Category: Commentaries

  • FG should pay my 25 years pension

    SIR: The civil servant is at it again in their drift. He does great harm in the subterranean and come to the market place wearing the holy but deceptive look. He wears the teeth that is whiter than snow and spit out white saliva but inside him is the venom that is the killer more venomous than the venomous snakes of Mexico. This time the Federal Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development and his director of human-resources refused to pay my 25 years of pension since the approval was given to me by the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation by his Letter Ref: No. PNB. 1662 fo 19th July, 2012.

    Gleefully and in a well-merited triumph, I wrote my first letter of demand dated 6th August, 2012, to the Federal Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development, floating on the wings of victory but I soon realized that I was in a utopia. Let me remind or rejuvenate the minds of my readers that I have used the words “triumph” and “victory” because it took me six agonizing years before the Head of Civil Service of the Federation approved my application for pension. I was already a victim of obsession in my thought for litigation by the time I received the approval. Coming from my cognitive powers I indulge in systematic economy of words and energy because they may be in greater use in future. Now is another time! My second letter of demand was dated 20th September, 2012 and the third was 6th March, 2013. None was replied and this dangerous and unethical silence explains to any rational being the type of beings in our state bureaucracy: the civil service: I have been mentioning the words “Civil Servant” which can be defined to mean whole but in this sense I do not mean to condemn across board because nature is not monolithic. Like one cannot say that a whole tribe is evil. However, the deaf hears the blind sees that civil servant has facilitated the death by hunger of number less pensioners who were denied their pensions. Let the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development pay my pension.

    • Oladele Osunbote

    Ibadan, Oyo State

     

  • Attention BRF: More pedestrian bridges needed.

    Attention BRF: More pedestrian bridges needed.

    The lives of Lagosians and others therein need to be considered by the Governor of the State and his entire team.

    Driving through the Agege Motor way, I saw things that really touched me and it’s something we must address in this state, Pedestrian Bridges. The road is one of the busiest of roads and we got citizens ranging from School kids to pregnant mothers and women using the express as a means to get to the other end of the road en route their various destinations. This is not right as the lives of these people is at stake and served on a platter of gold for onrushing and senseless drivers plying that route.

    Not less than 20 Pedestrian bridges needs to be build to serve the masses and ease their stress of having to cross the slab and the express road to get to the other side of the road. We must be our brother’s keeper and the Government should know this is something that needs urgent attention.

    The Agege Motor way is not the only road that needs to have these bridges built. Other areas like the Ikorodu and alike, where there are few or no pedestrian bridges should be visited so as to see how people use the express. Apart from individual’s lives at stake here, traffics on these routes are tiring due to pot holes and drivers slowing down for these individuals to successfully cross the express way to the other side.

    Please, we must act fast and treat this with paramount.

     

  • Jona, Ama, the hunchback and the witchdoctor – a fable

    Once upon a time, when Hardball was not born, the fable goes that a certain hunchback, being weary of backing his life’s burden like a rusack, started to seek a cure for his condition. He had travelled the length and breadth of the land to no avail until he met this wily witchdoctor. Upon diagnosis, he opined that the hunch was not ordinary, that the mortal baggage was the result of the sin of his fathers now stacked on his back by the gods as a living testimony. There was antidote, of course, but precedent upon the condition that unlike his father, he was a good man.

    I am a man of honour, he said promptly, you will find corroboration in the entire clan and beyond, he said frantically. Hold your peace, the medicine man said gently, the gods of the land do not seek corroboration they are the story, from the beginning to the end. Was it not your fathers to the fifth generation who gathered this evil load you now have to lug about? Why is it your lot to carry it? Though you look innocent and benign, would you be one of those who have a good face and dark heart? Would you kill in the bush and dash to the foot path and ask who has killed? If you are not double-faced, do you forgive? Are you low and mean-spirited like a rapscallion?

    You know the gods would forgive anything, even murder and serial adultery (which by the way has grown to a scourge around here), but not an unforgiving nature and meanness of heart. Not to forget is to play god and no man is god and our gods abhor any man playing god. To be mean and ungracious is to assume eternity. Only god is eternal and man, miserable man, will always come and go like the seasons. What is man to go to bed with grudges, with bitterness and ill-will towards another man? Who does he think stir him back to life each day? Ah, man! Fleeting breath, morning dew, blooming flower that exfoliates in splendor and majesty only when its end is nigh!

    Anyway, never mind the digression, I am no god myself, I only bear message. I will give you antidote to your hump but there is a caveat: if you are not the good man you pose to be, you will end up suffering double jeopardy because as you cure your hunch back, your stomach will protrude until… so do you still want the herbs? Yes indeed I want the herbs, the hunchback replied, the whole village world can attest to my obvious good nature. Well then, replied the witchdoctor, here you are, take this bunch of herbs, warm it in an earthen pot and dab three times on your back in the morning and at night. Do it for seven days and present yourself let us see whether you are as much a good man, as you claim.

    Hunchy promptly set about his treatment, but he had a ‘lump’ in his heart. Ten years ago a dainty young man had made off to town with the only woman that ever flashed him a hearty smile. He had never lived it down. The ‘sore’ had festered in his heart all these years and he would harm the young man the instant he sets his eyes on him. He is convinced he has justification to retaliate against this impudent young man. He kept soothing his back with warm herb. By the third day he could feel enormous relieve on his back … but his stomach has become discomfiting. By the fifth day he could barely rise to his feet… the hunchback’s troubles it seemed, had been brought forward. He could never present his self to the medicine man. Never again… MORAL: be quick to forgive, shake hands, make up and move on because you are not god.

  • Salisu Buhari’s UNN appointment

    SIR: In April, the Goodluck Jonathan-led Federal Government, in exercise of its executive powers, reconstituted the governing councils of federal universities and made elaborate appointments therein including, the appointment of Salisu Buhari into the Governing Council of the University of Nigeria, (UNN).

    As a proud alumnus of that great institution, I feel thoroughly scandalized by the thoughts and decision of the Jonathan administration to embarrass the entire university community and her alumni with such unmeritorious appointment. This particular appointment, like the Alamieyeseigha’s pardon, sends a very clear signal that crimes and criminal activities are not only condoned but rewarded, under the present administration.

    It would be recalled that the beneficiary of the present appointment, Alhaji Salisu Buhari, was the first elected Speaker of the House of Representatives in 1999 upon the return of civil rule in Nigeria. He was tried and convicted for forging a certificate purportedly obtained from a Canadian University which subsequently enjoyed the infamous notoriety otherwise known as the “Toronto Certificate saga” . He was accordingly removed as Speaker on account of the forgery. Although he was allegedly pardoned by the Obasanjo administration, yet such alleged pardon does not detract from the fact that he was once convicted for a criminal offence of forgery and misconduct. The integrity of the University of Nigeria conceived by visionary leader Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe and founded on high academic and moral grounds with a distinctive mission statement and motto: To Restore the Dignity of Man cannot afford to parade men and women of questionable characters in her Governing Council. Such would be antithetical to the objectives and the high moral pedestal on which the institution is founded.

    As an institution that is resolute on the quality and content of its grandaunts particularly in Learning and Character, this development constitutes a dangerous set back as the signal already created is one that justifies moral transgressions and misrepresent the values for which the institution is known and associated.

    Mr. President, as the Visitor of the University is enjoined to invoke his powers under Sections 14 and 15 of the University of Nigeria Act Laws of the Federation and remove or drop Buhari from the Governing Council of the university.

    To be sure, the appointment of Salisu Buhari, is ill-advised, Unmeritorious, totally completely condemnable and accordingly rejected.

    • Malachy Ugwummadu

    Legal Adviser, University of Nigeria Alumni Association

    Lagos Branch.

  • A note to NANS President

    Though my heart is heavy but I have not come in its heaviness because emotions are known to ultimately becloud judgment and that is what I have come to do today; to judge our national malady, to appraise the educational insanity and to give resounding rounds of applause to the mediocrity of the Nigeria students [Of whom I am one].

    I have come to try to take you down the lane called memory, as we flip through the pages of history, trying to revisit the relics of time and learn the lessons that history teaches.

    Many may have sent you condolences after the death of the Senate President [NANS] and other NANS faithful whose lives were offered on the altar of cluelessness of a nation seeking self-definition. I would have loved to join the army of friends, unionists and public office holders who have sent their deep regrets and say, that the soul of the FAITHFUL departed [emphasis on faithful] rest in due peace, but this would be a slap on the face of the departed. Though I want them to rest in peace, but saying “rest in peace” like every other person would not necessarily make them rest in peace, but acting against the vices that put them six feet beneath our feet would be the best feat to make them rest in peace. Lip regrets are only a disservice to the fallen meteors.

    Lend me your ears, that I may bury my words in them, but more importantly your heart, that I may inscribe my thoughts on its walls, that we may safely transform our nation and put the departed to rest. For their sakes, do not turn on the deaf ears as I play from this drum of observation and intellect. For the sakes of the fallen, do not pretend to be blind as I extend these vices to your frontlet, for their sakes mind my words and tend to my advice, then together we shall take a handful of the sands of fulfilment and pour on their caskets as we bade them adios and watch them rest in sane peace.

    Over the past week, I have been buried in the pool of pain and conflicting reports, I have been trying to scan all information gotten on the screen of truth to see which one comes through, like Abraham Lincoln advised, but almost to no avail. Some reported that the riot in the University of Uyo just led to the loss of life of a promising young Kingsley, while others said there were about three to six students who lost their dear lives in the plot. With respect to the attempted peacemakers (NANS Senate President and co.), who were victims of the road crash, some reported that the death was caused by a crash into a trailer; some said it was caused by police roadblocks, and some others opined that the crash emanated from the mood drinks taken by our departed faithful.

    What report(s) to believe in this chronic media confusion is not my plan of action today, but the insanity that surrounds corporate existence as Nigerian students. How we handle issues, when we react to apparent oppression and our overall responsiveness to the matters that affect us the most. We now fight the wrong enemies; we have become myopic in our dealings and now have a flare for dealing with frivolous issues. We run from pillar to post in a bid to cure ringworm even when leprosy has taken over our feeble existence.

    Now to history’s lane. In 1961, the National Union of Nigerian Students [NUNS] protested against the decision of the Nigerian government to enter into Anglo-Nigeria defence pact with British government. The students saw it as selling the Nigerian birthright and resisted. The students involved were victimized by the government yet they took their stand.

    This was a time when the student body which you head today influenced national and even international policies that were perceived capable of crippling our existence. This was a time when they knew that leprosy if not tackled will birth banes that are beyond the management of the ringworm killer.

    These times are gone; our hobbies now lie in staining the pages of newspapers with baseless interviews and write-ups, with condolence messages of deaths that could be avoided, with complaints to the man who is trying to cut our toes, while applauding the one with a loaded rifle facing our fore-head.

    Over the past few years, the budgetary allocation towards Nigerian students has been extremely cruel. From 2006 to 2010, less than N300billion has been recurrently allocated to a sector, with much more going to security, yet we have our hands akimbo. In 2011, N1.592trillion [about 35%] was allocated to security, while education was ailing at less than 10% as though we live in a war ridden nation. Year 2012 was no different with 8.4% [394.58bn of 4.697trn]. The final deception came in 2013, when education was said to have got the highest allocation, with just 426.5bn which amounted to 11.489% of the national budget.

    NUNS of 1961 could pre-empt the government, and act against policies perceived as harsh. The same could have applied to us if we could pre-empt all of this. The UNIUYO crisis which led to these avoidable deaths all began from N2,000 and N200 introduction of GST and transport fare respectively and the inhumane intervention of armed policemen in the university. If you as the head of NANS could make NANS stand firm on the policy of “no use of arms” within our institution by the police, all of this could be avoided. Besides, if the school was properly funded as it should be, and we could fight for our rightful 26% of the budget, the introduction of such fees may be impossible.

    In 1983, students were expelled from the University of Maiduguri due to protest against the then Vice Chancellor, Prof. Jubril Aminu. This was taken up by late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN) and the students were restored to the university. This was one of those NANS victories, but since the demise of the Senior Advocate of the Masses (SAM), NANS has not found it pertinent enough to find a worthy replacement and have someone like this that would be a fierce defence for us in the days of trouble.

    Like Desmond Tutu said; “Don’t raise your voice, improve your argument”! I heard you were dealt with by Oyo State’s “operation burst” operatives, due to your intentions and deeds to barricade the road leading to UCH in a bid to shut down all of the nation’s universities. Though this is difficult to believe, but if any truth dwell in this then you are raising your voice, not improving your argument. We cannot achieve results by working on the impulses generated by these deaths without strategizing on how we can on a long term conquer these present realities.

    Finally brother, I am sure I am not the first Nigerian student to write you, and may not be the last, but I plead with you, not to turn deaf ears on my feeble argument, let it not be another round of drums to the deaf or lightning to the blind. Sieve it through and take what we both know can make Donald, Kingsley, Abdulazeez, Jerry, Japheth and Asa rest in perfect peace. As youths, Benjamin D’Israeli calls us the trustees of posterity; we are called to be architects of the future, not its victims.

     

    • Adebayo writes from the University of Ibadan.

  • Re: Haba, Labaran!

    SIR: Olatunji Dare’s column “At Home Abroad” in The Nation, June 25 on the above subject matter refers.

    Much as I admire Dr. Dare’s nimble wits and his artful writing, – being a fervid follower of his column – every statement of his must still be placed against the mirror of truth. I feel obliged to correct his attempt to cripple the feet of truth and efface evident facts as contained in his article.

    Having participated in the National Good Governance Tour in Kebbi, Zamfara, and Katsina States, I sure stand a better chance than Dare to educate the public on the activities of the NGGT Team. First, let the notion be corrected that the NGGT travel by Executive jets; contrariwise the entirety of the NGGT Team – including the Minister of Information – always travel by road in regular buses. It is equally noteworthy that the team does not restrict its project inspection activities to state capitals, but traverses a vast majority of Local Governments distant from the state capital visited. Contrary to Dare’s perception, the NGGT Team sparsely had any time for leisure and in most instances skipped meals as projects were inspected from dawn till dusk.

    Contrary to the perceived suspicion of certain governors from opposition political parties, the NGGT did not set out to deride or disparage their efforts. This much was attested to by the Governor of Zamfara State (ANPP), Dr. Abdul’aziz Abubakar Yari when he applauded the NGGT Team for being fair and dispassionate in its assessment of governance in the state. He went further to state that he had equally nursed his own reservations about the NGGT, but that his doubts had cleared by the strict adherence of the NGGT Team to purely developmental issues rather than political witch-hunting.

    On the whole, the NGGT has recorded novel achievements and stirred up an active consciousness in the hearts of the Nigerian public to hold government at all levels accountable. On the wings of its accomplishments is a renewed debate on the role of the Local Governments in the quest for autonomy. The NGGT is a very welcome initiative by the government and independent media and Civil Society Organizations which has helped to ventilate the reportage and focus on developmental attainments in our dear nation.

    • Solomon Adodo

    National Coordinator,

    Empowerment for Unemployed Youths Initiative,

    Abuja

  • One nation bound in corruption

    SIR: Everybody talks about corruption. Everybody laments the level of corruption

    in the country. One way or the other — consciously or unconsciously, directly or indirectly — everybody fuels corruption. We pretend to fight corruption. Sadly, everybody is in trouble.

    One doesn’t have to be a pessimist to realize that we’re all in big trouble. Even though corruption hurts the poor disproportionately, the rich are not immune to the pains and sorrows that accompany endemic corruption.

    Corruption is a virus eating away at the very fabric of society. By subterfuge, it destroys institutions and values that contradict its nature. Corruption ruins families and communities. Corruption pollutes religions of love and peace with greed and violence. Corruption turns centres of learning into epicentres of decadence. Corruption converts the judiciary from the temple of justice into a fortress for corruption itself. Corruption substitutes the virtue of honesty with the culture of impunity. Corruption prefers the cacophony of sycophancy to the strength of moral character. Corruption jettisons the tradition of meritocracy but embraces the celebration of mediocrity. Corruption turns the world upside down, for instance, by associating celebrity with indecency; and so on.

    But who is really fighting the monster that is threatening our existence? Is it the political class that the revered Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka aptly summed up as “The very quagmire of corruption, nurtured on corruption, sustained by corruption and dependent on corruption for its very survival”? Or, the public-private partners that occupy strategic positions in the web of corruption! Could it be the impoverished citizens who have common enemies to fight against, but are being knocked down by ignorance and deeply divided by forces stronger than the bonds of brotherhood? Maybe, the endangered species in our midst whose wisdom and genuine voices are eternally being despised!

    Corruption! We have gone abysmally down this perilous way. But why has it become so difficult to halt the country’s slide into destruction? Are we hopeless as a people?

    Whereas most of our woes are attributable to corruption, bad leadership — corruption’s closest ally — is the main culprit. Bad leadership fuels corruption, and every attempt to confront corruption is neutralized by bad leadership, and vice versa.

    At the centre of corruption is the system that breeds bad leaders. This notorious system in the remote past had irreversibly set in motion a chain reaction leading to a self-propagating, self-amplifying and self-sustaining series of crises. That explains why we have been busy all along chasing shadows and hopelessly treating mere symptoms of an ailment whose root is continuously been nourished by a pool of structural defects.

    The episodes in our “fight” against corruption in the last one year—let’s pretend we have short memories—including the presidential pardon for Diepreye Alamieyeseigha, a former Bayelsa State governor—more and more people, even born optimists, are beginning to doubt the possibility of Nigeria ever winning this battle.

    Corruption in Nigeria is like a cancer in its advanced stage. And as we watch the disease run its course, may God have mercy on our souls.

     

    • John Adebisi

    Abuja, FCT

  • Rethinking media coverage of terrorism

    The important question of the relationship between media coverage of terrorism and the impact of such media depiction on the rest of us ordinary citizens has continued to generate debates and commentaries in different climes. It is a measure of its importance and direct relevance to the contemporary security challenges confronting Nigeria that I am, as it were, adding my own voice to the numerous views on the subject matter.

    The topicality of the subject is so pronounced that two broad schools of thought have emerged. The first echoes the remonstration by the former British Prime Minister, late Margaret Thatcher, that media coverage is “the Oxygen of terrorism”, therefore, the way to manage it is not to report it. The other view however, is that championed by the likes of Rick Van Amersfool and David Hohmes, which opines that reporting crime and terrorism is both beneficial to the media, the state and its agencies as well as the public.

    Time and space would not allow me to dwell extensively on these interesting schools of thought. My position however is that in engaging in reportage of this nature, the media should resist the urge for sensationalism, outright falsehood and unnecessary exaggeration and be guided by well-tested ethics of the profession – objectivity, control and that which promote healthy values in society. I am also of the view that the media has a crucial role to play in the delicate act of nation-building. Thus, media practitioners should deliberately work towards building a strong synergy between them and the law enforcement agencies in the task of ensuring safety of lives and property and addressing the scourge of terrorism.

    Crime can be defined as any act or omission which violates the law and which is punishable upon conviction. It is the commission of an act that is forbidden or the omission of a duty that is commanded by a public law which ultimately makes the offender liable to punishment by the law. Unlike crime, the word terrorism has multivalent definitions and has no universally accepted meaning. Thus, many would argue that the erstwhile militancy in the Niger Delta does not merit the nomenclature of terrorism.

    According to the US National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), terrorism and terrorist attacks are “the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion or intimidation”. Another definition sees it as a “calculated and extreme use of violence or threatened violence, perpetuated by malice to cause serious harm or violence against individuals, governments and their assets with the intention to attain political, religious or ideological goals through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear on civilian population”.

    What is evident from these definitions is that terrorism, as well as crime, poses a grave threat to national security and the lives and property of individuals around the globe. While all terror acts amount to crimes, not all crimes amount to terrorism.

    This then brings us back to our central theme, that is: how media coverage of terrorism and violent crimes impact on the overall well-being of the rest of us. My concern here is how we can manage our media coverage of terror activities in such a way that we do not inadvertently promote the cause of the criminals and terrorists or unconsciously turn our media outfits to external PR organs for terrorist interests.

    In order to appreciate how media coverage impacts on terrorism, there is need to know what motivates criminals and terrorists in their quest to unleash terror and anarchy in society.

    To gain attention of the media, terrorists carefully plan and select targets of attack that would attract maximum media coverage. A few examples here perhaps may suffice to illustrate this tendency: In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, while every eye was glued to the Games, the Palestinian terrorists struck and kidnapped Israeli athletes and thus monopolised the attention of the global television’s estimated 800 million audiences. The same argument informed the attack by terrorists on the Transit System in London during the G-8 Summit on July 7, 2005 in neighbouring Scotland.

    Both the 9/11 terrorist attack in the United States by Al-Qaeda and the insensate attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab on the American Airliner, Airbus A330 – 300 on December 25, 2009 were all attempts by these vectors of violence to gain attention of the media.

    In addition to gaining the attention of the public, terrorists also use the media to inform, publicise or inflict the public with their political causes, motives and rationale for resorting to violence. Through this, they hope to win the sympathy or empathy of the public and new converts to their cause(s), particularly from those whose cause they claim to fight. In Nigeria the unguarded attacks on the Police Headquarters Abuja on June 16, 2011, the UN building in Abuja on August 26, 2011 and other institutions of the state as well as the deliberate targeting of churches are well organised attacks intended to attract maximum attention and publicity.

    Given these motives, terrorists usually carry out their attacks intentionally and strategically with full desire and craving for media coverage to enable them realise their goals. The terrorists’ quest for publicity has been greatly aided by the new and emerging media now at their disposal and discretion to publicise their messages to wider audiences.

    The media’s response to crime/terrorism in Nigeria has rather been ambivalent. In some instances, the media has done extremely well in partnering the police and other law enforcement agencies in combating crimes and criminality in our society. But in other instances, some sections of the media have played roles that are, to say the least, lamentable. The bizarre and gory tales of destruction, tears, blood and fatalities perpetrated by these monsters are what we find everyday on these sections of the media.

    But perhaps the most worrisome is the tendency of some media practitioners to engage in sensationalism and emotionalism, all in a bid to promote sales and profit in the unrestrained spirit of capitalism. While all these are happening, our common adversary – the hoodlums and terrorist – are savouring the gains of free publicity and extra psychological mileage.

    Another reason is that violence is a central and defining quality in contemporary television culture and is critical to the semiotic and financial momentum of contemporary media organisations. Much as the media have always been interested in reporting terrorism, the recent proliferation of television and radio channels and the emergence of mega – media organisations have led to greater competitions and insatiable appetites for shocking, sensational “infotainment” that is believed to keep audience captivated, boost ratings and circulation and increase profits.

    We fully identify with the view by Mc Quail (2010) that the “Media can and should be held to account for the quality, means and consequences of their publishing activities to society in general and/or to other interests that may be affected”. We expect the media to stop feeding the public with publications and broadcasts which border on sentiments and emotions and restrain themselves from writing subjective stories, especially ones capable of causing apathy, hatred, despondency and xenophobia in our society.

    Similarly, we appreciate the importance of a strong, free and incorruptible press in the affairs of any modern state. Thus, we are not, and will not canvass for the restriction of the freedom of the media in any way. We however recommend a responsive and responsible reportage in line with our national interests and the prevailing security challenges of the nation. We advocate a new regime of self-censorship and perhaps, peer review by media owners and practitioners as part of their contributions to the war against terror.

    Finally, as we intensify our onslaught against terrorism and other violent crimes, we appeal for the support and cooperation of the media. We advocate the prioritisation of our national interests above other narrow considerations. The truth is that if we must defeat terrorists and their collaborators, we must among other things, stop giving them unmerited fame and publicity. We must collectively advance our common cause and remedies, while simultaneously suppressing their villainy and destructive tendencies.

    • Mba, a chief superintendent of police, is Force Public Relations Officer

  • Open letter to the President

    First, let me apologize if you consider my decision to use this medium rather unusual. I really wish there were better alternative ways of reaching you directly. Sir, you are faced with enormous challenges on all fronts, just as it is needless emphasizing the fact that as the President, you take the blame for the failures of everybody in your cabinet and government, though you are not a spirit to know what they are doing or be everywhere at a time.

    No doubt, this counts among the many irreversible dilemma, which the office cannot be separated from, and which everyone occupying the office of the President all over the world understands, knowing that the office is not a tea party. Interestingly, too, it is also this particular attribute that separates the leader from the uncommon leader, someone who prepared for the challenges inherent in the office, from the one to whom presidency simply happened on, by accident.

    Little wonder everyone expects the President to have a little bit of the character of a genius – acting right and with a sense of honesty, all the time; making good decisions, drawing up and pursuing good policies and above all, taking responsibility for actions and in-actions!

    Indeed, there is no emphasizing the fact that a country is as good as its President, more so as the buck stops at the President’s desk, willy-nilly. This is why, sir, I decided to write you knowing that you have a role to play in putting a wedge on some of the shameful developments in our nation in recent times.

    In the last few months, newspapers have been abuzz with reports regarding the growing crisis of confidence among leaders of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), for which many national leaders of the party have their positions under check; resigned either voluntarily or otherwise.

    While one might say the crisis was undeserving of the media blitz it got, being an internal party issue, the development is a bold pointer to the rough road ahead for the PDP as the nation prepares for the 2015 elections. Worrisome as it is, though, it is not the main reason for writing you this morning. Instead, I want to draw your attention to the growing legion of sycophants and jobless ethnic jingoists that have become the face of your 2015 presidential ambition even when you have yet to officially declare desire to contest.

    Not only that. I am equally troubled like most Nigerians about the apparent division along ethnic and religious lines in Nigeria. While the roots of this nerve-wrecking development cannot be totally blamed on your administration, it is clear, however, to the discerning that it has risen geometrically in your tenure.

    Thirdly, I return to the PDP again. Truth is, the party has fought many battles and made needless enemies than was necessary and like a patient on life support, its leadership, including the Presidency, needs to act fast. And, like some of your kinsmen, who through unguided and inflammatory comments regarding whether or not you plan to seek re-election in 2015 have grossed some enemies for you, PDP is increasingly gaining a notorious reputation that is casting a negative perception on your person. While you have the right to seek re-election and your kinsmen, the right to get your back as their brother, it calls for caution. This is so because with the benefit of history, this method is far too familiar. It is dangerous, particularly when the re-election clamour is coming mostly from your kinsmen while other regions simply give themselves to the ‘siddon look’ approach.

    Recall that while former President Olusegun Obasanjo, primed himself for the controversial Third Term bid, the most vociferous of the opposition camps was his kinsmen, who against all odds – losing juicy contracts and board appointments – condemned the move to the point of pulling the strings when it mattered most. This cannot be said of your kinsmen for whom every decision you have made so far is in order. Mr President, this is dangerous and I urge you to sieve facts from fiction.

    While they are entitled to their opinion, I am wondering if it has ever bothered you that but for your kinsmen, no region – South-east or South-west – has shown so much passion and dedication regarding your 2015 election plans. Or, if, and when you decide to run, would the votes from the South-south region alone deliver the Presidency for you? Or, if, and when you win, would you become the President of South-south region alone? This explains why, sir, you must move quickly to stop these men with ‘creek’ mentality before they cause problems for you and disappear into thin air.

    Worse still, Mr President, I am afraid the unity of Nigeria is under clear threat. It is no longer news that the war on the Boko Haram insurgents, a war right on time though, has further divided the country along ethnic lines. Many, today, blame it all on its handling. But whether right or wrong, it cannot be disputed that Boko Haram emergence also points to the growing disunity in the land. Commendable as the drastic measures so far taken by your government to curtail their activities is, the nation having teetered on the feral zone in the northern region following their acts of terror, you must know that though the battle has been won in the field or almost won as the case maybe, it continues in the mind.

    So, no drums as yet, because those who would rather the group continued making Nigeria ungovernable for you now see the ‘war’ as the South against the north or, what a friend simply tagged: ‘President Goodluck Jonathan against the north.’ This is why I urge you to put on your thinking cap and make more friends even from every bad situation. In doing this, you would have extended a handshake of love across the north, and in return, winning over the willing among them as the 2015 elections approaches. Let no one beguile you by way of a noisy support on the pages of newspapers, for, at the risk of sounding pessimistic, the signs are pregnant with surprises. Yet they would amount to a child’s play when compared with the endless internal wrangling within the PDP leadership, the lack of internal democracy and increasing number of battles and enemies of the party. At a time when the opposition parties are mobilizing support, the PDP is neck-deep in destroying itself, ostracising real and imagined enemies of party leaders as if it were an instrument for fighting personal wars.

    Truth is, everybody in a party cannot subscribe to party decisions, because as they say, what an old man sees sitting down, a young man cannot see standing up. So, who says he’s infallible? While party leaders may have their way, it does not foreclose dissenting views. Therefore, suspending a member for whatever phantom offences it maybe, would be counter-productive at the end and can only point to dictatorship, especially where such a member was not given the right of say, to defend him or herself. Unfortunately, this seems to be common with PDP leadership from history. Without pretext, Mr President, this should stop. Let the ongoing reconciliatory overtures continue. And, let every hitherto estranged PDP member share in equal and honest treatment. Only this can put PDP ahead of very determined opposition parties in 2015.

    • Aiyenigba writes in from Ilorin

  • Before and after 2015

    The much-awaited Nigeria Governors Forum election has come and gone but the intrigues that surrounded the controversial election will not allow us to forget it in a hurry. At last, the embattled Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State was declared winner with 19 votes to defeat his opponent Governor Jonah Jang of Plateau State who scored 16 votes. I believe we don’t need a Professor Chike Obi to tell us the highest number between 16 and 19. The best thing for Governor Jang to do if he is not satisfied with the outcome of the election is to approach a court of law for redress instead of parading himself as the chairman of the Nigeria Governors Forum. By virtue of his status and experience as the oldest Governor out of thirty Six state governors we have as at now, nobody excepted Governor Jang to descend so low by accepting this dirty and dishonouriable assignment.

    As if all these were not enough, Governor Jang’s faction has opened its faction’s secretariat in Maitama in Abuja while Amaechi-led faction has its own secretariat at the Rivers State lodge in Abuja also. Can we describe all these events as the beginning of illegality ahead of 2015 general election or a planned work to achieve a planned goal?

    The focus of this article is to discuss those things that are likely to happen before and after 2015 general election. It is interesting to note that the ruling party – People Democratic Party has suspended Governor Rotimi Amaechi. Let us tell ourselves the bitter truth before it is too late. Suspension of members will not bring lasting and needed peace to the ruling party but would rather heat the polity and aggravate the situations on ground.

    With all these suspensions, intimidations, illegalities, impositions, court cases and character assassinations that are going on in the ruling party, can quality leadership still be guaranteed now and after 2015 election? Will some governors not be abducted on their way to government house as it happened to Governor Chris Ngige of Anambra State some years back? Will some Governors be allowed to attend executive council meeting in Aso Rock between now and 2015? Will some Governors not be denied their constitutional and moral rights because of their refusal to support a consensus candidate for 2015 general election? With the events and happenings within the ruling party in the recent time, one can conclude that the party is in deep and self imposed crises.

    To resolve most of the ongoing crises within the party, I am expecting the elders and stalwarts within the fold to wake up from their slumber and do the right thing before the whole thing will fall apart. Our expectation has been shattered as far as the role of elders in crisis resolution is concerned. Some of the elders or better still, godfathers in the ruling party we should consult for the way forward are now in different camps strategising and warming up for 2015 with different songs in their mouths. Whereas these so called elders fought tooth and nail to make the present political office holders what they are today, within the same house we now have disowned children and disowned parents. Can a house divided against itself stand?

    The tension created by our political gladiators has already made the political office holders to neglect their constitutional duties. The essence of power is to use it to better the lot of citizens not to use it to silence opponents. We have over 14 million jobless youth in Nigeria coupled with the security challenges our nation is facing as a result of Boko Haram’s activities in the northern part of the country. The revenue from oil subsidy disappeared into thin air without any explanation. As a Nigerian, I am expecting all our leaders to be having sleepless nights on how to resolve all these precarious situations and other challenging national issues facing us as a nation at present. Instead, they are having midnight meetings on how to retain their seats in next elections. They have already turned the game into a do-or-die affair and forget the fact that the power to elect or give a particular candidate second term lies in the electorate.

    May I ask that if this present situation continues, will it be safe for some candidates to contest in coming elections?

    By Olumide Aladejana

    Lagos.