Category: Saturday

  • Fixing the Eagles in South Africa

    We are on the march again for football glory. Pundits are tipping the Super Eagles to upset the chart even though they were absent at the 2010 edition – no thanks to the humbling pie handed the Nigerians by a more adventurous Guinean side.

    There is the strong feeling that Nigerians perform better when the odds are against them. The purists hinge their permutations on our players’ exploits in their European clubs. They can’t be far from the truth since these are the indices that fans rely on in predicting the eventual winners of big competitions, such as the Africa Cup of Nations.

    But have the Eagles changed from their old ways of not giving their best during the country’s matches? It is hard to place a bet that these Eagles could be different. We need to expose those things that we all cannot see that haunt the players during competitions. Whereas the fans worry about our chances before big games, the players cannot be disturbed. It is just a game and it is this indifference they carry onto the pitch to record all the poor results we have seen.

    The mentality of the players has not changed. They love the good life of wine and woman. They love the bottle, partying all the time like movie stars. If they don’t do it, it affects their performance.

    Since France 1998, the Eagles have been bad testimonial to professional football. They behave as if they are demi-gods who must party to ease tension. They constitute themselves into cabals and dictate what they want. Things got so bad that the players picked their jerseys and those who should coach them. Of course, they decide what they should earn and insist on staying in the best hotels.

     Their wishes were always fulfilled, yet they circumvented all processes meant to ensure that they were not distracted. These boys are too rich. They flaunt their wealth by paying for rooms in the hotels where they stay. Their friends, most of who are pimps, litter the team’s camps. They pretend to be discussing serious matters with the players, but all they do is set the clandestine moves that distract them during competitions.

    Things hit to the crescendo in 2004 when three players were expelled from the camp for frolicking and breaking camp rules. In 2008, some players had the temerity to ask Berti Vogts for permission to party in Ghana. The German, we are told, granted them. The Eagles fell apart and earned the sobriquet Super Chicken.

     Need I repeat what happened at the South Africa 2010 World Cup? What many consider as the difference are the new faces but they can’t be better than those dropped. Perhaps these new faces will create the competitive edge to get the coaches to actualise their dreams. It is fair to say that they appear disciplined in the camp but that has always been the trend with every new manager.

     The Super Eagles are an intriguing group to superintend in big competitions. They bond needlessly in fighting for their entitlements, irrespective of how they fare in matches. They break into groups when the games begin. This has been the biggest problem with the Eagles in competitions. Sadly, some of the coaches align with the dropped players to rock the camp.

    Indeed, some disgruntled sports administrators take side with the players to worsen the situation, all in a bid to ensure that the NFF board fails. Personal vendetta rules the camp with National Sports Commission (NSC) chieftains fuelling bitterness among NFF men.

     It is clear that the Eagles’ biggest opponents during tournament are not the participating countries but themselves. Their conduct, commitment, determination and concentration during competitions leave much to be desired. We need to ask them if they truly want to represent us. This idea of reporting to camp to cause pain by not putting in their best during matches must stop. Nigeria will not cease to be a sovereign nation if we parade young boys who will fight for glory than the reluctant bunch that the Eagles have been. Those who are not ready to report in camp by midnight of January 4 should be dropped. Keshi should paraded boys who will be focused on lifting Nigeria’s image in global football competitions, not nursing fathers or journeymen transiting with the Eagles, but with finalised plans for cruises to choice areas, such as the Bahamas.

    Our players see camping periods as an imprisonment. The job must be done quickly for them to proceed on holidays. The nation may

    Eagles have been. Those who are not ready to report in camp by midnight of January 4 should be dropped. Keshi should paraded boys who will be focused on lifting Nigeria’s image in global football competitions, not nursing fathers or journeymen transiting with the Eagles, but with finalised plans for cruises to choice areas, such as the Bahamas.

    Our players see camping periods as an imprisonment. The job must be done quickly for them to proceed on holidays. The nation may mourn their unceremonious exit from big competitions, yet their deals in Europe are secured.

    Our players should be prepared to sacrifice their holidays to make Nigerians happy. After all, 90 per cent of them earned their stardom by playing for this country. Rather than destroy this platform, they should leave it where they found it.

    Keshi must drop all the big-headed players for determined ones who are hungry for glory. We are tired of watching immobile boys who lack the zest to perform.

    We have changed several coaches, the NFF men and other backroom coaching staff, yet we are still rebuilding. Maybe, this competition would provide the mirror to critically look at those we field in matches and ask if it isn’t about time we dropped them, no matter what they do with their European clubs.

    Our players’ classy European shows that we appreciate to call for their inclusion in the Eagles should be given a rethink. They appear to have reached their apogee and cannot give better than what we have seen in the past.

    The striking difference now, unlike in 2010, is that there is no Presidential Task Force (PTF) struggling to perform Nigeria Football Federation (NFF’s) duties. This needless struggle for supremacy was chiefly responsible for the country’s shambolic outing at the South Africa 2010 World Cup tournament.

    One only hopes that President Goodluck Jonathan can stop the government delegation from accompanying the Eagles to South Africa, like he did with the Olympians and Paralympians. These men and women add to the problems rather than resolve them. They invade the dressing rooms and disturb the coaches from telling the boys the mistakes made and how to correct them. They become emergency coaches. They are the ones who fan embers of bitterness among the players and coaches in a bid to get at their perceived enemies in NFF.

    The perpetual rebuilding of the squad since 1998 must be concluded; otherwise, people would be forced to ask: how long will it take to complete this structure called Super Eagles.

    However, it is soul-lifting to hear Sports Minister Bolaji Abdullahi admit that the Eagles are not under any pressure to win the Africa Cup of Nations. Abduallahi doesn’t expect the Eagles to lie down and be the group’s whipping team. He expects them to compete favourably to make Nigerians see the future in the squad that is being rejuvenated.

    Abdullahi’s proclamation is the biggest fillip the Eagles need to surprise the continent. It has never been so good. With ministerial interference out of the team’s workings, the players and, indeed, the coaches would have themselves to blame if we don’t play to our potentials.

  • Security, governments and sovereign reputations

    The breaking news on the internet last Thursday about Nigeria was that 30 gunmen had entered a fortified building in Katsina in Northern Nigeria and kidnapped a French engineer and according to the State Police Commissioner burnt the nearest Police station to prevent being chased by the Police. At home in Nigeria in the news media , the hot news was the details of the helicopter crash that killed the former governor of Kaduna State Patrick Yakowa and the former National Security Adviser retired General Owoeye Azazi over the last weekend on their way back from a funeral they had attended at the home state of the nation’s President Goodluck Jonathan.

    Unfortunately such bad news was not peculiar to Nigeria and that really is the focus of our discussions today . We shall look at the way security issues are shaping the sovereign reputations of nations globally . Especially in a world in which information available from the internet have reshaped the way and manner that nations and governments have had to come to terms with security lapses of all shapes and sizes in a bid to protect their citizenry from the assault of well armed killers with inhuman and bizarre motives .

    In the US, President Barak Obama wiped off a tear as he addressed Americans on the news of the killing of 20 school children aged between 5 and 10 by a man aged 20 in an elementary school. Later in the week the US president ordered his Vice President Joe Biden to look into ways to stop such senseless and random killings with guns which were becoming rampant in the US and make recommendations within weeks .Also in the same week the report of the Inquiry ordered by the US government on the killing of the American Ambassador in Benghazi this year came out blaming lax security for the disaster as security contractors were a poor match for the killers who were well armed and well trained.

    These events and incidents in both the USA and Nigeria have political implications locally and globally for the image of the two nations in the comity of nations or the international community . We shall analyse them in that context.

    We shall also look at an event that happened during the week that will shape future perceptions of leaders with regard to how they have used their power and responsibility to make or mar the sovereign reputation of their nation or part of the world . The event happened in Russia where President Vladmir Putin announced that he supports Russian legislators making laws stopping the adoption of Russian children by Americans but also used the occasion to explain why he cannot be branded a dictator or be said to be running an authoritarianism in Russia .

    Starting with Nigeria again the two tragic and painful incidents are unfortunately in tune with Nigeria’s corporate or sovereign reputation in terms of terrorism , kidnapping and aviation disasters. The list of air crashes in Nigeria is legendary and the fear of air travel both for local and foreign destinations is not only mortal but is sickeningly morbid amongst Nigerians especially those whose businesses and jobs require travelling over the length and breadth of our nation.

    In the case of the kidnapping in Katsina the news report had it that Boko Haram has not claimed responsibility and that Katsina has relatively been spared the horror of such kidnappings till now . But Kaduna State , whose leader and governor died in the helicopter crash in Bayelsa has had a running battle with Boko Haram over weekly Church bombings one of which took place recently in a church in a military barracks . Given the ease with which knowledge and information filter through virally on the internet , the Nigerian nation ‘s sovereign reputation is that of a nation where people cannot go to church for fear of being bombed . That however is not the situation on the ground as millions go to church without security fears in Lagos, the South West and the East without fear of being bombed or kidnapped.

    Indeed the horror of the death of Kaduna state governor is that the Christians of Kaduna state have lost their Christian Governor , a rarity that occurred when the Vice President Mohammed Sambo was chosen as President Jonathan Goodluck’s running mate in the 2011 elections and the former’s deputy governor was sworn in as Governor of Kaduna state . It was rumored that Boko Haram’s fierce church bomb attacks on Kaduna were because of an incumbent Christian governor in a state that Boko Haram feels should be having Sharia Law.

    Now the tragedy in Bayelsa has favored Boko Haram’s wish , as a Muslim governor in the person of Patrick Yakowa’s former deputy governor has been sworn in as Governor of Kaduna state . Now it remains to be seen whether the coming of a Muslim Governor in Kaduna state will stem the fury of church bombing by Boko Haram in Kaduna state , or exacerbate it for one to draw appropriate political conclusions , with the concomitant security and sovereign reputation implications for not only Kaduna , State but Nigeria as a whole .

    In the US where a CNN report on Wednesday noted that 34 Americans are being killed by guns daily the sovereign reputation of that nation is that of a dangerous place to live in and that could be difficult to admit or defend for any citizen or government of the US . But in Connecticut where children of tender age were killed just like that one , or any citizen of the world , should think twice before making the US a destination at least in an ideal matter of choice situation What moved me most on the tragedy was the statement credited to the state governor that –Evil visited this community today .

    I think that should sum up the correct civilized community reaction to the gruesome murders as the name of the terrorist should just be substituted with the word Evil and his real name obliterated from human memory forever thus denying him the ignominious and mad recognition that drive such devil incarnate to their heinous crimes . For now the US must amend its gun possession laws in way that does not make individual self protection rights infinitely mightier than the security of the larger society.

    That is what common sense dictates , given the wasteful and high human costs of sustaining the present legal dispensation . Joe Biden, already at the behest of the US president , should drive the US legislature in that direction urgently to let the world know that Americans have respect for human lives – the opposite of which is the US sovereign reputation at present, globally.

    In Russia’s case Vladmir Putin was getting even with the US on the adoption laws because the US had not allowed the Russians to investigate allegations that Americans who adopted Russian kids had not treated them well .But that is typical diplomatic brick bats between old enemies and sometimes friend s. What interests me is that in the same report the Russian president objected to being called a dictator or that his regime is authoritarian and his excuse for this was that he did not tamper with the Russian constitution which he felt should have been easier . He even went on to say that he became Prime Minister after two presidential terms . Which is quite interesting for someone who claims to be a democrat . The essence of term or tenure presidency in a transparent democracy is to avert a monopoly of power by any individual and it is that principle that Vladmir Putin has sidetracked and manipulated to now hold on to power in seeming perpetuity in Russia.

    For him to say that he could have changed the constitution shows really that he is not at heart a true democrat but just another dictator bending the rules to remain in power as a monarch born to rule as it were or another dictator just like the ones just being ousted by the Arabs in the Middle East.

    Really it is a matter of time before the Russian masses, seeing the Arabs and their street demonstrations on satellite TV and the internet, get wise to Putin’s crude machinations to stay in power by all means , while making a mockery of democracy and transparency in Russia.

  • We’ve lost a crucial war

    We’ve lost a crucial war

    For five whole days last week, a battle was afoot in Ogwashi-Uku, Delta State, as it still is in Ibadan, Oyo State and who knows where else in the country. It is a struggle against crime, against abomination and indecency.

    Until Friday, the security community was trying to locate and rescue an octogenarian queen in Ogwashi-Uku kingdom, Prof Kamene Okonjo, from kidnappers. Two policemen were detained for not being on duty at the palace when the queen was abducted. Questions were also asked as to why the traditional palace guards were either not around when the kidnappers came or, if they were, why they failed to protect the queen. On Friday, we learnt that 63 suspects had been arrested over the incident. This was followed the same day by reports that the queen and professor of sociology had been freed. Her release coming five days after her abduction, brought a huge relief to the Ogwashi monarchy. Seeing Prof Kamene again put the king, Prof Chukwuka Okonjo and their children, among who is Finance Minister Prof Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, out of their torment. It also eased tension, somewhat, on the entire state, which is fast notching up a notoriety for kidnap, and whose governor Dr Emmanuel Uduaghan did his utmost to assure agitated Deltans and Nigerians that the woman would be found. Her assailants were to review downwards a billion dollar ransom placed on her to N200m.

    In Oyo State, unfortunately, the wife of a former governor of Western Region Brig Gen Oluwole Rotimi, kidnapped also in the week, was still not found as this column took shape on Friday. As in Delta, security personnel also deployed to battle, and with a bit luck, she too will be found unharmed.

    Still, the worrying fact remains that we have lost a crucial war. The police, detectives and military may win the battle of freeing abducted grandmothers from their kidnappers, aided in some cases by a huge pile of cash payout, but it is clear that the country has since lost the moral war, one that perpetually fights to keep its values intact.

    Every society, no matter how remote, has in-built mechanisms and sanctions to keep itself sane. Age, for instance, is valued in traditional societies. Hard work is a thousand times better than cheap fame or fortune. A title is earned, not bought. Africa’s literary pride Prof Chinua Achebe captured this eminently in his Things Fall Apart. Okonkwo amounted to something because by dint of hard work he defied his ineffectual background to make himself heard. The hero of TFA is a self-made man, not one who stole to become a chief or a layabout who slipped into the fortunes of his father. In Okonkwo’s case, his father left him nothing except perhaps debts and an unflattering lifestyle of palmwine drinking and daylong melodies.

    In the sane societies with which Nigeria was once richly blessed across its landscape, crime was decisively punished. In some places, a thief was made to wear a garb and crown of shame while dancing round the community in the hope that he will be mortified. A murderer paid dearly for his crime; in some cases, he was even banished. While hard work was encouraged, becoming wealthy was not a do-or-die. The end did not justify the means.

    Not anymore. Our moral fabric has since been ripped to shreds and tossed out the window. Hard work has taken the back seat. Leadership grandstanding has taken over, as have trickery, subterfuge, thievery in high places, opulence, contract inflation and what have you. Things we once cherished no longer count. They do not make sense anymore.

    When this new, ugly order crept in us is hard for me to determine. But I know that things are no longer the way they used to be. As the economy continues to slump and the naira weakens and more jobless youths roam the street, some bizarre opulence flaunts itself still. More SUVs or Jeeps, as we prefer, cruise our pothole-ridden roads. Mansions continue to spring up in swanky neighbourhoods, leaving lesser mortals in subdued protest. It is news if in a day or week the dailies do not lead with high profile fraud or something similar.

    I believe that is why the youths seem to have lost patience with everything. Many now risk all to own their own Jeeps and their own mansions. Many take to violent crime such as piracy and kidnapping, their sights set on the millions that will accrue after each operation. They are emboldened, as one arrested pirate inferred last week, by their highly placed sponsors.

    Some are no longer interested in merely watching their peers, even subordinates, cruise around in sleek cars simply because those rich dudes are leaders. The poor are taking their fate in their own hands by simply joining the bandwagon of vice, of kidnapping, piracy, contract fraud, robbery and the like no matter the cost.

    That is why kidnappers no longer care if their target is old enough to be their grandmothers. Or perhaps, that is why they care. The older and more connected to cash, the better. That was why they swooped on 82-year-old Prof Kamene, never minding her grey hair or weak frame. That was why they seized the equally aged wife of Gen Rotimi and took her away. That was also why gunmen shot and killed a soldier in Delta and abducted a Lebanese construction worker.

    Nothing matters anymore. All care is gone. Sanctity is lost. So is integrity.

    It is not hard to explain. We have since lost the most crucial war of defeating forces and tendencies that snatch our sanity. We are now grappling with problems of different kinds.

  • Re: Private jets as vehicles for the gospel

    I believe there is no gift that should be considered too big for a true man of God, all things considered. Many of the big churches today started very small, with their pastors having neither bicycles nor shoes to put on as they toiled day and night for the church to become what it should be spiritually and materially.

    I think it was in a situation like this that Paul sought to know why it should be considered too much for him to reap members’ material benefits after he had sown spiritual fruits in them. We have often seen some barren members of these churches giving birth to many children. The lame walk. The dumb speak. Small scale business men and women become billionaires and chronic diseases disappear all because of pastors’ prayers and cries to God about their members.

    If we can view the entire church setting and its activities holistically, what kind of material gifts in appreciation of pastors can be compared with all these?

    Emmanuel Egwu, Enugu

    •The growing army of jet pastors in Nigeria further confirms and re-affirms the veracity of Karl Max’s locus classicus, which states that religion is the opium of the masses. Just as I urge Nigerians not to forget Majek Fashek who told us in one of his lyrics that religion is politics.

    Why will they not buy jets while their congregation is sinking in the ocean of poverty and despicable peasantry. We need men like John Wesley to challenge this height of clear spiritual criminality.

    Godfrey Ehimare.

    •If you people have nothing to say, keep quiet. The world could have been a better place to live in. I pity you, Vincent. To judge God’s servant for good or bad is suicidal. Others, be warned.

    Uduak Israel, Owerri.

    •My dear brother, your piece on private jets as vehicles for the gospel was a masterpiece. Our present day men of God are too interested in wealth. Some of them are enjoying it here because they fear that they may not make heaven! They have disappointed God and mankind. I even believe there is Boko Haram in the church now. Leave them joo.

    Benson, Umuahia.

    •Your write-up on private jets is as good as my vision. It may sound like one of those stories but I tell you of the truth that it was God-inspired. God is raising a new generation of people who, like Elijah, would tell it as it is. This is my burden and I wish you are the chosen one to share the mind of God at this hour.

    Seerci Yehu Edobumn

    •Thank you very much for your peice on private jets. Keep it up, my brother.

    080355050..

    •Hmmm, beautiful write-up. But don’t forget that Jesus rode on a colt nobody had used before. These men of God did not beg to own private jets. Neither did they steal to acquire them. And mind you, they don’t own those jets for pleasure. Go and read your Bible well; there is nothing good that God witholds from the righteous

    080364806..

    •If these business moguls masquerading as men of God don’t engage in mindless acquisition of material wealth, how can we know that this wicked world is gradually fizzling out of existence? Have you forgotten that the Bible said that when the world would be coming to an end, men and women would be lovers of themselves rather than lovers of God?

    Any pastor who ignores the poverty that is sending thousands of Nigerians into their early graves and resorted to buying private jets, which Jesus would not have done, must be a rogue. His relationship with Christ is highly suspect.

    The Bible talks about discerning the spirits of those that come to us with the name of the Lord, because many people are ignorant of what the Bible says: many self-seeking capitalists passing off as ministers of the gospel are trading on their spiritual and psychological vulnerability, using the name of God.

    Ifeanyi O. Ifeanyichukwu, Abuja.

  • Leaders, power  and legacies

    As  mortality beckons the great Nelson Mandela I recall the Chinese saying  that says-count no man lucky until his death. With Mandela, at this stage of his life, and even well before now, one can easily say he has been an extremely lucky man and he has really earned that luck, right before our eyes  Today we discuss Mandela’s luck, an enduring one at that and compare it with those of other world  leaders who are well, alive and very powerful but who must tremble at the prospect of the saying that no man can truly be said to be lucky until his death.

    We  look at events in Ghana where the incumbent president just won the presidential elections with just over 50%  of the votes cast  and the opposition is contesting the results  and has gone to court.  We  examine the situation in Egypt  where  the president has kowtowed to protests on his seizing the powers of the courts,  only to proceed on a referendum that will give him the powers he had seized and returned under duress – by the back door.

    Of course the Egyptian people are still on the streets crying foul and saying they did not uproot one  dictator  planted by the army for years only for him  to be replaced by another one they just elected through the ballot box. Which  again puts  nagging doubt  on the desirability or otherwise of democracy in some nations and circumstances globally. We  end up again  with S Africa   where a unique transition of leadership is  taking place  again  by the ballot box. In  all these  instances we have at the back of our mind the Chinese saying – count no man lucky until his death.

    Let us go back to Mandela and his fight with mortality  to which he must succumb as he is mortal. But Nelson Mandela,  the world’s most famous prisoner is already destined for immortality in the way he fought for the liberation of his nation from the shackles of apartheid.

    He  was honored with the Nobel Prize for peace with his compatriot and president of S Africa  de  Klerk with whom he negotiated the exit of apartheid and the enthronement of democracy in what has become the Rainbow nation today. But it is in the way that he shunned power  and served his nation for only one term of five years  during which he forgave his jailors  through The Truth and Reconciliation Committee  headed  by another Nobel Laureate Desmond Tutu,  that Mandela secured his immortality  as a reference point on selfless leadership,  globally and eternally.

    At  that  time Mandela would have been hailed as the Messiah if he  had wanted to be a life president of S Africa. After him S Africa has had what I will  call two and half presidents namely Thabo Mbeki who served for almost two terms and Kwagima Motlanthe the present Vice  President who held fort briefly  after Mbeki was defeated in a leadership contest of the ruling ANC   by President Jacob Zuma who had been sacked by Mbeki   as  Vice President  for corruption.

     Now  this week the ANC  is having its national conference at which it will elect its leader who automatically becomes president of S Africa as  the ANC is assured of 60%  of the votes cast in any election in S Africa. This time however both the President and Vice President of S  Africa   are vying for the leadership  of the ANC  although Zuma is favored to defeat his Vice. One  thing that is certain is that S. Africans are disenchanted  with the performance of Zuma as President. Mbeki this week said that S Africa is drifting as a nation and something needs to be done urgently. The  Marikana Mine shooting of 34 miners by the Police recently is a great dent on the leadership credentials of the ANC  under Jacob Zuma.

    The  horrible fact that the survivors  of the Marikana shooting were first charged to  court  under an apartheid law still in the statute books before they were left off, showed that apartheid has not died a natural death when ANC  took power democratically  and till  the Marikana   incident. Also,   Zuma’s traditional ruler life style of four wives and 21  children and a renovation of his country home with $24 m  when miners were asking for  pittance as wage increase  showed that Zuma has become power drunk  as the leader  of a popular party in power in S/Africa  namely the ANC. Worse still Zuma’s defence of his insensitive profligacy that he took mortgage on the renovation of his country home is like adding insult to injury. Zuma’s actions  bear out vividly a good example of the dictatorship  of the majority  in any nation especially S Africa at this point in time.

    If  care is not taken,  however,  Egypt  under its President Mohammed Morsi is headed in the same direction as the ANC in S/Africa. This  is because the Muslim Brotherhood is well organized in Egypt and has proved its planning and organizational capabilities in the way it has survived several dictatorships in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood survived under Gamal Abdel Nasser  and its member killed the late Anwar  Sadat and survived the government clamp down that followed the assassination.

    Now the Muslim Brotherhood has its own  member as president from a free and fair democratic election in Egypt  and who can really blame it for having things its way  especially as democracy is intrinsically a game of numbers  and it has the majority as well as organizational skills that the other opposition parties lack. This  means that secular Egyptians and Christians are in for a tough time in Egypt’s new democracy under the Muslim Brotherhood and that really is the unfortunate truth.

    In  Ghana  too the election results  have divided the nation into two equal parts yet one can claim victory as there  is no room for a run off election. The  incumbent president who took over on the death of his boss has now been legitimately  elected. The circumstances seem similar  to that of Nigeria  as well as  the succession. Unlike  Nigeria Ghanaian leaders have not gone to court in the last two elections in that nation. Now the losers have gone to court alleging irregularities, which  is the Nigerian way.

    But  then a result that involves a victory of just over 50%  can be painful for the losers because of its closeness. A  way out would have been some form of power sharing or proportionate  representation. That however will depend on the constitution which mostly as a document is blind until situations such as this arise   and legal gymnastics take over . I  bet Nigerian lawyers are taking the next  flights to Accra to participate in what they have perfected at  the expense of our fledgling  democracy, which is post election litigations. I really wish Ghanaian politicians the best of luck especially as oil too is flowing in Ghana now.  Anyway I fervently   hope Ghana and Ghanaians do not swallow and follow the Nigerian example hook, line and sinker on elections and litigations.

  • Keshi: This is your life

    Keshi: This is your life

    How time flies. It’s almost looking like yesterday, yet 12 years have rolled by. He had been invited to partner Dutchman Johannes Bonfrere to guide the Super Eagles to lift the 2000 Africa Cup of Nations, which Nigeria and Ghana co-hosted. In fact, the National Stadium main bowl in Lagos broke into a frenzy when Stephen Keshi emerged from the tunnel with his traditional salute.

    This time, he wasn’t holding the ball nor was he punching the air and pulling his tug to signify his readiness for the impending game. He had deliberately delayed his appearance to test his popularity. Where I sat, I told my friends that the Keshi/Bonfrere combo was another anarchy that would further disintegrate the Eagles and pave the way for the Dutchman’s exit. They dismissed my view. I kept quiet since the future was just around the corner. Here is it today. How prophetic I was.

    For most Nigerians and, indeed, watchers of the beautiful game, the Bonfrere/ Keshi’ combo was the dream technical crew. That combination was all that the Eagles needed to lift the Africa Cup of Nations. But alas, it never happened. Cameroon’s Indomitable Lions nicked in a nail-biting final game that ended in penalties.

    Please, don’t remind me of Victor Ikpeba’s kick and the guilt he felt, putting his hands on his head. If he had worn a straight face or jubilated a little, perhaps, the referee would have had a second thought and awarded us the goal. It would have changed the trend of the game. But all these are in the past since Nigeria settled for the silver. Cameroon went home with the trophy. But dear reader, this is not the reason for this article.

    Things later turned awry between Bonfrere and Keshi. This combination was a time-bomb that was bound to blow the weaker person away, but our narrow minded officials lacked the foresight to envisage it. They always play to the gallery. For the Nigerian administrator, the quick fix therapy is the best for our problems since it leaves the cancer unhealed for “chop- chop” in the future.

    Bonfrere knew that with Keshi, he stood no chance with the players. The Dutch wanted to be the Sherriff. In doing so, the Big Boss had to be swept aside. Keshi lost the plot to remain in the Eagles. Our gullible officials demoted the Big Boss to the Flying Eagles with a big nomenclature of technical adviser.

    Keshi wasn’t fooled by the title. He took the job. Yet, he knew he belonged to the Super Eagles, having been drawn away from California to change the team’s fortunes.

    Let me not bore you with details. Bonfrere lost the Eagles job and Shaiubu Amodu wiped shame from the Big Boss’ face by making him the deputy. Together they salvaged Nigeria’s pride by qualifying the country for the 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup. The troika (Amodu, Keshi and Joe Erico) didn’t attend the competition, having being sacked in controversial circumstances. I digress!

    Back to the discussion. At that time, the Eagles were training in Ota, this time with Keshi as flying Eagles technical adviser. Newshounds stormed Ota to get juicy stories. It was quite a pitiable sight watching Keshi from the fence follow the Eagles’ sessions like journalists. The players knew that the former captain was around. They couldn’t greet him like they would have wished. But it was Keshi who felt the pain most. This writer had the privilege to ride with the Big Boss back to Lagos. He wished the team well but he nursed a grudge.

    As the journey continued, I told him he would coach the Eagles. He just had to manage teams outside Nigeria for him to be better appreciated. I reminded him about the story of his sojourn at Stella FC of Abidjan and how that suspension changed his life and, indeed, his career. Every disappointment is a blessing, this writer reminded the Big Boss.

    Shocked, Keshi turned, (he sat in front) and said: “Oh boy, na big talk be that o! I don dey get offers. But I believe say na Eagles go better pass. As I dey talk with you, Togo wan make I come. I go try there.

    As Keshi dropped me where I parked my car, the big scoop as I got to the office was: Keshi gets Togo’s job.

    My colleagues sneered at the story describ ing it as another public relations stunt. They said so in whispers, but I couldn’t be bothered. Didn’t Keshi call the Togolese president to accept the job? Months later, the story was carried by the international media and my colleagues looked at me in awe.

    I lost touch with Keshi because he left immediately to take the Togolese job. Need I tell the story? Nor do I need to reel out what happened to Keshi in Mali?

    I have gone through the memory lane to situate my relationship with Keshi. Hence, one wants to plead with him that the future that I foretold is here. As I said then, his problem won’t be the absence of quality players but how to blend them. He told me then that he would be fair in his selection and that only the best would make his list. I ask: Keshi, do you still hold this principle to heart like you did in 2001?

    Again, I asked Keshi then if he had the guts to ward off foreign agents or their cohorts in picking his players. He said coaches fell for such poisoned chalice because of the lure of foreign currencies.

    Pointedly, Keshi asked, “do you know how much I’m worth in any known currency in all modesty?” I have seen money. I have flown in many club presidents’ private jets as a player. I’m also not reckless with earnings. So, who is that agent and how much does he have? That agent could be a former player or manager. Please, I have made my mark in Europe to fall for peanuts. I ask Keshi again, “do I still trust you to shun agents when picking Nigeria’s 23-man squad to the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations?”

    The journey through the gridlock from Ota provided the proper setting. I also asked Keshi what he would do to players who feign injury and those who hide them to earn call ups. Keshi said: “If I take my players through callisthenic exercises, I will know each one’s injury problems. I played the game under renowned physiotherapists and I know what they did and how they discovered injured players. As for those who dodge national calls, it won’t happen because Nigeria is blessed with at least six players per position. Besides, I will develop a good relationship with my players. I will talk to them at home and ask questions about their welfare. I did that as the team’s former captain, so I know what I’m talking about. The Big Boss tag didn’t come because of any mafia setting in the Eagles. I led by example and the players trusted me.

    “Let me give you this example. Before the final qualifier against Algeria in Algiers, I summoned all the players to my room. I laid down the jerseys on the bed. I told them that we needed to fight the Algerians to get the ticket. I warned anyone who wasn’t ready to fight not to pick the jersey. It was a soul-searching session. I tell you, the first person to pick the jersey was Rashidi Yekini. The next was Daniel Amokachi and I have since loved both players, even as a coach.”

    Asked if he was a trained coach, his countenance changed, but Keshi broke into a smile and said: “my brother, I have served coaches and played as captain for most of the clubs I played for. I know what to tell the boys, how to prepare them for games and know what do to change the course of matches. Aside, I will go for coaching courses because I know that the game is dynamic. But note that football is more of practical than grammar. When I get to that bridge, I will cross it.”

    I asked Keshi what transpired in the Seyi Adebayor saga and his reply confirms all that has happened to Adebayor with renowned managers such as Arsene Wenger, Roberto Manicini, Jose Mourinho and even with Harry Redknapp until he renewed his contract at Tottenham.

    Put simply, Keshi said that Adebayour was undisciplined. Adebayor’s talk about Keshi wanting to share from his transfer fees to Arsenal, Keshi said, was cheap blackmail.

    Perhaps this story told by Aisha Falode about what she saw with the Malian side after their crash from the 2010 Africa Cup of Nations will suffice. Ma soro ju, like Aisha loves to address me, “I saw the big boys in the Malian side, Kanoute, Keita, name them, plead and some shed tears to try and convince Keshi to stay. But Keshi told them he was through with the job and needed fresh challenges.”

    Dear Keshi, your story is sweet, but it could turn sour, if the Eagles fail to fly in South Africa in January. Nigerians are bad losers. They want the Eagles to win every game convincingly. Shuaibu Amodu won matches, yet our administrators organised interview sessions with foreign coaches in the hotel where the Eagles stayed in 2010. The Eagles were still in the tournament. That is how wicked the Nigerian is with the Eagles.

    Should Keshi panic and press the distress button? Not necessarily; all he needs is to open his eyes and pick the best. He must be at his wits’ end to read games properly and make prompt substitutions.

    Keshi, this Eagles job is your life. Make it or mar it in South Africa. Good luck!

  • Does hunger loom after the deluge?

    Does hunger loom after the deluge?

    Travelling last month through Delta State, I missed the flood at its peak. But I saw enough to move me and offer a nasty hint of an unforgettable disaster. The waters had appreciably receded, yet parts of the dual-carriage way connecting Asaba, the state capital, to the Anioma area of the state remained flooded and impassable. Residents of nearby communities laid their fishnets in the probable hope that if they lost their farmlands and crops, they should at least catch some fish that came with the flood.

    At a primary school where the displaced were quartered in Ndokwa-East Local Government Area, life offered little excitement beyond food provided by the state and donors.

    In those two wet months, Nigerians felt the power of water, life’s otherwise precious liquid. No one was comfortable with that encounter. A persistent downpour swelled the Niger River and other rivers and tributaries, causing them to overflow their banks. The result has been utter devastation. Over two million people were reported to be displaced in Kogi and Edo states. Hundreds of houses collapsed under the impact of water. Displaced residents found temporary perching spots on the rooftops of surviving houses, waiting to be evacuated. Women clutched their babies, hoping something would happen to put them out of their nightmare. In Delta and Anambra, misery was widespread, as homes and farmlands were washed away.

    In Ndokwa-East, reports suggested no flood ever wreaked such havoc in its history. It left about 22 clans under water, their people in sheer torment, displaced and with little to eat and little to wear, in makeshift shelters, and unsure of what tomorrow would bring. In Onuaboh, for instance, a clan of three quarters, this year’s flooding will be a watershed. No dry grounds at all. Inyi, where I spent two formative years, was a vast body of water. 2012 will be the year of the Great Floods. Discounting the services of wall calendars, the year will help to set off one event from another. It was an unsavoury encounter with one of man’s most cherished resources.

    There has been some response from government. The Emmanuel Uduaghan administration in Delta State has sent relief to the displaced residents, as have individuals and organisations.

    But there is need for more work. There is need for the authorities, including the federal government, to assess the situation and ascertain the magnitude of damage. Next, it will help to determine what assistance is required. Plus, no one should forget that whatever relief is sent should be appropriate, targeted and monitored.

    There are reasons for these suggestions. Disaster management can easily be bungled if not properly thought-out, just as relief efforts can be misapplied and wasted if not clearly conceived and monitored. If the right things are not done at the right time, people needing help become hopeless. And that deepens the initial crisis.

    For some of the flood victims, their plight has a traumatising impact. Their farmlands may have been flooded in the past, but not their houses or entire communities, as is the case in Ndokwa-East and parts of Isoko in Delta State. These people are struggling with not just economic loss; they are also grappling with psychological shock and need help in that area as well. They need encouragement now, some sort of psychological therapy.

    They need comprehensive relief consisting of, but not limited to, food, medicine, water, clothing, and, of course, sleeping places, till the water recedes. They will also be happy to see that assistance meant for them actually gets to them, and not to some opportunistic dealers or people far removed from the floods. But beyond all that, they need something permanent, something to start and sustain them after the great waters. They need cash to buy new seedlings and begin all over again.

    It is in the interest of everyone if this crisis is well managed. For one, it will show that we can learn from past blunders in disaster management, and that our governments really care for the people they govern.

    No one should lose sight of the imperatives of mitigating the unpleasantness of life in a relief camp. Still, it must not be forgotten that tiding victims over the flood season is only one step, requiring another. That second step is even more fundamental. It should resolve the issues of life after the floods. What will the farmer-victims eat when the waters recede? And since these farmers also feed the society, what will we all eat when dry grounds appear?

    Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Dr Akinwumi Adesina has gone to great lengths to assure Nigerians that famine is out of the question. He said there is food and that Nigerians will not starve. Considering that some hefty sums have been raised by billionaires and other donors, perhaps the Jonathan administration is confident that all is well.

    The proof of that confidence will however lie in the judicious use and equitable distribution of what is provided. Only that will stave off hunger.

    This article was adapted from the one published in October entitled “Life after the floods.”

  • Give us this day our private jet

    Give us this day our private jet

    Would it not have been much better if the Lord Jesus Christ, the founder of the Christian religion and saviour of humanity had been born a Nigerian rather than a Jew? ‘Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness”, Jesus admonished his followers, “and everything will be added unto you”. But if Jesus were a Nigerian, he would have the street wisdom to enable his adherents enjoy to the fullest both the kingdom of this world and the blessings of the world to come – a win –win situation for all. If Christ was a Nigerian, he would have said something like this: “Seek ye first the kingdom of private jets, palatial mansions, exotic four wheel drives, lucrative oil blocs, multi-million private university enterprises, companionship of the high and mighty of this world and every other thing will be added unto you both in this world and that which is to come”. A Nigerian Christ would have found a workable compromise between the Kingdom of darkness and that of light. He would have urged us all to give unto Caesar what is God’s and give unto God what is Caesar’s and there would have been eternal peace between good and evil world without end, Amen. Can you imagine John the Baptist being foolish enough to have his head cut off for speaking truth to power if he were a Nigerian? No, he would have blessed the unholy matrimony between Herod and his brother’s wife, invoked divine blessings on them and gone on to spend the rest of his days in splendour and prosperity while fulfilling his God ordained mission on earth.

    I have often found some of the words of Christ in the Bible confounding, stupefying and astounding. For instance, there were two men fishing for their livelihood in the Sea of Galilee. “Follow me”, Jesus simply told them and I will make you fishers of men”. But how do you fish for men? Simply by seeking to win them over to the kingdom of God I can now understand. However, if it were in today’s Nigeria, how exactly would Jesus have framed his mission? I think he would have said, “Follow me and I will make you fishers of private jets.” And the reason would be quite simple. With luxury private jets, fishing for the souls of men becomes much more efficient, stress-free and maximally productive. Much more importantly, the man of God, cruising the heavenly spheres in his modern flying gadget would have a closer proximity to the Almighty and have a greater possibility of his prayers being answered on behalf of his prosperity seeking adherents.

    As I pen these words, two men of God, fishers of men in their own peculiar ways are on my mind. First, is Pastor Ayodele Joseph Oritsejafor, founding and senior pastor of Word of Life Bible Church, Warri, Delta State. Ever since he was converted by the late Archbishop Benson Idahosa in 1972, Pastor Oritsejafor has not looked back. He has been a fiery, uncompromising preacher passionately seeking to win souls to Christ. Over the last four decades, his ministry has flourished abundantly and he has become one of the success symbols of the now fashionable prosperity gospel. Only recently, Pastor Oritsejafor justly celebrated his 40th year on the pulpit. President Goodluck Jonathan personally graced the occasion – an indication of Pastor Oritsejafor’s standing in the kingdom of this world. President Jonathan on that occasion considered it noteworthy that Oritsejafor was President both of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN). I really do not think this is to Pastor Oritsejafor’s credit. Why should any individual want to cling to the two very influential positions? Does this not smack of some mini megalomania of sorts? But the highlight of Pastor Oritsejafor’s 40th anniversary as a preacher, was the gift presented to him by his congregation of Canadian-made Bombadier jet manufactured in 1994 and costing $3.5 million. When the announcement of the gift was made, the entire congregation reportedly erupted in joy, congratulating and backslapping each other on the good fortune of their pastor and, most assuredly, praying it would one day be their turn to be living testimonies to God’s miraculous blessings.

    If Pastor Oritsejafor symbolises the overly individualistic and materialistic orientation of the Pentecostal movement in contemporary Nigeria, the Metropolitan and Archbishop of Abuja, His Eminence, John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan, exemplifies the restraint, asceticism, deep learning and self effacement that is the essence of the Church. Archbishop Onaiyekan was one of the 22 new Cardinals elevated as elite princes of the church by Pope Benedict XVI. He thus follows in the footsteps of Francis Cardinal Arinze and Anthony Cardinal Okogie who were ordained Cardinals before him. An accomplished polyglot, John Cardinal Onaiyekan earned his doctorate in 1976. His interesting dissertation was on “The Priesthood in Pre-monarchical Ancient Israel and among the Owe-Yoruba of Kabba: A comparative study”. Surely, the Cardinal would do well to revise his thesis for publication and accessibility to a wider audience.

    The Catholic Church is a most unique organisation. It is at once all too human and yet manifests unquestionable traits of divinity. The Catholic Church places no premium on miracles. It does not pride itself on raising the dead or opening the eyes of the blind or conferring instant prosperity on the poor. Yet, despite millions flocking to instant miracle centres, the Catholic Church continues to flourish and maintain its own in the Christian community. By 2005, for instance, it was estimated that there were 18 million baptised Catholics in Nigeria and the country along with the Congo Democratic Republic had the highest number of priests in Africa. One of the greatest strengths of the Catholic Church is the very rigorous theological, philosophical and logical training that the church gives its priests. I have absolutely no doubt, for instance, that the average Catholic priest is far more intellectually equipped than his Pentecostal counterpart to respond pungently and effectively to such new books as ‘The God Delusion’ by the English biologist, Richard Dawkins or ‘God is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything’ by Christopher Hitchens; books that question the very basis of faith in the existence of God and the supernatural.

    I am not surprised that it is another great Catholic priest and intellectual, Dr. Monsignor Mathew Hassan Kukah, who has had the courage and honesty to speak up against the very obscene, purported gift of a private jet to Pastor Oritsejafor by members of his congregation. According to Father Kukah, “I do not see anywhere in the world where any worshipping community can claim that they’ve been able to raise over 7 billion Naira to buy such a gift for their pastor. But most importantly for me is that, amidst the squalor and poverty that we face in Nigeria, these are not the kind of model display that we should be to our people”. It is difficult to fault the cleric’s logic.

    And on the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Father Kukah is even more trenchant and biting. In his words “CAN has become more visible in relation to national prayer sessions, pilgrimages, alliances with state power and so on. Unless we distance ourselves, we cannot speak the truth to power. We cannot hear the wails of the poor and the weak. We should not be seen as playing the praying wing of the party in power”. Surely, I cannot put it better. But is Pastor Oritsejafor listening?

  • Terrorism, politics  and the law

    The  bombing of a church in a military barrack in Kaduna in Nigeria and the placement of a bounty of 50m naira   by the army on leaders of the terrorist group Boko Haram highlight  Nigeria’s  intractable and messy problem with terrorism. Unlike Nigeria, however Egypt faces a new problem from the use and misuse  of power from its new president  Mohammed Morsi,  who recently issued presidential orders granting him powers that are not challengeable in any court in Egypt.

    In Nigeria   again ,in a strange concoction of politics and finance,  the nation’s Central Bank Governor Lamido  Sanusi,  the Champion of Islamic banking in Nigeria  asked the Federal government   to  sack 50%  of its civil servants because  it is spending 70%  of its revenue on paying the salaries  of   these  civil servants .In  far away New  York , the UN Secretary General  Ban Ki Moon asked the UN Security Council to approve the sending of an ECOWAS force to Mali to rescue that nation from invaders both Tuaregs and religious militants  but asked the UN body not to provide the funds said to be worth  $50m.

    The issues highlighted above raise issues of terrorism, authoritarianism, economic planning and finan ce;  national, regional and global stability – and I intend to highlight these issues in that light and context today. Let me stress that it will  require a huge   balancing act to do this and it is in that regard that I will make reference  to an article by Burmese leader Aung San Suu Kyii  titled – ‘A  Sense  of Balance ‘   in The Economist which stressed  that both peoples  and nations will need to balance their acts to make the world a peaceful place to live in.

    In  that fine article Suu Kyii noted that the end of authoritarianism is not synonymous with the end of dissent or the  demise  of fundamentalism. The  power  impasse  in Egypt is a clear  vindication of that. Dissent she said should be channeled towards   concensus  and compromise  while she stressed that fundamentalism,  which can be volatile in times of change and uncertainty,  is   in reality  the natural enemy of balance .Suu Kyii  identified terrorists as those people lacking in self-respect who are incapable of compassion and restraint when they have an opportunity to deal with those who  they  think put them in a state of incapacity to attain what they perceive as their deserved niche. Such people who lack self respect are incapable of respecting others. The terrorist mentality she   concluded  is spawned by intellectual and social influences that  widen to an extreme  ‘the gap‘ between the terrorist and others   –  and this destroys the essential balance that promotes a common bond of humanity.

    It  is in the light of the wisdom of this  Burmese    Nobel  laureate that I take on the issues raised first on terrorism in Nigeria and the resurgence of authoritarianism in Egypt in the wake  of President Mohammed Morsi’s surprising and bold move to concentrate power in his hands. In  Nigeria,  terrorism  unfortunately is waxing stronger as terrorists  recently  week  bombed the headquarters of the special police unit in Abuja    where terrorists  were  being kept,  and some were said to have escaped. There have been reports that some suspected terrorists were found round the State House in Ekiti  State while Members of the National Assembly are  said  to be apprehensive that the Assembly could be the target of Boko Haram terrorists.

     It  is my considered view  that no government should allow terrorists to operate with such impunity as this weakens respect for constituted authority  and casts aspersion on the sovereignty of the state. It  is ironically to protect such sovereignty that President Mohammed Morsi   in Egypt seized the powers of the courts and decreed they  could not be used to challenge him in his bid to control law and order in Egypt.

    In Nigeria’s case it is apparent that the state is lax in tackling insecurity and terrorism for reasons best known to the authorities.  But  human lives should not be treated with  levity and nonchalance  by the rest of us because we have not had any  relatives killed yet  by terrorists. It is dehumanizing to see churches bombed on a weekly basis while Christians elsewhere  and   those  not directly involved just pause for a moment and move on while the state wrings its hands in futile admonitions and does nothing to deter the terrorist against the next attack. In Egypt where there is no such terror as in Nigeria, President Morsi has seized power ostensibly to forestall such state impotence in the face of expected terror.

    Morsi  is acting proactively  in anticipation of  spurious litigations that could hamstring the state – even though his anticipation and actions  are  decidedly undemocratic. The  difference between the Nigerian and Egyptian situation is that the party  of President Morsi, the Islamic Brotherhood is a Fundamentalist Party and secular Egyptians are afraid that  Morsi and his party will use the power  he has seized to introduce Sharia  Law  in Egypt,  to the detriment of opposition parties  and other religions in Egypt. Whereas in Nigeria the terrorist is rampant and running amok as it were.

    Yet,  there is still some caution and restraint in the way the stakeholders  and  politicians in  the Egyptian state deal with each other. When the demonstrations against  Morsi started, the Muslim Brotherhood  planned its own counter one for   the next week. But it cancelled this to avert bloodshed when it saw the turn out  of opposition  demonstrators  at Tahrir Square against the president’s usurpation of the power  of the Egyptian Courts. This  week the demonstrators in their thousands have piched camp  in front of the Presidential palace in Cairo.

    Unfortunately,  Such restraint is barren in the way Boko Haram bombs Churches,  killing and maiming   Christians and passers by in Nigeria. Worse still the business as usual stance of the security forces as well   as the ‘not my turn yet‘  attitude of the rest of us has  portrayed  Nigeria  as a nation of people thick skinned  to murder and mayhem in their midst. Which simply means that human life is cheap here as in the Hobbessian theory that says that in a state of terror, where  might is right,  human life is violent, brutish and short. Surely that is a sad and unfortunate image for any nation  not enmeshed in America’s war on terror like Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq,   nations   where most unfortunately, suicide bombing has made a mockery  of the sanctity of human lives.   Again, it is in that  light that I  consider the call   by the CBN governor to sack half the work force of our civil service as well as the  posture  of the UN not being ready to spend money on rescuing Mali. The  CBN governor’s call reminds one of ‘the shoot the messenger‘ syndrome while the UN uncharacteristic  frugality on Mali’s survival reminds one of the   proverbial  cat that would eat fish without getting its paws wet.

    What  the CBN governor has said is the correct thing for any government spending 70%  of its revenue on salaries to do, but even he knows that no  politician   or  government in Nigeria will do that and survive. Even the host governor at the venue where the CBN delivered his   stricture said it was not possible. So  the CBN governor was just barking at the moon even though every one knows that sacking of civil servants was never part of his schedule of duties and that makes the civil servants happy as they plan his downfall in the full Nigerian retaliatory syndrome. Anyway,  the CBN governor is as impervious to criticism as the politicians in the way he carried through his Islamic Banking  agenda  which is in tune with his Master’s degree in Islamic studies  from the University of Khartoum.  Really what is good for the  goose should be good for the gander.

    Lastly,  Ban Ki Moon has shown that he or the UN does not understand the gravity of the situation in Mali. ECOWAS  states alone cannot fund the reclamation of Northern Mali because they all have financial problems of their own. They  mostly rely on Nigeria   as the Father Xmas  of such military adventures. But Nigeria has problems of its own such as the one pointed out by the CBN governor, the oil subsidy theft, the huge allowances of its legislators as well as the fight against Boko Haram to which huge funds have been committed.

    The UN should not turn the proposed Mali ECOWAS force  into another laughing stock like  the  blue beret UN Congo troops who stood by and watched unconcerned as M23 rebels seized the town of Goma  from government forces  in the  DRC recently. Mali  is a member state of the UN that is in trouble because of regional problems stemming from the growth of militancy and fundamentalism on the northern part of all ECOWAS states and needs help,  especially the financial type to maintain its stability and sovereignty.

    If Mali falls there will be a wrong signal to militants  in the Sahel  that  they can simulate the situation in  Mali  in any state in ECOWAS . That  is one message that is lost to the  UN Scribe  for  now  .  Not  funding the military rescue of Mali can be counter productive and very costly for the UN in the short run not to talk of in the long. A  word is enough for the wise.

  • Samson Siasia’s pains

    Samson Siasia’s pains

    Samson Siasia is an interesting character. He sees things from his cocoon. He doesn’t think others’ views count. Things must be done his way; otherwise, nothing works. He knows it all, making it imperative to ask if he truly needs any employment.

     It’s over one year since Siasia lost the Super Eagles job and he has been very inconsistent in his comments. He threatened to challenge his removal in court but wisely did a recant which many people, including this writer, applauded as a sign of maturity.

     Since that rethink, Siasia has gone about his pet project of identifying future players from the grassroots – this is his area of strength and this writer was impressed, given his feats in the age-grade category that in the past was riddled with age-cheats.

     Since Siasia’s sack from the Eagles job, this writer has met him twice. He was cajoled to take pictures with me during the MTN Football Hub in Lagos last year and I wasn’t surprised. Yet, Siasia showed maturity when he said that all that transpired between us was in the course of doing our jobs. I was impressed. I shook hands with him. While taking the photographs with Siasia, his face didn’t light up. He still had pains; rightly so.

     The second meeting was in Abuja this year. We greeted and walked our different ways. Yet one was marvelled at the fact that he came to the Nigeria National League finals. Indeed, I gathered that he was in Abuja, training young lads. I asked The Nation and SportingLife’s correspondents to track what he was doing and send the reports for publication.

     I was, therefore, pleasantly surprised last Sunday when I read Siasia’s potshots against the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) over the manner of his sack. Not again, was my first response. I wanted to push the report aside. But an inner voice urged me to read it dispassionately. I did and the same voice challenged me to appeal to him to forget the past.

     Siasia is entitled to his views. It appears to me too that each time he throws this salvo; it helps him reduce the pains inside him. I sympathise with him. His sack truncated a promising career. But he should also understand that coaching is about hiring and firing, especially when the results go awry as in his case.

     Siasia should take a cue from what happened to Chelsea’s Roberto d’ Matteo, who won the UEFA Champions League trophy for the Blues, yet was sacked with ignominy because of the team’s poor results, in spite of the fact that they were third in the Barclays English Premier League table, then had a mathematical chance of remaining in the UEFA Champions League, among other competitions ahead of the season.

     There has been global condemnation over Matteo’s sack. Chelsea fans still carry placards voicing their rage. They boo the new man, Rafa Benitez, all through their matches.

     Matteo has not said a word against Chelsea’s owner; nor has he granted any interview to lament his situation. Instead, he has moved on, leaving the club’s supporters to fight his battle. Chelsea is out of the UEFA Champions League, a fate which many have ascribed to retributive justice. Yet Matteo is better off for it. His silence is golden. Need I remind Siasia of the shabby treatment meted out to Jose Mourinho at Chelsea for not winning the UEFA Champions League? He left quietly to lead Inter Milan to lift the UEFA Champions League, the Portuguese’s second as a coach, ahead of the English side, which did theirs last year.

     I urge Siaisa to emulate Matteo since he has age on his side. Shuaibu Amodu said worse things when former Sports Minister Jim Nwobodo sacked him. Indeed, Amodu’s wife granted interviews in which she advocated for foreign sports minister as the panacea for change since Nwobodo preferred a foreign coach to her husband.

     Amodu returned to coach the Super Eagles after a brief stint with Orlando Pirates in South Africa. Again, he was sacked after Nigeria’s qualification for the 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup. He made another appearance and Nigeria qualified for her second World Cup appearance, but Amodu didn’t sit on the bench to reap the fruits of his labour.

    levity after the 2002 Korea/Japan World Cup. But he moved on. He still accepted to serve in the NFF’s Technical Committee on patriotic grounds. That is the spirit that Siasia should imbibe, more so when his feats at the 2005 U-20 World Youth Championship (WYC) in Holland and at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games still serve as benchmarks to gauge the rise and fall of the beautiful game here.

    The lesson to learn from Amodu’s experience is that time is the healer of all wounds. Siasia should accept all the mistakes he made as a manager and which include the flaws in the contract, which he now feels tied his hands to the advantage of his former employers. What Siasia should do is to get an expert to prepare his contract.

    Secondly, he should never enter into any agreement without a lawyer. He fell into the trap because he was excited and thought that the voice of Nigerians was the immunity he needed to keep his job, irrespective of the results. He has learnt the hard way. It was bound to happen with the Nigerian fan, who is a bad loser.

    Siasia couldn’t manage the Eagles’ big boys. He allowed the Nigerians’ cry to instill discipline in the team get into his head and abandoned the carrot and stick approach. He ought to have known that as a coach, he is judged not by what he says or/and how well he prepares the players for matches, but by the outcome of games.

    He had issues with key members of the team. There was a mutiny. This writer is convinced, even though without sufficient evidence, that Siasia was sabotaged by the players for a breath of fresh air.

    It would interest Siasia to know that Stephen Keshi learnt from his mistakes in instilling discipline in the Eagles. Managing players is an attribute, not a way of life. It is the key to success. If the players are aggrieved, they will ease off the coach. They are like the proverbial “barracks that is static while the coaches come and go”.

    One needs to tell Siasia that part of the lessons he should take from his sack is the need to accept responsibility for his team’s poor showing. He got it wrong each time he blamed the players for poor results only to take the credit whenever the team won. Of course, the coach who picked them for matches that they won did so for those that they lost.

    To err, they say, is human, but to forgive is divine. Siasia should learn to forgive people. It was his albatross as the Super Eagles coach. If he truly forgave those players who crossed his path, he would still be the Super Eagles’ coach. Good luck, Siasia.

     Thank you, The Nation and SportingLife readers

    Last week Saturday at the Sheraton Hotel in Lagos, I was decorated as the Best Sports Editor of the Year by Hally Sports International, the business and sports conglomerate. It was a well attended ceremony.

    I never knew I would be adjudged as the best. I went there with an open mind and was prepared to celebrate any winner since our two titles The Nation and Sportinglife are seemingly new in the market.

    When my name was announced, I was transfixed. I summoned courage to rise to my feet to receive the award.

    But the award is not mine; it is yours, readers of The Nation and Sportinglife. I promise on behalf of my colleagues on the sports desk to continue to dish out interesting stories to satisfy your yearnings.

    Like I told everyone in the hall last Saturday, I promise to be back to pick more laurels next year, after satisfying our readers with the best of sports.

    Thank you, dear readers, for having faith in The Nation and Sportinglife. Cheers!