Category: Festus Eriye

  • Brave new world at the National Assembly

    The expectation within the ranks of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) high command would be that with the exit of Bukola Saraki as Senate President and Yakubu Dogara as House of Representatives Speaker, peace and amity would break out between the executive and legislative branches of government.

    There is nothing in the temperament of front runners for leadership of the Senate and House – Ahmed Lawan and Femi Gbajabiamila – to suggest that the lingering tension that was a feature of ties between the 8th National Assembly and the executive would be repeated.

    While the numbers don’t appear to favour his bid, the refusal of Senator Ali Ndume to join Danjuma Goje in dropping out of the contest, leaves some air of unpredictability in a Senate race that would probably be conducted under a secret ballot.

    For the Borno senator to win, he would need at least 10 senators from the ruling party to rebel and back him. He would also need the entire 40-odd votes of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senators to remain intact. You look at the states and you are hard put to find where those numbers would come from especially as PDP lawmakers are unlikely to vote en bloc.

    Were Ndume, against the run of play, to prevail then it would be the Saraki scenario all over. He would have won courtesy of PDP votes and would only survive by depending on the same ballots that brought him to power. He would be beholden to an opposition with a different agenda, confronting an angry ruling party frustrated at being cheated, again, out of a prize they assumed was rightly theirs.

    The tension between both sides would hit new heights. I suspect that the ruling party would try everything not just to make the Senate ungovernable for the ‘usurpers’, it would deploy every trick in the book to reclaim its ‘mandate.’

    Ndume would be a headache for the APC. It takes very steely character to have defied all pressure and entreaty from his party and continue with his bid knowing there would be consequences whether he wins or loses. He would pay a price for pursuing whatever principle he claims to be promoting by remaining in the contest after the party had taken a clear position backing Lawan. Anyone who is ready to stand alone in this way, is not the sort of character to listen to any sermons on patriotism from Aso Rock.

    This may suggest that Lawan or Gbajabiamila would just be pliant tools rubberstamping executive decrees in their respective legislative chambers. It is a burden for the gentlemen because their willingness to work with the executive, as well as being the choice of the establishment, puts them in an awkward position of being labelled as potential puppets.

    But the two men are experienced enough to understand that they are required to uphold the constitutional responsibility of the legislature to check the executive, while balancing that with cooperation as one government to deliver on their party’s governance agenda.

    The Senate and House are more than their respective presiding officers. The legislators represent hundreds of constituencies across the country – with their differing needs and aspirations. Neither the Senate President nor the Speaker has any powers to impose their personal agendas on the whole without their cooperation or consent. To be able to collar hundreds of lawmakers to a uniform position requires skill to work out compromises.

    Presiding officers are also only too aware that the moment their members begin to see them as agents of the executive their support base would quickly evaporate. A wise politician would perform a fine balancing act that enables him retain the backing of lawmakers who want to assert their independence while also doing business with the executive.

    That is why, whether it is Lawan, Ndume, Gbajabiamila or some other person who emerges, the 9th National Assembly would still have its fights with the Presidency over modifications to budget proposals, oversight functions and bills that end up being vetoed. Problematic nominees would still have issues clearing the confirmation process. It is the same everywhere no matter how friendly the leaders on both sides are.

    In an ideal situation it would be seen as creative tension between arms of government working towards a common end. In Nigeria, we’ve made it out to be the war of the branches; it ought not to be so. President Muhammadu Buhari would help by not expecting the National Assembly to merely chorus ‘rankadede’ whenever he sends proposal.

    Our constitution has given the National Assembly the power of the purse and as check on the executive. Just as the executive is not perfect in carrying out its functions, so also our legislature must be seen as work in progress. Thankfully, the courts are there when disagreements between the sides become intractable.

     

  • Life in the time of fake news

    The lifespan of a lie can be quite elastic depending on how intricately it is woven. Some can be buried for years, but in the age of social media it can be brutally short.

    That is why I am often confused as to the motivations of purveyors of fake news who know they can be found out in a matter of minutes or hours. While the creators have their dubious agenda, those who spread the lies – especially online – probably do so with some advantage in mind.

    Desperate bloggers and website owners who want to attract traffic to their sites would push out the most sensational of stories without subjecting same to the most basic journalistic tests. The more excitable amongst us who get their thrills from spreading the latest tales, are only too glad to share same with the gullible hordes on social media. So what, on the surface, looks like a manifestation of extreme insanity, clearly has method to it.

    These days the internet has become a sea of lies: headlines lie, photos and videos tell even bigger lies. The wicked and mischievous can lift a photograph from five years ago and use it to drive a story in a similar context today. The reader would swear he saw the pictures with his own eyes until a rebuttal knocks him back to reality.

    Beginning with the election campaign that threw up Donald Trump as US president, fake news has become a multimillion dollar global industry relentlessly deployed for political ends. Nigerians, quick to pick up on global trends no matter how diabolical – have not been slow to jump on the bandwagon.

    During the recent general elections it seemed there was a competition by liars to outdo themselves on social media. Perhaps anticipating the impact that the phenomenon could have in determining the outcome of the electoral contest, the then Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, launched a campaign against fake news. It was a non-starter that was quickly brushed aside by malevolent forces who thrive best in polarised environments such as ours.

    The inauguration ceremonies at federal and state levels in the last few days provided another fertile ground for fake news merchants to wreak their usual havoc. While the lies exposed the levels of bitterness and hate in our society, it also made for hilarity just imagining what the mischief-makers were trying to achieve. I would touch on a few.

    One headline screamed that barely 24 hours after leaving office former Imo State Governor, Rochas Okorocha, his wife and brother, were arrested by agents of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Given his controversial nature, and the alarm he had raised in the preceding weeks that his political foes were out to humiliate him using the anti-graft agency, this supposed news break looked like a swift fulfilment of prophecy.

    The report quickly went viral and bloggers lost their heads as they tripped over themselves to see who would be quickest to the draw in the posting the non-news.

    For those in the opposition waiting patiently for the All Progressives Congress (APC) government to set on its own, this was titillating stuff. Former Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, an alumnus of the EFCC’s Abuja detention facilities, was quick to rush out a mocking post welcoming Okorocha to the club. I am sure wherever he was holed up Rochas must have snorted derisively that this was a clear case of ‘Iberiberism.’

    Several hours after his enemies had rejoiced at the speed at which retribution had supposedly visited the recently departed governor, the EFCC emerged with a spoilsport press statement denying that it had arrested him and his wife.

    Clearly, there must be something about Imo State in this season as another major fake news item – also associated with the indefatigable Okorocha – emerged from there. The great statue builder had planted a giant concrete finger pointing towards the heavens somewhere in the state capital as an enduring democracy dividend for his people.

    But lo and behold, the whiff of his cologne had barely evaporated from Government House, when bulldozers ostensibly ordered by the new governor, Emeka Ihedioha, took to demolishing the so-called ‘Akachi’ statue.

    It was a surprise ‘move’ to see the new helmsman who comes across as the restrained and understated opposite of his excitable predecessor, bare his fangs so early in the day. The headlines announced that Ihedioha had swung into action by destroying one of the most noticeable of Rochas’ infamous collection of statues.

    While Okorocha may have an army of detractors, even they were taken aback that the new governor’s priority would be pulling down his predecessor’s ‘Eighth Wonder.’ A statement by his spokesman many hours later denying he ever ordered the demolition barely spoilt the fun for the fake news brigade. Some only reported he directed a halt in proceedings – leaving out the fact that they ascribed to him an action he never ordered in the first place.

    Meanwhile, back in Lagos State – home to a long line of ‘Action Governors’ – the new man Babajide Sanwo-Olu was apparently too slow for the hacks. A few hours after the oath-taking ceremony and with no word on appointments, they decided to make a key one for him. They announced he had appointed the Director-General of his campaign organisation, Tayo Ayinde, as Chief of Staff.

    Such an appointment was clearly in the works, but at the time the report appeared it had not been made official. It would be confirmed last Friday. Mortified at the leak, Ayinde issued a statement denying he had been named to the new role.

    He signed off with a lecture to the media about always crosschecking their facts – and there’s the rub. These days ‘the media’ is a catch-all phrase for everyone with a Facebook page or Twitter account. Not so. It would not have been lost on him, if he had checked, that not one of the traditional media outlets carried the ‘fake’ report. But this was one unusual case of ‘fake news’ – not being fake. Instead of lambasting those who scooped the news of his appointment, it would have been wiser not to respond and just let official confirmation come.

    I would touch on one more report, but at the risk of being accused of spreading fake news would preface it by saying he ‘allegedly’ did so. Up north, it was reported that the one of the first acts of the newly-inaugurated Yobe State Governor, Mai Mala Buni, was the acquisition of a brand new wife – reportedly his third.

    He has not deigned to respond to the reports so I would assume that is his way of not dignifying the fabricators of an event that never took place with a response. Alternatively, his deafening silence could be confirmation of the nuptials as one of the activities of the inaugural season in the state.

    Perhaps, there hasn’t been a confirmation or denial because the governor hasn’t made strategic media aide appointments. Hopefully, a denial is winging its way to the press – however long it takes. So for now I would suggest we file the report of Buni’s ‘new wife’ in the false reports category.

    For all their entertainment value, fake news represent a cancer that can tear a volatile multi-religious and multi-ethnic society like ours apart. Such reports can trigger devastating damage that rebuttals that come hours after cannot mend. Even worse, those who act on the strength of the initial account may never get to read the denials.

    Aside being a clear and present danger to our collective security, fake news erode trust in an environment where people desperately need to trust one another and those who govern them.

    That is why the government – executive branch and legislature – must make the fight against fake news a priority in this new dispensation. The traditional media also has existential reasons to be part of this effort.

    As a first step, those who generate fake news and those who gladly spread the poison should be made to pay a steep price. It is the least we can do to stave off tragedies somewhere in the future.

  • Three nuts to crack in Buhari’s second term

    Insecurity was pivotal to the downfall of former President Goodluck Jonathan in 2015. Back then, not even the nation’s capital was immune to the scourge of suicide bombers who were setting off their ordnance in public places and military barracks in the city.

    I recall that after one such attack at a popular motor park in Abuja, the president paid a quick visit to see victims at some hospital and thereafter headed to a Peoples Democracy Party (PDP) rally in Kano where he was pictured dancing enthusiastically.

    The optics were awful. Not only was Jonathan coming across as not having a solution to the security challenge of the time, his appearance at the rally painted a picture of an unfeeling leader. It was propaganda gold served on a platter to the opposition who milked it for all it was worth.

    Muhammadu Buhari, on the other hand, was sold as the no-nonsense general with commensurate experience to bring Boko Haram insurgents to heel. Four years after being handed the job, and on the cusp of entering his second lap, the scorecard is a mixed bag of significant progress in the Northeast and deterioration in some other areas.

    The government and its security agencies are quick to point to their successes against the insurgents as evidence that things have improved. They have their point because for years not a single bomb has gone off in Abuja or any of the major northern cities outside of the Northeast theatre of conflict.

    Much of the ground that Boko Haram once held has been retaken. This is a far cry from the days when the terrorists’ sleeper cells were uncovered in Kogi State and the fear was it just a matter of time before they struck in the Southwest.

    However, the progress against the insurgents has been vitiated by the snowballing of other security threats like kidnapping and banditry to unprecedented levels.

    No honest person would say we don’t have a crisis with kidnapping – a menace that is occurring in virtually all geopolitical zones. Where, once upon a time, it was a novelty associated with the Niger Delta struggle, now it has become a business venture – shorn of any political or religious motivations.

    The banditry scourge in Zamfara and other parts of the Northwest is even more complex. On the one hand it is a communal conflict pitting the Fulani against Hausas, but the killings have also been linked to economic factors.

    Add to this grim mix the lingering bloodletting between herdsmen and farmers and you have a gigantic headache for Buhari as he heads into the second tenure.

    Today, the armed forces and other security agencies have multiple operations currently running in different theatres across the country – each with fearsome names like ‘Operation Thunder Strike’, ‘Operation Python Dance,’ ‘Operation Puff Adder’ to name a few.

    The fact that they are so many underscores the gravity of the situation. In spite of these diverse emergency interventions, the security situation remains fluid as kidnapping, banditry and other forms of extreme criminality don’t look like they are about to disappear. Despite the position of the agencies that the situation is actually improving, each new day brings reports of some new outrage by criminals.

    Sometimes, the security agencies take the simplistic position that all such activities are fanned by desperate and ambitious politicians. That sort of thinking led the DSS under Jonathan to allege that the then opposition All Progressives Congress (APC) were the sponsors of Boko Haram.

    Perhaps we are seeing shades of that sort of thinking with the erstwhile rulers now turned opposition being accused of actively plotting to destabilise the Buhari government. That suspicion would remain until evidence is released to back up the charges.

    At other times the argument is that some of these groups just want to confront the state. While we must make room for erratic and irrational behaviour, one is left wondering what the motivation for confronting state is. Is it just confrontation as an end?

    Assumptions about groups bent on confrontation can be reasonably made when discussing Boko Haram and, to a lesser extent, Sheikh El-Zakzaky’s Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN). But the threats to wellbeing of the larger population are not from these two now significantly-weakened groups.

    The earlier the government addresses itself to the fact that criminality is rising because of the parlous state of the economy the better. Youth unemployment is rampant. We have scores of public and private universities churning out thousands of graduates yearly without any idea of how they would be put to work.

    There is even a greater nightmare with the less-educated and illiterate who have swarmed into commercial motorcycle riding (okada) – because for them it is the only game in town.

    Unfortunately, the economy is not creating new openings at a pace to offset mounting job losses. The upshot is a spike in the numbers of the idle and frustrated.

    The government spent the last four years pursuing a strategy of attempting to reflate the economy by investing massively in public infrastructure and paying contractors who were not receiving their monies under the last administration. It has also tried populist initiatives like Tradermoni.

    However, its best efforts don’t appear to be denting the problem. Buhari has to crack the co-joined issues of the economy and insecurity in his second term, otherwise the negative feedback surrounding these issues would totally eclipse whatever he may attain building infrastructure. Quite frankly, it’s still the economy, stupid!

    The third thing that has to be addressed urgently is the structure of the country. Much of the stresses and strains we are witnessing have much to do with how we co-exist, how common resources are apportioned as well as the manner in which power and responsibilities are shared by governments at different levels.

    There is failure of governance at the grassroots because many states have hijacked the funds and functions of local governments and are not willing to let go. Even with what they have grabbed, the sorry states are not in any better shape.

    For its part, the Federal Government has had too much stuffed on its plate by the constitution, making it ineffective and inefficient in many areas. There has to be a radical redefinition of how things work such that certain powers and responsibilities are taken from the centre and devolved to the states.

    In this wise, it is absolutely imperative that control over natural resources is redefined such that states can become viable and local economies built up without the current beggarly relationship that exists between them and Abuja.

    But the process cannot be helped if public officials keep regurgitating clichés about Nigeria’s indivisibility. While the advantages of size make it a wise option to remain one entity, we must accept that ours is a far from perfect union that desperately needs tweaking. That is why the visceral reaction to any mention of restructuring shouldn’t be some lecture about remaining one indivisible nation.

    It might be the wish of some to hold the nation together. But wishes are not horses. Sometimes, historical forces just take matters out of our hands. The centrifugal forces pulling Nigeria in different directions are increasing in their intensity such that there could be a rent somewhere if something urgent isn’t done about today’s issues.

  • El-Rufai the godfather slayer

    Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, is something of an enigma. To some he is a straight talker given to shooting from the lips. Others would say he shoots first and reflects later – thus pushing him into the category of loose cannons.

    This past week his soundbites made front page news because we are stuck in the political season and there’s still plenty of room for intrigues as the new government at the centre takes shape. That very process has implications not just for good governance in these next four years, but also in the unofficial race to succeed President Muhammadu Buhari come 2023.

    It is against this backdrop that the governor’s comments about ‘godfatherism’ at the Bridge Club in Lagos, can be analysed. First, El-Rufai bragged about retiring four notorious godfathers in his state – making him something of an expert in that sort of political warfare.

    Responding to a question as how to bring those who presently call the shots politically to heel, he proffered the following solution:

    “Here in Lagos, you have over six million registered voters, only about a million voted (in 2019 general elections); five million did not vote. If I want to run for governor of Lagos, I will start now. I will commission a study to know why those five million registered voters did not vote; where do they go on Election Day?

    “Then I will start visiting them for the next four years. I will try and get just two million of them to come and vote for me; I will defeat any godfather. The key is to go to the people. The card reader and the biometric register have given us the tools to connect directly with the people.

    “I assure you if you do that for the next four years, connecting with the people; the tin godfather, you will retire him or her permanently. But it is hard work; it requires three to four years of hard work. So, if you want to run in 2023, you should start now.”

    At the same Bridge Club event, he called on Buhari to deal with ‘desperate’ and ‘over-ambitious’ elements within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) whose activities, he said, could make the president’s second term difficult from day one.

    The governor’s position implies that these ‘overambitious’ politicians were starting to manoeuvre towards the next electoral contest too early – given that the president hasn’t been inaugurated for his second tenure.

    Given the time and place, many have jumped to the conclusion that El-Rufai was addressing his comments to a particular individual – even when he didn’t mention names. You only had to read between the lines.

    My concern is not so much about the target of his verbal arrows. I am more disappointed that for a man who many would describe as among the brighter minds in the APC, his comments are full of suppositions and contradictions. Stripped of their capacity to ignite controversy, they only make the governor look like a hypocrite speaking from two sides of the mouth.

    First, the claim that he saw off four godfathers in Kaduna is impressive if that achievement was actually down to the governor’s political prowess. Sadly, he didn’t mention those he put out of business.

    While the governor would understandably want to claim credit for winning the governorship polls in Kaduna in 2015 all by himself, another school of thought argues that back then he wasn’t a political giant or giant-killer who could have triumphed on the basis of his popularity.

    Rather, he was one of scores of politicians who were swept into office across the north clinging to the coattails of Buhari. Indeed, such was the force of the bandwagon back then that in many places in the region a dog would have been elected into office simply because of his association with the then APC presidential candidate.

    So for El-Rufai to rashly appropriate the success of the party in his state back then as a function of his political sagacity – without finding a place for the Buhari factor circa 2015 – is a bit rich. I doubt if he would have been elected governor – on his own steam – if he had run on a platform like the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) – shorn of the president’s pull.

    Another assumption is that the low turnout of voters at the recent general elections – in Lagos especially – was a protest against some supposed godfather. It is as simplistic an explanation as I have heard for a phenomenon that was widely reported across the country.

    If anything, voter apathy was driven by a complex mix of factors: among them disenchantment with the political class – godfathers, godsons and godfather slayers. In many places the outcome of the presidential election was a depressant to those who expected a different result. The upshot was they chose to vote with their feet. Others simply assumed that their votes wouldn’t count during the governorship contest that followed, so didn’t bother to come out.

    Part of El-Rufai’s counsel to aspiring godfather slayers in Lagos was for them to start working now. He said the project would require four years of hard work to succeed.

    Without any sense of contradiction, the godfather elimination expert who wants politicians to start planning for electoral success four years ahead, is the same person calling on Buhari to ‘deal with’ ‘desperate’ and ‘over-ambitious’ individual who are already scheming for the 2023 contest which is still four years away! How do you spell doublespeak!!!

    In other words, it is okay to work ahead if your aspiration is limited to Lagos, but unacceptable to carry that same mind-set to a political project in Abuja. Contradictory, if you ask me.

    As if the president does not have enough troubles on his plate, El-Rufai now wants him to move full tilt into the witch-hunting business – sniffing out ‘desperate’ and ‘overambitious’ politicians. The first hurdle he would run into is providing the means for measuring when ambition is acceptable and when it is excessive.

    You can never achieve anything in politics or any other walk of life without a healthy dose of ambition. I dare say that it was his ambition – the nameless godfathers he allegedly slew would most probably say ‘over ambition’ – that ensured he is the governor of Kaduna today. In fact, some swear that he has his own ‘next level’ 2023 aspirations. So should the president crack down on him also?

    It is sad that people who should be encouraging the liberalisation and the expansion of our democratic freedoms would be encouraging a militaristic mind-set that seeks to circumscribe what the constitution has freely given to citizens.

    All Nigerians who are eligible for public office should be free to aspire as long as they meet the legal requirements. It is not for El-Rufai or any other person to pick and choose for the electorate. Let the people deal with the ‘desperate’ and ‘overambitious’ using their votes – and not some office holder however eminent.

     

  • The wild, wild North

    Making sense of how bandits and kidnappers choose their targets is not complicated, if we assume that they are driven largely by economic motives.

    They presumably go after the affluent and influential, those connected with wealth and power, in the sure knowledge that even if their victims are financially hamstrung, their kith and kin would quickly pay up whatever ransom is demanded.

    So, this week the kidnapping plague sweeping through the country finally berthed – symbolically – in Daura, Katsina State, hometown of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The four gunmen who invaded the town had a special target: Musa Umar, district head of the town, who also happens to be father-in-law to Buhari’s aide-de-camp (ADC), Mohammed Abubakar.

    The calculation would probably be that they would harvest a ton of cash given the Abuja connection.

    Their action speaks volumes about where we are in terms of security. To target the family of a senior security aide to the president without fear of the immediate consequences, speaks to the contempt with which criminals hold the police and other state institutions. The fear factor keeps fading fast because the reign of impunity remains unchecked.

    The abduction of the Daura district head is the latest such incident involving high profile figures in the North Central and Northwest zones of the country. Two weeks ago, Mahmood Abubakar, chairman of the Universal Basic Education (UBEC) was seized along with his daughter, Yasmin, by kidnappers operating along the Abuja-Kaduna highway. They were freed a day later, some say after the payment of ransom in millions of naira.

    Before this incident, there was another that occurred along this same expressway. It happened at the same time that Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai was passing through. He made a very public show of stopping his convoy and marching into the bush with his security aides – ostensibly to pursue the kidnappers. Needless to say none of the criminals was apprehended, but there were photo-ops aplenty.

    As fallout from this episode, men of the Federal Anti-Kidnapping Task Force made a much-publicised sortie along the highway. Again, yielding lots of Facebook posts but very little in terms of kidnappers taken out of business.

    After a series of such operations, Acting Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Adamu, emerged from a security briefing with President Buhari, to declare the infamous Abuja-Kaduna highway free of kidnappers. They must have laughed loudly in their hideouts.

    Less than two weeks after the IG’s all-clear, they pinched the UBEC chairman and his daughter.

    Northern Nigeria is in deep trouble. In Zamfara, bandits and freelance gunmen with unknown agenda are killing and maiming unrestrained. In spite of bombings and other security interventions, sudden and brutal death has become the reality that unarmed local communities have to deal with for the foreseeable future.

    As has been broached earlier, large areas in the axis around the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Kaduna State and parts of the Middle-Belt have become kidnapper country. Everyone is a potential target as long as you are in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    In Kaduna, reprisal killings between communities do not look like they would go away soon because each vicious episode, provides the rationale for victim communities to hit back in kind. The government, which only becomes aware after the atrocities have been perpetrated, is reduced to mouthing platitudes.

    In other parts of the North Central zone, the gory harvest of deaths associated with herdsmen has largely exited newspaper front pages, but they haven’t been totally terminated. From time to time, fresh reports of mindless killings still pop up.

    As for the Northeast, the Federal Government’s declaration of a technical knockout of Boko Haram insurgents operating in the region, now seems like a celebration called prematurely. Suicide bombers wreak havoc from time to time, while outlying settlements are remain vulnerable to attacks – such as the one that claimed over 20 lives recently in Adamawa.

    The Islamists may be in retreat but they are far from defeated – especially with the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) breathing life into their operations.

    Even more alarming than the fact that the entire region is increasing looking like untamed frontier territory where gunmen reign supreme, is the reality that nothing the government has thrown at the problem seems to be a long-lasting solution.

    For a brief period, the bombing of the bandits in Zamfara looked like a magic wand that would wipe out the problem. It has since turned out to be a mere salve than didn’t address the issue at its core.

    Similarly, whatever magic cure the Acting IG was touting a few weeks back over the rash of kidnappings along the Abuja-Kaduna highway, now looks like something with all the efficacy of a fake drug.

    In the Northeast, the war against the insurgency brings good news one day and embarrassing setbacks another.

    It is a dilemma that demands more than the government is offering – be it community policing or whatever. Beyond urging security agencies to “deal ruthlessly” with bandits, Buhari and his men have to come up with more creative and all-encompassing solutions – especially those that are not politically correct. Nothing should be off the table – whether it is state police or the hard-to-define concept of restructuring.

    Security interventions may be useful in the short term, but they are not enduring answers. For one thing we don’t have enough soldiers and policemen to cover the vast territory that is Northern Nigeria. Isolated communities can never be covered for 24 hours and would always be at the mercy of the killers. What we need are solutions that provide vocational alternatives for the perpetrators of violence.

    At the root of the troubles is a mixture of economic and religious causes. Banditry and kidnapping are enterprises that generate revenues through cattle rustling and ransom payment. The bandits in Zamfara have also been linked to illegal mining activities.

    Our reality is that there is greater illiteracy and unemployment across the north compared to the rest of the country. For as long as the leaders of the region don’t develop their local economies, but remain hooked to the dwindling allocations from the federal purse, the situation can only get worse.

    Unfortunately, a succession of northern governors and political leaders haven’t shown that they understand the gravity of the problem or the urgent actions needed to address their situation. It is a shame that a region that has produced the largest number of our Heads of State never thought it expedient to let their charity begin from home. Now the region is reaping grievous consequences of failure of leadership.

    This crisis has taken five decades to come to a head and it will take more than bombings and posting of police commissioners to address.

    The time has come for leaders of the North to develop a blueprint for economic restoration of the entire region so it can close the gap with the rest of the country. It should be a document that all will agree to implement on a cross-party basis. Today’s crisis transcends mundane partisan affiliations.

    Amaechi, Rivers and South-South APC

    Strange things are happening in Rivers State. After the political conflicts of the last general elections and, indeed, of the last five years, I was astonished to hear Governor Nyesom Wike, following his victory at the polls, call on his bitter foes on the All Progressives Congress (APC) side, for cooperation and reconciliation.

    My initial reaction was that the comments were tongue-in-check. But at Easter, Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, again, struck the same reconciliatory tone – asking the people for forgiveness and unity, declaring that the state was far from where they envisaged it would be at this point.

    Anyone who has followed the harsh rhetoric that has trailed the power struggle by both sides, would therefore have taken notice when Amaechi’s allies in the APC for whom Senator Andrew Uchendu spoke recently, accepted Wike’s olive branch.

    The results of the governorship election in which APC never got to participate were never in doubt given the advantages of incumbency which Wike enjoyed. The closest he had to a challenger was the AAC’s Biokpomabo Awara’s feeble effort.

    Now that the battle has been won and lost, what should a strategic politician do? Continue to moan over spilt milk or begin to plan ahead for the next contest?

    The good thing is that there would be no incumbent on the ticket in four years – meaning the playing field would be more level. Lowering the political temperature gives the minister the opportunity of resolving the internal conflicts that ended up denying the party a chance to challenge Wike effectively.

    Such was the bitterness of the legal battles fought by Senator Magnus Abe – who like Wike was one of Amaechi’s closest allies having served as Secretary to the State Government under him – that reconciliation may seem like a farfetched dream at this point.

    Still, if Amaechi and Wike can be singing the same hymns of reconciliation, nothing makes it impossible for him and Abe to kiss and make up. That is why politics is referred to as the art of the possible.

    A change of strategy is imperative as the parties begin to look forward to 2023. In this wise, APC’s relative weakness in the south is something the party needs to address because PDP may have lost the presidency, but emerged with better national spread – having governors in every zone.

    In the south APC is strongest in the Southwest and weakest in the Southeast where it once again received an electoral rebuff.

    The South-South zone therefore offers the party the best option for shoring up its presence down south. Aside Edo where it has a governor and produced the APC’s national chairman, much hope was invested in the party riding on the supposed political strengths of former Akwa Ibom Governor, Godswill Akpabio, to penetrate the state. That turned out to be a forlorn hope.

    Which brings us back to Rivers, aside Edo and Akwa Ibom, as the party’s best hope of enhancing its national spread and shoring up its position in the South-South zone. There is no denying that APC retains substantial support in the state despite not being on the 2019 ballot.

    If it had had candidates, even if Wike had prevailed in the gubernatorial contest the parties would have shared the state assembly, House and senate seats. The challenge for Amaechi as the party’s leader is to build again on that latent support base by dealing with all the recent fractures.

    His job should be made easier by the fact that whatever losses have been suffered on the home front, have been ameliorated by the success of the presidential campaign which he headed. That virtually guarantees that he would be one of the returnees in Buhari next cabinet. A role in Abuja gives him the continued relevance necessary for this sort of effort.

     

     

  • National Assembly after Saraki and Tambuwal

    For drama, there are very few institutions that can match Nigeria’s National Assembly. On a given day, anything could happen: from legislators hurling chairs at each other or exchanging blows, to masked thugs invading the chamber to spirit the mace away.

    Sometimes the entertainment is provided by external forces. For instance, in the dying days of the Goodluck Jonathan presidency, the lawmakers arrived for work one day to discover that all entrances had been blocked by the police.

    It was part of the fallout from the power play between Jonathan’s Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) government and Speaker Aminu Tambuwal who had been flirting openly with the opposition All Progressives Congress (APC). At that point, the votes of the opposition were the only thing sustaining him in office.

    Enraged that they couldn’t gain entrance into their offices, and fearful that the executive was about to pull off something unsavoury against their man, the more excitable and adventurous among the legislators took to scaling the high gates and fences – not minding the impediment of their billowing agbadas. In the end the police backed off and normalcy was restored.

    More recently in August last year, it was the secret police in the form of hooded State Security Service (SSS) agents that arrived to seal off the assembly. Assisted by truckloads of the regular cops, their assignment was ostensibly to supervise the overthrow of Senate President Bukola Saraki and his deputy Ike Ekweremadu.

    But such was the backlash that Acting President Yemi Osinbajo removed the then SSS Director-General, Lawal Daura, from his position.

    From the early days of the Fourth Republic, the assembly has been a hotbed of intrigue as a succession of Senate Presidents and Speakers were toppled in messy coups at the behest of the Executive.

    Among victims were the likes of Evans Enwerem, Chuba Okadigbo, Anyim Pius Anyim, Adolphus Wabara, Salisu Buhari, Patience Etteh and Dimeji Bankole.

    While the legislature is a separate arm of government, its ability to choose its leadership without interference from external forces, has been limited. Although the arms are supposed to work in concert, the parliament’s power over the national purse as well as constitutional role in the possible impeachment of a president or governor makes it a threat to insecure politicians in the executive branch.

    This fact has often defined the relationship between the two sides. Many in the executive believe that they can only sleep with two eyes closed if they install a stooge to lead the legislature. On the part of the lawmakers many chafe under this constraint as they struggle to balance the desire for cordial ties with their constitutional duty to provide checks and balances.

    Under President Olusegun Obasanjo, the National Assembly was a very unstable place for those who led the institution. His successors – Umaru Yar’Adua and Jonathan – were less overbearing and allowed the lawmakers greater room for self-expression. But that didn’t stop the pattern of the executive overtly trying to install Senate Presidents and Speakers.

    That was until President Muhammadu Buhari famously washed his hands off the matter in 2015, declaring that he could work with anyone. His position was unprecedented in recent times and completely caught the APC leadership which was still trying to guide the succession process off-guard.

    In the vacuum that was created Saraki launched his power grab in the Senate with a bloc vote from the PDP, while half of the APC lawmakers were on a wild goose chase elsewhere in Abuja. In the House of Representatives, his confederate, Yakubu Dogara, pulled a similar stunt – again allying with elements of the opposition to defeat Femi Gbajabiamila who was backed by the party.

    While Saraki’s actions angered many within the ruling party’s leadership, his move was by no means original. Indeed, he had merely torn a page out of the APC’s very own play book as the party had openly cooperated with Tambuwal when he defied the PDP to run against the party approved candidate for Speaker, Mulikat Adeola. So, this was a case of unorthodox politics coming back to bite you.

    Since that episode, however, many have come to think that this is the proper way of doing things. Nothing can be farther from the truth.

    In pursuing their bids for self-actualisation, Saraki, Tambuwal and Dogara, trampled the concept of party supremacy underfoot. They probably felt they could later beg for forgiveness after deliberately sinning. It helped that at that point they were dealing with a naïve president and a weak party chairman.

    With attention now reverting to the National Assembly succession, many have been watching to see how the APC would handle things and how the PDP would play its own cards.

    Anxious not to allow a repeat of the debacle of four years ago, Buhari and the ruling party’s leaders have quickly seized the initiative by anointing Senate Majority Leader, Ahmed Lawan, to lead the upper chamber. They are believed also to have lined up the House Leader, Femi Gbajabiamila, for the Speaker slot.

    Further firing up controversy, APC National Chairman, Adams Oshiomhole, bluntly declared that the ruling party would not share power with the opposition. All committee chairs would be from the ruling party except for one slot constitutionally set aside for the opposition.

    While some have questioned whether this forceful intervention is wise given that it takes away much of the approved aspirant’s room for compromise, it does appear to have had an effect.

    It has only drawn muted protest from one aspirant – Senator Ali Ndume, but we’ve not witnessed the sort of mutinous response we saw in 2015. Buhari has also moved to mollify another interested party, Danjuma Goje.

    For its part, the PDP insists it would put up candidates to lead the National Assembly and would do everything in its power to derail the APC’s plans.

    Despite the criticism he has received, I can’t find much that is wrong with Oshiomhole’s position which simply echoes a basic principle that in a democracy the majority rules.

    Nigeria’s National Assembly, just like the presidency, is closely patterned after the United States’ model with minor modifications. In the US, the day to day business of the Senate is run by the Majority Leader and not a Senate President.

    However, succession from election to election is without fuss, as the most senior person simply moves into the next slot. For instance, when the Democrat’s Harry Reid was Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell of the Republican Party was Minority Leader. When the Republicans became the majority he became the leader of the Senate.

    The same thing happened in the  House of Representatives where Nancy Pelosi who used to be Minority Leader seamlessly stepped into the Speaker’s chair when the Democrats became the majority last November.

    In the same manner, it is the party with the largest number that heads the legislative committees. What occurred under Saraki in the Senate and Tambuwal and Dogara in the House with the two parties sharing chairmanships as equals was an aberration.

    They had to share power with the opposition because the manner in which they emerged demanded that there be a quid pro quo. Such arrangements are forced on you where you can’t muster a majority and have to cobble a working coalition together. It is uncalled for where you are in clear majority in the two chambers as is the case with the APC today.

    It is immoral politics for a party in minority to seek to rule over the majority. That would be like attempting to overturn the expressed will of the people.

    Rather than seek to govern a chamber where it is the second largest in number, the PDP should strive to excel in its opposition role and offer Nigerians a clear governance alternative.

    But such is the character of our politics today that despite its clear majorities in the House and Senate, there is still considerable trepidation within and without the APC as to whether it can make its members line up behind those backed by officialdom.

    There is this false notion that once people step into the chambers of the assembly, they should no longer be held to their partisan obligations. Nothing could be more wrongheaded. The Senate or House are not some special political clubs where legislators lose their partisan identifies.

    They are simply fora where people advance the vision of their parties for governing the country. Sometimes, there could be bipartisanship on issues. At other times voting could follow strict pary lines. It happens all over the world and we would not reinvent the wheel in Nigeria.

    I suspect that the case would be different in 2019 for a couple of reasons. The ruling party now has a strong leadership that has shown that it is able to confront those who were hitherto untouchables. Its handling of Ogun State Governor Ibikunle Amosun and his Imo counterpart Rochas Okorocha attests to that.

    Secondly, there is no Saraki in this contest. In 2015, he was driven by ambition and the politics of the legacy groups within APC. Since the presidency was out of the question, the Senate Presidency was the next best thing his new-PDP could fight for. He had the profile, following and resources to go against the party line and emerge unscathed.

    The dynamics are different this time. Those expecting a repeat of what happened four years ago should ask themselves whether Goje or Ndume want the Senate Presidency so badly that they are willing to confront Buhari and the APC high command. How far would they be willing to go in pursuit of their ambition?

    But perhaps the most important factor in the struggle for power in the National Assembly is the fact that PDP has emerged from the elections stronger than before. It has taken four states from the APC and now has governors in all zones. The APC has lost its lone foothold in the Southeast – Imo State.

    But what it lost at gubernatorial level, it has made up for by adding control of the National Assembly to its grip on the presidency. For it to maintain the initiative going into the next election cycle, it only makes sense for it to unapologetically maximise its advantages. I suspect that the PDP would do the same if positions were swapped.

     

     

     

  • Lagos: Why I don’t envy Babajide Sanwo-Olu

    Aside the presidency, being governor of Lagos State is one of the most powerful and prestigious political offices anyone can occupy in Nigeria – and for good reason too.

    Lagos is the nation’s commercial capital and currently ranked the fifth largest economy in Africa –putting it ahead of over 40 countries on the continent. It equally outstrips the 35 other states in terms of revenue generation and overall economic performance.

    Such is the depth of the state’s strength that in 2018 it generated 76% of its revenues internally. This amounted to about N34 billion monthly. Governor Akinwumi Ambode mid last year spoke of an aspiration to reduce the state’s dependence of federal revenues to less than 10%.

    While these figures may seem impressive against the backdrop of 27 states being almost bankrupt, much of what it generates is also devoured by overheads, an ambitious infrastructure development programme and the challenges of catering for an ever surging population whose reveal numbers remain guesstimates.

    State government statistics says 86 immigrants enter Lagos every minute of the day – the highest rate of any city in the world. That translates into 123,840 entrants on a daily basis and they come to stay.

    This influx overwhelms whatever facilities are on the ground and outpaces the ability of the government to provide new ones. So while the city might look like one massive construction site, whatever is being built simply plays catch-up, but never catching-up.

    This pattern will remain for as long as the rest of the country continues to struggle economically – leaving the city and to a lesser extent Abuja and Port Harcourt as the only centres of opportunity open to the desperate. This is the challenge that Governor-Elect, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, will inherit in a matter of weeks.

    His rise was unscripted, as the incumbent Ambode was expected to have an easy ride to a second term courtesy of his ambitious vision for altering the face of the city. In the first two years, his aggressive opening up of the interior of the state as well as showpiece projects like the Abule-Egba and Ajah flyovers, the skywalk and bus terminals at Oshodi and elsewhere, marked him out as a man of action who was intent on outperforming his predecessor, Babatunde Fashola.

    He was not only building big, he was equally providing solutions in certain areas of the city like Ojodu and Oworonsoki where traffic jams had become nightmarish. Unfortunately, it all went wrong suddenly.

    Ultimately, his attempt to reform the process of clearing refuse in the city proved his undoing. In the Visionscape debacle his political skills were tested and he fell short. Just as the deal collapsed, the coalition that brought him to power gave way – and the rest is history.

    Whatever may be Ambode’s legacy in terms of infrastructural development, he leaves for his successor a city that has regressed in so many ways.

    Today, Lagos has become one of the dirtiest cities on the continent. This dubious distinction was something the Bola Tinubu and Fashola administrations had managed to bury.

    The inability of the outgoing governor to crack the Visionscape logjam provides Sanwo-Olu with an opportunity for a quick win. The city stinks and is crying desperately for a clean-up. The world would sit up and notice if he can make the mounds of filth disappear.

    To his credit, under Ambode violent crime remained relatively low. Ironically, it was also a period marked by unprecedented lawlessness on the roads and elsewhere. A drive on most Lagos roads is like engaging in mortal combat. You may escape with your life but your vehicle would be the worse for wear.

    On any given day, from the tony environs of Ikoyi to the more prosaic parts of town, swarms of commercial motorcyclists (okada) and tricyclists unleash a reign of terror on the roads. Not satisfied with seizing the roads where the laws say they are officially barred, they now ride freely on pedestrian sidewalks! Driving against traffic, jumping the lights, is accepted practice. Frankly, on Lagos roads you can get away with murder – and not just in a figurative sense.

    Compounding the sense of chaos is the collusion of security officials with delinquent commercial bus drivers and motorcyclists. It is really a lost battle when those who are supposed to enforce regulations are in bed with offenders.

    Another maddening contradiction of the Ambode era is the fact that while embarking on these huge projects like the BRT lane from Abule-Egba to Oshodi, basic things like patching potholes on existing roads were left undone.

    What used to be a tradition of constantly fixing failed portions of key arteries in the city has been abandoned. No area is exempt – not even the seat of government in Alausa.

    The only reason these roads would be left in this condition is lack of funds. But a state that is able to finance multi-billion naira mega projects can spend a few billions fixing potholes if those governing care about the same things as the governed. The condition of roads – major and minor – is another crisis area Sanwo-Olu must address in a hurry.

    Lagos is a city of contrasts where breath-taking opulence lives side-by-side with depressing poverty. The aforementioned swarms of commercial motorcyclists are not just a nuisance on the road: they are a constant reminder of the impoverished state of the larger population in the city.

    That poverty is also on display in the form of street traders selling everything from fresh fruit to fire extinguishers taking over the rail tracks at Ikeja or the uncompleted BRT lane at Iyana-Ipaja as evening falls. The streets become a moving mall because the vendors – battling with daily survival – cannot afford regular stalls in proper markets.

    This poverty is another reason why the okada problem has defied solution. Although they provide transport solutions for people who wish to move swiftly along the clogged roads, they are now one of the major employers of labour in the city. The numbers in operation are probably in the tens of thousands. To eliminate them would require the creations of tens of thousands of jobs otherwise many would take to a life of crime.

    The ability of the government to create jobs for such a large number is limited. But the new administration can encourage the private sector to generate employment by ditching policies that are not pro-business or those that deter the would-be entrepreneur. In this context, multi-taxation by different levels of government in the state needs to be addressed.

    It is no exaggeration to say that if Lagos works, Nigeria works. For the city to be better than it is now, the incoming governor and his team must outgrow the smug satisfaction of being better endowed than less-favoured states, and focus on transforming the city into a truly world class metropolis.

    That begins with dealing with the problem of lawlessness and ensuring that basic rules are obeyed. Lagos cannot be a jungle where anything goes, if it truly aspires to be something special. The Eko o ni baje slogan must move beyond a fond wish and become active impulse that drives how people live.

    That requires a measure of ruthlessness. The governor-elect looks like a nice guy – all smiles and charm. But in Lagos nice guys don’t win, unless their external veneer hides an iron will. Until Fashola, Oshodi was a transport hub notorious for crime, grime and gridlock. But with steely determination he tamed it. Does Sanwo-Olu possess that same streak? His actions would shortly speak for themselves.

  • Nigeria and her vanishing voters

    At the just-concluded general elections, many voted with their feet rather than fingers and we are still scratching our heads wondering why.

    If voters are becoming an endangered species, it is certainly not for lack of numbers. Officially, Nigeria has 84 million registered voters and of that number, 72.7 million collected permanent voters cards (PVCs) to enable them participate in the polls. That represents 86.3% of persons on the electoral roll – a very high figure indeed.

    But those who picked up the cards were probably more intent on using them for identification purposes, than for queuing in the sun to elect their leaders.

    On Election Day they confirmed this by the numbers that showed up at polling stations. In states like Abia, Enugu and Ebonyi turnout was well below 30% at the February 23 presidential and National Assembly polls. The national average was only slightly better at 34.75%.

    If those numbers were depressing, the turnout for the governorship and state houses of assembly elections two weeks later was abysmal in most places across the country. At some locations it was barely 20% of those who could vote.

    These figures represent a steady pattern of decline from a high of 70% in 1999 when the military ceded power to civilians, to an average turnout of 42% in 2015, and now barely 35% showing up to vote in this year’s polls. Anyone attempting an honest analysis of this phenomenon would do well to acknowledge that the trend is not new.

    What should bother anyone concerned about sustainability of democracy in Nigeria is that until now we’ve not had a serious national discussion about voter apathy.

    It is especially troubling that this year’s turnout is one the lowest of all recent elections held on the African continent. According to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (I-IDEA), it is the second lowest – the worst being 32.3% recorded at the 1996 Zimbabwean presidential election.

    While we may not all agree as to what is responsible for the apathy, it is evident that these low numbers are symptomatic of something grievously wrong with the electoral process. The source of the dysfunction needs to be quickly identified and addressed.

    Catholic Archbishop of Abuja, John Onaiyekan, speaking immediately after the gubernatorial polls, described the turnout as a “massive boycott.” He said in many places it was “a loud protest and vote of no confidence in a process that had destroyed their trust in the system.”

    It was a sentiment echoed by Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) who, after voting on March 9 in Yola, Adamawa State, mournfully declared that he had no confidence that his vote would count. Never mind the fact that his party had won the state handily on February 23 and is well-placed to prevail in the governorship contest in a state presently controlled by an All Progressives Congress (APC) administration.

    Voter apathy in 2019 is a malaise brought on by a complex mix of factors; it goes beyond any shortcomings that can be attributed to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) or the Muhammadu Buhari administration.

    At a primary level, it is a protest against politicians who only remember the people every four years when they desperately need their votes. This is the dynamic that drives vote buying and selling. The cynical voter feels that the only time he or she would benefit from the politician is when they can extract the measly two thousand naira price for their vote. Once the results are in, the victors quickly revert to their default mode: filling their pockets with the spoils of office far from the cares and concerns of their hapless constituents.

    This disconnection between the political class and the people is being further exacerbated along age and regional lines. The younger generation of Nigerians – especially south of the Niger – who incidentally form the bulk of the population, appear less interested in all matters political than the older folk.

    A meme that made the rounds on social media during the elections aptly captured this phenomenon. In the image, there is a long queue of voters of all ages somewhere in the North, waiting patiently to cast their ballots. Directly beneath that was another picture of a group of youths playing football on a traffic-free street in Lagos on Election Day.

    That is a pithy riposte to cynics who sought to understand why turnout was much higher in certain areas up North supposedly susceptible to insurgent attacks, whereas in many areas in the South far from fear of violence, it was anaemic.

    Contributing to the problem is the low priority paid to civic education. INEC and government at different levels are not doing enough, neither are political parties, schools, religious organisations or parents helping much.

    Voters don’t just materialise, they are mobilised. Even in established democracies like the United States and United Kingdom, get-out-the-vote initiatives are major undertakings by political parties and non-partisan organisations to boost the turnout on voting day. It is something executed in a systemic manner – not by deploying the fire brigade approach for which we are famous.

    So, we now have a major problem getting the young and middle-aged enthusiastic about the political process.

    Getting the self-absorbed selfie and Instagram generation interested in anything other than themselves is tough enough: getting them excited about their civic responsibility requires more effort than is presently being devoted to it.

    Another factor that has definitely impacted turnout is the order of elections. In the past when the presidential elections came last, the outcomes of the gubernatorial contests stirred up enough anxiety, keeping interest at fever pitch for the main bout between the leading presidential candidates.

    But since the order was reversed – making the presidential polls first – state elections have become something of an anti-climax. It requires something extraordinary to motivate disappointed supporters whose candidate has just lost out in the big one, to file out for another contest where all signals indicate that defeat is the likely end. You need just as much effort to push the complacent.

    The other major reason for low turnout is fear of violence. In this cycle, the role of the military in the electoral process has come under close scrutiny. In certain parts of this country like Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa and Delta States, violence has become an intrinsic part of the process.

    Every electoral season is marked by killing, maiming and burning. Whoever has the upper hand in wreaking violence, or has the cooperation of the security forces, had free rein to cook up fraudulent results – especially in remote areas.

    It is to be expected that a people who have been terrorised by desperate politicians using vicious thugs to secure their goals, would be wary of putting themselves in harm’s way. The real question is whether it is the presence of soldiers or the activities of the fearless gunmen that frightens potential voters off the streets.

    These thugs are so well armed that the police – supposedly the lead security agency for the elections – are often outgunned. It is only the military that has proven to be sufficient deterrent to them. So if people argue that the presence of soldiers suppressed turnout in the Niger Delta, can the same be said of other areas of the country where they sight of them had a calming influence on the populace?

    Take away the soldiers from Rivers and Bayelsa and they would revert to the theatres of violence and bloodletting that we saw in 2015.

    Was there abuse of the electoral process by the military? Did they in any way prevent voters from exercising their franchise? That is for the authorities to investigate and punish where infractions are confirmed.

    The much-anticipated 2019 elections have come and gone. The process may not been pretty, but some of the surprising and unexpected outcomes are indicators that much of the past abuses are fading away.

    To win back the voters, more reforms are needed to make the process less tiresome. Still, it all boils down to what the government does about the identified security challenges. Democracy cannot take root, for as long as those bent on violently denying people the right to make a free choice, are allowed to thrive unchallenged.

     

    The avoidable deaths at Ita-Faaji

    wo days after the loss of 20 lives following the collapse of another decrepit building at Ita-Faaji in central Lagos on Wednesday, March 13, the state government began demolishing many of the structures in the area which had been marked for demolition.

    The four-storey structure which became the tomb for 20 young lives was marked for demolition in 2014. If it was adjudged to be unsafe for human habitation five years ago why was allowed to remain until it buried over a dozen little boys and guys?

    Lagos State Governor, Akinwumi Ambode, who rushed to the scene for the usual sympathy visit had an explanation: some of the landlords whose properties were affected, resisted the notices. This is an appalling excuse to give.

    What is the use of pasting a demolition notice if you have no intention of acting on it? In what form was the defiance of the landlords manifested to the extent that demolition could not be carried out for all of five years? Were there court orders stopping the government from following through on an action that was essentially for public safety?

    The absence of political will on the part of the state government, rather than the obduracy of the so-called landlords, was what allowed this avoidable calamity.

    We see that same weakness manifesting with regards to the insanity on most Lagos roads. In spite of all the laws against commercial motorcycles roaming free on expressways, today they have become an uncontrollable menace – just one road rage incident away from causing a major disaster in the city.

    We would not see any action until it happens – triggering a merry-go-round of sympathy visits and photo-ops from those who should have acted firmly to prevent it. A stitch is time can still save many potential casualties.

     

  • 2019 Elections: Why Buhari won and Atiku lost

    Except you are Atiku Abubakar, you would accept that the 2019 general elections have been won and lost and nothing is likely to change the outcome.

    But the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate is a fighter who knows that this is probably his last shot at the presidency and would use every means possible to actualise his long-cherished dream.

    For him and many of his diehard backers, Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress (APC) procured their victory through massive rigging. To prove that he is right and everyone else is wrong, he has initiated a legal challenge of the declared results.

    He calls the 2019 general elections ‘the worst in Nigeria’s history.’ But then it wouldn’t be a Nigerian election if the loser doesn’t cry rigging.

    These polls were certainly not flawless, but by no stretch of the imagination can they be dismissed in such ungenerous terms. Most observers acknowledge that the process was largely free and transparent across the country.

    Sure, there were disruptions in a number of locations. But the sinners were on both sides. For every video of malpractice which the opposition has, there are many showing people identified as PDP supporters doing dirty things. What Atiku has to prove, is whether this pattern was so prevalent across the 36 states as to invalidate the official results.

    Anyone insisting that these elections were only about rigging is simply in denial. The surprising pattern of results across the country doesn’t support such claims: not even Machiavelli could have cooked them up.

    Four years on, the president and APC still couldn’t manage a win in any of the South-South and South-eastern states – despite the police and military being available to be used as instruments of rigging.

    In the Southwest – supposedly a stronghold of the ruling party – Atiku won in Ondo and Oyo States. In the latter, the incumbent governor Abiola Ajimobi was humiliated in his bid to win a senate seat.

    Buhari only edged the former Vice President by about 10,000 votes in Osun. In Lagos, the margin between the parties closely mirrored what happened in 2015.

    Should we then assume that the improvements achieved in this zone by the PDP were down to its rigging prowess?

    One of the biggest stories of this election cycle was the comprehensive dismantling of the Bukola Saraki political machine in Kwara State. But rather than put his shocking defeat down to rigging, the Senate President quietly accepted his fate and graciously congratulated the winners.

    As predicted, Buhari and the ruling party lost in Benue, Plateau and Taraba States because of herdsmen killings as well as issues of religion and ethnicity. Here, again, we see the rigging allegations falling flat on their face.

    That leaves us with the Northwest and Northeast which, even, the most cynical of the opposition’s supporters would acknowledge as the ruling party’s strongholds – where it doesn’t have to manipulate things to achieve its ends. But the PDP would have us believe that the rigging here had to do with tweaking the margins between the parties!

    With Atiku already in court, we would soon discover whether he and his party are right and the rest of the world is wrong. But on available evidence, nothing about their loss surprises me. It was something I predicted four years ago because the then ruling party misdiagnosed why it lost power.

    It actually believed that the major factor in its defeat in 2015 was what it called APC’s ‘lies and propaganda.’ In rare moments of light penetrating, some of its leaders had apologised to the nation for its errors. But the ambivalence over the real source of its problems would see its other leading lights whining about being undone by propaganda.

    I argued in my column titled ‘PDP must earn right to criticise Buhari’ published on Sunday, May 10, 2015, that the former ruling party would never get it right for as long as it refuses to properly identify why it has found itself in the opposition wilderness. The reason is not the rigging or propaganda prowess of its main rival.

    I reproduce the following excerpt from that four-year old piece:

    “Buhari’s assignment is complicated by the bitterness factor. The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) was unprepared for the loss of the presidency. Party spokesman aptly described his organization as ‘traumatized’.

    “Many in the ruling party still cannot reconcile themselves with what has just happened: they are handing over the reins to the man they disdained and they just can’t stop the habit of sniping at him. This is the campaign that never ended, and the attacks would continue whether or not they are reasonable or morally justified.

    “That the PDP is in disarray after its calamitous electoral performance is to be expected. The scope of the debacle is such that the party which has been in power for an unbroken 16-year stretch would be would be psychologically damaged for a long time.

    “In Abuja, national chairman Ahmadu Muazu and members of his National Working Committee (NWC) are exchanging brickbats with aides and associates of President Goodluck Jonathan over the defeat while crossing swords with governors who want them sacked.

    “The savage in-fighting that has already kicked off is not going to disappear just because a committee has been appointed to examine why the party did poorly at the polls. Peace will only come when one of the factions contending for the soul of the party prevails.

    “Although there’s no unanimity as to the best way forward most members agree that PDP has to reinvent itself. But that isn’t going to happen until the party understands where it went wrong. The reactions of some of its leaders – from President Jonathan who’s already dreaming of PDP’s speedy return to power in 2019 to Muazu who’s been bragging about transforming into a vicious attack dog who will give the All Progressives Congress (APC) government nightmares – shows they still don’t get it.

    “Their comments and those of their camp followers on the internet show that their understanding of their new opposition role ends with lobbing criticism and invective at every move of the incoming lot and their leader, Buhari. It was that sort of woolly-headed thinking that inspired the hate campaign strategy that backfired spectacularly of March 28 and April 11.”

    Interestingly, the Muazu referred to in that piece has since defected to the APC. He is not alone; many of the party’s other leaders in the north have done the same in the last four years – further weakening it in a region where it desperately needed rejuvenation.

    As for reinventing itself, the PDP has remained largely the same – making it easy for its opponents to successfully hang all sorts of negative tags on it.

    Anyone who followed the party’s 2019 presidential campaign would have been astounded by the incoherent messaging. Initially, I thought it was going to revolve round the question: ‘Are you better off today than you were four years ago?’

    That singular focus on the economic struggles of Nigerians is something people from every region could have related to. But rather than make an effective case for changing the APC regime on this ground, the party quickly lapsed into its tried-and-failed abuse strategy.

    Its name-calling and attempts to label Buhari as corrupt and dictatorial failed to gather traction. A reputation built over a lifetime wasn’t going to be undone by one month of electoral mudslinging – especially when sensational claims were not backed with credible evidence.

    It was Atiku and the PDP’s misfortune that they were running against Buhari. Although they revile him, they should have been more dispassionate in analysing his strengths and perhaps come to more modest expectations for the 2019 polls.

    The president is one of those unusual political figures who emerge once in a generation. He is the only Nigerian politician who has attracted unwavering backing from followers across a region for more than a decade. He is very much a figure in the mould of the late Obafemi Awolowo in terms of his charisma.

    Beyond his much-vaunted honesty, his appeal is hard to place. He’s not popular because of any known ideological beliefs. All he needs to do is raise a clenched fist and a stadium full of delirious supporters would be baying ‘Sai Baba! Sai Buhari!’

    Despite the economic challenges of the past four years, arising from the recession and the slow recovery process, his popularity has astonishingly held up in his traditional strongholds. This wasn’t down to ethnic solidarity because he was up against another northerner unlike in 2015.

    Against this unusual opponent, the best the PDP could throw up was Atiku. But the strongest PDP candidate was also one who came with substantial negative baggage. It was easy for the ruling APC to define him as the graft-challenged alternative to their pristine candidate. Such was his problem with this tag that even his eventual entry into the US after 12 years – rather than being a help – further reinforced the notion of a man with a problem.

    People enjoyed a few laughs over Buhari’s serial gaffes during campaign stops, but there was no comment more damaging than when Atiku proudly announced to an audience of business leaders in Lagos that he would ‘enrich his friends.’ Whatever he actually meant by that loaded statement, it was a gift joyfully received by APC influencers to further paint him as someone who was only in government for what he could corner.

    Atiku and the PDP just didn’t make a good enough case for regime change and that’s why they lost. From the outset they never outlined a convincing path to victory, preferring instead to hang on to the vain belief that Buhari’s support had collapsed across the country.

    The only way the opposition could have won was to break up Buhari’s base up north. Atiku failed to deliver that and just like in 2015, they were punished across the region. PDP didn’t need help across the southern zones. The party’s candidate – a northerner – should just hold up his hand and take responsibility.

  • State of the Nation: Governorship election: How States will vote

    Political analyst and Sunday Editor of The Nation Newspapers, Festus Eriye, joined by Senior Correspondent Dare Odufowokan to discuss how states will vote at 2019 governorship and state assembly election.