Category: Segun Ayobolu

  • All eyes on Osun

    All eyes on Osun

    Classically defined as the government of the people, by the people and for the people, contemporary conventional wisdom describes democracy as the best form of government. One of the reasons for this view is that representative democracies are predicated on the will and consent of the people and must thus be responsible and accountable to them. Since democratic governments derive their legitimacy from the will of the people and remain in power only at the pleasure of the electoral majority, it is assumed, at least in theory, that they will be more compelled than dictatorships to promote development and the public good. However, this assumption cannot be taken for granted. Its validity depends firstly on free, fair and credible polls and, secondly, on performance being a key determining factor in electoral outcomes.

    What we have experienced in Nigeria since 1999 is the strange phenomenon whereby the PDP has continued to ‘win’ elections at the centre and in a majority of the states even as the fortunes of the country continue to decline in virtually all sectors and the vast majority of Nigerians increasingly impoverished under its watch. What then can be the motivation for a government to perform and keep its electoral compact with the people when it is rewarded with emphatic victories at the polls irrespective of the quality of its performance or the extent of its ineptness and moral degeneration? As the country has grown richer, at least according to the re-based GDP, unemployment, insecurity and hunger have worsened with the majority of Nigerians descending deeper into poverty. The increased impoverishment of Nigerians has fuelled the monetisation of elections with the highest bidder likely to triumph at the polls through the deployment of stolen public wealth. It cannot get more absurd than that. This is a classic case of what the late Claude Ake would describe as ‘how democracy underdevelops Nigeria’.

    Matters are not helped when a desperate Jonathan presidency cynically and ruthlessly exploits all opportunities to keep Nigerians divided along ethnic, religious and regional fault lines all in a bid to perpetuate itself in power at all costs beyond 2015. Can you see, for instance, how a Chibok community, hitherto united in their single-minded quest for the return of their abducted girls by Boko Haram brigands, have been divided through monetary gratifications by a delegation’s visit to Abuja’s cash-laden presidential Villa? All that the Jonathan presidency touches, it taints and divides!

    The enthusiasm and impunity with which the Jonathan presidency deploys asymmetric federal powers and resources to crush all opposition and impose its might on Nigerians no matter how lawlessly, shows that the whole idea of the national conference , purportedly convened to restructure Nigeria, fundamentally reduce the powers of the centre and create a more balanced federation, was an entire ruse. Let no one think that resolutions passed by a collection of unelected Nigerians with absolutely no legal powers can convince this president to give up the immense powers conferred on him by the existing constitution. That purpose can only be achieved by the irresistible force of people’s power expressed through a genuine mass movement. But that is a matter for another day.

    Is all therefore lost as far as elections are concerned in Nigeria? Must we raise our hands in helpless surrender and watch federal might and the emergent culture of ‘stomach infrastructure’ enable the PDP actualise its wish of imposing its suzerainty over Nigeria for the next six decades? I do not think so. There are some glimmers of hope that people’s power can still triumph in elections over arrogant and irresponsible use of federal might. In the Ondo and Anambra governorship polls, for instance, the PDP could not use its federal might for its own benefit. It had to work through auxiliary parties, Labour Party (LP) and All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) respectively to contain a resurgent and threatening APC. The behemoth may be grossly overrated after all.

    In Edo State, massive deployment of federal force and resources as well as crude ethnic manipulations could not displace the ebullient, high performing and grassroots-oriented Adams Oshiomhole. The jury is still out on what went wrong in Ekiti. Some attribute the unexpected outcome of the June 21 governorship election to sophisticated, scientific rigging. The APC has taken its case to the Election Petition Tribunal contending that a process tainted by excessive militarisation, intimidation and harassment of targeted party leaders could not have produced a flawless outcome. My take is that the gains of excellent governance and visionary reforms were eroded by inept, divisive and detached politics, which enabled an intellectual and moral Lilliputian like Ayodele Fayose to defeat a far more competent and credible Kayode Fayemi in Ekiti.

    An excited and misguidedly optimistic PDP now has Osun as its target in next Saturday’s governorship election. The Minister of State for Defence, Musliu Obanikoro and his collaborator in mischief, Minister of Police Affairs, Jelili Adesiyan, are once again hyperactive. Thousands of heavily armed security operatives have already been deployed to Osun, driving roughly round major towns and shooting in the air like thugs and ruffians. And this at a time when we need all the men and resources we can muster to contain the raging insurgency in the North-East – a war in which the country is continuously being given a bloody nose. This is clearly the most irresponsible Federal Government in the history of Nigeria.

    Yet, in Ogbeni Raufu Aregebesola, the diminutive Governor of Osun State with a razor sharp intellect and magnetic political charisma, the PDP has met its match. You cannot fault Aregbesola on the terrain of performance. Osun is 34th of the 36 states in terms of statutory allocation from the Federation Account. Apart from this paltry federal allocation, previous administrations were incapacitated by an Internally Generated Revenue of approximately N300 million monthly. Thinking outside the box and devising ingenious strategies, Osun’s IGR has grown to N1.6 billion monthly under Aregbesola’s watch. According to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Osun state today has the lowest poverty index in Nigeria.

    Through the revolutionary Osun Youth Employment Scheme (OYES), Aregbesola created 40,000 jobs, which injects N200 million into the local economy monthly. This is in addition to recruiting thousands of workers into the civil service and teaching service cadres. His massive road construction projects are visible across the state with beneficial impact on economic productivity. His administration has consistently supported the huge population of farmers to boost food production and enhance food security. His reforms in the education sector have created jobs for hundreds of tailors who produce school uniforms as well as caterers who provide one nutritious meal per day for all children in public schools. Of course, the innovative and revolutionary computer learning tablet, ‘Opon Imo’ has become a household name and even received international acclaim. There is no doubt in my mind that the flawed and insulting ‘stomach infrastructure’ hypothesis will be discredited, cremated and buried in Osun next Saturday.

    Aregbesola is at home both in the company of professors as well as of farmers and marketmen and women. He is the quintessential man of the people. As a grassroots mobilizer, he is incomparable. This is why the PDP candidate, Senator Iyiola Omisore’s antics of riding on okadas and eating roasted corn with a masked gun man behind him is so utterly ridiculous and laughable. You cannot give what you don’t have. Incidentally, Omisore, who recently claims to have acquired a Ph.D in some nebulous discipline, ran away from engaging Aregbesola and other candidates in a televised debate.

    Aregbesola’s grassroots mobilization skills are understandable. As a student, he was the President of the Black Nationalist Movement. Under the influence of the late Marxist theoretician and economist, Comrade Ola Oni, he became inclined towards revolutionary Marxism. We can thus understand the progressive, welfarist orientation of his politics. As commissioner for works for eight years in Lagos State, Aregbesola was a key pillar of the formidable grassroots structure of the ACN. This is why the APC in Osun is a true mass movement.  Although a fervent and devout Muslim, Aregbesola symbolises the liberal and tolerant religious outlook of the Yoruba of the South-West. The attempt to negatively tag him as a religious fanatic has failed abysmally. All religious faiths have been allowed to thrive under his administration and leading Christian clerics have openly identified with his administration. Next Saturday, we will see a confrontation between federal might and people’s power in Osun State. I am confident that the latter will triumph decisively as a signpost to the possibilities of 2015.

  • Ideological clarity in Nigerian politics

    Ideological clarity in Nigerian politics

    « …we, on the threshold of this new constitution, are on the cross roads ; there is that broad, smooth road, with promises of no-taxation, and efforts to get money from other places, leading nowhere but to perdition, poverty, disease and economic enslavement ; and there is the other road – people who go therein pay tax. They also have to apply self-help and self-sacrifice to get where they want. But this road, Mr President, leads to success, to prosperity and to the exploitation of our natural resources by the people of this country” –  Chief ObafemiAwolowo, August, 1954

    Responding to my article ‘Further Thoughts on Ekiti Polls’, an eminent son of Ekiti state sent me a text message agreeing substantially with my views but pointing out that the defeat of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in that election could be attributed beyond Dr KayodeFayemi’s flaws to the inability of the people to see any ideological differences between the APC and the PDP. I agree that the lack of ideological clarity among the major political parties is a major problem in contemporary Nigerian politics. The APC projects itself as a progressive party in the mould of the Action Group (AG) and the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) of the first and second republics. This image was tenable and credible particularly on the part of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) before the grand merger that produced the APC as a mega party.

    The very necessity of the merger to forge an alliance capable of effectively contending with the PDP behemoth at the polls inevitably blunted the progressive ideological edge of the new party. This is understandable. The APC had to devise strategies to win power first before being able to implement policies inspired by a progressive ideology. In the process, the APC was forced to accommodate all shades of characters and tendencies many of whom left the ruling PDP not on grounds of principle but because they were losing out in the power game within the party. Some of those who joined the APC at its inception and were even accepted into its inner leadership core were worse than conservative; they had reactionary antecedents. These elements have since found their way back to their natural habitat, the PDP thus reinforcing the notion that there are really no differences of ideology or values between the two parties.

    Interestingly, no one has captured more incisively and clinically the ideological hiatus that separates the APC from the PDP than the Governor of Ekiti State, Dr KayodeFayemi. In his very important book, ‘Regaining the Legacy: Three Years in the Saddle’, Fayemi captures the ideological essence of the APC and I will quote him at some length: “Nigeria stands at a historic juncture. For the first time, the nation is witnessing the practical differences between the neo-classical economic policies of the ruling PDP and the progressive political economic policies of the merging APC as exemplified by the states under our control. This difference has manifested itself in the divergence of opinions regarding issues such as Sovereign Wealth Fund, fiscal federalism and the fuel subsidy removal. The governing PDP has embraced the supply side economics in accord with the dictates of the doctrinal mindset of the international financial institutions. Under this worldview, the moneyed elite and big business are given the utmost advantage to reinforce their economic advantages. This trickle down economic theory has clearly failed to empower the bulk of our population. Conversely, we have embraced a more grassroots model of economic development that promises dignified employment and a decent wage, good social services, and social safety nets, modern, functional education that provides marketable labour skills; increased agricultural output, revival of moribund industries, promotion of the knowledge economy and provision of modern infrastructure”. The critical question is why with this deep philosophical insight Fayemi was unable to translate theory into practical electoral victory in Ekiti state. The answer lies in his personal leadership failings which I have addressed in this space and will not dwell upon further.

    It is not as if the APC has not tried to project its philosophy of governance and sought to focus public discourse on pertinent issues confronting the average Nigerian. The party was thus widely applauded when it earlier in the year launched its policy road map and manifesto. But what was the response of the PDP? The latter did not undertake a rigorous critique of the APC road map. Its spokesman, OlisaMetuh simply dismissed it as a ‘janjaweed agenda’ thus tarring the APC with the brush of religious bigotry. The APC confronts a major dilemma because its opponent is a party that defies any meaningful ideological categorisation. I have insisted that the PDP cannot rightly be described as a conservative party in the mould of either the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) of the first republic or the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) of the second republic. Conservatism is a respected and cohesive ideology, which places premium on minimal government, limited intervention of the state in the economy, fiscal discipline and strict adherence to moral and ethical principles. The PDP stands for none of these values. It is purely and simply a vote-harvesting machine with the singular aim of capturing and retaining power for its own sake.

    The PDP has been in power at the centre since 1999. Under President OlusegunObasanjo, its policy platform was the National Economic Empowerment Development Strategy (NEEDS). The late President UmaruYar’Adua jettisoned this for his nebulous seven-point agenda. President GoodluckJonatrhan has in turn dumped YaÁdua’s seven point agenda and is currently purportedly implementing a transformation agenda of little substantive content and negligible impact. Under the PDP’s watch, the country has degenerated abysmally on all fronts – education, health, security, electricity, employment generation, industrialization, agriculture, and poverty alleviation. Yet, President Jonathan is confident of being re-elected for a second term next year, not on the basis of his performance record, but on his ability to divide Nigerians in order to rule them. His has been the most divisive presidency in Nigeria’s history deliberately pitching Christians against Muslims, the North against the South or the middle belt against the core north.

    In the South-West, the PDP is propagating a most cynical form of populism. It promises to abolish or substantially reduce taxes. As Chief Awolowo noted in the quote above, the attractive road of no taxation may seem broad, easy and pleasurable but it eventually ends in poverty, penury and perdition. In Ekiti and Osun states, AyodeleFayose and IyiolaOmisore hop on Okadas or eat roasted corn by the roadside, albeit with sinister masked gun men behind them, in fake, hypocritical solidarity with the poor. We thus have an ironical situation whereby the PDP is now trying to profit politically from its poor macro-economic policies at the national level that has crippled Nigeria’s agriculture, led to massive de-industrialisation, multiplied unemployment and reduced large numbers of our populace to the dangers of riding okadas for a living or selling roasted corn by the road side. Which is really the party of the people? Is it that which wants to keep the people at the menial level of riding okadas for a living or that which through massive infrastructure renewal and qualitative social services wants to elevate the economy to create greater prosperity for all? That is the question the APC must creatively and ingeniously communicate to the electorate.

    The APC must refuse to be stampeded by the Ekiti electoral debacle into abandoning its core principles and values. Massive infrastructure provision cannot be compromised. Taxes are painful but inevitable for development. The level of recurrent to capital expenditure must be drastically reduced if meaningful transformation is to be achieved. The imperative of having competent teachers cannot be compromised if we are to have truly educated youth equipped to compete in a global economy. Our economy must be radically elevated so that our people have more dignified ways of earning a living than riding okadas. Principles, values and ideology matter. Everything is not about winning elections. Fayemi lost in Ekiti but he has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. Whatever may be his own flaws like all mortals, history will ultimately vindicate the values he stood for as Ekiti state governor. Unfortunately, the wide ranging and thought provoking interview he granted this newspaper last Sunday suggests a man living in denial and thus incapable of facing bitter political realities. His political future rests on his ability to confront and accept cold realities. His contention that he never gave a concession speech, for instance, smacks of intellectual dishonesty, which is totally unbecoming of a gentleman and sober scholar.

    In the absence of any redeeming ideology or coherent policy framework, the PDP has become devastatingly adept at running negative campaigns of calumny against the opposition. On the Ekiti polls, the authoritative and influential London-based journal, ‘Africa Confidential’ wrote: “Fayose told voters that Fayemi’s reform plans would mean massive job cuts in the civil service and claimed he was using state funds to build a university in Ghana. By the time Fayemi’s team issued rebuttals, much of the damage had been done. Fayose’s team ran a textbook negative campaign – well funded and personally targeted”. This is a communication challenge the APC must be prepared to confront and effectively counter in future elections.

  • Re: Further thoughts on Ekiti polls

    Re: Further thoughts on Ekiti polls

    Dear Mr. Segun Ayobolu,

    Please permit me to correct some wrong information in your article titled ‘Further thoughts on Ekiti Polls’   in your column on the back page of the Nation of July 5, 2014. It is obvious that you based many of your assumptions on the wrong information you received from Ekiti. Whoever gave you information in Ekiti gave you wrong information upon which you based your article and thus misinformed the public.

    Your first misinformation is that Dr. Fayemi lost his polling unit, town and ward to the PDP. However, the truth is that Dr. Fayemi won in his polling unit, town and ward- Isan/Ilafon/Ilemeso. The results from INEC’s form EC8A is, unit 09 Fayemi APC- 167, Fayose PDP- 1(one) Opeyemi Bamidele LP-(0). Fayemi’s ward- Fayemi-2,022 Fayose-261, Bamidele-6. Please always be sure of your facts. That is about election results in Fayemi’s polling unit and ward.

    On the other spurious misinformation upon which you based your article and conclusion, you are very wrong! Whoever gave you that information has misled you into writing your article and you are guilty of a grievous error of judgment. Fayemi did a lot in Isan though that is not to say he is a Governor of Isan town but that of Ekiti State and there should be no regret about this. It is possible that the man who sent you an sms from the governor’s town was the only voter for Fayose who recorded 1 vote in the town. This is expected as no leader, including Fayemi and Fayose, no matter how popular, can have 100 percent support in his home town. Let’s assume the result is the true expression of the wishes of Ekiti people,  while 38 people voted against Fayose in his home town of Afao,  only 1 voted against Fayemi in Isan so who is more popular at home?

    If excessive militarization of the State before and during the election did not affect the result of the election substantially what else did in your estimation assuming we are not considering other factors? A situation whereby as many as 400 (Four Hundred) APC leaders who were supposed to galvanise their members to vote were hounded and herded into various detention cells on the eve of election and on election day could not be said to be a non-issue. No doubt, this shameless, crude and naked abuse of Federal power substantially affected the result of the election.

    Mr. Ayobolu, how else will Fayemi refute the misinformation that he or his wife built a University in Ghana? Apart from debunking this wicked lie at every forum by the Governor and his wife Bisi, is the onus not on those who alleged to prove that he actually owns a University in Ghana? Till date, none of those who alleged this has been able to come up with the name or address of the University in Ghana so what else is Fayemi or his wife supposed to do?

    That Dr. Fayemi built mansions in Isan on assumption of office is not only fallacious, but mischievous because he had completed those set of six bungalows before he was sworn in on October 2010 and this was declared as part of his assets and published in the dailies.

    Your analysis about the stomach infrastructure cannot be correct. Let’s assume without conceding that Fayemi lost because Ekiti people prefer stomach infrastructure which he fails to do, are you telling us Fayose did better stomach infrastructure between when he emerged as governorship candidate of the PDP in April 2014 than Fayemi who started this 42 months ago? If it is all about rice (as we are made to believe and this is an insult to Ekiti people), do you know that Fayemi more than two years ago started feeding the elderly with choice cooked food all over Ekiti why those who can cook were given raw food stuff under the food bank programme?.

    This is apart from the fact that 25,000 elderly people were paid N5,000 monthly. 15,000 youths were paid N10,000 monthly under the Youth Volunteer Scheme. Over 2,000 women across Ekiti benefited from Conditional Cash Transfer by earning N5, 000 monthly. This is aside from thousands of women across the state that the wife of the Governor has empowered with cash and materials. Such groups as hairdressers, market women, tailors, food vendors were regularly empowered with cash and tools not once. There are many other programmes aimed at empowerment (stomach infrastructure) which the government did for many Ekiti people.  I need to be enlightened what other stomach infrastructure we are talking about. There is no community in Ekiti state that does not earn a monthly cash inflow of between 500, 000 and 20 million naira being various amounts earned by indigenes of such towns from various government programmes mentioned above so which other stomach infrastructure are we talking about? Is Fayemi expected to be throwing money on the streets at regular intervals?

    About Dr. Fayemi’s alleged disconnect with the masses, nothing could be farther from the truth.

    This is a governor whose budget is a result of town hall meetings of requests from the communities in Ekiti state. He did this from 2011 to 2013.  Many projects in the 131 towns in Ekiti state today are a result of the town hall meetings and requests made. The wife of the governor since 42 months ago have been interacting and impacting positively on the women in the rural areas through many of her empowerment projects. She has paid hospital bills of many indigent patients, she has taken over the care of multiple births under her Multiple Birth Trust Fund. She visited markets and farmsteads more than once to interact and empower the women. Fayemi is the only Governor who has given many communities various sums of money to assist in many projects such as town halls and palaces which many towns have abandoned due to lack of funds. So the question is, how else does a governor connect with the grassroots? Is the analysis of this election not all about calling a dog a bad name in order to hang it?

    You said Otunba Niyi Adebayo’s 22 year old son is the Special Adviser to the Governor on Diaspora matters, this is also not correct as there is no such position in Fayemi’s government. There is a Senior Special Assistant to Fayemi on Diaspora matters who is from Ire-Ekiti and he is close to 50 years of age. I don’t know where you got this wrong information from.

    On your allusion that Fayemi has kept Asiwaju and those who helped him to power at arms length, I don’t know what informed your position except Asiwaju complained to you! You may be close to Asiwaju but you are not the only person who is close to him and that is not the view and position of the rest of them. Fayemi has not kept Asiwaju at arms length but has continued to hold this human colossus in high esteem.

    I also don’t understand what you mean by the statement that Fayemi’s Commissioners and Special Advisers cannot boast of N1 million naira in their bank accounts, then I ask, is being a Commissioner all about personal aggrandizement? I won’t say much about that but I know that is also not correct.

    If you are truly Dr. Fayemi’s friend, you ought to have done a thorough check of your facts before writing that article which is an embarrassment to him and an attempt to rubbish his person and all his achievements in Ekiti State. With a friend like you Ekiti State needs look no further for an enemy or how else can one put the deliberate distortion of facts from you especially on the poll results from Fayemi’s unit, town and ward. This is why Yorubas say, Idaamu akoni lo maa so omugo di ologbon (It is the tribulation of a brave man that turns a foolish man to an emergency adviser)

    The truth of the matter is that there is not yet an agreement that the result of the Ekiti election as declared by INEC is the true reflection of the wishes of Ekiti voters. Many believe that the result is strange and more than meets the eye. Fayemi in his concession speech said that much and that is why the party is challenging the result in court. If the ballot papers were compromised as is rumoured in many quarters, then it means that the votes of Ekiti people didn’t count. If this is the case, it follows that any analysis based on the  result cannot explain anything, cannot describe Ekiti people as preferring stomach infrastructure to physical infrastructure and as people who are ingrates and who do not value development despite their education!

    I want you to ponder over these questions:

    1. Is it possible for Dr. Fayemi an incumbent who has transformed Ekiti so much to lose with such a margin to the extent that he didn’t win in any Local Government?

    2. If a thief burgles a house and carts everything away including the grinding stone for pepper, what will you think?

    3. If the result is real, why are people not jubilating across Ekiti in proportion the votes declared in favour of the PDP candidate? For example if it is true that Fayose scored 41,000 votes in Ado-Ekiti why is it that, not even 1,000 people of this figure could come out to jubilate after the result were announced?

    4. Did all PDP Governors who have earned second terms perform more than Kayode Fayemi or did they meet all your conditions especially stomach infrastructure for their people?

    5. Teachers have been on strike in Benue State for the past 9 months, are you saying the PDP Governor there will not win again if he should contest for another term?

    6. Are you saying the present Kogi State Governor will not win again despite his refusal to pay minimum wage?

    7. Are you saying that Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State will not win a second term despite conducting the same Teachers Development Needs Assessment (TDNA) which Ekiti teachers revolted against? In Bayelsa, those who failed the test were redeployed.

    The result defies all logic, all reasoning and all commonsense. Until the mystery behind the ballot papers is resolved, I implore you and other columnists to hold your judgment and analysis of Ekiti elections.

    Hakeem Jamiu

    Ado-Ekiti

  • Further thoughts on Ekiti polls

    Further thoughts on Ekiti polls

    The primary vocation of the intellectual is the pursuit and advocacy of truth no matter how distasteful or bitter. Paul Baran, the late American political economist, insisted that the intellectual must ruthlessly criticise everything under the sun with the determination and courage to pursue rational inquiry to wherever it may lead irrespective of the consequences. In a famous lecture at the University of Jos, the late Professor Aaron Gana, the eminent political scientist, linked this to the famous admonition by Jesus Christ that “You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free”. The journalist is no intellectual. The nature of the profession gives little time for the kind of detailed and rigorous research undertaken by the intellectual. Journalists are said to write history in a hurry. Yet, we are no less bound by a commitment to truth as the intellectual. That is why it is said in the profession that while comments are free, facts are sacred.

    Last week, I joined in the effort to make sense out of the June 21 governorship elections in Ekiti State, which saw an incumbent, Dr Kayode Fayemi, perceived to be high-performing losing comprehensively to a populist, theatrical and controversial Ayodele Fayose with a tainted record as an impeached former governor of the state. Like most other commentators, including the famous Professor Niyi Osundare, whose satirical poem, ‘A rice O compatriots, thy stomach’s call obey’ has gone viral on-line, I interpreted the outcome of the election as a vote by the Ekiti electorate for instant and transient material gratification rather than enduring development; an endorsement of crude distribution of food and cash to the people rather than initiating and pursuing projects and programmes to uplift them out of poverty.

    In his thoughtful public ruminations on the Ekiti polls, Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) has raised pertinent questions, which have been misinterpreted as insulting the Ekiti people. Like the Governor, I also wondered if governance should be about distributing money to the poor or empowering them to be self-reliant through development projects. I wondered how an incumbent governor could have lost in his own home town and ward in a credible election. Well, given the overwhelming responses to my column – phone calls, text messages, and emails – mostly from Ekiti indigenes, I am afraid I was dreadfully wrong. I reacted cognitively and logically to the Ekiti polls without a proper appraisal of the empirical realities.

    Yes, the excessive and intimidating militarisation of Ekiti before and during the election was unwarranted. The partisan use of security agents by the Minister of Defence, Musliu Obanikoro and Minister of Police Affairs, Jelili Adesiyan is contemptible and condemnable. The intimidation of APC political leaders, abridgement of the freedom of movement of APC governors and teargasing by mobile police of the Governor Fayemi’s convoy negated the creation of a level paying ground necessary for free and fair elections. Yet, from the feedback I have received, the truth is that Mr Ayodele Fayose would still have won without all of these abuses. Indeed, it appears to me that violence would have broken out if, for any reason, Fayemi had been declared winner. It was that bad.

    Is it possible that Dr Fayemi could credibly have lost in his own home town, Isan-Ekiti? A reader from the town sent me a text message that he voted against the governor because he always insisted he was the governor of the whole of Ekiti State and not of Isan. Thus, they did not enjoy any special privilege from the fact of their son being governor. This may have been ethically right on the part of Fayemi but it was politically suicidal for him at home. Another response to my article was that Fayemi had built an imposing country home in Isan within his first year in office while most of the people remained immersed in poverty. The Fayemi government never successfully refuted the widespread rumour that the First Lady, Bisi Fayemi, allegedly built a higher institution in Ghana during his tenure. Thus, it is not that the people did not see and appreciate the massive infrastructure projects of the Fayemi administration. However, the construction of these projects were perceived as financially empowering a few in Fayemi’s inner circle many of whom were of no significant economic status before his emergence as governor. Thus, the quite natural and understandable insistence of the people that what is now popularly called ‘stomach infrastructure’ must be democratised and not restricted to the governor and his friends.

    A lecturer at the Ado-Ekiti University told me that most of the staff and students of the institution voted against Fayemi. If a Phd holder could not connect with his own academic colleagues, what are we talking about? And at the same time Fayemi was completely disconnected from the grassroots lumpen elements that were swept off their feet by Fayose’s populist antics despite the latter’s well- known flaws. Similarly, a national legislator of the APC from Ekiti State told me of how Fayemi had become inaccessible and alienated from the legislators at both the state and national levels and even many members of his cabinet. I am told that while many of Fayemi’s commissioners and special advisers could hardly boast of one million naira in their bank accounts, those in his inner circle had reportedly become stupendously wealthy. The Chief of Staff, Yemi Adaramodu, reportedly rude, arrogant and snobbish was a key factor in Fayemi’s loss. An APC chieftain in Ado-Ekiti recalled how Fayose and Opeyemi Bamidele reached out to him morally and financially when he lost his mother while his own governor did not even give him a phone call. This illustrates how alienated the Fayemi government was even from his own party that was consequently demotivated from working for his re-election with passion and commitment.

    Otunba Niyi Adebayo reportedly had two commissioners in Fayemi’s government including the commissioner for works; his 22 year old son was Special Adviser on Diaspora Matters (whatever that means) to the governor and Adebayo had five cousins appointed at various levels of the administration. This was in addition to unrefuted reports of the former governor handling several contracts.  Yet, many of those who fervently supported Fayemi intellectually, morally, financially and logistically during his three and a half year struggle to reclaim his mandate, including Asiwaju Bola Tinubu were kept at arms –length by Fayemi. The same Tinubu has stood valiantly by him following his June 21 defeat. Otunba Adebayo who could not even deliver his polling unit to Fayemi has remained thunderously silent while another of Fayemi’s cherished ‘godfathers’, Chief Afe Babalola (SAN), who publicly supported Fayemi before the election has come out after the polls to say that Ekiti cannot afford to be in opposition! It is stunning that a highly respected SAN cannot appreciate the critical, indispensable necessity of opposition for healthy democracy and good governance. That, however, is a matter for another day.

    I hate to write these bitter truths but have no choice but to honestly put out the feed- back generated by last week’s column. Dr. Fayemi is my friend but I deliberately refused to visit Ekiti throughout his tenure. I never requested for, nor was ever offered even a bottle of coke by his government. All I have written in support of his government and re-election have thus been based on principle and the facts as I saw it. But what I can now surmise is that an ordinarily brilliant, humble and unassuming Kayode Fayemi became transformed by power into a haughty, hubristic governor almost contemptuous of his party and people. It is ironical that a student of power like Fayemi turned out to be so inept in its usage and management. There is no way, for instance, that an astute politician would have allowed Opeyemi Bamidele, who played such a key role in his emergence as governor, to become such a bitter opponent.

    The outcome of the June 21 election in Ekiti was a massive rejection of Fayemi’s style of governance and not necessarily of the APC. But the APC is suffering the consequences of condoning and ignoring the excesses of the governor. If Fayemi had got his politics right, a million bags of rice or a battalion of soldiers could not have delivered Ekiti to the PDP. Luckily for the APC, in Osun, Ogbeni Aregbesola is a solid grassroots politician; his lifestyle and attitude have not been perverted by power; he is a fervent and passionate party man; his massive development projects are integrated into the local economy and where he has inevitably had conflicts with interest groups, he has bent over backwards to explain his motives and resolve the issues. The loopholes that facilitated PDP’s victory in Ekiti do not exist in Osun. If the Ekiti elections reflected the will of the people, then it is very good for Nigeria’s democracy. This means that given his appalling non-performance, President Goodluck Jonathan is a very vulnerable incumbent in a credible 2015 election.

  • Ekiti: Nigeria’s democracy on critical support 

    Ekiti: Nigeria’s democracy on critical support 

    Truth has indeed triumph (sic) in Ekiti. Shame on people who are paid to image launder for people with impeccable moral and intellectual credentials. The people have spoken. Period and shut up please”. That was the insulting and gloating text message sent to me by a reader who was reacting to my short take, last week, on the Ekiti polls titled ‘Ekiti: Truth Will Triumph’. I wrote, “As is now usual with Nigerian elections under President Goodluck Jonathan, the number of security agents will probably outnumber voters in today’s polls. On one hand is a candidate yet to clear himself of corruption and murder charges currently in court. He confronts an incumbent with impeccable moral and intellectual credentials. There is a candidate whose loftiest idea of government was to build poultry sheds. There is an incumbent with sterling performance in infrastructure provision and social service delivery. In between is a decent progressive who unfortunately finds himself on the wrong side of history. Ekiti is a land of honourable and valiant people. They can neither be deceived nor intimidated. We shall ultimately celebrate the triumph of truth”.

    Despite the outcome of the election, I take nothing back.

    Despite Governor-elect, Mr Ayodele Fayose’s purported victory, Dr. Kayode Fayemi maintains the moral and cerebral high ground. In the aftermath of the polls, Dr Fayemi is suddenly being accused of sundry sins. Significantly, no one has said that he ran a corrupt government or stole Ekiti State’s funds. Yet, even after he was pronounced elected as Governor, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) maintained that Mr Fayose is still being prosecuted for alleged multi-billion Naira fraud involved in his administration’s Integrated Poultry project. Indeed, he was impeached and disgraced out of office by his own political party for that alleged offence. It speaks volumes of our diseased democracy and contaminated politics that such a person could have been presented to the electorate by a political party and claimed a landslide victory. The triumph of this kind of tainted truth can only be ephemeral and transitory. As for my friend, Honourable Opeyemi Bamidele, it can certainly not give him enduring fulfilment that all he has been able to achieve is help play the spoiler and enthrone the same retrogressive forces he had fought all his life as a committed progressive.

    Fayemi has remained an icon and role model of grace, decorum and honour in what is supposed to be his moment of travail. The last has certainly not been heard of this unique intellectual, democrat even if misunderstood reformer in the country’s politics. After rain comes sunshine and after darkness the glorious dawn, the great Awo once intoned. So shall it be in Ekiti. I am amazed at how uncritically some of our most respected public analysts have accepted and celebrated the outcome of the Ekiti polls as truly reflecting the will of the people. Governor Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) of Lagos State is one of the few who has taken a deeply introspective and philosophical look at the implications of the Ekiti polls both for decent human behaviour and democratic sustainability. Too many of our public commentators have been surprisingly desensitised to the unacceptable level of militarisation of Ekiti before, during and after the election. This has now become a normal feature of Nigeria’s abnormal elections.

    A Commander-In-Chief and his military high command currently being humbled and hobbled by a rag tag Boko Haram force can dissipate scarce resources as well as the energy, passion and focus of the security agencies on the conduct of armed elections at a time when they acknowledge the country is at war. This is the height of irresponsibility. All of a sudden the armed forces and other security agencies have become politically hyperactive. Minister of State for Defence, Musiliu Obanikoro and his Police Affairs counterpart, Abdul-Jelil Adesiyan, are given free access to Ekiti State. They reportedly deploy professional security personnel for partisan purposes. Yet, the mobile police tear gas the convoy of the incumbent governor. An army captain threatens to shoot another governor and prevents him from campaigning for his party in Ekiti State. The aircraft of another of the party’s governors is grounded and his freedom of movement curtailed.  When security agents get used to defying constitutional political authority, the entire democratic process is endangered. It has happened in the past. Let us be careful. There is darkness visible. Nigeria’s democracy is on life support.

    It is of course not impossible that Mr Fayose won the election. But is the margin of that victory defensible? Is the scale of his purported triumph logically and rationally justifiable? Could Governor Fayemi have been so bad that even the people of his home town would vote against him? It has been argued that the Fayemi government was ‘disconnected’ from the people. Now, my question is this: What is the first level and basis of a government’s ‘connected-ness’ with the people? Is it not performance? Now, even Fayemi’s harshest critics concede that he performed. He built roads. He modernised schools. He built health care facilities. His education reforms led to marked improvements in Ekiti State student’s performance in internal and external examinations. His health policies led to a reduction in maternal and child mortality rates. He is accused of not sharing public funds to the people (stomach infrastructure). But his government had the first comprehensive social security scheme for the elderly in the country. So the majority of those elder citizens and their relatives in all local governments voted against him? He is said to have been too elitist and distant from the people. Yet, he held Town Hall meetings in virtually all communities in the state to gauge the feelings of the people. His government introduced the first community participation in the budgetary process in the country. That way it was the priority projects identified by the various communities that were reflected in the budget and implemented.

    I am not saying Fayemi is a Saint. Let he who has no sin cast the first stone. It is most probable that even though he meant well, he did not communicate his government’s policies and strategies effectively enough. Post- election analysis also indicates that his administration alienated and did not empower his own party foot soldiers enough. Those are lessons for the future. But I insist that these factors cannot explain the margin by which he purportedly lost the election. Perhaps the unkindest cut has been from my favourite columnist, Ishaq Moddibo Kawu, of The Vanguard who cited Asiwaju Tinubu’s alleged overbearing influence as being responsible for the APC’s loss of Ekiti. While respecting Asiwaju as his leader, Fayemi tactfully and cleverly kept him at a distance from his administration in Ekiti. I can authoritatively say that Tinubu did not have a single nominee in Fayemi’s cabinet. Fayemi wisely cultivated local leaders like Otunba Niyi Adebayo and Chief Afe Babalola so that Ekiti people would not see him as being dictated to from Bourdillon. Indeed, the failure or reluctance of Tinubu and the other party leaders to rein in the governors and enforce party discipline for fear of being tagged overbearing has led to alienation between the governments and the party in many APC states that must be urgently addressed.

    For now, I congratulate Mr Ayodele Fayose on his victory. He sounds much wiser and more mature now. If he has learnt the appropriate lessons from his first outing, Ekiti will be the better for it. Ultimately, unorganised spontaneity, cynical populism and energetic mindlessness cannot be the basis of sound and progressive governance.

  • Developmental democracy and its malcontents

    Does an inexorable and inevitable relationship exist between democracy and development? Most contemporary democratic theorists and pro-democracy activists will unhesitatingly answer this question in the affirmative.  Learning from the glaring failure of various forms of ‘developmental dictatorship’ such as one-party, one-man, military or defunct communist dictatorships to impact positively on the well-being of their societies, advocates of liberal democracy proclaim the virtues of this form of government from the hill tops.

     Drawing from Professor Richard Sklar’s notion of ‘developmental democracy’, they posit that democracy is the best form of government with the highest capacity to guarantee progress and development. But in what circumstances and within which context can democracy be a handmaiden of development? The answers, of course are obvious: a strong, competent, visionary leadership with character and integrity; a free, independent and objective press; respect for the rule of law; a vibrant and vigilant civil society and periodic elections that are free, fair and reflective of the popular will. But the ultimate acid test for democracy is whether or not, it is helping to promote the ‘greatest happiness for the greatest number of the people’ through good and transparent governance.

    There is the school of thought, which posits that the greatest impediment to the actualization of Nigeria’s trapped potentials is fundamentally structural. They thus argue that the country cannot make progress unless she is radically re-structured with devolution of greater powers, responsibilities and resources from the centre to the federating units. Of course, this column has consistently supported the advocacy of re-structuring. Nigeria needs it badly. But the present structure of the country is no excuse for the abysmal governance she has experienced over the last 15 years particularly at the federal level. What is going on in many states especially infrastructural renewal, even with dwindling revenue from the Federation Account is simply amazing.

    I have had cause to write in this place on the phenomenal work that Governor Ibikunle Amosun is carrying out in Ogun State. Of course, this is part of the dramatic wind of change blowing across the South-West, including Edo State. Even though less ideologically driven than a Rauf Aregbesola, Kayode Fayemi or Adams Oshiomhole, Amosun, like Abiola Ajimobi or Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN) operates essentially as a technocrat and pragmatist. The tremendous physical transformation all over Ogun State today is a function of visionary leadership, determination, focus and incredible financial ingenuity. This column has no regrets for recognising Amosun as Grand Commander of Infrastructure Renewal (GCIR) earlier in the year. That recognition is even more pertinent and justifiable today. Rather than resting on his oars and lapsing into complacency, Amosun has girdled his loins for even loftier performance with clearly discernible evidence throughout the state.

    A few months ago, yours truly had the opportunity along with other senior journalists to accompany Senator Ibikunle Amosun on an inspection tour of projects in the state. We commenced our tour at about 9am taking off from the Government House, Abeokuta,in the same Coaster bus with the governor. Even though we were able to cover only three local governments, our tour did not end till well past 7pm! One thing that struck me was the quality of the roads constructed by Amosun throughout the state. Every road constructed, the Amosun government insists, must meet the Ogun standard in terms of depth and width as well as the provision of such road infrastructure as street lights, drainage channels, pipe ducts and pedestrian walkways. Thus the roads in the serene, idyllic rural town of Aiyetoro are of the same quality as those constructed in Abeokuta.

    When our team got to Ota, I was completely amazed at the transformation the town has undergone under Amosun. Virtually all the previously deteriorated roads of the town have been re-constructed, expanded and modernised. Those who used to go through hell to attend a popular Pentecostal church in the town can now move more easily and comfortably. Between Agbado and Akute, the Amosun government is building five new bridges at different levels of completion in addition to the on-going massive road construction along that stretch. The quality of life in Akute and adjoining communities is truly horrifying. It is amazing that successive governments had simply abandoned the people to their fate over the years. What is astonishing is that the infrastructure revolution being undertaken by Amosun is felt throughout the state simultaneously.

    Everywhere we went, the crowds thronged our bus when they realized it was the governor inside. In Akute, an old woman prayed fervently for Amosun raising her hands up to her neck to demonstrate the difficulty residents of the community had crossing the stream before Amosun’s intervention through the bridge construction.I strongly believe that many of those who denigrate the governor on the pages of newspapers or on television dare not go to many of the communities Amosun is transforming to campaign against him. Some would say that, after all Amosun is doing nobody a favour and the money he is using to provide qualitative infrastructure and services does not belong to him. Yes, but others passed the same way before as governors, had access to the same funds but squandered the opportunity to leave enduring legacies.

    Ordinarily, a governor who has posted such a commanding performance like Amosun should be the pride and toast of his party. He is a great electoral asset. But what do we have here? Some of the bitterest opponents of Amosun are right within his own party. This is quite understandable. To embark on the unprecedented infrastructural modernisation of Ogun, the way Amosun has done means that political entrepreneurs who live on politics, will be starved of the largesse they have been used to. They will not go down quietly. But the self-styled godfathers and ‘oracles’ of Ogun politics must beware of standing in the way of the developmental democracy through which Amosun is elevating the ‘Gateway State’ to new heights of socio-economic progress. They should be told in no uncertain terms to stop distracting Amosun.

    One of the vicious misinformation campaigns waged against Amosun is the allegedly astronomical cost of roads constructed by his administration. This is plain mischief. As the Commissioner for Works and Infrastructure, Olamilekan Adegbite, has explained, the state has expended N166.7 billion so far on the construction of 306.55km of roads that cut across the three Senatorial Districts. Noting that many of these roads have a bridge component, the commissioner notes that the cost of constructing a bridge is different from that of a road. He urged people to “please go round and see what we are doing. They are standard roads that will stand the test of time, not shoddy projects”.

    Many of those who are trying so hard to distract Amosun today, and bounce back into political relevance, were responsible for the victory of the PDP in the state in 2003. The progressives lost control of Ogun in 2003 because of the sheer arrogance, ineptness and complacency of the incumbent government. Many of my friends in Ogun State told me excitedly about how they had voted for PDP then because they were tired of gubernatorial tyranny and insensitivity of those now proclaiming that they dined and wined with Awo as if that is a criterion for leadership. Yes, the PDP engaged in massive rigging of the 2003 governorship election in the South West. But the complacency of the party structure and leadership made the rigging that helped rout the progressives possible.

    To worsen matters, once the progressives lost control of Ogun in 2003, those self-proclaimed political ‘oracles’ and ‘war generals’ promptly fled the state and took refuge in Lagos in a most cowardly manner. They failed to offer leadership when it mattered most. It was the moral, logistical and intellectual support from outside Ogun that enabled the progressives to re-organize and gradually but steadily fight their way back to victory in the state in 2007. If everybody had abandoned ship like those who now parade themselves as the ‘oracles’ of Ogun politics, would the progressive resurgence of 2007 have taken place?

    I call on Governor Amosun not to compromise on his commitment to developmental democracy. However, he should be gentle as a dove but wise as a serpent in dealing with those malcontents who crave the resurrection of a discredited and better forgotten era.

  • Okorocha inspires peace in Imo communities

    Okorocha inspires peace in Imo communities

    The dark cloud of strife has blown over in Imo State communities, thanks to the efforts of Governor Rochas Okorocha. No fewer than 632 communities are relishing a new era of harmony, many residents happy to have a king reign over them.

    Before the governor’s intervention, such a peaceful atmosphere was unheard-of for decades. Several communities were locked in endless rancour and even outright hostilities, monarchs against claimants or subjects against their kings. In some cases, lives and properties were lost when feuding factions took up arms against one another.

    Such tussles and communal crises have now been resolved by the state government through the alternative crisis resolution mechanism initiated by Governor Okorocha. New kings have been crowned;  pending court cases have been settled at no cost to the litigants and once again communal peace and genuine kinship have returned.

    One of the communities now enjoying its reprieve, after 28 years of a kingship tussle which polarised the community and stagnated its development, is the Amaimo Ancient Kingdom in Ikeduru Local Government Area of the state.

    Tracing the history of the communiy’s crisis, Chief Japheth Duru said the last traditional ruler of Amaimo Ancient Kingdom, Eze Jude Ohiri Alaribe, died in 1986, adding that since then the community had not known peace as the battle of succession tore the people apart.

    He said that immediately after the death of the monarch, his eldest son, Prince Macilinus Obinna Alaribe, hijacked the throne, even though it was not hereditary. Duru said the younger Alaribe  was crowned by ‘foreigners’ as the traditional ruler of Amaimo Kingdom.

    According to him, “after the mourning of the king, Eze Godwin Ehirim was selected in line with the customs and traditions of Amaimo and subsequently presented as the traditional ruler to the local government authorities for onward presentation to the state government but the son to the late king who had already usurped the throne went to court and that was how the legal battle started.

    “The matter lingered until Governor Okorocha set up a committee to reconcile all kingship tussles in the communities that the will of the people prevailed and Eze Ehirim was recognised and presented with a Staff of Office, which no doubt has put to an end all litigations and crisis that had stagnated Amaimo for close to three decades”.

    Other communities also began to experience peace; in many of them, new kings were installed.

    Presenting the Staff of Office to over 103 traditional rulers in the first phase, the governor commended the leaders of the various communities for supporting the initiative of the government to restore peace and order which had eluded them for long.

    Okorocha stated that the crisis which had bedeviled the communities, which he said made most of the communities ungovernable, had impeded development and prosperity and hindered government’s plan of massive rural development.

    He added further that, “when we came into power, most of the communities were eaten up by crisis and hatred, some have been in Court for over 30 years over kingship tussle and such situation impedes development because nothing good can thrive under the atmosphere of rancor and acrimony.

    “So the first thing we did was to move in and summon the whole communities and enlighten them on the need for peaceful coexistence. And we adopted alternative crisis resolution and resolved the entire kingship crisis. At first the people were skeptic but we were confident that it will be possible and today peace has returned.

    “Now government is working with the new monarchs to fast-track development in the rural areas. Most of what we achieved in the rural communities would not have been possible without the cooperation of the people”.

    The Imo governor however urged the new monarchs to see their power as a trust that can only be justified when used for the good of the people and improvement on their wellbeing by attracting developmental projects and improved agriculture in the localities.

    He regretted that most communities in the state depend on farm produce cultivated in northern states, adding that with the return of peace and unity to the communities, every household should cue into the palm to palm programme of the government by investing the N300,000 given to each community to plant at least one hectare of palm seedling and other crops for their sustenance.

    The governor insisted that, “any society that cannot feed itself is a faulty society”.

    Okorocha expressed his happiness that most communities which were ungovernable due to kingship tussles will now experience peace,  calling  on the new traditional rulers  to be honest, hard-working and treat their subjects with fairness and equity irrespective of past misunderstandings.

    He prayed thus; ”may the name of the Lord be glorified and may your ruler-ship bring peace, may you live long”.

    The governor informed royal fathers who still have disputes in their communities to resolve their differences before they will be recognised by government pointing out that “no Eze should be imposed on anyone.”

    The Commissioner for Community Government Council, Chief Val Mbamara said the presentation of the staff of office registers the prestige of Ezeship stool in the State and charged the new traditional rulers to live above reproach.

    Mbamara urged the monarchs to work without bias against any person or group of persons, stressing that government is for everybody; “handle your job with care so that the stable of justice will not collapse.”

    The Commissioner also charged the royal fathers to work in synergy with his Ministry and the CGC Officials to propagate the message of the Community Government Council (CGC) to the people at the grassroots.

  • Gej: Poverty of conspiracy theories

    Gej: Poverty of conspiracy theories

    No serious and objective analyst can rationally blame  President Goddluck Jonathan for being responsible for the multifarious challenges that have left  Nigeria at the brink of state collapse. The seeds of the  appalling poverty, misery, ignorance, physical and moral decay as well as descent to sheer anarchy were sown during decades of gross misrule by a succession of visionless and corrupt leaders.

      There are two contending schools of thought as regards how President Jonathan has risen to the challenges of his  office. There are those who accuse Jonathan of inept, effete, spineless and  pedestrian  leadership. Consequently, they contend that the problems of  the country, which predates his tenure have worsened under his watch.

    The other school of thought has a more sympathetic and favorable view of  Jonathan’s leadership of Nigeria. As far as they are concerned, the country’s present travails – Boko Haram insurgency and other assorted forms of violence including pipeline vandalisation and massive oil thefts- are all part of a grand conspiracy to undermine Jonathan and make the country  ungovernable for him. This position was strongly and passionately argued by  Professor Femi Aribisala in his characteristically provocative column in The Vanguard of Tuesday, May 13, titled “A season of conspiracies against Goodluck Jonathan”.

     Where others see stagnation, decline and retrogression in diverse sectors of our national life under Jonathan, Aribisala believes the  country is indeed taking ‘giant strides’ with the much trumpeted  ‘Transformation Agenda’ being implemented by the Jonathan administration. For him, Jonathan is not the  worst President  Nigeria has ever seen and even ranks among the ‘better ones’. Among the wonders of the Transformation Agenda, the professor avers, is the revelation that  Nigeria’s newly rebased economy is the largest in Africa; President Barak  Obama’s recent declaration in 2012 that Nigeria is  ‘the world’s next economic giant’, and the country’s hosting of the 24th World  Economic Forum (WEF) –  an indication of Nigeria’s  emergence as a frontier market in the world economy. Aribisala is impressed  that Nigeria is reportedly the number one destination for foreign investments in Africa, Aliko  Dangote is the 23rd richest man in the world, and that Dr. Akinwunmi Adesina was named Forbes magazine’s African of the Year 2013 – a reflection of the successes of the Transformation Agenda in the agricultural sector. He also attributes the reported seven percent growth in the Nigerian economy over the last few years to the administration’s policies including what he sees as ‘extensive rehabilitation of rail and road networks nationwide’.

    Well, in the first place, Dr Jonathan has absolutely no  reason to be the worst leader Nigeria has ever had. In fact, he has no excuse not to be the best. No leader before GEJ has had his level of formal education. He is the first doctorate degree holder to preside over Nigeria’s affairs. Again, as the current President, Jonathan has the opportunity  to learn from the successes and failures of his predecessors. He should  naturally post a more  stellar performance. Beyond this, Jonathan knew the enormity  of the challenges confronting the country when he campaigned vigorously for re-election in 2011 and made rosy promises to transform the country if given the mandate. Measured against his documented promises in every state of the country during the 2011  electioneering campaign, Jonathan’s performance has been dismal.

     Of course, Professor Aribisala knows only too well that statistical growth does not necessarily translate into concrete development. The same international  organizations that have hailed the statistical gimmickry of Nigeria’s rebadged  economy, also rank Nigeria as hosting a huge chunk of the country’s poorest people.

    Agriculture Minister, Akinwunmi Adesina, may well bask in the glory of his Forbes award. That does not detract from Nigeria’s  continued food dependency or the grim reality of the over 70 percent of our population who live on less than one dollar a day. Yes, Aliko Dangote may be a symbol of our entrepreneurial ingenuity but his example also vividly helps illustrate the gross inequality that characterizes our malformed economy – a gulf between the haves and the have-nots that has widened under Dr. Jonathan’s watch.

    Contrary to the view from Professor Aribisala’s observatory, federal highways  across the country remain dilapidated compared to the vigorous and impressive  road construction efforts in many states of the federation. What is being celebrated as the transformation of our railways or airports is a sick joke.

    According to Aribisala, “Jonathan is not the object of so much attack because he is incompetent, but because he comes from the  minority South-south. Moreover, a Northern cabal that has been out of power for 15 years is desperate to return”.  He thus reasons that the entire Boko Haram insurgency  including the abduction of the Chibok school girls are  carefully calculated and orchestrated to make the country ungovernable for Jonathan and abort the possibility of his re-election. Now, this argument ignores the fact that the Boko Haram extremism predates Jonathan’s election and actually flared out of control under the late President Umaru Yar’Adua. Again,  even if it is true that terrorism is being utilized as a weapon to make the country  ungovernable for  Jonathan, does he not as Commander-in-Chief possess sufficient powers not just to find and bring such sponsors to book but to also more effectively contain the insurgency? Are those allegedly undermining Jonathan also responsible for  the massive corruption under his watch that is giving the rag tag Boko Haram insurgents an edge over Nigeria’s military? As the US  has pointedly noted, “Corruption prevents supplies as basic as bullets and transport vehicles from reaching the frontIines of the struggle against Boko  Haram”.

    Professor Aribisala joins the Jonathan administration in laying the blame for the Chibok tragedy on the Borno State government. But he does not address the fact that Borno is under a state of emergency and the President is directly in charge of the territory through his military commanders. The massive corruption that has hobbled the efficiency of an otherwise competent  and professional Nigerian military is certainly not a function of any anti-Jonathan conspiracy.

    I do not deny that such a conspiracy may exist. If it does, Jonathan can effectively neutralize it through competent, visionary,  elevated and responsible governance. The mediocrity, ineptness and flagrant corruption that have flourished during GEJ’s tenure, cannot be excused by any resort to dubious  conspiracy theories.

     As a result of what he sees as the northern conspiracy against Jonathan, Professor  Aribisala contends that Jonathan must be voted back into office by all means in 2015. Interestingly, he does not deny that corruption thrives under Jonathan.

    But according to Aribisala, once GEJ is re-elected “we  will insist that the corruption that has gone through the roof under his  administration must  finally come to an end. The time is long overdue. Some  malefactors must be arrested, prosecuted and jailed. No more pussy-footing; Nigerians require a   transparent government and we require this  “yesterday”. Thus, we will first reward a corrupt administration with re-election and   then expect the same government to miraculously undergo a born again experience and launch a fierce onslaught against the corruption that guaranteed it  electoral success in the first place. It cannot get more weird than that. So much for the poverty of these conspiracy theories.

    On Brf’s successor (2)

    The battle to succeed the iconic governor of Lagos State, Babatunde Raji FAshola (SAN) is gathering momentum and getting more  interesting. The APC is  inevitably bearing the burden of its exemplary record of  governance in the  state. Its  highly prized ticket will be fiercely  contested. Oba Rilwan Akiolu caused a stir when he threw the weight of his office  behind Mr Akin  Ambode’s aspiration. Supporters  of some of the other  aspirants have been  throwing mud. But they would have grabbed the opportunity  with both hands if  the respected Oba had thrown a supportive nod in their  direction. After all, he  equally was unflinching in his support for a then little  known BRF in 2007. And   governor Fashola has also wisely admonished against unduly  allowing religion to  influence electoral choices in the state in the next  election. Luckily religion  has never been an issue in Lagos elections. In 1999 and  2003, Tinubu a Muslim  defeated Funsho Williams, a Christian in the governorship  elections. And in  2007, BRF, a Muslim won against accomplished Christian  opponents like Jimi  Agabaje and Femi Pedro. I am unaware that any aspirant in  the 2015 race is  flaunting religious credentials. But the governor’s  words of wisdom should  definitely be useful to those with a Boko Haram extremist  mindset who, luckily,  are far away from Lagos.

  • Bring back our country

    Bring back our country

    Bring back our girls. This has become the most popular refrain across the world since the abduction on April 14 of over 200 school girls by Boko Haram in Chibok, Borno State. It is a grand irony. The Boko Haram has the objective of spreading fear and hate. It seeks to erect walls of discrimination and prejudice between people. Its satanic fanatics strive to sunder the bonds that bind people together. They labour to sacrifice human love and solidarity on the altar of a blood guzzling deity. But the rubble and ruins – physical and psychological – of their destructive acts have become the building blocks of human compassion and unity across ethno-cultural and national boundaries.

     Thus, the Chibok girls are no more just girls. They are no more just Northerners. They are no more just Christians or Muslims. They are no more just Nigerians. They are now the common property of humanity. Across nations, continents, cultures, languages and faiths, they are simply ‘our girls’ – symbols of our shared humanity. Out of the darkness of the Boko Haram bestiality, the light of human empathy, benevolence and care shines brightly. The terrorists aim to turn neighbour against neighbour. But rather their bestial acts are reinforcing the realization that we are our brother and sister’s keeper. Surely, the merchants of hate are not winning.

    Where are our girls? They are somewhere in the cavernous belly of Sambisa forest. What exactly is the crime of these innocent girls? It is simply that they realize that the human mind is a terrible thing to waste. They know that a mind not nurtured degenerates into a barren swamp, an inner Sambisa forest of decay and rot. They thus summoned the courage, despite the threat of Boko Haram to dispel the darkness of ignorance through the light of education. They dared to cultivate and nurture their minds into beautiful and beneficial gardens through the acquisition of knowledge and skills. It is for this reason that they have been forced for one month now to inhabit an environment meant for rodents, reptiles, insects and feral beasts. But even more dangerous than these animals are the Boko Haram monsters in human skin holding these girls captive.

    Yes, by all means we must bring back our girls. We must rescue them from the belly of the Sambisa whale. When we successfully do that, we must then face the challenge of liberating our country from the Sambisa fortress of poverty, want, ignorance, criminal corruption, crass inequality, mass unemployment and gross underdevelopment (apologies to the inimitable Tatalo Alamu). A forest is a veritable heart of darkness. After over $16 billion gone down the drain, Nigeria remains helplessly embedded in darkness as electricity supply remains pathetically epileptic. Like Sambisa, like Nigeria. So sad.

    During the week, there was this incredible story from Owerri. A hungry lion had reportedly escaped from the Nekede Zoo causing panic in the town. People dashed for the safety of their homes. Parents rushed to pick their children from schools. Much earlier, in the same zoo, a lion had reportedly killed and eaten another lion – an allegation being investigated by an ad hoc committee of the state House of Assembly. Mercifully, the state police command later dismissed news of the escaped lion as the handiwork of a false alarmist.

    Well, the story of the Owerri lion may have been a hoax. But believe me, the doors of Nigeria’s national zoo have long been flung wide open and lions, hyenas, jackals, pythons, chimpanzees, baboons and an assortment of other beasts – many in human skin – are on prowl across the land. Do I exaggerate? Are you under the illusion that Sambisa forest is limited to some remote part of Borno State? No sir; that dreaded forest has migrated right to your back yard. Our country has become one sprawling jungle of fuel subsidy scams, kerosene subsidy rip-offs, pension fund fraud, kidnapping, ritual killing, armed robbery, lynching, rape – an arena of sheer anarchy.

    Kindly cast your mind back. Very recently, 710, 000 unemployed Nigerians were made to apply for jobs of which there were less than 5000 vacancies. Each applicant was made to pay a fee of N1000. Some still faceless consultants smiled to the bank with a cool N700 million. The applicants were crowded like cattle into various stadia across the country to write shoddily organised examinations. In the riotous process, 16 precious lives were lost and scores of others injured. Yet, not a single head has rolled for this crime. In fact, some of the hyenas responsible for the fiasco are sitting pretty on the country’s highest decision making body presiding over our affairs. Where but a zoo can this kind of thing happen?

    Let us take another example. Cast your mind even further back. Do you remember a certain man called Abdulrasheed Maina? He was the chairman of the Pension Reform Task Force (PRTF). Under his watch,over N400 billion was allegedly embezzled. Our ordinarily somnolent and lethargic Senate was alarmed enough to investigate the matter. Maina was summoned to appear before the Senate committee. He bluntly refused. The Senate issued a warrant for his arrest. The police claimed they could not find him. Yet, at that very time he reportedly moved around Abuja in long convoys and in powerful circles heavily guarded by the very same police.

    Exasperated, the Senate passed a resolution asking President Jonathan to sack Maina as PRTF Chairman. Citing the need to adhere to civil service procedures, the presidency demurred. Faced with the possibility of a serious show down with the Senate, Aso Rock blinked. The same President directed the Head of Service to take disciplinary action against Maina and also ordered the Inspector General of Police to effect his arrest. Just then, the miraculous happened. Maina simply vanished into thin air. Everybody has since forgotten about the matter. Yet, thousands of pensioners continue to languish in poverty and die in penury. Where but in a community of jackals can such impunity be tolerated?

    Yes, by all means we must bring back our girls. The international community can and is doing a lot to help us in this regard. But how do we bring back our country? No one can do it for us. The responsibility is ours. We must be determined to hold our governments accountable and ensure that our votes count in free and fair polls. This column joins the campaign to bring back our girls and our country…alive.

     Bolaji Uthman:

    For whom the bell tolls

    The news came like a thunderbolt. It was on Friday, May 9, that the funeral bell tolled. For whom did it toll? For Alhaji Bolaji Uthman – a consummate journalist, impassioned historian,ardent intellectual, dedicated and industrious civil servant, an adept public information manager, a proud Lagosian and moving encyclopaedia of the state’s history. Always thirsty for knowledge, Uthman was pursuing his doctorate degree at the Lagos State University (LASU). The numerous awards he won in the Lagos State public service testify to his invaluable contributions as an Information Officer in the Lagos State Ministry of Information and Strategy to the development of the Centre of Excellence. Along with Mr Frank Ajayi, a retired Director in the Ministry of Information and Strategy, Alhaji Uthman worked so hard, long and assiduously for the establishment of the Lagos State Records and Archives Bureau (LASRAB) where he was the Director General until his passing. The magnificent LASRAB building at Magodo testifies eloquently to Bolaji Uthman’s enduring legacy. He gave generously and unselfishly of his time, talent and deep well of knowledge to many younger ones that he passionately mentored. Bolaji Uthman thus lives on through them. Each time the funeral bell tolls for one, it tolls for all as the poet, John Donne, reminds us. One man’s death only signals the imminent death of all men. Dear Uthman, friend, brother, sparring partner and comrade, you have done your bit. Rest in peace in Allah’s bosom.

  • Sorry country

    Sorry country

    It angers. It provokes. It repulses. It humiliates. It disgusts. I refer to the chilling video of Boko Haram leader, Abubakar Shekau and his fellow armed gangsters taunting the Nigerian state, mocking the Nigerian people and celebrating the desecration of womanhood. In the video, Shekau is surprisingly relaxed. He exhibits confidence and a disturbing bravado. This is in sharp contrast to the seeming confusion and even hysteria emanating from Aso Rock. Boko Haram is obviously playing deliberate psychological games to further frustrate the Nigerian state. Is it this assortment of deranged and deluded ruffians that has virtually put a resource-laden Nigerian state to sword? Cry, the sorry country.

    Shekau gloats over the abduction of over 200 Chibok secondary school female students: “I abducted your girls. I said Western education should end. Girls, you should go and get married. I will sell them in the market by Allah”. It is instructive that thousands of girls across northern Nigeria are risking their lives to obtain an education despite the primitive threats of Boko Haram. Thousands of families are making the sacrifice to send their female children to school despite the ceaseless bombing campaign of Boko Haram. This shows that the extremists are a minuscule minority in the north. They are not winning the battle for the minds of the people.

    In an earlier video recording a year or two ago, the Boko Haram chief had boasted that he loved killing human beings like fowl to the pleasure of his strange Allah. Shekau’s Allah kills. His Allah enslaves. His Allah defiles innocent women. This certainly is not the Allah that has motivated Islam to be a force for human progress and civilisation in the arts, sciences, culture, scholarship and statecraft across centuries. This is why I support the Catholic Archbishop of Abuja, John Cardinal Onaiyekan, in his characteristically restrained criticism of the Jama’atuNasir Islam (JNI) for reportedly ‘accusing the Federal Government of persecuting Muslims under the guise of fighting terrorism’. The JNI and other Muslims should firmly, decisively and unambiguously denounce and distance themselves from the murderous Boko Haram and also support every effort to exterminate this poisonous virus. Muhammadu Buhari and Bola Tinubu in recent published articles have shown the right example in this respect.

    For me, the Shekau video has also evoked a feeling of profound pity. Pity for Nigeria- a ‘crippled giant’ (apologies to Professor EghosaOsaghie).Pity for Shekau and his followers, enslaved minds in urgent need of salvation if not beyond redemption. But then, Shekau and his misguided followers were not born this way. They are the bastard offspring of the abduction and serial rape of the Nigerian treasury by the predatory elite over the years. The resultant appalling poverty, want and criminal inequality particularly in Northern Nigeria have spawned the teeming army of jobless youth that provides ready foot soldiers for Boko Haram and international terrorist outfits like al qaeda.

    Of course, I agree that the northern political class must take primary responsibility for this situation.

    It makes absolutely no sense to blame the Jonathan administration for the Boko Haram menace. The conditions for this kind of extremist terrorism had been laid over decades of gross misrule by successive administrations. But then Jonathan is currently at the helm of affairs. The buck stops at his table. Leadership is not about excuses. It is about taking responsibility and finding solutions to problems. It is about radiating confidence, a sense of purpose and inspiring hope in people even in times of deep despair and seeming hopelessness. The Jonathan administration has failed abysmally in this regard. And nothing better showcases this failure than the very embarrassing intervention of the First Lady, Dame Patience in the abducted girls’ affair.

    Why did Dame Patience have to step in so forcefully, meddlesomely and unconstitutionally in the matter? It was to fill the vacuum created by her husband’s lethargic leadership. I refrain from joining in mocking her elocution or her occasionally lapsing into pidgin English. For me it is the motive that matters and I believe she meant well. As a mother she felt for the abducted girls and their parents. As a wife she was understandably protective of her husband and his job. It is only natural. This was probably why she was even persuaded to entertain the thought that the entire abduction saga was carefully stage managed to undermine her husband’s government. I would probably reason the same way if I was in her shoes. Let no one cast the first stone. My view is that her tears were genuine and heart felt. Her plaintive cry, ‘There is God O, there is God O…’ was no Nollywood acting. It came from a pained heart. In truth, despite her excesses, I admire Dame Patience’s originality, spontaneity and utter lack of pretension. I simply wish Dr Jonathan, the custodian of the constitutional mandate, had such fire in his belly.

    The scandal really is that the intervention of the First Lady even took place at all and in full glare of cameras. And even after it had happened, it was so lackadaisically allowed to get into the public domain. The blame goes first to Dr Jonathan who should be firmly in control on the home front and offer the leadership on the domestic terrain to avoid such occurrences. Also to blame are the plethora of aides – media, security, protocol, administrative etc – who are paid to advise, guide and protect the First Lady. The presidency is not just President Jonathan and the First Lady. It refers to the entire expansive bureaucracy that exists to help shield their weaknesses and project their strengths. I fear that if the President and his wife decide tomorrow to take a swim in the Atlantic Ocean, their aides would most respectfully allow them to go ahead with full media coverage for the event! It is either the duo is not getting good advice or they are refusing to listen to such advice. This should not be so.

    In a similar vein, Dr Jonathan’s disastrous outing in his last media chat is utterly inexplicable. His defence of the Petroleum Minister, Mrs Diezani Allison Madueke’s alleged expenditure of N10 billion on chartered private jets as well as her refusal to cooperate with the House of Representatives in getting to the root of the matter did incalculable damage to his person and exalted office. His exaggerated claim that the Minister has appeared before the House over 200 times is most astonishing. It appears to me that there was little or no preparation for the chat. The leader is in many ways an actor. No serious actor goes on stage without thorough preparation.

    The president’s media and strategy team should have anticipated the burning issues of the day and the likely questions. Rehearsals should have been held with his aides serving as the devil’s advocate posing him hostile questions and preparing him to respond effectively and persuasively to them. The president should have been tutored carefully as regards his body language and the need to be sensitive to the public mood. With adequate and thorough preparation, there is even no need for the presidency to hand pick the panellists thus undermining the credibility and subverting the purpose of the media chat.President Obama has excellent leadership skills but he also has his weaknesses like all mortals. But he smells like a Rose most of the time because his aides have the competence and are allowed to do their jobs as professionals.

    What all this points to is the fact that the country suffers from a severe deficiency of leadership under President Goodluck Jonathan. This is the vacuum that Dame Patience so disastrously sought to fill as regards the abducted Chibok girls with disastrous consequences for the country’s image. This is why a member of the Federal Executive Council like the Internal Affairs Minister, Abba Moro, can comfortably retain his seat on the body right under the president’s nose after the recent tragic immigration service recruitment saga. The sad but bitter truth is that Abubakar Shekau is offering more effective leadership to Boko Haram than President Jonathan is doing for Nigeria and that is a key reason why we remain such a sorry country.