Category: Thursday

  • Nigeria in the Afghan mirror

    Nigeria in the Afghan mirror

    Democracy in Afghanistan was unarmoured, an artifact of aggressive forging.

    While it lasted, it floundered nebulously against the furnace of insurgent Taliban. Yet it was an ideal to live for.

    Supervised by the United States’ military might, bolstered by NATO, its stratagem resonated themes found all over the world, a conflict between definitiveness and dissolution of state.

    Refuting it was deemed suicidal and redolent of the Taliban’s oppressive instincts and wild inclinations to propel Afghanistan to self-destruct. Accepting it, however, portended dangerous freedom. That barbaric power spuriously wished away in a hail of allied offensive and defensive military campaign has stirred into a beast, plunging Afghanistan into dystopic hell. The beast now waits in every glade, returned to its wild perch in nature.

    Afghanistan is back in hell’s kitchen, perhaps. The country’s capital, Kabul, fell on August 15, 2021, to the Taliban forces whose leadership assumed de facto control over most of the country and subsequently pronounced the country as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

    Prior to the Taliban takeover, the government, consisted of the cabinet of ministers, provincial governors, and the national assembly, with President  Ashraf Ghani serving as the head of government and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. Ghani, who was backed by two vice presidents, Amrullah Saleh and Sarwar Danish until Ghani fled to Uzbekistan as the Taliban took over the capital.

    Read Also: Five quick facts about Afghanistan

    In the last decade, Afghan politics have been influenced by the U.S. and other NATO countries, in an effort to stabilise and democratise the country. In 2004, the nation’s new constitution was adopted and an executive president was elected. The following year a general election to choose parliamentarians took place.

    Hamid Karzai was declared the first-ever democratically elected head of state in Afghanistan in 2004, winning a controversial second five-year term in 2009. The National Assembly was Afghanistan’s national legislature. It was a bicameral body, composed of the House of the People and the House of Elders. The first legislature was elected in 2005 and the most recent one in 2018. Members of the Supreme Court were appointed by the president to form the judiciary. Together, this system served to provide a set of checks and balances.

    Despite this massive investment in stabilising the country, it fell to the bullets of the Taliban.

    The U.S. President Joe Biden, probably summed up the ugly truth in his claim that there would never be a right time or less messy circumstance for America to quit Afghanistan.

    He condemned Afghanistan’s elected leaders and military for yielding so cheaply to the Taliban, stressing that they squandered the time and money America spent to assist their security forces.

    He said, “We gave them every tool they could need…We gave them every chance to determine their own future. What we could not provide them, was the will to fight for that future.”

    Biden said it was “wrong” to put Americans in harm’s way to do a job that Afghanistan wouldn’t do itself. “I am president of the United States of America, and the buck stops with me,” he said. “I’m deeply saddened by the facts we now face, but I do not regret my decision to end America’s war-fighting in Afghanistan.”

    Lesson learnt. The United States’ hasty desertion of Afghanistan after 20 years of carnage and war with the Taliban offers timeless lessons. It’s instructive that the country lost the war despite its supposed backing by America and NATO’s military intelligence and might.

    In recent weeks, the Taliban advanced across the north of the country, claiming possession of over two dozen districts against feeble resistance by a severely demoralised Afghan army and police.

    The nation’s armed forces retreated to fight on the outskirts of key cities such as Kandahar and Mazar-e-Sharif. Senior U.S. officials have warned of a civil war, in the wake of a forecast of the complete collapse of the Afghan government within a year – which the United States had worked to strengthen for two decades.

    Would Nigeria learn from Afghanistan? It’s about time we understood that nobody could love our country more than we do. Joe Biden could never love Nigeria more than Muhammadu Buhari. The U.S. president, like his predecessors, sees Nigeria as a mere tool for preserving his country’s enlightened self-interest. It’s as simple as that.

    No foreign media would ever aspire to utmost social responsibility in reporting Nigeria; that is a role best served by patriotic segments of the local press.

    Thus journalists and civil societies, in particular, must desist henceforth from inflaming the polity via incendiary statements and reports. The lust for NGO patronage should never incite them to mortgage national interests for hard currency – whatever the slant of their greed and their sponsors’ professed intent.

    Social media, in particular, has become a major source of warmongering for separatists and fake news aficionados; in truth, they are all terrorists. Those who spread fake news in bid to incite carnage and hatred against any individual, tribe, social or religious group must be prosecuted as terrorists. We do not need another civil war. We must not give the doomsayers the opportunity to gloat; since their prediction of Nigeria’s collapse by 2015 failed, they had been left smarting in shame and earnestly committed to Nigeria’s death-watch.

    It’s about time we learned from Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and victims of the obscenely romanticised Arab Spring. Neither America nor Europe must be blamed for our inclinations to self-destruct.

    Carter Malkasian, author of The American War in Afghanistan: A History, served as a civilian advisor in Iraq and Afghanistan; according to him, throughout his travels with U.S. military commanders around Afghanistan, he saw numerically superior and better-supplied soldiers and police suffer incessant defeats by poorly resourced and unexceptionally led Taliban.

    While the U.S. and Afghan forces fought for hegemony and money respectively, the Taliban soldiers were inspired by faith and a divine nirvana. They were united in belief and purpose as they fought to thwart a common enemy: the American soldiers of occupation and their Afghan enablers.

    May we not face a similar threat from Boko Haram, ISWAP, armed bandits, and spurious separatist groups.

    Corruption was part of Afghanistan’s problem. The military and police suffered as their commanders and government officials pocketed their pay, hoarded ammunition, and sabotaged the counterinsurgency operations.

    Predictably, the soldiers and police refused to lay their lives on the line for corrupt leadership. In a stunning rout, the Taliban seized nearly all of Afghanistan in one week, despite the billions of dollars spent by the U.S. and NATO over nearly 20 years to bolster Afghan security forces.

    In a Monday footage identifiable as one of the defining images of the Taliban takeover, Afghans clung to the side of a departing U.S. military jet as it rolled down the tarmac on Monday. Some of them fell to their death as the aircraft gained altitude, according to agency reports.

    The U.S. authorities estimated that at least seven people died during the chaotic evacuation at the airport, including several who fell from the military jet.

    The Afghan nightmare evidently mirrors the Nigerian situation. Thus we must scorn poisonous interventions by countries whose major interest is to abolish our sovereignty, plunder our resources, and strip us bare to devious elements.

  • In cold blood

    In cold blood

    BEFORE Plateau lost its lustre, it was the home of peace and hospitality. Its serenity and quietude were second to none. It was the place to be and many rushed there to work, to play, to rest and to catch fun generally. To be on the Plateau was to be at home and at peace with oneself.

    Now, all that is gone. Plateau State, especially Jos, its capital, famed for its cool weather, has turned to a hotbed of violence. Jos is now referred to in the past tense.There was a Jos, we are told, where people from different walks of life lived together like a family. No one bothered about where the other came from. They all saw themselves as one big Nigerian family. This was in the 60s, 70s and 80s.

    Things changed about 11, 12 years ago when brothers started turning on brothers. It suddenly dawned on this hitherto one big family that they had been living among enemies. Who are these enemies? Painfully, they are the same people who used to share things together,  eat together, play together and go out together. Even if they are not of the same faith, they gave out food to one another during their respective religious festivals. This is not only the sad story of  Plateau today, but also of many other parts of the country where our Nigerianness, if I may use that word, no longer counts.

    These days, we see ourselves more in the light of our state of origin and our religion. Nobody should blame it on Boko Haram. These signs of divisiveness were already manifesting before Boko Haram came on the scene and added fuel to the fire. When people started killing themselves and torching others’ properties on the Plateau, Boko Haram had not become so set in its ways as it is today. The Plateau problem did not start with Boko Haram, but it will not be entirely correct to say that the sect’s coming has not compounded the crisis.

    Whatever happens on the Plateau these days has either  the Boko Haram or the herder-farmer imprint. The latter seems to be more the case than the former. What happened on Rukuba Road on Saturday has this colouring. Some farmers were said to have been killed at Irigwe, a community around Rukuba Road, about two weeks ago. In the course of their funeral on Saturday, the mourners descended on scores of passengers returning from a religious programme in the neighbouring Bauchi State and killed 23 of them. Just like that! Human lives have become so cheap that people are cut down at will without the perpetrators batting an eyelid.

    What happened at Irigwe is despicable and condemnable. For too long, such dastardly acts have been carried out, without the perpetrators being brought to justice. What we usually get are statements from the central and state governments deploring those acts. We have never heard of people being brought to book to answer for the crime. So, why will the perpetrators not continue? It is unfortunate that the government does not see the clear and present danger in these dastardly acts. If it does, it will not be treating the perpetrators with kid gloves. How can a bunch of youths, no matter how aggrieved they are, kill 23 persons and be allowed to go scot free?

    Nigeria is a nation of laws and whoever breaches those laws should go in for it. The Irigwe youths have murdered sleep and they should, like Macbeth, in Shakespeare’s tragi-comedy play, Twelfth Night, know no sleep. He who kills, so says our laws, should be killed if found guilty during his trial. These dastardly killings must stop. The only way to stop them is to bring perpetrators to book and not by issuing statements dripping with ethnic and religious sentiments.

    Certain portions of the Presidency’s statement on the killings issued by Garba Shehu are in bad taste. There are certain things that should not be said by the government in order not to portray it as biased in certain matters. There was no need for these aspects of that statement: “This is rather a direct, brazen and wickedly motivated attack on members of a community exercising their rights to travel freely and to follow the faith of their choosing. With the evident preparedness of their attackers, it is clear that this was a well-conceived and pre-arranged assault on a known target, location and religious persuasion of the travellers, not an opportunist ambush”.

    Haha! Since the government knew this, is it not better to turn it over to the police so as to aid their investigation rather than put it in a press release? When the government talks like this, it opens itself to accusations of ethnic and religious bias. Whereas, government is supposed to be for all and not for only some people from a certain part of the country.

    This also goes for a section of the press, which reported the killings as if one region of the country was at war with the other. At times like this, we, especially in government and the media, must be extremely careful and avoid anything that will set the country on fire. In words and deeds, we must lead the way and show our compatriots that we are better off together than divided. We should not allow Afghanistan to happen here. The killing of any person, no matter where they come from, should be condemned and everything done to bring the perpetrators to justice. Those assailants must not go scot free. Bringing them to book is the duty we owe those killed.

     

    Afghanistanism

     

    In the eighties and early nineties, one word (who coined it?) that was popular in the media was Afghanistanism. It was deployed to taunt writers, who went on a voyage of discovery rather than comment on what was happening in Nigeria for fear of being arrested. So, it was better to play Afghanistanism and pretend that all was well in our own country, even when they were not.

    The age-long crisis in Afghanistan reached a climax on Sunday, with the Taliban overrunning the capital, Kabul. The Taliban took over, following the withdrawal of American troops after a 20-year sojourn in the country. President Ashraf Ghani has since fled the country, with the citizens too, where they can, trooping to neighbouring nations, in droves.

    Some fell off American planes which they clinged to in their desperation to flee the country and died. What is happening there has implications for our country. How prepared are we for the fall-out from the fall of Afghanistan? These are no longer days of Afghanistanism, but of telling truth to power, no matter how hurtful.

  • The fire next time

    The fire next time

    James Baldwin, a black American essayist published under the title “ The fire next time” two previous essays namely “Letter from a Region of my mind” and “My Dungeon Shook” in 1963 the year when American black people and their sympathizers marched on Washington DC to demand civil rights ordinarily granted other Americans and this was when Martin Luther King jnr. made his famous speech – “ I have a dream “ where he pleaded that he had hopes of a future when his grandchildren will no longer be judged by the colour of their skin but by their character. The title “The fire next time “is from a negro spiritual about how God promised never to destroy the earth by water again after the great flood, but by fire.

    This title is appropriate for the UN report on the future of the Earth which the Secretary General said was a “Red warning” of the impending destruction of the earth because of human abuse dating back to the time of the industrial revolution when greenhouse gasses  began to be emitted on to the global environment without ceasing until now when it is becoming almost an impossible task to take abatement measures to reverse what seems to be global environmental suicide and the end of this common patrimony of mankind damaged by human greed and carelessness. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s latest release paints a very dire picture of the condition of the global climate. The UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres describes the findings as “Code red for humanity”. The report clearly states that after a decade of collaborative work by hundreds of the best global scientists including meteorologists, geographers, climatologists, astrophysicists, computer scientists, marine biologists  environmental scientists and other such relevant scientists have come to the conclusion that unless serious mitigation measures such as radically cutting back  of greenhouse gasses’ emissions and reducing global warming by several percentage points so as to bring the global temperatures rise not above 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels from the present prevailing rate of warming well over this figure, the world will self-destruct. This report could not have come at a better time. There is unusual flooding in continental Europe, China, the Americas and Australia at the same time of raging wild fires in the western half of the United States and Canada, and in several countries in Europe particularly in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balkans with whole Islands in Greece and Turkey burnt down completely.  These fires virtually wiped-out flora and fauna in several Australian states in 2019/2020. What is more worrisome is the burning of more than a million hectares of virgin forests in the Arctic areas of Russia and American Alaska and the Northern territories of Canada. These fires in the Arctic are melting Arctic glaciers thus releasing huge volumes of water leading to sea rise which could possibly threaten coastal cities like our own Lagos, London, Miami, New York, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Rome, Paris and many great cities all over the world. Accompanying all these fires is the unbelievably high temperatures all over the world as well as the unseasonably heavy rainfalls in many parts of the world. These abnormal weather patterns are the result of the global climatic change.

    Some politicians like the former US President Donald J. Trump dismissed the scare of climate change as part of liberal posturing of several politicians in the West driven by more enthusiasm than wisdom in the face of galloping growth of the China’s economy their competitor where politicians are not bound by unrealistic laws about the protection of the environment. Trump may be right in his ignorance.

    The challenge is not to join China in polluting the earth but to join others in collectively preserving the global environment. Even China and India are now convinced about the need to reverse the current trend of environmental pollution. Europe and America which were through their automobile lifestyle and industrial production responsible for polluting the earth in the first instance before now presenting to the rest of the world  as a great threat to humanity caused not by all  but by the rich industrial world are now determined to take appropriate measures to reverse the trend. The idea of polluter pays principle subscribed to by the developing world in the 1990s appear irrelevant in the face of collective doom of climate apocalypse. This was why the whole world acceded to the Paris protocol of shared responsibility in protecting the environment to which all countries including the major polluters of China, India and the United States were signatories to in 2015. This treaty was hammered out over two weeks in Paris during the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) and adopted on December 12, 2015. This Paris Agreement was seen as landmark agreement committing the leaders of the world to collectively secure the global climate through drastic reduction of all processes that degraded the environment. National targets were set and the industrial North pledged to aid developing countries to adopt clean energy rather than going through the old industrial processes of the North with reliance on coal as industrial fuel to generate energy for their industrial processes. This was the Agreement President Donald Trump walked away from when he took office in January 2017 saying the terms of the Agreement would be injurious to the U S economy. Happily, his successor Joe Biden has returned the US to the agreement and has pledged to reduce US greenhouses gases by half within the next decade through the replacement of gas fueled automobiles with electric cars and trucks and abandonment of coal as source of energy and drastic reduction in new oil consumption and oil fields development. Unless countries like India and China put an end to building coal fired power stations, the efforts of the US and Europe will come to nothing. If the world is to be saved, there has to be a revolution not only in production but also in consumption. The damage present agricultural production does to the environment through methane emissions of cattle, deforestation in places like the Congo and Amazon basins, widespread use of fertilizers, slash and burn agricultural practices in the developing world and worldwide destruction of flora and fauna and over fishing and sea pollution constitute major threat to the environment. There is also the fear of the struggle to save the environment is taking on the hue of ideology with the politicians on the right thinking it is leftist liberal ideas of green and socialist parties. This ideological cleavage is most noticeable in the United States, a critical state for that matter, among the members of the Republican party who put the economy over the environment.

    However, the effect of all these problems are now clear even to the doubting Thomases who claim scientists are divided as to the cause of climate change and sometimes arguing that the whole thing is cyclical and that the global climate will repair itself. It is heart-warming that the recent G7 Summit in England saw leaders making pledges of drastic reductions in greenhouse gasses within the next decade with electric cars replacing petrol driven cars and with Diesel engines virtually phased out. The way out of the climate issue is not what governments alone can handle; it must be  a joint effort between governments and industry and the signs are good that industrial enterprises are also seized with the fight to save the environment.

    The issue of mitigation measures to reverse climate change  may still be subject to debate but there is no doubt that there is growing global consensus on what drastic abatement measures that need to be taken and how technological adaptation can turn a losing battle to victory especially that the choice is not between economic development and environmental degradation. Green economy can be the way of economic development in the future. It is a matter of life or death for the small islands in the Caribbean and the Pacific and the world owes the people there support by ensuring their homelands do not get washed away under them because of sea rise caused by global warming.

    The coming Conference of Parties (COP 26 ) in Glasgow Scotland in November should present an opportunity for the entire world now faced with the current extreme consequences of climate change to do something tangible and measurable that each country can key into from the large and wealthy countries of the North and the industrial and rising China and India whose development would have to be cleaner than it is at the present and to the vast continent of Africa and South America whose contributions to the environmental damage in the past is minimal but which can become a problem in the future unless they are brought on board the global train of environmental enhancement.

    For us in Nigeria we must think quickly about an economy not dependent on oil because in the future oil will no longer have any market and we have only ten years to adjust to this fact.

     

  • Warring Yoruba illustrious sons

    Warring Yoruba illustrious sons

    I dmired and despised with equal passion, Obasanjo, Tinubu and Bode George are divisive leaders towards whom the Yoruba people remain emotionally ambivalent. Opinions differ as to who among them has shown sufficient commitment to Yoruba’s quest for self-actualization within the greater Nigerian nation state, to wear the big shoe of Yoruba political leader. The unending sibling battle for acceptance was once again rekindled last week with an unprovoked attack on Bola Tinubu by Bode George. He had alleged Tinubu who could not put out the fire in his own APC house was behind the PDP crisis. He then veered into the issue of Tinubu’s certificate. Reminded that Adeseye Ogunlewe, his protégée recently declared that Tinubu who has not announced his interest in the top job possesses the mental capacity and educational qualification to be president of Nigeria, he insisted the issue of Tinubu’s certificate is what he is prepared to debate at 3 a.m. from his grave with Ogunlewe.

    Undoubtedly, Obasanjo, Bola Tinubu and Bode George are illustrious sons of Yoruba nation. They are resourceful, adventurous and anti-status-quo. They have demonstrated over the years that no one’s law is their law. And being rebellious and ambitious is only but a proof that they are the true scion of their equally illustrious forbears. It is after all part of Yoruba belief system that a child brought to the world who does not strive to be better than his father is brought to the world in vain.

    Dumping the old political order for new in Yoruba land is an accepted norm which is as old as the Oduduwa legend. The problem with Obasanjo, Tinubu and Bode George sibling war of attrition  however is that it is not about changing old order for new but driven more by envy or Yoruba predilection which Prof Williams captured as “sense of self-worth” which finds expression in Yoruba saying “bi ekute ko ba le je sese, a fise awadanu” literarily translated:  if I cannot have it, others must not have it.

    Unfortunately, the unending sibling rivalry and struggle for leadership is an exercise in futility precisely because leadership in Yoruba land which often comes from behind must be earned. And Yoruba know their true leaders. It would be recalled that in the run up to the 1999 election, the late pa Adesanya never publicly urged Yoruba people not to vote for Obasanjo. Yet Obasanjo lost not only all over Yoruba land but even in his ward in Abeokuta.

    Just as Yoruba know their leaders, they never have leaders they cannot tame. In recent times, history tells us that Chief SL Akintola unlike Obafemi Awolowo his leader and a federalist, was an unrepentant Yoruba irredentist. But when he sought outside help to upstage his leader, Yoruba made the west ungovernable for him until he literarily committed suicide by engaging trained soldiers in a gun battle.

    Now let us critically examine the legacies of these three illustrious Yoruba sons starting with Obasanjo. It is doubtful if the views of Obasanjo by his Yoruba compatriots have changed from what it was in 1999. Back then what counted against him was his declaration that the best candidate didn’t need to win the 1979 election eventually settled in favour of his candidate, Shehu Shagari by Richard Akinjide’s two-third formula. If anything, he seems to have justified his 1999 rejection by his people. First, he has said he is not a Yoruba leader but a Nigerian leader. Perhaps for this reason, he has never identified with Yoruba aspirations. In 2003, he exploited the Afenifere elders’ quest for restructuring to humiliate them and destroy AD, their political platform.

    Read Also: Obasanjo: we need to promote Yoruba culture

     

    He today accuses Buhari of trying to ‘fulanise’ Nigeria. But it was his failure to restructure the country some 18 years ago  that set the stage for infiltration of southwest forest by criminal immigrant herdsmen who lionized by Fulani irredentists in President Buhari’s government,  kill, abduct and rape women.

    Part of Obasanjo’s legacy in the west will also include the Lagos State initiated private electricity project scheduled for execution within six months but took almost four years because of bureaucratic bottleneck erected by Obasnajo’s government. It is also on record he abandoned Apapa-Port-Oshodi express way, the International Airport Road, the reconstruction of Lagos-Ibadan express way. He also illegally sat on Lagos State Local government allocations until a new president Yar’Adua came to Lagos State rescue.

    In terms of performance as governor, Bode George scored Tinubu who he said has no certificate one out of ten. He alleged Tinubu rakes in several millions every month through Alpha Beta he had set up to manage Lagos IGR. Records however show that from modest N600m, Lagos IGR peaked at about N17b towards the end of Tinubu’s term. From the near total collapse of Lagos roads under Olagunsoye Oyinlola who complained of lack of bitumen, there has been great improvement on roads infrastructural development. From the insecurity of Oyinlola and Abacha era, security situation in Lagos has improved. In terms of competitive federalism, Lagos State has since 1999 become a state of first choice for Nigerians and even immigrants trying to escape poverty of the Sahel region of West Africa.

    In the economic sector, Lagos economy is today the fifth biggest economy in Africa. In politics, Pa Ayo Adebanjo, once praised Tinubu for liberating the southwest from the strangle-hold of Obasanjo after Tinubu retrieved through the judicial process stolen mandates in Edo, Ondo, Ekiti and Osun from PDP. Although most Yoruba today believe Tinubu railroaded them into ‘one chance’ bus through his alliance with Buhari who reneged on his party’s promise to restructure the country, it is still part of Tinubu’s record that the Yoruba for the first time since 1959 replaced Igbo as spare tyre at the centre.

    Now let us look at Bode George record as governor of Ondo State for 34 months. African Concord Magazine was the first to report that Bode George was the first victim of his mismanagement of resources of Ondo State. The magazine had reported his administration bought a faulty N2m boat from Trpobel Nig. Ltd.

    During the maiden trip from Igbokoda to Aiyetoeo, a 45 minutes journey by speedboat, Governor George spent five harrowing hours.

    There was also the controversial sales of Cocoa Industries Ikeja (ICL), a company valued N97,958,000 in 1987 by Messrs Onakanmi and Partners but sold by Bode George and two other Babangida southwest governors for N9m, to Emerald Packaging Limited from Kaduna State, an amount less than the cost of the land on which the 24-year-old company was erected. Governor Adisa of Oyo, Abiodun Olukoya and Oladeinde Joseph of Ondo and Ogun states, their successors later queried the sale “because the participation of those that really produced the cocoa has not been reflected” in the sharing of CIL

    The African Concord also alleged that “ex-governor George disbursed the Ondo State funds with utter disregard for laid down procedures”, that “the construction of the artificial water fountains he authorized at a cost of N250,000 each packed up shortly after commissioning” and that he allegedly “spent N393,000 to print his portrait within 17 months”. The magazine also alleged he influenced the sale of over 60 per cent of Ile-Oluji Cocoa Industries to Majekodunmi Ventures, a decision also reversed by his successors. (Oluwajuyitan (2003) Nigerian under the Generals, Pg 92). Bode George never went to court to redeem his name.

     

  • Terror invisible in plain sight

    Terror invisible in plain sight

    By Olatunji Ololade

    A multitude of youths, disgruntled and starved, may flirt with strife and call it ‘revolt,’ just as a swarm of mosquitoes can make a noise like thunder. But when they emerge, irate and drugged-out, Nigeria should flinch.

    It gets scarier where their ignorance, intemperance, and rage enjoy the caress of a dubious demagogue. They launch like loose canons at the slightest provocation. Left to their devices, they are feckless and sterile.

    My recent sojourn across Lagos’ drug dens manifested as a pilgrimage. I encountered several teenagers venting in the vice-grip of harsh psychotropic substances. At drug dens in Alimosho local government area, for instance, many of them claimed to find escape from their daily travails in hard drugs.

    Bingeing indiscriminately on local brews like Gutter Juice aka Omi Gota, and its variants like Colorado, Pamilerin, containing rohypnol, tramadol, Indian Hemp, codeine, and cocaine, they blamed the government for keeping them unemployed and out of school. They also blamed the government for bad roads, insecurity, and persistent looting of the public coffers.

    Read Also: NDLEA recovers 8,268kg of illicit drugs in raids, arrests 15

    My encounters revealed, among other things, that, many are the same social products as their elders and peers in the political class. They vented their bitter, desperate intent to chance on sudden and stupendous wealth, by hook or crook – as canonised by the political class.

    They dream and speak of a revolution that would redistribute power to their hands. How could such vitally impaired characters be trusted to conduct their affairs appropriately and judiciously?

    It is the tragedy of the moment that Nigeria’s youth obsess more about fulfilling debauched stereotypes than building and securing a progressive future. Burrowing through decadent enslavement to find bliss, they fulfill a theatrical pledge of acceptance to dominance by a predatory political class.

    The latter know that beneath their cries of misery and clamour for change, subsists a tireless yearning to be demeaned, enslaved, browbeaten, and deployed as minstrels of carnage and death, across their impoverished neighbourhoods, for a token.

    If thus preoccupied, there is no way they could pay good mind to more beneficial causes, like training their minds to participate in free and fair elections, where they vote for truly humane and patriotic candidates.

    The incumbent administration of President Muhammadu Buhari identifies the harsh criticism and protests trailing the increment as the citizenry’s Initial Gra Gra (IGG) – their theatrical artifice to the government’s ‘tactical plunder.’ They consider it a futile, necessary performance of dissent as the citizenry wails, the economy lies comatose, insecurity worsens, and Nigeria becomes ungovernable and inhabitable to the poor, in particular.

    It is about time the youth moved past their lofty expectations of the incumbent ruling class and opposition figures, knowing they are all borne of dubious intent. A continual belief in the possibility that Nigeria might prosper and stabilize on their watch is tantamount to a malady, a conceptual persistence of mental and ethical disorders.

    Corruption and duplicity are the ritual links between the political oligarchs and the youth. The latter’s unquestioning belief in the former thus manifests as a triumph of fetishism; the consequences are all around us. We are on the receiving end of them. But who could lead us out of this quagmire? Not the hordes of youths peopling our rural and suburban drug dens.

    As you read, more youths, teens especially, are trapped in the rapture of hallucinogenic substances but they are ignored in plain sight by regulatory authorities. Between 2018 and 2019, nearly 15% of Nigeria’s adult population reported a “considerable level” of use of psychotropic drug substances, a rate much higher than the 2016 global average of 5.6% among adults, according to a study led by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and the Centre for Research and Information on Substance Abuse with technical support from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and funding from the European Union.

    It showed the highest levels of drug use were recorded among people aged between 25 to 39 but excluded teenagers drowning in the stark grip of psychotropic substances like Gutter Juice perhaps because they fall outside the radar of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).

    Gutter Juice has attained prominence particularly among teenagers and the consequences of taking it is often devastating on the user and their families. Dr. Oluwayemisi Ogun, the Medical Director (MD) of the Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital (FNPH), Yaba, recently sounded an alarm over the prevalence of drug abuse induced mental disorders among children, adolescents, and adult Nigerians, stressing that over 150 new cases are admitted at the hospital and its Child and Adolescent Centre, Oshodi Annexe every week.

    Just recently, Abiodun Toye, a 16-year-old developed acute psychosis soon after binging on the brew. He is currently chained to the floor at a traditional mental home in Ogun State even as Dr. Ogun insists that he is better off in the care of qualified FNPH personnel.

    But the consequences are no deterrent to hordes of teenagers trooping in thralldom in pursuit of irregular highs by the extremely dangerous potion, and other variants including Colorado, Pamilerin, recklessly sold and consumed across Lagos’ drug dens.

    My findings revealed that a litre of Gutter Juice is easily available to teenagers at a fraction of the cost of hitherto elusive narcotics, like cocaine. On average, users spend N9,000 per day on cocaine. This amount is half of the national minimum wage per month. However, one litre of standard Gutter Juice costs N3,000 while a 50cl bottle costs N1, 500.

    It’s hard not to panic over the prevalence of a drug that leaves devastating marks on its victims like paranoia, hallucinations and strung out physical collapse, not to mention the loss of inhibitions, brain damage, and predisposition to violence, according to mental health experts.

    Yet the dealers and users passionately answer as willing muscles, and army for achieving the mother of all revolutions as romanticised by random segments of Nigeria’s citizenry, the elite, middle class in particular.

    The truth often rankles a sore note. If you are elite, middle class, you won’t watch the revolution happen on TV because you will be in the thick of it. Since you have failed to emerge as the heart of a bloodless one, you will suffer the blows of a bloody one.

    The teen armies of the revolt, severely agitated and drugged out, will storm your homes while you enjoy family time and movie hour with loved ones, in your serene, gated suburbs, and amid the manicured lawns of your high society. They will intrude your peace, wielding guns, machetes and clubs indiscriminately furnished them by the predatory ruling class, to assault, rape, and hack you and your loved ones to death.

    At the dawn of the revolt, you will be identified as the enemy of the people, and tarred with the same brush as the proverbial one percent supposedly feeding fat off Nigeria and the citizenry’s bare bones.

    This is possible because we have lost our sense of ethics and nationhood, and embraced the erosion of our culture. The consequences are distressingly visible in the teenagers and young adults trooping in a daze, to dip their heads in Gutter Juice, in order to escape the present and detach from a belief in the future.

  • Reflection on Olympics 2020 in Tokyo

    Reflection on Olympics 2020 in Tokyo

    By Jide Osuntokun

    I was personally excited about the recently concluded Olympics in Tokyo after the postponement from 2020 to 2121. The fact that the games held at all is a triumph of human will. There were many people who felt because of the coronavirus pandemic, the games should either have been cancelled or postponed again. But thank God, the International Olympics Committee and the government of Japan stood their grounds in spite of the withering campaigns against the games by the international media.

    For me the Olympics was like a balm of Gilead ÿþ for the melancholy and depression I have suffered in the last two years from being cut off from my children and grandchildren – the only people I can absolutely trust as a widower. I needed something to take my minds off my own personal sense of loss. Secondly my life’s work as a patriotic Nigerian who had performed some public service as a university teacher, administrator and diplomat was becoming meaningless as a result of my country going to the dogs because of the onslaught of terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, senseless murders by herders some of who are foreigners as well as the triumph of ethnicism over nationalism. I just felt my life’s work had been wasted while watching the whole country unravelling with those who should do something unwilling or unable to halt the rush to Armageddon.

    The Olympics came in handy and I watched with keen interest as many sports that interested me. Some friends and relations couldn’t understand why I was so interested and engrossed with the games but there was no point in telling them about the therapeutic effect of the games on me.

    Thank God for the Ancient Greeks who contributed many things to world civilization. I feel, apart from democracy and system of government, the Olympics remains for me one of the enduring contributions of Ancient Greece to world civilization. Its origin goes back to 776BC when Koroibos , a cook from the nearby city of Elis, won  the stadion race, a foot race 600 feet long. Since then with slight modifications, the Olympics were held in Olympia every four years from 776 BC for the next 12 centuries. After its humble origin, it metamorphosed into a religious festival in honour of Zeus, the father of the Greek gods and goddesses. The festival of the games was held in Olympia, a rural area in the western Peloponnesus. The athletes that came to the games came from the several Greek city states and every corner of the Greek world from the Iberian Peninsula in the west to Turkey in the east. The sanctuary where they worshipped Mt. Olympus is the highest mountain in mainland Greece. The games were modified to include the marathon in the modern Olympics in 1896.The Marathon located northeast of Athens was the take-off point of the race to Athens a distance of 40 kilometres. The marathon commemorates the run of Pheidippides, an ancient runner who carried the news of the Persian landing at Marathon in 490 BC to Sparta a distance of 149 miles in order to enlist help for the battle. The distance of the modern marathon was standardized as 26 miles 385 yards or 42.195 kilometres in 1908 during the London Olympics.

    The first modern Olympics were held in Athens in 1896 thanks to the romantic love of the Olympics by Baron Pierre de Coubertin,  a French nobleman who had wanted to host the games in Paris but was prevailed upon to move it to Athens as a result of the interest by several countries  which suggested Athens should be the first host of the modern Olympics. The idea of the Olympic torch was introduced in the Amsterdam Games in 1928 but the modern Olympics torch relay was introduced in the Berlin Games of Adolph Hitler who thoroughly politicized the games as the triumph of his so-called Aryan race over all others.

    The games have held since 1896 except during wars, with several additional sporting competitions including Winter Olympics and  Special Olympics for the handicapped  which was inaugurated in 1968.The Olympics have evolved so much that the ancient Greeks if they were to come to the earth again would not recognize the games. But what has been retained is the goal of Olympics which was to promote global peace, amity and concord. But despite the International Olympics Committee trying to keep politics out of the games, it has not succeeded. Sometimes because of political differences, there have been six instances when movements to boycott the games happened  as in  Berlin in 1936 when Great Britain and the United States threatened to boycott the games because  of the racism and violence of Adolf Hitler and his NAZI Party. They however later participated in the games. But to their regrets, Adolf Hitler refused to shake the hands of the American fastest man on earth then Jesse Owens because he was black. The First and the Second World wars forced the cancellation of three Olympics games in 1916, 1940 and 1944. Germany and Japan were banned from the games in 1948 because of their roles in the Second World War. South Africa was prevented from the games during their country’s racist policy of apartheid and the presence of the South Africans nearly ruined the Montreal Canada Games of 1976 when several African countries boycotted and  a doping scandal in the Moscow Games in 1980 led to the ban of Russia even though Russians participated under their Olympics Committee but without flying the Russian flag in Tokyo 2020. Individual athletes like Tommie Smith and John Carlos protesting against racism raised what was called “black power salute” during their medals presentation during the Mexico City Olympic Games of 1968 creating a lot of rancour in the United States but support from American blacks who were being killed in American cities in the name of “Law and Order” which was Richard Nixon’s code words of putting the blacks where they belong in the ghettos of American cities.

    This last Olympics games did not witness any protest and everything went well without a hitch, thanks to Japanese proverbial efficiency and planning. Unfortunately, the billions invested by the Japanese brought them no dividends. The television windfalls went to the International Olympic Committee and the American network, the NBC which had monopoly on the telecast. The athletes could not move around Japan to buy things because they were cocooned in the Olympics village because of the coronavirus pandemic. All the sales that would have been made by hotels, restaurants, shopping centres, museums, pubs and other watering holes were denied them unlike what happened in London, Atlanta, Rome, Sydney Los Angeles former hosts of the Olympics which saw billions rolling into their economies. I was at the London Olympics in 2012 and it was a great opportunity to purchase various emblems of different countries and to sample various international dishes and culinary delights at the main stadium in East London. Japan is of course a rich country so it was a matter of pride that they hosted the games at all despite the coronavirus pandemic. For those who think the American century has ended, the fact that the USA topped China in medals won across gold, silver and bronze is a manifestation of American endurance. China came second and Japan came third and that is a clear illustration of the economic power configuration in the world.

    Charity begins at home and I again say how disappointed I was that our national anthem for whatever it’s worth was never played since we won no gold. Our performance was generally disgraceful; however I congratulate Efe Brume for her bronze medal in long jump and Miss Oboridudu for her silver in wrestling. We could have done better if we were well prepared, well organized and well-funded. I hope the two medallists will be well rewarded with at least houses in their places of choice. We must learn to reward people who have done us proud to forestall many of our people running under the flags of Italy, Great Britain, Bahrain and Qatar as was the case during this last games. As I have said before, we need to reorganize the ministry of sports to make it employment-generating for young people. South Africa and Egypt have well organized and well run league championships and athletics competitions. We used to have them in Nigeria.  We should bring them back. Let us start with secondary athletics and football competitions as was the case in my youth. We can then move to universities competitions and inter-states competition. With our inflated population of 200 million, we ought to be a sports power in the world. If we organize our sports well, there will be remuneration for sportsmen, masseuses, sports doctors, grounds men, stadia construction and maintenance, sports medicine, people in charge of logistics, advertisers, accountants, investment advisers, designers of sports wears, lawyers to draw up contracts, sports psychologists and team managers to name a few and these will be for individual teams and sporting organizations. I honestly don’t know why the various governments have not invested money in sports to reduce the boredom, tedium and unemployment amongst the youth which is what is fuelling youth rebellion, kidnapping and all kinds of anti-social behaviour in the country. I hope the young minister of sports can persuade his boss, the president to see sports as part of a way out of the morass and chaos plaguing our benighted country.

     

  • Saint IBB at 80

    Saint IBB at 80

    Lawal Ogienagbon

    From what I read; from analyses, I think we are saints when compared to what is happening under

    a democratic dispensation. So, who is better at   fighting corruption?  – Gen. Ibrahim Babangida.

    Yes, what you read above is true. That was General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida calling himself a saint in an interview with Arise News, the television arm of This Day Media Group. He was responding to a question on how corruption thrived under his government between 1985 and 1993. Babangida, who chose to be called president, the first time any military leader would go by that title in the nation’s history, ran the country with iron fists for eight years.

    His was a regime of anything goes. He courted the good, the bad and the ugly. He brought them all under the same roof in order to gain relevance. The good quickly saw through his game-plan and left his government before they could be tarred with the same brush. Those that dillydallied learnt the hard way, but by then, it was too late. IBB, as he was fondly called rose to power on the wave of popular sentiments.

    He toppled the junta led by then Major-Gen., Muhammadu Buhari under whom he served as chief of army staff. As army chief, he was supposed to protect his commander-in-chief, but he chose to lead a coup against him. By doing that, Babangida read the nation’s mood correctly. Buhari had overstayed his welcome with his brutish policies. The people had become fed up with his government, which they received with open arms when it toppled the Shagari administration on December 31, 1983.

    Babangida was not different from Buhari but he hoodwinked the people with his smiles. Those false smiles made many otherwise critical Nigerians to let down their guards. Those, who did not, became the junta’s enemies and they were promptly thrown into detention. One of such people was the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN). Gani was detained at various times in different parts of the country by the IBB junta under Decree 2, under which people were removed from circulation for a long period, and the courts stripped of the powers to look into the matter.

    IBB did not abrogate Decree 2 as erroneously stated in the Arise interview. He kept the decree and made use of it to detain many people in far-flung parts of the country for as long as he wished since the courts had been rendered impotent. With the courts’ jurisdiction ousted, he had a field day tampering with the freedom of the critics of his regime. As he curtailed the people’s freedom, so also did he play games with the political future of the country under the longest and costliest transition project ever seen in this part of the world.

    He also spoke on this programme in the interview, saying that it was designed to bring forth a democratic dispensation that would be the envy of others across the globe. The transition project was solely made by and for Babangida. He and only he understood the nuances of the programme. IBB knew from the beginning where he was heading to with the project, yet he invited his friends to join the transition train, giving them the impression that he was going to leave office. The money-guzzling scheme suited his purpose. It became a vehicle for ‘misappropriating’ (a word, which his regime was so much in love with) public funds. Other programmes were similarly designed. Billions were sunk into them without any results.

    Read Also: We must rally behind soldiers to win anti-terror war, says Babangida

     

    There was the Directorate of Food, Road and Rural Infrastructure (DFRRI); there was the Mass Movement for Social Mobilisation (MAMSER); there was the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission (OMPADEC); there was the Better Life Programme (BLP), which was run by his wife, the late Maryam, there was the Centre for Democratic Studies (CDS), with Prof Omo Omoruyi at the helm. It is instructive that the erudite professor later wrote a book on the June 12 presidential election. As close as he was to IBB, his book could not provide the much-needed answers to why his friend annulled the election.

    Twenty-eight years after, IBB himself is still struggling to extricate himself from the June 12 web in which he entangled himself. Omoruyi wrote that he advised him against that line of action, but the general’s mind was already made up on the annulment. Today, Babangida is still bandying the story that he did it to avoid “a violent coup”. He should say that to the marines. Coups have always been known to be violent here. Was the coup that brought in Gowon in 1966 not violent? Was the one against Murtala Mohammed in 1976, in which he, IBB, disobeyed superior orders to flush out the putschists from Radio Nigeria, Ikoyi, Lagos, not violent? Was the botched 1990 Orka coup against him not violent?

    Today, IBB can call himself a saint because of the failure of  our democratic leaders since 1999 to tackle the hydra-headed problem of corruption. We have anti-corruption agencies which believe more in witch-hunting those opposed to the government in power than getting tge job done. The agencies have become tools for whipping people into line in a society where politicians see public office as an opportunity to loot.From Obasanjo to Yar’Adua to Jonathan and now Buhari, the story is the same. Corruption, as some say, is walking on all fours – that is on both hands and legs.

    They may be right because the anti-graft agencies have bungled most of the cases they took to court. But it is not for Babangida, who turns 80 on August 17, to give us a lecture on corruption. Things may not have changed much since he left office in 1993, but we still remember the 1991 Gulf War oil windfall said to run into $12 billion. Some 30 years after, nobody has answered the query raised on it by the late renowned economist, Dr Pius Okigbo.

    Corruption still stalks the land, no doubt. It shows how far we have sunk as a nation for IBB to remind us of that. Besides, he is also boasting that in his time he sacked a governor for misappropriating (note: not stealing) about N313,000. What happened to the governor after his sack? Of course, he was allowed to go and sin no more. That was his own antidote for corruption! We will not recommend that to any serious government.

    The way to go is to try corrupt public officers and jail them when found guilty, as done in other countries. Thank you, IBB, for reminding us of successive governments’ failure to curb corruption in the last 22 years of democracy. May you age with grace as you join the octogenarian club. Happy birthday, sir.

  • Baleful legacies of Babangida

    Baleful legacies of Babangida

    Nigerian youths below 28 years of age, the target of General Babangida’s last week Arise interview designed to whitewash his soiled image need to know the truth. They need to be informed that Babangida, the evil genius, was chased out of office by the media that created him for betraying the country with his annulment of the most credible election in our nation’s history won by his friend, MKO Abiola. The youths need to know that their current travails stemmed from Babangida’s misguided socio-economic and political policy thrusts. The youths, our future, must understand our nation itself is a victim of a misadventure of a military not trained to manage society but in the words of Robin Luckman “marched out on a straight path towards their vision of good society, a vision that became more elusive the closer they came towards it”.

    While it was true that the politicians as new inheritors of power undermined our constitution after independence, it was our politicized military that destroyed the superstructure, replacing it first with a unitary system through Decree 34 of 1966 and later the current federal constitution that is anything but federal. Then confronted with crisis of nation-building, they plunged the nation into a civil war. And instead of addressing the fundamental source of social dislocation after the war, they waged war against institutions of society including, the universities, bureaucracy and the press. In pursuit of their blurred vision, they embarked on military social engineering efforts such as National Youth Service Corps, (NYSC), establishment of unity schools and quota system of admission into federal schools and into the bureaucracy which are mere symptoms of our unresolved national question.

    On corruption, Babangida says he and his colleagues that fraudulently claim they “sacrifice their present for our future” are saints when compared to what is happening under a democratic dispensation where “today, those who have stolen billions and are in court are now parading themselves on the streets.” Babangida probably thinks Nigerians suffer from collective amnesia. If we are, President Buhari recently reminded us that it was Babangida who pardoned those he imprisoned for corruption in 1985, returned their loots and then forced him to take the place of the freed thieves in prison for three and half years.

    With characteristic conceit and deceit of Shaka the Zulu, his hero, he says the 2023 presidential candidate must be someone who understands Nigerians and with wide appeal across the nation. But Nigerians remember that when his decreed parties and option A4 experiment unexpectedly threw up an MKO Abiola who secured votes from all states of the federation including Kano where he defeated Tofa, his opponent in his state, Babangida annulled the election.

    He says he always stand by his friends but Nigerians still remember how his friend and best-man, Mamman Vatsa, the poet was killed on allegation of a phantom coup despite the pleading by Chinua Achebe, Wole Soyinka and other Nigerian patriots.

    Babangida in the said interview, dismissed by Afenifere as ‘a sour taste  in the mouth’ also inflicted more injuries on the nation with his hypocritical comment on Nigeria’s divisive issues of politics including  restructuring, fiscal federalism and  rotational presidency. Any Nigerian elder statesman that wishes Nigeria well will not say  that with our current dysfunctional structure, adoption of market economy that works only for a few and  a presidential system that ignores our diversity and Nigerian unity “are settled issues that we shouldn’t be talking about now”.

    The travail of the naira started with Babangida and his economic whiz kids- Chief Olu Falae and Dr. Kalu Idika Kalu. The duo insisted on what they called “the inevitable large scale programme of devaluation” despite reservation by the then World Bank Jaime de Millo and Ricardo Fari of Johns Hopkins University who maintained that the wholesale devaluation of our naira would not help our situation. The experts were vindicated when what was called ‘first tier rate’ which was N2.80 to $1 in 1986 had by November 1990 moved up to N10.75 kobo to the dollar.

    Read Also: Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida

     

    Babangida’s economic whiz-kids who insisted there was no alternative to SAP assured Nigerians that “SAP will encourage  the elite that have stolen our money and transferred them to foreign banks, to bring them back to re-invest”. But those who brought their money back chose the banks that guaranteed more interest and snubbed the manufacturing sector since SAP brought with it IMF conditionalities that mandated us to open our market to importation of anything under the sun, reducing us in the process to net importer of the labour of other societies while our own youths roam the streets.

    It was not long that our car and truck assembly plants in Lagos and Kaduna, Ibadan and Bauchi and automobile supporting industries like battery, glass, tyre, brake pads plants collapsed. The flooding of our market with electronics, textiles, shoes, sanitary wares, electric cables, furniture and pharmaceutical products among others, finally sounded the death knell of our own budding manufacturing industries that had guaranteed stable exchange rate.

    Added to the travails of the naira, Nigerian airways with over 33 aircraft in 1980 collapsed under the watch of Babangida who went on to sell our public enterprises from hospitality industry to banks and oil companies to his cronies. From then on the free fall of naira which is today N500 to $1 was unstoppable.

    On Babangda’s political agenda, his Aso Rock professors of democracy assured us that the new democratic culture that will emerge from their political revolution “will not accommodate the idle drop-outs and never-do-wells nor have any place for the ‘ethno-regional political parties’ that they claimed “characterized the democracy of the First Republic”. They then destroyed our political socialization process by banning old politicians thereby cutting the umbilical cord between mother and the baby. Babangida decreed “two-party system,” to prevent what he described as ‘Executive Paralysis’ which characterized the Second Republic.

    MAMSER was set up to mobilize the apathetic public towards knowing their rights and duties, the Centre for Democratic Studies (CDS) where Babangida’s new breed politicians starting with the likes of Tom Ikimi and Babagana Kingibe  were taught the virtues of controlled democracy was established. A whopping N3b was pumped into building of political parties’ headquarters while the two government parties got N531million as take-off grants.

    Still playing the ostrich, Babangida blames the political elite for our current crisis of nation-building. But the current ‘new breed’ politicians that breed nothing but corruption were his creation. With the stillborn 3rd republic, his ‘new breed’ politicians became active members of “Abacha’s five fingers of a leprous hand”.

    They emerged in the 4th republic with some of them institutionalising ‘political sharia’ which involved sending northern youths for indoctrination under Osama Bin Laden, then taking refuge in Sudan. Some of them set up the Petroleum Products Pricing Regulatory Agency, PPPRA through which N1.7trilion was stolen though fuel subsidy scam.  They sold to themselves Nigeria’s total investment of over $100b for less than $1.5b through ill -implemented privatization programme. With their self-serving monetization policy, they shared physical properties kept in their care for our children. David Mark is still in court over the senate president’s mansion he bought at a fraction of its cost.

    Babangida, a creation of the media was as uninspiring as he was an unexceptional leader. He bewitched the media with his abrogation of decree two and four and the release from prison of jailed journalists. But after the initial honeymoon, Dele Giwa of Newswatch was killed with a parcel-bomb. Journalists disappeared from streets in broad day light and newspaper houses were closed. At the end, Babangida, a creation of the media was unmade by the media.

  • Inmates of familiar jail cells

    Inmates of familiar jail cells

    The current enthrallment with the politically correct aspirant will end in a splash of spittle and a curl of the tongue inwards. No doubt. But this minute, vistas of the 2023 elections unfurl like another fragile fiction of ‘Change.’

    Amid the racket, dreams of progress bloom like a fictional retreat. An elaborate simplicity. A Nabokovian invention of rarefied detail, as Gardner would say.

    Incensed by the fiery mantras: “Change!” and “Change the Change!” citizens marched to both real and taught indignation, ignorance, and unabashed arrogance, to stretch their necks for a leash of cash, bigotry, and sound bites at the 2019 general elections.

    Two years on, they have resumed howling from dawn through dusk, threatening litters of tumult atop the soapbox, forgetting that the storms they incited would eventually consume them and weaker, wretched compatriots. But they are making good their threats anyway and increasing the swell of trodden demise via terrorism. The press would sensationalise the tragedies they incite in reportage that stretch beyond the photographs of civil deaths.

    It’s all part of a recurrent script. Some would call it the Naija-theory of things. I would call it the therapy of the breadlines; the deputation of evil from one social class to the other.

    The heathen dialectic of Nigerian politics depicts electorate mind and nature. Nigerians vote for tribe, money, and random bigotries. Many vote to actualise established and latent hostilities thus the voter’s card becomes a weapon to torment a rival ethnic group and religious divide, seasonally.

    Both the 2015 and 2019 general elections fulfilled horrid stereotypes in Nigeria’s perpetuation of hate and bigotries. The electorate, severely divided along religious, ethnic divides, voted for Muhammadu Buhari and Goodluck Jonathan, and then Muhammadu Buhari and Atiku Abubakar, respectively, in fulfillment of the ugliest sentimentality.

    Few voters could convincingly articulate their reasons for choosing their candidate.  True, a depressed economy, sky-rocketing inflation, and embarrassing corruption across tiers of government substantiated the debate for and against each contender.

    For most voters, however, the decisive factor was the religious affiliation and ethnic root of the contestants. The malady subsists to date; as Nigeria prepares for the 2023 elections, the electorate separates into two factions, spawned on ethnic and religious bigotries. Whatever their frantic narratives, they are inmates of familiar mental jail cells.

    Education is the key out of such captivity. Being educated, however, hardly translates to insightfulness. Intelligence is morally neutral. It can be used to further the exploitation of the electorate by predatory oligarchs and corporations, or it can be used to defeat the forces of oppression.

    Where intelligence is docile, the educated man evolves like a bitch; a scrawny, sheeplike mutt, led only by wild instincts and subservience to a crafty, self-seeking shepherd. Oligarchic tyranny is bodacious and corruptive of intellect thus the unstated ethic of sheepish intelligentsia is to amass a fortune while justifying the dominance of their oligarch masters.

    Little wonder hack-writers, sponsored NGOs, and the academia commit to the sustenance of oligarchic choke-hold on Nigeria. Come 2023, we must acknowledge the inevitability of gifting power to yet another blundering oligarch – given our lack of a truly progressive, credible opposition from more vibrant, promising demographics.

    Thus we resume foraging in the desert end of our green pasture. Youthful segments of the electorate display political illiteracy that is embarrassingly sentimental and far-flung. In response, rival parties re-invent a political devil in each other, to exploit voter ignorance and intolerance.

    The youth rant that they have been excluded from power at the state and federal levels yet they have populated Nigerian politics for 61 years as thugs, murderers, arsonists, vote buyers and sellers, and rhetoricians. They are deployed every political season as emissaries of violence and death by aspirants who previously identified as youths five to seven decades ago.

    Nigeria’s current dilemma is a consequence of bad choices. There is an urgent need for the country’s enlightened youth and elder-statesmen to seek each other out in wisdom and coalesce into more definitive roles.

    True change can only be driven by true patriots vying on untarnished platforms. Platforms matter as much as the candidates. Failure to get these right has often foisted on the electorate, limited choices.

    Our situation demands urgent, proactive steps by progressive change-makers. The first is to provide a foundation for the unity of ideas and cause and to do it very quickly. The second is to evolve a social agenda that strengthens the ideals of progressive enlightenment, common progress, commonwealth, and moral autonomy.

    To prevent this, the ruling class deploys what Adorno called “the manipulative character.” The manipulative character, argues Hedges, has superb organizational skills yet is unable to have authentic human experiences. He or she is an emotional cripple. Such characters in government are driven by frantic delusions of self-worth and an overvalued realism of their governance style.

    Every manipulative character and government, however, thrives by pawns. The latter performs the role of a systems manager. Pawns by default are inclined to sustain the corrupt structure. Think the corruptible press and civil societies.

    Education, I reiterate, is the key out of this mental jail cell. More realistic learning divorced from the pricey occupational training by which tertiary schools turn several youths into mindless certificate-seeking machines.

    While violence and terrorism are often mistaken as the essence of revolutions, the fundamental tool of any successful revolution is the non-violent conversion of the oft violent forces deployed by the state to bully and restore order, to the side of the rebels. Most successful revolutions are, therefore, fundamentally non-violent.

    Revolutionary movements, however, fail in Nigeria because the arrowheads continually cloak their measures and homilies in hostilities and platitudinous chants; such hackneyed dialect is a barrier to effective communication and progress.

    It is the same dialect adopted by political, corporate players to cheat the electorate of their votes and rig the financial system in the obscure, cryptic language coined by their propaganda labs.

    To strip them of power, a new class of political leadership must emerge to assert the mental and moral freedom of the citizenry by communicating in a language comprehensible to the common man.

    Now is a good time to start. We must begin to teach our graduates and undergrads, street urchins, traders, commercial transporters, armed forces, and the unemployed, to scorn vote seekers who only visit the electorate to share corn meals and hold town-hall meetings at the dawn of general elections.

    Teach them to scorn leadership that commits crumbs of their constituency allowances to empower their constituents with wheelbarrows, machetes, sachet water, and pepper grinding machines, among others.

    It was Sparta that celebrated raw militarism, discipline, obedience, and power, but it was Athenian art and philosophy that echoed down the ages to enlighten new worlds, including ours.

    In the same vein, while soldiers and politicians jostled for political spoils at several fronts in post-independence Nigeria, deploying gruesome violence and massacre, it was Obafemi Awolowo’s political intelligence and his deployment of state resources to drive educational and socio-economic growth of the southwest region that echoes down the ages.

    Many beneficiaries of Awo’s statesmanship currently occupy public offices as governors, lawmakers, and presidential aides but they lack the intelligence that’s the essence of progressive politics, transformation, and growth. Thus Nigeria will never prosper by them.

    They are the ones whose dominance we must quash.

  • Nationalising  self-inflicted afflictions

    Nationalising self-inflicted afflictions

    In the overall interest of his people, Dr Abbas Tafida, the Emir of Muri, Taraba State, recently broke the espirit de corps among his fellow emirs and symbol of occupying powers, by issuing a 30-day ultimatum to Fulani herdsmen, to vacate the forests surrounding the town. Accusing them of betrayal, he had said: “Our Fulani herdsmen in the forests, you came into this state and we accepted you, why then will you be coming to towns and villages to kidnap residents, even up to the extent of raping our women? Because of this unending menace, every Fulani herdsman in this state has been given 30 days ultimatum to vacate the forests…”

    Muri sadly shares the fate of other northern towns and villages where mindless killing, raping of women and abduction for ransom by immigrant Fulani herdsmen have become an industry. But for the northern governing political elite, it had been eerie silence until Dr Tafida’s audacious intervention penultimate week. Being only interested in power without responsibility, they have since 1953 swindled the poor masses of the north on whose back they periodically rode to power, preying on their religious and cultural fears.

    General Alabi Isama in his contribution to the literature on the Nigerian civil war asserted that the northern political establishment and the Igbo political elite jointly ruled Nigeria between 1959 and 2015 when the Yoruba mainstream political tendency replaced the Igbo as spare tyre. Unfortunately, the north remains the poorest part of Nigeria with over eight million out of school children despite controlling power for that long.  The north at independence according to Trevor Clark, the biographer of Tafawa Balewa, “The Right Honourable Gentleman” was 70 years behind the south.  But unlike Ahmadu Bello, the North’s first premier who encouraged religious tolerance by allowing Christian missionary schools to co-exist with government schools, sent qualified northern youths to the best universities in the world and established Ahmadu Bello University, beneficiaries of his vision have no vision beyond dragging the south to its level by exporting northern problems to the south.

    Instead of a bold drive to enhance school enrolment and eradicate the widespread incidence of street begging, they established JAMB to lower standard of admission and introduced quota system of recruitment into the bureaucracy to trade meritocracy for mediocrity. The result as Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, former CBN governor and deposed Emir of Kano recently observed, was a situation where less qualified northern youths cornered all the jobs in government and parastaltas at the expense of their more qualified southern youths, a development he said was unhealthy for the unity of the nation.

    It has now been established that in order to acquire power by all means fair or foul, influx of Fulani herdsmen from Sudan, Niger and Cameroon into the country was encouraged, a development that has emboldened Kaduna’s El-Rufai, one of the leading lights of the northern establishment, to conceitedly remind Nigerians that if democracy is a game of numbers, the north has the population that guarantees ruling in perpetuity.

    It was also an eerie silence as the northern establishment played the ostrich when foreign herdsmen first embarked on mindless killing and sacking of local communities in Taraba, Benue and Plateau states. On January 7, 2018, 73 victims of herdsmen mindless killings were  given mass burial in Makurdi with Emmanuel Shior, the executive secretary of the Benue  Emergency Agency putting the figure of those driven to IDP camps by the rampaging herdsmen at 80,000. When finally, the Arewa Consultative Forum broke its silence through Emmanuel Yawe, its spokesman, it was to declare that: “Many of the people killed in Gwer West were murdered as a result of Benue livestock guards’ rustling of 400 cattle” without providing any proof. Continuing, the body told Nigerians that “others killed by Fulani in reprisal for cattle rustled by Benue livestock guards are three in Tse Jibrin, three at Jimba Saqhew, five at back Imande Abuul; 10 at Zegejir, and 40 in Shikaan vllage where others were also dislodged from their homes”. It was as if ACF, chaired by Audu Ogbe, was saying immigrants Fulani herdsmen were justified to resort to self-help.

    Read Also: Food scarcity looms over Benue herdsmen attacks

     

    Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) followed with a press briefing to say “the killings and attacks on subsistence farmers across the nation by herdsmen were being fuelled by the draconian laws put in place by some state governments bent on flushing out of Fulani herdsmen out of ethnic hatred”. The body however ignored existing records which showed that herdsmen killed over 600 people in 2013, 1,229 in 2014 and 847 in 2015 long before the enactment of anti-grazing laws by Benue and other besieged states betrayed by federal government’s inaction.

    While concerned Nigerian patriots and stakes holders including Obasanjo, the Nobel Laureate, Prof Wole Soyinka, Gen David Jemibewon, Col David Bamigboye, Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF), Middle Belt Forum warned that Buhari lopsided appointment in favour of the north and treatment of criminal herdsmen with kid gloves will only consolidate the argument of his political enemies that he was embarking on full ‘Fulanisation’ of Nigeria, the northern establishment saw nothing, heard nothing and said nothing.

    And while many well-informed Nigerians see Sunday Igboho and Nnamdi Kanu as mere symptoms of mismanagement of our diversity by President Buhari, members of the northern establishment including Kaduna’s El-Rufai who claimed the “arrest of Nnamdi Kanu who was calling for dissolution of Nigeria from abroad takes priority over the war against Boko Haram insurgents, bandits and herdsmen” and those representing the body in President Buhari’s government believe the two self-actualization campaigners pose more threat to Nigeria than herdsmen and bandits daily visiting violence on Nigerians.

    There was similarly no evidence of uneasiness on the part of the northern political elite when killer herdsmen infiltrated southern forests, kidnapped Olu Falae, a former secretary to government, killed 46 people in Ukpabi Nimbo, in Uzo-Uwani Local Government Area of Enugu State and massacred  30 residents of Igangan Oyo state before torching the Oba’s palace.

    It was perhaps a feeling of déjà vu for the northern political elite as violence spread to the south. One clear evidence of this was the reaction of Abubakar Malami, to the banning of open grazing by the 17 southern governors with his tongue in cheek argument that   banning open grazing “is as good as saying may be the Northern governors coming together to say that they prohibit spare parts trading in the North,” a crooked logic that forced Ohaneze Ndigbo to observe: “For the honest patriotic Nigerians, it seems provocative as well as suspicious that the herdsmen in a section of the country that occupies nearly 80 per cent of the country’s landmass want the land to graze cattle from those holding about 20 per cent.”

    Drawing a parallel between the silence that has so far greeted  Dr Tafida’s  fatwa to criminal herdsmen,  Garba and Mallami’s scurrilous attack on Ondo’s Governor Akeredolu for issuing similar ultimatum, deliberate efforts through government policy thrust to slow down educational advancement of the south  and northern political elite’s opposition to restructuring, fiscal federalism, state and local policing, the discerning cannot but see efforts by the north to nationalise its own self-inflicted afflictions.

    But as Professor Yusuf Dankofa of Faculty of Law ABU recently warned, “The north is only interested in power and nothing more. You cannot slow down your own progress and those of others and expect them to clap for you”.

    It is perhaps time to return to either the independence or republican constitution which allows nationalities to develop at their own pace without interference from others.