Category: Letters

  • Non-kinetic weapons to defeat Lukarawa terrorists

    Non-kinetic weapons to defeat Lukarawa terrorists

    • By Osung Edet DSP

    Sir: Collaborative intelligence and community policing, if well-coordinated, can be a very active and successful non-kinetic weapon to defeat Boko Haram and Lukarawa terrorists. Intelligence is a product of (information, rumour and grapevine) stories that have been treated professionally. Mind you – ordinary information is not yet regarded as intelligence until it is treated by trained brains and minds. Grapevine stories, rumours and ordinary information – when gathered, analyzed and processed can give birth to intelligence. Intelligence is a credible information with credible facts and figures that can assist law enforcement agents to apprehend offenders or launch lawful attacks on criminals.

    When the Nigerian Army, the Nigerian Navy, the Nigerian Air Force, the Nigeria Police, DSS, NIA and others share such intelligence and synergize together, terrorist like Lukarawa, Boko Haram etc would have nowhere to hide. This activity is aptly known as collaborative intelligence. The Lukarawa terrorist group is not new in Nigeria as it is widely published now, they have been around in Nigeria with late Abubakar Shekau in the Boko Haram camp. They later had a clash over supremacy and some of the terrorists went and pitched their tents with ISWAP while others chose to roam about as Fulani herdsmen.

    The so-called vicious, wicked Fulani herdsmen armed with AK-47 Riffles are not Nigerians as we wrongly believe because of ethnicity/our tribal sentiments tearing us apart. Most politicians, elites and rich men arm these dare devil Lukarawa – as their herdsmen. Lukarawa terrorists are from Chad, Niger Republic, Mali and other Sahel area of Africa. Boko Haram, bandits and insurgents brought some of them in as mercenaries. The intelligence community could not recognise them because they hid their true identity. Now that they brazenly made their identity public – tongues are wagging – that there is now a new terrorist group. They are not new in Nigeria!

    Read Also: EFCC fires two staff over corrupt practices

    Community policing can also be a veritable non-kinetic weapon against terrorism and criminal activities. Community policing is one of the misunderstood terms and activity – even amongst some senior police officers. Community policing is not Local Government Authority Police or State Police as being canvassed by politicians. It is not (special constabulary) that is employed for part-time or weekend work. Community policing is a philosophy of ACTIVE partnership and collaboration – by law enforcement agents with local or host community – for the purpose of maintaining law and order/apprehension and prosecution of criminal elements.

    Such partnership by way of collating criminal information, rumours, grapevine stories and giving same to law enforcement agencies is part of what constitutes community policing. Members of the local communities know where criminals live, they know where criminals frequents and their hiding places. If they courageously volunteered and give such information out, terrorists, bandits and insurgents, etc will have no hiding place.

    However, the law enforcement agents need to be trusted and their integrity not questionable. Lack of trust is one of those reasons the local communities refuse to collaborate with law enforcement agents.

    Those who do not understand the difference between asymmetric warfare keeps on blaming the military and the police for the prolonged war with terrorists. Asymmetric warfare situation differs from conventional warfare. Terrorists explore that to their advantage. Terrorists cannot withstand Nigeria’s military forces in conventional warfare setting.

    I want the general public to take note that with the political will and financial support of President Bola Tinubu government, the Nigerian military are daily neutralizing terrorists, bandits, insurgents etc. in Northwest, Northeast and entire nation.

    •Osung Edet DSP (rtd.)

    Abuja.

  • Obasanjo’s journey in self-glorification

    Obasanjo’s journey in self-glorification

    By Richard Odusanya

    Sir: On November 15, President Olusegun Obasanjo addressed the Chinua Achebe Leadership Forum at Yale University, sharing his insights on such topical issues as leadership, governance, and Africa’s development.  Obasanjo emphasized the importance of effective leadership, accountability, and transparency in Africa’s development. Furthermore, he stressed the need to combat corruption, citing it as a major obstacle to progress in the African continent.

    Obasanjo’s address, no doubt, benefited from his extensive experience as a leader/statesman. His call to action obviously resonated with the audience, particularly among African youths. He demonstrated a deep knowledge and understanding of Africa’s challenges and opportunities.

    However, some critics opined that Obasanjo’s address offered few new or innovative solutions.

    Selectively, he glossed over his own tenure which was marked by controversies, the lack of accountability, corruption, profligacy, recklessness, and the attempted unconstitutional elongation of his legitimate two-term tenure.

    No doubt, Obasanjo’s legacy remains a topic of heated debate among Nigerians. Many question whether he deserves the heroism he seeks, especially considering those controversies that dogged his administration vis-à-vis the perceived underperformance of subsequent regimes. Critics argue that Obasanjo’s self-portrayal as a hero is exaggerated and that his actions were often driven by personal interests rather than the nation’s well-being.

    Some of the other concerns raised about Obasanjo’s heroism include his questionable military record. Here, General Alabi-Isama (rtd), a fellow military officer, has disputed Obasanjo’s account of his military achievements, accusing him of lying about his role in the Nigeria-Biafra war. Obasanjo’s administration was marked by authoritarian tendencies, including the persecution of opponents and the suppression of dissenting voices. Critics argue that Obasanjo’s economic policies, including the privatization of state-owned enterprises, benefited his cronies rather than the Nigerian people.

    Read Also: ResQ Health offers free breast cancer screening for 500 women

    Given these concerns, it’s understandable that many Nigerians are sceptical about Obasanjo’s views including his claims of heroism. Some even view his attempts to portray himself as a hero as a desperate attempt to rewrite history and distract from his flaws. Ultimately, whether Obasanjo deserves heroism is a matter of personal opinion, but it’s essential to critically evaluate his legacy and consider multiple perspectives.

    His address at Yale University has further increased the level of agitation on failed leadership and failure to address challenges. Recall that the Obasanjo administration was criticized for its handling of the economy, with policies that benefited his inner circle rather than the Nigerian people. So also were his attempts to amend the constitution to extend his presidential tenure were widely seen as a power grab. The conduct of the 2007 elections under his watch was marred by electoral malfeasance.

    Many would equally argue that Obasanjo’s speeches and addresses lack fresh ideas and innovations and so offer nothing new, merely echoing the same old populist criticisms of the country.

    Obasanjo should, as an elder statesman, be humble, and call for unity and progress rather than perpetuating self-justification and glorification. He should acknowledge his shortcomings and propose a way-forward. Nigeria’s growth and development require collaborative efforts, not individual aggrandizement.

    Moving forward, Nigerians are determined to build a better future despite the distractions of Obasanjo’s self-promotion. By focusing on innovative solutions and collective progress, the country can overcome its challenges and achieve greatness.

    The responsibility of nation-building rests squarely on the shoulders of all of us. It behoves us to find a viable remedy for our ailing nation.

    • Richard Odusanya odusanyagold@gmail.com

  • Today is World Toilet Day

    Today is World Toilet Day

    Sir: Deprived of toilets where they can deliciously embrace one of nature’s most delicate demands with dignity, they make take up positions everywhere. Water channels, under bridges, bush paths, road sides and basically every inch of public space available is claimed by Nigeria’s army of the toilet-less.

    This tribe of the toilet-less is one without shame, privacy, and dignity. It is doubtful that one can find a more scandalous stamp of poverty than this.

    Nigeria’s quest to end open defecation in the country is one that has repeatedly run into man-made but mountainous roadblocks, namely: inadequate toilets. According to the Minister of Water Resources and Sanitation, Professor Joseph Utsev, the country needs about 11.6 million toilets to end open defecation by 2030.

    Today, November 19, marks the World Toilet Day, with the theme: “Toilets—a place for peace.” Nigeria has a nationwide 2030 Open Defecation-Free Target.

    In many ways, open defecation is a national problem. There are safety issues all round. For women, exposure to sexual exploitation is increased without access to toilets. There are health challenges too. A country already burdened by a broken healthcare system is certainly put under the cosh by the clear and present dangers presented by open defecation.  For one, the pollution of water channels leads to the rise and spread of diseases like cholera to which children are most vulnerable.

    The environmental pollution, especially air pollution inherent in open defecation, is also a national scourge. How about the immeasurable haemorrhage of dignity that accompanies open defecation? That people do not have the privacy or facility to carry out one of nature’s most urgent and basic demands is unacceptable.

    That many people who are pressed are also deprived is a tragedy. This lack of adequate toilets is a fall out of the housing and planning crisis Nigeria is gripped by. Many residential buildings and some public buildings are designed without adequate and sustainable provisions for sanitary facilities.

    Among Nigeria’s poorest, many of whom are cramped into squalid overcrowded settlements, toilets are at a premium, bringing in a whole barrage of health and safety hazards. This simply cannot be allowed to continue. Open defecation poses the greatest danger to children. For their sake, it must be fought tooth and nail.

    Furthermore, it is clear that Nigeria must also take a courageous stand against the shylock landlords who build houses, charge exorbitant rents, but neither have the dignity nor the decency to provide enough sanitary facilities for their tenants.

    Read Also: Anosike: NiMet positioned to safeguard economy through climate information

    Tackling open defecation is easier said than done, though.  Nigeria’s housing crisis directly feeds the health hazard that open defecation is. Quality housing unfailingly includes sanitary facilities to cater for one of man’s most primal needs. 

    Many times because people are forced by poverty to live just about anywhere, with many of those shelters lacking clean toilets. Nigeria’s many homeless people also make do with whatever open space they can find.

    Open defecation is a health hazard as well as a social crisis. It cannot be combatted without fixing housing, which is one of man’s basic needs.

    If open defecation is to be eradicated too, water has to be fixed. If people have access to clean toilets and sufficient water, it is doubtful that they would jettison hygiene, privacy and safety when answering nature’s call.

    Every Nigerian has a right to dignity of the human person. Open defecation directly erodes this dignity. Combating it is a restorative action towards the dignity of all those affected.

    •Kene Obiezu,keneobiezu@gmail.com

  • Abia’s laudable initiative

    Abia’s laudable initiative

    Sir: Nigeria’s quest to confront what is a spiraling crisis in the education sector was always going to be an uphill task without government commitment and adequate political will. As the chief funder and operator of the education sector, the government’s input and priority list showing where education fits is a pointer to the achievements and expectations in the sector.

    In its bid to boost education in the state, the Abia State government has declared that education will be free from primary to junior secondary school levels.

    According to Okey Kanu, who is the state commissioner for education, education from primary school to junior secondary school  will be free and compulsory throughout the state, and parents and guardians who deny their wards the opportunities under new policy will be prosecuted under the Abia State Child Rights Law of 2006.

    For years now, the rising number of Nigeria’s out-of-school children has become simply frightening. The numbers which are especially high in the North point to more profound problems in the country while promising future problems.

    As insecurity has debuted on the scene to complicate Nigeria’s convoluted difficulties with poverty, the many groups hounding Nigeria from all sides have found an inexhaustible pool of conscripts in Nigeria’s unemployed, and out-of-school children. This has proven a slippery slope as Nigeria has rallied to confront what is a burgeoning concern.

    When children stay out of school, enormous resources are wasted instead of saved. A country that allows many children to stay out of school is a country wasting away its future and promise.

    Prosecuting parents and guardians will be a disincentive for those who see their children only as more mouths to feed and more hands for the farm.

    The truth, however, is that no parent can  fully focus on the business of providing quality education to their children if they are crushed by the burden of providing food, shelter as well as healthcare for their  children.

    The more prosperous a society becomes, the likelier it is to provide quality education for its children. In turn, quality education feeds economic prosperity and advancement, as no society can grow without enlightened citizens.

    It is clear that giant strides are being made in Abia State by a governor who mustered the support of the people during the last election to demolish a decades-long hegemony on power. A country that doesn’t pay attention to the education of its children is one which digs its grave with its hands. It is only a matter of time.

    •Ike Willie-Nwobu,Ikewilly9@gmail.com

  •  Ajaokuta and an aborted dream

     Ajaokuta and an aborted dream

    • By Ike Willie-Nwobu

    Sir: The Ajaokuta Steel Company is a multi-billion dollar steel company expected to be the bedrock of Nigeria’s industrialization. As a company and a metaphor for failure, the Ajaokuta Steel Company continues to defy Nigeria, defining with stark clarity the reason Nigeria has found it so difficult to properly kick off its industrialization.

    For every administration that comes into power, evoking the Ajaokuta Steel Company is a ritual and rhetoric. Every year, the government talks about reviving it to give Nigeria a spine for what it needs most: industrialization. Yet, nothing always happens.

    The latest to evoke Ajaokuta is Khalil Halilu, Executive Vice Chairman of National Agency for Science Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI). According to him, reviving Ajaokuta is central to the government’s industrialization agenda, and it is top priority.

    A major reason Nigeria’s provision of adequate infrastructure for its citizens either stalls completely through the years or completely or being scandalously slow through the years is the general climate of confusion among those who make key decisions. Key questions like what projects to embark on, how to fund them, and whether they are sustainable eventually don’t usually receive the brainstorming they deserve resulting in poor decisions.

     There is also the problem of corruption which typically sees funds for projects embezzled or diverted, resulting in no work done, or shoddy jobs at best.

    Read Also: Obasanjo’s comment on Tinubu mischievous, says Afenifere chief

    A source of constant irritation and frustration for Nigerians in this is that Nigeria is not without models, exemplary countries that are exemplars it can look up to.

    Countries like Singapore and Malaysia have shown what single-minded, visionary leadership can do. It is gravely concerning that Nigeria, typically so eager to copy nebulous ideas from other countries, is reluctant to imitate some of the countries pushing in the right direction despite backbreaking challenges.

    While the Ajaokuta Steel Company lies moribund, calamitously dragging the country down the precipitous path of underdevelopment and stagnation, many young people who would be gainfully employed were the company churning out gains are drowning in the sea of unemployment where the sharks of different crimes, including terrorism, are eager to swallow them whole.

    Nigeria has not seen requisite return on its investment in the Ajaokuta Steel Company. Many Nigerians have been born, lived, and died without enjoying any benefits from what is supposed to be a source of pride for Nigerians. This is simply unacceptable.

    The grinding poverty that continues to suffocate Nigerians cannot give way without industrialization. Steel is central to industrialization efforts. A country which speaks about industrialization and development while allowing its premier steel company to lie in ruins is one conjuring up national deceit and dissatisfaction.

    •Ike Willie-Nwobu,

    Ikewilly9@gmail.com

  • Time to prepare for the rice revolution

    Time to prepare for the rice revolution

    • By Abdu Abdullahi

    Sir: The national treasurer of Rice Farmers Association of Nigeria ( RIFAN), Sadiq Daware has provided a diagnostic basis for the inevitable rice revolution in Nigeria with his estimation of over 12 million rice farmers cultivating an average of 0.5 hectare for two or three farming cycles annually, with an average output of four metric tonnes per hectare.

    To go beyond this impressive statistics, the revolutionary side is converting the figures to improvements in outputs, mass participation, sophisticated innovations, and massive investments by both the government and private sector for Nigeria’s economic development.

    We should draw inspiration from China, India and Indonesia, the largest producers of rice in the world. We ought to learn how the rice revolution tremendously impacted on these countries with amazing performance in rice production. This has made rice to be one of the most important staple crops in Asia and Africa. In Nigeria, for instance, rice is consumed across all geo-political zones and socioeconomic classes.

    However, only about 57% of the 6.7 million metric tonnes of rice consumed annually is locally produced, leading to a supply deficit of about three million metric tonnes. Nevertheless, the rice market is expected to show a volume growth of 8.8% growth in 2025.

    As we battle with economic conundrum related to oil, the need for economic diversification is long overdue and severally advocated, only to end at the periphery of endless discussion without any tangible outcomes. We are endowed with the fertile land for intensive and extensive agricultural activities. The northern Nigeria in particular serves as a potential zone for the rice revolution.

    Our rice revolution can make its debut in the effective management of land fertility, vastness, capital and labour, which can be harnessed to enhance our food security and improve the scope of the economy.

    The rice revolution can take different approaches and dimensions. But a particular and result-oriented scheme of rice farming that creates large scale production is the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), an approach developed by Fr. Henri de Laulanie in Madagascar in 1983.

    The SRI is evidence based, doubling yields. A small holder farmer in northern India, Sumat Kumar, used SRI to produce 22.4 tonnes of rice from a single hectare in 2012, breaking the world record. When SRI is adopted as a revolutionary strategy for rice production, it takes into consideration, the local conditions and requirements based on four interacting principles: early, quick and healthy plant establishment; reduced plant density; improved soil conditions through enrichment with organic matter; reduced and controlled water application.

    The SRI methods have been used in 47 countries and the overall results are impressive, 40% increase in yields, 40% reduction in cost, 23% reduction in water use, 68% increase in household incomes. Therefore, the proper application of the SRI provides a farming template for the success of the rice revolution in Nigeria.

    Read Also: Ex-lawmaker hails Tinubu, EFCC over stance on graft cases

    Undoubtedly, the rice revolution can create employment opportunities, increase production and consumption, reduce the level of poverty, ensure food security and save Nigeria foreign exchange.

    Interestingly, the rice revolution which began in tropical Asia (i.e. South and Southeast Asia) more than a half-century ago had resulted in dramatic increase in rice production in 1970s and 1980s.

    For us in Nigeria, it is time to transcend the failed ‘Operation Feed the Nation’ and the ‘Green Revolution’. It is time for the authentic revolution to feed the nation at affordable prices.

    Of course, we know of big challenges confronting our efforts in rice production such as the change in climate, resource scarcity, exerting pressure on our capacity. Nevertheless, collaboration between the federal and state governments can serve as a panacea to food insecurity and climate change affecting rice production.

    The rice revolution is a deep temptation which should not be allowed to collapse. When actualised, we would be proud to be counted as one of the leading countries in rice production.

    •Abdu Abdullahi,

    Ringim, Jigawa State

  • Of PFN’s 40-day prayer to address hardship, hunger

    Of PFN’s 40-day prayer to address hardship, hunger

    • By John Oluwadero

    Sir: I write in response to the announcement by the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) of a 40-day period of prayer and fasting to address the severe hardship and hunger that continue to plague our nation.

    As Nigerians invest a significant amount of their resources—time, finances, and energy—into the Church, it is only morally and spiritually right that the Church responds to these acts of devotion with measures that address the practical, day-to-day needs of its members and the larger community.

    The PFN’s upcoming conference, with its promise of guidance from prominent Nigerians and thought leaders, is a step toward sparking a conversation about Nigeria’s socioeconomic conditions. Yet, I would like to encourage the PFN to take this opportunity to initiate direct, actionable strategies alongside prayers.

    While prayer is an expression of faith, it often needs to be accompanied by intentional action. For instance, someone who prays to become a medical doctor but enrols in a civil engineering program cannot realistically expect to achieve their goal. Their faith would need to be supported by applying to an MBBS program, demonstrating both faith and a commitment to doing the necessary work.

    As our country faces an unprecedented economic crisis, hunger, and severe socioeconomic hardship, I humbly ask the PFN to consider adding a structured policy advisory to institutional members of PFN and action plan to complement the prayer rally. These measures could focus on promoting programs for food distribution, skills training, and economic support within churches and communities.

    We have a profound example in the early church. All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need. This was more than charity; it was a manifestation of their love and unity, as well as their commitment to living out Jesus’ teachings.

    While today’s congregations are not called—and do not need—to sell their possessions en masse, there is a clear message about communal responsibility and meeting the practical needs of fellow believers.

    I draw insight from my father’s 33 years of ministry as a pastor in the Christ Apostolic Church. In our mission house, we had a storeroom for tithes and offerings, and I remember that there was a special day every month dedicated to praying over the stocks and distributing them to those in need: mostly the pastorate, the elderly, single-parent families, the sick, pregnant women, and some were kept in reserve for emergency needs.

    Read Also: Obasanjo’s comment on Tinubu mischievous, says Afenifere chief

    While many of these practices may not apply to the modern realities of our postmodern Pentecostal churches, insights from these orthodox practices could conceptually inform policy direction. Such policies may guide institutional members of the PFN to adopt a structured approach to meeting the needs of their members. I strongly believe that insights from these practices could greatly contribute to finding sustainable solutions for addressing hunger by harnessing our shared social capital

    While this open letter may not provide sufficient space to explore possible structured approaches and plausible scenarios, some of the insights that can be looked into include the idea of church-owned community farms where the produce serves the members; training members in homestead gardening; coordinated and structured food bank programs; and, most importantly, accountable use and stewardship of available resources.

    The Church is one of the most financially supported institutions in Nigeria, receiving contributions from Nigerians of all backgrounds. With this support, it is vital for church leaders to ensure that these resources are directed not only towards worship and religious activities, which are very fundamental, but also towards initiatives that tangibly alleviate suffering and empower congregants.

    So, as we prepare for this period of prayer, let us also prepare for meaningful, deliberate action. The PFN’s leadership could encourage churches to develop community programs to support those who are most affected by the economic downturn. By organizing homestead gardening training sessions, establishing food banks, health insurance for seniors, or creating job opportunities for youths, we can better fulfil our calling to be the hands and feet of Christ. These efforts could provide a framework for members to live out their faith with the same fervour that they bring to prayer.

    Let us take this conference and the period of prayer and fasting as an opportunity to deepen our impact by combining our faith with collective action. Together, we can build a foundation of hope and strength for Nigeria that rests on both prayer and practical, compassionate solutions.

    •John Oluwadero,

    United States

  • Free Hamdiyya Sidi: Let Northern women breathe – a rejoinder

    Free Hamdiyya Sidi: Let Northern women breathe – a rejoinder

    By Danjuma Musa

    Always listen to both sides of the story before you come to a conclusion” – Mohith Agadi

    Chimamanda Adichie, the Nigerian novelist and activist popularized what she aptly described as “the Danger of a Single Story”. Long before her, several notable authors, concerned about the dangers of one-sided narrative, had admonished that we listen to both sides of the story before jumping to far reaching conclusions. Hasty conclusions based on skewed information and twisted facts, could cause irreparable damage to the hard earned reputation of the victim and would take serious efforts  to fix.

    If only this group of concerned  Northern women, operating under the name of Voices for Inclusion and Equity (VIEW), had adhered to the admonitions of Chimamanda Adichie, they wouldn’t have fallen for the antics of Hamdiyya Sidi, a political operative with close ties to the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), to brutally savage  the hard earned reputation of Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto, the amiable governor of Sokoto State, who they  not only subjected to a media trial, but have also summarily convicted as charged, without fair hearing.

    The irony is that while Hamdiyya Sidi, the supposed ‘victim” at the center of the controversy, was given a chance to tell her story by the Nigerian Police Force, the VIEW group have used their media/NGO power to intimidate  Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto of a crime he knows absolutely nothing about. As they say, indeed, uneasy lies the head that wears the crown. So, the governor can in that sense be vicariously guilty of the crime and indeed of every crime committed within the boundaries of Sokoto State, going by the logic of VIEW.

    Read Also; Sokoto: Lamido, Wamakko in supremacy battle

    Another issue that the VIEW group conveniently refused to address is the reckless use of the social media by Hamdiyya Sidi, to incite violence against the government in an area that is grappling with terrorists attacks. What she posted about the governor and his family would never be published by any mainstream media because of  its toxicity. Never!!!. It is unbelievable that the highly educated members of the VIEW group would rationalize a crime of incitement to violence in the name of freedom of speech.

    Having made this preamble, let us attempt a point by point rebuttal of the public statement by the VIEW group, which displayed crass lack of information on the subject and of the new Sokoto State under Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto.

    We wholeheartedly agree with the VIEW group that Hamdiyya Sidi, even though she is a known political operative working for the opposition PDP, she has a constitutional right to Freedom of Speech and the Right to hold and express opinions, but it is important to stress that these rights are not absolute. There is a universal agreement that rights are not absolute. Why do we have libel laws? Can her right to freedom of movement make her insist on strolling into the Presidential Villa without an appointment? Won’t that be a trespass? And while she has an inalienable right to life, she must succeed if she decides to terminate it by suicide, otherwise  the state would charge her for attempted suicide. Same with the incitement for which she has been rightly charged to court by the Nigerian Police.

    It needs be restated that rights are not absolute and that  there is no evidence whatsoever that law abiding citizens of Sokoto State are being denied their rights. The case being used by the VIEW group to reach its warped conclusion is not in anyway true of the situation in Sokoto State, nor can the police who in the legitimate performance of their law enforcement duties, rightly arrested Hamdiyya Sidi, a national of Niger Republic, and charged her to court, be blamed for doing their duty. Thankfully, Hamdiyya Sidi would have her day in court.

    The VIEW group was very uncharitable to Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto who has given the security situation in Sokoto State his every attention, despite being a glorified Chief Security Officer, in its assertion that the governor is indifferent to the security situation of the state. Though the accusation is wicked, it thankfully would not dampen the governor’s commitment to eradicating the terrorists who are wreaking havoc in the eastern border of Sokoto state with Zamfara State.

    For the benefit of the VIEW group and Nigerians in general, though the responsibility to secure the sovereignty of the Federal Government of Nigeria rests squarely on the central government, several sub-national units like Sokoto State have been forced to perform the role that is exclusively that of Tinubu, because it is their people that are being kidnapped, raped, killed and subjected to other forms of inhuman treatment.

    For the record, the Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto administration has not only rightly placed combating the security challenges on top of its agenda, but has continued to discharge its responsibilities to its citizens. It has established a Community Corps  to primarily gather intelligence and has invested  heavily in constructing military bases and has provided other logistics support for the security agencies, like the provision of buffalo vehicles, because the victims are its citizens. But being only a sub-national government, it lacks the coercive power to really go after the terrorists. The Sokoto State Community Corps can at best carry dane guns.

    The question is, are there other initiatives that Governor Ahmad Aliyu should take that he has not taken, in his bid to take the war to the terrorists operating in his state, within his constitutional authority? While it is not the constitutional responsibility of governors to construct military bases, Dr Ahmad Aliyu has, in enlightened self interest of his people, constructed one at Ilela for the armored corps,and built access roads to help the security agencies respond promptly to security breaches.

    So, why should Hamdiyya Sidi falsely accuse Governor Ahmad Aliyu, who has been up and doing? Is it because she was reportedly paid by the opposition to “cause trouble”, or the possibility of acting in a film based on her “ordeal”?

    The VIEW group, being an interested party in a stable and prosperous north, should urgently impress it on President Bola Tinubu to fulfill his campaign promise by immediately ordering massive recruitment of men and women into the security forces. The less than 300,000 strong armed forces is, without doubt, overwhelmed and over stretched by the various crises confronting the country.

    There is no doubt that only a massive recruitment will give the security agencies the much needed capability. Apart from increasing the booths on the ground, large scale recruitment into the security agencies would drastically reduce unemployment amongst the youthful population.

    The VIEW group made several fallacious statements. It is amazing how, for instance, the group can describe the verbal tirades against the governor by Hamdiyya Sidi as “bravely demanding  accountability”!

    she further went for the governor’s jugular and pointedly asked: “If he and his family faced the horrific violence that has befallen countless women across the North, women who have been violated in unspeakable ways, sometimes in front of their families, would he remain so indifferent?”. It’s astonishing that the VIEW group described the tirade as someone merely “asking a simple question”.

    Agreed that law abiding citizens have a right to speak freely according to their conscience, but Hamdiyya Sidi was certainly over the board in wishing evil to a man who is doing everything to end terrorist attacks in  his domain, not minding the fact that security services is the exclusive franchise of the Federal Government.

    About the attack on Hamdiyya Sidi, there is no evidence whatsoever that the Sokoto State Government instigated the attack on her nor does it support her attack. But wait a minute, did the VIEW group look at the possibility that the stakeholders that she had emotionally swindled took out their frustrations on her? Hamdiyya Sidi came promising the poor people palliatives which heightened their hopes, only to start raining insults on the governor and instigating them to forcefully occupy the government estate under construction at Wamakko. Dear VIEW group, this is a possibility and it is plausible. We have seen mob actions at accident scenes, but we do not hold the governor responsible simply because he is the governor.

    Once again, the VIEW group are wrong in their assertion that Hamdiyya Sidi spoke for women. She didn’t speak for  women and if she did, she definitely didn’t speak for northern women. The average woman in the core North, being well cultured, mannered and deeply religious, would not wish the governor and his family ill. She would accept her fate with equanimity. But because she was on a mission, she pushed her luck too far and deservedly got arrested. She is now famous and would hopefully land the roles she craves for in the Kannywood movie industry.

    And the Nigerian Police are very emphatic that she incited the people against the government. And that it was the Village Head who reported her in the lawful exercise of his responsibility. As Ahmad Rufai (ASP), the State Police Public Relations Officer said, “One of our constitutional responsibilies is to investigate crimes, both simple and capital in nature, to this end, the case of Hamdiyya is no exception”.

    There is no where in the entire matter where the governor featured. But it has become fashionable for fame seekers and political opponents to drag the governor’s name into any crisis to generate public sympathy.

    The VIEW group painted a picture of a dystopian Sokoto State where people cannot express their opinion for fear of being arrested. Certainly, this is not the Sokoto State that we know. Their charge is grossly unfair and is not supported by the reality.

    Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto is unassuming, certainly not power drunk, a thoroughbred democrat who cannot hurt a fly; and he is not a violent man. He is also not opposed to free speech expressed within the boundaries of the law.

    As deputy governor to Aminu Tambuwal, he resigned based on principles. And after the disastrous eight (8) years of  Aminu Tambuwal, Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto has restored the trust of the people in the capacity of government to deliver services.

    Sokoto State is not a terrifying place to be. It is nothing near  what the VIEW group had claimed. Rather, it is the likes of Hamdiyya Sidi that are hell bent on disturbing the peace of Sokoto State. Considering the security challenges Sokoto state is facing, especially in the eastern axis of the state, Marafa Yakubu, the Village Head of Sabon Birnin Daji village in Wurno local government area, was right as a government appointee to have alerted the police, an action which averted the breakdown of law and order. Hamdiyya Sidi certainly has the Village Head to thank for his quick response which saved her life.

    Going by the administrative structure, the Chairman of the local government would definitely have been informed, and he in turn would have brought the situation to the attention of the Commissioner of Local Government Affairs, and from there it probably would have been escalated to the State Security Council, depending on the assessment and there is no evidence that it has been brought to the governor’s attention.

    Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto is alive to his responsibility and he doesn’t need a rude and uncouth Hamdiyya Sidi to remind him of his responsibilities which he has been discharging diligently.

    The VIEW group asking the governor to denounce the legitimate actions of the police ought to know that it would certainly affect the psychology of the police who  only performed their legitimate duty of maintaining law and order. They didn’t subject her to inhuman treatment. So, why should the Governor Ahmad Sokoto call the police out?  Sometimes, being too close to a picture would blur appreciation of the work of art.

    Every Nigerian citizen, including foreigners and not just Hamdiyya Sidi, has the constitutionally  guaranteed right to free speech, but within the ambit of the law. The access to social media does not mean freedom to incite the people against the government. It is a freedom that must be exercised with responsibility.

    Governor Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto’s record speaks for itself, both in the number of female commissioners and other appointees and in specific programmes designed to uplift  women, because he understands the relationship between an empowered woman and development.

    Governor Sokoto equally understands what love by the people means. But for them, especially the women, he wouldn’t have been elected governor. He is ever mindful of that fact and he remains eternally grateful to them and, in return, has given them his all.

    The VIEW group must not  allow itself to be unwittingly used in an orchestrated campaign of demonization being funded by  discredited opposition elements, by dragging the Sokoto State Governor into the matter that falls squarely in  the domain of the police. If the promoters of VIEW should investigate Hamdiyya Sidi further, they would certainly tender an unreserved apology to Dr Ahmad Aliyu Sokoto when they find out they have been hoodwinked.

  • Uba Sani’s multi-million naira water solution

    Uba Sani’s multi-million naira water solution

    SIR: Water consumers in Kaduna State, including citizens, corporate organizations and individuals have struggled with pipe borne water supply for a long time. Most people who can afford it, have boreholes in their residences or business premises. However, the situation is about to change following a comprehensive revamp programme initiated by Governor Uba Sani.  First, he is set to clear the backlog of salary arrears of the staff of Kaduna State Water Corporation. Second, the governor has put them back to the state’s payroll. Not that alone, he plans to inject N93 billion in the next three years into KADSWAC, to repair and upgrade their facilities, treatment plants and other equipment.

    Despite heavy investments in the water sector in the late 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century, water supply has been dogged with series of problems in Kaduna State. For example, the World Bank had granted the state government over $100m facility for the repairs and upgrade of its then ageing and obsolete facilities, including broken down pipes and plants, in the 90s. However, very little was done with the colossal amount of money. That was during the old Water Board.

    The coming of KADSWAC, meant to run the corporation like a commercial entity, didn’t help matters because of structural problems.

    First, the population of Kaduna town has exploded beyond the capacity of the corporation’s equipment. Second, the pipelines and other mains have become too old to convey water to every household. Again, most of the textile companies that were the biggest customers of the old Water Board have folded up due to high operating costs, dumping and the general harsh economic conditions in the country. So, the corporation couldn’t even pay its staff, let alone meet customers’ demand for water.

    In a recent press briefing, the Commissioner of Public Works, Arch Ibrahim Hamza, disclosed that ‘’previous administrations invested $500 million into the urban water supply scheme in the last 10 years with no result. Rather, capacity utilisation dropped down from 43% in 2017 to 8% in 2023 with 5% coverage.

    Read Also: Korea cultural festival to strengthen bilateral ties with Nigeria

    The governor inherited the problem from the last administration but rather than look the other way, decided to solve the problem once and for all. For over a year, the workers went without salaries. It was not surprising that they went on strike several times, demanding the removal of Comrade Sanusi Maikudi, the then Managing Director.

    Expectedly, Governor Uba Sani’s decision to pay the backlog of N800 million salary arrears to the staff was greeted with wild jubilation. Similarly, water consumers including citizens and corporate organizations hailed the governor’s action. Apart from paying salary arears, Governor Uba Sani will inject N93 billion in KADSWAC in four instalments, starting with N17 billion this year. The balance is to be spread in three instalments of N35 billion and N30 billion in investments in 2025 and 2026 respectively. The remaining N11 billion will be invested in 2027.

    Although it will take about three years before the situation normalises, Governor Uba Sani’s intervention has already endeared him to a vast majority of KADSWAC customers, especially the masses who do not have the wherewithal to sink boreholes or make other private arrangements. Water sustains life and Governor Uba Sani has promised to inject life into KADSWAC.

     •Andrew Fadason,Kaduna

  • Charting a path for sustainable economic growth

    Charting a path for sustainable economic growth

    Sir: Corruption is dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power or position of authority. This is now becoming the ‘new normal’ in Nigeria and dangerous for our future! But it is not sustainable as it is a ‘leakage’ in the economy and has no limit to which it can be practiced. We all felt the military government before the 1979 civilian rule was financially reckless until we saw financial recklessness under Shehu Shagari administration between 1979 and 1983 in the federal level.

    For sustainable economic growth in Nigeria, government must recognise why “we the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria” have formed government, why everybody decided to surrender their sovereignty to a group of people in government and that there are different groups that must be taken care of in the country. As there are rich people in the country, so are poor people that must be taken care of.

    The best way to ensure that there is welfare and security of lives and properties is to ensure that as many citizens as possible, especially the youths can get job.  It is through the efficiency of the economy, that is, the youths contributing to the development of the nation as early as possible and knowing that there is dignity in labour that we can have a sustainable economic growth in Nigeria.

    Section 16, economic objectives, states that: (1) The State shall, within the context of the ideals and objectives for which provisions are made in this constitution – (a) harness the resources of the nation and promote national prosperity and an efficient, a dynamic and self-reliant economy; (b) control the national economy in such manner as to secure the maximum welfare, freedom and happiness of every citizen on the basis of social justice and equality of status and opportunity; (c) without prejudice to its right to operate or participate in areas of the economy, other than the major sectors of the economy, manage and operate the major sectors of the economy; (d) without prejudice to the right of any person to participate in areas of the economy within the major sectors of the economy, protect the right of every citizen to engage in any economic activities outside the major sectors of the economy.

    Read Also: Netizens blast Betty Akeredolu for referring to Nigeria as zoo

    It goes further in sub-section (2) that: The state shall direct its policy towards ensuring – (a) the promotion of a planned and balanced economic development; (b) that the material resources of the nation are harnessed and distributed as best as possible to serve the common good; (c) that the economic system is not operated in such a manner as to permit the concentration of wealth or the means of production and exchange in the hands of few individuals or of a group; and (d) that suitable and adequate shelter, right to food and food security, reasonable national minimum living wage, old age care and pensions, and unemployment, sick benefits and welfare of the disabled are provided for all citizens.

    Apart from provision of living wage and salary, the constitution in Section 16, subsection 2 (d), also provides for stipends to be paid to those who are unemployed, sick, disabled and old.

    It is along this line that government must not only concentrate on revenue generation through increase tax burden and widening tax net alone, but through employment generation for the masses. It will be the best to consider the areas where we have comparative advantage for employment generation, wealth creation and economic growth.

    It is a known fact that Nigeria, being a tropical nation, has comparative advantage in agriculture. It is also a fact that there is general apathy among youths to engage in agriculture because of the poor returns. It will be beneficial to the government to create farm estates across the nation with landholding of minimum of four acres and a residential estate in a cluster close by with two bedroom flats each, water provision, tarred roads to the farms and to towns for off-takers accessibility, recreation areas like football pitch and internet facilities.

    These modern farm estates should be allocated to youths who are interested in farming on lease basis. The construction of these buildings will generate jobs for thousands of people in Nigeria and the supplies of building materials will create wealth for our people. Eventually, the exercise will ensure food security and our high dependence on imported foods and high food inflationary rates will cease.

    •ESV. Olufemi Adedamola Oyedele,Lagos