Category: Letters

  • APC: Opportunity beckons

    SIR: The Nation of February 20, page 55 titled “APC, Buhari and 2015” is a very commendable and timely effort by the 4th FORCE. It is a brilliant exposition of the stark choices before APC as it approaches the next general elections. The author has so fluently and convincingly expressed the opinion of so many Nigerians, even from the South-south, aghast at the deteriorating turn of events for a once vibrant and promising nation. His analysis of Buhari’s profile is clear, faultless. We are therefore sad and worried about the unhealthy scheming and subterfuge going on within his party.

    We have now experienced President Jonathan for four years. We do appreciate that he has been trying his best for this country, but apparently against insurmountable odds. And it seems he is overwhelmed by the enemies of his transformation agenda, entrenched and operating perhaps more from within as fifth columnists, than from anywhere else. So I think that Buhari’s time has come.

    But what about Tinubu? Should he remain a kingmaker operating only from behind the scene? The fact is that both Buhari and Tinubu constitute the central core, the genesis of the APC. Indeed, were it not for the gradual polarization of Nigeria along religious divides, it would be ideal, even mandatory, for the party to field its two most prominent candidates side by side. A Buhari/Tinubu combination would present an excellent drive for the government and nation on the path their vision will create. A drive, I believe, into a brand new order, genuine development and prosperity for all.

    Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu also boasts an intimidating profile. His diverse activities during his tenure as Lagos governor project him as a stable and unwavering democrat. He is further distinguished by his phenomenal capacity for identifying, nurturing and then projecting out extraordinary talents as unrivalled architects of new centres of development. Due to his foresight and planning, he is especially credited with the consolidation of Lagos as the nation’s richest, most modern and vibrant economy.

    Therefore, for the APC, a unique opportunity beckons. A political party is primarily defined by the character of its president, or candidate, and the key officials he appoints to assist him run his government. It is an expensive waste of time and energy playing around with neophytes in preference to a fully tested and proven veteran.

    • John Ingwu

    Calabar

     

  • Celebration that shouldn’t have been

    SIR: It is appalling that despite the human lives and properties that were wasted last week in Adamawa and Yobe by the animalistic sect group, the federal government still went ahead with the so-called celebration of 100 years of the country’s existence. Most disgusting was that beyond a one minute silence, Aso Rock did not show much concern for the demise. It did not even deem it fit to fly the nation’s flag at half mast in recognition of those young chaps and adults who were sent to their early graves. But because human lives don’t mean anything to this administration, the Presidency carried on with the celebration with careless abandon. So, while the big men were clinking away glasses of wine in the nation’s capital territory, families in the remote Buni (Yobe) and Adamawa languished in trauma, anguish and sorrow.

    The Centenary celebration in the midst of the Adamawa and Yobe carnage was a sad reminder of the Goodluck Jonathan-led administration’s insensitivity to the plights of the masses of this country. Those precious lives couldn’t have meant anything to a president who recently threatened to pull out the soldiers in the embattled states in reaction to a honest and frank statement expressed by Governor Ibrahim Shettima of Borno, over the sect’s senseless killings in the state. For a government that has lost touch with the realities of the insecurity and deplorable economic conditions in the land, the Centenary celebration was more important and significant to her than finding ways of addressing these challenges.

    In the first place, there was absolutely nothing to celebrate. The false and fraudulent union which the 1914 amalgamation imposed on us does not warrant the waste of resources and time as witnessed in that fruitless venture. The Presidency did not need to waste such huge public fund to reopen the old wound called amalgamation. The recent mindless killingsby the Boko Haram sect group represent some of those violence and crises that have characterised the so-called marriage since 100 years ago. The innocent blood of ordinary Nigerians has been used by successive regimes to sustain the propaganda on the elusive unity of the country.

    No sensitive government would roll out drum of celebration (however important such event is) in the midst of the disaster as witnessed in the two northern states. This is why world leaders often cut short their foreign trips and official functions to visit disaster areas in their countries to commiserate with the victims. Such action usually go a long way in reassuring the citizens that their leaders care about them, and the consequence is that patriotism and hope are renewed in the people. This was exactly what most Nigerians expected from the Presidency. There was certainly nothing too urgent about the celebration (assuming it had to take place at all) that could have prevented the Presidency from shelving it to a later date at least to show the families and victims of that dastardly act that the government share in their pains and anguish.

    It is high time the Presidency woke up to her responsibility and stop dwelling so much on irrelevance. The fight against the many challenges bedevilling our dear country, especially insecurity, requires cooperation from Nigerians. But such cooperation can only be obtained when the government demonstrates some level of responsibility and concern for the total welfare of the citizens, and this was what the Centenary celebration failed to achieve. It is sad, indeed!

    • Barrister Okoro Gabriel,

    Lagos

  • Re: To praise or bury Obahiagbon

    Re: To praise or bury Obahiagbon

    SIR: I am compelled by simple reason to strongly express my disapprobation with the piece titled: “To praise or to bury Obahiagbon.” It was authored by one Gilbert Alasa on page 43 of The Nation of February 20. The writer clearly anchored his caption on ‘ignoranti facti’ and miss-information because empirical fact supports my claim that the caption should have been: ‘To praise Obahiagbon’. I strongly defer to the forgoing caption in view of Obahiagbon’s dexterous and acrobatic use of the human language with effortless precision. It is on record that Obahiagbon’s popularity rest on the oasis his unbeatable idiolect and mellifluous dialectal delivery.

    Such admirable feat can only be attained by self intellectual effort as opined by Saint Austine in one of his mantra that: “The heights that great men reached and kept were not attained by sudden flight, but they, while their companions slept, were toiling in the night.’’ Therefore, I think we  should not blame Obahiagbon for the inability of his audience to grasp his thoughts at times because while he makes all available etymological dictionaries his ‘vade mecum’ in the dead of the night, others retire into deep slumber and ‘doclce farnient’(pleasant idleness).

    The writer must concur with me that Obahiagbon deserves not only a ‘million’ praises but infinite praises for having that sagacious capacity in expanding the scope of world vocabulary. The writer also misfired when he wrote: “My concern is the recurring infusion of Latin and Greek terminologies in his discuss as well as verbosity…’’ To be candid, this writer, from my own estimation, does not know the beauty and dynamic nature of language coated in neologism, poetic licence and ‘register’.

    To him, the infusion of Latin in a speech made by a lawyer negates the principles of communication; then, why were we taught ‘register’ in school? But I will excuse my friend. Perhaps the school he attended never taught him ‘register’ as a basic form of communication. I also wish to remind him that verbosities are not necessarily bad in oral communication because they are necessary lexical ‘lubricants’ that oil the wheels of oratory. He can run a check on speeches made by great orators if he doubts the veracity of my submission. The writer went on to announce to the world that he was conferred with the sobriquet ‘Obahiagbon’. If true, I think the raison d’être for that sobriquet was to praise him for his grammatical wizardry. Since his peers did not burry him, then it will be an unforgivable sin for him to contemplate burring the political cum legislative lexicologist (Obahiagbon) of our time.

    The writer relied on Reuben Abati’s cliché which states that “we seem like in a generation in a hurry; we hurry to live, to love…” to straighten his point. Yet he fell prey to the force of ‘hurriness’ as shown in his spelling of the word ‘Crinkum – Crakum’ as ‘Krikum – Krakum’ in his piece. He also erred in his peroration when he wrote: “But what we have failed to understand is that oratory seems to have been lost especially in today’s Nigerian political sector”. I wish to admonish him to always listen to the like of Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, Governor Babangida Aliyu, Pat Utomi, Peter Esele and the great Obahaigbon again and again. God bless Nigeria.

    • Ehi Godfrey O.

    Benin City

  • Sanusi: A case of executive recklessness

    Sanusi: A case of executive recklessness

    SIR: There is no better way to describe suspension of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, by President Goodluck Jonathan than to say that it is a crude display of power and an attack on free speech, especially when it is evident that this is coming on the heels of accusations of corruption against the NNPC by the CBN governor. The oil sector is believed to be under the ampits of those highly connected to the president. This shameful action also lends credence to the fact that President Jonathan has continued to live in denial as he has demonstrated in recent time that the powers conferred on him by our extant laws are not enough for him. It is even more sad that these violations keep happening before the very eyes of the nation’s number one legal officer, Attorney General of Federation, Mohammed Bello Adoke (SAN). Ordinarily, Nigerians expect that the AGF should advise and properly guide the president on a right legal approach to take.

    The Presidency’s action is a paradox. The reason is that its action is completely at variance with what he would want Nigerians to believe informed the suspension of the CBN boss from office. For instance, the purported suspension was anchored on “financial recklessness” levelled against the governor by a so called report of the Financial Reporting Council. The CBN governor was accused of taking actions and financial decisions that ran foul of the law. It is worthy to note that the president has not demonstrated a better respect for existing laws in this regard. If President Goodluck so much cherishes rule of law, one wonders why he had to circumvent the provisons of Section 11 of CBN Act 2007 (as amended) in suspending the governor. The implication of this action is abundantely clear: the Presidency has come to equity with soiled hands! He has no such power to suspend the CBN governor. He only has power to remove the governor subject to 2/3 approval of the Senate.

    Unfortunately, the supporters of this authocratic action have not been able to justify their supports beyond the fact that the CBN boss deserved to be shown the way out for “running aground” the institution. I know as a fact that Nigerians would not be opposed to the removal of the governor if he was found wanting. Our contention is that such removal must and should conform with laid down norms. It should not be done at the whims and caprices of the presidency. The argument that he who hires has the right to fire does not hold any water under the circumstance. Unlike in the normal contract of service, the appointment and removal of the CBN governor is strictly regulated by the Act and until such provisions are altered, the action of the president remains ultra-vires

    In a sanner society, where parliamentarians perform their duty without fear or favour, the action of the president is enough to start an impeachment proceeding against him. The simple reason is that nothing could be more gross in conduct than this flagrant violation of our law. Nigerians must demand from their lawmakers to do the needful on this matter. It would be most miserable of us to allow the president get away with this inpunity.

    •Barrister Okoro Gabriel,

    Lagos

  • YOUWIN: Ekiti youths are exempted

    YOUWIN: Ekiti youths are exempted

    SIR: I wonder why some citizens and some states of Nigeria are not benefitting from the federal government empowerment scheme: (YOUWIN) www.youwin.org.ng. This programme was established to finance and assist the youth in creating job opportunities for themselves and others in the country. This is a good idea from the federal government; the young folks were so happy for this innovation. Most youths from every states of the country registered on the site in other to enjoy this benefit from the federal government

    My greatest surprise is that many were notified that they won and the winners were given some certain sums of money to empower them, but some states were exempted, including Ekiti. Is Ekiti State not part of Nigeria? Some of the youths there were notified that they won in the programme; the YOUWIN representative came to Ekiti State to meet the winners there. The winners were given a shirt, a jotter and a pen and with the promise by the representatives that they would be back in a short time to empower them financially.

    After a year, they came (October 2013), with the expectation of empowering the young folks there. They were given a certificate that they had participated in the YOUWIN programme instead of empowering them. They even took their photographs as if they had given them money.

    Mr President, no youth in Ekiti State has benefitted from your administration’s YOUWIN programme. Please note sir.

    • JoySunday

    ggodisgoodd@yahoo.com

  • Brooding over Nigeria

    SIR: Geographically speaking, Benin and Togo are much closer to Nigeria. But Ghana and Nigeria have English as their lingua franca, haven been ruled by  Britain consequent upon the colonial partition, and so the citizens of the two countries feel much at home in each other’s territory. I otherwise testify that Africans have a lot in common in their cultures, and wherever they find themselves in Africa, they are brothers and sisters.

    When I first visited Ghana, it was for a conference in Kumasi in 2007. What caught my fancy was night travel, or what one can call 24 hours movement, as I enjoyed it in Europe and America. We arrived in Accra in the night, and went straight to a park, a very busy park, and boarded a commercial bus to Kumasi. On our way out after the conference, we left Kumasi at around 2 am or thereabout to take an early taxi to Lagos from Accra.

    Why can’t Nigerians enjoy the same thing in their own country? Night travel was safe in the past. I used to travel at night alone in my official car in the 1980s. Gradually, insecurity became rampant. The extremely wide gap between the have and the have-nots is not helping matters, and the matter is not getting better as cases of official corruption and presidential protection of embezzlers/misappropriators have been on the increase.

    Politically, Nigeria is unsettled. If the politicians are not using ethnicism, they use religion to divide and rule the land; politicization of religion and imperialism are banes of Nigeria’s peace and progress. Surprisingly, there is order in the way things are done in Ghana and that is why Nigerians in Ghana enjoy electricity and peace of mind. Nigeria needs to get better also if brain drain must be averted and if other nationals must come to our country to live.

     

    • Pius Oyeniran Abioje, Ph. D, University of Ilorin.

  • Salami treatment for Sanusi

    SIR: The February 20, 2014 removal of CBN Governor Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, four months to the end of his term of office, reminds me of how President Goodluck Jonathan unjustly dealt with the former President of the Court of Appeal, Honourable Justice Isa Ayo Salami. This recent Salami treatment of Sanusi is ill-timed and a bad omen to all anti-corruption whistleblowers. Why the haste? I am of the opinion that the suspension was aimed at scuttling the on-going National Assembly investigation into allegations levelled against NNPC by the suspended governor of CBN. It would be recalled that SLS had accused the NNPC of non remittance of huge sums of money into the federation account. The initial amount was about $49b and more recently, after some financial reconciliation between the NNPC, Ministry of Finance and CBN, the disputed sum came to about $20b. Sanusi also accused NNPC of providing subsidy on Kerosene when the administration of erstwhile President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua had written a memo for this to be stopped.

    I commend SLS for coming out boldly to expose this act of impunity being committed by NNPC. Sanusi would be remembered for his many reforms of the banking sector among which is the sanitisation of the banking and the wider financial sector through the sack of some banks managing directors in August 2009; the introduction of cashless policy, the biometric registration of bank customers and the know-your-customers policy for banks.

    The reasons for the suspension given by government, should this be true, then the board of the CBN should have been dissolved alongside the suspension of the governor. This is because, Sanusi has always claimed that he has the approval of the CBN Act and the bank’s board to make all the donations made to schools and victims of terrorist attacks. Moreover, we learnt the FRCN report of June 7, 2013 that indicted SLS had found both the governor and the deputy governors culpable- why were his deputies left off the hook with one of them even being made acting governor?  By making a scapegoat of Sanusi, a lot of government officials who want to expose acts of corruption are being cowed from speaking out. The last may not have been heard about this case.

    Sanusi may have talked himself into trouble giving what many believed are unguarded statements that he made during his explosive tenure (remember the allegations he made against the National Assembly that they spend 25 percent or thereabout of the national budget, a claim NASS vehemently refuted). For me, Nigerians will remember Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as a courageous person who believes in speaking truth to power, not minding whose ox is gored. But definitely, he is someone the establishment loves to hate.

    • Jide Ojo

    Abuja

  • What does Boko Haram really want?

    SIR: The nation has been thrown into mourning as Boko Haram Islamists heartlessly engaged in the killing of several innocent pupils when they attacked the Federal Government College in Buni Yadi, Yobe State. The attackers reportedly arrived at the college at about 2am when the pupils were already asleep. During the encounter, they were said to have set locked hostels on fire, before shooting and slitting the throats of those who tried to climb out of the windows while some were said to have been burnt alive in which 40 houses, hostels, classrooms and staff quarters were razed down. This national calamity and a few others that happened thereafter show that there is need to urgently

    re-appraise and curb the activities of this notorious group that kills people as if human life is nothing. This can no longer be tolerated. It has always been obvious that Boko Haram abhors orthodox Islam that preaches peace and, like similar jihadist groups everywhere, by seeking to violently overthrow the existing order by imposing Sharia rule based on its own parochial and narrow interpretation of Islam.

    Then we should ask: who are they really fighting? Is it government? Is it Western education alone, which they say is evil? Could it be politicians who do not reason their own way in view of the fact that they dictate the tune of the sound in the polity? Through this latest massacre, many people have concluded that efforts by government to bring lasting solution to the crisis have failed. Wait a minute, what does Boko Haram really want? They have never given the slightest hint that they are engaged in a crusade for economic opportunities or inclinations.

     

    Will somebody, please, tell me what is sensible or what could be the justification for the dastardly killing of secondary school children? Are they the ones preventing Boko Haram from getting better deal from the powers-that-be? An honest advice that I want to give members of Boko Haram is that Nigerians are completely tired of their prolonged and horrifying attacks on many hapless fellows that remained unprotected by their government.

    The embattled governor of Borno State, Kashim Shetima recently raised an alarm when he met with President Goodluck Jonathan after another horror attack on his state and expressed concern that  our army was less equipped and poorly motivated than the enemy they were meant to curtail. Without mincing words, anyone who has followed events in the North-East would know that the governor had actually stated the truth. Rather than see this as a wake-up call, Shetima got a bashing from Mr. President’s spokesman. Must we continue this way?

    While every form of illegality and criminality should be discouraged in their totality, I don’t believe, however, that the final solution to the menace of Boko Haram lies in the exchange of gun, I sincerely believe that genuine resolution of the impasse should be through negotiation while the deployment of more troops should not be ruled out. Therefore, the first step in this direction is to allow the two parties to have a common ground to discuss and sort out issues. Boko Haram members should drop their guns – which have not been helpful at all – and opt for the peace option because human life is too precious to be wasted.

    On a final note, all agitations by Boko Haram – whether real or speculated may not be attainable – in view of the plural nature of our society. But something has to be done urgently now by government.

     

    • Wale Kupoluyi,

    adewalekupoluyi@yahoo.co.uk.

     

     

  • Babatunde Aloysius Ahonsi at 50

    Attaining half-a-century is a noteworthy achievement, especially in a country like ours where average life expectancy is below this landmark for both male and female. It gets more important when such life has been lived in pursuit of excellence and helping others to achieve their full potentials.

    Babatunde Aloysius Ahonsi’s life is a lesson in humility and excellence. Turning 50 on February 27 is, however, a noteworthy event even when he refused to have any elaborate celebration, which is very typical of him, as many of us who have interacted and worked with him at different levels know. But Nigerians have a duty to examine his life closely and see the lessons we can glean from it. It is doubtful if a critical analysis of our developmental efforts as a country in the areas of maternal and child health, HIV and AIDS, and gender empowerment in the last two decades would not reveal his imprint in all. Whether as a lecturer at the Universities of Ilorin, Calabar, and Lagos, or as a senior programme officer in the West Africa office of the Ford Foundation, or currently as Country Director for Population Council in Nigeria, his life has been geared towards rescuing children from a myriad of diseases, ensuring pregnant and nursing women live life to the fullest, and lifting women from the shackles which our tradition and religion have bound them with.

    He has also made stellar contributions to scholarship as his copious papers on health, development, and gender issues are everywhere for all to read. Even when he left the university environment formally in 1997, he has remained attached to the system in churning out papers regularly and actually planning to return to academics fully later in his life. BAA, as colleagues and friends affectionately call him, graduated with a first class honours in Sociology from the University of Lagos and a doctorate in Population Studies from the London School of Economics and Political Science which he undertook as a Commonwealth Scholar between 1988 and 1992.

    BAA is a winner of over 20 awards for academic excellence and professional distinction since 1985, and he has been a Visiting Young Fellow at the Population Institute for Research and Training at Indiana University, Bloomington, USA (1993), a Laureate at the 1st Gender Institute by CODESRIA, Dakar, Senegal (1994), and a World Bank-Robert McNamara Fellow (1995-6). He has also been actively involved in technical assistance to several Nigerian NGOs working on gender equity and sexual and reproductive health, and to major not for-profit companies on CSR issues. Highlights of his professional career in the last 17 years include helping to catalyse the school-based provision of comprehensive sexuality education for young people in Nigeria, the empowerment of persons living with HIV and AIDS in national responses to the epidemic, and the inter-linking of reproductive health education for poor youth and women with economic empowerment approaches. His newspaper articles have not been as regular as when he used to write a weekly newspaper column but appearing rather sparingly possibly due to the nature of his current assignment.

    Our paths crossed in 2003 even though his name has featured repeatedly in conversations with some friends before then. What struck me that time and till now is his simplicity in dressing and approach to issues with a knack for breaking down complex stuff to easily understandable parts. Until recently when I asked him his mother tongue, it was difficult placing him particularly within the prism of that usually confusing phrase, “state of origin” as most of our discussions are held in Yoruba which he speaks very fluently having grown up in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital. “Ogbeni, ki lo n happen?” he would intone in his baritone voice anytime we speak. More often than not, he plays the roles of a teacher, counsellor, sociologist, and educator whenever we speak. His cosmopolitan outlook has, however, not stopped him from supporting his homestead. BAA sits on the board of Otuo Microfinance Bank in Edo State.

    His undying love for Nigeria remains unparalleled and he would always intone, “Let’s keep hope alive, Nigeria is our country,” even when situation appears to be going contrary. Despite numerous opportunities to live outside the country, he has consistently refused to do so saying “Nigeria si ma da,” loosely translated: Nigeria will still get better. Whenever I asked him why he remained so eternally optimistic about Nigeria, he always answered that our abundant potentials in human and natural resources properly harnessed will surely do wonders and that he sees his life-long occupation as giving hope to Nigerians. He does not relate with anybody on the basis of ethnicity but solely on the fact that such person is a human being and that’s why his friends cut across the entire country and outside.

    He is also devoted to his family even when his career has forced him to live a peripatetic life recognising it as the hub for a successful and productive life. Babatunde – he loves that name greatly – is married to Francisca Ahlijah and they have two sons, Arenma and Osaemi. A devout Catholic who is not loud but whose life is an epitome of Christian virtues; he is an active participant in his community whether in the neighbourhood where he lives, the churches he worships both in Lagos and Abuja, and the schools his sons attend. He readily offers his skills and intellect in all these places. And for those of us his younger friends, he is the elder brother we don’t have offering us shade from the vicissitudes of life whenever we need it.

    I wish I could speak Otuo, a variant of the Bini language spoken in parts of Owan East LGA of Edo State, and wish him a Happy Birthday using the language. But this tribute suffices, and it comes with a prayerful wish that surely the best part of his life is still ahead.

    Fatade is a journalist in Lagos.

  • Nigeria’s leaders must preserve her peace

    SIR: May I use this medium to express my concern over the worrisome attitude of Nigerian rulers to issues about the peace of the nation, which has been writhing in crises and under-development. In 1999, the then leaders thought about Nigeria’s peace and proposed rotational presidency, consequent upon which all the major political parties chose their presidential candidates from the Southwest. When former President General Olusegun Obasanjo ended his second tenure in 2007, the pendulum shifted to the Northwest from where all the major political parties chose their candidates. That gave the impression that orderliness and peace had come.

    When President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua died, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (GEJ) and OBJ denied the rotational agreement, that it was Jonathan’s turn. Some Nigerians argued that the agreement was unconstitutional or undemocratic. I argued that the constitution was made for Nigeria and not vise versa. To those who said rotational presidency was undemocratic, I replied that democracy is about political order, and it becomes democratic if we endorse it.

    Curiously, there was a rumour in 2007 that OBJ chose Yar’Adua as his successor, knowing that he might soon die from kidney ailment, thus making GEJ his automatic successor and thereby helping the South-south people to taste the presidency. I dismissed the rumour in favour of my belief that OBJ chose Yar’Adua selfishly to compensate Shehu Musa Yar’Adua. But, everything happened as rumoured. Yar’Adua died, and OBJ declared operation total support for GEJ. Then I started begging Nigerians not to truncate rotational presidency for it would ensure order, equity, peace and progress if made to rotate among the six geopolitical zones.

    GEJ used his power of incumbency to set machinery in motion; depleted Nigeria’s foreign reserves and plunged the nation into bankruptcy. The debilitating campaigns necessitated fuel price increase from N65 to N97, soon after GEJ’s election in 2011, dressed as “fuel subsidy removal”. The same scenario is now playing out as GEJ is going from traditional rulers to religious leaders.

    I don’t trust Speaker Aminu Tambuwal. Therefore, I appeal to the All Progressives Congress (APC) to make amends where necessary for past mistakes. I beg Nigerians to resist GEJ’s bribery and corruption for the new Nigeria of our dream. Visiting leading Kings, Emirs, etc with brown envelopes will not sway people who are tired of political disorder, corruption and abject poverty. GEJ will only enrich the bribed and aggravate ordinary people’s penury.

     

    • Pius Oyeniran Abioje, Ph.D,

    University of Ilorin.