Category: Commentaries

  • Bayelsa Police Command: Salute to selfless service

    Bayelsa Police Command: Salute to selfless service

    By Jonah Okah

    The Bayelsa State Police Command was agog about two weeks ago, celebrating another landmark crime bursting, when it secured the swift release of two kidnapped victims.

    The victims were Mr. Akari and Nathan Egba who are personal aides and relatives of the Managing Director of the Niger Delta Development Commission, NDDC, Dr. Samuel Ogbuku. The abduction incident took place at Ayakoro community in Ogbia Local Government Area of Bayelsa State.

    The kidnap sent shocking shivers down the spines of the people of Ayakoro Community, residents of Yenagoa and the Niger Delta generally. It came on the heels of the prevailing peace and security being enjoyed in the state.

    When the incident got to the attention of the Francis Idu-led police command, a man known for his zero tolerance for crime, he summoned an emergency management meeting. CP Francis Idu, gave CSP Christopher Nwaogbo of the special anti-crime squad, Puff Arder, the marching order to rescue the victims.

    The commander of the Puff Arder, a crack crime fighter and a no nonsense officer fondly called “Oga Chris”, rolled up his sleeves, went into action, and scanned through the Bayelsa thick forest.

    Against all odds and at personnel risk, his team spent three nights in the thick and thin of the Ogbia axis of the forest. It was an operation carried out discreetly, with mathematical precision in closing in on the location of the victims and their captors.

    Read Also; I had no child to celebrate my 60th birthday, actress opens up on failed marriage, infertility

    There was general apprehension and fear about the lives of the victims by the Ayakoro Community and even the State Police Command.

    According to reports, CP Idu was constantly in touch with the inspector General of Police Mr. Kayode Egbetokun for updates from time to time.

    The team spent three nights in the forest and finally engaged the abductors in a shout out around the Ayama Community forest where the victims were held hostage, with the expectations of payment of ransom.

    In the middle of fierce gun dwell, the abductors who were obviously overwhelmed with fear of possible round up took to their heels, abandoning their victims, and the security took over the area, rescuing the victims and taking them to their Ayakoro Community. Sighting the victims under the full security escort led by “Oga Chris”, the community came out in their large numbers to receive the security team and the rescued victims in a heroic manner, and singing  traditional songs of appreciation to God and full of gratitude to the security squad for a job well done . The atmosphere was charged with joy that the security squad could afford to make such a sacrifice to rescue their brothers.

    The MD of NDDC could not hold back his excitement to see his aides and brothers rescued without paying any ransom. The kidnappers were rather disappointed that their  intention was not achieved.

    The operation was not a tea party, it was an uphill task, which required energy, sacrifice at the peril of the security team.

    In the Bayelsa Security architecture, the quick success recorded did not come as a surprise,  because the fear of the Christopher Nwaogbo led Puff Arder, a security intervention squad, is highly revered as  the beginning of wisdom. He is dreaded for  his courage, fearlessness , honesty and patriotic zeal in crime bursting, which has brought about positive results, leading to the successful rescue of about 50 kidnap victims. This is where “Oga Chris” as he is fondly called is widely respected as an officer among officers.

    Anyone who thinks that such a man with a strength of character in the combat against crime, will not receive a fight back, is really in the wildest of dream.

    CSP Nwaogbo has received a good dose of blackmail, frivolous petitions and paid agitation to keep him out of operation in Bayelsa State. The fact is that he is a thorn in the flesh of men of the underworld and their patrons . Only recently, a petition was written against him by some lawyers who were obviously acting out of malice because  of  their vested interest in a case being investigated by CSP Chris. In spite of these distractions, he has remained unperturbed like the rock of Gibraltar, fully committed to his professional line of duty in the fight against crime.

    As a star witness in several criminal trials in the court, he is the delight for the prosecution, giving his professional skills in investigation and unassailable evidence, leading to the successful prosecution and conviction of several high profile cases.

    This has not only brought accolades to the Bayelsa State Command of the Nigeria Police Force, but has also reduced the criminal profile of Bayelsa to earn the enviable position as the most secured and peaceful state across the Niger.

    Sadly, the public expectation of the Nigeria Police is high, but is hardly matched with the commensurate concern for their welfare and motivation which are nothing to write home about.

    This is were the Commissioner of Police of the Bayelsa State Command and his foot soldiers like Nwaogbo and his team as well as others involved in the fight against crime deserve the best of motivation by way of promotions to enable them do more to meet the expectations of the general public in the fight against crime. 

    They need contemporary state of the art equipment for the ever combat ready men and women of the police.  Though the Nigeria Police is strictly under the control of the federal government, they still deserve  complementary support of the states by providing necessary logistics for the optimal performance of the police. The private sector too needs to contribute their part to achieve the best of performance of the police. The fight against crime is a collective responsible of all.

    Meanwhile, the CP Idu-led command and the Nwaogbo-led Puff Arder deserve a pat on the back for the fearless and swift response in rescuing the victims of Ayakoro Community kidnap. They have certainly rekindled public confidence in the Nigeria Police Force in crime fighting and this is how things should be.

  • The imperative of emergency rule in Rivers

    The imperative of emergency rule in Rivers

    By Tunde Rahman

    As the leadership crisis rocking Rivers State escalated into the destruction of vital oil and gas infrastructure amid looming impeachment threats against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy Ngozi Odu, President Bola Tinubu wielded the big stick last Tuesday imposing a state of emergency on the oil rich state. He suspended the governor, his deputy and the inflexible state House of Assembly for a period of six months, and appointed former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd), as the administrator of the state. Following his inauguration on Wednesday, Ibas has begun the critical assignment. The ex-Naval chief has his job cut out for him. He has been called out of retirement to take charge of the affairs of the state and return Rivers to normalcy within six months. This is not a mean task. The retired Vice Admiral will have to summon all his courage as a soldier and be at his wits’ end to restore order and normalcy.

    Expectedly, the declaration of emergency rule on Rivers sparked debate. It elicited criticisms from opposition elements, including the Peoples Democratic Party, and a motley crowd of disgruntled politicians being put together as a coalition group by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. Being opposition politicians that they are, they failed to see the wisdom in President Tinubu acting promptly to save the state and the national economic infrastructure in Rivers. Though many know they are out to promote self-interests, they claim, however, that their grouse is the suspension of the governor, his deputy and the state assembly, contending that the President lacks such powers.

    Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, which is the operative provision for the declaration of a state of emergency, to be fair, is silent on the fate of the governor in the face of emergency declaration.

    Notably, the precedent set in our clime with respect to the fate of the governor during emergency rule is varied. When former President Olusegun Obasanjo imposed emergency rule on Plateau State in May 2004 following a surge in ethno-religious violence that led to widespread killings and destruction, he suspended then Governor Joshua Dariye and the state assembly for six months, and appointed Major-General Chris Alli (rtd) as administrator to restore order in the state. The same thing happened in Ekiti two years later when the state was engulfed in a protracted political crisis. President Obasanjo suspended then Governor Ayo Fayose, his deputy Mrs. Biodun Olujinmi, the state House of Assembly as well as Hon. Friday Aderemi, the then Speaker of the legislature who was claiming to be acting governor. He appointed retired Brigadier General Tunji Olurin to administer the affairs of the state and maintain security for the next six months.

    Read Also: Why NGF is silent on Rivers crisis, by DG Shittu

    In the case of former President Goodluck Jonathan, he declared emergency rule in selected local governments most impacted by Boko Haram terrorist attacks in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe States in 2013 without upending the political and democratic structures in the affected three states. President Jonathan also retained the chairmen in the impacted local government areas. Jonathan might have spared the three governors then and their houses of assembly because the emergency rule declared in the three states was limited to the most-impacted councils.

    Regarding Plateau State emergency proclamation, the Supreme Court that would have set a clear precedent in the matter failed to determine the constitutionality or otherwise of the dissolution of democratic structures on the grounds that the suit was procedurally incompetent because it was instituted at the time by the suspended legislators in the name of Plateau without the authorisation of the state.

    Some legal minds have referred to the Emergency Powers Act of 1961, which though no longer in use in the country but which provided justification for the dissolution of democratic structures and suspension of the fundamental human rights when emergency rule was declared on the Western Region in 1962 by the late Tafawa Balewa Government. It was in respect of two cases, namely Adegbenro vs. Attorney-General of the Federation (1962) NLR 338 and F.R.A.Williams vs Dr. M.A. Majekodunmi (1962) NLR 328, where the apex court in its judgment validated the Emergency Powers Act 1961 to justify the dissolution.

    The logic in the Supreme Court verdict in the matter of Plateau State emergency proclamation is unquestionable going by the argument of legal icon Professor Koyinsola Ajayi (SAN), who spoke on Arise Television last Wednesday. According to him, “the justices of the Supreme Court in that judgement were of the view that they were never eager to review the decision of the President when confronted with a present and imminent danger to lives and property and acted to restore public order and public safety.”

    Beyond the legal rigmarole, it would appear that what is germane in determining what happens to the democratic structures in a state during emergency rule period is the circumstance or situation in the state, the magnitude of the threat to public order and security of citizens and property in such a state. After all, no one remembers the provision of the law in an atmosphere of violence and disorder.

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) put the matter succinctly when he fielded questions from State House Correspondents on Wednesday. He said: “The government stands on the tripod: the Executive, the Legislature, and the Judiciary, and you (the governor) have made the functioning of government impossible. It is not enough for the Executive, to say, we are spending money, even the money you want to spend, the State Assembly must have appropriated it. These are some of the findings that the Supreme Court made. And at the end of the day, the Supreme Court said, or came to a decision, that the governor’s behaviour was like a despot, and that as the situation was, there was no government in Rivers. If there was no government in Rivers, what would we be looking for?”

    Fubara overreached and outplayed himself. He got carried away by the sentimental support he enjoys, and not strategy. He felt that violence would give him what he threw away by not stooping low to win. When some militants issued threats to destroy oil pipelines and other critical infrastructure, the governor failed to dissuade them. In fact, he had said openly that he would tell the people when to act. And a week after, some oil installations went up in flames. No one needs a soothsayer to understand what enabled the destruction. The governor also prevented 27 lawmakers from performing their work and even demolished the state assembly complex. He moved the four lawmakers loyal to him to the Government House, where they usurped the legislative functions of the 32-member assembly.

    Declaring emergency rule on Rivers, President Tinubu had said, among other things, in his address: “Some militants had threatened fire and brimstone against their perceived enemy of the governor who has up till now not disowned them. Apart from that, both the House and the governor have not been able to work together. Both of them do not realise that they are in office to work together for the peace and good governance of the state.”

    Those criticising the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers on the grounds that President Tinubu, while in opposition, strongly condemned the emergency declaration by former President Jonathan in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states conveniently forgot to mention Tinubu’s opposition to former Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki who muscled the state assembly and particularly refused to inaugurate the 14 lawmakers who were duly elected by their constituents till the end of his tenure. Tinubu called out Obaseki, labeling him a despot who emasculated the legislature, which is pivotal to the functioning of democracy, the same way he has condemned Governor Fubara.

    Again, the National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, has added democratic components to the emergency proclamation by announcing regular oversight on the work of the administrator and the National Assembly performing the law-making functions of the Rivers State Assembly as provided for in the constitution. The emergency declaration also helped to save Fubara, despite his imprudence, from the seemingly-imminent impeachment, which would have taken him out completely for the duration of his tenure and rendered him ineligible for any election going forward.

    In the final analysis, the President has demonstrated courage and exemplary leadership by acting to save the nation from what would have adversely affected her economic fortunes and reverse the gains already made. Oil production, which some years ago went as low 900, 000 bpd, is today hovering around 1.6 million bpd. Important governmental initiatives such as NELFUND for indigent students and CREDICORP, vital infrastructure projects being embarked upon by the government like road networks as well as monthly hefty receipts by state governors from the federal allocation accounts would have all been imperilled if the President had delayed taking that decisive action.

    What is required now, in my view, is for political stakeholders in the country, particularly Niger Delta leaders, to rally round, rein in the feuding parties – suspended Governor Fubara, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Nyesom Wike and the state House of Assembly members – and ensure a quick return to normalcy in Rivers State and a final resolution of the political crisis. The National Assembly has moved to take an important step in this direction by indicating it would set up a body of eminent leaders to help resolve the crisis among the contending parties and return the state to the path of peace and tranquillity. The federal lawmakers deserve commendation for acting expeditiously to approve the emergency declaration and for their resolve to ensure a quick resolution of the crisis.

    *Rahman is Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity & Special Duties.

  • NYSC girl (Ushie Rita Uguamaye): A case of being smart by half

    NYSC girl (Ushie Rita Uguamaye): A case of being smart by half

    By Vincent G. Uba

    I have had serious thoughts as to why a National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member, who just graduated from the university and  about to enter the job market, was so hasty in making a video condemning the federal government and insulting the president of her country, branding him “terrible.”

    Instead of her to thank God for making it possible for her to graduate from school, in the face of excruciating economic hardship, and pray to find a good job, she decided to dubiously play smart by unleashing an insulting video that made me begin to wonder about the genuineness of her concern about the country.

    As a graduate, I believe she would have acquired some basic knowledge that should make her understand certain things about governance and management of affairs, even though I don’t know her discipline. I also believe she must have been resident in Nigeria over the years, not only during the less than two years of President Bola Tinubu, to be able to make an informed and rational comparative analysis of things in the country.

    By her academic exposure, Rita Uguamaye, should have been able to have a grasp of the reasons why things are the way they are currently. She should have known that this government is not given to creating false and fake impressions of the situations in the country, a situation akin to presenting Nigeria as a painted sepulchre, which is what previous governments had been doing.

    As a university graduate, she should have known that this government wants the citizens to face the reality, which is that things have been so bad for several years; but have deliberately been swept under the carpet. If this current administration had left it to continue that way, it would have spelt doom for the country in the long run.

    Read Also; I had no child to celebrate my 60th birthday, actress opens up on failed marriage, infertility

    Why wouldn’t this young lady see President Tinubu as one who had the courage to boldly take the bull by the horns, unlike his predecessors who wanted us to continue to live in the illusion of plenty and boom? Why didn’t she see this President as a reasonable leader who would rather let the masses pass through temporary pains and hardship to recover the country, than be afraid of their cries and pains and allow the country to go under?

    The previous Presidents were like parents who were afraid that their children would suffer discomfort and would, therefore, not want to administer painful remedies to heal their sickness. But this President is like a responsible parent who knows that it is better for his children to suffer pains and hardship under some bitter pills to recover from their sickness than avoid these pills and so allow them to die afterwards.

    Watching and listening to this young lady, some thoughts came into my mind. I feel that she is being smart by half, wanting to make it big, and so decided to play on the psyche of desperate politicians and some gullible Nigerians to draw their sympathy and attention to make some money out of them.

    Yes, her bank account would have swollen by now, since this brouhaha. Another thought is that she would have been made a tool by some opposition politicians to create a serious bad image against the government, as already, these politicians are now embracing, applauding and protecting her.

    Whichever way, she  lacks home training and no reasonable and responsible citizen will not condemn her actions. If her parents knew about their onions, they would have cautioned her by now.

    Again, what is the connection between the hardship she is complaining about and the Lagos she alleges to be stinking? All these would make one begin to think that there is more to this than meets the eye. I’m of the strong view that she is looking for cheap money, fame and unmerited attention and so Nigerians should not take her seriously.

    • Uba is the National Coordinator, ‘No Alternative To Tinubu -Shettima 2023,’ sent this piece from Lagos.

  • Power, privilege and governance

    Power, privilege and governance

    The concepts of power, privilege and governance are complex and multifaceted. Power refers to the ability to influence others, while privilege denotes unearned advantages. Governance encompasses institutions, structures and processes that regulate these dynamics. Together, these concepts raise fundamental questions about justice, equality and resource distribution. It emphasizes the importance of considering marginalized groups’ experiences and perspectives.

    The main problem in Nigeria today is its political economy, which is rooted in rent-seeking and fosters a mindset that prioritizes patronage over production. The country’s politics are characterized by a patron-client relationship, where everything revolves around government handouts rather than effective governance. This has led to a situation where “politics” in Nigeria is essentially a scramble for resources in a country with severely limited opportunities for self-improvement.

    When French agronomist René Dumont wrote ‘False Starts in Africa’ in 1962, he inadvertently described Nigeria’s current state in 2025. Nigeria’s missteps have magnified themselves in the theatre of the absurd, such as the construction of a new vice presidential residence and Governor Chukwuemeka Soludo’s boasts about the lavish official residence for the governor of Anambra State, currently under construction. It is to be noted in contradistinction that the newly sworn-in Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, is looking for somewhere to live. The official residence of the prime minister, 24 Sussex Drive, the Canadian equivalent of 10 Downing Street, is in disrepair and uninhabitable. No Canadian government can dare ask the parliament to appropriate the $40m needed to refurbish the residence.

    Canada’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) exceeds $2 trillion, while Nigeria’s GDP is less than $400 billion. Still, Nigeria claims to be a giant! With an electricity generation capacity of less than 6,000 megawatts, Nigeria’s proclamation seems absurd, especially when compared to cities like Johannesburg, Singapore, Hong Kong and Mumbai. Even Lagos State alone should be generating, transmitting and distributing at least 15,000 megawatts, which would be a basic expectation rather than an achievement.

    Read Also; Rivers crisis and the perils of unwisdom

    Nigeria today needs a comprehensive overhaul of its governance crisis to build a new political economy and social services that are fit for purpose. Although the government is on the right path in some ways, a root-and-branch transformation is still necessary. A notable breakthrough is the decision to recapitalize development finance institutions, such as the Bank of Industry and, crucially, the Bank of Agriculture. This move is significant in a rent-seeking state, as it addresses the need for long-term capital – a prerequisite for achieving meaningful progress.

    The development finance institutions require annual recapitalization of at least N500 billion, ideally N1 trillion. Achieving this necessitates a thorough cost evaluation of the government’s machinery, starting with the full implementation of the Oronsaye Committee’s recommendations. The resulting cost savings can then be redirected to development finance institutions and essential social services like primary healthcare. Furthermore, the government should be bolder, if it can afford to be so, especially since there’s no discernible opposition on offer

    At the moment, the Nigerian political establishment across the board appears to be enamored by the position put forward by the leader of the Russian revolution, Vladimir Lenin, after the failed putsch. Lenin wrote the classic, ‘What is to be done?’ His observation is that revolutions do not take place at times of grinding poverty. They do so during periods of relatively rising prosperity.

    Significant sections of the Nigerian establishment believe that relatively rising prosperity could trigger off social discontent. In their own interest, they had better be right. The caveat is that Lenin wrote ‘What’s to be Done’ in 1905. The world has moved on and changed since the conditions that led to the failure of the attempted takeover of government in Russia in 1905. Therefore, the Nigerian political establishment, for reasons of self-preservation, had better put on its thinking cap Addressing power and privilege in governance requires collective action, institutional reforms and a commitment to promoting social justice.

    Nigeria currently lacks a leadership recruitment process, which can only be established if political parties are willing to develop a cadre. Unfortunately, the country is dealing with Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) instead. It’s rare to find leadership in Nigeria operating political boot camps to recruit and groom youths for future leadership roles. This might be why many young people have a misguided understanding of politics, viewing it as merely a means of sharing the nation’s commonwealth.

    Mhairi Black was elected to the British House of Commons at 20 years old. However, the key point is that Black had started becoming involved in politics at a young age. By the time she was elected, she had already gained significant experience, effectively becoming a veteran in the field. In Nigeria, politics is often seen as one of the few avenues for self-fulfillment. However, the economy is stagnant, with few jobs created in the public sector and limited investment opportunities. This is a far cry from the 1950s and 1960s, when political parties were more substantial. Today, it’s worth asking how many Nigerian political parties have functional Research Departments.

    Besides, what socialization into any philosophy or ideology do our politicians have? Similarly to former Governor Rotimi Amaechi, many of those who currently hold power are motivated to stay in politics due to concerns about economic stability. Of course, that’s why the Lagos State House of Assembly has had to revert itself. It is the same challenge that has reduced the traditional institution to victims of Nigeria’s ever-changing political temperature. It is the reason an Ogbomoso indigene is not interested in what happened between Obafemi Awolowo and Ladoke Akintola. It is also the reason an Ijebuman sees an Ogbomoso man as his enemy without bothering to dig up the bitter politics that ultimately succeeded in putting the two families on the path of permanent acrimony. Of course, that’s why we have crises all over the place!

    The Rivers emergency dilemma!

    Rivers State is now under emergency rule, and it’s likely to remain so for the next six months, unless a drastic change occurs. If not managed carefully, this could mark the beginning of a prolonged crisis.

    In situations like this, opinions tend to be divergent. For instance, some people hold the notion that the security situation and the need to protect the law and public order justified President Bola Tinubu’s proclamation of a state of emergency in, and the appointment of a sole administrator for, Rivers State. However, others view this act as ‘unconstitutional’, ‘reckless’, ‘an affront on democracy’, and ‘a political tool to intimidate the opposition’.

    When we criticize governments for unmet expectations, we often rely on our own perspectives and biases. Our individual identities and prejudices shape our criticism. However, it’s essential to recognize that not all criticism is equal. Protesting within the law is fundamentally different from protests that descend into illegality. Once illegality creeps in, the legitimacy of the protest is lost.

    As John Donne wrote in ‘Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions’, “Never send to know for whom the bell tolls.” A protest is legitimate when it aligns with societal norms, values and laws. But when protests are marred by violence or sabotage, they lose credibility. Without credibility, protests become ineffective.

    Regarding the validity or otherwise of the emergency rule in Rivers State, it is imperative that the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors approach the Supreme Court immediately. They should seek a definitive clarification on whether the proclamation is ultra vires or constitutional. For whatever it’s worth, they owe Nigerians that responsibility!

     May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!

  • Climate Change: The rising tide of climate migration

    Climate Change: The rising tide of climate migration

    By Dr. Adebayo Adeleye

    Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time, with far-reaching consequences for our planet and its inhabitants. One of the most devastating effects of climate change is climate migration – the forced displacement of people due to rising temperatures, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events.

    The Alarming Reality: The World Bank estimates that climate change could displace up to 143 million people by 2050, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. This is not just a humanitarian crisis, but also a threat to global stability and security.

    Causes of Climate Migration

    Rising Sea Levels: Coastal communities are being displaced due to rising sea levels, erosion, and increased flooding.

    Drought and Water Scarcity: Changes in precipitation patterns and increased evaporation due to warmer temperatures are leading to droughts and water scarcity, forcing people to migrate.

    Extreme Weather Events: Increased frequency and intensity of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, wildfires, and floods, are displacing communities and destroying livelihoods.

    Loss of Livelihoods: Climate change is impacting agriculture, fisheries, and other industries, leading to loss of livelihoods and forced migration.

    Read Also: Elebuibon: Why there’s growing urge for money rituals

    Consequences of Climate Migration:

    Social and Cultural Disruption: Climate migration can lead to the loss of cultural heritage, social networks, and community cohesion.

    Economic Burden: Climate migration can place a significant economic burden on host countries and communities, straining resources and infrastructure.

    Human Rights Concerns: Climate migrants often face human rights challenges, including limited access to education, healthcare, and employment.

    Global Security Risks: Climate migration can contribute to global security risks, including social unrest, conflict, and terrorism.

    Solutions and Strategies:

    Climate-Resilient Infrastructure: Investing in climate-resilient infrastructure, such as sea walls, levees, and green roofs, can help protect communities from climate-related disasters.

    Sustainable Agriculture: Promoting sustainable agriculture practices, such as agroforestry and permaculture, can help communities adapt to changing climate conditions.

    Climate Education and Awareness: Educating communities about climate change and its impacts can help them prepare and adapt to climate-related challenges.

    International Cooperation: Strengthening international cooperation and agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, can help address the global challenges of climate migration.

    Conclusion: Climate migration is a pressing issue that requires immediate attention and action. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, it is essential that we prioritize the needs and rights of climate migrants. By working together, we can reduce the impacts of climate migration and create a more sustainable and equitable future for all.

    • Dr. Adebayo Matthew, Adeleye (Ph.D., Ibadan), Researcher on Environmental Pollution and Control – badeleye@gmail.com +234 803 525 6450

  • Rivers palaver: Is President Tinubu right or wrong?

    Rivers palaver: Is President Tinubu right or wrong?

    Sir: President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and all state lawmakers for an initial period of six months. This action was taken in response to escalating political tensions between the governor and the state House of Assembly, which had led to violence and threats to law and order.

    Historically, the effectiveness of declaring a state of emergency to resolve political conflicts in Nigeria has been debated. While such measures can restore order temporarily, they may also undermine democratic principles and weaken institutions. For instance, the 1962 state of emergency in Nigeria’s Western Region addressed immediate security concerns but raised questions about federal overreach and political motivations.

    In the current situation, some organizations, such as the Nigerian Bar Association, have criticized the declaration as illegal, arguing that emergencies should not dissolve elected governments. Additionally, there are concerns that frequent use of emergency powers could erode trust in democratic processes.

    It is noteworthy that while critics have raised concerns about endangering democracy, they have not proposed solutions aimed at saving endangered lives in Rivers State. It is indubitable that people need to be alive to enjoy and practice democracy, and the Nigerian constitution states eloquently in Section 14 that the primary purpose of government is SECURITY and WELFARE of the people. A responsible president must not sacrifice the security and welfare of the people on the altar of “democracy.”

    An important question to ask is that, can there be democracy without government?

    Read Also: Iyanya joins Nigerian Idol as new judge for season 10

    I think not.

    The Supreme Court has only a few weeks ago declared: “There is no government in Rivers State.” Governor Fubara and the Rivers State House of Assembly needed to ensure that democratic governance was restored in Rivers State. They failed! Accordingly, the presidential declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State suspending the governor and the state legislature did not, and has not threatened democracy. You don’t kill what has already died.

    The governor himself unilaterally “knocked out” the state legislature until the Supreme Court rebuked him unreservedly. Additionally, he demolished the hallowed and historic building of the Rivers State House of Assembly!

    Nonetheless, while the state of emergency may provide a short-term solution to restore order, it is crucial to address the underlying political issues through dialogue and adherence to the rule of law to ensure long-term stability in Rivers State. This is what the members of the Rivers State House of Assembly and Governor Fubara (along with his deputy) should strive to do during their forced “six-month vacation.”

    I wish them well.

    •Prof Leonard Karshima Shilgba, Admiralty University of Nigeria (ADUN),Ibusa, Delta State.

  • Kudos, Mr. President on Rivers’ political logjam

    Kudos, Mr. President on Rivers’ political logjam

    Sir: The political inferno in Rivers State has finally been extinguished by the firm hand of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. In a move both decisive and controversial, he has declared a state of emergency, suspending Governor Siminalaiyi Fubara, his deputy, and entire lawmakers of the state House of Assembly.

    To fill the power vacuum, he has appointed a former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ette Ibas (rtd) as sole administrator, tasked with restoring order to a state that has teetered on the edge of anarchy for over a year.

    The crisis, a festering wound in Nigeria’s democratic fabric, began in December 2023 when Governor Fubara took the unprecedented step of demolishing the state House of Assembly complex. That singular act was more than a symbolic gesture.

    It was an assault on the very architecture of constitutional governance, reducing the state legislature to rubble in both form and function. What followed was a bitter standoff between the governor and pro-Wike lawmakers, a battle for supremacy that defied every attempt at reconciliation.

    President Tinubu himself waded into the murky waters, seeking a resolution through dialogue, but his efforts, like those of other well-meaning stakeholders, were met with intransigence. Then came the Supreme Court’s judgment.

    Read Also: Reps, NHRC, UK govt, others pledge support to deepening rights protection in Nigeria

    In unequivocal terms, it declared that Rivers State had ceased to function as a proper government. The absence of a legislature, it argued, rendered governance illegitimate. The apex court upheld the membership of the defected lawmakers and ordered the immediate restoration of constitutional order.

    Yet, even with this legal pronouncement, the impasse persisted. The governor remained unmoved, the House of Assembly paralyzed, and the state in a political coma. Beyond the legal dimension, security reports painted an even grimmer picture.

    Militant groups, emboldened by the vacuum of power, had begun to assert their presence, vandalizing oil pipelines while the state government stood idle. Rivers is no ordinary state. It is Nigeria’s economic jugular, home to vast oil reserves and critical infrastructure.

    The prospect of unchecked lawlessness in such a strategic region was not just a state matter but a national emergency. With this declaration, Tinubu has pressed the reset button on Rivers politics.

    This is not just about punishing political actors who refused to govern responsibly. It is a statement that Nigeria’s democracy, however imperfect, will not be held hostage by personal ambitions. It is an assertion that when governance collapses, intervention becomes not just a choice but an obligation.

    But beneath the layers of legality and security concerns lies a more profound question. Does this intervention by Tinubu solve the deeper political fractures in Rivers, or does it merely mask the wounds with the bandage of federal authority?

    Emergency rule is a temporary fix, a stabilizing mechanism, but the tensions that birthed this crisis still lurk beneath the surface. For now, Tinubu has demonstrated that the federal government will not stand by while a key state spirals into disorder.

    But history teaches that interventions of this nature are as much about execution as they are about intent. The coming months will reveal whether this was a masterstroke that restored Rivers to the path of good governance or a high-stakes gamble that merely delayed an even greater reckoning.

    •Abdulsalam Mahmud,babasalam1989@gmail.com.

  • Tasks before the new Alaafin of Oyo

    Tasks before the new Alaafin of Oyo

    Sir: All is set for April 5, when Oyo Alaafin community and its environs will play host to thousands of dignitaries from all walks of life to witness the coronation of a new Alaafin, Oba Akeem Owoade,

    The new Alaafin is ascending the throne of his forebears after more than two years of the demise of the former Alaafin, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi III. Owoade’s emergence as the new Alaafin came after fierce battles against equally qualified princes from his own royal lineage. The immediate task before the new Alaafin is how to soothe the frayed nerves and pacifying the losers in the aftermath of the battles that must have taken huge tolls on the rivals in both cash and kind.

    Aside Ibadan which has a relatively peaceful succession, one of the debacles of Obaship in other parts of Yorubaland is its in-built schism whereby a once peaceful, progressive and friendly community is suddenly polarized through succession to a demised king.

    So delicate and horrendous are the contests that supposedly friendly families sometimes become arch enemies by virtue of supporting different candidates into throne. The new Alaafin must work assiduously to close ranks and provide a lasting truce between him and other contestant princes on one hand, and the wider Oyo community on the other.

    He must hit the ground running by initiating ideas and identifying with the traditional values capable of pacifying all and sundry. Obaship is all about tradition and culture, and the best way to proceed is to start learning fast, especially having been away from the scene for a long time so that he can win the heart of the people.

    Read Also: Genesis and development of universities in Nigeria

    Oba Owoade is ascending the Alaafin throne at the most in-auspicious time in the history of the Yoruba race. The Yoruba nation is gradually facing the dearth of leadership that could act as the rallying voice in a nation known for its virile and virulent interdependence and heterogeneity.

    With the now presumed incapacitation of Afenifere, the once effective pan Yoruba socio-cultural organization acting as the umbrella body for other Yoruba groups, there is an already an inevitable leadership lacuna which prominent Yoruba Obas like Ooni of Ife, Alaafin of Oyo and Soun of Ogbomoso must rise up to fill.

    It is kudos for the Ooni Ogunwusi who since his ascendency to the throne has been working tirelessly to restore the unity and past glory of Obaship in Yorubaland.  With the trio of Ooni, Alaafin and the Soun of Ogbomoso, who are not just paramount rulers, but are individuals imbued with sophistication, exposure, education and influence, taking up the gauntlet to restore the unity and sense of traditional purpose that fast ebbing and cascading into the state of abyss should not be impossible.

    Yorubaland is one family despite state creation; such sense of affinity is gradually being lost. The trio of Ooni, Alaafin and Soun should strive to reverse the trend by exploring a possible forum where Yoruba obas as descendants of Oduduwa can always meet at least once in a year or two.

    But then, there is always the fear of who will chair such meeting where you have Alaafin and Ooni, two foremost Yoruba Obas. This was the issue that predominated during the reigns of Ooni Olubuse and Alaafin Adeyemi. Given the education and exposure of both Alaafin Owoade and Ooni Ogunwusi, the issue of supremacy should not be allowed to constitute a cog in the wheel of progress and development of Yorubaland.

    On the on-going debate on the role of traditional rulers in the development of Nigeria, the trio of Alaafin, Ooni and Soun should constitute the vanguard in collaboration with their colleagues from the North, East, South to canvass a new role for traditional rulers in the constitution. Indeed, traditional rulers in Nigeria should take advantage of the ongoing constitutional review exercise to advocate for a new role in the constitution.

    •Sunday Olagunju,Ibadan, Oyo State.

  • Fuel: Why this Naira-dollar yo-yo?

    Fuel: Why this Naira-dollar yo-yo?

    If we allow it, petroleum downstream, the fuel sector that powers the economy, could soon follow cement, with an oligopoly banding together to sell the product at whatever price they like, even if cement’s raw materials are mostly sourced locally.

    So, before petrol, diesel and other auto and machine fuels go the cement way, the Federal Government must act fast, now that it can still be in charge, and save the citizens from wilful exploitation.

    Dangote Petroleum Refinery, the biggest single player in petroleum downstream, just announced it is, for now, stopping sale of its petroleum products in Naira — and for good logic.  Dangote claims that since the government is tardy in its crude-in-Naira sales policy, it would also sell its refined products in dollar, since it now buys crude in dollar.

    This argument is unassailable.  Why this tardiness to enter into a new agreement, after the first six-month deal had lapsed?  When the news first filtered, Zach Adedeji, the main man in charge of that policy, poured chilled water on it.

    Read Also: Nigerian Idol return for season 10 as Iyanya joins judges

    Still, shouldn’t the government have walked its talk, and post-haste put in place a new deal, but now for a longer spell?  Apparently, the government side has dithered — thus prompting the Dangote announcement, and all its dire economic consequences.  A shock therapy?

    Even with the fuel pump price coming down, it’s still too high for many — if not most — households.  Also, industries bleed with this high cost of energy, with earnings plateaued, even with reported falling inflation.  So, any rise in pump prices again would blight the economy, and fuel another round of punishing inflation.

    Petrol is too critical to the economy to admit any tardiness on the side of policy makers.  Which is why Zach Adedeji and his team must scramble together a fresh deal before things spiral out of control.  They should act — and now!

    So far, in moderating pump prices, Dangote has generally been a force for good.  Each time, it had forced pricing down, with NNPC Ltd, the government’s own player, scrambling after it.

    But it could easily turn a force for bad.  If others scramble after Dangote to cut pump prices, would they do so too, if it were to flare prices?  If they did, the cement nightmare would dawn!

    That would be extremely bad news.  The logic of local refining is that fuels would be far cheeper than imported cargo.  That’s common sense, and it takes no especial acuity in economics to realize that.

    Petrol is too strategic to the economy to be left at the mercy of investors’ greed.  That’s why the regulatory agencies must take full charge when they still can — and it’s absolutely no to any trace of laissez-faire on the part of the Federal Government in this season of great economic peril.

  • The untold battle of Nigeria’s entertainment industry

    The untold battle of Nigeria’s entertainment industry

    Sir: No one talks about the failures, the countless auditions, or the silent struggles behind the scenes, they only just the glamour, the wealth, and the “soft life.” 

    Bollywood thrives on strategic government investment, making it a global economic force that boosts employment, tourism, and digital expansion. Unlike Nigeria’s self-funded entertainment sector, India injects billions into its film industry, ensuring sustained growth and international reach. 

    Beyond captivating audiences, it turns filming locations into major tourist attractions, employs millions across various roles, operating as a well-structured economic engine that drives both cultural and financial influence.

    Bollywood wields significant soft power, shaping international perceptions, fostering trade partnerships, and influencing policy discussions on a global scale.

    Now, the burning question is – If India has done it, why can’t Nigeria?

    Nollywood is already the second-largest film industry globally, built almost entirely on private effort.

    According to research, Nollywood is currently generating over $590 million annually and producing around 2,500 films a year.

    Imagine if this industry received the same kind of backing Bollywood enjoys. Federal investment—free from corruption—could elevate production quality, generate millions of jobs, and turn Nollywood into Nigeria’s foremost non-oil revenue especially in this period of youth unemployment.

    Read Also: First Lady receives kudos for advancing Nigeria’s FDI drive

    Content creation, beyond Nollywood, has emerged as a formidable economic engine in Nigeria, proving that digital storytelling is not just a fleeting trend but a viable sector capable of generating wealth, employment, and global recognition.

    When properly harnessed, digital content creation can become a major economic driver much like Bollywood’s integration of influencers and digital expansion into film, tourism, and commerce. With the right policies—such as tax breaks, structured funding, and intellectual property protection—Nigeria’s content industry could grow into a leading non-oil revenue stream, competing with global giants like India and the United States.

    Despite its promise, the content creation industry in Nigeria still grapples with fundamental challenges that could hinder its full potential. Unlike Bollywood, which benefits from government-backed investment and structured growth strategies, Nigerian content creators operate in a largely informal economy, where access to funding, infrastructure, and legal protections remains inadequate. Some creators lack financial literacy, face inconsistent brand deals, and operate without a regulatory framework that protects their intellectual property.

    Additionally, the absence of dedicated digital innovation hubs limits their ability to scale, collaborate, or transition from short-form content to full-length productions capable of breaking into mainstream cinema as some have done.

    While some content creators have managed to bridge the gap between skit-making and brand influence, there remains an untapped market for leveraging content creation into mainstream entertainment and tourism.

    The government and private investors need to recognize digital storytelling as more than just “youthful amusement” but as a serious industry that, when properly structured, could create thousands of jobs, foster digital entrepreneurship, and export Nigerian creativity worldwide.

    If Nigeria is to truly harness the creative economy, it must institutionalize financial incentives, support digital film villages, and encourage content creators to transition into high-value productions that can contribute to global streaming platforms, film festivals, and international collaborations. Only then can the country move beyond isolated success stories to a full-fledged, structured entertainment ecosystem that mirrors the impact of Bollywood on India’s economy.

    States like Lagos, Kwara and some others have already positioned themselves as film hubs, investing in production studios, enabling policies, and film villages to attract investors. If these state-led initiatives can yield results, what would happen if Nigeria had a full-scale federal-backed Nollywood revolution?

    With well-structured grants, tax breaks, and infrastructure development, Nollywood could rival Hollywood and Bollywood, expanding tech-based employment and transforming Nigeria into Africa’s entertainment capital. 

    Yet, a crucial caution must be heeded. Nollywood, like every thriving industry, has its fair share of pitfalls. The rise of viral sensations over genuine talent, the exploitation of controversies for social media relevance, and the blurred line between creativity and chaos all pose risks to the industry’s long-term sustainability. The truth remains: talent is different from cruise, and entertainment is bigger than scandal-driven fame. Nollywood has the potential to be a global force, a national pride, and an economic goldmine.

    •Haroon Aremu Abiodun, exponentumera@gmail.com.