Category: Thursday

  • Yoruba and burden of history in the politics of Nigeria – 3

    During the struggle for power in western Nigeria before independence, political affiliation reflected the fault line of the civil wars in Yorubaland. The Oyo people mostly followed the lead of Alhaji Adegoke Adelabu into the NCNC (National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons), while non-Oyo people in rural Ekiti, Ijesha, Igbomina and Ife voted with the Action Group. In fact the aggressive boisterousness of Adelabu (penkelemesi), sometimes reminded people of the hurly burly days of Oyo domination of Yorubaland. There were however urban areas like Ilesha, Akure, Ondo, Ado-Ekiti and Ikare which largely voted for the NCNC. This may of course be because since 1944, the NCNC had already been planted into the consciousness of the urbanised Yoruba in these towns. The urban areas were also where educational institutions were located and missionary enterprise was at its highest in its impact. Hence, the control and influence of the Obas and traditional institutions were on the wane. This point is important because the Action Group was heavily dependent on the Obas as guardians of the home of Oduduwa. The party itself had sprung out of the Egbe Omo Oduduwa.

    Crisis and division in Yoruba politics

    Crisis seems to be a second nature in politics. Earlier in the politics of Lagos, the NYM had broken up when in 1941 there was a vacancy in the then legislative council of Nigeria and Earnest Ikoli, an Ijaw wanted to contest and he was backed by most of the important Yoruba leaders in Lagos, including the up and coming Obafemi Awolowo based in Ibadan. Nnamdi Azikiwe and others supported Samuel Akisanya who later became Odemo of Ishara. Azikiwe ironically branded supporters of Ikoli as tribalists. It was a complicated story in which Awolowo would end up being branded a tribalist for supporting an Ijaw man against an Ijebu man who was seen as a proxy of an Ibo man. This was to be the harbinger of future political divisions in Yorubaland.

    When the crisis in the Action Group broke out in 1962, it invariably took the form of the Oyo against non-Oyo. This was of course due to the exploitation of history by Chief S. L. Akintola, an Ogbomosho man, who used everything he had to survive a bitter political battle with an Ijebu man. The Ijebu generally attracted hostility to themselves because of their history of blocking for economic reasons, the route to the coast against the Ibadan in the 19th century. Thus, all Ijebu people were seen as closet opponents of the Oyo speaking people. In spite of Awolowo having lived most of his life in Ibadan, he was never totally accepted as an Ibadan man. The same tendency was witnessed during the second republic, when the titans of Ibadan politics like Chief Adisa Akinloye and R. A. Akinjide went against the general trend in Yorubaland of supporting Awolowo and his UPN. This was the continuation of the antagonism between the Awolowo and Akintola factions of Yoruba politics.

    This division seems to have continued until recently. Leading figures of the previous ruling party in Nigeria, the PDP (Peoples Democratic Party), in the South- west were mostly remnants of the Akintola tradition in Yoruba politics. In the current dispensation of the fourth republic, those who found their political home in the PDP could be traced to the NPC and NPN, while those in the AD/ACN/APC, can be traced largely to the Action Group and the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN). The political division and tendency in Yorubaland appears frozen for all times.

    The Ilorin and Fulani factors in Yoruba politics

    The Akintola tendency is seen in terms of a replay of Yoruba politics of Afonja’s betrayal of the Alaafin, and his own betrayal by Alimi and his son Abdul Salaam. Association with the Fulani regarded as Yoruba’s traditional enemies is seen as betrayal of Yoruba cause and interest. This is because of the 19th century seizure of Ilorin by Abdul Salaam, the son of Sheikh Alimi the Fulani cleric, who came to Ilorin as an itinerant preacher and was tolerated by Afonja the Are Ona Kakanfo of Oyo. Afonja was betrayed when the Muslim ummah in Ilorin, led by Abdul Salaam raised the flag of revolt against Afonja and Oyo, during which Afonja was killed and Ilorin became independent of Oyo and became an emirate under the Sokoto caliphate. The Ilorin episode has not been completely appreciated by historians. First of all, the coming of Muslims to Ilorin and Oyo itself during the 18th century, introduced Islam into the empire which undermined the imperial religion of Sango, which was a deification of the 15th century Alaafin. Many people in the empire were converted to Islam thus releasing them from loyalty to the Alaafin.

    The Are Ona Kakanfo Afonja himself may have been a closet Muslim or perhaps he wanted to use the Muslims to bid for the throne himself. He was therefore riding the tiger only to find himself inside it. Some of those who fought with Abdul Salaam were Yoruba generals like Solagberu, who was a Muslim and saw the conflict as a jihad against non-believers. The upshot of the Ilorin episode was that Oyo was destroyed from within by the coming of Islam. Modern Yoruba people, however, see the Ilorin seizure as a humiliation of the Yoruba and any political leader associating with the north was immediately branded another Afonja who allied with foreigners to betray the Alaafin and the Yoruba. This is in spite of the fact that for 16 years, virtually the whole of non-Oyo speaking Yoruba people were fighting against Oyo/Ibadan imperialism in the 19th century. In that fight, the Ekiti Parapo confederacy of the Ekiti, Ijesha, Igbomina, Akoko, and Ife allied themselves with the Ilorin in their resistance against the Oyo/Ibadan forces which were also fighting Ilorin.

    The sense of pan Yoruba feeling was not there yet and it did not really develop until the late 1940s. This had to be deliberately nurtured by Chief Awolowo, through the founding of the Egbe Omo Oduduwa in 1947 which metamorphosed into the Action Group in 1951. Before that time, the ethnic horizon of most Yoruba did not go beyond being Ekiti, Ijesha or Ijebu, Owu, Oyo, Igbomina and so on. We can therefore say politics created the pan Yoruba feeling, but ironically, the living history of the Yoruba undermined that pan Yoruba feeling. The result is that until the brief near unanimity of Yoruba support for Chief Awolowo’s Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN) in 1979, Yoruba people have always spoken with several political tongues, thus, reminding one of General Charles de Gaulle’s dismissive description of the French people that if you lock up two of them in a room to form a political party they will come up with three. This is what some have called the curse of politics in Yorubaland. But is it really something to be deprecated in a plural society like Nigeria? Will it not be good for Yoruba people and Nigeria as a whole if we encourage the blooming of a million political flowers in our country? If we all sleep facing the same place, how will we be able to see other directions? There is nothing wrong with Yoruba people coming up with several ideas, options and directions about who to associate with. What we should plead against is violence arising from political differences.

    The sore point of Ilorin’s political and administrative but not cultural separation from Yorubaland need not divide people of the same culture and language. Ilorin province, including the great town of Offa, is however still part of Nigeria and whatever boundary separating it from the rest of Yorubaland is mere administrative convenience. It is not as bad as that separating Sabe, Ajase, and Ketu now in the Republic of Benin from the rest of Yorubaland. In recent times, the people of Yoruba tongue there have found it important to visit and associate with the wider Yoruba world of Ogun State. It is surprising that in spite of French colonial assimilationist policy to obliterate the African culture, the Yorubas in Benin have survived and the institution of Obaship has thrived.

    Under the current political dispensation in Nigeria, in which political forces in Yoruba land and the north are allied, questions have been asked whether this constitutes a break with the past. What is the difference between the opportunistic politics of Akintola, allying himself with the north to survive and Bola Ahmed Tinubu, allying with Muhammadu Buhari now? They ask. The answer is of course that this alliance was presumably negotiated between apparently equal factions of the political elite. Although, the parochialism if not nepotism, characterising most of President Buhari’s appointments gives one concern. The Yoruba should deprecate this tendency and refuse to participate in it, but only demanding what justly belongs to it. Yoruba people’s concept of “Omoluabi” is a belief in fairness and equity. This will not allow them to collude with the Hausas and Fulanis to corner all appointments and resources, without equitable sharing of them with other ethnic groups in Nigeria.

  • Still on Buhari’s lingering ‘demons’

    •Hazards of cult worship of a struggling President

    There is an epiphany of morality in President Muhammadu Buhari, a vision of hope and romanticised ‘Change’ that the severely exploited and hapless citizenry would die for. Buhari rode to power chanting change and promising a radical, progressive departure from the pilfering and profligacy that characterised public office before his emergence.

    Buhari’s emergence however, complicates our perverse dynamics of corruption. His immediate past predecessor was no revolutionary – Goodluck Jonathan was no hero and he never pretended to be one. He was not interested in upsetting the status quo or ridding the country of sleaze. He understood that Nigeria throve on vice thus he simply played the role of passive leader and enabler. His infamous ‘Stealing is not corruption’ declaration accentuated imagery of his leadership as a moral and intellectual aberration.

    Enter Muhammadu Buhari, the redeemed dictator, self-proclaimed martyr and moral crusader. Buhari’s publicised distaste for corruption incites the separation and tension between moral and amoral personae. The attendant backlash from profiteers from the corrupt order, further accentuates the thrill of seduction and revolt against the incumbent president’s  anti-corruption campaign.

    In the ensuing melee, hard choices have to be made and unpopular decisions taken, often to the detriment of the nation’s longsuffering citizenry. Although there are estimated benefits in the long run, very few Nigerians are ready to accept that the obnoxious hike in pump price of Premium Methylated Spirit (PMS) from N87 to N145 for instance, was a necessary evil amid the country’s bordello of chaos and institutionalised corruption. And a fewer number of Nigerians, including Camp Buhari, are willing to accept a further hike in fuel price.

    Many more have lost patience with Buhari’s apparent incapacities at steering the nation to safe waters from its current abyss of strife and corruption.

    Notwithstanding his seeming incapacities, you can’t help but admire Buhari’s his valour and resolve to recoup the country’s looted funds from public officers that served in former President Goodluck Jonathan’s highly corrupt and disgraceful administration.

    But like I averred in recent past, President Buhari’s touted anti-corruption fight should only be taken seriously when culprits get sent to jail to serve sentences that befit their crimes. Nigerians should neither accept nor entertain any attempt at granting looters of public fund the luxury of ‘plea bargain.’

    If Buhari grants them such right, then he would be legitimising their corrupt acts and he would by default, have supported and applauded the mass murders and impoverishment committed by every public officer and their associates caught with the country’s looted funds. President Buhari ought to realise that looters of public fund are mass murderers.

    For instance, money that could have been used to arm the military to crush terrorism, repair damaged roads and fund the country’s ailing health sector have been embezzled by miscreants in power. Consequently, thousands of lives have been lost to terrorist attacks, ghastly accidents on bad roads, poor health facilities.

    The deaths of these hapless souls brutally hacked down in their prime by terrorists, bad roads and health sector, are blamable on the men and women that conspired to divert fund initially earmarked to resolve these problems.

    There is no gainsaying Nigeria is still afflicted by political profiteers comprising the ruling class and various segments of the poor, struggling masses. In the ensuing degeneracy of politics and cultural ethos, the hero we know today may morph into a dreadful monster. Given that power is the brandy of the turncoat, there is need to persistently scrutinize President Buhari uncompromisingly.

    For instance, his touted anti-corruption fight remains noise-making at the moment. When the ‘corrupt’ get prosecuted and sent to jail for their misdemeanor, Nigerians will believe him. And despite his touted reduction of his salary and that of his deputy, President Buhari is not working pro bono. He is being paid for the work he does. And it’s an open secret that his cozy allowances among other frills of being President and living in Aso Rock are the stuff the finest fantasies are made of.

    Buhari has been cuddled enough, by the media and his most ardent supporters. Nigeria needs him to work now. And no matter the floweriness and duplicity of spin accorded his performance so far, very little has changed since he became President. It is sad to note that the steadier electricity supply oft cited by his diehard apologists as a dividend of his leadership has since petered out. Electricity supply has become worse and despite the increase in electricity tariff, Nigeria currently runs the risk of a total blackout according to the Minister of Works, Power and Housing, Babatunde Fashola.

    And even though he vowed to crush Boko Haram by December 2015, it is clear that President Buhari didn’t achieve any such feat hence he should learn to be more tactful and modest in making future pledges. The military and police’s recent fiasco with the Shiite Muslim sect elicits greater apprehension among the citizenry – many are worried that President Buhari and his re-invigorated military might have sown the seeds of another bloody, villainous insurgent group masquerading as Muslims.

    While we acknowledge that his touted honesty and integrity exerts reasonable pressure on corrupt individuals and institutions to do a cartwheel away from corruption, it need be reiterated that his anti-corruption stance and ‘government with a human face’ propaganda will continually resonate as a desperate, corny lie, until the judiciary begins to sentence looters of public fund to severe jail terms.

    Buhari needs to divorce himself from sycophancy, vanities of power and decadent luxury emblematic of Aso Villa if truly he possesses the morality and Spartan discipline frequently ascribed to him. And contrary to claims that he has a great team to work with, he doesn’t.

    He has characters that have been embroiled in scandalous cases of corruption and administrative ineptitude in the past. Nigerians accepted him (Buhari) and his team not because they are the best that we could ever produce but because they represent that excusable part of our cancerous bulk that could pass our body.

    The citizenry see the ruling class as a primitive tribe of predators grossly inured in corruption. On the other hand, some love to see Buhari as our saviour. Contemporary boondocks legend paint a portrait of him as a warrior in wolf-skin vest, brandishing a shield of steeled morality and a stone-axe forged to hack down monuments that the corrupt ruling class built to entrench corruption.

    There is no gainsaying his emergence as President via the March 28 elections was a welcome development. But besides his bid to recoup looted funds from corrupt officers of the last administration, how does he fare as an administrator?

    Buhari’s touted morality was ennobled by widespread admiration and cult worship of him. The cult worship is gradually petering out. Nigerians, just like this writer warned, had set him up for failure. More sections of the press and the citizenry have stopped cuddling him. The truth dawns like eternal damnation; Buhari is not doing too well at the moment. His performance is below par.

  • These recession times

    These recession times

    Where has all the money gone?

    This is the question many Nigerians have been asking, like an unrepentant gambler after a night of losses at the casino.

    The signs were there in bold, unmistakable letters – that we had been hit by a  financial crisis. What was not clear was the weight of the calamity. Many states could not pay their workers as the federal accounts maintained a downward trend that seemed unprecedented. Oil prices crashed. Besides, Nigeria could not meet its quota as a new group of militants seized the industry by the throat, bombing oil facilities and boasting about it. A lifeline in form of a bailout was like a drop in the ocean.

    Then the government broke the sad news of a recession. It said we were not going to be in it for long. The man in the street did not understand what it was all about. Now we all know what it means; hard times. No doubt.

    Secretary to the Government of the Federation Babachir David Lawal’s lamentation when a group of lawmakers visited him at work was dreadful. He painted a grim picture of the financial mess. Our former presidents and heads of state had not been paid their allowances for 10 months, he said. Besides, said Lawal, the last Independence Anniversary was celebrated with a N33million loan. Ah! The irony of a rich country, blessed by nature but swimming in a self-made ocean of poverty, created by its treacherous leading lights who swore to care for it.

    Many Nigerians dismissed it all as a joke. All over town, there were questions on the propriety of “pampering” our former leaders. How much are they paid? Do they receive the money and smile or get that feeling of inner revulsion that pricks: “Do I really deserve this?” Did they serve us or we served them?

    Fair is fair. Why won’t they get paid for their meritorious services that brought us this far? In a compassionate environment, such leaders, who we deride as looters, will be deified and worshipped as true patriots who agreed to serve  their fatherland.  Their wives, those former first ladies, who had to carry on with state responsibilities of great importance instead of just attending to the first family’s overwhelming needs, should have a life-long supply of shoes and bags from the world’s best boutiques. Shouldn’t Imelda Marcos  be envious of them? Now we seize their hard-earned cash, forcing them to go to court to enforce their fundamental right to own huge funds in whatever currency. What ingratitude.

    Whichever way you look at it, the Lawal  story has shown our financial status. Our account is in the red.

    Another piece of bad news was broken on Tuesday. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) “contracts by -2.24% in third quarter”, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. In simple language, fewer goods and services have been produced. Government revenue has dropped further and foreign currency is drying up, with crude oil production falling to 1.63 million barrels per day. We had planned to do more than 2.2million barrels per day.

    What does this portend for 2017? Tougher times? Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor Godwin Emefiele says the worst is over and that we will soon be relieved, considering the measures being put in place by the government. In fact, Finance Minister Kemi Adeosun says about N750b has been pumped into the system to save it from collapsing. We are yet to feel the impact of this injection.

    Apparently worried that it has tried all the tricks in the book, but there seems to be little result and believing that it is being sabotaged, the government has resorted to some unorthodox means to drive home its desire. The other day in some major cities, it went after currency vendors in a desperate battle to crack the forex conundrum. They were beaten black and blue and dumped into detention. It was back to Fela’s Roforofo fight!

    Even though it is lawful to seize currency hawkers, is it the way to go now? Who are the sources of the cash these guys hawk? Are they unstoppable? Since banks have been forced to publish the names of their customers who get foreign exchange to import machines and raw materials, how many customers have been grabbed for misapplying such facilities? Why are factories either closing down or running at low capacities despite the foreign exchange injection? Why are manufacturers crying? Blackmail? We need to get scientific about this.

    There was even the rumour that the CBN –the apex bank has, thankfully denied it all – was planning to propose an amendment to the foreign currency law that will criminalise holding cash without taking it to the bank. Latching on to the rumour, the Senate issued a statement, saying it would not back such a proposal.

    And Nigerians keep on asking: where has all the money gone? Some would want the government to stop saying it has all gone into some people’s pockets and that it is battling to recover it. Others would even want due process set aside for the government to serve justice like a MacDonald’s burger – hot, fresh and fast. No. That way, the innocent will suffer the same fate as the gluttonous and reckless fellows who brought this cataclysm upon us.

    The other day in Ilupeju-Ekiti, a chief who allegedly stole a phone was sentenced to one month hard labour by the king, the Apeju, Oba Olaleye Oniyelu. The chief’s punishment, which he has begun to serve, is digging a well in the heart of the town’s main market.

    “The well must bring out clean water or else the punishment won’t be complete,” a resident said. Whoever is familiar with the Ekiti terrain – rocky, tough and reddish – will know that the troubled chief has his work cut out for him. I know that advocates of fast food justice and adherents of mob action must be hailing the Ilupeju solution. Are they right?

    It is reprehensible that amid the hunger in the land, some of our compatriots are busy talking about the 2019 elections – just a few months after the Muhammmadu Buhari administraton’s one year in office. There have been arguments on whether the masses will follow Buhari in 2019 or not? He will be lonely in 2019, Alhaji Buba Galadima, a former Congress for Progressive Change (CPC) chief, screamed the other day. He will not; the masses will follow him, presidential aide Garba Shehu yelled back.

    Please, give us a break. Has Buhari thrown his hat in the ring already? Is he also part of the incredulous plot by some of his aides and associates to seize the political landscape as a vehicle to drive their ambitions?

    Didn’t the holy book speak of a time for everything? This is no time for politics. It is time for our leaders to exhibit the talents that they often claim – and they are acclaimed – to possess, pull the country out of this recession and deliver the good times they promised. Otherwise, we risk an unpleasant situation, a masses revolt (God forbid).

    Amid all this, Nigerians have refused to allow their sense of humour to die. The fecundity of their minds for imaginative jocularity is amazing. They have been cracking some morbid jokes about the recession.

    Consider this from a colleague of mine: “Warning! Warning! Any Nigerian trying to commit suicide must be rescued, arrested and prosecuted .We are all in this recession together. Nobody is going anywhere. We must salvage it together.”

    Yet another: “This recession is terrible o. People are now pricing electricity; a beg how much is half current?”

    There is also the picture of a man who bought a popular brand of sausage. He tore off the package and exposed the stuff, which  shows just a little piece of beef. He screamed: “Ah…recession!”   

    Among the masses, the question won’t just go away: where has all the money gone?

  • Yoruba and burden of history in the politics of Nigeria – 2

    In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the government of western Nigeria knew the importance of history in nation-building and therefore established the Yoruba historical scheme under the late Professor Saburi Biobaku, who was sometimes Registrar of University of Ibadan, Secretary to the Government of Western Nigeria, before becoming Vice Chancellor of the University of Lagos. Those involved in the Yoruba historical scheme included late Professors J.F. Ade Ajayi, Adeagbo Akinjogbin and others. Much has been done in researching the Yoruba past but more needs to be done. Unfortunately, the governments we have had since the military intervention in Nigeria in 1966 abandoned the study of history. It seems they were determined to build a future on an historical void. Or perhaps, they wanted to have no comparative yardstick against which their regimes could be judged. Thankfully the Buhari administration has in 2016 taken a decision to ensure that history is taught at all levels of education in Nigeria.

    The military regime’s apologia was anchored on the need to build a technological and scientific foundation for the future. They were ignorant of the fact that the most technologically advanced countries like the USA, China, Germany, Japan, Great Britain and France have scrupulously preserved their history in well-endowed galleries and museums, as well as funding continuous research into the past and compulsory historical education to build confidence in their people. Knowledge of a glorious past can provide a platform or springboard for take-off for the future. Technological innovation does not depend on the multitude of scientists a country produces, but the effort of a solitary researcher or a group of geniuses, making breakthroughs in inventions or producing knowledge which can be applied to solve problems or to dominate the environment.

    It is sad that most Nigerians know very little about their past and young people suffer from cultural disconnect, disorientation and disorder. Those of us who teach young people are worried that our language and culture are dying, and we may in the future have to seek foreign assistance as usual in solving problems that are within our reach. We need to restore the teaching of history and Yoruba language to all primary and secondary schools in all states in the Yoruba area. All schools including private schools must be involved.

    Ironically, history still plays a big part in Yoruba modern politics. The struggle for pre-eminence among Yoruba Obas in recent times is a variant of how history is alive in Yorubaland. The Oyo Yoruba up to the 19th century were the dominant power in Yorubaland. In fact the Ekiti, Ijesha, Akoko, Owu, Igbomina, Egba and Ife witnessed a period of Oyo overlordship in their parts of Yorubaland. For a long time, this past history of domination was resented and this played a significant role in their political association. This was particularly the case in the rural areas even though urbanisation to a certain extent undermined the hold of history on the people. The fact that the Yoruba people are the most urbanised people on the African continent is not unconnected with the desire to congregate in fortified and easily defensible communities, believing that there is safety in numbers during the incessant wars that lasted a century from about 1793 to 1893.

    When the British came and following their desire to practice the indirect rule system of colonial administration and control which had been hugely successful in the north, they looked for suzerainty comparable with the Sokoto Caliphate. They felt they found it in Oyo and its ruler and they tried to build a new Oyo Empire. They gave the Alaafin more power than he was traditionally used to. The Alaafin might have had power in the past; this was however limited and constrained by delicate checks and balances. Raising taxes in the name of the Alaafin in Oke Ogun in 1916 for example, precipitated rebellion which exposed the British lack of knowledge of the intricate and complex politics of Yorubaland. For long, the Alaafins of Oyo enjoyed primacy in Yorubaland, yet the same British consulted the Ooni when there were disputes about succession to the throne in some parts of Yorubaland.

    Throughout the period of British colonial rule in Nigeria, the British dealt with the Obas in in terms of their order of importance to the colonial administration. The Alaafin took the preeminent position as traditional head of the Oyo-speaking people which included Oyo itself, Oke Ogun, Ibadan, Ibarapa, Osun division including Osogbo, Ede, Iwo, Gbongan and larger part of Ife division (Origbo towns and villages). Important rulers of Ijebu, Egba, Ijesha/Ekiti which included Akure and Igbomina were prominently recognised. Bini was treated as a separate but related kingdom. Apart from their utility value, there was no attempt to rank them in any hierarchical order which would have brought them into conflict with traditional politics and history, because what was apparent was not necessarily real and the importance of a ruler was not directly related to the size and economy of its kingdom.

    For most part of colonial rule, the British ruled largely by force with little or no consultation with the Africans. This was not surprising as it was the nature of imperialism. The majority of Nigerian people were uneducated. The gentlemen of Lagos who had benefited from colonial education through access to mission schools in Lagos, the most important of which was CMS Grammar School founded in 1859 were few. When Sir Fredrick Lugard came to amalgamate the Northern and Southern protectorates and the colony of Lagos, he derided the Yoruba educated elite in Lagos as “trousered niggers” who sent their laundry every week to Bond Street in London for dry-cleaning. The antagonism between him and the educated elite was mutual because they accused him of what they called “rancorous negrophobism” and authoritarianism. The disconnect and chasm between the ruled and the ruler was unbridgeable.

    Events outside Nigeria, particularly the First and the Second World Wars, undermined the colonial regime and the so-called superiority of the white man, with the effect that Nigerians starting from the Yoruba of Lagos, began to demand in the beginning participation in government and later home rule. Nationalist awakening dates back in Yorubaland to the 1880s when Lagos people organised themselves to protest against water rate. Newspapers and broadsheets had proliferated Lagos agitating against one thing or the other. It was therefore not difficult for the educated elite of Lagos after the First World War to demand for self-determination, as was being applied to the subject nationalities of the dissolved Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires.

    Various political parties, the most important of which were the NNDP (Nigerian National Democratic Party) and the NYM (Nigerian Youth Movement), straddled the period 1919 and 1944 when the biggest and most vibrant nationalist movement-the NCNC (National Convention of Nigeria and the Cameroons) was formed in 1944 and headed by Herbert Macaulay, the grandson of Bishop Ajayi Crowther, the Yoruba boy from Oshoogun enslaved and later educated in Freetown and London before becoming the first black African bishop of the Niger CMS mission. Nnamdi Azikiwe, the American educated Igbo man was the secretary of this nascent political organisation. The Ibo State Union was formed the same year and later became a corporate body in the NCNC and began to play significant roles in the party. Obafemi Awolowo, in reaction to this formed the Egbe Omo Oduduwa in 1947 to rally the Yoruba and to protect their interest. This was in response to the Arthur Richards constitution which divided Nigeria into three regions: namely North with Kaduna as its capital, East with its capital in Enugu and West with Ibadan as its capital.

    Awolowo founded the Action Group in 1951, which immediately became the ruling party in the west after an indirect election based on limited franchise. He was later to become premier of the region and to run one of the most successful and forward looking governments in tropical Africa, until he resigned in 1959 with the hope of becoming the Prime Minister after the pre-independence election of 1959. Unfortunately for him this was not to be. His failure was to have ramifications not only for Yorubaland but the entire country. The prominent role of the Yoruba in the political life of Nigeria was second to none at least up to 1944, and this was because since 1886, there were Yoruba lawyers and doctors beginning with the Ijesha Sapara Williamses. Thus, it was natural for them to assume the role of leaders until the whole country began to come together into the mainstream of politics in the 1950s. But as it is commonly said, politics is first local before it becomes national. This was so in Yorubaland.

  •  Long Bridge

    When 38 years ago, the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway was commissioned by former Head of State Gen Olusegun Obasanjo many saw it as the answer to the chaotic traffic along that corridor. The road leads out of Lagos to other parts of the country beginning with the nearby Ogun State.

    When it was constructed in 1978 it ranked among the best, if not the best in Africa. It was our pride and commuters boasted then that you could make Ibadan in 45 minutes from Lagos, a journey that hitherto took hours.

    It took the coming of the then Wole Soyinka-led Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC) to restore sanity on the road. The FRSC saved many motorists from killing themselves on the road, with its strict enforcement of safety regulations.

    As the busiest road in the land, the FRSC is duty bound to patrol it regularly to ensure that motorists do not turn it into a killing field. Even though it has been hectic for FRSC to ensure that things go well on the road because of its deterioration over the years, the agency needs to do more to regain its glory of the Soyinka days.

    To put the road back in good condition, Julius Berger (JB) and Reynolds Construction Company (RCC) are working on it. Berger is working from the Sagamu Interchange to the Lagos end and RCC is in charge of the Sagamu Interchange to the Ibadan end. Since these companies started work on the road, motorists and commuters have not been finding things easy because of the attendant traffic.

    For about three weeks now, the road has been narrowed to one lane around the OPIC Plaza, causing traffic to stretch from that point to as far as Alausa, Ikeja secretariat and beyond, at times, most nights. On November 8, it took hours to move from the Otedola bridge to the Long Bridge. The Long Bridge, for those who know it, is not a friendly spot at any time of the day. It is what is known in underworld parlance as a black spot. It is a 5-kilometre bridge which motorists can drive through in five minutes. But if a motorist is stuck on it those five minutes can look like eternity because of the fear of the hoodlums lurking around the place. This is why the bridge is  more known for its danger, disaster, death and destruction.

    Motorists are suffering because Berger did not do what it should have done before embarking on the project.

    And what is this? It is the provision of an alternative route to reduce people’s  suffering on the road while the work is ongoing. What Berger and the government called alternative route while the firm was working on the other side of the road is a marshy red soil which is not motorable whenever it rains. Besides, it is a dangerous spot because of its proximity to criminals den. Those who commit crime on the Long Bridge are known to flee into the nearby  surrounding bushes. This is the route that they tagged alternative despite being aware of the inherent dangers in plying the road for motorists

    There is nowhere in the world that construction companies embark on a major work like this without providing an alternative route and such routes are always ready before the main job starts. But because Berger does not respect  Nigerian motorists, it did not take them into consideration in the equation of things.

    For all Berger cares, motorists could go to hell as long as it is working on the road. It is this lack of respect for the Nigerian people that is causing the chaos on the Long Bridge. What would it have cost Berger to work on the existing alternative route that passes through the front of the Nigerian Compass Complex and terminates at the tail of the bridge at Wawa? It knew it was going to work on that side of the road after completing what it was doing on the other side. Again, it did not care and nobody is asking the company questions. Before taking up this job, the appropriate thing would have been for the Federal Ministry of Works, FRSC, fire service, emergency management agencies and traffic management outfits in Lagos and Ogun states to meet to design a plan on how to ensure free flow of traffic during the road rehabilitation. Everybody felt unconcerned until confusion ensued last week following an accident, which led to a 15-hour gridlock on the road. It was a disaster waiting to happen and when it happened there was no answer to it because there was no contingency plan to take care of it. Must we always wait for disaster to happen before we act? There is no amount of trips from Abuja to Lagos by anybody that will solve such problems if we do not plan ahead.

    It is easy to blame motorists when such accidents happen because our leaders do not go through what we face in traffic, especially when a construction work, such as what Berger is doing on the Long Bridge, is going on. While we are sweating it out in traffic, praying for it to move so that we can get to our destinations in good time, they will zoom past in their convoys and even push us off the road in the process. Do they know how the people, who may have been in traffic for hours, feel when such happens? They do not because they do not feel the pulse of those they govern. On such occasions, the public heaps curses on them for being insensitive to its plight. To serve well, our leaders must come down from their high horse to the people’s level. If they had done that what happened on the Long Bridge last week would have been averted.

    The accident, which led to the gridlock, was said to have happened around 2.30am. My colleague, Bunmi Ogunmodede, and I drove past the accident scene around 4.30am, having slept in the office because of the previous night’s traffic. We thought when we leave in the morning the traffic would have eased, we were wrong. When we saw a stretch of vehicles as we approached the pedestrian bridge at Ojodu Berger, we knew something was wrong in front. Motorists were already taking one-way to beat the gridlock. We followed suit by reversing and crossing to the other side of the road. That was how we managed to get out of the logjam. If we had remained on our side of the road or waited in the office a bit longer for the day to break, we would have been caught in the 15-hour traffic lock down.

    That was early Wednesday, November 15. We got home but we could not make it back to work that day because of the gridlock. Friends and colleagues were calling and warning us against coming out because traffic was bad. Both sides of the road were jampacked up to Arepo and beyond. It was so bad;  man hours were wasted on the road just because our leaders did not make adequate plans to take care of such problem when it arises. So, it is convenient to blame it on motorists.  We say never again to such traffic disaster! But to achieve that, our leaders must learn from it and take concrete measures to prevent a recurrence. A country grows by learning from its mistakes and not by shifting the blame to the led.

  • Corruption: Beyond PDP and ‘Dazukigate’

    President Buhari’s resolve to do what he thinks is best for our country is not in doubt. Precisely because he genuinely believes if we don’t kill corruption, corruption will kill us, he is pursuing his war against corruption with unwavering resolve. It is just as well that the majority of Nigerians support the renewed crusade. He is not afraid to stand alone. If it had been otherwise, as he did during his first coming as head of a military junta when he was removed through a palace coup for refusing to listen to those who criticized his method of tarring with the same brush, politicians who spent government money to build s universities for their youths and those who spent their state money to establish private banks, as well as those who campaigned against the killing of drug pushers through retroactive decrees. Today it is most unlikely Buhari will sacrifice his goal for popularity or for a re-election in 2019.

    For  the first time in our nation’s history,  Generals who as ‘custodians’ of our constitution fraudulently claim ‘they sacrifice their present for our future’  have been shown to be nothing but soldiers of fortunes and are in court to defend their honour. Politicians who believe ‘stealing government fund is not corruption’ are having their days in court.   The Senate President has spent the greater part of the last 16 months in court over alleged false and anticipatory declaration of assets. His deputy has had a day in court over an alleged forgery of Senate rules.

    The judiciary is not spared.  Some judges of appeal and apex courts, the otherwise untouchables, have been shown to be men with feet of clay. The Buhari war on corruption is in full swing and anyone, friend or foe that stands on his path will be crushed.

    But corruption as Buhari has said several times is fighting back. That is not unexpected with some of those indicted by a House probe over the theft of N1.6 trillion through the fuel subsidy scam now pontificating about how to rebuild the economy and solve the country’s foreign exchange problems; with those who confiscated our national patrimony for next to nothing only to erect skyscrapers where rents are charged in dollars constituting the political class and with those who through ill-implemented privatization programme, confiscated $100b national investments for a paltry $1b and who after asset stripping now control critical sectors of the economy.

    But corruption is national malaise that defies party lines. With Buhari unable to move beyond ‘Dazukigate’ and PDP almost 16 months in control, most people thought the corruption war in spite of his resolve was doomed until what appeared a breakthrough in Fayose and Patience Jonathan’s alleged fraud cases last week. Long before Obanikoro’s recent confession that he indeed ferried about N1.3b to Fayose for the purpose of rigging election, Fayose had maintained donations for his re-election bid poured in from well wishers including Zenith Bank. (The bank has since denied making contribution). The anti-corruption body, according to a Punch newspaper report, has trailed Mrs. Moji Ladeji, Fayose’s sister to the UK over a N200m house located at 44 Osun Crescent, Maitama, Abuja, a highbrow area in the nation’s capital. The body also told us that Fayose’s house on Tiamiyu Savage Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, said to be worth about N1.1bn was the proceeds of kickback from government contractors – Samchese Nigeria Limited, Tender Branch Concept Nigeria Limited, Hoff Concept Limited and Calibre Consulting Limited

    In the case of Mrs. Jonathan, we were also told she probably owns the staggering $175m found in the account of Pluto Property and Investment Limited (PPIL), one of the four companies convicted by Justice Babs Kuewumi Abuja Federal High Court, on November 2 for laundering the sum of $15.5 million, which the former First Lady had claimed belong to her.

    While the chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof Itse Sagay, has said “some of the sections under the ICPC law, allow such amount to be forfeited to the state, if you found a sum of money like that and somebody claims it but cannot establish how he or she acquired it”, Mike Ozekhome has said that “Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution, presumes the innocence of a person accused of any criminal offence”, arguing that “It is the state or the accuser that should prove a crime beyond reasonable doubt”. Udenga Eradiri, of the Ijaw Youth Council (IYC) Worldwide has however added a new dimension by claiming just like Fayose that the bulk of the money under investigation was given to the ex-First Lady as a gift by her well-wishers and friends of her family by ‘virtue of her position as wife to former deputy governor, governor, Vice-President”. He went on to speak of persecution of the Jonathan family by those who are not happy with his rising profile.

    “There are other First Ladies in this country”, he concluded with a tint of sarcasm

    He is right. For instance Reuben Abati, the former senior media adviser to ex-President Jonathan in a piece titled “the Ikoyi Houses Scam in The Guardian on Sunday April 3, 2005 had wondered “how Mrs. Stella Obasanjo whose only known occupation is that of being the wife of President Obasanjo has managed to become so rich that she alone collected eight certificates of ownership of Ikoyi property for herself and on behalf of her relations?” (Obasanjo later cancelled the allocations).

    Similarly, in the celebrated case between  Mrs. Jonathan and Hajiya Turai Yar’Adua, her predecessor  over the disputed Plot 1347 at the Cadastral Zone A00, the  latter  as the Registered Trustee of Women and Youth Empowerment Foundation, WAYE told the court that her NGO   not only paid N184,529,438 as statutory Right of Occupancy  but that  N76,939,210 was also paid as building plan fees’ shortly after which it engaged a building company, Al-Cooks Nigeria Limited, to develop the property for N13, 516,013,797.58.  Turai, like Stella and Patience, were all housewives.

    But I think EFCC’s new approach based on information and intelligence gathering  as done in other democratic societies where the ‘Big Brother’ is always there to let the governed know they have no hiding place for anonymous  donors to questionable pet projects by those in government and their spouses, is a step in the right direction.  Developed democracies are nothing but George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four Stalinist state. The sinister vision of Orwell who had said after writing the satire “I do not believe that the kind of society I describe necessarily will arrive, but I believe that something resembling it could arrive” is today a reality in USA, Britain, Germany and other European nations where Big brother is watching everywhere and freedom is curtailed, not merely by physical force but by a complete denial of privacy and by the control of all information”.

    Government today is a science. Politicians, soldiers, judges in developed democracies are humans with the same human frailties like us. The only difference is that there is deterrence for breaking the law because theirs is an Orwellian state while we have chosen to live in Orwellian Animal farm. Beyond ‘Dazukigate and PDP, Buhari’s greatest legacy in the war on corruption besides equipping the anti-corruption agencies  with necessary skills will be by investing in other institutions needed to run a modern democratic state.

     

  • Death is still that undiscovered country…

    Death is still that undiscovered country that we shall all visit. In that country, everybody shall be stripped of titles and accumulated wealth. Nobody shall be referred to as “Your Excellency,” “OON, CON, GCON” “Africa’s richest billionaire” and so on. In that country, the truth of our follies and the septic belly of our idiocies shall become even more pronounced and visible to all. Those of us, the billionaires particularly, who send so-called “prayerfully powerful” Alfas on holy pilgrimage to Mecca to seek for Allah’s forgiveness and infinite mercies on their behalf shall realize that they had simply been foolish. No amount of prayers-by-proxy, sacrifices and so on, shall move Almighty Allah to forgive them and grant them eternal peace and paradise if their handiwork is tantamount to evil.

    They shall all die eventually. It wouldn’t matter if they are buried in Victoria Court Cemetery or Atan Cemetery; it wouldn’t matter if their remains are unrecoverable in the event of their demise in a ghastly accident or assassination. Immediately they pass on, they shall begin to pay for their handiwork like the rest of us. They shan’t escape the trials of the grave.

    No priest, highfaluting ceremony of absolution from ‘original sin,” redemption and so on shall ennoble the Christians among us with the “infinite grace” of Almighty God if they remain evil at heart. If they like, let them build as many gigantic Churches and temples as they like, let their offerings and tithe tower beyond the rafters and sky-high, it shall never make them pious before God. May it not make them pious before God.

    No priest or Alfa can intercede with God on our behalf. We shall all die: President, governor, first lady, special advisers, ministers, accountant, journalist, activist, dibias, babalawos and so on. And even our tiniest depravity shall be summoned to witness against us.

    Those who profess to be godly live like they answer to some blind, stupid, and partial god. Almighty Allah is not stupid, silly or blind. Jehovah is neither partial nor handicapped by greed for worship houses, outlandish sacrifices and exaggerated humility. Chineke, Eledumare is surely no perverted wimp that we could corrupt by wile and insincere tokens of sacrifice and worship.

    He will judge us all according to our handiwork. In the face of such imminent reality, it’s amusing to see the ruling class administer our lives like they are answerable to no one. It’s even more bizarre to see our youth lend themselves as willing tools to the antics and designs of the ruling class. Many a self-styled professor of truth and champion of the masses’ rights have become junkyard dog and dunghill mongrel for the same ruling class they used to criticize.

    Talk is cheap really and Nigerians love to talk a good game. That is why everyone: literate, semi-literate and illiterate, display flawless capacities to decipher and summarize the political and socio-economic problems afflicting Nigeria, just for the fun of it or the benefit of applause.

    Besides a few good men and real heroes who have staked their lives and personal comfort to protest the gross ineptitude and bestiality of the ruling class and the society at large, most of us have accepted to remain acquiescent. When we are criticized for being unacceptably docile, we respond that there is infinite wisdom in choosing our battles wisely and keeping our mouths shut.

    Nonetheless, we continue to mount the soapbox in our living rooms, around our dinner tables and in the ubiquitous ‘beer parlours’ criticizing our leaders, casting blames and justifying our pathetic and apologetic existence.

    The tragedy subsists in our customary lamentation about the state of the Nigerian nation; every time our conscience is roused with a damning report, as it is still customary of us, more racist politicians and activists suggest that we split and go our separate ways touting it as the only solution to our league of extraordinary problems.

    There is no wisdom in secession unless it serves to eliminate the same bogeys that make Nigeria a living hell for us. Secession, I maintain, is the fruit of ‘reason’ that we need to be wary of and I will continue to say this hoping every prospective muscle – that is, the youth – by which the separatists hope to achieve their dreams of dissolution, would listen and learn to let the secessionists risk their skins and their lineages to actualize their platitudes.

    Let every political godfather, public office hopeful and so on send their sons and wives and daughters on to the streets to wield cutlasses, guns and bombs. Let the ruling class recall their children from their Ivy League schools and exclusive mansions abroad to march on the streets and hack to death perceived oppositions to their political ambitions. Let every youth from humble background and the breadlines mobilize instead to collectively seek an end to the ruling class’ reign of terror.

    Violence and bloodshed is never the answer. Secession is never the answer to our woes.

    The biggest misconception about separation, insurgence, self-determination or whatever the separatists choose to call it is that it could be peaceful and that the end result would be a conscientious and citizenry-centred dispensation.

    It’s all dirty, greedy politics. The separatists want the youth to fly the flags of their dream nations, they want everybody to brandish a bumper sticker that bellows, “Death to the Federal Republic of Nigeria!” They call anyone that’s anti-war and anti-secession, “pacifist,” “traitor” or whatever colourful adjective suits their rage. Then they promise the youth a prosperous future and better fate under their dream nation. Consequently, youth that ought to know better buy into such farce and they all begin to dream and talk of the great uprising that would set them free from the living hell Nigeria has become.

    Even when we see through the promises of the separatists, we choose to ignore it for the love of paltry inducements and instant gratification. It’s about time the Nigerian youth started postponing immediate gratification and endure hard sacrifices spurred by conviction that the future can be better than the past.

    But we face a far more difficult problem at our moment in history. What do you promise youth who have been told they can have anything they want, who are repeatedly urged to seek the best of all possible circumstances without shedding sweat for it? How do you tell them that “the good times,” as they have known them or heard of them, will definitely come back?

    The Nigerian youth needs a new vision to help them deal with reality, a promising story of the future that helps them let go of the pains and disappointments of the past. We need a grand vision of possibilities that Nigerians may pursue and dream on: the country’s rich socio-cultural and political tradition, the right of all citizens to larger lives. Such dreams should never be about getting richer than the guy next door or accumulating obscene wealth for applause and to show off but the right to live life more fully and engage more expansively, the elemental possibilities of human existence.

    Sophistry and deceit are the springboards from which our civilization evolves. Add mediocrity, mindlessness and greed and you have a perfect representation of the contemporary youth. We were wrong to think it a matter of years and decades that we would improve in citizenship and tact. We forget that true citizenship essentially translates to being an emissary of truth, hope, superior culture and progress to the benefits of the literate and unschooled.

    It should above all be the appendage of that fine adjustment between reality and the growing knowledge of life – an adjustment which discovers the secret of civilization and the solution to its seemingly intractable problems. Insanely, to this end, we apply bigotry in politics and religion. Thus by every manner of faith we commit the worst of inhuman transgressions – like terrorism and mass murder, inordinate acquisition of wealth and acclaim.

  • Yoruba and burden of history in the politics of Nigeria – 1

    The Yoruba numbers about 40 million people located in Nigeria in the following states: Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Kwara, Osun, Ondo, Ekiti, Kogi, Edo and Delta (not just the Itshekiri of Warri but the Olukumi of Oshimili LGA). They are also in Benin and Togo Republics and their descendants are found in Brazil, other countries in South America Cuba, Trinidad, Tobago and other Caribbean Islands as well as in Sierra Leone. Their culture has survived in the Yoruba diaspora perhaps because of their late coming into the trans-atlantic slave trade, following the collapse of the Oyo Empire towards the end of the 18th century, or because of the strength of the Yoruba culture particularly their religion, which is widely practiced in the Caribbean and South America even by people of European descent.

    The Yoruba claim Oduduwa/Olofin as their eponymous ancestor. Oduduwa is variously said to have descended from heaven and landed in Ile-Ife. Other variant, more sensible and credible myth of the Oduduwa story says he came from the East, Baghdad or somewhere in Arabia. He is said to have been the son of Lamurudu (Nimrod) who left his homeland following dispute over religious worship and succession to the throne.

    These are myths and myth is not the subject of history. What we can deduce from the myth is that a people of advanced civilisation with working knowledge of iron, displaced possibly Stone Age people living in Ile-Ife, seized the throne and dominated the people. From Ile-Ife, sons of Oduduwa fanned out to found new kingdoms or to overthrow existing rulers in Yorubaland, Bini and related peoples like the Aja and Ga of present day Benin and Ghana republics respectively. This has led to the fact that many rulers in Yorubaland claim descent from Oduduwa. The pre-existing rulers became shadowy kings and priests ministering to the new Oduduwa descendants. We know from the study of archaeology, that Meroe in the present day Sudan was the centre of the diffusion of iron technology to Africa, and perhaps these myths of origin of West African rulers may well be referring to the coming of those who knew how to make iron implements for agriculture and for offense and defence.

    The Bayijjidah legend of the Hausa also possibly refers to the same phenomenon of outsiders serving as change agents in Africa’s ancient history. The myth of Oduduwa as the progenitor of the rulers of yorubaland is however not universally subscribed to by all Yoruba people. Awujale, the paramount ruler of the Ijebu people, claim their people came from Waddai which is in present day Chad but was part of the Kanuri dominated Kanem-Borno Empire. This is not as fanciful as it may appear because there is an extant myth among the Kanuri, who say the Yoruba are their cousins who because of their love of money left for the coast in search of the Golden Fleece. Might this myth be referring to the Ijebu who with the Ijesha share the same facial marks with the Kanuri? We know of a certainty that the dynasty in Benin is descended from Oduduwa through his grandson Oranmiyan.

    The story is well known and it suffices to say that the Benin people sent to Ile-Ife for a ruler, after having gotten rid of their Ogiso kings and finding republicanism unworkable. Ife obliged them and sent the youngest of the grandsons of Oduduwa. After a while, Oranmiyan fathered a son Eweka but left Benin disillusioned that his subjects were too difficult to control and returned to Ile-Ife. From Ile-Ife, he proceeded to Oyo to establish a new kingdom. In this way, the great kingdoms of Ife, Bini and Oyo that were to play important roles in the history of West Africa were historically linked. The Bini now claim that in fact Oduduwa was a Bini prince who was expelled from Bini, got lost in the bush and later found his way to Ile-Ife and because of his knowledge of herbal medicine was made King by the Ife people. Oranmiyan therefore was more or less their grandson who returned home. This interpretation sounds rather convenient. The reason for this new revisionism in Bini is the assertion of independence and non-subservience to a foreign ruler in the past. What is however important up till today is that the cult/court language in the Bini palace is some kind of old Yoruba and the standard greetings in the palace is “How goes Ife (Uhe)”? The mystery surrounding Ife was further complicated by the late Professor Ade Obayemi, a distinguished Professor of Archaeology, when he said the present Ife may not have been the Ife of historical antiquity. He said he had identified seven existing Ifes and that the Ife of antiquity may well be near the rivers Niger and Benue confluence.

    Furthermore and in recent times, the hilly town of Idanre in Ondo state, but which its people call IFEOKE, claims it is the original Ife and that their Oba is acknowledged by the Bini as an elder to Oranmiyan, the founder of their dynasty and they have ancient artefacts to support their claim. Usen which play a prominent role in the coronation of the Obas of Benin share identical dialect with Idanre which further shows that there is a need to examine the role of Idanre (Ireke) in Ife-Benin relation in the past. Professor Alan Ryder in his book Benin and the Europeans, using mostly Portuguese sources claimed that when the Portuguese came to Benin in the 15th century, they were told Benin paid homage to the “Oghene Luhe” North east of Benin. This he felt might be in the same direction suggested by Obayemi. Of course, the Portuguese may not have reported correctly what they were told. Ife Olukotun, located near the area suggested has not yielded any artefacts that could be dated older than those found in Ife that were produced between the ninth and the twelfth centuries. The moat around Ile-Ife, even though most of it has disappeared and the various ancient artefacts found there suggest that the present Ife is the Ife of antiquity. There is much that we do not know and there is room for serious research, because a serious question of the provenance of the founder of ancient Yoruba kingdoms is too important to leave to guess work.

    I want to emphasise that the history of dynasties should not be confused with the history of peoples. For example, we all know that the current Hanoverian dynasty in England is from Germany yet this does not mean English people are descended from Germans. Although, I know that the Saxons, a Germanic tribe, had with the angles over run the Celtic people of England in historic times. Oduduwa may be the ancestor of the rulers of Yoruba kingdoms; it does not mean Oduduwa is the ancestor of all Yoruba people. There were people in Ile-Ife and Yorubaland before the coming of Oduduwa. This is why we have chieftaincies like Obalufe, Obatala, which apparently preceded the coming of Oduduwa. Recent disputes in several kingdoms in Akure, Ekiti land and Akoko where there exists two “Kings” in one kingdom, one active, the other passive until recent times, indicate there were autochthonous people in yorubaland before the coming of the Oduduwa party. The struggle between Olukere and Ogoga, Alakure and Deji, Owa Ale and Olukare and to a certain extent Odio and Ewi and the struggle between the Oba of Benin and a chief Ogiamien claiming his ancestors were the rulers of the kingdom before Oranmiyan, are manifestations of the fact that there were not only people but rulers who have now been eclipsed and displaced by much more formidable new comers.

  • Trump’s election: Nigerians need caution

    Ever since Donald Trump won the United States presidential election, most Nigerian commentators have gone out to paint an incendiary picture of him. Most are raising fears about the kind of government he is likely to give to this most powerful country in the world. Most raise fears, in particular, about the probable impact of his immigration policies on the millions of Nigerians now resident in the United States, and even on Nigeria itself at home.

    Of course, most of these negative responses to him by Nigerians are justified. The ideas he has ventilated in the past many months about further immigration into America, about “undocumented immigrants” already in America, about the very large number of Nigerian immigrants in America, about further Nigerian immigration into America, and even about Nigeria as a country, are alarming. All over Nigeria now, many families who have members in America are fearfully wondering what will happen to their people at the hands of a Trump presidency.

    Still, I think that we Nigerians need to handle the situation with caution. It is possible that we Nigerians could generate among us at home and abroad such intense hostility towards Donald Trump and a Trump presidency that the Trump presidency’s policy makers may come to feel the need to focus specially on Nigerians.

    It is not that I am afraid for most Nigerians resident in America. Until I returned home to Nigeria about a year ago, I had lived for nearly 25 years continuously as a professor in America, and among the students I taught and mentored (at undergraduate and graduate levels), I can count thousands of Nigerians. I know for sure that most Nigerians in America are there legally. It has never been really easy for Nigerians to enter America illegally, or to reside in America illegally – far less easy than for persons from Mexico and other Latin American countries, and even persons from countries of the Middle East and Asia.  Many Nigerians do come legally to America with visas that allow them to come for short visits only, or for few years as students in American colleges and universities. Many of these usually leave at the expiration of their visas or at the end of their studies. The few among these who decide to stay are typically diligent about pursuing legal permission to stay – and many of these may even become, legally, citizens of America. In short, it is not easy to find a Nigerian who is truly illegally residing in America. An overwhelming majority of Nigerians who reside in America are residing there legally. And if a person is in America legally, there is nothing that American officials, or the American legal system, can do to their residence – especially if they do not involve themselves in crimes.

    And I also know that Nigerian residents in America are, on the aggregate, among the most law-abiding people in America. I am not saying that no Nigerians in America have crime records there or that none of them gets involved in crimes. Every human group in the world has its own crop of criminally inclined and criminally active members. But it is my assessment, based on very close and long contacts and observations in the Nigeria community in various parts of America, that the criminally inclined and criminally active tend to be fewer among Nigerians in America than one would find among most non-Nigerian groups in that country. On some occasions, we hear some hoopla about “Nigerian crime rings”, but I insist that, even with these, Nigerian youths in America are among the most serious students and hardest workers in that country, and are significantly less likely to lapse into a life of crime. Most Nigerian students come without any scholarship from home, and without sufficient, or any, financial support by parents. But almost all come with a peculiarly Nigerian resolve to succeed, and almost all succeed in the American educational system. Many earn scholarships with their high quality performances in their studies; most scrub floors and do other menial jobs to make their ways through colleges and universities. On the whole, Nigerian youths in America make older Nigerians like me proud, and deserve to be thought of with pride by their parents and their country.

    About three years ago, a department of the American government – the United States National Census Bureau – published the information that Nigerians are the most educated national group in America – more educated than any other immigrant group from any other part of the world, and more educated than even Americans themselves, indeed the most educated group of immigrants in all the history of the United States. The publication added the further detail that in the typical Nigerian family in the United States, the father and mother commonly come with a university degree from their country, that the father (and often the mother) then acquires a postgraduate degree (Masters or Ph.D.), and that their older children are typically enrolled in colleges or universities studying for first degrees or postgraduate degrees. Those who come younger (with school leaving certificates) almost always go on to obtain first degrees, and then higher degrees.

    The result of this is that Nigerians are very formidably included in all aspects of America’s economy and society. Of the thousands of universities in America, there is hardly any one without some Nigerian professors. There are countless Nigerians serving in very high levels of the American government and civil service, in all branches of the American military, in top positions in the American health services, research establishments, elementary schools and secondary schools, the professions, businesses, security services, state governments, local governments, etc.

    Nigerians in America are therefore not as vulnerable as candidate Trump may have imagined during his electioneering campaign – and definitely not as vulnerable as we Nigerians at home seem to fear.   And therefore we Nigerians do not need to be trembling about the coming of a Trump presidency. We do not need all the hostile rhetoric we have been spewing at him. We must stop acting as we are sure that our people living in America are among the most vulnerable people in that country. They are not.

    Very importantly too, we must not appear to be set on a venture of disrespecting the American people. Whatever any of us may think of Donald Trump, he is the man whom the American people have chosen to be their president, and we ought to respect the American people. The president of Nigeria has joined the leaders of other countries of the world to congratulate President-elect Donald Trump, and it is, I suggest, time for us to wish him well, wish our people in America well under his presidency, and wish the great country of America well.

    Finally, here is an insight that may help us a little in assessing the surprising impact of Donald Trump over America at this time. During my decades of residence in America, one political development had gradually been observable in the politics of America – namely, that the politicians had gradually become unpopular with the masses of the common people. This was caused mostly by the fact that the leading politicians had become increasingly incapable of compromise among them, with the result that importantly needed decisions and changes were becoming impossible to arrive at. This reached a sort of peak under President Obama. At the beginning of the Obama presidency, some Republican officials even said explicitly that they intended to see to it that Obama would achieve nothing worthwhile. President Obama responded by significantly rejecting compromise too; and quite often, over difficult issues, he seemed to prefer to go on the road campaigning to the masses of his supporters rather than painstakingly working for compromise with his opponents in Washington DC. The stock of politicians fell sharply. Donald Trump’s initial attraction among some of the masses of Americans was that he was not one of the politicians. As he found this to be a bigger asset than he had first thought, he and his handlers used it more and more – and he said a whole lot of stuff that was far out. Well, it won him the election.

    But can he – can any American president – do some of the wilder things that he has indicated? I doubt it. Most of my friends and colleagues in the American intellectual community doubt it. America is a very solid entity with very solid political traditions. It is very unlikely that President Trump will be able to rock the boat as violently as some of his youthful supporters may expect. Many of the things we fear today concerning him are not likely to materialize. But we shall see.

  • America, their America

    He was the outsider in the race. Even in his wildest imagination, Donald John Trump never thought he would be elected president of the United States (US).  But in the wee hours of last Wednesday, the unexpected happened, the underdog upset the apple cart, shattering all polls that gave the election to Hillary Clinton. The outcome of the election was shocking and benumbing. Many across the globe are yet to get over it more than one week after the exercise. Many Americans are still wondering what hit them – a President Trump – is that who we really voted for?

    It seemed it never crossed their minds that election is a two-edged sword which cuts both ways. In such an uncertain race, anything can happen. The front-runner may become the loser and the underdog may become the winner. Elections are nobody’s race. The polls may give the race to a person perceived as the strongest among the contestants but that does not mean that he/she will win until it is all over.

    Trump did not enter the race as a serious contender. Politically, he was and is still a nobody. He came out of nowhere to give the presidency a shot, counting on his wealth to see him through since his fellow rich were not ready to identify with him. He was a political liability not worth doing business with. He knew his limitations but he did not allow these shortcomings to weigh him down. His limitations, which the Hillary Clinton camp hammered on, eventually helped him to win.

    Trump may have joined the race for the fun of it, but after emerging victorious, he must know that it is time for serious business. One thing he had going for him was saying it as it is. He was not afraid to say his mind and what he said resonated with Americans, especially those who felt that the so-called Washington establishment to which the Clintons are associated, had failed them. These people described as the white working class are not happy with the way things are in their country. They are demanding more inclusiveness in the affairs of their country, which they feel is in wrong hands.

    This class sees President Barack Obama as a settler who has been lording it over the country’s true owners in the past eight years. They would rather score Obama low than hail him for running a damn good presidency.  America was built by the blood of immigrants who these whites see as settlers. The country is still being developed by the blood of naturalised immigrants whose forebears toiled day and night to lay a solid foundation for a great nation. If the children of these hewers of wood and drawers of water cannot today lay claim to America as their country then something must be wrong with the so-called greatest country on earth. Not all that glitters is gold. America may have all it takes to be a great country, but it has not overcome its racist tendencies over 240 years after its independence.

    Trump knows his countrymen inside out. This is why  he played on these divisive tendencies to ride to the presidency. Having won the election, he has to win the confidence of his countrymen by showing that he has what it takes to run the country. The cards are stacked against him because many people worldwide doubt his capability. More discernible Americans are yet to believe what has befallen them. President-elect Trump! They are still in a daze. President-elect Trump!! They did not bargain for that. If the hands of the clock can be turned back, many Americans will want the election repeated so that they can pick the person that fits their choice. Do we then say that those who voted for Trump made the wrong choice? Yes and no.

    Yes, because many voted out of anger against a system, which they perceived has for long shut them out. They did not vote for capability, qualification and experience. They voted for racism, segregation and injustice, which are all the issues Trump expounded during his campaign. No, because they exercised their rights to vote for the person of their choice, regardless of whether he is incompetent and inexperienced. They believe they chose the person who made more sense to them – the man who promised to ‘’Make America Great Again’’. All they want is the return of their country. But, was their country ever taken from them? The Blacks, the Latinos, the Spaniards, the Jews, the Irish, the Filipinos, the Mexicans never stole America from the natives. Rather, they are contributing to its growth.

    America is what it is today because of its diversity. Some people like Trump may not be happy about that but that is the way the country attained its greatness. America may have reached a stage where it thinks it no longer needs these people but it cannot wish away the fact that without them and their forebears it may not be where it is today. Trump has his job cut out for him as the US’ incoming 45th president and that is to build on the gains made by his predecessors and not to do anything to split the country. If America splits, the consequences will be great for the world. Some people may say that will never happen, but they should know that there is nothing new under the sun. Great countries and empires fell in the past (where is the Roman Empire?) but the world is still standing today despite their death.

    It is the cataclysmic effect of the fall of America that bothers me because the world revolves around it. This is why when it sneezes, the world catches cold. Trump has a powerful nation to manage and the earlier he wakes up to the reality of the enormity of this task the better for him and the world. The critical American media has tried to guide him  to the right path before he assumes office on January 20, next year. Despite being shocked by his election, the media has asked him to put the country first in whatever he does. In its editorial on November 9, the New York Times said : ‘’So, who is the man who will be the 45th president? After a year and a half of erratic tweets and rambling speeches, we cannot be certain. We don’t know how Mr Trump would carry out basic functions of the executive. We don’t know what financial conflicts he might have since he never released his tax returns…we don’t know if he has the capacity to focus on any issue and arrive at a rational conclusion.

    ‘’We don’t know if he has any idea of what it means to control the largest nuclear arsenal in the world. Here is what we know. We know Mr Trump is the most unprepared president-elect in modern history. We know that by words and actions, he has shown himself to be temperamentally unfit to lead a diverse nation of 320 million people…we know he lies without compunction… misogyny and racism played their part in his rise, but so did a fierce and even heedless desire for change. That change has now placed the US on a precipice.’’

    The Washington Post was no less scathing in its editorial. ‘’Donald Trump’’, it began, ‘’was elected the 45th president of the US on Tuesday. Those are words we hoped never to write…all Americans must accept the voters’ judgment and work for the best possible outcome for our country and the world. We have every wish that he will understand that the US system of government is not for or about one person…the powers of the Oval Office do not exist to punish his enemies…Americans are not and have never been united by blood or creed, but by allegiance to a democratic system of government that shares power, cherishes the rule of law and respects the dignity of individuals. We hope our newly elected president will show respect for that system…’’

    As the world awaits the inauguration of President Donald Trump, we cannot but wish that he will bring to this high office the high sense of responsibility that it deserves. The American presidency is too big for him to toy with or to turn into a platform to abuse women and others he perceives as his enemy.  Americans pride themselves in having institutions that can check any president, no matter how cantankerous he may be. The world is waiting to see how these institutions will work under President Trump. For America, this may yet be its greatest democratic test in its 240 years of nationhood.

     

    Life so precious

    CHILDREN, we are told, are an heritage of the Lord. They light up our environment, but whenever they become ill everywhere becomes gloomy. No one prays for a sick child. But as humans, once in a while such things happen. Anuoluwapo, we call her Anu, is a precious little girl. Going to two, Anu fell ill last weekend and could not attend church on Sunday. On Monday, she was taken to a health centre where she was treated and discharged. In the night, her condition worsened and she was taken to Igando General Hospital. The doctor said there was no bed and referred her to Ikeja General Hospital, where they were told the same story and directed to the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH) without a referral letter. By then, it was about 11pm and all this while, my spiritual father, Rev Biodun Okunade (JP), had been trying to get me on phone. I did not know anything until I got home past midnight and was informed by my wife that our reverend had been calling me. I quickly called him and he told me what has been happening. Under what circumstances can general hospitals reject a patient who is at the point of death? Is it proper to reject such patients under the flimsy ground of ‘no bed’? If Anu were to be the doctors’ daughter would they have rejected her in such a critical condition? Thank God Anu is now recuperating in a private hospital. I dread to think what might have happened if the private hospital had not admitted her. May the mercy of God forever be upon her.