Category: Sunday

  • Femi Falana on  the stalemate

    Femi Falana on the stalemate

    …Notwithstanding that there is no provision in the law for the death of a candidate in the middle of an election; the INEC is not totally helpless in the circumstance. Having declared the election inconclusive, the INEC is duty bound to conclude the election within seven days in line with Section 179 of the Constitution. It is submitted that once the results of an election have been declared, whether conclusive or not, the INEC has no power to cancel same, as the power to cancel any result so declared is vested exclusively in the governorship election petition tribunal. As the APC cannot be allowed to substitute or replace the nomination of Mr. Audu at this stage of the electoral process, the INEC is legally bound to conclude the exercise. The question of falling back on the results of the primary election conducted by the APC does not arise as it conflicts with section 179 of the Constitution…

    The 20th amendment to the United States’ Constitution is in pari materia with Section 181 of the Nigerian Constitution as it allows a vice president-elect to become President if the president-elect dies before inauguration…

    In  relying  on the  US experience the INEC is urged to base its decision of the Supreme Court in the case of  Amaechi v INEC (2008) 10 W.R.N. 1, where it was held that elections are won by political parties which sponsored  candidates . Since the APC which sponsored the late Prince Audu  is deemed to have led the PDP by 41,300 votes there is no legal basis for cancelling the results of the election as both the party and the PDP are competent to take part in the supplementary  election to be conducted by the INEC. In other words, the INEC is not legally disabled from concluding the governorship election notwithstanding the unfortunate death of the APC governorship candidate.

    Since, the governorship and deputy-governorship candidates of the APC jointly contested the election pursuant to section 187 of the Constitution, the votes scored by the party in the inconclusive election remain intact and untainted…

     

    Excerpted from Femi Falana’s piece on the subject matter

  • Petroleum mode and pork barrel governance (3)

    Petroleum mode and pork barrel governance (3)

    There is no better illustration of the political programme of waste and senseless consumption than the creation of 36 states and 774 local governments out of the four pre-coup regions under a federal system inherited by the first military government.

    • Initiate action to amend our Constitution with a view to devolving powers, duties and responsibilities to states and local governments in order to entrench true Federalism and the Federal spirit;
    • Restructure government for a leaner, more efficient and adequately compensated public service;
    • Balance across regions by the creation of 6 new Regional Economic Development Agencies (REDAs) to act as champions of sub-regional competitiveness;
    • Put in place a N300 billion regional growth fund (average of N50bn in each geo-political region) to be managed by the REDAs, encourage private sector enterprise and support to help places currently reliant on the public sector —FROM Buhari/APC MANIFESTO

    Last week, we posited that military dictators in control of Nigeria between 1966 and 1999 responded to the rising flow of revenue from petroleum the way a toddler would respond to gifts from Santa Claus: excitement without an awareness of life beyond gift-giving at Christmas. Civilians brought to power through elections supervised by military dictators all continued the adoption of an expenditure culture that took the disconnected the polity from productive economy. From extravagant compensation of political officers and public servants to proliferation of government ministries and agencies, military dictators chose the style of lottery winners to spend national revenue with little attention to economic development of the country for citizens’ welfare. Civilian governments birthed by military dictators through dubious elections also mimicked their military mentors in sustaining a political economy driven principally by the country’s non-renewable money spinner.

    There is no better illustration of the political programme of waste and senseless consumption than the creation of 36 states and 774 local governments out of the four pre-coup regions under a federal system inherited by the first military government.  Many folk commentators are already saying that President Buhari has been elected to come and deal with the nemesis of military distortion of Nigeria’s federal system and the creation of a wasteful centralist governance and over 100 sub-national administrative bureaucracies that function more as sites for distribution of pork or benefits of power than as units for development to enrich citizens’ lives. On the positive side, some opinion leaders believe that, given the mythology about Buhari’s strength of character and sincerity of purpose, the president stands a good chance of changing the country well enough to atone for the failure of military intervention in the polity.

    Instructively, General Buhari’s election manifesto acknowledging that the 1999 Constitution needs to be revisited and renewed, with the hope of entrenching “true Federalism and the Federal spirit” signals the determination of his administration to go back to the drawing board on how to make Nigeria achieve its full potential. Making the entrenchment (or re-entrenchment?) of true federalism the first item in his 90-item menu of initiatives indicates the readiness on the part of the president and his ruling party to move from using the revenue from petroleum or any other finite resource for that matter to service facile unity and use such finite resources to nurture a country that can advance through economic development and unity of purpose.

    Unlike many countries that used fossil energy to add significant value to the lives of citizens, such as Norway, Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria after 57 years of sale of petroleum, which could have been an economic rescuer of the country, today stands hobbled by the failure of past leaders (mostly military rulers) to use revenue from petroleum to advance the country with respect to the economy, polity, and even culture. The four regions that stood tall and proud as leaders in agriculture and light manufacturing in the 1960s are now about 100 subnational administrative units carrying bowls to a central government that waits nervously for the latest news about price of petroleum in the international market. Electricity, the sine quanon of modernity and modernisation, virtually disappeared in the country as citizens hear more about the fall and rise of megawatts rather than having electricity to run their factories or preserve their food. Instead of investing in infrastructure development and citizens’ convenience, military designers of post-colonial Nigeria used revenue from petroleum to ‘service’ political appointees and bureaucrats in 36 states and 774 local governments designed to beg for monthly running costs. While states and local governments are obliged to pay thousands of public workers virtually on sinecures, political leaders at all levels of governments plunder the country with impunity, on the strength of a constitutionally backed immunity for the top echelon of rulers.

    At the time that President Buhari starts his administration, the states and local governments created to use the revenue from petroleum are not only unable to pay workers’ salaries and pensions on time, they are also crying out loud about their lack of capacity to pay N18,000 minimum wage. This is despite the fact that individuals on executive and legislative lines of duty across the nation receive outsize salaries and allowances; fly jets or helicopters to visit their constituencies; and are provided with policemen and women who lack access to modern healthcare and have to use prayer warriors in place of gynaecologists and paediatricians for their dependants. The more money flows into the country’s purse from oil, the more inequality festers in all manifestations. The tension generated by inequality has become obvious to rulers to the extent that they hire image makers to frame public discourse along the narrative of national unity for its own sake, rather than for any political, economic, or cultural purpose, the rationale for all modern democracies.

    To advance the cause of national unity, development, and stability, none of the 90 items in Buhari’s manifesto should be adjudged superior to the other. Removing the flaws in the structure of government and constitution, already acknowledged in Buhari’s manifesto, is as crucial for peace, stability, development, and unity as the fight against corruption at the hands of a venal elite. As unenviable as the challenges before President Buhari in a country that has been degraded for decades by poor policies that include deliberate dismantling of Nigeria’s federal system may be, the bitter truth for Buhari to face is that past mistakes need to be rectified not excused. The current constitution is a graphic illustration of such mistakes.

    It is instructive that President Buhari has vowed to engage all militant groups that threaten the survival of united Nigeria: Boko Haram and Indigenous People of Biafra, for example. But the president must not lose sight of the fact that not all nationalities or regions complaining about marginalisation and inefficient and ineffective governance are interested in seceding from Nigeria. Many nationalities and regions are calling for restoration of federalism, rather than mobilising for disintegration. As the president focuses on ending Boko Haram terrorism and recovering the country’s stolen funds from thieves of state, he should give attention to establishing an inclusive process of re-crafting a federal constitution.

    Such process must not be mechanical as efforts in the past by both military and civilian rulers had been, even if establishing a constitutional review process has to take more time than the quick-fix that had characterised all the national conferences in the past. President Buhari needs to mobilise all regions to participate in the process of creating a people’s constitution through their duly elected representatives for the purpose of identifying needed changes to the polity and the fiscal culture. None of the national conferences in the past should be taken as having completed the thinking needed to restructure the country for peace, stability, and development while none of the ideas in previous conferences should be dismissed without proper consideration by those elected by their communities to participate in constitutional review. Citizens should be given a free hand to decide whether they want regional cluster of states that create development through fiscal autonomy or another federal bureaucracy (called in Buhari’s manifesto Regional Economic Development Agencies (REDA)) that is to administer development.

    It will be simple-minded and over-sanguine to continue to look for revenue to continue the tradition of waste and extravagancy that led Nigeria to its current backwardness in spite of huge revenue from oil in the past. President Buhari should avoid one dimensionality in his diagnosis of the country’s problem. Corruption is certainly a cause of underdevelopment, so is the use of revenue to create and sustain fiefdoms for politicians an important factor in the country’s underdevelopment.  Citizens appear to have seen through all the stratagems in the last fifty years to deceive and distract them from coming to terms with the determination of a band of rulers-military or civilian-to exploit and dominate them. This is the right moment to demilitarise the polity, and Buhari is in the best position to do this, having been a major player in the era of what Abubakar Umar once called the mistakes of military rule.

  • Buhari: 42 months to go!

    Buhari: 42 months to go!

    With six months already gone, the president should realise that time flies!

    Going by Nigeria’s constitution, the president, governors and legislators have a four-year mandate, after which they return to the electorate to seek approval to continue, or go home to rest. So, exactly 42 months from now, Nigerians would either be waiting for the return of President Muhammadu Buhari for a second term, or be preparing to swear in another president if they deem him to have performed below expectations. The choice is the president’s.

    Traditionally, many writers who remember the import of today as exactly six months since the president came on board would dwell on his activities of the last six months. For me, however, this has become predictable despite its little significance. The last six months is gone; it can never be recovered. So, we should look forward to the remaining three-and-a-half years of the Buhari presidency. And, if we even think the president has 42 months to go, we must have lost sense of the country’s political trajectory.  Unless there is a new paradigm, the race for 2019 will begin at best 24 months from now. This is much more so that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) that President Muhammadu Buhari’s All Progressives Congress (APC) trounced at the polls is not resting. It wants 2019 to come as early as yesterday, in its dream of returning to the same power it occupied for 16  wasted years.

    In fairness to the president, when he assumed office, a few things changed for good in the country. Perhaps the most noticeable of these is power supply. Nigerians suddenly realised that electricity supply to their homes and businesses improved even as President Buhari was yet to form his cabinet, and even as he was yet to add a single megawatt to what he met on ground. Nigerians simply attributed these positive changes to Buhari’s ‘body language’. Only a few remembered that he was yet to appoint ministers then. But the recrudescence of fuel scarcity and a few other challenges have changed that perception. Buhari, where is your ‘body language’? They began to ask. The number of those asking the question began to increase as they watched the scarcity worsen from days to weeks. If the matter is not resolved this weekend, more people would still join those wondering what has happened to Buhari and his ‘body language’.

    One can only imagine what could have happened if the president had not named his ministers until now because, even as there were no serious challenges before the team was finally sworn in November 11, many Nigerians had started to be apprehensive of when we will know those that would work with the president. President Buhari promised to have his cabinet latest September but when the month was almost ending and he was yet to fulfill this promise, Nigerians naturally began to ask questions: if it took him this long to name his cabinet, then how far can he go, given the time so far spent without ministers? For me, however, the time the cabinet is chosen is immaterial. This has nothing to do with the performance of the ministers. We have had situations in the past where presidents had named cabinet almost as soon as they were inaugurated; yet we had nothing to show for it. Indeed, some of such ministers left us worse than they met us. But this should not be taken as assurance that we will have value for money only because Buhari’s ministers were late in coming. Far from it. What I am saying is that the time the cabinet is formed is not necessarily a guarantee of good performance. Even after naming the cabinet, some people say if the list paraded as what the president could offer, why did he waste our time before naming them? Irrespective of what Nigerians, particularly arm-chair critics might say, President Buhari believes he has named some of the best persons that can better do the job he wants for the country.

    One thing is that, as with the Jonathan administration when we had Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as finance minister and coordinating minister for the economy, former Governor Raji Fashola would appear Okonjo-Iweala’s equivalent in the Buhari administration, with his bagging of the power, works and housing portfolios! Not a few are wondering what President Buhari intends to achieve with this appointment in particular which, to me, signposts the measure of his implicit confidence in the former governor. Suffice it to say that President Buhari found a soul-mate in Fashola. Remember his hard-line posture as governor and Buhari’s tendencies too when he was a military head of state. But, whether the president has made the right decision or not is in the wombs of time.  We have also seen solid minerals, agriculture and the economy as Buhari’s other areas of focus, given the ministers he appointed to oversee the respective ministries. If the ministers in these ministries (particularly Fashola) succeed and make reasonable dents on the challenges in their ministries, then Buhari’s presidency would have been made.

    With his cabinet now formed, both the president and his cabinet members know the country’s problems. President Buhari knows like any other Nigerian that the economy was destroyed by the rapacious Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) government that he took over from; he knows that there is insecurity in the land; he is aware that Nigerians are not happy with the state of power supply, that the roads are bad; our schools are in urgent need of revamping, our hospitals are now worse than the ‘mere consulting clinics’ that he met when he came as military ruler in 1983. With the crash in oil price and the massive corruption that pervaded the land, especially in the immediate past, it has become a daunting task to expect sudden improvement in the country.

    Expectedly therefore, some Nigerians have said the government is too slow in making things happen. I have the feeling some may even be silently asking how come the government has not built ‘a single’ refinery in the last six months if it does not want to remove fuel subsidy! As a matter of fact, some are asking: how many corrupt Nigerians has the government jailed? These were the same people who accused General Buhari of high-handedness when he clamped many Nigerians suspected of being corrupt behind bars without due trial in the 1980s. That has been the case with human beings; they are hardly patient for results; preferring instead, quick fixes which often break down as soon as they are fixed. It has been like that since the days of Moses when he led the Israelites out of captivity in Egypt.

    Whilst it may be tempting to see some of the criticisms, particularly those coming from the former PDP chieftains (some of who should be behind bars now but for rule of law) who ruined the country, as deserving of little attention, the president should be interested in constructive criticisms, irrespective of where they are coming from because it is part of what keeps government on its toes.

    What should not be lost on him is that Nigerians not only want change; they want the change that would endure and President Buhari should know that time is not on his side. Before we know it, it would soon be one year that he took over. That would be less than a quarter of his four-year tenure because, as I said before, the race for 2019 will begin anytime in 2017 and attention would be shifting from the present government to the next, unless the president succeeds in steering affairs in a way that would make this unattractive. And one way to do that is by giving Nigerians the good governance that PDP could not give in 16 years.

    With six months already gone, those asking for President Buhari’s policy direction obviously have a point. Government, like an aero plane, needs a compass. Otherwise, ministries would be working at cross-purposes and ministers will be singing discordant tunes. Beyond that, there must be yardsticks with which to measure the government’s performance. This implies the government setting timelines to its programmes and policies. We need to see all that in the coming weeks, perhaps months, to keep hope alive that there will, indeed, be light at the end of the tunnel.

  • Kogi: Of a soporific INEC and a listless professor – was INEC error a deliberate ethnic plot?

    Kogi: Of a soporific INEC and a listless professor – was INEC error a deliberate ethnic plot?

    If the three INEC commissioners deployed, and the state electoral commissioner suddenly lost concentration, what was a supposedly erudite Professor Kucha thinking about, not knowing there was no way 25, 000 votes can overtake 41, 000?

    Lawyers were at the forefront of the revolution that gave rise to the American declaration of independence. Majority of delegates to the constitutional convention that gave birth to the American independence were lawyers. Britain and America, the two leading democracies in the world were, at the same time, simultaneously led by lawyers. Lawyers were at the vanguard of a new constitution in Ghana. Lawyers led the constitutional reforms in South Africa and Zambia. Nigeria has produced its sizeable number of great lawyers who are untainted by the common vices that afflict ordinary folks. Lawyers are nation builders. They are influential agents of change in the society with prominent responsibility to build practical and pragmatic democracy founded on the Rule of Law and the constitution – Elder Dele Adesina SAN, in Kunle Ogunsakin’s ‘FOR THE LOVE OF THEIR NATION(Lawyers as agents of change in Nigeria).

    Pray, if the above is true, why are some senior Nigerian lawyers, even judges, doing everything to subject the noble profession to outright profanity by putting financial gratification before national interest?

    All of a sudden, it became the fad that a state Election Returning Officer must be a university professor and sitting vice-chancellor. Ordinarily, with their erudition and high profile, you would reckon this is in order and when you factor in the fact that the immediate past Chairman of INEC was both professor and former vice-chancellor, you are forced to concur with its reasonableness. But do their performances meet their high profile? Hardly; not with what Nigerians saw one of them do at the presidential votes collation, literally unable to read what he claimed he wrote personally, and this recent one in Kogi State where Professor Emmanuel Kucha, vice-chancellor, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, was in action . PDP’s reaction, rejecting INEC decision that APC should replace its late candidate with another, did not come as a surprise.  Granted, though, that this decision itself has no backing in the Nigerian constitution, I had, much earlier in the day, foreseen that some opportunistic forces would rapidly step into the electoral conundrum to try to make money. I had consequently written as follows on my Face book wall: ‘ …take the Kogi case which lawyers will soon turn to billion naira briefs representing both sides, for instance, whereas the only thing that needs be cured is that silly mistake by INEC. That is why APC should promptly head to the Supreme Court to get INEC to reverse itself. This is because, if Governor Wada and PDP get ALL the less than 25,000 votes at the intended supplementary election, they will still be losers. Why then should there be any supplementary election? But look through the newspapers or listen to the television networks and all you find are lawyers obfuscating things and confusing everybody’.

    Read the statement by PDP’s  Metuh, and you can see that lawyers are already fast at work,  edging the country to a constitutional crisis which would go all the way to the apex court to  resolve rather than proffering the most reasonable way out in an election that was already won,  and lost, before some complicit INEC officers,  and a listless professor  created an unnecessary logjam.  For truth be told, the Kogi election was already clearly over and so what needs  be cured, now, is the totally unpardonable  mistake of declaring it inconclusive.  But since INEC cannot legally reverse itself, APC should go to court to put a finality to the needless controversy.

    As you read this, the following are the current standing of the two leading parties at the election:  APC – 240, 867,  PDP – 199, 514. Total number of registered voters is 49, 000 while only 25,000 have Permanent Voter Cards. It stands to reason to hold, therefore, that the number of accredited voters cannot be more than 25,000. In a situation, therefore, where the late Audu and APC were leading by 41, 000 votes, if ALL the votes at the proposed supplementary election went to PDP/Wada, they would  be only a runner up and with a win in only five local government areas, a complete no hoper. It needs be noted that apart from having the majority votes, the APC candidate also had the constitutionally prescribed geographical spread. So what exactly is the sense in declaring the election inconclusive? If the three INEC commissioners  deployed, and the state electoral commissioner suddenly lost concentration, what was a supposedly erudite  Professor  Kucha thinking about, not knowing  there was no way 25, 000 votes  can overtake  41, 000?

    And this, exactly, is where I suspect that a grand conspiracy, agreed to by the leading Igala members of both parties, NEVER to allow a non-Igala rule the state comes in.  Governor Wada, with all the intelligence and security resources at his disposal, and particularly at such a sensitive period, cannot, in good conscience, claim ignorance of Audu’s death even within an hour of its happening. That is the point at which I think top Igala politicians must have gone to work on the grounds that it was better an Igala, any Igala at all,  than any minority,  no matter on which party platform. That’s why, I suspect, INEC DELIBERATELY messed up an election that had been won and lost.

    A word then about the PDP and its fishing expedition with Wada reported as heading to court to ask to be declared winner on the laughable grounds that he is the candidate with the highest number of votes alive. Such morbid thoughts from a state governor cannot be laughable at all. It is a shame that not even its massive shellacking at the last presidential election would suffice in taming the PDP and return it to the path of rectitude. Among other claims, the PDP, in its laborious press release, claimed that APC was being permitted to transfer the votes of a dead man – note the arrant insensitivity – to another candidate, easily forgetting that PDP provided the precedent in the transfer of votes at an election. I quote below, how a veteran journalist, Wole Olujobi, captured that episode on ekitipanupo: “One thing strikes me about Metuh’s hallucination in his eagerness to return PDP to winning ways after clearly losing the election. Olisa Metuh ?agonised over transfer of a dead Audu’s votes to another candidate, conveniently forgetting that his own party created history in Nigeria when the votes of a sitting  governor  were transferred to another  person, who neither pasted a campaign poster nor attended a campaign rally to become the governor in Rivers State. I refer here to Celestine Omehia who won an election on the platform of the PDP and was sworn in as the governor before another PDP aspirant went to court, claiming to be the rightful PDP candidate. At the conclusion of that case the Supreme Court held that Amaechi? was the candidate of PDP and ordered that Omehia’s votes be transferred to him on the grounds that the votes belonged to the PDP and whoever won its governorship primary election.  Obviously, Metuh must have suffered a momentary loss of memory to claim as he did’.

    I was almost completing this article when I ran into Professor Lai Olurode’s interview on Channel’s television and I came to perfectly understand why Nigerians have had to endure INEC for so long. According to the Professor of Sociology and former INEC commissioner, in his own reasoning,  all that matters in an election is the register of voters which contains the names of registered voters many of who are, of course, long dead, did not collect permanent voters cards nor would ever come near a polling booth on election day. For him, PVCs are mere INEC internal product with no probative value in an election and, if his incredible thought process is followed, accreditation too, means nothing to the process either. Were these not his totally incredible  postulations, he should have known that with less than 25,000 accredited for the election in the areas where elections were cancelled, there is no magic, except there is an INEC magic, by which PDP can now overtake  APC.  By his thoughts, you would never think Olurode had ever seen the inside of an INEC office. It’s such a shame.

  • The best laid plans of mice and men…

    Clearly, no one ever had any inkling that the best laid constitution of a country could be stumped by a simple fact as a man taking the most natural step of dying, albeit at an ill-chosen moment

    I am sure that you have been as enthralled by the Kogi State election problem as I have been. Here is that, at best sleepy and at worst little known, state suddenly finding itself being flung into a constitutional crisis it did not ask for. Does it not just remind you of those stories about unknown, laid back citizens content to be buried in their drinking cups suddenly finding all eyes in the country trained on them because, God Almighty, they are holding the winning vote? Grrr! Right now, I bet the people of the state are looking much like a rat surprised suddenly by light from a torch.

    What brought all this about is well known to us, i.e. the sudden death of APC’s candidate who was well nigh biting into a victorious second coming in the state as governor. Well, many of us regard this as one of those things that happen in life. How do we say it, life happens, right? Yeah, life happens, in spite of your best laid or worst laid plans. Let me illustrate.

    The story is told of a man who went all out to obtain a government contract. Naturally, he was in competition with others for it. This man pulled all the stops to get the contract: notes from all and sundry that mattered. Indeed, with such well-marshalled armoury, our man was well on the way to victory. He was told by the fellow in charge to return at eight in the morning and sign the papers; and he was warned that eight had to mean eight a.m., not nine as it would go to the next man in line. Well, guess what: our man started his celebration that evening and did not wake up until half past ten the next morning. According to a commentator on the story, it was an illustration of how to snatch a loss from the jaws of victory.

    Actually, you can also snatch a victory from certain defeat; just watch a football match where the best and winning goals are scored in the dying minutes of the game. The incredulity of such unplanned wins and losses have led to the making of careers and, of course, the shooting of wives who change TV channels without permission. There is however no greater illustration of how to snatch a loss from certain victory than the story of the country called Nigeria.

    Nigeria is very good at it, snatching losses from victories, that is. I have since found out that no matter how Lady Victory clenches her jaws and determines to favour us, we determinedly insist on turning the victory to watery defeat. So many states are blessed with large numbers of talented and well educated people who can lead their states to unparallel victories, but somehow it’s the uneducated ones among them who are called to rule and take their states to the despair-inducing depths of defeat. Reason? Most times, we flash the cards of tribalism and/or religion. Uncanny, no?

    On the other hand, take the little matter of natural resources for instance, or even the earnings from those resources. Very few countries on earth have oil in this abundance or even anything else for that matter and they are getting by. Here we are in Nigeria not only collectively burning off this oil; worse, we are individually squandering our earnings from it in petty thieving and brigandage. From the clenched jaws of victorious abundance, Nigeria is wrenching out deep, abundant poverty.

    So, the little problem in Kogi is great material indeed for an election drama. At the height of the election victory of his APC party, Audu, the gubernatorial candidate keels over and dies. It can’t get more dramatic than that. So, rather than talk of victory now, the party and Nigerians are instead plaintively crying, what do we do, just what do we do? And there is none to answer them, not the constitution, not the law. Clearly, no one ever had any inkling that the best laid constitution of a country could be stumped by a simple fact as a man taking the most natural step of dying, albeit at an ill-chosen moment.

    Believe me, there have been suggestions, many of which should just pass in through one ear and be cocked by the other, never exiting through the mouth but I will tell only you. I have heard some say the running mate should transmute to the governorship. A good solution if only INEC had declared the election good and won by APC, or if the state were made of one homogeneous group instead of three very divided peoples. But this declaration was not made by INEC, in its wisdom and the winning tribe is flashing its card. Some have suggested that there be some kind of candidate substitution. Some, on the other hand and perhaps out of grief, have suggested replacing the deceased with his son. Now, now, now, I say, let’s pause a bit.

    First, I ask myself, does the constitution permit the substitution of a deceased candidate with his son? Obviously the constitution is very silent on many things. It only says for instance that my child is entitled to food but it is silent on the kind of food I am supposed to give him as his parent. So he cannot brandish the said constitution in my face when he demands that I feed him salad instead of eba. So, I ask again, which silent part of this constitution says that once we vote in a man we have voted in the entire blessed family, sane or mad, cattish, doggish, etc.?

    I therefore think that the so called elders of the deceased’s party who came up with that hare-brained idea should put on their thinking caps once again. I would have taken the suggestion as coming from grieving mouths which can say anything but for the fact that one or two supposedly educated governors have reiterated it. Now, I do not know the young man who is being put forward; but I object very strongly to the attempt to make the entire country feel obliged to take such a suggestion.

    When words such as ‘to compensate the Audu family’ are used to persuade us to accept the son in place of the father, I ask, what kind of democratic practice allows that? What are we compensating exactly? Who is responsible for that death: the country? More importantly, is any of Nigeria’s elective position hereditary now? Are these governors and others thinking like them trying to tell us that the wisdom to govern states resides only in their families? I only ask.

    Many people have said rightly that the problem with Nigeria today is her elite class. They are the ones who twist the right things around to suit their selfish egos. They are the ones who reinterpret democracy for the rest of us and give us home-grown concoctions for governance in the hope of keeping their families in perpetual governance. They forget two important and immutable laws of life: whatever goes around comes around; and as we lay our beds, we must also lie on them. On these two laws hang all human deeds.

    I think it is important that we all strive to build a future for this country that will not give us palpitations. This means that we all must be objective about what we put down today in the name of governance because we and our children for generations to come are surely going to have to eat our fills from it. It is a truism that the best laid plans of mice and men are filed away somewhere, because, I tell you, life happens.

  • The liberal tradition and its enemies

    The death of Stanley Macebuh last weekend robs Nigeria of one of its greatest minds ever; a man of outstanding intellect and great cultivation.  He was cut in the finest tradition of the liberal intellectual. He was refined, humane and tolerant of dissenting opinion. He was also generous and compulsively selfless. In a brutal and uncaring society, these endearing traits cannot be part of a survivalist kit or a manual for manumission from economic slavery. But exceptional nobility of spirit is not a crime. It is a monument in itself.

    Stanley Macebuh was the quintessential man of ideas, an intellectuals’ intellectual and a pundit among pundits. He was unarguably the doyen of intellectual journalism in Nigeria. To make this claim is of course to do grievous injustice to those “old thunderers” of early Nigerian journalism; anti-colonial men of letters and pan-African patriots who took the colonialists to the cleaners in their own game of fiery polemics. In his grave, Lord Lugard still winces in pain at the rowdy effrontery of “these seditious niggers”.

    But when we are talking of intellectual journalism, we are talking of a deliberate and systematic infusion of ideas and conceptual rigour into the practice of journalism and the transposition of the principles of standard scholarship into its modus operandi. On this, the scholarly and urbane Macebuh was the dean and doyen. He was the driving motivator and master of connectivity.

    It is to be noted that before Macebuh arrived on these shores from America, he was already a tenured Associate Professor and author of two acclaimed scholarly works particularly a memorable treatise on James Baldwin, the celebrated African American writer. Had he chosen to stay on in America, the sky would have been the limit. But America’s loss is Nigeria’s inestimable gain.

    It is to this fortuitous development in conjunction with certain beneficial economic and political circumstances that we owe the intellectual transformation that has taken root in Nigerian journalism. A few prominent Nigerian journalists might have become a corrupt and unethical lot, but there can be no doubting the keenness of their mind or the soundness of their education. If in the process they have become a more menacing danger to the society, this is a subject for another day.

    Before its dramatic transformation, journalism in Nigeria was in danger of becoming a veritable haven of “the flotsam and jetsam” of the society as Jeremiah Obafemi Awolowo once memorably put it. The typical column was an impressionistic rollercoaster lacking intellectual depth or rigorous engagement; full of sound and fury; brimming with petty sulking and nasty name-calling. Conceptual thinking was persona non grata and litigious writs flew in all directions from Agbadagbudu to Kakawa Street.

    Macebuh and his colleagues seized all this intemperate nonsense by the scruff of the neck. Apart from Macebuh with his cherubic insouciance and professorial mien, there was the courtly, cigar-chomping Patrick Dele Cole with his donnish imperiousness and Oxbridge bravura. And then there was Oladele Sunmonu Giwa, he of the film star good looks and Great Gatsby sartorial aplomb, who pioneered a new tradition of feature writing based on American New Journalism with its combination of creative flair and political pizzazz.

    It must be said at this point that certain favourable developments anticipated and complemented this new intellectual crusade in journalism. First, was Alhaji Jose’s visionary policy of recruiting fresh graduates into Journalism. This singular policy was so transformative that it led to a paradigm shift and an explosion of talents. Next was the arrival on our campuses from various graduate schools a new generation of university teachers who were bent on having a say in how the nation was run. Finally, the economic and political climate was quite good. Nigeria was awash with petrodollars, and having survived a Civil War, the country was also steadily and solidly transiting to democratic rule.

    But something was afoot in journalism. Something truly new was coming out of Africa. The old order took it all in the chin, shocked and awed by the daring of it all and the breezy confidence of the shamans of the new order. Ruing the momentous developments one afternoon on the corridor of the Daily Times at Kakawa with a friend, the late Chief Olu Akaraogun, himself a notable journalist with considerable intellectual firepower, was shocked out of wits when Stanley Macebuh, the subject matter, suddenly materialised. But rather than join an animated but futile discussion, Macebuh romped through the duo as if they were nonexistent. Macebuh took both praise and damnation in his stride.

    Stanley Macebuh always took things in his stride. He was not a temperamental genius. He was gifted with calm fortitude and equanimity. He was courteous, courtly and unfailingly polite, but he knew his onions. He could be roused to occasional fury by ungentlemanly conduct. But till the end, there was something about him which reminded one of a star professor in a notable American campus. Perhaps it was his mien and comportment.

    But the professorial mantra cuts both ways. While it connotes a cool sobriety and calm detachment, it also suggests a certain degree of naiveté and idealistic hubris. In the real world to be dismissed as an intellectual is to be deemed to be on sabbatical from grim reality. In the brutal world of post-colonial politics it is almost always fatal to be demonised as an intellectual.

    Yet only a visionary idealist could have conceived The Guardian on such magnitude and magnificence. The Guardian remains a magnificent tribute to visionary idealism and the ineluctable power of brilliant ideas and to the fact that no monument is ever left behind by the incurable cynic. But The Guardian is also a telling reminder of how lofty idealism can come unstuck under the relentless hammer of dogged reality.

    The typical Macebuh project always came unstuck as recalcitrant reality came into violent and potentially fatal contradiction with posturing idealism. To have imagined that the liberal tradition as it is known in the west can be transplanted to a post-colonial culture without first transforming its illiberal economy and politics is a classic instance of daydreaming that is particularly touching in its idyllic innocence.

    To think that the tenets of New Journalism as it is practised in America can be grafted overnight on a culture nurtured by Fleet Street and the wizards of Wapping is to fail to distinguish between harsh reality and elevated reverie. Finally, to begin to imagine that intellectual capital, however solid and sterling, will be equated to real capital when the blue chips are down is to substitute fiction and fantasy for the real world. But as Paul de Man has taught us in Literary Theory, the moment of great insight is often accompanied by great blindness.

    The illiberal culture has a way of taking care of the liberal tradition. No organic liberal tradition can emerge from a society steeped in authoritarian and feudal mores. As we are currently learning with the drama unfolding in Nigeria, the more you try to humour such a malignant tradition, the more severe and exorbitant its price becomes.

    Stanley Macebuh ought to have learnt the lesson very early enough. Shortly after the military retreated to the barracks, Dr Patrick Dele Cole, his bosom friend and confidant, was eased out of office. Most politicians have no time for freewheeling intellectuals. For Macebuh, the final straw and the moment of radical epiphany came not long after. By his own admission, he had gone back to Umaru Dikko’s office to retrieve a document only to find the great man of letters and Admiral of the rice armada, red biro in hand, poring over an editorial he (Macebuh) had just passed for publication. It doesn’t get more liberal than that.

    Still, it must be conceded that it takes a certain audacity of hope to have conceived The Guardian on such a scale, and so soon after The Daily Times fiasco. The Guardian at its inception was the greatest constellation of intellectual luminaries to have graced any newspaper stable in the history of Nigeria. It was brimful of the best and the brightest and boasted of all kinds of ideological tendencies from the far left to the far right. Almost three decades later, one still marvels at how anybody could have pulled off such a stupendous coup. It was a starry-eyed venture by a starry-eyed intellectual.

    As a completely detribalised Nigerian who believed in the aristocracy of intellect, one of the unintended consequences of the arrival of The Guardian was that it opened the door for many Nigerians who were technically Macebuh’s intellectual adversaries to be heard. Snooper owes Macebuh  and Dele Giwa a personal debt of gratitude for this development. But as usual, reality came knocking very fast. The strange but understandable reversal of The Guardian’s “simply Mr” policy was a sickening blow to its credibility but it was a pointer to a coming katakata. It showcases the immense capacity of a rooted and organic illiberal culture to upend a disembodied liberal tradition. From this point, things began to read like the chronicle of a liberal collapse foretold.

    After the great electoral robbery of 1983 by the Shagari administration, The Guardian for a long time maintained a studied and significant silence. It was a case of hear no evil and see no evil. It took a blistering and damning rejoinder from a don in one of our universities to rouse the flagship from its millennial stupor. The article was published on 1st November, 1983 after The Guardian Nomenklatura sat on it for over five weeks. As the author, yours sincerely should know.

    As a direct response to the article and a rebuttal of its argumentative thrust, Stanley Macebuh penned a classic famously titled, The liberal Tradition and its Enemies. It was Macebuh at his most brilliantly persuasive and at the summit of his stylistic sublimity. But the article was also seething with glaring contradictions and unintended ironies. Rather than calming frayed nerves, it brought a gale of intellectual recriminations which only subsided with the military take over a few weeks after. The Guardian and Macebuh had been badly mauled.

    After this, it was only a question of time before the contradiction between real capital and intellectual capital would arrive at the flashing point of fatality. In the contest between brutish, illiberal power and effete liberality the outcome is certain. The end came not long thereafter. In a night of the long knife, Stanley Macebuh was summarily cashiered from The Guardian. He was also reportedly slammed with an oath of silence as part of the settlement.

    By this time, Dele Giwa had been physically accounted for. SAP was also taking care of those rowdy professors who were disturbing the peace of the nation by writing what they were not paid to write. Surely, if they do not eat, they cannot philosophize; and if they are made to become pedestrians all over again, their thinking will also become pedestrian. By which time they will know the true husband of their mothers. And so it came to pass. All became quiet on the intellectual front. It is called the pacification of professors.

    But Stanley has paid his dues and paid the price. Hurt by the abominable discourtesy with which he had been treated by the capital class, Macebuh also made a bid to acquire real capital through the business of sugar importation. This did not go far either. Impishly hilarious as usual, MKO Abiola was known to have accosted Macebuh at a public function. “Ah Stanley, sugar is sweet ooo!!!”, MKO bellowed. “Chief, but money sweet pass”, Macebuh was said to have shot back.

    Sugar is sweet, money is sweeter but power is the sweetest. In his bid to understudy power, Stanley Macebuh was rewarded with serial dismissal by his friend, General Olusegun Obasanjo. Perhaps we can now conclude. The greatest enemies of the trader in intellectual commodity are not the other traders in ideas however adversarial but the trader in power as a commodity. The greatest enemy of the liberal tradition is the illiberal tradition and its champions and collaborators. Let this great Nigerian now rest in peace.

     

    • First published in 2009

     

  • Consumers bemoan absence of meat in beef sausages/rolls

    Consumers bemoan absence of meat in beef sausages/rolls

    Beef sausage rolls and beef rolls as they have been christened by their manufacturers are not food products one needs to go far to get in Nigeria.

    They roll off the conveyor belts in various factories in their thousands every day and end up being sold along the roads in traffic, corner shops, open market, super markets, virtually in every nook and cranny.

    It is one of the most convenience foods for a hungry person. It is a piece of sausage meat baked in a roll of spiced pastry or dough.

    Practical food? Yes, because it is handy, tasty, affordable as it sells for N50 each, quite filling especially when eaten with a bottle of drink, can be easily accessed, neatly and safely packaged as a majority of the popular brands are produced by multinational companies.

    Beef sausage rolls have become a food product most Nigerians have come to trust and rely on especially when you are hungry and trapped in traffic hold ups like the ones experienced by Lagosians.

    The most popular brands are Gala from the UAC foods, Meaty from Leventis Stores, Chopsy beef Rolls manufactured by UTC foods, Super Bite/ Beef Rolls from CHI Ltd, Bigi etcetera.

    The sausage industry in Nigeria started with the first brand Gala, from UAC foods, in 1962. Then it was sold only in Lagos. For those outside Lagos State, it was a must-buy for them any time a relation or close ones travel to Lagos. Both adults and children relish the gift of gala sausage roll from Lagos.

    However, the market has greatly expanded. With many brands in the offing now, there is virtually no place in the country that one cannot find these snacks. Though the amusing thing is that the name gala has stuck with most people. Most consumers still refer to other brands as gala. It is a common thing to hear a buyer calling on the boys who hawk this product in traffic to bring gala, then when the seller comes with his cartoon filled with the various brands, the buyer will then select or ask for a specific brand. Generally people in most cases refer to all of them as gala.

    Is the so called beef sausages/rolls, or should I ask the pastry tasty? Yes. The problem, however, is that consumers do not know if the snacks are qualified to be called beef sausage as a majority of the brands do not seem to have any resemblance of beef in them.

    The stuffing that is supposed to be beef does not seem beefy neither does it taste meaty. The filling of the gala of old tasted meaty as is attested to by some consumers and that was why consumers got hooked to the product and when other companies saw their success rate they all went into the business. Unfortunately, they did not imitate the UAC standard of old. What we have as stuffing in the so called beef rolls are just spiced, lumpy, pink coloured dough.

    If at all there is any resemblance of minced beef in them, is the percentage of the meat enough to qualify those sausages as beef rolls and beef sausages not to talk of being called ‘Meaty’?

    Nigerian consumers definitely deserve to be treated better. They have the right to be fully informed as to what they are buying. Many consumers have registered their anger and concerns with Consumer Watch. Recently, a Public Relations consultant, Larry Ofile Badmus, called in anger after buying one of the so-called beef rolls and wondered why such a product that has no meat in it should be registered by government regulatory agency as a ‘beef roll’.

    “They can market the products but under different names that do not reflect or give the impression that the filling is made with beef,” adding that the manufacturers should be called to change the deceptive names or add enough beef to the stuffing to qualify it as a beef roll or ‘Meaty’ sausage”.

    However, reacting to the allegations, Mrs. Joan Ihekwaba, the General Manager, Marketing UAC Foods, makers of the leading brand, Gala, strongly stated that “Gala sausage rolls stands out with its unique beef filling made from pure beef, micronutrients, seasonings and other ingredients stated on the packaging in line with regulatory requirements.”

    Speaking in an interview, she refuted claims that the Gala of the 80s was of a higher quality than what we have now. She said that UAC Foods has not rested on its laurels but has rather improved its value offering over the years.

    “The brand is now 53years old and several improvement initiatives are routinely carried out towards meeting consumer’s expectations. It is the first brand in Nigeria to include micronutrients,” emphasised the GM Marketing, UAC Foods.

    Explaining further, Mrs. Ihekwaba said that the company engages in regular consumer research and identifies with aspirations of Nigerians and their appetite for success, thereby providing consumers with top quality safe and healthy convenience foods.

    Speaking with a nutritionist and food scientist at the Federal Institute of Industrial Research Oshodi (FIIRO), she said that for those snacks to be qualified to be called beef sausages and beef rolls they must contain between 15% and 20% beef in them.

    Analysing the stuffing in most of the popular brands, the civil servant, whose name cannot be mentioned because of civil service rules, said the manufacturers should change their recipes and include enough meat in their products or change the names of those products.

    “The stuffing is strong and even stony which should not be the case. It’s just spices, flour, binders, pink food colouring and maybe very tiny amount of minced meat which does not qualify the snacks as meaty or the other names,” she said.

    Calling on the manufacturers to stop the deception, she advised them to change their recipes or come to FIIRO for help in reformulating their recipes.

    “Though those manufacturers know the right thing to do, it’s just greed for high profit that is beclouding their sense of judgement,” she claimed.

    Exonerating NAFDAC, the civil servant said that most of the manufacturers present the right food products for reviews and inspection only to start producing substandard products after NAFDAC, SON must have issued them with approvals.

    However, that excuse does not exonerate the regulatory agencies as their duty does not end with the first inspection. They are supposed to carry out regular checks and monitoring to ensure standards are enforced and maintained.  Besides, they are residents of this country and definitely they are equally patronising those products.

    Reacting to the issue in her office at NAFDAC office, Isolo, Lagos, NAFDAC Public Relations Manager, Mrs. Christie Obiazikwor, said that the sausages actually have beef filling. Strongly debunking claims that the stuffing were anything other than beef, she said that the agency would not have approved them if that was the case.

    At the office of CHI Ltd, the company’s Customer Relations Manager insisted that the stuffing in both Super bite and Beef Rolls produced by them were minced meat.

    In fact, she said that at a time they had complaints from consumers who said that they were coming across difficult chewy parts of meat when they munched their beef rolls, adding that their recipes are a reflection of consumer demands and wants.

  • Biafra’s rising stridency

    Biafra’s rising stridency

    From its beginnings in 1999 when the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) embodied its goals, and now when the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has given it added vibrancy and renewal, the Biafra concept has refused to be a passing fancy. It is unlikely to go away anytime soon. Both MASSOB and IPOB, sometimes now used interchangeably because their goals converge, are a recrudescence of an idea that took root in 1966, was romanticised in the sanguinary accounts of epic battles between 1967 and 1970 during the civil war, and continues to achieve striking relevance because of the dire failings of an unstructured and distorted federation. Since 2005 when Ralph Uwazuruike gave MASSOB some ideological and administrative oomph, and since early this year when Nnamdi Kanu’s Voice of Biafra Radio gave IPOB resonance and poignancy, the Biafra idea has steadily grown in scope and appeal in the hearts of southeasterners. Nigerians and their leaders, including many sceptical Southeast opponents of the idea, are mistaken to think the idea will suddenly dissipate because it is denounced or repressed by force.

    Speaking at the launching of the 2016 Armed Forces Remembrance Emblem at the Presidential Villa last Monday, President Muhammadu Buhari, who has not really addressed the ferment in the Southeast, observed that: “Our nation has recently celebrated 55 years of political independence and continues to remain as one indivisible entity despite several grievous challenges. Since independence, Nigeria has witnessed a lot of internal strife, survived a civil war and has remained united. This feat achieved by the country is an eloquent testimony to the determination of our citizens to remain as one people.” This is perhaps his first real attempt to speak to the problem that is gradually assuming a disturbing dimension. Many southeasterners themselves are ambivalent over the Biafra idea. Biafra died with Emeka Ojukwu, argue some. Yet others suggest that the economic imperatives of Nigeria and the so-called Biafra, not to say the peculiar map and demographics of the country, make the idea unattractive.

    Governors of the Southeast have been more hesitant taking a position. As elected leaders of the region, they bear the brunt of the disruptions and agitations for Biafra. Their first major attempt to address the matter was inconclusive. They will be reconvening to examine the matter more carefully, perhaps with more tact, and will doubtless take a stand sooner or later. The region’s cultural leaders have also been full of vacillation. They are sensitive about the yearnings and aspirations of Biafra’s advocates and their own relevance as traditional and social leaders of the region. They will see which way the cats are jumping before they take a more definitive position. Ohaneze Ndigbo has denounced the Biafra idea as impracticable and useless, hinging its position inelegantly on a troubling materialistic view of Igbo destiny. But it acknowledges that Southeast grievances are real and legitimate. Sundry media commentators have also equally been less squeamish in taking a position. From the safety of their media establishments and columns, some have denounced Biafra as anachronistic, and others have suggested that the federal government must engage Biafra advocates to resolve the contentious issues and controversies predisposing the region to centrifugal tendencies.

    Security and law enforcement agencies have on their own been very predictable. The police see the matter strictly as one of law and order, leading to the shooting or detention of some Biafra advocates during marches. The Department of State Service (DSS) has similarly been stereotypical in its approach. The army inexplicably speaks thunder, almost as if its officers forget the beginnings and the trajectories of the Boko Haram insurgency in the Northeast and how difficult it has been to combat the menace. Army commanders, who still can’t get military rule out of their veins, have spoken of their readiness to crush the separatist tendencies of Biafra’s advocates once the order is given. Do they know the implication of what they are saying? Have they done their study to find out whether once military muscle is applied, the problem would invariably yield to superior force? Have they studied contemporary military campaigns such as the United States’ Iraq War, the Syrian War, Afghanistan War, and many others which offers ample examples to militaries to look beyond the punch they pack?

    The restiveness in the Southeast is real and growing. There is nothing puzzling about it. But so far, neither the government nor the security agencies have shown any modicum of understanding of the Biafra phenomenon and what it presages. Worse, given the way they speak and the approach they have taken, it is unlikely they will view the problem with the wisdom and surefootedness needed to tackle it. Since the presidency of Olusegun Obasanjo, right through those of Umaru Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan, the Biafra crisis has steadily grown in scope and worsened in temper. It would not matter whether the federal government seems favourable to the Southeast, the Biafra idea will grow in stridency. And if not Biafra, then other groups, whether Boko Haram or a hypothetical Yoruba Liberation Group. The reason is clear. Youths are unemployed and drifting, and a vast majority of Nigerians are frustrated and alienated.

    Nor would it matter just how much force is applied to check the crisis. The logic and the environmental elements that feed it are expanding; and as long as the crisis remains unattended to, it will grow more menacing. It is surprising that the dithering and foolishness that enabled Boko Haram to fester are being replicated in the Southeast. Many years back, the federal government was either ignorant of the forces that birthed and fed Boko Haram or it was simply careless. Now they are displaying even worse ignorance and carelessness. Somehow, Nigerian leaders and many others, including some southeasterners, seem to believe that Biafra is nothing but a romantic and nostalgic idea. They don’t think it is a manifestation of deeper fissures in the country’s political tectonic. They think a decisive application of force, using what the army elegantly calls its rules of engagement, would be effective. Said the General Officer Commanding 81 Division, Major General Isido Edet: “It is in the public domain that certain elements are agitating for secession, though they have been counselled by elder statesmen that such exercise is not for the good of Nigerians  because we have gone through that lane before…The Nigerian Army would like to send an unequivocal warning to all and sundry, more specifically, to all those threatening and agitating for the dismemberment of the country, those committing treasonable felony and arson as well as wanton destruction of lives and property that once the army is deployed, we shall apply ROE to the letter.” The officers seem to forget that this is the age of asymmetrical war, wars without borders, wars most armies are unprepared and poorly equipped to fight, wars in which territories reclaimed by regular armies cannot be held in the face of radicalised and suicidal militants. Had the Nigerian civil war been fought today, the outcome would probably have been different.

    President Buhari should get serious about tackling the Biafra matter. And the army should keep quiet, await orders, refrain from offering unsolicited public opinion on critical issues, and avoid fouling the polity with superfluous display of valour. Whether the government likes it or not, Biafra and other separatist ideas will not fizzle out until they are scrupulously and comprehensively addressed. Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State gave probably the best indication of what needs to be done to tackle the problem. At a lecture in Abuja last week, the governor suggested: “There is a major issue that we must address urgently in Nigeria, and that is the issue of unity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Today, I must say that the only force holding Nigeria is God because all the qualities and qualifications of nations that have broken, all of them are here, and all the characteristics of a broken nation are in Nigeria.” Two observations flow from the governor’s point of view.

    One, Biafra and similar separatist tendencies flow from a lack of national identity. No government since independence has been able to unite Nigerians around a set of national values, principles and ambitions to give the country a sense of being and purpose. The constant romance with the so-called national orientation movement and ethical revolution mantra have proved wasteful, useless, sentimental and irrelevant. Right from its founding constitution as authored by a set of brilliant and philosophical leaders, the United States had envisioned a great and powerful nation, one that would assume regional and global leadership based on the universality and applicability of the principles and values it espouses. Since no leader can give what he doesn’t have, it is a ringing indictment that the absence of national guiding ethic and ambition reflects the intellectual and philosophical poverty of Nigerian leaders. The undisputable fact is that no Nigerian leader, from Balewa to the present, has ennobled the office they so grandly and garishly occupied. In consequence, the Igbo gravitate strongly around the powerful cultural values of their founding and metamorphosis; and the Yoruba, Hausa/Fulani and other ethnic groups yield supinely to their own worldviews and historical antecedents. Until Nigerian leaders can distill from their country’s national history a lofty and unifying perspective, and then imbue it with a great and robust essence and ambition, the country will continue to gravitate towards its centrifugal core. How the Nigerian Army, despite their study of great military empire builders such as Napoleon Bonaparte, Alexander the Great and Suleyman the Magnificent can imagine that the application of force will replace a vacuous and brittle core is hard to fathom. Can force replace the philosophical and existential magnet around which a country should successfully and enduringly coalesce?

    Two, as Gov Okorocha suggested, and as many other patriots have argued, Nigeria was founded on a poor, untenable and conflictive foundation. That foundation needs to be broken down and rebuilt. Biafra agitators are merely reminding the nation of the responsibility it has shirked for a long time. If that responsibility is not embraced now, the consequences will indeed be grave and unmanageable. Past leaders have played ducks and drakes with the national emotions. Whether it was the hedonistic Sani Abacha, or the sanctimonious Olusegun Obasanjo, or the experimentalist Ibrahim Babangida, or the opportunistic Goodluck Jonathan, none of these former leaders had altruistically attempted to restructure the country on the nationalistic foundations that conduce to a successful, united, modern, stable and prosperous nation-state.

    President Buhari will have to face the responsibility of political restructuring squarely if he is not to lose the initiative and the little momentum triggered by his ascendancy. The problem of the country is not primarily corruption which needs integrity and honesty to resolve. The problem, contrary to the president’s obsession, is largely the constitutional enthronement of an unworkable and highly flawed federation. With many national conferences already held over the decades, it may be time to take a look again to synthesize the various reports. This is necessary in order to find a workable and inspiring mean strong and sensible enough to be placed before a constituent assembly and perhaps for a referendum. Above all, this vital revolutionary change must be anchored on the president’s own political vision. For if he does not have a deep appreciation and conviction of the problem, and does not believe in his panaceas and vision for Nigeria, how can he drive the process wholeheartedly? The problem, it must be reiterated, is not whether the Igbo can survive as an independent and landlocked nation with a restrictive geographical space, as some have rightly drawn attention to. The dominant issue is that without a consensual political and economic federalism that can endure far into the future, Nigeria’s ethnic groups will continue to view irredentism as a practicable and beguiling prospect.

    Indeed, the great question is whether President Buhari, whose perspectives on economic and political issues need depth, tremendous broadening and harmonisation, can take the bold and revolutionary step to redraw Nigeria’s internal boundaries, fine-tune its demographics into coherent and harmonious parts, and rework its internal dynamics essentially along linguistic lines. The task is huge, and the risk manifold. If he fails, or if by commission or omission he embraces military application of force, the consequences may be far graver and more complicated than he imagines. The time is short, and the leeway to take bold steps is getting constricted. Now is the time for President Buhari to forswear his instinctive conservatism and hesitations and bravely and intelligently break the mould. After all, Nigeria’s present boundaries were drawn a little over a century ago. There is nothing that says certain forces cannot be unleashed to redraw it sooner or later in ways no one has contemplated.

  • In Search of… good health

    When heads come together in a well-meaning, genuine, round-table knocking, I believe that doctors, jingles and pounded yam can indeed mix to translate to more health.

    As I am writing this, there are many people in this country who are right now traversing Nigerian roads to attend the burial ceremony of one close relative or another, most of who have died prematurely. Whenever I have heard that someone has died and have asked what killed the fellow, I have often been told ‘Death’. How is it, I ask, that death can kill so… so… so… irrevocably when it has no hands? Turn left or right and you see your fellow Nigerians of all ages dropping off like… like… flies from all kinds of diseases! Just the other day, someone mentioned how she had been to an office one day in search of a contract and had chatted with everyone at each desk only to have gone back the week after and been told that one of them had died. Talk of a surprise.

    No, I am not talking about life expectancy today; I am talking about how Nigerians are allowed to eat and die in ignorance with very little intervention from the body that should be needling them into long life. It’s often been said that ignorance is bliss, but no one has ever tried to sit down to calculate whether the level of bliss is commensurate with the ignorance that spurns it or even calculate the very high cost of blissful ignorance. When someone eats him/herself to death in ignorance, the costs are borne by the survivors who have to carry on in his/her absence. Sadly, some of them never recover.

    Ultimately, everyone holds his health in his hands, with complete responsibility devolving on him or his family. However, when an individual takes decisions from a vantage point of blissful ignorance, then we are dealing with weighty matters indeed. Worse, he may even find himself not taking any decision because he cannot. So, leaving all issues concerning health in our hands is downright dangerous I say.

    Look, there are two matters compounding this problem. The first is that what we know as the Nigerian diet is seriously in need of divine intervention. It is a given that the larger part of the nation’s population is rural based with little or no education; therefore, the likelihood is high that they would mostly be the victims of the diet situation. Now, you and I agree that what constitutes our diet on this hemmed-in island is mostly what you would call the sugars with little relief. What I mean by relief is this. In this here parts, when a child is given his dish, his face breaks out in grins larger than that of the Cheshire cat at the sight of what he believes will fill his stomach. That is the main concern; what will fill his stomach. So he, least of all, notices that the contents of his dish are designed to satisfy only one aspect of his ravenous hunger. He hardly notices that there are other parts of his body also badly in need of satiation; those parts in need of protein, vitamins and minerals. Too often, these are absent. On a steady stream of that starchy diet therefore, your young Nigerian child grows into an adult who is more developed in physical terms than in mental ones. Either way, officer, we are being cheated by our consummations. Now, I wonder indeed if I know what I’m talking about.

    Anyway, one notable result from this skewed consumption pattern is the rise in diseases. Now, doctors tell us that diabetes and hypertension are almost in epidemic proportions. Nearly every one of two people you meet in the city is swallowing something to fight something else. On the other hand, nearly every rustic you meet in the hinterlands does not even know he/she has anything to fight until that something comes to punch them in the face, belly, arm, leg, blood, head or any other susceptible part. That is when the doctor’s questions or admonitions concerning the badness of the culinary habits handed down from ancestors without end really sound like Greek. Then you don’t know who to pity more: the poor man who is obviously sick and does not understand why it is not his neighbour ‘doing him’, or the doctor who is vainly trying to marry two incompatible people – modern medicine and traditional man. Me, I stay in their middle: firmly on the fence.

    The second matter is that there are just too many folk beliefs firmly ranged as arsenals against the doctor’s doctrines. Our rural folks do not believe that taking things like milk and eggs, etc., is morally good. One, they spoil the teeth and they encourage children to steal. Two, those things spoil children rotten. I have visited a number of villages having large, lush lands for growing things to take to the market while their children have skins that look like crocodile’s scales. The villagers just do not believe in feeding milk and eggs and chicken meat to their children. Come to think of it, neither do many chicken farmers. After raising their chickens, do they not cart the whole lot off to the economic market to sell, leaving the neighbours with only the scented whiffs of chicken droppings?

    Interestingly, even many parents living in the city are not much different. Their credos revolve around preserving the children’s honour rather than their lives. Then people find that in the face of ill-health, honour is not as valuable a premium as good eating sense. Oh wait, there is this health insurance scheme that is as incomprehensible to me as I think it appears to many. The reason is that there are still many questions not yet answered. Many civil servants do not know the limit that can be spent on their health; many of us do not know what happens when big illnesses strike; who takes care of the rural folks who succumb to these big illnesses; etc. Right now, health insurance or not, most people are bearing their health expenses out of their pockets and the health care providers are smiling to the bank.

    Doctors have sounded some warning bells on the rising phenomena called cancer, diabetes and hypertension, which, together are killing people off silently. Sadly, most people put such deaths down to ‘spiritual attacks’ or ‘wicked home people’. I am not here to argue with them though because everyone is entitled to a second opinion, so I am consulting my own crystal glass again. Yep, it tells me such people are suffering from severe cases of ‘deep, debilitating ignorance’.

    Honestly, this country can help itself preserve the lives of its citizens. Even in advanced countries, the government still sponsors advertisements which advise citizens on the proper diet to follow, the consequences of wrong diets, as well as admonitions on taking the right stuff such as milk, eggs and greens. This country can borrow a leaf from that. There must be a way of letting us the uninformed people know why we should keep a wary eye on the calorie contents of our steaming, mouth-watering plates of well-rounded eba, amala, pounded yam and rice, and why we should also keep the other eye on the meat to be sure it does not walk off the plate in indignation about its tiny size.

    How about we try radio jingles? They are catchy, cheap to produce and are definitely more far-reaching. Yeah, I know, in many cases it’s not the knowledge that is lacking, it’s the financial will. Even with that, there must be a way. All that this country – government, corporate world, people, etc. – needs is for heads to come together in a well-meaning, genuine round-table knocking. That is where we will find that doctors, jingles and pounded yam can indeed mix to translate to more health.

    • This article was first published in 2013.
  • Lagos, the Black capital of the future

    Lagos, the Black capital of the future

    Among the many sins of the Black people, none stands out more conspicuously than their inability to build or sustain durable nation-states.  Only very few African nations are sustainable in their current configuration.  In western diplomatic circuits, the standard joke is that Africans don’t do nations. As proof, they point to the sorry mess on the continent and out of the continent in Haiti where the African psyche finally overwhelmed African heroism.

    In the more extreme version of this Afro-dismissal, the entire continent is seen as being merely there to make up the number. As a writer famously put it, humankind first evolved in Africa, but they have not continued to do so there. In such circles, Africa is seen as a historic digression and Africans an evolutionary bye-pass in the course of human evolution.

    It is a scary proposition, this thesis that shuts out a whole race and the founding continent of humanity. One of the debilities pointed out is the inability of African nations to create and configure modern institutions that will sustain and nurture the neo-colonial state foisted on the continent and its people by imperialist conquest and subjugation. Needless to add that this sin flows from the original sin, the colonial contraptions foisted on Africa in the name of nations, or what Basil Davidson has famously described as the Blackman’s burden.

    If we discount the use of illness as an alibi as newly perfected by Nigerian elites when the law catches up with them, the greatest sin of Africa’s post-colonial elites is their inability to create and sustain great cities and megalopolis which will serve as a cultural, economic and technological hub for the rest of the nation and the continent at large.

    In what is now a celebrated encounter with the Lagos epic gridlock, The Economist correspondent put the blame for the resumption of traffic anarchy on the streets of Lagos on the incompetence and inadequacies of the new governor, Akinwumi Ambode, who in his estimate has so far been unable to match the proactive vigour and sheer reforming energy of his immediate predecessor.

    It is possible that the correspondent of The Economist wrote out of turn and out of anger without doing his research or homework. He did not bother to find out what was actually going on. This has brought a gale of furious recriminations accusing the iconic London magazine of neo-colonial journalism. Taken together, this is just as it should be, for it shows that many Nigerians are bothered about the state and condition of the greatest conurbation of black people anywhere in the world.

    The best way to go is to tackle the matter from the root in order to show why Lagos matters to Nigeria and to Africa and the black person.  Are Africans truly incapable of creating and sustaining great cities? If we insist that early European explorers of the fifteenth and eighteenth century spoke of the wide well-paved streets of Ilesa, the neat perpendicular avenues of Benin and the sprawling amphitheatre of old Oyo town, it may be dismissed as foolish romanticization.

    But the fact remains that when the Portuguese adventurers arrived at the old Kongo kingdom around present day Angola around the middle of the fifteenth century, they met a political organization and social structure at par if not superior to the one they left at home. They loitered around a bit hoping to have a glimpse of the mighty army that underwrote the flourishing kingdom. Alas, old Africans didn’t do matching military either. And since God marches on the side of the bigger battalion, virtually all the inhabitants of the kingdom were captured and transported to the new colony of Brazil through the slave port of Luanda.

    In the event, the old kingdom was to suffer three different types of colonial rationalization: Portuguese, French and Belgian. There can be no bigger recipe for millennial disorientation and dysfunction. In his leopard cap and resplendent costume complete with barbers daily imported to Gbadolite from Paris, Joseph Mobutu reminded one of the old Belgian minister of the interior famously captured in Conrad’s The Heart of Darkness who superintended the systemic brutalization of a race while being elegantly and nattily turned out. Yet by 1901, the indigenous city state of Abeokuta had solved the problem of sanitation and peaceful order.

    There is a sense then in which it can be argued that Lagos is the once and future capital of Nigeria, nay of Africa and the Black race. We do not mean capital in the pedestrian capitalist modernist sense but in the sense of a cultural, economic and technological hub of a nation, a continent and the whole Black race.

    This is why Lagos means so much to many, with the astral aura of greatness as an authentic African megalopolis hovering over it. It should be noted that Lagos did not start out as the capital of amalgamated Nigeria and neither has it ended up as the commanding capital of a harshly unitarist nation. But there can be no doubting its continuing relevance as the cultural, technological and economic powerhouse of the nation and indeed tropical Africa as a whole.

    There are at least three other great African mega-cities that could have served the same purpose: Cairo in Egypt, Johannesburg in South Africa and Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo. But while Johannesburg lacks an authentic African feel, Cairo is hobbled by religious and cultural constraints whereas the sprawling anarchic human conurbation of Kinshasa has unraveled under the strain of a thriving kleptocracy and endemic political disorder.

    Lagos seems to have been specially prepared for its destiny. Originally a flourishing fishing, trading and farming outpost, the modern name was a Portuguese reenactment of home abroad. The city has since grown exponentially taking in mammoth waves of settlers as it survived colonial slave raiders, a civil war, colonial bombardment and a protracted intellectual, political and cultural duel between its coastal elites and the colonial authorities fought out in pamphlets and newspapers which shaped and defined its character and possibilities as a Black Mecca of freedom and enlightenment.

    With its Yoruba and later Benin nucleus and influx of Nupe settlers, Hausa traders, Brazilian returnees, Sierra-Leonean recaptives, West African fortune-seekers and the Igbo people, this colonial and post-colonial hybridity has helped to foster a sense of oneness and belonging for all bar a few hiccups arising from competition for increasingly scarce resources. This delicate mix should not be overturned in the name of ethnic jingoism or cultural revanchism.

    No other African metropolis can boast of this kaleidoscopic potpourri. This is why Lagos has set the pace for the rest of the country, whether it is colonial politics, the decolonizing project, fashion, music, literature and post-colonial razzmatazz. The most iconic picture one can boast of is that of the late regally resplendent Oba of Lagos, Adeyinka Oyekan circa 1966, waltzing with the famous Caribbean singing diva, Millicent Small. It was a class act at the summit of sophistication and culture.

    Also as if by some divine or mystical coincidence, Lagos parades an illustrious gallery of former military and civilian rulers: from Mobolaji Johnson, the late Navy Commodore Lawal, the indefatigable Admiral Godwin Ndubuisi Kanu, the iconic Lateef Jakande to the late Air Commodore Gbolahan Mudashiru. But it is with the advent of the Fourth Republic and the financial wizardry and modernizing genius of Bola Ahmed Tinubu that Lagos finally came into its own in terms of breakneck development consolidated by his tough and doughty successor, Babatunde Raji Fashola.

    This is where the current Governor, Akinwunmi Ambode, has his work cut out for him. If he appears slow and tardy in coming away from the starting block, if he appears to have been remiss in darting away at the sound of the referee’s whistle , it may well be because the methodical accountant in the governor has been taking  a mental and fiscal audit of the Lagos project in its entirety. The truth also is that the Lagos APC command centre which ought to have nudged the governor appeared to have been distracted by the protracted and unproductive politics surrounding President Buhari’s cabinet.

    But if that were to be the case, the return of traffic gridlock and unruly motorists, cyclists and criminal urchins to the streets of Lagos tells its own story. It goes to show why and how the institutionalization of human habits and behavioural  patterns often matters even more than the enforcing personnel. Institutions are a function of repeated habits and gestures with instant state reprisals for offenders burnt into the human consciousness. If putative offenders know that no matter how long it takes the long arm of the law will finally catch up with them, they will think twice.

    Yet it is also axiomatic that no straight furniture can be procured from crooked timber. Without documented data and a functioning electronic pool of drivers, commercial or otherwise, tracking offenders is going to be a Herculean task. Many will offend simply to re-offend. And in a parlous economy bristling with bitter inequity asking the police, LASTMA officials and members of the Road Safety Corps not to take or demand bribe is a tall order indeed.

    While pursuing institutionalized order through constant education and enlightenment programmes for road users through organs of mass dissemination,  Ambode should not be afraid of wielding the big stick on offenders while purging the worst miscreants from the services. Nigerians are a hardy and hardened lot and if all humankind are angels, there would have been no need for government.

    Having said all this, the time has come for the federal authorities to see Lagos as a special national project which is beyond the scope and resources of a particular state government. With a population approaching four medium-sized states of the federation, it is time for Nigeria to revisit the structural and constitutional anomaly which groups Lagos together with other states.

    A Lagos megalopolis of the immediate future must have an underground metro which will rival the best efforts in Europe, Asia and America. It must also be self-sufficient in the generation and production of its own electricity needs. Needless to add that this cannot be handled by the state but in partnership with the private sector. It will be recalled that the first time these ameliorative projects were contemplated, they were summarily scuttled by unitarist governments whose sole concerns seem to be the forcible uniformity of growth for the different components of the nation.

    Going forward and given this sorry history of unitarist and statist governance in Nigeria, we must now repeat the original question. Can the Black person do great cities? Of course yes, and Lagos is going to be the stellar exemplar. Rather than relying on a solitary state, a megalopolis is often the product of the explosion of human vitality and multifarious talents convulsing and concussing together as they break through man-made barriers and artificial boundaries all within the bounds of law and order.

    Given the great developmental strides Lagos has taken in the last forty years and in particular the last one and a half decades, it should be clear that no human principality can stop a megalopolis whose time has come. The rough edges will eventually be straightened out. The history of human development has shown that timeless cities often trump temporal states and transient authorities. No matter the future configuration of Nigeria, Lagos is the destined capital of the Black race.