Category: Lawal Ogienagbon

  • Ode to Adadevoh

    THE was a physician, who knew her onions. She proved this by  the way she handled what has  now come to  be known as the index Ebola case. Through the yeoman effort of the late Dr Stella Adadevoh,  the index case, the late Patrick Sawyer, was not allowed to slip away into  the night to spread the deadly Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). As we said here a couple of weeks ago, the late Liberian-American, who brought Ebola here from his country had evil intentions.

    It was as if the late Dr Adadevoh knew what the late Sawyer was up to. Call it instinct or what, she refused to discharge him despite pressure to do so and by that singular action, she saved countless lives.  The late Dr Adadevoh knew that a walking Sawyer on the streets of Nigeria would be sowing  dead and destruction. So, she was resolute that she would not discharge him. Those who wanted the late Sawyer discharged  may have  even attempted to bribe her to look the other way in their desperate bid to spirit him out of the First Consultants Hospital in Obalende, Lagos.

    Since many have the erroneous belief that with money you can get any Nigerian to do anything, including selling  his or her conscience, the late Sawyer and his  friends would have been disappointed by the late Dr Adadevoh’s resistance. Just imagine what would have happened if the late Sawyer had been allowed to leave hospital in his condition. With what we have been experiencing since his death on July 25, we would have been confronted with an epidemic, the kind of which had not been witnessed since Ebola first hit the tiny countries of Sudan and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1976. We were saved from that epidemic by the late Dr Adadevoh.

    If she had not stood her ground, I shudder over what we would be going through today. This woman of courage, this woman of character, this woman of valour, this uncommon human specie died on August 19 after battling the same ailment she saved millions of her compatriots from contracting by stopping the late Sawyer from spreading the deadly virus. The late Dr Adadedoh did what many of us  wouldn’t have done if we were in her shoes. In a society where people believe so much in money and influence peddling, the late Sawyer and his cohorts would have had their way with a covetous Nigerian. That is just the truth.

    We were simply lucky that they met an Adadevoh, a woman, who was more than a match for their wily ways. Those who wanted the late Sawyer out of the hospital at all costs under the guise that he had a conference to attend in Calabar, the Cross River State capital,  knew that he was terribly ill and yet wanted him discharged under such condition. To be discharged so that he could go and die ‘peacefully’ at home or what? To be discharged so that he could go about spreading the deadly virus that he knowingly brought into our country? I just don’t understand why they were so desperate to get him out of hospital in that condition.

    The more I think about this sad episode, the more I feel pained because it was a deliberate act of man’s inhumanity to man. The late Sawyer, we have not been told otherwise, was not possessed.  I want to believe that he was also in full control of his faculties, except if they had been damaged by Ebola, which he contracted before leaving Monrovia, the Liberian capital.  We have heard different stories about what he did for a living. Some said he worked in a mining firm; others said he was a diplomat, citing the Economic Commission of West African States (ECOWAS) protocol officer, who came to receive him on arrival in Nigeria on July 20 to support their position. That protocol officer has since died of Ebola after being infected by the late Sawyer.

    Before coming here, the late Sawyer was in a good frame of mind except, of course,  for his illness. He was mentally alert and was said to have avoided contact with people at the airport in Lome, the Togolese capital.   Did the illness make him lose his senses to the extent that he forgot he should not come in contact with people when he got here? The late Sawyer knew how gravely ill he was and this was why he sneaked out of Monrovia to come here through Lome.  I still don’t understand why he did what he did to us? Was he sent? Who sent him?

    These are the posers we must unravel after we must have put behind us this Ebola saga. Thank God that Sawyer died before he could spread the virus further than he did. We owe a debt of gratitude to the late Dr Adadevoh for saving our country from being sunk by Ebola. We are eternally grateful to her. How can we leave out the illustrious Adadevoh family in all this? Without the family, there would not have been the late doctor. My heart goes out to this family, which has through its late daughter showed us what it is to be a patriot.

    Patriotism is not by words of mouth; it comes by our actions, which will speak louder than any voice. The late Dr Adadevoh rose when it mattered most for her country and through her efforts she saved over 160 million Nigerians from the risk of dying of Ebola. For her country, she gave her life. What will you give for your country? Instead of giving, aren’t our  leaders  stealing the country blind? They loot and loot and loot and stash fortunes abroad. Money meant for healthcare delivery finds its way into their pockets, while they go abroad on medical expedition.

    It is not all about our leaders alone. We as followers also have a role to play  in making our country better by following the path beaten by the  late Dr Adadevoh. We owe her big time. She deserves a monument in her memory so that generations unborn will know of her noble deed. Here was a Stella Adadevoh! When  comes such another?

  • The hood and the monk

    They are never in short supply for those who need their service. Sycophants are always there for the picking of  those in power. Their tribe is so large that you do not need much to get them to do your bidding. They are 10 for N1 or even cheaper than that depending on your bargaining power. At times, you may not need to pay them, just give them food  and booze and the job is done.

    To the larger society, sycophants constitute a nuisance, but to those who use them, they are the best thing to ever happen to mankind.  Those in power like to be surrounded by sycophants while at the same time   pretending that they do not have need for such people. Sycophants thrive on mischief.  They deceive a leader into believing that he is the all-in-all; that there is no other person like him and that without him the country would go burst. The late Head of State, Gen Sani Abacha, was made to believe that without him, Nigeria will crumble. But, 16 years after his death, Nigeria is standing gidigba.

    Since we like those who massage  our egos,  leaders generally  are easily taken in by such talks. When they hear such statements, their heads swell and  they  grin from ear to ear, while asking : ”is that so?”  Of course, the response is usually : ”it is so,  your excellency,  without you, there will be no Nigeria. So, you must remain in office forever”. These sycophants, these friends of  any government in power are at it again. They have started playing on the intelligence of President Goodluck Jonathan just  as they did to former President Olusegun Obasanjo, former military president Gen Ibrahim Babaginda and the late Gen Abacha, among others.

    Last Saturday, a group, the Transformation Agenda of Nigeria (TAN), kicked off its campaign to get the President to declare his second term ambition. It is not  a hidden fact that Jonathan is interested  in a second term. Want to bet? He will run for election  next year. If he does not run, I will go into exile, to borrow the words of those who in the past prevailed on some of our past leaders to run or they will become citizens of other countries if those leaders did not heed their call.

    Knowing that Jonathan will run next year whether heavens fall or not, TAN does not need to go into all these pains to organise rallies to beg him to do so. It reminds one of the rallies held all over the country in the Abacha days by one misguided youth called Daniel Kanu. Where is he now? Despite his father’s stupendous wealth, the boy was misled into dipping his hands into a matter bigger than him. No wonder, he ended up the way he did. Kanu was used by politicians, who stood to gain from his ill-conceived project.

    The Youth Earnestly Ask for  Abacha (YEAA) so-called one-million man march in Abuja was well funded from within and outside government.  The five  existing parties then also urged the late Gen Abacha to  transmute from a military to a civilian leader to prevent Nigeria from collapse. What a cheek!  All the  parties adopted him as their consensus candidate even when he did not indicate interest in the post  nor was he a  card carrying member of any of the parties. No doubt, Kanu was suffering from youthful exuberance, but what  do we say of the old men and women who saw nothing wrong in picking the late Abacha as their parties’ standard bearer despite not being their member. That was how low we sunk as a nation under his administration.

    TAN is following that path. The only difference is that  Jonathan is a politician, who is interested in running, while the late Abacha was a general, who was interested in running but could not come out to declare his intention. He preferred to do it through proxies like Kanu, the United Nigeria Congress Party (UNCP), Congress for Nigeria Citizen (CNC), National Centre Party of Nigeria (NCPN), Democratic Party of Nigeria (DPN) and Grassroots Democratic Movement (GDM), which were the parties in existence then. Of the lot, GDM tried to stand its ground but its voice could not be heard in the cacophony created by the other parties and Kanu that were hell bent on installing the late Abacha as president.

    We are walking the same road again with TAN’s planned  pro-Jonathan  rallies, the first of which was held in Awka, the Anambra State capital, last Saturday for the Southeast zone.  The next stop is this Saturday in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital for the Southwest. The Southsouth edition will hold on August 30 in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State capital.  Minna, Niger State (Northcentral) – September 9; Gombe (Northeast) – September 20 and Kano (Northwest) – September 27. Without doubt, TAN has the government’s  backing  in engaging in this shenanigan. The group has the right to drum support for whoever it believes should lead the country, but it should be mindful of public sensibilities.

    Is the group reading the mood of the nation at all? Is this the time to embark on such a sensitive  campaign? The man at the centre of it all knows the implication of taking such a step at a time like this, hence he has kept mute on his ambition, to his apparent discomfiture. There is nothing the President may  desire most at this time than to tell the whole world that he is contesting next year’s  election, but his hands are tied by the problems besetting  the country. Although he fixed  this year for his declaration, he knows that it is inauspicious to make such a declaration now.

    What will he say to make Nigerians buy into the Jonathan-for-another-term project if he declares now with the prevailing insecurity and the yet to be rescued  over 200 abducted Chibok girls, who have been in captivity since April 14, among others?  What will he say are his achievements since he mounted  the saddle in 2010, following the death of former President Umaru Yar’ Adua? Only a president without a heart will make such a declaration at a period like this. Do not get me wrong, if Jonathan wishes to declare, he is free to do so, but he should do  first things first. Let him bring back the Chibok girls and make the country safe, then he may remain in office for life, if he so wishes!

    It is a shame that TAN and its
    backers, including the gover
    nors and top government functionaries that  attended its Awka  rally last Saturday could lend themselves to such nonsense. Has the quest for power made them to lose their sense of reason? Is being in power more important to them than  the unity of Nigeria? It is a shame that those among them that we hold in high esteem could stoop so low. And for us to have ever thought that these were respectable people. Huh! Do they think it was appropriate to be part of such campaign at this period? If their children were among the abducted  Chibok  girls will they be out in the street campaigning for second term for Jonathan?

    Why are they doing this? The answer is obvious, they want to remain in the good books of Jonathan, who is just waiting for the right time to tell us that he will run in 2015. Our security agencies saw nothing wrong in the pro-Jonathan rally; they even provided security for the organisers. Will they act  the same way  if some other people organise an anti-Jonathan rally? If they disperse such a rally,  they will be  indirectly  telling Nigerians that they, too, are for Jonathan. We are told that the hood does not make the monk. How true. In truth, Jonathan does not need TAN or any amorphous group for that matter to do what he already has in mind – run for a second term.

    It is as clear as daylight, Jonathan will run in 2015, whether or not TAN and other  related  groups, goad him to do so.

  • The Ebola war

    THE world is  at war. Before you say the  Third World War!,  let me quickly add that it is not a war between nations, but a war by man to save himself from extinction. It is  a war to save the human race from being wiped out by the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD), which hereinafter shall be referred to as Ebola.  Until a few days ago, Ebola seemed so  distant  from us.  It was something  we heard about in  other countries.

    To the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea (DRC), Zaire, Sudan, Sierra Leone and Liberia, Ebola is not something strange. They have been living with the deadly virus, which has killed hundreds of people in those countries for years. Ebola kills within the twinkling of an eye if the victim does not pay attention to his health in good time. It can kill as fast as within three to 21 days.

    Ebola took the world like a storm in 1976 in two simultaneous outbreaks in Nzara, Sudan and Yambuku, DRC. Yambuku is close to the Ebola River from which the disease got its name. These countries still experience seasonal outbreaks of Ebola, the latest of which has spread to Nigeria, Spain and the United States (U.S). Ebola was imported into Nigeria on July 20 by a Liberian, the late Patrick Sawyer, who flew in through Lome, Togo, to evade being stopped at his home country’s airport since he knew he was an endangered specie.

    The late Sawyer, who was also an American citizen,  deliberately brought the disease to Nigeria. We do not need to be diplomatic in expressing our feelings over  this matter; I believe we should say it as it is because the late Sawyer did not mean well for this country by travelling down here in his endangered  state.  It was sheer wickedness for him to have done that.

    He knew that he had Ebola and was therefore, literally,  carrying death in his luggage.  He knew that he was not supposed to travel in that condition, yet he did. He knew that he should not have contact with people, yet he sat comfortably with others in the plane.   The late Sawyer, as an  educated man, knew all these, yet his conscience did  not prick him.

    What is so important about the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) conference he was coming to attend in Calabar, the Cross River State, that he sneaked out of  Monrovia, the Liberian capital, for in his killer state?  We have not been told the whole truth about how he left Liberia.

    Through his despicable act, over 160 million Nigerians are today at risk of Ebola. Anywhere you turn today, the fear of Ebola is palpable.  The young and the old have nothing else to discuss, but Ebola – and its cure(s). This is why we have heard of the bitter cola and salt water therapies, among others.

    These therapies are no match for Ebola, experts have said. Despite experts’ advice, I can boldly say here  that many will not report to hospital if they take ill, but will try out  these therapies first before going to the hospital as last resort. That is the way we are as Nigerians. But for the sake of our families and neighbours, this is the time for us all to, more than before,  be our brother’s keeper. Let us report all known cases of ill health before they get out of hand. By so doing, we will be saving lives and will not be carrying death all over the place like the late Sawyer.

    Through the late Sawyer’s inhuman act, we have lost a nurse, while a doctor, another nurse and others who had primary contact with him are in hospital for Ebola infection. These people contracted the disease while trying to save his life when he was rushed to the First Consultants Hospital in Obalende, Lagos, last July 20. They were infected in line of duty by a patient, who knew what he was suffering from, but intentionally kept quite. What a callous and cruel act. Scores of others also came in contact with him at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA) in Ikeja, Lagos from where he was rushed to the hospital.

    He has endangered the lives of all these people who did not know that he had Ebola and were genuinely helping a man who they saw was ill. It is so painful that our people showed him so much care in order to save his life, but in  the end got what they never bargained for. Since the Liberian government knew about the late Sawyer’s status why did it allow him to leave the country for Nigeria?  I do not buy the argument that he ‘escaped’. How  could he have escaped if he was in isolation. The thing is that the government left the late Sawyer  to his own devices  despite being aware that he lost a sister to Ebola.

    If other countries allow Ebola victims to leave their shores, where will the world be today? Ebola cases will abound all over the place with the risk of the entire world being wiped out. But the late Sawyer’s evil  plan was not against the world but against Nigeria. But he forgot that Ebola knows no boundary once a victim is let loose like the way he sneaked out of his country to  come to  Nigeria where  he died on July 25. There was nothing for the late Sawyer to come and pick here. So, he should have remained in his country to manage his ailment. And who knows, he might have survived if he did not take up the additional burden of travelling in that his very weak and sick state.

    We have an emergency on our hands as the government has noted. People who caught  the virus in line of duty should not be abandoned to their fate. This is not a job hazard that they should be left to bear alone.  There are job hazards and there are job hazards, but this  hazard is a different one entirely.  Although the government has risen to the challenge so far, more still has to be done.The government must ensure adequate  protection of health, airport, Customs, Immigration and allied workers if we are serious about containing Ebola. These are the people that will do the job and if there is no protection for them, they may abandon work  and we all know what that means.  The late Sawyer put us through all this stress because of his evil intentions. Why did such an urbane man behave that way?

    This is why I agree with President Goodluck Jonathan that the late Sawyer was a ”mad man”. If he was not mad, he would not have brought Ebola here and kept mute when he fell seriously ill.   If he was not mad,  he would have  opened up at the hospital   when his condition worsened that ”look this is what I may be suffering from having lost a sister to Ebola”.  Our people say the dead does not shield himself from those that will bury him. At that point there was nothing for him to hide again.  If he had no ulterior motive that was what he should have done as a gentleman. My fear is that those who came with him from Liberia for the Calabar conference are on the loose.  If they have the virus, they might have infected other participants without knowing.

    The problem is how do we trace these people and  those  they came in contact with. We have a hell of a problem on our hands. Because of the callousness  of one man, a nation of over 160 million people is being threatened to be wiped out  by Ebola. If this is the intention of the late Sawyer and his collaborators, they will not succeed. Nigeria will overcome Ebola, come what may.

  • Political miscalculation

    UNDER the Constitution, the legislature is empowered to check the executive, just as the judiciary is there to ensure that these two institutions do not misuse their powers. In this wise, the National and state assemblies have the powers to deal with the president and governors if they misbehave. Such misbehaviour, the Constitution notes, must be fundamental  to warrant initiating their  impeachment.

    In the past 15 years of democratic rule, we have witnessed the impeachment of some governors. In some instances, the process was faulty and it was reversed by the court. The impeachment of then  Governors Rashidi Ladoja (Oyo), Joshua Dariye (Plateau) and Peter Obi (Anambra) was quashed by the court because their  Houses of Assembly abused the process.

    To achieve their aim of removing the governors, the lawmakers were found to have gone too far. They sat either outside their states or at ungodly hours when the stipulated time for sitting is 9a.m. How do you explain a House of Assembly sitting at 3a.m., or 4a.m., all in its bid to impeach a governor? This is the sort of things we have been witnessing  under this dispensation and they were rampant  during former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s tenure.

    Despite his own serial breaches of the Constitution, former President Obasanjo survived eight years in office because the National Assembly was too timid to move against him. The impeachment of a president is not as easy as that of a governor. Where only the House of Assembly can decide the fate of a governor, the Senate and House of Representatives must concur to impeach the president. So, removing the president will be an uphill task where both Chambers of the National Assembly do not agree.

    What counted in Obasanjo’s favour is also playing to the advantage of President Goodluck Jonathan, who despite his claim to being soft, has done what tough  leaders like Gen Yakubu Gowon,  Obasanjo, Gen Muhammadu Buhari, Gen Ibrahim Babangida and Gen Abdulsalami Abubakar could not do in their own time. Although moves were made by some members of the House of Representatives few months ago  to make the President answer for some of his misdemeanour they were not enough to rattle him.

    But, then impeachment is not a piece of cake as 24 members of the Nasarawa State House of Assembly have come to realise. About two weeks ago, the Assembly initiated the  impeachment of  Governor Tanko Al-Makura, for you guessed right, alleged  gross misconduct. The Constitution stipulates that a governor can be removed on the grounds of gross misconduct and it  defines  what amounts to gross misconduct under Section 188 (11) thus : ”Gross misconduct means a grave violation or breach of the provisions of this Constitution or a misconduct of such nature as amounts in the opinion of the House of Assembly to gross misconduct”.  To suit their  case, many of the Houses of Assembly prefer to use their own opinion of what amounts to gross misconduct and drop the constitutional definition of it which is ”a grave violation or breach of the provisions of this Constitution”.

    It is easier for the lawmakers to get a governor using their own definition of  gross misconduct because they and only they know what they are looking for. A governor can only escape their wrath if he is lucky to be cleared by the panel that investigates him. In many cases, the panel, which is expected to be non-partisan and independent, dances to the lawmakers’  tune. I do not know the hold they have over these panels, which according to the Constitution, are set up by Chief Judges at the instance of the Speaker.

    To me, the panel is the linchpin in the process. Despite the much touted power of the Assembly to remove a governor, it cannot exercise that power if the panel does not give it the go ahead. The Assembly’s impeachment  power may have been deliberately  curtailed by framers of the Constitution, who in their wisdom brought in the investigative panel to check the lawmakers’ excesses. The panel may have been introduced to stop the lawmakers from being the accuser, the prosecutor and the judge in their own case.

    Let us look at the Nasarawa scenario again. If the lawmakers, who were the accusers  had also  been the investigators, Al-Makura would have been removed by now. Unfortunately, some panels do not know the power they wield in this impeachment business. Many of them prefer to go with the lawmakers without looking carefully into the allegations levelled against the governor. They seem to have made up their minds from the outset that the governor is guilty and so rule without considering the merit or otherwise of the case against him.

    The Constitution allows the panel three months to do its job and this provision may have been adopted to ensure thoroughness in the process. Many of the panels are nothing but thorough. They do a shoddy job without being mindful of their place in history. Many governors have been sacrificed on the altar of our lawmakers’ greed.  It is refreshing that Al-Makura’s case did not go the way the lawmakers expected. They were determined to remove the governor for no just cause,  but failed in their mission because of the investigative panel’s  vigilance.

    The lawmakers saw the handwriting on the wall after the Chief Judge, Justice Suleiman Dikko, constituted the seven-man panel headed by Yusuf Shehu Usman. They claimed that the panel members were members of political parties and asked Justice Dikko to disband it. Of course,  the judge ignored them because having set up the panel he had become functus officio (i.e performed his official duty) and could no longer interfere  with the panel. On Tuesday, the panel cleared Al-Makura, who appeared before it on Monday to defend himself.

    His accusers, the lawmakers,  stayed away that day, only to put up a ”protest  appearance”  through their counsel, Ocha Ulegede, on Tuesday. The lawyer  said his clients had no confidence in the panel, claiming that two of the panellist  were Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) members,  four, All Progressives Congress (APC) members and the last, a worker of the State Christian Pilgrim Welfare Board. The lawmakers’ allegations cannot be taken at their face value. They must substantiate their claim  because in law ”he who alleges must prove”. Without such proof, their allegations would remain what they are, mere  allegations.

    For once, let these lawmakers stew in their own juice. ”He who digs a pit”, the scripture says, ”will fall into it, and he who rolls a stone, it will come back to him”. Let them stop whining and face the job of lawmaking because the panel  has spoken and, according to the Constitution vide Section 188 (8),  ”where the panel reports to the House of Assembly that the allegation has not been proved, no further proceedings shall be taken in respect of the matter”.

    But, will they let go? Your guess is as good as mine.

  • The burden of a nation

    TERROR. This six-letter word has unfortunately become the face of Nigeria. Hardly a day passes that hoodlums do not strike, especially in the north and whenever they do they leave death, destruction, sorrow, tears and blood. In the past five years, we have known no rest from these terrorists who appear not ready to stop their dastardly acts.

    To many Nigerians, the face of this terror is Boko Haram. They may be right because the Islamic sect seems to have declared war on the country, with the way it has been killing and maiming people in the Northeastern  states of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe.  The Northwestern states of Kaduna and Kano have also  joined the league of states under terror attacks.

    Could it be Boko Haram that is operating in these two leading  Northwestern states? Or could it be the handiwork of another group, which is banking on the public blaming it all on  Boko Haram? The public should not be blamed if it fingers Boko Haram for  attacks in Kaduna and Kano in the last few days  because they carry the sect’s  imprimatur.

    Until the sect claims responsibility for these attacks, the citizenry should give it the benefit of doubt. Many will not want to hear that – give Boko Haram benefit of doubt when it is known for such attacks!  This actually is the  problem. Some people somewhere may be using these attacks as a ploy to destabilise the country, knowing that the incidents may not be traced to them since there is a  fall guy – Boko Haram – to always carry the can.

    Yes, Boko Haram is evil, but let us look beyond the sect in unmasking the perpetrators of the Kaduna and Kano attacks. If we do not do this, I am afraid, we may never win the war against terror. Boko Haram, we all know, but what about the other faceless  groups that are  wreaking havoc on the country, using the dreaded Islamic sect as cover?

    Indeed, we are lucky as  President Goodluck Jonathan said on Sunday  that former Head of State Gen Muhammadu Buhari was not killed during last Wednesday’s attack on his convoy in Kaduna. If Buhari had been killed as the President noted, the nation would have been in turmoil. Buhari narrowly escaped death, but over 100 others were not so lucky. Must we continue to lose our compatriots this way? Week in, week out, we lose hundreds of people to these recurring  terror attacks.

    The worst part of it is that there is no sign of respite. It means that we will continue to be at these hoodlums’  mercy  for as long as they wish. Can our country afford that? Of course, we cannot, but what can the people do in the face of the  seeming helplessness of the  security agencies. The other day, the Chief of Army Staff, Lt Kenneth Minimah, said soldiers are handicapped in the war against terror because they were not trained for such. What this means is that we are in  for a long haul with these perpetrators of evil.

    Boko Haram, we know, but who are the others making life uneasy  for Nigerians? It is only when we are able to identify the others, that is assuming Boko Haram is not the sole evil doer, that we will be able to stop these terror agents, who struck in Kano barely 24 hours after the Kaduna incident.  For now, we do not know where they will strike next. Kano, however,  seems to be their main target. They have hit the North’s commercial nerve centre thrice in the last five days.

    To add to  the series of bloodbath, Boko Haram came on the scene last weekend, rampaging through Kano, Adamawa and  Cameroon, where the sect kidnapped the country’s vice Prime Minister’s wife and killed three persons. In three villages in Adamawa, they killed 30 persons and abducted a village head. A family comprising the father, his son, daughter-in-law and maid were killed by a bomb thrown at a church congregation. All these happened during  the celebration of the Sallah festival to mark the end of Ramadan.

    As if this is not enough, the nation is being buffeted on other fronts by Ebola and a  gale of impeachments. In Nasarawa State, Governor Tanko Al-Makura is battling to save his job. The House of Assembly is determined to impeach him  just as the lawmakers in Adamawa did to Governor Muritala  Nyako a few days ago. Al-Makura and Nyako are members of the All Pogressives Congress (APC), which is determined to wrest power from the ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in 2015. PDP is not ready to let go of  power just  like that and it is  determined to use everything in its arsenal to crush the leading opposition party.

    There are also speculations that the Houses of Assembly in Edo, Rivers and Oyo may move against Governors Adams Oshiomhole, Rotimi Amaechi and Abiola Ajimobi. Ask the lawmakers why they are making such move and you are likely to get  the mantra  ”gross misconduct”. Under the Constitution, the lawmakers are empowered to impeach a governor for gross misconduct, but it does not define what amounts to  gross misconduct. So, Houses of Assembly have been hiding under this indefinable phrase to cause all sorts of legislative mumbo-jumbo in order  to impeach a governor whose face  they do not like.

    The Constitution demands that details of the gross misconduct must be specified but in most cases what the lawmakers itemise are laughable, but they usually have their way because they have the number or, at times, the backing of  the central authority. This week, Al-Makura is expected to appear before the panel raised by the Chief Judge, Justice Suleiman Dikko, to probe the allegations of ”gross misconduct” against him. Many will be shocked if the panel absolves him of the lawmakers’ allegations. These panels are a smokescreen for lawmakers to do whatever they want with an ‘uncooperative’  governor.

    Like play, like play, Ebola has sneaked into the country through a Liberian,  Patrick Sawyer, who  died  of the disease last Friday,  about five days after his arrival in the country for an Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) event  in Calabar, Cross River State. Since Ebola  is said to be highly contagious, the fear is do we have what it takes to contain the deadly disease?  We have heard the authorities speak on efforts so far made to check the spread of the disease.

    We commend their efforts, but they need to do more in order not to endanger the lives of millions of Nigerians. Are they sure that one of  those that the late Sawyer came in contact with has not escaped, carrying the deadly virus without him or her unwittingly? Whenever I see those treating Ebola patients in their coveralls, I get a chill down my spine. Is that how bad Ebola is, I ask subconsciously, while praying that it does not get here.

    Now that it is here, how do we fight  it beyond the personal hygiene of washing our hands with soap and water? This is the question we must  address our minds to before the disease spreads like wildfire.

  • Cry, the beloved country

    AT times like these we need to sit back and take another look at ourselves and our country. What is really happening with things going topsy-turvy? Is it a sign of the coming to pass of  the doomsday prediction that Nigeria will break up in 2015? I fear for our country. The way things are going leave room for  nothing to cheer about.

    Nigeria is in crisis, deep crisis; and the earlier our leaders realise this fact the better for us all. There is no need to paper over the cracks as if all is well. Eventhough I hate to say this, the truth is that all is not well with our dear country. How I wished things were not like this. Instead of looking for solution to the problem, things are being compounded by those at the helm.

    To President Goodluck Jonathan and his loyalists, everything  are fine.  But they know that they are living a lie and they want to hoodwink the citizenry  to join their club. That certainly, is not possible.  To a large  extent, the Presidency is part of the problem; so,  it cannot be trusted to find the solution.  Why are things the way they are? Is it because of the impending elections in which the President is much  interested but has yet to declare his intention?

    I fear for our country because the polity is being needlessly overheated. If they are not taking on the media; they are descending on the opposition or critics.  The government will not admit it, but there is no way it can exonerate itself from the prevailing crisis. In a democracy, there is bound to be this kind of problem, with people agreeing to disagree.

    This is the beauty of democracy, but when things start to get out of hand well-meaning people are expected to intervene before the country descends into anarchy. We have seen the way the Presidency has been using  the federal might to suppress individuals and institutions –  for no just cause. Is it wrong to disagree with,  or criticise,  the President?

    From the look of things, it seems it has become a sin to be critical of Jonathan or not to belong to the same party with him. Look at the way he has been treating Governors Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers), Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano) and Aliyu Wamakko for defecting from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).   Former Adamawa State Governor Muritala Nyako, who defected along with them got the ultimate treatment last week–he was impeached-, with soldiers standing nearby while the panel, which probed him, and the House of Assembly, which carried out the dirty job, sat. The House has the right to impeach him, no doubt, but what is wrong is for the lawmakers to be teleguided in carrying out their constitutional duty.

    Like governors, the President too is not immune to impeachment. His own fate lies with the National Assembly. So, impeachment is not a tool open to only Houses of Assembly. Those who are gloating over Nyako’s fall need to be reminded of the noise they made when some members of the National Assembly threatened to take similar step against Jonathan some months ago. Or, have they forgotten so soon?  Let them rejoice less over Nyako’s downfall, which will certainly not be the end of his political career.

    As for Amaechi, there is nothing the Presidency has not done to get him out.   Notwithstanding the failure of the plots so far,  eternal vigilance remains the price Amaechi has to pay to keep his job until the expiration of his tenure in May, next year. Kwankwaso,  especially,  has been the butt of vitriolic attacks by the Presidency and he has often paid back in kind to show that he is not afraid of any federal might. Even House Speaker Aminu Tambuwal is not spared. He is viewed with suspicion in the Presidency and as such, he is kept at arm’s length.

    They have also tried all tricks in the book to get him removed as Speaker, but failed. A few weeks ago, they tried to embarrass him by stopping his vehicle for a search in Kaduna. Yet, our President portrays himself as meek; someone who cannot hurt a fly. If things are like this under a so-called meek  President, what will they be like under a brutal leader?  Even in the Second Republic things were not as bad as these before the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo raised the alarm in a letter to former President Shehu Shagari.

    ”There”, he wrote,  ”is a frightful danger ahead visible for those who care and are patriotic enough to look beyond their narrow self interest. Our ship of state is fast approaching a huge rock, and unless you, as chief helmsman, quickly rise to the occasion and courageously steer the ship away from its present course, it shall hit the rock. And the inescapable  consequence will be an inescapable disaster such as is  rare in the annals of man”. The Shagari administration ignored the warning to the nation’s  peril.

    The Jonathan presidency appears to be treading the same path. The president has received similar letters from two elderstatesmen, Gen Muhammadu Buhari and Alhaji Maitama Sule. In his letter, which content he divulged to reporters on Monday, Sule said : ”I wrote to the Chairman of the Northern Governors’ Forum and the President, telling them about the prevailing situation. I also pointed out that if President Goodluck Jonathan doesn’t stop it, we would have disastrous consequences. The situation in the country is so bad, but I believe what we should do is to get together and tell one another the truth – let us agree to accommodate our differences and put Nigeria above personal interest”.

    Gen Buhari’s letter  drew the President’s ire  as Awo’s  did to Shagari in 1981 because it contained some bitter truths. Just as Awo did 33 years ago, Buhari warned : ”The dangerous clouds are beginning to gather and the vultures are circling. Let no one, whether the leader or the led, the high or the low, a member of the ruling or the opposition, do anything to torpedo the system. Let no one, whether on the altar of personal ambition or pretension to higher patriotic tendencies, do anything that can detonate the keg of gunpowder on which the nation is sitting. Our nation has suffered serious consequences in the past for egregious acts that are not even close to what we are seeing now. It is time to pull the brakes”.

    The Presidency did not find Buhari’s intervention funny and as usual it resorted to name calling and abuses instead of replying him, as lawyers would say,  on points of fact and rest its case. The truth is that if the Buhari/Idiagbon regime  had succeeded in bringing back the late Umaru Dikko in a crate in 1984, politicians of his hue would have learnt a big lesson, and who knows we may not find ourselves in the mess the Jonathan administration  has plunged us into today.

    May I commend the immortal words of the late American clergyman, James Freeman Clarke, to President Jonathan : ”A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman , of the next generation”. It is left to the President to make his choice – will he be a politician or a statesman?

     

  • Campaign of calumny

    IF the government has its way it would have decreed that the campaign  for the release of the abducted Chibok girls be stopped.  It tried to do something like that through the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Commissioner of Police, Joseph Mbu, who it uses for such dirty jobs when the burgeoning czar banned the bring back our girls protest in Abuja.

    Their backdoor method of trying to stifle a lawful protest fell flat on its face when the nation rose as one to condemn the ban. The police through the Inspector-General,  Muhammed Abubakar,  promptly reversed the annoying order. Since then, Mbu has remained quiet, but that is not to say that we have heard the last of him.

    For sure, he has his uses and whenever the need arises, he will be tapped to do what he knows best to do. But, why is the government afraid of the bring back our girls campaigners? Are they doing anything wrong campaigning for the release of the abducted 217 Chibok schoolgirls, who are spending their 94th day in captivity today? Shouldn’t the government be encouraging the campaigners instead of being averse to what they are doing?

    Elsewhere government would encourage such campaigners by lending them a hand instead of distancing itself from what they are doing.  The reason for its action is obvious. It does not believe in what the group is doing because it never believed that the girls were abducted. Even when the news broke, the rescue of the girls was not its paramount concern. It was busy asking itself is it true (?) when it should have launched a rescue operation for the girls.

    Na lie don turn to na true and the government is looking for a scapegoat to hang its tardiness on. That is the way of our government. People’s life means  little or nothing to it. It is only interested in getting their votes during  elections after which they may go to hell for all it cares. There is nothing to show that the government cares about the fate that befell the Chibok girls and their families. The government is simply just not bothered.

    To the government, it is as if nothing happened in Chibok on April 14. So, it will not take it lightly with any one or group that tries to  remind it that something happened that day  in that remote community. This is why the government is bitter with the champions of  the rally. There should have been no need for such anger, if government has the interest of its citizens at heart. Nigerians love their government, but all they want is for the government to come clean with them.

    But, where government acts as if it has something to hide, it creates room for suspicion. By calling the campaigners name, is the government saying it is happy with what happened to the Chibok girls? If it does not want  the campaign, what else  can be done in its own view  to keep the girls’ abduction alive until they are rescued? We are asking these  questions  since it seems the government considers it a cardinal sin to  draw  attention  to the issue.

    Should the girls’ parents keep quiet and pretend that their children were not abducted? Isn’t it unfair that the government which should be consoling them is the one calling them names and trying to gag them from crying out over what  happened? I am sure that if the government has its way it would frame up the campaigners  and even the girls’ parents all in a bid to paint them black before the world.

    It has taken the first step towards that with the statement credited to the State Security Service (SSS), last week, that the bring back our girls campaigners are up to no good. According to its spokesperson, Mrs Marilyn Ogar, who I believe is also a mother, the campaign has become a franchise with different divisions into groups,  giving each other specific assignments.

    “If it is not a franchise but an ordinary movement seeking or acting to put more pressure on government and security operations to release these girls, there would be no need for the group to have tag, insisting that members must have a tag and be properly registered. We know that they have bank accounts and also know that they want to go to Asokoro Extension and simulate some force movement where they will have foreign media and say they are marching into Sambisa Forest and Chibok. We hope that genuinely you don’t go to hire people to come and claim to be the parent of the child you did not give birth to, so, it is a franchise…”

    The SSS is free to do its job, but in so doing, it should not use its privileged position to turn facts on their heads. Can the SSS prove its damaging  claim? If  it can, let it  make public the group’s bank details and put the campaigners to shame. If  it cannot,  it should withdraw the statement and apologise to the group. The SSS knows what to do if its claim is true and I know that if the allegation is true, it would have since descended on the group and show the campaigners to the whole world for what they truly are!

    But, in the circumstance, it cannot do that because its claim beggars belief. The group, to borrow the SSS’ word,  has the franchise to defend itself, so we will not do that here. Suffice it  to say that the group  has denied the allegation, shifting the burden of prove to the SSS.

    Dare @ 70 :Matters arising

    Whenever Dr Olatunji Dare writes under the above headline, you know that he has a wide range of issues to touch in short strokes. When I started reading him  in  The Guardian  many years ago, I never knew that one day I would  find myself in the same organisation with the  journalism legend. I do not know whether to call it a meeting because there was no opportunity to chat with the professor  and drink from his fountain of knowledge. It was at the Ikeja High Court premises shortly after his resignation from the The Guardian. His exit did not go down well  with the company’s management, which decided to deal with him.   The company ejected him from his quarters, but being  a firm believer in the rule of law, Dare went to court. As a court reporter,  I got wind of the case and my colleagues and I went to cover it.  We did not quite succeed in our mission because the lawyers had other plans. They wanted an amicable settlement of the matter  and so  covering it was out of the case  in order not to jeopardise the peace process. I have never told Dr Dare this; so he may be surprised reading it here today on his 70th birthday. Between that day in 1995 and now, I have come to know Dr Dare better.  In the about eight years of this  paper’s existence, he  and his fellow scholars, Prof Adebayo Williams, Prof Ropo Sekoni and Prof Moses Makinde, among others, have played a vital role in our short but rich history.  As Editorial Adviser, Dare goes through the paper with a fine tooth comb, pointing out errors and suggesting ideas on how we can stay ahead of the competition. Besides, his human relations is super. On several occasions, he has called to wish me well. That is Dr Dare for you.  About a month ago when he  arrived in the country on vacation  from his United States (U.S) base,  he, as usual called to say he is in town. ‘’Alhaji, eku ile’’, he said in his booming voice, and I answered, ‘’prof, eka bo sir’’.  Happy birthday, prof.

  • Who killed Funsho Williams?

    THE public was outraged at his killing.  It still is and it was looking forward to the bringing to justice of the perpetrators. Nothing would have pleased Nigerians, especially Lagosians more,  than the unmasking of the killers of Anthony Olufunsho Williams, the engineer-politician, who was cut down in his Ikoyi home on July 27, 2006. He was killed in the heat of preparations for the 2007 elections in which he had interest as a governorship aspirant.

    In fact, he was believed to be the one to beat for the governorship ticket of his party – the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) – but with his death, things changed. To compensate his family, some leaders of the party tried to get the ticket for his widow, Hilda. Things did not work out that way as the ticket eventually went to Musiliu Olatunde Obanikoro, who is now Minister of State (Defence).

    The circumstances surrounding Williams’  death showed that he was murdered. The job was clinically executed by those who carried out the operation. They left no trace whatsoever of their dastardly act. The police were expected to untie this Gordian knot, but they have failed to do just that. Last Monday, Justice Adeniyi Adebajo of the Lagos High Court freed those charged with Williams’ murder for want of evidence. According to the judge, there is no evidence linking the defendants with the murder.

    The defendants were on trial for seven years, meaning that for all those years the state wasted time and money  prosecuting a case it was ill-prepared for. According to the law,  a murder case  has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt to earn a conviction against the defendant, who is presumed innocent until otherwise proven. The prosecution’s inability to prove  the defendants’ guilt  led to their acquittal by the court.

    Williams was killed about the same time this paper was planning to hit the newsstand eight years ago. My first column which bears the same title as this one was on him. The column wondered if his murder would not end up unresolved like that of Dele Giwa, who was killed 28 years ago. Till today, the killers of Giwa have not been found. So also are the killers of Chief Bola Ige, former Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation; Harry Marshal and Aminasoari Dikibo yet to be found. What is wrong with us as a nation that we cannot resolve the cases of  murder of eminent people?

    Last year, we asked the same question : Who killed Funsho Williams? following a witness’ testimony that some evidence in the murder case had been destroyed. They were said to have been destroyed doepileptic power supply. The destroyed evidence were the blood samples and the virtuous humour of the eyes of the deceased. In the light of this depressing evidence,  we warned against allowing anything to truncate the defendants’ trial. The warning went unheeded. It is apparent that some people somewhere wanted the case to go the way it ended last week.

    I am not saying that those who stood trial killed Williams. What I am saying is that the police and the prosecution did not do their homework well before rushing, as it were, to trial. Did they gather the necessary facts before coming to court? Did they preserve the perishable evidence, such as the ones destroyed, well? Did they make alternative provision for the  preservation of  the evidence whenever public power supply failed? It is the failure of the police and the prosecution to do their jobs diligently  that led to the defendants’  acquittal.

    Their acquittal has got the people  worried. Their interpretation of this development is that the state cannot be relied upon to protect them when they are deprived of their rights.  Williams was deprived of his right to life as guaranteed under Section 33 of the Constitution by those who stormed his residence in the early hours of July 27, 2006 and snuffed life out of him. What should naturally follow is for the state to ensure that the perpetrators are brought to book. But, eight years after, what do we have? The acquittal of those tried for the offence. Mind you,  these people  may not have even known anything about the murder.

    It was apparent from the outset that the police were going to  mess up  the case, despite their promise to ensure that no stone was  left unturned in getting the perpetrators. They had all the time in the world to investigate the case and gather all the evidence to avoid the kind of unimpressive showing the prosecution put up  in court. For God’s sake, this was a murder case and the police and prosecution knew that it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt to get a conviction. Any doubt, according to the law, is resolved in the defendant’s favour.

    It is to avoid a miscarriage of justice that the law  allows  1,000 criminals to go scot-free than to punish one innocent person. I do not seem to understand why the police and the prosecution bungled this case. Is it that they were not prepared? Did they arraign the wrong defendants? Where then are the killers of Williams? Will they ever be brought to book? Something Justice Adebajo said in his judgment is worth reproducing here:

    ”The prosecution did not make any effort to tie the cause of death to the action of any individual or set of defendants. I am satisfied that the deceased has been shown to have died, but it remains at large after the conclusion of prosecution’s case as to the person or persons who caused his death. The pathologist who said the deceased died by strangulation did not allude to any of the defendants as having carried out the act, he was never asked. There is absolutely nothing to suggest that the death of the deceased resulted from the act of any of the defendants”.

    It beats me  why the prosecution will handle a sensitive case such as this with levity. If the killers of Williams are still walking the streets free  today, we have the police and the prosecution to blame. If they had been thorough,  the case would not have ended the way it did – without the killers paying the price for their dastardly act. It is a shame that the police and the prosecution failed to be alive to their responsibilities.

    But, the killers should not rejoice yet. Wherever they are, the long arms of the law  will get them. If not now, certainly in future. That is the law of retribution.

  • Promotion storm in Immigration

    THERE is disquiet in the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS) over promotion. Some officers are not happy that they were bypassed in the exercise. They claimed that their subordinates were elevated above them. The officers are accusing the Internal Affairs Minister, Mr Abba Moro, of being the brain behind the promotion of junior officers above their superiors. The minister was said to have approved the promotion of those due for such in 2010, leaving a backlog of those who should have been elevated before them. There is anger in the Service, according to sources, who blame the minister for having ethnic agenda. The exercise  was carried out three weeks ago at the expense of those who  have been due for promotion since 2003, 2006, 2007 and 2008. Moro was lucky to have escaped being axed over the Immigration recruitment disaster a few months ago. Now, he is swimming in another trouble water. Many of those who claimed to have been shortchanged are raring for a showdown until, according to them, ‘’justice is done’’.  How will the matter end? Time will tell.

  • Profile in courage

    For, in the final analysis, our most common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal. – John F. Kennedy.

    I would have titled this article  The Mama Boko Haram job or What Mama Boko can do, but neither  of these titles   would suffice for you. Many Nigerians did not know you  until President Goodluck Jonathan raised  a peace panel to talk with Boko Haram. Even at that, we still did not know you because all  we saw of you was a photograph in which you were dressed in an Islamic  attire. You were covered from head to toe, leaving two tiny slits in the cloth for your eyes.

    Till today, none of those who saw that photograph in April, last year,  can see you on the street and identify you because you left no  room for such identification. It has been over one year since the inauguration of the Committee on Dialogue and Peaceful Resolution of Security Challenges in the North, yet nothing has changed in that part of the country. The worst hit is the Northeast, where Boko Haram  has been on the rampage in the last four years.

    My dear Hajia Aisha Wakil, your  membership of the panel was informed  by  your closeness to the sect. You were expected to leverage on this special relationship to get the  ‘boys’,  if I may use that word, to cease fire. I know that you would have put in your best to get these ‘boys’ to see reason, but then for their own safety they would  require some assurance that they will come to no harm if they drop their weapons.  They may not see you as being in the position to give them such assurance. This, I believe, is your dilemma. I feel for you madam.

    As they say, a lot of water has passed under the bridge since the inauguration of the panel  and the submission of its report. Your panel recommended amnesty for members of the sect, who are willing to renounce violence. I strongly believe that the sect can still renounce violence, if properly handled. It is not going to be an easy task, but I know that it can be done. And Hajia, you are the one to do it.  You are the woman for the job because you are their ‘mother’.

    You may not be their biological mother, but you wield a motherly influence over them. They will listen to you because they trust you even more than they trust their own mothers.  Hajia, so far, you have shown that you are a courageous woman.  I salute your courage. As a mother yourself, I am certain that you cannot be happy with what is happening in the three Northeast states of Adamawa, Borno and Yobe. As a resident of Maiduguri, the Borno State capital, you are aware of the atrocities committed by Boko Hram. No day passes without the sect wreaking havoc on one village or the other. How long will this continue?

    I am pained that 80 days after the Chibok  schoolgirls were abducted, they are yet to be released by your ‘children’, who have claimed responsibility for the act. The government says it is working covertly to get back the girls, but to me, nothing seems to be moving, even with the intervention of the so-called super powers. Hajia, our destiny lies in our hands in this matter and people like you have a vital role to play if we must get back these girls safe and sound. I  am appealing to you to do all you can to bring back these girls, who as it were, will be going through psychological trauma wherever they are.

    Their parents too will be psychologically troubled. We do not know what these people are going through because we are not the ones wearing the shoe. We can only feel their pains but cannot suffer the same psychological trauma they have been going through in the past two-and-a-half months.  Let us  imagine  that our own children are forcefully taken away from us just as these schoolgirls were abducted, how will we feel? If these girls were to be the children of those in power will they be treating this matter like this?

    I want us to bypass even the government in this matter, if possible, because it has not done enough in getting back these girls. It did not act promptly when the news of their abduction broke, rather, it was waiting for proof that ‘’over 200 girls can be abducted like that?’’ Now that it has the proof from its panel on the Chibok girls abduction,  has  the government become convinced? It is the politicisation of the girls’ abduction that brought us to this pass. If we had not delayed the rescue effort, the girls would have been back home by now. Hajia, you can still do something to redeem the situation.

    The government keeps on saying that it is working covertly to get them back, but there are no signs that we will see them soon , if people like you do not intervene. Last week, our President was the butt of a scathing editorial by the New York Post following his letter carried by The Washington Post in which he wrote about his secret plans to get back the girls and how he will get the United Nations to establish and coordinate a system to share intelligence . To the New York Post, the government’s secret plan to get the girls back- which the President says he has to ‘’remain quiet about’’ – isn’t much impressing Boko Haram. Of course, it has not because the sect  has not ceased killing, maiming and looting since the April 14 abduction of those children.

    Hajia, your interview with Al Jazeera, shows that you can prevail on Boko Haram to release these girls in this holy month of Ramadan, in which Prophet Mohammad  told us that no true Muslim should fight. I know that you are also worried by what is going on and have been doing all that you can quietly to help. Now, is the time to step up that effort and Allah will crown your effort with successs.  In the Al Jazeera interview, you recalled how you got to know the late Boko Haram leader, Mohammed Yusuf , and also spoke of how he and members of his group enjoyed your cooking.

    ‘’He(Yusuf) prayed that Almighty Allah would reward me because so many were eating from my pot, and that was how we established a close relationship. The boys called me  ‘mum’.  Many of them didn’t have mothers’’. Hajia, you have become the mother that they do not have. What these ‘boys’ need is motherly love and care , which you have been providing them in the past five years. Please, talk to them  like a mother to her sons  and let them  see reason why they should let the girls go. Hajia, you can do it. May Allah grant you the wisdom  to handle this national assignment.