Category: Lawal Ogienagbon

  • A nation under spell

    Nigeria was not always like this. Even though we had our challenges, they were looked int speedily with the government of the day do the needful to assure the citizenry of their safety and security. We didn’t appreciate what we had then. We probably thought that the government was not doing enough to protect us then; now we know better. If government at the national level then strove to maintain law and order, the same cannot be said of the present administration under whose watch life has short, brutish and nasty.

    To the government, it is normal for things to be the way they are. This is why it could say that ‘’Nigeria is safe’’, a political statement, which it knows is far from the truth. If it knows that it was not true why then did it make/ The answer is obvious. It was made for the sake of foreigners who may be interested in investing in the country. Our government forgets that foreigners are no fools; they have their embassies and high commissions and can easily obtain information about the country from there. Lying about a nation’s state of security in order to attract foreign investments should not be an attractive option for a government with such a challenge on its hands.

    What the government should be looking for are solutions and not to compound issues by trying to pull wool over the people’s eyes. Every nation has its security challenge no doubt, but the difference is in their respective attitude towards remedying the situation. Some tackle the problem head-on, while others pay mere lip-service to the challenge. Unfortunately, we are in the latter group. Rather than be making progress as a nation, we are regressing. Problems that were solved some 20 to 30 years ago have returned to haunt us without the government being able to proffer any solution. What can then be said of us as a nation?

    Rather than accept our shortcomings, we have chosen to live in denial and the implication of this choice is that we are not ready to solve our enormous problems. Is it that the government is incapable of solving these problems? Or is it sidestepping these problems for political reasons? With the way things are, the government has virtually abandoned the people to their fate. With a government like this, we have only God to run to now for help. What is wrong with us? What is it that makes our government behaves without a care for the people? Do we have a government?

    Of course, we have, but its impact is not being felt. What we have is a government only in name, no more, no less. If Nigeria were to be a human being, many will say that, that person is under a spell. Are we not under a spell as a country from the look of things? A country which is suffused with oil but imports refined products for domestic use. Today, we are in the grip of a fuel shortage, which has virtually grounded the country. From Sokoto to Gusau; Minna to Ilorin; Ibadan to Lagos; Port Harcourt to Asaba; Benin to Enugu, motorists are stuck in fuel queues. For many, the filling stations have become a second home. They sleep and wake up at these places, yet they don’t get petrol to buy. Diesel and kerosine are different kettles of fish. Their prices are out of the reach of the common-man. And the government’s response to that is that diesel is not for them.

    What about kerosine, a product which is widely used by the common-man? The product’s price has shot through the roof and the poor cannot afford it. Yet, this is a product that Edo State Governor Adams Oshiomhole described as ‘’common-man specific ‘’.With the price ranging between N120 and N150 per litre no poor man can afford it. The government is not concerned about all this. It has ceded its powers to marketers who now play games with the importation of fuel.

    Because a lot of money is involved in the deal, they have held the nation to ransom, demanding payment for job not done . Many of them do not import fuel but they get paid all the same in a huge subsidy scam to which the country has lost trillions of naira. Subsidy is meant for the less privileged but it has been hijacked by the well heeled with the connivance of those in power. Today, the most lucrative business in town is oil marketing. Whether you have a registered company or not; whether you have an office or not, once, you have the right connections, you are in business. The millions will start rolling in without you doing anything.

    This is how many marketers bleed the country with those in power turning a blind eye. The present fuel scarcity, we were told, was caused by the vandalism of the System B2 pipeline at Arepo in Ogun State sometime in September. The vandals later killed three officials of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) who were sent to fix the pipe. Since the destruction of the NNPC has not been able to send other engineers to repair the damaged pipe for fear of their being attacked by vandals.

    Does it mean that we are at the mercy of criminals? If NNPC cannot send its men to repair such an important pipe for fear of hoodlums, then we are in for a long drawn fuel scarcity. The System B2 supplies all of the Southwest fuel and some parts of the North, particularly Ilorin , Kwara State. Must we watch and allow hoodlums to seize major national assets? What is the government doing to flush out these vandals from not only Arepo but other places where they are operating?

    Government must know when to bare its fangs and when to be soft. This is a time to be hard on people such as pipeline vandals and the like who are drawing back the hand of the clock. Boko Haram has turned out to be the menace it is today because of the government’s lukewarm attitude to serious national crises. What about kidnappers? These ones have turned kidnapping to an art all because the government has been indulging them. The truth of the matter is these boys are making a hell of money from the illicit trade. This is why they have kept on kidnapping people. They won’t stop unless we are ready to match them fire for fire. Is government ready to do that or will it keep on paying them ransom in secret while coming out to tell the public a different story?

    We have what it takes to become great; what we need is the will to do what is right and take certain drastic actions no matter whose ox is gored. We are not a cursed nation; so we should not behave like one.

  • ‘My life has been a struggle’

    ‘My life has been a struggle’

    He was a political neophyte when he joined the Victor Attah administration in Akwa Ibom State as Commissioner for Local Government Affairs. When he indicated intention to succeed his boss in 2007, nobody gave him a chance. Today, the story is different. Governor Godswill Obot Akpabio has come of age politically. By 2015, he will complete his two terms as governor of the state. Since he is constitutionally barred from seeking a third term, Akpabio plans to move to the Senate to, according to him, serve his people who have asked him not to quit politics yet. 

    As governor, Akpabio, who turns 50 today (Sunday, December 9), believe he has touched the lives of his people. In this interview with Lawal Ogienagbon, Deputy Editor, and Ibrahim Kazeem, Akwa Ibom State Correspondent, Akpabio speaks on his journey in life.

    AS your name Godswill a product of your political fortune?

    It is a coincidence that my name is Godswill. I think it has more to do with my belief in God. My late brother taught me that everything in life radiates from God and the Bible is clear on that. The ways of prosperity are there, enshrined in the Quran and the Bible, that seek ye first the Kingdom of God and all other things shall be added unto it. That was what my late mother taught me. My name is God’s will and I believe strongly that God has a divine purpose for every man. You don’t just come into the world and believe that you don’t have direction. You definitely came into the world for a purpose. God placed you in your family for a purpose and therefore God gave me the name Godswill for a purpose. And that name He gave me was for me to do His will and to continuously seek His face and say let God’s will be done in my life. In 2007 when we were going for election, I did not say God make me the Governor of Akwa Ibom. I said let God’s will be done. I believe there is a lot of relationship between my name and my action. It is only through God that things are possible. The will of God is in this administration and that is why Godswill is being done and there is a direct relationship between the name Godswill, what is happening and the fortune of Akwa Ibom today.

    You always say you are being propelled to perform by anger, what is the source of this anger?

    Any Nigerian who has lived to be 50 years knows that the source of our problem is not lack of resources but how to utilise the natural resources for the benefit of all Nigerians. Every research in Africa and in the world shows that the problem of Nigeria is not availability of resources and how to utilise the resources; leadership is the bane of Nigeria. I became angry with the situation I saw and I said I wished God will give me the opportunity to be a leader so as to show the difference. Why was I so angry? I lived in Lagos and each time I came home, I will not be able to drive my car to my village. My village is sedentary, it is on the road between Ikot Ekpene and Aba, the road that comes from Umuahia, in Abia State. For 29 years I had no road to my village. The federal road between Ikot Ekpene and Aba was totally out of function and all the filling stations on that road were closed down. Even to get Okada to get into the road was a problem. We used to have pipe-borne water in the 60’s and we even saw some of it when we came back from the war. By the 80’s there was no water to drink, people had to resort to streams and I say what is happening in Nigeria. I could enter train in 1973 to Zaria to go and take entrance exam in the Nigerian Military School. Thrity years after, the train disappeared. If by 1990 as a young lawyer I could drive my car from Lagos, from Lagos I could drive seven hours and by the 8th hour, I am in Ikot Ekpene in my state and I would go to a restaurant to eat. From 1990, about 15 years after, the road disappeared between Lagos and Akwa Ibom. Don’t you think there is a reason to be angry? So the question there is what we are going to bequeath to our children if in my own time, the trains the cheapest means of transport have disappeared? I was a young boy of 10 years old when I travelled alone by train to Zaria to attempt to enter Military School. Thrity years after, no train and nothing. So, what about children who are not as privileged? I wasn’t a privileged child, but I was able to find my way to Zaria to take entrance examination. Can you say the same today of children who are orphans? Where would they get money to enter a plane since the roads are no longer there; the trains are no longer there. There was a reason to be angry. That is why when I came, I approached development with anger. I can tell you even as I am talking now the feeling of the anger is coming back but I am trying to reduce it. When I look around and drive round Uyo and I see over 34 to 38 urban roads that we have done, the anger starts reducing.

    I was angry because of the decayed infrastructure; I was angry because of the number of children that were hawking in Lagos State from Akwa Ibom. I was angry because every groundnut seller in Port Harcourt was from Akwa Ibom State. I was angry because every single person in Lagos or Rivers states is from Akwa Ibom. I was angry because if you find 50 children that were trafficked from Nigeria to Gabon, 40 of them would be from Akwa Ibom State. I was angry because every house in Lagos or Abuja had an Akwa Ibomite as an housemaid because they had no money to go to school. So, with the policy of free and compulsory education and the inherent triple school enrolment and the number of children from orphaned homes being taken care of here in Uyo, Akwa Ibom children are no longer in servitude. My wife is sending them to school and those orphans now have hope that in spite of their situation in life they can become something and the anger starts subsiding. I am happy now that you cannot easily find an Akwa Ibom child that is about the age of five who is still into slavery and servitude. I was angry because I lived as a young lawyer in Lagos and on one, two or three occasions I rescued some Akwa Ibom girls raped by certain expatriates some of whom were Indians. In a particular estate in Ebute Metta a woman used hot iron on the breast of a 12-year old from Akwa Ibom because she dared to say she wanted to visit home because the father was thinking of sending her to school and the woman asked her. Is school for your type?’ and used the iron on her breast. I went to the police station out of anger to represent the girl. The anger is going down.

    At 50, according to you, a man should start counting down. Why?

    Do you know why I was afraid to be 50, it is because I love counting up but when you are 50, you start counting down. When you are five and 10 years old, you keep counting up but when you are 50, you can hardly count 50 again.

    As a young person, you celebrate first birthday, second birthday, 30, 40 but once you get to 50, you are not likely to count to 50 again. It is difficult to count up to 40 again. When the first 50 is over, can you ever count 50 again? Even if you are to count 50, you are to count down. Very few people in our generation count 50. Even if you were to count 50 you can’t count up again. But it is to the glory of God that one should be 50.

    What has life been like in the last 50 years?

    Life has been a mixture of ups and downs. I have learnt a lot in the last 50 years. First, as a young child it was very traumatic, I had a lot of challenges. Second, as an adult and somebody with a feeling that you have worked hard and succeeded in life, you also learnt the travails of life that the Mexican play, The Rich Also Cry, which used to be on the television, came to mind. While the poor cry, the rich also cry. At what stage would you really say that life has been smooth? It has been very rough. Everything has been a struggle. The struggle to obtain education, the struggle to get school fees, the struggle to look for a place to do NYSC. As a young lawyer if you go to anywhere they will ask you if you have any Executive Director working in a bank. When you say no, they will send you out of the office. I stayed for two months in Lagos looking for where to do my NYSC, but I couldn’t because they wanted to link your name to a manager of a bank, and through you they will get briefs. But I wanted to practice law. Even I went to the oil industry, those to be taken had already been taken. Those in the oil industry want their children or their relations to do NYSC in those places. Sometimes merit is not recognised in Nigeria. It is only connections and we allow mediocrity to thrive in the society. A lot of young bright people are not given the opportunity to display their talent. So it has been a lot of challenges. It is sadness and joy. Joy in the sense that you have been able to graduate as a lawyer, sadness that it wasn’t possible for you to get a place to do NYSC. Joy in the sense that you now surmounted that problem, sadness in the sense that you could not get a permanent job that could give you decent living. Joy in the sense that you are able to surmount that other aspect and sadness in the sense of the absence of a decent job, the struggle must continue and then eventually you get to a point of saying that I’m a state governor then you discover that the rich also cry. The politicians try to paint you in a colour that is not yours. The only thing that has given me sanity is my dependence on God

    Can we now say that at 50, you are now fully developed politically? In 2007, when we were talking about choosing the PDP candidate for this state, it was a tug of war and God used a particular line Chief Ufot Ekaete. Today we hear that you are your own man now, you don’t have God father. How true is that?

    I have never had a Godfather in Akwa Ibom State. Your reading of the Akwa Ibom political situation in 2007 is totally wrong. Please, do a little bit of more investigation. Chief Ufot Ekaete was Secretary to the Government of the Federation. He was not in my political campaign team for the governorship of the state in 2007 before the primaries. The PDP primaries, I believed strongly that he had his own sympathy. When you interview him he would tell you who his preferred candidate was. I never had a Godfather before I emerged as the candidate of PDP in Akwa Ibom State. That was why there were so much troubles but I thank him for being a man of integrity and truth. Chief Ufot Ekaete was among the Akwa Ibom elders that came out in my support and said since he has won the primaries, we must stand by his victory not that he was a Godfather who put me to win the primaries. He was among the elders who spoke the truth that we don’t know how the young man won the primaries, but he won it, therefore, he should be given the opportunity to contest a governor of the state. For that, I remained grateful to him but interms of the primaries I had no single elders in the state of national prominence that was in my camp. Infact, I used to dress up some of my PA’s with their chieftaincy dresses whenevr we were going for meetings.

    Let me give you a little bit of clarification so that you can understand. In 2006 we had about 56 to 57 aspirants. There was a particular aspirant from Ikot Abasi Local Government Area that had the blessing of the then SGF before the primaries and ofcourse the incumbent governor had a particular aspirant. I don’t want to name names. The elders that should have come together to support another aspirant all went into the race themselves. They all wanted to be governor.

    If I wasn’t politically mature in 2006 as you were saying but I managed to win the primaries out of 57 people then that is the kind of political immaturity that I want. Here is the man, young man that was the chairman of rally and mobilisation committee for PDP re-election in 2003 and chairman of the rally and mobilisation committee of Obasanjo/Atiku campaign mobilisation in 2003 for Akwa Ibom State. I went round the state to canvass support for the governor of the state with the youths of the state for his re-election in 2003. He was not political matured but he was the chairman of all the campaign committees for Obong Victor Attah on rally and mobilisation in the state. I organised the 31 local governments rallies for the 31 local governments in the state. I mobilised support in 329 wards with the youths of the state for the then governor to win re-election in 2003. I also organised the PDP Presidential rally at the Uyo Township Stadium that was second to none, never seen in the history of this state. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo was so excited and announced that he had never addressed this kind of rally even in Western Nigeria. This was a young man totally politically immature in 2006 and therefore, he became a Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs and they had over 539 cases in court on chieftaincy matters but he sat in judgment in the chambers daily and all the communities in court withdrew their cases from in court and came before him. Also communities that never had Paramount Ruler for 14 years withdrew their cases in court and settled them. A community like Uruan that was in court for over nine years was able to get a Paramount Ruler during my time. People felt that he was a man of justice therefore his pronouncement was respected by all because I gave justice to all irrespective of your status. This was the same young who wasn’t politically matured but he was the last to declare for governorship in the state because of the respect he had for the former governor. When he realised that the former governor had his own preferred candidate he refused to go into the race until women went to the primary school and stayed there. Thousands of Akwa Ibom women said they were going to go naked unless Godswill Akpabio declare for governorship of the state. Grudgingly, he was the last to enter the race and when he entered, he never said he wanted to be governor he just told Akwa Ibom people, let Godswill be done.

    Do governors need a summit to come together on regional integration? For instance, we have BRACED commission in the South South and given the incessant border disputes between governors over allocation of oil wells. Don’t you think the regional integration is being threatened?

    Also what has happened to the Southern Governors’ forum?

    I am actually not an activist at 50. I am a governor at 50. So what you are talking about will be a better question for people who are involved in activism. I won’t know much about it. It is a very good idea but it is not the oil well that will divide the South South. There will always be differences. But we must focus on things that unite us and one of those things is how to integrate ourselves economically. We can do things that will be of general advantage to our people. The oil wells you mentioned are things that could divide the people. Let us not focus on oil well. Let us focus on economic integration.

    You talked of economic integration, for instance, Uyo-Calabar/Umuahia-Ikot Ekpene road are in the state of collapse? The roads though federal, can there be an integration between the three states?

    I am working on how the three sister states can collaborate for the repairs of the road. I have written to President Goodluck Jonathan and he has given me approval to work with my brother states of Abia and Cross River and ensure that those roads are not only done but they are dualised. I got the approval from the Federal Ministry of Works. President Goodluck Jonathan graciously granted the approval and that for me is how to integrate the state. that is why I said let us focus on things that will benefit our people and not on things that will divide us. The oil well is all about money issues but if we focus on truth then there will be no conflict. The reality is that for instance, I don’t want to speak for Bayelsa and Rivers States but if what I am hearing is true that these were the issues that were done in the year 2000 and not things that were done in 2012 then you can see that the protagonists are a little bit unfair to the president because the reporting tends to give the impression as if it is being dine under the presidency of Bayelsa. For instance, look at the Akwa Ibom issues, it was settled even in the Supreme Court in 2005 when Cross River State went to the Supreme Court. They explained to Cross River State that if Bakassi goes to Cameroun, there is no way you can talk about oil well on the deep sea, yet, the current administration still went back to the Supreme Court. I tried everything possible to stop them from doing so. I even wrote a letter to them saying that it was unnecessary offering assistance at that time but they still went to court. So those are the issues. It is the individual attitude that could threatened, the unity of the South South because oil wells are not movable assets. They are permanently fixed. If we all believe in justice and speak the truth then there will be no conflict in the regard. As a governor I decided that the best way to move forward is to focus on things that can unite the South South and not on things that can divide the South South. Let the BRACED commission concentrate on economic integration, commonality, and comparative advantage in agriculture and how we can create wealth system for our people. Right now I am intervening on the road from Arochukwu to allow the people from there get to Akwa Ibom State. so that they can also make use of the Ibom International Airport. That is also what informed my request to Mr. President to grant me permission to dualise road from Uyo to Aba in Abia State and from Uyo to Calabar in Cross River State. I am going to be working with my brother governors in that regard so that we can create common facilities/infrastructure that will enhance the living standard of our people and not to focus on things that divide us. That is why I said at 50 I will never be an activist. I will only be a man who speaks the truth.

    What is your position on the call by some sections of the North calling for the review of the Onshore/Offshore dichotomy?

    That was a settled issue. We should not reopen old wounds. Even when that policy was in place the entire Nigerians described it as obnoxious. Obnoxious in the sense that it was a clear case of an unjust policy and then Nigerians decided to find a solution to it. They went through alot of processes before finally arriving at a compromised position. I need to tell you that thousands of oil wells in Nigeria are still offshore. The onshore/offshore dichotomy is still there but the compromised position was that for oil wells between 200 meters isobaths, we should pay derivation but oil wells beyond 200 meters isobaths, no derivation because that is almost like international waters. So, oil wells within the shadow waters that impacted alot on the aquatic life with the region and affect the livelihood of the people who are predominantly fishermen and the impact of the oil spill also spills on the land and destroyed the possibility of agriculture. Since the people are riverine and depend on the water but the water is already black as a result of the activities of oil exploration. They should get compensation. So, we got to a compromised position. The position was that we should pay derivation up to 200 meters but some of my colleagues in the North when they are granting interview, you hear them saying 200 nautical miles. Nigeria doesn’t even have the capability to police up to 200 nautical miles. So you have to correct some of these distortions. These things are being done and propagated in order to confuse and cause bad blood between the north, the south south and oil producing communities. That is not the correct position. The reality is that the dichotomy is still there. I give you an example, if dichotomy was totally removed, the highest oil producing states in Nigeria will not be in the South South, it will be Lagos State. That is where you have Bonga Oil field that produces up to 800,000 barrels per day but it is deep offshore. It is beyond the 200meters isobaths. That is why Lagos is not a derivation state. That is the simple truth. There are lots of thousands of oil wells in Bayelsa, Rivers, Akwa Ibom that are beyond 200 meters isobaths that we are not getting derivation on but the ones within 200 meters isobaths that impact on the landmass should be regarded as part and parcel of the land for the purpose of derivation and yet people are not still happy. In 2012, when American decided to quadruple oil production and trying to compete with Saudi Arabia in oil production and our greatest partner is America. Shouldn’t we be worried that a time may come that oil will have no value? It is a time we should be talking of more dependence on oil instead of thinking about how to diversify the economy?

    From Nassarawa to Zamfara we have mineral deposits. From Jos, we have bauxites everywhere in the North. There is no part in this country that God has not embedded mineral resources in the soil. Why don’t we set up corporation and even increase derivation to make it attractive to our sister states to go into major exploration and exploitation of these mineral resources so that we can diversify our economy. We have things embedded in the soil all over Nigeria, we have not talked about that, we are depending on crude oil. Is it the time in 2012 that we should be talking of how to grab more oil so that we can share more revenue while forgetting the environment impact on the people such as oil spill, gas flaring that is affecting peoples’ lungs, acid rain and the rest of them.

    I am not into that argument. I want to thank the President and the Attorney General of the Federation who issued a statement and pointed out that that was a settled issue. That Nigeria should move forward not backward. That is an issue that will move the country backward. For me I want to move forward. If we start the issue today, it means that we are moving backward and we are not patriotic. Also that some people are elected to destroy Nigeria and I think it is important for us to bring leaders into this country who will rather build this country than dividing the country.

    You have a grass to grace story. What is the greatest lesson you have learnt in life and what impact do you want it to have on the lives of people?

    Perseverance is the key. If you persevere you will succeed. Then don’t depend on your ability, depend on God. Any child no matter the circumstances of your birth, persevere, work hard and realise that there is only one place in the world where success comes before work and that is in the dictionary. That is where you see S before W. In real life, it is work before success.

    Before you got married, what was your relationship like with the opposite sex?

    I was very timid because I was a very poor man. You know you only have confidence when you have money in your pocket. So, I congratulate young men who are handsome and rich. But the rest of us who are good looking even when girls try to get close to you, you will think they are trying to mock you. I have not always been a ladies man. Humanity gets attracted to my personality. That is why when I was a student in the university I didn’t join any cult because I felt I had too many friends and therefore I was a cult onto myself. So, I said how can you carry a cult into a cult. Already the name Godswill Akpabio was an attractive name. I am very sociable and a mixer. I have always been that kind of person all along. In secondary school, I was a general senior prefect and I have the largest number of school sons. Everybody wants to be Goddy A school son. Instead of me having school sons that washed clothes for me. I washed clothes for my school sons. I washed plates for them, they stayed with me and I have to make sure they are clean. I will ask them my friend have you changed your pants today, they would say Goddy A I want to be your school son. I would tell them if you want to be my son you must be clean. I rather served my school sons instead of them serving me. That was why I had many school sons. So, that kind of personality has always been there for me.

    I was the speaker of the Students’ Union Parliament in the University of Calabar. The students said I should contest for president but I refused. I pulled out in the last minute because of family considerations. They said they had the money to sponsor me for president but I told them supposing the union is dissolved and I am sent home, will I start over as a poor man?

  • A nation in denial

    People and institutions hate to hear the truth about themselves, especially when such is not palatable. It is natural to feel that way. We want to hear nice things being said about us because they are what make our heads spin. When we hear negative things we get demoralised and even feel unwanted. At such times, we see the world collapsing on our heads. We become lonely despite being surrounded by people. As it is with people so it is with nations. Nations are at their best when things are going on smoothly for them.

    They are at their worst when things are the other way round. No person or even nation prays to see the hard side of life, but when it comes, some take it as a quirk of fate, others blame it on some perceived enemies. The truth is life is full of ups and downs. This is why the Yoruba say that people’s problems are not the same. The problem which stares some in the face may have its back turned on others. That is life and we have to accept whatever portion the Almighty allots us, just as Job accepted his fate in the Bible. If I sound like a preacher today please forgive me for I am doing as being led by the Spirit. Why this sermon? You will get my drift shortly.

    For over three years now, we have known no rest from the clandestine and sometimes not so clandestine activities of the Islamic sect Boko Haram. To say that Boko Haram has made the country unsafe will be an understatement. The group has simply made the country ungovernable. Yet, the government does not wish to accept this fact. In Abuja and the Northeastern part of the country, the fear of Boko Haram is so palpable that you could feel it in the air. In some Northeast states like Borno and Yobe, government activities have been paralysed. Nothing seems to work in these states again because of the fear of Boko Haram.

    Where they hold, government activities are done in hiding far from the reach of the murderous group. Our government has unwittingly handed over power to Boko Haram, yet it is mouthing ‘’Nigeria is safe’’. Is there any dispute about that? ‘’Nigeria is safe’’; it is safe indeed. Or is it not safe? For two years (2011 and 2012) now, the Independence Day anniversary has been held in the confines of the Presidential Villa and not on the expansive grounds of the Eagle Square, as we used to do in the past, all because of the fear of Boko Haram. Yet, we are told ‘’Nigeria is safe’’. If ‘’Nigeria is safe’’, the government will not move the celebration of that august anniversary to the hallowed grounds of the Villa. It would have stuck to tradition by holding it at Eagle Square. To prove its claim that ‘’Nigeria is safe’’, the government should hold the 53rd Independence Day anniversary at Eagle Square on October 1, next year.

    The issue of the nation being safe or not came about because of the bombing of the Command and Staff College, Jaji, Kaduna State, and the Force Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) in Abuja on November 25 and 26. Being military and police formations, these are places, which many thought were out of the reach of Boko Haram. But it scored a bull’s eye when it hit those formations about nine days ago. The military is pained by the audacious attack and it has since moved to ensure that such does not happen again. Nobody prays for that, but we need to come clean with the people about these matters. The government does not have to lie because the facts are obvious. There is insecurity in the land. Even those with police escorts are not safe not to talk of those of us who cannot afford that luxury.

    Presidential aide Doyin Okupe can blab and blab about safety in the land because he enjoys privileges which many of his compatriots are not entitled to. He has round-the-clock security both at home and at work and as such does not know what is happening in town except what he reads in the papers. May I point out to him that the papers, which reported that the country is not safe were not being unduly sensational; they were reporting things as they are. Is Nigeria truly safe? Okupe knows the answer in his heart of hearts. To issue a statement that Nigeria is safe amounts to standing the truth on its head. Nigeria is not safe and the earlier those in government wake up to this reality the better for all of us. How safe is our country when people disappear at will?

    How safe is our country when

    mothers are kidnapped

    while taking their children to school? How safe is our country when old men and women are abducted right in front of their houses? How safe is our country when vice-chancellors are kidnapped in broad daylight? How safe is our country when our leaders flee their home-states to seek refuge in neighbouring states? How safe is our country when the central government suddenly moves the celebration of our National Day from its traditional venue to where it considers a more secure and safer place? Dr Okupe, I am sorry to say, Nigeria is not safe. Oh! wait a minute, you may be right after all that ‘’Nigeria is safe’’. Your claim of a safe Nigeria is strengthened by the relocation of Yobe State government officials to Jigawa State. According to Niger State Governor Babangida Aliyu , who is the chairman of the Northern Governors Forum, ‘’insecurity’’ forced the Yobians to relocate.

    Said Aliyu : ‘’The (insecurity) situation has reached a situation whereby members of the state Executive Council in Yobe now run away to nearby Jigawa State for their safety. What is happening is very scary…those who are after us have defeated us and have taken over , what is the best way out and how do we address this situation because if the government institution is relocating then it means nobody is safe. We must stand up and say no to terrorism in northern Nigeria. We must tell the government what to do and many of us have access to government’’. Aliyu is not an alarmist as people like Okupe may want to describe him for speaking the way he did. The governor probably spoke out of concern about the way things are going. When we did A nation under siege in this space last week it was to draw attention to the worrisome state of security in the country. Things just keep going down the hill and government seems not to know what to do.

    Those who have ideas about what to do are not ready to avail government of their expertise because they are benefiting from the chaotic situation. These are the people Aliyu is appealing to, to help the government resolve the Boko Haram riddle. As concerned Nigerians, we cannot watch and allow things to continue like this; more importantly, government should admit that it has a big problem on its hand and reach out to those who can help it. All hands must be on deck to flush out the Boko Haram elements and the government must take the lead in this all-important task instead of living a lie.

    Let Sanusi be

    Many Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) governors have come and gone. So, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi’s case cannot be different. When his time comes he will go but he will be remembered as the most outspoken governor in the history of the bank. You may not like some of his interventions on burning national issues, but one thing is clear he will never leave you in doubt on where he stands. His latest intervention, which I find interesting, is generating ripples. There is nothing new in this position; it is the same old position he has held on such matters. Since he assumed office, he has been critical of the high cost of governance; the unviable states and local governments and the spending of the nation’s scarce resources on a few elected public officers and their aides. We know as a fact that a large chunk of the budget is spent on maintaining these officers who contribute virtually nothing to the development of the economy. The nation can ill -afford to continue to maintain them unless we want the economy to go kaput. There is economic sense in what Sanusi is saying. We cannot say that because we don’t like the man’s face we should not listen to him when he talks, especially when he is making sense. Whether or not a CBN governor should talk like that is a different matter. But as a Nigerian, shouldn’t the CBN governor contribute to discourse relating to his area of specialisation in order to enrich public debate? I think he should and when he does we should listen to him for our own good. I don’t think Sanusi is out of line this time because he is not talking politics but economics. As you will notice, I have deliberately kept quiet about his take on civil servants because of the controversy over what he actually said. Did he demand the sack of half of civil servants? He said he didn’t. Having made that clarification, it will be unfair to hold that against him as some people are now doing. Their intention is to pitch Sanusi against the all – powerful labour movement. What a way to deal with a public servant with a caustic tongue, they would have reasoned. But labour should not allow itself to be used against Sanusi in this instance for he has spoken well. As the Yoruba will say, a stubborn child has his own day.

  • A nation under siege

    Nigeria is not at war, but it is at war with itself Why do I say this? In the past three years, internal security has been stretched beyond its limit while trying to curtail the activities of those who have declared war on the country. With no corresponding response from the security agencies to their murderous acts, these renegades have made the country virtually ungovernable.

    Yet, we have a government and a thing like this is happening. It is the job of government to secure the country and ensure the safety of lives and properties; but doing this has become an Herculean task for the present administration. These days, all sorts of characters with guns strike at will, killing, maiming and looting.

    If Boko Haram is not doing its own, bandits are busy terrorising the people. No part of the country is safe now from the grip of these bad boys. Perhaps, if it had been Boko Haram alone, the public would have known the direction to face to seek divine solution to this gargantuan problem. As things are, the people are between the devil and deep blue sea.

    Who do we run to or who do we run from between Boko Haram elements and your run-of-the-mill bandit? None, I say, because there is no difference between them; it is like six and half a dozen. They are only different in name, but similar in evil deeds. As if to see who will outdo the other, these renegades have been unleashing terror on the country in a relay race like manner. As soon as one finishes a lap, it hands over the baton to the other and vice versa.

    Between Sunday and now, the nation has known no rest from these animals in human skin, apologies to the late Fela Anikulapo-Kuti. And I tell you, they, especially Boko Haram, are not selective in those they attack. They attack civilians, military and para-military personnel. So, if the military and the police can be attacked, who then is safe from Boko Haram and those we commonly refer to as die-hard rogues?

    Although, Boko Haram has a history of attacking military and police formations, it has never done so in quick succession as it did on Sunday and Monday. On Sunday, it hit the elite Command and Staff College, Jaji, Kaduna State, and on Monday, it took its destructive campaign to the Force Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) Headquarters in Abuja. That same Monday, gunmen struck in the polytechnic town of Auchi in Edo State, looting and killing.

    In Jaji, 15 were officially confirmed dead. The figure is believed to be higher than that unofficially; two reportedly died in the SARS attack. Fifteen persons, among them three soldiers, were said to have died in Auchi. Chances are that the casualty figures are likely to be than these by the time we take proper stock of what happened. I will be putting it mildly to say I’m not shocked by the attacks on the military and police formations considering what they went through in Boko Haram’s hand not too long ago.

    The attack on the 244 Recce Brigade also in Kaduna a few months ago prompted the army to devise means of stopping the Islamic group’s suicide bombers from hitting home easily. The metallic security device, we were told, can stop any bomber who runs into it at the entrance of any building, particularly a church, where it is placed. Were there no security device at the entrance to the church in Jaji last Sunday when Boko Haram struck? Or is it a matter of complacency by the army? Could it have relied only on its name-army- to scare away the fundamentalists?

    What about the police? With the havoc Boko Haram wreaked on the Force Headquarters not too long ago, should the police have gone to sleep so quickly in taking steps to tame the group? Does it not speak volume about our police that Boko Haram could successfully hit another of their facility and get away? The Inspector-General of Police (IGP), it was reported, has ordered that security be beefed up in all police and public buildings, is that to say, there were no such security measures in place before now?

    Boko Haram and hoodlums will always be a step ahead of our security agencies if they are only quick at taking fire brigade measures. With the way Boko Haram has been terrorising some parts of the country, these agencies don’t need to be told that they have to be pro-active and not reactive to curtail the group’s activities. If they continue like this, it will only amount to shutting the stable when the horse has bolted away.

    But for how long will the people continue to live in fear of Boko Haram and hoodlums? The fear of these people is the beginning of wisdom for many Nigerians now. We live in fortresses, yet, we are not safe. Billions of Naira are voted for security and defence, but we don’t know how the money is spent because neither us nor our properties are safe. We-the leaders and the led- are at the mercy of renegades, who have become law unto themselves. Will we ever know peace?

    Yes, we can, if the government can get its act together and use its might to do what should be done in matters like this. Should a government keep quiet in the face of serious challenge to its authority by renegades? The answer is no. I pray that the government will summon courage to act before things get out of hand (as if they haven’t) because it will be too late to cry when the head is off. No renegade can be bigger or mightier than government, except a government which does not know the enormity of its power.

    READERS’ TURN

    RE: When president fight

    Boko Haram’s reign of terror is fuelled by its knowledge that we have a leader that lacks courage and vision, to send a signal to the blood suckers that somebody is in charge; that is why they issued irritating terms of dialogue to the presidency to our shame from: Joseph Solomon, Kaduna, 08099577661.

    It is better our president accepts instructive criticism and rise to the Boko Haram challenge. His in action shows that he does not value life just like Boko Haram. From: 08030817528

    The president should go to battle with Boko Haram not former President Olusegun Obasanjo. From: 08163498511.

    President Jonathan is planning to seek second term in office, that is why he is afraid of fighting the killer-group in the Northern part of Nigeria. From: Bola Oluwatuyi, Akure, 08136055942.

    May the Lord grant our president listening ears, a receptive heart and wisdom. From: 08095607404.

    Our president is too soft on Boko Haram. He should stop saying that Boko Haram will soon be a thing of the past because whenever he says so, the evil men hit harder. From Edet Bassey, 08027343842.

  • When presidents fight

    When presidents fight

    Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has a way of dealing with his protégés when they fall out of line. He doesn’t call to talk to them, especially when the issue at stake is in the public domain; he rebukes them in the open, probably for the benefit of the people who he believes should know where he stands. No doubt these people would have preferred that he called them in private and say whatever he likes to them, but Baba doesn’t do things that way.

    Obasanjo seems to get a kick from ridiculing his ‘boys’ in public and I have tried to hazard a guess as to why he does this, without success. Could it be because they don’t listen to him when he advises them in camera? Could it be because he wants to be seen as pro-people? Obasanjo pro-people? It sounds somehow because he is not known to be a man who shows concern for the people, except it is politically motivated.

    Really, why does Obasanjo take delight in talking down to sitting presidents when he has unrestrained access to them? Assuming he was in those people’s shoes, how will he feel if he was at the receiving end? Knowing Obasanjo for who he is, he would never allow such attacks to go without a fight. Presidents are a cult of sorts. Whether serving or not, they bond together, meeting and conversing at forums exclusively meant for them. Such forums should provide a veritable ground for an ex to advise a sitting president and avail him of his own experience while in office.

    With his native intelligence, Obasanjo may think that such forums are not appropriate for the discussion of certain sensitive matters under which we can categorise his castigation of his one-time minions for perceived poor handling of the affairs of state.

    Ask former military president Ibrahim Babaginda; ask the late President Umar Yar’Adua and now President Goodluck Jonathan has got the length of Obasanjo’s tongue. In 1986, Obasanjo tore Babaginda apart over the military dictator’s Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), which the gap-toothed general said had no alternative.

    SAP as an economic policy was harsh and Nigerians groaned under it. The late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN), who in his characteristic manner , tried to provide an alternative through enlightened debate was arrested and kept in detention for long. Thus, other Nigerians were cowed from speaking out on the issue. Like a bolt out of the blue, Obasanjo descended on Babaginda and his SAP.‘’Any economic policy’’, he said, ‘’must have human face and milk of kindness’’.

    Any policy, which does not pass this test, is not worth it, he said matter of factly to the admiration of Nigerians. In the heat of the crisis caused by the illness of the late Yar’Adua, Obasanjo was on song again. Responding to criticisms that he foisted a sick man on the nation, Obasanjo absolved himself of blame. He said he could not be held responsible for the way the late Yar’Adua turned out in office.

    Taking a shot at the late Yar’Adua, who he went round the country campaigning for in 2009, Obasanjo said if someone is given a job to do and he knows that he is not fit to do that job, the best thing is to call it quits. Obasanjo said : ‘’If you take up an assignment, a job, elected, appointed; whatever it is, and then your health starts to fail and you will not be able to deliver to satisfy yourself and to satisfy the people you are supposed to serve, then there is a path of honour and the path of morality’’.

    It was an unkind cut because Obasanjo cannot feign ignorance about the late president’s health challenge, but that did not stop him from speaking out in public then. If Obasanjo could not be restrained from talking by the late Yar’Adua’s health challenge, how can President Jonathan, who has no such problem expect Obasanjo to keep quiet if he believes that things are not going on well in the country.

    Does the Obasanjo that Jonathan knows behave like that? No, he doesn’t. Obasanjo is known for calling a spade a spade, whether you like it or not. So, he was simply behaving true to type when he took Jonathan to the cleaners over his handling of the Boko Haram insurgency.Baba did not say anything new as we all know that Jonathan has been too soft in his handling of the delicate Boko Haram issue.

    The president is only being

    cautious in his approach,

    but do the group and its backers appreciate this? It is good to be meek and gentle, but it is not noble to allow that gentility to be taken for granted, at least not in this Boko Haram case.

    The group needs to be handled with iron hand and this is the message Obasanjo was trying to pass across by criticising the president. So far, Jonathan has taken it too easy with the group. Truly, going by his track record, if Obasanjo were to be in charge, things would not have been handled this way.Give it to Baba.

    With his military background, he would have taken some drastic actions, which by now, may have changed the course of events. It may not have necessarily ended the Boko Haram insurgency, but the point would have been made that no group can just wake up one day and resolve to wage war against the society for no just reason without paying the price.

    Of course, there would have been some collateral damage, but a message would have been sent across. What is the message that Jonathan is sending across with his handling of the group’s excesses? I’m sorry to say there is none whatsoever and that is the truth.Rather than see Obasanjo’s broadside as an attack on his administration, Jonathan should see it as a wake-up call to do something about this Boko Haram insurgency before things become worse than they are.

    There is no need for him to go to battle with Obasanjo over this issue. The group that he should do battle with is Boko Haram and the sooner he faces this enormous challenge the better for us all. Whether the Odi invasion was a failure or not, one thing is certain, we had a president who rose to the challenge of the time and did something.

    The question posterity will ask Jonathan is what did he do when his country was burning under the Boko Haram threat? Will he want to be remembered like Nero who fiddled while Rome was burning? It is not enough for Mr President to lament the invasion of the seat of power by Boko Haram elements; what the nation expects him to do is to fish out these people and bring them to justice.

    May God grant him the will to do this.

  • The Presidency and Ribadu-phobia

    Not many who watched the drama on television that night will forget it in a hurry. It was a show not fit for the hallowed grounds of the Presidential Villa, but there it happened right under the nose of President Goodluck Jonathan and some of his key aides. Channels Television transported millions of Nigerians to the scene with its brilliant coverage of the debacle. But for the Nigerian Television Authority (NTA), it was its usual style of drab and pedestrian reporting, which told viewers nothing about the drama which overshadowed the main event.

    As it is wont to do, NTA left the meat of the story, which was the exchange between former anti-graft czar Nuhu Ribadu and former Head of Service (HOS) Steve Oronsaye. Ribadu and Oronsaye were at the Villa to submit the report of the Petroleum Revenue Special Task Force of which they were chairman and deputy chairman. By now, almost every Nigerian knows what happened that Friday, November 2, when the duo threw brickbats over the authenticity or otherwise of the report. Ribadu stood for the report, but Oronsaye was against it because as he claimed the process adopted is flawed.

    With a bold face, Oronsaye not only condemned, but also bore down on the president with his uncouth language. That is what normally happens when people allow anger to becloud their reasoning. ‘’What I’m saying is that the president has said come and submit the report, so what? If we are not ready, we are not ready’’. Coming from a former HOS, who should be an exemplar in public conduct and decorum, that was too harsh a statement and the president deserves a public apology for it.

    How can Oronsaye address the president like that in public? With those words, he showed no respect for the high office of the president. As expected, neither the president nor his aides saw anything wrong in what Oronsaye did because they were more interested in his rubbishing of the panel’s report. They wanted something with which to discredit the report and they seemed to have found one in Oronsaye’s statement. Did Oronsaye play into their hands? Or was the former HOS acting a script? It is not unlikely considering how his excesses were overlooked on that occasion.

    Could Oronsaye have looked former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who he served as HOS, in the face and say to him, ‘’the president has said come and submit the report, so what?’’ We all know that he could not have done that to Obasanjo without the former president given it back to him in kind. Unfortunately, rather than rebuke him, those who should complain are not doing so. Why? The reason is as clear as daylight; they are happy with the tearing of the Ribadu report by no less a person than the deputy chairman of the panel. They don’t come bigger than that, do they?

    Contrary to what the Presidency wants the people to believe, nothing will satisfy it more than to get a pole on which to hang the Ribadu report. It seemed to have found that pole in Oronsaye’s statement. Will the Ribadu report be accepted and implemented by the government? The answer is no and I will show you why presently. Shortly after he received the report, the president, who sat through the exchange between Ribadu and Oronsaye, invited the former HOS to write a minority report, if he so desired. Must it take the prompting of the president for an aggrieved person to state his case?

    Oronsaye is not a dimwit; he knows what to do if he is aggrieved. For him and his ilk, who are not happy with the report, not to have written a a minority report, shows one thing : they don’t have their hearts where their mouths are. If they do, they don’t need to be goaded before they make their case in the approved manner. What Oronsaye should have done was to have come to the event with his and Ben Oti’s minority report, stating the areas where they disagree with the Ribadu report. They didn’t do that, but chose to come and make noise at that ceremony.

    Now, the government is trying to assist Oronsaye and Oti to finish the job. From the look of things, it is the government which instigated the theft that is shouting ‘’thief, thief…’’ in order to catch the culprit after the act. But Nigerians are wiser than that. If the Presidency is not happy with the recommendations of the Ribadu report, it should just dump it instead of looking for excuses, where there are none in order to rubbish the work done by the panel.

    If the government has no hidden agenda, why will it appoint Oronsaye and Oti members of the board of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) after it had saddled them with the task of auditing the corporation and others in that category. The government acted in bad faith. It knew what it was doing by bringing Oronsaye and Oti to the NNPC board; it was preparing for a day like this and it knew that when the day comes it can fall back on these men, just as it is doing now.

    The president was not so tact

    ful in his handling of the is

    sue; if he had been, we would not have seen through his failed attempt to use some members of the Ribadu panel against the larger house. Hear him : ‘’Of course, government will take the majority and minority reports, but in this case, there is no clear minority report. The issue is that there are some lapses in the processes, probably not everybody agreed on some of the conclusions’’. Mr President sir, the truth of the matter is that there was no minority report submitted to you on November 2. At best, what you got that day was a verbal complaint by Oronsaye.

    Can that pass as a minority report? No, it cannot. What Oronsaye intended to do was to rubbish the Ribadu report publicly in order to render it valueless and become unacceptable by government. He never knew that he had to write a minority report to make the government’s job of rejecting the report easy. Now, the government is in a dilemma over how to reject the report and make it look as if it did in the best interest of the people. The job that Oronsaye and Oti started but could not finish, is now being taken up by a presidential aide, Doyin Okupe. Who else but him?

    In his characteristic manner, Okupe opened wide his mouth to vomit rubbish about the report. The report, he says, is incomplete and not capable of indicting anyone. What about the panel’s finding that over N800 billion oil revenue cannot be accounted for by the NNPC? Is that not indicting? Are there no people in NNPC ,who can be held responsible for the missing oil money? Okupe is his master’s voice. He is telling us what the Presidency expected Oronsaye and Oti to have highlighted if they had written a minority report.

    Albeit in the absence of such report, the Presidency seems to believe that a disclaimer by a loose cannon like Okupe will do the trick. That is where the government is wrong. The people have seen many of the likes of Okupe and have come to know them for who they are. Okupe falls in the category of those Nigerians will not like to wake up and see. To wake up and see them is a bad omen. Nobody prays for that whenever the day breaks.

    The government should save us from the antics of people like Okupe and be honest with us on what it wants to do with the Ribadu report. Does it want to accept or reject the report? The Presidency should answer this question in a straight forward manner and stop speaking from both sides of the mouth the way it has been doing in the past 13 days.

  • Constitution review: A dangerous oversight

    He passed through this road before. But we seem not to have learnt any lesson from what happened then. The country faced a constitutional crisis following the late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s long absence from home, leaving the ship of state rudderless. We had a vice president in person of Dr Goodluck Jonathan, but the late Yar’Adua crowd did everything to stop him from acting for his boss.

       And they found a justifiable ground for their position in the Constitution. Now, we are travelling the same road again, with Taraba State Governor Danbaba Suntai taking a somewhat forced leave of absence from work following his plane crash on October 25. The only difference this time around is that the issue is restricted to the tiny state of Taraba. But treating it regionally instead of nationally will be taking a myopic view of the issue.

    The issue at stake is the same as that of 2010 when the late Yar’Adua left home in a hurry and did not return until about six months later in the heat of the constitutional crisis caused by his absence. Now, Suntai too has left his state for treatment in Germany just as the late Yar’Adua went to Saudi Arabia late in 2009 and did not return until May 2010. For now, we don’t know when Suntai will return. This, I daresay, is the crux of the matter.

    When will Suntai, who was flown out on October 27, return? When he returns will he be medically fit to return to work? Should his absence lead to a vacuum at the Government House, Jalingo? For how long can a governor be away on medical treatment before his office can be declared vacant? All these questions have become necessary because of the political bent his absence seems to be taken. Remember, this was how  the  Yar’Adua case went until providence intervened.

     With the Yar’Adua case still fresh in mind, we need to do things the way they should be done before the Taraba matter becomes something else. Right now, we are all pretending that everything is normal, when we know that they are far from being normal. It is almost two weeks now that Suntai left the country and there is no way that by now there are no matters calling for his attention.

     As we all know, in his present condition, Suntai cannot attend to state matters. The most important matter he can attend to for now is his health, which should also be of utmost concern to all those who truly love him. As we pray for his speedy recovery and await his return home, one thing, however, cannot wait and that is governance. The government of Taraba must continue to run with or without Suntai.

    Governance cannot pack up all because Suntai was involved in a plane crash. We thank God that he is alive. What if he had died in the crash? Won’t his deputy have been sworn in by now as governor? We should not be sentimental about this issue at all. What has happened has happened. We cannot close down Taraba because of this unfortunate incident as some people are suggesting. For how long will we have to wait for Suntai to get well in order to return to office?

    The Constitution, which foresaw a situation like this, unfortunately did not make clear-cut provisions for a deputy governor to take charge immediately the governor is indisposed. This is the lacuna the supporters of Suntai are exploiting to stop the deputy governor, Alhaji Garba Umar, from taking charge.

    The framers of our Constitu

    tion, in their wisdom, did all

    they could to prevent a vacuum in the absence of the president or a governor, but our politicians have devised a way of circumventing the constitutional provision on this issue.

    With what we saw in the Yar’Adua case and what is about to happen in Taraba, we need to take a look at Sections 144 and 189 of the Constitution in order to stop political hyenas from reaping from where they did not sow. When the late Yar’Adua was away for months, these political interlopers seized power from the righful person, the then Vice President Jonathan, turning him into a sissy in his own administration. Then, the National Assembly through the Doctrine of Necessity, saved the day.

      With that, we can say we have a precedent to fall on to avert the brewing constitutional crisis in Taraba. As is often the case, the crisis is instigated by those who believe that by their action, they are being loyal to Suntai. Others are doing it for the fear of the unknown. They don’t know whether the governor will survive or not and as such they don’t want to be caught on the wrong side if he pulls through.

      The issue is beyond Suntai or even any one of us. The question we should ask ourselves is this : is it proper for a state to be without its duly elected governor for 13 days, the number of days that Suntai has been out of the country as at today, counting from October 27? This is where I think the Constitution did not do well. But we cannot blame the framers for this, rather we should blame our politicians, who are always looking for a loophole in any thing in order to have their way.

    The loophole they are cashing in on can be found in Section 189, which similar provision in Section 144, the Yar’Adua clique used for long to stop Jonathan from coming to office in 2010. Section 189 reads : The governor or deputy governor of a state shall cease to hold office if – (a) by a resolution passed by two-thirds majority of all members of the executive council of the state, it is declared that the governor or deputy governor is incapable of discharging the functions of his office; and (b) the declaration in paragraph (a) of this subsection is verified, after such medical examination as may be necessary, by a medical panel established under subsection (4) of this section in its report to the speaker of the House of Assembly’’.

      With this provision, Suntai can stay in Germany for as long as he wishes because neither the Taraba State Executive Council nor the House of Assembly will initiate such a move. Who will bell the cat?

    This is a long shot, but having seen what happened in the Yar’Adua case, let all men of goodwill appeal to the good conscience of the executive council members and the lawmakers to do what is necessary. It will be in the best interest of their state to allow Suntai’s deputy to step in, pending the governor’s  return from his medical trip.

    Making Umar acting governor will not detract from the fact that Suntai is the governor because it is not an impeachment. It is better to have an acting governor in place rather than leave the state without a constitutionally recognised leader as it is now.

    Doing this will not amount to disloyalty to Suntai because his supporters will be doing him a world of good in his most trying moment.

     While at this, let me quickly submit that the planned Constitution review will be incomplete if nothing is done about Sections 144 and 189. It is time these sections were amended to state specifically how long the President or a governor can be away before the vice president or deputy governor steps into their shoes in acting capacity. I will go for seven days.

    If this issue is not factored in, then I am sorry to say, we are not serious about amending the Constitution. We cannot afford to keep quiet over this sensitive issue after seeing what happened in 2010 and the lie now being led in Taraba.

  • Salami : A Daniel has come to judgment

    Salami : A Daniel has come to judgment

    When in August 2010, President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Isa Ayo Salami, was suspended, right thinking members of the society kicked against the irrational act. They were ignored because the government was working towards the answer in a calculated and clinically executed plot to get Salami out of the judiciary.

    Out of the way? Yes, the ruling government considered and still considers him a threat to its ‘political fortunes’. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is not comfortable with having Salami around because he does not stomach nonsense. This judge is not ready to dine with the devil even with a long spoon.

    As a party, the PDP believes in doing things in the dark. Openness and transparency do not exist in PDP’s dictionary. They are Greek words to the party, so, wherever people of light like Salami are gathered, it feels threatened and is ready to do anything to tar them.

    They have applied different kinds of tar brush on Salami, but this incorruptible judge has always come out clean. But they are unrelenting; they are determined to give him a bad name in order to hang him. Nothing will be more pleasing to the party than to lay hands on evidence to do Salami in as a corrupt judge. It has searched everywhere for such evidence to no avail.

     If the party had been able to get such evidence, I bet you, Salami would have been history today after an ignominious sack from the bench, with a trial to boot. Salami, probably never knew that a day like this would come when he was joining the judiciary, but being an upright person, he stood firmly by his oath in the discharge of his duty.

    And as fate would have it, he made it to the pinnacle of his career following his appointment as PCA after the retirement of Justice Umar Abdullahi. He was doing his job without any hassles until politicians came with their troubles after the 2007 elections. The Appeal Court, which he headed, played a  crucial role in the post-election matters.

    The court upturned the election of sitting governors all of who were elected on PDP platform. The party was aghast. It was shocked by the temerity of the court in unseating its governors, wondering why the judges could not turn a blind eye to the rigging which brought them to power.

    Rather, the court dug into the rigging by doing  a forensic analysis of the ballot papers on the strength of which it removed the governors. The court was about delivering judgment in the Sokoto State governorship election appeal when former Chief Justice Aloysius Katsina-Alu, in his wisdom, intervened.

     All he wanted Salami to do was a simple thing, at least, according to Nigerian standard. He invited Salami to his office and told him to please ‘’arrest’’ the verdict. Salami asked why and when he did not get a plausible answer, he rejected Katsina-Alu’s request.

    The chief justice could not believe it that a judge in the judiciary headed by him could turn him down. He forgot that he could only throw his weight around where he is acting true to his oath of office. There is nothing in the rules of court that allow the chief justice to use other judges to subvert justice as Katsina-Alu tried to do in the Sokoto case. Salami resisted him and for that Katsina-Alu plotted his suspension.

    Reversing that asinine

    action has become a prob

    lem for the Presidency, which hastily intervened in a matter, which was best left to the judiciary to sort out by itself. Instead, President Goodluck Jonathan listened to no-gooders and appoved the suspension of Salami.

    When the president took that action, Salami was in court to challenge his planned elevation to the Supreme Court by Katsina-Alu and also stop the National Judicial Council (NJC) from giving effect to the report of the panel, which recommended his suspension. The president sidestepped the case and suspended Salami instead of sacking him as demanded by Katsina-Alu.

     The plotters have had their day on the political turf, but Salami has continued to rubbish them in court even though judgment is yet to be delivered. The matter is becoming more interesting by the day. The Presidency and NJC seem to have parted ways on the matter; they are no longer on the same page.

    This is a plus for Salami because those hitherto against him are now backing him, demanding that he be returned to office, without any input from the president, who thinks that Salami can only regain his job just by his saying so. Last week, the NJC, which has been hiding in between the Presidency’s legs on this matter, came out to assert its authority to reinstate Salami without recourse to the president.

    My fear is that the same set of people, who advised him to suspend Salami over two years ago are still around him and may urge him to ignore NJC. To them, NJC’s well-informed position may not be more than the rantings of an ant. That is where they are making a mistake.

    NJC is constitutionally empowered to discipline judges and in the exercise of that power, it does not report to anybody, including the president, but politics has changed things. This is why today, the NJC is tied to the apron string of the Presidency to which some of its past leaders sold its birth right. NJC under Katsina-Alu was a toothless bulldog in the Salami case because the former chief justice was working hands in glove with politicians to get the PCA out of the way.

    What the present NJC leadership is trying to do is to reverse the wrong done Salami and restore the people’s hope in the judiciary as the bulwark against oppression and injustice. Salami has suffered indignities in past two years despite his high office. If Salami could be so treated, what will be the fate of those who are not as privileged as him? The NJC has said it all that it reserves the right to recall him.

    In papers filed in court, it said the president has no power or role under the 1999 Constitution or any other law to recall or reinstate Salami or any other justice of the appellate court. It also frowned on the retention of Justice Dalhatu Adamu as acting PCA for two years now in contravention of the Constitution, which Jonathan swore to uphold.

     By now if the Presidency is actually acting with sincerity of purpose in the Salami case, it would have reinstated him in light of the NJC’s stand. But then as we have always maintained in this space, there is more to its action than meets the eye. No matter what happens, one thing is sure, a Daniel has come to judgment, with NJC’s new found courage to state the true position of things. It is a matter of time before Salami returns to his job.

  • Otedola’s curious N141b debt settlement

    Otedola’s curious N141b debt settlement

    It is good to have friends in high places. In a country like ours where people believe so much in connections, we struggle to have friends in such quarters. The reason for this is obvious. Having friends in such places confers a lot of privileges. It opens doors and at the mention of your powerful friend’s name, others will cringe before you.

    Some will even bow to you because they know that you only need to speak the word and they are finished. It is indeed good to have friends in high places. With the support of your powerful friends, you can get away with anything, including murder.

    Having friends in high places has its advantages no doubt. In the interdependent world that we live in today, it is good to know people be it in politics, business or at the social level. We need to move out of our cocoons and make friends for the betterment of our lives and society.

    The essence of friendship is to have people to fall back on when the need arises. Some of us are good at making friends; some are not that lucky, no matter how hard they try. We collect friends for different reasons. Some deliberately make friends in high places because of what such friendship can fetch them. Those people are not assets to their friends, but liabilities. But do they care?

    They don’t because they intentionally made such friendship because of what it can fetch them. These are people who go to government offices, throwing their weight about and asking through their body language, do you know who I am? They are super connected and they leave no one in doubt about that. Where some talk of friendship in high places, they boast of friendship in higher places. They are friends of leaders of the country and you know what that means; it means power, raw power. Because of their closeness to power, they tend to treat others with disdain, forgetting that their privileged position should make them humble.

    Being a friend of the president of a country should make any rational person to be fearful and grateful to God at the same time. It is a privilege, which many crave, but which only a few can obtain. So, those who obtain this rare favour in the face of the Almighty should be mindful of how they use it. Such favours are not meant to be used by shouting all over the place that I am the friend of the president.

    Those who are true friends of a president are known by how they contribute to his success; they are known by the kind of public good they dispense; they are known by their humanitarian gestures; they are known by their ethical and moral conduct; they are known for their uprightness in all their endeavours.

    These are attributes of a person, who does not want his powerful friend to fail through his questionable conduct on account of their friendship. But what do we have today? We see all over the  place, people hanging around the president because they want to be identified as his friend so that others can say of them : don’t you know that man, he is the president’s friend. Nobody can touch him; anything he does, he will get away with it. Yes, on earth, anything they do, they will get away with it. But in the Hereafter, we will all answer for our deeds. Even the president will answer to a higher president.

    On earth, let all those who want to use the president to achieve their selfish desires continue to do so, but a day is coming that there will be a Pharaoh who knows no Joseph.

    Nobody can really put a fin

    ger to the kind of relation

    ship between President Goodluck Jonathan and oil magnate Femi Otedola beyond the fact that they are friends. Their friendship, I have heard it said, predates Jonathan’s assumption of office. According to the grapevine, Otedola was there for the president when the cabal was hellbent on stopping him from emerging acting president before the death of President Umaru Yar’Adua in 2010.

    Some even said he committed time and money to the Jonathan project before and after Yar’Adua’s death. So, both men are close. Because he is not an ingrate, the president has brought Otedola close to himself since he came to power and the oil baron is seen all over the place with him. It was said that when things seemed not to be going well for Otedola, it took only a little push from the president for him to get his bearings back. I don’t know how well his businesses are doing, but from the look of it, things are not bad for him.

    The chink in his armour may be his alleged indebtedness to the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) for which he and 418 others were blacklisted by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Their blacklisting followed their alleged reluctance to service the debt despite the buying of the loan by AMCON at an agreed price.

    Otedola’s debt was put at N192.4 billion, but it was bought by AMCON for N140.9 billion. With over N50 billion chopped off his debt, it was expected that Otedola and others who enjoyed similar mark down on their loans will promptly begin to service the facility to continue to enjoy the support of their banks. You can trust the Nigerian businessman, they never did that.

    They started to play the waiting game to see what will happen next. Meanwhile, they were still going to their banks for more loans. This leads us to this question : Should a debtor that refuses to service his/her debt be allowed to obtain more loans? The CBN answered this question appropriately by blacklisting the debtors. I agree with the CBN.

    What kind of precedent will we be setting if we treat debtors like the ones blacklisted by CBN with kid gloves while going after small debtors with a sledge hammer? It will be a bad precedent and the consequences for us as a nation will be grave if we continue to pamper big debtors.

    Many banks are dead today because of the refusal of some big debtors to defray their debts. Many of those debtors are strutting all over the place as lords of the manor, despite causing the death of these banks. Why will a debtor refuse to pay? Is it for lack of fund or what? Can he choose to pay at his own will or as scheduled by the bank?

    Barely one week after news broke of his being blacklisted, Otedola reportedly paid his N141 billion debt. Just like that; yes just like that. So, he had the money all along but chose not to pay? Why did he choose to pay now? To ensure that he continues to enjoy credit facility from his banks? No, that cannot be the case since he was compelled to pay up by CBN’s action.

    I don’t know how much Otedola is worth, but one thing I know for sure is that N141 billion is a huge sum, which cannot just be picked up off the street. Where did he get the money from? What are the assets he sold?

    AMCON must come clean with the people on this issue because of insinuations that Otedola might have benefited from his friendship with the president. For me, it is not a sin to have the president as a friend, but it will be wrong to use that friendship to gain undeserved favour.

    Will other debtors benefit from such help so that they can continue to remain in business and be able to borrow money from the banks until they are killed just like some financial houses before them? Friendship should not stand in the way of justice; no, not at all. The people have the right to know how Otedola was able to raise such huge sum within so short a time when he could not do so for years before the CBN threat.

  • Animal Farm

    Animal Farm

    It was not supposed to become like an Animal Farm’s tale, but like everything that those in government handle, they have introduced class to it. Yet, when Taraba Governor Danbaba Suntai and his aides flew out of Jalingo, the state capital, last Thursday, one thing that probably was far from their minds was class. Unarguably, every one on board that ill-fated flight knew where he belonged in the hierarchical structure, it  was not an issue to be flaunted to the extent of embarrassing anyone. It was a flight of jolly good fellows, perhaps, on  a Sallah binge. But it turned out otherwise.

      It is not Suntai’s fault that his lieutenants are being treated as subjects in a matter of life and death because he himself is not aware of what is going on around him, at least, for now. Our prayer is that he pulls through. Suntai needs all the prayers to be alive because it appears he is between life and death. Suntai has a passion which we have all come to know him for and this is flying. He loves running around in a plane and at the least opportunity he takes to the sky. Since he passed out from the Nigerian College of Aviation Technology (NCAT), Zaria, Kaduna State, Suntai has been flying himself whenever he is opportuned to do so.

      To him, flying is not only an hobby, but a passion. Hear him: ‘’Personally, right from the onset of my life, I chose aviation as a career and pursuing it I was able to obtain admission to Mbrevidaila Aeronautical University in Florida, but coming from a very poor background, I could not sponsor myself in school; so, I started seeking scholarship, but I could not obtain a scholarship. So, that was how I ended up in the pharmacy profession. However, aviation has continued to bite in my blood. And when I learnt that I could even fly at my age, I decided to come over here to see the rector and inform him about my ambition and he enrolled me.

     ‘’And after some few training, today, I was able to undergo this solo flight. So, in my blood I have it as a passion, so this passion translates to my belief in encouraging students who want to be pilots to be sponsored to train…so, it is a passion…I don’t know about other governors but the thing is all about passion’’. Suntai spoke in August 2010 after he finished at NCAT and took his first solo flight as a pilot. He was no doubt ecstatic that, at last, he could now fly a plane. Many of us would wish we could also do the same thing but we lack the courage to take up that challenge. We can only fly with our mouths.

     Suntai, it is said, so much loves flying that he devotes so much time to it at the expense of his executive duties as governor. This is, however, not the subject under discussion. We are here concerned with the way other victims of the crash are being treated. It all appears as if the governor was the only one aboard the Cessna 28 plane flown by him whereas he was not. There were others with him. Among them were his Aide-De-Camp (ADC). Dasat Iliya, Chief Security Officer (CSO), Timo Dangana, and Chief Detail, Joel Dan. Now the only difference between them and Suntai is that the latter is a governor, which by our country’s standard, makes him a demi-god. This explains all the fawnings over Suntai since the unfortunate accident.

     It is as if those on board the plane with Suntai  do not exist as far as the authorities are concerned. To them, it is all about Suntai, Suntai and Suntai. We are not saying that the government should not show concern about the well-being of the governor. All we are saying is that they should also show interest about the well being of others injured in the crash.

    We are told that the govern

    ment is so much con

    cerned about the governor because he sustained far more serious injuries than others and I say that is where they got it all wrong. Why do I say so? A man, in most instances, does not die from the seriousness of his injuries. The severity of an ailment does not necessarily hasten the death of the indisposed. So, why are we not as concerned about the others as we are about Suntai.

    Life is the same, be it that of a prince or a serf. In so much as we do not want Suntai to die, we should also strive in like manner to ensure that the others also live. When it concerns life, we should treat the king and his servant the same way. The state, which flew Suntai to Germany for treatment also has the means to fly the others abroad for treatment, so why didn’t it do so? Was it advised medically not to extend the same gesture to them? What informed such medical advice? Is it because they are lesser mortals who do not deserve such royal treatment? God forbid, but if any one of them dies from his injuries, how will the government look like before the people? Has the government spared a thought for that?

     Well, what am I even talking about? Do they care about losing face before the public? It is not too late to make amends. The others too should be flown abroad for proper medical treatment because life is the same, whether that of a governor or his ADC, CSO or chief detail.

    We are all equal before God and no life is more precious than the other in the eyes of the Almighty.We are not in George Orwell’s  Animal Farm where pigs turned things upside down, broke the commandment on equality and turned the kingdom into where ‘’all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.’’ I wish all the Cessna 28 plane crash victims hasty recovery.

       Carpenter’s hammer as gavel

    Our lawmakers will not cease to confound the world with their absurdities. Last week in Lokoja, the Kogi State capital, members of the House of Assembly turned themselves into a laughing stock when they held plenary outside the constitutionally recognised venue because they did not have access to the Assembly Complex. Besides that, they also sat without the mace, the House symbol of authority.

    The speaker added to the drama by wielding a carpenter’s hammer as gavel. In a society like ours where most of our lawmakers behave more or less like thugs, anything could have happened had there been any tiff during that session. If any of his colleagues had annoyed him that day, only God knows what the honourable speaker would have done with the carpenter’s hammer he wielded with so much relish.

    Will our lawmakers ever grow up? When will they stop ridiculing their countrymen with their incivility? They need a lesson in public behaviour, but my fear is they may think they are in one of those their sessions and turn the poor facilitator to a punching bag.