So  in  basic  terms the term  ‘fantastically  corrupt’ may  not  be a monopoly  of nations like  Nigeria  and  Afghanistan where corruption  is rampant  and  may  even  be a way  of life. It  is equally  applicable  for the major  recipient  of stolen  assets like Britain  whose  capital  is littered or  adorned in terms of choice  property  by  the proceeds  of stolen  money  and assets  from  all  parts  of  the world

    Indeed it was  widely  reported that  Russian billionaires who  made money  by the plundering  of  Russian minerals  industries at  privatization  prefer to  go to  British  Courts to settle  claims  on ownership, fronting, interests  and   cross  interests  in such  assets  transferred to  Britain  because  they  believe in getting justice  on such  assets  in  British  Courts. But  no  one ever  denied in  Britain  that the assets  were  stolen  from  Russia  through  shady  deals  when the  West  including Britain  were pushing Russia  to  democratize, deregulate  and marketize  its economy after  the collapse  of  Communism  under   former    President  Mikhail  Gorbachez. The  British  government  looked the other way as the  Russian  stolen  assets  boosted  the British economy  and  the British  judges, assiduously ,  straight  facedly  administered justice  as if they never knew the  assets  in question were stolen  assets.  If that is not fantastic, out of the world corruption and duplicity  I  wonder what  it is. Mr  Cameron  should   just   listen to what  President  Muhammadu Buhari said  in  London    this week    that he would  not ask  for an  apology    from  him but would  only seek  that stolen  assets  be returned . What  the usually  taciturn  Nigerian  leader  did not  say  in so  many   words   was  that  those  who  live in glass  houses  should  not throw  stones,  especially  on global  corruption.

    In   fighting corruption  however  it  is  necessary  for  those  involved  to always look  over their  shoulder   because corrupt  people  have money  to defend their  stolen  assets and they  can  fight  back .But  those  who  fight  corruption  too if  they  are hurt  by  corrupt  practices  can  always  fight  back. Today  I  am  going  to use  Brazil as  an  example  of how  corruption  has fought back  successfully and dislodged a sitting president.   Also  I  will  use  Nigeria as an example  of where corruption  is determinedly fighting the anti  corruption war  of President Buhari by  putting  Trojan  horse   as   it were  within its  gates like  an  enemy  within.

    This  week  the Brazilian  President Dilmar Rousseff  was  suspended while impeachment  proceedings  commenced  against her. Dilmar  has  called this   a coup but  the New  York  Times  in an editorial  called her impeachment  a  successful  fight  back  by powerful  politicians  in Brazil who  felt  that he did not  protect them  enough when the corruption  charges brought  against them on Petrobas Brazil’ s  major  company  broke  out  sometime  ago. The  Petrobasanti  corruption  investigation  has consumed  many prominent  and powerful  senators and businessmen  in  Brazil  but  Dilmar  was unscathed  even  though  she was Chairman  of  Petrobas  before  she became  president.  Her  party the  Workers  Party has  produced  the last  two  presidents in Brazil  and it is  her second term that is being scuttled  having been  elected to a second  term  in  2014. Dilmar  is being impeached  for tampering with the budget deficit  that made the economy looked buoyant  for  her election in her  first term a not unusual ploy in  most elective democracies.

    Yet  her real  sin  could  have  been  that her predecessor former  President  Lula  Da  Silva  brought two  major  sporting events to  be staged in  Brazil  and  defeating two  major world  powers,   especially  Britain  and the US  in the process. Under  Lula,  a socialist, Brazil  won the rights to stage the 2014  World  Cup  and the 2016  Olympics.  The  bids  for the events  had  serious  UK  and  US  interests  and  President  Barak   Obama    was   even   personally present at  one in which  he was upstaged  by the Brazilian  president. This  has  been  used  as a campaign  issue  against Obama in the on going US presidential  elections by no less a person than the controversial  GOP presidential  Nominee  Donald  Trump. Dilmar  and her party could  be paying for daring to walk where angels  fear  to tread and the anti  corruption  machinery  of the US  may  be  having its own  back  on the  Brazilian President, her predecessor and their  nation for  daring to humiliate  the US in  the  prestigious   international sporting world  while its own  government was reeking with  corruption at Petrobas.  Dilmar’s  fall again  has shown  that on  corruption again those  who  live in glass  houses  should  not  throw  stones.

    In  the   case of  Nigeria I  am  greatly  disturbed  by  the new  petrol  price  of 145  naira simply  because  of the  multiplier  effect in  terms of high  prices it will create on virtually  every consumable item  you  can  imagine as well  as  transportation  and  commuting fares  which will  affect the welfare  and  living standard  of the average  Nigerian, very  adversely. That  is why I think  it is a Trojan  horse  parked  within the gates of the Buhari  administration  like  the Greeks  did in Greek  mythology  only to come  out at night  to  slaughter  the unsuspecting citizens  of Troy. The  price  hike to  145 naira  will erode  the goodwill  that this administration  has  enjoyed so  far  especially  on the war  against  corruption. If  the APC  had  campaigned  that it  would  raise  petrol  price to 145 naira it could not have won  the 2015 elections. I  thought the increase  was a ruse  to antagonize  the new  government  but then even  Asiwaju  Bola Tinubu  has said  that Nigerians should  learn  to live  with  this pain. This  is  a very  tall order and the political  system  is  going to be very  charged  from  now on just  because  the increase  would be very  unbearable  for  most  Nigerian  families.  I  honestly  hope that the  anti-corruption  forces  have  not penetrated   the administration and  are using  this new deregulation  or new  petrol price  to derail  its  focus  on  the   anti- corruption war  or  even  governance  for  that  matter.  Both  the timing  and the huge  increase do  not serve the interest of  our democracy  and  those in  government should  really  look over their  shoulders in the  days  and  weeks  ahead  and do  a rethink  or a u turn  before   it is too late. Once  again  long live the  Federal  Republic  of  Nigeria.

  • A middle way

    A middle way

    Former Minister of Education in the Obasanjo administration, Mrs Oby Ezekwesili, has once again descended scathingly on the economic policies of the President Muhammadu Buhari administration. Speaking at a forum organised by the Covenant Christian Centre, Abuja, Mrs Ezekwesili accused the ascetic  General of implementing ‘opaque’ and ‘archaic’ economic principles reminiscent of the ‘command and control approach’ of his first coming as a military dictator a little over three decades ago.

    In the weighty words of Oby Ezekwesili, “During the first coming of this our new president, a command and control system was adopted. During that era, inflation spiralled. During that era, jobs were lost. During that era, the economic growth level dipped. That era wasn’t the best of eras in economic progress. What did not work in 1984 cannot possibly be a solution in a global economy that’s much more integrated…In a year we have lost the single digits inflation status we maintained in previous administrations. Mr Buhari’s distortion of the foreign exchange system has left the poor it was intended to support even worse off.” Contending that PMB’s economic policies are encouraging massive corruption, Madam Oby avers that “Enormous power is being abused as a result of opaque economic policies. Companies are suddenly finding themselves unable to produce because they are unable to access foreign exchange.”

    It is certainly most unfair for Ezekwesili to say that an administration, which has done more than any since the commencement of this dispensation in 1999 to expose, investigate and punish corruption as well as retrieve billions of stolen funds, is encouraging massive corruption. Even if it is true that some unscrupulous elements may be exploiting loop holes in Buhari’s economic policies, particularly rigid foreign exchange controls and import restrictions, to indulge in sharp practices, Ezekwesili must agree that graft is no more a cardinal and directive principle of state policy as it had become in the recent past. As a result of his famous ‘body language’, the fear of PMB has become the beginning of wisdom for public officeholders.

    True, the administration in which Ezekwesili served without blemish as Minister and a key member of its Economic Management Team, established institutions like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) to fight corruption, but Nigerians are well aware of a certain African leader (name withheld) who was elevated right from prison to his country’s apex political position with his business entirely in ruins. Yet, he left office at the end of his tenure with an expansive hilltop mansion in his home state, an extensive private presidential library built in controversial circumstances and numerous thriving business ventures. It reminds me of ‘Chichidodo’, the bird in one of Ayi Kwei Armah’s novels who hates faeces but feeds on maggots!

    Mrs Ezekwesili speaks glowingly of single digit inflation status and impressive growth rates achieved by previous administrations but are now being eroded by Buhari’s policies. But what was the impact of these statistical data on the level of poverty, inequality, unemployment, infrastructure development, industrialization or power supply? Haven’t all of these worsened over the last 16 years? Should the present administration continue with tried and failed policies of the past and yet expect a different outcome of promised change?

    Yes, the administration in which Mrs Ezekwesili served cannot be wholly held responsible for the ‘fantastically’ massive corruption that led to the industrial scale squandering of humongous oil revenues earned over the last six years. Today, the country lies prostrate because oil prices are cascading and we did not prepare for the rainy day. But then, Obasanjo’s signal failing was that he lacked the perspicacity and discernment to ensure that he was succeeded in office by a competent and fit leadership, capable of sustaining and improving on his legacy.

    It is true that the nationalistic and state-centric economic policies pursued by the Buhari/Idiagbon military administration in 1984 only worsened the crisis it inherited from the preceding Shagari administration.  Buhari stubbornly refused to accede to the International Financial Institution’s conditionalities of massive devaluation of the Naira, across the board privatisation, liberalisation of trade, removal of subsidies and deregulation of prices and interest rates. The ensuing stalemate and deepening economic crisis as well as authoritarian methods of the regime facilitated the ascendancy to power of Babangida.

    Interestingly, it is the type of IMF/World Bank-dictated neo liberal and extremist free market policies including currency devaluation that the Babangida regime succumbed to that Mrs Ezekwesili is vigorously urging PMB to adopt now. But what were the implications for the economy? Listen to the late Pa Alfred Rewane in a public letter he published on 2nd May, 1992: “In the evening of Friday, 26 September, 1986, I was at home with some friends when the Federal Military Government announced its decision to introduce the Structural Adjustment Programme and the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM)…By implication, it was claimed that Nigerians had opted for a deregulated economy including a floating exchange rate regime, subject only to what was described as market forces. As my friends and I discussed the implications of the government’s announcement, I expressed the view that the devaluation of the Naira was a recipe for disaster and that within five years, the Naira would be worth less than 20 per cent of its then existing value, leading to the possible collapse of the Nigerian economy.”

    And Pa Rewane’s reason? His words: “I reminded them of a standard economic argument that devaluation of the national currency is best contemplated where the nation’s economy depends largely on the export of manufactured products for its foreign exchange earnings, and where devaluation is considered appropriate to ensure the competitiveness of its manufacturers.”

    Pa Rewane was right. President Babangida’s eminent academic economic advisers were wrong and we have been in a permanent state of unending and unfruitful structural adjustment and reforms for the last three decades. The country remains as underdeveloped and impoverished as ever relative to her rich resource endowment. Faced with non-functional domestic refineries, the imperative of importing refined petroleum, the crash in oil prices and continuous deterioration of the value of the Naira, the APC administration has been forced to deregulate the downstream sector of the oil sector with the pump price of fuel rising to N145.00 per litre from N86.50 per litre.

    This will no doubt have serious implications for mass poverty at least in the short to medium term. It thus becomes more imperative that the social protection nets for the poor provided for in the 2016 budget be effectively and efficiently implemented. Asking now why a country that has reaped gargantuan revenues from crude oil over decades has negligible domestic refining capacity can only be academic. The question is: what is the way forward towards the development and transformation of Nigeria? Surely, it cannot be that of rigid state controls and intervention in the economy as Ezekwesili rightly argues. But it can also not be the path of doctrinaire neoliberalism that throws open the Nigerian economy to the voracious sharks of the so-called free market. I think the Buhari administration’s economic management team is trying to find a pragmatic middle way that attracts the support of the international economic and investing community without jeopardising our national interest. They deserve our support.

     

    Buhari, Biafra and Niger Delta ‘avengers

    This column staunchly supports President Muhammadu Buhari’s strong and firm stand against the agitators for the breakup of the country particularly the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB). As I have said before, Buhari has a legal mandate to lead Nigeria for four years in the first instance. He does not have a mandate to preside over the breakup of the country. PMB and Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo have also asserted in clear terms the determination of the Federal Government to protect oil pipelines and facilities in the Niger Delta, which have come under crippling attacks in recent times by a group that calls itself Niger Delta Avengers.

    The very essence of the state is its legitimate monopoly of the instruments and mechanisms of coercion within its sphere of jurisdiction. A state that shares this attribute with any other group is fast becoming a failed entity. However, should Buhari have renewed his warning against pro-Biafra agitators during a visit to his home state, Katsina? I don’t think so. It was tactless, insensitive and politically unwise. By now the President should have visited the South-East or met critical stakeholders and opinion leaders from the region to dialogue and win their confidence. There is no indication that the mainstream of the Igbo leadership is in support of this Biafra nonsense. Buhari should not alienate them.

    In the same vein, PMB should personally and forcefully speak up against the atrocities of herdsmen across the country the way he has done on Biafra. This is because the herdsmen are, rightly or wrongly, perceived to be Fulani like Buhari himself. PMB must not allow himself to be seen in the mould of a Fulani rather than a pan Nigerian President.

  • Cameron in fantasy land

    Since he became Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron has cultivated the habit of ruffling feathers, especially those of Nigerians and, sometimes, some of his own people, and to no particular end. This week, standing slightly bowed before Queen Elizabeth at Buckingham Palace, he blurted out a phrase that has since so animated Nigerians back home, in the offices, on the road and everywhere else that it could well have helped them absorb the shock of a fuel price increase that was announced shortly after. On the eve of a multi-national anti-corruption summit in London, the Prime Minister was filmed telling the monarch that Nigeria and Afghanistan were among “fantastically corrupt” countries attending the meeting. President Muhammadu Buhari was billed to deliver a keynote address on Thursday entitled: Why we must tackle corruption together.

    It may never be known why Mr Cameron said what he said about Nigeria and Afghanistan, nor what he hoped to achieve by saying it. Was he hinting in a Cameronic way at the indiscretion of allowing representatives of such dirty countries into clean Britain? Or was he trying to warn as many Brits as would attend the summit to beware some strange characters in their midst, a way of mobilising them to come with something like a 14-foot-long spoon when refreshment was served? Mr Cameron’s agenda was not clear.

    In Nigeria, however, the effect was electric. Suddenly, the phrase “fantastically corrupt” popped up in almost any conceivable or inconceivable stretch of utterance. Trust us; we sure got something good out of Mr Cameron’s latest offering. The laughter must have helped to calm things down momentarily.

    A few years ago, when our usually distracted federal lawmakers chalked up enough willpower to pass a definitive law against gay practices, prescribing 14 years for anyone convicted of same-sex indulgences, the British Prime Minister responded with such an imperial threat that it was clear at least in his mind who between him and then President Goodluck Jonathan was king and who subject. Britain, Mr Cameron declared, would withdraw aid from Nigeria and any other country where people of gay persuasions are denied their sexual preferences, whether to engage in sex at will or marry or live together.

    Nigerians fought right back, calling the Prime Minister’s bluff and essentially asking if he imagined their country was still a colonial corner of Britain. Thankfully, the lawmakers and Dr Jonathan himself held their ground.

    In fact, it would seem as though imagination or fantasy were a crucial part of Mr Cameron. Back in his own country, he has called a Muslim cleric a supporter of ISIS, the terrorist group wreaking havoc in Syria and Iraq and indeed Europe and elsewhere. He later apologised after the man threatened to sue. It is possible that Mr Cameron spoke fantastically in a sense that would suggest that he imagined or fantasized more than he actually knew of his subject of attack.

    Minds, generally, are notoriously difficult to read, let alone Mr Cameron’s. It would have been quite satisfying to know how his works considering some of the unflattering revelations touching on the Cameron family’s sense of propriety if not outright corruption. The Prime Minister’s father Ian, a renowned stockbroker, was named in the Panama Papers, a dizzying tome of leaked offshore tax-free accounts which earned Mr Cameron himself a notable protest if not call for his outright resignation by the outraged British public. The Prime Minister fumed and fussed in defence of his daddy before conceding apologetically that he ought not have handled the matter the way he did. If there was such legendary streak of integrity running over in his family, why did his father not look hard enough for a place in Britain to stash his wealth? Why Panama?

    If Mr Cameron intended to impress the queen with the notion that Britain has been as clean as a whistle since he became Prime Minister six years ago, it is difficult to determine what effect his effort had on the monarch. Right in majestic Britain, Mr Cameron has been perceived by some as showy, vain and unreliable. It has been pointed out that once in a few hours Mr Cameron changed his clothes four times. His rivals have labeled him a chameleon.

    They were probably harsh, perhaps seeking only to knock it into every British skull that Mr Prime Minister was up to no good. That is incorrect because Mr Cameron’s schoolmates have admitted that he was exemplary, a first-class material. He may well have been but one teacher also once dismissed him as “very confused…his speech filled with contradictions,” perhaps hazy with misunderstanding.

    That may not the true picture of the man who has presided over the affairs of Great Britain for six years but it could provide a few insights into his fantastic core.

    Yet, did Mr Cameron really miss the mark on Nigeria’s corruption profile? Not quite. I think he only disappointed his fellow leaders to whom such comments must be kept private, never voiced in public. Mr Cameron himself did not intend his comments for the public, a point that President Muhammadu Buhari made in his defence, telling CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that somehow people like her got to know about it.

    In any event, the PM said what he said and we all have heard what we heard. Are Nigerians fantastically corrupt? Some, in fact, a few, are. Majority are quite clean.

    The question is: Why do leaders like Prime Minister Cameron look the other way while the crooked lay their loot in their strongest vaults?

    President Buhari did well to say he was not interested in Mr Cameron’s apology; only to hand back what Nigerian crooks took to Britain and other havens. Mr Cameron has a fantastic opportunity to redeem himself and return to the real world.