Category: Saturday

  • The MohBad reality show

    The MohBad reality show

    It’s been an interesting few weeks watching reactions to the untimely death of the singer MohBad – real name Ilerioluwa Oladimeji Aloba. In life he was at best an up and coming afrobeat artiste; in death he has achieved the level of fame he desperately craved for.

    In an outpouring of grief hundreds of youths held marches across the country demanding justice for the late singer based on the belief that there was foul play behind his demise.

    Evidence to back this up was a string of videos and a further string of circumstantial stuff related to the singer Naira Marley, erstwhile head honcho of the crowd in which MohBad ran, and his sidekick – a certain Sam Larry.

    In these parts nobody dies naturally, there’s always a villain to blame. In what is fast becoming a pattern on Nigerian social media, once the herd swings in one direction, heaven help you if have a different opinion or dare to ask questions.

    So, all of a sudden, all manner of sympathisers were falling over themselves to be good to MohBad and his clan. Politicians were beating a bush path to the singer’s home to condole with the mourning. Among the distinguished mourners was a certain senator from the Northeast who was not long ago caught publicly bullying a shop girl. Here he was grandstanding to support a celebrated victim of bullying.

    Read Also: Atiku on fishing expedition, Tinubu tells US court

    Nollywood actresses and sundry celebrities jumped on the bandwagon as though their lives depended on it. They descended on anyone who dared say anything that was less than laudatory. Their grieving was always public, always recorded to the posted on Instagram, X, Tik Tok or any other platforms that had a traffic count. Even when they went a shopping for a second coffin for coffin for MohBad, they made sure the tape was rolling.

    They were not alone. Other sympathisers didn’t just stop at kind words. Their grieving was cash-backed. Millions have been donated to Mo’Bad’s son, wife, mother, father and so on. Naturally, these donations had to be publicised for the sake of posterity.

    But of all the acts of the sympathisers, the one that took the biscuit was when one do-gooder offered the late singer’s young widow N10 million to cover the cost of a DNA test to prove that her child was truly fathered by MohBad.

    Clearly, none of the cast of clowns seeking their own 15 minutes of attention in MohBad’s afterglow ever heard of quiet grieving, or of a family being left alone to mourn their dead. Sadly, their grief has become the latest poorly-scripted reality show.

  • 78th UNGA: President Tinubu and his defining moment

    78th UNGA: President Tinubu and his defining moment

    • By Tunde Rahman

    The just-ended 78th session of the United Nations General Assembly was President Bola Tinubu’s first outing at that important gathering of global leaders and on that first appearance, he left behind a lasting impression.

    Addressing the gathering around 8pm local time in New York which was 1am in Nigeria, on Tuesday September 19, President Tinubu was in an excellent form. Watching him as he delivered his speech in measured tones, you would be proud to be a Nigerian, nay African.

    At that global stage, at the biggest congregation of Presidents and Heads of government from all over the world, President Tinubu did not only speak for Nigeria, he spoke for Africa. He delivered what many called an outstanding speech. His speech was a defining moment for Nigeria.

    That speech dwelt on a number of important topics including the past failures of Nigeria and Africa, poverty in the continent, flooding and erosion, conflict and wars, extremism, climate change, military coups and the case of Niger Republic, as well as the unsavory roles played by the rich Western nations in some of these issues. The highlights of the speech are as follows: President Tinubu began by noting some of the failures of Africa to include bad governance, broken promises and weak economies, while also identifying unfair treatment and outright exploitation from abroad as contributory factors. Reminding his audience of this history, he said if the theme of that UNGA session- “Rebuilding Trust and Reigniting Global Security: Accelerating Action on the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals Towards Peace, Prosperity, Progress and the Sustainability for all” was to mean anything at all, “it must mean something special and particular to Africa.”

    To address the identified problems of the African continent, he identified solutions, which he said African leaders must strive to fix. He stated categorically, however, that Africa would demand the same level of political commitment and devotion of resources that described the Marshall Plan, which emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War.

    Realising that the underlying conditions and causes of the economic challenges facing today’s Africa are significantly different from those of post-war Europe, President Tinubu said Africa “is not asking for identical programs and actions. What we seek is an equally firm commitment to partnership. We seek enhanced international cooperation with African nations to achieve the 2030 agenda and Sustainable Development Goals.”

    The President called on global institutions, other nations and their private sector actors to see African development as a priority, “not just for Africa but in their interests as well,” pointing out that due to both internal and external factors, Nigeria’s and Africa’s economic structures had been skewed.

    Speaking specifically about Nigeria, the President noted that if Nigeria is to fulfill its duty to its people and the rest of Africa, the country must create jobs, create a better economy and a better future for her people and lead by example.

    On the economic reforms he instituted in Nigeria, President Tinubu said he was mindful of the hardship that reform can cause, adding, however, that it is necessary for the country to go through this phase in order to establish a foundation for durable growth and investment to build the economy the people deserves.

    While welcoming partnerships with those who do not mind seeing Nigeria and Africa assume larger roles in the global community, he said “the question is not whether Nigeria is open for business. The question is how much of the world is truly open to doing business with Nigeria and Africa in an equal, mutually beneficial manner.”

    According to him, the critical aspects of the cooperation Nigeria and Africa would require are direct investment in critical industries, opening of ports in Europe and beyond to a wider range and larger quantity of African exports and meaningful debt relief.

    Denouncing military coups, he warned that the wave of coups crossing parts of Africa does not demonstrate favour towards coups. “It is a demand for solutions to perennial problems.”

    And speaking on the recent military coup in Niger, President Tinubu told the gathering that he was negotiating with the military leaders to help re-establish democratic governance “in a manner that addresses the political and economic challenges confronting that nation, including the violent extremists who seek to foment instability in the African region.”

    Read Also: Labour shuns meeting with FG over proposed strike

    On violent extremism, while stating that African nations would work to improve their economies to stem migration to other nations and also devote themselves to disbanding extremist groups on their turf, he urged the international community to strengthen its commitment to arrest the flow of arms and violent people into West Africa to fully combat the threat.

    The President also sought global support and solidarity to secure the continent’s mineral rich areas from pilfering and conflict, while mentioning countries like The Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Mali, Bukina Faso and Central African Republic, which have all become centres of misery and exploitation.

    While noting that climate change severely impacts Nigeria and Africa, President Tinubu declared that African nations would fight climate change but would do so on their own terms. “To achieve the needed popular consensus, this campaign must accord with overall economic efforts. In Nigeria, we shall build political consensus by highlighting remedial actions, which also promote economic good,” adding, however, that continental efforts regarding climate change will register important victories if established economies were more forthcoming with public and private sector investments for Africa’s preferred initiatives.

    Closing his speech, President Tinubu left these parting words from Africa to the rest of the world: “I say walk with us as true friends and partners. Africa is not a problem to be avoided nor is it to be pitied. Africa is nothing less than the key to the world’s future.”

    That fine address is not the only significant aspect of Nigeria’s participation in this year’s UNGA. There were other interesting aspects, which are no less remarkable.

    On the sidelines of the General Assembly, President Tinubu met with some other presidents, global leaders, top businessmen and investors. For instance, on Wednesday September 20, he met UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, at his UN Headquarters office during which he called for international collaboration against illegal miners who pillage the resources of Africa and undermine African countries’ efforts to reform their economies.

    Two days earlier, still on the sidelines of UNGA, President Tinubu had also held fruitful bilateral talks with South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa, where he canvassed stronger economic ties with that country, and with President of the Union of Comoros and Chairperson of the African Union, President Azali Assoumani, during which he pledged Nigeria’s solidarity with AU to ensure the stability and prosperity of Africa. In another engagement, this time with the Secretary-General of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, Hissein Brahim Taha, President Tinubu noted that the OIC has a strategic role to play in the sustenance of peace and development in Africa and across the world.

    On the much-talked about proposed meeting with US President Joe Biden, having met with him on the margins of the recent G20 Nations’ meeting in India, another meeting with the US President during the UNGA was no longer required and was not even on President Tinubu’s schedule, contrary to the impression in some quarters.

    At the just-ended UNGA, as President Tinubu has always done at every available opportunity, he also used the New York summit to strategically promote Nigeria’s new business opportunities and canvass for foreign investments into Nigeria. He met with the global executives of ExxonMobil. Interestingly, the oil giant pledged nearly 40,000 bpd additional production in its Nigeria operation.

    The President was also at the NASDAQ Stock Exchange where he told the whole world that Nigeria is open and ready for business, while ringing the NASDAQ closing bell. At the follow-up US-Nigeria Executive Business Roundtable, President Tinubu assured US business leaders and investors not to be afraid of doing business in Nigeria, adding that it’s a new day for business in the country, while noting that policy somersaults and inconsistencies, corruption, inclement business climate, multiplicity of exchange rates, among others have worked to hamper business and investments in the country in the past.

    Perhaps the highpoint of the President’s activities during his first UNGA appearance is his engagement with the Nigerian Community in New York at the Millennium Hilton Hotel, UN One Plaza on Wednesday September 20. That interaction was very revealing to say the least. Put together by the Chairman, Nigeria in Diaspora Commission, Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, the event showcased the very best of us, the Nigerian professionals in New York and in the entire United States, working daily, shattering boundaries, breaking records and giving our country a good name as opposed to the bad eggs dragging our name in the mud.

    The list of them at the meeting with President Tinubu is rather long. But let me mention just a few.

    Colonel (Dr) Cornel Gabriel Isioye is one of them. Isioye is currently the Commander of the 818th Hospital Center in Utica, New York, overseeing over 700 soldiers and civilians. He is also the owner of Premier Family Dentistry in the Bronx, New York. There is also Oye Owolewa from Kwara State. Oye became the first Nigerian-American elected to America Federal Office in 2021. As Washington DC’s US Representative, Rep. Oye focuses on fighting for DC statehood, improving public health and safety, empowering DC’s youths and developing minority and women-owned businesses.

    Ola Fadiran, a youthful Artificial Intelligence guru, was also at the event. He is the CEO of Chiplab, a firm that is on a mission to develop the semiconductor ecosystem in Africa. He and his team have already made rapid strides in forging strategic alliances with academic and industrial partners.

    And of course, also at the meeting was popular Zuriel Oduwole. On January 6, 2017, the then US Secretary of State, John Kerry, honoured then 14-year-old Zuriel in Washington DC at the State Department for her tireless work advocating against child marriages and speaking for girls’ education across the globe. Zuriel has reportedly met with over 30 world leaders including presidents and prime ministers to address global social development and education challenges that children and teenagers face. Zuriel’s father was present in the hall when her daughter rose to speak. After her speech, an impressed President Tinubu called out her father to take pictures with him and Zuriel. Addressing the gathering, the President commended the Nigerian-Americans for making our country proud. Citing himself who was also previously in the US and returned home to contribute to development efforts as an example, he told them to be ready to come back home, saying “we need you back home, Nigeria is back again.”

    -Rahman, former Editor of Thisday on Sunday Newspaper, is a Presidential Aide.

  • Club owners indeed

    Club owners indeed

    Who can retrieve the beautiful game in Nigeria from club owners who want to serve as ‘owners of the clubs’ and also help to organise the league matches? Wouldn’t there be a conflict of interest at some points during the competition? Where is such a thing done with a candidate for an examination also becoming the examiner? Nobi juju be that? Isn’t it a shame that club owners who should be insisting on getting the league to be in tandem with the European leagues’ kickoff dates are the ones being the cog in the wheels of progress? If these people know their onions, they should be worried that the domestic league has no calendar on which the corporate world and well-meaning Nigerians can plan to render financial support to make the league solvent.

    Who doesn’t know when the European leagues start and end? No club owner dares challenge what has been in existence for a while. This calendar is what business firms and individuals use to plan their yearly fiscal budgets. The calendar guides them in arriving at business decisions to back the different leagues in Europe wholesomely. Firms’ monies aren’t theirs. They belong to shareholders whose decisions encourage them to plough their resources into sports businesses. Of course, no firm would love to associate its goods and services with organisations dogged with controversies, sharp practices etc.

    Club owners should do a quick rethink after reading what happened in Italy this week. On Wednesday, we saw how one Udinese FC of Italy player walked towards Victor Osimhen and demanded the Nigerian’s SSC Napoli of Italy’s shirt at halftime. Osimhen obliged him by taking off his top. Osimhen could afford the luxury of giving away his jersey knowing that even before coming onto the pitch before the game started, he had, at least, four others in his drawer in the team’s dressing room. Can any Nigerian club owned by these so-called people allow their players to swap shirts, let alone give out the club’s property even before the end of the game? These are the ones who want full disclosure. Meddlesome interlopers in the game, if you ask me. Have you asked yourself why Nigerian clubs hardly have the names of the players on the back of their shirts for easy identification? You tell me.  Who is it that would dare ask these club owners to disclose their jersey contracts? Where can any club owner point out where their jerseys and other apparel are in stock? Isn’t these kinds of shopping outlets that European clubs use to make themselves solvent?

     Some Nigerians just like to have power even if it means standing the truth on its head. Club owners want to hijack the league’s organisation in the face of all the ills and disservices in the game as perpetuated in the domestic league matches. Thrice the commencement date of the 2024 Nigeria Premier Football League was announced, but thrice it was postponed because the club owners had issues with certain aspects of the contracts signed by the league board. Really! The club owners wanted a full disclosure. What does that mean for a body that cannot tell us how much their clubs are worth? A body that cannot tell us how much they earn from gate takings for the year. A body that cannot tell the world how much they earned from intra and inter-club transfer fees?

    Read Also: IPOB bans Independence Day anniversary in Southeast

    Who is fooling who? How many clubs owned by these so-called people have websites where everything about the club is laid bare for the public scrutiny? Isn’t it ironic that a body that is so secretive in disclosing who the insurers of their clubs are now want to poke their noses in others’ affairs? A body, which takes delight in owing players, coaches and backroom staff their wages running into several months other times close to years, leaving their victims with the tardy option of self-help by seizing the clubs’ vans on away soils.

    A few years back, one of the state-owned clubs had its real owners seeking to revamp the squad. At a meeting, this real owner wanted to know the players on the payroll who were bona fide members of the team. This official was shocked to find out that the team’s big boys weren’t among the bona fide players. Those who truly made the team shine were there on loan. He lost his patience and ordered a proper investigation into the apparent shenanigan.

    Surprised? Don’t be. Such unsportsmanlike acts happen in most of these teams. You only realise this rip-off when such players sign for foreign clubs.  How many teams have fulfilled all the requirements enshrined in the Club Licensing Act? It is only in the NPFL that a club will sack as many as 25 players at the end of the season. The question, which throws itself up as a sore thumb is if such players have only one-year contracts. Wasn’t it a top club official who boasted that a league title-winning coach did nothing to help the club achieve the feat? The official boasted that he knew how the team won the title that year.

    This issue of graduated measures of fulfilling the Club Licensing requirements is simply a failure of leadership or should I say witchcraft, which shouldn’t be tolerated. Professional football began in 1990 in Nigeria and it is despicable to note that 33 years after the league still wears diapers in implementing basic rules of the game. It is equally disappointing that league boards can sit at meetings, and make pronouncements about the commencement of the competition’s kickoff dates yet won’t stick to it, indeed, it is customarily for previous league boards to announce kickoff dates like the new NPFL Board chairman  Gbenga Otolorin Elegbede has done by promising an August 26 date. True to type, the date was moved to September 9 and now today September 30. I hope the league games truly begin today.

    Club owners just trumpet what the NFF want the league board to do. NFF on its part would tell everyone that the league board is autonomous, yet the simple task of picking match officials is theirs just as the right to punish them. They are quick to tell you that it is the rule as provided by FIFA. NFF also appoints most of the league board members who are usually their allies. Anything not possible in the Nigerian league doesn’t exist.

    Nigeria’s sports administrators should always look at the bigger picture which looks forward to making the sporting industry the veritable ground for stemming unemployment in Nigeria. Is sports truly “play play” as one governor once described it? Who will challenge us to see sports as a  platform to bolster the country’s revenue? Doesn’t the government know that sports is the best vehicle for massive employment?

     Who can stop these undertakers from killing our league which has produced several soccer greats? Need I mention names?

     Yearly, our representatives in the CAF inter-club competitions complain of lack of matches to keep their players in competitive form as the reason for their early exits. Why the NFF executive board members have turned deaf ears to this disturbing trend beats one’s imagination. It doesn’t matter if the country’s representatives take turns being eliminated from every round of the competitions. What insults our sensibilities is the yearly explanation after the teams must have crashed out that we would do something and nothing gets done about it.

  • Nigeria@63: Thoughts of our fathers and we the children (1)

    Nigeria@63: Thoughts of our fathers and we the children (1)

    Three score and three years ago, our nation’s independence resonated all over the African Continent and the world with the panjandrums getting excited over the creation of what many expected to be the first black power since the days of ancient Egypt, that even Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe perhaps in a spell of prophecy or in his natural oratorical brilliance had in a speech hankered  on Nigeria becoming a force not only vital to the restoration of dignity of man in Africa but of the whole world.

    Far and wide, the world heralded much from the emergence of Nigeria on the global stage. For example, then racist South Africa prepared for a continental showdown with Nigeria contributing a majority of the troops that would determine the future of white supremacy. Conversely, a number of African nationalists rallied to Nigeria for leadership and this to an extent she did exert.

    To our fathers, this was the chance of the Blackman to show the white man that he was able to govern himself and chart their collective destiny within the comity of nations. It was the opportunity to develop our nation and harness our culture and resources in shaping our citizens, our economy and technological advancement.

    Economically we were doing wonders, dominating the exports of oil palm and groundnuts. An agriculturally dominant nation, we were projected to be self sufficient by the 80’s and totally self reliant in the 90’s. We showed great promise, and with agriculture and Agro based industries  as the linchpin of our industrial drive.

    Owing to the prevailing political circumstance then, the various regions which then comprised of the sub nationalities that made up the Nigerian nation were in a form of healthy rivalry with each other. The Western Region under the guidance of its Premier, Chief Obafemi Awolowo maintained great strides in terms of infrastructure and the provision of a number of social services such as education, which was free in the region and healthcare services. His Eastern counterpart, MI Okpara had led the Eastern Region with a form of lightening speed that it was adjudged  the fourth fastest growing economy in the world. Ahmadu Bello and Midwest counterpart Dennis Osadebe also served as pacesetters in their respective regions, Nigeria was truly then on the march!

    Read Also: Abuja is not Katsina, work for all Nigerians, Wike tells appointee

    Our fathers dreamed of strong institutions; democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, fairness and the enthronement of a value system where hard work, honesty and other virtues were instilled in our people.

    Even with the numerous crises that greeted the nation in its first few years, the nation was to still show promise as a maturing democracy deploying compromise where necessary. On the global front, the nation assumed its role as the continent’s big brother, its interventions in Tanzania and Congo Kinshasa under the auspices of the United Nations were indeed deemed as remarkable. Africa as the centerpiece of our diplomatic ensemble gave us the opportunities to elevate Africa’s concerns to the world irrespective of the prevailing ideological struggles. In one event we even broke diplomatic relations with France following its nuclear weapons tests in the Sahara.

    We looked to a nation that was united beyond  the gritty realities as presented by religion and region and tribe, despite the tribal hectoring which was a regular feature amongst the leadership and the elite, we hoped that we would soon understand that Nigerians needed each other if the nation was to progress.

    Our fathers thought of mass literacy for the masses, they dreamed of improving the skill base of the nation, meeting the technical needs required to leapfrog the Nigerian economy from a rudimentary and developing one into an industrialized one. We sited universities and technical colleges to meet such needs and in turn churned out quality graduates who manned departments, offices and units in the nation’s civil services.These men and women were the nation’s future, the mandarins of the nation’s golden era.

    How a nation of so much promise which at independence stood heads above a number of nations such as the People’s Republic of China in terms of its GDP( Nigeria’s GDP in 1960 stood at 1521.23 compared to China which had its real GDP at 507.03) today flounders at the other end of development should bother any right thinking Nigerian. Today, after 63 years of independence we have moved from such promise and envy to a state where we are reportedly derided by more serious nations.

  • NDLEA and Buba Marwa’s burden

    NDLEA and Buba Marwa’s burden

    There was a time in Nigeria when the name, National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) suggested a dynamic, positive and functional institution. Perilous, and as the war against drug crimes and related offences was, society and criminals were conscious of the institution’s existence. During the time, everything was bright and beautiful for the Agency but, somewhere along the line, there was a lull and that lull represented a brief moment. It was as if it was strange to happen to Nigeria but, of course, it wasn’t strange to the world for a period of that nature to occur in public administration. Considering the level of corruption and institutional decay that has been deliberately overlooked in times past, the good news is that vibrant days are back under the present leadership.

    It is one of the less-used attributes of historicism to be able to deduce the patterns and styles of administration from the antecedents of leadership structure. In the present dispensation, the expectations of the masses, written or unwritten, sum up the total willpower and goodwill of the founding fathers. Therefore, whoever is chosen to head the government establishment no doubt reflects the assurance of the government that such aims and functions of the NDLEA would be achieved under him.

    Mohammed Buba Marwa was appointed as NDLEA Chairman at a critical time in Nigeria’s rich history. With only two years in office, it is interesting to note that the man at the apex of the institution has proved to Nigerians that he has something to offer; and those being mentored must not take it for granted, for this is the only way to sustain society. The management and staff of NDLEA must also be commended for previous achievements and improvements in the service to dear fatherland.

    By all appearances, Marwa has made a positive impact on the NLDEA. The 70-year-old, Kaduna State-born retired military officer has relevant, diverse and better exposure in training, and he has brought the effects of those qualities to bear on the Agency and used them to deliver the goals of that office. If we are looking for an ideal model in public office, Marwa is one sure candidate. As a former governor, the Armoured Officer is well connected. So, he has the adequate finesse to run that office. He lives among the people. His experiential knowledge in administration has also helped. He is also level-headed and very quiet. He’s neither lousy nor one of those reckless ‘owambe’ gangs, yet he’s efficient. If Tinubu’s government wants to succeed, these are the kinds of people to use. How we also wish countries where the threats of illicit substances and their purveyors have “crossed borders and destroyed societies and dreams” would allow the Marwas of this world to help them!

    As President Bola Tinubu said in a Keynote Address to the 31st meeting of the Heads of National Drug Law Enforcement Agencies, Africa (HONLAF) recently, African continent would “remain in chains in a diseased and amoral world, as will our children and their children,” until it is able to “dismantle the criminal enterprises that threaten our future and build a brighter tomorrow for all Africans”. The tragic truth is that the devil has been around for long, cautious, yet determined. But again, that there’s an escalation of substance abuse in Nigeria has painted a picture of mere creation of a platform for surface scratching. For instance, how on earth will one claim to be fighting a societal menace while conditions that facilitate the same are being knowingly and intentionally watered and nurtured? How can Marwa dry the drug river that has already outburst its channel, with the spring of this dangerous river getting more illegally legitimate with each passing day? How can demons cast out demons and how can the Marlian emperor deal with his empire? Won’t success always be a steep hill to climb as long as the real lords of narcotics and highly influential cartels in the country continue to beat the long arm of the law to its strategies? 

    Read Also: Petroleum Minister Lokpobiri, Kyari inspect ‘quick-fix’ works at Warri Refinery

    How can Nigeria plough the best course when “the future of our youth, the strength of our institutions, and the well-being of our communities” are architectured by a carnival of uncertainties? Why won’t ours be a world “at the mercy of a threat that knows neither race nor geography, neither gender nor social class” when, year in, year out, we allocate huge budgets to security and defence at the expense of equally critical sectors like Health and Agriculture? How can we enhance the production of goods and services in “a population at war with drugs?

    Right from time, Marwa has been a shrewd, decent and dutiful officer. But he is just a strong person doing well. But what happens after his tenure? The more reason those coming behind must watch what they do. A benchmark has already been set. It remains to be shown the aesthetics of management parley among future leaders. That’s what will distinguish the leadership of each institution because every leadership brings something that’s peculiar to it. Yes, that’s been our trajectory in Nigeria.

    Since vigilance is the eternal price of victory, NDLEA must never lose its guard. The Agency is like a house of glass. Therefore, caution must not be thrown to the wind because the cost of rectification may be too much to pay for a struggling country like Nigeria. As an institution that works, the government must ensure that NDLEA is sustained. It must be well-funded and given all supportive mechanisms to keep it afloat, until a tradition of perfection is established and sustained.

    By the way, Naira Marley is a warning, not only to the NDLEA but also others, not to move with the tide. Had the Agency conducted proper due diligence before venturing into the choice of a face, the Marlian malady that’s currently troubling its public perception would have been avoided. If a boss is tough, it’s better for him to wear it as a badge of honour. If the world likes, let it misconstrue the word, ‘tough’ for ‘bad’; a focused leader doesn’t have to be moved because ‘tough’ is what gets the job done.

    Whatever floats its boat, if it is necessary that NDLEA must have a face, let him or her be a credible person!

  • The naked gods (2)

    The naked gods (2)

    Unlike the Catholic Bishops who were more reticent about making predictions of electoral outcomes before the February 25 presidential election, many Pentecostal spiritual leaders rashly and brashly prophesied an outright Peter Obi victory at the polls. Many of them spoke with such boldness and seeming spiritual authority that many people would not be blamed for assuming that they were on personal speaking terms with God Almighty. I was aghast when one of the Pentecostals openly demanded that his leg be amputated if Obi did not win the election.

    Another declared that as a prophet of the most high God, it would mean there was no God in heaven if the Labour Party (LP) candidate did not triumph at the polls. Because of the brazen way they literally danced naked in the market square with their confidently asserted prophecies of the outcome of the presidential polls, it is not surprising that many of the politically partisan Pentecostal pastors have been more restrained in commenting on the outcome of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC).

    Prior to the judgement by the PEPC, a Pentecostal pastor who had vehemently condemned the outcome of the election without resorting to rhyme or reason had placed large-sized pictures of the five judges on the altar of his church and prayed as well as prophesied vociferously that they would deliver Justice. He was a well- known Peter Obi supporter and in his jaundiced view only a verdict that favored Obi could be regarded as being in consonance with truth and Justice. Another fanatical and reflexively thoughtless pastor in his support for Peter Obi, Paul Enenche of the Dunamis International Ministries purported on his pulpit to avail the PEPC judges of the benefit of his jaundiced advice on how they should judge the petitions before them!

    These crassly partisan Pentecostal clerics apart from desecrating the altar of God also embarrassed, denigrated, and disgraced the name and image of the Almighty. It is not unlikely that the prophecies of these Pastors on Peter Obi’s assumed electoral victory emboldened the latter to believe that he had any chance of winning an election in which he failed to forge a possible winning coalition.

    Indeed many of these pastors reportedly got their congregations to fast and pray that Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu would not win the election or that he would die. I watched one of these Pentecostal Bishops prophesying on national television after Tinubu had won that the then President-elect would not be sworn in. He vividly described a vision in which he claimed that he saw Tinubu being arrested by soldiers on May 29, an interim government put in place and fresh elections ordered. Or what do we make of the popular, fiery Pentecostal pastor who boldly told his congregation that God had categorically told him that he would be the country’s 16th President after ex-President Muhammadu Buhari. Did this pastor realize that the calling of a pastor is infinitely higher and more critical than that of a political office holder in God’s agenda for humanity?

    Indeed, he went on to pay the sum of N100 million to collect the presidential nomination form of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), contested the party’s presidential primaries, and scored zero votes from delegates. Is his God so profligate that He would ask him to spend such a humongous amount on procuring the nomination form and yet not guaranteeing his victory at the intra-party polls? Is it really the voice of God that these failed pastors heard or that of some sinister being bent on deceiving them and eroding the integrity and credibility of God? Is the Christian God such a capricious and inconsistent being? I don’t think so.

    Read Also: The naked gods (1)

    You must give it to leading Pentecostal pastors like Pastor Enoch Adeboye of the Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor W. F. Kumuyi of the Deeper Life Ministries, Pastor Daniel Olukoya of the Mountain of Fire and Miracles Ministries or Pastor Sam Adeyemi of the Daystar Church who were restrained and refused to desecrate their altars for cheap and selfish partisan political goals. It is sad that most of the pastors campaigning openly for Peter Obi on their pulpits were of Igbo stock like the LP presidential candidate and it was difficult to decipher if they were actuated by genuine Christian motives or selfish ethnic considerations.

    There were of course those especially from the dominant Christian states of the Middle Belt who were irked by and were reacting to the APC’s Muslim-Muslim ticket. They assumed that the Christian God would not endorse such a same-faith ticket and presumed to speak God’s mind when they had apparently not heard from Him. As the APC repeatedly explained to these clerics to no avail, their same-faith ticket was a pragmatic and expedient strategy to achieve electoral victory given the realities of the country’s demographic composition and nothing more.

    The outcome of the presidential election justified and confirmed the projection of the APC on the electoral viability of the Muslim-Muslim ticket. In any case, the fiery rhetoric of many Christian clerics in support of Obi, the candidate’s elaborate campaigns of church tourism where he was received by enthusiastic crowds of Christians at big church events effectively de-marketed him in predominantly Muslim states in the North-East, North-West and North-Central as well as substantial Muslim populations in the South-West making it impossible for him to win the pan-Nigerian victory imperative to emerge as President.

    Beyond this, what gave the Christian clerics the impression that a Christian president or Vice-President would necessarily lead the country to the promised land of our dreams? Were Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan not self-professed Christians and did their tenures witness any effective dent on the country’s multidimensional problems of poverty, corruption, gross infrastructure deficit, mass unemployment, insufficient housing and other indices of underdevelopment?

    Again, it is sheer fallacy to presume that any religion can Islamize or Christianize the state in a democratic Nigeria as claimed by most Pentecostal clerics. The Christian clerics were deaf to explanations that President Tinubu’s wife, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, is not only a Christian of Pentecostal persuasion but a Pastor to boot. Even the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in Borno State testified that Vice President Kashim Shettima was of great assistance to the church during his tenure as governor of the state for eight years. Only recently I read a complaint by Professor Ishaq Akintola’s Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) that President Tinubu’s appointments so far are skewed in favour of Christians and calling for the appointment of more Muslims to key positions. I do not know how the Muslim Association came to this conclusion but this complaint is instructive and demonstrates the sheer mischief of those who sought to give the APC’s Muslim-Muslim ticket a negative and pejorative coloration.

    Although I cannot claim close familiarity with Christian theology or Biblical exegesis, it would appear that God in the Old Testament made use of non Jewish, pagan Kings like Nebuchadnezzar or Cyrus to pursue and fulfill his purposes in history. It is part of the sovereignty and unquestionable jurisdiction of God to choose who to utilize as instruments of his will in the history and evolution of nations. Furthermore, it is misplaced and misleading for Christians to believe that they need the backing of the state through the support of those of their faith in high political positions to advance the cause of their religion. After all, in what ways did Professor (Pastor) Yemi Osinbajo’s occupying the office of Vice-President for eight years between 2015 and 2023 necessarily have a beneficial impact on the progress of the church?

    In the New Testament, the Lord Jesus kept far away from the palaces of Kings and royalty preferring to equip his 12 disciples of humble origin to preach the good news which ultimately brought the mighty Roman Empire to its knees in supplication to the Christian faith. State patronage has all too often had a negative impact on the efficacy of the Christian church across space and time as Christ does not require the support of Caesar to propagate his good news of salvation to the world.

    The preoccupation of the Pentecostals with politics in the 2023 elections was a needless distraction and their often erratic prophesies that were wide off the mark have done incalculable damage to the credibility of the church from which it will require considerable time to recover. The most critical mission of the church in our contemporary world is not to anoint political leaders but to preach Christ’s message of salvation to a world so obviously headed for a catastrophic implosion. Much more dangerous than the economic crisis, political combustions and social dysfunctions that afflict our world are the moral turpitude and spiritual paralysis that erode positive values and demean the human worth and essence.

    Politics and political leadership will not save the world as important as these are. In the same way, neither economic prosperity nor high educational attainment will heal the malignant cancer at the heart of contemporary human society. Rather, it is my view that the solution to the current human dilemma lies in Christ and the church should urgently halt its distraction by politics and return to its primary reason for being which is to save the souls of men through the unique message of Christ.

    Just like the Pentecostals in Nigeria, the Evangelicals in America got unduly immersed in that country’s electoral processes during the 2020 presidential elections. Many leading evangelical men of God predicted publicly that Donald Trump would win the election as he was purportedly the choice of God. Yes, genuine evangelicals in America had every cause to be unhappy with the moral decline attendant on the influence of the liberals in that society through, for instance, the legalization of abortion rights, the elevation of gay rights to a cardinal principle of state policy or the elimination of prayer from public schools. But it was wrong for evangelical clerics to claim that God had told them that Trump would triumph when it became obvious with the victory of Joe Biden that they had not heard God’s voice. As the case in Nigeria, this falsehood had a corrosive effect on the integrity of the American church.

    Both in Nigeria and America, the Christian church should strive to enthrone positive and ennobling values in the larger society through the force of their moral example and the influence of their spiritual vitality and virility. Claiming to prophesy the outcome of elections when they have not heard from God and thus effectively portraying God as a liar will only make more people lose faith in the church and embrace the amoral values of a secular society gone amuck. And it becomes even worse when the church in both countries joins deliberately dishonest politicians like Trump or Peter Obi in peddling the falsehood that they won elections which they glaringly and patently lost. That would be the equivalent of stripping the church naked to the scorn and jeers of her detractors.

  • On Nigeria’s infrastructural challenge

    On Nigeria’s infrastructural challenge

    Nigeria like most third world countries has for long been immersed in an infrastructure conundrum. Successive governments since the nation’s independence have attempted through numerous policies to rectify such and remove the nation from the pedestal of infrastructural deficiency. Now, despite all these and the promises of the infrastructural Eldorado as promised by both military and civilian administrations the Nigerian infrastructural base or portfolio which includes  and covers several critical sectors such as  road networks, agriculture, healthcare, financial infrastructure, technology, innovation, and power remain largely unimpressive which has impacted on the growth and development of the economy.

    Nigeria roughly requires three trillion dollars over the spate of thirty years to successfully lift itself from such a conundrum, bridging the gap and leapfrogging the Nigerian economy unto the paths nations like the United States, China France, Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom are presently on.  Haven missed past opportunities to meet our infrastructural needs, owing to the trifecta  evils of corruption and mismanagement of the economy, (that Raila Odinga story, “100 percent here” readily comes to mind) and models of infrastructural frameworks,  Nigeria now grapples with the consequences of such; consequences for businesses, travelers,  workers and even the government. At a point where countries like China have immensely invested in a number of infrastructural. projects, including it’s flagship  global infrastructure project, known as the Belt and Road Initiative and where the likes of the United States of America under President Biden have sought to reinvent the quality of infrastructure in the US, with both enabling each nation  to expand their nation’s economic influence across the world, Nigeria cannot be found wanting if it must take it’s place as the Giant of Africa.

    Read Also: You’re Nigeria’s real problem, estranged wife tells Obasanjo

    Nigeria, similar to a number  of  other infrastructural advanced nations such as Canada, France, and the United Kingdom have attempted to establish their  infrastructure frameworks via their central governments which has directed  and delivered on such projects, now while these countries have achieved success using such a model, the Nigerian nation has conversely experienced otherwise, with it’s  infrastructure stock standing at  25% of  it’s GDP.

    Some readers may readily  scoff at my comparison with the aforementioned, arguing that these nations have long been in existence before the Nigerian nation and thus serve as a poor benchmark for comparison! What then would these persons say when I also note that the likes of Tunisia, South Korea,, Morocco , Bostwana and Namibia, nations that are largely our peers  outrank our nation in terms of infrastructure too.

    What however should be of immense importance to us is how do we as a people improve on our infrastructural base? How do we as a nation fashion sustainable policies capable of providing long term finance for our infrastructural development. This is because relying alone on either the federal, state or local government levels of government to foot the $3 trillion dollar deficit is indeed a tall order as even today’s modern economies are now relying on the use of mostly private capital to support infrastructure investment

    which in turn creates the much needed multiplier effect  across critical sectors.

    Poor economic growth, poor revenue returns have caged the government’s ability to do such 

    This is not to say that the three levels of government should readily shirk from their responsibilities. However, these levels of government with the increase in funds at its avail can utilize more funds for infrastructural development , getting returns on such investments via introducing user fees, tolls etc.

    Asides the direct interventions by government the grafting of private sector capital as I earlier stated can also help trim such a deficit. Employing funds from this sector would  speedily foster economic activities and inclusive growth.

    Thus interventions such as that of InfraCO and the Nigerian Sovereign Investment Act, NSIA may be game changers .

    InfraCo with a plan to attract N15 trillion in it’s kitty will surely halve the nation’s infrastructure deficit  through Public Private Partnership (PPP).

    InfraCO, which is the collaboration between the Federal Government through the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and the NSIA on one hand and the African Finance Corporation, AFC may be Nigeria’s best option at using the private sector to meet such targets.

    While it is still too early to access the performance of InfraCo, it is yet important to be moderate in our expectations given the introduction of previous policies under the past administration which largely failed to address the desired targets.

    Examples include the Road Trust Fund (RTF) that was signed in 2017 and the Executive Order 007 in 2019 on Road Infrastructure Development and Refurbishment Investment Tax Credit Scheme.

    There are a number of reasons for such failures: for example, the RTF failed largely because the participation of the private sector  was limited due to the poor percentage of cost that could be recovered by such private players.

    Such, I believe will not be the fate of InfraCo which seems to have dotted it’s I’s and crossed it’s T’s.

    The nation has no business being 24th of the 59 African nations in terms of infrastructure!

  • Who can save Amusan’s career?

    Who can save Amusan’s career?

    These are not the best of times for renowned world 100-meter women’s hurdles record holder, Tobi Amusan, over her failure to participate in the mandatory three-out-of-competition dope test which in itself is a grave infraction on the rules on such a matter. How Amusan escaped a ban remains a mystery which has perhaps compelled the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU) to test the judgment. AIU had filed an appeal against World Athletics’

    Disciplinary Tribunal last month overturned the provisional suspension imposed on Nigeria’s hurdler, Tobi Amusan.

    The AIU on its X (formerly Twitter) handle, announced that it filed the appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) penultimate Friday – the eve of the expiration of the 30-day window for appeal.

    The World Athletics Disciplinary Tribunal had on 17 August lifted the ban on Amusan, claiming the athlete did not commit an anti-doping rule violation for Whereabouts Failures. The AIU in its post claimed it would not make further comment on the matter until the conclusion of the appeal.

    Indeed, Duro Ikhazuagbe, Thisday newspapers’ Group Sports Editor, himself an athletics guru told this writer that: ”You are suspended. If your appeal succeeds you are reinstated. AIU also has the right to appeal and take the matter to  CAS. A top athlete like Tobi cannot claim ignorance of Whereabouts tests unless she has something to hide. I still feel it must be carelessness. Tobi has done enough to get to where she is now.”

    What is clear is that AIU wants to test the veracity of the decisions to clear Amusan as provided by their rules books. It is also an opportunity for athletes who may fall into the trap set in the whereabouts rule which Amusan ran afoul of in the future. Indeed, in clearing Amusan, the body provided answers for two grounds out of three. It really doesn’t matter how many grounds. It could have been one. But, one just hoped that the Athletics Federation of Nigeria (AFN) members would not stand aloof in Amusan’s quest for justice by following through all the processes available to AIU in their appeal. The AFN should be prepared to foot Amusan’s bill for justice at the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) in Lausanne, Switzerland.

    These “Whereabouts” flaws would have been avoided had the AFN’s medical committee been functional. After all, Amusan won laurels running for Nigeria at the Commonwealth Games held in London, last year.

    Read Also: Minister salutes Amusan, Brume on Diamond League feats

    Amusan passed previous platforms to get justice over her innocence when the news first broke that she failed to observe the mandatory three out-of-competition dope tests.

    Divergent views abound in this Amusan saga! While some view it as the athletics regulatory body trying to apply the rules strictly, yet, some pundits see it as the usual dilemma that has become an albatross for a high-flying Black sportsman/woman. This latter position held by this school of thought is dotted with a litany of examples to buttress their argument. For instance, on March 6, 1993, Canadian sprinter, Ben Johnson, was banned for life by the world governing body for track and field after its doping commission affirmed that Johnson failed a second drug test that revealed abnormally high levels of testosterone, thus terminating the once blistering career of the Jamaican-born sprinter who once laid claim to the title of world’s fastest human. He suffered the humiliation of being stripped of a gold medal and world record in the 100-meter dash after he tested positive for steroids at the 1988 Seoul Olympics.

    In January 2001, former world heavyweight champion Mike Tyson was suspended for three months and fined $5,000 by Michigan state officials for refusing to submit to a pre-fight doping test.

    It isn’t enough for our sports authorities to litter the media with a litany of congratulatory messages to Amusan. They need to face the brass task of getting the female hurdler to be cleared by the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS), with less than ten months to the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. Amusan is Nigeria’s surest gold medal potential if the country’s sports administrators know their onions. It would amount to a crass failure of leadership if Amusan is left alone to face the politics of clearance from previous verification agencies to date.

    It is instructive to remind AFN and NOC that AIU has won similar cases which they sent to CAS to adjudicate. What this translates to is that Amusan stands the chance of being banned by CAS if left to face the music alone. Indeed, AIU appealed Salwa Eid Nader (400m) from Bahrain and Christian Coleman of the USA’s clearance at CAS and won.

    Amusan’s innocence isn’t in doubt having participated in major athletic meets and cleared by the races’ organisers to have scaled the competition’s several dope tests. But AIU’s appeal smacks of not allowing Amusan to win at CAS to serve as an avenue for future athletes to exploit to escape the sanctions associated with the whereabouts rule. So what if Amusan scales the CAS hurdle if truly she is innocent of any kind of accusations of flouting the whereabouts rule on competitions’ dope tests?

    Honourable sports minister sir, this should be your first charge to show that you understand the dynamics associated with this kind of matter. The minister should get athletics experts to recruit lawyers whose forte rests with such matters for proper and informed representation at CAS before the 2024 Paris Olympic Games.

    A gold medal for Nigeria at the 2024 Paris Olympic Games from Amusan could catapult the country to an enviable position in the polity of sporting nations especially as we haven’t done too well at the global multi-sports competition in the past. The other likely sure bet for a medal is Ese Brume in the female long jump and the question remains, what have we done as a nation to supervise her preparations for the Olympics in Paris next year?

    Amusan and Brume are the two Nigerians with a top five ranking in the world for the women’s 100-meter hurdles and the women’s female long jump. Others such as in wrestling are potential medallists with former Commonwealth champion, Odunayo Adekuoroye qualifying for the Paris 2024 Olympic Games when she clinched a bronze medal in the women’s 57kg category at the  2023 World Wrestling Pre-Olympic Qualifiers in Belgrade, Serbia on Wednesday. The three-time former champion beat Turkey’s Elvira Kamaloglu 9 to 5 points in the third-place match.

    This writer had a good laugh whilst reading the story that three Nigerian boxers had qualified for the 2024 Paris Olympic Games. I felt pity for the boxers because they would be fighting for honours only to be taught the new rules hours before their bouts. I couldn’t believe my eyes that we could ask coaches whose knowledge of the fistic trade was outdated. Other boxers at the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games were punching non-scoring parts of their opponents who knew where to jab the Nigerians to get huge points haul. One only hopes that these set of boxers are abreast with the modern-day rules of the fistic trade.

    A  few years ago, I wrote here that our athletes shouldn’t be made to rely on philanthropists and sports-loving governors when they require funds to prepare themselves for national assignments. Other countries have several avenues to source funds, such as Sports Lottery Schemes and fund-raisers where the President sits at dinner with the corporate world to show the level of commitment towards such an exercise. Blue-chip firms are given tax incentives for what they pay into the projects’ coffers. The president’s speech will spur others not at the ceremony to join the queue.

    Civilised countries develop their sports through the neighbourhood system where facilities are built to engage the youth and push them away from social vices. Nurseries serve as the bases for storing the data of those discovered. Such information helps to nurture and monitor the good ones to stardom. Besides, nurseries lay the foundation where the athletes are taught the rudiments of the game. It is at such factories that playing styles and patterns unique to such countries are evolved.

  • Governor-deputy feud in Ondo

    Governor-deputy feud in Ondo

    History is repeating itself in Ondo State. It may be the fallout of the refusal to learn from the lessons of the past.

    Also, some have attributed the brewing crisis in the state to a curious ill luck or stroke of fate. Others believe that it is a fait accompli.

    Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu and his deputy, Lucky Ayedatiwa, are at war. When this kind of face-off broke out in the past, it defied solution. Reconciliation was difficult, for obvious reasons.

    During the week, the governor applied his hammer, following his return from a three-month medical leave in Germany. All the aides of the embattled deputy governor were axed. Fear has now gripped other members of the State Executive Council (Exco) over an imminent reshuffle.

    The major issue is power, which is either constitutionally monopolised, reluctantly shared, or compulsorily delegated with reservation by the governor, who is the boss, to his deputy, who is perceived as a spare tyre.

    The presidential system only bestows power and authority on one man-president or governor. The deputy governor is like a footnote, except the chief executive dies, or he is impeached by the House of Assembly, or he is totally incapacitated by illness. It is only under any of these rare circumstances that the lone deputy can enjoy substantial power. It is unlike the parliamentary system where the next-in-command to the prime minister or his successor is picked by the party with the majority in the Parliament.

    Closely related is whether the beneficiary of seemingly shared power under the presidential system should be carried away by the relatively transient privilege to the extent that he now becomes oblivious to the limitations of the exercise of delegated executive power as acting governor.

    The correct interpretation of the executive presidency is that in the Governor’s Office, the governor is the boss who fully calls the shots. Other functionaries, including the deputy governor, are clustered with the most junior Personal Assistants. They are perceived as the governor’s servants who are not expected to compete for prominence with the big boss.

    The third dimension is human nature, which is brought to bear on constitutional interpretation of political roles. While the presidential system was suggested as a replacement for or better alternative to the parliamentary system in 1979 to prevent a scenario of “a nominal or ceremonial president working hollow to a power-loaded prime minister or head of government,” it has also unleashed a scenario of bitter feud between the President and Vice President, and between governors and their deputies in some states.

    The pattern of governor-deputy rift in Ondo State, and Edo, is, in part, the consequence of the practice of presidentialism.

    However, it is noteworthy that the governor-deputy crisis in Ondo State is usually associated with the politics of succession, which usually unfolds in varying dimensions. Reminiscent of previous dispensations, trust has broken down between Akeredolu and Ayedatiwa because certain mistakes or pitfalls were not avoided. Only a few indigenes, residents, and outsiders could be said to be neutral as the crisis escalated during the week. Tension engulfed the State Executive Council, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), the Aketi political family, and some parts of the state.

    The problem with the political class is that when cracks appear on the wall of brotherhood, political actors usually lack the skill and the right disposition to agree on how to mend them. The split is worrisome, bearing in mind that the governor also parted ways with the man that Ayedatiwa replaced, Agboola Ajayi, who was accused of scheming against his boss, ahead of the last governorship election in the Sunshine State.

    Read Also: Tinubu names Cardoso CBN governor in major shake-up

    The Ondo State governor is not a typical Nigerian politician. Those who know him have testified that he is neither pretentious nor aberrant. Despite being an experienced lawyer, he is not favourably disposed to administrative dribbling and cajoling. He does not incite or promise what he cannot deliver. Highly principled, Akeredolu does not hide his feelings; he has little time for political diplomacy. Among his virtues is investing trust and confidence in his aides.

    Conversely, he is swift to commence malice when trust is breached. The governor, like many leaders, loathes betrayal. He could be hot-tempered. But being the son of a priest, he forgives a lot. But, it is debatable if he can easily forget whenever he is seriously injured through backstabbing.

    Details of the governor’s dispute with his deputy are unknown. However, it is obvious that their interests no longer align. Besides, the usual argument is that a governor only moves against his deputy if – and only if – the honorary number two man has seriously breached the code of loyalty, which is the sole criterion for political survival. Although Ayedatiwa has reiterated his loyalty to his boss, it seems his leader perceives this as an afterthought.

    Why the deputy governor’s case has attracted more attention is that he was the governor’s choice when the more experienced and popular Agboola was dropped. Ayedatiwa was not imposed on Akeredolu. Besides, it was believed that the now embattled deputy governor was among those being considered for the governorship ticket ahead of next year’s election. He is from Ondo South District, where the ticket has been informally zoned.

    In the past, and even now, the bone of contention between governors and deputies is the approach of the latter to the actualisation of the ambition to occupy the number one seat. It has often resulted in a clash of interests within the dominant, but fictionalised camp within the ruling platform. Instead of waiting for Akeredolu to fight the battle for the ticket for him, it appeared the deputy governor, in perceived insensitivity to past instructive lessons, made some political moves in the absence of his boss, which ultimately became his undoing.

    Already, the deputy governor seemed to have an edge, following the relinquishing of power to him, as demanded by the constitution, when the governor embarked on the medical leave. He was proclaimed acting governor. But while in the eye of the constitution the acting governor is expected to take charge, it may be impracticable due to some political factors. The office of the deputy governor is a delicate place. Loyalty to the governor is not easily transferable to the acting governor. It is worse when the acting governor is also bidding for the governorship ticket, like some commissioners and other aides, who believe they only owe the governor their total submission.

    As the practice of presidentialism in Nigeria has shown, the vice president and deputy governors who acted for their bosses in periods of illness usually have crosses to carry for their actions and inactions when the president or governors return from medical vacation. That is why during the emergency, a deputy governor, who wields temporary power, should exercise caution or restraint in anticipation of the day of reckoning. Besides, the deputy governor is in a vantage position to know that no number two man has ever triumphed over his boss. This is because conflicts are often resolved in favour of governors. Power resides with the Senior Excellency.

    Historically, when a crisis broke out between former Ondo State Governor Adekunle Ajasin and his estranged deputy, Chief Akin Omoboriowo, over the 1983 electioneering, the deputy governor had to resign. Yet, the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) governorship ticket still eluded him. He went to the rival National Party of Nigeria (NPN), where he also lost his deposit. Also, when a disagreement broke out between former Ondo State Governor Olusegun Mimiko and his deputy, Ali Olanusi, over defection, the deputy governor was impeached, in error, because he refused to follow his boss to the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Ayedatiwa also witnessed the war of attrition between Akeredolu and Ajayi. The former deputy governor lost the war.

    The trend of appears the same across states: Olaniyan of Oyo, Abaribe of Abia, Aluko of Ekiti, Omisore of Osun, Agbaso and Madumere of Imo, Pedro of Lagos, Adesegun of Ogun, and Achuba of Kogi.

    All these scenarios point to one fact: the influence of a deputy governor is limited. His scope of constitutional responsibility is restrictive. Therefore, running mates require coping implements, adjustment skills, and emotional intelligence that are critical to survival while playing the second fiddle.

  • The naked gods (1)

    First published in 1971, the famous novelist, Chukwuemeka Ike’s ‘The Naked Gods’ vividly portrays the self-demystification in a fictive Shonghai University of Academics who had hitherto been apotheosized by a society which at the time placed much stock by high intellect and sound learning. But in the acrimonious and bitter struggle for the position of Vice-Chancellor of the institution in the soon-to-be independent country, otherwise highly revered scholars threw all morality and decorum to the winds and proved to be as ethically depraved and decadent as any other category of society.

    In the run-up to the last general elections and even in the aftermath of that landmark event in our political evolution, a good number of our Christian clerics of various denominations but especially the Pentecostals cast off their cloak of sacrosanct spirituality and donned the garb of partisan politicians prophesying victory in vain for candidates of their jaundiced prejudices all in the name of God. But did the Almighty not warn severally in the scriptures that his name should not be taken in vain?

    I think it was Joseph Schumpeter, the great Austrian economist, who once observed that when the average individual operates as a member of a crowd, he tends to drop to a lower level of intellectual and mental performance. Can it be denied that, in this season of unprecedented ascendancy of Information and Communication Technology and the attendant tyranny of the pervasive social media lynch mob, most of us, as individuals or groups, and no matter how brilliant, have succumbed to the lure of group think no matter how ridiculous and lacking in rigour our thought processes? The economist, John Galbraith, described it as the malaise of ‘conventional wisdom’ which may most often be quite misleading.

    It would appear that the Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria (CBCN), an otherwise highly regarded body of clerics, who added considerable value to society through rigorous and objective social, economic and political critiques, has given in to the seductive lure of political partisanship. We recall with nostalgia the patriotic, nationalistic and courageous stance of the CBCN against military dictatorship particularly in the aftermath of the annulment of the outcome of the June 12, 1993, presidential election. In the 2023, presidential election, however, the judgement of most members of the hierarchy of the Catholic Church have been tainted and swayed by the fact that a leading presidential candidate in the election, Mr. Peter Obi is reported to be a Catholic. His critics when he was governor of Anambra State alleged that he exhibited open partiality to the Catholic Church to the detriment of the other main faith, the Anglicans, resulting in tension, rivalry and hostility between the two. In recent times, such icons of the Catholic leadership hierarchy as John Cardinal Onaiyekan, the Archbishop Emeritus of Abuja and Archbishop Mathew Hassan Kukah of the Sokoto Archdiocese of the church have, in recent times expressed brazenly partisan views devoid of the logical rigour and empirical verity they are usually known for.

    With the delivery on September 6 of the much awaited judgement of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT) in the petitions filed against President Tinubu’s victory by candidates of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM), Labour Party (LP) and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), respectively, one would have expected a sober, insightful and well-reasoned response to the judicial verdict by the CBCN. It is unfortunate that what we had at the opening ceremony of the 2023 Second Plenary Assembly of the CBCN was a regurgitation of Ill thought out generalizations continuing to seek the delegitimization of the election and the PEPT judgement, mischievous innuendoes and misleading insinuations. It is no surprise that the Archbishop of Owerri, Lucas Iwejuru Ugorji, an Igbo like Peter Obi, who is the current President of the CBCN, was the spokesman at the opening of the event. The overlap between his Igbo ethnicity and Catholic religious faith, attributes he shares with Obi, no doubt coloured the good cleric’s perception of political reality with distorting bias.

    For instance, Archbishop Ugorji was quoted to have averred gravely that “continuous disregard to the will of the people who, for once trooped out to vote their desired candidate, was a threat to the nation’s democracy which was currently in a dangerous position”. What does the cleric mean by saying people trooped out “for once” during the 2023 election to vote for their desired candidate? Did people not come out to vote for their desired presidential candidates in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 and 2019 before now? Have people not voted for their desired choices in scores of other executive and legislative elections at the state level since 1999? Which ‘desired candidate’ is Archbishop Ugorji talking about? The one of his biased imaginations?

    There were three major contestants in the 2023 presidential election – Asiwaju Bola Tinubu of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Waziri Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Mr. Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP). Each of them won in at least 12 states including the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). In such a closely fought election, how did the Archbishop come to the conclusion that someone of his choice was the desired candidate and the will of the people has been disregarded because of such a person’s non-emergency? Were the petitioners against Tinubu’s victory able to convince the PEPT that he was not the choice of the majority of voters who gave him 8,894,726 votes in the election with Atiku recording 6,984,520 votes to come second and Obi coming third with 6,101,533 votes?

    The judgement of the PEPT which lasted for over twelve hours and was televised live has been widely praised for its thoroughness, meticulousness, lucidity, logic and clarity. Ironically, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba (SAN), an undisguised Obi supporter, sent a text message to an Arise News television anchor that the judges should have summarized their findings and the delivery should not have taken more than one hour. But as Mr. Dave Ajetomobi, a former Chairman of the Ikeja NBA, rightly observed, the judges “refused to summarize their findings so as to foreclose speculations by the fanatical supporters of a candidate.”

    In spite of the clearly demonstrated knowledge, experience, industry and competence of the PEPT to a global television audience, the CBCN constituted itself into an alternate court and declared that the election was “flawed by threats, intimidation, violence, the spilling of blood, poor logistics arrangement, inducement, impunity as well as the lack of transparency, manipulation of results, abuse of the power of incumbency, alleged ‘glitches’ and outright rigging”.

    It is indeed most pitiable when a supposedly revered body of clerics like the CBCN is unable to rise above the pedestrian, jejune and almost illiterate level of reasoning of the average member of the notorious ‘Obidients’ movement. For, in this election so cavalierly disparaged by the Catholic clerics, Obi and his LP won over 95% of the votes in the five South-East states in addition to winning such South-South states as Delta, Edo, Akwa-Ibom and Cross River. In the North-Central, the LP won in Nasarawa and Plateau while the party also won in Tinubu’s redoubt in Lagos as well as the FCT, Abuja. Obi directed his campaign mainly at his Igbo kinsmen as well as diverse segments of the Christian community and those were where he secured his victories. Conversely, his narrow ethnic and religious electoral appeal alienated him from predominantly Muslim states in the North-East, North-West and North-Central preventing him from securing the requisite spread of support to win a presidential election in a complex and diverse polity line Nigeria.

    Indeed, if the votes of the LP and New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) were added to that of the PDP, from which Obi and Rabiu Kwankwaso broke away, they had a total of 14,582,586 votes which suggests that the APC was unlikely to have won had the PDP not fragmented into the LP and NNPP. Beyond this, five governors who remained in the PDP refused to campaign for the party’s presidential candidate and the PDP failed to win in any of the states controlled by the G5. One would have expected a body of spiritual giants and intellectual titans like the CBCN to have been able to take all relevant factors into consideration to credibly analyze and arrive at informed conclusions on the elections.

    Commenting on the inability of INEC to upload the results of the presidential election on its IREV portal as it had earlier promised due to what the commission described as unanticipated glitches, the CBCN averred that this disappointed most Nigerians and that it affected the outcome of the elections. The PEPT specifically stressed that the petitioners presented no evidence before it to disprove INEC’s contention that the said glitches were unanticipated and not deliberate. According to the CBCN, “Despite the billions of Naira of tax-payers money appropriated for the provision of the BVAS technology as a game-changer in our general elections, the Judges in their ruling tried, among other things, to suggest that it was wrong to expect INEC to keep its promise or obey the electoral regulation of transmitting election results electronically in real time from the polling units”. It will be disrespectful to say that the clerics lied. But here they peddled an untruth.

    The judges were of the view that the Electoral Act gives INEC the discretion to transmit results by whatever means it finds appropriate and realistic. The CBCN should disprove the PEPT by citing specific laws compelling INEC to transmit results electronically. Nowhere, contrary to the CBCN, did the PEPT say that it was wrong to expect INEC to keep its promise. Rufai Oseni, one of the anchors of Arise television Morning Show, had wondered why INEC had apologized for its inability to upload results onto its IREV electronically in real time if it was not legally obligated to do so. No less could have been expected of the Commission. It had promised in its guidelines to upload the results on its IREV in real time but could not do so due to unexpected glitches and apologized as a decent organization should. But its guidelines are not superior to the Electoral Act which does not compel it to transmit results electronically. That is incontrovertible.

    Again, the PEPT had submitted that the petitioners did not demonstrate with evidence before the court that the results eventually transmitted to INEC’s IREV portal differed substantially from the results manually recorded on prescribed forms and signed by electoral officials, party agents and security operatives at the 176,974 polling units across the country. In any case, the court found it inexplicable that the petitioners did not present any of their polling agents across these thousands of polling units to give eyewitness accounts in court of the alleged widespread malpractices before the judges!

    It is clear that what the CBCN wanted was a victory for its desired candidate at the PEPT which such a candidate did not achieve at the polls on the field. Anything short of this, the body of partisan Catholic bishops will continue to question the integrity and credibility of the judiciary even right up to the Supreme Court. But the respected clerics should remember that three landmark judicial decisions enabled Peter Obi to emerge and serve as governor of Anambra State for eight years from March to November, 2006, February to May 2007, and June 2007 to March 2014. It is unfair and dishonest to create the impression that if judicial decisions do not go Peter Obi’s way now, then it means that the judiciary is corrupted and Nigeria’s democracy endangered. When the men in cassock allow ethnic and religious biases to becloud their reason, pervert their judgement and make them unwitting purveyors of manifest falsehood, they strip themselves naked in the marketplace.

    Contrary to the CBCN, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Joseph Nwobike, in assessing the judgement, told the Nigerian Tribune that “I must confess that the judgements delivered by the Tribunal are unassailable. The basis for the resolution of all the issues of law and facts formulated by the parties are consistent with the body of judicial precedents on all the points. The decisions are therefore correct…I will want to appreciate the learned justices for the rare industry applied in writing and delivering the judgements. The decisions will for a long time to come serve as a veritable guide for lawyers, administrators and politicians involved in electoral processes in Nigeria and perhaps beyond.”

    And the 85-year old Chief Robert Clarke (SAN) submitted that “These two judgements are the best judgements I think this country has ever had; it is a good thing that these two judgements today are being broadcast live so that you and I and those who aren’t knowledgeable in the law will understand what is at stake in the country. These two judgements have greatly enriched the jurisprudence of this country despite or in spite of what the Labour Party might say and I can tell you that I can boast of learning tonight what I normally teach my young lawyers that you can win or lose on your pleadings. The two judgements, especially Atiku’s case, show you that pleadings were the cause of the loss. In Atiku’s case, the pleadings were rough and inadequate”.