Category: Tuesday

  • Koseleri 1 & 2

    Koseleri 1 (Koseleri: Yoruba for unprecedented), was Abiola Ajimobi’s historical stunner: the first-ever Oyo governor to earn re-election; a myth of glory, if ever there was one.

    But Koseleri 2 crashed that myth, even before you could mutter ‘Ajimobi!’ — and in less than four years!

    In electoral hustle-and-buckle, it is a classic glory-to-gory tale!

    The Ajimobi stumble is all the more humbling, as the Senate-as-former-governors’-retirement-coven, is one hubris that has evolved since 1999.

    A governor completes his two terms, and feels his immediate constituents, as of right, must serenade him with a senatorial slot.  What hubris!

    Ajimobi’s spectacular crash could well slow down that gubernatorial conceit.  The outgoing governor is only one of a few – if not the only case – of a failed governor-to-senator transition, much to the delight of his traducers.

    Those are quite a number, for Ajimobi, like the great Bola Ige before him, doesn’t suffer fools gladly, pressing into service his razor-sharp tongue.  But that tongue, his enemies now gaily scream, has become his grand nemesis.

    That is true, especially in the passionate present; and in the excitable short-run, when taunts turn free-wheeling jaunts, to further clobber the defeated.

    But in the long run, when legacy trumps politics?  Ajimobi may yet triumph as spectacularly as he had succumbed. This is because, by miles, Abiola Ajimobi has been Oyo’s best governor since 1999.

    In sheer wit, poise, dash and panache, none of his predecessors, since 1999, could hold a candle to Ajimobi.

    In all of Oyo history, perhaps only Bola Ige — he too of the famously sharp tongue and cutting wit! — could go toe-to-toe with Ajimobi, in a boxing bout, where wit, poise, dash and panache are the prize belts.

    Maybe Adegoke Adelabu too, the famous Penkelemesi, in all Western Region history?  Perhaps!  Ironically, not a few believe Penkele’s  grandson, Bayo Adelabu’s futile gubernatorial bid was collateral damage, from Ajimobi’s most galling political hour.

    But then, Penkelemesi, the adjudged master of political dissembling, belonged to a different age, even if at present, his grandson is consumed by a peculiar mess of mixed (mis)fortunes!

    Yet, don’t write Ajimobi off.  Long after present politics recedes into memory, legacy will emerge from that mist to robustly proclaim his case.

    Politics versus legacy!  That incidentally is what, in this same Ibadan, capital of this same Oyo, has distinguished the great Awo from Adelabu, and his peculiar mess.

    Adelabu, brilliant, pithy, witty and charismatic, among the Ibadan hoi polloi, was dramatic master of the politics of the moment — and he always gave Awo a bloody nose!

    But Awo, no less brilliant but more dogged, acute and rigorous, was a policy Leviathan, clinically focused on the next generation.

    On that score, Awo’s legacy has clearly trumped Adelabu’s immediate politics, though not a few would argue that was because Adelabu died rather young.

    That would explain why Penkelemesi’s own grandson would opt for APC, a party which South West wing claims Awo as avatar; instead of the more ideologically fluid PDP, to which Penkelemesi himself could have been more comfy.

    But even if Bayo Adelabu’s choice was only a convenience of the moment — in an age of unfazed vacuum in ideological politics — Awo’s legacy triumph still galvanized Lam Adesina to the Oyo governorship in 1999.

    Pre-office, the late Lam was an Awoist, aside from his Ibadan nativity.  He left office still proudly Awoist.  But he, as governor, added pretty little to that legacy stock.  Which was why it was easy to shoo him off, after only one gubernatorial term.

    But the band of Ibadan nativists, that shooed Lam off, were barbarians yoked to the past; not reformers primed for the future.

    First, was “homeless” President, Olusegun Obasanjo’s 2003 “capture” (to use that inglorious PDP quip) of his native Southwest.

    Then, there was Lamidi Adedibu (now dead), his Oyo enforcer-in-chief.

    Of course, there was also Rashidi Ladoja, the pitiable gubernatorial sheep led to slaughter, because of his seedy emergence.

    So, when Adedibu started laying claim to 30 per cent of Ladoja’s security vote; and the governor owed his tenure, not to the pleasure of his electors but the brute of his irate godfather; and the democratic president growled his garrison commander had the veto in a state governed by law; you knew new anarchy was loosed upon Ibadan, the town Awo’s dutiful policies conferred respectability, despite Penkelemesi’s empty theatrics!

    But Oyo would hit its nadir under Adebayo Alao-Akala (2007-2011) — first, rogue governor during Ladoja’s illegal impeachment. Then, “elected” governor, under Adedibu’s absolute suzerainty, in the 2007 elections considered Nigeria’s worst ever.

    By this time, Ibadan was mincemeat, whenever Eleweomo, Auxillary and allied local NURTW thugs decided on their turf wars — which were pretty often!  Adedibu’s golden boys were in town; and everyone had better dive for cover!

    It was this prehistoric debacle Ajimobi had to clear — and he did so with uncommon brilliance.  Security, from near-absolute chaos, is perhaps Ajimobi’s prime legacy.

    Then, winsome infrastructure.  That started with a simple flyover solution at Mokola, Ibadan, which Ladoja and his pre-historic crowd even tried to bad-mouth.

    That soon snowballed into an urban upgrade, never seen since the era of Military Governor, David Jemibewon (Western State: August 1975-March 1976; then, newly created Oyo State, now Oyo and Osun states: March 1976-July 1978).

    All of a sudden, the notorious Alesinloye and Mokola traffic gridlocks all but vanished.  The Adamasingba-Jericho-Onireke GRA areas received new vim — did anyone ever think, from that corridor, Eleyele was just a flit away?  So did Challenge extension, with its expanded four-lane free-way.

    Outside Ibadan, the eternally abandoned Oke-Ogun areas were proud beneficiaries of Ajimobi’s infrastructural touch.

    And a profile in courage!  Ajimobi’s stumble over the Olubadan chieftaincy question is only a future come too soon.  If you doubt, there was a time splitting the Ibadan Municipal Council (IMC), at Mapo, was political heresy.  Today, that era is gone and forgotten.

    Then, the Ayefele Music House crisis, and its eventual resolution, was the quintessential Ajimobi: never shirked tough decisions because of public growls — a profile in courage!

    And the environment?  In just four short years, Ibadan, almost always the dirtiest of places was striving among the neatest, thanks to Ajimobi’s street cleaning and waste disposal reforms.

    When the first-term governor sought a second term, a cynical campaign stirred, to de-market his great infrastructural strides — “Se titi laa je?” — best captured in pidgin: “na road we go chop?”

    Koseleri 1 triumphed over all that, as Ajimobi romped to unprecedented victory, on account of policy clarity and brilliant performance.

    But Koseleri 2 also sundered all that, as Ajimobi slumped to unprecedented defeat — his tongue as ruthless nemesis!

    The gripping epitaph of the Ajimobi era?  Policy brain and beauty ruined by a reckless tongue!

  • Success Adebor: Shame of a nation

    I had consigned the story of the angry seven-year old allegedly sent out of school for inability of the parents to pay a school levy to the stuff of fiction – the type you daily hear on our hyperactive rumour mills. Although the story had been shared in different variants on the social media, I initially considered the story too incredible to be true. Until Sunday night when I finally got around to see the trending video.

    Success Adebor – that is the name of the girl – was thrown out of the classroom over a levy of N900. The angry young lass would not understand why her teacher would not apply alternative sanction of flogging instead of the humiliating treatment of being sent out of school over a school levy.

    “They will flog tire”… she shot back at her interlocutor, in a somewhat mocking defiance.

    As it turned out, little Success is not only a pupil of a public school – Okotie-Eboh Primary School, Sapele, in the oil-rich state of Delta, at her age, the Universal Basic Education (UBE) is supposed to guarantee her free education at least for the first nine years of school.

    I understand the state government has stepped into the matter. The issue goes beyond the attempt at window-dressing to understand why at this time and age, a seven-year old girl-child will be subjected to such cruelty.

    Over to you – Delta State government.

  • Time for change

    The contests for various positions in the 2019 general elections were extremely viciousin in many places. Whether for the executive or legislative positions, the contestants acted as if their lives depended on it. Or better said, as elections thrive on sucking blood; in obedience of which, the contests were soaked in blood in many states. For instance, in Rivers State, the military turned a purely civic duty to a war drill, while in Kaduna State, the contest parlayed between sundry killings and vote buying.

    According to accounts, the 2019 elections in many states were a sham. Some contestants even paid the supreme price all in the effort to serve? They were however instances where elections went on smoothly without untoward incident. Notably, in some places were the card-reader were not fully pressed to action during the presidential and federal legislative assembly elections, the violence spiked as INEC conducted the governorship and state assembly elections. So, without any doubt, technology has become the saviour of lives and giver of electoral purity.

    Going forward, President Muhammadu Buhari has a chance to change the electoral fortunes of Nigeria, and make it one of his legacies. If he appreciates history, the time to act is now, and not when the next elections are close and desperation has set in. By then, those positioning themselves to benefit from the next elections would lie to him that handing over to his preferred candidate, instead of conducting a free and fair election should be the prime legacy.

    So, with haste, electoral reforms must become the foremost plan, if the president wants to be remembered positively. His success in that respect will substantially reduce corruption in public service, because those who will emerge through a reformed process will be more service inclined than those elected through a dubious process. Again, if the process is cleaner, more decent people will participate, and if confidence is imbued in the electoral system, violence will decline. The scenario of less than 20% electorates participating in many states is not good enough.

    The president and his team must also work hard to change the infrastructure deficit plaguing the country. Luckily the government is already revamping the railways. The work on the Lagos-Calabar and Port-Harcourt-Maiduguri lines should come on stream immediately. While the projects will provide massive employment opportunities for our teeming unemployed, it will also save our roads from trucks and tankers that are destroying them. With goods from the wharf moving on rails, accidents on our roads will reduce. Also the Apapa nightmare will seize.

    The government must also change plans with regards to electricity production, distribution and retailing across the country. While production programmes appear commendable with the diverse investment plans in multiple sources, the present system of having a centralized national electricity grid should be changed to smaller grids. Perhaps a programme that could attract private investors to build such smaller grids should be explored. On their part, those who bought distribution companies have shown lack of capacity, so either they reinvest or the government seizes the licenses for reselling to competent corporations.

    No doubt, the distribution-end have been the weakest in the delivery chain, and unless the government changes the present dynamics,it will fail like its predecessors. Many Nigerians believe the government has barked enough on the slow pace of investment in the sector, and so it is time to bite. Those who were beneficiaries of the shadowy sales by the last regime must either live up to expectation or give up their equity holding for more endowed investors.

    To show the limited capacity of the distribution companies, the hanging-transformers installed since about 2014,in FESTAC area of Lagos State, have been idling away. I was shocked when an official of the EKDC living in my area, made arrangement to connect one transformer amongst five others in the same vicinity. On enquiry, he explained that any of the transformers certified okay could be connected. Yet, thesetransformers have been there since.

    In essence, what has deprived EKDC customers the opportunity to enjoy an improved electricity supply, should the hanging-transformers be connected to electricity,is nothing more than lethargy on the part of the distributor.The other nightmare experienced by electricity users in the country is the refusal by the distribution companies to install metres for its customers. Again, when I accosted an official on why installing metres for customers is buried in unnecessary acrimony, he explained to me that the slowness in issuing metres is a business decision.

    He explained that in places where metres have been installed, the revenue generation are abysmal, and so the official policy is to delay meter installation as long as is possible.But in fairness to the distribution companies, they have complained that the approved rating system is unsustainable. Even without comparing the statistics in other countries, one can say that electricity from the companies are unrealistically cheaper than the privately generated electricity. Of course, while not calling for the heads of consumers, there is need for balance in order to encourage the needed investment in the sector.

    Another area needing change, is the level of investment in education. While revamping the national infrastructure will suck the teeming unemployed youths roaming our cities, riding motorcycles, and mugging motorists and passer-by as a horrible means of eking out a living; the Buhari government should lay the foundation to develop a knowledge-based economy. It is the knowledge-based economy that could transform our country from a third-world laggard to a second-tier government within a generation. The labour intensive jobs is merely a stop gap, to save the country from a war by the unemployed against the seemingly employed.

    Even the security challenge will get a lift from creation of employment. While buying arms and ammunition is inevitable to fight the scourge of insecurity, the ultimate security lies in the provision of employment opportunities. As the challenges in the northeast and lately in the northwest show, the theatres of war within the country will continue to mutate unless opportunities are created for the jobless youths in the country. Those in authority must not be foolish to think the other regions are immune to such organized banditry that is plaguing the northern region.

    Of course, the federal government’s agricultural programme is a step in the right direction. The building blocks has been laid, especially in the provision and distribution of fertilizer. The government should immediately rebuild the river-basin authorities across the country. Also, the social investment programs of the government is a worthy change-agenda. So the tradermoni, school feeding and similar programs should reach all the states in the federation post-haste. The time for change has come; so without hesitation, the APC led government must urgently move to the promised next level.

  • Ambo bitter-sweet

    With Jide Sanwo-Olu’s triumph in the March 9 governorship election, Akinwunmi Ambode becomes the first one-term governor of Lagos, since 1999.

    It’s a dramatic, if painful, departure from the fate of his two predecessors:  Governors Bola Tinubu (1999-2007) and Tunde Fashola (2007-2015), who enjoyed their maximum two terms.

    So “Ambo” is not unlike the comet — vanished before you even see it!  Indeed, the quintessential bitter-sweet he is!

    Bitter is his fleeting perch, on the Lagos gubernatorial couch; when re-election was his to lose.  By all objective criteria, he isn’t the worst governor in town!

    But sweet may yet be his fate, given his stoicism in the face of adversity, most of it self-inflicted, though.

    Nothing prepared Ambode for his novel but chastening role: a sitting governor, undefeated by a partisan opponent; yet condemned to handing over to another of his party mates, because he lost re-nomination.

    But Ambo has scaled that daunting test with uncommon calm, unbelievable grace and audacious dignity.

    History may yet be kind to him — but that would be in the long run.

    Talk of Ambo bitter and sweet!

    Still, Ambode is master of his own doom, which again could turn long-term grace.

    His opening power days, on the Lagos traffic street, ended in a humiliating fiasco.  He went to war, unprepared, with officers and men of LASTMA — Lagos State Traffic Management Authority, the ubiquitous Lagos traffic police.

    A piqued LASTMA, folks whispered, promptly sabotaged the new government. Lagos turned instant traffic Armageddon with hideous gridlock.  The thoroughly smitten new governor beat a hasty retreat.

    An opening gambit was never more crushing!

    Then, an initial skirmish with LAWMA — the battle-tested Lagos State Waste Management Authority — an earlier version of which, ironically, Ambode himself had had a stint, as a rising civil servant.

    Ola Oresanya, highly decorated general, in the bruising war against virulent Lagos filth, was the bruising victim of that skirmish.

    Folks claimed the new governor was after the so-called “Fashola boys”.  But Ambo’s own new voices banished such this-Pharaoh-knows-no-Joseph tales, insisting the new governor was after no one, but reforms.

    Still soon, an Ambode-Fashola antipathy became clear, though driven more, it would appear, from the new governor’s end.

    That followed complications from Ambode’s own rancorous emergence as governor, against the wish — and will — of many a Lagos All Progressives Congress (APC) powers and principalities.

    The first of those events was the formal presidential commissioning, of the expanded Ago Palace Way, Okota; a road artery that links Okota to Amuwo-Odofin GRA, Festac Town and the traffic hub of Mile 2.

    Though former Governor Fashola, who did most of the work during his tenure was there, new regnant Lagos protocol near-totally ignored him, even as Vice President Yemi Osinbajo did the commissioning.

    The other was the widely publicized Lagos-Federal Government row (read Ambode-Fashola tiff), over the Lagos Airport road re-development project; which the governor alleged his predecessor was subverting, in terms of federal approval, even if Lagos had the cash to proceed.

    All that squabble, however, receded; after the Power, Works and Housing minister visited his successor, at the Lagos House, Ikeja.

    Soon after, in a racy, glorious two years, Ambode launched his own policy and infrastructural foxtrots, which sent not a few gushing.

    In a virtual wink of the eye, Ambode had delivered the Abule Egba flyover, with a sparkling fountain to boot!

    At the Lekki end, he had also delivered the Ajah flyover, bringing immense traffic relief to the denizens of two ends — the one high, the other low — of the sprawling Lagos metropolis.

    It was a stunning triumph of his “One Lagos” philosophy, away from the perceived elite area developmental skew, of the Fashola era.

    In rural Lagos, at the Alimoso end, Ambode’s name is etched in near-permanent gold.  Suddenly, infrastructure only dreamt of — smooth roads and glittering streetlights — all of a sudden, stood at their beck and call!

    But it’s in Ambo’s native Epe that the outgoing governor stands to be a folk hero, with stupendous community value.

    In less than four years, Epe, that seemed to have snoozed and snored all ages, suddenly leapt up — gloriously recalled to life!

    With the renewed Epe Marina, glittering and penetrating network of futuristic roads, linking mainstream Epe to the adjoining Ejinrin and Eredo, Epe is making a dash into modernity, after slinking, for much too long, back into the past — all in less than four years, thanks to Ambode’s audacious infrastructure.

    But that’s only Phase 1.  The incoming Sanwo-Olu government should not abandon the Phase 2.  If it did, that would be Deputy Governor-elect Femi Hamzat’s albatross.

    But even metropolitan Lagos won’t forget Ambo in a hurry.

    With the imminent delivery of the new Lagos Airport-Oshodi road, the new Oshodi exchange and mart, the Pen Cinema, Agege, flyover, as well as the Abule Egba-Oshodi Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) track, all in four years, Ambode’s infrastructural legacy appears cemented.

    The other corridor though — the Orile-Okomomaiko-Ijanikin section of the Lagos-Badagry expressway, with its planned integrated rail track — will probably curse the Ambode governorship, for culpable abandonment.

    Still all these, benediction or malediction, would pale before a present contagion — the resurgent Lagos refuse, under which a buried Ambode jerked, bawled and yelped for second term; but to which everyone feigned merry and proud deafness.

    First, was the ignominy of losing re-nomination.  Then, now comes the pain of premature power surrender when, in fact, only a few of the re-elected governors can match his sheer achievements.

    But from this deep pit may yet spring Ambode’s eventual resurrection.

    First: none for him, a sensational huff into “enemy” camp, to seek a renewed mandate.  The Lagos PDP had hoped for such blind Samson complex.  But they have been sorely disappointed.

    Then, after a whispering post-presidential election campaign, the governor just delivered Epe for his party — and incoming successor.  That’s a study in rare grace, when faced with unbearable pains.

    Ambode started his exit from power as the clear and present danger to party unity and cohesion.

    But he could well have ended it the ultimate exemplar, in submission to party discipline, at its most rankling, most painful and most humbling worst.

    If it can happen to a sitting governor, it can happen to anybody.

    Babajide Sanwo-Olu had better learn from the Ambo odyssey; and not allow power to get to his head.

    Otherwise, the whip used to tan the old wife, could well be nestling and resting in the rafters, to thrash the new!

     

     

  • A poll and its aftermath

    Here we go again – was my gut reaction to the rejection of the outcome of the February 23 presidential election by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, former vice president Atiku Abubakar.

    “If I had lost in a free and fair election, I would have called the victor within seconds of my being aware of his victory to offer not just my congratulations, but my services to help unite Nigeria by being a bridge between the North and the South”.

    That was Atiku moments after INEC declared the incumbent president, Muhammadu Buhari winner of the February 23 presidential poll. Well, he didn’t “lose”; rather his opponent won. And the victory is as emphatic as can be: 15,191,847 votes for the incumbent as against Atiku who polled 11,262,978 – which means that Muhammadu Buhari and Yemi Osinbajo will remain in charge for the next four years.

    By the way, when compared with his showing of 15,424,921 in the 2015 election against incumbent president Goodluck Jonathan, the latest showing might seem not only modest but indicative of how fewer friends the president has made since; however, when his foray albeit limited,into such states as Akwa Ibom, Abia and Rivers – states which hitherto presented as a formidable iron curtain are factored in, the surge in the mandate become understandable. And this is aside the four million-vote margin between him and the closest challenger. That is as unassailable as can be.

    Could Atiku have won the election?

    I certainly understand the anger of those who, frustrated by what they perceive as the many ‘sins’ of the Buhari presidency,are led to think that the country deserves better than what is on offer more so at this time. To this group, the sins of this presidency are legion:they range to an allegedlack of sensitivity to the nation’s diversity evidenced by the lopsidedness in appointments, the administration’s rather poor handling of the herdsmen/farmers clashes to the slow pace of governance etc. To them, nothing of the so-called infrastructure deliverables can assuage for the grievous sin of a lack of inclusion.

    But then, let’s flip the question in another way: could the incumbent, President Buhari, with all the foibles of his administration in the last four years, have lost against an Atikuwho in fact offers nothing spectacularly different from the incumbent?

    To begin with, Atiku is hardly a new product on offer; other than the singular factor of name-recognition which unfortunately carries with it a lethal baggage, the only other thing that can be said as going for him is that he has been there before and so should able to understand how the system works. Yes, Nigerians know Atiku – but for what? Secondly, he says nothing new that Nigerians are not too familiar with. As for his public thoughts on governance and economy, not only are they dated but are increasingly seen as toxic! While he boasted of his pedigree as a job creator, Nigerians struggled to find the vintage entrepreneur but found instead the archetype Nigerian comprador-investor who thrives in state subsidies! In any case, I didn’t hear our policy wonk offer new perspectives on the unemployment situation or a coherent strategy to deal with it. In the end, his touted recordcould only sound hollow if not dubious. And that is not counting terrible damage inflicted on his brand by no less a personality than his former boss, Olusegun Obasanjo.

    That was the man presented by the PDP to run against the saintly Muhammadu Buhari, the perceived nemesis of the corrupt elite; and friend of the talakawa in a process that became more of a referendum on the performance on the incumbent rather than a true electoral contest. While it amounted to a censure of sorts for the incumbent, it was in the end, a case of no contest between them.

    So where do we go from here.

    All of course depends on how the victory is managed. Given the volume of bile spewing daily on the world-wide-webfrom partisans on both sides of the national divides, you’ll think that the country is already on a full-blown war as against merely ruing the import of a mere electoral fest. Currently, all it takes is a minor joke on the social media sites for textual fusillades to be unleashed by those presumably hurting from the loss of their candidate on perceived enemies.

    Welcome to the season of ethnic baiting – a season when nothing is held sacrosanct and our common humanity perches on a fragile thread. As friends turn enemies over differences in political choice,our traditional fault-lines have not only been exacerbated, our country is left swinging dangerously towards the precipice. It is truly Silly Season 11. Whereas the election may have produced clear winners, now itseems increasingly doubtful that the country will be allowed to savour the fruits of victory.

    I am not here writing of an Atiku going to court to retrieve his “stolen mandate”; but of growing animosities that have divided the country along the lines of faith, geography and ethnography; along the tribe of wailers and hailers. The battle unfortunately is one the country is least prepared for or even likely to be able to win.

    To be fair to President Buhari, he has been most conciliatory – and statesmanlike in victory. I wish yours truly can say this of the hordes of supporters of ruling APC who in their moments of mindless triumphalism have long cast off any restraints or humility; or their sparring partners who think little of delegitimizing the process simply because they came short.

    For a country in the throes of terrorism and its malignant variants, the omens are simply not good. It is like pouring more petrol on an already combustible surface. It is the surest route to Armageddon.

    As it is, President Buhari has his work out: time to embark on a healing mission. As the president may have found out in nearly four years of being in the saddle, it requires far more effortto court the minds of menthan it would in building concrete bridges on the Niger. Imagine his poor showing in Anambra – a state where the on-going Second Niger Bridge would ordinarily have guaranteed a haul of votes. That task must begin now.

  • Lost and won

    “Correct the mistake of 2015.  Vote out the corrupt legislators” – That has been a running campaign, by this column (check the column mast), no less than two years now.

    From the National Assembly election results, at least 60 senators won’t return to the 9th Senate.  The actual tally is between 64 and 66.  That suggests, others things being equal, severe voter anger with the 8th Senate – and by extension, the 8th National Assembly.

    Contrast that with the thumping triumph of President Muhammadu Buhari (PMB), and you could easily see who the voters are angry or pleased with.  That revalidates the general perception that the outgoing National Assembly has been seriously remiss in its duty.

    To suggest Republican Ripples galvanized this voter anger would be vain, sweeping and simplistic.

    But it is also very pleasing that a substantial segment of the voters – even among the unlettered, who couldn’t have read the column —  shared its anger; to the extent of turning their ballot into a sweeping red card.  That is the severe majesty of democratic choice!

    Even more pleasing: Bukola Saraki, outgoing Senate president and unfazed symbol of that legislative blight, topped the electorally guillotined – not unlike Lucifer, in John Milton’s Paradise Lost, heading the cascading tumble, of fallen angels, from paradise to hell!

    Better to reign in hell, Lucifer had huffed, than serve in heaven!  Legislative Lucifers, filled with conceit over their electors, and bristling with proud hostility to voter aspirations, sure got their wish.

    True, a few like Dino Melaye somewhat escaped the drop.  So did outgoing Speaker, Yakubu Dogara.

    Even then, this voter mauling should be, for them, enough warning – never again to take their electors for granted, no matter the hollow delusion they might erect around themselves, in that otherwise hallowed chamber.

    Still for Kogi West, fighting a Yahya Bello to flaunt a Dino Melaye is nothing but a net loss.  But again, who can question the majesty – and severity – of democratic choice?

    But beyond the mundane and sundry mauling, there would appear something mystical about these elections.

    All of a sudden, there appeared strange realignments, which seemed to echo Prometheus’s famous quip, in Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s poem, “The Masque of Pandora”, written in 1875: “Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.”

    First, Saraki forgot the Baba Oloye’s most sacred rule: never leave the ruling party!  He did and plunged into doom – and just as well!  By the time he woke up, O-to-ge had swept away his Kwara empire of democratic feudalism!

    Olusegun Obasanjo, former two-term president, one-time military head of state and perhaps the most opaque of Nigeria’s political heart of darkness though he glows in incandescent hypocrisy, suddenly located his core in Atiku Abubakar, the fellow he had battered and traduced, all his post-presidential years, since 2007.

    His Atiku about-turn was resonant hubris: he had forgiven  Atiku, though all he wrote about him, in his My Watch, was true.

    Atiku had repented; apologized to Obasanjo. Obasanjo had forgiven him.  So, Nigerians too must! All that fitted pat into Obasanjo’s earlier boast: he had made up his mind to remove PMB from office!

    In Nigeria’s political equivalent of the Biblical whited sepulchre, leading lights of Nigerian religious faiths were gathered – all come to push Atiku’s re-beatification, in Pope Obasanjo’s holy cathedral!

    There, was Catholic Bishop of Sokoto, Matthew Hassan Kukah, Winners Chapel Bishop, David Oyedepo, with an unforgettable smack on his face; and, on the Muslim divide, Sheik Abubakar Gumi, all gathered to plead Atiku’s case – Atiku that Obasanjo had always stridently declaimed!

    Even a segment of Awoists also made own pro-Atiku visitation to Obasanjo’s Vatican City – no crime!  But in the present heat of passion, old foes freely jumped under the sheets, to push a lost cause!

    This minority segment, of the South West progressive mainstream, hid behind “restructuring”, their twin sour grape: virulent peer envy against Bola Tinubu and his All Progressives Congress (APC); and ethnic condescension against a so-called “Fulani” president!  But only the most obtuse of fanatics was fooled by their amusing disguise.

    Indeed, those the gods would destroy, they first make mad!

    Which is why Obasanjo-slaying would appear the most humbling metaphor of this election.

    But it is less Obasanjo as a person, though his over-due personal debacle would fill not a few with immense mirth and intense joy; knowing the polity would be spared, at least for now, his sanctimonious cant, served with galloping ill grace.

    Obasanjo-slaying epitomizes the electorate’s sensational checkmate, of a post-Yakubu Gowon military plutocracy.

    Though these blokes pushed the country to the brink in almost every facet, they insist, as the so-called “owners of Nigeria”, on enthroning and dethroning, subject to their wild whims — even if that would mean junking the “electorate” for a “selectorate”, to quote that brutal pun, by The Nation on Sunday columnist, Tatalo Alamu.

    Their saving grace though is that PMB, their electoral nemesis, also came from the same generation of former military officers.

    Besides, Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar, another belonging that troubled military epoch, has comported himself with exceeding grace, dignity and nobility, since his post-head of state years. So, theirs is not an entirely “wasted generation” — again, to use the immortal words of our own WS.

    Obasanjo-slaying also symbolizes the routing of spiritual hustlers who, at the most critical juncture of their country, sided with graft and sleaze, despite the havoc free-wheeling corruption has wrought in this polity.

    These hate-preaching hustlers, with their weird presidential election prophecies, became Nigeria’s political equivalent of the Jewish Medium of Endor; who couldn’t exactly help King Saul, after the king had gone against Yahweh’s express instructions.

    For the media, Obasanjo-slaying is but a stern warning.  The Nigerian press, over the ages, has made itself the doughty hero of democracy and good governance, just because it locates the people’s pulse; and serves as dutiful and honest tribunes.

    From the media performance since 2015, however, that can no longer be taken as given.  It is therefore time to pause, reboot and restart.  Or else, the Fourth Estate risks self-doom, thus becoming part of the problem, instead of the solution it is contracted for.

    Overall, however, the real owners of Nigeria – the long-suffering people – have won this one.  It’s a new dawn for genuine patriots.  But it’s also excruciating work, to snatch Nigeria from perpetual noxious forces.

  • Winning the peace

    The 2019 general elections will reach a denouement this Saturday after the gubernatorial and state assembly elections. With tension ricocheting across the country in the past few weeks, I earnestly hope it will be an anti-climax to the palpable fear that the 2019 general elections will ferryArmageddon to our country. Except for few states where local warlords are raising the stakes, the tension associated with the general elections has dimmed.

    It is also heart-warming that President Muhammadu Buhari who won the presidential election has set an agenda to win the peace. His conciliatory statement, while visiting his re-election campaign team and after receiving his certificate of return, shows he may have realised the best essence of public power: doing public good. In his first incarnation, after the 2015 election, the president spoke about paying each according to the measure of votes given to him during the election.

    While he was fairer in his conduct than in his words, the president would have realised that perception is as important as reality. Many opposed to his re-election bid, relied more on what he reportedly said in the past, than what he did with his powerssince 2015.   As he would also have realised, four years is a short time in the life of a nation, such that before he could really settle down after winning the 2015 elections, he was faced with preparing for the 2019 election.

    The same scenario could play out going forward unless he ignores the merchants of rancour and face the task of doing public good. The ancient wisdom says: time waits for no one; make hay while the sun shines. If he wants to be remembered positively, he must speak and act statesmanlike going forward. While he may have a lot of power to make mountains move, he cannot compel people to love and respect him. But by his words and action, he can make any reasonable person love and respect him.

    Of course, there will be those who are adamant at hating him. But he can gain the respect of the majority if he acts fairly to all persons in all circumstance. As a guide, he can borrow the famous four-way-test of the rotary club. That indomitable redoubt for doing public good will help him rebuild our country which is badly fractured along ethnic and religious lines. This fracture has been assuming a dangerous proportion in statesthat have non-homogenous populations.

    Feeding on the mood of the nation, some misguided persons are trying to set Lagos on the part of tribal recriminations in the name of politics. Those who lost the national election of penultimate Saturday are trying to push Ndigbo to fight their hosts in Lagos, as if the national election was a tribal contest between Igbo and Yoruba.While majority of Igbo may have supported the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) which lost the election, there are sizeable members of All Progressive Congress (APC), who are Igbo.

    So those stoking ethnic agenda to advance their failed political interest, must not be allowed to foist crisis on the foremost cosmopolitan city in Nigeria. Lagos has been welcoming to all comers regardless of tribe or religion. Indeed, it has been more rewarding since the past 20 years,because Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu created a template that has made the city the sixth biggest economy in Africa. Those opposed to the political tendency in Lagos, must seek to wrestle power through the ballot box, and not by making Ndigbo their cannon fodder.

    The coming governorship election in Lagos State is between experience and experimentation. While the candidate of PDP, Jimi Agbaje,who has no experience of working in the public service is an experiment, Babajide Sanwo-Olu of the APC, who has served as a commissioner and also headed vital state agencies in the state is overwhelmingly experienced to continue the trajectory that made the Lagos economy one of the biggest in Africa. Sanwo-Olu’s credentials and experience would no doubt be a gain for Lagos.

    At the presidential election, the political leadership of Ndigbo made the wrong call by supporting PDP, which eventually lost to APC. While they are entitled to their choice, they must accept they miscalculated. Agreed that Peter Obi,the PDP vice presidential candidate may be an attraction to support Atiku, many discerning commentators knew that the project would not fly. So, it was a huge mistake to corral the south-east zone to vote PDP, when the zone that produced the presidential candidate overwhelmingly supported his opponent.

    An Igbo adage says: you cannot cry more that the bereaved, otherwise you will asked if you know what killed the dead. No doubt, in the failed Atiku’s presidential project, the political leadership of Ndigbo cried more than the bereaved, despite words of caution from several quarters. This column maintained that the PDP project was an emotional gambit, and not a referendum on the public service records of the two leading presidential candidates. It pleaded with limited success that the chaff should be separated from the grains.

    Next Saturday, the governorship and state assembly elections would hold in Lagos. As I have argued above, the candidate of the APC is miles ahead of the PDP candidate in terms of experience and public service records. Also, the dominant political tendency in the state is sagacious and entrenched and will prevail. It also has a record of performance and capacity to take the state to the next level. So on a fair assessment, the candidate of APC deserves to be re-elected, and is most likely going to be re-elected.

    Ndigbo should support the candidature of Sanwo-Olu, because he is not only a better candidate, he has the brightest chance to win. Politics is a game of the possible, not the ideal. Talking of ideal, Sanwo-Olu fits into the ideal candidate more than any other contestant. So on what basis would anyone advise Ndigbo to cast their net in a famished river, with a promise they will make a haul. This column has preached the need for a strategic alliance across the Niger for nearly a decade, and the time to actualise that has come.

    The Igbo has nothing to gain by posturing as political antagonists of their host in Lagos. It will not be a sign of weakness, if they work with APC in Lagos State. Many arguably view the Yoruba and Igbo as the major competitors in the Nigerian project, and some on both sides mistake the competition as war. While agreeably each competitor will always want to win, common sense dictates that a gamely competition should never be a do-or-die affair, otherwise there would no game the next time.

    This column urge Lagosians from all divides to overwhelmingly vote for APC at the governorship and state assembly elections on Saturday, for continuous progress.

  • Mo(u)rning after

    They call you a thief, yet you prance around with newly stolen kids” —Yoruba proverb

    The morning, after a crushing electoral defeat, is full of mourning – and moaning – for the vanquished.   But for the victors, nothing tastes like that light-headed cheer.

    Yet, it’s no time to gloat.  Winners are not saints any more than losers are villains.  Those the voters prefer are just temporary “kings” – at least till the next cycle of elections.

    As the popular Nigerian cliché goes, it’s all in the spirit of democracy.  Your loss validates my win.  Negative or positive, democracy wins in everyone!

    Still, that should come with a rider: that each side plays the game decently.  To be sure, that is an ideal seldom completely attained, even in the best of democracies.  Still, if 80 per cent of the public, parties and electorate alike, stick to decency and civility, a positive attitude to democracy would still have prevailed.

    That appears still dicey here, though Nigeria’s latest shot at democracy hits 20 years this year (1999-2019).  It can only get better, though not a few think bad democratic conduct changes rather slowly – in fact, too slowly.

    That re-echoes the opening Yoruba proverb: they call you a thief and you still caper around with newly stolen kids!  That speaks to horrible conducts en route to these elections, which nevertheless the emerging results appear to sensationally punish.

    Take the case of Bukola Saraki, the sitting Senate president, who won’t return to the chamber.  Saraki, since 2015, has been the unfazed poster boy of everything wrong with our politics.

    Beat-me-if-you-can fashion, he has trumped everything sane and decent in political conduct.  His “win”, as Senate president, was a study in concentrated perfidy.

    His brazen trade-off, for personal gain, of the deputy senate presidency (DSP), would make even Niccolo Machiavelli scramble from the grave for fresh tutorials!

    But even if that manoeuvre were bitter politics, its crossover into legislative (mis)governance was fatal to voter interests.  Saraki bossed the National Assembly, and changed the people’s assembly into a reactionary coven, subverting urgent infrastructural efforts to lift the economy out of doldrums.

    The most visible casualties are the Lagos-Ibadan expressway and the 2nd Niger Bridge, which completion got deferred, no thanks to cynical juggling of appropriated funds, for junk constituency projects.

    When he finally defected, still keeping his Senate presidency, he became Nigeria’s first minority Senate president, even if blatant parliamentary defections-with-seat-intact had become a sickening norm, across party lines.

    So, when Saraki spectacularly crashed, with his Kwara PDP virtually wiped out in all the nine constituencies at stake (three senatorial and six House of Representatives), an emerging rime rammed it all in: “When O-to-ge! (Enough is enough!) trumps O-tun-ya! (Let’s do it again), it is O-to-pe! (it all ended in praise).

    O-to-ge was the anti-Saraki battle cry.  O-tun-ya was the pro-Saraki counter.  O-to-pe was the post-battle crow.  Great drama, sweet and bitter!  It’s all the mo(u)rning after!

    But how might the morning after be, in former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s camp?  Obasanjo was he, in his Atiku support, tried to demonize the electoral process in advance, envisioning wide rigging and dreaming free-wheeling Armageddon.

    The Ebora Owu might yet rally his “international community” friends, for whatever cause.  But in fairness to him, after he voted, he sounded much more conciliatory and unbelievably nuanced, in contrast to his earlier sabre-rattling.

    Still, one thing is clear: from the emerging trend of results, Obasanjo and his proverbial co-”owners of Nigeria” would learn to take the Achebe Igbo quip much more to heart: those whose kernels are cracked for them by benevolent spirits, should learn to be humble.

    But away from winners or losers, a Muhammadu Buhari win, which appears only awaiting formal confirmation, would be a plebiscite on many issues.

    Take the economy.  From the dawn of the 4th Republic on 29 May 1999, the economy, at least from the Nigerian federal government, has been an expert’s mystique, with the masses expecting some trickle down manna, from that esoteric haven.

    But the practical manifestation (whether by corruption or delayed trickle-down) has been a near-total collapse of local infrastructure – and manufacture — which consigned the country to the mercy of imports, even of the most basic of products, that could be locally made.

    Since 2015, there has been a radical shift from that path, making not a few, even in the general media outside the esoteric conclave of economists, to label that shift as “ancient” – in any case, not “modern” enough.

    Yet, that “ancient” mode has wrought comparatively great wonders: in increased electricity power, extensive road construction, rapid rail modernization and a boom in agriculture which, in less than four years, has catapulted Nigeria as Africa’s No. 1 cultivator of rice; setting the country on the path to food security.

    A Buhari win would confirm voter approval for such a rapid shift in economic policy.

    Since 1999 till 2015 also, poverty had wreaked great but silent havoc.  The rich had been lulled into a false sense of security.  But the poor too had been seething in quiet rage, snorting something, sometime, somehow would give.  That was putative class war, ticking like a time bomb!

    But again from 2015, there has been a conscious and concerted effort at pro-poor welfare.  The most significant symbol of that is Tradermoni, a scandalous novelty, in a polity rippling and bristling with a poor, overwhelming majority.

    But Tradermoni is scandalous not because it was introduced — on the contrary, it is highly praise-worthy.  Rather, it is because it took the federal authorities 16 years into democracy, and a change of partisan guards, to birth a specific pro-poor policy.

    Even then, much of the media has been too distracted, along inane lines, to realize how this specific basket of pro-poor policies could have saved the country from avoidable but looming tragedy.

    But then again, a Buhari win would have secured a robust voter plebiscite to further deepen pro-poor programmes (Tradermoni, schools feeding programme, conditional cash transfer to the society’s poorest and most vulnerable, N-Power volunteer jobs, etc) – at least, as stop-gap measures until improved infrastructures start expanding the economy, and everyone can fairly fend for themselves.

    Still, as winners soar and loser sink, the one beams and the other scowls, both camps must realize that the joy of victory, or grief of defeat, is no monopoly of anyone.  Other things being equal, it is reward or censure for using or misusing public trust.

    On that sweet and grim note, let democracy win and public service thrive.

  • INEC: It’s the old curse of mediocrity

    It seems one instance when it is far easier to play the blame game rather than address a pathology so deeply ingrained to the point of becoming an intrinsic part of our national life. Trust our politicians with their hollow indignation: with the way some of them have been carrying on since Professor Mahmood Yakubu and his crew at the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) announced the shift of the general elections in the ungodly hours of Saturday morning, you’ll probably think that the 2015 shift under Goodluck Jonathan by six weeks never happened let alone the earlier bizarre version under the same Jonathan in 2011 that was aborted midway.

    Nigerians, unlike our politicians who perennially feign amnesia, remember the event of April 2011 just like yesterday. For while the 2015 election was moved forward by six weeks, those currently beefing about the 2.30 am announcement by Prof Yakubu will do well to remember that in 2011, the National Assembly elections had actually kicked off in states like Lagos, Kaduna, Kebbi, Delta, Zamfara and Enugu only to be aborted vide a press release by the then INEC chairman, Attahiru Jega, touting an unanticipated emergency. The Attahiru Jega-led INEC had cited among others, the late arrival of result sheets in many parts of the country and of officials at the polling units as making it difficult to implement the Modified Open Ballot Procedure adopted by the commission. Whereas Jega had claimed that INEC could have proceeded with the elections in Lagos, Kaduna, Kebbi, Delta, Zamfara and Enugu –where all the materials were available, he nonetheless insisted that “in order to maintain the integrity of the elections and retain effective overall control of the process, the commission has taken the difficult but necessary decision to postpone the National Assembly elections to Monday, April 4, 2011….”

    That was some eight years ago.

    After marching steadily albeit slowly, in the journey towards democratic consolidation, it seems to me that the same cannot be said of our efforts to discharge the burden of the old nightmare: not only has it refused to go away, it appears to have mutated into a new form of malignancy. Rather than isolate the problem for what it is, we seem to have found solace in the semantic muddle of  calling mediocrity and plain incompetence by fancy descriptions of “logistics challenges” and “sabotage”!

    Just imagine the gospel, according to Prof Yakubu: “Preparations were hindered by bad weather in parts of the country, which affected distribution of materials…We therefore had to rely on slow-moving long haulage vehicles to locations that can be serviced by air in spite of the fact that we created five zonal airport hubs Abuja (North Central), Port Harcourt (South-south and South-east), Kano (North-west), Maiduguri and Yale (North-east) and Lagos (South-west) to facilitate the delivery of electoral logistics.”

    Over to you, the Nigerian Meteorological Services Department and Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).  While the two agencies might yet have a tale or two to tell about the situation that Nigerians are not already familiar, the question of why INEC will have to wait to announce the shift at 2.30 in the morning, some few hours to the start of an exercise that has been in the works for more than 36 months will obviously continue to rankle.

    So also is the claim of ‘sabotage’ which in the circumstance seems at best an alibi: “In a space of two week, we had to deal with serious fire incidents in three of our offices in Isiala Ngwa South Local Government Area of Abia State, Qu’an Pan Local Government Area of Plateau State and our Anambra State office at Awka. In all the three cases, serious disruptions were occasioned by the fire, further diverting our attention from regular preparations to recovery from the impact of the incidents”.

    Fire incidents in THREE local governments out of 774? For an election that INEC has had nearly the whole of four years to prepare? Well said – should suffice for the INEC chief!

    Little wonder PDP chairman, Uche Secondus insisted that INEC boss should resign. Without as much as supplying proof, he says, the postponement “is a plot by President Muhammadu Buhari to cling to power”. Said he:  “Anything short of a well organised electoral process devoid of manipulation,  harassment and intimidation of voters and the opposition particularly members of the PDP”.

    As for the ruling APC, it was a case of the PDP being up to its old trick again. According to Festus Keyamo, Director, Strategic Communications, APC Presidential Campaign Council, PDP is sworn to discredit this process the moment it realized it cannot make up the numbers to win the election. Urging INEC not collude with the PDP on this, he warned darkly that:  “We do not want to be forced to a situation of announcing our total loss of confidence in INEC, because we know where that would leave our democracy”.

    The rest of us caught in the middle can only wait and watch while the slugfest lasts.

    The shame unfortunately isn’t just INECs, but the so-called African giant that continues to waddle in mediocrity.

    Now, it isn’t that Nigerians do not appreciate the enormity of the problems. In an election with some 23,316 candidates on the ballot spread across 119,973 polling units, INEC’s task is certainly challenging enough without the class act of delinquent actors adding their nefarious script to spoil the fun for the body and ultimately the rest of us. Vanguard for instance informs us of the 640-odd cases in which the commission is either sued directly or joined as in cases arising from disputed party primaries. Add that to the challenge of recruiting, training, and deploying one million odd ad hoc staff; put it side by side with the sheer task of deploying materials to far flung places; the operation would seem to require something on the scale of a war drill.

    But then, that is precisely what the job is all about. That is why the country, despite the lean times, has not denied commission the resources it needs to get the job done. More importantly is that the challenges are hardly anything new, having been rolled over with each successive cycle of elections. Which is why Nigerians expected the electoral body to have gained mastery – not to recycle the same old but worn clichés of “logistics’.

    Will INEC redeem its image on Saturday? For that to happen will be a leap into the eighth wonder of the world. That will certainly be a miracle. But then, like a friend assured me the other day, miracles still happen – a la Nigeria.

  • Of endorsement and postponement

    It is the season of commentariat endorsement.  But what has happened is sudden election postponement.  Life goes on.

    Still, the reaction, angry if understandable, has suggested the world had ground to a halt.  It hasn’t — and it wouldn’t.

    But that doesn’t make the postponement of the presidential/National Assembly election the ideal.  Indeed, for a fragile polity, it’s no good news — and it should never happen again.

    Even then, it’s no novelty.  In 2011, the same presidential/National Assembly election got postponed, even hours after it had opened.  Reason: failed logistics.

    In 2015, the election opener got pushed back by six weeks.  Fearing incumbent defeat and a lack of momentum, the then National Security Adviser (NSA), Sambo Dasuki, went to Chatham House in London to raise a Boko Haram scarecrow.

    Days later, Dasuki’s postponement got rammed down the country’s throat, via the National Council of State (NCA).  At that meeting, the NSA baited INEC chair, Prof. Attahiru Jega, to go on, if he could conjure up security.

    Yet, the yak and yelp that greeted this latest postponement, suggesting a novelty, betrays a sickening lack of institutional memory.

    It’s a troubling national forgetfulness that condemns Nigerians to reacting to about everything with dashing hysteria, coupled with vulgar abuse and damning conspiracy theories.

    Still, that is not to say pushing elections, at the virtual last minute — this latest one got announced around 2am on Election Day — should be tolerated.  Indeed, it must be condemned.  And trust Nigerians: the blame beam got switched on with blinding flash, complete with wild name-calling and a torrent of curses.

    All that is okay — after all, you don’t smack a child and expect it not to yelp or scream.  The problem though is that even as Nigerians froth in holy anger, they tightly shut their eyes to the root of the problem.

    Many have dismissed the  Mahmood Yakubu-chaired Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as “incompetent” — and it could well be.

    Still, though the INEC chair had changed from Prof.  Jega (whose tenure was responsible for the 2011 and 2015 postponements), the blighted operating environment, that forced the umpire to eat crow back then, is perhaps even worse today.

    Since Nigeria’s formative years, leading up to independence in 1960, elections here have been the civic equivalent of a shooting war — with booming guns not altogether silent; and baleful politicians, with a win-at-all-cost mentality, anything but civil.

    In such perilous setting, sabotage is rife.  Where venality is second god, especially among the unscrupulous elite, hefty-bribe-for-sabotage appears even rifer, if the price is worth the risk.  In such dog-eat-dog milieu, INEC and its operations are fair game.

    So, perhaps Prof. Yakubu’s most grievous sin was waiting too long to halt the train.  Even then, no one wants to, in a hurry, face the proverbial Nigerian bile — for “incompetence”, the polity’s latest cliché!

    But then, better pull the plug and earn that bile, than get consigned to the Nigerian electoral Hades, where Maurice Iwu hankers down as the Satan of all time!

    Jega, after all, endured two postponements (though to be fair, the 2015 one was state blackmail beyond his help), only to lift Nigeria from electoral morass, after the Olusegun Obasanjo/Maurice Iwu all-time “do-or-die” meltdown of 2007.

    So, as folks growl, hiss and bristle at INEC, this grim news: this election postponement might not be the last in Nigeria’s electoral cycle.

    Why?  Because there are still too many rotten players, strutting around the democratic space, sworn to winning at all cost, whatever it takes!

    For one, former President Obasanjo is not weaned of his do-or-die temper of 2007.  This year, he has an added blackmail weapon in the so-called “international community”, whose hypocrisy has, so far, been rather benumbing.

    For another, you don’t stay loudly quiet at clearly organized arson against INEC — a convoy bearing key election materials completely razed on the highway at Akwa Ibom; containers with 4, 695 smart card readers, among other materials, burnt in Awka, Anambra State; other INEC office arson in Plateau and Abia states; and materials for two of the three Niger State senatorial districts, vanishing on election eve — and still expect Yakubu to conjure “free and fair” elections.  That would be electoral reverie taken too far!

    Yes, INEC has its own share of the blame. But the Nigerian people should also partner with their state to rid the electoral process of political desperadoes.  They know they are doomed.  But they want to take everyone down with them.

    So long as Nigerians tolerate or even gloss over these renegades, so long would they condemn themselves to last-minute poll postponements — or even worse — with the associated heart aches.

    That is the bitter take from this latest postponement.

    Endorsement?  O yes! But first: this analogy-turned-allegory, from Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart.

    It goes by unconscionable tortoise, who though stitched up with borrowed feathers to make a bash in the skies, rechristened himself “All of you”, to corner all the gravy.

    His angry, hungry and cheated benefactors would strip him of all the borrowed plumes.  As a result, he got tossed down from the skies, badly fracturing his shell, from his cascading fall.

    Tortoise, as “All of you”, perfectly epitomizes Nigerian national governance since 1960 —and the perfect living symbol of that is former President Olusegun Obasanjo.

    As military Head of State (February 1976 – 1 October 1979), Operation Feed the Nation (OFN), was one of Gen. Obasanjo’s key policies, to mainstream household farming.

    But after, another OFN — Obasanjo Farms Nigeria — became the crown jewel of the former junta head’s tour of duty.  The Land Use Decree (now Land Use Act) paved the way to cheap access to vast farm lands, suggesting sweet private lollies, buried deep in patriotic public policy.

    Obasanjo’s second coming, as elected president (1999-2007), boasts a similar self-gifted tiara: Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library (OOPL) — clear extortion, dubbed as “donation”, from Business and Political Nigeria, to a sitting president and Oil minister!

    Since 2015, however, that “All of you” culture appears receding, with public money progressively working more for the bulk of the people.

    The Nigerian state, under PMB, is bonding with the poor and the most vulnerable, through specific pro-poor initiatives; aside from a visible infrastructure upscale, physical and social, even the blind can see.

    Still, the “All of you” army charges into this election with snorting horses and furious chariots; baying “international community!” as the gallop into battle!

    But they forget: what Achebe rendered in “All of You” is the Igbo equivalent of the Yoruba version, rendered so dramatically in Ola Rotimi’s Kurunmi: a tortoise that swore never to return from his trip, until he was disgraced!

    On Saturday, let the majority vote in those who spend the people’s money on the people – not on their selfish selves.  That is what PMB has done since 2015 – and that is the logical path to tread.